HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 08-17-2005Approved Minutes
City of Plymouth
Planning Commission Meeting
August 17, 2005
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair Frank Weir, Commissioners Sarah Anderson, E.J.
Clyman, Nancy Franke -Wilson, Kathleen Murdock and James Holmes
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Peggy Larson
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Director Anne Hurlburt, Planning
Manager Barbara Senness, Senior Planner Shawn Drill, Senior Planner Marie Darling,
Planner Joshua Doty, Associate Planner Kip Berglund, Associate Planner Jared Noelting,
City Engineer Ron Quanbeck, and Office Support Representative Janice Bergstrom
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC FORUM
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Director Hurlburt said Item 7A is related to Item 6D and these items could be discussed
concurrently. She said staff recommends moving Item 7A after Item 6C.
MOTION by Commissioner Holmes, second by Commissioner Murdock to approve the
August 17, 2005 Planning Commission Agenda with the change recommended by staff.
Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 3, 2005, PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Murdock, seconded by Commissioner Clyman, to approve
the August 3, 2005 Planning Commission minutes. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved.
B. INSPEC, INC. (2005064)
MOTION by Commissioner Murdock, seconded by Commissioner Clyman, to approve
the request by Inspec, Inc. for a site plan amendment for a bituminous drive with adjacent
concrete sidewalk at Oakwood Elementary School located at 17340 County Road 6. Vote.
6 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 2
C. EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS (2005096)
MOTION by Commissioner Murdock, seconded by Commissioner Clyman, to approve
the request by Edward Farr Architects for a site plan amendment to allow a parking
expansion at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION
approved unanimously.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. FAEGRE & BENSON LLP (2004019)
Vice Chair Weir introduced the request by Faegre & Benson LLP for a planned unit
development amendment to allow various site plan inconsistencies from the original
planned unit development approval for Parkers Lake Apartments located at 15100 18'
Avenue North.
Associate Planner Berglund gave an overview of the August 9, 2005 staff report.
Vice Chair Weir opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak
on the item.
MOTION by Commissioner Clyman, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to approve the
request by Faegre & Benson LLP for a planned unit development amendment to allow
various site plan inconsistencies from the original planned unit development approval for
Parkers Lake Apartments located at 15100 18th Avenue North. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes.
MOTION approved.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 3
B. LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES (2005033)
Vice Chair Weir introduced the request by Lifestyle Properties for a rezoning, preliminary
plat, site plan, conditional use permit and variance to allow the construction of thirteen
apartment -style buildings to be called the "Villas of Bass Lake Creek" for property located
at the southwest corner of the intersection of Nathan Lane and Bass Lake Rd. (County
Road 10).
Senior Planner Darling gave an overview of the August 12, 2005 staff report.
Commissioner Clyman asked if there are any ordinances controlling the use of a
community room such as the one proposed for the RMF -3 building.
Senior Planner Darling said there is no ordinance for a community room in a private
development, although the noise ordinance applies.
Commissioner Clyman asked if there would be increased lighting for the proposed
community room.
Senior Planner Darling answered nothing is shown on the site plan.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Bill Gleason, Lifestyle Properties. Mr. Gleason said the main
issue has been that the buildings closest to the single family homes were too tall and the
proposed buildings have now been lowered. He reiterated this is a project to accommodate
seniors. Mr. Gleason said they reviewed a lot of scenarios for this development and said
the higher density helps keep the price down. Mr. Gleason said the buildings are designed
to have all end units so windows and light make the units more livable. He said all
buildings would have elevators, underground parking, an extra handicapped parking space
for visitors, and wheelchair ramps. Mr. Gleason said all units are designed to be
handicapped adaptable inside. He said they tried to create more green space around the
buildings. Mr. Gleason stated the site is restrictive and he feels there is no way to develop
other than RMF -4 zoning for the majority of this site.
Commissioner Wilson asked if the proposed units could be sold to non -senior buyers. She
asked if, other than the design of the condominiums, there would signage educating buyers
that this is a senior housing.
Mr. Gleason said the units would not be age restricted. He said the design of the units, the
single parking space under the building and reduced amount of outside parking attracts
senior buyers mainly and designs most other people out of the building. He said there have
been young, single women in their other projects, but they've never had a family situation.
He said their project in Shorewood is 98% seniors. He added that the proposed community
room has been abandoned.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 4
Commissioner Wilson said she asked this question as there was concern from the
neighbors regarding numbers of people with the proposed development.
