Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 12-17-1996CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 17, 1996 MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Allen Ribbe, Commissioners Saundra Spigner, John Stoebner, Tim Bildsoe and Jeffrey Thompson MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Roger Berkowitz and Chairman Mike Stulberg STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt, Planning Supervisor Barb Senness, Planner John Rask, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, and Clerical Supervisor Denise Hutt 1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:06 p.m. 2. PUBLIC FORUM: 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to recommend approval of the November 19 and 26th Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: No Items. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. THE ROTTLUND COMPANY, INC. (96140) Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced the request by The Rottlund Company, Inc. for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan for senior rental and for -sale housing and office commercial uses for The Village of Bassett Creek located at the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Revere Lane. Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the December 12, 1996 staff report. Commissioner Bildsoe asked why the City would want to approve removing 23 acres from commercial designation since the supply is running low on developable land, and there is less commercial than residential. He stated that there should be more land in northwest Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #302 Plymouth available for residential than commercial. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that currently there is more commercial land available than residential. She stated that the City does not know how much land will be available for urban development in northwest Plymouth. The City has not done an overall land availability study for about 18 months, but will be looking at that relatively soon. Planning Supervisor Senness pointed out that the soils on the site are very bad and this type of use may be better suited for the site. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked if the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Department has approved the site for Section 202 Housing already. Planning Supervisor Senness replied that the applicant has received commitment of funding from HUD. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked what the income levels would be for this type of housing program. Housing Supervisor Goldsmith replied that the income for a single person could not exceed $19,100 per year and for a couple it would be $21,850 per year. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked if the HUD approval allows the developer to lower the rents. Housing Supervisor Goldsmith explained that the HUD grant for the project provides an annual subsidy to the developer, which in turn subsidizes the tenant's rent. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked once the decision is made for Section 202 housing, does the building remain as such for the life of the project. Housing Supervisor Goldsmith replied the building will remain as senior housing. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Richard Palmiter, the petitioner. Mr. Palmiter explained the two different for -sale housing units. The Gable townhomes are row type housing with tuck under garages. The end units would have two car garages. Mr. Palmiter stated that they are able to achieve higher densities with these units. They are currently constructing similar units in Minnetonka across from the regional mall. The Village Homes are single family detached townhomes placed at an angle. Each unit would have two car garages. These homes would be similar to the cottage homes at Rockford Glen and are typically purchased by empty nesters. The Gable and Village homes units vary in price from $110,000 to $160,000. Mr. Palmiter stated that they have brought in Common Bond Communities for the senior housing building. This site is the only HUD choice for a Section 202 housing project in the Twin Cities area this year. The building will be a two-story partial brick building, with grade level parking and one stall per unit. There will be an office area along Highway 55 on the site for a possible two-story office building. Mr. Palmiter stated that they would probably spin this off to a commercial developer, as Rottlund does not specialize in commercial developing. Trail systems would be provided through the project and tie into the existing City trail system. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked if the developer of the Section 202 housing would be the same entity that would manage the units. Mr. Palmiter replied affirmatively. He also stated that Common Bond Communities used to be known as Westminister. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the applicant is proposing city -owned roads through the development. Mr. Palmiter replied that their intention is for some private roads, as the site will be challenging as it has a lot of wetlands and they will need some flexibility. Mr. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #303 Palmiter stated that they will work with the City regarding public versus private roads for the development. Acting Chairman Ribbe opened the public hearing. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Mr. Marshall Rappaport of 1044 Trenton Circle North. Mr. Rappaport stated his opposition for the plan as proposed because the density is too high. He stated that the congestion caused by the project would be detrimental to the area. Mr. Rappaport asked how the project will affect Trenton Ponds environmentally. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Mr. Jim Schurz of 1167 Trenton Circle North. Mr. Schurz stated that when he purchased his property he was told the site was zoned for commercial use, which would be low density, one level office buildings or a day care. Mr. Schurz stated that with a commercial building, it would be much quieter on the evenings and weekends. Mr. Schurz stated that 10th Avenue gets a lot of traffic bypassing Highway 169 and Highway 55. He stated that anything built of high density will have to have a lot of pilings and good footings. Mr. Schurz commented that private streets are narrower and cause parking problems. He asked how the applicant would handle the overflow parking. Mr. Schurz commented that the site is close to Highway 55 and you can hear the traffic. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Mr. Paul Siegel of 1035 Nathan Lane. Mr. Siegel expressed concern over the environmental impact of the proposal. He stated that his company (Minter Weisman) owns 14 acres of undeveloped land. He stated his concern that if the proposal goes in as residential, they would have a harder time developing their land if they need to expand their company. Mr. Siegel asked if there would be a stop light at Revere Lane if it connects with 10th Avenue. Acting Chairman Ribbe closed the public hearing. In response to density issues, Planning Supervisor Senness stated when looking at residential development, six to 12 units per acre are allowed. It is less than commercial development that could occur on this property. Director Hurlburt asked how the proposal would compare to the density in Trenton Ponds. Planning Supervisor Senness replied that Trenton Ponds is guided LA -3. Mr. Rappaport stated that there are 56 units on 14 acres. Relating to environmental issues, Planning Supervisor Senness explained that staff at this point is looking at the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. They will look at wetlands and runoff issues and how it would affect Trenton Ponds at the next level of review. If there are issues that arise, they will have to be dealt with. Director Hurlburt stated that at this point, staff doesn't know how many parking spaces the applicant will propose, or whether there will be private roads. Planning Supervisor Senness explained that this application is just the first step. The applicant would have to come back with other applications for the site, which would require another public hearing before the Planning Commission and then on to City Council. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #304 Acting Chairman Ribbe asked how long the site has been commercial. Planning Supervisor Senness replied that it has been zoned commercial for quite some time. She stated that staff have been discussing this particular proposal for almost a year informally. Director Hurlburt stated that the application was submitted about two and one-half months ago. She stated that the landowners were told correctly that the site is commercial, but a landowner can request a change. Mr. Palmiter stated that there are no good soils to be found on the entire site. He stated that it is evident that this type of development would permit a little bit of a break rather than have to correct the entire site. Mr. Palmiter stated that they would have to remove all the soil and replace with good soils. In response to traffic concerns, City Engineer Faulkner stated that the proposed guiding would produce significantly less traffic and spread it out over a longer period of the day. He stated that the applicant is not proposing to construct Revere Lane with this proposal. When Revere Lane is constructed, city staff would have to look at traffic levels to see if a traffic light is warranted. The intention is to build 6th Avenue to the west to get over to South Shore Drive, which would provide another outlet to and from the site. There is an intent to connect to 10th Avenue, but it shouldn't cause a problem. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the new ordinance requires two and one-half parking spaces per unit. For those units that have one garage, the driveway could be used if it is of sufficient length. She stated that the applicant would need additional areas for overflow parking, and would have to designate that on the Site Plan when they submit it. Director Hurlburt stated that if the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment is not approved, this proposal will not move forward. In response to Mr. Siegel's concern, Planning Supervisor Senness stated that their business is already located in the area, and anyone purchasing a home would be aware that there are other industrial buildings in the area. Commissioner Spigner asked why the Commission is considering this change when properties were looked at through the proposed zoning ordinance, and it was decided at that time that it should be limited business and commercial business. Director Hurlburt stated that the current guiding is CL, and the property will continue to be limited business now or Commercial Office. She explained that staff did not study properties to see if they should be changed, but rather put them into a similar district for the use that they are currently. Property owners were told if they wanted a change, they would need to apply for a change, as is the case with this application. MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe recommending approval of a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for The Rottlund Company, Inc. for property located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Revere Lane. