Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Planning Commission Packet 11-15-2023
Planning Commission 1 of 2 November 15, 2023 CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA Regular Planning Commission November 15, 2023, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PUBLIC FORUM—Individuals may address the Commission about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the Commission will continue with the agenda. The Commission will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff for future reports. 3. APPROVE AGENDA —Planning Commission members may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Commission will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 4. CONSENT AGENDA —These items are considered to be routine and enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commission member or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. 4.1 Recommend approval of variances for a 6 foot fence and paved sport court at 4700 Juneau Ln (Brad Winger - 2023076) Planning Report Proposed Design Fence and Court Location Notification Map Resolution 4.2 Adopt October 18, 2023 minutes Draft Minutes 4.3 2024-2032 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 2024 (Amended 2023) CIP by Department 2024 (Amended 2023) CIP by Funding Source 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 Rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan, and conditional use permit for Eagle Brook Church to allow construction of a church on property located at 17910 Chankahda Trail (2023-065) Planning Commission Report Information Location Map 1 Planning Commission 2 of 2 November 15, 2023 Aerial Map Aerial Map (zoomed in) Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map LA-2 Text from Comprehensive Plan Applicant's Narrative David Weekley Homes Sketch (2022) Perspective Views Traffic Study Site Graphics Correspondence Received -- Through 11-6-2023 Correspondence Received -- 11-7 and 11-8-2023 Ordinance Resolution - Findings of Fact for Rezoning Resolution - Prelim Plat, Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT 2 Regular Planning Commission November 15, 2023 Agenda Number:4.1 To:Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by:Chloe McGuire, Planning and Development Manager Reviewed by:Grant Fernelius, Community and Economic Development Director Item:Recommend approval of variances for a 6 foot fence and paved sport court at 4700 Juneau Ln (Brad Winger - 2023076) 1. Action Requested: Motion to recommend the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the variances at 4700 Juneau Ln. 2. Background: Brad Winger, owner of 4700 Juneau Ln N, has requested the following two variances: 1. Variance for a 6 foot fence in the front yard. Since this property is a corner lot, it has two front yards under the Zoning Ordinance. The request is for a 6 foot fence along the southern property line, which is the side of the residence. A 6 foot fence would be allowed administratively along the southern lot line if it met the front yard setback (25 feet). The property currently has a 6 foot fence that meets this setback, but the property owners want additional backyard space. 2. Variance for a sport court (basketball court, pavement only) in the front yard of the property. Since this property is a corner lot, anything that protrudes in front of the home closer to the road than the home is considered in the front yard. The sport court will meet and exceed required front yard setbacks, but there is not an administrative approval option in the Zoning Ordinance for this situation. Staff is recommending approval of both variances. 3. Budget Impact: NA 4. Attachments: Planning Report Proposed Design Fence and Court Location Notification Map Resolution 3 Planning Commission Report Information BRAD WINGER VARIANCE – 4700 JUNEAU LANE INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of a 19-foot front yard setback variance for a fence, as well as a variance to allow for the construction of a sport court in the front yard, for the property located at 4700 Juneau Lane. Notice of this public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet. A copy of the notification area map is attached. CONTEXT The property (4700 Juneau Lane) is guided LA-1 and is zoned RSF-2 Surrounding Land Uses Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning North Single Family Residential LA-1 RSF-2 East Single Family Residential LA-1 RSF-2 South (across 47th Ave.) Single Family Residential LA-1 RSF-2 West (across Juneau Ln) Single Family Residential LA-1 RSF-2 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a 19-foot front yard building setback variance to the required 25-foot front yard building setback to allow for the construction of fence in the front yard approximately 6 feet from the property line and a variance to allow for the construction of a sport court/recreational facility in the front yard. The property is located at 4700 Juneau Lane. The proposed fence and sport court will encroach into the front yard along 47th Avenue, which is considered a front yard for this corner lot. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether the proposal meets the standards for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance. 4 2023076 Page 2 ANALYSIS OF REQUEST This property is a corner lot that has frontage on both Juneau Lane and 47th Avenue. The zoning ordinance requires a front yard building setback of 25 feet on both sides of the lot that abut the public road. The applicant wishes to construct a fence on the side of the lot that abuts 47th Avenue. The proposed setback for the fence is 6 feet, where a 25-foot setback is required, thus necessitating the need for a 19-foot front yard setback variance. The applicant is also proposing to install a sport court behind the home on the lot, which also extends into the front yard along 47th Avenue. The setback of the sport court is acceptable in that it is setback 27 feet from the property line on the corner lot. The sport court, however, is considered a play and recreational facility, as defined below, and this court is not permitted within front yards. Therefore, a variance is required for the location of the court within the front yard of the site. 21115.04. Subd. 1 of the zoning ordinance addresses play and recreational facilities and their allowed locations: The following shall not be considered as encroachments on yard setback requirements. (d) Pursuant to Section 21120 of this Chapter, accessory buildings and structures including, but not limited to, sheds, play and recreational facilities, private dog kennels, laundry drying equipment, and gazebos shall not be located in a front yard. Such accessory buildings or structures may be located within: 1) a side or rear yard, provided they comply with the minimum side or rear yard setback requirement for accessory structures as prescribed by the applicable district; and 2) a front yard which qualifies as an equivalent rear or side yard (as defined by this Chapter) provided they are set back from such front lot line a distance equal to, or greater than, the minimum front setback specified for the principal building on the lot, and comply with the minimum side yard setback requirement for accessory structures, as prescribed by the applicable district. No encroachment shall be permitted in existing or required drainage and utility easements, unless approved by the City Engineer. The exception is that eave overhangs and any related gutters for detached accessory buildings may encroach into a yard setback and drainage and utility easement up to 24 inches beyond the exterior walls of the building. Play and Recreational Facilities: Accessory structures and/or uses that are customary and incidental to the principal use of the site, including but not limited to swing sets, play structures, sand boxes, fire pits, skateboard ramps, batting cages, tennis courts, sport courts, swimming pools and their related aprons, and the like, intended for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests. The variance proposed for the sport court is for a portion of a play and recreational facility within the front yard (in front of the furthest wall projection of the principal structure toward 47th Avenue). The applicant establishes proposed practical difficulties with complying with the ordinance in the attached variance narrative. 5 2023076 Page 3 The applicant has submitted a letter from the adjacent property owner to the north who is in support of the application. Staff reviewed the requests according to the standards listed in section 21030 of the zoning ordinance and has made the following findings: 1. The variances, and their resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The applicants have demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance regulations, because: a. The requests are reasonable and the property would be used in a reasonable manner; and b. The requests are due to circumstances not created by the landowners; and c. The variances would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood. 3. The variance requests are not based exclusively upon economic considerations but rather, the variances are requested to make improvements to the lot to make it more usable for the current occupants. 4. The requested variances and resulting construction would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. 5. The requested variances and resulting construction, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would they substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. 6. The variances requested are the minimum action required to address the practical difficulties and allow the homeowners to improve the livability of the home and to provide usable space. RECOMMENDATION: Community and Economic Development Department staff recommend approval of the variances at 4700 Juneau Lane, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. 6 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/25/2023 Comments: 1 inch = 50 feet PARCEL ID: 0911822420061 OWNER NAME: W B Winger & K P Winger PARCEL ADDRESS: 4700 Juneau La N,Plymouth MN 55446 PARCEL AREA: 0.38 acres, 16,453 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $504,000 SALE DATE: 12/2020 SALE CODE: Warranty Deed ASSESSED 2022, PAYABLE 2023 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $553,000 TAX TOTAL: $6,157.02 ASSESSED 2023, PAYABLE 2024 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $570,600 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is not suitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2023 Fence extends 28' off house (6' from property line which is 15'from the curb 7 8 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 0 100 20050 Feet Date: 11/6/2023 Buffer Size:200Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 9 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2023- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR BRAD WINGER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4700 JUNEAU LANE (2023 076) WHEREAS Brad Winger has requested the approval of a setback variance and a front yard variance to allow for the construction of a fence and a sport court in the front yard; and WHEREAS, property legally described as follows Lot 15, Block 1, Tyrell 8th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Brad Winger for a variance to allow a 6 foot fence in the front yard setback and a variance for a sport court in the front yard at 4700 Juneau Lane, subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The requested variance are hereby approved in accordance with the application received by the City on October 24, 2023, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. The requested front yard setback and front yard variances are approved with the findings that all applicable variance standards would be met. Specifically: a. The variances, and their resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. b. The applicants have demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with the ordinance regulations, because: i. The requests are reasonable and the property would be used in a reasonable manner; and ii. The requests are due to circumstances not created by the landowners; and iii. The variances would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood. c. The variance requests are not based exclusively upon economic considerations but rather, the variances are requested to make improvements to the lot to make it more usable for the current occupants. 10 Resolution 2023- File 2023076 Page 2 d. The requested variances and resulting construction would not be detrimental to the public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. e. The requested variances and resulting construction, would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would they substantially increase traffic congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood. f. The variances requested are the minimum action required to address the practical difficulties and allow the homeowners to improve the livability of the home and to provide usable space. 3. The permit is subject to all applicable building and fire codes, and to all city regulations and ordinances. Any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 4. The variance shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicants have commenced the authorized improvement or use, or unless the applicants, with the consent of the property owner, have received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21030.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. APPROVED by the City Council on this ___th day of _____, 2023. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on ______, 2023, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the city this ________day of ___________________, _________. __________________________________ Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk 11 Regular Planning Commission November 15, 2023 Agenda Number:4.2 To:Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by:Chloe McGuire, Planning and Development Manager Reviewed by:Grant Fernelius, Community and Economic Development Director Item:Adopt October 18, 2023 minutes 1. Action Requested: Motion to approve the October 18, 2023 minutes. 2. Background: The Planning Commission held their regular meeting October 18, 2023. 3. Budget Impact: NA 4. Attachments: Draft Minutes 12 1 Proposed Minutes October 18, 2023 Proposed Minutes Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2023 Chair Boo called a Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on September 20, 2023. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Michael Boo, Bill Wixon, Marc Anderson, Neha Markanda, and Jennifer Jerulle COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Julie Olson, and Josh Fowler STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planner Shawn Drill, Senior Planner Lori Sommers OTHERS PRESENT: None Chair Boo led the Pledge of Allegiance. Call to Order Public Forum Approval of Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Jerulle, and seconded by Commissioner Wixon, to approve the agenda. With all Commissioners voting in favor, the motion carried. Consent Agenda (4.1) Planning Commission minutes from meeting held on September 20, 2023. Motion was made by Commissioner Anderson, and seconded by Commissioner Markanda, to approve the consent agenda. With all Commissioners voting in favor, the motion carried. New Business (5.1)Approve variance request for 1530 Weston Ln N (2023067 - Jon Green) Senior Planner Drill presented the staff report. Commissioner Anderson asked if there would be any issues related to the additional impervious surface being added. 13 2 Proposed Minutes October 18, 2023 Senior Planner Drill replied that this lot is not within the shoreland overlay district and therefore that is not a concern. He stated that this is well under the 30 percent building to lot ratio. Chair Boo introduced John Green, applicant, who stated that the only other location would be the backyard because of the locations of his neighbors but noted the difficulty in reaching that location because of the grade of his property. He stated that access to any other location on his property would be difficult. Commissioner Wixon asked if the neighbors in the adjoining lots support the project. Mr. Green replied that his neighbors to the north, south, and two neighbors across the street support the project. He noted that many properties on Weston Lane do not even have the 15-foot setback on the side. He noted that the two lots south of him are only 50 feet wide. Commissioner Wixon asked if the neighbors understand that there will be construction noise. Mr. Green provided details on his proposed design/construction which would match the typical home appearance. Commissioner Markanda asked if the neighbors have been communicated with the timeline of the project. Mr. Green replied that he hoped to have this constructed this summer, but his process was delayed. He stated that his case is scheduled to move to the Council in November and therefore it would most likely be spring before the footings could be dug. Commissioner Anderson asked when the home was built. Mr. Green replied that the home was built in the 1970s as were most of the homes in that area. Commissioner Anderson commented that this will be a nice improvement to the property. Chair Boo noted that this is a reasonable modification, and the variance is necessary because of the lot and area. Motion was made by Commissioner Anderson, and seconded by Commissioner Wixon, to recommend approval of a resolution approving a variance for John K. Green for the property located at 1530 Weston Lane N., with the removal of “tributary stream” from the resolution. With all Commissioners voting in favor, the motion carried. Adjournment Chair Boo adjourned the meeting at 7:12 p.m. 14 Regular Planning Commission November 15, 2023 Agenda Number:4.3 To:Planning Commission Prepared by:Chloe McGuire, Planning and Development Manager Reviewed by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager File No:NA 1. Applicant: City of Plymouth 2. Proposal: Review the Capital Improvement Program for years 2024-2032. 3. Location: Plymouth 4. Guiding: NA 5. Zoning: NA 6. School District: NA 7. Review Deadline: November 15, 2023 8. Description: The capital improvement program (CIP) is updated biennially and includes: the financing/building of physical facilities, equipment/software, and projects in excess of $25,000 for the next ten years. 15 9. Attachments: 2024 (Amended 2023) CIP by Department 2024 (Amended 2023) CIP by Funding Source 16 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments Switch Upgrades 2017 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 0 120,000 Newly identified Police Squad Computer Upgrade 2024 190,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190,000 190,000 0 190,000 Newly identified Switch Upgrades 2024 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 0 80,000 Newly identified Hosted Phone System 2024 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 Newly identified $370,000 $80,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000 $490,000 $0 $490,000 $370,000 $80,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000 $490,000 $0 $490,000 Dome & Turf Repair and Replacement 2020 0 0 700,000 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 0 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 0 Fieldhouse Electrical & Mechanical 2020 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 Fieldhouse Equipment 2020 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 $0 $30,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,930,000 $1,930,000 $1,930,000 $0 Replace Ice Center Dehumidifier Desiccant Wheels 2013 0 0 0 50,000 0 65,000 0 0 0 0 115,000 115,000 115,000 0 Replace Ice Center Roof 2013 0 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 Replace Ice Center Dasher Boards 2013 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195,000 195,000 195,000 0 Replace Cooling Towers at Plymouth Ice Center 2016 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 0 340,000 340,000 310,000 30,000 moved up from 2026 Replace Ice Center Roof Top Air Handler 2013 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 275,000 275,000 275,000 0 PIC General Building Improvements 2019 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 275,000 275,000 275,000 0 Rupp Roof Air-Exchange 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 110,000 110,000 110,000 0 PIC Water Heaters 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 PIC Sound System 2020 110,000 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 190,000 190,000 190,000 0 PIC Rubber Flooring 2020 0 0 0 90,000 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 PIC Ice Resurfacers 2020 0 0 0 0 170,000 170,000 0 0 0 0 340,000 340,000 340,000 0 PIC Scoreboards 2020 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 0 0 0 165,000 165,000 165,000 0 $470,000 $295,000 $125,000 $690,000 $250,000 $295,000 $270,000 $310,000 $0 $0 $2,705,000 $2,705,000 $2,675,000 $30,000 Replace Irrigation Systems 2003 0 400,000 275,000 0 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 1,075,000 1,075,000 1,075,000 0 Neighborhood Parks 2012 0 700,000 300,000 400,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 0 Boardwalk replacement 2010 225,000 0 150,000 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 525,000 525,000 525,000 0 Tennis Court Repair 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 475,000 0 0 0 475,000 475,000 475,000 0 Northwest Greenway 2012 1,850,000 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 0 Park Lighting 2016 0 0 175,000 0 480,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000 655,000 655,000 0 Playfield Land Development 2016 5,800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,800,000 5,800,000 5,300,000 500,000 Asset Renovation/Replacement 2022 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 New Trails 2003 150,000 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 800,000 800,000 0 Playground Replacement or Renovation 2006 500,000 270,000 300,000 400,000 350,000 375,000 350,000 350,000 0 0 2,895,000 2,895,000 2,895,000 0 Trail Repair 2003 500,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 Miscellaneous Park Improvements 2006 0 200,000 175,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 150,000 0 0 825,000 825,000 825,000 0 Outdoor Artificial Turf 2020 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 Park Amenities & Facilities 2020 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 Land Acquisition 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 (1,200,000) Park Building Repair/Renovation 2020 0 0 0 1,300,000 0 1,000,000 0 100,000 0 0 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 0 $9,125,000 $2,620,000 $1,875,000 $4,300,000 $1,880,000 $3,425,000 $1,475,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $26,200,000 $26,200,000 $26,900,000 $(700,000) $9,595,000 $2,945,000 $2,950,000 $4,990,000 $2,130,000 $3,720,000 $2,695,000 $1,810,000 $0 $0 $30,835,000 $30,835,000 $31,505,000 $(670,000) Air Compressor 2007 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,000 38,000 38,000 0 Remote Sheepsfoot Trench Compactor 2012 0 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 2005 Air Compressor 2016 31,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 31,000 31,000 0 1996 350 Kw Generator on Wheels 2017 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 2006 Dozer 2017 235,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235,000 235,000 235,000 0 2013 Ford Pick up with plow 2019 0 46,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,500 46,500 46,500 0 2013 Bobcat S630 Skidsteer 2019 51,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51,000 51,000 51,000 0 New Sidewalk Machine 2020 0 185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185,000 185,000 185,000 0 GF impact 2013 Smithco Field Painter 2019 21,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,500 21,500 21,500 0 Utility Body - Truck 1 2024 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145,000 145,000 145,000 new request (Fire). Public Safety Aid funding Utility Body - Truck 2 2024 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 new request (Fire). Public Safety Aid funding Chevrolet Colorado (Inspector Truck)2024 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 new request (Fire). GF impact 2006 Cat Loader with plow and wing 2020 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0CE-24-0202 CE-23-500X CE-23-6045 CE-24-00X2 CE-24-00X3 CE-24-00X4 CE-21-0302 CE-21-0304 CE-23-2014 CE-23-3048 PUBLIC WORKS Central Services - Central Equipment CE-11-0319 CE-15-0205 CE-20-0239 PR-XX-9006 PR-XX-9007 Total: Parks & Rec Admin TOTAL: PARKS AND RECREATION PR-23-0003 PR-23-0004 PR-23-0005 PR-29-0001 PR-XX-9005 PR-14-0005 PR-16-0002 PR-20-0001 PR-22-0001 PR-23-0001 Parks & Rec Admin PR-07-0005 PR-13-0001 PR-14-0003 PR-14-0004 IC-XX-9003 IC-XX-9004 IC-XX-9006 Total: Ice Center IC-23-0001 IC-23-0002 IC-30-0001 IC-XX-9001 IC-XX-9002 Ice Center IC-14-0003 IC-16-0002 IC-17-0001 IC-20-0001 FH-XX-9001 FH-XX-9002 FH-XX-9003 Total: Field House Total: Information Technology TOTAL: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PARKS AND RECREATION Field House Information Technology IT-17-0007 IT-24-0001 IT-24-0002 IT-24-0003 City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 17 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Police Cars (7)2020 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 126,000 126,000 0 Public Safety Vehicle Up-fitting (4)2023 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 2014 Ford F-350 4x4 with plow 2020 44,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,300 44,300 44,300 0 2014 Truck mounted heated Asphalt patch unit 2020 0 87,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87,000 87,000 87,000 0 2004 Atlas Copco Generator 52 Kw 2020 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 27,000 27,000 0 2012 Big Tow Skid Steer Trailer 20" deck 18,200lb 2020 0 0 13,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,700 13,700 13,700 0 2014 Multi terrain Loader Tracked Skid Cat 287D 2020 0 0 94,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94,400 94,400 94,400 0 2014 1/2 Ton 4x4 GMC PU Engineering 2020 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,500 34,500 34,500 0 MacLean MV2 Sidewalk Machine 2020 211,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211,000 211,000 211,000 0 2014 Ford SUV Escape 2020 0 0 32,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,700 32,700 32,700 0 Bob Cat All Steer Skid Steer A770 2013 2020 66,850 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,850 66,850 66,850 0 2014 Chev 4x4 Pick up 2020 0 44,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,200 44,200 44,200 0 2014 ABI Field Groomer 2020 26,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,300 26,300 26,300 0 Pickup Truck w/ Utility Box 2024 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 new request (P&R). GF impact Toro Reelmaster 3100D 2024 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 new request (P&R). GF impact 2014 Pro Core deep Aerator SR72 2020 32,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,000 32,000 32,000 0 2016 Vermeer BC 1800XL015 wood chipper 2017 88,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,000 88,000 88,000 0 Kubota Tractor Snowblower 2024 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 new request (P&R). GF impact Medium Duty Fire Rescue Truck 2021 0 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 360,000 360,000 0 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup w/plow 2021 0 53,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53,500 53,500 53,500 0 2015 Lift Station Truck with F-550 chassis 2017 0 104,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,000 104,000 104,000 0 2015 Chevrolet Pickup 4x4 w/Utility box 2021 0 59,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,500 59,500 59,500 0 Police Cars (7)2020 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 126,000 126,000 0 2015 Black Ford Taurus Investigation 2021 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2015 Chev Pick up 4x4 with plow 2021 0 88,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,000 88,000 48,000 40,000 enhanced replacement (PW). GF impact 2015 Chevrolet Pickup 4x4 w/ plow 2021 0 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 48,000 48,000 0 2015 White Colorado Bldg div 2021 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2016 Chev Colorado, Bld Inspections 2017 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 4 door 4x4 Pickup Truck 2021 0 44,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,700 44,700 44,700 0 2015 Ford Focus Hatchback car 2021 0 26,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 2015 T-650 Tracked Bobcat Skid Steer 2021 0 77,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,000 77,000 0 77,000 not purchased in 2023 Toro GM 7210 Mower, blower polar tracks 2017 0 71,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,000 71,000 0 71,000 not purchased in 2023 2015 Mower with blower Toro GM 7210 with Polar tracks 2017 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 70,000 77,000 (7,000)cost adjustments 2015 Groomer Rake Toro Model 8750 Pro Sand 5040 2017 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 37,000 71,000 (34,000)cost adjustments 2017 Ground Master Mower 2022 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 130,000 70,000 60,000 cost adjustments F550 Truck w/ Dump box, Plow, Sander 2024 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 37,000 63,000 new request (P&R). GF impact RC Mower - Tracked 52" Rotary Mower 2024 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 130,000 (55,000)adjusted request (P&R). GF impact 2020 GPS Robot Sprayer 2022 0 44,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,000 44,000 44,000 0 E-21 Engine Pumper for Duty Crew 2017 0 0 640,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 640,000 640,000 640,000 0 2016 Ford Expedtion used by Fire Chief 2017 0 0 57,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,500 57,500 57,500 0 2016 Ford Expedtion 2017 0 0 58,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,000 58,000 58,000 0 2014 Mack Tandem with plow etc. 2022 0 0 365,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 365,000 0 2015 Mack Tandem, with snow equip 2022 0 0 365,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365,000 365,000 365,000 0 2014 Single Axle dump with Swap Loader Hook 2022 301,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301,600 301,600 301,600 0 2001 Onan 350 Kw Generator on Trailer 2022 0 0 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115,000 115,000 115,000 0 2016 GMC Sierra 1/2 ton 4x4 double cab Sr Eng Tech 2017 0 0 0 35,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,500 35,500 35,500 0 2016 GMC with Utility Body for Hyd Maint 2017 0 0 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61,000 61,000 61,000 0 2015 Engine Pumper 2022 0 0 630,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 630,000 630,000 630,000 0 Nilfisk Advance CS7000 Floor Sweeper/Scrubber 2017 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 68,000 68,000 0 PD SUV Investigation 2021 0 0 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 48,000 48,000 0 2008 24' trailer with 6' ramps for Paver 2022 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 2016 Carlson CP100 Asphalt Paver 2017 0 0 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 270,000 0 Pavement Melter 2020 0 0 59,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,000 59,000 59,000 0 Mini Excavator Case CX318 2014 2022 0 0 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56,000 56,000 56,000 0 2016 Colorado, Bld inspections 2017 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 2016 Colorado Pick up--Bld inspections 2017 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 2016 F-350 Ford pick with plow 2017 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 F-350 Ford Pick up with plow 2017 0 0 49,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49,500 49,500 49,500 0 JD Gator Groomer and Rake 2020 0 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 27,000 27,000 0 2017 Toro GM 7210 D Zero turn 2020 0 0 0 71,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,500 71,500 71,500 0 2015 Ford F-150 Pick Up Utility 31 2017 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 0 2016 Tandem Truck with Plow 2023 0 0 0 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 360,000 360,000 0 2016 T880 Kenworth Truck Tractor 2023 0 0 0 0 0 190,000 0 0 0 0 190,000 190,000 190,000 0 2017 GMC 2500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 2017 GMC 2500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 46,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,000 46,000 46,000 0 2017 GMC 1500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 Police Cars (7)2020 0 0 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 126,000 126,000 0 CE-27-0385 CE-27-0386 CE-27-1000 CE-26-5045 CE-27-0052 CE-27-0293 CE-27-0378 CE-27-0384 CE-26-4007 CE-26-4008 CE-26-5039 CE-26-5040 CE-26-5042 CE-26-1723 CE-26-2008 CE-26-2038 CE-26-2046 CE-26-3060 CE-26-0305 CE-26-0381 CE-26-0382 CE-26-051 CE-26-0789 CE-26-0053 CE-26-0054 CE-26-0290 CE-26-0291 CE-26-0292 CE-25-5052 CE-25-50X1 CE-25-50XX CE-25-6136 CE-26-0051 CE-25-5032 CE-25-5035 CE-25-5036 CE-25-5037 CE-25-5038 CE-25-2027 CE-25-2028 CE-25-4005 CE-25-4006 CE-25-5031 CE-25-0376 CE-25-0377 CE-25-0379 CE-25-1000 CE-25-1718 CE-24-50XX CE-24-6070 CE-24-6085 CE-24-60XX CE-25-0035 CE-24-5025 CE-24-5027 CE-24-5028 CE-24-5030 CE-24-50X1 CE-24-3025 CE-24-3045 CE-24-3059 CE-24-4004 CE-24-5021 CE-24-1000 CE-24-17XX CE-24-2020 CE-24-2023 Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 18 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2017 Bobcat S770 Skid Steer 2020 0 0 0 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,000 57,000 57,000 0 2017 Bobcat S770 Skid Steer 2020 0 0 0 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,000 57,000 57,000 0 2015 Low Boy Trailer Towmaster T-100DTG 2017 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 120,000 0 2015 Side Dup'r trailer 25 yard 2023 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 66,000 66,000 0 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2017 Ford F-350 4x4 with plow 2017 0 0 0 49,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 49,500 49,500 49,500 0 Toro GM 7210 Mower, blower polar tracks Broom 2017 0 0 71,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,000 71,000 71,000 0 2017 F-350 Truck 2022 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 2017 Ford F-350 Truck 2022 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 2017 Isuzu Garbage Truck 2020 0 0 0 139,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,000 139,000 139,000 0 2017 Mack Tandem dump truck 2017 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 355,000 0 2017 Mack Tandem dump truck 2017 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 0 355,000 355,000 355,000 0 2017 Kenworth with B-10 Aquatech Jetter/Vac truck 2017 0 0 0 0 520,000 0 0 0 0 0 520,000 520,000 520,000 0 2017 GMC Sierra Reg Cab 4x2 2023 0 0 0 0 46,000 0 0 0 0 0 46,000 46,000 46,000 0 2018 F550 4x4 dump 2022 0 0 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 86,000 86,000 0 Police Cars (7)2020 0 0 0 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 145,000 145,000 145,000 0 Falls 12' Snowplow 10' wing 2024 0 0 0 0 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 56,000 56,000 56,000 0 2013 Case Wheel Loader 721F 2017 0 0 0 0 265,000 0 0 0 0 0 265,000 265,000 265,000 0 2016 Stepp 4 yrd hot box for asphalt with F-750 Chassis 2017 0 0 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 195,000 195,000 195,000 0 Street Sweeper 2020 0 0 0 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 290,000 0 Street Sweeper 2020 0 0 0 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 0 290,000 290,000 290,000 0 2018 Ford F-150 2022 0 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 0 0 0 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 Cat Loader 908H2 2024 0 0 0 0 149,000 0 0 0 0 0 149,000 149,000 149,000 0 2017 Ford F-450 2023 0 0 0 0 87,000 0 0 0 0 0 87,000 87,000 87,000 0 F150 Pickup 4x4 2020 0 0 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 37,000 37,000 0 Vermeer Wood chipper 2020 0 0 0 0 98,000 0 0 0 0 0 98,000 98,000 98,000 0 2020 Trimax Mower 2022 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 52,000 52,000 0 2020 mower/mulcher 2022 0 0 0 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 27,000 27,000 0 2014 Explorer Fire Dept 2025 58,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,000 58,000 58,000 0 Fire Mini-Pumper 2021 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 0 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 450,000 0 2018 Mack GU Single Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 330,000 0 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 330,000 0 2018 Mack GU713 Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 2019 F550 Truck Dump and Lift Gate Body 2022 0 0 0 0 0 91,000 0 0 0 0 91,000 91,000 91,000 0 2019 Freightliner M2 - Jetter 2022 0 0 0 0 0 277,000 0 0 0 0 277,000 277,000 277,000 0 2019 F250 Truck w/ Snow plow 2022 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 0 0 52,000 52,000 52,000 0 2019 TV Van - Utilities 2022 0 0 0 0 0 308,000 0 0 0 0 308,000 308,000 308,000 0 Ford F-450 contractor box 2017 model 2017 0 0 0 0 0 76,000 0 0 0 0 76,000 76,000 76,000 0 2017 Msaba Conveyor 2022 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 68,000 68,000 68,000 0 2019 Cat Asphalt roller 2022 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 68,000 68,000 68,000 0 XQ 30KW Portable Generator 2025 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2019 Ford Fusion (pool car)2021 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 0 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 2019 Ford Fusion (pool car)2021 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 0 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 2017 F-450 One ton contractor box 2017 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 86,000 86,000 86,000 0 Sidewalk Machine 2020 0 0 0 0 0 215,000 0 0 0 0 215,000 215,000 215,000 0 2017 Ford F550 Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 93,000 0 0 0 0 93,000 93,000 93,000 0 2017 Ford F-550 box and lift gate 2022 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 175,000 175,000 0 2017 Ford F-450 with box and lift gate 2022 0 0 0 0 0 77,000 0 0 0 0 77,000 77,000 77,000 0 2017 Kubota RTV 2022 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 0 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 2018 Ford F150 4x4 Super Cab 6.5 Box 2023 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 Fire Engine Pumper 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 920,000 0 0 0 920,000 920,000 920,000 0 2019 Tandem Axle 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 335,000 0 0 0 335,000 335,000 335,000 0 2018 Tandem Axle 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 261,000 0 0 0 261,000 261,000 261,000 0 2020 Chevy Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Police SRO Truck 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 Police SUV 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,000 0 0 0 44,000 44,000 44,000 0 2015 Asphalt Tack oil distributor with F-750 Chassis 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 2019 F-550 Truck with Crew cab 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 2020 Chevy Silverado 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 0 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 0 2020 Arrow Board 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 2020 Chevy Truck 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 2020 Ford Ranger 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2018 International Single Axle Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 207,000 0 0 0 207,000 207,000 207,000 0 F550 Ford 4x4 Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 94,900 0 0 0 94,900 94,900 94,900 0 F250 4x4 2019 Super Cab Ford Pickup 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,600 0 0 0 54,600 54,600 54,600 0 F250 4x4 2019 Super Cab Ford Pickup 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 0 52,000 52,000 52,000 0 CE-30-4017 CE-30-5054 CE-30-5057 CE-30-5061 CE-30-5062 CE-30-2030 CE-30-2072 CE-30-2080 CE-30-2085 CE-30-4016 CE-30-0387 CE-30-0388 CE-30-0395 CE-30-1728 CE-30-1730 CE-29-5050 CE-29-5051 CE-29-5053 CE-29-5060 CE-30-0048 CE-29-4014 CE-29-4015 CE-29-5043 CE-29-5046 CE-29-5047 CE-29-0394 CE-29-2039 CE-29-2051 CE-29-2076 CE-29-3061 CE-29-0296 CE-29-0297 CE-29-0390 CE-29-0391 CE-29-0392 CE-28-6104 CE-28-6133 CE-28-6134 CE-29-0047 CE-29-0049 CE-28-2065 CE-28-4012 CE-28-5023 CE-28-5043 CE-28-5058 CE-28-1000 CE-28-2018 CE-28-2019 CE-28-2037 CE-28-2056 CE-28-0294 CE-28-0295 CE-28-0380 CE-28-0383 CE-28-0389 CE-27-5044 CE-27-5045 CE-27-5048 CE-27-5049 CE-27-5055 CE-27-3067 CE-27-3068 CE-27-4009 CE-27-4010 CE-27-4011 CE-27-2053 CE-27-2054 Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 19 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2019 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 82,300 0 0 0 82,300 82,300 82,300 0 2020 Toro Zero Turn 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 2020 Toro Zero Turn 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 2020 F-150 1/2 Ton 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,000 0 0 0 42,000 42,000 42,000 0 2019 Cargo Van 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 0 41,000 41,000 41,000 0 2020 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab 1 Ton 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,200 0 0 0 54,200 54,200 54,200 0 2020 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab 1 Ton 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 56,900 0 0 0 56,900 56,900 56,900 0 2011 Ford F-350 4x4 Grass Rig 2027 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 66,000 66,000 66,000 0 2019 Mack GR64F Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 2019 Mack GR64F Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 2021 John Deere 710L 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 0 0 230,000 230,000 230,000 0 Shop Lift-drive on 14,000 lbs. Capacity with jacks 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,400 0 0 24,400 24,400 24,400 0 2019 Mack GR42F Single Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 380,000 0 0 380,000 380,000 380,000 0 2016 EH Trailer 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,000 0 0 104,000 104,000 104,000 0 2019 Colorado 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,000 0 0 38,000 38,000 38,000 0 2020 Chevrolet Bolt EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,800 0 0 36,800 36,800 36,800 0 2021 Chevrolet Bolt EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,600 0 0 34,600 34,600 34,600 0 2016 John Deere 4066R Utility Tractor with snow blower 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 0 110,000 110,000 110,000 0 2019 F-250 Ford Super Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,300 0 0 60,300 60,300 60,300 0 2021 Tractor 4066R 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95,400 0 0 95,400 95,400 95,400 0 2021 John Deere 624L Loader 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313,900 0 0 313,900 313,900 313,900 0 2021 Ford Transit Connect Cargo Van 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,900 0 0 35,900 35,900 35,900 0 Triple Combination Engine Pumper 2028 1,020,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,020,000 1,020,000 0 1,020,000 Originally scheduled for 2022. 2020 Western Star 4700 SF 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312,000 0 312,000 312,000 312,000 0 2020 Western Star 4700 SF 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 0 360,000 360,000 360,000 0 2020 Tymco 500X Street Sweeper 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425,000 0 425,000 425,000 425,000 0 2022 Asphalt Planer 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 0 36,000 36,000 36,000 0 2017 Wacker Dump Cart 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,400 0 88,400 88,400 88,400 0 2018 PV350-D1W Pacific Tech 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62,800 0 62,800 62,800 62,800 0 2020 T-50 Trailer 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,500 0 55,500 55,500 55,500 0 2019 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,800 0 33,800 33,800 33,800 0 2019 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,600 0 33,600 33,600 33,600 0 2020 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,600 0 33,600 33,600 33,600 0 2019 F-550 4x4 Ford Super Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86,100 0 86,100 86,100 86,100 0 2020 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 0 86,000 86,000 86,000 0 2019 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,600 0 77,600 77,600 77,600 0 2020 John Deere 4066R Compact Utility Tractor 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,100 0 91,100 91,100 91,100 0 2017 Turfco TRF 338 Spreader 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,500 0 42,500 42,500 42,500 0 $3,224,050 $2,292,400 $3,284,800 $1,293,500 $3,094,000 $3,180,000 $2,926,900 $2,229,300 $1,824,000 $0 $23,348,950 $23,348,950 $21,523,950 $1,825,000 Public Safety - Replace Garage Air Makeup Unit 2015 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Replace water to air and water to water pumps - Central and Zachary Plants 2020 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 180,000 180,000 0 Maintenance Facility - RTU Replacement for Mechanic's Office and Sign Making Room 2017 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Citywide - Bathroom Remodels 2020 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 270,000 270,000 0 Public Safety - Garage Waterproofing Repairs 2019 0 0 0 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 55,000 55,000 2023 project delayed Old Central - Roof Replacement 2020 0 0 0 0 135,000 0 0 0 0 0 135,000 135,000 135,000 2023 project delayed City Hall - Landscaping Replacement 2020 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 2023 project delayed City Hall - Elevator Replacement 2020 330,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330,000 330,000 330,000 2023 project delayed Public Safety - Passenger Elevator (entry)2021 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115,000 115,000 115,000 2023 project delayed PCC - Install Generator 2021 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Landscape Rehab 2023 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 120,000 2023 project delayed City Hall - Replace Kato-lite generator and supporting switch gear/panels 2020 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195,000 195,000 195,000 0 Fire Station 1 - Replace generator and switch gear 2023 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 Zachary WTP -- Parking lot replacement 2023 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 Public Safety VAV controller replacement 2023 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 PCC - Replace Metal Roof Sections 2020 0 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140,000 140,000 140,000 0 Public Safety - Roof Section Replacement 2020 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 Fire Station 1 - Roof Replacement 2020 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 City Hall - Replace and Repair Heated Concrete Sidewalk 2020 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 City Hall - Replace Vinyl Flooring 2020 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Fire Station 1 - Replace Plumbing Finishes and Fixtures 2020 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Station 73 - Replace AC, AC Compressors, & Radiant Heaters 2020 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Overhead Door Replacement 2022 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 City Hall - Courtyard Sidewalk Replacement 2023 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 City Hall - Landscape Rehab 2023 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 FM-25-0009 FM-25-0010 FM-25-0011 FM-25-0012 FM-25-0013 FM-25-0001 FM-25-0002 FM-25-0003 FM-25-0004 FM-25-0005 FM-23-0013 FM-24-0001 FM-24-0003 FM-24-0004 FM-24-0005 FM-23-0003 FM-23-0004 FM-23-0008 FM-23-0009 FM-23-0010 FM-19-0002 FM-20-0023 FM-21-0001 FM-21-0013 FM-23-0001 CE-32-5068 CE-32-6095 Total: Central Services - Central Equipment Central Services - Public Facilities CE-32-4022 CE-32-4023 CE-32-5063 CE-32-5064 CE-32-5065 CE-32-2090 CE-32-3078 CE-32-3079 CE-32-3082 CE-32-4021 CE-31-5079 CE-31-7002 CE-32-2071 CE-32-2074 CE-32-2084 CE-31-4018 CE-31-4019 CE-31-5041 CE-31-5067 CE-31-5076 CE-32-0043 CE-31-0396 CE-31-0791 CE-31-2057 CE-31-3075 CE-31-4013 CE-30-5074 CE-30-5075 CE-31-0042 CE-31-0298 CE-31-0299 CE-30-5066 CE-30-5069 CE-30-5070 CE-30-5071 CE-30-5072 Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 20 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Zachary WTP - Dehumidification and Ventilation System Replacement 2022 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 800,000 800,000 0 Central WTP - Exhaust Fans/Transfer Replacement 2022 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace 2 Roof Sections 2020 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 600,000 600,000 0 Zachary WTP - Replace Generator 2020 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 110,000 110,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Flooring Finishes 2020 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Electrical Panels from 1979 2020 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Standpipes and Repair Sprinkler System 2020 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,000 108,000 108,000 0 Central WTP - Mechanical Replacements 2020 0 0 950,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 950,000 950,000 950,000 0 Fire Station 1 - Replace Makeup Air Unit 2020 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Central WTP - Installation of RTU 2022 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 City Hall RTU 5 replacement 2023 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 Zachary WTP - Replace Roof 2020 0 0 0 205,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 205,000 205,000 205,000 0 City Hall - Replace/Update fire/security systems 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Fire Station 1 - Fire/Security update 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Public Safety - Replace Electrical panels/Switch gears and generator 2020 0 0 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 380,000 380,000 380,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Vehicle Storage Area Skylights 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Public Safety - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Roof Drains 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace HVAC Automation Controls 2020 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Zachary WTP - Replace Dry Cooling Rooftop Unit 2020 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 City Hall - Remodel Council Chambers, Reception, Trophy Cases, Decorative Woodwork 2020 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Bi-fold Door Replacement 2022 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 120,000 120,000 0 Zachary WTP - Replace electrical panels/switch gear servicing the facility 2020 0 0 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 130,000 130,000 0 City Hall - Replace Reheat Coil Units 2020 0 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 180,000 180,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Office Side Rooftop unit 1 2020 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Public Safety - Replace bi-fold garage doors 2023 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 Central WTP - Replace Roof 2020 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 160,000 0 City Hall - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Replace Wall Finishes 2020 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 City Hall - Replace Plumbing Fixtures 2020 0 0 0 0 0 90,000 0 0 0 0 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 Station 73 - Replace Standpipes and Repair Sprinkler System 2020 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Public Safety - Replace Gutters and Downspouts 2020 0 0 0 0 0 62,000 0 0 0 0 62,000 62,000 62,000 0 Public Safety - Replace Thermostats and Controls 2020 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 City Hall - RTU # 4 (trane)2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Zachary WTP - Exhaust Fan Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Public Safety - RTU #7 and 8 Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Mechanical Unit Heaters 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 Public Safety - Exhaust Fans 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,000 0 0 0 29,000 29,000 29,000 0 Public Safety - Water Softener 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 City Hall - Roll Down Door replacement 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 Maintenance Facility - RTU 2 replacement 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 Public Safety - Boiler Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Mechanic Equipment 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 0 Maintenance Facility - Interior Furnishes replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 City Hall - Replace 2 boilers 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 Fire Station 2 - Replace washers and dryers 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 0 Public Facilities Building Automation System 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 PCC - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 PCC - Exterior Repairs and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 PCC - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Fire Station 2 - Exterior Repair and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Fire Station 2 - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Fire Station 2 - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 Fire Station 3 - Exterior Repair and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 Fire Station 3 - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Fire Station 3 - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 Seal Coating/Crack Sealing/Asphalt Repair 2004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 450,000 450,000 450,000 0 Misc. Concrete Replacement 2004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 450,000 450,000 450,000 0 Roof Inspections and Repairs 2014 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 315,000 315,000 315,000 0 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 225,000 225,000 225,000 0 Door and Window repair/replacement - Citywide 2020 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0 270,000 270,000 270,000 0 Interior Flooring Repair/Replacement 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 225,000 225,000 225,000 0 Exterior Maintenance to City buildings 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 225,000 225,000 225,000 0 $1,525,000 $3,090,000 $2,788,000 $1,755,000 $1,340,000 $1,067,000 $1,114,000 $660,000 $1,305,000 $0 $14,644,000 $14,644,000 $13,829,000 $815,000 FM-XX-9004 FM-XX-9005 FM-XX-9006 FM-XX-9007 Total: Central Services - Public Facilities FM-32-0011 FM-32-0012 FM-XX-9001 FM-XX-9002 FM-XX-9003 FM-32-0006 FM-32-0007 FM-32-0008 FM-32-0009 FM-32-0010 FM-32-0001 FM-32-0002 FM-32-0003 FM-32-0004 FM-32-0005 FM-30-0007 FM-30-0008 FM-31-0001 FM-31-0002 FM-31-0003 FM-30-0002 FM-30-0003 FM-30-0004 FM-30-0005 FM-30-0006 FM-29-0004 FM-29-0005 FM-29-0007 FM-29-0008 FM-30-0001 FM-28-0004 FM-28-0005 FM-29-0001 FM-29-0002 FM-29-0003 FM-27-0015 FM-27-0016 FM-27-0018 FM-28-0001 FM-28-0003 FM-27-0006 FM-27-0007 FM-27-0009 FM-27-0010 FM-27-0014 FM-26-0013 FM-27-0001 FM-27-0002 FM-27-0004 FM-27-0005 FM-26-0005 FM-26-0008 FM-26-0009 FM-26-0011 FM-26-0012 FM-25-0017 FM-25-0018 FM-26-0001 FM-26-0002 FM-26-0003 Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 21 General Fund levy impact Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Total 2024-2032 2023 CIP Total Dif Comments City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Department Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Department GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Mission Farm Lift Station Rehabilitation 2022 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 300,000 700,000 Lancaster Lift Station Electrical Renovation 2022 100,000 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,500,000 200,000 Line Sanitary Sewer Main: Annual Program 2002 1,630,000 1,370,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 12,200,000 11,000,000 10,100,000 900,000 Trunk Sewer Oversizing 2004 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Future Lift Station Improvements 2020 0 150,000 560,000 250,000 150,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 150,000 150,000 0 3,410,000 3,410,000 3,410,000 0 $2,830,000 $3,120,000 $1,660,000 $1,350,000 $1,250,000 $2,100,000 $2,200,000 $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $1,200,000 $18,410,000 $17,210,000 $15,410,000 $1,800,000 Hamel Road Frontage Road Connection 2016 120,000 1,480,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,600,000 1,600,000 0 1,600,000 2023 project delayed 54th Avenue from Peony Lane to CSAH 101 2016 0 0 250,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 0 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 2,900,000 2,900,000 2,900,000 0 Station 73 Transit Regional Improvement Project (TRIP)2022 4,350,000 20,000,000 2,973,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,323,000 27,323,000 5,000,000 22,323,000 Consolidated three separate projects into single project Hwy 55 Pavement Preservation Project 2022 480,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 480,000 480,000 0 480,000 2023 project delayed Chankahda Trail Reconstruction - Phase 3 (Vicksburg to CR 61) 2022 500,000 13,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,500,000 13,500,000 13,500,000 0 2024 project moved to 2025 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 9,280,000 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,780,000 12,780,000 7,480,000 5,300,000 Portion of 2023 project delayed and increased scope 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 1,500,000 5,850,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,350,000 8,350,000 3,500,000 4,850,000 Consolidated three separate projects into single project Peony Lane Bridge over CP Rail Improvements 2023 0 200,000 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 950,000 950,000 0 950,000 New project Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 6,000,000 5,750,000 6,150,000 4,700,000 9,700,000 7,850,000 10,250,000 7,850,000 9,200,000 0 67,450,000 67,450,000 61,200,000 6,250,000 Project shift due to RAISE & inflation Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 3,725,000 