HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 04-20-2010 BOE.pdfCITY OF PLYMOUTH
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION RECONVENED
AGENDA
APRIL 20, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Call to Order.
2. Council Action on Recommendations
3. Adjourn.
Board of Equalization Reconvened April 20, 2010
2010 Local Board of Appeal & Equalization
Staff Recommendations
Reports PID Number 2010 Estimated
Market Value
Staff
Recommendation
1. Roberto DeGaetano 12-118-22-22-0025 175,300 185,000
2. Todd Hollands 19-118-22-23-0066 788,800 651,600
3. Jerry Lorenzini 22-118-22-14-0024 421,200 No Change
The above properties have been inspected by the assessing staff. All
appeals have been settled and the property owners are in agreement with
the recommendations.
Page 1
REPORT # I
2010 BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: Roberto DeGaetano
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5274 Ximines Ln N
PID #: 12-118-22-22-0025
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 17 Block 4 Harrison Hills
PROPERTY TYPE: Townhome
2010
MARKET VALUE
VALUE PRIOR TO
LOCAL BOARD
ASSESSOR'S
RECOMMENDATION
LAND MARKET VALUE 50,000 50,000
STRUCTURE MARKET VALUE 125,300 135,000
TOTAL MARKET VALUE 175,300 185,000
ASSESSMENT HISTORY 2008 2009 2010
Total Market Value 200,700 188,200 185,000
Limited Market Value 200,700 188,200 185,000
Improvement 0 0 9,700
Page 2
RECONCILATYON OF VALUE:
An inspection of the property was conducted on April 9, 2010. The appraiser observed
additional basement finish, an upgraded bathroom on the lower level, upgraded
baseboard and new door and window trim through out the home. After accounting for
the improvements it was determined by this appraiser that the value should be increased
by $9,700.00. Mr. DeGaetano was contacted and agreed to the increase in value thereby
dropping his appeal. It is the opion of this appraiser that the 2010 assessed value should
be:
185,000
j- LOJ
Michael Vander Linden, CMAS
Appraiser
763) 509-5356
mvanderl@plymouthmn.gov
Page 3
I
L;Ity oT F'iymouin
Assessing Division
2010 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Assessment Application
3400 Plymouth Blvd
Plymouth, IwDr 1 55447
Phone: 763-509-5360 Fax: 763-509-5060
Email: JHebert@ci.plymouth.mn.us
Return this form to the City of Plymouth Assessing
Division no later than April 2, 2010. By submitting
this application your appeal will be entered into
the record. It is not required to attend the Board
meeting.
Date:
Owners Names) I 1 L' t'r
Office Usq Only
Date Returned:
Received via: S v/fir
r
Date Withdrawn:
Withdrawn via:
Dist Nbad G%f1ri
Home Number: -
Work Number: '7 & 3 - 293 - 3Z-2
Cell Number:
Fax Number:
Address: % Z 7' 1,,' j,v e r ! %` A/
Zip Code:—S'Email: _ i Crsc-l'af`
7 1-tater
Property 11): /9- 149 - d,-- - Ud--; -5-Purchase Date: C,' 7
Property Address: lh•hCf !N Purchase Price: 1
2010 Assessor's Estimated Market Value: 1 73 ; 3 1 G
Additions, renovations, or
improvements since purchase
7 ti 1 e-Lv lhteriak', /1 }r app1i4iref. lyo-,
1
r //
Y S°h tl r
Cor=fir rAfzf -
Cost of I'm rovements since purchase:
D d Owner's opinion of Estimated Market Value
as of January 2, 2010
What are the reasons or
documentation supporting the
owner's opinion of market value?