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #305 Commissioner Thompson stated that he supports the application, as it is a good and exciting development for senior housing, with excellent transition of housing. By putting in commercial it helps maintain the commercial along Highway 55. Acting Chairman Ribbe stated his intention to support the application, as it fills a need for senior housing that is evident in the City. He concurred with Commissioner Thompson that it provides good transition. Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. B. AMERICAN PORTABLE TELECOM (APT), REPRESENTED BY CELLULAR REALTY ADVISORS (96167) Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced the request by APT, American Portable Telecom, represented by Cellular Realty Advisors for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to place a 130 -foot high telecommunications tower at the Plymouth Middle School Playfield located at 10011 -36th Avenue North. Planner Rask gave an overview of the December 11, 1996 staff report and submitted a revised resolution adding Condition #6. Commissioner Bildsoe asked what would happen if the applicant wants to extend beyond the 130 feet. Planner Rask replied that the applicant would have to come back to the City with another application. Planner Rask commented that as providers add additional antennas, they typically should come down in height. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if this is a desirable site, or are there other sites that would fit the applicant's need. Planner Rask replied that APT is a new company in the area and looking to establish service along with Sprint. He explained that this site has the benefit of being close to Highway 169. Commissioner Spigner asked if other school systems have approved antennas for their school sites. Planner Rask replied that Minnetonka has looked at it. Commissioner Spigner asked why the applicant would choose a school site. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Peter Heimdahl, of Cellular Realty Advisors, representing the applicant. Mr. Heimdahl thanked staff for their informative recommendation and noted that on page two of the staff report, paragraph one, it should read three equipment cabinets instead of two. Mr. Heimdahl stated that digital technology provides better voice quality. He explained that they supply a smart card which is a credit card with a computer chip, that allows the person to call from anyone's portable cell phone, and the call will be billed directly to the card user. Mr. Heimdahl stated that the site was picked because of the location and the site fits into the network for the coverage. Mr. Heimdahl presented a computer imaging picture of the site depicting what the tower Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #306 would look like. Mr. Heimdahl stated that they are currently looking at a school site in Eagan and that they have a number of towers on park sites. Commissioner Spigner asked the applicant if they have any towers currently on a school site. Mr. Heimdahl replied negatively. Commissioner Spigner stated that she is not comfortable with a tower being located on a school site, and asked if the applicant had considered the water tower in New Hope located on 26th Avenue. Mr. James Lee of APT replied that they looked at a number of locations and approached the City of New Hope regarding the use of the water tower, but did not get a response from the City. Mr. Lee stated that the school location is ideal to blend into the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner Spigner asked how the school district felt about having an antenna on the property. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Jim Dahle, representing the school district. Mr. Dahle stated that the school district was approached by two other phone companies, and the land is owned by the City and leased by the school district. Mr. Dahle stated that discussions took place between the school district, City Manager and City staff. The school district and the City will share proceeds from the lease. Acting Chairman Ribbe asked if the school district has any safety concerns. Mr. Dahle replied negatively. Director Hurlburt stated that the Parks Director has been involved with this, and has no issues or problems. Mr. Heimdahl stated that the ordinance addresses co -location on towers. He stated that they have been approached by US West and Sprint, as they are also interested in the site. Commissioner Bildsoe asked the applicant how many more times they would be back before the Commission with an application. Mr. Heimdahl replied that they are looking at two more sites - both are NSP substation sites. Commissioner Stoebner asked if the water tower site in New Hope would fulfill the same needs as the proposed site. Mr. Lee replied that with the water tank they would have to locate the antenna on top of the tank. Commissioner Stoebner asked if it's the City's position to encourage water towers. Director Hurlburt replied that the ordinance addresses antennas and encourages placement on water towers, as it would not require a conditional use permit. Planning Supervisor Senness asked the applicant about the possibility of Sprint and US West co -locating on the water tower in New Hope. Mr. Lee stated that the antennas would probably have to be at a different level or a different position on the water tower. Commissioner Spigner stated that the tower would be intrusive to a possible residential area for the property surrounding Plymouth Oaks. Director Hurlburt noted that most of that land is wetland, but that there could be some potential land developed for residential. Commissioner Spigner asked if there were any existing poles, such as the proposed already in Plymouth. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that there is an antenna that is approximately 100 to 110 feet located by the Radisson on Highway 55 and I-494. Director Hurlburt noted that during staff's research, they saw many examples where Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #307 towers were added to light towers in ball diamonds or parking lots. Mr. Heimdahl stated that the existing poles at Plymouth Middle School appear to be about 50 feet high. Acting Chairman Ribbe opened the public hearing Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Norb Weimholt of 10010 - 36th Place North. Mr. Wimholt stated that he realizes that towers are being erected all over the country, but most are opposed due to health reasons. Mr. Weimholt stated that some believe radio waves can be harmful over a long period of time. Mr. Wimholt stated that the proposed location is one of the most dense in Plymouth, and that the applicant should consider a different location such as French Park. Mr. Weimholt asked if the school district would go along with the application if they weren't going to receive revenue from it. Mr. Weimholt asked who has the right to place antennas on sites. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced John Hanso of 10020 -36th Place North. Mr. Hanso declined to speak. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Mr. Dave Hagen of 10715 - 39th Avenue North. Mr. Hagen stated that he is an employee of Sprint Spectrum and has children that attend Plymouth Middle School and Armstrong High School. Mr. Hagen stated that this site is an excellent location for this type of antenna as schools have large structures and ballfields with lights on poles. The antenna will be consistent and harmonious with the area. Mr. Hagen stated that Sprint Spectrum recently received approval with the City of Mendota Heights and currently working with the Roseville School District to place antennas on their school sites. Mr. Hagen stated that Sprint Spectrum has done studies on if antennas towers negatively affect property values. They researched areas in Golden Valley, New Hope, and Stillwater and found there was very little affect on property values. Acting Chairman Ribbe closed the public hearing. Mr. Heimdahl stated in that 1995, the FCC auctioned off two broad band spectrums for PCS technology. For this particular technology there were two successful bidders - APT and Sprint. A company has to apply to the FCC in order to be licensed and to operate. Mr. Heimdahl stated that the school district is comfortable with the safety aspects, and are interested in the proceeds from the tower. He stated that they are tightly controlled by the FCC and they consider this a safe technology. A tower generates 500 to 600 watts, base unit generates 25 watts, which is less than what you receive from a microwave oven. MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Stoebner to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Amendment to allow installation of a monopole tower and related ground equipment for wireless communication services at Plymouth Middle School located at 10011 -36th Avenue North. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #308 Commissioner Spigner stated that she would not vote in favor of the application due to it being proposed in a residential area. She stated that the City needs to set up a subcommittee to study antennas further and where they should be allowed. Commissioner Thompson stated that he is familiar with health hazards and reports and that there is no proof or evidence of towers causing health problems. He stated that there is no grounds for denial, and that it is not a bad thing for the school to receive the revenue. Commissioner Thompson suggested co -location for towers for aesthetic purposes. Commissioner Bildsoe stated that it was unfortunate that the City of New Hope did not respond to the applicant's request. Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 4-1 Vote. (Commissioner Spigner voted nay.) Acting Chairman Ribbe called a recess at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:55 p.m. 7. OLD BUSINESS A. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281 (96120) Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced the request by the Independent School District 281 for an Amended Conditional Use Permit to change an approved resolution to permit Cooper High School events at Armstrong High School athletic stadium in the event an emergency renders Cooper's stadium not useable. Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the December 10, 1996 staff report. She stated that under new zoning ordinance this area would become public institutional which would require a Site Plan Amendment instead of a Conditional Use Permit, but the conditions would be the same. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Jim Dahle, representing the petitioner. Mr. Dahle stated that the school district has met with City staff and requested a postponement to meet and address issues of the neighborhood. He stated that they are prepared to meet with their engineer and change the lighting to meet the standard. Acting Chairman Ribbe read a letter dated December 17, 1996 from R. Berglund of 10620 -34th Avenue North. In her letter, Ms. Berglund stated that the residents who live near the Armstrong stadium should be able to experience at lease one year of compliance to the conditions in Resolution 94-511 before an amendment is even considered. Ms. Berglund stated her concern with the school violating conditions #11, 12, 13, and 16 of Resolution 94-511. Ms. Berglund stated in her letter that the Commission should not recommend approval of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #309 Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Denis Biagini, principal at Armstrong High School. Mr. Biagini stated that the parking signs are in cooperation with the Plymouth police department. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the "no parking" signs is the City's responsibility to place on the site. Mr. Biagini stated that the school district will be retesting the lighting. The school district is working on rule regarding stopping time and timeouts that prolong the football games. The school will begin football games at 7:00 p.m. next year. Mr. Biagini stated that the boosters will be cleaning up after the games and will try to meet the 10:00 p.m. deadline. They will also limit playing music to 15 minutes before games, and will test the noise level, but noted that the wind has a lot to do with how noise travels. Commissioner Stoebner commented that one of the complaints was that the speakers were directed to the residential areas. Mr. Biagini stated that the speaker in question has been redirected and the sound system will be tested. MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Independent School District 281 for property located at 10635 - 36th Avenue North. MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Spigner to add Condition #7 stating that no music shall be played on the public address system prior to 15 minutes before the first event and no music after the last event. Roll Call Vote on MOTION to Amend 5 ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried unanimously. B. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (96160) Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced the request by Sprint Spectrum, L.P. for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit to place a 140 -foot high telecommunications tower and related ground phone equipment at Hampton Hills Golf Course, located at 5313 Juneau Lane North. Planning Supervisor Senness gave an overview of the December 9, 1996 staff report. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Gary Gandrud, representing the petitioner. Mr. Gandrud stated that Sprint is going to locate antennas on three Plymouth water towers, and this is a fourth site. Mr. Gandrud stated that if the City of New Hope lifts their moratorium, they could locate on their water tower, if not, they would be looking at co - locating with APT at the Plymouth Middle School site. Mr. Gandrud presented a photo simulation of the tower on the site. Commissioner Thompson asked when the moratorium ends in New Hope. Mr. Gandrud replied March 1, 1997. Mr. Gandrud stated that they intend to launch their system in March, 1997. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #310 Acting Chairman Ribbe stated that the public hearing on the item was previously closed, but that he would reopen the public hearing for limited comments. Acting Chairman Ribbe read a petition signed by 17 individuals in opposition to the tower. Acting Chairman Ribbe also acknowledged receipt of a letter dated December 12, 1996 from Bruce Banister of 5340 Vicksburg Lane North stating his opposition to the proposal. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Bruce Banister of 5340 Vicksburg Lane North. Mr. Banister stated that he is opposed to the tower going into the golf course, as that is surrounded by residential. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced James Lee of APT. Mr. Lee declined to comment. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Shari Hanson of 5565 Juneau Lane. Ms. Hanson stated that she bought her property for the view and that she pays high taxes. Ms. Hanson stated her opposition to the tower, as it would devaluate her property. She questioned where the studies were done that Mr. Hagen referred to. She asked if they were in low or middle income areas. She asked how would towers affect property in a higher income area, and if the City of Plymouth wants to have towers dotting its City. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Roger Schroeder of 5565 Juneau Lane. Mr. Schroeder stated his opposition to the proposal and concurred with Ms. Hanson's comments. Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced Steve Weld of 5605 Juneau Lane. Mr. Weld stated the proposal is intrusive to the surrounding area. He stated that he bought his property to look at trees, not a tower. Acting Chairman Ribbe closed the public hearing. In response to Ms. Hanson's question regarding the property value studies, Mr. Hagen stated that the studies were done near existing water tower antennas in Golden Valley, south of Medicine Lake Road, east of Highway 169. Three towers located in New Hope near the northwest quadrant of Winnetka Avenue and 36th Avenue and in the western portion of Stillwater. Neighborhoods were different in terms of property values ranging from $110,000 to $170,000. He stated that the results of the neighborhoods were the same, with no impact of discern being located near a tower. Director Hurlburt asked the applicant to show on the map where the antennas would be placed. Mr. Eugene Sigel, representing the petitioner pointed out where they plan to place the antennas in Plymouth and surrounding cities. He explained that the colors on the map Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #311 show the signal strengths from green being the highest for receiving signals then to yellow, red and blue being the weakest. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the other site the Commission asked them to look into was not chosen because of the proximity of the water tank site on Highway 55 that the applicant intends to place an antenna. Mr. Sigal agreed that it was one of the reasons, but more so because of how high the topography is. By shifting the site they couldn't provide acceptable coverage for some areas. Commissioner Bildsoe asked about the possibility of picking a site to the east, near the commercial area. Mr. Sigal replied that if they move further east, it would cause a gap in coverage for another year. Commissioner Thompson asked what landscaping is proposed. Planning Supervisor Senness replied that the applicant would install a six-foot high chain link fence around the perimeter. Director Hurlburt commented that the base would not be seen at the site because of the existing trees. Tim Dean, representing the petitioner stated that they will be putting up pillars to protect the tower along the west side. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if APT has something in mind for this area also. Mr. Sigal responded that Sprint has not been approached to co -locate for this site. He stated that there will be certain sites that will overlap and that they can co -locate, but there will be other areas that they can't. Commissioner Thompson asked if there was any effort being made by the carriers to co - locate on sites. Mr. Terry Hanna, representing the petitioner replied that Sprint has entered into master lease agreements with most of the local carriers (AT&T, APT, One Comm., Next Tell) and have made efforts with Air Touch or U S West Cellular and US West PCS (not yet granted a license). Commissioner Thompson commented that the applicant should be prepared to address how many future applications they intend to have before the item goes to City Council. Mr. Hanna stated that Sprint is trying to promote co -location and to be locate on water towers. He stated that other competitors use a different type of technology and coverage is different. Planning Supervisor Senness stated that the ordinance does have a condition for co -location. Commissioner Spigner asked if Hampton Hills would not have agreed to this, what would have been their alternative plan. Mr. Sigal replied that they really don't have an alternative plan because they need this site in order to make coverage work for the entire area. Director Hurlburt asked the applicant if this site didn't work out would they have to relocate the other sites or move off the water tower into another freestanding tower. Mr. Sigal responded affirmatively. Mr. Hanna stated that they don't want to have to build a new structure, as they have all of the other sites, and need this one for the level of service they need. Mr. Sigal stated that in a typical ring, they have more than one site picked, but in this ring it is located in an area that is impossible to find a back up because of the proximity of the water towers. Planning Commission Minutes December 17, 1996 Page #312 MOTION by Commissioner Stoebner, seconded by Commissioner Thompson recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Amendment to allow installation of a monopole tower and related ground equipment for wireless communication services at Hampton Hills Golf Club located at 5313 Juneau lane North and adding a condition that the applicant shall promote co -location. Commissioner Thompson commented that there were no facts presented on devaluating property values, other than those presented by petitioner. Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION carried on a 4-1 vote. (Commissioner Spigner voted nay.) C. TOWN AND COUNTRY Acting Chairman Ribbe introduced the request by Town and County Homes, Inc. for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment from CS (Commercial Service)/C (Commercial) to LA - 3 (High -Medium Density Residential/Living Area 3) and Sketch Plan for a 159 -unit townhome community located in the northwest quadrant of Highway 55 and Dunkirk Lane. Planning Supervisor Senness noted that the applicant requested the item be table to January 14, 1996, but the City is requesting tabling the item to January 28, 1996. MOTION by Commissioner Thompson, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to table the item to January 28, 1996. 8. NEW BUSINESS Director Hurlburt stated her thanks to Commissioners Bildsoe and Spigner for their service and wished them well on the City Council. Commissioner Thompson stated that it has been a pleasure serving with both Commissioners Bildsoe and Spigner. Commissioner Stoebner and Acting Chairman Ribbe concurred. Commissioner Bildsoe asked if the Commission could direct staff to discuss with the applicant about the possibility of approaching the City of New Hope after March 1 about placing the antennas on their water tower. Director Hurlburt replied that the City is obligated to decide on their application before March 1, 1997. MOTION by Commissioner Spigner, seconded by Commissioner Bildsoe to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 10:09 p.m.