2,300,000 2,000,000 1,700,000 1,600,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,750,000 2,450,000 0 18,425,000 18,425,000 15,400,000 3,025,000 Project shift due to pavement condition assessment Replace Retaining Walls 2005 100,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 0 1,065,000 1,065,000 1,065,000 0 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 3,350,000 4,050,000 3,600,000 2,850,000 3,250,000 4,250,000 4,000,000 4,200,000 4,200,000 0 33,750,000 33,750,000 34,500,000 (750,000)Project shifts due to development and scope shifts Traffic Signal Improvements 2020 50,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 300,000 0 0 0 800,000 800,000 800,000 0 Concrete Sidewalk Replacement 2007 0 0 300,000 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 0 525,000 525,000 525,000 0 $29,455,000 $56,545,000 $17,188,000 $12,415,000 $14,665,000 $14,290,000 $18,605,000 $14,005,000 $15,980,000 $0 $193,148,000 $193,148,000 $149,120,000 $44,028,000 Zachary WTP Plate Settler Plant Expansion 2022 2,250,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 0 Well Refurbishing 2003 320,000 330,000 345,000 510,000 530,000 540,000 540,000 365,000 380,000 0 3,860,000 3,860,000 3,860,000 0 Trunk Watermain Oversizing 2004 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 Treatment Plant Refurbishing 2019 50,000 175,000 561,000 827,000 595,000 595,000 309,000 235,000 210,000 0 3,557,000 3,557,000 3,557,000 0 Water Storage Facility Improvements 2020 0 0 125,000 75,000 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 0 Trunk Watermain Lining Program 2022 3,000,000 75,000 2,250,000 0 75,000 2,250,000 0 75,000 0 0 7,725,000 7,725,000 7,025,000 700,000 $5,720,000 $1,580,000 $3,281,000 $1,412,000 $1,200,000 $3,385,000 $849,000 $825,000 $590,000 $0 $18,842,000 $18,842,000 $18,142,000 $700,000 19th Avenue/Dunkirk Lane Pond Improvement 2016 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 0 Ponderosa Woods Stream Restoration 2017 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 Parkers Lake Chloride Reduction Project 2020 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 0 300,000 2023 project delayed Storm Sewer Outfall Repair Projects 2023 0 820,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 820,000 820,000 100,000 720,000 2023 project delayed Four Seasons Mall Water Quality Improvements 2023 820,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 820,000 820,000 0 820,000 2023 project delayed Plymouth Creek Stream Restoration – Dunkirk to PIC 2014 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 West Medicine Lake Pond Maintenance 2022 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 Maintain Water Quality Ponds 2002 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 300,000 0 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 0 Unspecified Drainage Improvement 2004 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 BCWMC Water Quality, Channel, and Basin Improvements 2020 0 0 75,000 500,000 75,000 500,000 75,000 500,000 0 0 1,725,000 1,725,000 1,725,000 0 Future Water Quality Improvement Projects 2020 0 0 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,500,000 0 8,750,000 8,750,000 8,750,000 0 Future Lift Station Improvements 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 280,000 180,000 320,000 0 780,000 780,000 780,000 0 $1,720,000 $1,970,000 $2,475,000 $3,150,000 $1,725,000 $2,200,000 $2,155,000 $2,480,000 $2,420,000 $0 $20,295,000 $20,295,000 $18,455,000 $1,840,000 $44,474,050 $68,597,400 $30,676,800 $21,375,500 $23,274,000 $26,222,000 $27,849,900 $21,549,300 $23,469,000 $1,200,000 $288,687,950 $287,487,950 $236,479,950 $51,008,000 $54,439,050 $71,622,400 $33,666,800 $26,365,500 $25,404,000 $29,942,000 $30,544,900 $23,359,300 $23,469,000 $1,200,000 $320,012,950 $318,812,950 $267,984,950 $50,828,000 TOTAL: PUBLIC WORKS GRAND TOTAL WR-XX-9002 WR-XX-9003 WR-XX-9004 WR-XX-9005 Total: Water Resources WR-22-0003 WR-22-0004 WR-25-0001 WR-25-0002 WR-XX-9001 Water Resources WR-19-0001 WR-21-0003 WR-21-0006 WA-XX-9002 WA-XX-9003 WA-XX-9004 WA-XX-9005 Total: Water Total: Street Maintenance Water WA-23-0001 WA-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-XX-9003 ST-XX-9005 ST-XX-9006 ST-XX-9007 ST-24-0002 ST-24-0003 ST-25-0002 ST-26-0003 ST-XX-9001 ST-17-0002 ST-17-0003 ST-20-0001 ST-23-0003 ST-23-0004 SS-XX-9002 SS-XX-9003 Total: Sewer Street Maintenance Sewer SS-23-0002 SS-24-0001 SS-XX-9001 Aug 11, 2023 04:40 PM 22 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total Chankahda Trail Reconstruction - Phase 3 (Vicksburg to CR 61) 2022 0 7,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,000,000 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 Air Compressor 2007 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,000 Remote Sheepsfoot Trench Compactor 2012 0 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 2005 Air Compressor 2016 31,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 1996 350 Kw Generator on Wheels 2017 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 2006 Dozer 2017 235,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235,000 2013 Ford Pick up with plow 2019 0 46,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,500 2013 Bobcat S630 Skidsteer 2019 51,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51,000 2013 Smithco Field Painter 2019 21,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,500 Utility Body - Truck 1 2024 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145,000 Utility Body - Truck 2 2024 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 2006 Cat Loader with plow and wing 2020 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 Police Cars (7)2020 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 Public Safety Vehicle Up-fitting (4)2023 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 2014 Ford F-350 4x4 with plow 2020 44,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,300 2014 Truck mounted heated Asphalt patch unit 2020 0 87,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87,000 2004 Atlas Copco Generator 52 Kw 2020 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 2012 Big Tow Skid Steer Trailer 20" deck 18,200lb 2020 0 0 13,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,700 2014 Multi terrain Loader Tracked Skid Cat 287D 2020 0 0 94,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 94,400 2014 1/2 Ton 4x4 GMC PU Engineering 2020 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,500 MacLean MV2 Sidewalk Machine 2020 211,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 211,000 2014 Ford SUV Escape 2020 0 0 32,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,700 Bob Cat All Steer Skid Steer A770 2013 2020 66,850 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,850 2014 Chev 4x4 Pick up 2020 0 44,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,200 2014 ABI Field Groomer 2020 26,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,300 2014 Pro Core deep Aerator SR72 2020 32,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,000 2016 Vermeer BC 1800XL015 wood chipper 2017 88,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,000 Medium Duty Fire Rescue Truck 2021 0 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 4x4 Pickup w/plow 2021 0 53,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53,500 2015 Lift Station Truck with F-550 chassis 2017 0 104,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,000 2015 Chevrolet Pickup 4x4 w/Utility box 2021 0 59,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,500 Police Cars (7)2020 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 2015 Black Ford Taurus Investigation 2021 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 2015 Chev Pick up 4x4 with plow 2021 0 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 2015 Chevrolet Pickup 4x4 w/ plow 2021 0 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 2015 White Colorado Bldg div 2021 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 2016 Chev Colorado, Bld Inspections 2017 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 4 door 4x4 Pickup Truck 2021 0 44,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,700 City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Bonds CE-15-0205 CE-20-0239 CE-21-0302 CE-21-0304 CE-23-2014 ST-24-0002 Total: Bonds Central Equipment CE-11-0319 CE-24-1000 CE-24-17XX CE-24-2020 CE-24-2023 CE-24-3025 CE-23-3048 CE-23-6045 CE-24-00X2 CE-24-00X3 CE-24-0202 CE-24-5027 CE-24-5028 CE-24-5030 CE-24-6070 CE-24-6085 CE-24-3045 CE-24-3059 CE-24-4004 CE-24-5021 CE-24-5025 CE-25-1718 CE-25-2027 CE-25-2028 CE-25-4005 CE-25-4006 CE-25-0035 CE-25-0376 CE-25-0377 CE-25-0379 CE-25-1000 CE-25-5031 23 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2015 Ford Focus Hatchback car 2021 0 26,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 2015 T-650 Tracked Bobcat Skid Steer 2021 0 77,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,000 Toro GM 7210 Mower, blower polar tracks 2017 0 71,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,000 2015 Mower with blower Toro GM 7210 with Polar tracks 2017 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 2015 Groomer Rake Toro Model 8750 Pro Sand 5040 2017 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 2017 Ground Master Mower 2022 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130,000 2020 GPS Robot Sprayer 2022 0 44,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,000 E-21 Engine Pumper for Duty Crew 2017 0 0 640,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 640,000 2016 Ford Expedtion used by Fire Chief 2017 0 0 57,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,500 2016 Ford Expedtion 2017 0 0 58,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,000 2014 Mack Tandem with plow etc. 2022 0 0 365,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 365,000 2015 Mack Tandem, with snow equip 2022 0 0 365,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 365,000 2014 Single Axle dump with Swap Loader Hook 2022 301,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301,600 2001 Onan 350 Kw Generator on Trailer 2022 0 0 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 115,000 2016 GMC Sierra 1/2 ton 4x4 double cab Sr Eng Tech 2017 0 0 0 35,500 0 0 0 0 0 35,500 2016 GMC with Utility Body for Hyd Maint 2017 0 0 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 61,000 2015 Engine Pumper 2022 0 0 630,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 630,000 Nilfisk Advance CS7000 Floor Sweeper/Scrubber 2017 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 PD SUV Investigation 2021 0 0 48,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 2008 24' trailer with 6' ramps for Paver 2022 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 2016 Carlson CP100 Asphalt Paver 2017 0 0 270,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 Pavement Melter 2020 0 0 59,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 59,000 Mini Excavator Case CX318 2014 2022 0 0 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 56,000 2016 Colorado, Bld inspections 2017 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 2016 Colorado Pick up--Bld inspections 2017 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 2016 F-350 Ford pick with plow 2017 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 F-350 Ford Pick up with plow 2017 0 0 49,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 49,500 JD Gator Groomer and Rake 2020 0 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 2017 Toro GM 7210 D Zero turn 2020 0 0 0 71,500 0 0 0 0 0 71,500 2015 Ford F-150 Pick Up Utility 31 2017 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 2016 Tandem Truck with Plow 2023 0 0 0 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 2016 T880 Kenworth Truck Tractor 2023 0 0 0 0 0 190,000 0 0 0 190,000 2017 GMC 2500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 0 0 0 41,000 2017 GMC 2500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 46,000 0 0 0 0 0 46,000 2017 GMC 1500 Sierra Double Cab 4x4 2023 0 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 Police Cars (7)2020 0 0 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 126,000 2017 Bobcat S770 Skid Steer 2020 0 0 0 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000 2017 Bobcat S770 Skid Steer 2020 0 0 0 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000 2015 Low Boy Trailer Towmaster T-100DTG 2017 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 2015 Side Dup'r trailer 25 yard 2023 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 2017 Chevy Colorado 2022 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 CE-25-5038 CE-25-5052 CE-25-6136 CE-26-0051 CE-26-0053 CE-25-5032 CE-25-5035 CE-25-5036 CE-25-5037 CE-26-0381 CE-26-0382 CE-26-051 CE-26-0789 CE-26-1723 CE-26-0054 CE-26-0290 CE-26-0291 CE-26-0292 CE-26-0305 CE-26-4008 CE-26-5039 CE-26-5040 CE-26-5042 CE-26-5045 CE-26-2008 CE-26-2038 CE-26-2046 CE-26-3060 CE-26-4007 CE-27-0386 CE-27-1000 CE-27-2053 CE-27-2054 CE-27-3067 CE-27-0052 CE-27-0293 CE-27-0378 CE-27-0384 CE-27-0385 CE-27-3068 CE-27-4009 CE-27-4010 CE-27-4011 24 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2017 Ford F-350 4x4 with plow 2017 0 0 0 49,500 0 0 0 0 0 49,500 Toro GM 7210 Mower, blower polar tracks Broom 2017 0 0 71,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,000 2017 F-350 Truck 2022 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 2017 Ford F-350 Truck 2022 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 2017 Isuzu Garbage Truck 2020 0 0 0 139,000 0 0 0 0 0 139,000 2017 Mack Tandem dump truck 2017 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 355,000 2017 Mack Tandem dump truck 2017 0 0 0 0 355,000 0 0 0 0 355,000 2017 Kenworth with B-10 Aquatech Jetter/Vac truck 2017 0 0 0 0 520,000 0 0 0 0 520,000 2017 GMC Sierra Reg Cab 4x2 2023 0 0 0 0 46,000 0 0 0 0 46,000 2018 F550 4x4 dump 2022 0 0 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 0 86,000 Police Cars (7)2020 0 0 0 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000 Falls 12' Snowplow 10' wing 2024 0 0 0 0 56,000 0 0 0 0 56,000 2013 Case Wheel Loader 721F 2017 0 0 0 0 265,000 0 0 0 0 265,000 2016 Stepp 4 yrd hot box for asphalt with F-750 Chassis 2017 0 0 0 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 195,000 Street Sweeper 2020 0 0 0 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 290,000 Street Sweeper 2020 0 0 0 0 290,000 0 0 0 0 290,000 2018 Ford F-150 2022 0 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 0 0 41,000 Cat Loader 908H2 2024 0 0 0 0 149,000 0 0 0 0 149,000 2017 Ford F-450 2023 0 0 0 0 87,000 0 0 0 0 87,000 F150 Pickup 4x4 2020 0 0 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 37,000 Vermeer Wood chipper 2020 0 0 0 0 98,000 0 0 0 0 98,000 2020 Trimax Mower 2022 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 0 0 52,000 2020 mower/mulcher 2022 0 0 0 0 27,000 0 0 0 0 27,000 2014 Explorer Fire Dept 2025 58,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,000 Fire Mini-Pumper 2021 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 0 0 0 450,000 2018 Mack GU Single Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 330,000 0 0 0 330,000 2018 Mack GU713 Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 350,000 2019 F550 Truck Dump and Lift Gate Body 2022 0 0 0 0 0 91,000 0 0 0 91,000 2019 Freightliner M2 - Jetter 2022 0 0 0 0 0 277,000 0 0 0 277,000 2019 F250 Truck w/ Snow plow 2022 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 0 52,000 2019 TV Van - Utilities 2022 0 0 0 0 0 308,000 0 0 0 308,000 Ford F-450 contractor box 2017 model 2017 0 0 0 0 0 76,000 0 0 0 76,000 2017 Msaba Conveyor 2022 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 68,000 2019 Cat Asphalt roller 2022 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 0 0 0 68,000 XQ 30KW Portable Generator 2025 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 0 36,000 2019 Ford Fusion (pool car)2021 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 2019 Ford Fusion (pool car)2021 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 2017 F-450 One ton contractor box 2017 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 0 0 0 86,000 Sidewalk Machine 2020 0 0 0 0 0 215,000 0 0 0 215,000 2017 Ford F550 Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 93,000 0 0 0 93,000 2017 Ford F-550 box and lift gate 2022 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 0 0 0 175,000 2017 Ford F-450 with box and lift gate 2022 0 0 0 0 0 77,000 0 0 0 77,000 2017 Kubota RTV 2022 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 CE-27-5045 CE-27-5048 CE-27-5049 CE-27-5055 CE-28-0294 CE-27-5044 CE-28-2018 CE-28-2019 CE-28-2037 CE-28-2056 CE-28-2065 CE-28-0295 CE-28-0380 CE-28-0383 CE-28-0389 CE-28-1000 CE-28-6133 CE-28-6134 CE-29-0047 CE-29-0049 CE-29-0296 CE-28-4012 CE-28-5023 CE-28-5043 CE-28-5058 CE-28-6104 CE-29-2039 CE-29-2051 CE-29-2076 CE-29-3061 CE-29-4014 CE-29-0297 CE-29-0390 CE-29-0391 CE-29-0392 CE-29-0394 CE-29-5051 CE-29-5053 CE-29-4015 CE-29-5043 CE-29-5046 CE-29-5047 CE-29-5050 25 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2018 Ford F150 4x4 Super Cab 6.5 Box 2023 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 Fire Engine Pumper 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 920,000 0 0 920,000 2019 Tandem Axle 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 335,000 0 0 335,000 2018 Tandem Axle 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 261,000 0 0 261,000 2020 Chevy Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 50,000 Police SRO Truck 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 Police SUV 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,000 0 0 44,000 2015 Asphalt Tack oil distributor with F-750 Chassis 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 2019 F-550 Truck with Crew cab 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 2020 Chevy Silverado 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 0 0 55,000 2020 Arrow Board 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,000 0 0 26,000 2020 Chevy Truck 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 35,000 2020 Ford Ranger 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 0 0 36,000 2018 International Single Axle Truck 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 207,000 0 0 207,000 F550 Ford 4x4 Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 94,900 0 0 94,900 F250 4x4 2019 Super Cab Ford Pickup 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,600 0 0 54,600 F250 4x4 2019 Super Cab Ford Pickup 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 0 0 52,000 2019 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 82,300 0 0 82,300 2020 Toro Zero Turn 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 0 45,000 2020 Toro Zero Turn 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 0 45,000 2020 F-150 1/2 Ton 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,000 0 0 42,000 2019 Cargo Van 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 41,000 0 0 41,000 2020 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab 1 Ton 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,200 0 0 54,200 2020 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab 1 Ton 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 56,900 0 0 56,900 2011 Ford F-350 4x4 Grass Rig 2027 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 0 66,000 2019 Mack GR64F Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 350,000 2019 Mack GR64F Tandem Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 350,000 2021 John Deere 710L 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 0 230,000 Shop Lift-drive on 14,000 lbs. Capacity with jacks 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,400 0 24,400 2019 Mack GR42F Single Axle 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 380,000 0 380,000 2016 EH Trailer 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,000 0 104,000 2019 Colorado 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,000 0 38,000 2020 Chevrolet Bolt EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,800 0 36,800 2021 Chevrolet Bolt EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,600 0 34,600 2016 John Deere 4066R Utility Tractor with snow blower 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 110,000 2019 F-250 Ford Super Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,300 0 60,300 2021 Tractor 4066R 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95,400 0 95,400 2021 John Deere 624L Loader 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313,900 0 313,900 2021 Ford Transit Connect Cargo Van 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,900 0 35,900 CE-31-0043 Triple Combination Engine Pumper 2028 1,020,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,020,000 2020 Western Star 4700 SF 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312,000 312,000 2020 Western Star 4700 SF 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 360,000 2020 Tymco 500X Street Sweeper 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 425,000 425,000 CE-29-5060 CE-30-0048 CE-30-0387 CE-30-2072 CE-30-2080 CE-30-2085 CE-30-4016 CE-30-4017 CE-30-0388 CE-30-0395 CE-30-1728 CE-30-1730 CE-30-2030 CE-30-5069 CE-30-5070 CE-30-5071 CE-30-5072 CE-30-5074 CE-30-5054 CE-30-5057 CE-30-5061 CE-30-5062 CE-30-5066 CE-31-0791 CE-31-2057 CE-31-3075 CE-31-4013 CE-31-4018 CE-30-5075 CE-31-0042 CE-31-0298 CE-31-0299 CE-31-0396 CE-31-7002 CE-32-2071 CE-32-2074 CE-32-2084 CE-31-4019 CE-31-5041 CE-31-5067 CE-31-5076 CE-31-5079 26 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> 2022 Asphalt Planer 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 2017 Wacker Dump Cart 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,400 88,400 2018 PV350-D1W Pacific Tech 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62,800 62,800 2020 T-50 Trailer 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55,500 55,500 2019 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,800 33,800 2019 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,600 33,600 2020 Nissan Leaf EV 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,600 33,600 2019 F-550 4x4 Ford Super Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86,100 86,100 2020 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86,000 86,000 2019 F-550 Ford Reg. Cab 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,600 77,600 2020 John Deere 4066R Compact Utility Tractor 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,100 91,100 2017 Turfco TRF 338 Spreader 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,500 42,500 $2,929,050 $1,892,400 $3,284,800 $1,293,500 $3,094,000 $3,180,000 $2,926,900 $2,229,300 $1,824,000 $22,653,950 Dome & Turf Repair and Replacement 2020 0 0 700,000 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 1,400,000 Fieldhouse Electrical & Mechanical 2020 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 500,000 Fieldhouse Equipment 2020 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 $0 $30,000 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $1,930,000 New Sidewalk Machine 2020 0 185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185,000 Chevrolet Colorado (Inspector Truck)2024 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 Pickup Truck w/ Utility Box 2024 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 Toro Reelmaster 3100D 2024 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Kubota Tractor Snowblower 2024 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 2015 Chev Pick up 4x4 with plow 2021 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 F550 Truck w/ Dump box, Plow, Sander 2024 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 RC Mower - Tracked 52" Rotary Mower 2024 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 $295,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000 Station 73 Transit Regional Improvement Project (TRIP) 2022 0 15,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000,000 $0 $15,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000,000 Replace Ice Center Dehumidifier Desiccant Wheels 2013 0 0 0 50,000 0 65,000 0 0 0 115,000 Replace Ice Center Dasher Boards 2013 0 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195,000 Replace Cooling Towers at Plymouth Ice Center 2016 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 340,000 Replace Ice Center Roof Top Air Handler 2013 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 275,000 PIC General Building Improvements 2019 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 275,000 Rupp Roof Air-Exchange 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 0 0 110,000 PIC Water Heaters 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 CE-32-2090 CE-32-4023 CE-32-5063 CE-32-5064 CE-32-5065 CE-32-5068 CE-32-3078 CE-32-3079 CE-32-3082 CE-32-4021 CE-32-4022 FH-XX-9002 FH-XX-9003 Total: Field House - Admin General Fund CE-32-6095 Total: Central Equipment Field House - Admin FH-XX-9001 CE-25-2027 CE-25-50X1 CE-25-50XX Total: General Fund CE-23-500X CE-24-00X4 CE-24-50X1 CE-24-50XX CE-24-60XX IC-14-0003 IC-17-0001 IC-20-0001 IC-23-0001 IC-23-0002 Grants ST-23-0003 Total: Grants Ice Center - Admin IC-30-0001 IC-XX-9001 27 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> PIC Sound System 2020 110,000 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 190,000 PIC Rubber Flooring 2020 0 0 0 90,000 0 60,000 0 0 0 150,000 PIC Ice Resurfacers 2020 0 0 0 0 170,000 170,000 0 0 0 340,000 PIC Scoreboards 2020 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000 0 0 165,000 $470,000 $295,000 $125,000 $190,000 $250,000 $295,000 $270,000 $310,000 $0 $2,205,000 Switch Upgrades 2017 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Police Squad Computer Upgrade 2024 190,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190,000 Switch Upgrades 2024 40,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 Hosted Phone System 2024 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 $370,000 $80,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000 54th Avenue from Peony Lane to CSAH 101 2016 0 0 250,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,150,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 900,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 0 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 2,425,000 3,250,000 1,650,000 1,600,000 2,215,000 2,300,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 20,190,000 Traffic Signal Improvements 2020 0 300,000 0 50,000 0 0 300,000 0 0 650,000 $3,325,000 $6,050,000 $1,900,000 $3,550,000 $2,215,000 $2,300,000 $2,550,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $26,390,000 Station 73 Transit Regional Improvement Project (TRIP) 2022 3,600,000 5,000,000 2,973,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,573,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Zachary WTP Plate Settler Plant Expansion 2022 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 $5,600,000 $5,500,000 $2,973,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,073,000 Neighborhood Parks 2012 0 700,000 300,000 400,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 Northwest Greenway 2012 1,850,000 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,550,000 Park Lighting 2016 0 0 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 Playfield Land Development 2016 5,800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,800,000 New Trails 2003 150,000 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 Outdoor Artificial Turf 2020 0 0 0 0 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 1,200,000 Park Amenities & Facilities 2020 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Land Acquisition 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hwy 55 Pavement Preservation Project 2022 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 575,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 575,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 $8,625,000 $1,350,000 $475,000 $2,100,000 $300,000 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $14,250,000 Replace Irrigation Systems 2003 0 400,000 275,000 0 0 0 0 400,000 0 1,075,000 Boardwalk replacement 2010 225,000 0 150,000 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 525,000 IC-XX-9006 Total: Ice Center - Admin IT Systems IT-17-0007 IC-XX-9002 IC-XX-9003 IC-XX-9004 Minnesota State Aid Fund ST-17-0003 ST-24-0003 ST-25-0002 ST-XX-9005 IT-24-0001 IT-24-0002 IT-24-0003 Total: IT Systems ST-25-0002 WA-23-0001 Total: Other Governmental Agency Park Const Dedication Fees Fund ST-XX-9006 Total: Minnesota State Aid Fund Other Governmental Agency ST-23-0003 PR-29-0001 PR-XX-9005 PR-XX-9006 ST-23-0004 ST-XX-9002 PR-13-0001 PR-14-0005 PR-16-0002 PR-20-0001 PR-23-0001 PR-14-0003 ST-XX-9005 Total: Park Const Dedication Fees Fund Park Replacement Fund PR-07-0005 28 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Tennis Court Repair 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 475,000 0 0 475,000 Park Lighting 2016 0 0 0 0 480,000 0 0 0 0 480,000 Asset Renovation/Replacement 2022 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Playground Replacement or Renovation 2006 500,000 270,000 300,000 400,000 350,000 375,000 350,000 350,000 0 2,895,000 Trail Repair 2003 500,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0 4,000,000 Miscellaneous Park Improvements 2006 0 200,000 175,000 0 150,000 0 150,000 150,000 0 825,000 Park Building Repair/Renovation 2020 0 0 0 1,300,000 0 1,000,000 0 100,000 0 2,400,000 $1,325,000 $1,270,000 $1,400,000 $2,200,000 $1,580,000 $2,025,000 $1,475,000 $1,500,000 $0 $12,775,000 Central WTP - Exhaust Fans/Transfer Replacement 2022 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 Central WTP - Mechanical Replacements 2020 0 0 950,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 950,000 Central WTP - Installation of RTU 2022 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Central WTP - Replace Roof 2020 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 0 0 0 160,000 $0 $160,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,670,000 City Hall - Landscaping Replacement 2020 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 City Hall - Elevator Replacement 2020 330,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330,000 City Hall - Replace Kato-lite generator and supporting switch gear/panels 2020 195,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195,000 City Hall - Replace and Repair Heated Concrete Sidewalk 2020 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 City Hall - Replace Vinyl Flooring 2020 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 City Hall - Courtyard Sidewalk Replacement 2023 0 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 City Hall - Landscape Rehab 2023 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 City Hall RTU 5 replacement 2023 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 City Hall - Replace/Update fire/security systems 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 City Hall - Remodel Council Chambers, Reception, Trophy Cases, Decorative Woodwork 2020 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 City Hall - Replace Reheat Coil Units 2020 0 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000 City Hall - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 City Hall - Replace Plumbing Fixtures 2020 0 0 0 0 0 90,000 0 0 0 90,000 City Hall - RTU # 4 (trane)2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 75,000 City Hall - Roll Down Door replacement 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 City Hall - Replace 2 boilers 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 400,000 $585,000 $515,000 $250,000 $450,000 $180,000 $190,000 $155,000 $0 $400,000 $2,725,000 Fire Station 1 - Replace generator and switch gear 2023 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Fire Station 1 - Roof Replacement 2020 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Fire Station 1 - Replace Plumbing Finishes and Fixtures 2020 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Fire Station 1 - Replace Makeup Air Unit 2020 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Fire Station 1 - Fire/Security update 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 $200,000 $125,000 $30,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000 PR-14-0004 PR-16-0002 PR-22-0001 PR-23-0003 Public Facilities - Central Water Plant FM-25-0018 FM-26-0009 FM-26-0012 FM-29-0001 PR-23-0004 PR-23-0005 PR-XX-9007 Total: Park Replacement Fund FM-24-0001 FM-25-0004 FM-25-0005 FM-25-0012 FM-25-0013 Total: Public Facilities - Central Water Plant Public Facilities - City Hall FM-23-0004 FM-23-0008 FM-29-0004 FM-30-0001 FM-30-0007 FM-32-0001 Total: Public Facilities - City Hall FM-26-0013 FM-27-0002 FM-27-0016 FM-28-0003 FM-29-0002 FM-26-0011 FM-27-0004 Total: Public Facilities - Fire Station 1 Public Facilities - Fire Station 1 FM-24-0003 FM-25-0003 FM-25-0009 29 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Fire Station 2 - Replace washers and dryers 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 Fire Station 2 - Exterior Repair and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 Fire Station 2 - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 Fire Station 2 - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Fire Station 3 - Exterior Repair and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 Fire Station 3 - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 Fire Station 3 - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $165,000 PCC - Install Generator 2021 0 0 0 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000 PCC - Mech/Elec/Plumbing updates 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 PCC - Exterior Repairs and Maintenance 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 PCC - Interior Repair/Maintenance to Finishes 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $600,000 Public Safety - Passenger Elevator (entry)2021 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115,000 Public Safety VAV controller replacement 2023 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Public Safety - Roof Section Replacement 2020 0 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 Public Safety - Replace Electrical panels/Switch gears and generator 2020 0 0 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 380,000 Public Safety - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Public Safety - Replace bi-fold garage doors 2023 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Public Safety - Replace Gutters and Downspouts 2020 0 0 0 0 0 62,000 0 0 0 62,000 Public Safety - RTU #7 and 8 Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 0 0 250,000 Public Safety - Exhaust Fans 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,000 0 0 29,000 Public Safety - Water Softener 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 35,000 Public Safety - Boiler Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 300,000 $140,000 $185,000 $0 $480,000 $150,000 $62,000 $314,000 $300,000 $0 $1,631,000 Old Central - Roof Replacement 2020 0 0 0 0 135,000 0 0 0 0 135,000 Maintenance Facility - Landscape Rehab 2023 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Maintenance Facility - Overhead Door Replacement 2022 0 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace 2 Roof Sections 2020 0 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Flooring Finishes 2020 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Standpipes and Repair Sprinkler System 2020 0 0 108,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,000 Public Facilities - Fire Station 2 Public Facilities - Fire Station 3 FM-32-0010 FM-32-0011 FM-32-0012 FM-32-0002 FM-32-0007 FM-32-0008 FM-32-0009 Total: Public Facilities - Fire Station 2 FM-32-0005 FM-32-0006 Total: Public Facilities - Plymouth Creek Center Public Facilities - Public Safety Total: Public Facilities - Fire Station 3 Public Facilities - Plymouth Creek Center FM-23-0010 FM-32-0004 FM-28-0005 FM-29-0007 FM-30-0003 FM-30-0005 FM-30-0006 FM-23-0009 FM-24-0005 FM-25-0002 FM-27-0005 FM-27-0009 FM-23-0013 FM-25-0011 FM-26-0001 FM-26-0003 FM-26-0008 FM-31-0001 Total: Public Facilities - Public Safety Public Facilities - Public Works FM-23-0003 30 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Maintenance Facility - Replace Ceiling Tiles 2020 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Vehicle Storage Area Skylights 2020 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Roof Drains 2020 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace HVAC Automation Controls 2020 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 Maintenance Facility - Bi-fold Door Replacement 2022 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Maintenance Facility - Office Side Rooftop unit 1 2020 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Wall Finishes 2020 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 0 0 0 40,000 Maintenance Facility - Mechanical Unit Heaters 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 Maintenance Facility - RTU 2 replacement 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 300,000 Maintenance Facility - Mechanic Equipment 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,000 0 45,000 Maintenance Facility - Interior Furnishes replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 $120,000 $645,000 $258,000 $300,000 $235,000 $140,000 $330,000 $120,000 $0 $2,148,000 Zachary WTP -- Parking lot replacement 2023 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Zachary WTP - Dehumidification and Ventilation System Replacement 2022 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 Zachary WTP - Replace Roof 2020 0 0 0 205,000 0 0 0 0 0 205,000 Zachary WTP - Replace Dry Cooling Rooftop Unit 2020 0 0 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Zachary WTP - Replace electrical panels/switch gear servicing the facility 2020 0 0 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 130,000 Zachary WTP - Exhaust Fan Replacement 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 75,000 $60,000 $800,000 $0 $235,000 $130,000 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000 Public Safety - Replace Garage Air Makeup Unit 2015 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Replace water to air and water to water pumps - Central and Zachary Plants 2020 60,000 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 180,000 Maintenance Facility - RTU Replacement for Mechanic's Office and Sign Making Room 2017 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 Citywide - Bathroom Remodels 2020 90,000 90,000 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 270,000 Public Safety - Garage Waterproofing Repairs 2019 0 0 0 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 55,000 PCC - Replace Metal Roof Sections 2020 0 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140,000 Station 73 - Replace AC, AC Compressors, & Radiant Heaters 2020 0 80,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,000 Zachary WTP - Replace Generator 2020 0 0 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 110,000 Maintenance Facility - Replace Electrical Panels from 1979 2020 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Station 73 - Replace Standpipes and Repair Sprinkler System 2020 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000 Public Safety - Replace Thermostats and Controls 2020 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Public Facilities Building Automation System 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 Seal Coating/Crack Sealing/Asphalt Repair 2004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 450,000 Misc. Concrete Replacement 2004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 450,000 Roof Inspections and Repairs 2014 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 315,000 Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 225,000 Door and Window repair/replacement - Citywide 2020 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 270,000 FM-28-0004 FM-29-0003 FM-30-0004 FM-30-0008 FM-31-0002 FM-27-0006 FM-27-0007 FM-27-0010 FM-27-0014 FM-27-0018 FM-25-0017 FM-27-0001 FM-27-0015 FM-28-0001 FM-30-0002 FM-31-0003 Total: Public Facilities - Public Works Public Facilities - Zachary Water Plant FM-24-0004 FM-21-0001 FM-21-0013 FM-23-0001 FM-25-0001 FM-25-0010 Total: Public Facilities - Zachary Water Plant Public Facilities Admin FM-19-0002 FM-20-0023 FM-XX-9001 FM-XX-9002 FM-XX-9003 FM-XX-9004 FM-XX-9005 FM-26-0002 FM-26-0005 FM-29-0005 FM-29-0008 FM-32-0003 31 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Interior Flooring Repair/Replacement 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 225,000 Exterior Maintenance to City buildings 2023 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 225,000 $420,000 $660,000 $900,000 $240,000 $295,000 $515,000 $240,000 $240,000 $315,000 $3,825,000 Mission Farm Lift Station Rehabilitation 2022 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 Lancaster Lift Station Electrical Renovation 2022 100,000 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,700,000 Line Sanitary Sewer Main: Annual Program 2002 1,630,000 1,370,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 11,000,000 Future Lift Station Improvements 2020 0 150,000 560,000 250,000 150,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 150,000 150,000 3,410,000 Hamel Road Frontage Road Connection 2016 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 60,000 60,000 70,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 715,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 130,000 90,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 820,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 50,000 50,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 540,000 $3,120,000 $3,420,000 $1,870,000 $1,540,000 $1,465,000 $2,350,000 $2,460,000 $1,610,000 $1,610,000 $19,445,000 Hamel Road Frontage Road Connection 2016 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 54th Avenue from Peony Lane to CSAH 101 2016 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,100,000 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 200,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 800,000 910,000 640,000 900,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 11,750,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 475,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,475,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 600,000 550,000 400,000 400,000 700,000 500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 4,050,000 $2,275,000 $2,210,000 $1,290,000 $2,650,000 $2,650,000 $2,450,000 $2,450,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $20,475,000 Hamel Road Frontage Road Connection 2016 120,000 870,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 990,000 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 1,780,000 0 0 2,280,000 Station 73 Transit Regional Improvement Project (TRIP) 2022 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,000 Hwy 55 Pavement Preservation Project 2022 330,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330,000 Chankahda Trail Reconstruction - Phase 3 (Vicksburg to CR 61) 2022 500,000 6,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,500,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 4,830,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,330,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 1,500,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,500,000 Peony Lane Bridge over CP Rail Improvements 2023 0 200,000 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 950,000 Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 3,040,000 2,659,000 3,197,000 1,784,000 4,736,000 3,337,000 5,112,000 3,286,000 4,310,000 31,461,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 2,070,000 1,620,000 1,330,000 1,140,000 1,040,000 875,000 875,000 1,175,000 1,875,000 12,000,000 Replace Retaining Walls 2005 100,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 1,065,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 0 0 1,240,000 540,000 0 1,090,000 1,090,000 1,230,000 1,230,000 6,420,000 Traffic Signal Improvements 2020 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 150,000 Concrete Sidewalk Replacement 2007 0 0 300,000 0 0 75,000 75,000 75,000 0 525,000 SS-23-0002 SS-24-0001 SS-XX-9001 SS-XX-9003 ST-17-0002 FM-XX-9006 FM-XX-9007 Total: Public Facilities Admin Sewer - Admin ST-XX-9005 Total: Sewer - Admin Special Assessments ST-17-0002 ST-20-0001 ST-24-0003 ST-25-0002 ST-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-XX-9005 Total: Special Assessments Street Reconstruction Fund ST-17-0002 ST-17-0003 ST-20-0001 ST-24-0003 ST-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-25-0002 ST-26-0003 ST-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-XX-9003 ST-20-0001 ST-23-0003 ST-23-0004 ST-24-0002 ST-24-0003 ST-XX-9005 ST-XX-9006 ST-XX-9007 32 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> $13,290,000 $14,964,000 $7,982,000 $3,579,000 $5,891,000 $6,042,000 $9,062,000 $5,896,000 $7,545,000 $74,251,000 Replace Ice Center Roof 2013 0 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 2,750,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,750,000 $2,750,000 $2,000,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,250,000 Trunk Sewer Oversizing 2004 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Trunk Watermain Oversizing 2004 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Hamel Road Frontage Road Connection 2016 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 310,000 0 0 310,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 1,900,000 2,500,000 1,900,000 2,200,000 16,400,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 400,000 300,000 300,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,200,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 1,400,000 Zachary WTP Plate Settler Plant Expansion 2022 250,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,250,000 Well Refurbishing 2003 320,000 330,000 345,000 510,000 530,000 540,000 540,000 365,000 380,000 3,860,000 Treatment Plant Refurbishing 2019 50,000 175,000 561,000 827,000 595,000 595,000 309,000 235,000 210,000 3,557,000 Water Storage Facility Improvements 2020 0 0 125,000 75,000 0 0 0 150,000 0 350,000 Trunk Watermain Lining Program 2022 3,000,000 75,000 2,250,000 0 75,000 2,250,000 0 75,000 0 7,725,000 $5,720,000 $3,940,000 $5,231,000 $2,962,000 $3,950,000 $5,660,000 $4,034,000 $3,125,000 $3,190,000 $37,812,000 Juneau Lane from Hampton Hills to 59th Avenue 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 Plymouth Blvd Rehabilitation 2023 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 36th Ave Rehabilitation 2021 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 Annual Street Reconstruction 2012 700,000 721,000 743,000 766,000 789,000 813,000 838,000 864,000 890,000 7,124,000 Mill & Overlay Projects 2005 75,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 355,000 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Project 2019 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 1,050,000 19th Avenue/Dunkirk Lane Pond Improvement 2016 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 Parkers Lake Chloride Reduction Project 2020 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 Storm Sewer Outfall Repair Projects 2023 0 820,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 820,000 Four Seasons Mall Water Quality Improvements 2023 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70,000 West Medicine Lake Pond Maintenance 2022 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Maintain Water Quality Ponds 2002 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 300,000 1,950,000 Unspecified Drainage Improvement 2004 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,000,000 BCWMC Water Quality, Channel, and Basin Improvements 2020 0 0 75,000 0 75,000 0 75,000 0 0 225,000 Future Water Quality Improvement Projects 2020 0 0 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,500,000 8,750,000 To Be Determined IC-16-0002 ST-24-0003 Total: To Be Determined Total: Street Reconstruction Fund Water - Admin ST-17-0002 ST-20-0001 ST-24-0003 ST-25-0002 Utility Trunk Expansion Fund SS-XX-9002 WA-XX-9002 Total: Utility Trunk Expansion Fund WA-XX-9003 WA-XX-9004 WA-XX-9005 Total: Water - Admin ST-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-XX-9005 WA-23-0001 WA-XX-9001 ST-XX-9002 ST-XX-9005 WR-19-0001 WR-21-0006 WR-22-0003 Water Resources - Admin ST-20-0001 ST-24-0003 ST-25-0002 ST-XX-9001 WR-XX-9004 WR-22-0004 WR-25-0002 WR-XX-9001 WR-XX-9002 WR-XX-9003 33 Year Identified 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2024-2032 Total City of Plymouth 2023 Amended Capital Improvement Plan 2024-2032 Projects by Funding Source Budget Year: 2024 Report Group: Program GL Account Type: Revenue & Expense Stage: <All> Department or Division: <All> Account Category or GL Account: <All> Asset Category or Asset Type: <All> Fund Category or Fund: <All> Future Lift Station Improvements 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 280,000 180,000 320,000 780,000 $1,470,000 $3,081,000 $2,358,000 $2,546,000 $2,669,000 $2,673,000 $3,253,000 $3,029,000 $3,495,000 $24,574,000 Ponderosa Woods Stream Restoration 2017 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 Parkers Lake Chloride Reduction Project 2020 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 Four Seasons Mall Water Quality Improvements 2023 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,000 Plymouth Creek Stream Restoration – Dunkirk to PIC 2014 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 BCWMC Water Quality, Channel, and Basin Improvements 2020 0 0 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 1,500,000 $1,150,000 $50,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $4,700,000 0 $54,439,050 $71,622,400 $33,666,800 $26,365,500 $25,404,000 $29,942,000 $30,544,900 $23,359,300 $23,469,000 $318,812,950 WR-XX-9005 Total: Water Resources - Admin Watershed District Total: Watershed District GRAND TOTAL WR-21-0003 WR-21-0006 WR-22-0004 WR-25-0001 WR-XX-9003 34 Regular Planning Commission November 15, 2023 Agenda Number:5.1 To:Planning Commission Prepared by:Shawn Drill, Senior Planner Reviewed by:Grant Fernelius, Community and Economic Development Director File No:2023-065 1. Applicant: Eagle Brook Church 2. Proposal: Rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan, and conditional use permit. 3. Location: 17910 Chankahda Trail (Luedke farm) 4. Guiding: LA-2 (living area 2) 5. Zoning: Current zoning is FRD (future restricted development) 6. School District: ISD 284 (Wayzata) 7. Review Deadline: January 13, 2024 8. Description: See attached Planning Commission Report Information. 35 9. Attachments: Planning Commission Report Information Location Map Aerial Map Aerial Map (zoomed in) Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map LA-2 Text from Comprehensive Plan Applicant's Narrative David Weekley Homes Sketch (2022) Perspective Views Traffic Study Site Graphics Correspondence Received -- Through 11-6-2023 Correspondence Received -- 11-7 and 11-8-2023 Ordinance Resolution - Findings of Fact for Rezoning Resolution - Prelim Plat, Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit 36 Planning Commission Report Information Eagle Brook Church (2023-065) INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1) Rezoning of the site from FRD to RSF-3 (single-family detached 3); and 2) Preliminary plat to establish two lots (one lot for the church and one lot to be dedicated as city park land); and 3) Site plan for the proposed physical changes to the site including construction of a 64,000 square foot church that seats 1,500 people, 685 parking spaces, and related site improvements; and 4) Conditional use permit (CUP) for a religious institution. Notice of the public hearing was published in the city’s official newspaper. Because the proposal includes a rezoning, two mailed notices were sent to all property owners located within 750 feet of the site. The first mailed notice was sent on September 27, 2023 to announce that the application was received, and the second mailed notice was sent on November 3, 2023 to announce the Planning Commission’s public hearing date. Both mailed notices provided information on where the proposed development plans and materials could be found on the city’s website. A copy of the Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map is attached. Development signage has also been posted on the property. CONTEXT Site Location The subject property is located at 17910 Chankahda Trail (hereafter referred to as “the site”). The site presently consists of three unplatted parcels located north of Chankahda Trail (formerly known as County Road 47) and west of Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane. Refer to the location map on the next page. Note that the road segment that is called Maple Grove Parkway was formerly called Lawndale Lane. The road segment lying south of Chankahda Trail was also formerly called Lawndale Lane but is now called Peony Lane. 37 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 2 Location Map Site Area The site contains 55.96 gross acres, which includes roadway easement areas for Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway. The net acreage of the site is 52.99 acres after the roadway easement areas (to be dedicated to the public though the platting process) are deducted. Site Guiding The site is guided LA-2 (living area 2) on the land use map of the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is not requesting a comprehensive plan amendment to reguide the site. Per the Comprehensive Plan, the types of development allowed in LA-2 guided areas include: 1) Detached homes, attached (2-unit) homes, townhomes 2) Churches 3) Schools, and 4) Recreational facilities 38 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 3 For residential developments, LA-2 guiding specifies a minimum density of three units per acre and a maximum density of six units per acre. RSF-3 zoning is listed as a corresponding zoning district for properties that are guided LA-2. (Information pertaining to the RSF-3 zoning district is provided in the ‘Rezoning’ section later in this report.) A copy of the LA-2 text from the comprehensive plan is attached. Natural Characteristics The site lies in the Elm Creek watershed district. The site is not located in the floodplain or shoreland overlay district. The site contains 13.02 acres of medium-quality wetland in four wetland basins. Under the plan, two wetland basins would not be impacted, and two wetland basins would have minor impacts totaling 0.3375 acres (or 2.6 percent of the total wetland acreage). The minor impacts are needed to construct the driveway between Maple Grove Parkway and the parking lot, and to line the driveway up with the 61st Avenue segment lying east of Maple Grove Parkway – as required by city code for safety purposes. To offset the wetland impact, the applicant would purchase wetland credits to re-create 0.675 acres of new wetland area off the site. The wetland replacement plan application does not fall under the purview of the Planning Commission, but rather would be reviewed and considered separately by the City Council. Natural wetland buffer strips would be provided around all four wetlands, pursuant to city code. Surrounding Land Uses Surrounding land uses include single- and two-family homes to the north, single-family homes and a neighborhood park to the west, single-family homes to the east, and an elementary school and future city playfield park to the south (see table below). There are 16 single-family homes and 5 two-family homes in Maple Grove that abut the site, and 6 single-family homes in Plymouth that abut the site. Refer to the table below and the aerial map on the next page. ADJACENT LAND USE GUIDING ZONING North Single- and two-family homes in Maple Grove -- -- West Single-family homes ---- Harvest Park LA-2 RSF-3 East (across Maple Grove Pkwy) Single-family homes LA-2 RSF-3 South (across Chankahda Trail) Meadow Ridge Elementary School ---- The Meadows Park (city park and playfields to be developed in 2024) LA-2 ---- LA-2 RSF-3 ---- FRD 39 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 4 Aerial Map Previous Actions The site presently contains a house and two outbuildings that would be removed. The remainder of the upland (non-wetland) portions of the site are currently being farmed. In May 2022, the City Council reviewed a sketch proposal for development of the site from David Weekley Homes. The sketch (copy attached) showed 137 single-family homes on the site. Council feedback on the sketch was split, with some Council members stating they would entertain incorporation of some townhomes into the plan to increase density and provide lower-cost housing options. Upon review of their pro forma (cost / benefit analysis), David Weekley Homes cancelled their purchase agreement and decided not to pursue the development. 40 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 5 RLUIPA The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) is a federal civil rights law requiring local governments, when implementing and enforcing land use regulations, to do so without burdening the exercise of religion by religious institutions and to treat them in the same manner as non-religious institutions. RLUIPA also protects religious institutions from discrimination in zoning regulations and landmarking laws. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING The rezoning of land is a legislative action (enactment of policy). The zoning ordinance and map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set by the comprehensive plan. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. This is because preliminary plat review is a judicial action (enforcement of established policy). If a preliminary plat application meets the established standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether the proposal complies with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance standards. If it meets the standards, the city must approve the site plan. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether the proposal meets the standards listed in the zoning ordinance. If it meets the specified standards, the city must approve the conditional use permit. However, the level of discretion is affected by the fact that some of the standards may be open to interpretation. ANALYSIS All development applications are reviewed by a team of city staff professionals that make up the development review committee (DRC). DRC membership includes representatives from the building, engineering, fire, forestry, parks, planning, police, public works, and water resources divisions. 41 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 6 REZONING Current Zoning The site is currently zoned FRD (future restricted development). Refer to the graphic below. Current Zoning The FRD zoning designation is a remnant of the former rural / agricultural designation. All developed land in this portion of the city was zoned FRD before it was developed. The FRD district primarily serves as a “holding zone” until a landowner or developer makes an application for development. At such time, the affected property must be rezoned in accordance with its land use guiding designation. State law and city code requires consistency between the comprehensive plan and the zoning map. Consequently, in conjunction with any development of the site, it must be rezoned to a zoning designation that is compatible with LA-2 guiding, which includes: RSF-3, RSF-4, RMF-1, RMF-2, and other districts if meeting density criteria. 