HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 11-09-2010 Special 1.pdfCITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
November 9, 20101 5:30 p.m.
MEDICINE LAKE CONFERENCE ROOM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. DISCUSSION TOPICS
A. 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program
B. Vicksburg Lane from Highway 55 to County Road 6
3. ADJOURN
Special Council Meeting 1 of 1 November 9, 2010
rp)City of
Plym0uth
Agenda ANumber:
Adding Quality to Life
To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
STUDY SESSION
MEETING Prepared by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
Reviewed by: November 9, 2010
2011-2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
Item: PROGRAM (CIP), DRAFT NO. 1
1. ACTION REQUESTED:
Discuss the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Draft No. 1.
2. BACKGROUND:
Attached please find the first draft of the 2011-2015 CII'. The Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the CIP at their November 3, 2010 meeting. Attached
are the minutes from that meeting.
Most notable of the changes from the 2010-2014 CIP are projects and purchases that
are proposed to be delayed or postponed and new projects that have been added for
consideration including some new and amended Parks and Recreation projects, a new
street reconstruction program and adjustments to a number of water resources
projects. Central Equipment projects also changed as the replacement schedule on a
number of items was extended based on use, wear and condition. All projects that are
new in the CIP are denoted with a double asterisk (**) in front of the project name.
Specifically, the following changes are worth note:
Central Equipment — A number of large equipment replacements have been
delayed (compare first two digits in the project number to the program year).
There are also a number of previously delay replacements that now appear in
the 2015 program year. Two new Fire RAD SUV replacements that were not
previously in the CIP have been included.
Facilities Management — In addition to the 2015 program year additions, four
projects were added in the 2011 program year (City Council Chamber
Upgrades, Fire Station Lighting Upgrades, Replace Wood Floor — Plymouth
Creek Center, and Drainage Improvements — Fire Station No.3).
Information Technology - In addition to the 2015 program year addition, one
project was added in the 2012 program year (Fiberoptic Telecommunication
Interconnect) which is intended to take advantage of a Wayzata School
District project to interconnect City facilities with fiber.
Parks and Recreation — Three new projects were added (Miscellaneous Park
Improvements, Plymouth Dog Park Site Improvements and Fieldhouse Turf
Replacement) as well as scope changes, cost estimate updates and program
year changes to nearly all of the Park and Recreation projects.
Sanitary Sewer - In addition to the 2015 program year addition, one project
was added in the 2011 program year (Abandon Conor Meadows Lift Station)
which is intended to take advantage of recently installed gravity sewer in the
Elm Creek Highlands development.
Streets - In addition to the 2015 program year additions, four projects were
added in the 2011 program year (Cimarron Ponds Private Street
Reconstruction, Lancaster Lane Reconstruction, Replace Concrete
Intersection — The Reserve, and Concrete Sidewalk Replacement). The 2011
Pavement Rehabilitation Project reflects the first year of the change in the
street reconstruction program.
3. BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
4. ATTACHMENTS:
2011-2015 CIP, Draft No. 1 Executive Summary
Proposed Street Reconstruction Program Changes
City of Plymouth
2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program
Draft No. 1 Executive Summary
October 25, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 tt,,,z 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Central Eqnipment
Fire Rescue Vehicle R-21 08 -CE -017 n1a 100,000 100,000
Fire Pickup Grass Rig 09 -CE -006 n1a 40,000 40,000
Single Axle Plow with Sander 09 -CE -273 nla 191,000 191,000
Fire Pickup Grass Rig 10 -CE -003 n1a 40,000 40,000
Fire Engine Pumper 10 -CE -019 n1a 430,000 430,000
Fire Pickup 4X4 Crew Cab 10 -CE -023 nla 50,000 50,000
Fire RAD SUV 10 -CE -030 nla 35,000 35,000
Fire Deputy Chief SUV 10 -CE -032 nla 35,000 35,000
Wheel Loaderwith Plow Wing 10 -CE -200 n1a 270,000 270,000
Sign Truck 10 -CE -247 n1a 106,500 106,500
Single Azle Plow with Sander 10 -CE -274 nla 195,000 195,000
314 Ton 02 Pickup with Utility Box 10 -CE -348 n1a 30,000 30,000
Mower 6' with Broom 10 -CE -527 n/a 46,000 46,000
Sidewalk Machine 10 -CE -539 nla 110,000 110,000
Loader IT 12F 10 -CE -564 nla 110,000 110,000
Snow Blower for Loader IT 12F 10 -CE -565 nla 60,000 60,000
One Ton with Plow 10 -CE -582 n1a 66,000 66,000
Mechanic's Service Truck 10 -CE 721 nla 60,000 60,000
Fire Engine Pumper 11 -CE -018 n1a 430,000 430,000
Fire RAD SUV 11 -CE -033 nla 37,000 37,000
Street Sweeper 11 -CE -230 nla 170,000 170,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 11 -CE -252 n1a 31,000 31,000
Tandem Axle Plow with Sander 11 -CE -278 nla 255,000 255,000
Air Compressor 11 -CE -319 n1a 35,000 35,000
Pool Car Hybrid 11-CEA92 n1a 30,000 30,000
Building Inspections SUV 11 -CE -498 nla 27,000 27,000
Building Inspections SUV 11-CE499 nla 27,000 27,000
Mower 16' 11 -CE -530 n1a 109,000 109,000
Sidewalk Machine 11 -CE -540 nla 114,000 114,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 11 -CE -583 n1a 31,000 Y, 31,000
One Ton 4X4 with Plow 11 -CE -585 nia 60,000 60,000
Police Squad Cars {4} 11 -CE -SQUADS n1a 112,000 112,000
Police Dodge Charger 12 -CE -150 n1a 27,000 27,000
Police Chief SUV 12 -CE -191 n1a 27,000 27,000
Skid Steer 90 XT 12 -CE 221 n1a 53,000 53,000
Asphalt Planer for Skid Steer 90XT 12 -CE -221A n1a 25,000 25,000
Page 1 blunday, November- ol. 2010
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Back Hoe 430 12 -CE -237 n1a 140,000 140,000
Hammer for Back Hoe 430 12 -CE -237A n1a 25,000 25,000
Single Axle Plow with Sander 12 -CE -275 nta 220,000 220,000
Mower 6' with Broom 12 -CE -528 n1a 43,000 43,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 12 -CE -587 nla 33,000 33,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 12 -CE -588 n1a 33,000 33,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 12 -CE -569 nla 33,000 33,000
Floor Sweeper/Scrubber for Public Works Faciiily 12 -CE -745 nta 60,000 60,000
Fire Hurst Hydraulic Rescue Equipment 12 -CE -FIRE nia 40,000 40,000
Police Squad Cars (8) 12 -CE -SQUADS nla 256,000 256,000
Police SUV 13 -CE -189 n1a 40,000 40,000
Truck Mounted Patch Unit 13 -CE -212 nla 58,000 58,000
4 Door Truck with Crane 13 -CE -244 nla 110,000 110,000
One Ton Truck with Plow 13 -CE -253 Na 70,000 70,000
Tandem Axle Plow with Sander 13 -CE -276 n1a 247,000 247,000
Tandem Axle Plow with Sander 13 -CE -277 nla 247,000 247,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 13 -CE -357 n1a 37,000 37,000
