Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Packet 12-14-2010.pdf
RECAP AGENDA) CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 14, 2010, 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLYMOUTH FORUMIndividuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or Commission for future report. 4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS 4.01 Announce New Year's Eve Event at the Plymouth Ice Center (Park Director Eric Blank) 5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the ConsentAgenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. (Approved) 6.01 Approve 2011 Tobacco License renewals (Res2010-325) 6.02 Approve disbursements (Res2010-326) 6.03 Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the City Code relating to Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants and approve summary publication Ord2010-22, Res2010-327) Items Require 6/7th's Vote of the Council Regular Council Meeting 1 of 3 December 14, 2010 6.04 Approve agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the Minnesota State Patrol for enforcement programs (Res2010-328) 6.05 Approve payment No. 4 and Final for Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds Project (3105 — Res2010-329) 6.06 Approve Payment No. 4 and Final for South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project (4145 — Res2010-330) 6.07 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan Application for Wild Wings Flood Protection Project (7135 — Res2010-331) 6.08 Award contract for Wild Wings Flood Protection Project (7135 Res2010-332) 6.09 Award contract for Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project (8128 — Res2010-333) 6.10 Approve reduction in retainage for the 2010 Street Reconstruction Project 10001— Res2010-334) 6.11 Approve amendment No. 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Agreement with Hennepin County (Res2010-335) 6.12 Accept utilities for continual maintenance for Taylor Creek (2010035 Res2010-336) 6.13 Approve the 2011 City health and dental insurance and deferred compensation contributions for non -represented City employees (Res2010-337) 6.14 Approve Payment No. 2 and Final for 26th Avenue bridge replacement and Campus Drive mill and overlay (8107 — Res2010-338) 6.15 Approve pedestrian bridge abutment construction and steel truss installation for West Medicine Lake Park (Res2010-339) Items Require 6/7th's Vote of the Council Regular Council Meeting 2 of 3 December 14, 2010 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.1 Vacation of highway easements within Plymouth Station (southeast corner of County Road 24 and Highway 55) (Res2010-340) (Approved) 8. GENERAL BUSINESS 8.1 Approve appointments of Board and Commission Members (Res2010-342) Approved) 8.2 Approve 2011 Council Coordinating Representatives and other agency appointments (Res2010-343) (Approved) 8.2.1 Appointment of Deputy Mayor for 2011 (Res2010-344) (Appointed Ginny Black) 8.3 Adopt the 2011 Budgets and Tax Levies and 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program (Res2010-345, Res2010-346, Res2010-347, Res2010-348) (Adopted) 8.4 Discuss staff comments regarding Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Draft Plan Amendment (Res2010-349) (Approved) 8.5 Consider receipt of Livable Communities planning grant for the Four Season site and consider adoption of interim ordinance (Res2010-341, Ord2010-23) Approved) 9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 10. ADJOURNMENT (9:12 p.m.) Items Require 6/7th's Vote of the Council Regular Council Meeting 3 of 3 December 14, 2010 1 I City of Plymouth Addin, Q..h1, to Off' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 6.01Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Reviewed by: Cal Portner, Administrative Services Director Item: Approve Tobacco License Renewals for 2011 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution renewing 2011 Tobacco Licenses. 2. BACKGROUND: The City has received the renewal license applications for the applicants listed on the attached resolution. The Police Department has found no reason to deny the issuance of the licenses. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The annual license fee of $300 per business has been received. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING 2011 TOBACCO LICENSES WHEREAS, The City has received applications for Tobacco License renewals; and WHEREAS, all license fees have been paid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the Tobacco Licenses are hereby approved for the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011 for: Business Name Essex Court Plymouth Tobacco Address 505 N Hwy 169 16605 Co. Rd. 24, Suite 203 Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Licensee Spyglass Associates, Inc. Valley Group of MN Page 2 rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quality to life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 6.02Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Deb Luesse thru Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager Reviewed by: Calvin Portner, Director of Administrative Services Item: Disbursements Ending December 4, 2010 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution to approve the disbursements for the period ending December 4, 2010. 2. BACKGROUND: Attached is a list of city fund disbursements for the period ending December 4, 2010. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers Resolution Page 1 Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 12.4.10/Council meeting 12.14.10 FUND 100 General Fund 176,614.76 200 Recreation Fund 12,202.31 210 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 0.00 220 Transit System Fund 5,562.76 234 Economic Development Fund 0.00 250 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 12,397.00 254 HRA Section 8 Fund 2,164.17 254 HAP Check Summary 236,964.18 258 HRA General Fund 134.80 300 1998C GO Activity Center 0.00 302 2003B GO Street Reconstruction 0.00 305 2004A GO Public Safety 0.00 307 1998A -TIF #7-5A Rottland 0.00 308 2005A TIF #1-1 0.00 400 General Capital Projects Fund 9,392.48 401 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00 404 Community Improvement 0.00 405 Park Replacement Fund 62,675.18 406 Infrasturcture Replacement Fund 0.00 407 Project Administration Fund 0.00 408 Park Construction 62,675.16 409 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00 412 Utility Trunk Fund 0.00 413 Improvement Project Construction 1,647,502.48 414 Shenandoah Administration 0.00 416 Public Safety Expansion 0.00 851 HRA Senior Apt. Constr Fund 0.00 418 Utility Trunk System Expansion 0.00 420 Water Sewer Construction 0.00 421 Enterprise -Other Construction 9,089.80 998 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const) 0.00 998 TIF # 7-3 P.O.S. (Const) 0.00 422 TIF #7-4 P.T.P (Const) 0.00 423 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const) 0.00 424 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const) 0.00 425 TIF Housing Assistance Program 0.00 426 TIF #7-7 Stonecreek ('Const) 0.00 427 TIF #7-8 Shops @ Plymouth Creek 0.00 428 TIF HRA Senior Apt. Constr. Fund 0.00 429 TIF HRA 1-3 Crossroads Station 0.00 431 CON -2010A Open Spaces 0.00 500 Water Fund 118,427.69 510 Water Resources Fund 62,174.57 520 Sewer Fund 450,373.88 530 Solid Waste Management Fund 46,179.80 540 Ice Center Fund 45,576.70 550 Field House Fund 4,454.65 600 Central Equipment Fund 31,743.05 610 Public Facilities Fund 56,955.79 620 Information Technology Fund 21,845.93 630 Risk Management Fund 356.96 640 Employee Benefits Fund 268,475.71 650 Design Engineering 0.00 660 Resource Planning 0.00 851 Vicksburg Crossing 0.00 0.00 Total Invoice Expense Distribution: 3,343,939.81 Page 2 r 111r.rtty of Check Payment Register Plymouth 11/14/2010 to 12/04/2010 Check EFT Date Paid: 11118/2010 1 C M A Amount: $ 41,014.22 Inv. 2010-00000322 11/18/2010 ICMA- ICMA Deferred Comp* $ 41,014.22 Check EFT Date Paid:1111812010 ING Amount $ 4,250.39 Inv. 2010-00000323 11/18/2010 ING - ING Deferred Comp $ 4,250.39 Check EFT Date Paid: 11/1812010 Selectaccount Amount: $ 25,023.17 Inv. 2010-00000330 11/18/2010 VEBA CONTR - VEBA Contribution* 25,023.17 Check EFT Date Paid:1113012010 US.- Bank%Visa r Amount.: $ 14,03366.20 Inv. 101115 11/30/2010 10.18111.15.10 Visa Charges 14,036.20 Check 114585 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Ace Lock & Safe Co Inc Amount: $ 220.00 Inv. A86127 11/04/2010 City Hall Repair Cobra Lock to Housing Office 110.00 Area Inv. A86158 11/03/2010 PD -Repair Jail Access Foldger-Aclaims 110.00 Mortise Lock Check 114586 Date Paid:1111912010 Acme Tools Amount $ 110.96 Inv. 483832 10/29/2010 4 GAL Winter Chain Oil, 1 QT Bar chain oil, 110.96 2-318" P1CCO Chain Check 114587 Date Paid: 111191201'0' Airgas North Central Amount: $ 48.09 Inv. 105411190 10/31/2010 11.'10111.'11 Annual cylinder maint fee 48.09 Check 114588 Date Paid: 1 1/161206' American Red Cross'Assoc. Amount: $ 45.00 Inv. 1101357 10/27/2010 Kristin Johnson/BBST training 45.00 Check 114589 Date Paid:1111912010 Artc ice Systems Amount: $ 278.49 Inv. 11578 10/25/2010 CC icemaker repairs 278.49 Check 114590 Date Paid:1111912010 Astech Corp Amount: $ 510,557.28 Inv. 101031 10/31/2010 Proj10002 #1 So Shore Dr Rehabiliation 510,557.28 Check 114591 Date Paid: 1111912010 ATOM - Amount $ 200.00 Inv. 101202 11/15/2010 2011 Membership 200.00 Check 114592 Date Paid: 1111912010 Back 2 Basics Learning LLC4 Amount $468-00 Inv. Fa11107 09/28/2010 Sep-Oct'10 Twoosy doodlers 468.00 Check 114593 Date Paid: 1111912010 Batteries Plus Amount: $ 8.53 Inv. 021211209 10/28/2010 2 1 PK 3V Duracell Lithium Batteries 8.53 Check 114594 Date Paid:1111912010 Bertelson Total Office Solutions Amount: $ 35.24 Inv. W06531361 10/26/2010 CS -24 AA Batteries 18,69 Inv. W06531451 10/26/2010 1 Box Recycled File Folders, 113 Cut 16.55 Check 114595 Date Paid:1111912010 Brauer & Assoc Ltd Inc Amount: $ 20,278.69 Inv. 1202842 10/31/2010 Sep-Oct'10 PCP Hockey rink design 11,819.64 Inv. 1202850 10/31/2010 Sep'10 36th Ave landscape enhancement 2,191.26 constr Inv. 1202854 10/31/2010 Sep-Oct'10 Hilde Perf improv design/PO 3925 6,267.80 Check 114596 Date Paid:1111912010 C S McCrossan Construction Inc Amount: $ 2,916.82 Inv. 8633MB 10/29/2010 10.29.10 57.30 ton LVWE45030B Rap 2,541.44 Inv. 8634MB 10/29/2010 10.25.10 7.64 ton fines mix,LVWE 375.38 Page 3 Page 1 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114597 Date Paid:1111912016 CDW Government lnc Amount: 17.21 Inv. VHB7819 10/18/2010 Datalogic USB Type A Straight Cable 17.21 Check 114598 bate Paid:1111912010 Central Power Distributors Inc Amount: 84.66 Inv. 548177 10/14/2010 Unit 528 6 Mulching blades 84.58 Check 114599 Date Paid:1111912010 Chinook Book a _ _ Amount: 132.00 Inv. IM0000016607 09/30/2010 12 2011 TwinCities Chinook books 132.00 Check 114600 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Cobalt Construction LLC Amount: 10,001.43 Inv. 1223 10/12/2010 Station 73 parking ramp scaffold&poly 8,831.54 enclosure/partial pay Inv. 1224 10/25/2010 New wall in CC boiler room 1,169.89 Check 114601 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Coca Cola Enterprises Bottling Amount: 1,328.20 Inv. 0148129520 09/15/2010 IC Concession pop resupply 416.19 Inv. 0148129821 09/22/2010 IC Concession pop resupply 283.50 Inv. 0158121706 10/20/2010 IC Concession pop resupply 284.63 Inv. 0178053512 10/06/2010 IC Concession pop resupply 343.88 Check 114602 Date Pald:1111912010 Commercial Refrigeration Syst Amount: 7,938.50 Inv. 38865 10/25/2010 7.14.10 Rink a Sand floor regrading 7,938.50 Check 114603 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Concept Financial Group Amount: 700.00 Inv. 1951 10/25/2010 Crane transport to dome for setup 700.00 Check 114604 Date Paid: 1111912010 Dean Constantine Amount 280 00 Inv. 101110 11/10/2010 10.20111.10.10 Dancing like the stars 2 280.00 Check 114605 Date Paid: 1111912010 Dakota Supply Group Inc Amount: 12,457.35 Inv. 6670718 10/27/2010 48-314" M35 Short Gal Integ ITron & 11,952.90 48-314"X7112" #2 Setter Inv. 6671690 10/27/2010 1.5" M120B Gal ITRON Integral & 1.5" ELL 504.45 Flange Acessory Set Check 114606 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Dalco _... Amount: 815.67 Inv. 2263129 10/20/2010 PCC -2 Jumbo Smoke Dispenser & 1 Smoked 91.83 Tissue Dispenser Inv. 2263651 10/21/2010 PCC -1 case Centerpull Towel & Jumbo Smoke 36.72 Dispenser Inv. 2270172 11/11/2010 PCC-10cs Sofpull Towel,2 cs Tiolet Tissue 687.12 Check 114607 Date Paid:1111912010 Data Recognition Corporation Amount. 2,425.92 Inv. 00073101 10/29/2010 Oct'10 UB processing 2,425.92 Check 114608 Date Paid: 11/1912o10 Digital Ally Inc Amount: 27.50 Inv. 1029848 10/26/2010 1 Car Adapter 12 VDC 27.50 Check 114609 Date Paid:1111912610 DPC Industries ]nc Amount: 2,124.65 Inv. 8270177410 10/26/2010 ZWP 6024lbs Hydrofluorosilicic 2,124.65 Check 114610 Date Paid: 11/19/260 Earl F. Andersen Inc. Amount: 5,369.01 Inv. 00934901N 10/31/2010 12-9"Street Sign Plates (HIP) 272.92 Inv. 0093498IN 10/31/2010 Parkers Lake Recon street signs 5,096.09 Check 114611 Date Paid:1111912010 Elder -Jones Building permit sv Amount: 121.29 Inv. 201007471 11/10/2010 2710 Olive LN Bldg permit 201007471 refund 121.29 Page 4 Page 2 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114612 Date Paid:11l1912010 Electrical Installation & Mnt` Amo unt: 1,992.05 Inv. 0011463IN 10/29/2010 FH/dome furnish/install elec power 1,130.00 10/26/2010 Inv. 00114641N 10/29/2010 Repair Signal Relamp TH55@Peony 107.00 Inv. S01282174004 Inv. 00114651N 10/29/2010 Repair Vicksburg@Old Rockford RD PED push 143.74 Inv. 9380107848 10/26/2010 PW -48 Lantern 6Volt Battery 105.17 button SW Corner PW -4 Swivel Eye Block, 2 -Eye Hook & 2 -clip & 105.33 Inv. 00114661N 10/29/2010 Repair Vicksburg@Schmidt LK RD mist walks 282.67 PW -10 Reducer Bushing, 112" Coupling, Elbow 111.58 don't walks out Inv. 00114671N 10/29/2010 Repair TH55@W Med lake Rd 2 Red LEDS 328.64 out Check 114613 Date Paid:1111912010 Environmental Wood Supply LLC Amount: 330.00 Inv. 10112010 10/13/2010 9.20. 10 Mulch left on site 330.00 Check 114614 Date Paid:11l1912010 Factory Motor Parts Co Amount: 308.13 Inv. 13492273 11/04/2010 1 Generator 178.30 Inv. 13493525 11/05/2010 CR70030336 Memo Returned Brake Lining Kit 48.29) Inv. 69024292 11/05/2010 3 Headlamp Bulbs 19.21 Inv. 70030336 10/25/2010 Brake Lining Kit 48.29 Inv. 13493013 11/05/2010 2 Super Duty Pades 110.62 Check 114615 Date Paid:11l19l2010 Fast enal C 1. ompany Amount: 7.17 Inv. MNPLY43156 10/27/2010 100-8X314 Pan SDS3 Z 7.17 Check 114616 Date Paid:11119l2010 FedEx Inv. 727295186 10/27/2010 10.19.10 to Travelers Prot assoc Check 114617 Date Paid:1111912010 Inv. S01280358002 11/01/2010 Inv. S01280358001 10/26/2010 Inv. S01280358003 10/26/2010 Inv. S01282174001 10/26/2010 Inv. S01282174002 10/26/2010 Inv. S01282174003 10/26/2010 Inv. S01282174004 10/26/2010 Ferguson Enterprises Inc 5 Type 11 VB Adapt Fits #6 Base on valves 10 -Type II VB ADPT Fits #6 Base on valves 25-FLWR Plate O -Ring 2 -Bolt 3-3PC Star G VB W/Base & Lid 9-3PC Star G VB W/Base & Lid 3-3 PC Star G VB w/ Base & Lid 3-3PC Star W/Base & Lid Amount: $ 36.68 36.68 Amount: $ 2,564.70 320.20 320.20 128.78 448.88 448.88 448.88 448.88 Check 114618 Date Paid:11l1912010 G&K Services Inc Amount $ 360.26 Inv. 1006656080 10/29/2010 PW Uniforms 360.26 Check 114619 Date Paid: 1111912010 Galls Amount: $ 49.63 Inv. 510925825 10/27/2010 Kline uniform pants 49.63 Check 114620 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Grainger Amount: $ 619.30 Inv. 9362627904 10/04/2010 2 Light duty toasters 297.22 Inv. 9380107848 10/26/2010 PW -48 Lantern 6Volt Battery 105.17 Inv. 9382356286 10/28/2010 PW -4 Swivel Eye Block, 2 -Eye Hook & 2 -clip & 105.33 Thimble Kit Inv. 9382993583 10/29/2010 PW -10 Reducer Bushing, 112" Coupling, Elbow 111.58 and 6 1/2" Tee Check 114621 Date Paid: 1 111 912 01 0 1 nv. 950559756 10/25/2010 Inv. 950559757 10/25/2010 1 nv. 950606418 10/26/2010 Graybar Electric Company Amount: $ 3,819.92 JM -CML Tyco OSP Division $ 184.79 12 Gen Vendor PVCPA, 2,500 14 -Sol Blk Gen $ 303.44 Vendor Wire Conduit for communication line $ 3,331.69 Check 114622 Date Paid:1111912010 Grove Nursery Inc Amount: $ 1,421.08 Inv. 21875600 10/12/2010 2-Chokeberry, 6 -Sumac, & 1 -Sumac Trees $ 136.16 Inv. 21891900 10/19/2010 Various shrubs,plants $ 690.43 Inv. 21902200 10/28/2010 3 Sugar maple,red jewl crab,mulch $ 594.49 Page 5 Page 3 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114623 Date Paid: 1111912010 Hach Company Amount $ 369.30 Inv. 6969707 10/28/2010 1-Tensette Pipet,2-PK100 Iron $ 369.30 Check 114624 Date Paid:1111912010 Inv. 100923 10/01/2010 Check 114625 Date Paid:1111912010 Inv. 3168908 R I 10/26/2010 Check 114626 Date Paid: 11/19/2010 Inv. 762336 10/25/2010 Feerrover,3-PK100 PHOSVER PWD PLW Bruce Hansen 7.10. 10 HomeDepot/9.23.10 Lowe's-Watersoftner rplc/8th Ave recon Hawkins Water Treatment CWP 658.1227gl LPC -9L, 64401b Sodium Permanganate Hedberg Aggregate Inc 2.52 Ton Gravel River Rock 1 1/2" Amount; _$,_,_9,7_6-,,._6,7_ 976.67 Amount: $ 13,414.77 13,414.77 Amount: $ 87.80 87.80 Check 114627 Date Paid:1111912010 Hennepin Co Info Tech Dept Amount: 099.29 Inv. 210108041 10/31/2010 Oct'10 Fire Radio lease 2,124.44 Inv. 210108042 10/31/2010 Oct'10 PD MDC's/Radio lease 4,074.85 Check 114628 Date Paid:1111912010 Hennepin County treasurer''" Amount: 220.85 Inv. 101031 10/31/2010 Oct'l0 4.39 ton solid Waste Hauling 220.85 Check 114629 Date Paid:1111912010 Highway 55 Rental Inc Amount; 36.18 Inv. 432129 11/04/2010 60" Tripod projector screen rental for salt 36.18 workshop Check 114630 Date Paid:1111912010 History Theatre Grou1. p Sa11 les Amount: 385.00 Inv. 101209A 11/15/2010 12.9.10 Bal owed/Experience the Unforgettable 385.00 Check 114631 Date Paid: 1111912-M6 Independent School District 284 Amount: _$_,1__68._00____-, Inv. 23046 10/01/2010 Oct'10 Gymnastics equip use 168.00 Check 114632 Date Paid: 1 111 912 01 0 Insty Prints Amount: 117.56 Inv. 28358 10/25/2010 875- 2010 MN Letterfold MN Fire Symposium 117.56 Check 114633 Date Paid:1111912010 InternationalCodeCouncil/ICC Amount: 2,746.00 Inv. 110207 11/15/2010 Feb'11 Registr 11 Bldg division 2,746.00 Check 114634 Date Paid:1111912010 J . 11 J Landscaping#Inc Amount: 500.00 Inv. 101028 10/28/2010 City Center trees installed 500.00 Check 114635 Date Paid:11/1912010 Kidd Plumbing Inc Amount: 207.50 Inv. 7125 11/03/2010 Rink C/Rink B plumbing repairs 207.50 Check 114636 Date Paid: 11/19/2010 KTCO Inc Amount; 94 58 Inv. 101001 10/01/2010 59 car washes during 8th Ave Recon project 94.58 Check 114637 Date Paid:11119/2010 League of Minnesota Cities Amount: 40 00 Inv. 145904 10/25/2010 11. 17.10 Cal Portner regional meeting 40.00 Check 114638 Date Paid:1111912010 Lennar Family, of Builders _ Amount: 2,259.25 Inv. 101110 11/15/2010 Ref spec assessment 04.23.0083 & 2,259.25 04.11.0013 R2010.5759 Check 114639 Date Paid: 11/1912010 LSCResource Inc Amount: 308,08 Inv. 23025 10/27/2010 600 Senior Grapevine Newsletter Flyer 308.08 Nov -Dec Check 114640 Date Paid: 11/19/201 0 Maple Grove Park & Recreation Amount: 3,489.20 Inv. 12538 11/10/2010 Summer 2010 Music for Everyone 3,489.20 Check 114641 Date Paid: 1111912010 Marshall & Swift Amount: 724.15 Inv. 6183141111 11/01/2010 2.1.'1112.'1'12 valuation/12.'10/12'11 Resid cost 724.15 handbk Page 6 Page 4 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114642 Date Paid:1111912610 Inv.00196895SNV 10/26/2010 Check 114643 Date Paid:1111912010 Inv. 128232 1013112010 Check 114644 Date Paid: 1111912010 Inv. 194040 10/2212010 MES Inc Fire -Wrench HYD Adust Single HD SP Metro Athletic Supply Inc Prk-3 Shuttlecocks,4-Brine Soccer Balls, and delivery Amount: $ 40.76 40.76 Amount: $ 213.38 213.38 Metro Garage Door Co. Amount: $ 1,884.71 FS3 garage door repairs $ 1,884.71 Check 114645 Date Paid:1111912010 Metro Sheet Metal Inc AmoIunt: 740.00 Inv. 03515 10/26/2010 IC repair duckt work on Rink A munters 740.00 1012112010 PS -1 100PK DVD -R Spindle, 1-100PK CD -R 30.63 dehumidifier TDK Check 114646 Date Paid:1111912010 MN Secretary of State Amount: 120.00 Inv, 101115 11115/2010 Diane Tiegslnotary renewal 120.00 Inv. 538532791001 Check 114647 Date Paid: 11/19/2016 Mobile Lock And Safe Co. Amount: 20.09 Inv. 05850 1011112010 10 Keys 20.09 PW -12 Letter Holdrs & 10 Clipboards Letter Check 114648 Date Paid: 1111912010 Morrie's Imports Inc Amount. 322.50 Inv. F6CS423495 1012912010 Unit 1005 Labor to replace rear ABS Sensor 322.50 7.22 Check 114650 Date Paid: 1111912010 Neumann's Enterprise LLC Amount: 2,900.00 Inv, 101110 11/10/2010 23rd&Kirkwood restore ditch 2,900.00 Check 114651 Date Paid:1111912010 Northern Safety Tech no lo gyAmount 1012612010 422 221.. Inv. 25527 10/2512010 Unit 5010 Strobe light 422.22 84.22 Check 114652 Date Paid: 1111912010 NorthwestVAsphalt Inc Amount: 77,247.25 Inv. 101025 10/25/2010 Proj10032 #1 Hadley Hills 2nd Addn 77,247.25 11/1012010 Check 114653 Date Paid: 11!1912010 HorthWorks Occu atiional -- 14 -ea -16 __. A.m. ount: 57.00 Inv. 00000569 10/31/2010 10.22.10 Todd Kloss respirator fit test 57.00 PW -27 Calendars Check 114654 Date Paid:1111912010 Inv. 535937047 001 10/01/2010 Office Depot Amount: $ 1,135.00 PR 1 BX of Name Badges & 2 BX 113 Letter $ 39.57 Folder Inv. 536254881001 1010512010 100 Recyled Sefl-Sealing Mailers 62.55 Inv. 538127271001 1012112010 ADMIN -1 PK 12 12.5" Kraft Mailer 31.25 Inv. 538292173001 1012112010 PS -1 100PK DVD -R Spindle, 1-100PK CD -R 30.63 TDK Inv. 538465710001 1012212010 PS -1 Calendar Deskpad & 1 Pk Sleeve for 21.54 CD/DVD Inv. 538532791001 1012512010 PS -10 Binders 56.34 Inv. 538573945001 1012512010 PIC -2 PK Pushpins 50 -Pack 3.51 Inv. 538580494001 1012512010 PW -12 Letter Holdrs & 10 Clipboards Letter 306.75 Size Inv. 538690829001 1012612010 ADM -2-1 DZ Poly Lead Pencils & 2-1 DZ Lead 7.22 7MM Inv. 538693082001 1012612010 1 -Letter Opener, 1 -BX (100) Folders, 6PK Glue 18.92 Stick nv. 538790545001 1012612010 6 -Post IT 116X70 & 3 -Laser Labels 40CT 40.88 nv. 538898796001 1012712010 1 -Calendar, 1 -Planner, 1 Jape 84.22 Dispenser, 12-Pad,12-Steno Pad nv. 539313901001 11/0112010 FIR -8 Calendar Refills 122.32 nv. 540025730001 11/1012010 CM Admin -200 Refill Cards,200 Clasp 77.72 Envelopes, Roledex A -Z Cards Inv. 540333710001 11/10/2010 PW -27 Calendars 231.58 Check 114655 Date Paid:1111912010 OnSite Sanitation Arno unf: $ 37.68 Inv. A408019 10/2812010 10.16110.22.10 Oakwood Plyfld 37.68 Page 5 of 22 Page 7 12/6/2010 Check 114656 Date Paid: I'll 119/2010 Owens Com - .. :... _... _ T ry ... :........:... ponii' esInc o-u nt: _ r .,$ Amou ll-,5-49.5'6 . _ -_._... Inv. 37160 10/22/2010 FS1 replace rooftop unit for lounge 8,660.00 Inv. 37161 10/22/2010 FS1 econonizer installation 1,630.00 Inv. 37372 10/31/2010 Roftop Unit 1 bad induced draft motor 598.56 Inv. 37533 11/09/2010 Remove & replace Humidifier Drum In Liebert 661.00 Unit Check 114657 Date Paid:1111912010 Personnel Evaluation Inc Amount: 60.00 Inv. 95291 10/31/2010 Oct'10 3 JV Pep 60.00 Check 114658 Date Paid:1111912010 Phasor Electric Company Amount: 5,092.80 Inv. 039247 10/26/2010 Rpr OSHA violations at var locations 1,225.00 Inv. 039261 10/28/2010 CCIPS Parking lot light repairs 3,014.25 Inv. 039262 10/28/2010 FS3-Replace 2 damaged flag pole lights 722.30 Inv. 039263 10/28/2010 Plymouth Lift Station removal exterior solenoid 131.25 Check 114659 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Practical Systems Amount. 4,005.00 Inv. S118171 09/30/2010 4237 Goldenrod Ln rplc furnace/AC 4,005.00 Check 114660 Date Paid:1111912010 Printers Service Inc _ Amount: 90.00 Inv. 250308 10/26/2010 Ice 5-77" Ice Knife Sharpening 90.00 Check 114661 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Protek Painting Inc Amount: 7,500.00 Inv. 101115 11/15/2010 Progress pay #4 Metrolink Station 73 painting 7,500.00 Check 114662 Date Paid:1111912610 Public Grants & Train n-Inifiativ,es Amount. 380.00 Inv. 28686859 11/12/2010 4 Registr/Women survival 1.13.11 380.00 Check 114663 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Rainbow-Treecare Inc Amount: 14,329.05 Inv. S177497 11/15/2010 10.7110.26.10 Tree removal/chipping 14,329.05 Check 114664 Date Paid:' 11/1912010 Reliakor Services Inc r Amount: 35,235.35 Inv. 101001 10/01/2010 Proj10016 31Final 2010 Street Sweeping 35,235.35 Check 114665 Date Paid: 11116/2011'0 Susan Ritchie Amount: 262.50 Inv, 101030 10/30/2010 10.14110.28.10 Knitting class 262,50 Check 114666 Date Paid:1111912010 WA Services LLC Amount: 4,263.30 . lnv. 2010839 11/04/2010 Oct'10 9,474 Meter Reads 4,263.30 Check 114667 Date Paid: 1111912010 Sam's Club Amount. 52.99 Inv. 101108 11/08/2010 10.30.10 IC Hot dog buns/concessions 52.99 Check 114668 Date Paid: 1111912010 Scharber & Sons ry Amount: 80.16 Inv. 14495 10/18/2010 Cub cadet rental 80.16 Check 114669 Date Paid: 1111912616 Scherer Printing Amount: 1,530.45 Inv. 27328 10/19/2010 1,150 Fire Correction Notices 841,11 Env. 27329 10/19/2010 2,850 Notice Door Hangers 689,34 Check 114670 Date Paid:1111912010 SHe'd-knight Sec Sys Of MN In Amount: 50.00 Inv. 00062585 10/26/2010 PCC Alarm repair 50.00 Check 114671 Date Paid: 1111912010 Sports Unlimited Amount: 480.00 Inv. 101101 11/15/2010 Nov Tuesday sport sampler 480.00 Check 114672 Date Paid: 11119/2010 SRF Consulting Group, Inc Amount 4,959.18 Inv. 07265002 10/31/2010 Oct'10 Four Seasons Mall Traffic study 4,959.18 Check 114673 Date Paid:1111912010 St Joseph Equipmentlnc Amount 356.96 Inv. 5182009 10/29/2010 Claim 2010.30 Skid steer door glass/seal 356.96 Check 114674 Date Paid:1111912010 Star Tribune Amount: 1',135.00 Inv. 101031 10/31/2010 10.10.10 PoliceOfficerjob position 1,135.00 Page 8 Page 6 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114675 Date Paid: 1111912010 Streicher's Inc Amount: 465.35 Inv. 1783260 10/29/2010 Fire -2 Tactel Navy Jackets and 2 Navy Pants 129.98 Inv. 1783479 10/29/2010 Fire -Pants 34" Waist, Reg Rise 59.99 Inv. 1783758 11/01/2010 Fire 1 -Cargo Pants,1-DutyMaxx Pants & 1 Shirt 129.98 Inv. 1785172 11/05/2010 Fire 1 Tactel Jacket & 1 Navy Pants 59.99 Inv. 1785271 11/06/2010 PS 1 Break -Free Clip 4 oz,2-#9 Solvent Nitro 25.62 Powder Inv. 1785295 11/06/2010 Fire 1 pair of pants and 1 tactel Navy Jacket 59.99 and Fire Patch Check 114676 Date Paid:1111912016 Superior Brookdale Ford Amount: 74.42 Inv. 37280 10/25/2010 1-AW7Z19E616 Car Motor 52.77 Inv. 37424 10/27/2010 2-5W1 Z1 OA936A Car Jewel 21.65 Check 114677 Date Paid: 11/19I2010 Supreme Building `Maintenance Amount: 1,586.03 Inv. 101510 10/05/2010 Oct'10 Cheshire Metrolink shelter janitorial 223.37 Inv. 105210 10/05/2010 Oct'10 Station 73 Janitorial/window cleaning 1,362.66 Check 114678 Date Paid:1111912010 ._ SWIWC Service Cooperatives Amount: 192,067.50 Inv. 101201 11/15/2010 Dec'10 BCBS Health Insurance 192,067.50 Check 114679 Date Paid: 1 111 91201 0 SWC S -MN Chapter ......... Amount: 1 140.00 Inv. 101108 11/15/2010 Kevin Springob 11.8111.10.10 invasive species 140.00 cont Check 114680 Date Paid:1111912610 Thompson Publishing Group Amount: 328.30 Inv. 101115 11/15/2010 2011 FLSA Handbook subsc renewal 328.50 Check 114681 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Toll Company Amount: 173.21 Inv. 327206 10/25/2010 1 Cylinder Propane Fuel Gas 84.35 Inv. 327315 10/26/2010 1 Cylinder Propane Fuel Gas 39.51 inv. 411778 10/31/2010 1 propane & propylene 49.35 Check 114682 Date Paid:1111912010 Total Tool Amount: 943.13 Inv. 77109680 10/28/2010 Repair of over head cranes in repair center 261.84 Inv. 77109691 10/29/2010 Pendant switch for overhead crane 82.79 Inv. 77109692 10/29/2010 2010 C&H Inspections 598.50 Check 114683 Date Paid: 1 111 912 01 0 Trans -Alarm Inc Amount: 1,334.74 Inv. SV103946 10/11/2010 PS Card reader repairs 1,309.09 Inv. SV103978 10/12/2010 FS3 Card reader repairslrp[c battery 25.65 Check 114684 Date Paid:1111912010 Trugreen Chemlawn Amount: 16,381.18 Inv. 526438 10/22/2010 10.22.10 Elm Creek fertti[izalweed 1,611.43 Inv. 565414 10/22/2010 2010 Buckthorn chemical control 10,474.24 Inv. 567494 10/23/2010 10.23. 10 Hilde deep root fertilization 4,295.51 Check 114685 Date Paid: 11/1912016 Tw nwest Chamber of Commerce - _ Amount 30.00 Inv. 74275 10/29/2010 Nov'10 Ginny Black legislative brkfst 30.00 Check 114686 Date Paid: 1111912010 USA Mobility Wireless Inc Amount: 11 1 106.53 Inv. T0296261K 11/0112010 Nov'l0 UT pager rental 106.53 Check 114687 Date Paid:111191 010 Valley Rich Co Inc 1 Amount: 15,914. 17s Inv. 15923 10/11/2010 11305 Sunset Tr watermain break repairs 257.00 Inv. 15925 10/15/2010 17125 13th Avelwatermain break repair 4,290.32 Inv. 15927 10/05/2010 5157 Yuma Lnlwatermain break repairs 3,777.20 Inv. 15953 10/20/2010 10205 10th Avelwatermain break repairs 4,077.15 Inv. 15984 10/28/2010 Bass Lk&Kirkwood Watermain break repair 3,512.50 Page 9 Page 7 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114688 Date Paid:1111912010 Village Chevrolet Co.' Amount: 97.31 Inv. 212477 11/01/2010 1 -Shaft Unit 497 97.31 Check 114689 Date Paid:1111912010 W D Larson Companies -LTD Inc Amount: 1 1. 04.89 Inv. F202990041 10/26/2010 Various filters 104.89 Check 114690 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Wenck Associates Inc Amount 9,089.80 Inv. 1003955 10/31/2010 Proj8128 Oct'10 Plym Crk Restoration 9,089.80 Check 114691 Date Paid:1111912010 Westside Wholesale Tire Inc. Amount: 65.11 Inv. 650358 11/15/2010 Unit 221 4 tire tubes 65.11 Check 114692 Date Paid' All1912010 WSB &Associates _ Amount: 944.50 Inv. 019270004 11/01/2010 Proj04145 Sep'10 SoShore Drive bridge 944.50 Check 114693 Date Paid:1111912010 Xcel Energy Amount: 4,922.24 Inv. 51450946641110 11/10/2010 9.16111.3.10 Zach,Rdgmnt,Lacompte,E Med 1,949.40 LK,PC path Inv. 51472281601010 10/26/2010 9.15110.18.10 2 Water Towers 53.75 Inv. 51554915751010 10/26/2010 9.14110.18.10 8 Lift Stations 760.59 Inv. 5161820453101OA10/29/2010 9.11110.28.10 Traffic Signals 2,158.50 Check 114694 Date Paid: 11/1912010 Yocum Oil Company Inc Amount: 286.99 Inv. 406698 10/27/2010 104.6 fuel oil for generators 286.99 Check 114695 Date Paid: 1 111 912 0 1 0 Ziegler Inc Amount. 331.31 Inv. SW050156225 10/23/2010 Fall'10 Station 73 transfer switch maint 331.31 Check 114696 Date Paid:11119/20 1 0 Diane Evans Amount. 41.00 Inv. 101105 11/05/2010 9.29111.5.10 82 Mileage Reimb 41.00 Check 114697 Date Paid:1111912010 Minnesota Department of Revenue Amount: 457. 676 6 Inv. 101112 11/12/2010 Misc payroll deduction 457.67 Check 114698 Date Paid: 1111912010 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Amount: 400.00 Inv. 101104 11/15/2010 MS4 Permit reissuance 400.00 Check 114699 Date Paid: 1111912010 Sara Mittelstaedt Amount: 127.98 Inv. 101107 11/07/2010 11.1111.7.10 Old log, Office Max, Costco/Sr 127.98 program supplies Check 114700 Date Paid: 11/19/2010 Mark S Peterson Amount. 82.00 Inv. 101027 10/27/2010 10.18110.27.10 164 Mileage Reimb 82.00 Check 114701 Date Paid: 11119/2010 Calvin Portner Amount: 44.60 Inv. 101116 11/15/2010 Reimb overpayment of flowers/ 44.60 Check 114702 Date Paid: 1 111 912 0 1 6 Follese, Cheri Amount: 39.00 Inv. Import - 926 11/17/2010 Park and Rec Refund 39.00 Check 114703 Date Paid:1111912010 Hopkins Parts Co. Amount: 526.33 Inv. 058944 10/13/2010 2 Marker L 5.15 Inv. 058991 10/13/2010 10 Bulb 139.15 Inv. 059335 10/20/2010 Pwr steering fluid,splash G,fuse 94.18 Inv. 059342 10/20/2010 1 Repl lamp 6.81 Inv. 059367 10/21/2010 5 Whl brg 21.11 Inv. 059658 10/27/2010 Unit 5010 Hook,PT hook,HT pin 172.44 Inv. 059693 10/27/2010 D Earth 32.02 Inv. 059846 10/29/2010 Unit 188 upper ball joint 55.47 Check 114704 Date Paid:11119/2010 Volgistics Inc Amount: 906.00 Inv. 61588641 11/19/2010 11.2615.26.11 Volunteer database subsc 906.00 renewal Page 10 Page 8 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114705 Date Paid: 11124/2010 Adam's Pest Control, Inc. Amount. 175.28 Inv, 612149 11/05/2010 Oct-Dec'10 FS 1 Pest Control 80.16 Check 114720 Inv. 612150 11/02/2010 Oct-Dec'10 FS 2 Pest control 95.12 Check 114721 Check 114706 Date Paid: Ii 412016 Allina Occ Med Amount: 535.00 Inv. 61146 10/31/2010 9.28&10.4.10 Medical/drug test 535.00 Date Paid: 1112412010 Check 114707 Date Paid:1112412010 Am' erican'F'astener Amount: 224.52 Inv. 00167051 11/03/2010 Misc Washers and 2-Instru Ball Valves 114 inch 224.52 Check 114708 Date Paid: 11/2412010 American Planning Assoc. Amoun1. t: 950.00 Inv. 047251100801 09/15/2010 Jan-eC'11 Senness Membership 510.00 Inv. 080168100801 09/15/2010 Jan-Dec'11 Drill Membership 440.00 Check 114709 Date Paid: 11124/2610 Andy's Lawncare Amount: 376.85 Inv. 18493 11/01/2010 Nov'10 Snowplowing 376.85 Check 114710 Date Paid: 11/24/2016 Aurora Loan Services Amount: 64.29 Inv. 247589 11/22/2010 16608 50th Ct N water refund 64.29 Check 114711 Date Paid:1112412010 Barton Sand & Gravel Co Amount: 1,852.60 Inv. 101115 11/15/2010 11.1111.8.10 209.73 ton Class 5 Recycle 1,852.60 Check 114712 Date Paid: 11/24/2610 Bertelson Total Office Solutions Amount; 234.16 Inv. W06554421 11/05/2010 CS -5 Boxes Twin -Pocket Files, 1 -Press 234.16 Tabs,2BX Staples,Copy Stamp Check 114713 Date Paid:11124'12010 Nancy Brisk and Gary Smith Amount: 7 4. 17 Inv. 185429 11/22/2010 1665 Evergreen Ln N water refund 74.17 Check 114714 Date Paid: 11124/2010 C S-_6MCrossan Construction Inc Amount: 11,021.55 Inv. 8646MB 11/01/2010 11.1.10 6.35 ton LVWE45030B Rap 281.64 Inv. 8649MB 11/02/2010 11.2.10 168.79 ton LVWE45030B Rap 7,486.39 Inv. 8657MB 11/04/2010 11.4.10 69.68 ton LVWE45030B Rap 3,090.54 Inv. 8661MB 11/05/2010 11.5.10 3.05 ton Fines Mix 162.98 Check 114715 Date Paid:1112412010 Cynthia Carlson ro Amount 144.85 inv. 16703301 11/22/2010 2760 Zanzibar Ln N water refund 144.85 Check 114716 Date Paid:1112412016 CDW Government Inc Amount: 744.14 Inv. VLN0294 11/03/2010 Photoshop 744.14 Check 114717 Date Paid:1112412010 CenterPoint Energy Amount: 9,611.83 Inv. 8000014737311101110512010 9.20110.31.10 Natural Gas 9,611.83 Check 114718 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Inv. 135817 11/11/2010 Check 114719 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 2418906 11/22/2010 Check 114720 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 101108 11/08/2010 Check 114721 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv, 1147 11/01/2010 Check 114722 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 6678403 11/03/2010 Check 114723 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 103901 11/06/2010 Page 9 of 22 Clarey`sSafety Equip. Co Amount $ 108.95 Pediatric defibrillation pads 108.95 Michael Clipper Amount: $ 54.25 9930 26th Ave N water refund 54.25 Comcast Amount: $ 199.90 11.18112.17.10 CC High Speed Internet $ 199.90 Custom Valve Nut Replacement Amount: $956.53 36th&Pilgrim Ln install #4 SS rplcmnt valve nut $ 956.53 Dakota Supply Group Inc _ Amount: $ 3,180.00 10 1" M70 meter gal, 10 #4 1" setters $ 3,180.00 DC Management & Environmental Services Amount: $ 2,185.00 Shooting range repairs $ 2,185.00 Page 11 12/6/2010 Check 114724 Date Pal d:1112412010 DSS Commercial Ince.. MAmo n.,__ .. unt: 2,591.17 Inv. 15099 11109/2010 Oct'10 Messiah Lawn maintenance 106.88 Inv. 15100 11/09/2010 Oct'10 Station 75 Lawn mowing 1,008.90 Inv. 15106 11/09/2010 11.1.10 4 -Seasons heater not working 396.17 Inv, 15107 11/09/2010 Oct'10 Various Transit shelter maintenance 1,079.22 Check 114725 Date Paid:1112412010 Samantha Durfee Amount: 11.90 Inv. 17707800 11/22/2010 3010 Larch Ln N water refund 11.90 Check 114726 Date Paid:1112412010 Earl F. Andersen Inc. Amount: 926.83 Inv, 0094044IN 11/05/2010 Stop/Stop ahead signs for fernbrook&23rd 926.83 Check 114727 Date Paid: 1 11/24/201 0 Dennis Euteneuer Amount: 16.06 Inv. 11760600 11/22/2010 12910 46th Ave N water refund 16.06 Check 114728 Date Paid: 11/2412010 Fasten -al Company Amount: 69.45 Inv. MNPLY43305 11/12/2010 3-72 ct Scrubbing Wipes 47.61 Inv, MNPLY43312 11/03/2010 100-114" 20 FHNZ,50-114X1114 PEB,100-114 21.84 USS FMZ Check 114729 Date Paid: 1112412010 FedEx Office Amount: 222.06 Inv. 101031 10/31/2010 10.27110.28.10 Laminate parking signs 222.06 Check 114730 Date Paid:1112412010 G&K Services Inc Amount: 431.54 Inv. 1006658118 11/01/2010 11.1.10 Rug service 81.66 Inv. 1006667079 11/05/2010 Public Works Uniforms 349.88 Check 114731 Date Paid:1112412010 GMH Asphalt Corp Amount 1,011,343.49 Inv. 101015 10/15/2010 Proj10001 #5 2010 Street Reconstruction 1,011,343.49 Check 114732 Date Pald:1112412010 Gopher Amount: 1,559.61 Inv. 8210302 11/01/2010 2 Lacrosse goals & nets 1,559.61 Check 114733 Date Paid: 11124120- 1- 10 Grainger Amount. 