42 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 7 Requested Zoning The applicant is requesting to rezone the site from FRD to RSF-3 (single-family detached 3). Refer to the graphic below. Requested Zoning The RSF-3 zoning district allows a variety of uses including single-family homes, educational facilities such as public and private elementary, middle, junior high, and senior high schools, and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, synagogues, and mosques. For single-family developments, the RSF-3 provisions require the following: 1) minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet; 2) minimum lot width of 65 feet; and 3) minimum building setbacks of 25 feet from front and rear lot lines and minimum building setbacks of 8 feet (living space) or 6 feet (attached garage space) from side lots lines. The exception is that minimum building setbacks are increased to 50 feet from lots lines abutting arterial roadways. 43 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 8 For other allowable uses such as churches and schools, the RSF-3 provisions require the following: 1) Minimum lot size of one acre; and 2) Minimum lot width of 200 feet, and 3) Minimum building setbacks of 50 feet from front lot lines, 40 feet from rear lot lines, and 25 feet from side lot lines. As previously stated, churches are specifically listed as appropriate land uses in LA-2 guided areas and are allowed in the RSF-3 zoning district. Additionally, RSF-3 zoning is listed as a corresponding zoning district for LA-2 guided areas. Consequently, the proposed RSF-3 zoning would be consistent with the LA-2 guiding of the site. Conclusion on Rezoning request: The request to rezone the site to RSF-3 would be appropriate, based on the following findings: 1) The requested RSF-3 zoning is compatible with the LA-2 guiding designation of the site; 2) The proposed development and lot arrangement would exceed the RSF-3 zoning standards; and 3) Adequate infrastructure is in place to support the requested RSF-3 zoning and proposed development. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to establish two lots; one lot (Lot 1) would be for the church site, and the other lot (Lot 2) would be dedicated as city park land. Additionally, the plat would include dedication of public rights-of-way for: 1) a new permanent cul-de-sac turn-around in the west portion of the site for the existing 61st Avenue stub street; and 2) existing roadway easements along Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway. The following table provides a break-down of the proposed plat areas: Acreage Lot 1 (Church site) 47.91 Lot 2 (Park) 4.56 Right-of-way for the 61st Avenue cul-de-sac turn-around 0.52 Sub-Total: 52.99 Existing arterial roadway easements to be dedicated as right-of-way 2.97 Total: 55.96 44 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 9 Wetlands As previously stated, there are four wetlands on the site. The site is subject to the rules of the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA). WCA allows wetland areas to be impacted, provided proper sequencing (avoidance, minimization, and mitigation) and a wetland replacement plan are approved. The applicant is requesting to impact two of the four wetlands as follows: Wetland ID Wetland Size (acres) Impact Type Impact area (acres) Replacement at 2:1 ratio (acres) Wetland 1 3.22 None 0.0000 (no impact) N/A Wetland 2 0.54 Fill 0.0388 0.0776 Wetland 3 9.09 Fill 0.2987 0.5973 Wetland 4 0.17 None 0.0000 (no impact) N/A Total: 13.02 0.3375 0.675 See the wetland delineation exhibit below: Wetland Delineation Exhibit 45 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 10 Although the review of wetland impacts does not fall under the purview of the Planning Commission, a technical evaluation panel (TEP) consisting of wetland specialists from the city, Hennepin County, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, and Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources has reviewed the requested wetland impacts and will be recommending approval of the impacts to the City Council. Rather than have the applicant try to re-create 0.675 acres of new wetland on the site to offset the 0.3375 acres of impact, the TEP is recommending that the applicant purchase credits for 0.675 acres of wetland within an existing wetland bank located off the site. The applicant concurs with this approach. Note that similar wetland impacts to those being requested would be anticipated with any development of the site, because the impacts are needed to provide access to the site in locations as dictated by the city (e.g., the driveway must line up with the 61st Avenue segment lying east of Maple Grove Parkway to create a four-way intersection for safety purposes). Platting of the site also makes it subject to the city’s requirement for establish ment of natural wetland buffer strips on the upland areas surrounding the wetlands. The natural buffer strips consist of deep-rooted native grasses, wild-flowers, and other plantings designed to aid in filtering and slowing storm water runoff flowing toward a wetland. All wetlands on the site are classified as medium-quality wetlands – which require a buffer strip averaging 30 feet in width around the wetlands. A total of 4.89 acres of wetland buffer are required on the site. Under the plan, 5.30 acres of wetland buffer would be established on the site. Consequently, the proposed wetland buffers would exceed city regulations. Development Density Based on the LA-2 guiding of the site and 34.67 net acres (site area after wetlands and wetland buffers are deducted), the comprehensive plan would specify a minimum of 104 dwelling units and a maximum of 208 dwelling units if the site was developed residentially. Density does not apply to a church, as there would be one building on the site. Site Access Access for the proposed church would be provided via Maple Grove Parkway. A driveway would be installed on the west side of Maple Grove Parkway that lines up with existing 61st Avenue on the east side of Maple Grove Parkway to create a four-way intersection. The city code requires that access points line up for traffic safety purposes. Refer to the site plan on the following page and the attached site graphics. Regardless of whether the site is developed with a church or residentially, no site access would be allowed from Chankahda Trail. The city has extensively studied the Chankahda Trail corridor during the County Road 47 turnback process, and has limited the connections to maintain safety. The Chankahda Trail horizontal curve along the southwest portion of the site creates limited sight distance and an unsafe situation. 46 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 11 Site Plan An emergency-only access route would be provided via the 61st Avenue segment abutting the west boundary of the site – within “The Fields at Meadow Ridge” subdivision. That 61st Avenue segment was stubbed to the boundary to provide for its future extension and connection to Maple Grove Parkway if the site would be developed residentially. With the proposed church use, 61st Avenue would not be required to extend through the site. The existing temporary cul-de-sac turn- around that is located (via temporary easement) on property located at 18120 61st Avenue would be removed and restored, and a new permanent cul-de-sac turn-around would be installed on the site. An emergency-only access drive would come off the end of the new cul-de-sac turn-around to provide a secondary means of access to the site, pursuant to the city’s fire code requirements . The emergency-only access route would be constructed to fire lane standards and would be cordoned off to general traffic. 61st Ave N Chankahda Trail 47 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 12 Transportation The city contracted with Transportation Collaborative & Consultants (TC2) to conduct the traffic study. The applicant was required to provide funding for the study. The traffic study concluded that operations of the nearby public street system are not expected to significantly change if the proposed church is located on the site. The traffic study (copy attached) evaluated the impacts resulting from traffic associated with the proposed church development and compared it with LA-2 residential development. The traffic study provides an operational analysis of the existing intersections near the proposed development. The traffic generation estimates from the traffic study are as follows: Note: A round trip equals two trips. The proposed use would generate very little traffic outside of Sunday peak hours, including during the typical Monday through Friday AM and PM peak travel times. The arterial roadways serving the site (Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway) were designed to carry the volume of traffic that would be generated by the proposed use. The David Weekley Homes sketch plan, which was a single-family development with 137 units, would have resulted in 1,292 average daily weekday trips. Eagle Brook Church would not have a daycare. Eagle Brook Church uses a team of congregant volunteers to aid with internal traffic control and parking within the parking lot. The traffic study did not raise any concerns regarding the internal traffic flow. The capacity of nearby affected intersections was analyzed/modeled to identify the projected level of service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection would function. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle to get through an intersection. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation (10 seconds or less of delay), while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity (over 50 seconds of delay at unsignalized intersections). LOS A though LOS D are generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities area. 48 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 13 After construction of the proposed church, all nearby intersections would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service A, B , or C during the Wednesday PM, Saturday PM, and Sunday AM peaks. The exception is that, without any other traffic controls, the driveway intersection with Maple Grove Parkway would operate at acceptable level of service D (up to 44 seconds of delay) for roughly 15 minutes when church lets out during the Sunday AM peak. This is where the church would hire off-duty police officers to direct traffic, so there would less of a delay for non-church- related traffic entering that intersection. Any delays would occur either within dedicated turn lanes on Maple Grove Parkway for motorists entering the site, or for motorists within the driveway exiting the site. Neither scenario has a drastic effect on the overall roadway system. Although the traffic study concluded that no improvements are needed to the existing road system to accommodate the project from a capacity perspective, it offered the following recommendations: • There is adequate pavement width to accommodate the northbound left -turn queues on Maple Grove Parkway. The existing striping could be modified to formalize a northbound left-turn lane into the site. • Although not needed from a capacity perspective, a southbound right-turn lane on Maple Grove Parkway (to enter the site) could reduce potential conflicts with vehicles entering the site from the south. • The driveway exit from the site should be designed with two exit lanes that are at least 225 feet long. The north exit lane would be for drivers turning left onto Maple Grove Parkway or continuing straight onto 61st Avenue, and the south exit lane would be for drivers turning right onto Maple Grove Parkway. • A traffic control officer could be provided during the Sunday AM peak period to assist drivers at the Maple Grove Parkway intersection with the church driveway/61st Avenue. • The applicant should continue to work with the police department to develop a traffic control management plan for the site. The applicant is aware that they would be responsible for the above-listed items, and those items are addressed in the attached resolution. Under a residential development plan for the site, traffic would increase within the neighborhood to the west because the street within the site would connect to that area. Under the proposed plan, there would be no increase in traffic within the neighborhood to the west. 49 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 14 Storm Water Management The city requires that storm drainage systems be designed so the post-development rate of runoff from a site does not exceed the pre-development rate for specified storm events. Additionally, the city requires treatment of storm water runoff before it enters the drainage system. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the applicant would need to apply for and have an approved storm water pollution prevention plan from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The applicant would also be required to obtain watershed approval of the storm water and erosion control plans. The plat review includes an analysis of the proposed drainage system. A summary of the proposed development drainage is outlined below. The proposed grading plan would maintain the current drainage patterns around the site perimeter. Storm water runoff within the site would be directed to two sedimentation ponds, three biofiltration basins, and one filtration basin. All such features would be located in low areas of the site where they could collect runoff from hard surfaces (i.e., building roof, parking lot, and driveway) and then overflow into the existing wetlands after being retained for rate control and treated for water quality. The two sedimentation ponds would be wet ponds, the three biofiltration basins would be seasonally wet and would be installed with aquatic plantings (similar to rain gardens), and the filtration basin would seasonally wet with a sand bottom. Refer to the storm water plan below. Storm Water Plan 50 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 15 The proposed storm water plan management complies with city and watershed regulations. Approval of final construction drawings would be required prior to commencement of grading operations. The attached resolution addresses this matter. Tree Preservation The plat is subject to the city’s tree preservation regulations. The regulations require preservation of 50 percent of the caliper inches of existing significant trees, or reforestation and/or monetary restitution for any removal beyond of 50 percent. A significant tree is defined as one being eight inches or larger in diameter for deciduous trees, and four inches or larger in diameter for conifers. There are 3,838 caliper inches of eligible significant trees existing on the site. The applicant submitted a tree preservation plan indicating that 3,793 tree inches (98.8%) would be preserved. The 45 caliper inches of trees that would be removed are located interior to the site. All existing perimeter trees would be preserved. Consequently, the proposal would comply with the city’s tree preservation regulations. Park Dedication The applicant would satisfy the city’s park dedication requirement for this plat through the dedication of 4.56 acres of public park land in the southwest portion of the site. The land dedication would expand the size of existing Harvest Park (a 1.8-acre neighborhood park) located immediately to the west of the land to be dedicated. Harvest Park serves the 75 homes located north of Chankahda Trail and west of the site. The play feature for Harvest Park is currently in place. The park expansion area would allow for the existing trail within the park to be relocated to eliminate 90-degree bends, while also providing passive area, open space, and wildlife habitat. The applicant would not be given park land dedication credit for the wetland portion of the dedication area. Trails City trails presently exist along both sides of the Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway segments that abut the site. The applicant would install a trail on the site to connect the southeast portion of the church parking lot to the existing city trail located at the northwest corner of the Chankahda Trail/Maple Grove Parkway intersection. The existing city trail continues southerly with a tunnel under Chankahda Trail to provide a safe crossing of that roadway. The trail segment on the site would be placed within a trail easement granted to the city, as specified in the attached resolution. 51 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 16 Environmental Review A formal environmental review (i.e., an environmental assessment worksheet, or EAW) would be required for schools, churches, and similar facilities that contain 300,000 square feet or more of building area. A formal environmental review is not required in this case because the proposed church building would contain 64,000 square feet. Nevertheless, the environmental items that would be reviewed in an EAW (e.g., traffic, wetlands, etc.) are reviewed and addressed as part of the city’s standard review of all development applications. Conclusion on Preliminary Plat request The requested preliminary plat would comply with all of the city’s platting regulations. SITE PLAN The zoning ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan for a church in the RSF-3 zoning district. Staff used these standards to review the proposal. The specific standards that apply are as indicated on the following table. Standards for Churches in the RSF-3 District Specified Proposed Complies? Lot Area: 1 acre (min.) 47.91 acres Yes Lot Width 200 ft. (min.) 1,006 ft. Yes Building Setbacks: --Front (from east lot line abutting Maple Grove Parkway) 50 ft. (min.) 1,082 ft. at nearest point Yes --Front (from south lot line abutting Chankahda Trail) 50 ft. (min.) 631 ft. at nearest point --Side (from north lot line) 25 ft. (min.) 334 ft. at nearest point Yes --Rear (from west lot line) 40 ft. (min.) 393 ft. at nearest point Yes Parking Setbacks: --Front (from east lot line abutting Maple Grove Parkway) 20 ft. (min.) 670 ft. Yes --Front (from south lot line abutting Chankahda Trail) 20 ft. (min.) 280 ft. Yes --Side (from north lot line) 20 ft. (min.) 135 ft. Yes --Rear (from west lot line) 20 ft. (min.) 285 ft. Yes Parking Setback to Building: 10 ft. (min.) 16 ft. at nearest point Yes 52 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 17 Specified Proposed Complies? Drive Aisle Width: 26 ft. (min.) 26 ft. Yes Parking Stall Size: 9’ x 18.5’ 9’ x 18.5’ Yes Number of Parking Spaces: 500 (min.) 685 Yes Building Height: 35 ft. (max.) 35 ft. for sanctuary; 21 ft. for remainder of Bldg. Yes Structural Coverage (building size to lot size ratio): 50% (max.) 3.1% Yes Landscaping: 124 new trees or equivalent (min.) Equivalent to 124 new trees (108 new trees plus and 156 shrubs Yes Lighting: --Lumens/sq. ft. of Hardscape 1.25 (max.) 1.25 Yes --Fixture Height 25 ft. (max.) 25 ft. or less Yes --Shielding Shielded fixtures within 300 ft. of residential Shielded fixtures within 300 ft. of residential Yes --Curfew Reduce lighting level by 50% at 8 PM or close of building (whichever is later) Reduce lighting level by 50% at all times, unless the building is open Yes --Backlight/Uplight/Glare (BUG) Rating for Parking Lot Lighting B3, U0, G1 (max.) B2, U0, G1 Yes --Correlated Color Temperature of Lighting 4100 Kelvin (max.) 4000 Kelvin Yes Lighting The City of Plymouth has one of the most stringent lighting ordinances in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The ordinance was written using the model ordinance from DarkSky International – which provides tools and resources to communities, policy makers, and the lighting industry with the goal of protecting the nighttime environment from excessive lighting. The site is in Lighting Zone 1, which allows the least amount of lighting, and where: 1) Parking lot lighting levels are limited to 1.25 lumens per square foot of parking area 2) Mounting height of light fixtures cannot exceed 25 feet 3) Light fixtures mounted higher than 12 feet that are located within 300 feet of residential property must be equipped with house-side shielding 4) The correlated color temperature (CCR) of lighting cannot exceed 4100 Kelvin. 53 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 18 5) Light fixtures must meet specified BUG (backlight/uplight/glare) ratings, and lighting levels must be reduced by at least 50 percent at 8 PM or close of building, whichever is later. Parking Lot All parking for the use would occur on the site and would be surface parking (i.e., no parking ramp is proposed). The applicant would install more parking than required by the city to provide for a buffer between church services. Building Design and Materials The proposed building would contain one level of slab-on-grade construction (no basement). The height of the flat roof would vary, with the highest portion being over the sanctuary. The primary exterior wall materials would include architectural precast panels with varying colors and patterns – and would also include accent areas of architectural metal panels and glass. A cross tower would be located near the front building entrance. The proposed materials and design would comply with city regulations. Natural Preserve Although there would be some sodded/manicured/irrigated areas around the building and parking areas and along the driveway, the majority of the upland (non-wetland) areas of the site would be planted with a native seed mix to create a natural preserve and wildlife habitat. Noise There would be construction-related noise associated with any development of the site. Existing ambient noise sources in the area include the Wayzata High School football stadium/athletic facilities, Plymouth Gun Club, and incidental road noise from Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane. Noise levels would increase during project construction but are anticipated to return to near existing levels after construction is complete. No outdoor amphitheater is proposed, and the applicant states that they would not hold outdoor services or other activities. Grading and development construction operations (e.g., installation of public streets) are limited to between 7 AM and dusk on weekdays, and between 8 AM and 6 PM on Saturdays. Such grading and development construction operations are prohibited on Sundays and holidays. After the site is prepared for building construction, the building construction operations are limited to between 7 AM and 10 PM on weekdays, and between 8 AM and 9 PM on weekends and holidays. The police department enforces the noise ordinance with respect to hours of operation, and citations can be issued for violations. 54 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 19 The Meadows Park - Use of Church Parking Lot The applicant and city would enter into an agreement to allow the church parking lot to be used as overflow parking for The Meadows Park located south of Chankahda Trail. The agreement would not require involvement by the Planning Commission. Conclusion on Site Plan request No variances or other deviations from the established zoning standards are requested. The requested site plan would comply with all city regulations. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Conditional uses are uses that are permitted under the zoning ordinance, whereby the city may impose reasonable conditions that have a direct nexus to, and would help to address, any potential negative effects of the use. A conditional use permit is required for religious institutions (e.g., churches, chapels, temples, synagogues, mosques) to locate in residential zoning districts, including the RSF-3 district. The Planning Commission must review the requested conditional use permit for compliance with the established zoning ordinance standards, as outlined below. Staff has provided an analysis of the standards (see italicized verbiage after each standard). 21015.02., Subd. 5. The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. Its judgment shall be based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: 1) Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans. Analysis: The applicant is not requesting to amend the city’s 2040 comprehensive plan. The site is guided LA-2 (living area 2) on the land use map of the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan specifically names churches as a permitted type of development in LA- 2-guided areas. Development of the site with a church would not have adverse effects on public facilities or capital improvement plans. Consequently, the proposed church use would comply with the comprehensive plan. 55 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 20 2) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. Analysis: Like Meadow Ridge Elementary School across Chankahda Trail and similar to other churches in the community, the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed church use may help to promote and enhance the public welfare of the community. The proposed use would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. Public benefits include dedication of additional park land for Harvest Park, agreement to allow use of the church parking lot as overflow parking for The Meadows Park, and a trail within a public trail easement to connect the parking lot on the site to the existing trail that tunnels under Chankahda Trail. 3) The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Analysis: The proposed church use would not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other properties in the immediate vicinity, nor would it substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The church building and related parking lot would be set back substantially from all lot lines. Additionally, existing perimeter trees would be preserved and new trees would be planted on the site to help screen the use from abutting properties. 4) The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Analysis: The establishment of a church use on the site would not impede the normal and orderly development or improvement of nearby properties. Except for the planned ‘Meadows Park’ to the south, all nearby properties are already developed. The proposed church would not impede development of the future park. 5) Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the use which is proposed. Analysis: Adequate public facilities and services are available to the site. 6) The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Analysis: The proposed church use would conform to the RSF-3 standards and all other city regulations. 56 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 21 7) The conditional use complies with the general and specific performance standards as specified by this Section and this Chapter. Analysis: The proposed church use would comply with the general performance standards listed below. There are no specific standards listed for churches in the RSF-3 district regulations. 21015.04. GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: As may be applicable, the evaluation of any proposed conditional use permit request shall be subject to and include, but not limited to, the following general performance standards and criteria: Subd. 1. The use and the site in question shall be served by a street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the type and volume of traffic which would be generated. Analysis: Both of the streets that abut the site (Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway) are classified as arterial roadways. Arterial roadways are the highest order roadways designed for mobility and with fewer access points. Local streets and collector roadways within neighborhoods feed the arterial system to transport people and goods in an efficient manner. The city’s traffic study determined that Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway have capacity to accommodate the type and volume of traffic that would be generated by the proposed church use of the site. Subd. 2. The site design for access and parking shall minimize internal as well as external traffic conflicts and shall be in compliance with Section 21135 of this Chapter. Analysis: The city’s traffic study determined that the internal site design for access and parking would not result in traffic conflicts. Furthermore, the traffic study determined that the external site design would minimize traffic conflicts with the traffic study recommendations that are incorporated into the attached resolution. Subd. 3. If applicable, a pedestrian circulation system shall be clearly defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas from encroachment by parked or moving vehicles. Analysis: The existing city trails along both sides of Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway would remain in place. The applicant would construct a trail within the site to connect to the existing city trail system. Subd. 4. Adequate off-street parking and off-street loading shall be provided in compliance with Section 21135 of this Chapter. Analysis: The number of parking spaces for the proposed church use would exceed the city’s requirement. Loading operations would be minimal. 57 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 22 Subd. 5. Loading docks and drive-up facilities shall be positioned so as to minimize internal site access problems and maneuvering conflicts, to avoid visual or noise impacts on any “adjacent” residential use or district, and are in compliance with Section 21135 of this Chapter. Analysis: Not applicable, as there would not be any loading docks or drive-up facilities. Subd. 6. Whenever a non-residential use “is adjacent to” a residential use or district, a buffer area with screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with Section 21130 of this Chapter. Analysis: Preservation of existing trees, planting of new trees, and creation of natural preserve, together with substantial building and parking setbacks would provide a green belt strip around the site perimeter. Subd. 7. General site screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with Section 21130 of this Chapter. Analysis: The proposed tree preservation and landscaping plans would comply with all city regulations. Subd. 8. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts, and shall be in compliance with Section 21105 of this Chapter. Analysis: The proposed lighting plan would comply with all city regulations. Subd. 9. Potential exterior noise generated by the use shall be identified and mitigation measures as may be necessary shall be imposed to ensure compliance with Section 21105.10 of this Chapter. Analysis: Upon construction, there would be no exterior noise generated by the church use. All services and activities would be held indoors. Subd. 10. The site drainage system shall be subject to the review and approval of the City. Analysis: The proposed drainage system would comply with all city and watershed regulations. 58 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 23 Subd. 11. The architectural appearance and functional design of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing or potential buildings and area so as to cause impairment of property values or a blighting influence. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordinated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. Analysis: The building appearance and design would not impair property values or result in a blighting influence on nearby properties. Subd. 12. Provisions shall be made for an interior location for recycling and trash handling and storage or an outdoor, enclosed receptacle area shall be provided in compliance with Section 21105 of this Chapter. Analysis: Recycling and trash receptacles would be maintained within an enclosure abutting the rear (west) wall of the building. The enclosure would be constructed with materials that match the building. The enclosure would comply with all city regulations. Subd. 13. All signs and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Section 21155 of this Chapter. Analysis: Any signage would need to comply with the city’s sign regulations, as addressed in the attached resolution. Subd. 14. The use and site shall be in compliance with any federal or state laws or regulations which are applicable and any related permits are obtained and documented to the City. Analysis: The use and site for all properties must comply with federal and state laws and regulations. Any required permits would need to be provided to the city. Subd. 15. Any applicable business licenses mandated by City Code are approved and obtained. Analysis: Not applicable, as a city business license is not required for a church use. Subd. 16. The hours of operation may be restricted when there is potential negative impact upon a residential use or district. Analysis: The proposed church use would operate within typical church hours. Other than Wednesday and Saturday evenings and Sunday mornings, there would be little activity on the site. 59 Planning Commission Report Information (File 2023-065) Page 24 Subd. 17. The use complies with all applicable performance standards of the zoning district in which it is located. Analysis: The proposed church use would comply with all applicable performance standards established for the RSF-3 zoning district. Conclusion on Conditional Use Permit request Staff finds that the proposed use would be consistent with the comprehensive plan and would comply with all established zoning ordinance standards for the issuance of a conditional use permit, provided the conditions in the attached resolution are met. _______________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION Community and Economic Development Department staff recommends approval of the rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan, and conditional use permit for Eagle Brook Church for property located at 17910 Chankahda Trail, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the attached ordinance and resolutions. If new information is brought forward at the public hearing, staff may alter or reconsider its recommendation. The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council . The City Council makes the final decision. __________________________________________________________________ 60 Tr o y L n Plymouth / Maple Grove Border Chankahda Trail Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y Pe o n y L n 61st Ave 61 s t A v e SITE 2023-065Eagle Brook Church17910 Chankahda TrailExistng Zoning -- FRD K75007501,500375 Feet Meadow Ridge Elementary Schoo l The Meadows Park 61 SITE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y Chankahda Trail Pe o n y L n 61st Ave 61s t A v e T r o y L n 2023-065 -- Aerial Map K66006601,320330 Feet 62 SITE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chankahda Trail Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y Pe o n y L n 2023-065 -- Aerial Map K50005001,000250 Feet 63 64 65 66 9/13/2023 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH – WEST METRO CAMPUS – PLYMOUTH – Luedke Farm Site at 17800 and 17910 Chankahda Trail (formerly County Road 47) (Parcels 0611822120001, 0611822110002, 0611822110001) CITY SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE ZONING Request that the property be re-zoned from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to RSF-3 (Single Family Detached 3) to match adjacent development and to be consistent with the 2040 land use plan for LA-2. CUP Request a conditional use permit to authorize church (place of worship) use within Zone RSF-3 (a) Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including public facilities and capital improvement plans: In zone RSF-3 (Single Family Detached 3) a church is a complementary use to the adjacent residential zone RSF-3. The church use will create an opportunity to connect capital improvements of water and sewer to adjacent residential areas. A traffic study will recommend and describe any necessary road improvements and adjustments if needed. (b) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort: Similar to the school across Chankahda Trail, the church fulfills a beneficial role to the health and overall wellbeing of a community. A church is a place where people can connect with others, find community and experience real life change. When transformation happens in a person’s life, it can transform their family and in return, the communities they are a part of. (c) The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood: The site will have trees along the perimeter. The existing wetlands will be retained. The church building, parking and drives are toward the center of the site. The access to the site is from Maple Grove Parkway. Land adjacent to existing park is planned to be dedicated to the city for expanded parkland. Easement to be provided for a public path through the site from the neighborhood to the link to the elementary school and park to the south of the site. (d) The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district: The site is sufficiently sized to allow for the church use, including parking to be all contained within the property boundaries. Eagle Brook has staff dedicated to maintaining their property. A place of worship can be an asset to a well-rounded community. (e) Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably provided to accommodate the use which is proposed: 67 9/13/2023 Public facilities and services are adjacent to the site. (f) The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located: The property is a single story and will be reviewed with the City to comply with all applicable regulations. (g) The conditional use complies with the general and specific performance standards as specified by this Section and this Chapter: Building materials, screening, tree requirements, wetland buffers and other standards will all be met. The proposed design will exceed the recommended minimum setbacks and provide all the necessary buffers to insulate the surrounding neighbors. REPLATTING Preliminary and final plat are being submitted simultaneously. Hereby request to extend final plat review period to be consistent with preliminary plat review period. SITE PLAN REVIEW USE: Eagle Brook Church (EBC) is a multi-site church with a video venue that delivers a consistent message live from their Lino Lakes Campus to all of their satellite campuses on the weekend. EBC is currently hosting services at Wayzata High School on Sundays in what they consider to be a “mobile” site. This proposed West Metro Campus will become EBC’s permanent church site for this campus. The West Metro Campus is planned to have 1,500 seats in the Worship Auditorium, a spacious Lobby with a Café, an Administrative area for approximately twelve staff and a secure Children’s ministry classroom area for weekend kid’s programming use. EBC holds church on Saturday evenings (4:00p and 6:00p) and Sunday morning (9:00a and 11:00a). Wednesday evenings Eagle Brook hosts student ministry for junior high and senior high students (5:00p-9:00p). Christmas and Easter services will occur on other days of the week. All services are typically an hour in length and indoors. Ten to twelve staff will be in the building during the weekdays (Monday thru Wednesday, 8:00a to 5:00p). EBC will host a few small groups in the evenings (50-100 people) 1-2 times per week which include Divorce Care and Quest 180 (addiction recovery ministry). EBC does not host weddings and funerals on site. EBC also does not use the building for day care / education during the week. SITE DESIGN: The existing property is 55.96 acres (2,437,692 square feet) of farm and wetlands. A portion of the land will be dedicated to expand the existing park, including a trail easement through the site to connect the park and neighborhood to existing trails. Buffers and setbacks are provided around the property to meet or exceed zoning standards and the design intent is to minimize impact to existing wetlands. Building placement is toward the center and northwest of the site, with parking on three sides. Native vegetation to be provided with mown grass adjacent to the building. Surface biofiltration basins provided for run-off. Trees will be added along portions of the perimeter of the site. TRAFFIC: Cul-de-sac will be provided to terminate the residential street from the east. Single entry to the site will be provided from Maple Grove Parkway. Drop off is within the site. There will be 685 parking spaces on-site overall to accommodate capacity as determined from historic EBC data on other campuses. In addition to clear signage, 68 9/13/2023 EBC also retains people specifically to direct traffic during peak time periods. Long access drives within the site are utilized to accommodate stacking of cars if needed. BUILDING DESIGN: The church will be a single-story building approximately 65,000 square feet in size. The elevation of the building will be broken up by varying the height, size and orientation as well as the materials. A cross tower will be placed at the entry to identify this is a church. The primary materials will be architectural precast concrete, varied in two colors and patterns with accenting areas of architectural metal panels and glass. FUTURE EXPANSION: The proposed building is designed to accommodate the projected increase in attendance based on experiences at other campus locations. No future building or site expansion is intended for this site. SCHEDULE: Intend to have construction start Spring 2024 with completion around Fall 2025. 69 COUNTY ROAD 47 LA W N D A L E L N / MA P L E G R O V E P A R K W A Y 61st AVE 62ND AVE 61 s t A V E WETLAND WETLAND 505 504 503 502 501 601 602 664 623 624 625 627 655 654 653 652 656 657 660 661 662 663 603604605606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 637636634633 631 628 651 630 WETLAND WETLAND EX POND WETLAND SWM SWM 658659 556 526 531 532 642 641 640 639 638 643649 648 645 SWM 635632 629 533 527 528 529 530 650 647 646 644 557 558 559 560 561 665666667668 669 670 671 672 673 674 PARK SWM 562 555 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 534535536537538539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548549550551552553554 KI M B E R L Y L N RAN I E R L N 626 EXPAND POND CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH CR 47 ROW DED. 2.56 acres SWM SWM SWM 563 CR 47 ROW DED. FUTURE CR 47 IMPROVEMENTS (BY OTHERS) LA W N D A L E R O W D E D . TRAIL 'UNDERPASS' BY OTHERS EX. TRAIL H EX. TRAIL FUT. TRAIL BY OTHERS FUT. TRAIL BY OTHERS PARK PARKING LUEDKE PROPERTY - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - Site Plan +Aerial PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA WETLAND (ESTIMATED -FROM LiDAR AND VEGETATION PER AERIAL) PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY - DEDICATION REQUIRED PROPOSED TRAIL/SIDEWALK (PER PLAN OR FUTURE BY OTHERS) PROPOSED 55' WIDE LOTS - MEAS. AT FRONT SETBACK PROPOSED 65' WIDE LOTS - MEAS AT FRONT SETBACK 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 612.758.3099 www.alliant-inc.com MAIN FAX SITE DATA TOTAL AREA: LUEDKE (3 parcels) 55.595 acres per County GIS LAWNDALE LN RW DEDICATION = 2.011 AC (Ded. of Ex. Esmt) C.R. 47 RW DEDICATION = 0.868 AC (Ded. of Ex. Esmt, inc. recent add. APPROXIMATE WETLAND AREA (Per Depiction Estimate): = 11.13 AC (GREEN DASH LINE) PRELIMINARY/ESTIMATED NET DEVELOPABLE AREA: ±41.59 AC CURRENT LAND USE: LIVING AREA 2, LA-2 (3-6 units/acre) PROP. LAND USE: LA-2 EXISTING ZONING: FRD, FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF-3, SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING DIST 3 RMF-1, MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DIST 1 SITE DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY FEMA FLOODPLAIN OR SHORELAND MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. CONCEPT PLAN ASSUMPTIONS: SINGLE FAMILY - 2 SIZES ·SIZE 1=MIN LOT WIDTH: 65' @ Front Setback (Labeled with 600's) ·74 LOTS ·SIZE 2=MIN LOT WIDTH: 55' @ Front Setback (Labeled with 500's) ·63 LOTS ·MIN FRONT SETBACK: 25' Local R/W and 50' Arterial R/W ·MIN REAR SETBACK: 25' ·MIN SIDE YARD: 8' Dwelling, 6' Garage - 65' LOTS and 55' LOTS ·MIN LOT AREA: 7000 SF - 65 LOTS, 6,000 SF - 55' LOTS ·TYPICAL LOT DEPTH: MIN 110' - 65', MIN 110 - 55' LOTS ·MIN SETBACK TO CR 47: 50' ·MIN SETBACK TO LAWNDALE:50' TOTAL UNITS: 137 UNITS (±3.3 units per estimated net acre) ALL ROADS ARE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY PLYMOUTH ·50 FT RW and 28' Back to Back : 6,662 LF WETLANDS: ESTIMATE DEPICTED IN COMBINATION OF COUNTY GIS AND LIDAR AND AERIAL IMAGERY. FIELD DELINEATION TO BE COMPLETED ASAP SPRING 2022. WETLANDS ARE LISTED WITH MEDIUM CLASSIFICATION IN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: PER CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CLASS.AVG MIN MAX LOW 25'10'50' MEDIUM 30'10'50' HIGH 50'40'60' EXCEPTIONAL 75'50'100' REQUIRED BUFFER BUILDING SETBACK = 15' DECKS ARE ALLOWED 6' INTO BUILDING SETBACK DATE: 5/2/22 PAGE 1 OF 3 LEGEND DEVELOPER: DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES 12900 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 180 MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA, 55343 CONTACT: AZIZ SIDDIQUI (ASiddiqui@dwhomes.com) ~60' +/- (50' min. required) ~35' +/- (25' min. required) ~30' +/- (25' min. required) ~55' +/- (50' min. required) 70 EXISTING CHANKAHDA TRL MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y 62ND AVE N MEADOW RIDGE ELEMENTARY THE PINES AT ELM CREEK THE PRESERVE AT MEADOW RIDGE HARVEST PARK EAGLE BROOK - PLYMOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY - 10/12/2023 71 PROPOSED CHANKAHDA TRL MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y 62ND AVE N MEADOW RIDGE ELEMENTARY THE PINES AT ELM CREEK THE PRESERVE AT MEADOW RIDGE HARVEST PARK PROPOSED PARK 1082’ 393’ 63 1 ’ 33 4 ’ EAGLE BROOK - PLYMOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY - 10/12/2023 72 MEADOW RIDGE ELEMENTARY THE PINES AT ELM CREEK THE PRESERVE AT MEADOW RIDGE 1 2 3 4 EXISTING VIEWS 1 2 34 * SITE PHOTOS TAKEN ON MARCH 18, 2020 NOTES: CHANKAHDA TRL MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y 62ND AVE N PREPARED BY:PREPARED FOR: 73 MEADOW RIDGE ELEMENTARY THE PINES AT ELM CREEK THE PRESERVE AT MEADOW RIDGE * EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES SHOWN PER SURVEY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS; EXISTING UNDERSTORY SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER MATERIALS NOT MODELED; EXISTING TREE HEIGHT AND TREES OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY MAY DIFFER 1 2 3 4 1* 2* 34 PROPOSED VIEWS NOTES: CHANKAHDA TRL MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y 62ND AVE N PREPARED BY:PREPARED FOR: 74 SOUTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST NORTH EAST EAGLE BROOK - PLYMOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY - 10/12/2023 75 REPORT | www.transportationcollaborative.com | To: Chris McKenzie, PE City of Plymouth From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC Date: November 7, 2023 Subject: Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study INTRODUCTION TC2 completed a traffic study for the proposed Eagle Brook Church development in Plymouth, MN. The subject site, shown in Figure 1, is in the northwest quadrant of the Chankahda Trail (formerly County Road 47) and Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane intersection. The proposed development is a 64,000 square foot church, with a seating capacity of up to 1,500 people. The project would include a driveway that connects with Maple Grove Parkway across from 61st Avenue. The main objectives of the study are to quantify existing traffic conditions, evaluate potential impacts to adjacent roadways during various peak timeframes associated with the proposed development, and recommend infrastructure changes, if necessary, to ensure safe and efficient operations for all users. The following study assumptions, methodology, and findings are offered for consideration. Figure 1 Subject Site Subject Site Pe o n y L n Du n k i r k L n CR 1 1 6 Chankahda Trl Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y CR 1 0 1 Vi c k s b u r g L n Tr o y L n Schmidt Lake Rd 76 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 2 BACKGROUND The subject site is adjacent to Chankahda Trail (formerly known as County Road 47), which is being reconstructed to better serve the community and its users. Ahead of the roadway reconstruction project, the City, in partnership with Hennepin County, conducted the County Road 47 Corridor Study, which was finalized in May 2020. The corridor study quantified issues and needs within the area, evaluated various alternatives, and ultimately helped identify the future corridor vision to serve the community for the long-term. Subsequently, a phased construction plan was developed which began in 2022 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2024; the segment abutting the site was reconstructed in 2022. Eagle Brook Church is a multi-site church with a video venue that delivers a consistent message live from their Lino Lakes Campus to all their satellite campuses on the weekend. The church currently hosts services at Wayzata High School on Sundays in what is considered to be a “mobile” site. The proposed West Metro Campus would become the church’s permanent site and all operations that occur at Wayzata High School would be relocated to the new campus. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were reviewed within the study area to establish current operations to help determine impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions included reviewing historical traffic data, collecting traffic volumes, observing roadway characteristics, and analyzing intersection capacity, which are described in the following sections. Traffic Volumes With the segment of Chankahda Trail located east of Maple Grove Parkway closed during the development of this study, a combination of resources was used to establish current (non-construction) traffic conditions within the study area. This approach included a review of traffic volumes collected as part of the County Road 47 Corridor Study, StreetLight user data/counts during non-construction conditions, and Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes provided by MnDOT. The data sets were compared and normalized / balanced to reflect typical non-construction conditions while also accounting for travel behavior changes following the pandemic. StreetLight was used to collect intersection turning movement counts at the locations noted. The data obtained focused on Wednesdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. and 3 to 8 p.m., which encompass the expected peak periods of the proposed development. Note that with StreetLight data, a larger dataset was obtained than traditional intersection counts, which included data from January through April of both 2021 and 2022; City staff verified that there were no construction closures during these timeframes. Chankahda Trail Intersections Maple Grove Parkway / Peony Lane Intersections • Walnut Grove Lane • 62nd Avenue N • Troy Lane • 61st Avenue N • Meadow Ridge Elementary School • 57th Avenue N • Maple Grove Parkway / Peony Lane • Inland Lane • Dunkirk Lane Note that the City of Maple Grove asked to evaluate the Maple Grove Parkway and Fieldstone Boulevard intersection as part of a preliminary review of this report. Further discussion regarding this intersection is provided later in this report. 77 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 3 To illustrate how existing travel patterns within the area vary by time of day and day of the week (i.e., Wednesday versus Saturday versus Sunday), existing traffic volumes at the Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane intersection were reviewed. As shown in Figure 2, the Wednesday morning (7 to 9 a.m.) and evening (3 to 6 p.m.) periods represent the highest existing traffic volume timeframes within the study area. On Saturday evenings (4 to 6 p.m.), existing traffic volumes are about 20 percent lower as compared to the same timeframe on Wednesdays, while on Sunday mornings (10 a.m. to 12 p.m.), existing traffic volumes are about 50 percent lower as compared to the Wednesday morning (7 to 9 a.m.) peak period. Figure 2 Existing Chankahda Trl and Maple Grove Pkwy/Peony Ln Intersection Traffic Volumes Wayzata High School Hours: 8:15 a.m. to 3:10 p.m.; Meadow Ridge Elementary School Hours: 7:45 a.m. to 2:25 p.m. Roadway Characteristics Observations were conducted within the study area to identify various roadway characteristics. A summary of current roadway characteristics is outlined as follows: • Chankahda Trail – a 2-lane arterial roadway with dedicated left- and right-turn lanes; the posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour. A multi-use trail is provided along both sides of the roadway and a pedestrian underpass/crossing is located immediately west of Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane. • Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane – a 3-lane arterial roadway with a center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL); right-turn lanes are only provided at the Chankahda Trail intersection. The posted speed limit is 45 miles per hour and there are multimodal facilities (i.e., multi-use trail or sidewalk) along both sides of the roadway. Note that arterial roadways generally provide longer trips, have more mobility, provide limited access, and connect larger centers. All other study roadways are local 2-lane facilities, with limited to no turn lanes, and primarily provide access to arterial roadways for area residents. From a traffic control perspective, the Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane intersection is signalized, while all other study intersections are side-street stop controlled. A summary of the existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes is provided in Figure 3. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 In t e r s e c t i o n T r a f f i c V o l u m e Wednesday Saturday Sunday 78 Figure 3Existing Conditions Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study N 3 (1) 19 (74)11 (2) 88 (44) 3 ( 1 4 ) 1 ( 5 ) 4 (0)1 (12)10 (12)0 (0) 1 (1) 5 (40) 1 (0)1 (12)1 (3) 11 ( 3 5 ) 7 ( 2 9 ) 23 ( 4 4 ) 12 (70) 4 (24) 9 3 ( 6 7 ) 3 7 ( 9 3 ) 1 4 ( 1 1 0 ) 4 ( 1 5 ) 4 (9) 18 (79)1 (25) 96 (36) 0 ( 1 6 ) 3 ( 1 0 ) XXX (XXX) [XXX] X,XXX Wednesday PM Peak Hour Volume Saturday PM Peak Hour Volume Sunday AM Peak Hour Volume Estimated Weekday ADT Volume Traffic Signal Stop Sign Legend 2,050 4,300 2,250 6th Avenu e Highway 5 5 10th Avenue Revere Lane Mai n A c c e s s Of f i c e / S i t e Note that the Highway 55 and Revere Lane intersection was included in the analysis, but is not shown in the graphic. 10th Avenue Chankahda Trl 6th AvenueS Shore Drive Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y N Frontage Road 10 (15)5 (10)60 (230)5 (5)5 (10)35 (40)5 (5)55 (125)5 (15)75 (40)105 (155)120 (135)CR 73 35 (70)1245 (1805)55 (50)135 (115)2250 (1570)260 (170)105 (175)65 (60)65 (110)75 (300)50 (90)55 (100)25 (35)20 (20)75 (80)25 (35)10 (5)25 (40)30 (70)135 (225)30 (20)35 (60)120 (135)65 (80)10 (20)115 (240)0 (5)45 (85)120 (115)5 (5)70 (70)0 (0)10 (10)10 (5)0 (0)5 (5) 150 (105) [50] 175 (140) [85] 70 (50) [45] 3 (1)19 (74)11 (2)88 (44)3 (14)1 (5)3,600 37,500 6,5002,2004,900 1,8007,350 1,4002,600 400 Pe o n y L n 61st Ave 62nd Tr o y L n Wa l n u t G r o v e L n 61st Ave Av e and Du n k i r k L n 57t h A v e 56t h A v e Meadow Ridge Elementary 35 ( 2 0 ) [ 1 0 ] 18 5 ( 1 7 5 ) [ 1 8 0 ] 90 ( 1 1 0 ) [ 4 5 ] [15] (25) 40 [125] (150) 165 [35] (40) 65 [3 5 ] ( 4 0 ) 7 0 [ 1 4 5 ] ( 2 5 0 ) 3 5 5 [5 5 ] ( 7 5 ) 1 0 0 20 ( 1 0 ) [ 5 ] 24 0 ( 1 7 5 ) [ 1 1 5 ] 30 ( 1 5 ) [ 1 0 ] 10 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] 10 ( 5 ) [ 1 0 ] [5] ( 5 ) 5 [1 5 0 ] ( 1 9 5 ) 2 3 5 [1 0 ] ( 1 0 ) 1 0 [5] ( 1 0 ) 1 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [15 ] ( 1 5 ) 1 5 10 ( 1 0 ) [ 5 ] 310 ( 2 5 5 ) [ 2 5 5 ] [5] ( 1 0 ) 5 [23 0 ] ( 3 6 0 ) 5 1 5 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 0 [ 5 ] ( 5 ) 5 375 (265) [150] 15 (30) [10] [210] (290) 325 [15] (45) 30 [3 0 ] ( 3 0 ) 2 0 [ 2 0 ] ( 1 5 ) 3 0 Ln 10 (5) [5] 385 (290) [175] [5] (10) 10 [220] (325) 345 10 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] 10 ( 1 0 ) [ 5 ] 10 (5) [ 5 ] 220 (1 6 5 ) [ 1 1 0 ] 30 (2 0 ) [ 1 0 ] 5 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] 5 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] [5] ( 5 ) 5 [150] ( 1 9 0 ) 2 2 0 [5] (1 0 ) 1 0 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [1 0 ] ( 1 5 ) 2 5 275 (195) [125] 5 (5) [5] [170] (210) 255 [5] (5) 5 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 5 [ 5 ] ( 5 ) 1 5 In l 62nd Pl 5 (5) [5]5 (5) [5] 30 5 ( 3 0 5 ) [ 2 3 0 ] 5 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] [2 0 5 ] ( 3 5 5 ) 5 2 5 [ 5 ] ( 1 0 ) 1 0 10 (5) [5] 10 (10) [5] 30 0 ( 2 9 5 ) [ 2 3 0 ] 10 ( 1 5 ) [ 5 ] [2 0 5 ] ( 3 6 0 ) 5 2 5 [ 5 ] ( 2 0 ) 2 0 6,25 0 7, 5 0 0 7,00 0 4,50 0 79 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 5 Intersection Capacity Intersection capacity was evaluated using Synchro/SimTraffic Software (version 11), which incorporates methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. The software is used to develop calibrated models that simulate observed traffic operations and identify key metrics such as intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queues. These models incorporate collected traffic, pedestrian, and bicyclist volumes, traffic control and signal timing parameters provided by the corresponding jurisdictions, and driver behavior factors. Level of Service (LOS) quantifies how an intersection is operating. Intersections are graded from LOS A through LOS F, which corresponds to the average delay per vehicle values shown in Table 1. An overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is considered acceptable in the Twin Cities. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation; LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Table 1 Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Average Delay / Vehicles Stop, Yield, and Roundabout Intersections Signalized Intersections A < 10 seconds < 10 seconds B 10 to 15 seconds 10 to 20 seconds C 15 to 25 seconds 20 to 35 seconds D 25 to 35 seconds 35 to 55 seconds E 35 to 50 seconds 55 to 80 seconds F > 50 seconds > 80 seconds For side-street stop-controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service, which considers the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support the volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, most delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high-levels of delay (i.e., poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis, shown in Table 2, indicate that all study intersections, approaches, and movements currently operate at LOS C or better during the Wednesday p.m., Saturday p.m., and Sunday a.m. peak hours. In addition, all queues are maintained within the existing turn lanes. At cross-streets, the 95th percentile queues are generally 50 feet (i.e., one to two vehicles) or less. Note that for side-street stop-controlled intersections, the delay shown in the table represents the average side-street delay to access the arterial roadway (i.e., the mainline), which balances the delays for all movements. In general, average delays to make a left-turn from the side- street stop-controlled approach range from 10 to 20 seconds. Thus, there are no existing intersection capacity issues that warrant mitigation. 