HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 07-10-19964
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 10, 1996
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUM - Individuals may address the Council
about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum
of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are
not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the
agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items
discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff' or
commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Award of Excellence for 1995 Arbor Day Celebration
5. APPROVE AGENDA - Councilmembers may add items to the
agenda including items contained in the Council Information
Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The
Council will not normally take official action on items added to the
agenda.
6. CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so
request, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
A. Approve City Council Minutes
B. Approve Disbursements
C. Approve Planned Unit Development Amendment and Conditional
Use Permit Amendment for an addition at 11400 39th Avenue
North. Roger Schlussel. (96074)
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
July 10, 1996
Page 2
D. Approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing antenna
regulations including definitions, allowable uses and performance
standards. City of Plymouth. (96078)
E. Approve Conditional Use Permit Amendment to increase the
number of beds from 15 to 20 for an existing Juvenile Treatment
Program located at 105 Forestview Lane North. On -Belay of
Minnesota, Inc. (96079)
F. Site Improvement Performance Agreement Releases and Reductions:
1) Opus Corporation/Bass Creek Business Center Select
Comfort (93045)
2) Opus Corporation/Select Comfort Parking Expansion (95033)
3) Turck Inc., 3000 Campus Drive (94146)
4) Hedberg Aggregates, Inc., 1205 Nathan Lane North (95006)
5) Approve Site Improvement Performance Agreement Reduction
for Caliber Development Corporation for Bass Lake Business
Centre (95102)
G. Approve Reduction of Required Financial Guarantee, Hunters
Bluff Addition (94145)
H. Approve Payment of Insurance Deductible to the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
I. Approve of proposal from Robbinsdale School District to use
Plymouth Ice Arena and refer request for change in Conditional
Use Permit for use of Armstrong Athletic Field to staff
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Approve Amendment to Courtesy Bench Ordinance
B. Consider amendment to council rules of procedure
requested by Council members Anderson and Wold)
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
A
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
July 10, 1996
Page 3
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT
Items require 5 affirmative votes of the City Council for approval.
DATE: July 5, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kathy Lueckert, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Notes on the Agenda --July 10, 1996
A few comments on the upcoming agenda.
Plymouth Forum. We know of no one coming to speak at the Forum.
Presentations. The City received an Award of Excellence for our 1995 Arbor Day
Celebration. This event involved the students at Plymouth Creek Elementary and the
creation of a natural area at the school.
Consent Agenda.
Item 6-D. Zoning Ordinance Amendments Establishing Antenna Regulations.
The Federal Communications Commission recently has allowed additional licenses for
cellular telephone service. To manage the number and size of antennas in Plymouth,
the Planning staff has developed zoning regulations for antennas of all kinds, including
cellular, radio and television, satellite, microwave, and ham radio. At the first
Planning Commission hearing, ham radio operators expressed concern about some of
the proposed regulations, in particular height regulations and required involvement of
professional engineers in the installation of antennas. Staff and several of the ham
radio operators met and were able to draft language resolving the concerns. The
Planning Commission then voted unanimously in favor of the regulations at the second
hearing.
Item 6-E. Conditional Use Permit, On -Belay of Minnesota.
The applicant requests approval to increase the number of beds in the On -Belay house,
adjacent to St. Mary's -Of -the -Lake Church, from 15 to 20. The On -Belay house
provides chemical dependency treatment for juveniles. Notices were sent to property
owners within 1/4 mile of the site. Staff has not heard from any one, and no one spoke
against the application at the Planning Commission meeting.
Item 6-H. Approve Payment of Insurance Deductible to the League of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust.
In 1993 the City was named in a federal civil rights suit based on a 1992 incident
involving a traffic violation. The case was handled by LMCIT. At trial, the police
officers were absolved of any wrong doing and the court delivered a verdict in favor of
the City. The cost to defend the case was around $68,000. Our insurance with the
League sets our general liability at $600,000 limit, with a $50,000 deductible. The
League is requesting reimbursement of $50,000 for defense costs, equivalent to our
deductible.
Item 6-I. Proposal from District 281 for Use of Ice Arena and Athletic Field Facilities.
City staff and District 281 staff have held discussions about allocating District 281
teams to available ice arenas. The proposed rotation is found in Superintendent
Bollin's letter. District 281 also requests that Plymouth consider eliminating or
changing the provision in the special use permit for the Armstrong football field which
prohibits its use by a Cooper High team. The special use permit associated with the
Armstrong field was the subject of intense interest by the surrounding neighborhood.
Changing the provisions of the permit requires more staff review.
General Business
Item 8-A. Repeal Section 815 of the Plymouth City Code relating to Bus Benches.
Since 1989 the City has issued permits for 50 courtesy bus benches along bus routes.
Recently we received applications for additional courtesy benches from another
provider. Staff recommends repeal of this section for several reasons. The City Code
does not spell out a process for "divvying up" bus bench permits, nor does it currently
allow more than 50. Staff is concerned about how the advertising on bus benches
complies with the Zoning Ordinance and proposed changes to its sign section. Finally,
Metrolink will add new routes in the coming months, and transit staff will evaluate the
need for additional benches on these routes. Existing benches will become
nonconforming uses until such time as a new bus bench ordinance is approved. There
are ten benches which are no longer on bus routes. The proposed ordinance requires
their removal within 90 days.
Item 8-B. Consider Amendment to Council Rules of Procedure.
Councilmembers Anderson and Wold requested this item. When an item is removed
from the consent agenda or added to the agenda, the amendment will require that the
presiding officer immediately call upon the councilmember pulling or adding the item
when it is time for consideration of that item.
V
6- A
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
The regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Tierney
at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., on June 19, 1996.
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Tierney; Councilmembers Wold, Lymangood, Preus, and
Black. Councilmember Granath arrived at 7:55 p.m.
ABSENT: Councilmember Anderson.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Johnson, Assistant City Manager Lueckert, Public
Works Director Moore, Community Development Director Hurlburt, Finance Director
Hahn, Park Director Blank, Public Safety Director Gerdes, City Attorney Knutson, and
City Clerk Ahrens.
Item 3 Plymouth Forum
Dave Buzzelle, 10222 South Shore Drive, suggested that the City consider
installation of fishing docks on Medicine Lake.
Park Director Blank stated that a fishing dock is included in the final plans for
West Medicine Lake Park.
Item 4-A Up With People
A representative of Up With People announced that they will be performing at
Music in Plymouth on July 2. They are looking for host families from July 1-3.
Item 4-B Fire Survivor Handbook
Mayor Tierney announced that the City of Plymouth received the first place
award for its Fire Survivor Handbook in the League of Minnesota Cities
contest.
Item 5 Approve Agenda
Mayor Tierney noted that revised information has been distributed on Items
6-0, 7-A, and 8-F.
Councilmember Lymangood added Item 9-B, publicity on tobacco ordinance in
USA Today.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Black, to approve the agenda with the addition of Item 9-B.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 2
Item 6 Consent Agenda
Item 6-F was removed from the Consent Agenda.
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Motion carried, five
ayes.
Item 6-A Approve City Council Minutes
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to approve the minutes of the June 5 Regular Council Meeting.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-B Approve Disbursements
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-323 APPROVING
DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 7, 1996. Motion
carried, five ayes.
Item 6-C Site Performance Guarantee Reductions and Releases
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-324 RELEASING SITE
IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE, CALIBER
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ANNAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTER
95029). Motion carried, five ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-325 REDUCING SITE
IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE, CARLSON REAL
ESTATE COMPANY/THE TILE SHOP (95023). Motion carried, five
ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-326 REDUCING SITE
IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE, PRIME
BUILDERS, INCORPORATED/HICKORY HILLS VILLAS (94091).
Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-D Hate and Bias Crime Response Plan, Human Rights Commission
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-327 APPROVING THE BIAS
HATE CRIMES RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 3
Item 6-E Ordinance Amending City Code Regarding Liquor Licenses
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt ORDINANCE 96-13 AMENDING CHAPTER 12
OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING SALE,
CONSUMPTION, AND DISPLAY OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-G Vacation of Easements in Parkers Lake North 11th Addition
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-328 ORDERING PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR
PONDING IN PARKERS LAKE NORTH 11TH ADDITION. Motion
carried, five ayes.
Item 6-H 41st Avenue Street and Utility Improvements, Project 537
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-329 ORDERING
IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, HUGHSTON ADDITION - 41ST AVENUE
STREET AND UTILITIES, CITY PROJECT NO. 537. Motion carried,
five ayes.
Item 6-I Approve Amendment to Agreement for County Road 10 Project
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-330 APPROVING
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT, COUNTY ROAD 10, COUNTY PROJECT NO. 7408,
CITY PROJECT NO. 812. Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-J Authorize Condemnation for Peony Lane Improvements, Project 502
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-331 AUTHORIZING
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, PEONY LANE, CITY PROJECT
NO. 502. Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-K Award Contract for 1996 Seal Coat Program
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-332 AWARDING BID FOR 1996
SEAL COAT PROGRAM. Motion carried, five ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 4
Item 6-L Approve Plans and Advertise for Bids for Westbranch 3rd Addition,
Project 415
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-333 APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS,
WESTBRANCH 3RD ADDITION, PHASE H, CITY PROJECT NO.
415. Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-M Authorization to Call Outstanding Bonds
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-334 CALLING FOR
REDEMPTION OF THE OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1990. Motion carried,
five ayes.
Item 6-N Approve Bid for Maple Creek Park Playground Equipment
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-335 APPROVAL OF MAPLE
CREEK PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT. Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 6-0 Award Bids for Foundation and Subgrade Construction on Ice Rink
Motion was made by Councilmember Preus, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-336 AWARDING BID
PACKAGE 4.1 FOR FOUNDATION AND SUBGRADE CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION. Motion carried, five ayes.
Item 7-A Consider One-way Street or Closure, East Medicine Lake Boulevard
Public Works Director Moore explained that the City Council has set a public
hearing on alternatives to establish a separate pedestrian trail on East Medicine
Lake Blvd. from 18th Avenue to Medicine Ridge Road. Notice of the hearing
was mailed to about 300 properties in the area. He stated that the
recommendation in the staff report is that 18th Avenue between the Highway
169 frontage road and East Medicine Lake Blvd. would remain two-way. East
Medicine Lake Blvd. from 18th Avenue to the southerly intersection with
Lancaster Lane would become a northbound one-way street. East Medicine
Lake Blvd. between the southerly Lancaster Lane intersection and the
northerly Lancaster intersection at 23rd Avenue would remain a two-way
roadway. Improvements would be made in this area to widen the roadway for
a separate trail. East Medicine Lake Blvd. from the north Lancaster Lane
intersection to Medicine Ridge Road would be a one-way northbound street.
Director Moore stated that based on citizen input, a second alternative would
provide for a southbound one-way from Medicine Ridge Road to the
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 5
intersection with Lancaster Lane, rather than a northbound one-way. He said
that, continuing southerly, the street would remain a two-way, but the shoulder
could be paved and striped to provide a pedestrian trail. This alternative would
solve the problem of access to one driveway on East Medicine Lake Blvd.
between 26th Aven:.- and Medicine Ridge Road, which was a concern under
the original recommendation. He stated that the improvements could be
accomplished within two months at a cost of $25,000 to $30,000.
Councilmember Wold asked for clarification on the staff recommendation.
Director Moore stated the staff recommends the southbound one-way
alternative. The cost will not be significantly different, and the southbound
flows should discourage some of the morning peak traffic in the
neighborhoods.
Councilmember Black asked if the trail segment from Lancaster Lane south to
19th Avenue would eventually be built anyway, or whether it would be built
now and reconstructed later to serve as the regional trail.
Director Moore responded that this 300' trail segment would be constructed
just beyond the shoulder of the roadway. It could be incorporated into the
regional trail in the future, if it fit into the overall trail plan. The feasibility
report is not yet complete for the regional trail.
Councilmember Black asked about the difference in traffic counts on East
Medicine Lake Blvd., north and south from 18th Avenue.
Director Moore did not believe that.sufficient traffic counts were done to
differentiate the traffic in the area north and south of 18th Avenue. He stated
that 21 st Avenue has visibility problems due to steep hills and additional
vehicles should not be encouraged on this street. He said that 23rd Avenue is a
main connection.
Mayor Tierney opened the public hearing at 7:22 p.m.
Dave Buzzelle, 10222 South Shore Drive, supported a one-way on East
Medicine Lake Blvd. He uses the area for running, rollerblading, and
bicycling, and believes that people are afraid to use the lake area for recreation
because of the traffic safety concerns.
Lori Baker, 11515 37th Avenue North, stated she previously lived on Medicine
Ridge Road at East Medicine Lake Blvd. She and her family left that location
because it was so &ugerous for pedestrians. She supports starting the one-
way at 36th Avenue and continuing all the way to East Medicine Lake Road.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 6
Councilmember Lymangood stated that the notices for this public hearing
specified the area south of the intersection of East Medicine Lake Blvd. and
Medicine Ridge Road; however, comments are also welcome relating to the
northerly portion.
Steve Loe, 2815 Medicine Ridge Road, supports the southbound one-way
alternative. He believes a one-way will enhance property values and improve
safety, especially during peak traffic.
L. Gunderson, 2050 East Medicine Lake Blvd., favors a one-way street. He
suggested another alternative of ending East Medicine Lake Blvd. at Harty's
South. He said this would alleviate the parking problems in this immediate
area, no homes would need access to this segment of roadway, and the street is
in very poor condition. Mr. Gunderson believes that a stop sign will be needed
at 21 st Avenue and Lancaster Lane irrespective of whether a northbound or
southbound one-way is installed.
Mayor Tierney noted that a dead-end street would prevent individuals from
driving around the lake.
John Fischer, 2825 Medicine Ridge Road, supported either a northbound or
southbound one-way roadway. However, the southbound one-way would
resolve the issue with the difficult driveway access. He believes that a one-way
roadway would particularly improve safety during the summer months, and
suggested that the trail be placed along the lake side of the roadway. Mr.
Fischer stated that 60 days is too long a time in which to complete the project.
Joe Harty, Harty's Boats and Bait, East Medicine Lake Drive, spoke in favor
of a southbound one-way. However, he has concerns about the trail crossing
the Harty's north property. He is also concerned about vehicles pulling out of-
Harty's Boats and encountering rollerbladers and bikers going over 30 mph,
and suggested signage or speed humps to slow the pedestrian traffic.
Annette Malinsky, 3010 East Medicine Lake Blvd., favored a one-way
roadway for safety reasons. She believes that East Medicine Lake Blvd.
should be a one-way from 36th Avenue to the beach because the area from
Medicine Ridge Road northerly to 31 st Avenue is a very narrow and dangerous
section.
Mayor Tierney closed the hearing.
Public Works Director Moore responded to resident comments from the
hearing. He stated that only residents living south of Medicine Ridge Road
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 7
received notice of this hearing. He explained that to have effective one-way
streets; there generally needs to be opposite one-way streets or two-way
streets within two blocks of the one-way for good traffic circulation. He
believes that a good immediate solution to the traffic concerns is to designate
or install a pedestrian trail in along East Medicine Lake Drive. It will take 30-
45 days to complete this project, including ordering and installing signs, and
having the work completed by the City maintenance crews. It would take
much longer to complete if the project were bid.
Director Moore stated that the trail near the Harty's North location would be
along the roadway (not next to the lake), as requested by Mr. Harty. At the
Harty's South location, the boat ramp is at the road right-of-way and signage
could be effective in alerting vehicles to pedestrian traffic. He stated that from
18th Avenue to Harty's there are six homes that need access to East Medicine
Lake Drive, therefore, ending the roadway is not an easy option. Staff believes
that either leaving the roadway as a two-way, or making it a one-way, is a
better solution while the regional trail study is underway.
Councilmember Lymangood asked when the street would be reconstructed.
Director Moore responded that the street reconstruction would be done along
with the regional trail construction. The City would be prepared to do the
work next year, as the project has been on the City's reconstruction list since
1986.
Councilmember Black stated that during this hearing and at the previous
meeting held at Armstrong High School, concerns were expressed about safety
on East Medicine Lake Drive northerly to 36th Avenue. She asked what
assurances the City has that Hennepin Parks will construct the trail in 1997 so
that safety can be improved.
Park Director Blank responded that a preferred plan will be brought to the
Park District and City Council following another public meeting this summer.
The Park District has been purchasing property needed for the trail, and two
more homes have to be removed in order for the road project to move
forward. He believes that Hennepin Parks is showing good faith on moving
forward with the project so that it could be accomplished in 1997.
Councilmember Lymangood described the previous meeting held at Armstrong
High School on the issue of the East Medicine Lake Drive trail. He stated that
the recommendatior for a one-way street is the result of the interest expressed
by residents to get something started to improve safety. The City Council will
receive the regional trail feasibility report in July, and it may show a slightly
different alternative for the area south of 23rd Avenue. He stated that the
Council can establish the one-way street now to get something immediately
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 8
started, recognizing that there is additional work to do with the cooperative
effort of Hennepin Parks.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Wold, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-337 DESIGNATING A
PORTION OF EAST MEDICINE LAKE BOULEVARD FROM
LANCASTER LANE (NORTH INTERSECTION) TO MEDICINE
RIDGE ROAD AS A SOUTHBOUND ONE-WAY STREET AND
ESTABLISHING A TRAIL, deleting Condition 3, and directing staff to
communicate with Hennepin Parks the City's commitment to work
cooperatively with Hennepin Parks to address safety issues north of this
one-way segment.
Motion to amend was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by
Councilmember Preus, to add Condition 5 that the Council will, after receiving
the trail feasibility report, reconsider any possible actions that could be taken to
improve safety from 36th Avenue south to the intersection of East Medicine
Lake Blvd. and Medicine Ridge Road.
Councilmember Granath arrived at 7:55 p.m.
Councilmember Lymangood suggested that the public hearing could be kept
open until July 24 in order to address the additional segments of roadway after
the regional trail feasibility report is received. Director Moore stated another
public hearing will be needed, since the northerly segment was not included in
this public hearing notice.
Park Director Blank suggested that the alternatives could be considered at the
neighborhood level, or the City Council could conduct a public hearing on the
alternatives when the regional trail feasibility report is received. He stated that
a public information meeting held with the affected neighborhoods would allow
Hennepin Parks to assist in conducting the meeting.
Councilmember Black stated that her motion does not specify how the
consideration would take place, and perhaps the neighborhood information
meeting alternative could be used.
Councilmember Wold spoke in favor of the amendment. He would like the
subcommittee considering the East Medicine Lake Drive trail to determine
how the public input should be received.
Councilmember Lymangood stated that the City and Hennepin Parks have had
positive momentum toward resolving the safety issues the past several months.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 9
He supports continuing with the project in the spirit of joint cooperative efforts
with Hennepin Parks.
Councilmember Preus believed that the subcommittee would be the best
fashion in which to address the issues included in the amendment.
Motion to amend carried, six ayes.
Councilmember Preus asked if a potential problem of the trail switching sides
of the road could be created. Director Moore envisioned that the feasibility
report will recommend a separate trail delineated from the roadway.
Councilmember Wold noted that one resident had expressed concern about
access to their dock. He asked if this issue would be negotiated with the
Council or with Hennepin Parks.
Public Works Director Moore stated that tonight's action would cause no
problem with driveway or dock access. Park Director Blank stated it is the
City's intention that owners on the lake would retain their dock rights with the
permanent trail as well.
Councilmember Lymangood said that this is an interim solution to a long-
standing problem. He invited residents to contact the Council with concerns.
Motion as amended carried, six ayes.
Item 8-A Subcommittee to work with School District 281
Assistant City Manager Lueckert stated that Councilmember Lymangood
believes there are issues of mutual interest for the City and School District 281.
He recently suggested that the Council establish a council/staff subcommittee
to work with District 281 to identify and work on issues of mutual interest.
Councilmember Lymangood stated he has given the issue further thought. He
suggested that the Council reacknowledge that he is the Council Coordinating
Representative for School District 281. He will work with staff on identifying
potential cooperative issues between the City and the School District.
Item 8-11 Metropolitan Environmental Services Inflow/Infiltration Project Loan
Councilmember Lymangood referenced the dry and wet weather peak ratios
for the cities of Medina and Medicine Lake, shown in Exhibit B in the staff
report on the Metropolitan Environmental Services Inflow/Infiltration Project.
He said the sewage from Medina and Medicine Lake flows from those cities
through the Plymouth system, and then out of the City for treatment. He
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 10
suggested that Plymouth could share its experience with the sump pump
ordinance or other technical expertise on this issue with those communities.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Wold, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-338 AUTHORIZING
THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT A LOAN APPLICATION TO
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,
and direct staff to communicate with the cities of Medina and Medicine
Lake the City's willingness to work with them on addressing sewage flow
from their communities. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 8-C Plymouth Charter Commission Minutes
Councilmember Lymangood referenced the Plymouth Charter Commission
minutes of May 23, 1996. He noted that a motion was adopted `that the
Charter Commission meet on Tuesday, July 9, 1996 at 7 p.m. to consider the
supermajority vote issue, and that the City Council be invited to attend this
meeting." He expressed concerns with this action. He believes that there
could be a blurring of responsibilities in a joint meeting of the Charter
Commission and City Council, and he is hesitant to engage in such a meeting.
He viewed the Charter Commission as similar to a constitutional congress,
with powers not to implement change, but to make recommendations on
amendments to the City Charter. He is concerned that the City Council, an
elected body required to abide by the City Charter, would meet with the
Charter Commission to debate the issues. From a practical perspective, the
City Council has already adopted wording for a proposed Charter amendment
and he believes the issue is very clear. He expressed concern that the Charter
Commission has an opportunity to delay the process of getting the amendment
to the voters this November. Councilmember Lymangood stated he will not
participate in the meeting unless it is a televised public hearing, and he would
still have concerns about blurring of responsibilities.
Councilmember Preus had similar observations. He would be happy to attend
the Charter Commission meeting to give an explanation of his views on the
issue, but doesn't believe that the City Council should be jointly meeting with
the Charter Commission. He believes this issue is very clear and is concerned
that the Charter Commission members indicated they may need more time to
address it. He hoped that the Charter Commission does not delay the issue
further. The Charter Commission should either agree with the language
proposed by the Council, or recommend some other option.
Mayor Tierney asked the City Attorney if there is difficulty under a Council -
Manager form of government of having a joint City Council and Charter
Commission meeting.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 11
Attorney Knutson said there is no legal problem with such a meeting, but
councilmembers may have philosophical issues.
Mayor Tierney explained that the Charter Commission discussed the issue of
supermajority votes several years ago and decided that they did not want this
included in the Charter. The Charter Commission felt that, rather than take the
issue immediately to a public meeting, it would be good to hear from
Councilmembers on why they favor this amendment. The Charter Commission
noted that there was not much discussion among the Council on the issue,
other than to indicate support for the amendment. They would like to have a
clear understanding of why the City Council wants the amendment; therefore,
they would like to hold a meeting with the Council before a public hearing is
scheduled.
Councilmember Wold stated it is his understanding that the job of the
Commission is to oversee the Charter. The Charter Commission should be
paying close attention to the Council meetings in order to do so. He assumed
that the Charter Commission received the minutes of the City Council meeting
where the amendment language was adopted, and that they had access to the
Councilmember debates last fall when the issue was first raised. He feels that
the issue is perfectly clear, and he feels it is disconcerting that the will of the
Council wasn't clear when a member of the Council was present at the Charter
Commission meeting. Councilmember Wold stated that before voting on the
proposed amendment language, Councilmembers made it clear that raising
taxes is something that deserves more than a simple majority vote. He feels
that a meeting with the Charter Commission would serve no purpose because
the City Council's position is on public record and they would only restate the
position that has been adopted.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 12
Charter Commission attorney was denied payment for three months by the
previous City Council. The Charter Commission wants the City Council to
meet with them. Mayor Tierney stated she was not present at the City Council
meeting on May 15 when the proposed amendment language was adopted.
She suggested that Cite joint Charter Commission and City Council meeting
could be videocast. Mayor Tierney noted there is a current vacancy on the
Charter Commission and questioned whether any councilmembers had
submitted their application of interest.
Assistant Manager Lueckert stated that it would not be possible to televise a
joint meeting on July 9 because a Planning Commission meeting is scheduled.
Councilmember Lymangood stated that he has consciously not submitted an
application to serve on the Charter Commission. He has no desire to serve as a
Charter Commission member as long as he is in elected office. He believes that
the Charter Commission is intended to be an independent body and that
philosophical issues could be mixed by serving in both roles.
Councilmember Wold stated that he does not believe it is appropriate to serve
as a Councilmember and also on the Charter Commission that establishes the
lines" through the City Charter.
Mayor Tierney stated that the Charter Commission doesn't know whether the
desire to require a supermajority vote for a tax increase is just a political idea
supported by council candidates or whether it has good reason. She said there
is no legal restriction that a councilmember cannot also serve on the Charter
Commission. She was a member of the Charter Commission before becoming
a Councilmember.
nnnri maml,nr \I7 1.7 ..+. +-A 4L-. 4-1-- -*1 +_ -1- -
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 13
Councilmembers voted in favor of the Charter amendment language, and the
issue should go to the voters for a decision this November.
Councilmember Black said that she supported the supermajority requirement as
part of her campaign and believes voters should be allowed to decide if a tax
rate increase is more important than other city business.
Mayor Tierney stated that one issue is the concern of whether there should
ever be a supermajority vote requirement because it can turn decisions over to
a minority. She will not support the motion because she has not been shown
evidence that requiring a supermajority vote for a tax rate increase is good
government.
Motion carried, five ayes; Tierney nay.
Councilmember Wold called for division.
Motion carried on a roll call vote: Wold, Lymangood, Preus, Granath, Black
ayes; Tierney nay.
Item 8-D Weston Corporation, The Courts at Nanterre (96023)
Community Development Director Hurlburt presented the staff report on the
request of Weston Corporation for residential planned unit development
preliminary plan/plat, conditional use permit and variances for The Courts at
Nanterre located west of Vicksburg Lane and north of the Hollydale Golf
Course. The Planning Commission recommended approval, then denial, on a
vote of 3 to 3. The item is sent to the Council without a recommendation from
the Planning Commission.
She stated that The Courts at Nanterre is a proposed 37 -unit townhome
project located in the Nanterre planned unit development, for which concept
plan approval was given by the City in 1995. The single family part of the
project has been given final approval. Director Hurlburt stated that the issue of
the type of fencing along the Hollydale Golf Course has been resolved since the
Planning Commission meeting to the satisfaction of all parties. Another
concern was the setback from the Soo Line Railroad. Staff believes that there
is sufficient buffer for the units.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that an issue of staff
disagreement related to the road system in the development. The developer
has proposed a combination of public streets and private drives. Schmidt Lake
Road. Comstock Lane_ and 49th Place would be public streets. There would
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 14
explained that subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, the developer
proposed changes t-- the private driveways and staff supports the changes
which provide for narrower private driveways and concrete rather than asphalt.
The constraints on this property for development are difficult because it is a
very narrow parcel impacted by Schmidt Lake Road, the golf course, Soo Line
Railroad, a large embankment, holding pond, and large existing wetland. The
pond serves this subdivision as well as drainage from the golf course. Staff
believes this is an improved design that addresses the concerns about private
streets.
In response to a question by Councilmember Lymangood, Director Hurlburt
stated that Golfview Estates would be directly south of this site.
Councilmember Wold asked what assurance the City has that the private street
will be properly maintained. He noted there are other situations in the City
with townhome developments where the streets are in poor condition with no
plans for reconstruction.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that there are better
practices in place to ensure that a homeowner association has adequate
resources for private street maintenance. The residents need to be well
informed about expectations of which portions of the project are public and
private. The concrete material proposed for the private streets will last much
longer than asphalt streets, and the units will be fairly expensive. She said
there is a need for any homeowner association to keep up with maintenance.
The state legislature has also provided a mechanism for residents to petition
the city to get private street improvements done through a special assessment
process.
Councilmember Wold said he would like more information on the financing
options available for homeowner associations. Director Hurlburt said that she
believes a homeowner association will soon be coming to the Council with a
request.
Mayor Tierney expressed concern about whether the 30' setback from the
railroad is sufficient given past problems with train whistle complaints.
Director Hurlburt stated that vegetation will buffer these homes, and the tracks
are not at the edge of the right-of-way so the distance is greater than 30' from
the railway to the homes. She said there is nothing in the Zoning Ordinance
that specifies a setback from the railroad.
RirharA Rlnn», Z,<G'7 \x7 -A-T --- XX: --- .__i-- -- ---- - r- - .' .