801.95 Inv. 9377405924 10/22/2010 Pneumatic task stool 208.73 Inv. 9383683944 11/04/2010 Safety eyewear,air sprayer,solvent 81.56 Env. 9384093127 11/01/2010 1 Cable, 1/4", L50 FT, WLL 1640 LB 110.09 Inv. 9385047510 11/02/2010 10 112" Elbows with 45 Degree 40.19 Inv. 9386432265 11/03/2010 4 Space Heaters 120 V 108.41 Inv. 9386634449 11/03/2010 2-10PK Minature Lamps 15.86 Inv. 9387001416 11/03/2010 PCC cable tie's,flat washers,hex nuts 103.62 Inv. 9387585764 11/04/2010 2 Winger Lite - Elite Clear Lens 12.97 Inv. 9387585772 11/04/2010 2 Safety eyewear return/Inv 9383683944 23.34) Inv. 9388879224 11/05/2010 3 Halogen Rechargeable Black Spotlight 143.86 Check 114734 Date Paid: 111241"2- 01 0 Graphic Source Amount: 1,345.66 Inv. 32760 11/11/2010 18 Inkjet banner/Conference banners 1,345.66 Check 114735 Date Paid: 1 1112412611 0 Graybar Electric Company Amount: 1,875.92 Inv. 950793157 11/04/2010 Hand holes and covers 1,875.92 Check 114736 Date Paid: 11/2412010 GS Direct Inc Amount: 373-62 Inv. 273532 11/02/2010 2-36X40 4 Mil P1 IJ Film 373.62 Check 114737 Date Paid: 1 1124/20 1 0 Hawkins Water Treatment Amount: 3,271.56 Inv. 3172278RI 11/04/2010 ZWP 4776gl Azone 15 3,271.56 Check 114738 Date Paid: 11124/2010 iHennepin o into Tech DeptHennenC Amount: 476.07 Inv. 19 10/31/2010 Oct'l0 Frame Relay/Network Support 156.07 Inv. 210108099 10/31/2010 Oct'10 PW Radio lease 320.00 Page 12 Page 10 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114739 Date Paid:1112412010 Hennepin County Sheriff Amount: 3,858.57 Inv. 3325 10/31/2010 Oct'10 Booking fee prisoners 3,858.57 Check 114740 Date Paid:1112412010 Intoximeters Inc. Amount: 101.53 Inv. 317038 11/03/2010 500 Mouthpieces 101.53 Check 114741 Date Paid: 11124/2010 IpSwitch Inc Amount: 1,120 50 Inv. IN427217 11/01/2010 WhatsUP gold Prem sery agrmnt 1,120.50 Check 114742 Date Paid: 11124/2010 Joel Jensen Amount: 50-00 Inv. 101117 11/17/2010 11.17.10 Chopin&the Romantic Era 50.00 performance Check 114743 Date Paid: w244610 Virgins Johnson Amount: 17.85 Inv. 24133173 11/22/2010 4125 Upland Ln N water refund 17.85 Check 114744 Date Paid: 1112412010 David Jones Amount: 9.53 Inv. 24221535 11/22/2010 125 Orchid Ln N water refund 9.53 Check 114745 Date Paid: 11/2412010 Steven Leuer Amount: 19,662.50 Inv. 20318 11/13/2010 11.13.10 224hrs Snowplowing 19,662.50 Check 114746 Date Paid:1112412010 Nina Levin Amount: 23.99 Inv. 24173926 11/22/2010 15915 Co Rd 6 water refund 23.99 Check 114747 Date Paid:1112412010 Lynn Mara Amount: 55 98 Inv. 24152772 11/22/2010 4325 Rosewood Ln N water refund 55.98 Check 114748 Date Paid:1112412010 John McCarthy Amount: 50.73 Inv. 17982200 11/22/2010 9910 28th Ave N water refund 50.73 Check 114749 Date Paid:1112412010 MES Inc Amount: 91.70 Inv, 00198519SNV 11/02/2010 8 Barricade Tape -Fire Line Do Not Cross 91.70 Check 114750 Date Paid: 1112412010 Metro olitan Council Amount: 29 1. 106.00 Inv. 101031 10/31/2010 Oct'10 Sery Availibility Charge 29,106.00 Check 114751 Date Paid: 1112412016 John Metsker a Amount: 97.65 Inv. 24170204 11/22/2010 4600 Arrowood Ln N water refund 97.65 Check 114752 Date Paid:1112412010 Titus Mhiripiri Inv. 24114891 11/22/2010 2422 Hemlock Ln N water refund Check 114753 Date PaidA112412010 Inv. 245971 11/01/2010 Check 114754 Date Paid:1112412010 Inv. 101122A 1 112212 01 0 Minnesota Glove & Safety Inc 2dz Neon Thermal Terry,12pr blue Ithr palm gloves Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Proj8128 NPDES Construction activity permit wISWPPP Amount: $ 100.00 100.00 Amount $ 133.57 133.57 Amount: $ 400.00 400.00 Check 114755 Date Paid:1112412010 MMKR Amount: $ 1,000.00 Inv. 27598 10/31/2010 2009 REAC Report submission $ 1,000.00 Check 114756 Date Paid:1112412010 Inv. 101110 11/10/2010 Check 114757 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 2172 11/11/2010 Inv. 2174 11/18/2010 Check 114758 Date Paid:11/2412010 Inv.100546RG 11/02/2010 Inv. 100642RG 1 11/02/2010 MN Dept of Health Amount: $ 23.00 Joseph Raiche Class C water license certif $ 23.00 Natural Shore Technologies Amount: $9,61 2.50 Jul-Nov'10 Pond/Vlletland maintenance $ 5,982.50 Jul-Nov'10 Raingarden maintenance $ 3,630.00 Northwestern Power Equipment Co Amount: $ 4,609.50 Zach tower GA altitude valve chamber/labor to $ 3,282.11 rmv exist&install- Zach tower 16"over haul kit on GA valve $ 1,327.39 Page 13 Page 11 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114759 Date Paid: 1112412010 Odesa II LLC Amount: 113,830.70 Inv. 101105 11105/2010 PRK10033 Plym Creek Hockey Rink earthwork 32,618.25 1 Inv. 101105A 11/05/2010 Prk10033 Plym Creek Hockey Rink Concrete 80,912.45 1 Check 114760 Date Paid:1112412010 Office Depot Amount 388.22 Inv. 539176230001 10/29/2010 PS-4PK 40CT Labels, 100 113 Cut Folders,24 61.24 PERF Pads Inv. 539313966001 11/10/2010 FIR -1 Calendar Refill 5X8 30.50 Inv. 539482553001 11/02/2010 PCC 1 Dozen Mechanical Pencils 3.94 Inv. 539562843001 11/02/2010 PS-4-PK120 cups & 1 PK 25 Sets 8 Tab 48.13 Dividers Inv. 539641301001 11/0312010 PW -1 6/PK stackable trays 9.86 Inv. 539870847001 11/04/2010 PS -1 Deskpad and 4 DZ Lead Pencils 10.62 Inv. 540016718001 11/05/2010 PCC -5 Calendars,1 Ergo Wristrest,Paper & 192.83 C1ips,Laminate Refill Inv. 540055403001 11/05/2010 PS -200 CD/DVD Sleeves and 3 Calendar 31.10 Deskpads Check 114761 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 On Site Sanitation Amount: 317.97 Inv. A408293 11105/2010 10.16110.29.10 East Med Lake/final 44.89 Inv. A408294 11105/2010 10.16110.29.10 Skatepark/final 44.89 Inv. A408295 11105/2010 10.16110.29.10 Zach plyfld 1&2 final 89.78 Inv. A408296 1110512010 10.16110.29.10 Plymouth Plyfld final 138.41 Check 114762 Date Paid: 1112412D10 Phasor Electric Company Amount: 8,355.70 Inv. 039274 11/04/2010 Station 73 heat tape installed 8,268.20 Inv. 039275 11/04/2010 Disconnet CWP Pump at Water Treatiment 87.50 near PW Bldg Check 114763 bate Paid: 11124/2010 The Plumbing Guys Amount: 176.00 Inv. 16984 10/27/2010 10.27.10 remv outside sillcock to put back into 176.00 service Check 114765 Date Paid:11I2412010 Kelly Price Amount. 29.10 Inv. 12914201 11/22/2010 10130 48th Ave N water refund 29.10 Check 114766 Date Paid: 11/2412010 R&R Specialties of Wisconsin'lnc Amo. urtt: 392 07 Inv. 00462231N 1110412010 IC Elec edger circuit breaker kit 392.07 Check 114767 Date Paid:1112412010 Rachel & Steven Rosen Amount: 1,922.34 Inv. 147195 11/22/2010 14805 41st Ave N water refund 1,922.34 Check 114768 Date Paid:1112412010 Royal Credit Union Amount: 17.48 Inv. 18896401 11/2212010 15705 16th Ave N water refund 17,48 Check 114769 Date Paid:11124I2010 Jeff 5andino Amount: 325.00 Inv. 101118 11/18/2010 11.18.10 Traditional French Cuisine 325.00 Check 114770 Date Paid: 1112412010 John Sandvig Amount: 19.67 Inv. 17639200 11/22/2010 2915 Oakview Ln N water refund 19.67 Check 114771 Date Paid:1112412010 Science Explorers Amount: 276.00 Inv. 2137 11/08/2010 11.4111.18.10 Dynamite Dinosaurs 276.00 Check 114772 Date Paid: 1112412010 Goan Seo Amount: 80.44 Inv. 24126850 11/22/2010 12225 sunset Trl water refund 80.44 Check 114773 Date Paid: 11/2412010 SGC Horizon LLC Amount: 150.67 Inv. 48658 11/05/2010 Proj8128 Wild Wings flood protection 150.67 Page 14 Page 12 of 22 12/612010 Check 114774 Date Paid: 1112412010 Signature Concepts Inc Amount: 700.74 Inv. 14210786 11/04/2010 PCC/Dome staff jackets 700.74 Check 114775 Date Paid:1112412010 Michael Sip _ Amount: 29.45 Inv. 11298601 11/23/2010 4827 Orchid Ln N water refund 29.45 Check 114776 Date Paid: 1112412610 Jon Stokes Amount: 44.92 Inv. 24164362 11/22/2010 4330 Ithaca Ln n water refund 44.92 Check 114777 Date Paid:1112412010 Syndicate Sales Corp Amount: 256.50 Inv. 2108 10/26/2010 12 Polar hoods 256.50 Check 114778 Date Paid: 1112412010 Inv. 4659773111110 11/10/2010 Check 114779 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Inv, 1 OT F2151 11/02/2010 Inv. 1 OT F2152 11/02/2010 T Mobile Amount: $ 39 98 Nov'10 UT GPS cell $ 39,98 Taho Sportswear Inc Amount $ f 93.18 10 Fall Football T -Shirts and 2 Clr Screenprint $ 42.60 12 T -Shirts Fall Volleyball and 2 clr Screenprint $ 50.58 Check 114780 Date Paid:! 1 12412 0 1 0 TCF Bank Amount: 13.69 Inv. 24128010 11/22/2010 14820 39th Ave N water refund 13.69 Check 114781 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Richie Thacker Amount. 3 0'.'2 0 Inv. 187445 11/22/2010 1520 Glacier Ln N water refund 30.20 Check 114782 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Lisa Thompson Amount: 20.3 . 2 Inv. 236529 11/22/2010 4540 Jewel Ln N water refund 20.32 Check 114783 Date Paid: 1112412010 Ronaid Timm _ Amount: 50.00 Inv. 101116 11/16/2010 Computer ed instructors for Picasa 1 50.00 Check 114784 Date Paid: 11/241 0 1 0 Toll Company Amount: 298.11 Inv. 328749 11/05/2010 2 Oxygen Cylinders,1-Argon & CO, 298.11 Oxygen&CO2,Aceylene, Helium Tri Check 114785 Date Paid: 11124 . a_ 12010 o _ _,__ Dean Tomlinsn Amount: d 11 79 Inv. 24175432 11/22/2010 14141 54th Ave N water refund 11.79 Check 114786 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Total Control Systems Inc Amount: 7,420.0 - 0 Inv. 5422 11/05/2010 Well 10 rmv backplanelrplc 7,420.00 Check 114787 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Trans -Alarm Inc Amount 1,625.44 Inv. RMR745405 11/01/2010 Nov-Jan'11 ZWP fire monitoring 338.52 Inv. RMR745406 11/01/2010 Nov-Jan'11 CWP fire monitoring 311.56 Inv. RMR745409 11/01/2010 Nov-Jan'11 FS2 Sprnkler monitor 257.62 Inv. RMR745410 11/01/2010 Nov-Jan'11 FS1 Sprnkler monitor 257.62 Inv. RMR745411 11/01/2010 Nov-Jan'11 FS3 Sprnkler monitoring 257.62 Inv. SV105062 11/05/2010 Card reader repairs 202.50 Check 114788 Date Paid: 11124/2010 Molly Umland ' d Amount: 99.63 Inv. 24166690 11/22/2010 13850 54th Ave N water refund 99.63 Check 114789 Date Paid:1112412010 Inv. 110105 11/22/2010 University of Minnesota Amount: $ 230.00 Todd Sandell 1.5&1.6.11 Annual Institute $ 230.00 Check 114790 Date Paid:1112412010 University of Minnesota Amount: $ 90.00 Inv. 110114 11/22/2010 Joe Ryan 1. 14.11 Bldg annual institute $ 90.00 Check 114791 Date Paid: 11/2412010 Valley Rich Co Inc Amount: $ 10,765.36 Inv. 15994 10/05/2010 Vicksburg&47th Watermain break repair $ 10,599.28 Inv. 16000 10/29/2010 Bass Lk&Kirkwood q3 contracting Watermain $ 166.08 break repair Page 15 Page 13 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114792 Date Paid: 11124d61 6 Waste Management Services _. Amount: 45,511.5-7 Inv. 5732376 11/01/2010 Oct'10 CurbsidelDropoff Recycle less passbck 45,511.57 Check 114793 Date Paid:1112412010 Water Conservation Services Inc T Amount 451.00__._.__ Inv, 2077 11/10/2010 10. 11110. 18. 10 Leak detection 451.00 Check 114794 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 The Watson Company a..._ Amount: n N633.61 Inv. 792278 11/04/2010 IC Concession food resupply 633.61 Check 114795 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 Gerald INestby _ Amount. 5fi.68 Inv. 11049401 11/22/2010 4952 Comstock Ln N water refund 56.68 Check 114796 Date Paid:1112412010 Matthew Wood Amount: 87-08 Inv. 24201173 11/22/2010 11505 40th ave N water refund 87.08 Check 114797 Date Paid: 11/24/2010 X.:cel Energy moun-_- ua_, Amt: 29,675.69 Inv. 51465207541110 11/15/2010 9.16111.1.10 All wells&WTP except Well 7 22,197.23 Inv. 5146520754111 0A11116/2010 9.27110.27.10 Well 7 7,415.95 Inv. 51662037521010A11/04/2010 9.15110.18.10 Trfc signal,irrig light 62.51 Check 114798 Date Paid:11124120'10 Yocum biE6-rhpany lnc Amount: 18,807.36 Inv. 408291 11/04/2010 4997gl Unleaded, 3002gl Diesel fuel 18,807.36 Check 114799 Date Paid:1112412010 Community Health Charities Amount. 45.00 Inv. 2010-00000321 11/18/2010 CHAR CHC - Community Health Charities 45.00 Check 114800 Date Paid:1112412010 Law 1=nforce Lahor Serv./Union Amount: 1,316.91 Inv. 2010-00000324 11/18/2010 DUES POL - Police Union Dues * 1,316.91 Check 114801 Date Paid:1112412010 Minnesota Department of Revenue Amount. 223.12 Inv. 101119 11/19/2010 Misc payroll deduction 223.12 Check 114802 Date Paid:1112412610 Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyA A- Amount: 400.00 Inv. 101122 11/22/2010 Proj7135 NPDES Construction activity permit 400.00 Check 114803 Date Paid:1112412010MN AFSCME CounciI #5 Amount: 2-,,-3-9,8-.24- 2,398.24Inv. Inv, 2010-00000325 11/18/2010 DUES MTCE - Maintenance Union Dues* 2,398.24 Check 114864 bate Paid: 11124/2010 MN Child Support Payment Ctr-¢--- - m .=a.. Amount: 1,510.08 Inv. 2010-00000326 11/18/2010 CHID SUP% - Child Support Percentage* 1,510.08 Check 114805 Date Paid:1112412010 MN Environmental Fund Amount: o- 17.00 y Inv. 2010-00000327 11/18/2010 CHAR MN ENV - MN Enviromental Fund 17.00 Check 114806 Date PaidAv2412610 Open Your Heart Amount: 51.00 Inv. 2010-00000328 11/18/2010 CHAR OYH - Open Your Heart 51.00 Check 114807 Date Paid:1112412010 Joseph Raiche Amount. 32.00 Inv. 5668 11/19/2010 9.20.10 Reimb Class C water exam 32.00 Check 114808 Date Paid: 11124/2010 United Way Amount 101.41 Inv. 2010-00000331 11/18/2010 CHAR UW - United Way 101.41 Check 114809 Date Paid: 11/2412010 Marjorie Vigoren Amount: 17.00 Inv. 101118 11/18/2010 11.18.10 MAGC conf 34 Mileage reimb 17.00 Check 114810 Date Paid: 11/2412010 Johnson, Margaret Amount: 10.00 Inv. Import - 928 11/22/2010 Park and Rec Refund 10.00 Check 114811 Date Paid: 1112412010 Schee, Jon Amount: 115.00 Inv. Import - 927 11/22/2010 Park and Rec Refund 115.00 Check 114812 Date Paid:1112912010 Midland Title and Clifford Poetz Amount: 8,392.00 Inv. 101127 11/29/2010 4350 Trenton Ln #215 First Time Homebuyer 8,392.00 loan Page 16 Page 14 of 22 1216!2010 Check 114813 Date Paid:1210312010 Ace Lock& Safe Co Inc Amount 741.63 Inv. A86196 11/10/2010 PW access doors,garage doors lock rprs 741.63 Check 114814 Date Paid:1210312016 AIM Electronics Inc Amount: 94.50 Inv. 34062 11/19/2010 IC 11.1.10 repair 90 minute clock 94.50 Check 114815 Date Paid:1210312010 Airgas North Central Amount: 209.53 Inv. 105465322 11/08/2010 PD -3 Cylinders Ozgen 209.53 Check 114816 Date Paid: 1 2/63126-60 AI's Coffee Company Amount. 294.50 Inv. 81521 11/09/2010 IC Concession coffee resupply 294.50 Check 114817 Date Paid:1210312010 Ada Alden Amou nt: 84 00 Inv. 101024 10/24/2010 10,24.10 168 Mileage reimb to Onamia/Human 84.00 Rights mtg Check 114818 Date Paid: 1210312010 Allied Waste Services Amount: 599.98 Inv. 0894002330203 10/31/2010 Oct'10 PM Dumpster service 599.98 Check 114819 Date Paid: 1210312010 American Fastener _.. F Amount. 94. 056 _, g Inv. 00167132 11/12/2010 10 112X518-11 80 Gr Flap Disc 94.05 Check 114820 Date Paid: 1210312010 American Messaging Services LLC Amount: 122.19 Inv. D2081166KL 12/01/2010 Dec'10 PD pager rental 122.19 Check 114821 Date Paid:1210312010 Arena Services & Products LLC Amount: 1,175.63 Inv. 1838 10/11/2010 3 Rinks dasher board cleaning 1,175.63 Check 114822 Date Paid: 1 210312 01 0 Athietical"Sport Systems Unlimited Amount: 720.12 Inv. 0031922IN 10/31/2010 1C Lexan and bumper pads 720.12 Check 114823 bate Paid: 1-2/011616 Baldy Sanitation Inc Amount: 285.30 Inv. 101110 11/10/2010 Nov'10 Fire 123 Rubbish Removal 285.30 Check 114824 Date Paid: 1210312010 Batteries Plus Amount: 23.50 Inv. 021212128 11/10/2010 1 6V 12AH AGM 23.50 Check 114825 Date Paid:1210312010 Becker Arena Products Inc Amount. 4 6-3-1-3-6 Inv. 00081478 10/29/2010 IC Spring latch asmbly,handle, clevis pins,cotter 463.36 pins,screws,loc Check 114826 Date Paid: 1210312010 Boyer Trucks Amount: 145.70 Inv. 87471R 11/09/2010 Core Assembly F7HZ 18476 AA 145.70 Check 114827 Date Paid:1210312010 C S McCrossan Construction Inc Amount: 698.96 Inv. 8678MB 11/09/2010 11.9.10 13.08 ton Fines mix 698.96 Check 114828 Date Paid:12f0312010 Elizabeth &'Chad Carpenter Amount: 104.88 Inv. 158150 11/22/2010 3865 Yellowstone Ln water refund 104.88 Check 114829 Date Paid: 1210312010 Central Wood Products Amount: 4,168.13 Inv. 13791 11/09/2010 200yd Rec Step cert playfround chips 4,168.13 Check 114830 Date Paid: 1210312010 City of Maple Grove Amount: 1,195.22 Inv_ 12554 11/12/2010 Oct'10 Dog Impounds 1,195.22 Check 114831 Date Paid: 1210312010 CMI Inc Amount: 187.01 Inv. 758676 11/08/2010 6 pks mouthpieces 187.01 Check 114832 Date Paid: 1210312010 Comcast Amount: 72.48 Inv. 101116 1111612010 11 .26112.25. 10 ZWP data line 72.48 Check 114833 Date Paid:1210312010 Crystal Weldingzlnc" Amount: 3-,0-3--6,.5-3, Inv. 31239 11/1012010 Zachary plyfld wire mesh screens 3,036.53 Check 114834 Date Paid: 1210312010 Culligan -Metro Amount: 318.40 Inv. 101X022444207 1011412010 IC 49 501b solar salt 318.40 Page 17 Page 15 of 22 1216/2010 Check 114835 Date Paid: 12/03/2610 Inv. 513 11/10/2010 Check 114836 Date Paid: 1'2/0346110 Inv. 1030661 11/12/2010 Check 114837 Date Paid:1210312010 Inv. 01633682 11/04/2010 Inv. 01634332 11/08/2010 Dehn Tree Company AmounI. t $ 1,969. ;: 3 - 0 Various locations stump grinding/removal $ 1,969.30 Digital Ally Inc Amount: $ 272.50 1 Wireless Mic replacement $ 272.50 Discount Steel Inc Amount: $ 344.08 p PM-4HR Angle 1.25x1.25x118x20'&10',318" $ 199.29 Pipe, 1/2" Pipe 7 HR Angle 1 -114X1 -114x 118x20' $ 144.79 Check 114838 Date Paid:1210312010 DMJ As-p''fi -a If Inc Amount: 1-,314.00 Inv. 10329 11/15/2010 Schmidt Lk road trail patches 1,314.00 Check 114839 Date Paid:1210312010 DogPoopBags.com LLC Amount. 279.96 Inv. 3490 11/10/2010 5cs (2000) Dog clean up bags 279.96 Check 114840 Date Paid: 12/0312010 DTSIDocument Tech Solutions Amount: 261.64 Inv. INV43392 11/09/2010 IT -2 Boxes Staples for Copier Center 214.79 Inv. INV43405 11/10/2010 IT-1Cyan Toner, 1 -Waste Toner Bottle Mix 46.85 Check 114841 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Earl F. Andersen Inc. v AF Amount: 805.97 Inv. 0093543IN 10/31/2010 6 Cast Tri ring w/cievis shackel 453.15 Inv. 0093579IN 10/31/2010 4 Portable bench frames/rtn,freight/restock fee 352.82 Check 114842 Date Paid: 1210312010 Electrical Installation & Mnt Amount: 603.26 Inv. 0011495IN 11/10/2010 Signa[ rpr 6th Ave@Revere rpr knockdown pre 603.26 pole Check 114843 Date Paid:1210312010._ EveRio" Amount: 2,058.37 Inv. IN954648 09/24/2010 8 Triumph,4 Maestro,5 big Kid,4 Titan Rtn/ car 1,363.25 seats/resale Inv. IN959325 10/12/2010 4 Titan Elite car seats/resale 299.16 Inv. IN962163 10/28/2010 10 Maestro,2 Big Kid car seats/resale 587.96 Inv. RA960310 10/12/2010 Cr IN954648 Rtn 4 Titan car seats 192.00) Check 114844 Date Paid:1M3/201 0 Factory Motor Parts Co Amount: 89.12 Inv. 13507299 11/24/2010 4 Winter Blades 53.99 Inv. 70032277 11/10/2010 Tran Filter PP270 35.13 Check 114845 Date Paid:1210312010 Ferguson Enterprises Inc Amount: 426.00 Inv. S01284949001 11/10/2010 PW -20 Hydrafinder Hydrant Marker 5' with 426.00 Reflective Tape Check 114846 Date Paid:12I0312010 Fidelity Building Services Inc Amount: 9,154.97 Inv. 00581461N 11/01/2010 Nov'90 Janitorial110cs trash liners 8,887.78 Inv. 0058147IN 11/01/2010 Nov'10 PD Sunday Janitoria[ 267.19 Check 114847 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Fortin Consulting Inc Amount. 1,500.00 Inv. 2262 11/09/2010 11.3.10 Winter maintenance training 1,500.00 Check 114848 Date Paid:1210312010 G&it Services Inc Amount. 330.60 Inv. 1006678074 11/12/2010 Public Works Uniforms 330.60 Check 114849 Date Paid: 1 210 31201 0 GameTime Amount: 159.77 Inv. 792045 11/12/2010 1 Lexan bubble 28" dia 159.77 Check 114850 Date Paid: 1 210 3120 1 0 Todd Gerecke Amount: 552.50 Inv. 13755 11/0712010 9.27110,15.10 Forced cuts,Weed/Right of Way 552.50 mowing Page 16 of 22 Page 18 1216/2010 Check 114851 Date Paid:1210312010 Inv. 9 386192042 11/03/2010 Inv. 9392145588 11/10/2010 Inv. 9392398427 11/10/2010 Inv. 9394035183 11/12/2010 Inv. 9394035191 11/12/2010 Grainger Fire -12-65W Lamp & 10 13W Lamp PM -1 -Oilstone Sharpening Kit, 8x2x1in Drilling Screw, #12-14X1 112, PK 100 PW -4 Drilling Screws, 114-14, 1 112, PK25 CR Memo for Invoice 9392398427 Drilling Screw Amount: $ 274.73 43.54 156.55 36.84 74.64 36.84) Check 114852 Date Paid:1210312010 Graybar Electric Company Amount: 959.3 11 1 Inv, 950854031 11/08/2010 Tracing wire and conduit parts 554.45 Inv. 950874494 11/09/2010 Tracing wire and conduit parts 47.01 Inv. 950874495 11/09/2010 Tracing wire and conduit parts 357.85 Check 114853 Date Paid:1210312016 Greenway Lawn Maintenance Inc Amount: 1,050.00 Inv. 101115 11/15/2010 Nov'10 Snowplowing 1,050.00 Check 114854 Date Paid:1210312010 Gregor Farm & Greenhouse Inc Amount: 36.34 Inv. 3137 10/11/2010 PW -8 6.5" Mums, 1-10" Mum 36.34 Check 114855 Date Paid: 12/0312010 GroundsCare Inc. Amount: 1,500.00 Inv. 3987 11/08/2010 Nov'10 Snowplowing 1,500.00 Check 114856 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 HAB Inc Amount: 676.97 Inv. 02026611N 11/08/2010 Section 8 Manager for Encompass 676.97 Check 114857 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Hance Utility Services Inc Amount: 115.00 Inv. 17229 10/26/2010 Plym Creek Ctr utility locate 115.00 Check 114858 Date Paid:1210312010 Hawk Performance Specialties Amount: 1,476.74 Inv. 1327 10/1812010 IC 10.4.10111.4.10 Rink A Zamboni,clean 1,210.89 batteries. cable,jumper,t Inv. 1342 10/29/2010 IC Rink A electric resurfacer rpr 69.20 Inv. 1343 11/03/2010 IC 800 518" tire stud,screw in type 196.65 Check 114859 Date Paid:1210312010 Hawkins Water Treatment Amount: 1,806.55 Inv. 3172969RI 11/09/2010 ZWP 329.0614gl LPC -9L 1,806.55 Check 114860 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Hawkins, Ash,Baptie & Co. LLP Amount: 16 2-2. 0 0 Inv. 157238 11/04/2010 Nov'10 Section 8 Accts,REAC audit subm,UNA 622.00 pre/post admin recons Check 114861 Date Paid: 1210312610 Hillyard^Inc- e - _.__ ..:- ev,- Amoouu nt: Minneapolis 611.8811 Inv. 6527528 11/08/2010 PIC -Exhaust Filter Vac, 10 -Bag Filter Sensor, 61.81 Label RTU,Trigger Check 114862 Date Paid:1210312010 image Trend ins Amount: 195.00 Inv. 015705 11/01/2010 Nov'10 HireTouch 195.00 Check 114863 Date Paid: 1210312010 Itron Inc ® . a. Amount 1,091.29 Inv. 168042 11/11/2010 Dec-Feb'l1 Raptor 1,091.29 radio,G5POD,handheld,dock,MVRS sftwr Check 114864 Date Paid:1210312010 J H Larson Electrical Co Amount: 1,197.36 Inv. 430448001 11/10/2010 IC 184 various syllfluor lamps 1,188.73 Inv. 430448002 11/11/2010 PIC -4 Sylvania 120V 150W Coated Med Base 8.63 Check 114865 Date Paid:1210312016 Kidd Plumbing Inc Amount: 1,208.00 Inv. 7155 11/18/2010 IC Rink C Munterslreinstall motor pulleys&belts 458.50 Inv. 7156 11/18/2010 IC Rink B rple draft inducer&pressure switch 749.50 Check 114866 Date Paid:1210312010 Kustom Signals Inc Inv. 429776 11/09/2010 Laser repair freight Page 17 of 22 Amount: $ 29.00 29.00 Page 19 1216/2010 Check 114867 Date Paid:1210312010 Leica Geosystems 16_6- _ Amount: $ 371.67 Inv. US92879949 11/11/2010 2 Lithiumdon batteries for GPS unit 371.67 Check 114868 Date Paid:1210312010 Lisa Lynn Consulting Amount: $ 310.00 Inv. COPPD110 10/28/2010 9.19110.28.10 Assess ment&coaching services 310.00 Check 114869 Date Paid:12103 !2010 Logis Amount $ 8,009.00 Inv. 32901 10/31/2010 Oct'10 GIS/Internet 4,235.00 Inv.32949 10/31/2010 Cisco Catalyst/Firewall Maint Plymouth share 3,774.00 Check 114870 Date Paid: 1 210 312 01 0 Lubrication Technologies Inc Amount: $ 4,526.36 Inv. 1837461 11/09/2010 1 drum 50150 coolantlantifreeze 545.56 Inv. 1837463 11/09/2010 150g[ 15W40, 150gl 5W30, 150g1 ATF 3,980.80 Check 114871 Date Paid:12/0312010 Lyndale Plant Services Amount: $ 160.31 Inv. 20274 11/01/2010 Nov'10 Plant lease 160.31 Check 114872 Date Paid: 12/03120'10 MES Inc Amount: $ 123.25 Inv. 00199320SNV 11/05/2010 Fire -4 4L Maxi Fog Fluid 123.25 Check 114873 Date Paid:1210312010 Metro Athletic Supply [nc a.. 6 Amount: $ 63.59 Inv. 128438 11/12/2010 P&R-10 base plugs 63.59 Check 114874 Date Paid:1210312010 Metro Blooms Inc Amount: $ 7,831.84 Inv. 101104 11/04/2010 Schmidt Lk rain gardens design&install 7,831.84 Check 114875 Date Paid: U1012610 Metro Chief Fire Officers Association Amount: $ 200.00 Inv. 101124 11/29/2010 Rick Kline/Kip Springer 2011 membership dues 200.00 Check 114876 Date Paid:1210312010 Metro Fire SO Amount. $ 145.29 Inv. 39426 11/09/2010 Fire -1 Basic Diamond Plate Clearning Kit 63.62 Inv. 39436 11/12/2010 1 Belt Clip Assembly 81.67 Check 114877 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Metropolitan Council Amount: $_ 393,824.96 Inv. 0000944974 11/02/2010 Dec'10 Wastewater service 393,824.96 Check 114878 Date Paid: 1210312010 LL Minnesota Chiefs of Police Ass ociationlMCPAAmount: $ 58.78 Inv. 2800 11/10/2010 100 Permits to Acquire 58.78 Check 114879 Date Paid: 12/0312010 Minnesota Safety Council, Inc Amount: $ 8,232.57 Inv. 11433 10/28/2010 12 Nighthawk carbon monoxide 399.50 detectors/resale Inv. 11440 10/28/2010 32 Nighthawk carbon monoxide 1,040.95 detectors/resale Inv. 11497 10/31/2010 80 Nighthawk carbon monoxide 2,592.56 detectors/resale Inv. 11545 10/31/2010 128 Nighthawk carbon monoxide 4,199.56 detectors/resale Check 114880 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Moms Rock Fitness LLC Amount: $ 36.75 Inv. 101109 11/09/2010 Jan-Feb'l0 Stroller Strides fitness instr 36.75 Check 114881 Date Paid:1210312610 Morrie's Imports Inc Amount. $ 23.93 nv. 486484 11/10/2010 Jewels - Warning 23.93 Check 114882 Date Paid: 1 210 312 61 0_._.._ MS Govern n -t: 1 - 7... Amount. $ 7,736.12 Inv. XT00000954 08/23/2010 3.15.10 B Lauzon Govern Travel Expenses 3,424.74 Inv. XT00000955 08/23/2010 3.15.10 B Koperski Govern travel expenses 1,875.40 Inv. XT00000956 08/23/2010 5.13.10 B Lauzon Govern travel expenses 2,435.98 Check 114883 Date Paid:1210I201.0 MTI Distributing Inc' Amount: $ 5 0.6_2 Inv.76586900 11/08/2010 1 Disconnect Coupler 50.62 Page 20 Page 18 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114884 Date Paid:1210312010 National Martial Arts Association Inc Amount: $ 1,611.40 Inv. 101122 11/22/2010 9.14111.22.10 Kung Fu Classes 1,611.40 Check 114885 Date Paid:1210312010 Robert Nesbitt Amount: $ 2,014.00 Inv. 33023P 11/19/2010 11.8111.19.10 MN Joint Analysis 2,014,00 Check 114886 Date Paid:1210312010 North Works Occupational Health Amount: $ 93.00 Inv. 00000873 11/15/2010 Hemenway 11.9.10 Hepatitis B 93.00 Check 114887 Date Paid:1210312010 Office Depot Amount: $ 449.03 nv. 540042093001 11/10/2010 PCC-Stamp/RNDISQR 12x2.2 24.27 Inv. 540169675001 11/08/2010 PCC -1 Planner and 1 Ergoprene Wristrest 24.14 Inv. 540169800001 11/08/2010 PC Scotch Brite Sweeper 45.95 Inv. 540301173001 11/09/2010 CD Inspec-Self Ink Dater, 250 Envelopes,12 266.05 8.5X11 Pads Inv. 540333763001 11/10/2010 PW -1 Printer Cartridge $ 73.73 Inv. 540469467001 11/10/2010 Communications -1 BX Industrial 9V Alk $ 14.89 Battery Check 114888 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Inv. 47757 90 01 11/09/2010 Inv. 477624001 11/10/2010 Inv. 477624002 11/10/2010 Inv. 477802001 11/12/2010 Check 114889 Date Paid:12103/2010 Env. A408402 11/10/2010 Inv. A408403 11/10/2010 Inv. A408404 11/10/2010 Inv. A408405 11/10/2010 Inv. A408406 11/10/2010 Inv. A408407 11/10/2010 Inv. A408408 11/10/2010 Inv. A408409 11/10/2010 Inv. A408410 11/10/2010 Inv. A408411 11/10/2010 Inv. A408412 11/10/2010 Inv. A408904 11/12/2010 Inv. A408905 11/12/2010 Inv. A408906 11/12/2010 Inv. A408907 11/12/2010 Inv. A408919 11/12/2010 Inv. A409141 11/12/2010 Check 114890 Date Paid: 12103/2010 Inv. 8404432 11/15/2010 Oil -Air Products LLC Amount: $ 262.84 10-114"x118" Hose Barb, BRS,3-Coupler and 57.41 Nipple 53.44 PW -6 8G-8MPX,4 8G-10FJX,2 144.62 6G-8 M PX,4-8G-8M P,2-86-8 FForx,4-8 M P-8 F P 138.41 PW -2 Couplers and 2 Nipples 33.93 PW -2 Couplers,2 Coupling & 4 MMFOR-4MP 26.88 On Site Sanitation Amount: $ 1,207.73 10.16110.29.10 Final Elm Creek plyfld 183.30 10.16110.29.10 Final Zachary plyfld 53.44 10.16110.29.10 Final/Ampitheater 78.56 10.16110.29.10 Final Plym Creek 138.41 10.16110.29.10 Final Ridgemount plyfld 25.12 10.19/11.12.10 Final Paver Potty 44.86 10.16/10.29.10 Final W Med lake 93.52 10.16110.29.10 Final Parkers Ik plyfld 50.24 10.16110.29.10 Final Field House 25.12 10.16110.29.10 Final Bass Lk plyfld 25.12 10.16110.29.10 Final Pilgrim Ln Elementary 25.12 10.16111.12.10 Dog Park 50.23 10.16/11.12.10 Maintenance Facility 50.23 10.16111.12.10 Parkers Lake Beach 253.31 10.16111.12.10 Yard Waste Site 50.23 10.16111.12.10 Event Portable toilet 10.69 10.16111.12.10 Community Gardens 50.23 OnTrac Amount: $ 58.28 11.1111.15.10 Attorney courier service $ 58.28 Check 114891 Date Paid:1210312010 Phasor Electric Company Amount: $ 1,356.45 Inv. 039276 11/04/2010 PCC -Replaced motor and reversing contactor $ 1,356.45 on garage door Check 114892 Date Paid:1210312010 Pond &'L'ighting Des'igns Inc Amount: $ 1,105.00 Inv. 00005692 10/22/2010 Amphitheater Fal['10 fountain/aerator removal $ 353.00 Inv. 00005693 10/22/2010 Zachary Park Fall'10 fountain/aerator removal $ 376.00 Inv. 00005695 10/22/2010 Parkers Lake Fall'10 fountain/aerator $ 376.00 Page 21 Page 19 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114893 Date Paid: 12/0312010 Inv. 0014169 11/1212010 Inv. 0014170 11/12/2010 Inv. 0014171 11/12/2010 Inv. 0014172 11/12/2010 Inv. 0014173 11/12/2010 Inv. 0014214 11/12/2010 Inv. 0014215 11/12/2010 Check 114894 Date Paid: 1210312010 Inv. 250464 11/03/2010 Inv. 25057 5 11/1012010 Check 114895 Date Paid: 1210312010 Inv. TMN0044029 10/02/2010 Inv. TMN0045276 11/06/2010 Prairie Restorations Inc 11.2,10 Reserve Park prairie maint 11.2,10 Woodland trails prairie maint 11.2.10 Parkview Park prairie maint 11.2.10 City Hall prairie maint 11.2.10 Activity center prairie maint 11.8.10 Lowes prairie maint 11.8.10 Vicksburg Ln prairie maint Amount: $ 778.69 109.25 49.18 67.15 49.68 140.13 173.40 189.90 Printers Service Inc Amount: $ 90.00 PIC -77" Ice Knife Sharp $ 54.00 PICC -77" Knife Sharp $ 36.00 Q3 Contracting Inc Amount: $ 1,475.97 Lawndale Ln detour/road closed signs $ 1,000.40 Detour signs for SoShore Dr railroad track $ 475.57 rplcmnt Check 114896 Date Paid:1210312010 Quality Flow Systems Amount: 524 33 Inv. 23002 11/10/2010 Repair pump/central storm station 524.33 276.72 Check 114897 Date Paid:1210312010 Qwest Amount: 155.43 Inv. 51914431110 11/01/2010 Nov'10 519.1443 99.54 Inv. 55188241110 11/16/2010 Nov'10 551.8824 55.89 Check 114898 Date Paid:12103I2010 Shred N Go Inc Amount: 156.00 Inv. 17613 11/22/2010 11.3111.17.10 Shredding Service 9 consoles 156.00 Check 114899 Date Paid:1210312010 Sports Unlimited Amount. 960,00 Inv. 101129 11/29/2010 Nov-Dec'10 thursday sport sampler 960.00 Check 114900 Date Paid:12I0312010 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Amount: 5,946.19 Inv. 07114007 10/31/2010 STR10015 Oct'10 Peony Lane corridor 2,821.51 Inv. 07228001 08/31/2010 8.31,10 Plym Crk pond pedestrian bridge 3,124.68 Check 114901 Date Paid: 12103/2010 Sunram Construction lnc Amount: 11,154.55 Inv. 101102 11/02/2010 Proj8104 #3 36th Ave Median improve 11,154.55 Check 114902 Date Paid:12103I2010 Swanson Homes Amount: 700.00 Inv. 091112A 11/22/2010 R14064 11.12.09 15829 50th PI Tree dep 700.00 refund/P200906918 Check 114903 Date Paid:1210312010 Sword PlayAmount. 1, , 1080..0000 Inv. 101123 11/29/2010 Oct-Dec'10 fencing classes 1,080.00 Check 114904 Date Paid:1210312010 Inv. 1 OT F2153 11/11/2010 Check 114905 Date Paid:1210312010 Inv. 101118 11/18/2010 Check 114906 Date Paid: 1210312010 Inv. 689359 11/01/2010 l nv. 717443 12/01/2010 Check 114907 Date Paid: 12/0312010 Inv. 329539 11/11/2010 Inv. 329540 11/11/2010 Check 114908 Date Paid: 1'210312010 Inv. 30835 11/12/2010 Page 20 of 22 Taho Sportswear Inc P&R-28 Fal[ Basketball T -Shirts 2 Color Printing Target Bank 10.20111.16.10 Park&Rec supplies Amount: $ 117.12 117.12 Amount: $ 139.04 139.04 Thyssen Krupp Elevator Amount: $'339.58 Nov'10 PS Elevator service 169.79 Dec'10 PD Elevator service 169.79 Toll Company Amount: $ 703.15 PW-MISC hardware and tools 276.72 PW -Helmet New Tech XL 426.43 Tri-State Pump & Control, Inc. Amount: $ 2,623.53 Replace impellers -County 73 LS $ 2,623.53 Page 22 12/6/2010 Check 114909 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Ultimate Martial Arts Inc Amount: 142A 0 Inv. 101116 11/16/2010 Nov'10 2 Tae Kwon Do 142.40 Inv. SW050156992 Check 114910 Date Paid: 11/03/M 0 USA Mobility Wireless Inc Amount: 75.51 Inv. T0320490K 11/17/2010 11.22/12.21.10 RAD pager rental 75.51 Check 114911 Date Paid: 1 210 312 01 0 Viking Trophies Amount: 34.20 Inv. 101653 11/04/2010 PD 4 plate w/engraving 34.20 Check 114921 Check 114912 Date Paid: 12103/2010 Waste Management Services Amount. 479.08 Inv. 576289805003 12/01/2010 Dec'10 IC Rubbish Removal 479.08 Check 114913 Date Paid: 1210312010 The Watson Company Inv. 792522 11/11/2010 IC Concession food resupply Check 114914 Date Paid: 12/03120/0 Inv. 51509749551110 11/23/2010 Inv. 51520312001110 11/15/2010 Inv. 51552709981110 11/11/2010 Inv. 51593725791110 11/10/2010 Inv. 51671079401110 11/24/2010 Inv. 5168562158 11/10/2010 Xcel Energy 9.29/11.15.10 Playfields 9.27110.28.10 11 Lift Stations 10.11111.10.10 Civil Defense Sirens 9.28110.28.10 3 Transit shelters 9.27111.13.10 FS1,PW,FS2,IC 9.13110.29.10 Traffic signals/lights Amount: $ 214.58 _ $ 214,58 Amount: $ 39,539.75 5,021.15 5,461.89 57.71 1,041.43 25,310.66 2,646.91 Check 114915 Date Paid:12103/2010 Zero Max Amount: $ 15,000.00 Inv. 0810060 11/23/2010 R200800054 10.6.08 Site Improvement $ 15,000.00 Check 114916 Date Paid: 12103/2010 Inv. SW050156987 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156988 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156989 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156990 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156992 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156993 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050156994 10/30/2010 Inv. SW050157341 11/12/2010 Inv. SW140117635 10/30/2010 Check 114917 Date Paid: 12/03/2010 Inv. 101 11/29/2010 Ziegler Inc Fa11'10 FS 1 Mech rm gen set maint Fall'10 PS Interior lobby gen set maint Fall'10 PS outside parking lot gen set maint Fall'10 FS 3 gen set maint FaII'10 Portable #3025-04 gen set main Fall'10 Public Works gen set maint Fall'10 John Deere Transit 73 station gen set maint Mission LS fuel level gauge/dipstick Unit 202 Trouble shoot low RPM Sheila Stamps Dec'10 Old Fashioned Xmas perf Amount: 6$ 19,031.63 651.94 1,961.16 3,184.88 1,720.69 2,864.25 2,864.25 2,864.25 392.81 2,527.40 Amount: $ 50.00 50.00 Check 114918 Date Paid:12/0312010 Armstrong Chamber Singers Amount: 165.00 Inv. 101 11/29/2010 Dec'10 Old Fashioned Xmas pert 165.00 Check 114919 Date Paid:1210312010 Robert Gasch Amount: 275.00 Inv. 101 11/29/2010 Dec'10 Old Fashioned Xmas storytelling 275.00 Check 114920 Date Paid:12/0312010 Greg Krause _ A Amount: 3 9.28 Inv. 2483423582 11/07/2010 11.7112.6.10 Cellular phone reimb 39-28 Check 114921 Date Paid:1210312010 Sara Mittelstaedt Amount: 234.86 Inv, 101121 11/21/2010 11.5111.21.10 234.86 Costco, Office Max,Schwans, Byerly's,0ub,Trade rJoe,Wu Check 114922 Date Paid: 12103/2610 Norcostco Amount: 98.90 Inv. 101 11/30/2010 Old Fashioned Xmas Santa Suit 98.90 Check 114923 Date Paid:1210312010 Dubbelde, Margery Amount: 4.00 Inv. Import - 929 12/01/2010 Park and Rec Refund 4.00 Page 23 Page 21 of 22 12/6/2010 Check 114924 Date Paid:1210312010 W Ich, Joan Amount. $ 7. 0,0 Inv. Impart - 930 12/01/2090 Park and Rec Refund $ 7.00 Total Payments: 342 Total Amount Paid: $ 3,106,975.63 Page 24 Page 22 of 22 12!612010 Date: 12/6/10 Time: 8:26:42 AM H.M.S. Windows - Housing Assistance Payments Page: 0001 PAYMENT REGISTER -SUMMARY Q;lhmsVeportslPAYSUM.QRP Bank Account Description/Account Number Checkinr? 