Mr. Gleason reiterated that the design is for persons with only one vehicle. He said most
townhomes have a double garage and the proposed project has single garages so he does
not see it happening.
Commissioner Clyman said that there is a density of 1.5 to 2 units in the adjacent single
family neighborhood and wondered what the density is for the RMF -3 portion of the
proposed buildings bordering the single family homes. He said the reason he needs
clarification on the density is to get a better perspective on the transitioning which is his
biggest concern.
Mr. Gleason said they tried to keep the project so it looks the same and fits in. He added
that they had a homeowner meeting to discuss these revisions. He said he had not
calculated the density.
Senior Planner Darling said the RMF -3 would be about 4 units per acre.
Commissioner Clyman asked if townhomes were ever considered for the southern portion
so the parking lot on the western portion could be removed.
Mr. Gleason said the townhomes just would not work as this is a very tight piece of
property and they are trying to make the design of the RMF -3 buildings look like they fit
with the neighborhood.
Vice Chair Weir opened the public hearing.
Director Hurlburt stated that a one-page addition to an earlier petition was received, and e-
mails from Chuck Beisner, Charles Wolf, Eric Anderson, and Sharon Slye were received
and are all part of the public record.
Vice Chair Weir introduced David Hanson, 5660 Trenton Lane N. Mr. Hanson said his
main concern is the size and scale of the buildings. He said he appreciates that some
transition issues have been addressed but questioned if the changes help out since the rest
of the project is proposed to be RMF -4 and only the closest buildings are RMF -3. Mr.
Hanson said the Comprehensive Plan requires an RMF -4 development to be close to retail,
have bus access, and parks.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Ron Lustman, 5664 Trenton Lane N. Mr. Lustman said when
he saw the original proposal for the site, the word "surreal" applied and still applies with
the proposed changes. As he read the staff report, Mr. Lustman said he got the impression
the neighborhood should be glad for the changes. Mr. Lustman said no matter how the
developers and staff evaluate the proposal with the changes, it doesn't fit the location and
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 5
doesn't match the community. Mr. Lustman said if they don't sell, we'll have rental units.
Mr. Lustman said staff addresses the reduction in height as a big concession. Mr. Lustman
said the Hickory Hills neighborhood will be happy to know they'll have 3 level buildings
in their back yard. Mr. Lustman questioned Plymouth's commitment to preserving natural
spaces and wetlands. Mr. Lustman said the developer showed the neighbors the revised
plans and had commented that property values won't go down, but you'll have fewer
buyers as not everyone wants that development in their back yard.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Jack Gassner, 5570-1 Nathan Lane N. Mr. Gassner said
Hickory Hills is not opposed to the development but is concerned about traffic even though
the staff report says traffic is not a problem. He stated that at certain times of the day you
can wait through two traffic lights at Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane. Mr. Gassner said
they want sufficient screening so they do not see the southeast side of the development,
parking lots and a three-story building. He said the proposed buildings are not similar in
height to the adjacent homes in the neighborhood. Mr. Gassner said an eight -foot
landscaped berm would be required but now the staff report says six- to eight -foot
landscaped berm is proposed and he has an issue with that. He said the property to the
north will remain commercial and if there is another traffic access on Nathan Lane, traffic
will stymie the area. Mr. Gassner said the recommended parking lot lighting for security
would put the Hickory Hills neighborhood in the spotlight. He said he doesn't understand
the wetland mitigation and is concerned how the NURP pond in Hickory Hills will drain,
especially during construction. Mr. Gassner said they should reduce the building height by
one story to make proper transition to the neighborhood.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Jerry Unger, 10607 57th Pl. Mr. Unger said talks with the
developer lead him to believe there might be townhouses on the western and southern side
of the development. He said he is disappointed with this proposal which is very similar to
the earlier proposal and still is not appropriate for the area. Mr. Unger stated the earlier
petition is still valid. Mr. Unger disputed the location of the water quality pond on the
northwest corner of Bass Creek and said pollutants will be carried right through the pond
into Bass Creek. He said water needs time in the pond for pollutants to settle out. Mr.
Unger displayed pictures and explained how he can trace the water flow from the Lifestyle
Properties area, and showed how mud helps trace the water flow through the Harrison
Place pond. Mr. Unger said a moderate rainfall will push pollutants right into Bass Creek.