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 15
Commission meeting. He said that this area could have been platted as
condominiums, but the City would have lost review through the homeowner
association documents. He understands the disclosures and maintenance issues
that need to be addressed in the homeowner association documents. Mr.
Bloom said that the concrete driveways there provide a distinction between
what is public and what is private. The units will be four-sided with stucco and
brick. Each unit will have a three vehicle garage. The units are designed to be
connected at building corners and will almost look like detached units.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Granath, to adopt ORDINANCE 96-14 AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 16440
OLD ROCKFORD ROAD (96056), and RESOLUTION 96-339
APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
SUBDIVISION CODE VARIANCE FOR WESTON CORP. FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF VICKSBURG LANE NORTH OF
HOLLYDALE GOLF COURSE (96023), with the 14 recommended
conditions.
Councilmember Lymangood noted that some of the units in the development
will front public streets and some will front private driveways. He asked if
there will be a differential in the homeowner association dues.
Mr. Bloom said that the dues issued had not yet been addressed, but all units
will probably pay the same rate.
Councilmember Lymangood stated that this may cause some problems when
public street reconstruction is done because only the units facing those streets
would be assessed.
Mayor Tierney asked about the proposed fencing abutting the golf course and
whether landscaping is proposed.
Mr. Bloom stated that the Deziels' thought the previously proposed four foot
split rail fence would be too low. They have agreed with the proposal for a
five foot chain link fence, and they are considering ivy landscaping on the golf
course side of the fence. Mr. Bloom said that trees are proposed between the
building groupings.
Motion carried, five ayes; Lymangood nay.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 16
Item 8-E Deny Variance for Sign at Cottonwood Plaza Center (96033)
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that in 1987, the Board of
Zoning Adjustments and Appeals denied a variance to increase the surface area
of a free standing business sign from 96 sq. ft. to 200 sq. ft. at Cottonwood
Plaza Center. The decision was appealed to the City Council. The Council did
not approve the request, but did approve doubling the wall signage in the
shopping center. The applicant has again submitted the variance request, and
the Planning Commission recommended approval on a 4 to 3 vote. The
Planning Commission cited the setback of the shopping center and difficulty of
motorists to identify the tenants.
Director Hurlburt showed pictures of the Target Greatland sign which is
directly across the street, the proposed 200 sq. ft. sign, and the existing sign.
She stated that staff does not recommend approval of the variance request.
Few of the tenants have taken advantage of the previous variance to allow
increased wall signage, and that may address their concern. Staff does not
believe that the bank building blocks visibility of the center, and believes that
granting the variance would set a precedence for signage in other shopping
centers. She stated that the Target Greatland sign was larger than allowed by
ordinance, but that was negotiated with the initial approval of the development.
Staff has not done the necessary research to determine the impact of granting
this variance and would prefer to review the entire sign ordinance.
Barb DeMars, Cottonwood Plaza Manager, stated that this is the third time
they have made this request because signage was not considered during
development of the center. She said the shopping center started construction
in 1986 with the first tenants in 1987. The adjacent bank was constructed in
1988. In 1992, the increased signage was requested because businesses felt
their wall sign was not sufficient. She said that the bank building blocks the
view of the signs on the center, there is more traffic on County Road 9, and
Premier Lincoln and Target Greatland are adjacent businesses. Ms. DeMars
said the Cottonwood center is dwarfed by everything around it. She said that
they would like to install a sign that lists all of the tenants in the building. She
believes this is a hardship because people cannot find businesses located in the
center, and that this is a unique situation. She said the request is made not
solely to increase income, but to give each tenant equal signage at the road to
be competitive with other businesses. There are services such as vet,
chiropractor, and urgent care facility that are not currently listed on the pylon
sign. She said that Cottonwood Plaza pays $150,000 in taxes and they
maintain a nice shopping center. At the time the shopping center was built,
they were required to provide twice the number of parking spaces as the
national average and that set the building back from the roadway a significant
distance. Shortly thereafter, the parking space standard was changed and the
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 17
building could have been closer to road. She believes that the Target Greatland
sign has also set a precedent.
Virginia Berney, Business Coordinator for Plymouth Convenience Care, said
that people have difficulty finding their urgent care facility. They have
increased their wall signage and added a neon sign, but they need a better way
for people to locate the business.
Dr. Thomas Evans, Medical Director for Plymouth Convenience Care, said that
location, interior design, access, and signage are the four most important things
in locating a health care facility. They have a good location, interior design,
and access, but signage is a problem. In 1994, he had difficulty finding
Plymouth Convenience Care the first time, and patients say they don't know
this urgent care facility is in the community. He said that health care savings
can be achieved by serving people within the community.
Mayor Tierney expressed concern that the sign would be difficult to read if all
tenants are listed on it. She asked when the sign ordinance is scheduled for
review.
Director Hurlburt said the sign ordinance revisions will probably be enacted
early in 1997.
Motion was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Black, to approve the variance request.
Councilmember Preus said he is very sympathetic with the concerns expressed
by tenants, but believes that the petitioner has not complied with the variance
standards. He encouraged tenants to keep in contact with the Planning
Department to incorporate their concerns into the new sign ordinance.
Mayor Tierney suggested that the request could be tabled until the new sign
ordinance is adopted. Director Hurlburt responded that the City must act on
the application by August 16 or it will be approved by default.
Motion failed: Granath aye; five nays.
Motion was made by Councilmember Wold, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-340 DENYING VARIANCE
FOR JEROME AND BETTY BEGIN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3900 VINEWOOD LANE NORTH (COTTONWOOD PLAZA
SHOPPING CENTER) (96033)°
Motion carried, five ayes; Granath nay.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 18
Item 84 Golfview Woods. Richard Bloom (96056)
Community Development Director Hurlburt said that on May 28, 1996, the
Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
rezoning, preliminary plat and variances for Golfview Woods. Fifteen residents
spoke at the public hearing. Eleven were opposed to the project, including one
resident who presented form letters signed by 40 residents also opposing the
project. Four individuals spoke in favor of the proposal. The major concerns
raised by residents included opposition to a through street (even though that
was not a part of the application City staff reviewed), opposition to the
extension of the 45th Avenue North cul-de-sac based on increased traffic,
increased noise, loss of privacy and lifestyle, loss of safety for children, loss of
trees, and potential for construction of homes that do not follow covenants
adopted by the adjoining Golfview Estates homes which could reduce their
property values.
She said that those in favor of the project cited that it minimized environmental
impact, including tree removal, made the best possible use of the land, and
avoided another street connection to Old Rockford Road. The applicant
indicated that they had looked at several alternatives for the site and rejected
the ones with a through street and a cul-de-sac from Old Rockford Road. In
both these alternatives, the existing home valued at $204,000 would need to be
demolished. In addition, they were concerned about sight distances, given the
fact that the street would intersect Old Rockford Road on a curve. The other
alternatives would have also resulted in additional tree removal. She stated
that since the Planning Commission meeting, Golfview Estates residents have
submitted additional correspondence supporting the Planning Commission
recommendation of approval.
Councilmember Lymangood asked about the site zoning. Director Hurlburt
said that rezoning from FRD to R-lA is proposed. It is the City's practice to
hold property in the FRD District until it is ready to develop.
Councilmember Wold asked what assurances residents have that the fire
emergency access will not be turned into a through street.
Community Development Director Hurlburt said it will not be platted as a
through street and there will be no right-of-way established for a roadway.
The fire lane would have the route of the existing driveway with a paved width
of about 15 feet. The fire lane is recommended due to the length of the cul-de-
sac. It would be chained and only used for emergency situations. The existing
home would no longer have access to Rockford Road.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 19
Mayor Tierney asked if the driveway is paved. Director Hurlburt said it is
currently gravel, but would be asphalt for the emergency access. She
recommended that the emergency access be paved if it is intended to be used
for fire trucks.
Richard Bloom, 3657 Woody Lane, Minnetonka, stated that this development
plan will least impact the natural surroundings of the site. He stated that only
nine significant trees will be removed. The owner of Lot 3 will have
maintenance responsibility for the emergency access. The emergency access
will be chained as well as signed for emergency use only. He stated that they
will meet on the site with the adjacent property owners to make slight
adjustments to the roadway alignments to ensure they are happy with the
project.
Terry Kaine, 4490 Comstock Lane, favored a cul-de-sac from Rockford Road
with no extension. He questioned the need for an emergency access when
there is not one now. He wants the cul-de-sac retained, even if it will be
longer, and wants the covenants identical to those in Golfview Estates.
Marybeth Voves, 16475 45th Avenue North, stated that the existing curve
coming out of the development is a significant traffic hazard due to lack of
visibility. She is opposed to a through street and wants to minimize traffic for
the safety of children in the area. While an extension to the cul-de-sac would
increase traffic, that is preferable to extending the road to Rockford Road. She
said there are other new developments with only one access, and she
questioned the need for the emergency access.
Susan Gaither, 16500 45th Avenue North, agreed with the previous comments.
Her primary concern is to have no through street on 45th Avenue North. She
recognizes the rights of the developer and property owner, and believes that
the least impact to the neighborhood would result by extending the cul-de-sac.
M.F. Schroeder, 13405 32nd Avenue North, expressed concern that the
emergency access may look like a through street. If the emergency access is
perceived as necessary, he asked that it not be hard surfaced. He asked if an
emergency access has ever been used by the public safety department. Mr.
Schroeder said that a homeowner should not be given the responsibility to
maintain a road through his property and not be able to use it or park on it.
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 20
She stated that the developer has agreed to use the same covenants in this
subdivision as in Golfview Estates. She stated that other developments with
one access are usually a temporary situation until an adjacent plat provides a
second access.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Wold, to suspend the rules and set the adjournment at 10:20
p.m. Motion carried, six ayes.
Councilmember Lymangood stated there was an issue relating to a fire lane on
Comstock Lane, just west of this site, where the developer failed to put the
easement on the plat. The emergency access was supposed to be built, but was
not due to an error.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Preus, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-341 APPROVING
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCES FOR RICHARD BLOOM
FOR GOLFVIEW WOODS LOCATED AT 16440 OLD ROCKFORD
ROAD (96056).
Motion carried, six ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Wold, seconded by Councilmember Preus, to
suspend the rules and consider Item 9-A at this time. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 9-A Approve 1995 Audit and Financial Report
Finance Manager Jacobson presented the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report for the year ended December 31, 1995. He introduced CliffHoffnan
and Amy Allen from Deloitte and Touche LLP.
Mr. Hoffman presented the audit report and stated that the City is in excellent
financial condition. Ms. Allen referenced the other reports to the Council.
Councilmember Lymangood asked if all items in the audit have been addressed
with staff. He commended Deloitte & Touche for providing a fine report with
useful information.
Ms. Allen explained that they provide a recommendation on how to resolve
certain issues and management responds. The auditors believe that
mnnanPmPnt'e raennneP to all ;ti -me is nrdennatP and the items will he
Regular Council Meeting
June 19, 1996
Page 21
Motion was made by Mayor Tierney, seconded by Councilmember Black, to
adopt RESOLUTION 96-342 ACCEPTING THE 1995 FINANCIAL
REPORT AND AUDIT. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item S -G (6-F) Housing Elements of Comprehensive Plan (96077)
Councilmember Lymangood stated that he would prefer a detailed review and
discussion of the proposed new Housing Elements and Housing
Implementation Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Preus stated
that he also has concerns with aspects of the plan.
Community Development Director Hurlburt stated that the item could be
tabled to June 26 for consideration. She invited Councilmembers to contact
her for further discussions prior to that meeting.
Motion was made by Councilmember Wold, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to postpone action on the proposed new Housing Elements and
Housing Implementation Plan of the Comprehensive Plan to June 26. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Mayor Tierney adjourned the meeting at 10:20 p.m.
Laurie Ahrens
City Clerk
6-4
Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
The regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Tierney
at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., on June 26, 1996.
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Tierney; Councilmembers Wold, Lymangood, Granath,
Black, and Anderson.
ABSENT: Councilmember Preus.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager, Johnson, Assistant City Manager Lueckert, Public
Works Director Moore, Community Development Director Hurlburt, Finance Director
Hahn, Park Director Blank, Public Safety Director Gerdes, City Attorney Knutson, and
City Clerk Ahrens.
Item 3 Plymouth Forum
No one appeared for the Forum.
Item 5 Approve Agenda
Councilmember Granath requested that an update on South Shore Drive be
added to the agenda. Councilmember Black requested discussion on the
Charter Commission request for a the Councilmember to attend a Charter
Commission meetiv- to discuss the supermajority vote requirement to increase
the tax rate. Councilmember Lymangood requested addition of an item
regarding the tobacco ordinance.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Black, to approve the agenda with the three additions noted.
Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6 Consent Agenda
Manager Johnson suggested a change to the resolution for Item 6-0.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to approve the consent agenda removing Item 6-0. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Item 6-A Award Bids for Ice Arena/Rink System
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-343 AWARDING BID FOR ICE
ARENA REFRIGERATION SYSTEM AND DASHERBOARDS. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 2
Item 6-B Award Bid for Painting — Public Works Maintenance Garage
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-344 AWARDING BID FOR
PAINTING OF PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE GARAGE. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Item 6-C Renewal of 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-345 APPROVAL OF ON -SALE
AND OFF -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSES. Motion carried, six
ayes.
Item 6-D Approve Mighty Ducks Grant
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to approve the contract and to authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute the grant contract between the State of Minnesota,
Amateur Sports Commission, and the City of Plymouth for the Mighty Ducks
Grant. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-E Laukka-Williams Parkers Lake. (96065)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-346 APPROVING A MIXED
PLANNED UNIT PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT, FINAL PLAN/PLAT
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LAUKKA-WILLIAMS
PARKERS LAKE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF
VICKSBURG LANE AND SHENANDOAH LANE ON 25TH PLACE
NORTH (96065). Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-F Loucks and Associates. Holly Creek 5th Addition (96005)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt ORDINANCE 96-15 AMENDING THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED NORTH
OF 39TH AVENUE AND WEST OF DUNKIRK LANE (96005). Motion
carried, six ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-347 APPROVING
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY
PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SCHERBER
PARTNERSHIP PROPERTIES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH
OF 39TH AVENUE AND WEST OF DUNKIRK LANE (RPUD 92-1)
96005). Motion carried, six ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 3
Item 6-G Final Site Plan Amendment for Expansion of Protein Design Labs (96069)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood„ to adopt RESOLUTION 96-348 APPROVING A MIXED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR
WELSH COMPANIES LOCATED AT 3955 ANNAPOLIS LANE
NORTH (96069). Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-H Approve Site Plan Amendment and Conditional User Permit for
Rockford Road Burger King (96070)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-349 APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN
AMENDMENT FOR THE WEST WIND GROUP OF MINNESOTA,
INCORPORATED, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10000
ROCKFORD ROAD (96070). Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-I Francis Aihe. Approve Variance at 12400 28th Place North (96066)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-350 APPROVING VARIANCE
FOR FRANCIS AIRE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12400 28TH
PLACE NORTH (96066). Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-J Approve Final PWA For Fernbrook Woods 3rd Addition (96057)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-351 APPROVING FINAL PLAT
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR MARVIN H. ANDERSON
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WEST
OF FERNBROOK LANE AT SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD (96057). Motion
carried, six ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-352 ADOPTING
ASSESSMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 613, SANITARY SEWER AND
WATERMAIN AREA, FERNBROOK WOODS 3RD ADDITION.
Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-K Final Plat for Tyler's Upland Addition (96035)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-353 APPROVING FINAL PLAT
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR BOHLAND
DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED, FOR "TYLER'S UPLAND
ADDITION" LOt 1TED SOUTH OF 5TH AVENUE AND EAST OF
VICKSBURG LANE (96035). Motion carried, six ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 4
Item 6-L Approve Fire Lane Variance for IMR Products (96071)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-354 APPROVING A FIRE
CODE VARIANCE FOR DUFFY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15600 MEDINA ROAD (96071). Motion
carried, six ayes.
Item 6-M Establish Special Council- Meetings to discuss 1997 Proposed Budget
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to establish special City Council Meetings on August 14, 1996 at
7:00 p.m., and August 28, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the 1997 Proposed
Budget. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-N Accept Donation of Historic Log Cabin for installation in Parkers Lake
Park
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-355 ACCEPTING DONATION
OF LOG CABIN FOR INSTALLATION IN PARKERS LAKE PARK.
Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-P Authorize Grant Contract for Disaster Donations Management Program
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-356 AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO ENTER INTO
A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, BOARD OF
GOVERNMENT INNOVATIONS AND COOPERATION TO AWARD A
GRANT, NO. SS -95-016, IN THE AMOUNT OF $82,500 TO
ESTABLISH A FULLY INTEGRATED DISASTER DONATIONS
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-Q Street Lighting Improvements in Savannah 2nd Addition
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-357 DECLARING ADEQUACY
OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT,
STREET LIGHTING — SAVANNAH 2ND ADDITION. Motion carried, six
ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-358 RECEIVING REPORT
AND ORDERING PROJECT, STREET LIGHTING — SAVANNAH 2ND
ADDITION. Motion carried, six ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 5
Item 6-11 41st Avenue (Hug.4ston Addition) Street and Utility Improvements,
Project 537
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-359 ORDERING
IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, HUGHSTON ADDITION — 41ST AVENUE,
STREET AND UTILITIES, CITY PROJECT NO. 537. Motion carried, six
ayes.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-360 APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS,
41ST AVENUE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, CITY
PROJECT NO. 537. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-S Disapprove Local Transit Tax Levy Option for 1997
Motion was made by Councilmember. Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to not exercise the local transit tax levy option for 1997. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Item 6-T Implementation of Fixed Route Circulator for Plymouth Transit
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-361 DIRECTING STAFF TO
PLAN AND IMPLEMENT A COMMUNITY TRANSIT FIXED ROUTE
CIRCULATOR TO BEGIN OPERATIONS BETWEEN THE DATES OF
AUGUST 1, 1996, AND OCTOBER 1, 1996. Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-U Approve 6 -month Contract Extension with Metropolitan Council for
Paratransit Service
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-362 APPROVAL OF
EXTENSION OF THE PARATRANSIT AGREEMENT,
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND CITY OF PLYMOUTH. Motion
carried, six ayes.
Item 6-V Greenwood Elementary School Neighborhood Park Improvements
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-363 AUTHORIZING THE
FINANCE DIRECTOR TO REIMBURSE WAYZATA SCHOOL
DISTRICT 284 $55,000 FOR A NEW PLAYGROUND AT
GREENWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Motion carried, six ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 6
Item 6-W Approve New Housing Elements and Housing Implementation Plan of the
Comprehensive Plan (96077)
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-364 APPROVING NEW
HOUSING ELEMENTS AND HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (96077). Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 6-X Designate Frauenshuh Companies as developer of property at Highway
55 and Vicksburg Lane
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember
Lymangood, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-365 CONDITIONALLY
DESIGNATING FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES AS DEVELOPER AT
HIGHWAY 55 AND VICKSBURG LANE AND DIRECTING STAFF TO
NEGOTIATE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Motion carried, six
ayes.
Item 8-A Renewal of West Medicine Community Club 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses
Assistant City Manager Lueckert presented a resolution approving, with
conditions, an on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license for West Medicine Lake
Community Club, 1705 Forestview Lane North. She said that Councilmember
Granath has recently been working with the parties involved to attempt to
resolve the concerns of the neighborhood. She noted changes proposed in the
resolution that were negotiated with the Club and the neighbors. Staff believes
that these conditions are measurable and enforceable.
Meg McCormick, member of the West Medicine Lake Community Club, said
that in considering the license renewal the City Council should consider what is
in the best long-term interest of the community. She said that the Club serves
the community, including the youth, elderly, single parent families, and families
in crisis. The Club's goal is to expand its membership and role in the
community. They cannot meet this goal if restrictions increase and the club is
forced to close. She believes that the conditions in the resolution relating to
noise will set a precedent for other neighbors as well. The new park will bring
additional traffic to this area. Ms. McCormick believes that the Club has
responded responsibly to the neighbors' requests.
Mayor Tierney asked for Ms. McCormick's comments on the proposed
conditions.
Ms. McCormick said she wants the restrictions to end with this list of
conditions because additional restrictions could force the Club to close.
Jerry Houston, 11720 27th Avenue North, stated he is a 13 -year resident and
recent member of the Club. He said that this area includes some vacation
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 7
homes, and homes very close together following the lake. People in this area
enjoy the outdoors. He believes that rather than consider restrictions on the
Club, the Club should be considered a vital part of the community. He said the
Club is well managed and provides service to the community without taxpayer
dollars. He believes that the complaints about the Club have been made by a
few neighbors who want the Club closed. Mr. Houston stated that there is a
major park project including a pavilion proposed for construction in this area
and additional outdoor activities and noise will impact the neighborhood. He
supported the issuance of the liquor license, but expressed concerns about
undue restrictions being placed on the Club because some past events may be
discontinued.
Mayor Tierney asked Mr. Houston which regulations he felt were particularly
restrictive.
Mr. Houston responded that he feels the hours designated for events are fine,
but he does not believe the conditions should be related to the liquor license
approval.
Fay Buss, 3720 Oregon Avenue South, St. Louis Park, stated he is the Club
Manager. He expressed one concern with the proposed condition regarding
signage. He has no objection to the prohibition of signage on the road, but
stated that the current language would prevent the Club from posting a
pricelist or menu on the shelter building. Mr. Buss said that some of the
neighbors support the club activities. When he started as manager of the Club
two years ago, the Club had financial problems. However, that situation has
improved. The Club is nonprofit and its purpose is to serve the community.
The Fire Department has its picnic and Christmas party at the Club at no
charge. The City has been paying the minimum rental fee for community
seniors to meet at the Club three to five times each month. The Club property
ballfields have been turned over to the City for scheduling and use. An
additional ballfield is available for community use. Mr. Buss explained that
anyone in the community can use the Club for a funeral or wedding at no
charge. As far as he knows, there has never been an alcohol-related complaint
at the Club. He said that there were a few rental functions held this spring that
got quite noisy and that probably shouldn't have been booked. However, the
Club was trying to make money to make needed building improvements. The
Club is booked for nearly every Saturday and Sunday in 1996, and there are
already 30 bookings for 1997.
Mayor Tierney asked Mr. Buss if the proposed conditions would impact
negatively on the scheduled bookings.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 8
Mr. Buss responded that outdoor activities may be restricted too much. The
club is planning to hold a blue grass festival and ice cream social this summer.
Councilmember Granath asked if Mr. Buss and other club members had an
opportunity to review the amended proposed conditions.
Mr. Buss said the conditions are acceptable except for the signage condition.
Also, three people rather than two normally remain at the Club after an event
to clean and close the Club.
Matthew Abe, 1735 Forestview Lane, represented the Sydorenko, Hlavacek,
Hansen, Heathcote, and Abe families in the neighborhood. He thanked
Councilmember Granath for working with the neighbors to resolve concerns.
He said that the neighbors are not against the community club and the public
service that they provide. However, the neighbors have a problem with their
ballroom operations and picnics. Club rentals have greatly increased in number
and duration since March of 1996. The neighbors feel that their quality of life
has decreased due to amount of traffic on Forestview Lane. He agreed that the
level of noise at the Club is not unlike what you'd expect for a graduation
party or open house; however, the community club has these events every
week. This creates an undue intrusion on peace in the neighborhood. He
agreed that communication between the neighbors and Club could be improved
and stated that he intends to joint the Club. Mr. Abe stated that since
amplification cannot be eliminated from a practical perspective due to outdoor
weddings, the neighbors will work with the Club to determine an appropriate
sound level. He also recommended that outdoor events be limited to three or
four in a calendar year. This would have no fiscal impact on the Club since
there is no charge for rental for weddings.
Motion was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by Councilmember
Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-366 APPROVING 3.2 MALT
LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WEST MEDICINE LAKE COMMUNITY
CLUB, adopting the revised resolution.
Councilmember Granath stated that several meetings have been held on these
issues, and he characterized this action as setting ground rules agreed to by all
parties. He believes that the conditions in the resolution are reasonable and
that there is good faith on all sides. The Club is an asset to the community, and
the Club was well -represented at the meetings.
Motion to amend was made by Councilmember Granath, seconded by
Councilmember Wold, to change Condition #1 to allow three persons to
remain on the premises for purposes of clean-up and tear -down activities; to
delete the words "on the premises" in Condition #3 relating to signage; and to
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
L Page 9
amend Condition #7 to read: "The Club shall cause indoor noise levels to be
monitored with an appropriate gauge. The Club shall cause windows facing
the nearest neighbors to be filled with insulating material to lessen the sound
coming from inside the building."
Councilmember Granath stated that the Club has a device which allows them
to make an objective measurement of the noise level. This can be used as an
internal management tool.
Councilmember Wold agreed with the amendment because it will give the
Council some objective data to consider should the issue come before the
Council again.
Councilmember Lymangood asked Community Development Director Hurlburt
for direction on the signage language. Director Hurlburt stated that the
allowable signage is restrictive in residential districts. Regardless of this
signage condition, the Zoning Ordinance requirements would apply.
Motion carried, six ayes.
Main motion carried, six ayes.
Item 8-B Laurent Development Company (96017)
Community Development Director Hurlburt presented the staff report on the
request of Laurent Development Company for land use guide plan amendment
and sewer plan amendment, including MUSA addition, for property located
north of Schmidt Lake Road and east of Vicksburg Lane. The applicant is
requesting to reguide approximately 61 acres from LAR (Rural Density/
Agricultural) to LA -1 (Low Density Residential). The applicant has not
applied for any development approvals but a conceptual sketch plan showing
single family residential development has been submitted.
Director Hurlburt explained that in 1983, the City approved the creation of the
103 -acre Silverthorne PUD, including the 61 acres in this request. One of the
conditions of the PUD approval was that the land north of Schmidt Lake Road/
MUSA boundary in the Rural Service Area shall not develop until urban
services are available. She explained that the Sewer Plan currently shows that
this site would be served from the north from the Elm Creek District.
However, the applicant is requesting extension of service from the existing
system within the MUSA area. There is sufficient capacity to serve this parcel.
She explained that the City will be undertaking a study of the entire northwest
area of the City in the next year or so. This parcel is different and could be
considered at this time because of the existing sanitary sewer capacity, the
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 10
previous PUD approval, and the proposed Schmidt Lake Road construction.
The right-of-way exists and the preferred alignment is through this property.
Also, the City will build a new water tower with trunk watermain across this
property. Staff recommends that the City's Housing Goals be considered, and
recommends that if the parcel is added to the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area, it meet a goal of at least two units per acre.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing and continued it for two
meetings. Concerns were expressed by property owners north of the Soo Line
tracks wondering if the MUSA could be extended farther to include their
property. Director Hurlburt stated that the area north of the railroad tracks
could not be served with the existing gravity sanitary sewer system from the
south due to the significant grade difference. The land to the north does not
have the same characteristics as this site. Staff also responded to concerns
mentioned by residents regarding the Schmidt Lake Road right-of-way that
would be vacated due to the new alignment. The vacated right-of-way would
be returned to the original property owner, Laurent Development Company.
The staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of the requests. She
stated that the proposed resolution has been amended, as requested by
Councilmember Lymangood, to clarify the unique nature of this parcel.
Director Hurlburt said that the Council has broad discretion in approving the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and it requires a 5/7 vote. The Council must
act on this request by July 12.
Councilmember Anderson asked about the property that abuts this site.
Director Hurlburt stated that the property to the east is owned by the City of
Plymouth and is mostly wetland. The parcel farther to the east is currently
being developed by Mary Anderson Homes. Wetlands are located on the
property west of this site.
Public Works Director Moore stated that the City -owned landlocked parcel is
about 2/3 wetland and the City acquired it because right of -way will be needed
for Schmidt Lake Road.
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Black, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-367 APPROVING
LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND SEWER POLICY
PLAN AMENDMENT FOR LAURENT DEVELOPMENT CO. FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD AND
EAST OF VICKSBURG LANE (96017), (the revised version distributed
at the meeting).
i
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 11
Gary Laurent, President of Laurent Development Company, stated that
following the Planning Commission meeting, the neighborhood has indicated
support for this proposal. He believes that development of this property now
is beneficial to adjacent property owners and to the City. The development is
timely with regard to the Schmidt Lake Road and watermain projects. He
stated that timing is also appropriate with regard to gaining approval from the
Metropolitan Council for the MUSA expansion because this project can create
homes without a significant capital improvements cost. He introduced his
father who owns the land.
Raymond Laurent, 15305 47th Avenue North, stated he purchased the land 30
years ago. He asked for approval of the requests.