Please attach supporting
Documentation)
Signature of applicant
Date/
I
Page 5
J-
REPORT # 2
2010 BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: Todd Hollands
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3160 Xanthus Lane North
PID #: 19-118-22-23-0066
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4 Block 1 Churchill Ridge
PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Homestead
2010
MARKET VALUE
VALUE PRIOR TO
LOCAL BOARD
ASSESSOR'S
RECOMMENDATION
LAND MARKET VALUE 220,000 220,000
STRUCTURE MARKET VALUE 568,800 431,600
TOTAL MARKET VALUE 788,800 651,600
ASSESSMENT HISTORY 2008 2009 2010
Total Market Value $870.700 $832,100 $788,800
Limited Market Value
Improvement $ 670.700
Page 6
OWNERS CONCERNS:
Mr. Hollands appealed his valuation for 2010/payable 2011.
He reviewed several sales in 2009, and thought those comparables supported a lower
valuation.The valuations ranged from $150-$175 a square foot, and his is home valued at
265 a square foot.
He originally paid $908,508 for the property in 2007, he now feels the current valuation
should be less than $700,000.
Page 7
04/46/2010 TUB 14,56 FAX
FAX (763) 509-5060
To: Paul Kingsbury
From: Todd Hollands
Subject: Property valuation
would like to appeal the valuation on my house for my taxes payable in 2011. 1 do not agree with the
current valuation. I have reviewed several sales the fiscal year ended September 2009 and most of the
sales support a lower valuation. many of the comparables had more finished square feet, larger yards
and were valued less than my house. Many of the valuations ranged from $150 to $175 a square foot,
whereas mine is currently valued at over $265 a square foot. I would appreciate an evaluation of the
property to refine the valuation.
originally paid $908,508 in July 2007 and the current valuation is $788,800. Based on the comparable
transactions I believe the value should be less than $700,000.
Regards,
Todd Hollands
U, 001/001
Page --8 - _
RECONCILATION OF VALUE:
I visited the property in November 2007 to do an interior inspection of the completed
home as part of the new construction for the 2008 assessment. I was not granted entry of
the home at that time.
The original plan for the home was to include finishing a large portion of the area over
the garage and about 1200 square feet of the basement was to be finished as well.
Mr. Hollands had purchased the property in July 2007 for $908,500, and without an
interior inspection, it was assumed that those two areas were completed.
The square footage was adjusted after reviewing the property on April 7, 2010. The two
areas mentioned above had not been completed as the plan had indicated. The value was
lowered because of the correction to the finished square footage and comparable sales.
I called Mr. Hollands back on April 13`x', he confirmed the new 2010 valuation at:
651,600
Paul Kingsbury, CNIA
Appraiser
763-509-5357
pkingsbu@plymouthmn.gov
Page 9
REPORT #3
2010 BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: Jerry and Joann Lorenzini
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3210 Rosewood Lane N.
PID 9: 22-118-22-14-0024
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2 Block 3 Heritage Ridge
PROPERTY TYPE: Residential Homestead
2010
MARKET VALUE
VALUE PRIOR TO
LOCAL BOARD
ASSESSOR'S
RECOMMENDATION
LAND MARKET VALUE 110,000 No change
STRUCTURE MARKET VALUE 311,200 No Change
TOTAL MARKET VALUE 421,200 No Change
ASSESSMENT HISTORY 2008 2009 2010
Total Market Value $478,700 $434,900 $421,200
Limited Market Value
Improvement
Page 10
I
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Page 11
DIAGRAM
Sty Ht Dimensions Sq.Ft.
1/B 14 x 13 — 182
14 x 20 = 280
2/B 13.5 X 12 = 162
5 x 14 = 7
12 x 30 = 360
13.5 x 19 = 256
7 x 14 = 98
OH 2 x 7.5 — 15
2/OH 1.5 x 13.5 = 20
1 x 7 — 7
Q/G 13.5 x 19 = 256
7 x 23 = 161
Ground Floor Area =
2 Id Floor Area =
Gross Building Area —
1360
1327
2687
Porches/Decks
Deck 12 x 12 144
Open Porch 12 x 1 4 48
Garages
Garage 13.5 x 22 297.5
20 x 24 480
Garage Area 1= 778
Page 12
City of
Plymouth, MN
Medicine Lake
Subject Location Map
This represents a cortplafion of infomwkn atd
data fcm city, oounty.srare and ater sources that has
rot been Feld tQdied- hfamnon stmid be field
tented and carnpa+ed w dh origianl source doctmem.
nv
Page 13
I I kj,5)
Y
NZ 12g,30-.,
7tqA
12
04,
2 12915
1
46
q -1
Subject Site Map
3225
0, N
7
JZU3 '4
8125
foal
Subject Aerial Map
12925. 0
L
Page 14
COMPARABLE SALES
COMPARABLE #1
13000 34TH Ave. N.