Engineering All Wheel Drive Van 13 -CE -404 nla 26,000 26,000
Building Inspections SUV 13 -CE -405 nla 27,000 27,000
Mower 6' with Broom 13 -CE -520 nla 40,000 40,000
All Surface Vehicle Blower/Pallet Forks 13 -CE -537 Ma 62,000 62,000
Sidewalk Machine MT Trackless 13 -CE -538 n1a 110,000 110,000
Chipper Truck 13 -CE -590 nla 74,000 74,000
One Ton Truck with Plow 13 -CE -592 nta 70,000 70,000
314 Ton 4X4 4 Door Pickup 13 -CE -594 n1a 37,000 37,000
314 Ton Pickup with Utility Box 13 -CE -595 A 36,000 36,000
Police CSO Pickup 13 -CE -CSO n1a 25,000 25,000
Police Squad Cars (8) 13 -CE -SQUADS nla 260,000 260,000
Fire HazmaVRescue Truck 14 -CE -022 nla 425,000 425,000
Fire Rescue Pumper 14 -CE -034 nla 414,000 414,000
Ponce Investigator Van 14 -CE -198 nla 26,000 26,000
Spray Patcher 14 -CE -234 nia 190,000 190,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 14 -CE -245 n1a 36,000 36,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 14 -CE -246 n1a 36,000 36,000
Lowboy Trailer 70,000 lb. 14 -CE -255 nla 78,000 78,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 14 -CE -355 nla 36,000 36,000
Engineering 112Ton4X4 Pickup 14 -CE -402 n1a 26,000 26,000
Zero Tum MowerlSnow Blower 14 -CE -521 n1a 43,000 43,000
Mower 16' 14 -CE -529 n1a 110,000 110,000
Self Propelled Sprayer 14 -CE -561 n1a 37,000 37,000
Water Truck 1500 Gallon 14 -CE -563 nla 342,000 142,000
Park Maintenance SUV 14 -CE -591 nla 27,000 27,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 14 -CE -593 nla 36,000 36,000
Police Squad Cars (8) 14 -CE -SQUADS nla 264,000 264,000
Purge 2 Alandap, November 01, 2019
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Fire Chief SUV 15 -CE -037 nla 32,000 32,000
All Surface Vehicle (ASV) RC 100 15 -CE -233 nla 100,000 100,000
Tack Distributer on Truck Chasis 15 -CE -256A nla 82,000 82,000
One Ton Truck with Crane (Lift Stations) 15 -CE -358 nla 71,000 71,000
6' mower with blower and broom 15 -CE -5000 n1a 49,000 49,000
6' mower with blower and broom 15 -CE -5001 n1a 49,000 49,000
Utility Tractor 5300 15 -CE -569 nla 40,000 40,000
314 Ton Pickup with Plow 15 -CE -594 nla 37,000 37,000
314 Ton Pickup with Fibergfass Utility Box 15 -CE -595 n1a 36,000 35,000
One Ton 4X4 with Plow and Lift Gate 15 -CE -596 n1a 71,000 71,000
Police Squad Cars (8) 15 -CE -SQUADS n1a 268,000 268,000
Central Equipment Total 1,390,000 1,371,500 2,337,000 2,002,000 1,694,000 8,794,500
CenwalEquipment Firnd 1,380,600 1,296,500 2,327,000 1,965,000 1,694,000 8,662,500
General Ftin d 10,000 40,000 10,000 60,660
Grants 35,000 37,000 72,000
Central Equipment Total 1,390,000 1,371,590 2,337,000 2,002,000 1,694,000 8,794,500
Grand Total 1,390,000 1,371,500 2,337,000 2,002,000 1,694,000 8,794,500
Page 3 Adondav, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 thm 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
jFacilities Management
Construct Fourth Fire Station 06 -FM -002 rJa 3,000,000 3,000,000
Painting - City Wide 07 -FM -008 nla 38,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 158,000
Seal Coating/Crack Sealing 08 -FM -006 nla 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Misc. Concrete Replacement 08 -FM -007 nla 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Salt Covering System - Maintenance Facility 08 -FM -008 n1a 300,000 300,000
Emergency Siren 10 -FM -007 n1a 30,000 30,000
Replace Roof - Maintenance Facility 11 -FM -001 nla 750,000 750,000