3110681 Number Date Method Status Name Of Payee Total 0004480 12/1/10 Computer Ck, Paid Dmitrry Akerman 921.00 0004481 12/I/10 Computer Ck. Paid Simon Akerman 988.00 0004482 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Ilya Alchits 1,111.00 0004483 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid Allied Capital Management, LLC 302.00 0004484 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Charles & Helen Anderson 422.00 0004485 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Ryan Arvola 43.00 0004486 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Summer Creek Apts 1,448.00 0004487 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Melair Associates LP DBA 0.00 0004488 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Melair Associates LP DBA 24,586.00 0004489 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Bass Lake Hills Townhomes, LP 1,563.00 0004490 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Vladimir Begun 705.00 0004491 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 0.00 0004492 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 21,722.00 0004493 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos-Oakwood LLC 774.00 0004494 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Caberallo LLC 1,301,00 0004495 12/1/10 Computer Ck, Paid Fernbrook Townhomes 7,637.00 0004496 12/I110 Computer Ck. Paid Tim & Holly Flemming 755.00 0004497 12/I110 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Estates 0.00 0004498 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Estates 16,571.00 0004499 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Villa 390.00 0004500 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Todd Haigh 494.00 0004501 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCommons 0.00 0004502 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCommons 39,820.00 0004503 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Robin Lea Hellmer 364.00 0004504 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Paul Hintermeyer 331.00 0004505 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Elena & Boris Iliarski 633.00 0004506 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Kim Johannessen 480.00 0004507 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Eric Johansen 551.00 0004508 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Joseph Palen 1,932.00 0004509 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Barbie Jo Kalash 577.00 0004510 12/1/10 Computer Ck, Paid Gennadiy Kharam 463.00 0004511 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Lancaster Village Partnership 5,964.00 0004512 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Kathy LaPointe 834.00 0004513 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Gregory Mazo 910.00 0004514 12/I/10 Computer Ck. Paid Joan M. Michaud 518.00 0004515 1211110 Computer Ck. Paid Klara Mints 907.00 0004516 12/1110 Computer Ck, Paid Grant Moosbragger 403.00 0004517 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid Toni Muckala 780.00 0004518 1211110 Computer Ck, Paid Park Place Apartments 811.00 0004519 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Parkside Apartments 7,138.00 0004520 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Colony Apartments 10,269.00 0004521 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Ponds Ltd Partnership 16,863.00 0004522 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Pointe Apartments 350.00 0004523 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Regency Pointe Apartment Homes 13,190.00 0004524 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Ilya Roytelman 573.00 0004525 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Paul Savariraj 642.00 0004526 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Shenandoah Woods 11,573.00 0004527 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Gopal B Shenoy 1,622.00 0004528 12/7/10 Computer Ck. Paid Victor Shkolnikov 673.00 0004529 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Marina Shumakova CIO Creative Mgmt. Inc. 622.00 0004530 12/1/I0 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Leased Housing Assoc 9,144.00 0004531 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Dawa Tashi 470.00 0004532 12/I/10 Computer Ck. Paid The Place Apartments 1,649.00 Page 25 Date: 12/6/10 H.M.S. Windows - Housing Assistance Payments Page: 0002 Time: 8:26:42 AM PAYMENT REGISTER - SUMMARY QAhms\reports\PA'YSUM.QRP 0004533 12/]/10 Computer Ck. Paid Trina Turovskaya 573.00 0004534 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid Vicksburg Crossing 2,933.00 0004535 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Vicksburg Commons 4,137.00 0004536 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Vladimir Voynov 1,205.00 0004537 1211/10 Computer Ck. Paid Wellington Apartments Partnership I,878.00 0004538 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid David Wick 807.00 0004539 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Bloomington HRA 768.54 0004540 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid Dakota County Community Development Agen 729.54 0004541 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Lake County Housing Authority 0.00 0004542 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Metropolitan Council 1,195.08 0004543 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Minneapolis Public Housing Authority 6,202.86 0004544 12/1/10 Computer Ck, Paid Scott County CDA 1,760.08 0004545 I2/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid St. Louis Park Housing Authority 1,736.08 0004546 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid 17.00 0004547 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid A A 48.00 0004548 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid i to L 7.00 0004549 12/l/10 Computer Ck. Paid 1.00 0004550 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Lir `t Lt Ll c 36.00 0004551 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid Lt 79.00 0004552 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid L4 2.00 0004553 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid L tt It 16.00 0004554 12/1/10 Computer Ck. Paid tl 12.00 0004555 12/1110 Computer Ck. Paid t i t L i k 32.00 Total For Bank Account Checking 4 Of Totals Transactions Computer Checks 429 $236,964.18 Manual Checks 0 $0.00 Direct Deposits 0 $0.00 236,964.18 Total For Bank: $236,964.18 Total - All Bank Accounts Printed: 5236,964.18 Page 26 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS ENDING DECEMBER 4, 2010 WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending December 4, 2010 was presented to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the following funds is approved: M & I Bank — Check Register General & Special Revenue 206,776.83 Construction & Debt Service 1,791,335.10 Enterprise & Internal Service 1,106,564.73 Housing Redevelopment 2,298.97 Check Register Total 3,106,975.63 M & I — Housing Assistance Payments Housing & Redevelopment Authority $ 236,964.18 GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $ 3,343,939.81 Adopted by the City Council on December 14, 2010 Page 27 city of Agenda 6 . 0 3PlymouthNumber: Adding Qkelity to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Barbara Cox, Police Administrative Services Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Michael Goldstein, Chief of Police Approve Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Plymouth Item: City Code Concerning Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants and Approve Summary Publication 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt both the attached Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the City Code relating to Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants. 2. BACKGROUND: During this past summer, the department experienced issues with solicitors going into back yards and looking in patio doors of residences. Officer Nick Benesch worked with the City Attorney to draft language to address this problem. We also are using this opportunity to make changes to the current ordinance in another area to make that language more clear. The changes have been reviewed and approved by City Attorney Roger Knutson. He advised that the summary ordinance can be approved by motion of the Council and that motion requires a 4/5 vote, six votes to pass. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: There should be no impact on the budget to this change. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2010 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING SOLICITORS, PEDDLERS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 1140.05 of the Plymouth City Code is hereby amended as follows: 1140.05. Exemptions. This Section does not apply to persons engaged in the following activities: a) selling personal property at wholesale to dealers in such articles; b) selling newspaper subscriptions; c) soliciting money, donations, or financial assistance of any kind for- profit, for an organization that is religious, political, nonprofit, or educational in nature; or taking orders for goods sold by a political, religious, educational, or nonprofit organization, or selling or distributing literature or merchandise for which a fee is charged or solicited on behalf of such an organization; d) calling upon householders in connection with a regular route service for the sale and delivery of perishable daily necessities of life such as bakery products and dairy products; this exception does not relieve such person of the duty of compliance with any other applicable provision of this Code; e) calling upon householders at the request of said householders. SECTION 2. Section 1140.13 of the Plymouth City Code is hereby amended as follows: 1140.13. Practices Prohibited. No Peddler, Solicitor of Transient Merchant shall conduct business in any of the following manners: A. obstructing the free flow of either vehicular or pedestrian traffic on any street, alley, sidewalk, or other public right of way; B. conducting business in such a way as to create a threat to the health, safety, or welfare of any individual or the general public; C. entering upon any residential premises for the purpose of carrying on the licensee's or registrant's trade or business between the hours of Page 2 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. of the following day, unless such person has been expressly invited to do so by the owner or occupant thereof. D. call attention to his business or to his merchandise, by crying out, by blowing a horn, by ringing a bell, or by any loud or unusual noise in areas zoned for residential use. E. No Peddler, Solicitor, or Transient Merchant shall harass, intimidate, abuse, or threaten a person or continue to offer merchandise for sale to any person after being told not to do so by that person. F. Walk on or about any side or rear yard to attempt to make contact at any point other than the main point of entrance or front door of the residence. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota this day of 2010. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 3 61IJ81LVJKA •LIMA I7 VFAL414 3 0193 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING SOLICITORS, PEDDLERS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS This ordinance amends Chapter 11 of the Plymouth City Code concerning solicitors, peddlers, and transient merchants. The ordinance clarifies language regarding exemptions and adds one prohibited practice. A printed copy of the entire ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City Administrator/Clerk's regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, this day of , 2010. CITY OF PLYMOUTH ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Kelli Slavik, Mayor Page 4 p))city of Plymouth adding Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 6.04Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Captain Jeff Swiatkiewicz, Patrol Commander Reviewed by: Michael S. Goldstein, Chief of Police 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Enter Item: into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the MN State Patrol for Enforcement Projects The City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the Police Department to enter into a grant agreement, with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and the Minnesota State Patrol for enforcement programs. 2. BACKGROUND: Plymouth Police Department has been participating in several grant programs including Operation Night CAP and Safe & Sober to increase our DWI enforcement efforts since 2003. Grants run annually from October 1st through the following September 30th, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever comes first. Plymouth Police Department has been allotted a maximum of $11,000 for overtime compensation for this upcoming year. The Minnesota State Patrol is the grant administrator. The Grant allows the department the opportunity to focus on additional enforcement projects including DWI and speed. These types of enforcement are paramount to the safety of our citizenry. These grants allow us the opportunity to schedule additional officers to specifically concentrate on enforcement projects when overtime funding would not otherwise be available. The Minnesota State Patrol is requesting that participants obtain resolutions authorizing their participation for the next three years. Where normally on grants, the City Council authorizes the City Manager to enter into grant agreements, in this case, the State requires the Chief of Police or a ranking law enforcement official of Lieutenant or above rank to be the authorized signature. They further notified us with their Request for Proposal, that including specific dollar amounts and/or names on the resolution may mean the entire resolution will need to be redone if the details change. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The grants provide for reimbursement of overtime costs of the officer participating in the enforcement event. The State Patrol will be invoiced on a monthly basis for costs incurred. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Grant Page 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT This grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Public Safety, State Patrol Division, 444 Cedar Street Suite 130, St. Paul, MN 55101-5130 ("State") and the City of Plymouth, Police Department, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55443 ("Grantee"). Recitals 1 Under Minn. Stat. § 299A.01, Subd 2 (4) the State is empowered to enter into this grant contract. 2 Federal funds for this grant contract are provided from U.S. Department of Transportation's State and Community Highway Safety Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number 20.608. 3 The State is in need of coordinated impaired driving enforcement saturations and public information activities. 4 The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the satisfaction of the State. Grant Contract Term of Grant Contract 1.1 Effective date: October 1, 2010, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. Once this grant contract is fully executed, the Grantee may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred pursuant to Clause 4.2 of this grant contract. Reimbursements will only be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant contract. 1.2 Expiration date: September 30, 2011, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices; 12. Publicity and Endorsement; 13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 15. Data Disclosure. Grantee's Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: Perform the duties and tasks specified in the DWI Enforcement Grant Program Duties, Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant contract. Grantee will comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. Federal Audit Requirements is attached and incorporated and made part of this grant contract. See Exhibit B. 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this grant contract, time is of the essence. Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows: 1) Compensation. The Grantee will be reimbursed an amount not to exceed $11,000.00 for officer overtime rates, including fringe benefits, incurred in providing services pursuant to Clause 2 of this grant contract. Invoices for reimbursement must be submitted using the DWI Enforcement Invoice. All invoices for reimbursement must be supported by written documentation. 2) Travel Expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the Grantee as a result of this grant contract will be paid in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "Commissioner's Plan" promulgated by the commissioner of Employee Relations which is incorporated into this grant contract by reference. The Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for out of state travel. Minnesota will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out of state. No reimbursement shall be made for salary costs incurred in traveling to and from saturation events. MSP (11/06) 1 Page 2 3) Matching Requirements. (If Applicable.) Grantee certifies that the following matching requirement, for the grant contract, will be met by the Grantee: $.00. 4) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this grant contract will not exceed $11,000.00. 4.2 Paym en t 1) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule: Itemized invoices will be submitted within 30 days after each saturation event to the State's Authorized Representative. Final invoice pertaining to the first state fiscal year of this grant contract must be received by July 31, 2011. Reimbursements from the second state fiscaleat r may commence on or after July 1, 2011. The final invoice pertaining to the second state fiscal year of this grant contract must be received by October 31, 2011. Expenditures for each state fiscal year of this grant contract must be for services performed within applicable state fiscal years. Every state fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. 2) Federal funds. (Where applicable, if blank this section does not apply) Payments under this grant contract will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through Title 23 CFDA number 20.608 of the State and Community Highway Safety Act of 1966. The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds and accepts full financial responsibility for any requirements imposed by the Grantee's failure to comply with federal requirements. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Lt. Paul Van Voorhis, 2005 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422, (763)591-4698,or his/her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee's Authorized Representative is David Groth, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55443, (763) 509-5160. If the Grantee's Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant contract, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. 7 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Contract Complete 7.lAssignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.2Am en dm en ts. Any amendment to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 7.4 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. MSP (11/06) 2 Page 3 8 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract. 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this grant contract are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant contract. 10 Government Data Practices The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 11 Workers' Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility. 12 Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. 12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. 13 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 14 Termination 14.1 Termination by the State. The State may cancel this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 14.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the grant contract is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota MSP (11/06) 3 Page 4 Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State receiving that notice. 15 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any, or pay other state liabilities. 1. ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05. Signed: Date: Grant Contract No. 50000006598 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: MSP (11/06) 3. STATE AGENCY M with delegated authority) Title: Date: Distribution: DPS/FAS Grantee State's Authorized Representative 4 Page 5 Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 DWI Enforcement Grant Program Grantee's Duties 1 Coordinate alcohol saturations with the State's district authorized representative for saturation events to be held between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011, providing up to two hundred hours of enforcement. 2 All law enforcement officers participating in this program must be Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (POST) licensed as provided by Minnesota law. 3 All law enforcement officers participating in this program must be Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) trained. Grantee must provide proof of training for each officer not currently qualified before such officer(s) will be allowed to participate in the program. 4 All law enforcement officers participating in this program should aggressively enforce traffic laws with an emphasis on impaired driving. 5 Grantee will provide a list of eligible law enforcement officers who may participate in this program with their overtime rate of pay, including fringe benefits, on "Personnel Roster". Reimbursement will be made only for hours that officers work on a day off or on a shift extension. 6 Grantee will review Officer Activity Reports and Activity Logs (samples attached) to verify work efficiency by those officers working the saturations; officers unwilling or unable to diligently pursue impaired drivers cannot be allowed to work subsequent saturation events and Grantee will work with the State's district authorized representative to replace such officers with qualified officers. 7 Grantee will complete and submit all required paperwork following each saturation event including, but not limited to, Officer Activity Reports and Invoices to the State's district authorized representative within seven (7) working days following each saturation event. 8 Grantee will participate in public information and media efforts with the State's district authorized representative as a part of each saturation event. 9 Grantee shall provide for all operating costs including, but not limited to, maintenance and repairs of squad cars used in performance of this grant agreement and shall provide all necessary insurance for them. 10 Grantee's law enforcement officers, providing services under this grant agreement, are employees of the Grantee and not employees of the State or Federal government. 11 State's district authorized representative is Lt. Paul Van Voorhis, 2005 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, MN 55422, FAX: (763) 591-4649. Page 6 Exhibit B, page 1 of 2 FEDERAL AUDIT REQUIREMENTS For subrecipients that are state or local governments, non-profit organizations, or Indian tribes If the grantee expends total federal assistance of $500,000 or more per year, the grantee agrees to obtain either a single audit or a program -specific audit made for the fiscal year in accordance with the terms of the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996. Audits shall be made annually unless the state or local government has, by January 1, 1987, a constitutional or statutory requirement for less frequent audits. For those governments, the federal cognizant agency shall permit biennial audits, covering both years, if the government so requests. It shall also honor requests for biennial audits by governments that have an administrative policy calling for audits less frequent than annual, but only audits prior to 1987 or administrative policies in place prior to January 1, 1987. For subrecipients that are institutions of higher education or hospitals If the grantee expends total direct and indirect federal assistance of $500,000 or more per year, the grantee agrees to obtain a financial and compliance audit made in accordance with OMB Circular A-1 10 Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Universities, Hospitals and Other Nonprofit Organizations" as applicable. The audit shall cover either the entire organization or all federal funds of the organization. The audit must determine whether the subrecipient spent federal assistance funds in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 2. The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An independent auditor is a state or local government auditor or a public accountant who meets the independence standards specified in the General Accounting Office's "Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions." 3. The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133 (or A-110 as applicable). The reporting requirements for audit reports shall be in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accounts' (AICPA) audit guide, "Audits of State and Local Governmental Units," issued in 1986. The federal government has approved the use of the audit guide. In addition to the audit report, the recipient shall provide comments on the findings and recommendations in the report, including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and comments on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If corrective action is not necessary, a statement describing the reason it is not should accompany the audit report. 4. The grantee agrees that the grantor, the Legislative Auditor, the State Auditor, and any independent auditor designated by the grantor shall have such access to grantee's records and financial statements as may be necessary for the grantor to comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133. 5. Grantees of federal financial assistance from subrecipients are also required to comply with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133. 10105) Page 7 Exhibit B, page 2 of 2 6. The Statement of Expenditures form can be used for the schedule of federal assistance. 7. The grantee agrees to retain documentation to support the schedule of federal assistance for at least four years. 8. Required audit reports must be filed with the State Auditor's Office, Single Audit Division, and with federal and state agencies providing federal assistance, and the Department of Public Safety within nine months of the grantee's fiscal year end. OMB Circular A-133 requires recipients of more than $500,000 in federal funds to submit one copy of the audit report within 30 days after issuance to the central clearinghouse at the following address: Bureau of the Census Data Preparation Division 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132 Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse The Department of Public Safety's audit report should be addressed to: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Fiscal and Administrative Services 444 Cedar Street Suite 126, Town Square St. Paul, MN 55101-5126 10105) Page 8 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PROJECTS WHEREAS the City of Plymouth desires to participate in grant programs offered through the Minnesota State Patrol for various law enforcement projects; and WHEREAS, participation in the grant project through the Minnesota Department of Public Safety would allow us to increase various enforcement patrols and reimburse the City for overtime costs incurred with such enforcement; and WHEREAS, participation in the grant project requires a resolution from the City Council to participate from 2010 through December 31, 2013; and WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has participated in several of these grants in recent years for such projects as Operation NightCAP and Safe and Sober; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered this matter and believe that it is in the best interest of the City to continue participation and enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota State Patrol to provide enhanced traffic enforcement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the Plymouth Police Department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and Minnesota State Patrol and authorize the Chief of Police or his/her designee to execute such agreement and amendments as are necessary to implement these grants in the name of and on behalf of the City of Plymouth for the period of 2010 through December 31, 2013. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 9 rp)City of Plymouth Agenda 6 . O 5Number: v Adding QoaWy to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Payment No. 4 and Final Item: Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds City Project No. 3105 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of $20,643.37 to Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. for the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds Project, City Project No. 3105. 2. BACKGROUND: The Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds project constructed two water quality ponds totaling over 7 acres in size, to improve the water quality of Plymouth Creek, prior to the creek's discharge into Medicine Lake. The Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds will assist the City in meeting State established water quality goals as well as water quality goals for Medicine Lake listed in the City's Surface Water Management Plan. The Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds are designed to reduce non -point source pollution, including external nutrient and sediment loading, by removing an estimated 350 pounds of phosphorus annually from the Medicine Lake Watershed. Additionally, during the winter of 2010-2011, the Parks and Recreation Department anticipates installation of a new bridge crossing to connect the west parking lot with West Medicine Lake Park. Bridge construction is outside the scope of this project. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The 2010-2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) included a total project cost of $1,800,000 for this project. The total project cost of $871,201.52, including engineering, wetland mitigation, and construction, will be from the following sources: Bassett Creek Watershed $721,201.52 Three Rivers Park District $100,000.00 Metropolitan Council $50,000.00 Total $871,201.52 4. ATTACHMENTS: Map Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION REQUESTING PAYMENT NUMBER 4 AND FINAL PLYMOUTH CREEK WATER QUALITY PONDS CITY PROJECT N0. 3105 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. as contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds, City Project No. 3105, and said agreement was approved by the City Council on August 11, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the original contract amount for construction of the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds with Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. was $396,860.00. The work to date is $412,867.30 and is approved. The construction is more than the original contract amount by $16,007.30 or 4.0% due to additional rip rap and erosion control measures required to achieve soil stabilization. 2. The work performed by Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. for the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds No. 3105 and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of $20,643.37 to Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. for the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds, City Project No. 3105, is hereby approved and the City's Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith from the Water Resources Fund. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 3 aty of Agenda 6 . O 6rPlymouthNumber: 20019000ft— Adding Quality to Li(e To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Payment No. 4 and Final Item: South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project City Project No. 4145 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Payment No. 4 and Final to S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc for the South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project, City Project No. 4145. 2. BACKGROUND: The South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project included the removal and replacement of the existing timber bridge over Bassett Creek on South Shore Drive. A 34 -foot concrete slab bridge was constructed with a 10 -foot trail on the south side of the bridge for an overall total deck width of 42 feet, 8 inches. The work on this project has been completed and certified as meeting project specifications by WSB & Associates, the City's inspector for this project. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is included in the 2010-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the South Shore Drive Street Reconstruction Project at an estimated cost of $375,000, $295,000 for the bridge replacement and $80,000 for the approaches. The original contract amount for this project was $278,487.65. The final contract cost is $279,282.14 or 0.3% above the original contract amount. The total project cost for this project, which includes engineering and inspection services, is $382,056.13 or 2% higher than the CIP amount. One reason the total project cost is higher than the CIP amount is this project required additional reviews by the State and Bassett Creek Watershed that translated into additional comments and time addressing the comments by the City's consultant. This project has been approved to receive State Bridge Funding. It is anticipated that this project will receive $218,374.00 from the State. The remaining $163,682.13 will be paid by the City from the Street Reconstruction Fund. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Pay Request Resolution Page 1 Owner: City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd Plymouth, MN 55417-1448 For Period: 9/23/2010 to 10/23/2010 Contractor: S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. 650 Quaker Avenue Jordan, MN 55352 Pay Voucher PLYM - South Shore Drive Bridge Client Contract No.: Project No.: 01927-00 Client Project No.: Date: 10/1/2010 F :: s Request No.: 4 & FINAL Proiect Summary 1 Original Contract Amount 278,487.65 2 Contract Changes - Addition 14,367.56 3 Contract Changes - Deduction 0.00 4 Revised Contract Amount 292,855.21 5 Value Completed to Date 279,282.14 6 Material on Hand 0.00 7 iAmount Earned 279,282.14 8 Less Retainage 0.00 9 Subtotal 279,282.14 10 Less Amount Paid Previously 265,318.03 11 Liquidated Damages 0.00 12 jAMOUNT DUE THIS PAY VOUCHER NO. 4 & FINAL 13,964.11 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A FINAL EXAMINATION HAS BEEN MADE OF THE ABOVE NOTED CONTRACT, THAT THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THAT THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF WORK SHOWN IN THE FINAL VOUCHER HAS BEEN PERFORMED AND THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE WORK PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND PURSUANT TO, THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT IS AS SHOWN IN THIS FINAL VOUCHER. Recommended for Approval by: WSB & Associates, Inc. Approved by Contractor: Hentges & Sons, Inc. 4, CS I Specified Contract Completion Date: 10/14/2010 Comment: Construction Observer: Approved by Owner: City of Plymouth Date: Page 3 page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST FOR PAYMENT N0. 4 AND FINAL SOUTH SHORE DRIVE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 4145 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as the owner and S.M. Hentges & Sons as the contractor, have entered into an agreement for the South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project, City Project No. 4145, said agreement was approved by the City Council on May 25, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That the original contract amount was $278,487.65 and the value of the work to date is 279,282.14 and is herewith approved. The project is above the original contract amount by 0.2%. 2. That the work performed by the contractor for the South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 4 and Final in the amount of $13,964.11 to S.M. Hentges & Sons for the South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement Project is hereby approved and the Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. Funding will be from the Street Replacement Fund and State Bridge Funding. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 4 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 7PlymouthNumber: Adding QoaWy to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Wetland Replacement Plan Application Item: Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project City Project No. 7135 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for the proposed Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, City Project No. 7135 and the purchase of 2.8 acres of wetland credits from State Bank #1346 as mitigation for the proposed project. 2. BACKGROUND: This Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project proposes surface water utility maintenance to relieve the flood potential in the area by excavating channels into the middle of the wetlands to provide surface water flow for drainage. Settling basins, approximately 500 square feet, would also be constructed near the end of storm sewer pipes to increase the longevity of the proposed channels. The proposed channels are 26' wide with 3:1 average slopes and are proposed to be excavated to a depth of 4' below the NWL. Total wetland impact is 2.8 acres. Excavated materials will be removed from the site and disposed of per MPCA dredged materials guidance. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) has indicated that wetland mitigation of 2.8 acres is required to compensate for wetland impacts associated with this project. Staff has coordinated wetland mitigation in the form of purchasing wetland bank credits in the amount of 2.8 acres at a total cost of 129,895.92 according to Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetland Replacement Summary. Page 1 Basin Size (acres) Impacted Area MPCA required mitigation at N U acres) 1:1 ratio (acres) fua E Wetland 29.2 2.8 2.8 0 1 Et 2 L E V: 3) i Total 29.2 2.8 2.8 Notes: 0 New Wetland Credit (Bank #1346 - 2.8 Includes mitigation credits E Plymouth) purchased from Wetland Bank E 1346 in Hennepin County E a vZ, QJTotal Replacement 2.8 Page 1 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is identified in the City's 2010 — 2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for construction in 2010 with a project cost of $175,000 which did not include wetland mitigation. To accommodate wetland mitigation, staff has proposed a revised project cost of $375,000 in the draft 2011-2015 CIP. The total estimated project cost is $300,000 including wetland mitigation, construction, engineering, administration, and contingencies. Funding will be from the Water Resources Fund for the following project components: 1. Construction $138,992.50 2. Wetland Mitigation 129,895.92 Total $268,888.42 4. ATTACHMENTS: Map Resolution Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - APPROVE FILLING WETLANDS AND WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN FOR THE WILD WINGS FLOOD PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 7135 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth proposes to excavate wetlands for the purpose of flood protection through the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, City Project 7135; and WHEREAS, there are no reasonable alternatives for the location of the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Plan was prepared replacing the wetlands at a minimum 1:1 ratio as required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Plan meets the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the Mayor is authorized to execute the purchase agreement for wetland credits from State Bank #1346, approving the excavation of wetlands and the Replacement Plan for wetland restoration for the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, subject to the following conditions: 1. The replacement wetland must be constructed prior to site excavation. 2. A deed creating a restrictive covenant running with the land for the replacement area must be recorded. The deed shall be submitted to the City for approval before recording. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 4 rp)City of Agenda 6 . O 8PlymouthNumber: v Adding QoaWy to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Award Contract Item: Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project City Project No. 7135 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution awarding a contract in the amount of 138,992.50 for construction of the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, City Project No. 7135. 