80 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 6 Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Intersection Traffic Control LOS (Delay) Wednesday PM Peak Hour Saturday PM Peak Hour Sunday AM Peak Hour Maple Grove Pkwy / 62nd Ave SSS A / A (7 sec) A / A (6 sec) A / A (5 sec) Maple Grove Pkwy / 61st Ave SSS A / A (9 sec) A / A (6 sec) A / A (4 sec) Maple Grove Pkwy / Chankahda Trl Signal B (17 sec) B (15 sec) B (12 sec) Peony Ln / 57th Ave SSS A / A (7 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (4 sec) Chankahda Trl / Walnut Grove Ln SSS A / A (5 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (4 sec) Chankahda Trl / Troy Ln SSS A / A (6 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (4 sec) Chankahda Trl / Meadow Ridge School SSS A / A (5 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (3 sec) Chankahda Trl / Inland Ln SSS A / A (6 sec) A / A (7 sec) A / A (3 sec) Chankahda Trl / Dunkirk Ln SSS A / A (6 sec) A / A (6 sec) A / A (5 sec) SSS – Side-Street-Stop Wednesday PM (4:30 to 5:30 PM) ; Saturday PM (5 to 6 PM) ; Sunday AM (10 to 11 AM) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development, shown in Figure 4, is in the northwest quadrant of the Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway/Peony Lane intersection. The site, which is currently agricultural land, is proposed to be developed as a 64,000 square foot church, with a seating capacity of up to 1,500 people. The project would include a driveway that connects with Maple Grove Parkway across from 61st Avenue; emergency-only vehicle access would be provided to the west of the site via the existing 61st Avenue stub street. Approximately 685 parking spaces are proposed. Construction was assumed to be complete by 2025. Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan 81 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 7 Church Operations As noted earlier, Eagle Brook Church currently hosts services at Wayzata High School on Sundays in what is considered to be a “mobile” site. The proposed West Metro Campus would become the church’s permanent site and all operations that occur at Wayzata High School would be relocated to the new campus. Key operational details, include: • Seating Capacity: 1,500 people • Employees: 12 to 15 people • Tuesday/Thursday Activities: Support Groups (5:30 to 8:30 p.m.) • Wednesday Activities: Middle School / High School Ministries (6:15 to 9:15 p.m.) • Saturday Services (2): 4 and 6 p.m. • Sunday Services (2): 9 and 11 a.m. Communication with project representatives indicate that a total of approximately 1,060 people currently attend one of the three Sunday services at Wayzata High School. With the proposed development, the church expects to change to a four (4) service model, to be in line with other Eagle Brook churches in White Bear Lake, Blaine, and Lino Lakes. With a dedicated church space, overall total attendance is expected to increase to approximately 2,250 people over an entire weekend. Given the project’s similarities to the Eagle Brook Church in Blaine, the following attendance levels for each service were used as the basis for this study. • Saturday 4 p.m.: 300 people • Saturday 6 p.m.: 250 people • Sunday 9 a.m.: 900 people • Sunday 11 a.m.: 800 people • Total Weekend Attendance: 2,250 people Communication with project representatives indicate that a total of approximately 40 to 50 students currently attend one of the Wednesday evening school aged ministries. Attendance at these student ministries is expected to increase up to a total of approximately 150 people upon opening of a permanent facility. The church does expect to host various support groups, which generally occur on Tuesdays or Thursdays and have a total of up to 100 people in attendance per evening. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2026 conditions, which represents one (1) year after opening conditions. The forecasts include general background growth and trips generated from the proposed development. The following study assumptions, along with the church operations, were used to develop future year 2026 traffic forecasts within the study area. Background Growth To account for general background growth in the area, an annual growth rate of two (2) percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes. This growth rate was developed using a combination of historical average daily traffic (ADT) volumes from surrounding roadways as published by MnDOT, intersection growth rates from the County Road 47 Corridor Study, and traffic forecasts from the 2040 City of Plymouth Transportation Plan. 82 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 8 Proposed Development The proposed development trip generation estimate was established using a combination of resources, including the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, typical vehicle occupancy rates (i.e., 2.5 attendee to vehicle ratio), and vehicle/attendance data provided for other Eagle Brook church facilities. Multiple sources were used to ensure reasonable trip generation estimates for typical Wednesday p.m., Saturday p.m., and Sunday a.m. peak hour conditions were developed. Note that the trip generation provided represents a typical condition and does not account for the few times a year with higher attendance, such as Easter and Christmas. The proposed development, shown in Table 3, is expected to generate 74 Wednesday p.m. peak hour, 189 Saturday p.m. peak hour, and 646 Sunday a.m. peak hour trips. These peak hours represent the p.m. peak hour of the adjacent roadway on a typical Wednesday (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.), and the overlap periods between the first and second services on Saturday evening and Sunday morning (i.e., 5 to 6 p.m., and 10 to 11 a.m.), respectively. All other periods are expected to operate similarly or better than these scenarios. The site generated trips were distributed throughout the study area based on the directional distribution in Figure 5, which is based on a combination of existing area travel patterns and engineering judgment. The resultant year 2026 traffic forecasts are illustrated in Figure 6. Table 3 Trip Generation Summary Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Wednesday Saturday Sunday PM Peak Hr In / Out Daily PM Peak Hr In / Out Daily AM Peak Hr In / Out Daily Church (560) 64,000 SF 34 / 40 486 96 / 93 550 313 / 333 2,014 Comparable Land Uses SF Housing (210) 104 units 62 / 36 981 52 / 44 986 46 / 40 882 Townhomes (220) 208 units 67 / 39 1,402 42 / 43 946 37 / 38 804 Note that trip generation estimates were established for other comparable residential development types (i.e., single-family and condo/townhome) to understand the overall trip generation potential of the site relative to the current development proposal. The comparable land use sizes were developed using the allowable development density based on the LA-2 land use guidance for the site, which has 34.67 net acres (i.e., the site area after wetlands and wetland buffers are deducted). Note that a previous residential development proposal for the site was within this density guidance. Based on these comparable land uses, a residential development would generate approximately 35 to 40% more weekday peak hour trips and two to three times more weekday daily trips as compared to the proposed church. On Saturdays, a residential development would generate approximately 50% less p.m. peak hour trips, but nearly two times more daily trips. On Sundays, a residential development would generate significantly less a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 55 to 60% less Sunday daily trips. This information illustrates that a residential development would have more traffic volume impact throughout the day and the week, while the proposed church would primarily have more traffic volume impact for shorter periods associated around various activities and services, particularly Sunday mornings. 83 Figure 5Year 2026 Site Generated Trips Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study N XXX (XXX) [XXX] X,XXX [X,XXX] Directional Distribution Wednesday M Peak Hour VolumeP Saturday PM Peak Hour Volume Sunday AM Peak Hour Volume Estimated Weekday ADT Volume Estimated Sunday ADT Volume Legend Chankahda Trl Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y 9 (24) [78] (0) [0]0 (0) [0]0 Pe o n y L n 61st Ave 62nd Tr o y L n Wa l n u t G r o v e L n 61st Ave Av e and Du n k i r k L n 57 t h A ve 56t h A ve Meadow Ridge Elementary 6 ( 1 4 ) [ 5 0 ] (2 8 ) [ 1 0 0 ] 12 (2 3 ) [ 8 3 ] 10 [47] (14) 5 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [9 4 ] ( 2 9 ) 1 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (1 4 ) [ 5 0 ] 6 (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (0) [ 0 ] 0 (0) [ 0 ] 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [4 7 ] ( 1 4 ) 5 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (28) [ 1 0 0 ] 12 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [94] ( 2 9 ) 1 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 9 ( 4) [78]2 (0) [0]0 [83] (23) 10 [0] (0) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 Ln 0 (0) [0] (24) [78]9 [0] (0) 0[83] (23) 10 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (14) [5 0 ] 6 (0) [0 ] 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] [0] (0 ) 0[47] (1 4 ) 5 [0] (0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 6 (14) [50] (0) [0]0 [47] (14) 5[0] (0) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 In l 62nd Pl 0 (0) [0](0) [0]0 10 ( 2 9 ) [ 9 4 ] (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 [1 0 0 ] ( 2 8 ) 1 2 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 0 (0) [0] (0) [0]0 0 (0) [0] 10 ( 2 9 ) [ 9 4 ] 0 ( 0 ) [ 0 ] (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 [2 1 9 ] ( 6 7 ) 2 4 [0 ] ( ) 0 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 +120 [+50 0 ] +1 4 5 [+ 6 0 0 ] +75[+30 0 ] 30% 15% 30% 25% [100] (28) 12 [0] (0) 0 [233] (65) 28 +145 [+60 0 ] 84 Figure 6Year 2026 Conditions Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study N Chankahda Trl 170 (135) [130] (150) [90]185 (55) [50]75 Pe o n y L n Tr o y L n Wa l n u t G r o v e L n 61st Ave and Du n k i r k L n 57 t h A ve 56t h A ve Meadow Ridge Elementary 45 ( 3 5 ) [ 6 0 ] (2 1 5 ) [ 2 9 5 ] 20 5 (1 4 5 ) [ 1 3 0 ] 10 5 [65] (45) 50 [135] (160) 175 [40] (45) 70 [4 0 ] ( 4 5 ) 7 5 [2 5 0 ] ( 2 9 5 ) 3 8 5 [6 0 ] ( 8 0 ) 1 0 5 20 ( 1 0 ) [ 5 ] (2 0 5 ) [ 1 7 0 ] 26 0 (1 5 ) [ 1 5 ] 35 10 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] (0) [ 0 ] 0 (5) [ 1 0 ] 10 [5] ( 5 ) 5 [2 1 0 ] ( 2 2 5 ) 2 5 5 [1 0 ] ( 1 0 ) 1 0 [5] ( 1 0 ) 1 0 [0] ( 0 ) 0 [20 ] ( 2 0 ) 2 0 10 ( 1 0 ) [ 5 ] (305 ) [ 3 8 0 ] 340 [5] ( 1 0 ) 5 [345 ] ( 4 1 5 ) 5 5 5 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 0 [5 ] ( 5 ) 5 405 ( ) [235]305 (35) [10]15 [305] (335) 350 [20] (50) 35 [3 5 ] ( 3 5 ) 2 5 [2 0 ] ( 1 5 ) 3 5 Ln 10 (5) [5] (335) [265]420 [5] (10) 10[320] (375) 375 10 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] (1 0 ) [ 5 ] 10 10 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] (190) [ 1 6 0 ] 235 (25) [ 1 5 ] 35 5 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] (0 ) [ 0 ] 0 5 ( 5 ) [ 5 ] [5] ( 5 ) 5 [205] ( 2 1 5 ) 2 3 5 [5] (1 0 ) 1 0 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 0 [0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [1 5 ] ( 2 0 ) 3 0 300 (225) [185] (5) [5]5 [235] (245) 280[5] (5) 5 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 5 [5 ] ( 5 ) 1 5 In l 62nd Pl 10 (5) [5] (0) [0]0 10 (10) [5] 10 ( 3 0 ) [ 9 5 ] 32 0 ( 3 1 5 ) [ 2 4 5 ] (1 5 ) [ 5 ] 10 [2 2 0 ] ( 7 0 ) 2 5 [2 2 0 ] ( 3 8 5 ) 5 6 0 [5 ] ( 2 0 ) 2 0 6,80 0 7,60 0 4,85 0 [100] (30) 10 [0] (0) 0 [235] (70) 30 XXX (XXX) [XXX] X,XXX Wednesday M Peak Hour VolumeP Saturday PM Peak Hour Volume Sunday AM Peak Hour Volume Estimated Weekday ADT Volume Traffic Signal Stop Sign Legend Ma p l e G r o v e P k w y 61st Ave 62nd Av e 5 (5) [5](5) [5]5 33 5 ( 3 5 5 ) [ 3 4 0 ] (5 ) [ 5 ] 5 [3 2 0 ] ( 4 1 0 ) 5 7 5 [5 ] ( 1 0 ) 5 8, 1 0 0 85 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 11 YEAR 2026 CONDITIONS To understand impacts associated with the proposed development, year 2026 intersection capacity was again evaluated using Synchro/SimTraffic Software (version 11). To accurately depict the peaking characteristics during the Saturday p.m. and Sunday a.m. peak hours, the analysis was evaluated in 15-minute increments as opposed to modifying the peak hour factor. For purposes of the intersection capacity analysis, the peak hour level of service is shown in Table 4, as well as key level of service and queuing information associated with the proposed development access. Results of the year 2026 intersection capacity analysis indicates that all study intersections, approaches, and movements are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the overall Wednesday p.m., Saturday p.m., and Sunday a.m. peak hours. In addition, all queues are expected to be maintained within the existing turn lanes, except the northbound left-turn lane along Maple Grove Parkway serving the proposed development access. In this location, there is adequate pavement width to accommodate these queues, thus, the existing striping should be modified to formalize this northbound left-turn lane. Note that eastbound queues leaving the proposed development are expected to extend up to approximately 205 feet during the Sunday a.m. peak period. Therefore, the proposed development driveway should be designed with two exit lanes, one of which should be at least 225 feet. Table 4 Year 2026 Intersection Capacity Intersection Traffic Control LOS (Delay) Wednesday PM Peak Hour Saturday PM Peak Hour Sunday AM Peak Hour Maple Grove Pkwy / 62nd Ave SSS A / A (8 sec) A / A (6 sec) A / A (5 sec) Maple Grove Pkwy / Church / 61st Ave SSS A / B (10 sec) A / A (9 sec) A / C (15 sec) Maple Grove Pkwy / Chankahda Trl Signal B (18 sec) B (17 sec) B (16 sec) Peony Ln / 57th Ave SSS A / A (7 sec) A / A (5 sec) A / A (7 sec) Chankahda Trl / Walnut Grove Ln SSS A / A (5 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (4 sec) Chankahda Trl / Troy Ln SSS A / A (6 sec) A / A (5 sec) A / A (5 sec) Chankahda Trl / Meadow Ridge School SSS A / A (5 sec) A / A (4 sec) A / A (4 sec) Chankahda Trl / Inland Ln SSS A / A (7 sec) A / A (8 sec) A / A (5 sec) Chankahda Trl / Dunkirk Ln SSS A / A (7 sec) A / A (7 sec) A / A (6 sec) Maple Grove Pkwy / Church / 61st Ave Peak 15-Min Level of Service A / B (11 sec) A / B (13 sec) B / C (17 sec) Peak 15-Min Eastbound Queue 60 feet 70 feet 205 feet Peak 15-Min Northbound Left-Turn Queue 40 feet 60 feet 170 feet Maple Grove Pkwy / Church / 61st Ave (+25% Sensitivity) Overall Peak Hour Level of Service C / E (37 sec) Peak 15-Min Level of Service D / E (44 sec) Peak 15-Min Eastbound Queue 800 feet Peak 15-Min Northbound Left-Turn Queue 180 feet SSS – Side-Street-Stop Wednesday PM (4:30 to 5:30 PM) ; Saturday PM (5 to 6 PM) ; Sunday AM (10 to 11 AM) 86 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 12 Given the assumptions associated with this study, a sensitivity test was conducted to understand how an additional 25% of peak hour site trip generation would impact area options. This sensitivity analysis focused on the Sunday a.m. peak hour, which represents the most active period for the proposed development. Results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that the Maple Grove Parkway and Church Access / 61st Avenue intersection is expected to operate at LOS C during the overall peak hour and a LOS D during the peak 15-minute period. The eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E throughout the peak hour and eastbound queues from motorists exiting the site are expected to extend up to 800 feet; these queues would dissipate within 15 to 30 minutes following the end of service. The northbound left-turn lane queue increases slightly as compared to the base assumption scenario. This sensitivity test indicates that depending on attendance fluctuations, having a traffic control officer present would assist motorists at the Maple Grove Parkway and Church Access/61st Avenue intersection during the Sunday a.m. peak period, as well as reduce delays and queues for motorists at this intersection. No other locations are expected to need any additional infrastructure or traffic control officer assistance. Thus, further discussion with stakeholders should occur to finalize the appropriate infrastructure modifications, as well as the overall traffic control management strategy. Maple Grove Parkway and Fieldstone Boulevard As noted earlier, the City of Maple Grove asked to evaluate the Maple Grove Parkway and Fieldstone Boulevard intersection as part of a preliminary review of this report. The City expressed concerns about existing perceived safety and operational issues at this location and the potential impact of the proposed development. Thus, a cursory review of traffic impacts was completed following the study analysis. As shown in Table 5, the proposed development is expected to add approximately 25 Wednesday p.m. peak hour, 60 Saturday p.m. peak hour, and 200 Sunday a.m. peak hour vehicular trips to the Maple Grove Parkway and Fieldstone Boulevard intersection. Table 5 Maple Grove Pkwy at Fieldstone Blvd Traffic Volume Summary Time Period Wednesday PM Peak Hour Saturday PM Peak Hour Sunday AM Peak Hour Existing Maple Grove Parkway Volume (at Fieldstone) 850 670 445 Proposed Development Traffic Volume (at Fieldstone) +25 +60 +200 Future Traffic Volume 875 730 645 The change in volume during the Wednesday p.m. peak hour is within typical daily variations, while the future traffic volumes during the Saturday and Sunday peak hours are well below the Wednesday p.m. peak hour and expected to result in minimal change in overall intersection operations. During the peak 15-minute period on a Sunday morning, there would be approximately 60 additional vehicles traveling through the intersection, which equates to an additional four (4) vehicles per minute or one vehicle every 15-seconds; AASHTO notes that the typical time for a vehicle to make a left-turn from a stop condition is 7.5 seconds. Therefore, the change in operations at the Maple Grove Parkway and Fieldstone Boulevard intersection is expected to be minimal with the addition of the proposed development. 87 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 13 SITE PLAN / ACCESS REVIEW A preliminary review of the proposed site plan does not indicate any major issues. However, special care should be taken to locate signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues. In addition, heavy commercial vehicle (i.e., garbage trucks, moving vans) maneuverability should be reviewed to minimize any disruptions and/or impacts associated with these vehicles and their operation. This could include coordinating deliveries, dedicating garbage pick-up days/times, and/or incorporating wayfinding signage. No changes to the proposed access and/or internal circulation are needed based on preliminary review, however a southbound right-turn lane along Maple Grove Parkway at 61st Avenue should be considered to reduce potential conflicts with vehicles entering the site. Multimodal connectivity (i.e., sidewalks or trails) should be provided to all adjacent facilities within the area. 88 Plymouth Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study November 7, 2023 Page 14 SUMMARY The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration. 1) All study intersections, approaches, and movements currently operate at LOS C or better during the Wednesday p.m. (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.), Saturday p.m. (5 to 6 p.m.), and Sunday a.m. (10 to 11 a.m.) peak hours. 2) Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2026 conditions, which represents one (1) year after opening conditions. a. An annual growth rate of two (2) percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes to develop year 2026 background forecasts. b. The proposed development is expected to generate 74 Wednesday p.m. peak hour, 189 Saturday p.m. peak hour, and 646 Sunday a.m. peak hour trips. c. A residential development would have more traffic volume impact throughout the day and the week, while the proposed church would primarily have more traffic volume impact for shorter periods associated around various activities and services, particularly Sunday mornings. 3) Under year 2026 conditions, all study intersections, approaches, and movements are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (i.e., LOS D or better) during the overall Wednesday p.m., Saturday p.m., and Sunday a.m. peak hours. All queues are expected to be maintained within the existing turn lanes, except the northbound left-turn lane along Maple Grove Parkway serving the proposed development access. The following infrastructure modifications are offered to help maintain safe and efficient operations associated with impacts of the proposed development. a. There is adequate pavement width to accommodate the northbound left-turn queues along Maple Grove Parkway at 61st Avenue; thus, the existing striping should be modified to formalize this northbound left-turn lane. b. Although not needed from a capacity perspective, a southbound right-turn lane along Maple Grove Parkway at 61st Avenue should be installed to reduce potential conflicts with entering vehicles. c. Eastbound queues leaving the proposed development are expected to extend up to approximately 205 feet during the peak periods; the proposed development driveway should be designed with two exit lanes, one of which should be at least 225 feet. Note that the sensitivity test indicates that extending the two exit lanes further into the site would be beneficial to operations and should be discussed further with the project team. d. A traffic control officer could be provided at least during the Sunday a.m. peak period to assist motorists at the Maple Grove Parkway and Church / 61st Avenue intersection. e. Further discussion with stakeholders should occur to finalize the appropriate infrastructure modifications, as well as the overall traffic control management strategy. 4) Special care should be taken to locate signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues and heavy commercial vehicle (i.e., garbage trucks, moving vans) maneuverability should be reviewed to minimize any disruptions and/or impacts associated with these vehicles and their operation. Multimodal connectivity (i.e., sidewalks or trails) should be provided to all adjacent facilities within the area. 89 N O PA R K I N G N O PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 SITE PLAN OVERALL 220.CS Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 NOTE: SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET 250.CD - 253.CD FOR TYPE AND DEPTH INFORMATION. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT TYPES PERVIOUS PAVERS WETLAND BUFFER AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) NOTE: SEE CURB & GUTTER DETAILS ON SHEET 253.CD. SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) CURB TYPES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 7. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS G. FROST PROTECTION SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH LOADING AISLES WITH WHITE OR YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE OR YELLOW PAINT. 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL(S). 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT, PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES CURRENT ZONING: FRD - FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3 PROPERTY AREA (GROSS): 55.96 ± AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 47.91 ± AC RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 3.49 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 4.56 ± AC WETLAND AREA: LOT 1 BLOCK 1: 11.94 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 1.64 ± AC BUILDABLE PROPERTY AREA (NET): 35.97 ± AC DISTURBED AREA: 24.98 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.21 ± AC* PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.52 ± AC* *IMPERVIOUS AREAS BASED ON DISTURBED AREA ONLY SITE DATA YARD (BUILDING) SETBACKS: FRONT 50 FT MINIMUM SIDE 25 FT MINIMUM REAR 40 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 20 FT MINIMUM SIDE 20 FT MINIMUM REAR 20 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18.5 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 26 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING REQUIRED: ONE SPACE FOR EACH 3 PERMANENT SEATS BASED ON THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL (CHURCH) CAPACITY OF MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL = 1,500 SEATS REQUIRED PARKING = 1,500 SEATS / 3 = 500 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 685 STALLS (INCLUDING ADA STALLS) REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS** PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS **REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 501 TO 1000 STALLS (2% OF TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED) WETLAND 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 72,315 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 76,790 SF WETLAND 2 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 30,855 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 34,140 SF WETLAND 3 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 98,900 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 109,270 SF WETLAND 4 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 11,115 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,140 SF WETLAND BUFFER DATA 90 N O PA R K I N G N O PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 NORTH SEDIMENTATION POND HWL:947.75 NWL:944.75 BOTTOM:940.75 NORTH BIOFILTRATION BASIN HWL:944.64 TOP OF MEDIA:943.75 SOUTHWEST BIOFILTRATION BASIN HWL:944.24 TOP OF MEDIA:941.50 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 28 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 8.7 '18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 8.0 ' 18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 9.0 ' TY P 17 . 6 ' 26 . 0 ' 6. 7 ' 23 . 8 ' 6.0 ' 28 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL ADA PARKING SIGN/ BOLLARD COMBO (4) TYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP-SEE DETAIL FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRASH AREA TYP-SEE DETAIL 6. 0 ' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS SEAT WALL TYP-SEE DETAIL COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS BOLLARD (18) TYP-SEE DETAIL 10 . 7 ' FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 8 . 0 ' DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL 16 23 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 25 20 20 20 19 19 18 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 11 20 11 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL (2) ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION BASES TYP-SEE DETAIL COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL PLANS (4) ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL (4) BOLLARDS AROUND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION TYP-SEE DETAIL COORDINATE W/ ELECTRICAL PLANS 172'R 200'R 20'R 20'R20'R 20'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 20'R 5'R 3'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 20'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 30'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 12 . 1 ' 12 . 1 ' 25 . 8 ' 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 74'R 100'R 30'R 30'R 28'R 28'R 45'R 300'R 120'R FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS BOLLARD (4) TYP-SEE DETAIL 40' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 20.0' 40.0' 25' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS FIRE LANE TYP-SEE DETAIL BIKE RACK TYP-SEE DETAIL SITE LIGHTING-TYP SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER MATCH EXISTING CURB & BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGNS (14) TYP-SEE DETAIL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PAD SEE MECHANICAL PLANS MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2 0 . 0 ' 10 . 7 ' B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL 6.7 ' 3'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 3'R 10 . 0 ' 320'R 100'R REMOVABLE BOLLARDS (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL REMOVABLE BOLLARDS (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 SITE PLAN NORTHWEST 221.CS PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 NOTE: SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET 250.CD - 253.CD FOR TYPE AND DEPTH INFORMATION. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT TYPES PERVIOUS PAVERS WETLAND BUFFER AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) NOTE: SEE CURB & GUTTER DETAILS ON SHEET 253.CD. SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) CURB TYPES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 7. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS G. FROST PROTECTION SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH LOADING AISLES WITH WHITE OR YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE OR YELLOW PAINT. 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL(S). 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT, PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES CURRENT ZONING: FRD - FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3 PROPERTY AREA (GROSS): 55.96 ± AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 47.91 ± AC RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 3.49 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 4.56 ± AC WETLAND AREA: LOT 1 BLOCK 1: 11.94 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 1.64 ± AC BUILDABLE PROPERTY AREA (NET): 35.97 ± AC DISTURBED AREA: 24.98 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.21 ± AC* PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.52 ± AC* *IMPERVIOUS AREAS BASED ON DISTURBED AREA ONLY SITE DATA YARD (BUILDING) SETBACKS: FRONT 50 FT MINIMUM SIDE 25 FT MINIMUM REAR 40 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 20 FT MINIMUM SIDE 20 FT MINIMUM REAR 20 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18.5 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 26 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING REQUIRED: ONE SPACE FOR EACH 3 PERMANENT SEATS BASED ON THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL (CHURCH) CAPACITY OF MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL = 1,500 SEATS REQUIRED PARKING = 1,500 SEATS / 3 = 500 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 685 STALLS (INCLUDING ADA STALLS) REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS** PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS **REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 501 TO 1000 STALLS (2% OF TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED) WETLAND 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 72,315 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 76,790 SF WETLAND 2 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 30,855 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 34,140 SF WETLAND 3 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 98,900 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 109,270 SF WETLAND 4 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 11,115 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,140 SF WETLAND BUFFER DATA 91 N O PA R K I N G NORTHEAST FILTRATION BASIN HWL:930.51 TOP OF MEDIA:928.34 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 28 . 0 ' 28.0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' CONCRETE APRON TYP-SEE DETAIL BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL MATCH EXISTING MATCH EXISTING CURB MATCH EXISTING CURB MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 11 20 11 MONUMENT SIGN BY OTHERS 30'R 30'R 260'R 6'R 6'R 300'R 30'R 196'R 224'R 172'R 200'R 20'R 20'R20'R 20'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 74'R 100'R 30'R 30'R SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL 25' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' 50' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 50.0' 20.0' WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER 12 ' 14 ' 12 ' 14 ' Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 SITE PLAN NORTHEAST 222.CS PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 NOTE: SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET 250.CD - 253.CD FOR TYPE AND DEPTH INFORMATION. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT TYPES PERVIOUS PAVERS WETLAND BUFFER AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) NOTE: SEE CURB & GUTTER DETAILS ON SHEET 253.CD. SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) CURB TYPES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 7. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS G. FROST PROTECTION SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH LOADING AISLES WITH WHITE OR YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE OR YELLOW PAINT. 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL(S). 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT, PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES CURRENT ZONING: FRD - FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3 PROPERTY AREA (GROSS): 55.96 ± AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 47.91 ± AC RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 3.49 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 4.56 ± AC WETLAND AREA: LOT 1 BLOCK 1: 11.94 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 1.64 ± AC BUILDABLE PROPERTY AREA (NET): 35.97 ± AC DISTURBED AREA: 24.98 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.21 ± AC* PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.52 ± AC* *IMPERVIOUS AREAS BASED ON DISTURBED AREA ONLY SITE DATA YARD (BUILDING) SETBACKS: FRONT 50 FT MINIMUM SIDE 25 FT MINIMUM REAR 40 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 20 FT MINIMUM SIDE 20 FT MINIMUM REAR 20 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18.5 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 26 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING REQUIRED: ONE SPACE FOR EACH 3 PERMANENT SEATS BASED ON THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL (CHURCH) CAPACITY OF MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL = 1,500 SEATS REQUIRED PARKING = 1,500 SEATS / 3 = 500 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 685 STALLS (INCLUDING ADA STALLS) REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS** PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS **REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 501 TO 1000 STALLS (2% OF TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED) WETLAND 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 72,315 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 76,790 SF WETLAND 2 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 30,855 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 34,140 SF WETLAND 3 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 98,900 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 109,270 SF WETLAND 4 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 11,115 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,140 SF WETLAND BUFFER DATA 92 SOUTH BIOFILTRATION BASIN HWL:938.64 TOP OF MEDIA:935.5 SOUTH SEDIMENTATION POND HWL:939.98 NWL:937.00 BOTTOM:933.00 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 15 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 40 . 9 ' 26 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' CURBTYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL 18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 18 18 20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 11 20 11 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 30'R 30'R 30'R 36'R 200'R 226'R 200'R SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 50' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 50.0' 20.0' 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' 25' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 20' TRAIL EASEMENT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 20' TRAIL EASEMENT 10' BOARDWALK TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 75'R 65'R 20'R 30'R 210'R 200'R 10.0' 10 . 0 ' 10. 0 ' 20. 0 ' 20 . 0 ' MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 SITE PLAN SOUTHEAST 223.CS PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 NOTE: SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET 250.CD - 253.CD FOR TYPE AND DEPTH INFORMATION. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT TYPES PERVIOUS PAVERS WETLAND BUFFER AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) NOTE: SEE CURB & GUTTER DETAILS ON SHEET 253.CD. SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) CURB TYPES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 7. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS G. FROST PROTECTION SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH LOADING AISLES WITH WHITE OR YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE OR YELLOW PAINT. 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL(S). 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT, PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES CURRENT ZONING: FRD - FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3 PROPERTY AREA (GROSS): 55.96 ± AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 47.91 ± AC RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 3.49 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 4.56 ± AC WETLAND AREA: LOT 1 BLOCK 1: 11.94 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 1.64 ± AC BUILDABLE PROPERTY AREA (NET): 35.97 ± AC DISTURBED AREA: 24.98 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.21 ± AC* PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.52 ± AC* *IMPERVIOUS AREAS BASED ON DISTURBED AREA ONLY SITE DATA YARD (BUILDING) SETBACKS: FRONT 50 FT MINIMUM SIDE 25 FT MINIMUM REAR 40 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 20 FT MINIMUM SIDE 20 FT MINIMUM REAR 20 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18.5 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 26 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING REQUIRED: ONE SPACE FOR EACH 3 PERMANENT SEATS BASED ON THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL (CHURCH) CAPACITY OF MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL = 1,500 SEATS REQUIRED PARKING = 1,500 SEATS / 3 = 500 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 685 STALLS (INCLUDING ADA STALLS) REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS** PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS **REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 501 TO 1000 STALLS (2% OF TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED) WETLAND 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 72,315 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 76,790 SF WETLAND 2 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 30,855 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 34,140 SF WETLAND 3 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 98,900 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 109,270 SF WETLAND 4 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 11,115 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,140 SF WETLAND BUFFER DATA 93 SOUTH BIOFILTRATION BASIN HWL:938.64 TOP OF MEDIA:935.5 SOUTHWEST BIOFILTRATION BASIN HWL:944.24 TOP OF MEDIA:941.50 SOUTH SEDIMENTATION POND HWL:939.98 NWL:937.00 BOTTOM:933.00 18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 28 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 9. 0 ' TY P 15 . 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 40 . 9 ' 26 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' 18 . 5 ' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP-SEE DETAIL BOLLARD (18) TYP-SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL 8 . 0 ' LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED ADA PARKING SIGN (3) TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE SIDED NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE SIGN (2) TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL B612 CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL 18 . 5 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 37 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' TY P 18 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 11 20 11 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TYP-SEE DETAIL 10'R 10'R 30'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 10'R 30'R 30'R 30'R 36'R 200'R 226'R 200'R 28'R 28'R 45'R SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL CURB & GUTTER TYP-SEE DETAIL 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' 25' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 40' BUIDING SETBACK 20' PARKING SETBACK 40. 0 ' 20 . 0 ' SITE LIGHTING-TYP SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGNS TYP-SEE DETAIL MATCH EXISTING CURB & BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10 . 7 ' FLAT CURB TYP-SEE DETAIL 75'R 65'R 10. 0 ' 20. 0 ' Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 SITE PLAN SOUTHWEST 224.CS PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 NOTE: SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET 250.CD - 253.CD FOR TYPE AND DEPTH INFORMATION. LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT TYPES PERVIOUS PAVERS WETLAND BUFFER AREA B612 CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) B612 CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) FLAT CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) NOTE: SEE CURB & GUTTER DETAILS ON SHEET 253.CD. SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (STANDARD) SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TIP OUT) CURB TYPES 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 6. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 7. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC, FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS G. FROST PROTECTION SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH LOADING AISLES WITH WHITE OR YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE OR YELLOW PAINT. 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL(S). 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT, PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES CURRENT ZONING: FRD - FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING: RSF - SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 3 PROPERTY AREA (GROSS): 55.96 ± AC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 47.91 ± AC RIGHT OF WAY AREA: 3.49 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 4.56 ± AC WETLAND AREA: LOT 1 BLOCK 1: 11.94 ± AC PARKLAND DEDICATION AREA: 1.64 ± AC BUILDABLE PROPERTY AREA (NET): 35.97 ± AC DISTURBED AREA: 24.98 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.21 ± AC* PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 9.52 ± AC* *IMPERVIOUS AREAS BASED ON DISTURBED AREA ONLY SITE DATA YARD (BUILDING) SETBACKS: FRONT 50 FT MINIMUM SIDE 25 FT MINIMUM REAR 40 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 20 FT MINIMUM SIDE 20 FT MINIMUM REAR 20 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18.5 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 26 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PARKING REQUIRED: ONE SPACE FOR EACH 3 PERMANENT SEATS BASED ON THE DESIGN CAPACITY OF THE MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL (CHURCH) CAPACITY OF MAIN ASSEMBLY HALL = 1,500 SEATS REQUIRED PARKING = 1,500 SEATS / 3 = 500 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 685 STALLS (INCLUDING ADA STALLS) REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS** PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING = 14 STALLS **REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 501 TO 1000 STALLS (2% OF TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED) WETLAND 1 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 72,315 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 76,790 SF WETLAND 2 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 30,855 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 34,140 SF WETLAND 3 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 98,900 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 109,270 SF WETLAND 4 30' WETLAND BUFFER AREA REQUIRED = 11,115 SF 30' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,140 SF WETLAND BUFFER DATA 94 28.0 ' 11.8' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0'5.8' 3.8' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0' 4.2' 12 ' 14 ' 12 ' 14 ' 61ST AVE N 62ND AVE N 28.0 ' 11.8' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0'5.8' 3.8' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0' 4.2' 12 ' 14 ' 12 ' 14 ' 61ST AVE N 11.8' 11.0' 11.0' 11.0'5.8' 3.8' 12 ' 14 ' 12 ' 14 ' 61ST AVE N CHANKAHDA TRAIL N SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 CONCEPT TRAFFIC STRIPING EXHIBIT 61ST AVENUE NORTH TO 62ND AVENUE NORTH61ST AVENUE NORTH / ACCESS DRIVECHANKAHDA TRAIL TO 61ST AVENUE NORTH 95 N O PA R K I N G NO PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 WETLAND 4 30' BUFFER REQUIRED: 11,115 SF 30' AVG BUFFER PROVIDED: 11,140 SF IMPACTS: 0 SF WETLAND 1 30' BUFFER REQUIRED: 72,315 SF 30' AVG BUFFER PROVIDED: 76,790 SF IMPACTS: 0 SF WETLAND 2 30' BUFFER REQUIRED: 30,855 SF 30' AVG BUFFER PROVIDED: 34,140 SF IMPACTS: 1,690 SF WET DITCH 1 IMPACTS: 0 SF WET DITCH 2 IMPACTS: 145 SF WET DITCH 3 IMPACTS: 340 SF WETLAND 3 30' BUFFER REQUIRED: 98,900 SF 30' AVG BUFFER PROVIDED: 109,180 SF IMPACTS: 13,010 SF 94 5 95 0 94 6 94 7 94 8 94 9 95 1 93 5 9 4 0 93 3 93 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 93 5 93 5 93 5 9 4 0 94 5 9 4 5 95 0 95 0 93 2 932 93 3 93 3 93 4 9 3 4 934 93 6 9 3 6 93 6 93 7 93 8 93 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 94 4 9 4 4 94 6 9 4 6 94 7 9 4 7 94 8 948 94 8 9 4 8 94 9 9 4 9 95 1 951 95 2 95 2 95 2 95 2 94 5 95 0 94 6 94 7 94 8 94 9 951 952 9 3 0 9 3 5 9 4 0 9 4 5 950 9 3 1 9 3 2 9 3 3 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 9 4 5 94 4 944 944 94 0 93 6 93 7 93 8 93 9 94 194 294 3 94 4 94 5 945 945 95 0 9 5 0 950 9 5 5 94294294394394 4944 9 4 6946 9 4 6 946 946 9 4 7947 947 94 7 9 4 7 94 8 9 4 8 948 94 8 9 4 8 94 9 9 4 9 949 9 4 9 9 4 9 95 1 9 5 2 95 3 9 5 4 95 5 95 6 95 7 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 5 94 5 94 5 95 0 955 9 4 1 9 4 1 9 4 1 9 4 2 94 2 9 4 2 9 4 3 94 3 9 4 3 9 4 4 94 4 9 4 4 9 4 6 94 6 94 6 9 4 7 94 7 94 7 94 8 9 4 8 94 894 9 94 9 949 95 1 95 2 953 954956 9 5 0 9 4 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 9 5 1 9 5 2 9 5 5955 955 9 5 3 95395 3 9 5 4 954954 956 957 9 5 1 95 2 950 94 9 9 4 9 9 4 9 951 952 96 0 96 5 95 9 96 1 96 2 96 3 96 4 96 6 95 5 95 1 95 2 95 3 95 4 95 6 95 7 95 8 9 5 5 9 5 3 9 5 4 9 5 6 9 5 2 951 95 2 95 3 94 5 942 943 94 4 94 6 947 947948948 94 0 9 4 0 9 3 6 93 6 9 3 7 93 7 93 8 9 3 8 93 9 9 3 9 943 944 93 5 94 0 9 4 0 93 3 934 93 6 937 93 793 8 93 8 9 3 9 939 935 936 937 93 8 939 95 0 950 9 5 5 95 5 94 9 94 9 95 1 951 9 5 2 952 9 5 3 95 3 9 5 4 95 4 9 5 6 95 6 95 7 9 5 7 9 5 8 960 96 5 957 95 7 958 95 8 959 95 9 961962963 96 4 940 945 95 0 941942 943 944 946 947 948 949 95 1 9 4 5 950 9 4 1 9 4 2 9 4 3 94 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 948 949 9 4 5 9 4 4 9 4 6 9 4 7 94 5 94 1 94294 3 94 4 94 6 94 7 9 4 8 9 4 9 94 5 95 0 9 4 4 94 6 94 7 94 8 94 9 95 1 930 930 929931 9 3 1 932 9 3 2 933 9 3 0 92 6 9 2 7 9 2 8 9 2 9 9 3 1 9 3 2 9 3 3 N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 GRADING PLAN OVERALL 230.CG Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM AN ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS, DATED 09/12/2023. PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A CROSS SLOPE NOT EXCEEDING 2% AND A RUNNING SLOPE NOT EXCEEDING 5%. 3. AT TURNING POINTS ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THE PAVEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% IN ANY DIRECTION FOR AN AREA 60" IN DIAMETER. 4. ALL PUBLIC SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A CROSS SLOPE NOT EXCEEDING 2% AND A RUNNING SLOPE NOT EXCEEDING 5%. 5. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 6. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING. C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION. D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS. E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS. G. FROST PROTECTION. 7. EXISTING SOILS ARE ASSUMED TO BE FINE-GRAINED SOILS (SM, SC, CL) PER THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF EXISTING CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM ASSUMED SOIL CONDITIONS. 8. GRADING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL, OF THE INFILTRATION AREA(S) SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. NO WHEELED MACHINES SHALL BE USED. 9. SOIL BENEATH THE INFILTRATION AREA(S) SHALL BE RIPPED WITH A TOOTHED BUCKET TO REMOVE SOIL INTERFACE PRIOR TO BACKFILL. 10. A FLOOD TEST OR DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TEST SHALL BE COMPLETED FOR THE BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM TO VERIFY INFILTRATION RATES ARE WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF 1.53 IN/HR TO 1.63 IN/HR. 11. CITY AND WATERSHED SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER BMPS. 12. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 13. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 14. FOR SITE STAIRS, "TS" EQUALS SURFACE ELEVATION AT TOP OF STAIRS AND "BS" EQUALS SURFACE ELEVATION AT BOTTOM OF STAIRS. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF RISERS AND RISER HEIGHT. 15. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 16. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 17. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 18. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 19. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 20. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES PERMIT. 22. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 23. PER NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) REQUIREMENTS, THE WASHOUT AND CLEANOUT OF STUCCO, PAINT, CONCRETE, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND USING APPROVED METHODS OF CONTAINMENT SUCH AS PRE-FABRICATED WASHOUT CONTAINERS, CONCRETE WASHOUT TOTE, READY MIX TRUCKS WITH SELF-CONTAINED CHUTE CLEANOUT, ETC. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES AS NEEDED PER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND/OR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 96 35995 BLD B 939.67 35996 BLD 938.76 35997 BLD 937.07 35998 BLD 938.51 35999 BLD 936.68 36000 BLD 936.25 36001 BLD E 937.42 36002 BLD E J35995 938.20 20029 BLD E 945.27 20050 STEP B 946.05 20051 STEP E 946.06 20053 BLD B 945.50 20072 BLD E 945.00 20073 BLD E 945.12 20082 BLD E J20029 945.23 20091 BLD B 943.5920092 BLD 943.68 20093 BLD E 943.27 20105 BLD E J20072 J20082 945.24 20112 SEP 945.17 20113 SEP 945.2320120 STEP B 945.87 20121 STEP 945.91 20122 STEP E 945.85 35995 BLD B 939.67 35996 BLD 938.76 35997 BLD 937.07 35998 BLD 938.51 35999 BLD 936.68 36000 BLD 936.25 36001 BLD E 937.42 36002 BLD E J35995 938.20 20029 BLD E 945.27 20050 STEP B 946.05 20051 STEP E 946.06 20053 BLD B 945.50 20072 BLD E 945.00 20073 BLD E 945.12 20082 BLD E J20029 945.23 20091 BLD B 943.5920092 BLD 943.68 20093 BLD E 943.27 20105 BLD E J20072 J20082 945.24 20112 SEP 945.17 20113 SEP 945.2320120 STEP B 945.87 20121 STEP 945.91 20122 STEP E 945.85 N O PA R K I N G NO PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15025 15033 15052 15066 15083 15086 15090 15091 15125 15140 15168 15194 15214 15220 15241 35655 40135 40171 40180 40326 40327 45034 45057 45113 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB BEE STMH CB CB CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB RIM 940.24 940.04 939.60 933.78 932.52 930.38 931.78 932.17 928.17 925.93 926.07 929.05 930.94 933.75 939.64 933.27 940.83 939.94 940.12 925.65 925.84 946.69 945.02 940.56 INVERT(S) 934.82 933.84 933.64 933.46 929.39 923.80 920.73 922.06 925.22 926.74 928.67 928.64 928.56 932.80 931.33 931.29 922.03 936.57 936.28 936.24 934.16 933.56 921.15 921.40 942.81 941.14 936.75 DIRECTION NE N;S E N S E N S S N S E;N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 45135 45160 45191 45199 45219 45249 45276 45926 45949 46009 46019 46076 46098 46291 46317 46398 46441 46471 46489 46495 STRUCT. CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH OCS STMH CB CB BEE YD BEE BEE BEE BEE BEE STMH BEE RIM 937.83 936.29 931.74 932.56 934.10 939.39 941.92 928.14 950.64 957.80 957.68 957.54 961.76 948.26 946.12 930.84 929.52 930.32 949.22 950.34 INVERT(S) 934.09 932.61 927.18 926.18 925.85 925.84 930.87 934.01 920.88 927.47 925.55 924.10 923.14 921.82 943.07 952.65 953.08 952.93 953.79 944.86 944.76 943.11 942.33 942.26 929.16 927.12 925.42 925.09 926.42 926.29 945.14 944.82 946.03 945.97 DIRECTION W S N TOP OF WEIR ORIFICE W NE SUMP N S W E NW W N E E W N W E N W N S SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15213 40196 STRUCT. SMH SMH RIM 931.24 940.80 INVERT(S) 902.78 DIRECTION STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15025 15033 15052 15066 15083 15086 15090 15091 15125 15140 15168 15194 15214 15220 15241 35655 40135 40171 40180 40326 40327 45034 45057 45113 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB BEE STMH CB CB CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB RIM 940.24 940.04 939.60 933.78 932.52 930.38 931.78 932.17 928.17 925.93 926.07 929.05 930.94 933.75 939.64 933.27 940.83 939.94 940.12 925.65 925.84 946.69 945.02 940.56 INVERT(S) 934.82 933.84 933.64 933.46 929.39 923.80 920.73 922.06 925.22 926.74 928.67 928.64 928.56 932.80 931.33 931.29 922.03 936.57 936.28 936.24 934.16 933.56 921.15 921.40 942.81 941.14 936.75 DIRECTION NE N;S E N S E N S S N S E;N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 45135 45160 45191 45199 45219 45249 45276 45926 45949 46009 46019 46076 46098 46291 46317 46398 46441 46471 46489 46495 STRUCT. CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH OCS STMH CB CB BEE YD BEE BEE BEE BEE BEE STMH BEE RIM 937.83 936.29 931.74 932.56 934.10 939.39 941.92 928.14 950.64 957.80 957.68 957.54 961.76 948.26 946.12 930.84 929.52 930.32 949.22 950.34 INVERT(S) 934.09 932.61 927.18 926.18 925.85 925.84 930.87 934.01 920.88 927.47 925.55 924.10 923.14 921.82 943.07 952.65 953.08 952.93 953.79 944.86 944.76 943.11 942.33 942.26 929.16 927.12 925.42 925.09 926.42 926.29 945.14 944.82 946.03 945.97 DIRECTION W S N TOP OF WEIR ORIFICE W NE SUMP N S W E NW W N E E W N W E N W N S SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15213 40196 STRUCT. SMH SMH RIM 931.24 940.80 INVERT(S) 902.78 DIRECTION N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 UTILITY PLAN OVERALL 240.CU Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM AN ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS, DATED 09/12/2023. PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT, AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), CURRENT EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL SITE UTILITY SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR AND MECHANICAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BRINGING THE SERVICE(S) INTO THE BUILDING, INSPECTIONS AND TESTING PER APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 5. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 8.0 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 6. PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FROM WATERMAIN TO ANY MANHOLE, SEPTIC SYSTEM, CATCH BASIN, SEWER PIPE, OR OTHER SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF SANITARY STRUCTURE(S) AND UNDERGROUND SYSTEM(S) FOR ENGINEER'S REVIEW. 8. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. HYDRANT USE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WHEN THEY NEED TO USE A HYDRANT; ONLY PRE-AUTHORIZED HYDRANTS WILL BE USED. HYDRANTS TO BE OPERATED ONLY WITH PROPER EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A HYDRANT NUT WRENCH, NOT A PIPE WRENCH, HYDRANT METER IS AVAILABLE FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. ANY TRUCK, ETC. FILLED FROM A HYDRANT MUST BE METERED, MUST HAVE PHYSICAL BREAK OR BACK-FLOW PREVENTER APPROVED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. ALSO APPLIES TO SUBCONTRACTORS. 10. OPERATING VALVES FOR TURNING WATER MAIN ON/OFF: PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL OPERATE ALL VALVES AND FILL ALL WATER MAINS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE). CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE AT LEAST 24 HOURS NOTICE TO HAVE WATER SHUT OFF AND SHALL NOTIFY IN WRITING, ALL AFFECTED CUSTOMERS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BEFORE SHUT OFF; ATTACH TO DOOR, ETC., NOT IN MAILBOXES. 11. TEMPORARY SERVICE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY SERVICE IF SERVICE CANNOT BE RESTORED SAME DAY. IF USING HYDRANT FOR TEMPORARY SERVICE, NOTIFY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND USE ONLY PRE-APPROVED HYDRANT AND SUPPLIED HYDRO METER WITH BACK FLOW. THE CONTRACTOR'S TEMPORARY MAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SHOWN NEGATIVE PRIOR TO PUTTING THE TEMPORARY SYSTEM IN SERVICE. THE TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SHUTTING OFF ANY WATER MAINS. 12. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING. C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION. D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS. E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS. G. FROST PROTECTION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION OF CONSTRUCTED UTILITIES (RECOMMENDED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING) PER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND/OR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. 