Replace Roof - Bass Lake Playfield 11 -FM -002 rJa 25,000 25,000
Replace Duct Furnaces - Fire Station No. 2 11 -FM -003 n1a 20,000 20,000
City Council Chambers Upgrades t t -FM -004 nla 350,000 350,000
Fire Station Lighting Upgrades 11 -FM -005 nla 21,000 21,000
Replace Wood Floor- Plymouth Creek Center 11 -FM -006 n1a 26,000 26,000
Drainage Improvements- Fire Station No. 3 11 -FM -007 n1a 30,000 30,000
Floor Sealing - Fire Station No. 1 & No. 3 11 -FM -008 nla 40,000 40,000
Replace Roof - Public Safety "Old" 12 -FM -001 nla 250,000 250,000
Replace Roof- City Hall 12 -FM -002 n1a 460,000 460,000
Replace Carpet in Plymouth Creek Ballroom 12 -FM -006 nla 50,000 50,000
Replace Air Conditioner- Cily Hall 13 -FM -001 nla 65,000 65,000
Replace HVAC at Fire Station No. 3 13 -FM -003 nla 50,000 50,000
City Hall Window Replacement 13 -FM -004 n1a 150,000 150,000
Tuckpointing - All Facilities 13 -FM -005 n1a 130,000 130,000
Replace Roof - Oakwood Shelter 15 -FM -001 nla 12,000 12,000
Replace Roof - Historical Building 15 -FM -002 n1a 20,000 20,000
Replace Air Conditioners - Bass Lake 15 -FM -004 n1a 25,000 25,000
Replace Public Safety Boiler 15 -FM -005 n1a 40,000 40,000
Replace Radiant Heat- Mantenance Garage 15 -FM -006 nla 30,000 30,000
Roof Replacement Fire Station No, 2 15 -FM -007 nla 120,000 120,000
Replace Carpet - Maintenance Facility 15 -FM -008 nla 16,000 16,000
Facilities Management Total 630,000 430,000 410,000 790,000 4,158,000 6,418,000
Bo,i(Is 3,000,000 3,000,000
Facilities Management 363,000 290,000 410,000 790,000 1,121,000 2,974,000
General Fund 200,000 140,000 340,000
Grants 12,000 12,000
Park Replacement Fund 25,000 37,000 62,000
Pave 4 iV1onday- Arorember01, 2010
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Resource Planting 30,000 30,000
Facilities Management Total 630,000 430,000 410,000 790,000 4,158,000 6,498,000
Grand Total 630,000 430,000 410,000 790,000 4,158,000 6,416,000
Page 5 Monday, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 thru 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
lilnformation Technology
Land Management Software Replacement 09 -IT -002 n/a 500,000 500,000
Hand-held Device 10 -IT -011 3 57,600 57,600
Replace Tape Drives 11 -IT -002 nla 30,000 30,000
Park and Recreation Software Replacement 11 -IT -003 A 45,000 45,000
Replacement of GIS Software 11 -IT -004 n1a 20,000 20,000
Replace NICE DVR 11 -IT -005 nla 175,000 175,000
Fiberoplic Telecommunication Interconnect 11 -IT -006 n/a 100,000 100,000
Replace Portable 800 MHz Radios 12 -IT -001 n/a 500,000 500,000
Net Motion Server and Software 13 -IT -001 nla 16,000 16,000
Upgrade Microsoft Office Suite 14 -IT -001 n/a 80,000 80,000
Replace Squad Car Video Cameras 14 -IT -002 n/a 100,000 100,000
Replace Squad Car Mobile Computers 14 -IT -003 n/a 115,000 115,000
Replace Compellant SAN 154T-001 nla 28,000 28,000
Information Technology Total 210,000 657,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,766,600
Inforrnation Teehnolo,-y Frond 270,000 157,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,266,600
Other 500,000 500,000
Information Technology Total 270,000 657,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,766,600
Grand Total 270,000 657,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,766,600
Page 6 Monday, !November U1, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Progranq
2011 auu 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Parks and Recreation