2. BACKGROUND: The Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, City Project No. 7135, is located within the Wild Wings residential development, west of State Highway 169, east of Zachary Lane and adjacent to Schmidt Lake Road. The development is adjacent to DNR protected waters 579W and 584W. An additional wetland to the west (585W) was included in the preliminary plans, however, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) indicated through the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) process that the MPCA would be unlikely to permit this project if there was a likelihood that the project would discharge additional phosphorus to Bass Lake, a state listed impaired water. Therefore, wetland 585W was eliminated from the project scope. The area was developed during the mid-1980s and utilizes the existing wetland system for storm water management, including flood protection. Multiple storm sewer pipes deposit surface water into these wetlands from city streets and residential properties and act as the drainage system for surface water in the area. External sediment deposition from streets and yards as well as internal organic matter decay has blocked the natural flow of water through the wetland system. This has resulted in water flowing around the edges of the wetlands where property and infrastructure are impacted. Surface water is blocked from reaching the middle of the wetlands and has created a flood hazard for roads and properties adjacent to the wetland system. This project proposes surface water utility maintenance to relieve the flood potential in the area by excavating channels into the middle of the wetlands to provide surface water flow for drainage. Settling basins, approximately 500 square feet in size, would also be constructed near the end of storm sewer pipes to increase the longevity of the proposed channels. The proposed channels are 26' wide with 3:1 side slopes and are proposed to be excavated to a depth of 4' below the normal water elevation in each basin. Total wetland impact is 2.8 acres. Excavated materials will be removed from the site and disposed of per MPCA dredged materials guidance. Page 1 Bids were previously rejected for this project on February 9, 2010 due to higher than expected construction costs and after the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) indicated wetland mitigation would be required. Subsequently, to satisfy the requirements of the MPCA, staff has proposed to mitigate for the wetland impacts through the purchase of wetland bank credits. On November 23, 2010, new bids were publicly opened for the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project. A total of 8 bids were received at the following prices: Contractor Total Base Bid Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. 138,992.50 Frattalone Companies, Inc. 160,615.00 Sunram Construction, Inc. 212,013.50 Stocker Excavating, Inc. 219,772.60 Veit & Company, Inc. 237,009.50 Rumpca Excavating, Inc. 239,999.00 Ramsey Excavating Co., Inc. 525,165.00 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 566,942.50 Engineers Estimate 163,189.00 The low bidder on the project was Minnesota Dirt Works, from Lonsdale, Minnesota, with a Base Bid of $138,992.50. Factors which contributed to the substantially lower prices were the slow economy creating a very favorable bidding climate, the ability of contractors to find disposal sites in the proximity of the project, and the fact the work would occur during the winter months. Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. successfully completed construction of the Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds Project. Staff has reviewed the information submitted by Minnesota Dirtworks to comply with the bidder qualification policy and finds the information acceptable. Staff is recommending that the City award the project to Minnesota Dirtworks, Inc. for the Base Bid of $138,992.50. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is identified in the City's 2010 — 2014 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for construction in 2010 with a project cost of $175,000 which did not include wetland mitigation. To accommodate wetland mitigation, staff has proposed a revised project cost of $375,000 in the draft 2011-2015 CIP. The total estimated project cost is $300,000 including wetland mitigation, construction, engineering, administration, and contingencies. Funding will be from the Water Resources Fund for the following project components: 1. Construction 2. Wetland Mitigation 4. ATTACHMENTS: Map Resolution 138,992.50 129,895.92 268,888.42 Page 2 Page 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO AWARD CONTRACT WILD WINGS FLOOD PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 7135 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Wild Wings Flood Protection Improvement Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Total Base Bid Minnesota Dirt Works, Inc. 138,992.50 Frattalone Companies, Inc. 160,615.00 Sunram Construction, Inc. 212,013.50 Stocker Excavating, Inc. 219,772.60 Veit & Company, Inc. 237,009.50 Rumpca Excavating, Inc. 239,999.00 Ramsey Excavating Co., Inc. 525,165.00 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 566,942.50 Engineers Estimate 163,189.00 WHEREAS, Minnesota Dirt Works of Lonsdale, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, complying with the minimum specifications; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends awarding the project to Minnesota Dirt Works of Lonsdale, MN. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract for the Total Base Bid with Minnesota Dirt Works of Lonsdale, MN in the name of the City of Plymouth for the improvement of the area generally located north of Schmidt Lake Road and east of Zachary Lane, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer in the amount of $138,992.50. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Page 4 Resolution 2010 - Page 2 Funding for this project, including wetland mitigation, shall be from the City of Plymouth Water Resources Fund. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 5 irp)City of Plymouth Adding quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Award Contract Item: Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration City Project No. 8128 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution awarding a contract to Sunram Construction, Inc., for the Base Bid plus Alternate 2 in the amount of $666,664.13 for construction of the Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration, City Project No. 8128. 2. BACKGROUND: The scope of this project includes the area just upstream of the newly constructed Plymouth Creek Water Quality Ponds at West Medicine Lake Park and follows Plymouth Creek to 1000 feet north of 26th Avenue. This project will assist the City in addressing Medicine Lake's impaired water status for excess nutrients by reducing downstream sediment and nutrient transport and help the City meet future regulatory requirements set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency through Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements. The Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project is intended to address severe stream bank erosion through a variety of natural best management practices such as root wads, riffles, rock vanes, and soil pillows. In some cases, hard armoring with rock or riprap will be necessary to protect the stream bank. The portion of the project north of 26th Avenue will include five properties from 2725 Sycamore Lane to 2635 Sycamore Lane. The portion of the project south of 26th Avenue will extend from 26th Avenue to 12505 24th Avenue North and then from 2210 Oakview Lane to West Medicine Lake Drive. Staff has received four of six drainage and utility easements necessary to complete the work in this area and has received verbal commitments from the other two properties. Excluding the portion of the creek where there are no easements and where easements could not be obtained will not negatively impact the desired results of the project. This project also includes re-routing approximately 1,500 feet of Plymouth Creek near West Medicine Lake Drive to a historic location. Re-routing the creek in this area will help to reduce flooding potential of adjacent properties and to provide an improved alignment of Plymouth Creek into the newly constructed water quality ponds. Page 1 On December 7, 2010 bids were publicly opened for the Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project. A total of 8 bids were received at the following prices: Contractor Base Bid Alt 1 Alt 2 Base Bid + Alt 2 Stocker Excavating, Inc. 490,465.79 74,650.00 163,247.10 653,712.89 Sunram Construction, Inc. 495,372.97 78,540.00 171,291.16 666,664.13 Park Construction Co. 572,308.63 79,796.00 174,130.24 746,438.87 Eagle Construction Co., Inc. 539,440.00 123,660.00 212,931.00 752,461.00 Veit & Company, Inc. 596,688.60 74,000.00 163,247.10 759,935.70 G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 611,810.00 85,425.00 236,590.00 848,400.00 Burschville Construction, Inc. 851,325.34 110,180.00 179,808.40 1,031,133.74 Blackstone Contractors, LLC 927,619.15 102,538.80 171,291.16 1,098,910.31 Engineers Estimate 583,863.00 1 $61,200.00 1 $201,102.00 784,965.00 Alternate 1 is comprised of clearing, grubbing, tree, and stump removal. These items were bid as an alternate to accommodate the requirements of the Hennepin County Riparian Restoration and Stream Stabilization Grant received by the City that requires the use of the Tree Trust or Minnesota Conservation Corps for a portion of the project. Rather than include Alternate 1 in the contract award, staff is proposing the Tree Trust or Minnesota Conservation Corps complete this work under a separate contract for an estimated cost of $90,000. Alternate 2 is comprised of the installation of live stakes at various locations along Plymouth Creek. Staff had applied for a grant of labor from the Minnesota Conservation Corps for this work and outside of this contract; however, the application was withdrawn as a decision on the grant award by the Minnesota Conservation Corps would not take place until later this winter. The lowest submission on this project was from Stocker Excavating, Inc, however, the bid submitted by Stocker Excavating, Inc. contained irregularities including the failure to acknowledge the receipt of 2 addenda issued by the consulting engineer on December 6, 2010 and was missing the first three pages of the bidding documents. Therefore, staff is recommending the Stocker Excavating, Inc. submission be rejected. Each of the other bidders did acknowledge the addenda and submit the first three pages. The lowest bidder complying with bidding requirements and recommended by the consulting engineer is Sunram Construction, Inc. from Corcoran, MN with a Base Bid + Alternate 2 of $666,664.13. Factors which contributed to the substantially lower prices were the slow economy creating a very favorable bidding climate, the ability of contractors to find disposal sites in the proximity of the project, and the fact the work would occur during the winter months. Staff has reviewed the information submitted by Sunram Construction to comply with the bidder qualification policy and finds the information acceptable. The consulting engineer is recommending that the City award the project to Sunram Construction, Inc. for the Base Bid + Alternate 2 of $666,664.13. Page 2 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The 2010-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $1,100,000 between 2010 and 2014 for construction of the Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project. The estimated project cost including construction ($670,000), engineering ($180,000), tree removals ($90,000) administration ($75,000), and contingencies ($85,000) is $1,100,000. Funding is proposed from the following sources: Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission: Hennepin County Riparian Restoration and Stream Bank Stabilization Grant: Water Resources Fund (in-kind services): Total 4. ATTACHMENTS: Map Recommendation letter from Wenck Associates, Inc. Resolution 910,200 155,000 34,800 1,100,000 Page 3 Proposed Plymouth Creek Streambank Restoration Proposed Plymouth Creek Streambank Restoration North of 26th Avenue to West Medicine Lake Blvd. City Project 8128 City of Plymouth Engineering Department October 1, 2009 4- Wenck December 7, 2010 Derek Asche City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Bid Tabulation Plymouth Creek Rehabilitation Project City Project No. 8128 Mr. Asche: Wenck Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 763)479-4200 Fax (763) 479-4242 E-mail: wenckmp@wenck.com Bids were opened for the Plymouth Creek Rehabilitation Project on Tuesday, December 7, 2010. Transmitted herewith is an electronic copy of the bid tabulation for your information and file. The bids have been reviewed and found to be in order. The approved bid will be for the Base Bid and Alternative Bid #2. The following summarizes the results of the three most responsive bids received: AMOUNT Low Sunram Construction, Inc. $666,664.13 2 Park Construction Company $746,438.87 3 Eagle Construction Co., Inc. $752,461.00 The low bidder on the project was Sunram Construction, Inc. from Corcoran, Minnesota, with a Base Bid plus Alternative Bid #2 of $666,664.13. Sunram Construction, Inc. was the most responsive bidder by acknowledging both Addenda #2 and #3, and providing the required bid bond. The estimated project construction cost with contingency was $930,781. The total project cost including construction, engineering, permitting, construction administration, and contingencies was estimated at $1,154,781. The low bid is 28% lower than the estimated budget for the project. Factors which contributed to the lower prices were the slow economy creating a very favorable bidding climate, the ability of contractors to find disposal sites in the proximity of the project, and the fact the work would occur during the winter months. These factors combined resulted in substantially lower bid amounts, but could not be counted on when creating an estimate for budgeting purposes. We have done work with this Contractor before and found them to be a reputable company. T:\1756 Plymouth\03 Plymouth CreekT - Bid Award 12-7-10.doc-maw Page 5 Mr. Derek Asche City of Plymouth December 7, 2010 Page 2 We are therefore recommending that the Cily award the project to Sunram Construction, Inc. for the Base Bid plus Alternative #2 of $666,664.13. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (763) 479-4244. Sincerely, Encl. tA1756 plymouth\03 plymouth creekU - bid award 12-7-10.doe-maw Page 6 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO AWARD CONTRACT PLYMOUTH CREEK STREAM BANK RESTORATION CITY PROJECT No. 8128 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Base Bid Alt 1 Alt 2 Base Bid + Alt 2 Stocker Excavating, Inc. 490,465.79 74,650.00 163,247.10 653,712.89 Sunram Construction, Inc. 495,372.97 78,540.00 171,291.16 666,664.13 Park Construction Co. 572,308.63 79,796.00 174,130.24 746,438.87 Eagle Construction Co., Inc. 539,440.00 123,660.00 212,931.00 752,461.00 Veit & Company, Inc. 596,688.60 74,000.00 163,247.10 759,935.70 G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 611,810.00 85,425.00 236,590.00 848,400.00 Burschville Construction, Inc. 851,325.34 110,180.00 179,808.40 1,031,133.74 Blackstone Contractors, LLC 927,619.15 102,538.80 171,291.16 1,098,910.31 Engineers Estimate 583,863.00 1 $61,200.00 1 $201,102.00 784,965.00 WHEREAS, the submission from Stocker Excavating, Inc. is found to contain irregularities and is hereby rejected; and WHEREAS, Sunram Construction, Inc. of Corcoran, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, complying with the minimum specifications; and WHEREAS, the City's consulting engineer recommends awarding the project to Sunram Construction, Inc. of Corcoran, MN. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract for the Base Bid plus Alternate 2 with Sunram Construction, Inc. in the name of the City of Plymouth for the improvement of the area generally located south of 26th Avenue and west of West Medicine Lake Drive, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer in the amount of $666,664.13. Page 7 Resolution 2010 - Page 2 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest successful bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. 3. Funding for this project shall be from the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Organization, the Hennepin County Riparian Restoration and Stream Stabilization Grant and the City of Plymouth Water Resources Fund. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 8 p))city of Agenda 6 . 1 0PlymouthNumber: adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Approve Reduction in Retainage for the 2010 Street Item: Reconstruction Project, East Parkers Lake Area City Project No. 10001 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the reduction in retainage for the above project. 2. BACKGROUND: GMH Asphalt Corporation, the contractor for the 2010 Street Reconstruction Project, East Parkers Lake Area, has requested a reduction in the retainage amount. Work on this project is essentially complete, with minor punch list items and sod acceptance remaining. Staff feels that a retainage in the amount of $65,000 will be sufficient to complete any work items remaining and will result in a payment to GMH Asphalt Corporation in the amount of 105,466.74. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project was included in the 2010-2014 Capital Improvement Program at an estimated cost of $6,800,000. The estimated total project cost, based on the low bid submitted by GMH Asphalt, was $4,800,000. Staff anticipates that the actual total project cost, when calculated prior to the assessment hearing in 2011, will be within the estimated budget, based on the low bid received. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Map Resolution Page 1 2010 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT N CITY of EAST PARKERS LAKE & PARKERS PLYMOUTH LAKE CORPORATE CENTER AREAS SCALE 1:750 Paoa 7 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING REDUCTION IN RETAINAGE FOR THE 2010 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, EAST PARKERS LAKE AREA CITY PROJECT N0. 10001 WHEREAS, the payment requires City Council approval since it is recommended that the retainage be reduced to $65,000 for City Project No. 10001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plymouth City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota: That the Finance Department is authorized to make payment for reduction in retainage in the amount of $105,466.74 to GMH Asphalt Corporation for City Project No. 10001. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 3 rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quolity to Ofe REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 6.11Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Sarah Hellekson, Transit / Solid Waste Manager Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Approve Amendment 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Item: Agreement 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution to approve Amendment 1 to the Residential Recycling Grant Agreement. 2. BACKGROUND: As part of Minnesota's Waste Management Act (WMA), the 1989 Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) legislation has provided Minnesota counties with a funding source to develop effective waste reduction, recycling and solid waste management programs. SCORE funds are derived from a 6.5% tax on garbage collection and disposal fees. Since 1989, Hennepin County has disbursed recycling grants to cities as an aid in supporting residential curbside recycling programs. The current Residential Recycling Grant Agreement began January 1, 2008 and expires December 31, 2010. Amendment Ito Residential Recycling Grant Agreement extends the current Residential Recycling Grant Agreement one year through December 31, 2011. The amount each county receives remains to be determined in 2011. The city of Plymouth received $190,648 in SCORE funds from Hennepin County in 2010. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The 2011 Solid Waste budget reflects a $190,000 revenue source from the SCORE funding. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Agreement Residential Recycling Grant Agreement Resolution Page 1 e°'.-----"--^----.....___-_'-_it----=----------'-_ear_-..____-_ Amendment 1 to :Contract No: A081247 AMENDMENT 1 TO RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT This Amendment 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Agreement (the "Amendment") is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA (the "COUNTY") A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, on behalf of the Hennepin County Department of .Enviromnental Services; 417 North Fifth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1397 ("DEPARTMENT") and the CITY OF PLYMOUTH, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY entered into a three-year Residential Recycling Grant Agreement, Contract No. A081247 (the "Agreement"), for a residential recycling grant commencing on January 1, 2008; and. WHEREAS, the County Board; by Resolution No. 10-0486, adopted on November 16, 2010, approved the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy for the period January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, and authorized grant funding for municipal recycling programs consistent with said policy; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term. NOW,. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follow: 1, Paragraph a. of Section 1, TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT, shall be amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall commence on execution and terminate on December 31, 2011, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions set forth herein. 2. Paragraph b.4. of Section 2; SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED, 'shall be. amended to read. 1. as .follows: The CITY shall submit, on forms provided by the COUNTY, a Final 2008 Report by February 15, 2009; a Final 2009 Report by February 15, 2010; a Final 2010 Report by February 15, 2011; and a Final 2011 .Report by February 15, 2012. The CITY shall submit an updated Grant Application by February 1.5 of each year. 3. Except as hereinabove amended, the terns, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Page 3 COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Office STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Assistant County Attorney Chair of Its County Board Date: Recommended for Approval By: Director, Department of Environmental Seivices ATTEST: Deputy/Clerk of County Board Date: By: Richard P. Johnson, County Administrator Date: By: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of CITY as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* Signature: Printed Naive: Date: CITY shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time CONTRACTOR returns the Agreement to the COUNTY_ Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. Page 4 Contract No: A081247 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA the "COUNTY") A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, on behalf of the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services, 417 North Fifth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1397 ("DEPARTMENT") and the CITY OF PLYMOUTH, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447. ("CITY"). - WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County Board, by Resolution No. 07-539, adopted on November 27, 2007, approved the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy for the period January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2010, and authorized grant funding for municipal recycling programs consistent with said policy; and WHEREAS, the CITY operates a municipal curbside residential recycling program and other waste reduction and recycling activities (the Recycling Program) as described in their grant application referredto in Section 2 below; and WHEREAS, -said Recycling Program is consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A; the Office of Environmental Assistance Solid Waste Management Policy Plan; Hennepin County's Solid Waste Management Master Plan; and Hennepin County's Residential Recycling Funding Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY, on behalf of the DEPARTMENT, and the CITY agree as follows: TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT a. This Agreement shall commence upon execution and terminate on December 31, 2010. b. The initial grant payment for the year 2008 shall be equal to one hundred eighty- six thousand five hundred nineteen dollars ($186,519). Grant payments for subsequent years shall be calculated as set forth in Section 3. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED a. The CITY will operate its Recycling Program as more fully described in the Grant Application that was submitted by the CITY and kept on file with the COUNTY. The CITY agrees to submit an updated Grant Application each year of the term of Page 5 this Agreement in order to be eligible for future grant funds. The terms of the Grant Application, as updated each year, are incorporated herein by reference. b. In addition to the services referred to above, the CITY agrees as. follows: 1. On an annual basis, the CITY must demonstrate that. the average pounds of recyclables collected from households participating in their curbside residential recycling program must equal or surpass the 2007 base year figure. The base year figure is determined by dividing total pounds of recyclables collected in 2007 by the total number of households participating in the curbside recycling program in 2007. Failure to achieve this annual goal will result in the requirement that a plan be submitted for COUNTY approval that specifies the efforts the CITY will undertake to increase the recycling percentage within 90 days of the submittal of the municipal year-end report. The CITY may also be required to participate in COUNTY sponsored waste and recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in their community and to participate in efforts to increase recovery of target select recyclable materials being discarded in significarzt quantities. If the average pounds per household in any given year decreases from the base year by -more than ten percent 10%), the COUNTY reserves the right to withhold the CITY's grant funds until the COUNTY is satisfied that reasonable efforts have been made to maintain the base year pounds per household. 2. At a minunum, the CITY shall collect the following materials at curbside: a. Newspaper and inserts; b. Cardboard boxes; C. Glass food and beverage containers; d. Metal. food and beverage containers; e. All plastic bottles, except bottles that previously contained hazardous materials or motor oil; f. Magazines and catalogs; g. Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes; h. Boxes from toothpaste, medications, and other toiletries; and i. Mail, office, and school papers. r The CITY must estimate its participation rate in the curbside recycling program during the month of October of each year. Methodology for measuring participation must be approved by the COUNTY. 4. The CITY shall submit, on forms provided by the COUNTY, a Final 2008 Report by February 15, 2009; a Final 2009 Report by February 15, 2010; and a Final 2010 Report by February 15, 2011. The CITY shall submit an updated Grant Application by February 15 of each year. Page 6 - 3. 5. All grant funds accepted by the CITY from the COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement shall be used to operate its Recycling Program, including capital and operating expenses related thereto, in the year granted. The CITY shall not retain any grant funds in excess of actual Recycling Program expenses. 6. The CITY may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees, or any other method for that portion of the costs of its Recycling Program that is funded by COUNTY grant funds. 7. The CITY shall establish a separate accounting.mechanism, such as a project number, activity number, cost center, or fund that will separate recycling and waste reduction revenues and expenditures from all other municipal activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities. Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures are subject to audit by the COUNTY. 9. If the CITY does not contract for curbside services, the CITY will receive grant fiends provided that at least ninety percent (90%) of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the CITY meets all minimum pro grain requirements. The additional ten percent (10%) of grant funds maybe used for CITY administrative and promotional expenses. METHOD OF PAYMENT a. The COUNTY will distribute grant funds annually only to the extent. the COUNTY has received SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota. SCORE funds are based on revenue received by the State of Minnesota from a sales tax on garbage collection and disposal fees and are subject to change based on revenue received and allocated by the State. The CITY will receive grant fluids per the formula below: of Households Serviced Curbside by Total SCORE Grant Funds CITY Revenue X Received by = . Distributed to COUNTY from State CITY of Minnesota Total # of Households Serviced Curbside in COUNTY b. Under no circumstances will the COUNTY's distribution of grant fiends exceed the CITY's proportion of SCORE fund revenues received by the COUNTY. Page 7 C. The initial grant fund payment will be forwarded after the County Board receives and approves this Agreement signed,by an autliorized official of the CITY. Provided the CITY is otherwise in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, future grant fund payments will be made after submittal by the CITY and approval by the COUNTY of the updated Grant Application and Final Report as described in Section 2 and receipt by the COUNTY of SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CITY shall select the means, method, and manner of perfonning the services. Nothing is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties or as constituting CITY as the agent, representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose. CITY is and shall remain an independent contractor for all services performed under this Agreemerit. CITY shall secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of CITY or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by CITY will have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY and will not be considered employees of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against CITY, its officers; agents, contractors, or employees. CITY shall defend; indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE A. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of CITY, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss' by reason of the failure of CITY to perform any obligation under this Agreement. 4 B. hi order to protect CITY and those listed above under the indemnification provision, CITY agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement, and Page 8 C. beyond such term when so required, to have and keep in force the following insurance, either under a self-insurance program or insurance policies as follows: Limits 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with contractual- liability coverage: General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products—Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury 1,000,000 Each Occurrence—Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage 1,000,000 2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation Statutory If CITY is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota law. In accordance with Minnesota law, if CITY is a sole proprietor, it is exempted from the above Workers' Compensation requirements. In the event that CITY should hire employees or subcontract this work, CITY shall obtain the required insurance. Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident—Each Accident 500,000 Disease—Policy Limit 500,000 Disease --Each Employee 500,000 An umbrella or excess policy over primary -liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. Upon written request, CITY shall promptly submit copies of insurance policies to the COUNTY. 6. DATA PRACTICES CITY, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subcontractors shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from CITY's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or Page 9 subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data, or other noncompliance with the requirements of this section. CITY agrees to promptly notify the COUNTY if it becomes aware of any potential claims, or facts -giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination'of this Agreement. 7. RECORDS — AVAILABILITY/ACCESS Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, CITY agrees that the COUNTY, the State Auditor, the Legislative Auditor or any of their authorized representatives, at anytime during normal business hours, and -as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of CITY and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. CITY shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 8. SUCCESSORS, SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS A. CITY.binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the COUNTY for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract documents. B. CITY shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become due to it without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. A consent to assign shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the COUNTY may deem necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by the COUNTY and signed by CITY, the assignee and the.COUNTY. Permission to assign, however, shall under no. circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. C. CITY shall not subcontract this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve CITY of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, CITY shall be fully responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subcontractors in the performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or indirectly employed by subcontractors. Contracts between CITY and each subcontractor shall require that the subcontractor's services be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified. 9. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and Page 10 negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 10. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION A. If CITY fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless CITY's default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for the COUNTY to delay payment until CITY's compliance. In the event of a decision to withhold payment, the COUNTY shall furnish prior written notice to CITY. B. Upon early termination or cancellation of this Agreement, the CITY shall itemize any and all grant funds• expenditures up to the date of termination or cancellation and return such grant funds not yet expended. C. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY shall remain liable to the COUNTY for damages sustained by the COUNTY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by CITY. Upon notice to CITY of the claimed breach and the amount of the claimed damage,. the COUNTY may withhold any payments to CITY for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the COUNTY from CITY is determined. Following notice from the COUNTY of the claimed breach and damage, CITY and the COUNTY shall attempt to resolve the dispute in good faith. D. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to the COUNTY under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity. E. The COUNTY's failure to .insist upon strict performance of "any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. F. This Agreement may be canceled with or without cause'by either party upon thirty (30) day written notice. Page 11 G. In the event the COUNTY does not receive any SCORE funds, this Agreement will be terminated upon written notice by the COUNTY. H. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE; DATA PRACTICES; RECORDS-AVAILABILITY/ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION; PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS. 11. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION In order to coordinate the services of the CITY with the activities of the Department of Environmental Services so as to accomplish the purposes of this contract, Dave McNary, Solid Waste Division Manager, or his or her successor, shall manage this contract on behalf of the COUNTY and serve as liaison between the COUNTY and the CITY. 12. COMPLIANCE CITY shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, rules and ordinancescurrently in force or later enacted. 