Councilmember Anderson stated that he has been involved in Ward 1
development and the Schmidt Lake Road issue. He will vote against the
request. He is not against this particular development, but he opposes
developing the northwest area of Plymouth until there is an approved plan.
Mayor Tierney stated that the PUD was approved in 1983 so it will not set a
precedent.
Councilmember Lymangood acknowledged Councilmember Anderson's
concerns. He noted that this parcel had previously received PUD approval,
and he does not anticipate considering development for any additional areas in
this area until the northwest Plymouth planning is completed. Councilmembers
Granath and Wold agreed.
Motion carried, five ayes; Anderson nay.
Item 8-C (6-0) Request from School District 281 for Improvement Funds
Manager Johnson stated that this staff report recommends adoption of a
resolution authorizing the Director of Finance to make payment to Independent
School district 281 in the amount of $27,000 to be used for improvements at
the new baseball/softball field at the high school. He has received
communication from the District 281 Superintendent with suggestions of
alternative sources for funding the project. Manager Johnson suggested that
the resolution be revised so that either park dedication funds or tax increment
finance funds could be used for the project. He explained that tax increment
funds have been earmarked for joint recreation projects with the school
districts. The City may want to keep the tax increment funds intact for a larger
project.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 12
Motion was made by Councilmember Lymangood, seconded by
Councilmember Wold, to adopt RESOLUTION 96-368 APPROVING
FINANCING FOR FENCING AT ARMSTRONG
BASEBALL/SOFTBALL FIELDS, with the amendment that tax
increment financing or park dedication funds could be used.
Councilmember Lymangood thanked Manager Johnson for following up on
this request. He believes it will retain the City's flexibility.
Motion carried, six ayes.
Item 9-A South Shore Drive Update
Manager Johnson reported that he received communication from Medicine
Lake Mayor Schrader regarding the South Shore Drive issues. Mr. Schrader
said that the Medicine Lake City Council has not met since the Plymouth
Council meeting on June 5. The issues relating to South Shore Drive will be
on their July 1 agenda. Mayor Schrader indicated that he believes good
progress can be made on Items 1 through 4 in the Plymouth Council resolution
and will discuss having a meeting with the Subcommittee that was appointed
by the City Council.
Mayor Tierney described conversations and meetings she had with the
Medicine Lake Mayor and Attorney prior to the June 5 Plymouth City Council
meeting.
Councilmember Lymangood asked for a point of order, as this item was added
to the agenda for only a status report and the items raised are past history.
Mayor Tierney declined. Councilmember Lymangood challenged the ruling of
the Chair and requested that the item be put to a vote.
Mayor Tierney encouraged Councilmembers to attend the July 1 Medicine
Lake City Council meeting. She believes there was a breakdown in
communications between the Plymouth and Medicine Lake elected officials.
She said the Medicine Lake Councilmembers felt offended by the action from
the Plymouth City Council.
Councilmember Granath said that he added this item to the agenda for a status
report from the City Manager. He applauded the intention of Mayor Schrader
and the Medicine Lake City Council to work with Plymouth on issues related
to South Shore Drive. He encouraged them to consider the issues at their July
1 Council meeting. If the Medicine Lake City Council is prepared to take
action as requested by the City of Plymouth, he doesn't believe that it is
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 13
essential that a meeting be held. He said it is in the interest of both
communities to resolve these issues.
Councilmember Anderson stated that he will not attend the Medicine Lake City
Council meeting. The Plymouth Council has effectively resolved issues
through established subcommittees. He took exception to several sentences of
Mayor Schrader's letter. Councilmember Anderson stated that the Plymouth
City Council has set a deadline of the end of July. He would like to see action
by that time, or he would expect Councilmember Granath to place the closure
of South Shore Drive on the agenda for consideration. He will seriously
consider that action if nothing further occurs by that time.
Councilmember Black stated that the July 1 meeting is where the City of
Medicine Lake should discuss their options. Plymouth councilmembers are not
needed for that discussion. She stated that the Subcommittee can meet with
the Medicine Lake City Council, once they decide how to proceed.
Councilmember Wold stated that the Subcommittee has his full support. He
believes the Subcommittee can work with Medicine Lake Council to reach a
compromise by the end of July.
Item 9-11 Charter Commission Request
Councilmember Black acknowledged that there are various points of view on
the issue relating to requiring a supermajority vote for a tax rate increase. She
suggested that one Councilmember be appointed to attend the Charter
Commission meeting to present the City Council's position and to enter into a
discussion with the Charter Commission on the issue. Councilmember Preus
has indicated he would be willing to attend the Charter Commission meeting to
do this.
The City Council expressed support for Councilmember Preus attending the
Charter Commission meeting and representing the position of the City Council.
Mayor Tierney stated she would like to see more councilmembers interested in
the various charter issues. She said that the Charter Commission has
previously discussed these issues.
Councilmember Black stated that she believes the Charter Commission has a
mission and a specific role to play, and the interference of the Council is
unnecessary. However, she believes it would be useful to have one
councilmember present the Council's position at the Charter Commission
meeting.
Regular Council Meeting
June 26, 1996
Page 14
Councilmember Lymangood agreed that this was a worthy compromise. He
said that the City Council has also indicated they would meet with the Charter
Commission at a public hearing on the issue.
Item 9-C Tobacco Ordinance
Councilmember Lymangood reported that an article regarding the City's
Tobacco Ordinance recently appeared in USA Today. The article quoted the
Public Safety Director. He acknowledged the work of the City Manager,
Public Safety Director, and City Attorney on developing this ordinance and
receiving nationwide attention on this issue.
Councilmember Wold reported that yesterday he attended a meeting on the
City's tobacco ordinance. He stated that one panel member was impressed
with the resolve of the Council in adopting the ordinance, and the forum was
very positive.
Councilmember Anderson left the meeting at 9:00 p.m.
Public Safety Director Gerdes explained that the City hosted a prevention
forum focusing on the scenario that "It's too easy for kids to buy tobacco in
Hennepin County." The Plymouth ordinance was highlighted and the meeting
was well received.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember Lymangood to
adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Motion carried, five ayes.
Laurie Ahrens
City Clerk
Agenda Number:
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Dale E. Hahn, Director of Finance & Information Technology
SUBJECT: Disbursements
DATE: Monday July 1, 1996 for the City Council Meeting
July 10, 1996
1. PROPOSED MOTION: To adopt the attached resolution approving the disbursements
for the period ending June 28, 1996.
2. DISCUSSION: Shown below is a listing of disbursements for the various funds for the
period ending June 28, 1996:
Anchor Bank
General
Construction & Debt Service
Enterprise
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Firstar Bank of MN.
Housing ,& Redevelopment Authority
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS
1029,643.33
340,098.91
540,351.11
00
125,543.78
2,035,637.13
Dale E. Hahn
3. RECOMMENDATION: I hereby approve the attached listing of disbursements and
recommend same for payment.
MEN <. ,
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO: 96 -
APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDING JUNE 28, 1996
WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending as presented to the City Council for
approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the
following funds is approved:
First National Bank of Wayzata
General $ 1,029,643.33
Construction & Debt Service $ 340,098.91
Enterprise $ 540, 351.11
Housing & Redevelopment Authority $ .00
Firstar Bank of MN.
Housing & Redevelopment Authority $ 125,543.78
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $ 2,035,637.13
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996.
U NL' KAL ( hhU&1NU AUUUUN l
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1•
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23351 106.50 06/13/96 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL, INC. FIRE STATION 2/PEST CONTROL 106.50
10 23352 195.00 06/13/96 ALARMEX MAY -JUN 96 FIRE TEST/FIRE 1 40.00
MAY -JUN 96 FIRE TEST/PW 40.00
MAY -JUN 96 FIRE TEST/PS 40.00
MAY -JUN 96 FIRE TEST/FIRE 3 40.00
MAY -JUN 96 FIRE TEST/FIRE 2 35.00
10 23353 10.00 06/13/96 AMERICAN RED CROSS ASSOC. 2 REVISION PAGES 10.00
10 23354 290.53 06/13/96 APACHE GROUP 20 RNSSNC C -FOLD TOWEL 145.26
20 RNSSNC C -FOLD TOWEL 48.43
20 RNSSNC C -FOLD TOWEL 48.42
20 RNSSNC C -FOLD TOWEL 48.42
10 23355 582.28 06/13/96 ARAMARK 16 REG,16 DECAF,SUGAR CREAM 40.76
16 REG,16 DECAF,SUGAR CREAM 58.23
16 REG,16 DECAF,SUGAR CREAM 267.85
16 REG,16 DECAF,SUGAR CREAM 116.46
16 REG,16 DECAF,SUGAR CREAM 98.98
10 23356 11.76 06/13/96 ASPEN EQUIPMENT ELEMENT 11.76
10 23357 3,401.01 06/13/96 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3-2/3-29 PROJ 940 MED LAKE 3,401.01
10 23358 6,073.43 06/13/96 BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOC INC 4-20/5-17 PROJ 330/W MED PK 6,073.43
10 23359 1,229.16 06/13/96 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO. 152.19TN CLASS 5 RECYCLE 656.45
132.78TN CLASS 5 RECYCLE 572.71
10 23360 8,000.00 06/13/96 WESLEY BENDICKSON 6 BIRCH TREES/AMPHITHEATRE 3,000.00
DIG/FIL WALK PATH/AMPHITHRT 5,000.00
10 23361 1,185.00 06/13/96 G C BENTLEY ASSOCIATES INC. 5-16/5-31 39.5HR PROG MGMNT 1,185.00
10 23362 710.38 06/13/96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. TAG,SHIPG,FASTENER,TAG 59.00
4PK MARKER,INDEX,8 TAB LSR 92.57
20 PENCIL/1DZ PNCL,COL ERS 10.55
6X10,5X12 BAG,MAILING 50.12
1BX RBBRBND,1 BNDR,RG,LOCK 13.02
9VLT,AA,AAA,BTTY,GLU,FL,MAG 108.19
1BX RIBBON,DP,4PK LABEL 50.11
DSPNCR,TP,MSTNR,CLNR,BRD 5.76
1 BX LASER INDEX,8 BN DRS 126.68
VARIOUS STORE SUPPLIES 97.12
2BX ENVELOPES/233 36.58
BRD,CLP,FL,TRAY,MARKER 31.22
1 MAT,CHAIR,ADVTG 29.46
10 23363 91.10 06/13/96 BEST & FLANAGAN MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 91.10
10 23364 120.00 06/13/96 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 5-15 T OIE/MOTIVATIONAL LDR 80.00
5-14 T OIE/TIME MGMNT 40.00
10 23365 3,328.00 06/13/96 THE CABINET PEOPLE INC. CR FIN SHELF,ADDL 3 CMPTR R 213.00
COPY RM CABINETS,P&R,FIN,CM 3,115.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23366 116.00 06/13/96 CAMPBELL GROUP 18 SHAPEUP CHALLENGE T'S 116.00
10 23367 355.89 06/13/96 CARD SERVICES SPORTMART GIFT CERT/SHAPEUP 140.00
CRAGUNS/2NITES LODGE/LUECKE 164.82
ICMA/TELECOMMUNIC/LUECKERT 48.50
JOHNSON/CRAGUNS 2.57
10 23368 116.03 06/13/96 CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO. HOSE CPLD,3"STRAINER 116.03
10 23369 1,880.00 06/13/96 CERES 4-30 MOBILZ/WOOD WASTE PROC 1,880.00
10 23370 79.88 06/13/96 CITY OF ST PAUL 3 MULTIUNIT CW SIGNS 79.88
10 23371 316.53 06/13/96 COLLISYS UNDRGRND 110V CABLE CUT 316.53
10 23372 924.00 06/13/96 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS JUN 96 RADIO/PAGER MAINT 378.00
JUN 96 RADIO/PAGER MAINT 546.00
10 23373 460.41 06/13/96 PLYMOUTH CUB FOODS BAKERY,POP/POLICE 45.41
BAKERY,POP/LIFETIME FITNESS 101.41
FOOD/CC TASK FORCE MEETING 43.91
BAKERY,OJ/RAD EXERCISE 45.63
FILM DELVEOPING/ASSESSING 18.28
BAKERY/SAFETY COMMITTEE 12.00
BAKERY,BOX LUNCH/102,105 31.92
BAKERY,BOX LUNCH/102,105 40.83
OJ,BAKERY/VOL FLOWER PLNTRS 9.05
OJ,FOOD/EMPL HEALTH FAIR 43.76
FLORAL,CURLING RIBBON/HLTH 31.51
BAGEL,CRM CHEESE,POP/PD 19.32
SOLID WASTE 17.38
10 23374 136.63 06/13/96 PLYMOUTH CUB FOODS HOTDOGS/CHIPS/FORESTRY 42.62
FILM DELVELOPING/ASSESSING 6.83
COOKIES/P&R PROG 016 21.71
MUFFINS/CHAT SESSION 23.50
OJ,BAKERY/P&R FROG 064 13.35
COOKIES,POP/P&R PROG 007 12.87
BAKERY/PLANNING COMMISSION 4.98
TWIZZLERS,SFTY PINS,POP/P&R 10.77
10 23375 1,580.00 06/13/96 D P C INDUSTRIES, INC. 8000LBS CHLORINE a .1960 1,580.00
10 23376 28.76 06/13/96 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. 1 FLATHEAD AXE FIBER 28.76
10 23377 63.90 06/13/96 DUNDEE NURSERY & LANDSCAPING CO. 13652/24 TROUL/FORESTRY 63.90
10 23378 22,011.98 06/13/96 ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY PYMNT 1 PROJ 417/NW BLVD 22,011.98
10 23379 40.00 06/13/96 FIRST BANK - PLYMOUTH DAY CAMP TREATS&MISC 40.00
10 23380 5,475.73 06/13/96 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO JUN 96 TERM LIFE INS 2,667.25
JUN 96 LTD 2,808.48
10 23381 34,049.50 06/13/96 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. WOOD CHAIRS/LOBBY,WAITING R 4,140.72
CHARIS FOR CONFERENCE ROOMS 29,908.78
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 3
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23382 88.00 06/13/96 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIP. CORP 1 SNRKL REMOTE CNTRL SWITCH 19.00
1 ALMNM BX FOR SNORKEL 69.00
10 23383 1,338.40 06/13/96 GOLD LIGHT HEALTH SYSTEM TEACH TAI CHI CHUAN 660.00
TEACH TAI CHI CHUAN 678.40
10 23384 3,645.45 06/13/96 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY SPRING 96 MUSIC FOR EVRYONE 3,645.45
10 23385 100.25 06/13/96 W W GRAINGER INC WELL MOUNT REEL,WATER HOSE 62.04
1 25' TAPE RULE/5 CABLE TIE 29.01
1 1/2" PUMP SHAFT SEAL 9.20
10 23386 692.46 06/13/96 GROVE NURSERY CENTER INC. 62 VARIOUS TREES/SHRUBS 548.68
1 COLORADO,2 BLACK SPRUCE 143.78
10 23387 418.20 06/13/96 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 94.19
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 36.47
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 9.36
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 41.77
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 3.19
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 79.82
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 32.77
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 32.30
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 11.47
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 6.25
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 37.00
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 27.45
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 6.16
10 23388 261.17 06/13/96 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 5.11
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 53.75
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 9.36
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 9.36
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 23.78
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 100.61
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 9.36
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 9.14
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS 40.70
10 23389 2,016.00 06/13/96 GRANT R. HARTMAN TEACH KARATE 4-2-96 2,016.00
10 23390 2,034.15 06/13/96 HEDBERG AGGREGATE 350 ANCHOR DIAM/130 CAP 2,034.15
10 23391 10,484.56 06/13/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER APR 96 ROOM AND BOARD 10,484.56
10 23392 84.52 06/13/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 96 BEG YEAR FICHE/FORESTRY 84.52
10 23393 194.67 06/13/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY 5-29 1.38TNGARBAGE DISPOSAL 66.14
5-7 .89TN GARBAGE DISPOSAL 42.65
5-20 1.34TNGARBAGE DISPOSAL 64.22
ASSESSMENT TAX 21.66
10 23394 77.62 06/13/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MAY 96 3.61TN WST MGMNT FEE 77.62
10 23395 25.00 06/13/96 HENNEPIN PARKS 6-21 PARKING PERMIT 25.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 4
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23396 1,580.38 06/13/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. APR 96 POLICE RADIO REPAIRS 70.46
APR 96 BOOKING FEES 1,509.92
10 23397 245.61 06/13/96 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL 2YD OF SOIL 31.95
2 HELIUM TANK 213.66
10 23398 607.05 06/13/96 HIRSHFIELD'S 30 5GL WHITE FIELD PAINT 607.05
10 23399 9,426.91 06/13/96 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. 102 3/4" MTRS/STRS/PO 4570 9,426.91
10 23400 15.45 06/13/96 I C M A 1 2/93 BENCHMARKING/FIRE 15.45
10 23401 38.41 06/13/96 IMS/MN 2 INK ROLLER 204 38.41
10 23402 57,803.05 06/13/96 IND SCHOOL DIST 284 ELM CREEK DESIGN/ARMSTRONG 57,803.05
10 23403 1,248.00 06/13/96 INFRASTRUCTURE TECH, INC. LINKPIPE INSALL/32ND&PILGRM 1,248.00
10 23404 34.36 06/13/96 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL, INC. FUEL FILTER 34.36
10 23405 920.70 06/13/96 GRETCHEN C KELLOGG 4-22 TEACH HOT SHOES 920.70
10 23406 14,357.37 06/13/96 KNOX LUMBER COMPANY 1245 TREATED WOOD #1 9,464.23
1245 TREATED WOOD #1 4,893.14
10 23407 81.12 06/13/96 LAGERQUIST CORPORATION JUN 96 ELEV SERV/PS 81.12
10 23408 482.76 06/13/96 LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVES, INC. PLANT MATERIAL 482.76
10 23409 2,244.20 06/13/96 LASER IMAGES MAY 96 PSTG DEP UTIL BILLS 1,122.10
MAY 96 PSTG DEP UTIL BILLS 1,122.10
10 23410 394.97 06/13/96 LAWN KING, INC. 15 ROLLS SOD 24.36
70 ROLLS SOD 123.01
20 ROLLS SOD 35.15
15 ROLLS SOD 26.36
50 ROLLS SOD 82.50
50 ROLLS SOD 82.50
12 ROLLS SOD 21.09
10 23411 75.00 06/13/96 M D A CONSULTING GROUP INC. CPI/L MORTENSON/ACCTG TECH 75.00
10 23412 185.25 06/13/96 MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC. 4 FAST STRAPS -VELCRO SET 3 92.25
4 FAST STRAPS -VELCRO SET 3 46.50
4 FAST STRAPS -VELCRO SET 3 46.50
10 23413 2,777.83 06/13/96 MIDWEST ASPHALT CO. 44.98TN FINE 6.0 ASPHALT 1,057.65
70.07TN ASPHALT MATERIAL 1,720.18
10 23414 914.78 06/13/96 STAR TRIBUNE ADV SR ENG TECH/ACQUISTIONS 437.33
ADV ICE ARENA MANAGER 426.30
ADV ICE ARENA MANAGER 51.15
10 23415 600.00 06/13/96 MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 96 MPRS MEMBERSHIP FEE/PD 600.00
10 23416 26,010.82 06/13/96 MINNESOTA TORO, INC. 1 SHIELD 13.57
F PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 5
113/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
N D 0 R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
VARIOUS IRRIGATION SPLYS 4,147.71
72" 4 WHEEL DRIVE HYDROSTAT 21,849.54
IMPORT COMPANY VARIOUS FERN/FORESTRY 701.44
6 10" ADJUSTABLE WRENCH 38.28
6 10" ADJUSTABLE WRENCH 38.28
5 10" ADJUSTABLE WRENCH/PD 31.90
ATES POWER CO. 4-22/5-21 LIFT STATION 104.74
4-19/5-21 STREET LIGHT 12.03
4-19/5-21 STREET LIGHT 15.60
4-18/5-17 TRFC SIGNAL 111.54
3-18/5-20 TRFC SIGNAL 141.08
4-19/5-21 TRFC SIGNAL 98.29
4-22/5-21 STREET LIGHT 12.39
4-18/5-20 WATER TOWER 16.37
4-19/5-21 TRFC SIGNAL 103.89
4-18/5-20 IMPERIAL HILLS 8.88
4-19/5-21 LIFT STATION 41.71
4-19/5-21 LIFT STATION 27.06
5/3-6-4 ZACH TRTMNT 7,368.67
TER WORK SUPPLY INC. 1 899-939 X 20 REPAIR CLAMP 180.66
MMUNICATIONS JUN 96 POLICE TO SHERIFF 73.14
JUN 96 ZACH COMPUTER LINE 76.87
JUN 96 PW TO CITY CENTER 91.74
JUN 96 PW TO CITY CENTER 91.73
JUN 96 PW TO CITY CENTER 91.74
JUN 96 DIGITAL TRUNKS 112.62
JUN 96 CITY CENTER 687.88
JUN 96 CITY CENTER 687.87
JUN 96 CITY CENTER 687.88
TION SYSTEMS SERVICED IBM PS/VP 382.69
SERVICED TOSHIBA SATELLITE 40.85
SERVICED NET NOVELL 55.00
5 HP VECTRA/5 NEC MONITORS 14,655.13
7 RUMBA V4.1,7 RUMBA V5.0 1,416.46
CES INC. FIRE 3/EXHAUST FAN MOTOR 215.84
ICAL CONTRACTING, INC. INSTL FIRE 2 GRG DOOR BUTTO 604.40
PROCESS,CONTACT SHEET 9.64
20CUSTOM B&W PRINT 5X7 17.04
PPLY COMPANY 2CS 38X60 LNR,DISP GLOVE 76.66
MOUTH PARTIC FEE/96 SHAPEUP CHLNG 258.00
JN PUBLICATIONS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS 34.88
1996 CRACK REPAIR 43.60
FILE 96005 SCHERBER PTRNSHP 40.33
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 26.16
10 J• -J O N MN OOPNWW M10 PP O0110--OPN—J
ISM O h %G 00 I OO 1O( mO O-:71 00.- NIli %9 VI ONPt PJJI M O/ 7-:0:19 O IA O IA*p
0000 O N PPPPPP-- f - V1 JNf--PPInJONOM— wNc, wtoNmm m OOJOMN—PmM
W V1(VN O N PPPPPP so 't MtiNNN N NVION P e -e -M V1 .O N.-.-%0 - %OO Ln Ncm n %0
0 O 00 -
a
M N
C In `0
InJ
Z 4%O
O x w w 10
O I- 1-- P
F- O ¢ 33333U w
C J W 0. a a n. a U ¢W N N N V)V) V)V) V) U) N N fn H O (n V)V)V) fn m (nV1 V) to V1 Vl N m V) V)(A V)VI V) fn m
m w x \\\\\\ 3 J Y Y Y Y r r Y Y Y Y Y Y r Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y r r r Y Y r Y Y r r r Y r Y
U H J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
U pz »»» pIi aaLLLLo o aaaao.aa. mamamaLL0.aoaaa aaaaao 13LMm
V) W w C xxxxxx wwwwwwwwww
W Qom+ W x w w C'C'C' JK
C3 x z )-- ¢ 00 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
U> W \ x xx xx S V1LL C CC' C'C' C'CC CC OC DCC CICK OC OC OC OC OC OC OC CIC OC C'K C'C' OC C'C OCC' C'CC CCC C'
LL 0 m i x p V) NV)V)VI N Q Q Q Q Q¢ Q¢¢ Q 6 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ¢Q Q
w m z O O z
z
z r. r. CC y 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
O 00 C' O m m m m m m O W O p p p p p p O p O O p p p p p O O p p p p p p p p
w w w w w w w w w wCC %O U O 3 m mm mm CO LL.-. O<C'C' DCC' CCC' KCC C'C' C'OL CC KCC KC' C'C' C'C' CCC K C' C'C' ar CC KCC C'CC K
CO Ln w LL p » » » a aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa ¢¢¢¢aaQaaa
I O S U Q CC OC w wix OC 0 O S x x x 2 x x S x x S x S x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 2 S x S S x x S 2
W %0 F- Z W W Z U
U P O ¢ (7 p 10 1010 1010 10 %0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I0 10 10 %0 10 %0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 %0 %0 %0 %0 10 10 10 10 %0 %0 10
Oz Q PPPPPP )--OC Plop, PPPPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPPPP of P P OPP PPPPP
O w x— J z O
J Y p V) >Y Y Y Y r Y + J Y Y Y r r Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y >- Y Y r Y r r r Y Y Y Y Y Y Y r r Y r r r Y Y
O x ¢¢ Q Q Q Q OCO Q 6 6 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 6 6 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 6 Q¢ 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q
LLao a xxxxxx 'L L) xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
DDLU
N b
C7 \ W
W MCC x
Y%0 ¢ U O
W Z
x x U U U
U C7 Z Z Z
x 0 U Z Z
orx O w O O OC w OC
Y o or U a Q Q
JP p Q LL a a
0." U a cD
CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER
06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
tITZ CAMERA CENTERS INC. 2 FILM/HR PROCESSING
1 HOUR PROCESSING
OUTLAB PROCESSING
1 HR PROCESSING
20AD RUNNER TRANS. 5-20 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
5-20 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
i F G TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CHIEBE'S HARDWARE STORE
CHIEBE'S HARDWARE STORE
CHIEBE'S HARDWARE STORE
APR TRAVEL EXP/B BROOKING
APR/MAY96 SCOPE,INSTL SFTWR
LICENSE/SUPPORT-BUDGETARY
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
PAGE 7
32.78
51.55
13.79
22.02
11.19
15.18
6.15
25.00
22.60
1,185.79
7,638.30
39,138.75
3.63
4.26
7.13
6.20
20.61
19.17
2.00
9.57
3.54
15.27
35.60
13.44
5.02-
1.82
17.25
10.05
12.24
12.82
6.90
8.00
1.24
3.40
3.99
15.31
28.87
6.88
29.77
9.58
3.20
2.01
4.99
6.64
9.56
2.45
0.90
6.97
4.46
11.83
CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER
06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
iIEBEIS HARDWARE STORE MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
MAY 96 HARDWARE SPLYS
RT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON PROJ 401 ENDING 4-30-96
COMPUTER IMAGE/RCPT 49591
3NATURE CONCEPTS/GOLD COUNTRY EMPL SHIRTS/RECEIPT 49343
IDIFICATION, INC 63.50HR SEAL/GROUT,WATERPLG
1THAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISE PROJ 541 2 WKS
ADVERTISE 96 CRACK REPAIR
NDARD TRUCK & AUTO 4-2/13 VAR U-BOLTS/PARKS
kTE OF MINNESOTA
4NESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
JNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
ZEICHERIS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQUIP
CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
COPY STATE REGISTR/ENGINEER
USE TAX/VENDOR 6950
USE TAX/VENDOR 49675
USE TAX/VENDOR 49675
USE TAX/VENDOR 49675
USE TAX/VENDOR 56940
USE TAX/VENDOR 84495
USE TAX/VENDOR 84495
USE TAX/VENDOR 84495
USE TAX/VENDOR 96697
MAY 96 STORES SALES TAX
MAY 96 FERTILIZER SALES TAX
MAY 96 CNTRL EQPT SALES TAX
MAY 96 WATER SALES TAX
USE TAX/VENDOR 50900
USE TAX/VENDOR 57802
USE TAX/VENDOR 68888
CENTER,OUTBOARD DOMES
1 HEADLIGHT FLASHER
3 CAPTAIN BADGE
3 CAPTAIN BADGE,1 DEPUTY
3 LIEUTENANT BADGES
3 RPL CNTR SEAL FOR HI-GLO
FILE 0931782 PROJ 310 4-96
FILE 0901341 PROJ 011 4-96
FILE 0962385 PROJ 929 4-96
FILE 0952228 PROJ 502 4-96
FILE 0952227 PROJ 502 4-96
FILE 0952255 PROJ 417 4-96
FILE 0962387 PROJ 417 4-96
FILE 0942081 PROJ 417 4-96
FILE 0921644 PROJ 031 4-96
PAGE 8
7.05
6.50
27.04
1.91
7.06
289.82
1,200.00
530.31
11,092.06
391.50
151.20
92.35
37.00
15.93
3.03
3.03
5.64
45.60
5.85
10.00
5.28
12.68
54.90
310.80
133.39
2,375.01
7.22
13.15
33.49
148.89
42.55
223.62
74.54
223.62
75.69
228.24
245.64
1,594.86
2,243.46
15,504.39
2,269.28
657.11
607.16
135.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23453 6.43 06/13/96 TARGET/DAYTONS MASKING TAPE,TRASH BAGS
10 23454 94.10 06/13/96 SUBURBAN PROPANE 2 33# CYLINDER/GARAGE
1 60# CYLINDER/STREETS
2 40# CYCLINDER/STREETS
10 23455 559.13 06/13/96 TRI -K SERVICES, INC. MAY96 170 YARDS PULV DIRT
MAY96 70 YARDS PULV DIRT
MAY96 70 YARDS PULV DIRT
MAY96 70 YARDS PULV DIRT
10 23456 72.89 06/13/96 TROSSEN WRIGHT ARCHITECTS, P.A. PROJ 506 ENDING 5-31-96
10 23457 874.63 06/13/96 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN SPRAY BASS LAKE PARK/#1
WEED CONTROL/GARAGE #1
10 23458 500.00 06/13/96 TWINWEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 96 EDC SITE TOUR SPONSORSHP
10 23459 97.80 06/13/96 U S WEST CELLULAR MAY 96 HEITKE CELLULAR
MAY 96 PATROL CELLULAR
MAY 96 INVESTIGATIONS
10 23460 30.00 06/13/96 UNITED FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC. 96 MEMBERSHIP/FIRE
10 23461 592.50 06/13/96 UNITED RECYCLING, INC. 585 SQ YDS CARPET COLLECTED
10 23462 382.91 06/13/96 UNITOGS RENTAL SYSTEM PAVILION RUG RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL
10 23463 617.72 06/13/96 VILLAGE AUTO BODY INC. REPAIR UNIT 534 LEFT DOOR
10 23464 231.91 06/13/96 WATERPRO 2 A-11 STEM/4 SPAN WRNCH
10 23465 933.47 06/13/96 WILSON'S NURSERY, INC. VARIOUS SHRUBS/PLANTS
10 23466 231.13 06/13/96 WORKPLACE 2000, INC. TACKBOARD,WALLTRACK,TOGGLE
10 23467 282.55 06/13/96 ZIEGLER, INC. 1 CNTL KIT SEA
10 23468 40.00 06/13/96 LYNNAE HESS REFUND IN LINE SKATING
10 23469 40.00 06/13/96 JOAN SCHWARZE REFUND IN LINE SKATING
10 23470 55.00 06/13/96 MARY ANNE YOUNG TEACH AEROBIC DANCING 4-22
10 23471 88,328.36 06/13/96 PARK CONSTRUCTION PYMNT 3/FINAL PROJ 502/PEON
PAGE 9