14. ALL UNUSED UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE ABANDONED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED UTILITY PERMITS FROM THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. STORM SEWER NOTES 1. ALL STORM SEWER SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT, AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), CURRENT EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL SITE UTILITY SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR AND MECHANICAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BRINGING THE SERVICE(S) INTO THE BUILDING, INSPECTIONS AND TESTING PER APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 6. PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FROM WATERMAIN TO ANY MANHOLE, SEPTIC SYSTEM, CATCH BASIN, SEWER PIPE, OR OTHER SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 7. ALL STORM SEWER DOWNSPOUT COLLECTION PIPES AND WYES SHALL BE PVC (SCHEDULE 40). 8. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF STORM STRUCTURE(S) AND UNDERGROUND SYSTEM(S) FOR ENGINEER'S REVIEW. 9. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY UNDERLYING SOILS BENEATH ALL STORMWATER FACILITIES, AND PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE ENGINEER, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITIES. 10. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4714. 11. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. REUSE OF ON-SITE SOILS B. GROUNDWATER AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXCAVATION DEWATERING. C. SITE GRADING AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION. D. PAVEMENTS AND EXTERIOR SLABS. E. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL. F. EXTERIOR UTILITY SUPPORTS. G. FROST PROTECTION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS-BUILT INFORMATION OF CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS & ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE (RECOMMENDED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING) PER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND/OR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. 13. ALL UNUSED UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE ABANDONED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 14. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED UTILITY PERMITS FROM THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 97 N O PA R K I N G N O PA R K I N G EXISTING TREE STAND TO REMAIN TYP. EXISTING TREE STAND TO REMAIN TYP.EXISTING TREE STAND TO REMAIN TYP. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE STAND TO REMAIN TYP. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota 08/31/2023 52050 Nathan Ekhoff - LA NWE/KVK EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 TREE INVENTORY OVERALL 260.TI Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS: TOTAL TREES:233 SIGNIFICANT TREES TOTAL CALIPER INCHES: 3,838 CALIPER INCHES REMOVAL THRESHOLD 75% (NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS MAY REMOVE OR DISTURB UP TO 75 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES. ANY REMOVAL OR DISTURBANCE BEYOND THIS THRESHOLD SHALL REQUIRE REFORESTATION OR RESTITUTION.) INCHES PERMITTED TO BE REMOVED 2,878 CALIPER INCHES PROPOSED SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED: 45 CALIPER INCHES TREE SYMBOL LEGEND AND NOTES: EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES TO REMAIN (SEE 261.TI TREE INVENTORY SCHEDULE) EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED (SEE 261.TI TREE INVENTORY SCHEDULE) 4' - 0 " EXISTING GRADE TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. DR I P E D G E O F T R E E 2" X 4" WOOD STAKE, POSITIONED AS NOTED. STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN WOOD STAKES PLACED 5' ON CENTER AND PLACED BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND DISTURBED AREAS. DR I P E D G E O F T R E E EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTION 1/4" = 1'-0"PROJ-22661-081 98 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota 08/31/2023 52050 Nathan Ekhoff - LA NWE/KVK EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 TREE INVENTORY SCHEDULE 261.TI 6001 SPRUCE, WHITE 12.5 IN IN 1 SIGNIFICANT 6002 WALNUT 14.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6003 BOXELDER 8.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6004 BOXELDER 13.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6005 ELM, RED 35.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6006 PINE, SCOTS 7.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6007 BOXELDER 20.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6008 PINE, SCOTS 8.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6009 OAK, BUR 21.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6010 MAPLE, SILVER 27.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6011 MAPLE, SILVER 29.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6012 WALNUT 32.5 IN GOOD 3 SIGNIFICANT 6013 WALNUT 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6014 WALNUT 12.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6015 WALNUT 16.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6016 WALNUT 13.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6017 WALNUT 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6018 WALNUT 17.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6019 REDCEDAR 9.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6020 REDCEDAR 11.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6021 REDCEDAR 13.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6022 REDCEDAR 43.0 IN GOOD 6 SIGNIFICANT 6023 MAPLE, SILVER 18.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6024 MAPLE, SILVER 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6025 BOXELDER 13.0 IN GOOD 2 SIGNIFICANT 6026 BOXELDER 11.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6027 BOXELDER 24.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6028 BOXELDER 9.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6029 BOXELDER 14.5 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6030 BOXELDER 15.5 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6031 ELM, AMERICAN 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6032 BOXELDER 14.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6033 BOXELDER 12.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6034 BOXELDER 12.5 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6035 BOXELDER 28.0 IN FAIR 5 SIGNIFICANT 6036 BOXELDER 17.5 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6037 BOXELDER 12.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6038 BOXELDER 9.5 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6039 BOXELDER 20.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6040 BOXELDER 18.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6041 BOXELDER 17.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6042 BOXELDER 10.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6043 BOXELDER 15.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6044 REDCEDAR 10.5 IN GOOD 2 SIGNIFICANT 6045 BOXELDER 16.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6046 BOXELDER 25.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6047 BOXELDER 12.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6048 BOXELDER 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6049 BOXELDER 13.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6050 BOXELDER 8.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6051 DOUGLASFIR 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6052 BOXELDER 10.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6053 BOXELDER 35.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6054 ELM, AMERICAN 13.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6055 BOXELDER 18.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6056 BOXELDER 27.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6057 BOXELDER 45.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6058 BOXELDER 40.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6059 BOXELDER 14.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6060 BOXELDER 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6061 BOXELDER 13.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6062 BOXELDER 26.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6063 BOXELDER 28.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6064 BOXELDER 70.0 IN FAIR 7 SIGNIFICANT 6065 BOXELDER 3.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6066 ELM, SIBERIAN 8.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6067 BOXELDER 31.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6068 BOXELDER 33.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6069 ELM, AMERICAN 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6070 ELM, AMERICAN 9.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6071 OAK, BUR 30.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6072 ELM, AMERICAN 12.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6073 BOXELDER 14.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6074 ELM, AMERICAN 10.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6075 BOXELDER 31.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6076 BOXELDER 13.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6077 BOXELDER 20.5 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6078 BOXELDER 11.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6079 BOXELDER 30.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6080 BOXELDER 21.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6081 BOXELDER 27.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6082 OAK, BUR 34.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6083 BOXELDER 28.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6084 BOXELDER 95.0 IN FAIR 9 SIGNIFICANT 6085 BOXELDER 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6086 BOXELDER 24.0 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6087 BOXELDER 43.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6088 ELM, AMERICAN 9.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6089 BOXELDER 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6090 OAK, BUR 21.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6091 BOXELDER 22.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6092 BOXELDER 8.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6093 ELM, AMERICAN 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6094 COTTONWOOD 11.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6095 COTTONWOOD 10.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT X 6096 COTTONWOOD 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT X 6097 WILLOW 11.5 IN GOOD 2 SIGNIFICANT X 6098 COTTONWOOD 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT X 6099 BOXELDER 13.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6100 BOXELDER 24.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6101 BOXELDER 18.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6102 BOXELDER 33.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6103 ELM, AMERICAN 17.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6104 BOXELDER 14.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6105 BOXELDER 12.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6106 ELM, AMERICAN 17.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6107 ELM, AMERICAN 8.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6108 BOXELDER 22.5 IN FAIR 3 SIGNIFICANT 6109 BOXELDER 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6110 BOXELDER 14.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6111 BOXELDER 16.5 IN GOOD 2 SIGNIFICANT 6112 BOXELDER 9.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6113 BOXELDER 14.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6114 BOXELDER 13.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6115 BOXELDER 38.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6116 BOXELDER 9.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6117 BOXELDER 9.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6118 BOXELDER 23.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6119 WILLOW 8.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6120 WILLOW 8.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6121 WILLOW 35.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6122 BOXELDER 13.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6123 BOXELDER 12.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6124 BOXELDER 10.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6125 BOXELDER 26.0 IN FAIR 2 SIGNIFICANT 6126 MAPLE, SILVER 8.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6127 OAK, BUR 85.0 IN GOOD 3 SIGNIFICANT 6128 SPRUCE, BLUE 4.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6129 SPRUCE, WHITE 5.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6130 SPRUCE, BLUE 6.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6131 SPRUCE, WHITE 4.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6132 COTTONWOOD 21.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6133 COTTONWOOD 31.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6134 SPRUCE, BLUE 6.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6135 COTTONWOOD 29.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6136 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6137 COTTONWOOD 23.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6138 SPRUCE, BLUE 7.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6139 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6140 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6141 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6142 COTTONWOOD 29.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6143 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6144 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6145 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6146 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6147 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6148 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6149 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6150 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6151 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6152 SPRUCE, BLUE 15.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6153 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6154 MAPLE, SUGAR 20.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6155 CRABAPPLE 9.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6156 ARBORVITAE 24.0 IN GOOD 4 SIGNIFICANT 6157 ARBORVITAE 26.0 IN GOOD 7 SIGNIFICANT 6158 MAPLE, SILVER 32.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6159 OAK, BUR 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6160 MAPLE, SILVER 36.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6161 OAK, BUR 11.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6162 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6163 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6164 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6165 SPRUCE, BLUE 7.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6166 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6167 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6168 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6169 SPRUCE, BLUE 14.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6170 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6171 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6172 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6173 REDCEDAR 4.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6174 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6175 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6176 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6177 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6178 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6179 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6180 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6181 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6182 HONEYLOCUST 28.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6183 ASH, GREEN 27.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6184 ARBORVITAE 22.0 IN FAIR 6 SIGNIFICANT 6185 ARBORVITAE 20.0 IN FAIR 4 SIGNIFICANT 6186 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6187 ASH, GREEN 25.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6188 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6189 ARBORVITAE 26.0 IN GOOD 4 SIGNIFICANT 6190 ASH, GREEN 11.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6191 SPRUCE, BLUE 14.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6192 SPRUCE,NORWAY 21.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6193 SPRUCE, BLUE 14.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6194 ARBORVITAE 24.0 IN GOOD 3 SIGNIFICANT 6195 MAPLE, SILVER 25.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6196 MAPLE, SILVER 18.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6197 MAPLE, SILVER 23.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6198 MAPLE, SILVER 19.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6199 MAPLE, SILVER 23.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6200 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6201 SPRUCE, BLUE 12.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6202 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6203 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6204 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6205 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6206 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6207 SPRUCE, BLUE 13.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6208 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6209 SPRUCE, BLUE 15.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6210 SPRUCE, BLUE 7.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6211 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6212 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6213 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6214 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6215 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6216 SPRUCE, BLUE 8.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6217 SPRUCE, BLUE 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6218 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6219 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6220 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6221 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6222 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6223 SPRUCE, BLUE 10.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6224 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6225 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6226 SPRUCE, BLUE 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6227 COTTONWOOD 18.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6228 WILLOW 9.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6229 WILLOW 10.0 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6230 WILLOW 11.5 IN FAIR 1 SIGNIFICANT 6231 WALNUT 12.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6232 WALNUT 14.5 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT 6233 HONEYLOCUST 23.0 IN GOOD 1 SIGNIFICANT POINT SPECIES DBH CONDITION STEMS CLASSIFICATION REMOVED REMAIN POINT SPECIES DBH CONDITION STEMS CLASSIFICATION REMOVED REMAIN POINT SPECIES DBH CONDITION STEMS CLASSIFICATION REMOVED REMAIN POINT SPECIES DBH CONDITION STEMS CLASSIFICATION REMOVED REMAIN SEE 260.TI FOR TREE LOCATIONS 99 2,437,692± SF 55,781± SF 2,437,692± SF 55,781± SF NO PA R K I N G N O PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 CONVERT EXISTING TURF AREA REMOVE EXISTING TURF AND SEED AS SPECIFIED PROTECT EXISTING TREES LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (TYP.) DECIDUOUS TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SGM 21 ACER FREEMANII `SIENNA GLEN` / SIENNA GLEN MAPLE B & B 2.5"CAL SKH 18 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS `SKYCOLE` / SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5"CAL QB 14 QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5"CAL NP 3 QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS / NORTHERN PIN OAK B & B 2.5"CAL RL 9 TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND` / REDMOND LINDEN B & B 2.5"CAL AE 27 ULMUS `MORTON` / ACCOLADE ELM B & B 2.5"CAL EVERGREEN TREES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. WHP 16 PINUS STROBUS / WHITE PINE FULL FORM B & B 6` MIN. HGT. SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SPACING INH 24 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `INCREDIBALL` / INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA 5 GAL 24" HGT 60" o.c. GF 88 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 5 GAL 24" SPRD 48" o.c. PERENNIALS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SPACING WC 188 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` / WALKERS LOW CATMINT 1 GAL 24" o.c. PA2 46 PEROVSKIA ABROTANOIDES / RUSSIAN SAGE 5 GAL CONT.30" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SPACING ARJ 68 JUNIPERUS SABINA `ARCADIA` / ARCADIA JUNIPER 5 GAL 18" SPRD 60" o.c. GRASSES QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SPACING FG 241 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL 24" o.c. NSG 38 PANICUM VIRGATUM `NORTH WIND` / NORTHWIND SWITCH GRASS 1 GAL 36" o.c. SH 35 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEED 1 GAL 24" o.c. GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. SPACING SD-01 NATIVE SEED MIX DRY PRAIRIE SEED MIX - BWSR SEED MIX #35-621. SEED SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE LIST OF ADDED FORBS TO BE REVIEWED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. APPLY PER MNDOT MANUAL RECOMMENDATIONS. REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-9219 SEED SOD TURF SOD SOD SD-02 WETLAND SEED MIX RIPARIAN SOUTH AND WEST SEED MIX - BWSR SEED MIX #34-262 SEED SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE LIST OF ADDED FORBS TO BE REVIEWED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. APPLY PER MNDOT MANUAL RECOMMENDATIONS. REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-9219. SEED PLANT SCHEDULE N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Landscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota 08/31/2023 52050 Nathan Ekhoff - LA NWE/KVK EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 LANDSCAPE PLAN OVERALL 270.LP Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND / OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS / GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR THE UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONCERNS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB / GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND / OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS: MINIMUM OF ONE OF THE GREATER: 1 TREE PER 50 LINEAR FEET OF SITE PERIMETER (6,190 LF / 50 FEET = 124 TREES) OR 1 TREE PER 1,000 SQ. FT. OF GROSS BUILDING (63,710 SQ. FT. / 1,000 SQ. FT. = 64 TREES) TREES REQUIRED:124 TREES OVERSTORY TREES PROVIDED: 108 TREES SHRUBS PROVIDED - 156: 16 TREE CREDITS TOTAL TREES PROVIDED:124 TREES SEE 2 7 5 . L P SEE 275.LP SEE 273.LP SEE 271.LP SEE 274.LP SEE 272.LP NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM AN ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED BY LOUCKS, DATED 09/12/2023. BOLLARD SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL SPEC.MATERIAL MANUFACTURER MODEL COMMENTS FORMS + SURFACES HELIO 9/280.LD 32 39 13 STEEL FORMS AND SURFACES SERIES 600 EDGING SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL SPEC.MATERIAL FINISH COLOR COMMENTS LANDSCAPE EDGER 6/280.LD 32 94 13 STEEL NATURAL BLACK 3/16" X 4" LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL SPEC.MATERIAL FINISH COLOR COMMENTS ROCK MULCH - TRAP ROCK 5/280.LD 32 19 13 STONE WASHED NATURAL 2"-3" TRAP ROCK LIGHTING SYMBOL DESCRIPTION DETAIL SPEC.MATERIAL FINISH COLOR COMMENTS POLE LIGHT SEE ELEC. SEE ELEC.SEE ELEC SEE ELEC. BO-01 ED-01 LM-01 LT-01 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SCHEDULE 100 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.10.10.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 FF F FF F EE A2-HS A2 A2-HS A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 W3 W3 W3 W3 A1 A1 A1 A2 A1-EGS BB BB BB BB BB BB BB A1 A1 A1-EGS A2 A1 W3 W3 W3 W3 W3 EE FF GG BIT. TRAIL BIT. TRAIL BIT. TRAIL PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.4 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.9 3.3 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.0 2.3 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.4 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.9 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.9 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.5 1.4 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.1 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.4 1.3 1.8 2.6 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.7 3.2 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.2 0.6 0.4 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.7 2.8 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 1.5 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 2.3 3.3 3.5 2.7 3.0 1.6 0.9 0.6 0.4 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.4 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.3 2.1 2.6 3.0 3.3 2.0 1.0 0.7 0.4 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.0 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.5 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.4 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.7 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.1 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.4 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.7 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.4 2.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 2.3 3.0 3.3 3.5 2.7 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.1 1.7 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 1.1 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.6 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.3 0.7 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.0 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.2 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.4 3.3 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.6 0.3 0.9 1.7 1.2 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.7 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.5 2.9 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.3 0.8 2.2 4.0 3.0 1.8 1.7 4.3 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.2 3.5 5.1 4.9 3.4 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.5 4.5 4.6 2.7 1.9 2.9 3.4 2.5 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 3.0 1.8 2.3 4.6 5.3 4.5 2.5 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.9 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.8 2.5 3.9 5.1 4.2 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.4 0.6 1.0 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 2.2 3.0 2.5 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.1 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 1.6 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 1.6 2.4 4.5 5.3 4.6 2.3 1.4 3.1 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.9 0.7 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.9 3.2 4.3 3.6 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.4 3.1 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.5 2.9 2.9 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 2.1 2.0 1.9 3.1 3.1 2.2 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.9 3.6 3.2 3.2 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.5 1.3 2.4 4.7 5.0 4.1 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.4 3.4 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.5 2.7 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 4.1 5.4 3.8 1.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.8 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.8 3.4 2.1 0.8 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.3 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.4 3.3 3.4 2.8 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.1 0.5 1.0 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.2 1.5 2.0 1.9 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.3 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.3 3.3 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.4 2.8 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.6 3.0 2.3 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.6 2.3 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.4 2.9 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 3.0 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.8 2.2 1.8 1.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.7 3.1 3.5 2.7 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.9 2.5 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.7 3.5 3.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.1 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.4 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.2 3.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.4 2.7 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.4 2.8 3.5 3.5 3.3 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.3 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.0 1.7 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.2 2.9 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.9 3.5 3.0 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.6 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.3 3.4 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.4 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.6 3.1 2.9 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.6 2.9 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.2 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.0 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.7 3.4 2.9 3.3 2.6 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.7 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.1 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.8 2.5 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.4 3.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.9 2.5 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.1 3.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.6 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.7 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.1 3.0 3.5 2.9 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.7 3.3 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.4 2.8 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.6 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.5 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.4 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 0.1 0.1 1.7 2.3 3.1 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.6 2.9 2.9 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.7 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.4 1.6 1.4 1.3 0.1 3.1 3.6 3.1 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.4 1.5 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.7 2.7 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.5 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.3 3.3 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.6 2.0 2.7 3.5 3.1 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.6 0.9 0.6 3.2 2.9 3.4 2.7 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.3 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.2 1.0 1.2 1.3 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.7 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.1 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.0 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.2 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.6 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.0 1.7 2.6 3.5 3.7 3.7 2.9 2.0 1.8 2.7 3.6 3.9 3.2 2.8 2.0 1.8 3.1 5.7 7.6 3.3 2.9 2.0 1.8 2.8 4.4 3.1 2.3 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 3.7 3.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.7 1.1 2.5 1.9 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.6 2.8 2.2 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.7 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 3.7 3.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.8 2.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.3 3.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.2 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.5 2.5 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.7 1.8 1.7 2.2 1.4 2.3 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.1 1.0 2.4 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.8 1.8 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.3 2.6 0.8 1.8 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.1 2.9 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.4 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.3 3.1 3.7 2.7 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 2.1 4.5 5.2 4.6 2.2 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 2.5 3.7 4.7 3.8 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.3 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.7 2.1 1.2 1.6 3.3 3.3 2.3 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.5 1.2 2.5 4.8 5.1 4.3 1.8 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.8 4.1 5.2 3.6 1.3 0.4 0.2 17.9 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 2.3 3.2 1.9 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.6 3.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.6 2.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.4 1.3 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.2 0.2 0.3 2.3 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.3 1.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 3.7 0.6 0.8 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.3 2.4 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.3 0.7 1.7 2.1 1.5 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.5 3.4 4.3 3.3 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 3.7 0.9 2.1 4.5 5.2 4.6 2.4 1.3 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 3.7 1.8 3.1 4.1 3.6 1.9 1.3 1.3 1.8 2.3 1.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 1.6 2.1 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.7 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.1 3.7 3.5 2.8 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.1 0.3 3.6 3.0 3.0 2.3 1.6 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 3.7 3.0 3.3 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.7 1.8 2.3 2.7 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.7 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.1 3.7 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.2 3.7 3.6 3.2 2.8 2.4 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 3.0 3.4 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 3.7 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 3.7 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.0 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.7 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.2 3.6 3.7 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.4 2.9 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.2 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.7 2.4 1.7 0.6 1.0 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.5 3.7 2.9 3.3 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.0 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.5 2.7 2.0 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 3.7 3.5 3.0 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 2.2 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 3.5 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.3 1.8 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.5 3.7 0.4 3.0 3.5 2.8 2.1 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 2.3 2.8 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.5 3.1 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.3 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.0 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.0 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Schedule Symbol Label QTY Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Number Lamps Lamp Output A1 6 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P1 40K 70CRI T3LG D-Series Size 1 Area Luminaire P1 Performance Package 4000K CCT 70 CRI Type 3 Low G Rating 1 6783 A1-EGS 2 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P1 40K 70CRI T3LG EGS D-Series Size 1 Area Luminaire P1 Performance Package 4000K CCT 70 CRI Type 3 Low G Rating External Glare Shield 1 6783 A2 20 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P2 40K 70CRI T5LG D-Series Size 1 Area Luminaire P2 Performance Package 4000K CCT 70 CRI Type 5 Low G Rating 2 10,224 A2-HS 2 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P2 40K 70CRI T5LG HS D-Series Size 1 Area Luminaire P2 Performance Package 4000K CCT 70 CRI Type 5 Low G Rating Houseside Shield BB 7 Luminis Lighting CT185-L1LWT-TYP5 CT185 1 7779 EE 2 Lithonia Lighting DSXF2 LED P2 40K 70CRI MFL DSX Floodlight Luminaire Size 2 P2 Lumen Package 4000K CCT 70CRI Type MFL Distribution 1 N/A F 6 Lithonia Lighting LBR8 ALO4 (5000LM) SWW1 (3500K) AR LSS 80CRI 8 INCH LBR DOWNLIGHT ALO4 (5000LM) 3500K CLEAR SEMI-SPECULAR MEDIUM-WIDE 80 CRI 1 4910 W3 9 Lithonia Lighting WPX1 LED P2 40K Mvolt WPX1 LED wallpack 3000lm 4000K color temperature 120-277 Volts (Building Wallpacks) 1 2913 16 Ft 25 Ft 25 Ft 25 Ft 25 Ft 12 Ft N/A 9 Ft 70CRI 70CRI Mounting Height 10,2242 FF 1 Lithonia Lighting DSXF2 LED P2 40K 70CRI MFL DSX Floodlight Luminaire Size 2 P2 Lumen Package 4000K CCT 70CRI Type MFL Distribution 1 N/A N/A GG 1 Lithonia Lighting DSXF2 LED P3 40K 70CRI NSP DSX Floodlight Luminaire Size 2 P3 Lumen Package 4000K CCT 70CRI Type NSP Distribution DBLXD U 1 N/A N/A (Decorative Lighting) (Decorative Lighting) (Decorative Lighting) (Building Entry Canopy Lighting) Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min Building Front Entry 2.6 fc 17.9 fc 0.2 fc 89.5:1 13.0:1 East Driveway and Sidwalk 0.5 fc 7.6 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A NE of Building Parking 1.1 fc 2.3 fc 0.5 fc 4.6:1 2.2:1 NW Parking Lot 1.6 fc 3.7 fc 0.2 fc 18.5:1 8.0:1 SE Parking Lot 1.4 fc 3.7 fc 0.2 fc 18.5:1 7.0:1 GENERAL SHEET NOTESLUMEN CALCULATION A. PROJECT SITE IS IN LIGHTING ZONE 1 (LZ1). B. COLOR RENDERING INDEX (CRI) OF ALL LIGHT FIXTURES IS A MINIMUM OF 70. REFER TO LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE FOR CRI OF EACH FIXTURE. C. MAXIMUM MOUNTING HEIGHT OF ALL FIXTURES ARE AT 25 FEET IN LZ-1. D. HOUSE-SIDE SHIELDING TO BE PROVIDED FOR LIGHT FIXTURES THAT ARE WITHIN 300 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES. E. SITE LIGHTING TO BE SET AT 50% DIMMING AS NORMAL OPERATION. OCCUPANCY SENSORS TO BE PROVIDED TO TURN LIGHT FIXTURES UP TO 100% UPON SENSE OF MOVEMENT FOR A 15 MINUTE DURATION FOR SECURITY PURPOSES. F. LUMENS PER SQUARE FOOT OF PARKING LOT AND OTHER HARDSCAPED AREAS IS CALCULATED TO 1.25 LUMENS PER SQUARE FOOT. G. REFER TO CUTSHEETS OF EACH FIXTURE FOR BUG RATING MEETING LZ1 CRITERIA (B3, U0, G1). TOTAL FIXTURE TYPE A1 LUMENS 54,264 TOTAL FIXTURE TYPE A2 LUMENS 449,856 TOTAL FIXTURE TYPE BB LUMENS 54,453 TOTAL LUMENS 558,573 TOTAL SITE TOTAL LUMENS HARDSCAPE SQ FT 558,573 LM / 445,089 SQ FT = 1.25 LUMENS PER SQ FT Phone Fax 3550 LaBore Road, St.Paul, MN 55110 {651} 484-4900 {651} 484-2248 www.gephartelectric.com SHEET NUMBER: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name: Signature: Date: Reg # 45581 BRIAN SCOTT BINKLEY PD F M A D E : FI L E L O C A T I O N : 11/3/2023 11:25:26 AM Autodesk Docs://220072200-Eagle Brook Church Plymouth Campus/E22-EBC WM Plymouth.rvt 900.PM SITE PLAN -PHOTOMETRICS EA G L E B R O O K C H U R C H PL Y M O U T H C A M P U S 61 0 0 M a p l e G r o v e P k w y Pl y m o u t h , M N SS EL 11/03/2023 1762302 11/03/2023 1" = 50'-0"1 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRICS Date No. Description 09/13/23 CITY SUBMITTAL 11/03/23 CITY SUBMITTAL 101 40213 WMN B 942.83 40214 WMN E 942.66 40213 WMN B 942.83 40214 WMN E 942.66 N O PA R K I N G N O PA R K I N G PROPOSED BUILDING 64,000 SF FFE=953.00 1.305 ACRES 1.610 ACRES 1.640 ACRES 0.409 ACRES N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Consultants LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 22661 SD ISSUE LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title Comm. No.Drawn P.2200722.00 This document may be an electronic file or maybe printed from an electronic file provided tothe user. It is the sole responsibility of the userto ensure that the content and quality isconsistent with the content and quality of theoriginal documents on file at BWBR. Issued For Consultants 608.829.3701 Madison, WI 53703 1 S. Pinckney St., Ste. 500 bwbr.com This Sheet may bea Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N Name Date Lic./Reg. No.XX-XX-XXXX 58688 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was preparedby me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed/Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota Zachary B. Moen - PE 08/31/2023 ZBM/MDC/JRM EAGLE BROOKCHURCHPLYMOUTH CAMPUS SD ISSUE - REV 1 09/07/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 PARK DEDICATION AREAS EXHIBIT Gopher State One Call WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 PARK DEDICATION (CREDITED) PARK DEDICATION TRAIL EASEMENT (CREDITED) LEGEND PARK DEDICATION NORTH = 1.305 ACRES PARK DEDICATION SOUTH == 1.610 ACRES PARK DEDICATION TRAIL EASEMENT = 0.409 ACRES TOTAL PARK DEDICATION (CREDITED)= 3.324 ACRES PARK DEDICATION WETLAND (UNCREDITED) = 1.640 ACRES TOTAL PARK DEDICATION:= 4.964 ACRES PARK DEDICATION AREAS PARK DEDICATION (UNCREDITED) 102 45243 WAL B GND 939.8945247 WAL.N 942.46 45259 CGG 941.94 45260 CGG 941.86 45267 CGB E AE CGT 942.24 45268 CGC CON B 941.84 45289 CGC CGB B AB 941.7345290 CGB CGT 941.9445291 CGB CGT 942.14 45292 CGB E AE CGC 941.92 45296 RWG B AB 941.78 45297 WAL E.N 942.56 45298 RWG 940.77 45299 RWG AE 938.59 45300 RWG 935.75 45301 RWG 934.51 45302 RWG 934.12 45303 RWG 933.39 45304 RWG E 930.70 30000 CHK 8 941.59 30041 RIP B 927.76 30042 RIP 926.73 30043 RIP 926.5530044 RIP 926.82 30045 RIP E F 927.75 15247 CGB 940.85 15250 CGB 941.24 15255 CGB 941.23 35999 BLD 936.68 36000 BLD 936.25 40117 CGB B AB CGT 942.11 40118 CGB 942.24 40119 CGB AE 942.23 40128 CGB 941.94 40129 CGB 941.71 40134 CGB 941.38 40136 CGB 941.10 40141 CGB 940.83 40142 CGB 940.59 40172 CGB 940.44 40173 CGB 940.49 40181 CGB 940.58 40182 CGG 940.28 40183 CGB 940.79 40189 CGB AB 941.19 40190 CGB 941.31 40191 CGB E AE J15255 941.33 40197 CGL CON B 940.81 40198 CGL CON E 941.00 40199 CGB B CGT 941.38 40200 CGB1 B CGT 941.22 40202 CGB1 941.47 40203 CGB 941.58 40204 CGB 941.92 40205 CGB1 941.74 40206 CGB1 941.99 40207 CGB 942.24 40208 CGB 942.57 40209 CGB1 942.34 40210 CGB1 942.57 40211 CGB 942.80 40213 WMN B 942.83 40214 WMN E 942.66 40215 CGB1 E CGT 942.69 40216 CGB E CGT 942.92 40217 CGL CON B 942.55 40218 CGL CON E 942.30 40308 RWG B 936.04 40309 RWG 929.72 40310 RWG E CON B 926.54 40318 RWG AB 926.85 40319 RWG 928.94 40320 RWG E AE 930.24 40324 CGB B CGT 926.33 40325 CGB E 926.30 40328 CGB B 926.44 40329 CGB E CGT 926.56 40330 CGC BIT B 926.54 20000 CHK 8 941.66 55,781± SF 45243 WAL B GND 939.8945247 WAL.N 942.46 45259 CGG 941.94 45260 CGG 941.86 45267 CGB E AE CGT 942.24 45268 CGC CON B 941.84 45289 CGC CGB B AB 941.7345290 CGB CGT 941.9445291 CGB CGT 942.14 45292 CGB E AE CGC 941.92 45296 RWG B AB 941.78 45297 WAL E.N 942.56 45298 RWG 940.77 45299 RWG AE 938.59 45300 RWG 935.75 45301 RWG 934.51 45302 RWG 934.12 45303 RWG 933.39 45304 RWG E 930.70 30000 CHK 8 941.59 30041 RIP B 927.76 30042 RIP 926.73 30043 RIP 926.5530044 RIP 926.82 30045 RIP E F 927.75 15247 CGB 940.85 15250 CGB 941.24 15255 CGB 941.23 35999 BLD 936.68 36000 BLD 936.25 40117 CGB B AB CGT 942.11 40118 CGB 942.24 40119 CGB AE 942.23 40128 CGB 941.94 40129 CGB 941.71 40134 CGB 941.38 40136 CGB 941.10 40141 CGB 940.83 40142 CGB 940.59 40172 CGB 940.44 40173 CGB 940.49 40181 CGB 940.58 40182 CGG 940.28 40183 CGB 940.79 40189 CGB AB 941.19 40190 CGB 941.31 40191 CGB E AE J15255 941.33 40197 CGL CON B 940.81 40198 CGL CON E 941.00 40199 CGB B CGT 941.38 40200 CGB1 B CGT 941.22 40202 CGB1 941.47 40203 CGB 941.58 40204 CGB 941.92 40205 CGB1 941.74 40206 CGB1 941.99 40207 CGB 942.24 40208 CGB 942.57 40209 CGB1 942.34 40210 CGB1 942.57 40211 CGB 942.80 40213 WMN B 942.83 40214 WMN E 942.66 40215 CGB1 E CGT 942.69 40216 CGB E CGT 942.92 40217 CGL CON B 942.55 40218 CGL CON E 942.30 40308 RWG B 936.04 40309 RWG 929.72 40310 RWG E CON B 926.54 40318 RWG AB 926.85 40319 RWG 928.94 40320 RWG E AE 930.24 40324 CGB B CGT 926.33 40325 CGB E 926.30 40328 CGB B 926.44 40329 CGB E CGT 926.56 40330 CGC BIT B 926.54 20000 CHK 8 941.66 55,781± SF 1 . 6 % 1.4% 1.6 % 1 1 . 8 % 1 . 7 % 3.2% 3.7% 1.5% 33.6% Boardwalk = 929.44 940.72 941.36 941.07 937.97 937.91 940.97 929.75 30.8 % 32.1 % 4.5 % 19.6 % 929.81 1.2% 1 9 . 6 % 929.44 929.52 929.44 938.51 938.51 938.45 938.45 929.52 937.70 937.88 940.47 940.86 6.6% 6.6% 4.5 % 4.5 % 25.0% 1.5% 19.4 % 32.1 % 29.3% 15.7 % 19.8 % 17. 2 % 24 . 1 % 2 1 . 5 % 2 . 1 % 9 3 0 9 3 5 9 4 0 9 3 1 9 3 2 9 3 3 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 8 9 3 9 9 4 1 9 4 2 94 3 9 4 3 2.1% 38.5 % 18.0 % 935 94 0 9 3 2 93 3 93 4 93 6 93 7 93 8 93 9 9 4 1 935 933 934 936 937 938 9 3 5 9 3 1 9 3 2 9 3 3 9 3 4 9 3 6 9 3 7 9 3 6 9 3 7 937.00 936.82 929.44 929.44 4 . 8 % 8.0% 8.0 % 943.92 943.84 943.67 943.80 93 5 94 0 93 1 93 2 93 3 93 4 93 6 93 7 93 8 93 9 94 1 94 2 94 3 94 4 93 0 93 5 940 93 1 93 2 93 3 93 4 936 937 938 939 941 942943 944 10' BOARDWALK TRAIL 10' BITUMINOUS PATH 10' BITUMINOUS PATH 20' TRAIL EASEMENT 2023-11-03 103 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15213 40196 STRUCT. SMH SMH RIM 931.24 940.80 INVERT(S) 902.78 DIRECTION STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15025 15033 15052 15066 15083 15086 15090 15091 15125 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB BEE STMH CB CB RIM 940.24 940.04 939.60 933.78 932.52 930.38 931.78 932.17 928.17 INVERT(S) 934.82 933.84 933.64 933.46 929.39 923.80 DIRECTION NE N;S STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15140 15168 15194 15214 15220 15241 35655 40135 40171 STRUCT. CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH CB CB RIM 925.93 926.07 929.05 930.94 933.75 939.64 933.27 940.83 939.94 INVERT(S) 920.73 922.06 925.22 926.74 928.67 928.64 928.56 932.80 931.33 931.29 922.03 936.57 936.28 936.24 DIRECTION E N S E N S S N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 40180 40326 40327 45034 45057 45113 45135 45160 45191 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB RIM 940.12 925.65 925.84 946.69 945.02 940.56 937.83 936.29 931.74 INVERT(S) 934.16 933.56 921.15 921.40 942.81 941.14 936.75 934.09 932.61 927.18 DIRECTION S E;N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 45199 45219 45249 45276 45926 45949 46009 46019 46076 STRUCT. STMH CB CB STMH OCS STMH CB CB BEE RIM 932.56 934.10 939.39 941.92 928.14 950.64 957.80 957.68 957.54 INVERT(S) 926.18 925.85 925.84 930.87 934.01 920.88 927.47 925.55 924.10 923.14 921.82 943.07 952.65 953.08 952.93 953.79 DIRECTION W S N TOP OF WEIR ORIFICE W NE SUMP N S STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 46098 46291 46317 46398 46441 46471 46489 46495 STRUCT. YD BEE BEE BEE BEE BEE STMH BEE RIM 961.76 948.26 946.12 930.84 929.52 930.32 949.22 950.34 INVERT(S) 944.86 944.76 943.11 942.33 942.26 929.16 927.12 925.42 925.09 926.42 926.29 945.14 944.82 946.03 945.97 DIRECTION W E NW W N E E W N W E N W N S The East 682 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5thPrincipal Meridian, EXCEPTING 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota; situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 6, by deed, in Book 115 of Deeds, on page 217, and by deed from William Dolan and Lydia Dolan, his wife, to School District No. 120, dated November 15, 1933. AND The West 643 Feet of the East 1325 Feet of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 118, Range 22. AND West 258 feet of the East 1841 feet of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. AND West 258 feet of the East 1583 feet of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55330 763-424-5505 1. Prepared September 14, 2023. 2. The address, if disclosed in documents provided to or obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 17510, 17800 and 17910 Chankahda Trail, Plymouth, MN 55446. 3. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 4. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 5. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0159F, Community Panel No. 270179 0159 F, effective date of November 4, 2016 and Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0167F, Community Panel No. 270179 0167 F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 6. The field work was completed on September 6, 2023. Current Zoning: FRD (Future Restricted Development) Any zoning classification, setback requirements, height and floor space area restrictions, and parking requirements, shown hereon, was researched to the best of our ability and is open to interpretation. Per the City of Plymouth Zoning Map and City Code, on July 10, 2023, information for the subject property is as follows: Current Setbacks: Front 100 feet Side 25 feet Rear 40 feet Height 35 feet Proposed Zoning: RSF (Single Family Detached 3) Proposed Setbacks: Front 50 feet Side 25 feet Rear 40 feet Height 35 feet ZONING INFORMATION Areas: Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 = 2,087,123 +/- square feet or 47.91 +/- acres Proposed Park = 198,383 +/- square feet or 4.56 +/- acres Right of Way Dedication Area = 152,186 +/- square feet or 3.49 +/- acres Total Property Area = 2,437,692 +/- square feet or 55.96 +/- acres SITE DATA OWNER/DEVELOPER: Eagle Brook Church 7015 20th Avenue Centerville, MN 55038 651-429-9227 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - P P L A T Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLYMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 OF 2 License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 CITY SUBMITTALDETAIL Not To Scale 104 15109 CABINET 931.43 40213 WMN B 942.83 40214 WMN E 942.66 45930 STRM INV 1.95' INV 3" ORIFICE 927.50 45927 STRM INV TO INV 21" RCP SUMP 6.86' TO INV 928.68 45929 TOP WEIR 927.47 45931 STRM INV STC 21" RCP 924.10 20112 SEP 945.17 20113 SEP 945.23 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - P P L A T Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLYMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 N SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 OF 2 License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 09/12/23 CITY SUBMITTAL 105 A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 H G F E D 7654321 Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title BWBR Comm. No.Drawn This Sheet may be a Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N C B A Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com Keyplan TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PLYMOUTH CAMPUS This document may be an electronic file or may be printed from an electronic file provided to the user. It is the sole responsibility of the user to ensure that the content and quality is consistent with the content and quality of the original documents on file at BWBR. 11 / 3 / 2 0 2 3 1 1 : 3 2 : 0 2 A M EXTERIOR 3D 511 P.2200722.00 SD ISSUE 08/31/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 106 PAINTED ALUMINUM CROSS, SIMILAR TO ANOKA PC-02 PC-02 MP-02 PC-02 PC-03 PC-01 MP-01 MP-01 MP-01 PC-01 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE - CFCI PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING 21 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 0 " PAINTED ALUMINUM CROSS, SIMILAR TO ANOKA PC-02 PC-02 PC-02 PC-02 PC-03 PC-01 TRASH ENCLOSURE - PRECAST ENCLOSURE WALLS WITH METAL PANEL GATE PREFINISHED METAL COPING MP-01 PC-01 PC-03 50 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 0 " PAINTED ALUMINUM CROSS, SIMILAR TO ANOKA PC-02 PC-02 PC-03 PC-01 PC-02 PAINTED INSULATED HM DOORS TRASH ENCLOSURE SF1 SF1 106A 38 ' - 0 " PREFINISHED METAL COPING 35 ' - 0 " EAGLE BROOKEAGLE BROOK CHURCH 5' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 9'-0" PRECAST MONUMENT SIGN PRECAST CAP MASONRY LEDGE PLYMOUTH CAMPUSPLYMOUTH CAMPUS BACK LIT, CUT OUT LETTERS - BOTH SIDES EXTERIOR MATERIALS KEY PC-01 PC-02 PC-03 MP-01 MP-02 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - MEDIUM GREY FINISH METAL PANEL - PAINTED METALLIC FINISH, DARK GREY ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - LIGHT GREY FINISH, REVEAL PATTERN 2' H X 12' W RECTANGLES ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - DARK GREY FINISH METAL PANEL - PAINTED METALLIC FINISH, LIGHT GREY * FINAL COLOR SELECTIONS TO BE DETERMINED 128A 126A PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING PC-02 PC-02PC-02 PC-01 PC-03 21 ' - 0 " 21 ' - 0 " TRASH ENCLOSURE A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 H G F E D 7654321 Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title BWBR Comm. No.Drawn This Sheet may be a Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N C B A Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com Keyplan TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PLYMOUTH CAMPUS This document may be an electronic file or may be printed from an electronic file provided to the user. It is the sole responsibility of the user to ensure that the content and quality is consistent with the content and quality of the original documents on file at BWBR. 11 / 3 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 2 7 : 5 4 A M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - PRESENTATION 512 P.2200722.00 3/32" = 1'-0"512 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH EAST 3/32" = 1'-0"512 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH EAST 3/32" = 1'-0"512 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH WEST 1/4" = 1'-0"512 5 MONUMENT SIGN Copy 1 3/32" = 1'-0"512 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH WEST SD ISSUE 08/31/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL - REV 1 09/19/2023 DD ISSUE 11/16/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 107 DN DNDN A C C ACC TOILETS 60 SF EA. 6" TALL FRAMED WOOD PLATFORM WITH 1:20 RAMP CLIMBING WALL WITH BACKING VESTIBULE VESTIBULE LOBBY PARENT / CHILD INFANT WALKER TODDLER TOILET JANITOR WORK ROOM KID-O-DEO PRESCHOOL TOILET CORRIDOR PRE-KINDER KINDER TOILET TOILET ELEVATE (1-3) ELEVATE (4-5) IDF OPEN OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE MEETING WOMEN MEN CAFE SERVE CAFE PREP CAFE SEATING LIGHT LOCK LIGHT LOCK MOTHERS NURSING WATER WALK VOLUNTEER CENTRAL ENGINEERINGCONTROL ROOM GREEN ROOM WORSHIP PLATFORM BACK OF HOUSE ELECTRICAL ROOM AMP ROOM TOILET WATER ROOM VESTIBULE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE LIGHT LOCK LIGHT LOCK CORRIDOR CORRIDOR FRONT OF HOUSE RAMP DROP OFF A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 H G F E D 7654321 Co p y r i g h t B W B R DateItem Sheet No. Sheet Title BWBR Comm. No.Drawn This Sheet may be a Reduced Copy. The bar above is 1" long on a Full Size Sheet.Drawing Scales apply to Full Size Sheets. NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N C B A Issued For Consultants 651.222.3701 Saint Paul, MN 55102 380 St. Peter Street, Ste. 600 bwbr.com Keyplan TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PLYMOUTH CAMPUS This document may be an electronic file or may be printed from an electronic file provided to the user. It is the sole responsibility of the user to ensure that the content and quality is consistent with the content and quality of the original documents on file at BWBR. 11 / 3 / 2 0 2 3 5 : 4 4 : 2 4 A M Author PRESENTATION PLAN 401 P.2200722.00 1/16" = 1'-0"401 1 FLOOR PLAN - FIRST LEVEL SD ISSUE 08/31/2023 CITY SUBMITTAL 09/13/2023 CITY RESUBMITTAL 11/03/2023 108 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15213 40196 STRUCT. SMH SMH RIM 931.24 940.80 INVERT(S) 902.78 DIRECTION STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15025 15033 15052 15066 15083 15086 15090 15091 15125 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB BEE STMH CB CB RIM 940.24 940.04 939.60 933.78 932.52 930.38 931.78 932.17 928.17 INVERT(S) 934.82 933.84 933.64 933.46 929.39 923.80 DIRECTION NE N;S STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 15140 15168 15194 15214 15220 15241 35655 40135 40171 STRUCT. CB CB CB STMH CB CB STMH CB CB RIM 925.93 926.07 929.05 930.94 933.75 939.64 933.27 940.83 939.94 INVERT(S) 920.73 922.06 925.22 926.74 928.67 928.64 928.56 932.80 931.33 931.29 922.03 936.57 936.28 936.24 DIRECTION E N S E N S S N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 40180 40326 40327 45034 45057 45113 45135 45160 45191 STRUCT. CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB RIM 940.12 925.65 925.84 946.69 945.02 940.56 937.83 936.29 931.74 INVERT(S) 934.16 933.56 921.15 921.40 942.81 941.14 936.75 934.09 932.61 927.18 DIRECTION S E;N STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 45199 45219 45249 45276 45926 45949 46009 46019 46076 STRUCT. STMH CB CB STMH OCS STMH CB CB BEE RIM 932.56 934.10 939.39 941.92 928.14 950.64 957.80 957.68 957.54 INVERT(S) 926.18 925.85 925.84 930.87 934.01 920.88 927.47 925.55 924.10 923.14 921.82 943.07 952.65 953.08 952.93 953.79 DIRECTION W S N TOP OF WEIR ORIFICE W NE SUMP N S STORM SEWER STRUCTURE INFORMATION NO. 46098 46291 46317 46398 46441 46471 46489 46495 STRUCT. YD BEE BEE BEE BEE BEE STMH BEE RIM 961.76 948.26 946.12 930.84 929.52 930.32 949.22 950.34 INVERT(S) 944.86 944.76 943.11 942.33 942.26 929.16 927.12 925.42 925.09 926.42 926.29 945.14 944.82 946.03 945.97 DIRECTION W E NW W N E E W N W E N W N S N SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - A L T A Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 4 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION PLYMOUTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLYMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 SURVEY LEGEND 09/12/23 SURVEY ISSUED License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 1 OF 5 SITE CHANKAHDA TRL CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y (Per Schedule A of the herein referenced Title Commitment) Parcel 1: The East 682 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5thPrincipal Meridian, EXCEPTING 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, Hennepin County, Minnesota; situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 6, by deed, in Book 115 of Deeds, on page 217, and by deed from William Dolan and Lydia Dolan, his wife, to School District No. 120, dated November 15, 1933. Parcel 2: The West 643 Feet of the East 1325 Feet of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 118, Range 22. Parcel 3: West 258 feet of the East 1841 feet of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 4: West 258 feet of the East 1583 feet of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Abstract Property. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per Schedule B, Part II of the herein referenced Title Commitment) The property depicted on this survey and the easements of record shown hereon are the same as the property and the easements described in the Commitment for Title Insurance issued by The Title Team - North Shore Title as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, File No. NST222858, effective date November 23, 2022. The numbers below correspond to those in the title commitment. 