Mr. Unger, a retired professional engineer, said he has reviewed the elevations and believes
the pond could be placed on the western end where 95% of the runoff would drain into the
pond. Mr. Unger said the current plan shows there is permissible grading and replanting
along the creek but he said the developer is not doing enough in this development to
protect the natural conditions. Mr. Unger addressed the impervious surface calculations
and said the City should take another look at their calculation procedures as the current
calculations for private/public streets give a false impression and it is also confusing to
many area agencies and commissions. Mr. Unger said shortly Plymouth taxpayers will be
paying for degrading the waters from this development. Mr. Unger added that there is a
tremendous advantage to do this right the first time as it costs 20 times more to redo it
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 6
later, like trying to clean up Medicine Lake. He said it is not enough to keep hearing the
words "strive for less density in development and keeping open spaces". Mr. Unger
concluded that this proposal is not appropriate for taxpayers, the environment or the
neighborhood.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Daonna Depoister, 5355 Union Terrace Lane. Ms. Depoister
said she is co -president of the Ponds of Bass Creek homeowners association which
represents 72 homes, 6 of which back up to this proposed development. Ms. Depoister
said their petition asks that the development be zoned to RMF -3 or lower, which would
limit the height of the buildings. She said they have met with the developer and viewed the
new plan with lowered buildings but existing residents still would view 11 buildings that
are 3.5 stories of 45 -foot height. Ms. Depoister said her ReMax real estate agent was very
clear how this proposed development would lower property values and limit the number of
potential buyers. Ms. Depoister said she would like to view existing 3.5 -story buildings
next to single family homes in the City of Plymouth to see what happens to property
values. Ms. Depoister suggested a traffic study be done at the corner of Bass Lake Road
and Nathan Lane as the proposed 144 units would have a significant traffic impact. She
said an RMF -4 zoning requirement suggests transportation, parks and shopping be within a
local area. She said the City's bus service was recently reduced and the Ponds of Bass
Creek's park may or may not be amenable to the requirement for parks. Ms. Depoister said
she still has questions in her mind as to how this proposal fits in conjunction with other
areas.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Karen Benson, 5594 Nathan Lane. Ms. Benson said she lives
in Hickory Hills and echoes the concerns of earlier speakers. She said her main concern is
incompatibility with surrounding townhomes and single family homes.
Vice Chair Weir introduced James Sweat 5545 Nathan Lane, Hickory Hills Townhomes.
Mr. Sweat said there is an unresolved issue regarding truck traffic on Nathan Lane. He
said the truck traffic would go right by the proposed development bothering new neighbors.
Mr. Benson questioned the project being restricted for seniors only and said a similar
development on Bass Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue is a jumbled mess. Mr. Benson
said there are townhomes and single family homes in this area and the proposed apartment -
style buildings 45 -feet tall just don't cut it. He said he is not opposed to development, but
is opposed to RMF -4 and it needs to be one or two level buildings.
Vice Chair Weir closed the public hearing.
Director Hurlburt asked for clarification on the traffic information.
City Engineer Quanbeck stated that traffic was counted at a location near the entrance of
the proposed development at Nathan Lane. He said many hours at various times during the
day were spent observing the intersection to see how it operated and to identify problems.
City Engineer Quanbeck said they did not observe situations where it took more than one
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 7
light cycle to get through the intersection. City Engineer Quanbeck said the occasions
where the residents might need to wait through two light cycles would not warrant a major
project change.
Senior Planner Darling added that traffic counts were conducted near the main entry and
the south side of 56th Avenue, and the speed information collected has been relayed to the
traffic control division of the Public Safety Department.
Director Hurlburt asked where access would be for the commercial site when it develops.
Senior Planner Darling said the best location for an access would be across from the
southernmost drive at the Super America site.
Director Hurlburt asked if the drainage outlet from the NURP pond in Hickory Hills would
be disrupted by the proposed development.
City Engineer Quanbeck said the pond in Hickory Hills drains directly west through two
wetlands to Bass Creek and the proposed project would not impact the drainage. He added
this pond is scheduled for review by the City as part of the maintenance program. City
Engineer Quanbeck said the pond would be located at the lowest part of the site and the
creek is also on the lowest part of the site. He said the western side of the development
could be an alternative location for the pond, but the current location does meet City
standards and the watershed requirements.
Director Hurlburt asked about impervious surface measurements in shoreland areas.
Senior Planner Darling said the Zoning Ordinance requires private properties and private
streets within a certain distance from a protected lake or stream to limit impervious surface
to reduce run-off. Senior Planner Darling added this Shoreland policy was adopted in
1980.