6.43
26.50
30.97
36.63
247.62
71.89
99.85
139.77
72.89
692.25
182.38
500.00
17.67
52.41
27.72
30.00
592.50
22.36
48.18
48.17
24.39
24.39
24.39
24.39
38.83
17.19
48.43
2.75
59.44
617.72
231.91
933.47
231.13
282.55
40.00
40.00
55.00
88,328.36
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 10
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23472 575.00 06/13/96 I F M A J TABERY/SALT LAKE CITY,UT 575.00
10 23473 80.00 06/13/96 MARGARET BRUCE REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23474 80.00 06/13/96 JANA RICHARDSON REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23475 182.50 06/13/96 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC. SPEC RECYCL TRAILER RENTAL 182.50
10 23476 40.00 06/13/96 SUSAN ITEM REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23477 111.97 06/13/96 RADISSON SUITES K LEUER/1 RM DEP/MO CONF 111.97
10 23478 80.00 06/13/96 JOAN WIGGINTON REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23479 40.00 06/13/96 LAUREL JOHNS REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23480 80.00 06/13/96 KAREN RICKER REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23481 77.00 06/13/96 ALL FIRE TEST 6 SCBA CYLINDERS HYDROTESTE 77.00
10 23482 40.00 06/13/96 LINDA BAILER REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23483 40.00 06/13/96 DEB WIELE REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23484 119.17 06/13/96 K E A, INC. 1PKG VEHICL SEARCH,SUM SHT 119.17
10 23485 150.00 06/13/96 THE ALL SEASONS TRAVEL GROUP ROOM DEP/IFMA CONF,SALT LAK 150.00
10 23486 40.00 06/13/96 KELLY KOMULA REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23487 55.00 06/13/96 QUANTUM DEVELOPMENT, INC. BLDG RNTL/AEROBIC DANCE 55.00
10 23488 40.00 06/13/96 BECKY HERKE REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23489 3,703.92 06/13/96 K M T COMMUNICATIONS 5-15/5-30 MARKETING COMMUNI 3,703.92
10 23490 1,108.28 06/13/96 RICMAR INDUSTRIES 6 KEGS REPEL-60,4GL RIGHT S 1,108.28
10 23491 40.00 06/13/96 LINDA YAKSHE REFUND IN LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23492 28.00 06/13/96 DIANA STRAATE REFUND K BALL 28.00
10 23493 5,359.56 06/13/96 MULTIPLE CONCEPTS INTERIORS TURFLEX FLOORS AT PLYFLDS 5,359.56
10 23494 720.00 06/13/96 HEWLETT PACKARD 5-20 R TURNER/HP-UX BASICS 720.00
10 23495 290.35 06/13/96 TOMAHAWK LIVE TRAP COMPANY 6 RACCOON TRAPS 290.35
10 23496 6.75 06/13/96 LYNN JAPS REFUND PLAYTIME DISC COUPON 6.75
10 23497 30.15 06/13/96 JAY'S INC. 1 GAUGE,VAC 4" 30.15
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 11
RUN DA -E: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23498 117.15 06/13/96 NORTH SUBURBAN TOWING LAWN MOWER TOWED/PARKS 117.15
10 23499 40.00 06/13/96 ARLEEN ARENDT REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23500 40.00 06/13/96 MARGE BACHE-WIIG REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23501 100.00 06/13/96 BARBARA HAUGEN REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 35.00
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 12.50
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 12.50
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 7.50
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 12.50
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 12.50
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 7.50
10 23502 40.00 06/13/96 LINDA BERG REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23503 40.00 06/13/96 SUSAN NELSON BOSER REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23504 40.00 06/13/96 LINDA BOSS REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23505 40.00 06/13/96 NANCY BURK REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23506 40.00 06/13/96 SARAH VILLALOBOS REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23507 40.00 06/13/96 JOHN FREDERICKSON REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23508 40.00 06/13/96 BETH JOHNSON REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23509 40.00 06/13/96 MARY KOLKIND REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23510 40.00 06/13/96 JOANNA LARSON REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23511 40.00 06/13/96 JEAN LORENZ REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23512 40.00 06/13/96 KAREN MANN REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23513 40.00 06/13/96 SANDY MULLANEY REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23514 40.00 06/13/96 CYNTHIA NOLL REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23515 40.00 06/13/96 MERCEDES RIDINGS REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23516 40.00 06/13/96 GARY SOLARZ REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23517 40.00 06/13/96 PAULA NELSON REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23518 40.00 06/13/96 KIMBERLY TILLER REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23519 40.00 06/13/96 LOUISE WERTS REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23520 40.00 06/13/96 MICHAEL WOODS REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23521 45.00 06/13/96 HEIDI MAKAREM REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 45.00
10 23522 45.00 06/13/96 TIM JOHNSON REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 45.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 12
RUN DA,E: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23523 45.00 06/13/96 LYNN BUCKA REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 45.00
10 23524 45.00 06/13/96 PENNY AGUIRRE REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 45.00
10 23525 80.00 06/13/96 KATHY RANCOURT REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23526 80.00 06/13/96 PEGGY MURPHY REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23527 80.00 06/13/96 ROBERT MEYER REFUNF IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUNF IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23528 80.00 06/13/96 ERIC JUNGELS REFUNF IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUNF IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23529 80.00 06/13/96 BONNIE JADWIN REFUNG IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUNG IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23530 80.00 06/13/96 ANN BAUFIELD REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
REFUND IN-LINE SKATING 40.00
10 23531 25.00 06/13/96 GARY SOLARZ REFUND TENNIS 25.00
10 23532 25.00 06/13/96 ANN TAYLOR REFUNF TENNIS 25.00
10 23533 73.00 06/13/96 MARGARET FOURTE REFUND SWIMMING 39.00
REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23534 34.00 06/13/96 ELIZABETH SAYER REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23535 34.00 06/13/96 CHERYL FORSYTHE REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23536 749.60 06/13/96 DANIEL KELLY REFUND S/A PYMNT/RCPT 47876 749.60
10 23537 130.77 06/13/96 MATRIX MEDICAL INC. FIRST AID SPLYS 26.15
FIRST AID SPLYS 26.15
FIRST AID SPLYS 26.15
FIRST AID SPLYS 10.89
FIRST AID SPLYS 41.43
10 23538 99.00 06/13/96 BILL MENSCH REF VARIANCE/RCPT 49052 99.00
10 23539 35.00 06/13/96 NORA PRODZINSKI REF PICNIC SHELTER RNTL 35.00
10 23540 45.00 06/13/96 RICHARDSON, RICHTER & ASSOCIATES K LUECKERT/PERFORMANCE MEAS 45.00
10 23541 200.00 06/13/96 STEVE SCHEUNEMANN REFUND PAVILION RENTAL DEP 200.00
10 23542 34.00 06/13/96 LINDA CHRISTIANSEN REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 478,517.67
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 192
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE
RUN DATE: 07/03/96 06/19/96 THROUGH 06/19/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23543 $99.20 06/19/96 PERKINS RESTAURANT PANCAKE MIX/SAUSAGE/6-19 99.20
TOTAL AMOUNT $99.20
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23545 83.40 06/20/96 RICHARD TURNER REIMB 4 LUNCH/ORACLE TRAIN 16.65
PARKING/STRICTLY BUS EXPO 4.75
REIMB MILEAGE/ORACLE TRAIN 62.00
10 23546 85.45 06/20/96 JACK TABERY SAMS/CUB-FRUIT/PANCAKE BRNC 85.45
10 23547 18.16 06/20/96 LORENE BRINGLE JUN 96 COMPUTER PHONE LINE 18.16
10 23548 16.00 06/20/96 NANCY BYE EARL,NANCY LUNCH/HAM MEETNG 16.00
10 23549 40.80 06/20/96 ROBERT PEMBERTON GEMPLERS/2 WRIST SUPPORT 40.80
10 23550 122.95 06/20/96 STAN BIRNBAUM LUNCH/NEW HORIZEN TRAINING 5.73
2 LUNCH/SFG ON-SITE INSTALL 15.91
LUNCH/ SFG ON-SITE INSTALL 5.39
PHONE CALL TO SFG 1.39
TIME,FRANKLIN QUST/DAY BOOK 25.45
LUNCH/GIS FAIR ACKN FOR VOL 33.95
KINKO'S/ 30.15
OFFICEMAX/READY INDEX 4.98
10 23551 5.50 06/20/96 KEVIN PREGLER REIMB PARKING/FEDERAL COURT 5.50
10 23552 15.69 06/20/96 RICHARD KLINE LUNCH MTG W/CHIEF ANDERSON 15.69
10 23553 84.32 06/20/96 GLENN C. UPTON REIMB 272 MILEAGE 84.32
10 23554 10.00 06/20/96 BARB COX CHILIS GIFT CERTI/GIS OPNHS 10.00
10 23555 43.50 06/20/96 KAROL J. GREUPNER FRANKLIN QUEST/PLAN CALENDR 22.36
TARGET/BOX FRAMES/FITNESS C 21.14
10 23556 40.92 06/20/96 RICHARD J BUSCH REIMB 132 MILEAGE 40.92
10 23557 98.60 06/20/96 CYNTHIA M. ANDERSON PIZZA HUT/SWIM REGISTR STF 8.00
PIZZA HUT/SWIM REGISTR STF 12.00
2 NITES LODGE/ST CLOUD CONF 78.60
10 23558 52.08 06/20/96 MARK S. PETERSON REIMB 168 MILEAGE 52.08
10 23559 83.70 06/20/96 GREG COOK REIMB 270 MILEAGE/CRAGUNS 83.70
10 23560 30.00 06/20/96 BETH MYERS HENN PARKS/PARK PERMIT 30.00
10 23561 157.83 06/20/96 TED MYERS SAMS/CANDY FOR CONCESSIONS 157.83
10 23562 30.00 06/20/96 SUSAN BYL 2 ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS 30.00
10 23563 276.84 06/20/96 KEVIN SYMENS CIRCUIT CITY/2 BEACH PHONES 138.42
CIRCUIT CITY/2 BEACH PHONES 138.42
10 23564 655.00 06/20/96 AETNA LIFE INS & ANNUITY CO., INC. PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000001 655.00
10 23565 297,592.88 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000000 137,948.41
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000005 19,136.14
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000001 16,013.14
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2•
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N 0 0 R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000009 34,363.04
PAYROLL FOR 062096 90,132.15
10 23566 43,790.89 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000000 43,790.89
10 23567 46,309.10 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000013 36,273.24
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000000 10,035.86
10 23568 897.24 06/20/96 ANOKA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DIV. PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000001 897.24
10 23569 179.20 06/20/96 THE HEALTHFUND OF MINNESOTA PAYROLL FOR 060696 00000005 89.60
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000005 89.60
10 23570 380.31 06/20/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & COLLECTIONS PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000003 380.31
10 23571 107.30 06/20/96 MN ENVIRONMENTAL FUND PAYROLL FOR 060696 00000000 53.65
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000000 53.65
10 23572 210.00 06/20/96 P E R A PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000000 210.00
10 23573 3,656.40 06/20/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000011 1,943.29
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000003 1,713.11
10 23574 42,238.83 06/20/96 P E R A PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000004 42,238.83
10 23575 458.00 06/20/96 UNITED WAY OF MPLS PAYROLL FOR 060696 00000012 229.00
PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000012 229.00
10 23576 192.20 06/20/96 WRIGHT COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY PAYROLL FOR 062096 00000012 192.20
10 23578 68.82 06/20/96 ALBINSON'S 1 36X50 PDBLUE/STORES 39.52
1 42X50 PDBLUE/STORES 29.30
10 23579 638.18 06/20/96 ALL STAR SPORTS 8DZ INCREDIBALLS/P&R 298.12
5DZ BASEBALLS,2CS ICEPACKS 127.73
6DZ PRACTICE TENNIS BALLS 47.93
24 WOOL CAPS 164.40
10 23580 409.50 06/20/96 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 4-16/5-15 PROJ TEST 503 409.50
10 23581 165.39 06/20/96 AMERICAN RED CROSS ASSOC. 2 CPR PROF RESCUE MAN/1 BK 5.00
2 CPR PROF RESCUE MAN/1 SK 25.67
7 RNTL MANIKIN,MASK,VIDEO 134.72
10 23582 201.92 06/20/96 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC. 12 DOG WASTE SIGNS 201.92
10 23583 51.54 06/20/96 ASPEN EQUIPMENT STRAINER,GASKET/FREIGHT 51.54
10 23584 791.51 06/20/96 BAILEY'S NURSERY FORSYTHIA,WILLOW,CORNUS,SAM 321.63
ALNUS GLUT-EUR,PRUNUS AMERI 146.44
BETULA NIGRA-RIVER 63.58
CORNUS RACEMOSA-GRAY 159.75
VIB DENTATUM-ARROWWOOD 100.11
10 23585 268.00 06/20/96 BEACON BALLFIELDS 2 PUDDLE PUMP,50FT HOSE 268.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT
RUN DATE: 06/21/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE
10 23586 $195.53 06/20/96
10 23587 $1,627.50 06/20/96
10 23588 $2,268.00 06/20/96
10 23589 $620.49 06/20/96
10
10
10
10
10
CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER
06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
BELSON MFG. 1 GRIDDLE 241IX30"
G C BENTLEY ASSOCIATES INC. 6-1/6-15 54.25HR PROJ MGMNT
BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS JUN 96 WORKERS COMPENSATION
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
23590 $403.68 06/20/96 BERTELSON BROS. INC.
23591 $1,411.12 06/20/96 BIFF'S INC.
23592 $852.49 06/20/96 BIFF'S INC.
23593 5,916.85 06/20/96 BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK
23594 2,300.00 06/20/96 BRAUER & ASSOC LTD INC
6 STENO BOOK
1 LEATHER PAD HOLDER
2PK NEON GRAB GRIP
2BX PORTFOLIO CVR,2DZ CLIPS
LTR TRAY,TUFVIN BNDR,HANG F
2RL SEALING TAPE
6RL FAX THERMAL PAPER
90PK 9VOLT,60EA MAILG BAGS
1ST HIGHLIGHTER MARKERS
VARIOUS STORE SUPPLIES
LTR OPENER,1BX DISKETTE
1 SHEARS
1 GENERAL PHASE STAMP
24 RG BNDRS,INDEX,SINDING
1BX GUIDE CARD
1BX RUBBERBAND
ECOL PADS,PENS,HILITERS
INK,STAMP PAD,NOTE,STICK T
JUN 96 ZACH SOFTBALL 1&2
5-13/6-30 CIRCLE PARK
5-13/6-30 HERITAGE PARK
5-14/6-30 IMPERIAL HILLS PK
5-13/6-30 LIONS PARK
5-14/6-30 MISSION HILLS PRK
5-13/6-30 PARKERS LK BEACH
JUN 96 HNDCP BASS LK PLYFLD
JUN 96 HNDCP LACOMPTE PLYFL
JUN 96 HNDCP PILGRIM LN ELE
JUN 96 HNDCP PLYMOUTH PLYFL
JUN 96 HNDCP RIDGEMOUNT PLY
JUN 96 HNDCP ZACHARY ELEM
5-13/6-30 SWAN LAKE PARK
5-13/6-30 TIMBERSHORES PARK
5-13/6-30 TURTLE LAKE PARK
5-13/6-30 W MED LK COMM CLB
5-13/6-30 W MED LAKE PARK
5-13/6-30 ROLLING HILLS PRK
5-13/6-30 SCHMIDT LAKE PARK
5-14/6-30 SHILOH PARK
5-14/6-30 ST MARYS PARK
FILE 7029409 PROD 509 4-96
FILE 7029500 PROJ 523 4-96
FILE 7029900 PROJ 537 4-96
FILE 7000 GENERAL 4-96
PROJ 606 PLAN PROC NE NEIGH
PAGE 3
195.53
1,627.50
2,268.00
2.97
18.69
2.08
24.50
177.40
7.75
29.86
257.97
11.07
29.22
8.08
1.25
49.65
267.71
5.45
3.04
106.85
20.63
116.52
95.15
95.15
93.22
95.15
93.22
95.15
118.26
118.26
136.26
118.26
118.26
118.26
95.15
95.15
95.15
95.15
95.15
95.15
95.15
93.22
93.22
234.75
2,886.32
151.58
2,644.20
2,300.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 4RUNDATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23595 5,223.68 06/20/96 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 99.15TN 1 MINUS CL5 726.79
613.47TN 1 MINUS CL5 4,496.89
10 23596 25,187.16 06/20/96 CAMPBELL,KNUTSON,SCOTT & FUCHS MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 6,451.75
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 16,214.24
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 41.58
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 766.03
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 479.56
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 150.00
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 798.00
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 273.28
MAY 96 LEGAL FEES 12.72
10 23597 336.37 06/20/96 CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO. 12 BROOMS/STREETS 320.01
3 NOZZLE VEEJET 1/4 16.36
10 23598 1,533.60 06/20/96 CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO. 200 DIAMOND DRY 1,533.60
10 23599 10,173.75 06/20/96 CERES 5-31 2100CU YD DISPL SEPPI 6,300.00
5-31 7HR HAULING OF SEPPI 3,180.00
5-31 9.25HR RMV,DISPOSE 270 693.75
10 23600 6,832.10 06/20/96 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 4.09TN TYPE 41A WEAR 6.0% 90.08
21.49TN TYPE 41A WEAR 6.0 482.91
289.45TN 41A WEAR 6.0% 6,259.11
10 23601 9.95 06/20/96 COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED MAY 96 COMPUSERV/AMY 9.95
10 23602 5.00 06/20/96 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNTS RECVBL SHIPPING CHARGE ON GRID 5.00
10 23603 988.60 06/20/96 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS THIS CK REPLACES CK 23372 378.00
THIS CK REPLACES CK 23372 168.00
ANTENNA/RADIO UPGRADE 442.60
10 23604 1,783.88 06/20/96 JOSEPH COOLEN 6-4 TREE REMOVALS 1,783.88
10 23605 2,311.88 06/20/96 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. 1PR BUNKER BOOT,S SUSPENDER 126.00
3 JAMESVILLE TURNOUT GEAR 2,185.88
10 23606 4,000.00 06/20/96 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP TOWNE SQUARE YR END12-31-95 4,000.00
10 23607 1,806.55 06/20/96 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY MAY 96 MIN/APR USG 2110A 1,450.53
MAY96 MIN/APR USG 95 COPIER 356.02
10 23608 1,346.60 06/20/96 EASTMAN KODAK CREDIT CORP JUN 96 LEASE 2110/95 COPIER 1,346.60
10 23609 218.32 06/20/96 ELSMORE AQUATICS 11 MENS/WOMENS SWIMSUITS 218.32
10 23610 3,518.48 06/20/96 FEED -RITE CONTROLS INC. 4752 LBS CA -C-9 @.7400 3,518.48
10 23611 225.75 06/20/96 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. MAY 96 129 BILLABLE CALLS 225.75
MAY 96 0 BILLABLE CALLS/PW 31.50
MAY 96 CREDIT FOR 0 CALLS 31.50-
10 23612 143.78 06/20/96 GRAFIX SHOPPE GRAPHICS ON SQUAD 117 143.78
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 5
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23613 217.31 06/20/96 W W GRAINGER INC 1 PORTABLE WATER COOLER 45.22
6 BANDSAW BLADES 43.52
FLOOR SQUEEGE,HNDL,GRP NZZL 41.66
5 CABLE TIE,1 ROPE 86.91
10 23614 2,107.62 06/20/96 HILGER TRANSFER INC 5-15 20YD DUMPSTER/PW 401.86
5-16/5-20 SPEC COLLECTION 1,705.76
10 23615 7,100.37 06/20/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 961VALUATION NOTICES MAILED 7,100.37
10 23616 47.93 06/20/96 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL 3 YD OF SOIL 47.93
10 23617 607.05 06/20/96 HIRSHFIELD'S 30 5GAL WHITE FIELD PAINT 607.05
10 23618 7,928.93 06/20/96 HOPKINS PARTS CO. 10OTN ELEC/HYDRAULIC PRESS 7,928.93
10 23619 50.00 06/20/96 INT'L ASSOC ARSON INVEST. 96 MEMBERSHIP/STAN SCOFIELD 50.00
10 23620 395.00 06/20/96 INT'L ASSOC OF ASSESSING OFFICER NANCY BYE/ANNUAL CONF 395.00
10 23621 3.43 06/20/96 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL, INC. 2 OIL FILTER 3.43
10 23622 681.60 06/20/96 JUDE WHOLESALE, INC. 2 CS NORMANDY CANDY MIX 85.20
14 CS NORMANDY CANDY MIX 596.40
10 23623 201.55 06/20/96 J. H. LARSON ELECTRICAL CO. THIS CK REPLACES CK 22024 3.31
THIS CK REPLACES CK 22024 56.12
THIS CK REPLACES CK 22024 142.12
10 23624 1,650.00 06/20/96 LAW ENFORCE LABOR SERV. MAY 96 POLICE UNION DUES 1,650.00
10 23625 75.00 06/20/96 M D A CONSULTING GROUP INC. CPI/KIM STORY/POLICE RESERV 75.00
10 23626 9,076.00 06/20/96 M S A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4-28/5-25 299 INSPEC/REINSP 9,076.00
10 23627 69,454.92 06/20/96 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONST., INC. PYMNT 1 PROJ 602/96 STREETS 69,454.92
10 23628 165.72 06/20/96 METRO WATER CONDITIONING INC. 63 40# BAGS SOFTNER SALT 165.72
10 23629 141,669.00 06/20/96 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MAY 96 SERV AVAIL CHARGE 141,669.00
10 23630 940.29 06/20/96 MIDWEST ASPHALT CO. 39.99TN 41A W5.8 ASPHLT 940.29
10 23631 300.00 06/20/96 MIDWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. 8 BAG VARIOUS POP/CONCESSN 300.00
10 23632 3,323.10 06/20/96 MINNEGASCO/MN GAS CO 4-18/5-20 HIST SOCIETY 69.91
4-18/5-16 FIRE STATION 2 191.79
4-17/5-15 CITY CENTER 786.42
4-18/5-17 PUBLIC WORKS 312.24
4-18/5-17 PUBLIC WORKS 312.23
4-18/5-17 PUBLIC WORKS 312.23
4-18/5-17 PUBLIC WORKS 312.23
4-19/5-21 LACOMPTE PARK 36.38
4-17/5-15 WELL #4 235.12
4-22/5-22 RIDGEMOUNT PLYFLD 22.85
4-22/5-22 TRTMNT PLANT 1 687.13
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 6-
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
3-23/5-23 TRTMNT PLANT 2 22.83-
4-22/5-22 PRKRS PAVILION 67.40
10 23633 1,339.69 06/20/96 MINNEGASCO/MN GAS CO 4-17/5-15 FIRE STATION 3 465.22
4-23/5-24 FIRE STATION 1 299.39
4-20/5-21 BASS LK PLYFLD 39.12
4-17/5-15 PUBLIC WORKS 535.96
10 23634 2,238.88 06/20/96 MINNESOTA AFSCME COUNCIL #14 MAY 96 PROF UNION DUES 1,408.73
MAY 96 PW UNION DUES 830.15
10 23635 11,102.35 06/20/96 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER MAY 96 BLDG PERMIT SURCHRG 11,102.35
10 23636 15.66 06/20/96 STATE OF MINNESOTA MICROFICHE/PERMITS,INSPEC 15.66
10 23637 20.30 06/20/96 MOBILE LOCK AND SAFE CO. KEYS,RINGS,TAGS/CITY HALL 20.30
10 23638 8.00 06/20/96 NORTH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 5-8 M LINNEA/VENIPUNCTU 8.00
10 23639 3,699.90 06/20/96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. 5-1/5-31 CIVIL DEF SIREN 6.28
4/2-6-4 WELL #11 1,518.01
5/2-6-3 MIP TOWER 7.34
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 149.23
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 121.56
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 153.60
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 158.51
5/3 6/4 TRFC SIGNAL 210.51
5/3 6/4 FLASHER 9.55
5/3 6/4 LIFT STATION 794.82
5/3 6/4 LIFT STATION 17.30
5/3 6/4 FIRE STATION 1 546.91
5/2 6/3 CIVIL DEF SIREN 6.28
10 23640 30,582.29 06/20/96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. 4-30/5-30 CIVIL DEF SIREN 3.14
5-1/5-31 CIVIL DEF SIREN 3.14
5/3-6-4 FLASHER 9.00
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 159.40
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 89.28
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 130.15
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 213.55
5/3-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 500.44
5/2-5/31 TRFC SIGNAL 41.19
5/3 6/4 FLASHER 9.23
5/1 6/1 STREET LIGHTING 28,743.99
5/3 6/4 LIFT STATION 13.26
4/2 6/4 FIRE STATION 2 666.52
10 23641 9.14 06/20/96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. 5/3 6/4 FLASHER 9.14
10 23642 2,318.92 06/20/96 NORTHERN WATER WORK SUPPLY INC. VALV BOX,LID,PLUG,RISER 448.93
VALV BX EXT,RISER,TOP/LID 374.73
MISC HYDRANT PARTS 1,495.26
10 23643 811.50 06/20/96 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS JUNE 96 PLYMOUTH JR HIGH 32.76
JUNE 96 FIRE STATION 2 123.12
JUNE 96 RIDGEMOUNT PARK 70.22
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 7
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
JUNE 96 LACOMPTE PARK 32.76
JUNE 96 HIST SOCIETY 53.63
JUNE 96 FIRE STATION 1 152.14
JUNE 96 FERNBROOK PARK 32.76
JUNE 96 BASS LAKE PAY 55.97
JUNE 96 PLYM CRK PAY 63.90
JUNE 96 ZACHARY PAY PHONE 63.90
JUNE 96 ZACHARY PARK 41.61
JUNE 96 OAKWOOD PARK 32.76
JUNE 96 PAVILION 55.97
10 23644 118.86 06/20/96 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS JUNE 96 FIRE STATION 3 118.86
10 23645 6,011.90 06/20/96 OWENS SERVICES INC. CC/CLEAN HUMIDIF BOILER 1,760.57
CC/RETUBE HUMIDIFIER BOILER 1,248.33
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 162.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 39.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 936.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 150.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 414.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 579.60
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 105.00
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 386.40
APR-JUN 96 MAINTENANCE 231.00
10 23646 27.53 06/20/96 PET SUPPLY CITY BISCUIT/FOOD FOR K-9 27.53
10 23647 957.44 06/20/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 4-16/5-15 HIST SOCIETY 4.89
4-16/5-15 PLYM CREEK PARK 120.24
4-16/5-96 CITY CENTER 144.11
4-16/5-15/PUBLIC WORKS 56.56
4-16/5-15/PUBLIC WORKS 56.55
4-16/5-15/PUBLIC WORKS 56.55
4-16/5-15/LACOMPTE PARK 79.89
4-16/5-15/PLYM HI PLYFLD 87.17
4-16/5-15 E MED LAKE 28.89
4-16/5-15 FIRE STATION 2 63.12
4-16/5-15 ZACHARY PARK 100.12
4-16/5-15 OAKWOOD PARK 103.29
4-16/5-15 FIRE STATION 1 56.06
10 23648 440.03 06/20/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 4-16/5-15/PUBLIC SAFETY 85.35
4-16/5-15/BASS LK PLYFLD 88.17
4-16/5-15 PAVILION 51.12
4-16/5-15 FIRE STATION 3 102.64
4-16/5-15 PARKERS LK PLYFLD 112.75
10 23649 36.08 06/20/96 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS VACATION/SUGAR HILLS ADDN 36.08
10 23650 130.00 06/20/96 POSTMASTER JUL-DEC96 PO BOX RNTL 47370 65.00
JUL-DEC96 PO BOX RNTL 47370 65.00
10 23651 3,300.00 06/20/96 POSTMASTER JUL 96 PSTG PLYMOUTH NEWS 3,300.00
10 23652 1,764.71 06/20/96 PRECISION GRAPHICS INC. TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.12
TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.12
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 8•
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.11
TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.12
TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.12
TABS FOR 95 ANNUAL REPORT 294.12
10 23653 2,557.14 06/20/96 T OUITMEYER'S LAWN SERVICE MAY 96 LAWN MOWING/Po 4569 2,557.14
10 23654 1,055.27 06/20/96 RECREONICS INC. 5 REGULATORY MARKER BUOY 1,055.27
10 23655 62.89 06/20/96 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS INC. 1 HR PROCESSING 5.43
1HR PROC & 6 FILM 41.39
1HR PROCESSING 5.12
1 HR PROCESSING 10.95
10 23656 42.50 06/20/96 ROAD RUNNER TRANS. 5-24 UNIVERSAL TITLE 17.50
5-24 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 25.00
10 23657 6,657.29 06/20/96 ROLLINS OIL CO. 4001GAL DYED PREM DSL@.6723 2,769.69
4000 GAL ETH 10% @.8319 3,887.60
10 23658 827.43 06/20/96 SEARS VARIOUS SMALL TOOLS/PARKS 796.74
VARIOUS SMALL TOOLS/PARKS 30.69
10 23659 50.00 06/20/96 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION A HURLBURT/FUTURE WSTWTR CO 25.00
B SENNESS /FUTURE WSTWTR CO 25.00
10 23660 130.00 06/20/96 SPECTRUM HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEMS JUL 96 HR/1200 SUPPORT 130.00
10 23661 245.99 06/20/96 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO 2 PIN,2 U-BOLT 37.81
SPG,BUSHING,4 PIN 208.18
10 23662 38,923.72 06/20/96 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FILE 0952228 PROJ 502 5-96 2,073.26
FILE 0952227 PROJ 502 5-96 17,932.36
FILE 0962387 PROJ 417 5-96 1,115.93
FILE 0942081 PROJ 417 5-96 4,327.73
FILE 0921644 PROJ 031 5-96 429.62
FILE 0962381 CRLSN PKW 5-96 50.00
FILE 0931782 PROJ 310 5-96 781.86
FILE 0962435 PROJ 610 5-96 915.00
FILE 0962442 PROJ 615 5-96 2,308.24
FILE 0962439 PROJ 218 5-96 1,600.16
FILE 0962458 PROJ 415 5-96 5,371.50
FILE 0952275 PROJ 531 5-96 654.40
FILE 0962385 PROJ 929 5-96 1,363.66
10 23663 111.66 06/20/96 TARGET/DAYTONS 6-3 FITNESS CHALLENGE FRAME 18.05
5-30 TREATS,FRM/FITNESS CHL 48.94
6-11 MAXELL TAPE/PD 44.67
10 23664 262.82 06/20/96 TERMINAL SUPPLY COMPANY CLAMPS,SHRINK TERMINALS,FLS 262.82
10 23665 175.05 06/20/96 THRALL DISTRIBUTION, INC. VAR VALV,PVC PIPE,ETC 175.05
10 23666 1,453.73 06/20/96 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN WEED CNTRL/PARKERS LK #1 745.50
WEED CNTRL/CEMETERY # 1 117.15
WEED CNTRL/PARKERS LK #1 372.75
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 9
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
WEED CNTRL/EAST BEACH #1 218.33
10 23667 18.00 06/20/96 TWINWEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 6-4 SITE TOUR & FORCAST 18.00