1 - 8 do not require comment. 9. Easement for sanitary sewer purposes in favor of the Metropolitan Council, dated December 11, 2003, filed December 2, 2004, as Document No. 8482966. Shown hereon along the east property line. The temporary easements in this document expired 03/17/05. 10. Agreement as to Stormwater Pond Maintenance, Right of Way Maintenance, Special Assessments, Soil Correction, and Field Entrances between the City of Plymouth and Leonard E. Luedke and Judy L. Luedke, dated September 22, 2017, filed October 30, 2017, as Document No. A10498462. Not shown hereon. This document was not provided. 11. Final Certificate dated October 9, 2017, filed November 6, 2017, as Document No. A10499064. Shown hereon along the east and south property lines. The temporary easements in this document expired 09/30/15. 12. Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements in favor of the City of Plymouth dated February 17, 2022, filed March 30, 2022, as Document No. 11092714. Shown hereon along the south property line. The temporary easements in this document expired 07/31/23. 13. Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements in favor of the City of Plymouth dated February 17, 2022, filed March 30, 2022, as Document No. 11092717. Shown hereon at the southwest corner of the property. The temporary easements in this document expired 07/31/23. 14. Grant of Permanent and Temporary Easements in favor of the City of Plymouth dated February 17, 2022, filed March 30, 2022, as Document No. 11092722. Shown hereon along the south property line. The temporary easements in this document expired 07/31/23. 15. Rights of the public in right of way for County Road 47 and Maple Grove Parkway North, as laid out and traveled. Shown hereon along the south property line. 16. Unmarketability of title, as to Parcel 1, arising from vague and ambiguous description of exception parcel, namely "excepting 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 6". Shown hereon at the southeast corner. TITLE COMMITMENT EXCEPTIONS (The following items refer to Table A optional survey responsibilities and specifications) 1. Monuments placed (or a reference monument or witness to the corner) at all major corners of the boundary of the property, unless already marked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses to the corner are shown hereon. 2. The address, as disclosed in documents provided to the surveyor, obtained by the surveyor, or observed while conducting the fieldwork is 17510, 17800 and 17910 Chankahda Trail, Plymouth, MN 55446. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0159F, Community Panel No. 270179 0159 F, effective date of November 4, 2016 and Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0167F, Community Panel No. 270179 0167 F, effective date of November 4, 2016. 4. The Gross land area is 2,437,692 +/- square feet or 55.96 +/- acres. The Right-of-way area is 129,248 +/- square feet or 2.97 +/- acres. The Net land area is 2,308,444 +/- square feet or 52.99 +/- acres. 6. (a) Any zoning classification, setback requirements, height and floor space area restrictions, and parking requirements, shown hereon, was researched to the best of our ability and is open to interpretation. Per the City of Plymouth Zoning Map and City Code, on July 10, 2023, information for the subject property is as follows: Zone FRD (Future Restricted Development) Setbacks: Front 100 feet, Side 25 feet, Rear 40 feet; Height: thirty-five (35) feet; 7. (a) Exterior dimensions of all buildings are shown at ground level. 8. Substantial features observed in the process of conducting fieldwork, are shown hereon. 9. There are no striped parking stalls on this site. 11. (a) We have shown underground utilities on and/or serving the surveyed property per Gopher State One-Call Ticket Nos. 232012217, 232012240, 232012284, 232012310, 232012322 and 232012409. The following utilities and municipalities were notified: COMCAST (800)778-9140 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE (763)494-6370 CITY OF PLYMOUTH (763)509-5950 CENTURYLINK (800)778-9140 HENNEPIN CO. PUBLIC WORKS (406)541-9571 MCI (800)624-9675 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL (651)602-4511 CENTER POINT ENERGY (812)483-7923 WAYZATA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (218)346-5500 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP (800)778-9140 i. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for surveying purposes such as this. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate utilities from their main line to the customer's structure or facility. They consider those utilities “private” installations that are outside their jurisdiction. These “private” utilities on the surveyed property or adjoining properties, may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" utilities. A private utility locator may be contacted to investigate these utilities further, if requested by the client. ii. Maps provided by those notified above, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 811 or (651) 454-0002. ALTA/NSPS OPTIONAL TABLE A NOTES SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 3. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 4. Tree diameters shown hereon are measured at breast height. 5. See sheet 2 through 5 for existing conditions. To Eagle Brook Church; Leonard E. Ludke and Judy L. Luedke; The Title Team - North Shore Title; and Stewart Title Guaranty Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1 - 4, 6(a), 7(a), 8, 9 and 11(a) of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on August 23, 2023. Date of Plat or Map: September 12, 2023 ______________________________________________ Max L. Stanislowski, PLS Minnesota License No. 48988 mstanislowski@loucksinc.com CERTIFICATION CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER CONCRETE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE FLARED END SECTION SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON SET NAIL WETLAND FLAG TOP NUT HYDRANT WATER LINE AREA DRAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM SPIGOT RETAINING WALL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE PIPE, MARKED "LS 12294" WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENV. SERVICES ON AUGUST 10, 2023 MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON RIP-RAP TIE DISTANCES ARE SHOWN ON SIDE WITH FEATURE MEASURED TO PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE MARKED "LS 48988" PLANS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 13 11 9 11 11 15 16 109 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - A L T A Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION PLYMOUTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLTMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 N SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY (NW CORNER) 2 OF 5 SURVEY LEGEND SITE CHANKAHDA TRL CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE YARD LIGHT CULVERT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAILBOX ELM BOXELDER FIR LOCUST OAK PINE SPRUCE CEDAR COTTONWOOD MAPLE WALNUT CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE MISC FRUIT SOIL BORING ELEV @ THRESHOLD ROOF DRAIN TREE LINE CLEANOUT CURB STOP OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE FLARED END SECTION TOP OF CURB SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON SET NAIL FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND FLAG TOP NUT HYDRANT WATER LINE SERVICE CLEANOUT AREA DRAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM SPIGOT ASH RETAINING WALL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE PIPE, MARKED "LS 12294" WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENV. SERVICES ON AUGUST 10, 2023 MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON ACCESS POST RIP-RAP ARBORVITAE TIE DISTANCES ARE SHOWN ON SIDE WITH FEATURE MEASURED TO PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE MARKED "LS 48988" PLANS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED (See Sheet 5 of 5 Sheets) (S e e S h e e t 3 o f 5 S h e e t s ) SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 3. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 4. Tree diameters shown hereon are measured at breast height. 5. See sheet 1 for ALTA Notes and utility elevations. See sheets 3 through 5 for existing conditions. WILLOW 09/12/23 SURVEY ISSUED License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 MA T C H L I N E MATCH LINE 110 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - A L T A Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION PLYMOUTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLTMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 N SCALE IN FEET 0 ## ## ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY (NE CORNER) 3 OF 5 SITE CHANKAHDA TRL CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y (See Sheet 4 of 5 Sheets) (S e e S h e e t 2 o f 5 S h e e t s ) 11 11 SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 3. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 4. Tree diameters shown hereon are measured at breast height. 5. See sheet 1 for ALTA Notes and utility elevations. See sheets 2, 4 and 5 for existing conditions. SURVEY LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE YARD LIGHT CULVERT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAILBOX ELM BOXELDER FIR LOCUST OAK PINE SPRUCE CEDAR COTTONWOOD MAPLE WALNUT CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE MISC FRUIT SOIL BORING ELEV @ THRESHOLD ROOF DRAIN TREE LINE CLEANOUT CURB STOP OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE FLARED END SECTION TOP OF CURB SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON SET NAIL FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND FLAG TOP NUT HYDRANT WATER LINE SERVICE CLEANOUT AREA DRAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM SPIGOT ASH RETAINING WALL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE PIPE, MARKED "LS 12294" WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENV. SERVICES ON AUGUST 10, 2023 MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON ACCESS POST RIP-RAP ARBORVITAE TIE DISTANCES ARE SHOWN ON SIDE WITH FEATURE MEASURED TO PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE MARKED "LS 48988" PLANS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED WILLOW 09/12/23 SURVEY ISSUED License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 MATCH LINE MA T C H L I N E 9 11 111 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - A L T A Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION PLYMOUTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLTMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 N SCALE IN FEET 0 ## ## ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY (SE CORNER) 4 OF 5 SITE CHANKAHDA TRL CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y MATCH LINE (S e e S h e e t 5 o f 5 S h e e t s ) 11 14 11 12 9 11 SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 3. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 4. Tree diameters shown hereon are measured at breast height. 5. See sheet 1 for ALTA Notes and utility elevations. See sheets 2, 3 and 5 for existing conditions. SURVEY LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE YARD LIGHT CULVERT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAILBOX ELM BOXELDER FIR LOCUST OAK PINE SPRUCE CEDAR COTTONWOOD MAPLE WALNUT CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE MISC FRUIT SOIL BORING ELEV @ THRESHOLD ROOF DRAIN TREE LINE CLEANOUT CURB STOP OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE FLARED END SECTION TOP OF CURB SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON SET NAIL FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND FLAG TOP NUT HYDRANT WATER LINE SERVICE CLEANOUT AREA DRAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM SPIGOT ASH RETAINING WALL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE PIPE, MARKED "LS 12294" WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENV. SERVICES ON AUGUST 10, 2023 MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON ACCESS POST RIP-RAP ARBORVITAE TIE DISTANCES ARE SHOWN ON SIDE WITH FEATURE MEASURED TO PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE MARKED "LS 48988" PLANS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED WILLOW 09/12/23 SURVEY ISSUED License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 16 MA T C H L I N E (See Sheet 3 of 5 Sheets) 112 LOUCKS W: \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 6 6 1 \ C A D D D A T A \ S U R V E Y \ _ d w g S h e e t F i l e s \ 2 2 6 6 1 - A L T A Pl o t t e d : 0 9 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 6 P M 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD QUALIFICATION PLYMOUTH EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 17510, 17800 & 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL PLTMOUTH MN, 55446 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 7015 20TH AVENUE CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 N SCALE IN FEET 0 ## ## ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY (SW CORNER) 5 OF 5 SITE CHANKAHDA TRL CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF PLYMOUTH MA P L E G R O V E P K W Y MATCH LINE (S e e S h e e t 4 o f 5 S h e e t s ) 13 SURVEY REPORT 1. The Surveyor was not provided utility easement documents for the subject property except for those shown on the Survey. 2. The bearings for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD 83 (1986 Adjust). 3. Benchmark: MnDOT 2722Z In Hamel, in the southwest corner of Railroad Bridge No. 5847 over TH 55; 0.2 mile southeast along TH 55 from junction of TH 55 and CR 101 Elevation = 992.08 feet (NGVD29) Site Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located 370± north of Chankahda Trail on west side of Maple Grove Blvd., as shown hereon. Elevation = 934.24 feet (NGVD29) 4. Tree diameters shown hereon are measured at breast height. 5. See sheet 1 for ALTA Notes and utility elevations. See sheets 2 through 4 for existing conditions. SURVEY LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CATCH BASIN CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER HAND HOLE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE YARD LIGHT CULVERT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAILBOX ELM BOXELDER FIR LOCUST OAK PINE SPRUCE CEDAR COTTONWOOD MAPLE WALNUT CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE MISC FRUIT SOIL BORING ELEV @ THRESHOLD ROOF DRAIN TREE LINE CLEANOUT CURB STOP OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE FLARED END SECTION TOP OF CURB SET 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON SET NAIL FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT WETLAND FLAG TOP NUT HYDRANT WATER LINE SERVICE CLEANOUT AREA DRAIN CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE 1 SCHEDULE B II ITEM SPIGOT ASH RETAINING WALL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE PIPE, MARKED "LS 12294" WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY KJOLHAUG ENV. SERVICES ON AUGUST 10, 2023 MAPPED STORM SEWER MAPPED SANITARY SEWER MAPPED WATERMAIN INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON ACCESS POST RIP-RAP ARBORVITAE TIE DISTANCES ARE SHOWN ON SIDE WITH FEATURE MEASURED TO PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE MARKED "LS 48988" PLANS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED WILLOW 09/12/23 SURVEY ISSUED License No. Date I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of VICINITY MAP Field Crew Max L. Stanislowski - PLS Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No. Minnesota. 48988 22661 MLS SFM MLS DJP 09/12/23 15 (See Sheet 2 of 5 Sheets) MA T C H L I N E 113 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Index of Correspondence Received -- Through 11-6-2023 114 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 115 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 116 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 117 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 78 79 77 118 1 Shawn Drill From:Info Sent:Tuesday, August 29, 2023 11:04 AM To:Chloe McGuire Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church KeArra Thompson | Office Support Representative City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763P50955058 -----Original Message----- From: Christa Adamczyk <christa.adamczyk@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 6:58 PM To: Info <info@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church [You don't often get email from christa.adamczyk@icloud.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hello, I’m reaching out regarding the plans for Eagle Brook Church off of Peony/47. Although my family technically lives just over the city lines in Maple Grove, we frequent Plymouth for most things and also attend Eagle Brook at Wayzata High School. We are thrilled with the idea of having a permanent place of worship so close to home. The explosion of residential areas since we moved here in 2014 has caused a lot of excess traffic as well as overloaded the Wayzata schools as I’m sure you’re aware. I don’t know what the alternative would be for that land, but a church community that meets 2 days a week for a few hours seems far less disruptive than 200+ more residential homes. I am aware Eagle Brook has lost space in neighboring communities due to people being concerned about traffic of a “mega church.” Although their views are valid, I believe they are misled and not familiar with the campus approach of Eagle Brook. It is one big church that meets in 10 different locations of varying sizes. We have never had issues coming or going from Wayzata High School, traffic wise; however, there are issues with space inside the building that necessitates a building more suited to the church’s needs hence why we would be overjoyed if this project is approved. I cannot say enough good things about what this church has done for my family as well as all the communities it reaches. I believe Plymouth is a perfect location and will benefit greatly from this church’s permanent residence in the city. Thank you for your time, Christa Adamczyk Maple Grove Resident/Plymouth Consumer 1 119 1 Shawn Drill From:Michael Solovy <mikesolovy@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 29, 2023 11:04 AM To:Chloe McGuire Cc:Webmail - Planning; Kip Berglund; Shawn Drill; Lori Sommers; Dave Callister Subject:Re: Eagle Brook Church Proposal Thank you for the quick and detailed response. Michael Solovy On Aug 29, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Hi Michael – Thanks for reaching out to share your concerns. At this time, we don’t have a formal application for the church, but they have started to work on a traffic study with our engineering staff. I have saved your email in our project file, and if/when they submit for a formal approval, we will include your email in the packet to Planning Commission and Council. If/when it moves forward into a formal application, we would send a notice to neighbors within 750 feet of the site, place signage onsite, and put information about the proposal on our city website. It looks like you live at 6085 Urbandale, which is outside the mailing radius, so please feel free to email Shawn (cc’d) and I with any questions about next steps at any time. We’re here to help. If there’s any additional information I can get you in the meantime, please let me know. Thanks, Chloe Please note: I have removed the Council from this email in order to stay compliant with open meeting law. Chloe McGuire, AICP (she/her) | Planning and Development Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5452 From: Michael Solovy <mikesolovy@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 6:34 PM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov>; Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov>; Kip Berglund <kberglund@plymouthmn.gov>; Shawn Drill <sdrill@plymouthmn.gov>; Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov>; Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov>; Alise You don't often get email from mikesolovy@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 2 120 2 McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Peterson <jpeterson@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov>; Clark Gregor <cgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church Proposal Hi Plymouth Leaders, I am writing to find out where I can learn more about Eagle Brook’s proposal for a mega church in Plymouth, across from Meadow Ridge Elementary school after being denied by a number of neighboring cities. I strongly oppose this potential proposal. The Corcoran location is less than a mile from the current location proposal. If it wasn’t good for them then the current location isn’t much better. There is a large group of residents starting to rise up in opposition on social media. I encourage you to hear the concerns of residents and voters, including the short and long term impact to home prices, environment, traffic and safety. Best, Michael Solovy 121 1 Shawn Drill From:Info Sent:Thursday, August 31, 2023 8:27 AM To:Kelsey Baustian Cc:Shawn Drill Subject:RE: Eagle Brook Church building Kelsey, I have forwarded your message onto Shawn in our Planning Department Thank you, From: Kelsey Baustian <kbbaustian@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 7:59 AM To: Info <info@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church building Good morning! I'm writing in as a concerned resident of Plymouth to express my disappointment in allowing Eagle Brook Church to build a new location in Plymouth. The amount of traffic this would bring into the area is concerning, as is their lack of tax status and their members' almost cult-like devotion to their practices. These are not the kind of people I want gathering in my neighborhood. Please, please, please do not consider their proposal. Thank you. -- Kelsey B. Baustian kbbaustian@gmail.com 612-716-7916 You don't often get email from kbbaustian@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 3 122 1 Shawn Drill From:Shawn Drill Sent:Thursday, August 31, 2023 2:38 PM To:Hongying Cui Cc:Info Subject:RE: Seeking Confirmation and Expressing Concerns About Site Plan for Eagle Brook Church Hello Hongying. To get your address for the record, are you the Hongying Cui that resides at 12135 45th Ave. located south of Schmidt Lake? --If your current address is different, please let me know. Eagle Brook Church has not submitted a development application to the city at this time. Consequently, there is no information/details to share yet. I believe they plan to hold a neighborhood meeting before they apply to the city. They are looking at the property you describe but have not purchased it yet. A traffic study in underway, but not completed yet. You may continue to communicate with me about this in the future. Thanks, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Info <info@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 11:55 AM To: Hongying Cui <hongycui@hotmail.com> Cc: Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: RE: Seeking Confirmation and Expressing Concerns About Site Plan for Eagle Brook Church Hongying, I am copying Shawn Drill, Senior Planner, on this email to notify him of your inquiry. Amy Gottschalk | Office Support Lead-Deputy City Clerk City of Plymouth From: Hongying Cui <hongycui@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 11:52 AM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov>; Info <info@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Seeking Confirmation and Expressing Concerns About Site Plan for Eagle Brook Church To whom it may concern, Some people who received this message don't often get email from hongycui@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important 4 123 2 I am writing to seek information and express my concerns regarding the proposed Eagle Brook Church project at the intersection of Chankahda Trl and Maple Grove Parkway. I recently came across this information on the social media platform Nextdoor and wanted to verify its accuracy with the city. Could you please confirm whether the proposed Eagle Brook Church is under consideration at the mentioned location? As a concerned resident, I would appreciate any details you can share about the current status of the project and the relevant approval process. Additionally, I would like to express my concerns about the potential implications of such a project on our residential area. The fact that a similar plan from the same church was rejected by the City of Corcoran raises questions about the suitability of the current location in Plymouth, especially considering the close proximity to the two proposed locations. Could you please provide information about the appropriate channels and contacts within the City of Plymouth that I can communicate with regarding this matter? I would appreciate any guidance you can provide in this regard. Thanks, Hongying 124 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 7:43 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fw: Eagle Brook Church From: Bill Ward <oufdah@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 11:41 PM To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church [You don't often get email from oufdah@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi Chloe, I live off Dunkirk and Chankada and just heard about the proposed 60,000 sq ft church campus. Plymouth has done a great job with the development in this area to date, successfully balancing between neighborhoods, schools and natural spaces. Eagle Brook should have the campus they would like to build. However, a facility of this size is not complimentary to the wonderful planning that has been accomplished in the area of the proposed site. An appropriate location would be near comparable facilities, such as along highway 55, or 494 for example. I wish you the best in your and the city’s evaluation of the proposal. Regards, Bill Ward 5 125 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:50 AM To:Shawn Drill; Chloe McGuire Subject:FW: Peony and 47 intersection proposal/EBC Attachments:Jeremy Nichols 2023.09.04 EBC Letter.docx FYI Lori Sommers, AICP, LEED AP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5457 - Fax: 763.509.5407 From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:27 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Peony and 47 intersection proposal/EBC FYI Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 www.plymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Jeremy Nichols <jeremy.h.nichols@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 4:01 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Peony and 47 intersection proposal/EBC [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jeremy.h.nichols@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Dear Mayor Wosje and Councilors McGregor, Peterson, Davis, Pointner, Gregor and Willis, Please see my attached Word document, containing input on the recent Eaglebrook Church proposal for the corners of Peony and 47. This is a very similar proposal to one the Corcoran council dealt with in 2020 and the Minnetonka council dealt with in 2022. I was heavily involved in the Corcoran submission because it bordered my property, and am now on the Corcoran city council. The Corcoran council recently adopted code updates to require a sliding scale of buffers for assembly uses in residential zones and established requirements for the kinds of roads assembly uses must access. My hope is to provide you with a primer for the decision you will be asked to make to ensure you understand the 6 126 2 options you have and what distractions you can expect to encounter. Feel free to reach out if you would like to discuss anything further. Best regards, Jeremy Nichols 612-501-3684 127 Dear Major Wosje and City Councilors, I am writing you to share my experience in working with Eagle Brook Church (EBC) at their initial site proposal in Corcoran 1 mile west of the current proposal on Chakhanda Trail and Peony Ln N. I am currently a city councilor in Corcoran. I was elected in 2020 as 3/5 of the Corcoran city council (including its mayor) were defeated at the polls due to widespread issues with zoning and land use, especially with approving incompatible land uses near residential neighborhoods. Having now been on the Corcoran council for 3.5 years, and having worked with staff to draft code updates to better communicate the appropriate scale for assembly uses in residential districts, I wanted to share some perspectives that Plymouth may benefit from. Similar to Plymouth’s work on the Walmart proposal with Four Seasons Mall, you should expect a lot of heated conversations and divergent viewpoints. Also similar to the Walmart proposal, your city has wide latitude to choose how to assess the proposal and its impact on residents. Your code has some very clear language in the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) requirements that you have every right, power and justification to apply, and a good deal of the challenges for those of us in Corcoran was getting the council to understand and apply that authority for the benefit of the city. The Corcoran EBC controversy started with EBC presenting a concept to city council and receiving positive feedback and a welcoming reception from the council. It was ultimately rejected due to the realization that the traffic volume generated would overwhelm the single lane access roads and create too great a burden on residential infrastructure that was not built for surges in traffic flow that such a facility would generate. The decision making process was extremely contentious, with EBC members from all over the metro writing and calling in to try to convince the Corcoran council that the well-meaning impact of the organization meant it should be approved without any regard for the requirements of the CUP. In reality, Corcoran residents found CUP requirements were violated in literally 17 different ways. Having reviewed the new site location, it is similarly at a intersection of single lane roadways in a heavily residential area, with at least 4 established city neighborhoods with only uncontrolled single access points that would be effectively blocked by church entrance and exit traffic when services turn over across the weekend. This is also similar to a site proposed by EBC in Minnetonka, which was rejected by that city. Based on recent EBC sermons and talking points appearing on social media, it appears they are trying to redouble their efforts to overwhelm the people who actually live near their proposed sites with comments about them being “good for the community” or “better than something else going in th e location”. As you begin on this path, I wanted to provide context and advice on the framework to apply: 1.) The choice you will be asked to make is not a vote up or down on churches in general, or this church specifically. It is a vote on whether this proposal meets the criteria of the Plymouth CUP standards which are designed to ensure compatibility for uses outside of the permitted use. If Plymouth wanted all assembly uses to be accepted, the use would be in the permitted use section of the code for the zone. 2.) You will hear a lot of comments about good experiences with this specific church. Most of these people will be from outside of the area affected, but the code is intended to protect the people in the affected area. These arguments are distractions and should not hold sway. 3.) Ensure the traffic study is performed by experts in traffic generation studies using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Method. Also, ensure the traffic study looks at all of the uncontrolled intersections to identify wait times for residents trying to navigate the area during service times. In Corcoran, the traffic study was compromised by being run with a tool intended for generating signal light timing and intersection performance, but the software tool’s manual explicitly stated it was not appropriate for the kind of study needed and performed. The timing based models used in Syncho and Sim Traffic and per the HCM are 3x less accurate than the ICU approach. Because there are at least 5 neighborhoods with only 1 uncontrolled outlet to Peony or Chankahda, you need to understand the timing and frequency of gaps in the traffic during the changeover times between services in order to decide if there is sufficient infrastructure to support the proposed use. (Plymouth code 21015.04 subd. 1 & 2) 128 4.) Scale: You will also hear a lot of comments about churches belonging in neighborhoods. Often, these people will not live in the neighborhoods impacted. This is really a matter of scale, small churches fit in wonderfully, but larger ones with their greater surge traffic fit better in areas with greater road capacity and traffic control. No matter how many police are hired to direct traffic, road capacity remains fixed. Large lots with 750 cars coming and 750 cars going over a 20 minute period are more than single lane roads far from a highway can comfortably accommodate. The importance of scale needs to be communicated- large scale uses require large scale road infrastructure, while smaller scales may not. 5.) Impact on adjacent property: Part of the difficulty with the Corcoran site was that wetlands at the road boundaries pushed the parking and building close to existing residential property. Some homes would have been less than 200 feet from the proposed 10 acre parking lot. This is an artists’ rendition of how that would have fit: 129 This design did not allow adequate screening as even tall trees and berms would not be able to provide an effective visual barrier given the extent of the site. The Plymouth site also has wetland and impermeable C/D soils that will create a need for large of stormwater areas. This could shift the plan toward existing Plymouth homes. Plymouth city code 21015.04 subd. 6 and 11 apply here. 130 6.) Level of discretion: In Corcoran, at the outset of the EBC proposal there was concern that the federal RLUPA law would require the city to agree to essentially any development proposal advanced by a religious nonprofit corporation. This understanding is incorrect. What it must not do is treat the applicant any differently than it would any other applicant. But, the city is able to make judgements, subjectively or objectively, as to the bearing of its ordinance requirements on the application. It does not need to ignore its requirements because of what kind of entity submitted the application. Instead, it has an obligation to balance the interests of existing residents against those of an applicant. If it makes a reasoned decision that promotes public health, safety and welfare, its actions will be sustained. 7.) You will also hear a lot of statements about schools, school traffic, and residential traffic and how there is a school in this area already. Having driven by Meadow Ridge Elementary, even with a comparatively small drop off population there is considerable traffic generated onto a single lane road, and it is a very challenging and dangerous intersection because it is hard to access Chankahda from that parking lot. The EBC parking lot (and traffic volume) will be a factor of 3-4 times Meadow Ridge. While this site may accommodate up to ~100 homes as currently zoned, residential traffic is not subject to the same weekend surges of high intensity use, and residential road networks are already designed for this type and volume of vehicles. You should also keep in mind that you do not have to choose between competing plans- there is only one plan to consider, and your code is well configured to guide you to consider the right factors in making any future decisions. Naturally, this decision is ultimately up to you- you will be the ones who must make the hard calls and decide what is right for Plymouth. My hope is that this framework will help you process the feedback you will receive and make the best choice. Best regards, Jeremy Nichols 131 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:51 AM To:Chloe McGuire; Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church Opposition FYI Lori Sommers, AICP, LEED AP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5457 - Fax: 763.509.5407 From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:43 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Eagle Brook Church Opposition From: Molly Allene <molly.allenew@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 1:03 PM To: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov>; Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Peterson <jpeterson@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Christine Morgan <christine.morgan223@gmail.com> Subject: Eagle Brook Church Opposition Good afternoon, My name is Molly Wierman and I live at 1535 Black Oaks Lane N. I'm writing in firm opposition to the proposed land purchase by Eagle Brook Church ANYWHERE in the town of Plymouth. I have friends who live near their location in Lino Lakes and they tell me the traffic caused by this mega church is a nightmare. We do not need any more traffic issues on this major artery to the suburbs north of us. We also do not need a tax- exempt organization taking up valuable land and resources without giving back to Plymouth via taxes. We know statistically these orgs use more than they give in towns and there are better uses for that land. There are MANY churches within a mile of that land. Our town does not need a mega church added to our population of non-taxed entities clogging up traffic and using up resources our tax dollars pay for. Please vote No against this land grab. Thank you, Molly Wierman Christine Morgan Some people who received this message don't often get email from molly.allenew@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 7 132 2 Gabriel Bunch 1535 Black Oaks Lane N. 133 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:52 AM To:Shawn Drill; Chloe McGuire Subject:FW: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church FYI Lori Sommers, AICP, LEED AP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5457 - Fax: 763.509.5407 From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:44 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church From: Neela Saikrishnan <neelakantan@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:16 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church Hello, I have been a Plymouth resident for 10 years, and live off Chankhada Trail. Over this time, I have steadily watched as acres of green space have been built over, primarily for residential developments. The latest attempt to convert farmland off Chankhada Trail for a megachurch only takes this one step further. I became aware of an attempt by Eagle Brook Church to build a megachurch across from the Meadow Ridge Elementary School. I am shocked at the attempt by this organization to plant such a large structure, causing significant challenges with traffic and environmental issues. As you may be aware, a similar proposal was voted down by Corcoran, about a mile west of the proposed site for these exact reasons. Similarly, Minnetonka also voted down a proposal for a megachurch. There is no reason that Plymouth as to bear the brunt of this development, when better sense prevailed in our neighbouring cities. A megachurch at this location is unsuitable, I implore and strongly encourage you to vote down this proposal when it comes to your attention. Thank you Neela Saikrishnan -- Some people who received this message don't often get email from neelakantan@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 8 134 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 10:02 AM To:Chris Kellett Subject:RE: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Hi Chris – What’s your address? I’ll add this to our records. Thanks, Chloe Chloe McGuire, AICP (she/her) | Planning and Development Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5452 Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Chris Kellett <chriskellett@ymail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 9:25 AM To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Hi Chloe! I’m a Plymouth resident who lives just down the road in the Serenity on the Greenway neighborhood from the proposed Eagle Brook Church development, and wanted to reach out with my two cents. Our family are members of the church, and we’ve been waiting years for an opportunity for land like this. Just because we’ve been waiting however, doesn’t mean the opportunity is a given, and I can sense that in the recent Fox9 article. With that said, one voice from the article that states the land should be preserved as well as local roads and traffic being issues for this development. Where I am at a loss with these two concerns is that the very land this persons home sits on, who assumably lives near by, was itself developed as has most farmland in Plymouth. If the owner of the land doesn’t sell to Eagle Brook - we can likely bet our last dollar they’ll sell to a residential development. In that case, the traffic with homes will be coming and going day in and day out versus mostly on the weekends. It’s easy to oppose what many would consider a “mega church”, however when the onion is peeled back I’m guessing there will be less daily traffic and many local blessings from a church that gives back tremendously to its community. Hoping a bit of support helps, and THANK YOU for all you do for our community! You don't often get email from chriskellett@ymail.com. Learn why this is important 9 135 2 Chris Kellett Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 136 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, September 7, 2023 1:44 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: New development FYI From: Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 11:52 AM To: Michael Thompson <mthompson@plymouthmn.gov>; Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Re: New development Thank you! I appreciate your help!! Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get Outlook for Android From: Michael Thompson <mthompson@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 11:46:21 AM To: Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov>; Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: RE: New development Hi Julie, There are no plans that I am aware that MnDOT is considering at the Fish Lake interchange. Any proposed developments such as Prudential would have a negligible impact on 494. The local roads have been studied with the EAW process and was shown to work fine with a full build out of the site. The engineering team reviews all proposals to ensure traffic flow works properly. You can certainly refer this resident to me if he wants to talk in any more detail. Michael Thompson, P.E. | Public Works Director From: Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 7:00 PM To: Michael Thompson <mthompson@plymouthmn.gov>; Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Fwd: New development Hi Micheal, I am not aware of conversations on the road plans, can you help me? Thanks, Julie Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get Outlook for Android 10 137 2 From: bradysather@aol.com <bradysather@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 6:46:14 PM To: Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: New development Council member Julie, I have recently heard about 2 major developments that will be increasing traffic on 494 during and after construction and therefore Northwest Blvd and local roads during rush hour, it will increase the already loud road noise for and particulate matter. I heard that Eagle Brook first wanted to build in Minnetonka but the people of the city said "no". Therefore, they are looking at property near Wayzata High School. Then there is the proposed development of the Prudential property that will significantly increase traffic in the Fish Lake interchange and the surrounding area. I have heard talk through the years of constructing a road to the west of 494 much like 610 that runs north of 694. I would like to know of any plans of developing a western bypass of the Fish Lake interchange if these two projects are seriously considered. Is there an upcoming community meeting about these 3 possible developments? Thank you, S. Brady Sather You don't often get email from bradysather@aol.com. Learn why this is important 138 1 Shawn Drill From:Webmail - Planning Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 8:11 AM To:Chloe McGuire Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church VOTE NO !! Jennifer Harmer | Permit Technician City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.plymouthmn.gov%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cc mcguire%40plymouthmn.gov%7C85edb8bd52be4795b9c208dbb2c881f2%7Cbf6d566f483b411ca4c654bc2edc438b%7C 0%7C0%7C638300346485728033%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1 haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HhGM0VMpvHsCE3hacsyABn89DwZVFZXpSnrtLPoI4hE%3D&res erved=0 -----Original Message----- From: Kelly Klick <kklick16@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2023 7:36 PM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church VOTE NO !! [You don't often get email from kklick16@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi there I am a Plymouth Tax Payer and I DONT WANT THIS CHURCH to be built on old County Road 47!! Too much traffic and congestion. This is not a place for this huge church and parking ramp!! Tell them to go find another area just like Minnetonka and Corcoran did!! Kelly Klick 13805 54th Ave No Plymouth Sent from my iPhone 11 139 1 Shawn Drill From:Liz Robley <robley.liz@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 12:32 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Yes to EBC building [You don't often get email from robley.liz@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hello - we are emailing in support of building the new church(Eagle Brook) in Plymouth off of hwy 47 (Chankadha) and peony. We have lived not too far from the site for 25 years and we see it as a positive addition to our community. Please grant any necessary approvals to move forward with plans to develop the land with the proposed church construction. Thank you, Liz & Craig Robley 18225 48th Ave N Plymouth Sent from my iPhone 12 140 1 Shawn Drill From:Erika Adams <erikaadams1@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 12:01 PM To:Webmail - Planning; Chloe McGuire; Kip Berglund; Shawn Drill; Lori Sommers Subject:No EBC! I urge you all to deny Eagle Brook Church from building in Plymouth. A mega-church is the last thing we need in the location they have proposed, especially one that is discriminatory and doesn't pay taxes. I would love to see more affordable housing or green space. Further, churches like this have been shown to reduce the value around them in the past. Do you think all those that bought the new houses around where this would go will be ok with that? Let's take a stand, just like Minnetonka and Corcoran did and leave them to find a different spot. Thanks, Erika Adams You don't often get email from erikaadams1@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 13 141 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:49 AM To:Chloe McGuire; Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Cancel Request - Eagle Brook Project (Plymouth) FYI From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:40 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Cancel Request - Eagle Brook Project (Plymouth) FYI From: Ben Steger <benjaminsteger22@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:39 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Cancel Request - Eagle Brook Project (Plymouth) Hello, I wanted to reach out to share some concerns with you that I have regarding the Eagle Brook project in northwest Plymouth (north of Meadow Ridge, west of Peony/Maple Grove Pkwy). As a property owner, tax payer, and resident in the directly adjacent neighborhood to this section of land, I feel that the project poses a number of risks and adverse impacts to my family and neighbors that I would like to avoid! I believe that the rezoning and development of the large Eagle Brook facility in this area will lead to: 1) increased traffic surges and delays - Peony Ln is a critical access route with few convenient alternatives 2) increase risk of vehicle collisions and personal injury (many children and adults run/bike along Peony) 3) increase light/noise pollution 4) decrease value of neighboring properties I recognize the likelihood that the land will be developed, and would much prefer the land be used for parks and recreation, single family housing, or educational facilities, any of which would be better suited for this community than a megachurch. Myself and my neighbors are proud to be members of this community and are grateful to be able to share our voice with you. Thank you for all you do for the city of Plymouth! Ben Steger 6251 Queensland Lane N Some people who received this message don't often get email from benjaminsteger22@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 14 142 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:18 AM To:Chloe McGuire; Shawn Drill Subject:FW: No to Proposed Location for Eagle Brook. FYI -----Original Message----- From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:02 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: No to Proposed Location for Eagle Brook. Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 wwwwplymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life -----Original Message----- From: John Evans <evans.johnrichard@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:49 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: No to Proposed Location for Eagle Brook. [Some people who received this message don't often get email from evans.johnrichard@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] I am a Plymouth resident that lives by the proposed location for Eagle Brook Church. I urge you to please vote no to the current proposed location for Eagle Brook Church. In other cities, they operate in commercial and industrial areas. I support the church wanting to find a permanent home in Plymouth, but please follow the lead of Minnetonka and Corcoran, who decided that residential neighborhoods are not the best locations for a facility like this. 15 143 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:19 AM To:Chloe McGuire; Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Concern over EBC Proposed Development FYI -----Original Message----- From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:02 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Concern over EBC Proposed Development Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 wwwwplymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life -----Original Message----- From: Rachel Raiola <rar.dsouza@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:52 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Concern over EBC Proposed Development [Some people who received this message don't often get email from rar.dsouza@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Good morning, My name is Rachel and I am emailing to express my concern and opposition over the proposed development of EagleBrook Church. My family and I live at 18516 58th pl n in Plymouth, a neighborhood next to Meadow Ridge Elementary. We are VERY concerned about the proposed development causing increased traffic, not only on Sunday’s but any other day of the week the church may hold an event, or rent out to other groups. We used to live in Eden Prairie next to Grace Church and learned quickly it was not just Sunday service traffic congestion. It’s also Wednesday night youth groups, holiday concerts, graduations etc. Our fear is this will cause increased traffic on 47/peony as well as Troy Ln our major cross street. Troy is very curvy and people already speed up and down the hill, there are no sidewalks near the barn and those commuting to the church would use that road as a cut through. This could cause congestion as well as additional safety concerns. 16 144 2 This is a HORRIBLE location for a mega church, it is a neighborhood. We do NOT want this in our neighborhood. They need to find a more commercial location. Thank you, Rachel D’Souza 145 1 Shawn Drill From:Christina Lindholm <christinajlindholm@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:29 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Oppose Eagle Brook Church Hello, I live in the neighborhood directly behind where this church would be off of fieldstone. 6338 Ranier Ln N, Maple Grove, MN 55311 On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, 11:59 AM Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Christina, what is your address, so we have it for the record? Thanks, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Christina Lindholm <christinajlindholm@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:47 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Oppose Eagle Brook Church Hello, I am writing today to express concerns over the mega church trying to come into our residential area. My entire neighborhood is against this. We do not want that massive industrial building and the traffic to come with in our nice residential area. If something must be built in the area we would all prefer it to be something to benefit our community like a few more houses, a park, or perhaps a middle school that we so badly need. Please do not let them into our residential part of our community. There are so many other places that they could build closer to 55 where that traffic is common. Thanks for caring. Christina Lindholm 612-986-4918 Some people who received this message don't often get email from christinajlindholm@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 17 146 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:08 PM To:Lori Sommers Subject:FW: Yes to EBC From: James Imsdahl <james.imsdahl@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:01 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Yes to EBC Hello, I'm a Plymouth resident of 2 years. I love Plymouth and the people. I've also been attending EBC for 10 years and it's an organization that truly cares about serving people of the community. I believe EBC in Plymouth would be a positive for the city just as it's been for Lino Lakes. I have a good friend who lived half mile from the Lino location and had reservations about a church going up down the road from his home however after it was built the way the services times are staggered the traffic wasn't bad as he imagined it might be. Thank you for your time, Jim Imsdahl Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Some people who received this message don't often get email from james.imsdahl@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 18 147 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:12 PM To:Lori Sommers Subject:FW: Please Support Eagle Brook Church -----Original Message----- From: Melissa Imsdahl <melimsdahl@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:11 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov>; Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Please Support Eagle Brook Church [Some people who received this message don't often get email from melimsdahl@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hello! I am writing to ask that you support Eagle Brook Church in building a campus in Plymouth. I have been a member of EBC for more than a decade and am currently a Plymouth resident that volunteers in their kids Sunday morning services. EBC is an amazing partner to have in our community. The church and leadership team truly cares about the community they serve. I have two kids in the Wayzata public schools and they are looking for a church that they can invite friends to as well as meet new friends from their community. We have been attending the Wayzata campus since it opened and have not seen any detrimental impact on the neighbors or neighborhood when it comes to traffic on Sunday mornings. I truly believe this will be a blessing to our community. Thank you for your support! Mel Imsdahl Sent from my iPhone 19 148 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:35 AM To:Shawn Drill; Chloe McGuire Subject:FW: Opposition to Eagle Book FYI From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:36 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Opposition to Eagle Book From: Lauren Schnobrich <Lauren@SchnobrichLaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:15 AM To: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: dtschnobs12@gmail.com Subject: Opposition to Eagle Book Hi Ms. McGregor: My husband and two daughters live near Meadow Ridge Elementary Schools. I am writing to express my opposition to the Eagle Brook church as my family (nor any of my neighbors that I have encountered) want Eagle Brook building a 70,000 square foot building in a residential neighborhood. This is an inappropriate location for any facility of this size. I am concerned about a number of things including, but not limited to: increased traffic; the safety concerns and environmental concerns associated with increased traffic; noise and light concerns; the two story building being an eyesore; and general concerns about a tax free organization being allowed to purchase this volume of land. Having Eagle Brook in our neighborbood would negatively impact our quality of life (and likely home values). I am glad to hear Eagle Brook has been turned away in Corcoran and Minnetonka for similar reasons. We moved into this neighborhood so we would have the experience of a safe and peaceful residential neighborhood. Allowing Eagle Brook in the community would be in direct opposition to the wishes of the residents. I appreciate you taking this feedback into consideration. Sincerely, Lauren Lauren Schnobrich, Attorney 763-299-7830 | lauren@schnobrichlaw.com Some people who received this message don't often get email from lauren@schnobrichlaw.com. Learn why this is important 20 149 1 Shawn Drill From:Lori Sommers Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:35 AM To:Chloe McGuire; Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church FYI From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:37 AM To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Eagle Brook Church Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 www.plymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Becky McBreen <beckymuyres@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:26 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church Good morning, I am writing in opposition of Eagle Brook Church building a 'church' in a residential neighborhood in our wonderful city. Please follow Corcoran and Minnetonka by not allowing this atrocity to plague that neighborhood. It would be an embarrassment to our city to allow them to build here - especially considering they are a tax-exempt organization and would not contribute financially to our community. And thank you for finally tearing down the Four Seasons Mall, my neighborhood really appreciates it. Thank you, Becky McBreen 3635 Trenton Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55441 Some people who received this message don't often get email from beckymuyres@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 21 150 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 1:57 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Chankahda Trail: Historical markers and more Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 www.plymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 1:31 PM To: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Fwd: Chankahda Trail: Historical markers and more Audrey sent to individual council members so making sure you see this. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Audrey Britton <audreybritton@outlook.com> Date: September 11, 2023 at 1:41:18 PM CDT To: Clark Gregor <cgregor@plymouthmn.gov>, Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov>, Julie Peterson <jpeterson@plymouthmn.gov>, Jim Willis <jwillis@plymouthmn.gov>, Jim Davis <jdavis@plymouthmn.gov>, Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov>, Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Chankahda Trail: Historical markers and more We are thrilled Plymouth is home to Chankahda Trail. The night we learned the name of the road, made me and many others proud of our city and proud of our city council for their representation. It remains a point of pride in our city. We understand the city is planning sidewalks, bike lanes and safety measures. Wonderful! We are also requesting historical markers and protections for nearby wetlands and open space. I’ve inquired about this previously but do not believe I’ve made a written request. 22 151 2 Doing so would honor the original inhabitants who lived in Minnesota for thousands of years before being forcibly removed in 1862. (I learned last weekend that Minnesota is home to the oldest known Dakota person. Her remains are 15,000 years old.) There is a large parcel of land along Chankahda Trail. Of course a large park with walking/bike trails would be wonderful but, perhaps, not possible. Perhaps senior homes and affordable housing that embraces open spaces and parks. It’s a great opportunity to plant trees, too. I’m not a planner, of course but can imagine the entire area from the beginning to the end of “the trail” becoming something Plymouth could be known for and Plymouth residents proud of. Commercial use, large buildings… seem like such a misfit for Chankahda Trail, especially as the city considers bike trails and paths. It’s unfortunate timing that I’ve recently learned of plans for a large church on the open land along Chankahda Trail. While this church may or may not be a good fit for Plymouth and Plymouth’s strategic plan, it would be heartbreaking to see it developed along Chankahda Trail when it is antithetical to the ways of the Dakota people. Thank you for all your work, Audrey -Audrey Britton 12500 53rd Ave North Plymouth MN 55442 152 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:01 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: No Eaglebrook Mega Church in Plymouth From: Shan Wan <shan.wan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:00 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: No Eaglebrook Mega Church in Plymouth Hi, Plymouth City leaders, As a Plymouth resident living close to Chakahandra Trail, I and my family are extremely concerned about the potential build of Eagle Brook Church off Chankahda Trail. A Mega Church doesn't belong to this quiet residential area. The traffic, noise, negative impact to the wetland and environment are dangerous to the community- not mentioning it significantly drags down the property value of all the adjacent housing. We moved to Plymouth in 2018, and really enjoyed the beautiful neighbourhood Plymouth provides. If this Mega church is built, we will definitely sell our house and move to another area. So please help us to maintain our great community and block the EBC plan. Thank you for listening to our concerns, thousands of neighbours feel the same way. Shan Wan Some people who received this message don't often get email from shan.wan@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 23 153 1 Shawn Drill From:PAUL R <SATHERPR@msn.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:06 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Mega church 17809 70th Place No Maple Grove MN 55311 Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 12, 2023, at 1:48 PM, Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: > > What is your address, so we have it for the record? --Also, they will not be proposing an outside amphitheater. Thanks, > > Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner > City of Plymouth, MN > Phone: 763P50955456 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:42 AM > To: Lori Sommers <lsommers@plymouthmn.gov> > Subject: FW: Mega church > > > -----Original Message----- > From: PAUL R <satherpr@msn.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:40 AM > To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> > Subject: Mega church > > [Some people who received this message don't often get email from satherpr@msn.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > I have nothing against building a new church of a reasonable size. This proposed mega church is way to large and will cause a multitude of traffic and other problems. This proposal for an outside amphitheater is crazy. Who wants to be forced to listen to the music or whatever they air. It's like if your neighbor turned his classical music way up but you like country or some other music. Stop or reduce the size of this church. > > Sent from my iPhone 24 154 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:54 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church proposal in Plymouth From: Phil Hoch <philhoch26@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:42 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church proposal in Plymouth Hello, I am writing to express my concerns over the Eagle Brook Church plan to build in NW Plymouth. I live nearby in the Westin Ridge neighborhood, and can only see the downside in this proposal. 1. There will be severe traffic jams every weekend. Even in smaller churches like St. Philip the Deacon on Hwy. 6, the police need to be there to manage the flow. And that church is MUCH smaller than the proposed plan for EB. This will be crazy, even if they went with a smaller footprint. 2. Safety of residents will be compromised because of the influx of traffic. What is currently a nice walking/biking path along Chankhada Trail will become a game of Frogger for families to dodge cars. Meadow Ridge Elementary is right across the street. I'm sure EB will respond that services are on weekends, but mega churches like that have programming throughout the week, putting more people at risk of traffic incidents on most days. 3. Adding a mega church "holding company" will hurt existing churches, pulling members from the smaller ones. Think of this like a Wal-Mart coming into a small town and taking business away from established small business. People are drawn to the next shiny object. When they realize it is just a money making business, will they stay? 4. I get that the land on which they want to build won't remain a field forever, and our view will be ruined by something or another, but having a mega church doesn't solve any problems. It just adds a contentious new neighbor that will divide the community. People are very heated over this proposal, and allowing this to pass will degrade the quality of life in Plymouth. Thank you, Phil Hoch 612-232-1901 Some people who received this message don't often get email from philhoch26@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 25 155 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 4:03 PM To:Webmail - Planning; mike.louis@protonmail.com Cc:Shawn Drill Subject:RE: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Inquiry via Website Hi Mike – Thanks for your kind email. You are correct that no formal development plans have been filed/applied for yet. That being said, yes, we do have a traffic study application. The traffic study is owned by the city (we are the “applicant”) and paid for by the developer, in this case, Eagle Brook Church. We take an escrow for this of $12,500 which is the typical cost for this. If the costs go over, the developer (EBC) would pay the overage. We don’t have the study yet, so I can’t tell you the full amount or any posted charges at this point, but I hope that’s helpful information. Please let me know if we can get you anything else! Thanks, Chloe Chloe McGuire, AICP (she/her) | Planning and Development Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5452 From: Mike Louis <mike.louis@protonmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 2:54 PM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Inquiry via Website Hello, By way of introduction, I am a resident of Plymouth, at 4565 Glacier Lane North. First, let me say that I’m sorry that your department is going to get caught up in this mess. I also realize that, as far as I know, nothing has been filed with the city for the proposed development of Eagle Brook Church near Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway. However, I do have a few questions. Eagle Brook Chruch Sr. Pastor Mike Emmert, stated to KSTP on Sunday that they (EBC) were already working with the city and the city was doing a comprehensive traffic study that EBC would pay for. Please share with me the details of the work that the city is doing or planning to do and what communications have occurred with EBC, if there have been any. As things stand right now, I am opposed to the building of this church because in part I believe that they will grow in size and add a significant amount of unplanned for traffic onto Chankahda trail and in the neighborhoods nearby. You don't often get email from mike.louis@protonmail.com. Learn why this is important 26 156 2 Best Regards, Mike Louis 4565 Glacier Lane N Sent from Proton Mail for iOS 157 1 Shawn Drill From:Molly.Kramer <Molly.Kramer@target.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 1:33 PM To:Chloe McGuire; Kip Berglund; Shawn Drill; Lori Sommers Cc:Molly.Kramer Subject:EBC Opposition Dear Members of Plymouth Planning, I hope this letter finds you well. I want to begin by expressing my deep appreciation for the hard work and dedication you all put into making our community a better place. I am writing to share some concerns and sentiments regarding a matter that has recently come to my attention—the potential construction of an Eagle Brook Mega Church on Maple Grove Parkway and Chankahda Trail. Approximately two weeks ago, I became aware of discussions surrounding this project, even though no formal proposal has been submitted as of yet. Despite the absence of any concrete plans, I feel compelled to share my apprehensions with you proactively. A decade ago, when I first made my home in this area, it was evident that our community was flourishing at a rapid pace. It was, and still is, a beautiful place that offers the convenience of accessibility to downtown while maintaining a cherished small-town atmosphere. At that time, the land that now houses Meadow Ridge Elementary School was dotted with farm fields. We understood that development was inevitable, but we took solace in knowing that the comprehensive plan designated this area for residential use. However, my feelings of comfort were shaken approximately two weeks ago when I saw various communications, media coverage, and announcements from Eagle Brook Church that seemed to suggest they were poised to become our new neighbors. While I understand that no official proposals or approvals have been made, the sudden prospect of a 70,000 sq ft building and an 180,000 sq ft parking lot next to my home was jarring. My expectations were for residential neighbors who would contribute to the community in ways similar to our existing residents. The thought of such a substantial departure from the comprehensive plan deeply concerns me, as it could significantly affect the enjoyment and use of our home. Moreover, I worry about the potential impact on property values due to the size of the building, parking lot, and increased traffic. Beyond the incongruence of a mega-church amidst our residential neighborhoods, my concerns extend to the issue of traffic. Currently, the Church draws around 1,200 in-person attendees on Sundays. The pastor has hinted at the possibility of doubling or even tripling this number with a permanent site. The prospect of 3,600 people trying to access the site on a Sunday morning raises serious concerns about traffic congestion. I am also troubled by the potential for events and services on Wednesdays and Saturdays, as seen at other Eagle Brook campuses. This could lead to additional Some people who received this message don't often get email from molly.kramer@target.com. Learn why this is important 27 158 2 traffic challenges, not only at the church's entrance/exit but also in adjacent neighborhoods as commuters seek alternate routes to avoid congestion on Maple Grove Parkway. Fieldstone Blvd and Elm Rd, quiet roadways in neighboring areas, may experience increased traffic as people detour to bypass delays near the Church. Additionally, the impact on CR 47 and CR 101, which are already busy, is worrisome with the possibility of tripled attendance. In addition to zoning, building size, and traffic, I also have concerns about the proposed parking lot. The presence of parking lots on multiple sides of the building could result in unwanted light pollution in adjacent neighborhoods. For safety reasons, well-lit parking lots can be expected, and with our home facing one of these proposed lots, it may affect the tranquility of our surroundings. In conclusion, I kindly urge you to consider the potential consequences of allowing Eagle Brook Church to move forward with their proposal. Our existing community's character, traffic patterns, and the quality of life for residents like myself hang in the balance. Your thoughtful consideration of these concerns would mean a great deal to our community. With heartfelt regards, Molly Kramer 17865 62nd Ave N 159 1 Shawn Drill From:Melissa Kollasch <kollaschmelissa@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:43 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Eaglebrook Church 17095 72nd Ave N, Maple Grove On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 8:24 AM Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: What is your address, so we have it for the record? Thanks, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Melissa Kollasch <kollaschmelissa@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 4:52 PM To: Grant Fernelius <gfernelius@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eaglebrook Church Hi Me. Fernelius- I am writing to express my concern over the proposed Eaglebrook church site near my home. The increase traffic and likely decrease in property values are a big concern for me. I also would rather we used the land for something that would create a tax revenue stream like housing or business development rather than bring in a church that doesn’t provide and tax revenue and doesn’t believe in the diversity, equity, and inclusion that this city believes in. I would strongly recommend you not move forward with this proposal as it would cause much more harm to the community that good. Sincerely, Melissa Kollasch You don't often get email from kollaschmelissa@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 28 160 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Friday, September 1, 2023 9:10 AM To:Brian Mrugala Cc:Shawn Drill Subject:RE: Eagle Brook Church Proposal Hi Brian – There is no formal proposal at this time. Thanks for your comments. Thanks, Chloe Chloe McGuire, AICP (she/her) | Planning and Development Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5452 Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Brian Mrugala <bmrugala70@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 9:06 AM To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church Proposal Hi Chloe, As a member of Eagle Brook Church who attends at Wayzata High School, I fully support the proposal to build a church on the site in Plymouth. I hope the proposal receives quick city approval at the Planning Commission And City Council meetings. Thank you. Brian Mrugala You don't often get email from bmrugala70@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 29 161 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, August 31, 2023 8:56 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church on Chankandah From: Webmail - Planning <Planning@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 8:17 AM To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: FW: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church on Chankandah Jennifer Harmer | Permit Technician City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 www.plymouthmn.gov From: Natalya Mudry <natalyamarion@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 7:24 PM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church on Chankandah Hello City of Plymouth, I’m just writing to voice my opinion on the potential build of Eagle Brook Church on Chankandah Trail and Maple Grove Parkway. I strongly oppose this consideration as it will be incredibly disruptive to the area - traffic, noise, light. I live in a nearby subdivision, Bonaire, and it’s already hard enough as it is to take a left turn onto Maple Grove Parkway in the direction of the fire station. I hear people say “it’ll only be on Sundays”, but I truly do not believe a brand new beautiful church facility will only be used one day per week - it will be several days per week! With the design of one entry/exit to this facility, there will be a considerable disruption to traffic patterns in both directions. I think it’s great that Eagle Brook Church operates out of Wayzata High School right now! Let’s keep using that big beautiful building we pay taxes on. One more opinion I have is “Doesn’t this area have enough freakin churches?” I want to know what the churches per capita are in this area. Holy moly. Thank you, Natalya Mudry Sent from my iPhone You don't often get email from natalyamarion@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 30 162 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 1:54 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church FYI From: Shelby Byron <sjkamrowski@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:50 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Fwd: Eagle Brook Church Hello, I'm writing today to express my opposition to the building of Eagle Brook Church on Chankahda Trail. I live off Chankahda Trail and feel this proposed building will negatively impact my daily life and the surrounding community. Simply, the proposed church location is too residential and the area is not suitable for a church that will bring that volume of people. The residents of Plymouth do not want a mega church in their residential community. Best, Shelby Byron Some people who received this message don't often get email from sjkamrowski@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 31 163 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:10 PM To:Lori Sommers Subject:FW: Concern on Eaglebrook mega church plan From: Tao Jin <jintao99g@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:04 PM To: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Concern on Eaglebrook mega church plan Dear Mrs. McGregor, My name is Tao Jin, and I reside on 62nd Ave N in Maple Grove, adjacent to the recently acquired farm land by Eaglebrook church. I wish to express my profound concerns regarding the recent news indicating Eaglebrook church's intention to construct a mega-sized church within our well-established, low-density residential community. To clarify, I hold no opposition to religious institutions, my children attend after-school programs at Plymouth Covenant Church, and I greatly appreciate the services they provide for our community. However, it appears only reasonable that any new construction should harmonize with the existing surroundings, maintaining a sense of balance. Here are my thoughts on this matter: 1. A development of such considerable size could potentially compromise the natural beauty of our area. It threatens to diminish the green vistas we currently enjoy from our windows and may force the natural "residents" (wildlife) to seek refuge elsewhere. 2. The nearby schools, particularly Wayzata High School, already contribute to challenging traffic conditions during weekdays. The addition of a mega church would undoubtedly exacerbate traffic congestion during both weekdays and weekends. 3. This plot of land, spanning over 50 acres, is the largest space within a residential neighborhood predominantly characterized by single-family homes. A 70,000 sqft church, along with a matching parking lot, seems incongruous with the character of our community. Homeowners in this area made their purchases with the understanding that it would remain a low-density residential zone. Any significant change to this status quo could adversely affect the property values of nearby homes. 4. An examination of Eaglebrook's current ten locations reveals three distinct categories: a. Those situated in business or mixed-use zones: Anoka, Apple Valley, Blaine, Ham Lake, Rochester, Spring Lake. b. Those in residential zones but of considerably smaller size: Maple Wood. c. Those surrounded by farmlands: Lino Lake, White Bear Lake, Woodbury. Some people who received this message don't often get email from jintao99g@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 32 164 2 It is perplexing why Eaglebrook, which has adhered to these categories thus far, now wishes to build a mega-sized church within the heart of a residential area, deviating from its traditional approach. 5. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that Eaglebrook's development plans have been rejected twice by the cities of Corcoran and Minnetonka. The persistence in presenting the same plan to the City of Plymouth suggests questionable judgment and a lack of foresight on the part of the church leadership. In summary, I am not opposed to the church's expansion but urge careful consideration of the impact such a significant development may have on our cherished community. It is essential to preserve the harmony, natural beauty, and property values that attracted us to this neighborhood in the first place. Best regards, Tao news source: https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/neighbors-in-plymouth-concerned-over-possible-70000- square-foot-church/ 165 1 Shawn Drill From:Lynette H <hauxlj@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:55 PM To:Chloe McGuire Subject:Eaglebrook church [You don't often get email from hauxlj@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hello Chloe, Just wanted to say, our family lives in Bonaire and we are absolutely for, the building of the Eaglebrook Church nearby. Thanks for your hard work! Lynette Haux 33 166 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 2:59 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Please support Eaglebrook Church location in Plymouth From: nanpi@comcast.net <nanpi@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 2:42 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Please support Eaglebrook Church location in Plymouth Dear Plymouth City Council members: I am shocked by the nega) vity surrounding the poten) al site for a permanent Eaglebrook Church loca) on for the Northwest metro. I have a- ended the temporary church loca) on in Wayzata High School for quite some ) me, and I know establishing permanent roots could be a force for so much good in the community. Full disclosure: I am not a Plymouth resident, but live in the Maple Grove neighborhood near Church of the Open Door, which in years past housed a very large congrega) on. Although traffic in our neighborhood was impacted Sunday morning by a- endees arriving for and depar) ng from services, the rest of the week there was very li- le impact. The increased traffic argument just doesn’t seem to carry much weight for me. In addi) on, I have witnessed Eaglebrook church’s heart to reach and be a posi) ve force in the communi) es where each campus is opera) ng, and I know the building would be used for good (divorce care, addic) on support groups, youth group gatherings to name a few). If the church, which I assume would preserve as much of the site’s natural beauty as possible, does not build, this area will likely end up in the hands of housing developers yet again. I’m not sure how that would preserve the natural beauty of the neighborhood, and I am certain it would magnify traffic in the neighborhood exponen) ally -- every day of the week. Please consider the voices of the less vocal who are very much in favor of welcoming an Eaglebrook church campus at the proposed Plymouth loca) on. Respec>ully, Nancy Pias Some people who received this message don't often get email from nanpi@comcast.net. Learn why this is important 34 167 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:11 PM To:Lori Sommers Subject:FW: Opposition to EBS mega complex From: Randy Lewis <rlewis813@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:08 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to EBS mega complex Hello, I'm writing to express my concern with the anticipated proposal EBC is making for the lot on Chankada Drive. Let me start by saying, I'm not opposed to churches or organized religion in any way. They are both important and beneficial to our society in many ways. However, what EBC is proposing is a grand excess for the area proposed. a 70,000 sq foot complex with a 700 car parking lot is NOT appropriate for the area. The problems with just the traffic alone will be a nightmare for not only residents, but also any emergency vehicles needing to get through or into the area on Saturdays and Sundays. Then, you get into problems with water shed from a 700 car parking lot, or the destruction of wildlife and wetlands. These wetlands are supposed to be federally protected, yet EBC's initial drawing plan shows roads right through the wetland areas. Additionally, what will happen to the property value of both Plymouth and Maple Grove residents directly adjacent to this location? This could potentially greatly negatively impact the financial lives of many citizens. I'm not against EBC proposing something smaller in this location (50% or so smaller). What they're looking to propose though, is just far too large for the area. A commercially zoned area off HWY 55 is a much more appropriate location for that. Thank you for taking the time to read these concerns. Some people who received this message don't often get email from rlewis813@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 35 168 1 Shawn Drill From:Kathleen Keller <kykeller@stkate.edu> Sent:Friday, September 15, 2023 8:17 AM To:Chloe McGuire Subject:Re: Church in Plymouth Good morning, 6516 Merrimac Lane N. Maple Grove 55311 I'm less than .5 mile from the proposed site. Thanks! Kathy Kathleen Y. Keller, MA, RN, PHN, CNE St. Catherine University Whitby Hall- Office 211 2004 Randolph Avenue South St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 2 To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Church in Plymouth Greetings! I would WELCOME a church in the Plymouth area along Chanuka Trail and in fact would consider attending the church. Churches can add a lot to the community and in my opinion would be better than a Kwick trip or more apartments. Traffic on Sunday and Wed isn't going to be that bad. Thank you, Kathy Kathleen Y. Keller, MA, RN, PHN, CNE St. Catherine University Whitby Hall- Office 211 2004 Randolph Avenue South St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 10:07 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth From: Laura Paulsen <lpaulse1@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 9:48 AM To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth Hi Plymouth Council Members, Hope this email finds you well. I am emailing you to voice my concerns and opposition to construction of the Eagle Brook Church near the intersection of Maple Grove Pkwy and Chankahda Trail across from Meadow Ridge Elementary School in Plymouth. I believe construction of this church will invoke undesirable traffic patterns - substantially higher volume especially on the weekends; negative environmental effects; and unwanted devaluation of surrounding homes. The proposed location for the EBC is in the midst of a primarily residential area with the exception of the nearby elementary school and high school further south on Maple Grove Pkwy/Peony as well as a small gas station and Walgreens at the intersection of Vicksburg and Chankhada. Putting such a large, commercial structure at this proposed location would disrupt the surrounding community. My husband and I live in the nearby Terra Vista neighborhood about a mile away from where the proposed EBC mega church would be located. We moved here not quite a year ago and chose this neighborhood and home in large part because of the location amidst other homes, neighborhoods, and schools. Had there been a 60,000 sqft mega-church with thousands of cars and people consistently visiting, we would likely have sought an alternative home. Thank you for taking the time to read this email. Again - I am voicing my concerns and opposition to the Eagle Brook Church construction. Both my husband and I have signed the petition and hope you and the leaders of our Plymouth community will consider our voices and prevent the construction of the EBC mega-church. Thank you, Laura Paulsen Some people who received this message don't often get email from lpaulse1@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 37 171 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 10:07 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church Dave Callister | City Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763-509-5301 wwwwplymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life -----Original Message----- From: Zuricrew <zuricrew@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2023 5:45 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church [Some people who received this message don't often get email from zuricrew@comcast.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] We are steadfast against the building of this mega church in Plymouth. It is counterintuitive to, on the one hand, look to reduce traffic and speed in this northwest territory of Plymouth, while simultaneously building a mega church which would require this traffic vein. We are over-built already and the serenity and bucolic recesses of Plymouth are systematically replaced by structures like this. We cannot mortgage the future quality of this community. Please do not sign off on a measure which will ultimately adversely impact the quality of life and residence we enjoy here. William and Rhonda Garvis 38 172 1 Shawn Drill From:Shawn Drill Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 2:27 PM To:kucharski5@icloud.com Subject:RE: Support of Eagle Brook Church’s new building in Plymouth Thanks for your e-mail. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Angela Kucharski <kucharski5@icloud.com> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2023 2:44 PM To: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Support of Eagle Brook Church’s new building in Plymouth Hello Elise, I am sure you’re receiving your fair share of emails regarding the building request for Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth. I live within walking distance to this location and support the use of this land for EBC. I am not a member of this church, just a citizen that is not opposed to them building a church in this space. Thank you! Angela Kucharski 612 309-8644 Sent from my iPhone Some people who received this message don't often get email from kucharski5@icloud.com. Learn why this is important 39 173 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 2:57 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Say No to Eagle Brook Church From: Chris Mahrer <chris.mahrer@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 2:29 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Say No to Eagle Brook Church Dear City of Plymouth Leadership, I'm writing as a Plymouth resident living within a few blocks of the proposed Eagle Brook Church (EBC). I'm unable to attend the meeting they're hosting this Wednesday night (Sept 20) and want to voice my concerns about the proposal. I am opposed to the building of this church in Plymouth for a number of reasons and my sentiments are shared by the dozens of neighbors with whom I've spoken over the past few weeks. 1. By selling this land to EBC, Plymouth would be giving a large parcel of land in a residential neighborhood to a tax-exempt entity, taking away potential tax revenue from the city. 2. The majority of attendees to EBC would be coming from other cities, increasing traffic congestion and road usage in our residential area of Plymouth every Saturday and Sunday of the year. This burden will ultimately be placed on Plymouth residents, a majority of whom would not attend the church services. 3. The traffic from other cities would likely not result in extra revenue for local Plymouth businesses - but rather the nearest commercial hub next door in Maple Grove. 4. Eagle Brook Church is known for preaching anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. I know many members of the LGBTQ+ community within my neighborhood and our broader Plymouth community. I am strongly opposed to Plymouth enabling EBC to preach about the exclusion of fellow community members across the street from the elementary school my children will be attending. I urge Plymouth city leadership to consider these financial and ethical factors, along with the circulating change.org petition and general public backlash against allowing Eagle Brook Church to establish itself in our residential neighborhood at the expense of the City of Plymouth and its taxpayers. Thank you, Chris -- Chris Mahrer 612-990-9398 chris.mahrer@gmail.com Some people who received this message don't often get email from chris.mahrer@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 40 174 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 2:57 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: EBC -----Original Message----- From: SUSAN FRANTZ <zuwiki@aol.com> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 2:34 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: EBC [Some people who received this message don't often get email from zuwiki@aol.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] As residents living in ElmCreek Meadows we are NOT in favor of Eagle Brook Church Being built basically at the end of our block. With that much additional traffic we will have a hard time getting out of our development to travel East on county rd 47, now ridiculously renamed Chadacawda Trail . please add out names to the NO list. Susan and Michael Frantz 6165 Garland Lane N Plymouth, MN. 55446 Sent from my iPad 41 175 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 19, 2023 7:10 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Eagle Brook Church (EBC) Discussion Begin forwarded message: From: Dan Ng <danny.ng06@gmail.com> Date: September 18, 2023 at 10:22:51 PM CDT To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church (EBC) Discussion Hello Plymouth City Council, I am Danny Ng, and my wife, Devyani Totre, and I have been new Plymouth residents off of Troy Lane N and Chankahda Trail since early 2022. We want to thank the City of Plymouth for providing continuous updates that could significantly affect the area where we live, such as the planned construction of the EBC megachurch within a mile from where we live. Being a past member of a megachurch many years ago, I'd like to share my thoughts and concerns of this planned development within the area. I am aware of EBC's congregation having been in the Wayzata High School for many years and understand the nature of churches that they want to continually sow the seeds and grow their congregation and establish permanent locations. There are already many existing churches in the area, but to be fair, they differ in denominations and people will have preferences on which church they are comfortable being associated with. Pro EBC personnel noted that Sundays will be the busiest day for traffic in the area. In a way, it's true, but they'll often fail to disclose the fact that a church will serve as much as they can. Churches, especially of this size, will want to have multiple services, often many times per day as well as days other than Sundays. A megachurch I was a part of held main services on Saturdays, Sundays, and Wednesdays and were much smaller in-scale than EBC. On top of this, they'll have grouped activities outside of services, such as small and focus groups and other special / speaker events that will often happen throughout each week. They'll often mention they support the community, but what this usually means is supporting mostly members within their community while reaping tax-savings benefits. This is evident with their limited reporting of their annual statement, which I believe it's unaudited. With that said, I expect to see significant traffic going eastbound Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway. The traffic is concerning, because both Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway are single- lane roads. I used to live in Chanhassen where a megachurch off of Highway 5 and County 41 where 41 was always congested with multiple church services throughout the day. If congestion was already bad near a major highway for this church, imagine what the traffic is going to be with this church location further into the residential neighborhood here on single-direction adjacent lanes. Every single year, Some people who received this message don't often get email from danny.ng06@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 42 176 2 there have been roadwork on Chankahda Trail, so having this in addition will make things even more difficult for people like us getting in and out. If the roads around the mile radius between Chankahda Trail and Maple Grove Parkway were to be expanded as double-lanes going onto each direction, the problem of traffic congestion in this area should be resolved. With EBC being a tax-exempt entity, any modification and continual maintenance of this area should not be the onerous of the taxpayers. Perhaps others would still oppose for varying reasons, but if EBC agrees to foot all of the costs of expanding the roads as well as continually maintaining the affected areas, then I think more people, including myself, would be more ok with it. They would also need to agree to cover any other costs using public services to their benefit, such as police / security, insurance, etc. as I do not think it's appropriate for taxpayers to provide additional benefit for tax-exempt organizations. We would love to participate the September 20th quorum, but unfortunately, we are both out of the Country right now. We hope that this feedback provides some additional clarity and perspectives, and perhaps our neighbors also have similar views. On the September 20th discussion, we ask that you raise these concerns with the EBC representatives and move towards a more concrete plan in resolving our concerns if this is to be pursued by them. Otherwise there already seems to be a large petition of not wanting this church in the area already (already 2x more than their Minnetonka petition): https://www.change.org/p/no-eaglebrook-mega-church-in- plymouth?original_footer_petition_id=28985010&algorithm=promoted&source_location=petition_foot er&grid_position=13&pt=AVBldGl0aW9uAMR%2FOQIAAAAAZQeLxx1CGY82OTVmYWUxNA%3D%3D Thank you, please feel free to reach-out with any further questions and concerns. Danny Ng 952-297-5581 177 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 4:48 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Opposition to Eaglebrook Chruch -----Original Message----- From: Mary Ann Honors <mary.ann.honors@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 9:59 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to Eaglebrook Chruch Some people who received this message don't often get email from mary.ann.honors@gmail.com. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Good morning. I am writing to express my opposition to the potential building of the large Eagle Brook Church building in Plymouth. I have lived in Plymouth for 8 years and do not believe this project would be in the best interest of the city and it’s residents. This project will have a large impact on traffic in the area and lead to greater wear and tear on the surrounding streets. Because the church would not be paying taxes, the costs to offset this would fall to city residents and taxpayers. I respectfully ask you not to approve this project if it comes for a vote. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Mary Ann Honors 43 178 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Monday, September 18, 2023 8:35 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: NO EBC in Plymouth Begin forwarded message: From: Chelsey Foster <chelseyvfoster@gmail.com> Date: September 18, 2023 at 8:29:05 PM CDT To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: NO EBC in Plymouth Good Evening, I’m sure you’ve been hearing from a lot of ward 1 members about the proposed Eagle Brook Church just north of Meadow Ridge Elementary. As a resident of our ward and someone who lives close by, I wanted to ask that you oppose this proposed development. I have two primary concerns about the proposal - the increase in non-local traffic that would be generated by events at the church throughout the week, and the economic impact. Specifically, I am concerned that having this land be occupied by a non-taxable entity lowers the city’s ability to generate tax revenue versus other alternatives, increasing the burden on other tax-paying residents. This proposed church has already been rejected by Minnetonka and Corcoran. If it doesn’t make sense there, I don’t think it makes sense economically or for Plymouth’s best interest a half-mile down the road. This area has been configured for more of a residential development - this church would be outside the character and the capacity for the region. Please vote to deny this development in this area. Thank you, Chelsey Some people who received this message don't often get email from chelseyvfoster@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 44 179 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Tuesday, September 19, 2023 10:58 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church proposal From: Brian Simonson <simonsonb@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 10:56 AM To: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov>; Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church proposal Hi Alise, Jeff and other council members, I hope this email finds you well. I'm writing to let you know I'm strongly opposed to the proposed building of the Eagle Brook mega church near my Elm Creek Highlands neighborhood in Plymouth. I have major concerns about the large increase in traffic that this would create and in general, I'm opposed to the concept of mega churches. If they are truly a non-profit organization (which I don't believe for a second) then how are they able to build these massive buildings? If they have that much money, they should be donating it to help people not using it to build more venues to add to their coffers. It's a total scam. Please vote against this proposal. Thanks for your time and consideration. Regards, Brian Simonson 5060 Merrimac Lane North Plymouth, MN 55446 Some people who received this message don't often get email from simonsonb@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 45 180 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Wednesday, September 20, 2023 5:48 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Eagle Brook Church Get Outlook for iOS From: nddigiovanni <nddigiovanni@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:11:57 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church Good afternoon, I fully support the church coming into the area. It will be good for the economy and the community. Regards, Nina Sent from my Galaxy Some people who received this message don't often get email from nddigiovanni@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 46 181 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Wednesday, September 20, 2023 6:58 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: No to Eagle Brook Church Get Outlook for iOS From: Abby Schutt <ahschutt@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 6:54:44 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: No to Eagle Brook Church Hello, As a Plymouth resident, I want to express my opposition to the potential building of Eagle Brook Church. I believe there would be negative impact on my family and our broader Plymouth community. One thing I greatly appreciate about Plymouth is the green space - it contributes to the charm of our city. Adding an Eagle Brook Church building would detract from this charm. Other concerns include: · Increased traffic · Impact on property values · Loss of residential land Should they submit a site application, i request as one of your constituents that you deny the project. Thank you, Abby Schutt Beckman Ward 4 Some people who received this message don't often get email from ahschutt@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 47 182 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Wednesday, September 20, 2023 9:18 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Concerns Regarding Proposed Land Development for Eagle Brook Community Church Begin forwarded message: From: Emmett Tischmak <emmett.tischmak@gmail.com> Date: September 20, 2023 at 7:12:20 PM CDT To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Proposed Land Development for Eagle Brook Community Church I am Emmett Tischmak, a homeowner (5725 Walnut Grove Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55446), parent, taxpayer, and military veteran, deeply engaged in our community's civic processes. I write to express my strong opposition to the proposed development of a parcel of land for church use in our neighborhood. I have three key concerns: Reason 1: Maximizing Land Benefits Our community faces a housing shortage, a fact underscored by multiple macroeconomic reports. Given this scarcity of land, allocating it for a church is an inefficient use, especially in a neighborhood in high demand among families. Housing, in contrast, directly meets our community's pressing residential needs. Reason 2: Negative Persistent Financial Impact on the Community Churches, as non-profit entities, do not pay property taxes. By zoning the land for residential use instead, I estimate we could potentially generate $1-2 million annually in taxable income. This revenue supports critical community services, such as schools, infrastructure maintenance, and essential social programs. Reason 3: Many Alternative Options for the Church to Pursue I propose alternative solutions that can benefit both the community and the church: Utilizing the local high school auditorium for Sunday services, and optimizing existing infrastructure. Leveraging the surplus of available and under-utilized commercial real estate in Plymouth and the wider metro area, without disrupting local businesses. Exploring options outside densely populated suburbs with better access to economic corridors. In conclusion, I join the vast majority of our community in opposing the rezoning and approval of the use of this land for the church. It would hinder access to quality housing, squander our limited land resources, and cost our community millions in essential tax revenue. I implore our elected leaders to Some people who received this message don't often get email from emmett.tischmak@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 48 183 2 prioritize the well-being of our entire community in land use decisions, considering these concerns carefully. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to further discussion. Thanks, Emmett Tischmak Cell: 701-426-2978 184 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:46 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Concerns Regarding Proposed Land Development For Eagle Brook Community Church From: Andrew Peterson <petersonandrewc@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 9:58 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Proposed Land Development For Eagle Brook Community Church Dear Plymouth City Council, My name is Andrew C Peterson, a homeowner (5720 Walnut Grove Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55446), parent and taxpayer, deeply engaged in our community's civic processes. I write to express my strong opposition to the proposed development of a parcel of land for church use in our neighborhood. I have three key concerns: Reason 1: Maximizing Land Benefits Our community faces a housing shortage, a fact underscored by multiple macroeconomic reports. Given this scarcity of land, allocating habitable land for a church is an inefficient use, especially in a neighborhood in high demand among families. Housing, in contrast, directly meets our community's and surrounding metro area's pressing residential needs. Reason 2: Negative Persistent Financial Impact on the Community Churches, as non-profit entities, do not pay property taxes. By zoning the land for residential use instead, I estimate we could potentially generate $1-2 million annually in taxable income (56 acres, 3-6 dwelling unit per acre, ~$6k year in property taxes). This revenue supports critical community services, such as schools, infrastructure maintenance, and essential social programs. Reason 3: Many Alternative Options for the Church to Pursue I propose alternative solutions that can benefit both the community and the church: · Utilizing the local high school auditorium for Sunday services, and optimizing existing infrastructure. · Leveraging the surplus of available commercial real estate in Plymouth and the wider metro area, without disrupting local businesses. · Exploring options outside densely residential suburbs with better access to economic corridors. In conclusion, I join the vast majority of our community in opposing the rezoning and approval of the use of this land for the church. It would hinder access to quality housing, squander our limited land resources, and cost our community millions in essential tax revenue. I request our elected leaders to prioritize the well-being of our entire community in land use decisions and carefully consider all of the negative impacts this request would have. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to further discussion. Some people who received this message don't often get email from petersonandrewc@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 49 185 2 Sincerely, Andrew C Peterson Cell: 952.200.9164 186 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, September 21, 2023 2:15 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Proposed EBC Church on Chankhada -----Original Message----- From: Angela McBride <akaymcbride@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 6:49 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov>; Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov>; Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed EBC Church on Chankhada [Some people who received this message don't often get email from akaymcbride@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] To Whom It May Concern, My husband and I live in the Westin Ridge Community near the proposed site for EBC off Chankhada. We are extremely concerned about a mega church being proposed for this site for three reasons; loss of green space, high traffic in a residential area and our home value. On behalf of our community, please stop these plans from moving forward so this site can be used for what was intended. Thank you, Angela and Adam McBride 5972 Alvarado Ct N Plymouth, MN Sent from my iPhone 50 187 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Thursday, September 21, 2023 1:38 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Oppose to Eagle Brook Church -----Original Message----- From: Chetan <chetanbalegeri@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 1:04 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Oppose to Eagle Brook Church [Some people who received this message don't often get email from chetanbalegeri@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Hi, I am opposed to a 70,000 sq ft complex with 1200 seats and 600 parking spaces in our residential neighborhood here in Plymouth. The traffic here is already bad and our kids have trouble crossing the road to the local playground next door. The previous proposal for Corcoran (which was turned down), less than 2 miles away, propsed 1500 seats and 800 parking spaces, and EBC was adamant they could not and would not reduce the requested building size or parking. This concerns me that this initial proposal only reflects the starting size with implied future expansion. The comprehensive plan for the City of Plymouth shows this area zoned as low-density residential, and as the area has developed it was under that assumption. This proposal would result in significant traffic surges that the area was not built to accommodate. The proposal currently requests to pave through wetland in 3 different areas. The wetlands have been clearly marked and identified via a wetland delineation. They knew the limitations of the parcel and should not be treated with exception to infringe on wildlife. Thanks Chetan Balegeri 18155 59th ave 51 188 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Friday, September 22, 2023 7:42 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Eagle brook church proposal Begin forwarded message: From: Nancy <nschleif@comcast.net> Date: September 21, 2023 at 10:24:42 PM CDT To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle brook church proposal Hello, As a long time resident of Plymouth, I am against this EBC church expansion for several reasons. Among them I have traffic concerns, and also would rather see something there that would generate some tax payments to the city, since they will be utilizing city services the rest of us pay for. For these and other reasons, I signed the petition against their proposal. Thank you Nancy Schleif 2765 Ranchview Ln N Plymouth, Mn 55447 Sent from my iPhone 52 189 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Thursday, September 21, 2023 9:21 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Eagle Brook-Supplemental comments and sourcing related to my 9/20/23 public forum comments Thanks, Chloe Chloe McGuire, AICP | Planning and Development Manager City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763.509.5452 Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Mike Louis <mike.louis@protonmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 6:27:47 PM To: Michael Boo <mboo@plymouthmn.gov>; Neha Markanda <nmarkanda@plymouthmn.gov>; Bill Wixon <bwixon@plymouthmn.gov>; Josh Fowler <jfowler@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Olson <jolson@plymouthmn.gov>; Marc Anderson <manderson@plymouthmn.gov>; Jennifer Jerulle <jjerulle@plymouthmn.gov>; Grant Fernelius <gfernelius@plymouthmn.gov>; Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov>; Webmail - Planning <Planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook-Supplemental comments and sourcing related to my 9/20/23 public forum comments Hello Chair Boo and Planning Commissioners, Thank you for the opportunity to speak at Wednesday’s Planning Commission public forum regarding the proposed Eagle Brook development. Before I get to my comments, I want to thank you for your time on the commission. Your service to the community is important and helps guide the best growth and redevelopment of our city. I would like to supplement my comments on Sept. 20th’s Planning Commission meeting public forum with additional source material with attributions and a few additional points for your consideration in this matter. I realize this matter has not had a public hearing yet, so you are not allowed to state what your thoughts are on the matter until after the public hearing has occurred. The main point that I would like to convey is that Eagle Brook is already telling us that traffic will be a problem, without directly saying so. In some of my points, these are their own words. In other points I would like to make, their words do not align with what people’s experiences will be living in the neighborhoods nearby. As I mentioned, Pastor Emmert states that going from a mobile to permanent campus results in doubling or tripling attendance. 53 190 2 https://kstp.com/kstp-news/top-news/petition-grows-against-megachurch-eagle-brooks-proposed-plymouth-location/ This is also supported by EBC’s prepared comments to the Corcoran City Council in 2020: Page 221 of the Corcoran City Council agenda & packet for August 27, 2020, agenda item 8.c. https://www.corcoranmn.gov/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16989755 191 3 In CCX media’s report, Pastor Strand states that in five years the Wayzata mobile campus has grown by 32%. https://ccxmedia.org/news/plymouth-megachurch-proposal-receives-opposition-from-neighbors/ Corcoran’s Traffic Study from EBC’s application for a location found that it would generate significant traffic on Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday. This was referenced in the lawsuit against our city as related to Hollydale. https://ccxmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Hollydale-v-Plymouth-Summons-and-Complaint.pdf page 18 of the pdf, numbered page 16 of the complaint. 192 5 193 6 As well, at the EBC Community Meeting on September 20th, there was a comment made that traffic will occur during “off peak” times. Traffic will not be “off peak”, the use of roadways for the proposed use and the surrounding residential areas are more correlated than they are dissociated. Think of it this way, when people are doing non-work related activities they are in spaces like the proposal or in residential areas. So this proposal will be introducing more traffic in highly residential areas than another residential development in the same space would. Also at the September 20th meeting it was stated that Eagle Brook will be having two services Saturday and two services Sunday. In any given year, there are 52 Saturdays and 52 Sundays. 