Director Hurlburt asked if lighting in the parking lots would impact homes nearby.
Senior Planner Darling said the applicant proposes no lighting except over doorway entries.
She said for safety and security reason staff is encouraging a minimal amount of lighting
for parking areas, such as short bollards or shoebox overhead lighting with side shields to
protect adjacent properties.
Commissioner Murdock asked about the proximity of the new road for the development to
the intersection of Nathan Lane and Bass Lake Road.
City Engineer Quanbeck the location of the road into the residential development is far
enough away from Bass Lake Road so that it would not interfere with Bass lake Road
along Nathan Lane.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 8
Commissioner Anderson said she has listened closely to the residents and the developer on
this project and she is still concerned about transition from single family and townhomes
with other development in the surrounding area. Commissioner Anderson said she is
concerned about the height of the five proposed buildings that border the proposal. She
said one or two story structures would be more in line with what the City of Plymouth has
done in the past.
Commissioner Wilson said she agrees that Plymouth needs senior housing, however, she
does not support the RMF -4 zoning. Commissioner Wilson said the infrastructure is not
there to support it, there is a transition problem, and it does not fit in with surrounding
development.
Commissioner Murdock said she has similar concerns with the RMF -4 zoning for part of
the development and would prefer RMF -3 for the entire property. She said she has looked
at the property and is concerned about the height of the buildings and the parking situation.
Commissioner Clyman said the RMF -3 would be 4 units per acre and said he feels it would
be an appropriate transition. He said the developer has a right to build on his property and
said he feels the developer did make a concession and lowered the height of the building.
Commission Clyman noted that there is industrial and commercial to the north so the
RMF -4 is a good transition. He added there could be shopping developed to the north.
Commissioner Holmes said this is a tough one and comes down to "nobody wants this in
my back yard". Commissioner Holmes stated it is someone else's property. Commissioner
Holmes said he looks at the transition from single family to multi -family to commercial
and said he sees an orderly transition. Commissioner Holmes said the height issue with the
buildings is an architectural aesthetic question and 20 years ago they would have been flat-
topped buildings. He said he is concerned about water runoff and management, and the
developer can work with that and manage the water flow. Commissioner Holmes said he
will vote in favor of the proposal.
Vice Chair Weir said that the proposal is a relatively good plan for the area. He said some
things could be done a little differently but does not see transition as an issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to deny the
request by Lifestyle Properties for a rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan, conditional use
permit and variance to allow the construction of thirteen apartment -style buildings to be
called the "Villas of Bass Lake Creek" for property located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Nathan Lane and Bass Lake Rd. (County Road 10). Roll Call Vote. 3
Ayes. MOTION failed. Commissioners Holmes, Weir and Clyman voting Nay.
MOTION by Commissioner Clyman, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to approve the
request by Lifestyle Properties for a rezoning, preliminary plat, site plan, conditional use
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 9
permit and variance to allow the construction of thirteen apartment -style buildings to be
called the "Villas of Bass Lake Creek" for property located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Nathan Lane and Bass Lake Rd. (County Road 10). Roll Call Vote. 3
Ayes. MOTION failed. Commissioners Anderson, Murdock and Wilson voting Nay.
The Planning Commission will send this item forward to the September 13, 2005 City
Council meeting with no recommendation.
The Planning Commissioners took a 10 -minute break.
C. CALHOUN DEVELOPMENT (2005078)
Vice Chair Weir introduced the request by Calhoun Development for a preliminary plat for
Larkin Ponds", a subdivision of 4 lots for single-family dwellings, for property located at
1010 Harbor Lane North.
Planner Doty gave an overview of the August 9, 2005 staff report. Planner Doty said a
condition has been added that permission must be given to the developer for grading on
south side of the proposed development. He said another condition has been added that a
25 -foot front yard setback is required for the western boundary of the western lot because
the lot line is adjacent to City -owned right-of-way.
Vice Chair Weir introduced the applicant, Floyd Calhoun, Calhoun Development. Mr.
Calhoun said this is his first development opportunity in Plymouth. He said he is a smaller
developer and typically does infill development. Mr. Calhoun said that he chose not to
propose the higher density that the guiding for this property allows. Mr. Calhoun said his
projects are carefully reviewed with regard to roadways and surroundings so as to enhance
the neighborhood and he runs very safe construction sites.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Sarah Schield, Landform, 650 Butler N., 510 1St Avenue N.