13. PAPER RECYCLING The COUNTY encourages CITY to develop and implement an office paper and newsprint recycling program: 14. NOTICE'S Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices'to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy to the originating Department at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notice to CITY shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the Agreement or to the address stated in CITY's Form W-9 provided to the COUNTY. 15. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE CITY agrees that the terms "Hennepin County" or any derivative shall not be utilized in any promotional literature, advertisements of any type -or form or client lists without the express prior written consent of the COUNTY. 16. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations Page 12 between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. 17. .MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 466. The City's duty to indemnify and hold harmless the County set forth in this Agreement is subject to the limitations, immunities and defenses in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 which shall apply. THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 13 COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION . Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF BENNEPIN Office STATE OF MINNESOTA Assistant County Attorney Date: CITY OF PLYMOUTH* . Signature: Name:l t CUIK rinted Name) Title: y Priv e Title) Date: Chair of Its County Board ATTEST: Deputy/Clerk of County Board By: Richard P. Johnson, County Administrator Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: Recommended for Approval By: Director, Department of Environmental Services CITY OF PLYMOUTH* % Signature:fll.L/f lrP - ra Printed Name Title: y 2 P to TitleIV Date: 4. c 3 CITY shall submit.upon request by COUNTY documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. Page- 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - APPROVING AMENDMENT 1 TO RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.552, Counties shall ensure that residents have an opportunity to recycle; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has set as a requirement that the City enter into a Residential Recycling Grant Agreement" with the County; and WHEREAS, the current "Residential Recycling Grant Agreement" between Hennepin County and the City of Plymouth shall expire December 31, 2010; and WHEREAS, this amendment shall extend the current "Residential Recycling Grant Agreement" between Hennepin County and the City of Plymouth through December 31, 2011; and WHEREAS, the City desires to receive these County funds. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City enters into the "Amendment 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Agreement" with Hennepin County and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the agreement with the Hennepin County Contract Compliance Officer. Adopted by the City Council on December 14, 2010. Page 15 rp)City of Plymouth 7 Adding Quofity to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 6.12Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: James Renneberg, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Accepting Utilities for Continual Maintenance Item: Taylor Creek of Plymouth (2010035) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt the attached resolution accepting utilities for the Taylor Creek development (2010035). 2. BACKGROUND: We have received a request to accept the utilities, which reflects completed work in the development. The City has made inspections of the work and has determined that it is acceptable. The funds the City would retain are for the required warranty period for the utilities. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Resolution PAOrxa.,zat,onTouncilTo—il Staff Reports\2010\121410\z 612 1 ENG_TaylorCr_20 .tocx Resolution No. 2010 - FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per Section 8.1 of the approved Development Contract remain as follows: ITEM Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm Sewer Cleaning Cash Letter of Credit No. 112 ORIGINAL CURRENT AMOUNT AMOUNT 2,000 $ 2,000 43,000 $ 43,000 FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the utilities are accepted for continuous maintenance as of December 14, 2010 subject to the two-year guarantee by the Developer per Letter of Credit No. 112. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITIES FOR CONTINUAL MAINTENANCE FOR TAYLOR CREEK (2010035) WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated September 22nd, 2010, Taylor Creek, LLC, developer of Taylor Creek (2010035), has agreed to install certain improvements for said development; and WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading as noted below; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the required financial guarantee to reflect the completed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA; that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items remain as follows per Letter of Credit No 112: P:\0rganization\Counci1\Counci1 StaffReports\20lo\l21410\z 612 1 ENG TaylorCr 20 R .4ocx ORIGINAL CURRENT NEW ITEM AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT Street Construction 340,102 136,040 136,040 Sanitary Sewer 181,039 36,208 45,260 Watermain 176,952 35,318 44,238 Storm Sewer 109,980 21,996 27,495 Blvd and Drainage Swale Sod, Silt Fence 13,712 13,712 13,712 Filtration Basin Construction 17,675 3,535 3,535 Street & Traffic Control Signs 5,225 1,045 1,045 Sidewalk Improvements 55,851 55,851 55,851 Landscaping (Irrigation) 4,500 4,500 4,500 Street Lights 30,000 30,000 30,000 Site Grading and Drainage Improvements 253,325 50,665 50,665 Setting Iron Monuments 13,900 13,900 0- Design, Administration, Inspection, As- 144,228 72,114 62,543 Builts TOTAL 1,346,129 474,884 474,884 P:\0rganization\Counci1\Counci1 StaffReports\20lo\l21410\z 612 1 ENG TaylorCr 20 R .4ocx Resolution No. 2010 - FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the financial guarantee requirements for the following items per Section 8.1 of the approved Development Contract remain as follows: ITEM Maintenance of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Street Sweeping, and Storm Sewer Cleaning Cash Letter of Credit No. 112 ORIGINAL CURRENT AMOUNT AMOUNT 2,000 $ 2,000 43,000 $ 43,000 FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the utilities are accepted for continuous maintenance as of December 14, 2010 subject to the two-year guarantee by the Developer per Letter of Credit No. 112. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 5 rp)City of Agenda 6.13PlymouthNumber: w- Adding Quu?ity to Li(P To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Givonna Kone, Human Resources Manager Approve the 2011 City Health and Dental Insurance andDecember14, 2010 Item: Deferred Compensation Contributions for Non - Represented City Employees 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the attached resolution, which provides for adjustments to the city's health and dental insurance, and deferred compensation contributions for non - represented city employees. 2. BACKGROUND The city's contribution toward health and dental insurance premiums for non - represented employees is established by resolution. It is staff's intent to negotiate the same contribution levels approved by the City Council into 2011 labor agreements. Changes in premiums. For 2011, our health insurance premiums increased by 2.05%, and dental premiums increased by 11%. Based on 2011 premiums and the traditional 50150 split of the increase in health insurance premiums, staff proposes the following city contributions for non -represented staff. HEALTH INSURANCE: 2011 Proposed Contribution Levels for Non -represented Staff W Employees who waive health insurance receive $353 monthly toward deferred compensation. Page 1 Total City City Total EE Monthly Contribution Contribution COP Contribution Premium to Premium to VEBA Contribution to Premium VEBA 832 Single ($2,250 Deductible) 419.50 419.50 353.00 772.50 0.00 Family ($4,500 Deductible) 1,048.00 667.55 243.94 911.49 380.45 VEBA 830 :ffl Single ($1,200 Deductible) 504.50 504.50 275.00 779.50 0.00 Family ($2,400 Deductible) 1,260.50 769.82 141.67 911.49 490.68 Employees who waive health insurance receive $353 monthly toward deferred compensation. Page 1 The contribution levels above reflect an additional $12.75 per month for the city's contribution to family plans and an additional $10 per month on one single plan and an additional $8 per month for the other single plan. Staff is not proposing a change to the city's VEBA contribution or to the city's deferred compensation contribution for 2011. In 2010, the city paid the full single or family dental premium for employees who elected single health coverage or waived city health coverage. The premium for single dental coverage is $40.25 and $113.18 for family dental. These figures represent monthly increases of $4.00 and $11.22, respectively. 2011 Wages for Non -represented Staff Please note that in December of each year staff typically brings forward a request for adoption of a resolution that sets wages for non -represented staff for the following year. Staff recommends making no change at this time. Instead, staff proposes to review salaries for non -represented job classes over the next several months. The results of the review will be reported to the City Council in mid -2011. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The additional contribution level for health insurance, deferred compensation or VEBA contribution will be within the amount budgeted for non -represented employees' benefits for 2011. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2011 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2011 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE, DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND VEBA TRUST CONTRIBUTIONS FOR NON -REPRESENTED CITY EMPLOYEES. WHEREAS, the City Council annually reviews the compensation package for non - represented city employees; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the 2011 city contribution to health and insurance premiums represent the traditional 50150 split of the increase; and WHEREAS, staff has recommended that effective January 1, 2011 the city pay the full cost of single or family dental insurance for employees who elect single health insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that is should and hereby does: Authorize the payment of the premium for single health insurance and for single or family dental insurance for employees who elect single health coverage. The City Council further authorizes an increase in the city's contribution to benefits according to the following schedule for all its non -represented employees, effective January 1, 2011. HEALTH INSURANCE: 2011 Proposed Contribution Levels for Non -represented Staff Employees who waive health insurance receive $353 monthly toward deferred compensation. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 3 Total City City Total EE Monthly Contribution Contribution COP Contribution Premium to Premium to VEBA Contribution to Premium I VEBA 832 Single ($2,250 Deductible) 419.50 419.50 353.00 772.50 0.00 Family ($4,500 Deductible) 1,048.00 667.55 243.94 911.49 380.45 VEBA 830 Single ($1,200 Deductible) 504.50 504.50 275.00 779.50 0.00 Family ($2,400 Deductible) 1,260.50 769.82 141.67 911.49 490.68 Employees who waive health insurance receive $353 monthly toward deferred compensation. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 3 rp)City of Agenda 6.14PlymouthNumber: i Adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Robert Moberg, P.E., City Engineer December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Approve Payment No. 2 and Final Item: Campus Drive / 26th Ave Mill & Overlay and Culvert Replacement Project City Project No. 8107, S.A.P. 155-159-004 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Payment No. 2 and Final to Ryan Contracting Co. for the Campus Drive/26th Avenue Mill and Overlay Project and Culvert Replacement Project, City Project No. 8107, State Aid Project No. 155-159-004. 2. BACKGROUND: The project consisted of a mill and overlay of Campus Drive/ 261h Avenue from County Road 61 Northwest Boulevard) to Teakwood Lane, reconstruction of 26th Avenue between Teakwood Lane and Sycamore Lane, and replacing the Plymouth Creek culvert under 26th Avenue. The mill and overlay removed and replaced the wearing course or top 2" of bituminous. Any settled, cracked or heaved concrete curb and gutter was removed and replaced to properly convey water to the storm sewer system. Storm and sanitary sewer structures were repaired as needed and the traffic signal loop detectors at Northwest Boulevard were replaced. In addition, 5 foot wide concrete aprons were installed for existing commercial/industrial property driveways. The reconstruction portion of the project included the removal of the bituminous surface, replacement of the subgrade material with sand and rebuilding the crushed rock and bituminous layers. Concrete curb and gutter was removed and replaced. The Plymouth Creek culvert runs under 26th Avenue between Teakwood Lane and Sycamore Lane. The existing pipe, an 11 foot diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP), was replaced with a 10 foot x 8 foot reinforced concrete box culvert. Two change orders were executed for the project. The first change order addressed the replacement of a 16 -inch water main in the vicinity of the culvert replacement. The second change order addressed additional work needed to correct a substandard pavement section in the mill and overlay portion of the project. On June 10, 2009, the Metropolitan Council approved approximately $250 million in federal stimulus funding for transportation projects from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ARRA). The Campus Drive/26th Avenue project was one of the projects selected to receive ARRA funding. The work on this project has been completed by Ryan Contracting Co. and certified as meeting project specifications by the Engineering Division. Page 1 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This project was included in the 2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at an estimated cost of $530,000. The original contract amount for this project was $376,826.90. Two change orders, totaling $55,277.90, were approved for this project, resulting in an adjusted contract amount of $432,104.80. The final contract cost is $425,551.15 or 1.5% below the adjusted contract amount. The total project cost for this project, which includes engineering and inspection services, is $489,383.82. Funding for this project is summarized as follows: ARRA Funds $346,560.00 Water Fund $33,000.00 Street Replacement Fund $36,349.47 Special Assessments $73,474.35 TOTAL FUNDING $489,383.82 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Pay Request Resolution Page 2 M1 5Y 26th Ave & Campus Drcox Mill & Overlay/Bridge Replacement z C.P. 5107 JO N7 T rs H rita o D dal q Cf 00 Q 29 2 Begin \5 959-04 rn z o Plymouth Cre k F 27TH w Ax o2> TygG y O5`c 27TH A a LLI a V i— Z Z a 26TH AVE z rea to be Re onstru ted 24TH V LLI am Ne 5 PL MOOT INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD r $Ys y r X Project Number 155-159-004 r Old Bridge Number 92597 New Bridge Number 27,145 Township 118 N Range 22 W AT----- IR ,- Area be o erlayed i REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: December 6th, 2010 FOR PERIOD PLACE: Plymouth, MN FROM: 6-11-10 TO: 10-31-10. PROJECT: Carnets Drive Mill & Overlay/ 26'11 Avenue Bridge PROJECT NO.: 8107 FILE NO.: SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: June 25, 2010 CONTRACTOR: RYAN Contracting Co.. ADDRESS: PO Box 246 26350 France Ave. Elko. MN 55020 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: Payment No. 2 & Final SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Orders - ADDITION $ 55,277.90 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 0.00 376,826.90 4. Revised Contract Amount 432,104.80 5. Value Completed to Date 425,551.15 6. Material on Hand 0.00 7. Amount Earned 425,551.15 8. Less Retainage % 0.00 9. Less Liquidated Damages 0.00 10. Sub -Total 425,551.15 11. Less Amount Paid Previously 397,308.67 12. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 2 (Final) 28,242.48 Approved By: (ENGINEER) By: Approved By: (CONTRACTOR) Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 2 AND FINAL CAMPUS DRIVE/26TH AVENUE MILL Et OVERLAY AND CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 8107, S.A.P. 155-159-004 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as the owner and Ryan Contracting Co. as the contractor, have entered into an agreement for the Campus Drive / 26th Avenue Mill & Overlay and Culvert Replacement Project, City Project No. 8107, S.A.P. 155-159-004; said agreement was approved by the City Council on January 12, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the original contract amount was $376,826.90 and two change orders totaling $55,277.90 were previously approved, resulting in an adjusted contract amount of $432,104.80, the value of the work to date is $425,551.15 and is herewith approved. The final contract amount is 12.9% over the original contract amount. 2. That the work performed by the contractor for the Campus Drive / 26th Avenue Mill & Overlay and Culvert Replacement Project and certified to the Council by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 2 and Final in the amount of $28,242.48 to Ryan Contracting Co. for the Campus Drive / 26th Avenue Mill & Overlay and Culvert Replacement Project is hereby approved and the Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. Funding will come from a combination of Federal ARRA funds, Water Fund, Street Replacement Fund, and Special Assessments. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 5 DR) City of Agenda 6.15PlymouthNumber: Adding Qooiity to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Dan Heitke Park Maintenance Supervisor December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Eric Blank Director of Park and Recreation Item: Approve Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Construction And Steel Truss Installation for West Medicine Lake Park 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Veit & Company the award of bid for the West Medicine Lake Park pedestrian bridge abutment construction & prefabricated steel truss installation. 2. BACKGROUND: At the October 26th'20 10 council approved resolution 2010-301 amending the budget for the West Medicine Lake Park pedestrian bridge project. Plans and specifications were prepared for the bridge abutments needed along with installation of the steel truss structure. Notices of bids were published in the Plymouth Sun Sailor on November 11, 2010. We are recommending approval of bid from Veit & Company Inc. for $112,816.00. If council approves their bid, they intend to perform the work over the winter and install the bridge when it is completed, by next spring as proposed 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The budget approved for the project is for $100,000 to come from Water Resources Fund and 100,000 from the Park Dedication Fund. The bid received from Veit & Company came in about 6,000 under our estimate. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Aorgmizat;m\—cih—cil staffnp s\2010\l21410\z 617 westmedpedbridgestaffreport-2010.docx Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - A RESOLUTION Approving Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Construction And Steel Truss Installation for West Medicine Lake Park WHEREAS, the City Council has given budget approval for the Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Construction and Steel Truss Installation; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared specifications, advertised, received and opened bids on December 3, 2010; and WHEREAS, the following bids were received; Company Contact Address City/State/Zip Phone # Bid Name Person Amount NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA to award Veit & Company the pedestrian bridge abutment construction and steel truss installation at a cost of $112,816.00 for West Medicine Lake Park. APPROVED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010. orgmizaf;m\—ci1\—ci1 staffnp s\2010\l21410\z 617 westmedpedbridgestaffreport-2010.docx Page 2 Stacy Veit Meyers 14000 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374 763-428-2242 112,816.00 850 Wickett Minnowa Drive NW - PO Harmoney, MN Construction Ben Box 188 55939 507-886-6162 1227386.00 Sunram. Ryan 20010 75th Corcoran, MN Construction Sunram Avenue North 55340 763-420-2140 1291250.00 9003 Mayhew Sauk Rapids, MN Odesa II Jim Lake Road NE 56379 320-250-1287 130,000.00 Terranova - Bid Received @ 7401 Metro Blvd 10:03am Rod Miller 350 Edina MN 55439 952-937-7663 1847500.00 Landwehr St. Cloud, MN Construction Derek P.O. Box 1086 56302 320-252-1494 No Bid NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA to award Veit & Company the pedestrian bridge abutment construction and steel truss installation at a cost of $112,816.00 for West Medicine Lake Park. APPROVED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010. orgmizaf;m\—ci1\—ci1 staffnp s\2010\l21410\z 617 westmedpedbridgestaffreport-2010.docx Page 2 ityOf Agenda 7.1PlymouthNumber: AddmQ Quntrty to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Bob Moberg, P.E., City Engineer December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Authorize the Vacation of a Portion of a Highway Item: Easement in Section 20 Related to Plymouth Station 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution vacating a portion of a highway easement within Section 20. 2. BACKGROUND: On November 10, 2010, City staff was contacted by Hans Hagen Homes, owners of Plymouth Station, to verify the existence of a highway easement across their property. Title work for their property identifies a highway easement that was dedicated to Hennepin County in 1958 and the majority of the easement is located along the alignment of Old County Road 24. A smaller portion of the easement is located along the old Dunkirk Lane alignment. Sometime after the easement was secured, Hennepin County created a right-of- way plat (Hennepin County Highway Plat No. 4) for County Road No. 24 that encompasses the easement. When County Road 24 was realigned in the mid -1990's, the County transferred ownership of the excess right-of-way for Old County Road 24 and for Dunkirk Lane to the City. The City vacated the excess right -of way in 1997. A search of City records indicates the highway easement was not transferred to the City when the County transferred the Old County Road 24 right-of-way. In an effort to clear up title for Plymouth Station, as well as for the Seven Ponds Seventh Addition and Dunkirk Meadows subdivisions, all of which abut the existing highway easement, City staff is recommending vacation of all of the easement which lies northeasterly of the westerly plat boundary of Seven Ponds Seventh Addition. Hennepin County has been notified of the proposed vacation and concurs with it (letter attached). In addition, all private utility companies have been contacted; three responded and had no conflict with the proposed vacation. It is recommended that the resolution be approved, unless new information is provided at the hearing. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of administering, publishing and recording the vacation resolution, estimated to be $450, will be borne by the City. 4. Attachments: Map Letter from Hennepin County Resolution Page 1 Page 2 s` t CO 1 r c mcE Y N Y W 3 l O 1 l' 2 y O zrz f oW s j V1 J a w d is n A3 a Jf U E I l0 ` W_ N E N NCW O pa) 00 U aa. / N LU Q W c mQ CO Al c 9) C:/ Ez w O m J z LU N LUOW ox I` y O W O O O z Page 2 Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit T : '---- ..._....__...._.._.... - 1600 Prairie Drive 612-596-0321, Phone Medina, MN 55340-5421 763-478-4000, FAX 763-478-4030,TDD www.hennepin.us December 8, 2010 Mr. Robert L. Moberg, P.E. City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd.. Plymouth, MN 55447-1482 Re: Notice of Public Hearing on Vacation of a Highway Easement within Plymouth Station Dear Bob: As we discussed in the December 6`" meeting of your office regarding the City of Plymouth's proposed vacation of the old alignment of CSAH 24 (part of Document No. 3151949): To protect the County of Hennepin's interest in the existing right of way for CSAH 24 that is described in Document 3151949 we request that the proposed vacation of the old alignment of CSAH No. 24 be limited to; that part of Document No. 3151949 which lies northeasterly of the westerly and northwesterly lines of Block 1, SEVEN PONDS SEVENTH ADDITION. With this limitation Hennepin County would have no objection to the proposed vacation. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, 1-k A Karl Holtz Pre Acquisition Supervisor Land Acquisition Group Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer Paftyydedpaper CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A HIGHWAY EASEMENT WITHIN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 118 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for December 14, 2010 in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 and the City Charter Section 12.06; and WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks prior to the meeting of December 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, all property owners adjacent to the proposed vacation were duly notified by mail; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on December 14, 2010 to inform any and all interested parties relevant to the vacation of the highway easement within Plymouth Station, Seven Ponds Seventh Addition and Dunkirk Meadows; and WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easement is not needed for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That a portion of the following described highway easement within Section 20 be vacated: All that part of the South 1/2 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 20, Township 118 North, Range 22 West, and all that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 118 North, Range 22 West, lying South of Highway No. 48 and East of County Road No. 24, lying within a distance of 40 feet on each side of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East and West 1/4 line of Section 19, Township 118 North, Range 22 West, distant 590.7 feet West of the East 1/4 corner thereof, thence East along said East and West 1/4 line a distance of 100 feet to the point of beginning of line to be described; thence deflect to the left along a five degree curve (delta angle 43 degrees 50 minutes, tangent distance 461.2 feet) a distance of 876.7 feet, thence on tangent to said curve a distance of 556.3 feet; thence deflect to the right along a 2 degree curve (delta angle 20 degrees 4 minutes, tangent distance 506.9 feet, a distance of 1003.3 feet; thence on tangent to said curve a distance of 793.8 feet; then deflect to the left along an 8 degree curve (delta angle 66 degrees 2 minutes, tangent distance 465.8 feet) a distance of 400 feet and there terminating; Page 4 Also that part of the Northeast'/4 of the Northwest'/4 of said Section 20 lying South of Highway No. 48 and East of County Road No. 24, lying within a distance of 33 feet on each side of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the North and South 1/4 line of said Section 20 distant 1464.7 feet South of the North 1/4 corner thereof; thence North along said North and South 1/4 line a distance of 100 feet; thence deflect to the left along a 14 degree curve (delta angle 74 degrees 38 minutes, tangent distance 312.7 feet) a distance of 533.1 feet and there terminating; Containing 2.35 acres more or less in addition to existing roads and recorded as Document No. 3151949. The portion of the highway easement to be vacated is described as follows: All of said easement lying northeasterly of the westerly and northwesterly lot lines of Lot 4, Block 1, Seven Ponds Seventh Addition, Except that part of said easement which lies within the right-of-way for Medina Road (southerly alignment) as platted in Seven Ponds Second Addition, and Except that part of said easement which lies within that part of the right-of-way for Dunkirk Lane lying south of the northerly right-of-way line of Medina Road southerly alignment), as platted in Seven Ponds Second Addition, and Except that part of said easement which lies within the right-of-way for Dunkirk Lane, as platted in Dunkirk Meadows, lying south of the easterly projection of the northerly right-of-way line of Medina Road (southerly alignment), as platted in Seven Ponds Second Addition. FURTHER, that said vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas lines, sanitary and storm sewer lines, water pipes, mains, hydrants, and natural drainage areas thereon or thereunder, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereof. Approved this 14th day of December, 2010. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. Page 5 The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Page 6 City of pi ymouth Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 8.1Number: v To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Reviewed by: Cal Portner, Administrative Services Director Item: Approve Appointments to Boards and Commissions 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution appointing individuals to fill terms on Boards and Commissions. The City Council conducted the board and commission interviews on December 7 and requested that the attached list of individuals be appointed to the boards and commissions. The Council will continue to solicit applications for the following vacancies: Park and Recreation Advisory Committee — Ward 3 position Park and Recreation Advisory Committee — Ward 4 position Environmental Quality Committee — Ward 3 position Elm Creek Watershed District - Alternate 2. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING INDIVIDUALS TO FILL VACANT TERMS ON VARIOUS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, that the following individuals are appointed to boards and commissions effective February 1, 2011, or sooner upon resignation of the member: Name Commission Seat Term Expires Kelli Slavik Human Rights Commission At Large January 31, 2014 Bob Stein Human Rights Commission At Large January 31, 2014 Mike Goldstein Human Rights Commission At Large January 31, 2014 Jim Davis Planning Commission Ward 1 January 31, 2014 Scott Nelson Planning Commission Ward 3 January 31, 2014 Bryan Oakley Planning Commission At Large January 31, 2014 Greg Anderson Park & Rec. Advisory Comm. Ward 1 January 31, 2014 Andy Polzin Environmental Quality Comm. At Large January 31, 2014 Tawnia Johnson Environmental Quality Comm. At Large January 31, 2014 Sylvia Gustafson Advisory Committee on Transit At Large January 31, 2014 Christina Rudnick Advisory Committee on Transit At Large January 31, 2014 Tim Bildsoe Advisory Committee on Transit At Large January 31, 2014 Fred Moore Elm Creek Watershed District Director January 31, 2014 Ginny Black Bassett Creek Watershed District Director January 31, 2014 Judy Johnson Bassett Creek Watershed District Alternate January 31, 2014 DawnSorenson Shingle Creek Watershed District Director January 31, 2014 Andy Polzin Shingle Creek Watershed District Alternate January 31, 2014 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council confirms the following appointments made by Mayor Slavik to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority: Jim Willis Housing & Redevelopment Authority January 31, 2016 Adopted this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 2 rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quoky to Life To: REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Agenda Number: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk 8.2 December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Cal Portner, Administrative Services Director Item: Council Coordinating Representatives and Other Agency Appointments for 2011 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Council Coordinating Representatives and other agency appointments for 2011. 2. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 20010 - A RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCIL COORDINATING REPRESENTATIVES AND REPRESENTATIVES TO OTHER AGENCIES Be it resolved by the Plymouth City Council that the following appointments are made for 2011: Board/Commission/AgencyBoard/Commission/Agency 2011 Appointment Planning Commission Murdock Park & Recreation Advisory Commission Stein Environmental Quality Committee Bildsoe School District 279 (Osseo) Black School District 281 (Robbinsdale) Stein School District 284 (Wayzata) Slavik, Murdock School District 270 (Hopkins) Slavik School District 284 CICC Johnson/Ahrens Plymouth Community Foundation Willis Municipal Legislative Commission 1 elected and 1 appointed) Slavik, Ahrens Bildsoe alt. Northwest Suburban Cable Comm. 1 elected and 1 appointed) Willis, LaFave Northwest Suburbs Community Access Corp. LaFave Suburban Rate Authority Willis, Cote alt. Highway 55 Corridor Commission Johnson, Moberg alt. Plymouth Civic League Slavik Suburban Transit Association Johnson Adopted this 14th day of December, 2010. Page 2 City of Plymouth Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2010 Agenda 8.2.1Number: v To: Mayor and Council Prepared by: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Reviewed by: Item: Appoint Deputy Mayor 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution appointing a Deputy Mayor for 2011. 2. BACKGROUND: The City Charter and City Code require that the Council choose a Deputy Mayor from among its members at or before the first regular meeting of each year. The Deputy Mayor performs the duties of the Mayor during the disability or absence of the Mayor from the City or, in case of a vacancy in the office of Mayor, until a successor has been appointed and qualifies for office. 3. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPOINTING DEPUTY MAYOR FOR 2011 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT IS APPOINTED AS DEPUTY MAYOR FOR 2011. Approved this 14TH day of December, 2010. Page 2 rp) City of Agenda Q . 3PlymouthNumber: v Adding Quo[ity to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Calvin Portner, Administrative Services Director December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Item: Adopt 2011 Budgets and Property Tax Levies 1. ACTION REQUESTED: a) Discuss amended 2011 budgets and tax levies b) Allow for public comment on 2011 budgets and tax levies c) Adopt the 2011 Amended Budget, General Property Tax Levy and the HRA Levy d) Adopt the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program 2. BACKGROUND: The City Council has held two study sessions to discuss the City Manager's proposed amendment to the concept 2011 Budget and Property Tax Levy. As a result of the budget meetings, the property tax levy is proposed to be the same as in 2010. The proposed amendment to the 2011 General Fund Budget includes a slight increase of $12,781. The increase is required to maintain current service levels and debt levies including a levy for 2010A Open Space Bonds sold last year under the voter approved referendum. The proposed budget does not include new services or service level increases. The median value Plymouth home for taxes payable in 2011 is $265,400. Due to changing (often declining) property values, some property taxpayers will see an increase to their city taxes The levy meets the state -mandated levy limit requirements and reflects changing economic conditions. The 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 2, 2010. The Council reviewed the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program on November 9, 2010 and November 23, 2010. Council has previously received copies of the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program document. Included in the Capital Improvement Program is a multi-year project to replace aging and inefficient playfield lighting systems. Council has discussed condensing the timeframe and moving forward with the project earlier to maximize potential savings. Staff will seek proposals and bring to Council for further discussion in the near future. For 2010, state statute changes replaced Truth -in -Taxation public hearings with a public forum to receive public comment on the budgets and levies. The public will be able to do so at tonight's Page 1 meeting. The Council has received an updated copy of the entire budget document and it is also available in the City Hall Council Chambers for public viewing. 3. ATTACHMENTS: Budget Memo Resolution Authorizing the 2011 HRA Levy Resolution Adopting the 2011 Budgets Resolution Adopting Tax Levies for Tax Payable in 2011 Resolution Adopting the 2011 — 2015 Capital Improvement Program Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE 2011 HRA LEVY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the EDA Act), the City of Plymouth City Council, created the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the Authority); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the HRA Act, the City Council granted to the Authority all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of Minnesota statutes; and WHEREAS, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the HRA Act permits the Authority to levy a tax upon all taxable property within the City to be expended for the purposes authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, such levy maybe in an amount not to exceed 0.0144 percent of taxable market value of the city; and WHEREAS, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance with the budget procedures of the city; and WHEREAS, based upon such budgets, the Authority will levy all or such portion of the authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that approval is hereby given for the Authority to levy for taxes payable in 2011, such tax upon the taxable property of the city as the Authority may determine, subject to the limitations contained in the HRA Act. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2011 BUDGETS WHEREAS, in 2007, the Plymouth City Council directed staff to implement a biennial budget cycle with a proposed current budget year and an in concept budget proposal; and WHEREAS, the 2010/2011 budget marks the city's second biennial budget proposal; and WHEREAS, this proposed amendment to the approved In Concept 2011 operating budget resolution and the accompanying proposed 2011 tax levies contained in Resolution No. 2010 - are submitted by the city in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and other applicable laws in effect on this date; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs on the 2011 Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority budgets in the amount of $3,880,909. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the 2011 proposed operating budgets for the following funds are hereby given final approval. Fund 2011 Proposed Budgets General 29,578,331 Recreation 1,757,090 Transit 4,333,264 Comm. Development Block Grant 426,270 Water 7,030,293 Water Resources 3,894,927 Sewer 7,878,412 Solid Waste 1,265,800 Ice Center 1,414,548 Field House 368,025 Central Equipment 2,788,189 Public Facilities 1,636,870 Information Technology 2,259,384 Risk Management 739,412 NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the city's budget and property tax levies both proposed and final. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO PROPOSE PROPERTY TAX LEVIES FOR TAXES PAYABLE 2011 WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the proposed operating budgets for calendar year 2011; and WHEREAS, the proposed budgets require monies to be raised from property taxes on taxable property within the City of Plymouth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the following sums of money be raised by property tax on taxable property within the City of Plymouth for taxes payable in 2011 as set out in the amended 2011 budget. Special Levies PERA $ 157,588.00 Public Safety $ 9,593,124.00 2003B Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 179,563.13 2004A Public Safety Bonds $ 601,682.81 2007A Open Space Bonds $ 254,764.13 2009B Activity Center Bonds $ 407,557.50 2010A Open Space $ 263,259.24 Total Special Levies $11,457,538.81 Total City Levy $28,176,681.96 HRA $ 551,277.00 Total Levy $28,727,958.96 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the said property tax levy be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before December 28, 2010. Page 5 2011 Property Tax Levy Levy Limit Base General Fund 12,560,323.00 Market Value Credit 552,502.00 Street Reconstruction 2,607,789.80 Recreation Fund 618,497.00 Capital Improvement Fund 380,031.35 Total Levy Limit Base 16,719,143.15 Special Levies PERA $ 157,588.00 Public Safety $ 9,593,124.00 2003B Street Reconstruction Bonds $ 179,563.13 2004A Public Safety Bonds $ 601,682.81 2007A Open Space Bonds $ 254,764.13 2009B Activity Center Bonds $ 407,557.50 2010A Open Space $ 263,259.24 Total Special Levies $11,457,538.81 Total City Levy $28,176,681.96 HRA $ 551,277.00 Total Levy $28,727,958.96 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the said property tax levy be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before December 28, 2010. Page 5 Approved this 14"' day of December 2010. CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING 201 1-201 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program for the City of Plymouth on November 2, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program is hereby approved. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 6 rp)City of Plymouth Agenda 8 .4Number: v Adding QoaWy to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Approve staff comments Item: Minnehaha Creek draft Plan Amendment Local Plan Implementation & Reporting 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve staff comments on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Draft Plan Amendment 2. BACKGROUND: In July 2007, following an extensive planning and review process that involved citizens, cities including Plymouth), state agencies, and other stakeholders, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) adopted their 3rd Generation Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (WRMP). The WRMP includes information on local plan implementation and reporting requirements Attachment 1). Plymouth staff commented in 2006 prior to plan adoption by the MCWD, that a copy of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) annual report (which is a report currently completed by staff and required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)), would be supplied to the MCWD as compliance with the municipal reporting responsibilities. The MCWD responded that they are working with the MPCA on streamlining reporting requirements and are committed to close coordination with municipalities, however, they would not guarantee fulfillment of MCWD reporting responsibilities through submission of the MS4 annual report. In addition to local plan implementation and reporting requirements, the WRMP requires municipalities exercising sole regulatory authority with respect to one or more MCWD rules to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which would describe the role of each party, require MCWD approval of any variance to a water resource ordinance, specify ongoing or periodic communication, and reserve the MCWD's ability to exercise its regulatory authority within the municipality if the municipality is not implementing its regulatory program in accordance with its local plan (Attachment 2). The City of Plymouth authorizes the MCWD to exercise regulatory authority for applicable MCWD Rules within the City and is therefore not subject to this requirement of the WRMP. In 2008, the City of Plymouth revised our Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) for consistency with MCWD's plan, as required by statute, and received MCWD approval on November 20, 2008. Despite the absence of supporting language within the MCWD's WRMP, Page 1 the Board of Managers approved the City's SWMP with the condition the City enter into an MOU establishing implementation plan responsibilities between the City and MCWD. Staff attempted to negotiate and come to an agreement on an acceptable MOU, however, several issues surfaced that would prevent the MOU from being acceptable to City staff. At the time of MCWD approval, the MOU template had not been finalized by the MCWD. No opportunity to coordinate or comment on development of the MOU was provided by the MCWD. This led to extended negotiations between City staff and MCWD staff in order to find acceptable language. For example, in order to expedite the permitting process for City projects, staff had requested MCWD include language in the MOU that would improve efficiency in maintaining our drainage system by allowing for either an annual exemption from permitting requirements for routine drainage work or providing for a minimum threshold before which a permit would apply. City staff also requested language committing the MCWD to maintenance of their capital improvement projects, consistent with our obligation to maintain our capital improvement projects. MCWD staff claimed that the MOU was only intended to summarize all of the pre-existing obligations to which each agency has committed and that it was not intended to create any new obligations. Staff expressed concern that the language in the MOU would pose a significant encumbrance on time and resources and would commit the City to new obligations. The MCWD assured us that was not their intent. The City's request for inclusion of additional language was not acceptable to the MCWD, however, MCWD staff were amenable to other negotiated changes to the MOU template and based on the outcomes of an August 3, 2009 meeting between staff and the MCWD, staff prepared to bring the MOU to the City Council on August 25, 2009 with a recommendation for approval. Prior to the City Council meeting, MCWD staff contacted the City and indicated discussions with the MCWD Board regarding the outcomes of the August 3, 2009 meeting did not go well. Subsequently, consideration of the MOU was removed from the Council agenda. Several voice mails to the MCWD in August 2009 to discuss how the City should proceed with the MOU were not returned. On November 18, 2010 the MCWD issued a draft plan amendment for comment to municipalities and state review agencies regarding annual municipal reporting to the MCWD. The 45 -day comment period ends on January 3, 2011. This is the third Draft Plan Amendment to the MCWD's WRMP since its approval in 2007 (there has since been a fourth proposed draft plan amendment). This particular amendment replaces existing Section 7.2 (Attachment 1) with new language on minimum requirements for municipal annual reporting to the MCWD, items the MCWD will consider when assessing how a city implements its SWMP, and steps the MCWD may take if it perceives a city has failed to implement its plan. Much of the language in the Draft Plan Amendment (Attachment 3) comes directly from the MOU template (Attachment 4) to which staff previously objected. Staff comments on this Draft Plan Amendment Attachment 5) have not been issued to the MCWD. The proposed Draft Plan Amendment confirms staff concerns with the MOU and will require significant staff time and resources. Despite assurances from the MCWD that close coordination with municipalities would be made, the MCWD did not communicate, collaborate, or cooperate on the development of the MOU or draft plan amendment language with the City of Plymouth. Page 2 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The additional requirements in the draft plan amendment will require significant additional staff time and resources. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Current MCWD Local Plan Implementation and Reporting Requirements Attachment 2: Current MCWD language for requiring and MOU Attachment 3: Draft Plan Amendment: Local Plan Implementation Attachment 4: MOU template Attachment 5: Staff comments on the Draft Plan Amendment: Local Plan Implementation Page 3 Attachment 1 7.1.3 Housekeeping Requirements The land management and housekeeping practices of the LGU include activities as street sweeping, snow plowing, salt and snow storage, road and utility right - 140y maintenance, stormwater management facility maintenance, and public land and par ntenance. Unlike the District's preceding plan, this Plan does notate LGUs to specific land management and housekeeping practices. Rather, an is to consider changes in these practices as one set of tools to achieve the water res e performance goals established in this Plan and the local plan. The District will seek t ist LGUs by providing technical guidance on land management and housekeeping prac that are beneficial for water quality and other water resource performance objectives. e local plan should: 1. Describe current 2. Examine pote 1 improvements in these practices; 3. Identify barriers to implementing these improvements; 4. In to what changes the LGU will make; and Describe, with appropriate quantification, the impact these changes are expected to have toward achieving water quality and other water resource goals. 7.2 LGU ANNUAL REPORT Minnesota Statutes §103B.235, subdivision 4, states that once the District approves a local plan, the LGU must adopt and implement it within 120 days, and must accomplish any amendment of ordinances required by the local plan within 180 days. Thereafter, the LGU must annually report to the District activities it has undertaken in the previous year in implementing its plan and in progress toward meeting water quantity, water quality, and ecological integrity goals. The District will develop guidelines for the LGUs regarding the content of this annual report. The District will also consider adopting the Unified Sizing Criteria proposed in the 2005 Minnesota Stormwater Manual as the basis for BMP evaluation. This reporting may be incorporated into the LGU's NPDES annual report. The District's ability to implement the policies, programs, and projects of this Plan depends also on the LGUs' implementation of local plans that are consistent with these policies, programs, and projects. The District's approval of a local plan will be conditioned on the LGU's reasonable and continuing efforts to implement its plan. If the District has concerns as to whether an LGU is implementing its plan, it will communicate those concerns to the LGU and pursue a collaborative effort to understand and assess the LGU's implementation efforts. The District will use the process set forth in Minnesota Rule 8410.0180 as appropriate to resolve any ongoing issues concerning LGU and District Plan implementation, and will take other appropriate steps to minimize the impact of LGU non -implementation on achieving the goals of the District Plan. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 104 February 2007 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Page 4 Attachment 2 General LGU Reauirements Local Plans must meet the general requirements of Minnesota Statutes 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 as well as the requirements of the District's Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP). Individual subwatershed plans and specialized studies such as the Hydrologic, Hydraulic, and Pollutant Loading Study (HHPLS) identify on a more detailed basis particular issues of concern to the District that must be addressed in the Local Water Management Plans. These are summarized for each city in an Appendix to the WRMP. General requirements are summarized below. Refer to the WRMP for more specific details and LGU requirements. 1. Describe the existing and proposed physical environment and land use. 2. Define drainage areas and the volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff, including a map of the stormwater system. 3. Include a stormwater system map that shows ponds, streams, lakes and wetlands that are part of your system; structural pollution control devices (grit chambers, separators, etc.) that are part of your system; pipes and pipe sizes and other conveyances in your system; and outfalls and all other points of discharge from your system that are outlets. 4. Identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance standards established in the subwatershed plans. 5. Identify areas of known flooding and areas identified in the HHPLS where modeling predicts that public roads, private roads, or private drives might overtop during infrequent events or there may be minimal freeboard above the flood level. Local plans must assess whether the risk of occasional flooding is acceptable or should be addressed, and set forth a plan for making improvements as necessary. 6. Identify land -locked subwatershed units and basins and strategies to manage water volumes in those land -locked areas to minimize flooding. 7. Assess the condition of locations identified in the HHPLS where modeling predicts that under existing or future development conditions higher velocities than desired may result in erosion at outlets or culverts, potentially warranting erosion control or energy dissipation. The local plan must assess the need for such measures, and set forth a plan for making improvements as necessary to correct existing or prevent future erosion. 8. Define water quality and water quality protection methods adequate to meet performance standards established in the watershed plan. 9. Identify specific steps you will take to achieve the annual phosphorus load reductions assigned in the subwatershed plans affecting your community. 10. Identify regulated areas, such as Outstanding Resource Value Waters. 11. Identify Key Conservation Areas in the WRMP in your community, and assess the adequacy of local policies and regulatory controls in place to conserve hydrologic and ecologic values of the resources within those Areas. The plan must set forth a plan and schedule for the amendment of those policies and controls as necessary to meet performance standards established in the subwatershed plans. 12. Assess the consistency of the LGU's wetland regulation, including any wetland classification system and specific wetland classifications, with the management classifications, classification system and proposed regulation set forth in this Plan. 13. Set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls and, as appropriate, a capital improvement program. 14. Describe your permitting process for land and wetland alteration work, including an assessment of the adequacy of current official controls and a plan and schedule for the amendment of those controls as necessary. 15. Describe your conformance with NPDES requirements for MS4s including TMDL and Nondegradation requirements. The local plan must include the LGU's Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan (SWPPP) or a summary of its contents. Page 5 Integration with Land Use Planning As a part of the Local Water Management Plan and City Comprehensive Plan development process, LGUs should carefully examine how water resources management and protection can be integrated into land use planning and development. The District will look for each local plan to do the following: 1. Examine city- or township -wide land use needs, both within the planning period and beyond, in the context of resource maps and inventories; and describe how land use and regional water resource needs are being reconciled to secure the greatest degree of long-term water resource protection. 2. Describe efforts to integrate Safe Drinking Water Act and other wellhead protection plans, as well as the protection of sensitive surface- and groundwater resources, into the local zoning code. 3. Describe how water resource protection priorities have been integrated into local parks, open space, recreation and land acquisition plans. 4. Describe how local authority to require land or easement dedication or protective covenants as a part of subdivision regulation is being used for water resource protection purposes. 5. Consult with District staff on approaches to low -impact site design that preserve natural hydrological systems and capability to assimilate development impacts; examine how those approaches can be integrated into local land use regulations; describe constraints or competing concerns that prevent further integration; and describe how you will integrate such approaches into your development code. 6. Identify how conflicts between (i) development code setbacks and (ii) water resource requirements in local ordinances or District rules will be reconciled to give due weight to water resource protection goals. 7. Show that your development code requires stormwater facilities and wetlands in residential subdivisions that are subject to future maintenance obligations under local ordinance or District rule to be located entirely on outlots, and justify exceptions to this requirement. 8. State that the local subdivision ordinance requires, or within 180 days will be amended to require, that a copy of each proposed preliminary plat, and iterations thereof, be provided to the District for informational purposes at the time it is submitted to the locality. Housekeeping Requirements The WRMP does not obligate LGUs to specific land management and housekeeping practices. Rather, you should consider changes in these practices as one set of tools to achieve water resource performance goals. The Local Plan should: 1. Describe current practices. 2. Examine potential improvements in these practices. 3. Identify any barriers to implementing these improvements. 4. Indicate what changes the LGU will make. 5. Describe, with appropriate quantification, the impact these changes are expected to have toward achieving water quality and other water resource goals. Permit Program In accordance with statute, on the request of a city or township, the District will cease to apply its rules and permit requirements within the boundaries of that LGU on its approval of the local water plan. To approve a local plan, however, the District must find that the local permit program is at least as protective of water resources as the District rules. An LGU may meet this standard by stating in the plan that it is authorizing the District to continue to apply its rules within the locality. Alternatively, if an LGU wishes to assume the sole regulatory role, the District will evaluate its plan according to the following: Page 6 1. The local plan must identify those District rules for which it wishes to assume sole regulatory authority. 2. For those District rules, the local plan must include existing or proposed ordinances for a District determination that they are at least as protective of water resources as the District rules. 3. Procedural details of local ordinances may differ from District rules provided they do not compromise water resource protection. 4. The local plan must describe a compliance monitoring and enforcement program in adequate detail. 5. For those areas for which the LGU wishes to assume sole authority, it must describe the technical expertise it has or will acquire to implement its ordinances, describe how it will monitor and enforce compliance, and present an estimate of its annual cost to implement its program. 6. The local plan must state whether the LGU intends to assume the role of "local government unit" responsible to implement the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act within that part of the LGU that lies within the watershed, or whether it chooses for the District to assume that role. If the former, it must describe the technical expertise it has or will acquire to implement WCA, describe how it will monitor and enforce WCA compliance, and present an estimate of its annual cost to implement and enforce WCA. 7. The local plan must state that within one year after the District provides notice that it has significantly revised a District rule, the LGU will submit for District approval, adopt and put into effect a revised ordinance consistent with the District rule change (the LGU should allow 60 days for District review). If the LGU chooses not to make the revision, it can simply authorize the District to apply its revised rule within LGU boundaries. 8. If an LGU chooses to exercise sole regulatory authority with respect to one or more District rules, the District's approval of the local plan will be given effect through a memorandum of understanding MOU) executed by the District and the LGU. The MOU will: a. Describe the regulatory roles of each party; 7::2> b. State that the District must approve the granting of any variance to a water resource ordinance by the LGU; c. Specify ongoing or periodic communication between the District and the LGU to allow for District awareness of the LGU's water resource permitting activity; and d. Reserve the District's ability to exercise its regulatory authority within LGU boundaries if the LGU is not implementing its regulatory program in accordance with its local plan. Page 7 Attachment 3 DRAFT PLAN AMENDMENT: LOCAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 10-7-10) Present Section 7.2 is replaced by the following new section: 7.2 LGU Local Plan Implementation and Reporting Minnesota Statutes §103B.235 establishes a process for watershed district review and approval of local water plans. Typically District staff will work with LGU staff through successive versions of the draft local plan until staff finds that the plan meets content requirements and standards of Section 7.1 and is recommended for approval. If an LGU is not able to satisfy District staff and believes nevertheless that its plan is entitled to District approval, it may request to have the plan brought before the District Board of Managers without a recommendation of approval. The District's preference is that a local plan be revised as needed so that when it is presented to the Board of Managers it may be approved without the need for further revisions. However, if it requires only minor revisions when it comes before the Board or if the need for minor changes is identified during Board review, the Board's approval resolution may approve the plan conditioned on identified revisions. Otherwise, typically the resolution will contain only standard conditions that implement the terms of Section 7. The Board also may include conditions as needed to address the specific circumstances in a given case. Minnesota Statutes S103B.235, subdivision 4, states that once the district approves a local plan, the LGU must adopt and implement it within 120 days, and must complete amendment of ordinances required by the local plan within 180 days. After the local plan is adopted, the District and LGU will coordinate watershed and local plan implementation over the course of the 10 -year planning cycle. Consistency between plans and coordinated implementation will help to ensure that capital spending, land conservation, public education, regulation and other activities will be carried out to best achieve shared water resource goals in a cost-effective and transparent way. Under the watershed law, each metropolitan -area watershed district is responsible to maintain awareness of local water plan implementation by LGUs within its boundaries. The District intends to carry out this responsibility through a process of LGU annual reporting and District monitoring of local plan implementation. The District has sought to create a framework that allows it to remain reasonably knowledgeable as to local implementation without being burdensome for LGUs. The framework also is designed so that any implementation issues are addressed through communication and collaboration to the extent possible. It seeks to respect the ability of the District and individual LGUs to make their own program and Page 8 funding decisions. But it preserves the District's ability to step in if water resource commitments and goals are not being met. 7.2.1 Annual Report and Meeting Each LGU must provide a written report to the District by June 30 annually, describing how the LGU has implemented the local plan over the past report year May 1 through April 30). The annual report date coincides with the submittal date for municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) annual reports as set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). If the MPCA should change that date, the District would adjust its annual reporting date administratively. An LGU may submit its MS4 report to the District as its annual report, with supplementation as needed to provide all of the information listed below. For efficiency, the District may develop a standard format that LGUs would be required to use. Until that time, an LGU may prepare a separate report using a format of its choosing. LGUs are encouraged to use a concise format for the annual report. At the same time, LGUs need to provide information that is sufficient for District staff to be fully apprised of activities by, and within the boundaries of, the LGU that affect water resources and further water resource programming. At a minimum, the annual report must cover the following for the reporting year: 1. The status of capital projects identified in the local water plan and any other water resource projects under LGU development or consideration, and identification of any project on which the LGU is interested in partnering with the District. 2. Progress on each water resource issue identified in the implementation section of the local plan. 3. The status of each action identified in the local plan as a means to contribute to the LGU's allocated phosphorus/nutrient load reduction, the cause of any failures or delays, and any proposed changes to the LGU's strategy for meeting the load reduction. 4. A summary of LGU land use activity as it may affect water resources, including: (a) permit applications for land disturbance received; (b) actions taken, including any variances granted; (c) pending development or redevelopment activity not yet the subject of an application; (d) zoning changes made or requested. 5. Additional water quality, hydrologic, wetland and floodplain data developed within the LGU. 6. A description of stormwater conveyance/management facility construction, inspection, maintenance and repair activity, including identification of any 2 Page 9 structural changes within the conveyance system affecting hydrologic/hydraulic modeling on greater than a parcel basis. 7. A summary of LGU housekeeping activities including salt/sand storage and use, hard surface sweeping and other public facility management activities to protect water resources. 8. An inventory of riparian, buffer, corridor, open space and other conservation land rights acquired through dedication, gift, purchase or any other means. 9. A summary of the LGU's budget as it pertains to local plan implementation. Following District staff review of an LGU's annual report, a meeting between staff may be arranged to complete the review, bring each party up to date on the other party's activities, and coordinate activity for the next year. District staff may have questions or need further information about matters contained in or omitted from the LGU report. If the District perceives that LGU implementation has lagged, this would be an opportunity to discuss this, identify causes of any failures or delays, and mutually consider adjustments. As well, LGU staff may require more information about District activities over the past year as they affect the LGU. This meeting is an opportunity for the two parties to anticipate the next year's activity. A mutual briefing can be provided concerning programmed or potential capital projects, land conservation interests, cost-sharing or grant opportunities, development activity and other matters that would benefit from coordination. Pending or necessary plan amendment can be reviewed. Minnesota Statutes 103B.235, subdivision 1, and Minnesota Rules 8410.0160 requires that each local plan be revised and approved by the District within two years of a District plan amendment that affects an LGU, or as otherwise specified in the District implementation program. The District has adopted the two-year standard of 8410.0160, except where the plan specifically states otherwise. Where an LGU lies partly within the District and partly within one or more other watershed management organizations, the District will require local plan revision and approval within two years for at least that part of the plan that concerns land within District boundaries. The District will endeavor to maintain communication and flow of information between itself and its LGUs on an ongoing basis. The Board of Managers encourages opportunities for joint meetings with city councils on specific matters or for the purpose of general communication. Page 10 7.2.2 Review of LGU Plan Imulementation The District will maintain awareness of LGU plan implementation largely through the annual reporting and meeting framework. However, this will be supplemented through ongoing communication with LGUs and knowledge of developments within the watershed gained through other usual channels. It is possible, then, that the District at any time may perceive that an LGU is not fully implementing its local water plan or meeting its commitments. In this case, the District will follow the course outlined here. This process is intended to ensure that the District has a full understanding of the LGU's water resource program, that the District respects the LGU's control of its own programs and its role in overseeing activity within its boundaries, and that the parties work collaboratively to ensure progress on mutual goals. At the same time, it is the District's responsibility under watershed law to maintain oversight of local water plan implementation and to take steps as necessary so that water resource goals are met. The District will consider the following items when assessing LGU plan implementation: 1. Water Resource Permitting (this subject will be relevant primarily when the LGU, through the local planning process, has elected to assume sole authority for water resource permitting in one or more areas covered by District rules and/or has elected to serve as the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) implementing authority): a) Have ordinances been adopted as described in the approved local plan and in response to any subsequent District rule revisions? b) Do they conform to MCWD-approved standards? c) Have the ordinances been applied as written? d) Where there is room for interpretation, has LGU discretion been exercised in a way that is sensitive to water resource protection? e) Has the MCWD been notified of variance requests per Minnesota Statutes §103B.211? f) Have technical expertise and program resources been maintained at levels described in the approved local plan? g) Has regulated activity been diligently monitored and have LGU ordinances and permits been diligently enforced? h) The same considerations, as applied to the LGU's actions as WCA- implementing agency. rd Page 11 2. Land Use: a) Has good progress been made to integrate Safe Drinking Water Act and other protections for wellheads and sensitive groundwater resources into the development code, as described in the approved local plan? b) Has the LGU worked carefully to integrate low -impact development concepts into the development code and development review process? c) Has the LGU met local plan commitments to reconcile development code setbacks and water resource protection goals? d) Has the LGU revised its development code as necessary to require stormwater facilities and wetlands in residential subdivisions to be located on outlots? e) Has the LGU ensured that the District timely receives proposed preliminary plats and revisions, in accordance with the approved local plan? f) Are local plan commitments otherwise being met? 3. Capital Program: a) Does the capital improvement program (CIP) continue to reflect the level of commitment toward water resource goals of the approved local plan? b) Is CIP implementation on schedule? c) Is the LGU making adequate progress toward achievement of phosphorus load reductions identified in the approved local plan? d) If issues have arisen that were unexpected or are beyond LGU control, has the LGU identified, and is the LGU pursuing, alternative strategies? e) Is the LGU diligently maintaining stormwater management facilities for which it is responsible? 4. Land Conservation: a) Have water resource protection priorities been integrated into parks, open space, recreation and land acquisition plans, and are those tools being diligently implemented? Page 12 b) Are dedication and fee in lieu requirements under the development code being used to support water resource protection consistent with commitments in the approved local plan? c) Is the LGU diligently monitoring municipal open space lands, protected lands and vegetated buffer areas under its control? 5. Housekeeping Practices: Is the LGU meeting local plan commitments for street sweeping, snow plowing, salt and snow storage, right-of-way maintenance, stormwater management facility and vegetated buffer maintenance, public land management and other housekeeping matters with water resource impacts? 