New Trails 07 -PR -001 n1a 130,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 590,000
Land Acquisition 07 -PR -003 nfa 2,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000
TraiVParking Lot Repair 07 -PR -004 n1a 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 450,000
Replace Irrigation System 07 -PR -005 n1a 140,000 145,000 285,000
Trail Crossing - Federal or State Trunk Highway 08 -PR -001 n1a 1,000,000 1,000,000
Hilde Performance Center 08 -PR -005 nla 1,400,000 1,400,000
Trail Crossing - Cheshire Lane 09 -PR -001 nla 250,000 250,000
Playground Replacement 10 -PR -001 ala 125,000 230,000 260,000 240,000 855,000
Skate Park Replacement - Water Treatment Plant 10 -PR -002 nla 210,000 210,000
Add/Replace Outdoor Hockey Rinks 10 -PR -004 n1a 240,000 240,000
Miscellaneous Park Improvements 10 -PR -008 n1a 25,000 16,000 41,000
Plymouth Dog Park Site Improvements 11 -PR -001 n1a 260,000 260,000
Field Lighting Replacement 11 -PR -002 n1a 656,000 546,000 550,000 550,000 2,302,000
Fieldhouse Turf Replacement 12 -PR -001 nla 500,000 500,000
Parkers Lake Park Lighting Replacement 12 -PR -006 nla 150,000 150,000
Replace Miscellaneous Boardwalks 14 -PR -003 nla 85,000 85,000
Parks and Recreation Total 3,330,000 3,881,000 1,172,000 2,480,000 1,755,000 12,618,000
Bonds 1,600,000 1,600,000 3,200,000
Connitltmty rinprovetnent Fttnd 1,400,000 1,400,000
Other 250,000 250,000
ParlcDedication Fund 1,390,000 515,000 115,000 115,000 315,000 2,450,000
Park Replacement Fund 340,000 1,516,000 1,057,000 965,000 640,000 4,518,000
State/County/Federal 800,000 800,000
Parks and Recreation Total 3,330,000 3,881,000 1,172,00D 2,480,000 1,755,000 12,618,000
Grand Total 3,330,000 3,881,000 1,172,ODO 2,480,000 1,755,000 12,618,000
Page 7 Monday, 1Vovember 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 thro 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Sanitary Sewer 1
Line Sanitary Sewer Main: Annual Program 06 -SS -003 nla 500,000 510,000 570,000 630,000 710,000 2,320,000
Trunk Sewer Oversizing 08 -SS -0C2 nla 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000
Refurbish Imperial Mills Lift Station 11-S3-001 nla 600,000 600,000
Abandon Conor Meadows Lift Station 11 -SS -002 Na 200,000 200,000
Refurbish Ferndale North Liftstation 13 -SS -001 nla 100,000 700,000 800,000
Refurbish Kingswood Farms Liftstatton 14 -SS -001 nla 100,000 700,000 800,000
Refurbish Greentree Lift Station 15-SM01 n1a 140,000 600,000 740,000
Sanitary Sewer Total 1,400,000 710,000 1,470,000 1,470,000 1,310,000 6,360,000
Sewer Fund 1,100,000 610,000 1,370,000 1,470,000 1,310,000 5,860,000
Utility Trunk Ferrrd 300,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
Sanitary Sewer Total 1,400,000. 710,000 1,470,000 1,470;000 1;310,000 6,360,040
Grand Total 1,400,000 710,000 1,470,000 1,470,000 1,310,000 6,360,000
Page 8 11onday, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Progrcim
2011 thni 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Transit
Small Passenger Bus Replacement 07 -TR -001 nla 180,000 180,000
Large Passenger Bus Replacement 09 -TR -002 n1a 1,500,000 1,500,000
Station 169 Transit Facility 10 -TR -001 nla 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000
Bus Garage NW Transit 10 -TR -002 nla 15,000,000 15,000,000
Transit Station Maintenance and Repairs 10 -TR -003 nla 30,000 33,000 55,000 43,000 45,000 206,000