COMPARABLE 42
12925 34`h Ave. N.
COMPARABLE #3
3405 Rosewood La. N.
COMPARABLE #4
3180 Sycamore La. N.
Page 15
SALES COMPARISON ADJUSTMENT GRID
Subject: Comp #1 Comp #2 Com #3 Com #4
ADDRESS: 3210 Rosewood La 13000 34th Ave 12925 34th Ave 3405 Rosewood La 3180 Sycamore La
PID: 22-118-22-14-0024 22-118-22-11-0060 22-11B-22-11-0048 22-198-22-11-0041 22-118-22-14-0011
SALE DATE: Aug -09 Sep -09 Nov -08 Jul -09
SALE PRICE: 400,000 410,000 430,000 473,500
FINANCING/POINTS PD BY
SELLER 5,000 10,500
ADJ. SALE PRICE 39.5,000 410,000 430,000 463,000
TIME ADJUSTMENT-
4%/MONTH 2.00% 1.60% 5.20% 2.40%
7,900 6,560 22,360 11,112
ADJ. SALE PRICE 387,100 443,440 407,640 451,888
TYPE OF BUILDING: 2 Story 2 Story 12 Story 2 Story Split Level
ABOVE GRADE FINISH:$50 2687 2234 22650 2616 3550 2565 6100 1810 43850
QUALITY: Above Avg. Avg.-Ab.Avg 5000 Avg.-Ab.Avg 5000 Avg-Ab.Avg 5000 Ab.Avg
AGE: 112% per year 1989 1985 7742 1981 16138 1981 16306 1988
CONDITION: Avg Avg Avg Avg. Ab.Avg 20000
BEDROOMS: 4 4 3 30004 4
OF BATHS: 3+112 3+112 2+112 4500 3+112 3+112
FIN.BSMT AREA: $251$40 800 -Avg. 780 None 20000 1000 5000 1235-Ab.Avg 29400
WALKOUT: No No W/O -7500 No W/o 7500
FIREPLACES: 1 1 3 -100002 5000.1
GARAGE: 3 car 2+Car 5000 3 Car 2 Car 10040 3 Car
DECK: Yes Yes Yes No 5000 Yes
PORCHES: No No No Small 10000 No
POOL No No No Yes 6000 No
LOCATION:
Heritage Ridge,.34
Ac., Backs to NW
Blvd
Heritage Est
2nd .37 ac
Through
Sstreet 1 -5000
Heritage Est
2nd .51 Ac -
Through
Street, Backs to
Nature 1 -8000
Heritage
Estates, .35
Ac, Corner Lot 5000
Heritage Ridge,
35 Ac 5000
NET ADJUSTMENT: 35,392 26,688 11,406 18,050
u
ADJ. SALE PRICE: 422,492 430,128 419,046 433,838
ROUNDED ADJ SALE PRICE: 1 422,500 430,104 1 $419,000 1 $433,800
VALUE January 2, 2010: 1$426,400
VALUE CONCLUSION
LOCATION:
The subject neighborhood is centrally located within the city. It is approximately one mile
north of State Highway 55 and is just west of County Road 61, or Northwest Boulevard.
The property is located in the Heritage Ridge subdivision, Lot 2 Block 3. The home is
located on Rosewood Lane, a dead-end, cul-de-sac street, one lot north of 32nd Avenue.
The property backs to Northwest Boulevard.
SITE:
The site is an interior, rectangular shaped lot, 81 feet wide along Rosewood Lane, 98 feet
wide along Northwest Boulevard and 164 feet deep, for a total of .34 acres in size. It has
level topography. It has average landscaping with a few trees and shrubs in the front yard.