6. Other Commitments: Is the LGU otherwise meeting commitments assumed under the approved local plan? If District staff, at the direction of the Board of Managers or on the basis of its own review, has concerns about local plan implementation, the District will generally follow a process that emphasizes communication and collaboration to assess these concerns and identify approaches to addressing any deficiencies. Presuming the LGU has a similar interest in this approach, initially the process will involve staff -to - staff communication and a process of staff collaboration. District staff will report back to the Board of Managers and the District will seek to memorialize any agreed outcomes in appropriate fashion. If District or LGU staff believes that, for any reason, adequate progress in resolving concerns is not being made, the Board of Managers and city council may be asked to convene an informal joint meeting. Ultimately, if the Board of Managers is not satisfied with a resolution of concerns, it may schedule the matter for formal consideration on its agenda. LGU representatives will be invited to attend; District staff, LGU representatives and interested members of the public will have an opportunity to address the issues; and the Board will make a finding as to whether it believes the LGU is failing to implement its plan in an important way. If the Board makes such a finding, it may take further steps within its authority as it judges will foster improved local plan implementation or allow resources to be focused on areas where they are more likely to leverage effective efforts. Such steps may include the following: Requesting that the LGU engage in further discussions or provide written commitments. Reasserting District regulatory authority for proposed land -disturbing activity for which city approvals have not yet been issued. Page 13 Reprogramming or reprioritizing District capital funds identified for expenditure within the city. Placing a hold on cost -share and other program funding within the LGU. Advising the Metropolitan Council, and other potential municipal grantors where watershed district approval is relevant, of the District's finding. Restricting eligibility for District -funded water/land use planning assistance or other forms of District cost- or technical -assistance. Establishment of one or more water management districts encompassing the LGU or parts thereof to fund District implementation of local plan commitments not being met. An action under Minnesota Statutes 5103B.235, subdivision 4, requesting that the LGU be directed to implement its local plan. At any time, an LGU may advise the District of further implementation steps taken and allow the Board of Managers to determine that the local plan is again being adequately implemented. The Board also may take steps as outlined above where an LGU has not submitted or has not received approval of a local water plan in a timely way. 7.2.3 Applicability to Existing Approved Local Water Plans Most LGUs wholly or partly within the District have completed and approved local plans responding to the District's 2007 plan. BWSR rules require these plans to be revised within two years of a District plan revision to maintain consistency. The reporting responsibility and procedures outlined in this revised Section 7.2 trigger this revision requirement and the specifics herein will apply to each LGU two years from the date of the District amendment or when the LGU plan revision is approved, if sooner. Until then, reporting and related procedures will apply to each LGU according to the terms of its prior local plan approval and any memorandum of understanding signed by the District and LGU in conjunction with that approval. 7 Page 14 Attachment 4 1MIl, VI ORANDUM of UNDrRSTANDING Between the MiuuelWui Creek-Watershed,Disirict and the-. City of Plymouth. for Local Water Plannigg and ReguIatlQu This-Menrrorandum;of Understanding (MOS is made-byaiid'betwoen the,Minnehaha Creel. Watershed Dist icf, -a watershed.:district-with.;pur.poses iuid>pQwers -as set_forth at Minnesota Statutes Chapters .l•03B-and 103D (' INICNVD'), and the -City of Plymouth, a body eorporate,and olntic and'a statutor.: cnt inthe:State°of:Minnesota "Cit " p Y Y . Y' ) Recitals and Statement of Purpose WI`IEREAS ih 2007, the MCWDrevised.its comprehensiv=e wateished-Management plM:. under Minnesota Statutes § 103B.231, which details the existing physical er vironrnent, land -use and development in the watershed and establishes a plan to regulate water resource use and naanagemoiitto.protect watorresoi ces, iriiprove, water quality; preeent.floodnn`g'aad:otherwise achieve,the go:als. of 1ylinnesota S=tatutes Chapters 103B and MID. WHEREAS the MCWD.'s com. prehensive watershed management plan'ia corporates the Rules .adopted Eby the: OWD to..proiect:Lwater resources, nmprowewater quality, pr _ '- flooding and orherwise achieve the goals of MitMesota:Statutes Chapters.103$ n. d`r1.03D; WHEREAS. the City has .developed a local water management planttnder lyiirnnesota Staiutes;§ 103B;3 that descxibe`s:thee iStirng.and proposed phy ncal env ibidnent and larid use . within Ate City and sets fork an nrinplernentation plan for lringnng local water marnagement into couforinaike with the MCW,D's-comgreheris ve watershed management:plan, WHEREAS.on November 20, 2008, the MCWD Board of Managers -conditionally approvedthe`CntyTs local water,:rriana eri nVI: an by'adop ion orResolution t}$=QST, vhicl resolution is attached and incorporated herein;Flj WHEREAS the City; wi dies to continue to: authorize' M'C WD pernni tting authority with r=espect to alI areas. regulated by the MCWD with'the exceptia fof the 11Sit n soca. 3retl 1', Conservation Act; WHEREAS MCWD. approval,of -a local plan requires a findin ___hat the :oPf eial'co'ntrels ' of the =local governrrient are at least as protective of watgr resources.as -the MCWD Rules; HERE thz finding by MCWD:Board of Managers in (inns regard'rests on the City's autharivation of the 1VMWD's continued exercise of regulatory authority within the City in accordance with.Minnesota Statutes §-I03B.211.:,: subdivision 1{a}(3); WHEREA:S> the MCWD .and Cit1M memorialize their respective `roles in impleineating water resource pro#ectioni and management`withnn`the City; Page 15 . 0 NOW THEREFORE it is: mutually agreed. by and between the:piulies that they enter into this MOU in order to document the understanding of the parties 'as to the 'rofes' and res po asibilRies of each.party. 1.0 Responsibilities of the City 1.1 The -Cit y may exercise all present and future authority it otherwise may .possess to issue permits for and regulaie activities affecting water :resouxces wi-tlun the City, 1.2 The City will meetat least annually with the MCWD to review the implementation of. the City's local water management plan.. 1.3 The City.will forward. to MCWD the annual report required by theMimmesota.Boa:rd of Water and Soil- Resources: o°f all Local Government Units implementing the Minnesota' Wetland Conservation Act. 1.4 Annually, by the date specified for the City's submittal of its annual report duder. its . NP.DES municipal stornlwater, permit, the City will submit to the 1VICbVD.a concise: bu specific report describing: a. `:Pifa.gress'on:theloeal water, management:plan.imp lenientation program: b. Progres.s on meeting phos 'horus, load reduction requirements of the WMR c: Ai1y adj:ustimnents to the implementation and/ ai .capital, improvement program in the local water . matagement plan. d. Alisting, with urther specificinformation as the MCWD mayrequest, of grading and structural alterations approved or occurring yvithin.city .boundaries since the last annual report (both private and public. altdiations) that could measurably affeethydraulic and hydrologic model outcomes, The -City may: incorporate its annual report: into its VN DES MS4 annual report, provided it addresses the above items with specificity. 2.6 kmR6 isibUities of the NICWD 2.1 The-MCWD will continue to apply and enforce its Rules, as they may be.amended from time to time, within Che `C'ity: .. . 2:2 1'he-MC4VD. will meet with the City at leasG.arinually to review -the implementation of the City's local'water management plan; addressing ata minimum the following topics: 1. Maintenance -of up--to-date: water-. quality meastnes, Stich as concentrations ofPhosphorus,-: ifi the City':s local water management plan; 2. The City's progress toward.Iinplenientation`Program/CIP-goals in general, acid updating the 1980 Drainage Plan specifically; 2 Page 16 Utilizing street sweeping to meetNICW"D-Phosphorus Loading Reduction goals, with yin aim to- estimate load reductions that occur between the street and'vuaterbodies; and 4, The manner in which the City-en-forces the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. 23 The 114-MD retains all authority that it niay possess under Minnesota Statutes.Chapters 103B and 103.1. or any other provision of law, except as explicitly reposed iii the City under this. MOLJ,Jncluding but not liiiited to:-authority set Forth at Nlu nesota Sxatutes §§101B.211,: subdivision 1(a);- 1,03D..335 and 103D.341..: 3.0 :: General 3.1 Thi MOU .is. effective on the date that it has been executed by- both. parties; will remsin an e•ffiect for :f ve .years; aiid will be extended automatically for fiveRyear terms unless terminated. b agreement of the,panties, N'6vithstanding; the City Wvi11-bbntinue to. be subject to applicable statutes. acid rules requiring that itrevise its local water .managertient plan:in response to MCWI) revisions of the WMP.- 3:2 This NIOU may.be•.amended only by a.writir}g signed by*.'bothparties.. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties-hereto have-executed li s'Nlemorandum of Understa aiding. ary .or PL i IOUTIi IYIIN EI TAIGA CRT+IFK WATER- HED DISTRICT . . By 13.y _ Mayor' .President; :Board. of Managers By City Manager Date:, Date, . APPROVED. AS TO FORM AND APPROVED A9 TO. FORM AND EXECUTION ' EXECUTION By. . Its Attorney ' r Its Attorney Page 17 " • . Ms. Becky Houdek Planner Specialist 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 SUBJECT: DRAFT PLAN AMENDMENT LOCAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION & REPORTING MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Dear Ms. Houdek: Attachment 5 December 6, 2010 gAFT Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's MCWD) draft plan amendment to its Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan WRMP) regarding Local Plan Implementation and Reporting. Based on your cover letter, it is understood the purpose of the draft plan amendment is to clearly outline the "...expectations of the District regarding Local Water Plan annual reporting and meetings, and would eliminate the need for a [Memorandum of Understanding) MOU for those cities not implementing District regulations. " In 2006, during development of the MCWD WRMP, the City of Plymouth expressed concerns with regard to the annual reporting requirements. MCWD staff assured that the MCWD is committed to close coordination with the City of Plymouth and other stakeholders to ensure an effective outcome to the annual reporting requirement. It is disappointing that development of this draft plan amendment and MOU did not follow a collaborative or coordinated approach and that the first time most stakeholders will see this draft plan amendment language is during the 45 - day comment period. As you may be aware, city staff and the MCWD did attempt to negotiate acceptable language into the MOU. During this process, the MCWD assured the City of Plymouth on several occasions that the purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding was to summarize all of the pre-existing obligations to which each entity was already committed and that the MOU was not intended to create new obligations. Your cover letter, however, has reduced and refined that explanation to outline specific obligations of both the LGU and the District." This has left open the possibility that the draft plan amendment now includes new commitments and obligations for municipalities, which was an original concern of the City of Plymouth with the MOU. Please provide clarification on the MOU or draft plan amendment by responding to the following questions: 1. The WRMP went through and extensive planning and review process and resulted in no language requiring an MOU for municipalities (such as Plymouth) who authorize the MCWD to exercise regulatory authority. Please explain the origination and need for an MOU for those municipalities continuing to authorize the MCWD to exercise regulatory authority? 2. Why did the MCWD pursue MOU's through approving resolutions of local water management plans and not within the WRMP adopted in 2007? O:\Engineering\WTRRESRC\Watersheds\Minnehaha Creek\draft planamendment - local plan implementation and reporting.docx Page 18 3. Why is there no language requiring MOU's for municipalities who authorize the MCWD to exercise regulatory authority included in the WRMP? 4. Is the draft plan amendment a summarization of pre-existing obligations as previously assured by the MCWD? 5. If so, where can these pre-existing obligations be found? 6. Has the MCWD included new commitments and obligations for the City of Plymouth? 7. If so, has the MCWD estimated the amount of staff time and resources necessary to comply with the requirements of the Draft Plan Amendment? Regarding the text of the draft plan amendment, please accept these comments as part of your review process: 1. The City of Plymouth does not recognize any MCWD authority over Safe Drinking Water Act requirements. That responsibility lies with the MN Department of Health. 2. The City of Plymouth does not recognize any MCWD authority over Wetland Conservation Act requirements. That responsibility lies with the Board of Water and Soil Resources and the LGU. 3. The MCWD assured the City of Plymouth on several occasions that the purpose of the MOU was to summarize all of the pre-existing obligations to which each entity was already committed and that the MOU was not intended to create new obligations or be a serious encumbrance on staff time. Plymouth staff understands the draft plan amendment to include many new commitments and obligations despite previous assurances from the MCWD. Providing the information to the MCWD in the draft plan amendment will require significant staff time and resources and the City of Plymouth will be unable to provide the information requested. The City will, however, provide copies of annual reports provided to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency upon request by the MCWD as these reports are already drafted by staff. The MCWD has never been denied a meeting with Plymouth representatives and staff will be able to accommodate an annual meeting request from the MCWD. The development of draft plan amendments and/or documentation should be through a cooperative process when there is the potential to encumber significant staff time and resources. The process should result in a reduction of duplication of effort between municipalities and watershed management organizations and should be a cost effective strategy for protection or improvement of water resources. I suggest the MCWD consider that approach in view of previous assurances made to the City of Plymouth by the MCWD. I look forward to your responses. If you have any questions on these comments, please feel free to contact me directly at 763-509-5526. Sincerely, Derek Asche Water Resources Manager Cc: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Bob Moberg, City Engineer Lee Keeley, MCWD Board of Managers O:\Engineering\WTRRESRC\Watersheds\Minnehaha Creek\draft plan amendment - local plan implementation and reporting.docx Page 19 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2010 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE STAFF COMMENTS MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT DRAFT PLAN AMENDMENT - MUNICIPAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND REPORTING WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has prepared a draft plan amendment to their Water Resources Management Plan regarding municipal plan implementation and reporting; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District publicly noticed the draft plan amendment on November 18, 2010 with the public comment period ending January 3, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District did not communicate, collaborate, or cooperate on the draft plan amendment with the City of Plymouth; and WHEREAS, the draft plan amendment will require significant staff time and resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. That staff comments on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District draft plan amendment regarding municipal plan implementation and reporting are hereby approved. 2. Staff is directed to forward the comments to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Approved this 14th day of December 2010. Page 20 City of Plymouth Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING To: Prepared by: December 14, 2010 Reviewed by: Item: 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Agenda 8.5Number: v Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Consider Receipt of the Livable Communities Planning Grant for the Four Seasons Site and Consider Adoption of an Interim Ordinance. Consider receipt of the Livable Communities Demonstration Account 2010 Pre -Development Grant to study the Four Seasons Mall Site and consider adoption of an interim ordinance to protect the planning process. 2. BACKGROUND: In April 2010, staff started the process of preparing the attached grant application to secure 100,000 of funding from the Metropolitan Council to study the Four Seasons Mall site (and wetlands directly to the south). With this funding and financial assistance from Hennepin County and the Bassett Creek Watershed District, the following activities were proposed: Market Study — Analyze the current demographics and market components and suggest potential future uses. Alternative Site Designs — Based on the market study results and initial traffic analysis, prepare alternative design concepts. Traffic Study — Preliminary analysis of current constraints and analysis of the various design concepts. Storm Water/Environmental Review and Design — As part of the alternative design concept preparation, include analysis of how to incorporate the existing storm water stream located to the north and east of the existing building and the wetland complex to the south as a focal point amenity for the site and the neighborhood. A major element of the process will be public meetings to discuss the possibilities with the surrounding neighborhood. The expected results of the studies would be the creation of market -supported design alternatives that incorporate storm water and environmental amenities to not only enhance the redevelopment of the Four Seasons Mall site but also the greater surrounding neighborhood. On July 13, 2010, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2010-176 identifying the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding and authorizing an application for grant funds. With this resolution, the grant application was submitted on July 16, 2010. Page 1 The application has continued to go through the Metropolitan Council review and approval process and on December 8, 2010, the Metropolitan Council approved the application, providing the City of Plymouth with a $100,000 grant. Based on the Metropolitan Council approval of the grant, it is appropriate for the City Council to determine if they would like staff to continue with the studies and if so, how best to accomplish the proposed work. Staff has determined three options for the City Council to consider: 1) Notify the Metropolitan Council that the City of Plymouth has determined that they do not want to move forward with the studies at this time and reject the grant award; 2) Accept the grant award and direct staff to move forward with developing the work plan and completing the studies (approve attached resolution); or 3) Accept the grant award, direct staff to move forward with developing the work plan and completing the studies and adopt a twelve-month interim ordinance to protect the planning process (approve attached resolution and interim ordinance separately). 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The grant award must be matched by a 25% local contribution of the total amount requested. Conservatively, it is estimated that staff will spend 130 hours during the process (design meetings, study reviews, public meetings, report writing, etc.). At an estimated $50 per hour salary and benefits), this would amount to a total of $6,500 of in-kind staff services. Further, Hennepin County staff has indicated they would participate in the storm water studies through the Daylighting Hennepin program at an estimated contribution of $18,500. These two sources would cover the required $25,000 match. 4. ATTACHMENTS: LCA Grant Application and City Council July 13, 2010 Supporting Resolution Resolution Directing Staff to Prepare Study Interim Ordinance Page 2 LIVAHLE UUNIMUIN] 1 IlLN ULMUNNl KA i lU1V AUUUUNT 2010 PRE-DE'V'ELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION Project Name: Four Seasons Mall Redevelopment Applicant: city, county or development authority City of Plymouth, Mi nttesota Project Location: City: 4100 Lancaster Lane North Street boundaries. address or major intersection: Plymouth, Mi` 55441 Contact for Name and Title: Steve Juetten Application: Address: 3400 Plymouth Blvd. City, Zip Code: Plymouth, Mme' 55447 Phone, 1-ax: 763-509-5401 E-Mail: s'uetten ci. hmoutlt.mn.us Grantee Information: Name: Steve Juetten Contact person Title: Community Development Director/HRA Executive Director Phone: 763-509-5401 E-Mail• sjuetten(ci. 1 lnouth.mn,us Authorized cit%. counn, or Name: deceloprnem authurit% otlictal(s) Tale: lour contract :ignauuetsl l E-Mail: Section I. A. Requested Activities and Project Area Pre -Development grants fund activities that hell} prepare a project in a specific project area for it future y=ear's application in the LCDA Development category. Funded activities must he complete([ within two years of the grant award date (Dec. 2010/Jan. 2011). No grant extensions ,-611 he permitted. e.g. preparing a detailed redevelopment design for a specific project, preparing an analysis of alternatives for land use and market mix. If you are requesting more than one item, list them all bri"eflt' (list funding request and detail in See. I.C, page 2). Total funding requested: 5100,000 The project area must he a specific geographic site that the Applicant plans to develop or redevelop in accordance with the LCDA program criteria. Include the location of the Project Area within the City, size of the Project Area (in acres or number and size of parcels) and current land uses and conditions. Address the goals and objectives for the Project Area within the two-year grant term, and longer-term. The Four Seasons ilActll Rculevelopment Projecl Areci (Project Area) is loculecicrl the highlY visible southwest corner of 771169 (82,000 cars per Gl(n) crtul Co. Rd, 9 (32,400 cars pet• day), on the ecistern edge gfTlynio rth. The 0.96 acre Project .'Area currenlly consists gfan aging 117,000 sq.jt. vintage 1978 strip cenlel' wilh alt interior corridor, o n111nlcrptil It -ell, till 111711•errled storm water stream rind two wetlands. Storrll irciter in the area flows through the it1Nr'ealed sirctim into the wellcrncls• tinct then i1710 IVelV Hope, Golclen !`killer, arrd ,11itlnecipolis, rill within the Bassett Creek iiwiershed. Within one wile of the site, there care over a, 000 housing units (over 3, 000 ore altached imits) that contain a polnilatimi of oyer 11,700, Daring they 030 courprehensive plcm plcinningpublie visioninglJroeess, the Cit}' deterininect that the cippropriate redevelopnrent of the Project Area woulcl include a miv of cominercicit, retail and office rises along with cl .strong transit component and environmented enhancements. A redevelopinenl that includes such ei iniv of uses would br'ingservices cnrcl jobs to the irunrecliale ureo, inerecise the vicibilitl, rind efficielrcy of transit, arrd improve the surrounding ncrttn'crl envirU17171el7t. From 1997 to 2008, the site included a leased sill face pork and Tide lot. The compl•ehensive plan cotrlenlldates the 1•eltlrn oflr'alUil to this site with the develolmie171 of pork d11014cle fClCilit'V Thal lt'otlldComp1e111e17t and silly)art the reclevelolmient q0he Projecl .erect. A cross parking arl•crngemelrl would allow j0' r c1U1' parking fill the trimsil rider chid evening cind weekelyd parkingfol' the c'ollnnercial worker cintl visitor. The rerluesteti funds will ti/low the cite, comity, weitel•shed distr•icl, properlY owner rind neighbors login then eleletif the rederelolmient of the propel•ty through the completion of site design alterncitives, inarket ana4ysis, treinsportcrtion pfcn7niug cn7cl elnirorn17e1rtcrl pfcmnilrg. T17fs is ci antique o11Jor'tinril_yto form a public• frt'irale pal7nerslrip 1tJ sluclt' cr prgieel cireu, cit a markei time, thcit allows for peruse. Page 3 Section I.B. Funding Request, Documentation of Match and Timeline (I inrit rrrre page, triads ape hlv ulrl B fore completing this page, see the Sample Page atlached to this application Grant Request,: ]Dist specific tasks in order of priority or sequence to accomplish the project obicctives. Under "responsible person(s)," list who will be doing the work, including consultants (identified or proposed) and city staffor others. Match: Grant awards must be matched by a 25% local contribution of the total amount requested, in cash and/or in-kind staff services (i.e.. staff time allocated to completing eligible project activities). This means that the Applicant must contribute 25% oi'the requested amount over and above the requested amount. Put another way, for every four dollars ot'grant funds, the Applicant must contribute one additional dollar. Activities covered by the match must be grant -eligible activities and the match must be contributed after the date of the **rant award. Dollar matches may include contributions from partners. The match applies to the total cost of the eligible activities, not to individual activities. This means that the match may be applied to sonic activities and not others in a list of more than one requested item, or may be pro -rated among a list of more than one requested item. TYITY Eligible Activity Grant Request for Match Expected Outcome(s) or Deliverables of this Work Responsible Person(s) Start Date End Date this activity For eligible uses, see page 7 of the Predevelopment Cost, not including try line item or List the deliverable (report, etc.) Identify staff positions MMNY MM/YYGrantfundingcriteriaintheapplicationpacket Inatch prorated or consultants l Redevelopment cleslgn alternatives and X38, 000 S3,500 Complete redevelopment design Consullant and Crt 1112011 12/2011in!lrlen7entalion strategies* alternatives. S'lcrff Pr efli1 roar' traffc sitidi, and concelnual trgf c S20, 000 1, 500 C'OrMplele tr of studies D79 117 C'On.57lltQnl andC-11; 1/2011 12/2011nalvsisoftheallernalivedesigns * diflLrenl design alternatives. Stuff 3. Complete ntarkel analysis (general & specific) 20,000 S1,500 Complete general market analysis Consi.dtant and Cit 11/2010 12120111'ecommendations on alternative designs* and On design allernalives. St(?/ nalwe redevelopment designs, C-'OMsullants, Iletin, 4. Storm t1'ater"%L'r1U11'Or77'71C'nlal review and design 22,000 518,500 current storei ivater issues &Co., Watershed ana 1112010 1212111 con!. fele environmental plans. Cily Staff 5. The activities will he inle"Taled and par'ls u11 aclivilies trill overlap. Grant Totals Match Sources Amounts dist Source(s) Total Grant Request 100,0011 Total Dollar Match 17,000 dimervhed District Grant & Hennepin County Total Match 25,000 In -Kind Match 4,000 City Staff and Watershetl District Total Grant Request plus Match 125,0110 Total Match 25,000 Page 4 Section I. C. How will the grant -funded activities support and help implement future development in thel Project Area? Discuss issues you will address or for which you will seek clarification, questions you hope to resolve. I t unci 1: h The prope'tl' oitwel' has hacl the properly listed,fin• lease antl ur sale vff and on, fen- the past several vears. City .stall has sCe17 a ntlmbel' of conceptual i'edevelopinenl plans that irolilcl reillove the existing buildn'7g, remodel the e_l"LSt.ng bliilcliilg, oI' a combinatian of remodel acid builcl new, Holrever, clone of file proposals 1 lfl_rinli=eel the parcel's• pntewial ill tc'1'117.5' Of efficient lase Uf•land, of adeguatell' aehb-essed imf.lcic'ts to the wellawis of transit sel'vlce. The enhancedplanning of the Project .4i,ea that will be possible with file gl'(nnl f mels gill provide the opporllmity to prepare plans that nol onli. opllmi=C the reclevelopment of the Prolect,li-ea but also promote transit onsite, and improve the eluant), of the stolwl h'eife'r Viream and wellancl6, 77iroiigh the chie diligence investigations pelformecl in the past, developers raised cmicerns that lnclucle the ankiioitw market, file grolmcl awl slaface baler issues, transportation constl'aints antisite design hurdles. To date, hecaus'e of these miknon'n.5, no clevelopment has 1'eacheel the Heli Poarfl or Cify Domicil. The 1ntew of the gi-aw-fimdeclphaining is to allow the ln'operti' owne'i' [clic/ the city to collaboratively' mai-ket the site with IlIore,foc'lfseel outcome-orlewefl reclevelopmew ftlte'natives and the anal 'i'lical lfrn'k dial suppol'ls theii-fiectsibllitV. ifs the Diff qI P11 -mouth ages, moi -e and more pl'Operties it=ill heed reelel-clopmew planning. To elate Plvmouth has hacl a relativeh, .Small aI1101111t Of 7'edevelopmeid activity. The planning that will occul'•fol' this Project Ai -ea will sel-ve as a model fol• other areas that maY experi.mce redevelopment to the filture. Section I. D. Planning and pre -development activities completed to date for the Project Area.. Describe the planning, visioning or other activities that have been completed for the Project Area or for portions of the Project Area. List or describe the products of these activities, such as planning documents_ area or neighborhood plans. The Project >i1'e1! was discussed in detail cha-iilg the 2030 Comprehensive Plan ulWate process, which concluded with the Iletropollfan Council's acceplaiwe ill 2009. ,Staff has also hacl mmiero its redevelopment cliscIlssions with pt'ospec ive purchasers of'the property. Ditring the coinpi•ehenshw plfni process, the Plcm ling Cotiuliission and Cit), Council heldjoint meetings to discias e'1.51711g clel'ClcJpecl fll'ef1.5. T17e liieelll7gS lncllicled preselltcltiot7s cmd ttxteilsive Ilip111 fl'olil i'esi(lty7ts ctiidl)1'opel'fy oliwel's. This 1'ZsiUlllllg p1'Oe'e'.S.S .Slfggc'.S'tecl that a pi'efet'1"ecll'c'flel'elol)iliciii sc'e17cil'to fol' the P7'0)ecl irea would include a nlil: Of c011ll 7e1'C'lcll, 1'efclll, Office find ei7i,ii-oii777C 71a1 ellhcmceliiei7t.5. Pecalise the ft!'ect liaS a hefn'v coacel7fi'afion Of allached tapai'linentf 1lmts within one mule of the .Site, the visioningprocess slid not conclude that housing is a priority"f01' this parliculat' site. Howevei-, the market analysis frill elhlore whelher specific types of housing uses, such as senior, life ci'cle, or live -n ork housing inayfif a redevelopment model. frith the fmancial assistance provided hi, elle LCA g7 -ant, the city- will be able to con7plete market analyses, traffic studies and ellvil'olnnenfal studies to fin'ther I'efine a77f1 lulpl'ove 017 the 1'JS7o17i77g riff{] cOncept7lall plalnlJng irllll the ei1Cl gocil ofere'alilIg a marketable master plali. Section 1. E. Future development in the Project Area. Explain specific goals or expectations for the future project the grant-futided activities will support; and for development' generally, in the Project Area (if the Project Area is larger than a first development phase). When is development expected to commence in the Project Area or in a portion of the Project Area? Explain 11Ow YOU would phase the project, if applicable. ii-imir 15 liow.,., The oulcomes ()f the planning that will be performed will result in a iilarkethig packet that cotticl be presenfeel to laced and national cevelopers. _411hoiigh the site could be redeveloped in one phare, given the sire of the site, the pfn'tnefs involved and the current lull in the market, the likely scenario is• for the site to be 1'edeveloped ill phases. This will allow the cowinifecl involvement of the Livable Colmnunifnes program, the public and the community. If P/'Ymouth does not I'eceive the LCDA grant, the oiiwe1' hill likell, market just the site, with 110 preliminal_t' reclevelopmew plan, no enl'il'011illel7tal explorations into storm water olid wetla leis enheincements to pl'ovide amenifies lbr the i-edevehtpmellt, no market analysis colisideration of'opli'ons olid opportunifiesfor mixing uses incht(lingspec'ialh, 11011.Silig to compleinew 17ecn'by housing choices. Ill other i1•ol'ds, a significant oppol'fiinit'r will be lost, fol' umovative 17111117-7fse, 111111ti-allienifl, I'edevelopmenl that c'oulcl be useilay a model fen' other similal', ohlel', lmdei'lltilized, incl ile'fel'7c77`aling commel'cial shopping complexes in Plymouth anal In other flys(- and second -ring silburbs. Page 5 Section II. Project Area Status Section II. A. Local Land Use and Regulatory Status: Mark (X) whether the following will be needed for the Project Area or any part thereof, is underway or is completed, or if not applicable, place `NA' in the box. Briefly state additional information requested. Will be Underway City has X Needed approved development (e.g. PUD)? Tlie ro )ei•t)' i.s iri ivithiii a TIF Disti•icl. Adopted X IF YES, has the plan been adopted by the municipality in which the Project Area is located? be pt•irlrcii•il)', jinaticed tlm•oiigl7 prii'lrte sotirces. The cify is confident that through a privalelpuhhe paroie; 'ship design flexibdill, will allow.for a liable plan that can be developed privately, it th a publiclyfunded lrami'f facility, Comprehensive plan amendment. If needed, describe: The City 2030 Comprehensive Plan contemplates the redevelopment of the X Project Area. Based on the planning that ivill be completed, an am7endmew rmcry Development standards. Briefly describe: Through the design X be necessary. The city is pr•epar•ed to support an amendment to allotiv alternatives process, the city will idents development stanclards that implementations of the determinedplanning objections and outcomes, Environmental Reviews — EAW, EIS, AUAR. If needed, describe: NA Environmental study will occur. However, it sloes not appear f •om our rrelinrir7ary revie iv that a mandator , EA TV is reg riired. Zoning changes and variances. If needed, please list and include change to/from: Tlie property is cunr•ently zoired C-2 A'eigl7borhood Comrtr7ercicil, X consistent with its current use. Based on the outcomes of the planning that will be comrpleled, the city is prepared to support a rezoning to allow implementation of the determined objectives and outcomes. Section II. B. Other Planning and Regulatory Status IL B. (a) Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box NA X Is the Project Area currently within a designated TIF or other development district, or anX approved development (e.g. PUD)? Tlie ro )ei•t)' i.s iri ivithiii a TIF Disti•icl. II. B. (b) Yes No dark (X) appropriate box NA X Is the Project Area currently within or covered by an area, neighborhood, corridor or other local plan? A park of a designated development district, or an approved development (e.g. PUD)? Does the Applicant or any of its entities or partners own the Project Area site or a developable IF YES, state name of theplan: Design standards. Briefly describe: Through the design alternative X IF YES, has the plan been adopted by the municipality in which the Project Area is located? iSectiion II. C. Status of Design or Development Standards: Will he Needed Underway City has Adopted NA X Does the Applicant or any of its entities or partners own the Project Area site or a developable Design standards. Briefly describe: Through the design alternative X The erisling !mall portion (Jf the Project Area is privately olt'ned and it is desirable for the final retlevelopmenl to be pt•irlrcii•il)', jinaticed tlm•oiigl7 prii'lrte sotirces. The cify is confident that through a privalelpuhhe paroie; 'ship design flexibdill, will allow.for a liable plan that can be developed privately, it th a publiclyfunded lrami'f facility, process, the city 1011 develop design standards that would promrole an environmrentall , enhanced, trcmrsit oriented mired use neighborhood. g Development standards. Briefly describe: Through the design X alternatives process, the city will idents development stanclards that relate to and enhance the design slandards. Section II. D. Site Control of Project Area Yes No Mark (X) appropriate box X Does the Applicant or any of its entities or partners own the Project Area site or a developable portion or phase of the Project Area? If NO, are steps being taken to gain site control? Explain tLi'nrit 4 line.4l The erisling !mall portion (Jf the Project Area is privately olt'ned and it is desirable for the final retlevelopmenl to be pt•irlrcii•il)', jinaticed tlm•oiigl7 prii'lrte sotirces. The cify is confident that through a privalelpuhhe paroie; 'ship design flexibdill, will allow.for a liable plan that can be developed privately, it th a publiclyfunded lrami'f facility, Page 6 Section II. E. Market and Feasibility Studies: Completedt UnderwayWill Be Needed Mark \ a ro nate bo` to indicate status. Knot applicable, plicable, %%rite \A in a ro riate box. pp p 1 1 1 P P Names of Developer(s) Type of contract or commitment X Market studies Yes_ No X Feasibility studies: El- ecled to be ri part of the rncirket cmd trQfc studies. If -completed. briefly state conclusions of the studies, and for which project components (e.g. retail, office, omiership housing. rental liolislng): (I taiii A int-ii-ket ancilysls and ownsl)onation stilcly brill be colnlllefecl us pari of the gi,ciiil llti7d1ecl pt(iniiriig. The market C11HIII-'is Will i1011de a market oi,ei-iliew Of the area cind include em Lriwcysls Of the desrgn ulterilcltives. The lralfic sindli, will look to cin -rent trd jllc volumes and nrtersection constraints and cUi bizethedesignollei-natives. The illteill of this market Lind ownsporlatioip1cuming, is to determine the opimcd rises given the mcirket ciml the lrtmspoiicllioii Collstrcfints. Section IL F. Developer Status Yes No \dark (X) appropriate box X blas the Applicant selected a developer for the Project Area? If YES, provide the requested information about the develo er(s): Names of Developer(s) Type of contract or commitment Yes_ No Nlark (X) appropriate box X X If X10, has the Applicant been working with a developer on future development plans for the Project Area? Brieilt explain developer stattis or next steps for working with or selecting a developer. FIs mentioned cibove, the cit) hcis heldl moneroris meetings with the pi-ol)erty owner Cind polential developers of the l71'01will, to vel ci iiriniber of redevelopment idlects. However, given the curi-ent economlt and unsludied site uncert(llnties, a Clevelry'lel• lids not sfepped f n-imird to purchase the prof-wrt)N rind start the redevelopment process_ The city iroilld use the .Pre -Development Gi-ri77l,finidls, to cony3lele the necessary planning docnnmellts to edlow dl furn- l{e}' Clei,elopnmellt. Page 7 Section Ill. Information for Evaluating Your Project on the Step One & Step Two Criteria Section M. A. Land Use Criteria 1. Use Land Efficiently a. Describe how you plan to develop the Proiect Area to use land more efficiently or increase the intensity of land Use on the prOlect site, and how you plan to maximize the potential of the Project Ana's location. r 11 i'.k I The Prajecl Area is currently a highhv risible untlerwili_e(1 properl-v with a unitage mall thcr1 i.s, fi•eouled by tt large biluminoiis 1wrking lot anda14ro lretlauds. The intent of'the planning is to prepare reclevelopm nt concepts that are Market analysis suppol•tecl chid to eaplorc opportunilie:s that oplimice the mixed use potential of the site while integrcw.nir a transit comliouerit, caul to provide environmental amenities through and wi jacew to the site. The conibin,aion C)f the various uses and design enhancements will allow,for the redeveloInnent Of the Project Area in a manner thtit will "opera the site to a broader polmlation 111' taking advantage Uf 1/ the e visting nu or 11,C111sporlalivii routes, siipple11 ented with a new lransit facility and / the environmental canenilies. The planning will examine the fe£isibility of creating a waler fe[intre to enhance the sites natural syslelus, as well (is, enhance the sites redevelopment potential. A wciler fewifre ll'ouN provide aesthetic and recreatiUllal bent fits t() filliire litiel's Of the site and add to the livability gild (Ilfalitt' C)f life foJ' those living in the surrounding area. 2. Develop land uses linked to the local anti regional transportation system. a) Yes No Is the project located: X within a one-half mile radius of an existing or identified station on the following transitway-s: I liawatha LRT, Central Corridor LRT, Northstar Comnuiter Rail, or South-west LRT, I -35W BRT. Cedar Avenue BRT, 1-394 HOT/HOV Lane. If yes, state the corridor and station X within a one-half mile radius of a station under study along the Bottineau, Rush Line or Red Rock transitways. If yes, state corridor and station location X within a one-half mile radius of a potential station tinder consideration along these firture transitways where no mode or stations have been identified: I-35 W North: 1-94 East: Central Avenue; TH 36iNE, If yes, state corridor and potential station location: X within a one-half mile radius of a stop on future arterial BRT corridors: Snelling Avenue/Ford llarkm av_ West Broadwav, Nicollet Avenue. Chicago Avenue, East 7t11 Street. Robert Street, West 7th Street. American Boulevard I i N cs. state corridor and location of stop T X ithin a one-half mile radius of a park-and-ride facility on an express commuter bus or express bus route. X If yes, state the name of the park and ride : Nathan Lciile Park diad Ride within a one-half mile radius of fixed stop on a high-fre£luency bats route if yes, state route and location of stop Page 8 b) Identify bLis routes that serve the Project Area. State xx hether they are express or regular route. 