Ms. Schield said she concurs with the staff report and conditions except for Condition #4
and asked that the grading plan have more flexibility. She asked that the applicant be
allowed to provide a written easement agreement or revise the grading plan. Ms. Schield
said Condition #6 requires a sidewalk on one side of the local streets. She said there are no
connecting sidewalks in the neighborhood and questioned the need for a sidewalk for four
single family homes.
Ms. Schield said the vacation of the trail easement and utility easement will be forthcoming
from the applicant.
Commissioner Clyman asked if the neighbors do not grant permission for grading are there
alternate plans in place and how would the plan be affected.
Ms. Schield said the grading plan would need to be looked at.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 10
Mr. Calhoun said if they can't get an easement agreement, staff has indicated they would
support a revised grading plan.
Director Hurlburt asked if a revised grading plan would still meet City standards.
Ms. Schield responded affirmatively.
Vice Chair Weir opened the public hearing.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Stuart Adelman, 925 Fernbrook Lane N. Mr. Adelman stated
that no one has said one word to him about an easement. He said people have been on his
property without permission. Mr. Adelman said he appreciates their rights to develop as
long as they follow rules. Mr. Adelman said the proposed road goes across their property
and he is very uncomfortable with this road. He asked how it would affect his rights and
setbacks if he wanted to do an addition. Mr. Adelman said his property would be on a little
island of two roads and a significant amount of his property would be impacted by grading
and construction. He said builders' assurances don't carry a lot of weight with him. He
said the roadway makes no sense and would impact the trees, pond and environment.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Patrick Burke, 890 Fernbrook Lane N. Mr. Burke said he is
100% vehemently opposed to the construction of this road. He said some middle ground
could be reached and suggested three 3 homes could be built. Mr. Burke opposes
extending a road into the Harbor Woods neighborhood as there are lots of kids in the
neighborhood and there would be degradation of the wetlands and woods. He said there is
no benefit to the neighborhood and in no way adding "quality to life" for the Harbor
Woods neighbors.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Susan Smith, 895 Fernbrook Lane. Ms. Smith said she
supports the proposed houses to be built but opposes the road. She said there is emergency
access by cutting across the Luce Line by Harbor Lane and by Fernbrook Lane.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Jill Arnebeck 940 Fernbrook Lane. Ms. Arnebeck said a
petition representing 42 single-family homes of 63 taxpayers was submitted opposing the
proposal. She said that of the 42 single-family homes, there are 57 children. Ms.
Arnebeck discussed the exceptional quality of life in the Harbor Woods neighborhood and
submitted a 9 -page memo with arguments against a connecting street between Harbor Lane
and Fernbrook. Ms. Arnebeck said the neighborhood is not opposed to development of the
land, but opposed to the street which would create negative impacts on the environment,
community, and safety of the neighbors and anyone who utilizes the proposed affected
section of Fernbrook Lane.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Adam Hesse, 940 Fernbrook Lane. Mr. Hesse echoed Ms.
Amebeck's concerns. He said there would be a very poor site line on the proposed road at
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 11
the Fernbrook intersection. Mr. Hesse reviewed bicycle and vehicle crash statistics for
intersections and two-way streets and stated the risks for the through street far out -weigh
the benefits. He said he is opposed to the through street, not the development.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Sarah Cranny, 915 Fernbrook Lane. Mr. Cranny said she has
not been approached by the developer for grading of her property and she is very opposed
to any grading on her property. Ms. Cranny said the only benefits would be for the
developer to meet City codes and to maximum his money. Ms. Cranny was concerned
about safety, street lights in her back yard, and the wetland.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Carmen Diamond, 1000 Fernbrook Lane. Ms. Diamond
submitted a statement concerning environmental impact. Ms. Diamond stated that meeting
the requirements is good but a cul-de-sac would be even better. She said she strongly
opposes this specific plan for development and would support some form of private drive
so as to lessen the environmental impact on the neighborhood.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Murray Crummer, 900 Fernbrook Lane N. Mr. Crummer said
he is not opposed to the developer's rights to develop but appealed to the Planning
Commission to realize the unnecessary nature of that segment of proposed road.
Vice Chair Weir closed the public hearing.
Director Hurlburt asked what would the impact be if the Adelman's do not grant an
easement.
Mr. Calhoun said it would be impossible and illegal to take Mr. Adelman's land, nor would
they try to do such a thing.