104 days in total. If these 104 days were stacked together, then that would be from January to mid-April. This amount of traffic on weekends will have a detrimental impact upon the neighborhoods. And as I pointed out, it is also telling that they mention having police officers and volunteers manage traffic in and out of the parking lot. It is telling because they know they are trying to utilize the roads at rates beyond the road’s capacity and need to have intervention in order to handle the high volume. At all other churches I have known, usually this only occurs on Easter and Christmas, not every weekend on both Saturday and Sunday. The Future: We can see the future of the proposed development by looking at the history of development of Wooddale in Eden Prairie, located near US 212 and Shady Oak Road. Wooddale and Eagle Brook are both affiliated with Converge, formerly known as the Baptist General Conference. So, Wooddale is a good analogy to what this proposal will experience if it is approved. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wooddale_Church https://wooddale.org/about/history/ For Wooddale’s Eden Prairie campus this has been their growth story: In 1981 they purchased 32 acres of undeveloped land near the intersection of US 212 and Shady Oak Road. In 1983, initial construction started (I could not find information on the size of the initial construction). In 1985, initial construction was fully finished. In 1988, three years after initial construction finished, construction on a new 63,000 square foot expansion started. In 1990, the construction of the 63,000 square foot expansion was finished. In 1995, five years after the first expansion was completed, an additional expansion of 34,600 square feet was started. In 2000, the construction of the 34,600 square feet expansion was dedicated. The wikipedia page says they have about 5,000 people attend each weekend. This is on 32 acres of property. For comparison, the proposal is approximately 40 developable acres (~54 - 13.58 wetlands per the presentation on September 20th). These two parcels in the image below make up the ~32 acres of Wooddale: 194 7 195 8 As you can see above, the 32 acres of Wooddale are as fully developed as they can be given the terrain and this occurred in about 15 years from when the site was first developed. Eagle Brook’s proposal will start with the approximately 10 acres, but they will expand to the available acreage as time goes forward. So while approximately 30 acres of the available property will not be built upon now, in the future they will want to expand on the remaining 30 acres of developable land. As a final point, traffic issues go beyond the immediate vicinity of the property. The nearest east-west thoroughfare is Chankahda Trail. Chankahda will be used by people coming and going from the church due to it being the shortest distance to get to I-494 as well as to get to other residential areas to the east or west. This means additional traffic from the church will propagate along the whole length in both directions, to the detriment of the neighborhoods farther away from the church. I want to close by thanking Chloe McGuire and the Planning & Development Department for their replies to my emails and the work that you do for our city to be a better city for all. Best Regards, Mike Louis 4565 Glacier Ln 55446 Sent from Proton Mail for iOS 196 1 Shawn Drill From:Webmail - Planning Sent:Friday, September 22, 2023 11:08 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Concern Michelle Bast | Community Development City of Plymouth -----Original Message----- From: Michelle Mader <michelleamader@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 9:50 AM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Eagle Brook Church Concern [You don't often get email from michelleamader@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] To whom it may concern, My name is Michelle Mader and I am a resident at 6110 Yellowstone Lane N. I am writing to you to voice my concern over the proposed Eagle Brook Church development at the intersection of Chankahda and Maple Grove Parkway. My main concern is surrounding traffic, as my home is a half a mile away from the proposed site. Before moving to Plymouth two years ago, my home was in Chanhassen near another “mega church” that also was built adjacent to a two lane road (Highway 41). Even with police managing traffic on Sunday mornings, the volume of cars on the two lane road was so high that we often found ourselves needing to plan our Sunday outings or routes so we did not get caught in church traffic. I am concerned that the proposed Eagle Brook Church site will cause similar disruptions for me & my neighbors, as Maple Grove Parkway and Chankahda at this location was not designed for this volume of traffic at one time. I hope you will take into account the considerations of myself and other concerned residents as you are evaluating the proposal. Best regards, Michelle Mader 54 197 1 Shawn Drill From:Grant Fernelius Sent:Friday, September 22, 2023 1:51 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: EBC Opposition Hey Shawn, Here’s another one for the record. Thanks! Grant Fernelius | Community & Economic Development Director City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447-1482 Phone: 763.509.5401 www.plymouthmn.gov Plymouth, Minnesota | Adding Quality to Life From: Molly.Kramer <Molly.Kramer@target.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 1:26 PM To: Grant Fernelius <gfernelius@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: EBC Opposition Dear Mr. Fernelius, I hope this email finds you well. I want to begin by expressing my deep gratitude for your dedicated public service to our beloved community. Your efforts have undoubtedly enriched the lives of countless residents in Plymouth. I am writing to you today with concerns that have been weighing on my mind regarding the proposed development of the Eagle Brook Church complex in our area. My intention in reaching out to you is to seek a compassionate understanding of the challenges we face as residents. I respectfully request that you deny a conditional use permit for this site and uphold existing zoning. Traffic Concerns: One of my most pressing concerns revolves around the limited ingress/egress access to the church, which not only poses the need for additional road infrastructure in Plymouth but also raises safety concerns for the many pedestrians and bikers that frequent this area. The single access point on Maple Grove Parkway presents a significant challenge for the adjacent neighborhood on the corner of Maple Grove Parkway and Chankahda Trail, as that neighborhood would share that same single access You don't often get email from molly.kramer@target.com. Learn why this is important 55 198 2 point. I am also deeply worried about the potential traffic congestion during Saturday evenings and Sunday mornings, which could lead to traffic diverting through the quiet adjacent neighborhood streets. This, in turn, threatens the peace and safety of our community. Light Pollution Issues: Moreover, the revised site plan places the entrance/exit roadway for the Church in close proximity to homes on 62nd Ave in the Bonaire neighborhood, which is where I live. This positioning will stream headlights into the back of my home as cars enter and exit the Church. This, combined with the need for well-lit roadways and adjacent parking lot lights for safety, will disrupt the tranquility and peaceful enjoyment of my home. Incongruence with Existing Area: Finally, we find ourselves facing a dilemma regarding the proposed construction of a large 64,000 sq ft building, along with the possibility of more than 200,000 sq ft of asphalt parking. This development is out of sync with the existing residential character of our neighborhood. Many of us made significant investments in our homes and communities based on the understanding that the comprehensive plan guided this area as residential. Any significant deviation from this plan can have a substantial impact on our property values and our overall quality of life. I humbly request your understanding and support in addressing these concerns. Please reject a conditional use permit or re-zoning this parcel. My aim is to ensure that any development in our cherished neighborhood is carried out with sensitivity to the needs and well-being of its residents. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your consideration. Molly Kramer 17865 62nd Ave N 763-443-3790 Molly Kramer | Sr. Divisional of Planning | Ready-to-Wear |Target| 612-761-0341 199 1 Shawn Drill From:Nicole McDade <nicolemcdade2023@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 25, 2023 8:07 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Opposition to Eagle Brook Mega Church Campus in Plymouth 15620 24th Ave North Unit E Plymouth, MN 55447 On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 8:29 AM Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Thanks for your e-mail. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Thanks, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Nicole McDade <nicolemcdade2023@gmail.com> Date: September 15, 2023 at 2:10:57 PM CDT To: Council Members <Council@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Mathew McDade <mathewmcdade@gmail.com> Subject: Opposition to Eagle Brook Mega Church Campus in Plymouth Hi Mayor Wosje and Members of the City Council, I hope you're doing well. My name is Nicole McDade and I'm a resident of Plymouth. My husband Mathew, CCed on this email, and I are opposed to the Eagle Brook MegaChurch being built in Plymouth and would like to share our opposition. We do not think that a 70,000 square foot facility with 600-700 parking spots can be considered a good neighbor to the residential areas surrounding the area. We also do not think that allowing this megachurch to be built upholds the city's strategic theme of Environmental Stewardship. The plans shared with KSTP-TV news do indicate a small "stormwater rain garden" in between the two parking lots but that hardly offsets all of the environmental impacts (including water and energy usage) of such a large campus. Some people who received this message don't often get email from nicolemcdade2023@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 56 200 2 We also have concerns about the economic impacts on the city of such a large, tax-exempt business being built. Let's be very honest, a non-denominational megachurch is a business, full stop. And businesses with tax-exempt status hardly give any direct financial support to the cities in which they exist. Taxes aside, all of the church-goers' food, drink, media needs (like books and movies) and social events are housed inside the church by church-owned and run businesses, minimizing any opportunity for those church-goers to utilize surrounding Plymouth businesses. It's a farce to say that the building of this business will bring other Plymouth businesses support. The mega-church business model is insular and self-perpetuating. We only have to look at the megachurches of the SouthEast to see case-studies of how campuses such as Eagle Brook negatively impact the residential areas, the environmental areas, the local businesses and the cities in which they are built. Let's follow our neighbors in Corcoran and Minnetonka and not allow this campus to be built in our city. Thank you for your time. We hope to have your support in this issue. Best, Nicole and Mathew McDade 201 1 Shawn Drill From:Shawn Drill Sent:Monday, September 25, 2023 10:41 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Proposed and current construction along Chankahda Trail From: Audrey Britton <audreybritton@outlook.com> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2023 11:45 AM To: Neha Markanda <nmarkanda@plymouthmn.gov>; Michael Boo <mboo@plymouthmn.gov>; Bill Wixon <bwixon@plymouthmn.gov>; Josh Fowler <jfowler@plymouthmn.gov>; Julie Olson <jolson@plymouthmn.gov>; Marc Anderson <manderson@plymouthmn.gov>; Marc Anderson <manderson@plymouthmn.gov>; Marc Anderson <manderson@plymouthmn.gov>; Grant Fernelius <gfernelius@plymouthmn.gov>; Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Julie Pointner <JPointner@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed and current construction along Chankahda Trail Roster | City of Plymouth, MN (plymouthmn.gov) Hello, Plymouth Planning Commissioners and CM Pointner. Thank you for serving and for all you do for our city. Below are comments for the proposed and current construc9on along Chankahda Trail A last chance: I understand there is a proposed large building and parking lot on this gorgeous land along Chankahda Trail off of 101 (image a<ached). This is the last or one of the last lands like this in Plymouth. It is a flee9ng opportunity to make a las9ng, posi9ve impact that will permanently affect all nearby neighbors and others in our city, and affect our “preferred community” status. Zoning: I am also hearing that the area will be rezoned MSF-3. Why? Have there been public hearings? All the years I’ve lived in Plymouth, the council has historically claimed that absolutely nothing can be rezoned no ma<er what. That’s the excuse that was used for Hollydale. If rezoned, why not consider preserva9on? Or a mix of preserva9on, restora9on (new trees) and a few smaller homes that blend into the natural environment? Environmental impact: The land includes all-too precious wetland and some prairie land that is scarce (and has been destroyed) in Plymouth and quickly disappearing throughout Minnesota at an alarming rate. Much or some of this land was likely forest cleared for farming. Preserving this land and plan9ng trees where appropriate, would benefit nearby neighbors and become an asset for all of Plymouth. We live 2-3 miles away and this area would easily become our closest and go-to place to bike to for nature walks. Preserving the site, cuts down on pollu9on by cuF ng down on traffic and human ac9vity. Trees naturally clean the air. Walks in nature are proven to increase mental health. Nature trails greatly increase a city’s “great place to live” score. Neighbors and sense of community: Zoom into the image and you will see that nearby neighbors’ beau9ful views. Those views will literally change to a sea of parking lots and a huge building (that has a history of expanding once it’s in place). 57 202 2 This en9re area is adjacent to and surrounded by beau9ful, peaceful neighborhoods, with a lovely mix of single homes (small and larger) and townhomes. Large buildings or commercial development would destroy the look and feel and sense of community that exists here. Home values: A large building and/or commercial development will decrease the value of nearby homes. Natural lands would increase values. Adjacent school: A school is directly across the street. Teachers and students could enjoy the preserve simply by crossing the street. Addi9onally, preserva9on of the land will not add traffic. Less traffic means greater safety and cleaner air for children. Housing: If housing is needed, please keep it to a minimum and make it affordable, perhaps with children who would a<end the nearby school or low-key elderly/disabled one level living. Have the housing take up only part of the area and have it blend into/complement the surrounding environment. Plymouth has plenty of “high-rise homes.” We do not need more. Have entry into the neighborhood from already exis9ng entries. Chankahda literally means “into the forest.” Much of the land along this road was forest before being cleared for farming. It was where the Dakota spent their winters before being forcibly removed in 1862. When renaming the road, Almost double as many residents voted for a name to honor the Dakota. As one city staff person said, ‘it received overwhelming support and indicated public sen9ment that the council should respond to.’ Please con9nue this spirit and intent. Preserve the wetland for wildlife, the grass land for peaceful walks through nature and refores9ng which is good for all living things. Minneapolis and other ci9es are returning some lands to those from which it was stolen. You could also consider giving this land back with an understanding it would be preserved/restored. Historical markers and bike lanes/trails: We have inquired numerous 9mes about historical markers and bike trails/lanes along this road when it was renamed and before construc9on began, but have not heard back from city staff nor council members. That was part of the presenta9on given to the city council when the name was finalized. Would you please pursue this? (Our state legislators have said this is a local ask.) I look forward to hearing from you, Audrey Bri<on 12500 53rd Ave North Plymouth MN 55442 203 1 Shawn Drill From:Webmail - Planning Sent:Monday, September 25, 2023 8:02 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Planned Eagle Brook Church Michelle Bast | Community Development City of Plymouth -----Original Message----- From: John Kelly <jwkelly928@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 4:35 PM To: Webmail - Planning <planning@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Planned Eagle Brook Church [You don't often get email from jwkelly928@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed Eagle Brook Mega Church in Plymouth near Meadow Ridge Elementary School. The city is (thankfully) currently widening Chankada Trail to accommodate the increase in traffic seen in recent years. The addition of this monstrous parking ramp and the traffic to it will only make traffic worse than ever. One step forward three steps back if this development is approved. John Kelly Sent from my iPhone 58 204 1 Shawn Drill From:Greg Laden <laden.greg@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 25, 2023 11:18 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Eagle Brook Church Hi Shawn, Address: 15300 37th Ave N Apt A124 On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:16 AM Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: > > Hi Greg. Thanks for your e-mail. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Thanks, > > > > Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner > > City of Plymouth, MN > Phone: 763.509.5456 > > > > From: Greg Laden <laden.greg@gmail.com> > Date: September 22, 2023 at 8:34:43 PM CDT > To: Jim Davis <jdavis@plymouthmn.gov>, Julie Peterson <jpeterson@plymouthmn.gov>, Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>, Julie Pointner <jpointner@plymouthmn.gov>, Clark Gregor <cgregor@plymouthmn.gov>, Jim Willis <jwillis@plymouthmn.gov>, Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov> > Subject: Eagle Brook Church > > > > Council and Mayor, > > > > The Eagle Brook Church abides by the belief, and promulgates the belief, that those in a same sex marriage, LGBT+ Individuals, and trans individuals in particular, are sinners in need of cleansing. Recently, members have aggressively commented in various online forums that members of our community in Plymouth are sinners. This is harassment and despicable. I am aware that this church is interested in building a facility in Plymouth, near the High School, and that to do so, the city must decide this would be acceptable. > > > > As a citizen of Plymouth, I do not want this church, which is essentially a hate group, to have a presence here, and I 59 205 2 urge you all to vote no on any proposal or motion that would allow the church to be built. > > This is a pretty serious issue to me. A yes vote advancing this church in Plymouth would sever any good will between any council member and myself. I would hate to see that happen, but on behalf of my own flesh and blood, who are already objects of hate by this church, I must make a very firm stand on this issue. > > Sincerely, > Greg Laden > Plymouth > > > > > > -- > > > > Consulting Anthropologist > > Tutor (test prep and science content areas) > > Contract Writer - Messaging > > > > > > -- Consulting Anthropologist Tutor (test prep and science content areas) Contract Writer - Messaging 206 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Friday, September 29, 2023 9:15 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Eagle Brook Church - Strongly Opposed! From: Alex Krenik <alex.krenik47@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 9:08 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Eagle Brook Church - Strongly Opposed! Hello Council Members, I just emailed Alise but wanted to message you all as well. I am a neighbor of Emmett Tischmak who already sent you a very well crafted email expressing his concern and view of the Eagle Brook Church development. Needless to say, pretty much everyone in the neighborhood and city strongly opposes their development and I am one of those individuals. Logically speaking, all in all if you let this go through, you're making a horrible business move for the city. Land benefits - out, taxpayer dollars - gone, community unrest - maximized, etc. Please take this and many others' opposition to this development into consideration! Alex Krenik - 5715 Walnut Grove Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55446 Cell 612.325.2051. Emmett's email: My name is Emmett Tischmak, a homeowner (5725 Walnut Grove Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55446), parent, taxpayer, and military veteran, deeply engaged in our community's civic processes. I write to express my strong opposition to the proposal by Eagle Brook Church to develop of a parcel of land in our neighborhood. I have three key concerns: Reason 1: Maximizing Land Benefits Our community faces a housing shortage, a fact underscored by multiple macroeconomic reports. Given this scarcity of land, allocating habitable land for a church is an inefficient use, especially in a neighborhood in high demand among families. Housing, in contrast, directly meets our community's and surrounding metro area's pressing residential needs. Additionally, as stated in their community meeting this building and infrastructure would only be utilized a small fraction of the week (Saturday evening, and Sunday mornings) whereas houses are used and inhabited a vast majority of the time. Reason 2: Negative Persistent Financial Impact on the Community Some people who received this message don't often get email from alex.krenik47@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 60 207 2 Churches, as non-profit entities, do not pay property taxes. By zoning the land for residential use instead, I estimate we could potentially generate $1-2 million annually in taxable income (56 acres, 3-6 dwelling unit per acre, ~$6k year in property taxes). This revenue supports critical community services, such as schools, infrastructure maintenance, and essential social programs. Reason 3: Many Alternative Options for the Church to Pursue I propose alternative solutions that can benefit both the community and the church: · Utilizing the local high school auditorium for Sunday services, and optimizing existing infrastructure. · Leveraging the surplus of available commercial real estate in Plymouth and the wider metro area. Before approval for Eagle Brook's proposed development, I would like to see an exhaustive independent study stating why the surplus of already vacant commercial in the community would not be suitable for their purposes. · Exploring options outside densely residential suburbs that are better suited to this intrusive type of development. In conclusion, I join the vast majority of our community in opposing the rezoning and approval of the use of this land for the church. It would hinder access to quality housing, squander our limited land resources, and cost our community millions in essential tax revenue. I request our elected leaders to prioritize the well-being of our entire community in land use decisions and carefully consider all of the negative impacts this request would have. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to further discussion. Sincerely, Emmett Tischmak Cell: 701-426-2978 208 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Friday, September 29, 2023 9:16 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Concerns for Proposed Development of Eagle Brook Community Church From: Jessica Krenik <jessica.l.krenik@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 10:34 PM To: Alise McGregor <amcgregor@plymouthmn.gov>; Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Concerns for Proposed Development of Eagle Brook Community Church Hello Alise, I am a homeowner (5715 Walnut Grove Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55446) and parent in our community. I am writing to add my voice to those opposing the proposed development of an Eagle Brook Church (EBC) at the land near Meadow Ridge Elementary . It is my understanding that this land has been zoned for residential use and that is what I believe it should be utilized for. As a homeowner who bought into a new development near this site, I anticipated a future neighborhood would ultimately be in that space. Adding a church there would greatly impact the feel of the surrounding community in a negative manner. The church will not look residential in nature and will cause light pollution to the nearby neighborhoods. Furthermore, EBC stands to bring in a large influx of people in a short periods of time. This would cause great disruption too those trying to access their homes/neighborhoods. Additionally, Eagle Brook Church is not known for being a great community partner. Continuing with the zoned intention of residences means meeting a community need for housing and creates a space for more community families who will bring care to our part of Plymouth. Homes would also provide yearly property taxes which can be used to support our community services and programs. I truly believe there are more suitable options for the church to pursue. Options such as continuing to utilize existing spaces like the high school auditorium, utilizing available commercial spaces, or looking to locations that are not in densely residential areas. I request our elected leaders to prioritize the well-being of our entire community in land use decisions and carefully consider all of the negative impacts this request would have. Thank you for your time and consideration, Jessica Krenik 612-250-0010 Some people who received this message don't often get email from jessica.l.krenik@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 61 209 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Sunday, October 1, 2023 6:59 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Support for Eaglebrook Church Get Outlook for iOS From: Neal Wahlman <neal_wahlman@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2023 2:05 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Support for Eaglebrook Church Mayor Wosje and Council, I am writing in support of Eaglebrook Church’s (EBC) plan to build in Plymouth. I have seen and read several social media postings and understand that there are some that are opposed to the plan. However, I believe strongly that churches help create the kinds of citizens and families that make our city (and all towns and cities) a better, safer, and more forgiving place to live. We need churches (of any denomination) to reinforce the fabric of community. Opponents have given many reasons why they object to the plan, and frankly, I find that most of them are selfish and trivial. For example, some have opposed the plan based on the reduction in property taxes due to the church’s tax- exempt status. With Plymouth’s tax base, this is a trivial loss of tax revenue, and it is more than made up for by the good that churches do. Would these opponents want the types of development there that would pay the maximum in property taxes? I think not. Yes, EBC is classified as a mega-church, but I think EBC is unfairly labeled. The Plymouth location would not be a 15- or 20,000 plus gathering as classical mega-churches are. Its decentralized structure allows it to have economies of scale but meet in smaller locations (hundreds to perhaps 1,000 attendees). Others oppose the traffic implications. EBC has been meeting at Wayzata High School since 2018. (I commend WHS for allowing this.) Perhaps I’ve missed it, but I’m not aware of any traffic concerns caused by this arrangement. EBC has arranged for traffic control assistance during Sunday services and has an army of volunteers directing traffic both before and after the services. Sunday services and Wednesday evening programs happen at times when traffic is light in the area, and it’s for a short time – the 9:00 and 11:00 Sunday services, then the heavier traffic is over. Some oppose rezoning. We all know that property is rezoned in Plymouth and other municipalities on a regular basis. Just because a parcel is zoned one way doesn’t mean it is set in stone and cannot be changed, for the good of the community. Others are concerned about wetlands. Yes, this is a concern, but during my business career I was involved in retail development and know that the various regulatory bodies, local and state, have strict requirements that must be met for all concerned. I have no doubt that EBC will comply with whatever requirements are set forth. EBC has been a good citizen in the other municipalities where they have locations. They want to be a good neighbor. Misinformed folks have claimed EBC is a for-profit entity. It is not and that is easily proven. Some people who received this message don't often get email from neal_wahlman@msn.com. Learn why this is important 62 210 2 Some are concerned about a reduction in property values. While I don’t know if this is factual, I would hope that Plymouth would do its due diligence and research what the results are of EBC building in other locations. I would think that information should be readily available from the municipalities in which EBC operates. EBC greatly benefits the communities and the citizens where they operate. Their many programs serve communities in many ways. In addition to traditional church services and offerings, their programs include counseling, addition recovery, divorce care, hospital visits, grief share, one-on-one care, and many others – all free to anyone – no taxpayer dollars or fees involved. This is a very caring organization that wants each person and family to be happy, healthy, and successful. I would encourage you to view their website (eaglebrookchruch.org). Thank you for your consideration. Neal Wahlman 3435 Rosewood Ln N Plymouth, MN 55441-2201 neal_wahlman@msn.com 612 709-8499 211 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Friday, September 29, 2023 1:01 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Permanent Eagle Brook Church From: Tammy Saphir <tammysaphir@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 12:25 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Permanent Eagle Brook Church Hello I am writing to voice my support of a permanent Eagle Brook Church site in Plymouth Minnesota. Thank you, Tammy Saphir, RPT Mobile Rehab, LLC 612-310-8844 NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain information or other private communication that is privileged at law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute, or reproduce this transmission. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the sender by reply e-mail, fax, or phone. Some people who received this message don't often get email from tammysaphir@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important 63 212 1 Shawn Drill From:Kathy Simula <kathy.simula@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 4, 2023 12:55 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Re: Request for Rezoning for Eagle Brook Church and Conditional Use Permit 18165 62nd N Maple Grove 55311 On Wed, Oct 4, 2023, 9:46 AM Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Thanks for your e-mail Kathy. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Shawn Drill, Sr. Planner Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2023, at 7:00 AM, Kathy Simula <kathy.simula@gmail.com> wrote: To whom it may concern: We own a home within 750 feet of this site. Before purchasing this home, we investigated the area. We wanted a low-traffic, quiet, residential neighborhood away from major highways or areas of high traffic. A 64,000 square foot church will generate lots of traffic. This would totally change the quiet, peaceful area where we purchased our property. A church of this size should be built away from established homes. Then if potential property owners chose to live nearby, there would not be an issue. We are opposed to changing the zoning of this property to accommodate a large church. Sincerely, Steven G. Simula Kathleen J. Simula You don't often get email from kathy.simula@gmail.com. Learn why this is important You don't often get email from kathy.simula@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 64 213 1 Shawn Drill From:Dave Callister Sent:Saturday, October 14, 2023 8:54 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Fwd: Rezoning application from Eagle Brook Church Get Outlook for iOS From: Gary Swoverland <gary.swoverland@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2023 8:15:09 PM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: allcouncil@maplegrovemn.gov <allcouncil@maplegrovemn.gov> Subject: Rezoning application from Eagle Brook Church [Some people who received this message don't often get email from gary.swoverland@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Dear Mayor and City Council members: My name is Gary Swoverland and my address is 6205 Shadyview Lane North, Maple Grove, MN. I recently received a letter from the City of Plymouth informing me that Eagle Brook Church has submitted a rezoning application to build a 64,000 square foot church with seating for up to 1,500 people and parking space for 685 vehicles within 750 feet of my home. My property along with a number of my neighbors in the Bonaire neighborhood of Maple Grove abuts the Maple Grove/Plymouth dividing line. When the farmland next to this parcel was developed in 2017 I received a similar notice from the City of Plymouth and I attended the city council meeting. I inquired as to what was going to be built as was assured that the development of the property would be custom homes as nice or nicer than the homes nearby. The proposal to build a large church in the midst of the Bonaire and Hanson home developments is out of place and incongruous with our residential neighborhoods and will be very disruptive to the people who live in this area. I attended the Eagle Brook Church meeting at Wayzata High School. The church indicated that they would hold several services on Saturday afternoon/evenings and multiple services on Sunday mornings possibly going into the afternoons. They also have activities on Wednesday evening. The church intends to build a road along the south side of the Bonaire development to access the church from Maple Grove Parkway. This will create a significant amount of traffic and commotion in the area on weekends when the homeowners would like to have the ability to enjoy their homes. The Plymouth and Maple Grove homeowners in this area have a significant investment in their homes and should have a right to quiet enjoyment of their property. Sincerely, Gary Swoverland Sent from my iPad 65 214 1 Shawn Drill From:Darnell Fischer <dsf820@aol.com> Sent:Monday, October 16, 2023 4:41 PM To:Shawn Drill Cc:Dave Callister Subject:Re: Opposition to mega church in Plymouth Thank you Shawn for your response. My address is 17130 60th Ave N, Plymouth 55446 Sent from my iPhone Darnell Fischer On Oct 16, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Good morning. Thank you for your e-mail. In response, please note that Eagle Brook Church is not proposing a two-story parking garage structure. Also, an EAW is not required -- as the proposed church building would contain less than 300,000 square feet (it would contain 64,000 square feet). The wetland review is being conducted separately in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act. Your e-mail will be added to the public record on this matter. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Thank you. Sincerely, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Darnell Fischer <dsf820@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2023 8:56 PM To: Shawn Drill <sdrill@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to mega church in Plymouth [You don't often get email from dsf820@aol.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] <image001.jpg> Sent from my iPad You don't often get email from dsf820@aol.com. Learn why this is important 66 215 216 1 Shawn Drill From:Chris LaBounty Sent:Monday, October 16, 2023 8:57 PM To:ref13064@gmail.com Cc:Dave Callister; Jeffry Wosje; Michael Thompson; Shawn Drill Subject:RE: Proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth Evening Richard, Regarding your question on an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW): an EAW is not required -- as the proposed church building would contain less than 300,000 square feet (it would contain 64,000 square feet). The wetland review is being conducted separately in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act. If you’d like any more details on this you can contact Shawn Drill, cc’d on this email. Sincerely, Chris Chris LaBounty, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director | City Engineer From: Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 12:12 PM To: ref13064@gmail.com; Chris LaBounty <clabounty@plymouthmn.gov>; Michael Thompson <mthompson@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Re: Proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth Richard, thank you for taking time to share and appreciate your thoughts. At this point we have received an application and a traffic study is currently underway. We expect this application to be heard by the Planning Commission in November and in front of the Council in December. There will be opportunity for further public comment at both of these meetings. I am also copying staff on the EAW question you raised so they can follow up with the requirement details when this needs to be applied. Jeff Wosje Mayor City of Plymouth From: ref13064@gmail.com <ref13064@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 12:05 PM To: Jeffry Wosje <jwosje@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth [You don't often get email from ref13064@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] 67 217 2 Hello mayor Wosje, I am writing today to express my opposition to the proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth, MN on Chankahda Trail. The proposed complex would impact the traffic congestion, the environment, and the surrounding neighborhoods. I would also like to request that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be completed for the area, as it is located on protected wetlands and is in a residential neighborhood not zoned for this type of building. The area has considerable vehicle traffic now,the added traffic burden of a mega church is unapprovable. In the end the the megachurch proposed effects negatively my family,our immediate neighbors and conceivably all residents of the nationally recognized “Quality of life”Plymouth MN. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration, Richard Fischer Homeowner in adjacent neighborhood of proposed megachurch. Sent from my iPhone 218 1 Shawn Drill From:MmMAspiriN <mmmaspirin@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2023 11:20 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:RE: Potential Megachurch in Plymouth Hello, My address is 17205 Chankahda Trail, Plymouth, MN. Thank you for your reply. Anthony On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:53 AM, Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> wrote: Hello. Thank you for your e-mail. What is your address, so we have it for the record? Thanks, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 Get Outlook for iOS From: MmMAspiriN <mmmaspirin@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2023 1:06:43 AM To: Council Members <council@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Potential Megachurch in Plymouth Hello, I am writing you in concern about a potential megachurch being built down the street from me. My family and I do not support this potential decision. The traffic, environmental, and quality of life impacts to residents is immeasurable (not to mention the financial impact due to the immediate devaluation of surrounding homes). This is a residential area and we do not need a for-profit mega church impacting our neighborhood. I have signed the petition at change.org (https://www.change.org/p/no-eaglebrook-mega-church-in-plymouth) as have over 3,000 other people. Please reconsider allowing this to happen to our neighborhood. Anthony Hommes Some people who received this message don't often get email from mmmaspirin@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important 68 219 1 Shawn Drill From:Shawn Drill Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2023 1:21 PM To:Treichel, Brett (he/him/his) Cc:Kel Treichel Subject:RE: EagleBrook Development Plan Hi Brett. The Planning Commission’s public hearing, which you will be invited to and may wish to attend, is tentatively scheduled for Nov. 15. The City Council date for final action is tentatively set for Dec. 12. Thank you, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Treichel, Brett (he/him/his) <Brett.Treichel@bsci.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 11:24 AM To: Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Kel Treichel <treichka@gmail.com> Subject: Re: EagleBrook Development Plan Thanks Shawn- very helpful and appreciate the quick follow-up. When will the approval process be finalized (either denied or accepted)? Brett From: Shawn Drill <SDrill@plymouthmn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 9:05:38 AM To: Treichel, Brett (he/him/his) <Brett.Treichel@bsci.com> Cc: Kel Treichel <treichka@gmail.com> Subject: {External} RE: EagleBrook Development Plan Good morning Brett. Thank you for your e-mail. 1. 61st Avenue was stubbed up to the east border of “The Fields at Meadow Ridge” to provide for its future continuation/extension through the Luedke Farm area to connect over to Maple Grove Parkway. Since no new street access is allowed to Chankahda Trail, the street design was set up so that any residents living on the Luedke Farm area would enter and exit that site either to their west (through your neighborhood), or to their east to Maple Grove Parkway. A temporary cul-de-sac turn-around was placed (via easement) on 18120 61st Ave. for the interim period. Under the Church’s plan, that temporary cul-de-sac turn-around would be removed/restored and a new permanent cul-de-sac turn-around (with curb and gutter) would be constructed to the east, right off the end of the existing stub street. An “emergency-only” driveway access would provide a secondary means of access to the church site from the cul-de-sac turn-around to the church building, as required by the police and fire departments -- in case there is an emergency on the site and the main driveway You don't often get email from brett.treichel@bsci.com. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Be Security Conscious! 69 220 2 from Maple Grove Parkway is blocked (e.g., downed tree, etc.). The “emergency-only” driveway would not be open to general traffic and would be cordoned off in some fashion yet to be determined. 2. Yes, existing Harvest Park (a city neighborhood park) would be expanded to the east so about one-half of its area is within “The Fields at Meadow Ridge” and about one-half its area is on the Luedke Farm site. Would just be additional park land/open space at this time, as the play feature is already installed within the existing portion of the park. 3. Yes, the parking lot will be lit but Plymouth has one of the most stringent lighting ordinances in the metropolitan area (modeled on the Dark Sky Institution draft ordinance). Given the distance of any parking lot lighting to residential lot lines, it is unlikely that the lighting will be noticeable from off the site. Also, we require that lighting levels be turned down overnight to 50% of what’s allowed. 4. They will need to be working on your street to remove the existing temp. cul-de-sac and install the permanent cul-de-sac. Other than that, all other construction site access is planned to come from Maple Grove Parkway. They’ve told us, if approved, they would hope to start construction in spring and complete it in about one year. Note that there would also be construction noise, etc. with any type of site development. Sincerely, Shawn B. Drill, AICP | Senior Planner City of Plymouth, MN Phone: 763.509.5456 From: Treichel, Brett (he/him/his) <Brett.Treichel@bsci.com> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 4:43 PM To: Shawn Drill <sdrill@plymouthmn.gov> Cc: Kel Treichel <treichka@gmail.com> Subject: EagleBrook Development Plan Hi Shawn, I’m a homeowner at the Fields of Meadow Ridge on 61st Ave. North (adjacent to the proposed new Eaglebrook church). Have a few questions I’m hoping you can answer. 1. There’s a cul-de-sac proposed next to the Fields at Meadow ridge at the end of 61st Ave. North. Please confirm that there is no plan for traffic flow through to the church. I believe that’s the case, but can’t tell from the drawing. It looks like there is an access road to the church parking lot – is that for emergency use only? How wide will that path be? 2. Is there a proposed Park expansion? If so, what is planned and where will it be located? 3. Will the church parking lots have outdoor lighting? Concerned with how bright that will be at night and how late those lights will be on throughout the night time. Please confirm. 4. When would the proposed construction begin and end? How will construction team members access the site? Do not want large construction trucks driving through our neighborhood. Thanks, Brett Treichel Home Owner – 18125 61st Ave N. Plymouth, MN 55446 You don't often get email from brett.treichel@bsci.com. Learn why this is important 221 1 Shawn Drill From:karin webster <kswebster365@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 1, 2023 5:30 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Eagle Brook Church [You don't often get email from kswebster365@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Good Evening Shawn, I am writing to share my support of Eagle Brook Church building on hwy 47. As a family living off 47 & 101 for many years, I can definitively say a church would be a welcome sight. The area is so over populated with homes now, that a change is needed. Please allow the purchase and build to move forward. Thank you, Karin Webster 70 222 1 Shawn Drill From:Brian Mrugala <bmrugala70@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 2, 2023 2:18 PM To:Shawn Drill Subject:Eagle Brook church project Hello, I attend Eagle Brook church that currently meets at Wayzata High School. I fully support the current proposal and feel the church will fit in perfectly with the surrounding Thank you for your time. Brian Mrugala You don't often get email from bmrugala70@gmail.com. Learn why this is important 71 223 1 Shawn Drill From:Chloe McGuire Sent:Tuesday, October 31, 2023 8:31 AM To:Shawn Drill Subject:FW: Proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth From: Rakesh Neelimandhu <nrrakesh@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 10:26 PM To: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth Hello, I am writing today to express my opposition to the proposed Eagle Brook Church in Plymouth, MN on Chankahda Trail. The proposed complex would impact the traffic congestion, the environment, and the surrounding neighborhoods. I would also like to request that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be completed for the area, as it is located on protected wetlands and is in a residential neighborhood not zoned for this type of building. Thank you, Rakesh Neelimandhu You don't often get email from nrrakesh@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important 72 224 73 225 74 226 227 75 228 229 76 230 77 231 78 232 79 233 234 Index of Correspondence Received -- 11-7 & 11-8-2023 Support Oppose Name Address Letter No. X Laura Kooistra 5925 Xene Ln 80 X Andy & Cassie Olson 16610 58th Ave 81 X Adam & Svetlana Nawrocki 2700 Quaker Ln 82 X Katherine Haight 5410 Polaris Ln 83 X David Haight 5410 Polaris Ln 84 235 80 236 81 237 82 238 83 239 84 240 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2023- ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO RECLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL (2023 065) THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of City Code. Chapter 21 of the City Code of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, adopted December 18, 1996 as amended, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Plymouth Zoning Map from FRD (future restricted development) to RSF-3 (single-family detached 3) with respect to parcels located at 17910 Chankahda Trail with Hennepin County Property Identification Numbers of 06-118-22-11-0001, 06-118-22-11-0002, and 06-118-22-12-0001. Section 2. Current Legal Description. The property is currently legally described as follows: Parcel 1: The East 682 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPTING 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, Hennepin County Minnesota; situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6, by deed, in Book 115 of Deeds, on Page 217, and by deed from William Dolan and Lydia Dolan his wife, to School District 120, dated November 15, 1933. Parcel 2: The West 643 feet of the East 1325 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 3: The West 258 feet of the East 1841 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 4: The West 258 feet of the East 1583 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. 241 Ordinance 2023- (2023065) Page 2 Section 3. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this ** day of ****, 20__. ______________________________ Jeffry Wosje, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk 242 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2023- RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL (2023 065) WHEREAS, Eagle Brook Church has requested reclassification of the zoning from FRD (future restricted development) to RSF-3 (single-family detached 3) for roughly 53 acres located at 17910 Chankahda Trail; and WHEREAS, the affected property to be rezoned to RSF-3 is presently legally described as follows: Parcel 1: The East 682 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPTING 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, Hennepin County Minnesota; situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6, by deed, in Book 115 of Deeds, on Page 217, and by deed from William Dolan and Lydia Dolan his wife, to School District 120, dated November 15, 1933. Parcel 2: The West 643 feet of the East 1325 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 3: The West 258 feet of the East 1841 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 4: The West 258 feet of the East 1583 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the property from FRD to RSF-3. 243 Resolution 2023- (2023065) Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for reclassification of the zoning from FRD to RSF-3 for roughly 53 acres as legally described above, based on the following findings: 1. The requested RSF-3 zoning is consistent with the LA-1 guiding of the site pursuant to the City’s comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed development and lot arrangement would meet or exceed the RSF-3 zoning standards. 3. Adequate infrastructure would be provided to support the proposed development. APPROVED by the City Council on this ** day of ****, 20__. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on _______________________, 20__ with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this _________ day of _______________________, ___________. ________________________________ City Clerk 244 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2023- RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EAGLE BROOK CHURCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17910 CHANKAHDA TRAIL (2023 065) WHEREAS, Eagle Brook Church has requested approval of a preliminary plat, site plan, and conditional use permit to establish two lots and allow construction a new 64,000 square foot church building that seats 1,500 people and has 685 parking spaces for the roughly 53-acre site located at 17910 Chankahda Trail and presently legally described as follows: Parcel 1: The East 682 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPTING 1.25 acres heretofore conveyed to School District No. 120, Hennepin County Minnesota; situated in the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 6, by deed, in Book 115 of Deeds, on Page 217, and by deed from William Dolan and Lydia Dolan his wife, to School District 120, dated November 15, 1933. Parcel 2: The West 643 feet of the East 1325 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 3: The West 258 feet of the East 1841 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Parcel 4: The West 258 feet of the East 1583 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the preliminary plat, site plan, and conditional use permit for Eagle Brook Church for property located at 17910 Chankahda Trail, subject to the following conditions: 245 Resolution 2023- File 2023065 Page 2 1. A preliminary plat is approved to subdivide the site into two lots; one lot for the church and one lot to be dedicated as city park land, in accordance with plat drawings received by the City on September 14, 2023, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat is contingent upon approval of the request to rezone the site from FRD (future restricted development) to RSF-3 (single family detached 3). 3. The site plan is approved in accordance with the plans received by the City on September 14, 2023 and revisions dated November 3, 2023, except as may be amended by this resolution. 4. A conditional use permit is approved to allow church use of the site in accordance with the detailed staff analysis findings, as listed in the Planning Commission report. 5. Prior to recording of the final plat, the applicant shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Provide an easement to the city in recordable form for the trailway that would extend from the parking lot to the southeast corner of the site. This easement must be recorded with the final plat. b. Execute a site improvement performance agreement (SIPA) for the public and private improvements, and provide the related financial guarantees and fees. c. Provide the city with a warranty deed free and clear of any and all encumbrances for Lot 2 (the park land to be dedicated). 6. Building permits are required prior to commencement of the project. 7. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Obtain city approval of final construction plans. b. Install silt fence prior to any grading or construction work on the site. c. Obtain any required permits and/or approvals from the Elm Creek Watershed District. d. Obtain approval of the storm water pollution protection plan (SWPPP) and of a national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) permit, if required. e. Provide a storm water maintenance agreement in recordable form for the drainage system. f. Provide evidence that any existing septic systems and wells on the site have been properly abandoned and sealed in accordance with the regulations of Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Health. g. The maximum slope of five percent (1:20) for accessible routes must be identified on the plans from accessible parking spaces to the accessible building entrance. h. Required permanent wetland buffer and park monument signs shall be installed. 246 Resolution 2023- File 2023065 Page 3 8. Implementation of the traffic study recommendations are the responsibility of the applicant, and are hereby incorporated into the approval, as follows: a. Existing striping shall be modified to formalize a northbound left-turn lane into the site. b. A southbound right-turn lane on Maple Grove Parkway (to enter the site) shall be installed to reduce potential conflicts with vehicles entering the site from the south. c. The driveway exit from the site shall be designed with two exit lanes that are at least 225 feet long. The north exit lane shall be for drivers turning left onto Maple Grove Parkway or continuing straight onto 61st Avenue, and the south exit lane shall be for drivers turning right onto Maple Grove Parkway. d. At the discretion of police department, a traffic control officer shall be provided during Sunday morning peak periods to assist drivers at the Maple Grove Parkway intersection with the church driveway/61st Avenue. e. The applicant shall work with the police department to develop a traffic control management plan. 9. The applicant shall construct the city trail within the trail easement and, upon its satisfactory completion, the city shall reimburse the applicant for the cost of the trail installation. 10. The applicant shall remove the temporary cul-de-sac turn-around located in the southeast portion of property located at 18120 61st Avenue. Upon installation of the permanent cul-de-sac turn- around for that street, the applicant shall restore that area including installation of soil and sod. 11. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city to allow use of the church parking lot as overflow parking for The Meadows Park playfield site. 12. The fire lane (emergency access route) coming off the new permanent 61st Avenue cul-de-sac turn- around in the west portion of the site shall be cordoned off to general traffic, in a manner as approved by city staff. 13. The applicant shall work with the City Clerk’s office to allow the site as a possible polling (voting) location for primary and general elections. 14. Standard Conditions: a. Any signage shall comply with Section 21155 of the zoning ordinance and shall receive prior approval of sign permits. b. Any visible rooftop or ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be painted or screened to match the building. c. Compliance with the city’s lighting regulations. d. Compliance with all fire and building code requirements. e. The applicant would need to repair any damage that occurs to existing trails abutting the site, in accordance with City standards. f. The applicant shall remove any diseased or hazardous trees. 247 Resolution 2023- File 2023065 Page 4 g. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. h. The approvals shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has started the project, or unless the applicant, with the consent of the property owner, has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Sections 510, 21045.09 and 21015.07, respectively, of the city code. APPROVED by the City Council on this ** day of ****, 20__. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on _____________________, 20__, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the city this ______day of ___________________, _________. __________________________________ City Clerk 248