HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1981-546CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meetino of
io the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
24th day of August , 19 81. The following members were
present: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils, Schneider and Thrpinpn
The following members were absent: none
Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 81- 546
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 943
SCHIEBE'S BUSINESS PARK
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 24, 1981, the City Clerk
was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the total cost of the following
improvements:
1. 9th Avenue from Forestview Lane east to its terminus
2. Sanitary sewer from 9th Avenue, south between Lots 4 and 5, Block 1,
Schiebe's Business Park to the existing sanitary sewer
by the installation of watermain laterals, sanitary sewer lateral, bituminous street
with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and all necessary appurtenances; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
I. A hearing shall be held on the 21st day of September, 1981, in the City
Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard,
Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the
total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice
to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
o n�ijmembeC eil$ , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favorthereof: Maynr naypn nrtCouncilmembers Hpyt- _
Neils, Schneider and Threinen
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly -passed and adopted.