The backyard features pine and deciduous trees towards the back of the property which
provides some noise and visual screening from Northwest Boulevard.
IMPROVEMENTS and FEATURES:
The home is two story style, built in 1989. It has 2687 square finished above grade. The
main floor includes a living room, formal dining room, kitchen with island and informal
dining area, family room, laundry area, and % bath. The second floor includes four
bedrooms a full bath and master bathroom with separate tub and shower. The home has an
additional 800 square feet of average basement finish including 2 family room/recreation
areas and a 3/a bathroom. The home has a full basement, and lacks a walk -out elevation.
The home features a fireplace in the family room on the main level, a deck and a three car
garage. The home has been well maintained. The kitchen has been upgraded with granite
countertops. The millwork and cabinetry is original. The exterior of the home is wood and
brick with a cedar shake roof. Most homes in the Heritage Ridge neighborhood, including
the subject, are above average in quality.
OWNERS CONCERNS:
Jerry Lorenzini attended the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting on April 6,
2010 and submitted a written appeal.
Thursday, April 8, an on-site interior inspection was conducted. I spoke with Joann
Lorenzini at that time. She feels the 2010 market value exceeds what they could sell their
property for. In the past 12 months she was aware of one sale in their immediate
neighborhood and was not aware of any other sales. She addressed concerns with high
property taxes and felt it was unfair for a property owner to pay taxes on market values
from the previous year. I explained Minnesota state statutes sets the time frame for sales
we use for our assessments each year and the previous years assessment is the basis for
calculating the present year tax. For additional information I told her page 14 and 15 of the
booklet provided at the meeting on April 6 included an explanation of the effects of an
Page 17
appreciating versus depreciating market in relation to property tax. She also addressed
concerns regarding paying higher taxes on her home compared with the home located next
door to hers located at 3220 Rosewood Lane.
Later that morning I called Jerry Lorenzini and asked if he had any specific reasons or data
to show why he feels his property is valued too high. He feels the one property in his
neighborhood that recently sold looked larger than his and was maybe not comparable. He
then asked me about information presented at the meeting indicating the average single
family home decreased 5.7 percent, mentioning his decreased less than the average. I
explained the 5.7 percent was the average decrease for all single family residential, but
some neighborhoods were more and some were less depending on sales activity in each
neighborhood. I calculated his value having a decrease of 3.2% for the 2010 assessment. I
explained the sales activity in his neighborhood for the 2009 assessment indicated a 10
percent decrease for his value, whereas the average decrease was only 4.8 percent across
the city.
COMPARABLE #1
Comparable #1 is located on a through street approximately one half mile north of the
subject property in Heritage Estates 2nd subdivision. It is a two story home built in 1985.
It has 2234 square feet finished above grade which is approximately 450 square feet
smaller than the subject. The attached garage is 20 feet wide by 34 feet deep
accommodating two cars with additional space in the rear of the garage to store a vehicle
sideways. It is similar to the subject with the same basement finish area, same number of
bedrooms and bathrooms, has one fireplace, a deck, and no walk -out elevation. The house
is well maintained with no major remodeling.
COMPARABLE #2
Comparable #2 is located on a through street approximately one half mile north of the
subject property in Heritage Estates 2nd subdivision. The backyard enjoys a nature view
with a city walking trail to the rear of the property. It is two story home built in 1981. The
above grade square footage, which includes an all season sun porch, is similar in size to the
subject, however lacks one bedroom and one bathroom compared to the subject. It has no
basement finish; however it features 3 fireplaces and a walk -out elevation. It is similar to
the subject having a deck and 3 car garage. The house is well maintained with no major
remodeling.
COMPARABLE #3
Comparable #3 is located on a corner site approximately one half mile north of the subject
property in Heritage Estates subdivision. It is a two story home built in 1981. It is similar
in overall finished size, having 122 square feet less above grade, but 200 square feet more
basement finish compared to the subject. It has the same number of bedrooms and
bathrooms, no walk out elevation. It has a 2 car garage, however features a pool and small
3 season porch. The home is well maintained with updated granite counters in the kitchen,
but no major remodeling.