0,m I I 11! The Plipmouth Afelro Link pr'ovide.s bus• ser vice for the City of'Plymouth. Four routes stop at the hers shelter cit this location. Routes 791, 790, 793 and 795 provide Il 10 express .services trips anel three shuttle Ir'i17s to downtown Alnilleapolis ill /lie nml'nrng and JI 14 express seri ce trills Ci/1dSiX SI1111110 tl"rps f '0llI L101•1171on'll Ifil7ne(JIM lS• ill the flfie l -noon. The I'ili-mo rlli Metro Link Sta'f colrlil7nallt' anah'7,es l'oute data, clistolller comments and oasts to determine if chanuc'.s cn•r nrcCc.LIIT to wore economicalll'pr'ovide gualitl,.service that riders desire. S1cfthe pos.sibilities of connections to other mutesln'ovlded by the a1cirol)o1ilan Council transit st.'stem. eJ Describe plans or potential to achieve development that is designed in relationship to transit and transportation in the Project Area; describe how you propose to provide convenient pedestrian access to transit (if within walking distance) in as much detail as possible; how you \N ill Optimize relationships of development to the regional transit system, if Project Area has proximity to transit. 41 imir 1 i li,7L',l t'p until recentIv. the city leased and operated a 119.stall sinfiice parking park and ride lot at the proposed location. Further, the prolmi'tt> has been idelrtified in previous cityimetro transit plans and ill the current colriprehc nsire plan cis a filtirre lr•arrisit park ancf ride locatiolr..ll disc•ussiorts frith potential redevelnllers iirclude cl dr`_scussiorr gf tare need crrnl desire to lirme apar'k and Tide facility oil the site. .Such a f iclliti, is expected to .svi ve bolh transit users and the fnturc businesses located on the pr'operti The site is also irrrf)ortant ill the city's overall pedestrian and bicycle ststeln. Currently, the site includes a bimminous trail that is linked to the cit),, trail and sidewalk si>.stem. The ahility 10 include a water fecctur•e amenilr through redevelopment and to inelirde other park -like elements Till provide a destinationOrest sten] on the sidewalk and trail ststem that currenth, does nor exist in this area of'the coillimmitY. 3. Connect housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreation Lases a) Describe plans or potentiai to achieve development within the Project Area, and when added to the land uses in adjacent areas that will result in a variety of uses improved jobs -housing balance, access to a variety of destinations in a connected development pattern, it unit ' i l jwi,1 Within one mile of the Project Area, more than S, 000 hoirsin, fruits exist, marry of'it-hich are apartment units. 41ihorlgh the current thinking would 1701 support addilw 11101e res'idemied use, sl7eciali'e'd housing mqy he apossibilify as an adjunct to the desired commerce 011djobs. The planning will investigate hoar better to provide connections and_fitcilitale# alternative transportation options such cis ri,au,sit and bicycle ways. The planning will look at connections with the local ueighhorhood s, the inclusion oftic-ycle fcic-ilities (hike racks, lockers, showers, etc.) with building redevelopment, and the enhalWeMel7t cif public Iransil_ The desire is to create a model that ccnr be used elsewhere in Phvnouth, the Twin Cities metro area and elsewhere. This is an opporninitt, to integrate a unique storm water' Welland feature as a.1bcal pointfor the redevelopment af`the Project site cnld become a destirratioll/Co1717ecliorl.1UT the surrounding neig iborhood. Page 9 b) Mark (x) the types of uses within the Project Area and outside the Project Area within '/4 mile. Type of Uses (provide more detail on types in the spaces below) Within the Project Area Outside the Project Area within V, mile Office - Estimate the number of jobs outside the Project X Retail ct wirlett' q,l-etutl (i-ocery, fitness, convenience, gm, etc.) X X Services — me(lico!, costnetic, Teal Lslale, Etc. or car? (describe bus routes, streets, highways/ X Restaurant — sit cloirn and take unt. X X Entertainment Proiect Area: Government/civic — municipal it fi•crstruclure (ia,ater, selves) prinwriN her sheets, higlm,gys, trails and side milks. x Education -- Kciplan Professional Schools X ArtSkUltural pen space — s+wlancls c and w©©dlcrnds X X Public space — trctils acrd parks X X Residential —a wide variety ol`I)pes and clensilies X e) Employment Proximity and Access Estimate the number of jobs within the Project 4pprusimately 300 currenllt; Area Estimate the number of jobs outside the Project 4pproximcitell, 3, 000 Area Nv ithin °/a mile 1 loci' are the jabs within a'/4 mile reached by bus Pi-rnrcerilt, hY svrc c ls, highirtivs, truils and siclewulks, or car? (describe bus routes, streets, highways/ freeways traveled) Estimate how many jobs are within 1 mile of the 4pproxinxtlell 4,000 Proiect Area: I -low are these jobs within one mile reached by prinwriN her sheets, higlm,gys, trails and side milks. bus or car? (describe bus routes, streets, highways/ freeways traveled) Page 10 4. Develop a range ofhousing densities, types and costs a. Describe how you plan to develop the Projcct Area and/or add to the CXisting housing in adjacent neivhborhoods — to include a variety of housing tN pes and costs. This can be by integrating nes3 housing into existing neighborhoods throu011 redevelopment. infill or adaptive reuse; or bN buildim, ne%v housing in nevv neighborhoods. t,imn to imL s GAvir the Parrett' of housing in the surrounding area, to date the reclel•el(]pirment 1'ls'lonmg has been limited to commerce andjobs rather thein housing. The sari ornidinlg neighhorhoo(ls provide a ~vide l dirge' of holrsing olatious till relaiiveh, the sande age of construction)from rental apartments to rental townhouses to owner oc•cupiecl contlos, townhouses and single flnlily houses, for a variel7., of househohl income levels lltharrgll the lnrcltrs'lt3l7 (rf ifcl(l,'tl(J1rcll I101dtifng in the 1'edc'relol)lnellt pl(!1i f(11` tl'rc' Project Area fnat- be limited, the rnorkel analysis mill look (11 3t`h(t vecialiwed housing could he provided in the Project Area that would c(nnlrlemem the existing housing in the surrounding neighborhoods. b. Describe hove an), new planned Dousing in the Project Area will diversify housing choices in the community and the city. t 0 The surrofnrcling neighborhoods inchide rental apartments that proOtle mcir-kel rata options (md section 8 clplions fol' r•esldents. moth i'ertctl arid o11'irel' Occupied lo11•r'rhofis`es• calf bE fUull(I1t'ltlrrll these stiine neighborliood.v. Condom are also (re=adable, as are sulgle f rmily hoine.s ;'wined ft'om alywoxiinotelt' S200,000 to over 5500,000. It should he noted that a majority gfthe housing was built bent,een the late 1960s and 1980. Because (Jf this (lrvel•se housing stock, the area is ah•ea(k home to a diverse income antl ethnic population. With this salt/, hotirever, the market analysis ofthis Pl'oject Area will investigate l)osslble specfahzecl housing options that Inch' not current/}' e'x'ist in the sur'r'ounding neighborhoods, ffneir options exist, the market sitphor•ls them and a de1'etolmi, can be found to integrate a housing component into the oi,erall r'eeleiTlopment (# 'the Project Are(/. this part of the citta could see even more cliversification of housing choices. 5. Conserve, protect and enhance natural resources. a. Describe any ways you plan to develop the Project Area to integrate best management practices that incorporate water resource management into project design: or low impact development (LID) methods to integrate natural hydrologic functions into the overall project design. it.ima fy Linr,,%i Earlier it '!,•cis mentioned that intrch af'the storm waier,for this area of PIj,moilth flows unit/ e(tc d arortncl iii er the. Project :1rea into wellancls to the east and south of the properly and trot/ into 1llew Holre and Golden Valley. The wetland,; are currentll'pr•ajected to he dredged in 2013. The intent ofan.v redevelopment ojthe Project Area nvould be to imor•ove the water storage capacities and the water clualit-Y (tl'ecament). IT'ith the need io nnpr•o v the storm rated teilitres on the pr'oper'ty{ the opl)ortunity exists to provide an environmentalli, sensitive (lesign that also brings the nater amenities into the site. 1't'ith the current economic climate, the cit v, 11'ctel•shed district alitl Hennelinl C'ounly have the oppor1unit to reevaluate how to cirhance lira t:etlands rnld .storm water flow through incl around the site through exploration oj'clesign alternatives that ii -ill not onl_t, improve the natural resources but provide an amenitl, for the site and the surrounding neighborhoods. The concept designs trill also address, on a preliminar'l level, the use oj'other Best manageinerlt, livable corm uniiies, sustainable communities, green silt, find building design lech17iglteS to even fin•ther enhance the amenilies of the propertt-. The cilY continues to have discussions ivith the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission tinct Hennepin C'0111117'. It is currentlt' contemplated that Hennepin Count -v +till parlicipate in the stndr with Jimcling,fi•om its Dat lighting hrenne/ in Creeks program. The Basselt Creek 1 atershetl Colmnission Inas also agreed to participate in desl`gn alternatives. Page 11 b, Natural resources inventory and assessment Yes No x Has the municipality in which the Project Area is located prepared a local natural resources inventory and assessment (NRI/A) in coordination with the regional NRI/A? If yes, do you plan to use the local NRIIA preserve or integrate natural resources into future X development? Explain. The city's ,VRI in(lentUies the lvellunel colnplex as Pulustrille; emergent, The goal is to enhance this complex through upstream improi'ements cillcl cill tinily el7hcnicements. C. Describe any ways you plan to develop the Project Area to employ natural resources. where feasible and appropriate, as community connections. assets and amenities. It is the: intent to incol mrate halm-ul resources in pror'iding .storm mater ireatment, storage capacity- oriel amenities. Desikn altermith,es ii -ill be dei elol)etl aii(i ciiicill? ed thcit incorporate natural resources throiu hour the site to prowide necessary storin waler trefamelit and storCige. These improi,ements will fiirther be clesiAmecl as amenities for the Project . Irea anel surrounding neighborhood acid incorporated into the overall tl'ail a11t1 S7(!en'(ilk pla17 to provide natural elemenis that enhance the pedestrian and bicycle experience. llie des gn ahernaiii,es irlll analyze the inco1 pol'ation of outclool' patios anel public s]mces that Capitalize on the e_YistNlg it'ellcilids ci77ll that in turn builds' on the e. isli77g 1'ecreatioiictl ftitd l`etail ctsSet.s ill the at -ea. T'he intent hill be to make the storm water inip1'ovements the aesthetic ciiiclfiii7Clio7ial fC1Cal poiiii, not the backyard Ove) -all, the desire is to Connect the wetlamis to the corlitnunit}', inclucibig pede.stria11pcith C01117eCtictllS and stol'in water gar lens. Cl. Describe plans or opportunities for future development in the Project Area that go beyond standard sustainable design practices. Be as specific. as you can. giving examples or details, r imii If) tineq The Citi' will eaolum design alternatives unci implementation strategies diu'ingplannhigsuch as rooftole water S'1c11'clge, ITC'y'Cling grey walel' featitl'es, strategies ann' best liiClllCtgelll(:Ilt Jl`aC'tlC'e.5 fill' the rechiction and alternalive lreatlneill (?/ rills off ly'lll be G'lp101'etl :'f ltl7otig1l the Cit l' ly'lll Cel'lailily incorporate l'edilCtiol7 of 11Npe1'VloiiS S"ii1fiaG'e coi'erage within the Pmtect k -ea, the c1lV will also anci4 ze .sustainable alternatives that go be}'ontl the stanclard of approtich. Low impact development concepts that wilLe elly'TI'011l11e171ti11}' f7Yefldll' hifi'astructure enhanceme171S Will also be amily ecl. The design a1tel'17alh,es and' the incoipai-ation oJ'1he Hennepin C'ounlY Defy°lighting Creek principles will pi-oi,ide storm hater ahermitilye.s that go beyond Standard stortli walei• 17`eilme'nt to provide amenities to the site and the siti-l-oiillclfng neighborhoocis. Page 12 6. Other Innovation and Demonstration. Describe hose future development in the Project Area has potential to be innovative in ways other than those described elsewhere in Section M.A.I. through 11I.A. 5. e rmo lo !iris -o The planning that Will be completed Jor this Project Area will bring 10 lighl other potenlial innovative ideas that C'onld be 1rIcOITO"aled 11710 the Site redevelopment. Allhougl7 mentioned briefly above, the planning will look at lrarrsit and hoer the City of'Plvnlowh opt -out spleen can be ililpl•ored ihroiigl7 park crrJcl ride improvements. The planning tt'ill involve: the Bassett Creek Y%atershed Conunission ural provide unique options for .storm t'ater stol•age, treatrrlent and rfucrlitt. "1 he art}' hill anal}_e bike;'rrarlk IJlfl'cl.Stl'11ct111'( 11TCld TJIclIlde:£ t701 0171}%pltbllc lrarll and .ildElt'Crlk t1r11J1•rJl'e111e171.s, but also building design ideas that incorporate storage and shower facilities. None of the planning that u-i/I be conlAted - market, lransportotion, transit, storm water, or land Ilse - will be clone iudcpendc rrtli oforte crtlotlTcr, Ille.firlcrl reslrlt ccnl lead to a.flrlly urlegrated pr•ochrct tltcrt trill prol icic intplenlentutiou strategies to Inarket and redevelop the Project Area. Section HI. B. Potential to implement local and regional goals. 1. Comprehensive plan implementation Describe how the future planned development for the Project Area is consistent with and will implenrlcnt the Applicant City's adopted comprehensive plan, r_,,; ,, Ir liolc:o The city's recently updated conapr-eltetTsive p1c111 process included this property in its visioning and the,inal doc7lrnent idenli/ies the Project Area as potential redevelopment site. Land Use (Chapter 3) — "Based on these, faclors, the Citi, has concltded that this site is a good candidate for mired Ilse where it redevelops. An_v redevelopment plan ivould idealh, have a transit conrponetrt, ... '' Tran,sportution Transit (Chapter b) — "The cite° Will p]trsne a long term ('park and ridejricility) solttiorl ill conjlrtrctiolT irith any potential redevelopruent of the Four Seasons site. „ 5101.111 wafer (Chapter 5) "The focus of redei'elopinent projects in PlvnToulh is expected to be in the Bassett Creek and llinnehaha Creek watersheds... " 2. Helping to achieve Applicant City's housing goals: Yes No 'lark (X) appropriate boa: X Ido plans or goals for development in the Project Area include helping to achieve the Aoolicant Citv's negotiated affordable and lifecycle housing goals:r if' ves, state plans for helping to achieve the negotiated affordable and lifecycle housing goals. rL i n1 10 Ytarted previously, given the location of the Project Area, the redei'eloprrlent focus will be towards eonlnlerc'e and job Creation, However, the rnorket anahsis will review whe'lher specialized housing needs are not rnet ill the llrr'01111dmg neighborhoods. With this nijcrr'rnafion, the city can decide whether to Include speciali_edhousing options Within the alternative design concepts. Page 13 3. Implementing local area plans Describe how the proposed grant -funded activities and f iture planned development for the Project Area are consistent with and will implement any local adopted redevelopment plans, corridor or other local area plans applicable to the Project Area: r1,imil 10 liar._ -v The City of Pli:mouth Comprehensive Plan identifies the PI•ojeet Area ars a potential redevelopment property. The rcart-fitneleel planning It -ill allow the cit v, property owner, County, fifater•shed Di.slricl and .1feiropolilan Council to take the ne_ii steps to ready this propei7y_ for- r"e(lei,elol)rrieni. hits is eiii ol7pol'titnrt}l ter plat? ci Project Areci thcit to dale the private .sector has not been able 10 do alone. felltroried els•elVhere in this applicotion, thele are a number of irncer'tainties regarding the redel'elopneril of this property, that frill beconie Irtor•e itrlderstarrcicible tlrr•ougli the next phtrves cif plar7iiirrg. The market anall,Sis, redevelopment plan crll(1lvsis, transportation sntcly anal environnenied sner y will all prepare andposition the site, city, property owner and adjacent mi,ners.fur redevelopment. K Onark (\) this box if applicable) The Project Area is not .subiect to a local adopted redevelopment, corridor or other local arect Plan Section III.C. Potential for Successful Implementation 1. Local leadership, political commitment and community involvement to date Describe local leadership. political commitment and community involvement or involvement with other partners to date regarding activities in the Project Area. (umii it) lines) The Ply -mouth Plarmirrg Ct rrll17isSiol7 and City ('airmail have mipported the redevelopment oj'the Project Areci,fnr rirany. Nears. I Ifith the visioning that liars' clone ccs part of the cornpreher7sive plan and the approval of the grant application resolution, the Cite Council shows full support of the redevelopment of the Projrc•t Area. Staff has met 1i-ith the landmi'ner on a Immber o,f occoslons, land brokers Anel potential redevelopmew partners to discuss options Mid alterimlive.s. Staff inembers continually receive inquiries from r7eighbor's in the vicinity about the Project Areas. Given the urrlaiotrns, there is bath exciiement and an_viet)• over the property. Stctfjlrcts also discussed the needfor additional study frith the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission canal flennepin County Commissioner Steng(ien, and both support the planning gffor t. 2. Public involvement in Carrying Out the Grant -Funded Activities Describe how the activities in Question 1[I.C. 1. above. will be contiryued, or additional public involvement activities iilcltided in canyiiig otit the activities funded by the requested grant, The visioning that occurred as poet gfthe comprehensive plan li•as step one in the process of creating a fully a'017C'eptuali_ed l'etlei eloprneiit plcir7. Tlie gra77t f tliclecl plerrniirig ii-onlciallow for' nlct7'ket analysis to better identify• the appropriate itses. It lroidd allolijar• conceptual master plans to be developed to better outline yrhat the site g onirtr•ics and nrcrrket ll°ill srtppur7. ll uwulal alloov far ern ir•innnental sttuly acrid elesi I tel be imcorl,rnrerted hlto the rcrdevelopment to improve they quality aml amenity of'the storm irater as it floll s eelst from PI'I'mouth. "Ind it u,oldcl ollolr• for ti -(!/ /k- stucly to determine it -hat the cm -rem trarisportcttion .sj-sten can handle and what transportation ill it,rovetnents li=onlat irnprore the function of this area and promote redevelopment. All of this planning is necessm y Ir, firr•ther• engage the pitblic in discussion on the redevelopment of the Project Area Staff cr2rinions seieral nc ighborhood meetings and other Citi, Councit public meetings to discuss and move.1brirarel frith a redevelopment plan fell' the Pr'ofect Area. 12 Page 14 3. Im7oh'ement of Partners in Project Implementation. Describe hOMF you plan to include or coordinate with appropriate private and public partners to implement fitture development in the Project Area. Include mention of any particiilal- -stumbling block- issues you ss ill work on with one or inore public or private partners. ( The planning it -ill ml'oNe the Cit}', Hennepin Counfli; Housing, Commimiti' !Forks and Ti-ansrt, the Bass'et1 Creek Wfitel'shed District, ltletropolltan Council (transit). 'Ifelropolilan Council Lll'able ColnlninlltieS program, Hennepin t (ltlllil' Tr'cl11.S1)or'fafloll C111G1 the it•I1nrleSOtCd DC'pcll'tnrellt Of Tl'Glll.Sppr'1atH)1T, Oil the pril'ate side, sigff frill work with the property owner, Consultants, potential del'elopers and neighboring resitlents and btlsineSS OU'lle l'S hcrl'ing file ' planning and redei,elopmenl of the Project Area. 7o this point, through li'hai has beery learned through the comprehellsh)e plan rish ring pr'ucess, the largest issue to be athh-essed is nwnspoi'tation, specifically the intersection afLancaster Labe and County Boat] 9. The current geometries of the intersection, the proximitti uf'the re.sklential development to the south of the ilTtersectiolr, erne! the proximity of the intersection to the TI1169 interchange limit the reconfiguration possibilities. 4. Capitalizing on Unique Opportunities Offered by Developing the Project Site Describe any circumstances which present an opportunity to capitalize on Unique development opportunities or advantages offered by the Project Area. Would these opportunities bejeopardized or potentially lost if the Applicant does not proceed with the grant -funded activities at this tune to trove the project forward to the development stage? rt. in Fa t 11 Il„ c ,, There are a number of potential improwmenis that could be analt°_ecl.Jirrther through the planning contemplated with the grant, fr nds. Three of these 01)p01'11r17ifit S, all cliscussed prel'iouslt', are the enhancement antl improvementent of the Basset! Creek outlet fr'am PI'vinouth to Nerr Hope, the return Ofthe transit park aml ride C'OrnpOnellt 10 the pr'oper'1}l, and the incol por ation oj storm !rater' as all amenity. Given the (Imoma Of planning contemplated Cts part Of this gr'C117t 1' quest, without the gram, the possibilities tivrll be dramatically limited and left iip to the private sector to determine and implement, or l hal the public sector carr lege!/ll, require nl'a redeveloper. To elate, the private sector has been unable to deier'nline the proper market segments to concentrate ori, the proper environmental enhancements that ii,oulel benefr"t the site and the aetacent nei hborhoo(iS, and what public impr'ol'ernents will be necessary to optimize the Project Area 'S pOtelltlal, 5. Potential to enhance major state or regional transportation investments Describe the potential for future developmetit to enhance major state transportation investinems, such as new interchanges, ramps or major road improvements; or regional investments including transitways. The location of the Project Area and a relocated park and ride trcinsii fitciliti' lrithin the Project Area will 1111111'nve tile converlience far the transit rifler. Redevelopment of this .site with a transit component hill improve fr(Insil convenience, polentlalll' lncl'ea.snlg 1'idershlp, rechice vehicle l7umbers Oil T11 169 and lengthen the life of the roadlval TIre ti- nrsit enhancements are part and parcel of the recler,elopment of the Project .ll'ea. To optimize deer itr oil the site, a cross- parking agreemew and a full iutegi'ated site redevelopment is desired. Part ofthe storm !water stream planning mmbe able to more farivard independentli,from am, site planning. However, the intent is fi)r the stream welleml enhoncements to be incoiporatetl into the site to add vimfal eith nlcement to the pr'operti^ and the surrounding area. 13 Page 15 6. Potential for replication describe the potential for replication of future development in the Project Area, its kee elements or the project type, within the city iii which the project is located oi elsewhere in the region. 'timir Cur iainti, every redevelopment project has its own individualities that would pre.sertt the need to look cit thirrg.s uniquely. However, the planning that is proposed in the preceding pages will involve several public incl private pcu-nrer.ships, curd the relationships that unit/ be developed cis a part caf this planning will create a template that carr be usecl when planning other sites within the Cit "v oj'I'hruouth. Currewty, the citt is reviviring the r'edevclnpmerrt possibilities and possible visioning for the area cit County Roadv 6 acrd 101 card the area cit C"ounij, Road 73 unci State IfighwaY 55 where the city could utrder take the same planning as oulhnecl here. The ('it -v of PhImouth is aging and over the nevi .several years more .silex. it -it/ become canclidales for r -e development. The proposed planning for the Four Seasons Mall Project . Irea will allow the city to be better prepared for !hese frtture possibilities. 14 Page 16 Pour Seasons Mall -Aerial 2005 Aerial Photos Grant Application Type: Livable Communities Demonstration Account 0 450 900 ft. Created: May 18, 2010 Session URL: http:llgis.meiG.state.mn.uslimflimfjsp?session=23387 TOGS Aarsl PnobaQ Ano-ilebc lne_1.00i Raab O'lTe LammG mup, 2f.4i. Oi8ClAWER 9f AGG11flAGY. TI MetaDOMa Cana dop Mrmw le•npetllI WILM 643 Eala wlM mfpt Ee nE MnG156iale e'm'e, 'A+Lf.evnH aammY. Sw mnyMed t'imer a1P'I ip a mesa u r. n ati ctsY, Page 17 Four Seasons Mail - Land Use 2020 Planned Land Use Grant Application Type: Livable Communities Demonstration Account J z 0 AVZqV; 9N111ROCKEOR z 7- I zi HENNEPIN Az 41ST AVE N 0: z W Z o117AVEly UJ 40TH AVE N Ir I 4ANs Lly AL --- 39TH AVE N z z W NOR-THWOOD PKWY Q— J'~ ORLEANS E AVEjV0 38TH CT N z 0 500 1000 ft. Planned Land Use Sewers Roads, Railroads, Transit Agricultural Lift Station . Bus Stops Rural or Large -Lot Residential Gravity n Bus Routes Single Family Residential Foroemain — Principal Arterial Multifamily Residential Siphon —A Minor Augmentor Commercial A Minor Reliever J. Industrial A Minor Expander Institutional Regional Trails — A Minor Connector Mixed Use Trail Status — B Minor Multi -Optional Development Existing Major Collector Park and Recreation Planned Minor Collector Open Space or Restrictive Use Proposed — Railroads Rights -of -Way (i.e., Roads) Railway (inc. LRT) Airport Vacant or Unknown Open Water Created: May 18, 2010 Session URL: http://gis.metc.state.mn.ustimflimf.jsp?session=23373 0- .'I -R- C G- .1 -r - Page 18 Page 19 Four Seasons Mall SiteLEGEND Transit Stop Twin hams Industrial 07101/2010 V Bus_Routes Townhome Railroad City Sidewalk Cooperative Open Space rp)city w City Trail Multiple Family Residential Park of Land Use Code Condominium Utility Plymouth, Minnesota Agriculture Cemetery Public 0 0.05 0.1 4.2 0.3 0.4 Miles Single Family Development Institution School THIS REPRESF_NTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CRY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT PIAS Mobile Home Park Church Vacant NOT BEEN FIELD VERJFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELD DuplexVEMFILDANDCOMPAREDWITHORINGIALSOURCEDOCUMENTS. Commercial Page 19 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2010-176 A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2010 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account finds; and WHEREAS, the city has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and WHEREAS, the city has the institutional, managerial and financial capacity to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS, the city certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the city agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant application submitted on July 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, the city acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre -Development grants are intended to fund activities that can prepare projects to apply for the LCDA Development Grant category. WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of Demonstration Account grant funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the city; I . Finds that it is in the best interest of the city's development goals and priorities for the proposed activities to be performed for this particular Project Area site, as identified in the application, and at this particular time. 2. Finds that the project component(s) for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought; a. Will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable ftiture: and Page 20 b. Will not occur within two years after a grant award unless Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time. 3. Represents that the city has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure funding for the project activities for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding that is necessary for completion of the activities within two years and states that this representation is based on the following reasons and supporting facts: a. City of Plymouth General Fund — with the decrease values and revenues, the city's priorities for the use of tax revenues needs to focus on the essential services; police and fire, infrastructure provision and maintenance and protective inspections. b. Hennepin County — Hennepin County is providing some assistance to the project, however, with limited funds they cannot provide funding to complete the project. Some funding for this project is available from the Daylighting Creeks program. TOD funding is not available for predevelopment planning purposes. c. Watershed District — the Watershed district is providing some assistance to the project, however, with limited funds they cannot provide funding to complete the project. 4. Authorizes its community development director to submit on behalf of the city an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant funds for the project activities identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the project on behalf of the city. Adopted this 13`h day of July, 2010. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on July 13, 2010 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my handof xIca as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this f % tt day of (Jill P. 1 t City Jerk E Page 21 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO PREPARE A STUDY CONCERNING THE REDEVLOPMENT OF THE FOUR SEASONS MALL PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the City has applied for and has been awarded a $100,000.00 Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding Grant to study the redevelopment of the Four Seasons Mall project area; and WHEREAS, the Project area consists of an aging 117,000 square foot vintage 1978 strip shopping center, a municipal well, and two wetlands. WHEREAS, during the 2030 comprehensive municipal plan visioning process, the City determined that the appropriate redevelopment of the Project Area should include a mix of commercial, retail and office uses along with a strong transit component and environmental enhancements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. City staff is directed to undertake a redevelopment study of the area. 2. Based upon the findings in the study, the Director of Community Development is further directed to prepare ordinance amendments for consideration by the City Council. ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2010, by the City Council of Plymouth, Minnesota. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Page 22 mean: WholR71/.110to a 21 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING DEVELOPMENT IN A DESIGNATED AREA IN THE CITY THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms when used in this ordinance shall Comprehensive municipal plan: the definition in Minnesota Statutes § 462.352 Subd. 5 is adopted by reference. Design atedArea: Four Seasons Mall redevelopment project area, identified on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein, Property Identification Numbers: 13 -118 -22 -14- 0013,13 -118 -22 -14 -0007,13 -118 -22 -14-0008, 3-118-22-14- 0013,13-118-22-14-0007,13-118-22-14-0008, and 13-118-22-14-0009. Official Controls: the definition in Minnesota Statutes § 462.352, Subd. 15 is adopted by reference. Plat: the definition in Minnesota Statutes § 462.352 Subd. 13 is adopted by reference. Subdivision: the definition in Minnesota Statutes § 462.352, Subd. 12 is adopted by reference. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND AND INTENT. The Designated Area currently consists of an aging 117,000 square foot vintage 1978 strip shopping center, a municipal well, and two wetlands. During the 2030 comprehensive municipal plan visioning process the City determined that the appropriate redevelopment of the Designated Area should include a mix of commercial, retail and office uses along with a strong transit component and environmental enhancements. On July 13, 2010 the City adopted Resolution No. 2010-176 identifying the need for a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding to study redevelopment of the Designated Area and authorized submittal of an application to the Metropolitan Council for Grant funds. The application was submitted on July 16, 2010.On December 8, 2010 the Metropolitan Council approved a 100,000 grant to the City to carry out the study. The intent of this ordinance is to allow the City time to undertake the study of the Designated Area and to make appropriate changes in official controls and in the interim to protect the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the community. 1 Page 23 SECTION 3. TEMPORARY PROHIBITION. Pending the completion of the above referenced study and adoption of appropriate official controls, no approval will be granted for any of the following in the Designated Area: Changes in official controls Comprehensive municipal plan amendments Plats Subdivisions Conditional use permits Interim use permits Variances Site plan approval Building permits for new buildings and structures Building permits that result in the expansion of the footprint or floor area of an existing building or structure. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage and shall remain in effect until the date of the adoption of the official controls contemplated hereunder and the repeal of this ordinance or December 13, 2011, whichever occurs first. ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2010, by the City Council of Plymouth, Minnesota. ATTEST: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk CITY OF PLYMOUTH Kelli Slavik, Mayor 2 Page 24 La Rockford Road (County Road 9) T is Exhibit A 200 100 0 200 400 600 City of Feet Plymouth, M(r+MME13 3 Page 25