HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1981-684CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, so a was -M on -the
5th day of October 19 81 . The foliowin were
present: Ma� nay nnart. Councilme ers Hoyy , Neils, Schneide 9 and firs e men
The foll0w1ig members were absent. none
Cnunrilmembgr Threinen introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 81- 684
DENYING REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JEFFREY VITALE FOR "RODEO
LANES" (81042)
WHEREAS, Jeffrey Vitale has requested a Conditional Use Permit for a
Commercial Recreation Facility involving bowling lanes and amusement games
among other things, and a site plan therefore, at the northwest corner of
Nathan Lane and County Road 9; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called
Public Hearing and has not recommended approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request of Jeffrey Vitale
for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial recreation facility involving
a 32 -lane bowling center and amusement game room at the northwest corner of
County Road 9 and Nathan Lane because of the following reasons:
1. The prcposed use is not appropriate for the planned development
of this property which is in the B-2 (neighborhood shopping center)
Zoning District.
2. The proposed use is more regional in character than neighborhood
oriented.
3. Pursuant to Section 9, Subdivision A of the Zoning Ordinance, it
has not been demonstrated that the proposed use will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the
community and that the same is in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of the Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
4. That it is deemed inappropriate to consume 30% to 40% of the total
zoned parcel for a conditional use as a principal first development
rather than for a planned unified shopping center as was intended by
the ordinance
5. That the proposed conditional use would require an on sale retail
liquor license which is deemed inappropriate considering the
residential character of the area which is adjacent.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by'
Neils , and upon vote being taken thereon, th
a ow ng voted n favor ereo Mavor Davenport, Cound lmembers Hoyt, NeiTs,
ine ToJiowIng voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared dul