10 23668 311.59 06/20/96 U S WEST CELLULAR JUN 96 STREETS CELLULAR 1.57
JUN 96 STREETS CELLULAR 1.51
JUN 96 VETSCH CELLULAR 6.32
JUN 96 EMERGENCY RAD 3.27
JUN 96 PATROL CELLULAR 26.92
JUN 96 ENINEERING CELL 66.28
JUN 96 COOK CELLULAR 1.57
JUN 96 PATROL CELLULAR 73.29
JUN 96 PATROL CELLULAR 30.04
JUN 96 PATROL CELLULAR 40.04
JUN 96 PATROL CELLULAR 26.92
JUN 96 INVESTIGATOR CELL 26.92
JUN 96 MARK PETERSON CELL 6.94
10 23669 381.48 06/20/96 UNITOGS RENTAL SYSTEM PAVILION RUG RENTAL 22.36
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 48.18
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 48.17
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 24.39
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 24.39
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 24.39
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 24.39
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 37.40
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 17.19
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 2.75
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 59.44
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 48.43
10 23670 1,088.01 06/20/96 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS 10 LIME GREEN VEST/WATER 224.98
2 STOP PADDLE,1PR GLOVES 169.34
11 REFL MESH VESTS 245.80
6 REFL MESH VESTS 156.56
17 MESH REFL T-SHIRTS 291.33
10 23671 136.78 06/20/96 VIKING TROPHY 2 TROPHIES & ENGRAVING 136.78
10 23672 44.62 06/20/96 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC. 2 URINAL REPAIR KIT 44.62
10 23673 2,195.43 06/20/96 WORKERS COMPENSATION 3RD QTR 96 WORKERS COMP INS 1,851.64
95 ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT 1,240.95
96 PREM INSTALL RNWL/CREDIT 897.16-
10 23674 418.99 06/20/96 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 8GL ZEP VELVET 130.27
1CS RED FLOR-BUF PADS 18.98
8GL ZEP 45,1DZ ZEP 45 269.74
10 23675 4.00 06/20/96 KAREN SETTERHOLM REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23676 4.00 06/20/96 DEBRA MOOREHEAD REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23677 115.02 06/20/96 MILEY'S SPRINKLER SYSTEMS FILE 96-52/2500 NIAGARA LN 115.02
10 23678 34.00 06/20/96 MARY ATKINS REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 10
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23679 4.00 06/20/96 SHARON FRANKLIN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23680 4.00 06/20/96 HOLLY KAPPES REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23681 290.00 06/20/96 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 97 LIC RNWL/NANCY BYE 75.00
97 LIC RNWL/EARL ZENT 75.00
97 LIC RNWL/JAN OLSSON 50.00
97 LIC RNWL/J MCCORMICK 30.00
97 LIC RNWL/P KINGBURY 30.00
97 LIC RNWL/M CARROLL 30.00
10 23682 4.00 06/20/96 DIANA BURANEN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23683 4.00 06/20/96 MARY LANGERUD REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC 4.00
10 23684 39.95 06/20/96 COMPUTERWORLD 96 SUBSCR SUBSC/HOHENSTEIN 39.95
10 23685 4.00 06/20/96 HEIDI THOMSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23686 4.00 06/20/96 GWEN JOHNSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23687 21.00 06/20/96 NANCY OLSON REIMB ROLLS/WOMENS GOLF LG 21.00
10 23688 4.00 06/20/96 KATHY SMITH REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23689 4.00 06/20/96 LAURIE MILLER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23690 10.00 06/20/96 MN CHAPTER,I.A.A.I. 96 MEMBERSHIP/STAN SCOFIELD 10.00
10 23691 4.00 06/20/96 JANE JANDA REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23692 4.00 06/20/96 CYNTHIA MCNAB REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23693 95.00 06/20/96 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CPAIS 96/97 MEMBERSHIP/L JACOBSON 95.00
10 23694 4.00 06/20/96 RHONNA HED REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23695 448.80 06/20/96 B F I TIRE RECYCLERS OF MINNESOTA 174 TIRES/HAUL-SPEC RECYCL 353.80
63 TIRE DISPOSAL 95.00
10 23696 744.44 06/20/96 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. 5 EXEC CHAIRS/FIRE ST 1&2 297.77
5 EXEC CHAIRS/FIRE ST 1&2 446.67
10 23697 4.00 06/20/96 JORDAN FORD REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23698 83.81 06/20/96 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND SIGNS/MORTENSON,THOMPSON 83.81
10 23699 4.00 06/20/96 CANDY KIRBY REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23700 4.00 06/20/96 LAURA KIFFMEYER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23701 2,656.25 06/20/96 CONNECT 4-29/5-12 WINDOWS 95 CONSUL 781.25
4-15/4-26 WINDOWS 95 CNSLT 1,375.00
4-29/5-12 WINDOWS 95 CONSUL 500.00
10 23702 5,839.68 06/20/96 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. MAY96 225.01 CMRCL/IND ZONE 63.16
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 11
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
MAY96 225.03 RESIDENTIAL ZO 2,092.75
MAY96 225.04 CONSOLIDATION 1,847.79
MAY96 225.05 MEETINGS 500.00
MAY96 225.07 ANTENNA TOWER 1,335.98
10 23703 1,495.09 06/20/96 LSA DESIGN, INC. PARK & RIDE STUDY THRU 5-31 1,495.09
10 23704 39.61 06/20/96 ANCOM COMMUNICATION, INC. MINITOR CLIPS,VOL KNOBS,CHN 39.61
10 23705 4.00 06/20/96 KAREN MANN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23706 4.00 06/20/96 PAULA NELSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23707 8.00 06/20/96 CHERYL TOMCZYK REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23708 8.00 06/20/96 MAUREEN KAYSER REFUNF 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUNF 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23709 8.00 06/20/96 LISA HARTY REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23710 8.00 06/20/96 CONNIE TOWNSEND REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23711 4.00 06/20/96 ANNE BENTHIN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23712 4.00 06/20/96 MARY SNELL REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23713 4.00 06/20/96 KAREN BERG REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23714 4.00 06/20/96 VIVIAN FINK REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23715 4.00 06/20/96 MARCY POHLMAN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23716 8.00 06/20/96 ETTA BERNSTEIN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23717 4.00 06/20/96 BOB DORAN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23718 4.00 06/20/96 KATE CASEY REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23719 4.00 06/20/96 JUDITH MOTTAZ REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23720 19.00 06/20/96 PAT UJIFUSA REFUND FOR PITS 12.00
REFUND FOR PITS 7.00
10 23721 4.00 06/20/96 JEANNE DAVICH REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23722 160.00 06/20/96 KRIS SCHMITT REFUND LIFEGUARD TRAINING 160.00
10 23723 25.00 06/20/96 JARI DUBE REFUND FOR PICNIC SHELTER 25.00
10 23724 23.00 06/20/96 CINDY CESPEDES REFUND T-BALL 23.00
10 23725 4.00 06/20/96 SARA MOWER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 12
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23726 4.00 06/20/96 LORI SHOEMAKER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23727 4.00 06/20/96 JUDIE ANDERSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23728 4.00 06/20/96 TERESA CLASBY REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23729 4.00 06/20/96 BARBARA MILLER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23730 4.00 06/20/96 ALENE CORKEN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23731 4.00 06/20/96 MARTHA RANDALL REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23732 4.00 06/20/96 LORI PETERSEN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23733 4.00 06/20/96 LAURA POBOISK REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23734 4.00 06/20/96 LINDA STITTS REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23735 4.00 06/20/96 KRISTEN LENEAVE REFUNF 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23736 4.00 06/20/96 CATHY OLAUSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23737 4.00 06/20/96 JODY WATTS REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23738 4.00 06/20/96 ANGIE FECHNER REFUND 1 GYNNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23739 4.00 06/20/96 KELLY MOHN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23740 4.00 06/20/96 LORI HARROUN REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23741 8.00 06/20/96 SUE TERHARK REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23742 4.00 06/20/96 ANGIE FECHNER REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23743 8.00 06/20/96 ELAINE PELLISH REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23744 4.00 06/20/96 ANN LUND REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23745 34.00 06/20/96 MARCEY FAHRENHOLTZ REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23746 34.00 06/20/96 CATHY VOLD REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23747 80.00 06/20/96 MAUREEN BRANTNER REFUND GYMNASTIC CAMP 80.00
10 23748 28.00 06/20/96 KIM NELSON REFUND PEE WEE SOFTBALL 28.00
10 23749 200.00 06/20/96 JANE BROECKERT REFUND PAVILION DMGD DPOSIT 200.00
10 23750 67.00 06/20/96 PATRICK DYNAN REFUND SOFTBALL 36.00
REFUND SOFTBALL 31.00
10 23751 4.00 06/20/96 KELLY BAKER REFUND1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
10 23752 4.00 06/20/96 SUSAN NELSON REFUND 1 GYMNASTIC CLASS 4.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 13
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D 0 R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23753 94.04 06/20/96 CALIBER BUILDERS OVERPYMNT PERMIT/RCPT 49407 94.04
10 23754 2,091.00 06/20/96 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO. 5-16/5-31-96 PROJ 502 EXPEN 2,091.00
10 23755 1,000.00 06/20/96 HOYTE PROPERTIES REF RCPT 39220 A -FILE 91031 1,000.00
10 23756 40.80 06/20/96 DEBRA L HANCE REF RCPT 90027570/1814 YUMA 40.10
REF RCPT 90027570/1814 YUMA 0.70
10 23757 99.00 06/20/96 TIMOTHY JOPP REF RCPT 49314 VARIANCE 99.00
10 23758 73.00 06/20/96 KATHLEEN PRESKA REFUND SWIMMING 39.00
REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23759 99.00 06/20/96 MR JOHN PATTERSON REF RCPT 49312 VARIANCE 99.00
10 23760 4,000.00 06/20/96 WAYNE OR MICHELE SHARP REF RCPT 43005 A -FILE 94167 4,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 910,200.94
TOTAL OF CHECKS: 215
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1•
RUN DATE: 06/2/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CNECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23768 79.52 06/27/96 ALBINSON'S FOAM BRD,WING KNOB,T-BOLT 79.52
10 23769 73.49 06/27/96 ALL STAR SPORTS 6 BTTNG HLMTS 6 BASE SPIKES 73.49
10 23770 65.50 06/27/96 AMERICAN RED CROSS ASSOC. 3 RNTL MANIKIN,BVM'S,VIDEO 65.50
10 23771 171.00 06/27/96 ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEMS, INC. 7-1/9-30-96 PSTG METER RNTL 171.00
10 23772 123.27 06/27/96 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS INC. WINDSHIELD ON UNIT 541 123.27
10 23773 1,307.18 06/27/96 BACHMAN'S INC. 17 1.51, POTTED BLACK MAPLE 1,307.18
10 23774 2,079.88 06/27/96 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 3-30/5-31 PROJ 940 MED LAKE 2,079.88
10 23775 805.60 06/27/96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. REST,WRIST,PARTITION,TRAY 42.30
DSPNSR,TP,ENVLP,INTRDEPT 37.15
2 BINDER 0 RING 7.43
3 HOLDER,PAD,LEATHER 56.07
1PK STRIP,MAGNT 4.10
2 PAD,DESK 38.60
RTN 2PK ADH TABS 7.65 -
BINDING PLAST,TBS,BUSINESS 29.18
6PR BOOKEND,LARGE 45.78
4PK MAGNET,4 MARKABLE BRDS 552.64
10 23776 1,338.00 06/27/96 BLUE WATERS SAILING SCHL TEACH BASIC SAILING 357.00
TEACH BASIC SAILING 981.00
10 23777 160.00 06/27/96 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 5-21/G HURR-BASIC ARSON INV 160.00
10 23778 231.00 06/27/96 CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO. HEARING PROT,100' FIBER TP 112.72
12 PINK MARKING PAINT 41.54
2 36" LANDSCAPE RAKE,6' HL 76.74
10 23779 600.00 06/27/96 CITY OF ST PAUL 5-13/GOLDSTEIN/STRT SAFE OF 200.00
5-9/GROTH,JOHNSON/STRT SAFE 400.00
10 23780 120.00 06/27/96 COLLISYS CARLSON PKWY CABLE LOCATE 120.00
10 23781 13.41 06/27/96 COMPUTER SYSTEM PRODUCTS INC. 1 CROSSOVER CABLE 13.41
10 23782 1,522.95 06/27/96 JOSEPH COOLEN 6-14 TREE REMOVALS 1,522.95
10 23783 339.31 06/27/96 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO 12 1-1/4 REPAIR TOP 339.31
10 23784 1,652.18 06/27/96 DATA RECOGNITION CORPORATION 5-2/5-16 9703 UTIL BILLS 826.09
5-2/5-16 9703 UTIL BILLS 826.09
10 23785 7.26 06/27/96 EXPRESS MESSENGER UTIL BILL PICKUP THRU 6-5 7.26
10 23786 5,733.92 06/27/96 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO JUL 96 LIFE INS 2,667.25
JUL 96 LTD PREMIUM 3,066.67
10 23787 5,414.34 06/27/96 G M E CONSULTANTS, INC. 1-14/6-1-96 PROJ 330 W MED 5,414.34
10 23788 639.51 06/27/96 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO. 2 MAGAZINE TABLE/PO 4523 639.51
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # C.4ECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23789 439.54 06/27/96 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE MAY 96 DOG IMPOUNDS 439.54
10 23790 415.00 06/27/96 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF. ASSOC. 95 CERTIF OF ACHIEV REVIEW 415.00
10 23791 2,076.48 06/27/96 W W GRAINGER INC 1 CABLE DUCT/RACEWAY 15.56
2 QUART CLOCK BLACK 92.34
1 50LB LAUNDRY DETERGENT 42.82
4 SAFETY CAN SPOUT 16.57
1"BRASS BALL VALVE,IX3"NPPL 14.39
1 PULLOVER BOOT SZ 13 15.56
WATER NZZL HOSE,SAFETY CAN 94.53
6 1" AIR FLTR,36 HOWN LAMP 480.08
2 16CU FT JOBSITE BOX 521.85
3 16CU FT JOBSITE BOX 782.78
10 23792 80,664.41 06/27/96 HEALTHPARTNERS/GROUP HEALTH INC. JUL 96 MEDICAL PREMIUM 73,694.01
JUL 96 DENTAL PREMIUM 6,970.40
10 23793 613.44 06/27/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2556 POSTAL VERIFICATIONS 613.44
10 23794 2,456.10 06/27/96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2ND 1/2 TAX FOR 21-21-0008 1,352.32
2ND 1/2 TAX FOR 21-21-0008 1,103.78
10 23795 607.05 06/27/96 HIRSHFIELD'S 30 5GL WHITE FIELD PAINT 607.05
10 23796 159.30 06/27/96 HYDRO SUPPLY CO. 1 211-3"CMPND REG ASSY GLLN 234.30
CR FOR 60 SCRAP METER 75.00-
10 23797 130.00 06/27/96 1 C M A 96 INFOTECH NWSLTR SUBSCR 130.00
10 23798 100.00 06/27/96 I P M A 96/97 MEMBERSHIP/J SOBANIA 100.00
10 23799 168.69 06/27/96 J P FOODSERVICE, INC. VISTA SPOON,KNIFE,FORK 168.69
10 23800 370.95 06/27/96 LAWN KING, INC. JUN 96 71 ROLLS SOD/WATER 124.77
JUN 96 50 ROLLS SOD/WATER 87.86
JUN 96 6 RED SHRUB ROSE/PM 82.76
JUN 96 2 ROLLS SOD/STREETS 3.51
JUN 96 41 ROLLS SOD/STREETS 72.05
10 23801 344.29 06/27/96 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC VARIOUS EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 344.29
10 23802 1,245.00 06/27/96 LOGIS MAY 96 GIS SPRT/RELAY 1,245.00
10 23803 960.00 06/27/96 SCOTT MCLELLAN PLAN REVIEW/LIFETIME FITNES 960.00
10 23804 206.95 06/27/96 MEI/MICRO CENTER SURGE SUP,MSE PADS,DUSTERS 206.95
10 23805 165.82 06/27/96 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 6 HELMETS,12 INCREDIBAT 165.82
10 23806 1,020.60 06/27/96 MCC BEHAVIORAL CARE, INC. JUL-SEP 96 EMPLY @1.62 1,020.60
10 23807 46.50 06/27/96 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL-TRANSIT OPERATIONS 3 SUPERSVR/RCPT 49475/49458 46.50
10 23808 8,038.20 06/27/96 METROPOLITAN LIFE INS CO JUN 96 DENTAL PREMIUM 4,019.10
JUL 96 DENTAL PREMIUM 4,019.10
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 3
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # C4ECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23809 311,755.00 06/27/96 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL JUL 96 SEWER SERVICE 311,755.00
10 23810 3,325.73 06/27/96 MIDWEST ASPHALT CO. 2 PAILS TACK/STREETS 43.89
7.01TN CURB MIX/STREETS 168.73
124.85TN ASPHALT/STREETS 3,113.11
10 23811 90.00 06/27/96 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 10 BIKE LIC/8015630-8015642 90.00
10 23812 2,200.00 06/27/96 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 20 SOFTBALL ST TOURN BERTHS 2,200.00
10 23813 855.36 06/27/96 MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM 1ST QTR 96 FIELD/STARKS FEE 855.36
10 23814 115.79 06/27/96 MOORE MEDICAL CORP VAR MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRE 115.79
10 23815 300.00 06/27/96 MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP. ANNUAL PRODUCT SUPPORT 300.00
10 23816 133.07 06/27/96 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE POLAROID INSTANT PULL&PEEL 133.07
10 23817 120.00 06/27/96 N F S A SCOFIELD/FIRE SPRINKLER SEM 60.00
B FISKE/FIRE SPRNKLER SEMIN 60.00
10 23818 10.00 06/27/96 NATIONAL SCHOOL BUS SERVICE, INC. 1 DIAL A RIDE TCK/RCPT49556 10.00
10 23819 100.00 06/27/96 NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOC. 96 MEMBERSHIP/PD TEAM 100.00
10 23820 615.50 06/27/96 NEUMANN'S ENTERPRISE CLEANUP/HAUL JUNK NEAR ZACH 615.50
10 23821 400.00 06/27/96 CITY OF NEW HOPE 1-29/4-16 AFTER SCHL GAMES 400.00
10 23822 74.49 06/27/96 NORTHERN AIRGAS 674 MEDICAL OXYGEN 74.49
10 23823 4,986.66 06/27/96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. 5/3-6-4 WELL #8 2,208.76
4/2-6-4 TRFC SIGNAL 2.44
5/3 6/4 LIFT STATION 518.15
5/8-6/7 4 SEASON WELL 25.77
5/8-6/7 TRFC SIGNAL 141.65
5/8-6/7 LIFT STATION 1,233.13
5/3-6/5 LIFT STATION 7.64
5/8-6/7 TRFC SIGNAL 125.73
5/8-6/7 TRFC SIGNAL 129.67
5/3-6/4 TRFC SIGNAL 150.56
5/8-6/7 TRFC SIGNAL 415.45
5/3-6/4 WELL #1 9.49
4/2-6/4 PILGRIM LN ELEM 18.22
10 23824 4,504.51 06/27/96 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. 5/3-6/4 LIFT STATION 189.61
5/8-6/7 LIFT STATION 1,192.37
5/8-6/7 LIFT STATION 23.38
5/3-6/4 TRFC SIGNAL 92.06
5/8-6/7 EAST MEDICINE 13.01
5-17/6-19 PUBLIC SAFETY 2,994.08
10 23825 337.66 06/27/96 NORTHERN WATER WORK SUPPLY INC. 2 REPAIR CLAMPS 337.66
10 23826 2,277.84 06/27/96 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO. JUN 96 PLYMOUTH NEWS 1,679.34
ENVIRONMENTAL PAGES 598.50
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 4
RUN DATE: 06/2&/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23827 12,185.75 06/27/96 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICED IBM 6384 VALUEPNT 197.80
CR FOR INTEL NETPORT EXPRS 444.94-
1 INTEL NETPORT EXPRESS ETH 444.94
5 HP 16MG 840MG HD 120 MHZ 11,987.95
10 23828 50.00 06/27/96 OSI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 DRM OIL FILTERS CLLCTNS 50.00
10 23829 304.35 06/27/96 OMNI TRAVEL AGENCY R KLINE/7-21 EMMITSBURG,MD 304.35
10 23830 12,600.00 06/27/96 OPUS CORPORATION REF RCPT 48616 A -FILE 96022 1,000.00
REF RCPT 48809 A -FILE 96022 11,600.00
10 23831 339.03 06/27/96 OTIS ELEVATOR CO. JUL-SEP 96 ELEV SERV/CC 339.03
10 23832 52.31 06/27/96 PLYMOUTH SUPPLY COMPANY 4 PADLOCK MASTER LOCK 44.26
4 240Z BOTTLE W/TRIGGER 8.05
10 23833 210.88 06/27/96 POPP TELCOM INC. 5-8/6-96 LONG DISTANCE 70.30
5-8/6-96 LONG DISTANCE 70.29
5-8/6-96 LONG DISTANCE 70.29
10 23834 209.28 06/27/96 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS CITY PROJECT 523 46.87
CITY PROJECT 541 126.44
MAINTENANCE PAINTING 35.97
10 23835 14.00 06/27/96 POSTMASTER JUL-DEC96 PO BOX RNTL 47370 7.00
JUL-DEC96 PO BOX RNTL 47370 7.00
10 23836 2,557.14 06/27/96 T OUITMEYER'S LAWN SERVICE JUN 96 LAWN MOWING/PO 4569 411.57 -
JUN 96 LAWN MOWING/PO 4569 411.57
JUN 96 LAWN MOWING/PO 4569 1,357.74
JUN 96 LAWN MOWING/PO 4569 1,199.40
10 23837 604.00 06/27/96 RESCUE SYSTEMS INC. ROPE BAG,WEBBING,600'ROPE 604.00
10 23838 59.96 06/27/96 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS INC. 1HR PROCESSING 11.08
FILM FOR POLICE 12.25
23 135-10 ASA -100 24.25
1 HR PROCESSING 6.19
1 HR PROCESSING 6.19
10 23839 53.80 06/27/96 ROAD RUNNER TRANS. 6-3 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 25.00
6-6 DELOITTE TOUCHE 28.80
10 23840 164.70 06/27/96 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS ADV 1996 SEAL COAT PRGM 2WK 164.70
10 23841 69.97 06/27/96 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO 6 BUSHING,6 PIN 69.97
10 23842 1,044.00 06/27/96 P E R A JUN 96 EMPLOYEE LIFE INS 1,044.00
10 23843 304.86 06/27/96 STREICHER'S PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQUIP. LAMP MODULE,LENS,FLASHLGHT 247.40
1CS 30 -MINUTE FUSEE 57.46
10 23844 165.29 06/27/96 SUBURBAN TIRE, INC. 2 TIRES 165.29
10 23845 17,076.91 06/27/96 SUPERIOR FORD, INC. COST TO ASSIST INS ADJ U122 132.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 5
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
96-31 DEDUCT/RPR SQUAD 123 5,000.00
96-21 REPAIRS TO SQUAD 117 11,944.91
10 23846 79.70 06/27/96 TARGET/DAYTONS 6-12 CREDIT UNIFORM 36.45
6-6 BOAT VESTS,MIST SPR/P&R 32.69
6-6 BOAT VESTS,MIST SPR/P&R 8.59
6-6 BOAT VESTS,MIST SPR/P&R 1.97
10 23847 55.11 06/27/96 SUBURBAN PROPANE 3 60# CYCLINDER/STREETS 55.11
10 23848 361.19 06/27/96 TIERNEY BROS. INC. 4 1/211.4 1" WHITE MERLIN TP 361.19
10 23849 122.55 06/27/96 TREADWAY GRAPHICS 2 BALLOON SEAL W/RIBBON 122.55
10 23850 737.59 06/27/96 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS VARIOUS ART/CRAFT SPLYS P&R 737.59
10 23851 248.18 06/27/96 U S WEST CELLULAR JUN 96 IMS CELLULAR 32.82
JUN 96 GERDES CELLULAR 28.12
JUN 96 D BURKE FIRE 27.69
JUN 96 PARTOL CELLULAR 3.43
JUN 96 PARTOL CELLULAR 27.41
JUN 96 PARTOL CELLULAR 27.55
JUN 96 CSO CELLULAR 101.16
10 23852 457.97 06/27/96 UNITOGS RENTAL SYSTEM PAVILION RUG RENTAL 22.36
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 60.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 60.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 30.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 30.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 30.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 30.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 110.00
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 23.55
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 44.92
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 2.67
PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL 14.47
10 23853 32.10 06/27/96 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS 3 ALPHA CAP W/RATCHET ADJ 32.10
10 23854 1,167.67 06/27/96 VESSCO INC 2 LONG BODIED FLOAT 652.60
2 GLASS TUBE 515.07
10 23855 7,279.28 06/27/96 WAHL'S ENTERPRISES 1 AERA-VATOR W/ROLLER KIT 7,279.28
10 23856 143.00 06/27/96 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS 16 HIP PACK W/PCKTS,2IPPERS 143.00
10 23857 160.12 06/27/96 WATERPRO 151IX15" R CPLG CL 80.06
151IX15" RCPLG CL 80.06
10 23858 18.98 06/27/96 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 1CS RED FLOR-BUF PADS 18.98
10 23859 22.95 06/27/96 AMERICAN FIRE JOURNAL 96 SUBSC RNWL/S SCOFIELD 22.95
10 23860 254.54 06/27/96 ROGERS TRUCK & CAR WASH ACID WASH/ENGINE A-21 46.86
ACID WASH/ENGINE E-21 46.86
ACID WASH/ENGINE #11 25.56
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 6
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # C.HECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
ACID WASH/ENGINE R11 10.65
ACID WASH/ENGINE A11 31.95
ACID WASH/ENGINE E-31 23.43
ACID WASH/ENGINE E-32 26.63
ACID WASH/ENGINE T-31 42.60
10 23861 193.81 06/27/96 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS JUN 96 INTERNET RELAY 193.81
10 23862 69.00 06/27/96 UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA G BLACK/DEALING UPSET CITIZ 69.00
10 23863 200.00 06/27/96 AMES CONSTRUCTION REF COND PERMIT RCPT 49114 200.00
10 23864 19.00 06/27/96 PAGEEN MOHR REFUND PITS 12.00
REFUND PITS 7.00
10 23865 58.75 06/27/96 JUDY BLAKE REFUND PIANO LESSONS 58.75
10 23866 7.48 06/27/96 U S HOME CORP REF OVRPYMNT PERMIT/RC49555 7.48
10 23867 50.00 06/27/96 JOAN RISCHALL REFUND TENNIS LEAGUE 50.00
10 23868 94.00 06/27/96 KATHY BISSEN REFUND DISC DAY CAMP 94.00
10 23869 1,260.00 06/27/96 MINNESOTA TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSOC. REGISTR EMERG RESPONSE TEAM 1,260.00
10 23870 93.50 06/27/96 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 11 GRAD LUNCHEON/ACAD PUBL 93.50
10 23871 20.00 06/27/96 AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM ASSOC. 96/97 MEMBERSHIP/S SCOFIELD 20.00
10 23872 120.13 06/27/96 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. REPAIR TO SONY/POLICE 59.00
REPAIR TO SONY/POLICE 61.13
10 23873 26.30 06/27/96 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND LINDA MORTENSON SIGN 26.30
10 23874 102.90 06/27/96 DIANA MEYER 5-7-96 TEACH STEP AEROBICS 102.90
10 23875 33.00 06/27/96 LAURA KIFFMEYER REFUND TUMBLERS II 33.00
10 23876 450.00 06/27/96 COLT 45 PERFORMANCE 7-16-96 450.00
10 23877 61.00 06/27/96 REBECCA HAWTHORNE REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 28.00
REFUND TENNIS LESSONS 33.00
10 23878 1,716.83 06/27/96 J R NELSON & COMPANY UPDATE 100 1/2 SECTION BKS 1,716.83
10 23879 17.00 06/27/96 ELLEN GRIFFIN REFUND PITS 17.00
10 23880 90.00 06/27/96 FIRE RESCUE INT'L REGISTRATION C SCHARLAU/FIRE RESCUE CONF 90.00
10 23881 31.00 06/27/96 TERESA WEBER REFUND SOCCER CAMP 31.00
10 23882 34.00 06/27/96 FARRAH NODEHI REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
10 23883 175.50 06/27/96 FIRST CHOICE IMAGE WEAR 18 PLYMOUTH POLICE CAPS 175.50
10 23884 90.42 06/27/96 THOMAS SCIENTIFIC 4PK SAMPLE BOTTLES 90.42
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 7
RUN DATE: 06/20/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
10 23885 73.00 06/27/96 JAN BOYLE REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
REFUND SWIMMING 39.00
10 23886 85.00 06/27/96 DARLENE DOWNS REFUND DISCOVERY DAY CARE 85.00
10 23887 200.00 06/27/96 TERI ERSTAD REFUND PAVILION RENTAL 200.00
10 23888 73.00 06/27/96 BELINDA HARTCHER REFUND SWIMMING 34.00
REFUND SWIMMING 39.00
10 23889 39.00 06/27/96 JANA HARGREAVES REFUND FOR SWIMMING 39.00
10 23890 13.00 06/27/96 LAURA JENSEN REFUND FOR KIDS GAMES 13.00
10 23891 200.00 06/27/96 DARWIN LUND REFUND FOR PAVILION RENTAL 200.00
10 23892 15.00 06/27/96 DOROTHY MERRIAM REFUND FOR TENNIS INSTR. 15.00
10 23893 16.50 06/27/96 THERESA NONSELLO REFUND FOR T -BALL 16.50
10 23894 31.00 06/27/96 THERESA NEALE REFUND FOR TAI CHI CHUAN 31.00
10 23895 7.00 06/27/96 ANOLA NELSON REFUND FOR BALLOON ANIMALS 7.00
10 23896 34.00 06/27/96 DIRAN OBADINA REFUND FOR SWIMMING 34.00
10 23897 17.50 06/27/96 LYNN PLACE REFUND FOR T -BALL 17.50
10 23898 34.00 06/27/96 JANE SUHR REFUND FOR SWIMMING 34.00
10 23899 43.86 06/27/96 JOHN LINDELL REIMB ELEC BILL/HUNTERS BLF 43.86
10 23900 50.00 06/27/96 ANOKA POLICE DEPT KLEIST/REGION 12 K-9 TRIALS 50.00
10 23901 220.95 06/27/96 BROWN'S ICE CREAM VARIOUS ICE CREAM/CONCESSNS 220.95
10 23902 72.00 06/27/96 JASON CASPERSON SUBSTITUTE UMPIRE 4 GAMES 72.00
10 23903 508.75 06/27/96 HADER FARMS, INC 5-17 HAUL SEPPIED MTRL CERE 508.75
10 23904 3.50 06/27/96 ANGELA TROST REFUND WAY OUTER SPACE 3.50
10 23905 250.00 06/27/96 DIANE MILAN PERFORMANCE ON 6-25-96 250.00
10 23906 23.95 06/27/96 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PUBLICATIONS I SAW WHAT YOU DID " 23.95
10 23907 72.00 06/27/96 RAY SAWICKY SUBSTITUTE UMPIRE 4 GAMES 72.00
10 23908 48.50 06/27/96 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA RAPTOR CENTER RAPTOR CENTER TRIP 6-28-96 48.50
10 23909 4.00 06/27/96 SUSAN SMERZ REFUND FUN FITNESS/TUMBLING 4.00
10 23910 12.00 06/27/96 PAULA TRULEN REFUND PITS 12.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 521,275.54
TOTAL OF CHECKS: 143
HKA ACCOUNT - GENEKAL UL)bG ACCUUNT
REPORT: COUNCILRPT