Page 18
COMPARABLE #4
Comparable #4 is located in the subject neighborhood, Heritage Ridge. Both are located on
dead-end cul-de-sac streets. Comparable #4 is located on a corner lot with a shallow
backyard. Comparable #4 was built in 1988 and is a four level split style home. There is
1810 square feet of above grade finish and 1235 square feet of below grade finish. It
features a walk -out elevation. The house is similar offering the same number of bedrooms
and bathrooms, a deck and 3 car garage. The kitchen features original cabinetry with
upgraded granite counters. The main level bathroom was completely remodeled in 2005.
The house was recently upgraded with a travertine entry, custom closets and all new light
fixtures. The house is well maintained and above average condition.
RECONCILATION OF VALUE:
Based on the sales comparison approach to value, four recent comparable sales were
chosen and used as the basis for this appraiser's opinion of market value as of January 2,
2010. Adjustments were made for points paid by seller, and then a downward adjustment
was made for market conditions.
Comparable #l, 2, and 3 are all two story homes located in the Heritage Estates
neighborhood, approximately 1/z mile north of the subject. The homes are average to above
average in quality, also built in the 1980's, but are five to eight years older than the
subject. Comparable #4 was the only sale during the past year located in the subject's
neighborhood. Even though it is split level style it was chosen as a comparable because of
the neighborhood, finished size, quality of construction, and age. Adjustments were made
to the comparables for finished size above grade as well as basement finish, age and
condition, and amenities. An adjustment was also made based on the subject's proximity
to Northwest Boulevard. The sale price range before adjustments is $400,000 to $473,500.
The sale price range after adjustments is $419,000 to $433,800 with a mean, or average,
sale price of $426,400.
It is the opinion of this appraiser that the estimated market value for the subject property as
of January 2, 2010 remains unchanged at:
421,200
I spoke with Mr. Lorenzini on April 12, 2010 and discussed the comparable sales and
adjusted sale prices. He agreed with my findings and opinion of value.
Cindy Bowman, CMA
Residential Appraiser
763-509.5353
cbow-man@plymouthnin.govplymouthmn.gov
Page 19
Comparable Sales Map,
N
I 1
Thismpme Macmiph6onolinbmvF;onwd
yy _- E data tom ory,omeA.sGto and alherswaca thalus
ml been SeldvedW. bioana4un!hovlddefield
eeriled and canpaed wi0i origiaN SAvoe documerds.
Plymouth, MN
Page 20
City of Plymouth
Assessing Division
2010 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Assessment Application
I1A
3400 Plymouth Blvd Office Use Only
Plymouth; MLI 55447 Date Returned:/I1
Phone: 763-509-5360 Fax: 763-509-5060 Received via: ;1 `!,E 17
r
Email: JHebert@ci.plymouth.mn.us
Date Withdrawn:
Return this form to the City of Plymcuth Assessing
Withdrawn via:
Division no later than April 2, 2010. By submitting
this application your appeal will be entered into
the record. It is not required to attend the Board
Int;etLllg.
Date:
Owners Name(s) ! / / 6=rL•{id/'
G(c `` Address:
Zip Code:
00,00 Is ./ ,. A5A1i
Dist lv`bad Appraiser 'C f 'r-1/
1'
Home Number: ;; 3 Z6 97
Work Number: 2Ca j rj_f &21V _
Cell Number: 4; 11-LG rt `jf
Fax Number:
Email:
Date:
Property Address: Purchase Price -
27 0 10
rice-'
3010 Assessor's Estimated Market Value:
Additions, renovations, or
improvements since purchase:
Cost of improvements since purchase:
What are the reasons or
documentation supporting the
owner's opinion of market value`'
Please attach supporting
Documentation)
Owner's opinion of Estimated Market Value
as of January 2, 2010
O ry
Sianature ofapplica t
Date ' /a
Page 21