Director Hurlburt addressed the issue of public safety access. She said that not too many
years ago there was a house fire on Fernbrook Lane. Fernbrook Lane is one of the longest
cul-de-sacs in the City and Plymouth did an extensive review of cul-de-sacs and developed
some standards, including emergency access. With the fire on Fernbrook Lane, the Fire
Department didn't realize an access was available at the Luce Line. The proposed road
would give another option for people on the west for emergency access.
Director Hurlburt asked if street lighting is proposed.
Planner Doty said the street lighting would be addressed in the final plat. City Engineer
Quanbeck added that lighting would be probably limited to two intersections at either end
of the proposed street.
Commissioner Clyman asked about diminished sight lines from Fernbrook Lane.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 12
City Engineer Quanbeck said eastbound traffic looking southbound could potentially be a
concern, however, traffic would be moving slower as it approached the intersection.
Planning Manager Senness addressed Mr. Adelman's concerns about the road creating
another front yard for his property and limiting his ability to add on to his home. She
stated a condition would be added to the resolution prohibiting driveway access from his
lot to the new street. Consequently, the street would not affect his current setbacks nor
limit the ability to construct an addition.
Commissioner Clyman asked if the properties to the south would be assessed for public
street repairs and assessments.
Director Hurlburt said they would not.
Vice Chair Weir noted that many speakers stated this proposal would ruin their views and
their wildlife. He stated the developer has the right to develop the land as long as he is
following the established rules of the City of Plymouth.
Commissioner Clyman said he is not in favor of private drives nor creating streets that
create double frontage lots. However, the application meets zoning requirements so his
hand is guided to vote in favor of the plan.
Commissioner Murdock asked if the condition for the sidewalk could be deleted as
requested.
Director Hurlburt said it is possible this condition could be waived, however there would
be access on both ends of the development to the Luce Line which would generate some
walking traffic.
Vice Chair Weir introduced Josh Popehn, landscape architect for Landform, 650 Butler N.,
510 1St Avenue N. Mr. Popehn said eliminating the sidewalk would not save more trees
because there would already be grading for the road.
Commissioner Holmes commented that sidewalks are one of the ways communities are
better formed and he would not support removal of the sidewalk.
Commissioner Anderson agreed with Commissioner Holmes and said it is important to
have sidewalks. She said that although she feels a cul-de-sac would be ideal, the developer
has met the requirements and she would vote in support of the project.
MOTION by Commissioner Clyman, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to approve the
request by Calhoun Development for a preliminary plat for "Larkin Ponds", a subdivision
of 4 lots for single-family dwellings, for property located at 1010 Harbor Lane North.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 13
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Clyman, seconded by Commissioner Wilson to
amend Condition #4 to either provide a written easement agreement or a revised grading
plan. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION to amend approved unanimously.
Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION as amended. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved
unanimously.
D. DOVE CAPITAL I, LLC (2005079)
MOTION by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to postpone
Items 61) and 7A to the September 7, 2005 meeting. MOTION approved unanimously.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (2005080)
MOTION by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to postpone
Items 61) and 7A to the September 7, 2005 meeting. MOTION approved unanimously.
E. CITY OF PLYMOUTH (2005082)
Vice Chair Weir introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for a lighting zone map
amendment for Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church at the property located at 5005
Northwest Boulevard.
Associate Planner Noelting gave an overview of the August 9, 2005 staff report.
Vice Chair Weir opened and closed the public hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Murdock, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to approve the
request by the City of Plymouth for a lighting zone map amendment for Beautiful Savior
Lutheran Church at the property located at 5005 Northwest Boulevard. Roll Call Vote. 6
Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
F. MCGOUGH DEVELOPMENT (2005083)
Vice Chair Weir introduced the request by McGough Development for a site plan
amendment, conditional use permit, and variance for a parking lot expansion at the City
Center Professional Building located at 15700 — 37th Avenue North.
Planner Doty gave an overview of the August 9, 2005 staff report. Planner Doty said the
applicant has requested that Condition #8 in the resolution regarding lighting be removed
since there already is lighting on the site. Planner Doty said staff supports the applicant's
request.
Approved
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 14
Vice Chair Weir opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak
on the item.
MOTION by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to approve the
request by McGough Development for a site plan amendment, conditional use permit, and
variance for a parking lot expansion at the City Center Professional Building located at
15700 — 37th Avenue North, with the removal of Condition #8. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes.
MOTION approved unanimously.
8. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Commissioner Holmes, seconded by Commissioner Murdock, to adjourn the
meeting at 10:31 p.m.