RUN DATE: 06/14/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE
20 95 $1,147.20 06/13/96
20 96 $2,905.00 06/13/96
20 97 $1,685.00 06/13/96
TOTAL AMOUNT $5,737.20
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 3
CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER
06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOC. MAY 96 CHILD CARE ASSIST
SELA ROOFING AND REMODELING INC. REROOF/MARY TITUS/5830 LAWN
PREFERRED HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CARRIER FURNACE/830 KINGSVW
PAGE 1
1,147.20
2,905.00
1,685.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 11
RUN DATE: 06/19/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
20 98 $1,877.68 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 1,877.68
TOTAL AMOUNT $1,877.68
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
20 100 $1,010.09 06/27/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 61.25
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 9.42
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 504.00
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 25.00
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 14.25
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 100.00
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 196.17
JUL 96 232 FRINGE BENEFITS 100.00
TOTAL AMOUNT $1,010.09
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
HRA ACCOUNT - SECTION 8 ACCOUNT
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE ?
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
30 298 1,227.00 06/13/96 AT THE LAKES APARTMENTS JUN 96 HAP/ANN MATZEN 609.00
JUN 96 HAP/TERRA MILLION 618.00
30 299 192.00 06/13/96 LANCASTER VILLAGE APARTMENTS JUN 96 HAP/VIKKI TRUMBLE 192.00
30 300 119.25 06/13/96 HAWKINS, ASH,BAPTIE 8 CO. JUN 96 233 ACCTG SERV 119.25
30 301 496.00 06/13/96 OAKWOOD APARTMENTS JUN 96 HAP/VICTORIA WIBSTAD 496.00
30 302 471.00 06/13/96 PARK PLACE APARTMENTS JUN 96 HAP/C YLINIEMI 471.00
30 303 640.00 06/13/96 PLYMOUTH COLONY APARTMENT JUN 96 HAP/J SWANBERG 640.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 3,145.25
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 6
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/21/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
30 304 $1,948.04 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 1,948.04
30 306 $1,720.00 06/20/96 ST LOUIS PARK HRA MAY 96 FAMILY SELF SUFF 1,720.00
TOTAL AMOUNT $3,668.04
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 2
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1'
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E
30 308 $1,126.92 06/27/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH
TOTAL AMOUNT $1,126.92
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 70.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 9.42
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 450.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 50.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 14.25
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 116.67
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 285.33
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 131.25
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 07/01/96 THROUGH 07/01/96
BANK # CHECK #, CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
30 339 3,581.00 07/01/96 AT THE LAKES APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,177.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 425.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 979.00
30 340 471.00 07/01/96 BASS LAKE HILLS TOWNHOMES JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 471.00
30 341 250.00 07/01/96 KENT BAUER & JAMES EVENS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 250.00
30 342 4,108.00 07/01/96 LANCASTER VILLAGE APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,326.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,550.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 232.00
30 343 835.00 07/01/96 FOUR SEASONS VILLA APT JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 835.00
30 344 8,413.00 07/01/96 FOUR SEASON ESTATES JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 4,110.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,576.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,727.00
30 345 363.00 07/01/96 DONALD K. GEORGI JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 363.00
30 346 292.00 07/01/96 DOUGLAS HANSON JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 292.00
30 347 652.00 07/01/96 MARY LOU KLEIN JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 652.00
30 348 6,856.00 07/01/96 LAKEVIEW COMMONS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,841.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 3,325.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,690.00
30 349 354.00 07/01/96 PARKERS LAKE APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 354.00
30 350 1,040.00 07/01/96 WELLINGTON APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,040.00
30 351 3,706.00 07/01/96 OAKWOOD APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,200.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,506.00
30 352 838.00 07/01/96 PARK PLACE APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 838.00
30 353 898.00 07/01/96 PARKSIDE APTS AT MEDICINE LAKE JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 500.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 398.00
30 354 1,291.00 07/01/96 PLYMOUTH TERRACE APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 52.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 822.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 417.00
30 355 10,291.00 07/01/96 THE PLACE APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 4,272.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 3,947.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,072.00
30 356 1,818.00 07/01/96 PLYMOUTH OAKS APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 568.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,250.00
30 357 10,731.00 07/01/96 PLYMOUTH COLONY APARTMENT JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 4,692.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 5,175.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 864.00
30 358 630.00 07/01/96 PLYMOUTH PONDS APARTMENTS JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 630.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 2•
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 07/01/96 THROUGH 07/01/96
BANK CHECK #, CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
30 359 505.66 07/01/96 METROPOLITAN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 423.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 82.66
30 360 489.33 07/01/96 RICHFIELD HOUSING & REDEV. JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 448.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 41.33
30 361 240.33 07/01/96 ST CLOUD HOUSING & REDEV. JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 199.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 41.33
30 362 1,140.66 07/01/96 MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC HOUSING AUTH. JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 1,058.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT. 82.66
30 363 21,990.00 07/01/96 REGENCY POINTE APARTMENT HOMES JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 6,961.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 12,345.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 2,,684.00
30 364 269.33 07/01/96 SOUTH CENTRAL MULTI -COUNTY NRA JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 228.00
JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 41.33
30 365 356.00 07/01/96 UNITED APARTMENTS INC. JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 356.00
30 366 457.00 07/01/96 JAMES F VICTORSEN JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 457.00
30 367 607.00 07/01/96 MARK WASHA JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 607.00
30 368 488.00 07/01/96 VICTORIA WILSON JUL 96 SECTION 8 RENT 488.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 83,961.31
TOTAL OF CHECKS: 30
HRA ACCOUNT - SENIOR HOUSING
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/14/96 06/13/96 THROUGH 06/13/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
40 .73 $38.00 06/13/96 BEST & FLANAGAN MAY 96 234 LEGAL FEES
TOTAL AMOUNT $38.00
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
38.00
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/19/96 06/20/96 THROUGH 06/20/96
BANK # CHECK # CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
40 74 $2,872.71 06/20/96 ANCHOR BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAYROLL FOR 062096 2,872.71
TOTAL AMOUNT $2,872.71
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 1
REPORT: COUNCILRPT CITY OF PLYMOUTH CHECK REGISTER PAGE 1
RUN DATE: 06/28/96 06/27/96 THROUGH 06/27/96
BANK # CHECK CHECK AMOUNT CHECK DATE V E N D O R N A M E INVOICE BRIEF DESCRIPTION
40 76 939.58 06/27/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 35.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 41.42
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 478.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 8.33
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 20.58
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 100.00
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 133.75
JUL 96 233 FRINGE BENEFITS 122.50
40 77 21,167.00 06/27/96 CITY OF PLYMOUTH JUN 96 SR HSNG SUBSIDY 21,167.00
TOTAL AMOUNT 22,106.58
TOTAL # OF CHECKS: 2
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR ROGER SCHLUESSEL
FOR PROPERTY AT 11400 -39TH AVENUE NORTH (RPUD 75-2) (96074)
WHEREAS, Roger Schluessel has requested an RPUD Amendment and Conditional
Use Permit Amendment to allow construction of a garage addition that would be set
back six feet from the east side lot line, where ten feet is required, for property located
at 11400 -39th Avenue North;
The property is more specifically described as follows:
Lot 11, Block 1, Mission Ridge 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve
the request of Roger Schluessel for an RPUD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit
Amendment for a garage addition at 11400 -39th Avenue North, subject to the following
conditions:
1. This RPUD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment allows the
construction of an 8.5 -foot by 16.5 -foot addition that would be set back six feet
from the east side lot line, where ten feet is the requirement, in accordance with
the application and plans received by the City on May 9, 1996 and May 31,
1996, except as amended by this resolution.
2. The addition shall not encroach into the six-foot wide drainage and utility
easement that runs along the east lot line.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide an as -built
survey of the lot to ensure that the addition would not encroach the six-foot
wide drainage and utility easement that runs along the east lot line.
4. Compliance with all applicable requirements of the City and State Building
Codes.
File 96074, Page 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving RPUD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment
2. Petitioner's Narrative
3. PUD Standards
4. Conditional Use Permit Standards
5. Location Map
6. Site Graphics
File 96074, Page 2
3. ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting to construct an 8.5 -foot by 16.5 -foot two-story storage addition
onto the east side of the home. The addition would provide about 145 square feet of additional
storage space to each level, for a total of 290 square feet.
The upper level of the addition would be at about the same elevation as the existing garage
floor and would open to the front of the lot. This level would provide interior space for a
utility trailer that is presently parked outside on the east side of the garage. There would not
be a driveway leading to the addition.
The lower level of the addition would be at about the same elevation as the basement walkout
level and would open toward the rear of the lot. This level would provide additional storage
space for bicycles and patio furniture.
The addition would be designed to match the existing architecture and roof pitch of the home.
Under the plan, the lot coverage would be increased to 13.9 percent, which is well under the
20 percent lot coverage allowed by the ordinance.
The addition would encroach four feet into a portion of the required side yard. The
Amendment would allow the addition to be set back six feet from the east side lot line, where
ten feet is required under the Planned Unit Development.
The applicant would be required to provide an as -built survey of the lot to ensure that the
addition would not encroach into the six-foot wide drainage and utility easement that runs
along the east lot line. This requirement is addressed in the resolution.
Staff finds that the amendment would not result in any adverse effects on the surrounding
properties. The addition would not directly abut any homes, because the adjoining property to
the east is City -owned park land.
Agenda Number: ,
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
J
FROM: Shawn Drill, Planner through Anne urlburt, Community Development
Director
SUBJECT: Roger Schluessel. Planned Unit Development Amendment and
Conditional Use Permit Amendment for property located at 11400 -39th
Avenue North (RPUD 75-2) (96074)
REVIEW DEADLINE: September 28, 1996
DATE: June 27, 1996 for the City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the attached resolution approving an RPUD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit
Amendment, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Approval of an RPUD Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment requires a 5/7
vote of the City Council.
Resolution 96- , Page 2
5. No other amendments or variations are granted or implied.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a
meeting of the Plymouth City Council on with the original
thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
r M
Y 1996
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Dear City of Plymouth:
1-7
I am writing this letter- to supplement a Conditional Use Permit
application. The application was made on May 6,1996 and I did not
adequately answer how my garage addition would conform to the six
Conditional Use Permit Standards.
I plan to build an attached two story shed to our double car
garage. The shed will be about 16'6 " long and 8'10" wide
It may be narrower depending on an as -built survey.) with
electrical outlets and lights on both levels. We do not have
neighbors on the side where the shed will be built. The land is
City of Plymouth park property. The shed will be used to store a
utility trailer that now is parked next to the garage, bicycles
and deck furniture. There will not be a driveway to the shed.
Our existing house plus the shed addition will cover 13.9% of our
lot. A survey was done to identify all four property corners.
The following describes how the proposed addition conforms to the
Conditional Use Permit Standards:
1.The Plymouth Comprehensive Plan classifies this as residential
property and this addition will not change that.
2. This addition does not have any negative affects on the
general public welfare and it will not be detrimental to or
endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort.
3. The addition will not be injurous to the use and enjoyment of
other property in the immediate vicinity. The property next to
the addition is wooded City or Plymouth park property.
4. The addition will not impede the development of the
surrounding property since it is entirely developed already.
5. The addition is designed to provide ingress and egress. There
is a double door and a window on the upper level and a door on
the lower level. There will not be a driveway going to the
addition.
6. The addition will in all other respects conform to the PUD
regulations.
I hope this properly answers any remaining issues. If questions
still exist please write me or call me at 520-6804.
Sincerely,
4-00 S T' X V , A/0.
R7 Mowo / M S-544- I
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
P.U.D. CRITERIA
The Planning Commission, after holding the public hearing, shall make its
recommendations to the City Council for approval; approval with conditions;
or denial of the Conditional Use Permit for a P.U.D., preliminary Tlat and, --
rezoning if considered.
The Planning Commission shall forward to the City Council its recommendations
based on and including, but not limited to the following:
1) Compatibility with the stated purposes and intent of the Planned Unit
Development.
2) Relationship of the proposed plan to the neighborhood in which it is
proposed to be located, to the City's Comprehensive Plan and to other
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
3) Internal organization and adequacy of various uses or densities;
circulation and parking facilities; recreation areas and open spaces.
conventions:pl/jk/pud)
2. Procedure . Before any Conditional Use Permit may be granted, the
application therefore, shall be referred to the Planning Caumi.ssion for
purposes of evaluation against the standards of this section, Public
Hearing, and developrent of a reoamenxlation to the City Council, which
shall make the final determination as to approval or denial.
a. The Planning Cannission shall review the application and consider its
conformance with the following standards:
1) Cccrpliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan.
2) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional
use will pronate and enhance the general public welfare and will
not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,
morals or comfort.
3) The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the
purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and
impair property values within the neighborhood.
4) The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the
normal and orderly development and improvement. of surrounding
property for uses permitted in the district.
5) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress,
egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic
congestion in the public streets.
6) The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the
applicable regulations of the district in which it is located.
forms:o>pl/cup.stnd/s) 10/89
I:11
III NOW iM124, MR
mommommos- I I 1-9, aim- US
I1°•®=1®®
x 932 5
w
I -r
hG
or
947 9 / ti(.
x /
Sx '
pQ1'
S6 sJ / '
50.9 \ \ +
b' ^ x
x
o
Si
95i. 2
93 ..fie • v>
elf l_r7 \ 19
v
f
0 Denotes Iron Monument
Denotes Wood Stake
X000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 95.4.0000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 95.3.5
Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = 946.0
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of th fift'
Lot 11, Block 1, MISSION RIDI.E THIRD ADDITION.
MAY 9 1998
And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroach
CITY gFp i fjTonsaidland. It also shows the locaton of the stakes as set for a proposed buuiildiri'. A LABWN0DEPTbymethis7thdayofApril19-77
Dickman C. Knutson
Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg. No. 7979
5/%E-
40' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
ROOK PAGE forMcCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. B 77
LUND6RENCONSULiINCENGINEERSLANDSURVEYORSSITEPLANNERSI,ILENO. BROS. MINNEAPOLIS, HUTCHINSON antl MARSHALL, MINNESOTA
Agenda Number: ((1 L
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Barbara Senness, Planning Supervisor through Anne Hurlburt,
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: CITY OF PLYMOUTH. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
ESTABLISH ANTENNA REGULATIONS
DATE: June 27, 1996 for the City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the ordinance amending the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance to establish antenna
regulations.
A Zoning Ordinance Amendment requires a 5/7 vote of the City Council.
2. BACKGROUND:
Because the federal government has recently allowed additional licenses for cellular telephone
services, staff has requested that the City consider new antenna regulations prior to
consideration of the entire revised Zoning Ordinance. The federal actions will allow
additional carriers to provide cellular telephone services within the City of Plymouth. This in
turn means that the City can expect to receive applications for additional antennas within our
boundaries. Staff has in fact met informally with representatives of a new carrier who intends
to make formal application for additional antenna locations in the near future. As a
consequence, staff felt that it was imperative to have regulations in place that will clearly
address all aspects of these new antennas.
Staff notes that the antenna regulations as proposed cover all types of antennas, including
cellular telephone antennas, radio and television antennas, satellite dishes and microwave
On May 28, 1996, the Planning Commission opened a Public Hearing to consider new antenna
regulations. At the Public Hearing, a number of ham radio operators voiced opposition to the
regulations as drafted, notably the increased height limitation for antennas and the
requirements that antenna installation be verified by a professional engineer. Several of the
ham radio operators present at the Hearing offered to work with staff and the City's
Consultant to draft changes that would address their concerns. As a consequence, the
Planning Commission continued the Public Hearing to their June 25, 1996 meeting.
In the interim, staff and the Consultant met with representatives from the ham operators and
proposed several changes to the regulations that directly addressed their concerns, including 1)
maintaining the maximum height of an antenna permitted by right at the current 70 feet and 2)
exempting ham operators from co -location requirements that are not feasible and 3) exempting
them from verification requirements, provided that they follow manufacturer's instructions on
antenna installation and no CUP is required.
On June 25, 1996, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the
new antenna regulations. Based on input from staff and the Consultant, the Commission
included the additional requirement that more than one amateur radio station tower (ham) on a
given property would require a Conditional Use Permit. One ham radio representative spoke
at the continuation of the Public Hearing, indicating his support for the ordinance as now
drafted.
3. SUMMARY OF KEY ORDINANCE PROVISIONS:
The ordinance would regulate antennas through the issuance of Administrative Permits and
Conditional Use Permits. Staff would process permitted and permitted accessory antennas
through the Administrative Permit process. Antennas requiring a Conditional Use Permit
would undergo Planning Commission review and City Council approval.
In both commercial and residential districts, the ordinance would allow radio and television
receiving antennas, including smaller satellite dishes, amateur radio stations (ham) and cellular
telephone antennas attached to a public structure. The ordinance would require a Conditional
Use Permit for larger satellite dishes, amateur radio stations over 70 feet in height and cellular
antennas not located on a public structure.
The ordinance also establishes general performance standards that all antennas must meet, plus
additional performance standards specific to the different types of antennas covered by the
ordinance.
A nZ+nnT*K%A V?%M A TlrnW-
ATTACBMENTS:
1. Ordinance establishing Antenna Regulations
7/2/96
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-9, THE PLYMOUTH ZONING
ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING ANTENNA REGULATIONS.
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 4, Subd. B. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is
hereby amended to delete the following definitions:
Antenna
Essential Services
Section 2. Section 4, Subd. B of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is
hereby amended to add the following definitions:
Antenna, Cellular Telephone. A device consisting of a metal, carbon fiber, or other
electromagnetically conducive rods or elements, usually arranged in a circular array on a
single supporting pole or other structure, and used for the transmission and reception of radio
waves in wireless telephone communications.
Antenna, Public Utility Microwave. A parabolic dish or cornucopia shaped
electromagnetically reflective or conductive element used for the transmission and/or reception
of point to point UHF or VHF radio waves in wireless telephone communications, and
including the supporting structure thereof.
Antenna, Radio and Television, Broadcast Transmitting. A wire, set of wires,
metal or carbon fiber rod or other electromagnetic element used to transmit public or
commercial broadcast radio or television programming, and including the support structure
thereof.
Antenna, Radio and Television Receiving. A wire, set of wires, metal or carbon
fiber element(s), other than satellite dish antennas, used to receive radio, television, or
electromagnetic waves, and including the supporting structure thereof.
Antenna, Satellite Dish. A device incorporating a reflective surface that is solid,
open mesh, or bar configured and is in the shape of a shallow dish, cone, horn, or cornucopia.
Such device is used to transmit and/or receive radio or electromagnetic waves between
terrestrially and/or orbitally based uses. This definition shall include, but not be limited to,
what are commonly referred to as satellite earth stations, TVROs (television, receive only) and
satellite microwave antennas.
1
Antenna, Short -Wave Radio Transmitting and Receiving. A wire, set of wires or
a device, consisting of a metal, carbon fiber, or other electromagnetically conductive element
used for the transmission and reception of radio waves used for short-wave radio
communications, and including the supporting structure thereof.
Antenna Support Structure. Any pole, telescoping mast, tower, tripod, or any other
structure which supports a device used in the transmitting or receiving of radio frequency
energy.
Essential Services. The erection, construction, alteration or maintenance by public
utilities or municipal departments of underground or overhead telephone, gas, electrical,
communication, water or sewer transmission, distribution, collection, supply or disposal
systems, including poles, wires, mains, drains, sewers, pipes, conduits, cables, fire alarm
boxes, police call boxes, traffic signals, hydrants and other similar equipment and accessories
in connection therewith for the furnishing of adequate service by such private or public utilities
or municipal departments. Transmission reception support structures and antennas shall not be
considered an essential service.
Structure, Public. An edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work
artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner which is
owned, or rented and operated by a federal, state, or local government agency.
Section 3. Section 7, Subd. C. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Residential
Districts -Allowable Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
P = Permitted Uses C =Uses by Conditional Use Permit A = Accessory Uses
DISTRICTS USES
FRD R-lA R -IB R-2 R-3 R-4
50. A A A A A A Radio and television receiving antennas
including single satellite dish TVROs
one (1) meter or less in diameter, short-
wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of household
electronic equipment including radio
receivers, federally licensed amateur radio
stations and television receivers, limited to
one (1) support structures per property, and
as regulated in Section 10, Subd. F. of
this Ordinance.
2
DISTRICTS
FRD R -IA R -IB R-2 R-3 R-4
51. C C C C C C
52. P P P P P P
53. C C C C C C
USES
Single satellite dish TVROs greater than
one (1) meter in diameter as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Cellular telephone antennas attached to a
public structure as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Cellular telephone antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Section 8, Subd. B. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Business
Districts -Allowable Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
P = Permitted Uses C =Uses by Conditional Use Permit A= Accessory Uses
DISTRICTS USES
B-1 Office B-2 Retail B-3 Service
Limited
55. A A A Radio and television receiving antennas
56. P P P
57. C C C
3
including single satellite dish TVROs
two (2) meters or less in diameter, short-
wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of
electronic equipment including radio
receivers, federally licensed amateur radio
stations and television receivers, as
regulated in Section 10, Subd. F. of
this Ordinance
Cellular telephone antennas located on a
public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Cellular telephone antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Section 8, Subd. B. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (CC District -
Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
CC -P District.
0) Cellular telephone antennas located upon a public structure as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
CC -R District.
ddd) Cellular telephone antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
CC -RE District.
q) Cellular telephone antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
CC -OT District.
o) Cellular telephone antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Section 8, Subd. B. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (CC District -
Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
g) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs
two (2) meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio
receivers, federally licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated in Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 7. Section 8, Subd. B. of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (CC District -
Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
All CC Districts:
c) Cellular telephone antennas not located upon a public structure as regulated in
Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
4
Section 8. Section 8, Subd. D.1 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Industrial
District -Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
d. Cellular telephone antennas, including necessary equipment buildings, as
regulated in Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 9. Section 8, Subd. D.2 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Industrial
District -Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
n. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas, and public
utility microwave antennas, as regulated in Section 10, Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
o. Commercial, private and public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas
in excess of two (2) meters in diameter, as regulated by Section 10, Subd. F. of this
Ordinance.
Section 10. Section 8, Subd. D.3 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Industrial
District -Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following:
f) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs
two (2) meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those
necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, federally
licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated in Section 10,
Subd. F. of this Ordinance.
Section 11. Section 10, Subd. C.l.c.(3) of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (Height
Regulations) is hereby amended to read as follows:
3) Chimneys or smoke stacks, radio, television and cellular telephone antennas.
Section 12. Section 10 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (General Regulations) is
hereby amended to add the following:
Subdivision F ANTENNAS
1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Chapter to provide for and regulate antennas in the
City of Plymouth.
5
2. General Standards. The following standards shall apply to all cellular telephone,
public utility, microwave, radio and television broadcast transmitting, radio and television
receiving, satellite dish and short-wave radio transmitting and receiving antenna.
a. All obsolete and unused antenna shall be removed within twelve (12) months of
cessation of operation at the site, unless an exemption is granted by the Zoning
Administrator.
b. All antenna shall be in compliance with all City building and electrical code
requirements and as applicable shall require related permits.
C. Structural design, mounting and installation of the antenna shall be in
compliance with manufacturer's specifications and as may be necessary, as determined
by the Zoning Administrator, shall be verified and approved by a professional
engineer.
d. When applicable, written authorization for antenna erection shall be provided by
the property owner.
e. No advertising message shall be affixed to the antenna structure.
f. The height of the antenna shall be the minimum necessary to function
satisfactorily, as verified by an electrical engineer or other appropriate professional.
g. Antennas shall not be artificially illuminated unless required by law or by a
governmental agency to protect the public's health and safety.
h. When applicable, proposals to erect new antenna shall be accompanied by any
required federal, state, or local agency licenses.
L If a new antenna support structure is to be constructed, it shall be designed so as
to accommodate other users including but not limited to other cellular communication
companies, local police, fire and ambulance companies.
j. Antenna support structures under two hundred (200) feet in height shall be
painted silver or have a galvanized finish to reduce visual impact.
k. Except as may be applicable in cases where a conditional use permit is required,
antennas and support structures for federally licensed amateur radio stations and used in
the amateur radio service are exempt from sub -paragraphs (c), (f), and (i) above, and
must comply with sub -paragraph (1) below.
1. Amateur radio support structures (towers) must be installed in accordance with
the instructions furnished by the manufacturer of that tower model. Because of the
experimental nature of the amateur radio service, antennas mounted on such a tower
0
may be modified or changed at any time so long as the published allowable load on the
tower is not exceeded and the structure of the tower remains in accordance with the
manufacturers specifications.
3. Accessory and Secondary Use Antennas. The following standards shall apply to all
accessory and secondary use antennas including radio and television receiving antennas,
satellite dishes, TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio
receivers, federally licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers.
a. Accessory or secondary use antennas shall not be erected in any required yard
except a rear yard) or within public or private utility and drainage easements, and shall
be set back a minimum of three (3) feet from all lot lines.
b. Guy wires or guy wire anchors shall not be erected within public or private
utility and drainage easements, and shall be set back a minimum of one (1) foot from
all lot lines.
C. Accessory or secondary use antennas and necessary support structures,
monopoles or towers may extend a maximum of fifteen (15) feet above the normal
height restriction for the affected zoning district, except support structures and antennas
used in the amateur radio service may extend a maximum of two (2) times the normal
height restriction for the affected zoning district.
d. The installation of more than one (1) support structure per property shall require
the approval of a conditional use permit.
4. Cellular Telephone Antennas.
a. Residential District Standards.
1) Antennas located upon public structures: Cellular telephone antenna
located upon public structures shall require the processing of an administrative
permit and shall comply with the following standards:
a) The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/
interference analysis and capacity analysis prepared by a professional
engineer that location of the antennas as proposed is necessary to meet
the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the cellular system and to
provide adequate portable cellular telephone coverage and capacity to
areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a
less restrictive district.
b) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed
within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment
7
building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and
shall be screened from view by landscaping where appropriate.
C) An administrative permit is issued in compliance with the
provisions of Section 10, Subd. C.6.c.1. of this Chapter.
2) Antennas not located upon a public structure: Cellular telephone antenna
not located upon a public structure shall require the processing of a conditional
use permit and shall comply with the following standards:
a) The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/
interference analysis and capacity analysis prepared by a professional
engineer that location of the antennas as proposed is necessary to meet
the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the cellular system and to
provide adequate portable cellular telephone coverage and capacity to
areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a
less restrictive district.
b) The antennas shall be located on an existing structure, if possible,
and shall not extend more than fifteen (15) feet above the structural
height of the structure to which they are attached.
C) If no existing structure which meets the height requirements for
the antennas is available for mounting purposes, the antennas may be
mounted on a single ground mounted pole provided that:
1. The pole not exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height.
2. The setback of the pole from the nearest residential
structure is not less than the height of the antenna. Exceptions to
such setback may be granted if a qualified structural engineer
specifies in writing that any collapse of the pole will occur within
a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances.
d) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed
within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment
building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and
shall be screened from view by landscanine where anvronriate.
f) The conditional use permit provisions of Section 9, Subd. A. of
this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied.
b. Business District Standards:
1) Antennas Located Upon A Public Structure. Cellular telephone antenna
located upon a public structure shall comply with the following standards.
a) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed
within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment
building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and
shall be screened from view by landscaping where appropriate.
b) An administrative permit is issued in compliance with the
provisions of Section 10, Subd. C.6.c.1 of this Chapter.
2) Antennas Not Located Upon A Public Structure. Cellular telephone
antennas not located upon a public structure shall require the processing of a
conditional use permit and shall comply with the following standards:
a) The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/
interference analysis and capacity analysis prepared by a professional
engineer that location of the antennas as proposed is necessary to meet
the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the cellular system and to
provide adequate portable cellular telephone coverage and capacity to
areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a
less restrictive district.
b) The antennas shall be located on an existing structure, if possible,
and shall not extend more than fifteen (15) feet above the structural
height of the structure to which they are attached.
C) If no existing structure which meets the height requirements for
the antennas is available for mounting purposes, the antennas may be
mounted on a single ground mounted pole provided that:
1. The pole not exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height.
d) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed
within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment
building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and
shall be screened from view by landscaping where appropriate.
e) Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing structure, at the
discretion of the City, a security fence not greater than eight (8) feet in
height with a maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent shall be provided
around the support structure.
f) The conditional use permit provisions of Section 9, Subd. A. of
this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied.
C. Industrial District Standards.
1) Antennas Located Upon A Public Structure. Cellular telephone
antennas located upon a public structure shall require the processing of an
administrative permit and shall comply with the following standards:
a) An administrative permit is issued in compliance with the
provisions of Section 10, Subd. C.6.c.1 of this Chapter.
2) Antennas Not Located Upon A Public Structure. Cellular telephone
antennas not located upon a public structure shall require the processing of an
administrative permit and shall comply with the following standards:
a) The antennas shall be located upon a structure if possible.
b) If no existing structure which meets the height requirements for
5. Satellite Dishes.
a. Residential District Standards. Single satellite dish TVROs greater than one (1)
meter in diameter may be allowed as a conditional use within the residential zoning
districts of the City and shall comply with the following standards:
1. All accessory and secondary use provisions of Section 10, Subd. F.3. of
this Chapter are satisfactorily met.
2. The lot on which the satellite dish antenna is located shall be of
sufficient size to assure that an obstruction -free receive window can be
maintained within the limits of the property ownership.
3. Except where the antenna is screened by a structure exceeding the
antenna height, landscape buffering and screening shall be maintained on all
sides of the satellite dish antenna in a manner in which growth of the landscape
elements will not interfere with the receive window.
4. The satellite dish antenna is not greater than three (3) meters in
diameter.
5. The conditional use permit provisions of Section 9, Subd. A. of this
Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied.
b. Business District Standards. Satellite dish antennas within the business zoning
districts of the City shall be limited to those listed as permitted accessory and secondary
uses in the applicable zoning district subject to the provisions of Section 10, Subd. F.2
and F.3 of this Ordinance.
C. Industrial District Standards. Commercial, private and public satellite dish
transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of two (2) meters may he. Anwi-A ae n
4. The conditional use permit provisions of Section 9, Subd. A. of this
Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied.
6. Commercial and Public Radio and Television Transmitting Antennas and Public UtilitX
Microwave Antennas. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting and public
utility microwave antennas shall comply with the following standards:
a. Such antenna shall be considered an allowed conditional use within the I-1,
Planned Industrial District of the City and shall be subject to the regulations and
requirements of Section 9, Subd. A. of this Chapter.
b. The antennas, transmitting towers, or array of towers shall be located on a
continuous parcel having a dimension equal to the height of the antenna, transmitting
tower, or array of towers measured between the base of the antenna or tower located
nearest a property line and said property line, unless a qualified structural engineer
specifies in writing that the collapse of any antenna or tower will occur within a lesser
distance under all foreseeable circumstances.
C. Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing structure, at the discretion of the City, a
fence not greater than eight (8) feet in height with a maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent
shall be provided around the support structure and other equipment.
Section 13. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council this day of 1996.
N -W -1 -Nu
Laurie F. Ahrens, City Clerk
12
Joycelyn A. Tierney, Mayor
X
Agenda Number: - r
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: John Keho, Senior Planner through AnneHulburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: On -Belay of Minnesota, Inc. Conditional Use Permit Amendment for
property located at 115 Forestview Lane N. (96079)
DATE: July 3, 1996 for the City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
REVIEW DEADLINE: September 14, 1996
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the resolution providing for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment.
Approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment requires a 5/7 vote of the City Council.
2. BACKGROUND:
The applicant is requesting approval to increase the number of beds in the On -Belay House
from 15 to 20. The applicant is not proposing any exterior site changes. The applicant also
indicates that there will not be any changes to the type of services provided.
On June 25, 1996, the Planning Commission, on an unanimous vote, recommended approval
of this item. Notice of the Public Hearing on this item was mailed to all property owners
within 1,320 feet. Other than the applicant, no one was present to speak on this item.
3. ANALYSIS:
On -Belay of Minnesota provides chemical dependency treatment for adolescents age 13 to 17
and their families. The applicant indicates that the average stay is 90 days. Police records
show that there have been 39 calls to the site since January 1, 1990. A relatively small
number of the calls have been regarding runaways or for disorderly conduct. The Public
Safety Department indicates that On -Belay placed most if not all of the calls to the police. The
Planning Division does not have a record of complaints from area residents regarding this
facility.
96079, Page 2
The Zoning Ordinance requires the City Council to review Conditional Use Permit
applications for compliance with the six standards outlined in the Ordinance. A copy of the
Conditional Use Permit standards is attached. Staff finds that the proposal meets the standards
of the Zoning Ordinance for a Conditional Use Permit and is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution
providing for approval of Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to the conditions in the
attached Resolution as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit Amendment
2. Location Map
3. Site Graphics
plan\staffrep\cc\96079
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR ON -BELAY OF
MINNESOTA INC. FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 115 FORESTVIEW LANE
96079)
WHEREAS, On -Belay Of Minnesota Inc. has requested approval of a Conditional Use
Permit Amendment to increase the number of beds for a juvenile chemical treatment
program located at 115 Forestview lane N.; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve
the request by On -Belay Of Minnesota Inc. to increase the number of beds for a
juvenile chemical treatment program, subject to the following conditions:
1. The Conditional Use Permit Amendment is to increase the number of beds from 15
to 20 for a juvenile chemical dependency treatment program.
2. No other changes are proposed to the conditions listed in Resolution 79-785.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10 1996.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a
meeting of the Plymouth City Council on July 10, 1996, with the original thereof on
file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
liVI ill= ,
CL'
CL
Site
r
D
m
GOLDEN.
j %
VALLEY
II 2 (` coz
I V
1 vi P
m
1 q• L
3 / •/
O
Q0
I x /
A O 1
Z, •l 1 1 66
r 1%1
O 1 1
3w Om.
IO - i
0
I rn
ro
I rtht S --m /,he' of W,/" I v
I ( of SE v+ of see. 35, f. //9, ,t', 22 I mI
I
L — 338_20 _ — — — — — LA
s
RIDGEMOUNT AVE, wm :
m w P. 10 GF IN ` IU.","i Y' --
N90.00' 00•W 397.24 r v C
p r -n 33 33
H! L_ i_ , a P. c ,
m -- _ I S I_! -n Iw'-rJ•P.I "lot I- • I• Alp, IN 1:1:' rn
rn . ry) T I i Il_i l bl-6
N I r i r—
0
lo
t
R
CNI
II
ro
1
9 j
L) ej
C)
ui.
Ll 'I
LZ
0
lo
t
R
CNI
II
L) ej
ui.
Ll 'I
LZ
C
aj
Ur
JO
POP
r
I
Lj
G,
s 19,1'.7' r7 ,9,11 -I
f W
o
a
o
Q
u
0Fo—
a
8,bI " - 8,61
v
V
z
El
V /
z
W
11
x
o
W
o D
It
Wm
r
r
caz
Z
8,bI " - 8,61
v
V
z
El
V /
z
W
11
IM
LIN
J
a
W
U ,
H T'
W L
U ,}l
q , LE --
L
41
C1 3
Q
W
U ,
H T'
W L
U ,}l
q , LE --
Agenda Number: , r
TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
FROM: Berit Strom, Planning Assistant through Anne Hurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE REDUCTIONS AND RELEASES.
DATE: June 26, 1996 for the City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the attached resolution authorizing the reduction and releases of the five Site Performance
Guarantees to reflect completed work in the following developments:
Caliber_ Development Corp./Bass Lake Business Centre.(95102
Opus Corporation/Bass Creek Business Center Select Comfort (93045)
Opus Corporation/Select Comfort Parking Expansion (95033)
Turck Inc./3000 Campus Drive (94146)
Hedberg Aggregates. I11c./1205 Nathan Lane North (95006)
2. BACKGROUND:
The developers have requested a reduction and a release of the financial guarantees stating that all of
the site improvements have been completed for:
Caliber Development Corp./Bass Lake Business Centre (95102) (Reduction)
Planning staff inspected the site and found a majority of the site improvements have been
completed except: Final installation of seed along the east property line and winter survivability of
landscaping installed, placement of the trash dumpster inside the fenced enclosure and as -built
utility plan submitted to the Engineering Department.
Opus Corporation./Select Comfort (93045) (Release)
Planning staff inspected the site and found that all of the site improvements have been completed
including winter survivability of landscaping and submittal of as -built utility plan to the
Engineering department.
Opus Corporation./Select Comfort parking expansion (93055) (Release)
Planning staff inspected the site and found that all of the site improvements have been completed
including winter survivability of landscaping and submittal of as -built utility plan to the
Engineering department.
Turck, Inc./3000 Campus Drive (94146) (Release)
Planning staff inspected the site and found that all of the site improvements have been completed
including the winter survivability of landscaping.
Hedberg Aggregates, Inc./1205 Nathan Lane North (95006) (Release)
Planning staff inspected the site and found that all of the site improvements have been completed
including the winter survivability of landscaping.
3. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends adoption of the attached resolutions
authorizing the reductions of the financial guarantees for the above referenced projects. The new
financial guarantee totals are consistent with City Policy regarding reductions and releases of financial
guarantees for Site Improvement Performance Agreements.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolutions Authorizing Reductions and Releases of Site Improvement Performance
Guarantees.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
REDUCING SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
CALIBER DEVELOPMENT CORP./BASS LAKE BUSINESS CENTRE (95102)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Site Plan that was approved by the City Council on
October 24, 1995 Resolution 95-608; for Caliber Development Corp. developer of Bass
Lake Business Centre (95102), has agreed to install certain site improvements for said
development; and,
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a majority of the site improvements except:
Installation of seed along the east property line and winter survivability of
landscaping installed, placement of the trash dumpster inside the fenced
enclosure and As -built utility plan submitted.
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends a reduction of the financial guarantee to reflect the completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize
a $65,600.00 reduction of the Letter of Credit which was submitted to guarantee site
improvements for Bass Lake Business Centre to a new financial guarantee total of
5,500.00
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
RELEASING SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
OPUS CORPORATION/SELECT COMFORT (93045)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the site plan and resolution 93-324 approved on June
21, 1993, for Opus Corporation developer of Select Comfort (93045), has agreed to
install certain site improvements for said development; and,
WHEREAS, the developer has completed all of the site improvements including the
winter survivability of landscaping and As -Built Utility Plan submitted to the
Engineering Department.
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends a release of the financial guarantee to reflect the completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize
a release of the $190,200.00 Bond which was submitted to guarantee site improvements
for Select Comfort.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
RELEASING SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
OPUS CORPORATION/SELECT COMFORT (95033)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the site plan that was approved by Administrative
Approval Letter Dated May 24, 1995; for Opus Corporation developer of Select
Comfort (95033), has agreed to install certain site improvements for said development;
and,
WHEREAS, the developer has completed all of the site improvements including the
winter survivability of landscaping and As -Built Utility Plan submitted to the
Engineering Department.
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends a release of the financial guarantee to reflect the completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize
a release of the $4,000.00 Bond which was submitted to guarantee site improvements
for the Select Comfort parking expansion.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
RELEASING SITE EMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
TURCK, INC./3000 CAMPUS DRIVE (94146)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Site Plan Administratively Approved on November
08, 1994, for Turck, Inc., developer at 3000 Campus Drive (94146), has agreed to
install certain site improvements for said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed all of the site improvements including the
winter survivability of remaining landscaping.
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends a release of the financial guarantee to reflect the completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize
a release of the $625.00 Cash deposit which was submitted to guarantee site
improvements for Turck, Inc.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 96 -
RELEASING SITE EMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE
HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. (95006)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the site plan that was approved by Administrative
Approval Letter Dated February 22, 1995; for Hedberg Aggregates Inc. developer of
Hedberg Aggregates (95006), has agreed to install certain site improvements for said
development; and,
WHEREAS, the developer has completed all of the site improvements including the
winter survivability of landscaping.
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site and
recommends a release of the financial guarantee to reflect the completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize
a release of the $150.00 Cash deposit which was submitted to guarantee site
improvements for Hedberg Aggregates.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996
DATE: June 27, 1996 for the City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through
Fred G. Moore, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: REDUCTION IN REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
ACTION REQUESTED: We have received a request from the developer for a
reduction in the required financial guarantee to reflect completed work in the
development. The City has made inspection of the work and I recommend that the
attached resolution be adopted. This development is:
1. Hunters Bluff Addition
Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
attachment : Resolution
94145)
G:\ENG\DEVIIAN1'S\94145\IAEMOS\FINGUAR.DOC
A
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
REDUCING REQUIRED FINANCIAL GUARANTEE
BUNTERS BLUFF ADDITION (94145)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated February 21, 1995, S.T. & M., Inc.,
developer of Hunters Bluff Addition (94145), has agreed to install certain improvements for said
development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below;
and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements are reduced as follows:
ITEM ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Street Construction 60,000 20,000
Sanitary Sewer 50,000 0
Watermain 44,000 0
Storm Sewer 37,000 0
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 1,600 600
Mitigation Pond Construction 0- 0-
Sediment Pond Construction 7,500 0
Street Signs (1 x 200) 200 0
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 27,000 0
Park and Trail Improvements 0- 0-
Setting Iron Monuments 1,500 0
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts 27,456 2472
TOTAL 256,256 23,072
That the required financial guarantee for the above items be reduced as detailed above from $63,168 to
23,072 to reflect the completed work. Letter of Credit No. 14303 may be reduced accordingly.
G:\ENG\DEVLMNTS\94145\RESOL\BR94I45A.do
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
HUNTERS BLUFF ADDITION (94145)
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per
Section 8.1 of the approved development contract be reduced as follows:
ITEM
Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan Street Sweeping and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash:
Letter of Credit:
ORIGINAL NEW
AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,000 $1,000
4,200 $4,200
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer construction is
accepted for continual maintenance as of July 10, 1996, subject to the Two Year Guarantee by the
Developer per Maintenance Bond No. 7764740.
Adopted by the City Council on July 10, 1996.
G:\ENG\DEVUAMrS\94145\RESOL\BR94145A.dw
Agenda Number: -
TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager through Dale E. Hah , Finance Director
FROM: Bob Pemberton, Risk Management Coordinator
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CITY'S INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE FOR DEFENSE
COSTS
DATE: July 1, 1996 for Council Meeting July 10, 1996
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the resolution authorizing the payment of $50,000 to
the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust in accordance with the City's contractual
obligation contained in Policy CMC1340494 written for the period of April 1, 1993 to
April 1, 1994.
2. BACKGROUND: The City purchased insurance from the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust (LMCIT) for the period of April 1, 1993 through April 1, 1994. This
policy of insurance insured the City of Plymouth, its employees and agents for General
Liability and Police Professional Liability exposures. The insurance policy was written
with limits of $600,000 per claim, subject to a $50,000 deductible for any and all
payments including defense costs.
In the early morning hours of September 17, 1992 a Plymouth Police Officer on routine
patrol observed a moving traffic violation involving an automobile with Louisiana license
plates. He attempted to pull the vehicle over, but the driver proceeded to the AMOCO
Service Station located at the intersection of Xenium Lane and State Highway 55 where she
hurriedly left the vehicle and walked towards the service station door ignoring the Police
Officer. The officer requested, and the suspect produced several pieces of identification
which upon examination had different names. She was allowed to enter the Service Station
to telephone her baby-sitter. At that time the officer noticed another individual in the
stopped vehicle and called for back-up and proceeded to verify the identification of the
suspect and while waiting for the verification the suspect came out of the service station
and reached into the patrol car and attempted to retrieve her driver's license. The officer
told her to cease her action, and partially opened the door of the squad car which made
contact with her body. She immediately fell to the ground and alleged that she had been
assaulted and injured. The officer requested Supervisory back-up, and the arriving
supervisor assisted the suspect to his car, and by coincidence, North Memorial Paramedics
happened upon the scene. The Police Supervisor asked the paramedics to look at the
Dwight D. Johnson
June 29, 1995
Page 2
suspect and they questioned her if she was hurt, in pain, wanted attention or wanted to be
transported. She answered negative to all four questions and so they left.
The suspect was released and nothing more transpired until September 17, 1993 when the
City was served a Summons and Complaint which was filed in Federal District Court
alleging the violation of the plaintiff's Federal Civil Rights, Minnesota Human Rights Act,
emotional and physical injuries and assertions that the officers' conduct was outrageous,
hostile, and done for the purpose of intimidation, harassment, injury, and evil intent. We
immediately reported the litigation to the LMCIT who accepted the defense and assigned
outside counsel. Motions and discovery proceeded until the time that the plaintiff's
attorney removed himself from the case for undisclosed ethical reasons contained in a
sealed letter delivered to the Federal District Court Judge assigned to the case. The
plaintiff then proceeded to prosecute the case herself and despite pressure from the court,
the City and the LMCIT declined to settle the matter. The case was tried and jury
completely absolved the police officers of any wrong doing and delivered a Defense
Verdict in favor of the City. We also prevailed on our motion and were awarded costs in
the amount of $2,340.36, but the plaintiff is uncollectible.
The costs to successfully defend the case amounted to $68,163.58 and the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust is now seeking reimbursement of $50,000 which
represents our deductible.
3. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the authorization of payment of the deductible
portion of the defense costs to the LMCIT. Funds for the deductible portion will come
from the City's Risk Management Fund.
BERKLEY RISK SERVICES, INC.
DATE: 11/25/95
PLYMOUTH, CITY OF Attn: Finance Dept.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
RE: BRS CLAIM NO.: 00908109 (10 1 L- 5P6 5)
TRUST MEMBER: PLYMOUTH, CITY OF
CLAIMANT: LORRAINE WILLIAMS
DATE OF LOSS/OCCURRENCE: 09/17/92
CLAIMS MADE DATE: 09/17/93
The above claim has been concluded.
This claim occurred when -
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF RIGHTS BY POLICE (101 L 3859).
On behalf of your city, we have paid the following to conclude
this claim:
Paid Losses Paid Medical
00 .00
Ded.Recover PRIOR
This Bill This Claim
50,000.00 .00
Paid Expenses Total
68,163.58 = 68,163.58
AGGREGATE
This Covenant
8,258.72
Your city's deductible is $50,000 per occurrence/$200,000 annual
aggregate/$1,000 per loss per line of coverage (after aggregate is
exceeded). This applies under covenant number CMC1340494 effective
04/01/93 thru 04/01/94.
Accordingly, please prepare a draft made payable to the "LEAGUE OF
MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST" in the amount of $ 50,000.00
and forward it to Berkley Risk Services,Inc., 920 -2nd Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4023, Attention: Finance Department.
Please include our claim number, as captioned above, with
your remittance to insure proper credit.
Should you have anv Questions relative to the disposition of this
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 96 -
AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF INSURANCE DEDUCTIBLE TO
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth was insured under League of Minnesota Cities
Covenant CMC 1340494 for the period of April 1, 1993 thru April 1, 1994 and
incorporated within this Covenant was General Liability and Police Professional
Liability Coverage with limits of $600,000, subject to a $50,000 per claim deductible.
The cost of defense is included within the coverages and is subject to the $50,000 per
claim deductible; and
WHEREAS, a Plymouth Police Officer in the course of his duties stopped an
individual for a traffic offense on September 17, 1992 and said individual subsequently
filed suit on or about September 17, 1993 against the City of Plymouth and three
Plymouth Police Officers in Federal District Court for the alleged violation of her civil
rights and bodily injuries received in the traffic stop; and
WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Insurance Trust in accordance with the terms of
the Covenant successfully defended the City of Plymouth and the Police Officers
named in the Summons and Complaint before a Federal District Court Jury at a cost of
68,163.58. In accordance with the terms of the covenant the League of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust has requested reimbursement of the $50,000 per claim
deductible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the City of Plymouth
reimburse the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust $50,000 from the Risk
Management Fund for the City's deductible portion of the Cost of Defense.
r Agenda Number: Ji
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposal from School District 281 for use of ice arena and athletic
field facilities
DATE: July 1, 1996
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the proposal for use of the Plymouth Ice Arena
facilities for 1996-1997 through the 1998-1999 season and to refer the requested changes in
the possible use of the Armstrong athletic field to staff for a report to Council by August
21, 1996.
2_ RAC:KGROUNn- (`itv etnff .1"A :teff f--- XT— Tff--. --A r...,—*— no+
in cooperation with New Hope to possibly allow such use. The Council could then refer
the matter to the Planning Commission for the necessary hearing if one of the language
alternatives seems feasible. The New Hope Council has considered the same request and
voted to table the matter to ccordinate with Plymouth and have the same amendments
adopted by both cities.
5. BUDGET IlOPACT: One Armstrong team each year is beneficial in renting the
important after school hours. This will help assure that our arena is self-supporting.
Youth hockey associations will rent most of the time in the evening hours. This will keep
our ice use consistent and efficient during the prime skating season. The budget impact of
the emergency use of Armstrong Field by Cooper has not been evaluated, but is not
expected to be significant.
6. RECOMMENDATION: Eric Blank and I recommend approval of the proposal from
District 281 for use of our ice facilities from 1996-97 through 1998-99. I further
recommend that the use of the Armstrong Athletic Field for non -Armstrong games in case
of emergency be referred to the Community Development Department for further review
and a report back to the City Council no later than August 7, 1996.
1 A
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO.
Whereas, Independent School District 281 has proposed to use the Plymouth Ice
Arena upon its completion for a portion of its teams, and,
Whereas, the allocation of overall ice time between the Plymouth and New
Hope ice arenas has been considered in an equitable manner by staff of both cities, and,
Whereas, the boys and girls teams will rotate between the arenas, and,
Whereas, both cities wish to begin scheduling and planning for operations at
their respective arenas, and,
Whereas, the proposal to allow the use of the Armstrong Athletic Field for
Cooper High School games on an emergency basis requires further review to develop
language in consultation with New Hope;
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Plymouth that
the proposed allocation of Armstrong teams to the Plymouth Ice Arena is approved for
the 1996-1997 through 1998-1999 seasons; and,
Be it further resolved that the proposal to allow Cooper games at the Armstrong
Athletic Field on an emergency basis be referred to staff for a report no later than
August 21, 1996.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281
Ro66insdale Area Schools
Learning for a lifetime of growing
June 26, 1996
Dwight Johnson
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth MN 55447
Dear Dwight:
As a results of our discussions regarding the district's purchase of ice time from the cities of New Hope
and Plymouth, and other facilities use issues, I want to clarify the district's proposals. It is my hope that
you will support the following items and forward them for consideration by the Plymouth city council.
Robbinsdale Area Schools will agree to the following arrangement for the use of ice time:
1996-97 season: the New Hope Ice Arena will be designated as "home" ice for Cooper and
Armstrong high school boys' programs and the combined high school girls program.
0 1997-98 seasons: the New Hope Ice Arena will be designated as "home" ice for the Cooper boys'
hockey program and the combined girls' program, and the Plymouth Arena will be designated as
home" ice for the Armstrong boys' hockey program.
1998-99 season: the New Hope Ice Arena will be designated as "home" ice for the Cooper boys'
hockey program and the Armstrong boys' hockey program, and the Plymouth Arena will be
designated as "home" ice for the combined girls' program.
Following the 1998-99 season: the parties agree to plan out ice designation through the 2007-2008
season.
On a separate issue, we are asking the city of Plymouth to cancel the provision in the special use permit
for the Armstrong athletic facility that prohibits the use of the facility by a Cooper team. It is the
intention of the district to use the field only for Armstrong activities except in cases of an emergency.
Please let me know if you need additional information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
7;;n 694-
Thomas D. Bollin
Superintendent
4148 Winnetka Avenue North
New Hope, Minnesota 55427
612) 533-2781 0 FAX 1 (612) 537-0947
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Agenda Number: (7 _ A
TO: Dwight D. Jo son, City Manager
FROM: Laurie Ahrens, ity Clerk, and Kathy Lueckert, Asst. City Manager
SUBJECT: Courtesy Ben Ordinance
DATE: July 2, 1996, for City Council Meeting of July 10, 1996
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached ordinance repealing Section 815 of the
Plymouth City Code relating to courtesy bus benches.
2. BACKGROUND: In 1989, the City learned that a number of courtesy benches with
advertising signs had been placed throughout the community on bus lines. A local
company, U.S. Bench Corporation, had installed the benches over the years, often at the
request of Medicine Lake Lines , the City's transit provider. Staff inventoried the benches
and determined there were 35 existing benches in the City. However, U.S. Bench
Corporation tentatively identified locations for up to 54 bus benches along various bus
routes. Most benches were located in the public right-of-way, along collector streets in
residentially zoned areas. The City Council adopted an ordinance which regulated bus
benches in the City. A maximum number of 50 benches was established based on the ratio
of 1 bench per every 1,000 population.
In early 1996, another local bus bench company, Courtesy Bench Company, attempted to
submit applications to install courtesy benches in Plymouth. Staff did not accept the
applications or fees because the maximum 50 permits had already been issued to U.S.
Bench Corporation. Mr. Hank Moss, Courtesy Bench Company, sent a letter to the City
contending that the ordinance `hppears to be unfair competition and monopolistic. " He
requested that the City reconsider its issuance of permits to U.S. Bench Corporation so that
additional permits would be available. This letter and the entire ordinance was reviewed
by administrative staff, the City Attorney, and John Sweeney, Assistant to Public Works
Director.
There are several concerns with the current ordinance and the City's approach to these
benches:
There is inconsistency with respect to advertising sign regulations between the City
Code and Zoning Ordinance.
The current ordinance provides for a maximum of 50 benches, which no longer
reflects the intended ratio of 1 bench per 1,000 population.
There is no mechanism to allow staff to provide bench permits on a fair and
equitable basis among companies. At the present time all permits are held by one
company, but no franchise agreement exists. There are pending applications from
both companies and no available permits. When a permit does become available,
there is no established method of determining which company should receive the
available permit.
The current permit fee of $25 per bench is too low to justify the level of initial and
subsequent annual inspections of bus sites and ongoing monitoring of maintenance
and advertising content.
The transit staff questions whether the existing locations are the most appropriate
for public purpose or for advertising. Actual use of the benches also is a question.
Later this year, several new circulator routes will be added to the system. There
are no available permits to allow for benches on these new routes.
3. DISCUSSION: Bus benches do serve a public purpose by providing seating for
individuals when the benches are appropriately located on a bus route. The transit staff
reviewed the existing ordinance and made site visits to the current courtesy benches located
in the City. Their report indicates that "10 benches appear to be sited in locations no
longer served by Plymouth Metrolink. In addition, several benches are clustered in limited
areas, such as along Lancaster south from the Four Seasons Mall, along 36th Avenue
North near Armstrong High School, and along West Medicine Lake Drive. It is unknown
if the numbers and locations of these benches serve actual needs or if they simply provide
good advertising locations. " They further recommend that ridership at each location should
justify placement of a bench, and that a viable option is to have the City or Plymouth
Metrolink place benches (without advertising) in those locations where a public purpose
would be served.
A spot check survey of other cities indicates a wide range of approaches to courtesy
benches. Some communities license benches while others have no restrictions on the
placement of benches. A few examples:
Eden Prairie Bans benches.
Prior Lake Bans benches.
Bloomington Allows benches at fee of $12 for the first bench, $1.25 for
each additional bench, plus inspection fee. No limit on number.
St. Louis Park Has an ordinance similar to Plymouth.
Minnetonka Does not allow advertising in the right-of-way, and thus no
benches with advertising.
The City Attorney indicates that the City has broad discretion to allow or prohibit
advertising on bus benches (memo attached). Staff believes that the courtesy bench issue is
a signage issue that should be considered in the overall review of the Sign Ordinance next
year. The existing ordinance allows commercial signage in the right-of-way in residential
neighborhoods which would not normally be allowed under the Zoning Ordinance. There
should be consistent regulation of signage between the City Code and Zoning Ordinance.
The City Attorney has drafted the recommended ordinance which would repeal Section 815
of the Plymouth City Code regarding courtesy benches. Under the proposed ordinance,
existing benches as of the effective date of the ordinance could remain in place as
nonconforming uses if the bench is located at a bus stop. Courtesy benches would have to
be removed within 90 days after the bus stop at which they are located is terminated. Staff
will make a recommendation on an approach to bus benches after the revisions to the
signage section of the Zoning Ordinance, and after the new bus routes are evaluated for
benches.
The renewal date for the issuance of courtesy bench permits was July 1. Staff has delayed
renewal of permits until the Council could consider the ordinance issue. If this ordinance
is adopted, the renewal applications and fees would be returned to the applicant.
4. ALTERNATIVES: Several alternatives are available. The Council could
Take no action and retain the existing ordinance
Adopt the attached ordinance to repeal Section 815 of the City Code, as drafted by the City
Attorney and recommended by staff
Direct staff to draft an alternative ordinance increasing the maximum number of benches in
the City and establishing a mechanism to justify the issuance of permits in the best
locations.
Ban bus benches entirely and direct removal of the benches
5. BUDGET IMPACT: The City receives a maximum of $1,250 per year in permit fees
for courtesy benches. This amount is offset by the cost of inspections and issuance.
6. RECOMMENDATION: The attached ordinance is recommended for adoption.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 96
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 815 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE
CONCERNING BUS COURTESY BENCHES
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 815 of the Plymouth City Code is repealed.
SECTION 2. Courtesy benches lawfully in place on the effective date of this ordinance
may remain in place if the bench is located on a bus route. Courtesy benches must be
removed within ninety (90) days after the bus route on which they are located is
terminated.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the Plymouth City Council on July 10, 1996.
Joycelyn Tierney, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laurie F. Ahrens, City Clerk
3
Plymouth City Code
Section 815 - Courtesy Benches
815.01
815.01. Courtesy Benches on Public Walks and Places. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The
purpose of this section is to regulate the placing and maintenance of courtesy benches in, or
adjacent to, public rights-of-way.
815.03. General Rule. Subdivision 1. It is unlawful for a person to place a Courtesy
Bench in, or adjacent to, a public right-of-way without first having been granted a permit as
provided in this section.
Subd. 2. This section shall apply to all existing Courtesy Benches, as well as those
installed, after the adoption hereof. The permit once issued shall be annually renewed.
Subd. 3. The permit period shall be July 1 to June 30 annually.
Subd. 4. No more than 50 permits shall be issued and in force under this section.
815.05. Permits and Application. Application for permits shall be made to the City
Manager. The application shall contain the following information:
a) scale drawing showing the size and location of the Courtesy Bench relative to all
other objects on the property including the layout of applicable adjacent roadways,
intersections, traffic signage, sidewalks, trails, utility poles, fences and other
objects in the vicinity;
b) name, address and phone number of applicant;
c) detailed plans and specifications of each proposed bench including the general
nature of advertising matter, if any, to be posted thereon and total surface area
intended as signage not to exceed 12 square feet using the front, or seating side
surface only of the bench back in residentially zoned properties and not to exceed
24 square feet (12 square feet each on the front and back surface of the bench
back) in commercial and industrial zoned property;
d) current general liability Certificate of Insurance from an insurance company, rated
A" by A.M. Best Company and authorized to do business in the State of
Minnesota, naming the city as additional insured in the minimum amount of
600,000 for any and all claims arising out of the use or existence of the Courtesy
Bench, and approved by the City Attorney. The certificate shall provide for
automatic notification of the City with a minimum 30 days advance notice in the
event of cancellation;
e) A graphic showing the public transportation bus service which serves the proposed
Courtesy Bench and the specific bus stop location, including times of service, if
applicable, and approximate current number of passengers served by the bus stop
according to the transportation company;
f) An executed hold harmless agreement from the permittee, protecting the City from
any and all claims arising out of the use and existence of the Courtesy Bench;
g) such other information the City Manager may require.
Plymouth City Code 815.07
815.07. Consent of Owners or Occupant. The application must be accompanied by
the written consent, in a form prescribed by the City attorney, of the owners or occupant of the
property abutting the street right-of-way where the Courtesy Bench is to be located. The owner
or occupant may subsequently revoke his/her written consent.
815.09. Conditions Governing Issuance of Permits. Subdivision 1. Application. This
subsection governs the issuance of a permit for a Courtesy Bench.
Subd. 2. Permit for Each Bench. A separate permit is required for each Courtesy Bench,
but renewals may be granted for more than one location on the basis of a single application
provided the City Manager is satisfied that all the information required by this section has been
supplied for each proposed Courtesy Bench.
Subd. 3. Transfer: New Permit. If a Courtesy Bench for which a permit has been issued
is sold or title or control thereof is transferred or assigned, a new permit shall be required.
Subd. 4. Location. No permit may be issued for the installation of Courtesy Benches in
the following places:
a) on a public or private sidewalk or trail,
b) in an alley;
c) at any location where the distance from the face of the curb to the edge of the
right-of-way is less than eight feet and sidewalk or trail is located therein;
d) at any location more than 50 feet from the nearest point of intersection with a
street unless the city manager so authorizes;
e) within 20 feet of any street right of way corner or other locations as the City
Manager may determine which impede safety by obstructing the vision of
pedestrians or motorists as set forth in Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance;
f) other locations which the City Manager determines would potentially restrict
pedestrian traffic, pose a snow and ice control problem, obstruct vehicular traffic
or otherwise be detrimental to the public safety.
Subd. 5. Permit Fees. Fees for Courtesy Benches shall be $25 initial permit and $25 for
each subsequent renewal.
815.11. Insurance Requirements. Subdivision 1. Insurance. Permit holders shall deliver
to and keep on file with the City Manager a current general liability Certificate of Insurance
meeting the requirements of Section 815.05, as amended. The insurance shall be maintained in
its original amount by the permit holder at his or her expense at all times during the period for
which the permit is in effect. When two or more permits are issued to one person one insurance
policy may be furnished to cover two or more Courtesy Benches, and the policy shall be of a type
which coverage is automatically restored upon occurrence of any accident or loss from which
liability may hereafter accrue.
Plymouth City Code 815.13
815.13. Permits: Approval and Issuance. If the City Manager is satisfied that all of the
conditions enumerated in this Section have been met and that the erection and maintenance of the
Courtesy Bench at the proposed location will not restrict pedestrian traffic or otherwise be
detrimental to public safety, he shall approve the application.
815.15. Revocation of Permit. The City Manager may revoke or deny renewal of any
permit for failure to comply with the provisions of this Code, the Zoning Ordinance, for
misrepresentation of material facts in the original application, for failure to maintain the Courtesy
Bench, because the bench is considered a safety hazard, because the bench location is no longer
served by public transportation, or for any reason which would have been grounds for denial of
the original application.
815.17. Installation and Maintenance. Subdivision 1. Location. Courtesy Benches shall
be installed parallel with the curb, sidewalk or trail, and set back at least 3 feet.
Subd. 2. Size. Size limitations on Courtesy Benches are as follows:
a) height - 42 inches maximum;
b) width - 30 inches maximum; and
c) length - Seven feet maximum.
Subd. 3. Construction. A Courtesy Bench shall be installed and maintained on a durable,
level surface including, but not limited to, concrete, bomanite or decorative brick. The durable
surface shall extend six inches on either end of the bench and one and one-half feet in front. The
Courtesy Bench shall be of sufficient weight or shall be secured in a manner to minimize the
potential of accidental tipping or vandalism. No Courtesy Bench shall be fastened, secured, or
anchored to City property.
Subd. 4. Materials. A Courtesy Bench shall be constructed of durable materials
including but not limited to concrete, wood, steel, plastic, or combination thereof, with colors
limited to whites, earthtones of subdued greens, grays, browns, reddish -browns, and golds.
Subd. 5. Permit Display. Each Courtesy Bench shall display the permit number in a
conspicuous place.
Subd. 6. Conditions. It is the responsibility of the permittee to maintain each bench in a
safe condition and to keep benches neat, clean and in usable condition. The permittee shall keep
the Courtesy Bench and bench base fre& oLirand-s
Subd. 7. Advertising Matter. Advertising matter may be displayed only on the front
roadway side) surface of the backrest of a Courtesy Bench and shall not exceed 12 square feet in
surface area on residentially zoned properties and not to exceed 24 square feet (12 square feet on
each side of the bench back) on commercial and industrial zoned property. Advertisements for
liquor or beer, tobacco, political advertisements, obscene, immoral, indecent or illegal matter is
prohibited on all Courtesy Benches. No advertising matter on any Courtesy Bench may display
the words "Stop", "Look", "Drive In", "Danger" or any other word, phrase or symbol, reflective
material, or illumination device, which might interfere with, mislead or distract traffic.
Plymouth City Code 815.19
815.19. Removal of Benches. Subdivision 1. Notice. Upon the revocation or expiration
of any permit without renewal, the permittee shall remove the Courtesy Bench promptly. The
City Manager may remove the bench after ten days mailed notice to the permittee and the cost of
removal shall be paid by the permittee. If the permittee fails to pay the costs within 60 days after
receiving notice from the City Manager, the bench shall become the property of the city, but the
permittee shall remain liable for the cost of removal, restoration and storage of the bench. No
permit or renewal shall be granted to the permittee until all such costs are paid in full.
Subd. 2. Summary Removal. A Courtesy Bench placed in, or adjacent to, the public
right-of-way in the City, contrary to the provisions of this Section, may be summarily removed
by the City Manager, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.27, Subdivision 6.
815.21. Registration of Permits Obtained from Other Road Authorities. When a Courtesy
Bench is placed in the City within the limits of a street or roadway subject to the control of a road
authority other than the city as defined in. Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.02, the person placing
the bench shall file proof of permission from the other road authority with the City Manager.
Thoi%is J. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M. Scutt
Gary G. Fuchs
James R. Walston
Elliott R. Knetsch
Suesan Lea Pace
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A.
Attorneys at Law
612)452-5000
Fax (612) 452-5550
Ms. Laurie Ahrens, City Clerk
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482
May 29, 1996 -<:`.t
f
RE: Courtesy Bench Ordinance
Dear Laurie:
Andrea McDowell Poehler
Matthew K. Brokl
John F. Kelly
Marguerite M. McCarron
George T. Stephenson
The City has broad discretion to allow or prohibit advertising on bus benches.
Although the United States Supreme Court has not addressed this exact issue, it has ruled
that a City can prohibit billboards which is another form of off -premises advertising.
Metromedia v. 01y of San Diego. 453 U.S. 490 (1981). The Court's reasoning is
applicable to advertising on bus benches. At least one lower court has approved a bar on
bench signs. Coast -United Advertising, Inc. v. 01y of Long Beach. 124 Cal. Rpm 487
1975).
The City has the statutory authority to sell the right to place benches with
advertising signs within the limits of any street or highway.
Benches and shelters for the convenience and comfort of
persons waiting for street cars or buses may be placed and
maintained within the limits of any street or highway,
including streets and highways with cities, when a license,
permit, or franchise therefor is first obtained from the road
authority. The owners may place advertising on the benches
and shelters if authorized by the license, permit, orfranchise,
provided that advertising on shelters shall be limited to one-
third of the vertical surface of the shelter. The benches shall
not be placed or maintained on the portion of the highway or
street prepared and maintained for vehicle traffic.
Suite 317 0 Eagandale Office Center • 1380 Corporate Center Curve 0 Eagan, MN 55121
Ms. Laurie Ahrens, City Clerk
City of Plymouth
May 29, 1996
Page 2
The Council of any city may, by public negotiation or bid,
grant franchises for the construction, operation, or
maintenance of bus shelters and benches on streets and
highways within the city. The franchises shall be granted
subject to terms and conditions as the city may prescribe,
including the payment of compensation to the city. This
provision does not preclude the requirement for obtaining
permits from the appropriate road authority having
jurisdiction for construction within the limits of any trunk
highway, county highway, or county state -aid highway.
Minn. Stat. § 160.27, Subd. 2.
The City Code currently allows up to 50 courtesy benches with advertising in the
City. I do not understand the basis for the number selected. Perhaps there is a study or
planning report explaining its basis. If such a study cannot be found or some other basis
determined to justify the number, I recommend the Code be amended to either outright
prohibit new benches with advertising or to allow them at suitable locations under
standards to be established by ordinance.
RNK: srn
COURTESY BENCH CO.
4215 Wnnetka Ave. No.
New Hope, MN 55428
Ph: (612) 649-4473
FAX: (612) 536-8777
Laurie Ahrens, City Clerk
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Ms. Ahrens,
May 4, 1996
As you know, I recently attempted to apply for several Courtesy Bench permits within the City of
Plymouth. Please be advised that this letter constitutes a formal complaint in that matter.
The Plymouth City Council by statute have allocated only 50 site permits, all of which have been given to
U.S. Bench Co. U.S. Bench prior to December 1995 controlled 31 sites. About that time U.S. Bench
learned that my company (Courtesy Bench Co.) was in the process of securing possible sites throughout
the metro area. In December 1995 U.S. Bench applied for and received 15 of those 19 sites (4 are
pending).
My contention is that this appears to be unfair competition and monopolistic. The City Council and other
city officials may want to consider maintaining a degree of reasonableness within the community.
May 15, 1996
CITY OF
PUMOUTR
Mr. Hank Moss
Courtesy Bench Company
4215 Winnetka Avenue North
New Hope, MN 55428
Dear Mr. Moss:
Thank you for submitting a letter outlining your concerns with the City's courtesy
bench ordinance. You and I have discussed the ordinance on several occasions and it
was helpful to receive your specific concerns in writing. I have distributed copies of
your letter to the City Manager, City Council, and City Attorney.
The ordinance regulating courtesy benches was adopted in 1989, and no amendments
have been made since that time. You raise a valid point that perhaps it is time for the
City to review the ordinance to determine if it still meets the intent and need of the
City, or whether changes should be considered for legal or other reasons. I have asked
our City Attorney Roger Knutson and our Transit Administrator John Sweeney to take
a look at the ordinance and provide a recommendation on whether changes to the
ordinance should be made. The ordinance is also under review by the Administration
Agenda Number: 1S
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Amending City Council Rules of Procedure
DATE: July 5, 1996 for July 10, 1996 City Council Meeting
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the ordinance amending the Plymouth City Code
concerning City Council Rules of Procedure
2. DISCUSSION: This amendment was requested by Councilmembers Anderson and Wold.
It would require that when an item is removed from the consent agenda, or added to the
agenda, when the item is brought up for consideration the presiding officer shall
immediately recognize the councilmember who removed the item or added the item to the
agenda.
07/02/96 TUE 12:49 FAX 612 452 5550 C K S & F 444 PLYMOUTH 2002
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 96 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER H OF THE
PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING
CITY COUNCII. RULES OF PROCEDURE
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
SECTI N 1. Chapter 11, Section 200 of the Plymouth City Code is amended by
adding subsection. 200.18 to read:
200.18 Items Removed from Consent Agenda or Added to the Agenda.
If an item is removed from the consent agenda or is added to the agenda at the Council
meeting that was not on the printed agenda, when the item is brought up for consideration
the presiding officer shall immediately, without discussion or comment, recognize the
Council member who removed the item from the consent agenda or who added it to the
r
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT
Thomas J. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M. Scott
Gary G. Fuchs
James R. Walston
Elliott B. Knetsch
Mr. Fred Moore
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447-1482
Attorneys at Law
612) 452-5000
Fax (612) 452-5550
June 27, 1996
Re: Brian E. Stevens v. City of Plymouth
Court File No. AP 95-011716
Our File No. 3268/33
Dear Mr. Moore:
r
01
o, f
co
J
A.
Andrea McDowell Poehler
Matthew K. Brokl
John F. Kelly
Marguerite M. McCarron
George T. Stephenson
a N
Enclosed please find Judge William S. Posten's Order granting Summary
Judgment in favor of the City, dated June 21, 1996.
As you may recall, Mr. Stevens was challenging his $1,664.80 assessment for
street improvements to 25th Avenue, asserting that the City failed to comply with the
proper procedures in ordering the improvement project. The parties had agreed to
submit the entire case to the court on the question of whether the City had properly
complied with the statute in ordering the improvement project on the night of the
public hearing for the project. The court rejected Mr. Stevens' arguments and held
that Minnesota Statutes permit a City to adopt the resolution approving an
improvement project after the public hearing for the project and on the same night as
the public hearing.
Once the Court enters Judgment in this case, Mr. Stevens will have 90 days to
appeal. To date, Mr. Stevens has given the City no indication of whether or not he
would appeal an unfavorable decision in this matter.
Once I receive the Judgment in this case, I will forward a copy to you and I
will keep you informed concerning any appeal by Mr. Stevens and the expiration of
the time to appeal.
Suite 317 • Eagandale Office Center e 1380 Corporate Center Curve 0 Eagan, MN 55121
Mr. Fred Moore
June 27, 1996
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT
FUCHS
By:_
Andrea M. Poehler
AMP
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Dwight Johnson
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Brian E. Stevens,
vs.
City of Plymouth,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CASE TYPE: Other Civil
Court File No. AP 95-011716
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
AND JUDGMENT
The above -entitled matter came on for hearing on April 25, 1996, before the
Honorable William S. Posten, Judge of the District Court for the County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota, upon the parties' Cross -Motions for Summary Judgment. Andrea
McDowell Poehler, appeared on behalf of Defendant City of Plymouth. Brian E.
Stevens, Esq., appeared on his own behalf.
Based upon all the files and proceedings contained herein, together with the
arg.nnent of counsel, the Court hereby determines that the following acts are
undisputed:
UNDISPUTED FACTS
1. Plaintiff Brian E. Stevens ("Stevens") is a resident of the State of
Minnesota, who resides at and owns the property located at 17460 25th Ave. No.,
Plymouth, MN 55447.
2. Defendant City of Plymouth ("City") is a political subdivision of the
State of Minnesota.
3. On December 6, 1993, the City held a public hearing pursuant to Minn.
Stat. Ch. 429 to consider a road reconstruction project involving streets in various
areas in the City, including that portion of 25th Avenue North in the City abutting
Stevens property.
4. After closing the December 6, 1993 public hearing, the City Council
adopted a resolution that same evening by a 5-0 vote ordering the improvement project
and the preparation of plans and specifications.
5. On April 4, 1995, following completion of the road reconstruction
project, the City Council for the City of Plymouth held a public hearing pursuant to
Minn. Stat. § 429.061, to determine the amount of the assessments to be imposed
against the various landowners surrounding and bordering 25th Avenue North.
7. On June 20, 1995, the City Council for the City of Plymouth voted to
make certain special assessments against the property owned by Stevens to partially
fund the completed reconstruction of 25th Avenue North in the City.
8. The total assessments levied against the property owned by Stevens are
in the amount of $1664.80.
9. Stevens brought this action challenging the assessment on a number of
grounds, which were denied by the City.
10. The parties agreed to submit the entire matter to this Court through
cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of whether the City complied with
Minn. Stat. § 429.031 in ordering the improvement project on the same night as the
2-
public hearing on the improvement project. Both parties agreed that this court's
decision on the summary judgment motions would be determinative of the entire
lawsuit. Stevens is not challenging the assessment on the basis that the amount of the
assessment exceeds the benefit to his property.
The Court hereby makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. In a City's adoption of a resolution ordering an improvement project,
Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. 1 provides as follows:
a resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at
any time within six months after the date of the hearing by
vote of a majority of all members of the council when the
improvement has been petitioned for by the owners of not
less than 35 percent in frontage of the real property
abutting on the streets named in the petition as the location
of the improvement.
2. The phrase "within six months after the date of the hearing" in Minn.
Stat. § 429.031, subd. 1 does not require a city to adopt the resolution approving the
improvement project on some date after the date of the public hearing.
3. The provision "within six months after the date of the hearing" means
that the resolution may be adopted no later than "six months after the date of the
hearing." It merely refers to the final point in time by which the resolution must be
adopted.
4. The only purpose of the phrase "after the hearing" is to provide a
reference point in calculating the six months by which the resolution must be adopted.
It does not address the earliest date the resolution may be adopted. The statute
3-
permits the resolution to be adopted "at any time," so long as it is adopted no later
than six months after the date of the hearing.
5. Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. 1 permits a city to adopt a resolution
ordering an improvement project following the public hearing on the improvement
project and on the same date as the public hearing.
6. The City complied with Minn. Stat. § 429.031, subd. 1 in adopting the
resolution ordering the improvement project after the close of the December 6, 1993
public hearing and on the same evening as the public hearing.
7. There is no genuine issue of material fact.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The City is awarded summary judgment in its favor dismissing Stevens'
Complaint with prejudice; and
2. That Plaintiff Stevens' motion for summary judgment is denied in all
respects.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY AND FORTHWITH.
BY THE COURT
The Honorable Villiarn S. Posten
JUDGMENT
I hereby certify that the above Order constitutes the judgment of the Court.
Dated: , 1996.
MARK S. THOMPSON
COURT ADMINISTRATOR
Deputy Clerk
me