Bus Shelter Maintenance and New Shelters 10 -TR -004 nla 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Transit Total 230,000 5,233,000 21,935,000 243,000 245,000 27,886,000
Federal Transit Fnndinh 1,680,000 1,680,000
Regional Transit Capital Bonds 230,000 5,233,000 20,255;000 243,000 245,000 26,206,000
Transit Total 230,000 5,233,000 21,935,000 243,000 245;000 27,886,000
Grand Total 230,000 5,233,000 21,935,000 243,000 245,000 27,886,000
Page 1 l Honda),, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capitallrnprovernent Program
2011 thra 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Water
Well Refurbishing 07-W-002 n/a 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 250,000 1,130,000
Trunk Watermain Oversizing 08-W-003 Na 220,000 270,000 220,000 710,000
Cheshire Ln Trunk Watermain (rembrook to CR 47) 09-W-001 nla 370,000 370,000
Paint MIP Water Tower 09-W-003 n/a 550,000 550,000
New Well 17 10-W-002 nra 700,000 700,000
Paint Zachary Water Tower 12-W-001 n1a 60,000 70,000 1,000,000 1,130,000
Wells 18 and 19 and Now Water Treatment Plant 13-W-002 n/a 7,600,000 7,600,000
Paint CR 101 Water Tower 14 -W -00i n/a 45,000 100,000 1,200,000 1,345,000
Water Total 2,165,000 590,000 1,710,000 1,220r000 7,850,000 13,535,000
Utility Trunk Fund -. 1,290,000 270,000 220,000 7,600,000 9,380;000
Water Ftrnd 875,000 320,000 1,490,000 1,220,000_ 250,000 4;155;000
Water Total 2,155,000= :. 590,000 , 1,710,000.. 11220,000 ' 7,650,000 13,535,000
Grand Total 2,165,000 590,000 1,710,000 1,220,000 7,850,000 13,535,000
Page 12 rblon(lay, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 thru 2015
PROJECTS & FUNDING SOURCES BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
100;000. 850,000 50,000 1,650,000
Hennepin County_. 150,000 150,000
Water ReIsources Fund 1;700,000 9401000- 635,000 685,000 540,000
Nater Resources
Maintain Water Quality Ponds 06 -WR -002 n1a 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 450,000
Erosion Repair - Conor Meadows 06 -WR -004 nla 150,000 125,000 275,000
Stream Bank Repairs - Plymouth Creek 07 -WR -001 n1a 850,000 50,000 900,000
Wild Wings Development Wetlands 07 -WR -003 n1a 375,000 375,000
Unspecified Drainage Improvements 08 -WR -003 n1a 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000
RanchviewlMedina Road Welland 08 -WR -004 n1a 175,000 175,000
Bass Lake Outlet 08 -WR -005 n1a 75,000 325,000 400,000
Turtle Lake Outlet 08 -WR -006 nla 35,000 35,000
45th Avenue and Halhan SE Corner 10 -WR -001 n1a 50,000 100,000 200,000 350,000
Parkers Lake Storm Sewer Lift Station Rehab. 10 -WR -003 n1a 700,000 700,000
SI. Mary's Park Drainage Improvement 12 -WR -001 nla 50,000 75,000 125,000 250,000
four Seasons Mall Wetland Enhancement 13 -WR -001 n1a 100,000 850,000 950,000
Plymouth Creek Culvert at Fernbrook Lane 14 -WR -001 n1a 20,000 200,000 220,000
Schmidt Lake Storm Sewer Lift Station Rehab. 15 -WR -002 n1a 20,000 200,000 220,000
Pa,,e 13 iWonday. November (11, 2010
Water Resources Total 2,500,000 1,040,000 1,485,000 685,000 590,000 6,300,000
Bassett Creek Watershed 650,000 100;000. 850,000 50,000 1,650,000
Hennepin County_. 150,000 150,000
Water ReIsources Fund 1;700,000 9401000- 635,000 685,000 540,000 4,500;000
Water Resources Total 2,500,000 1,040,000 1,485,000 685,000 590,000, 6,300,000
Grand Total 2,500,000 1,040,000 1,485,000 685,000 590,000 6,300,000
Pa,,e 13 iWonday. November (11, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 ti•u 2015
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Central Equipment 1,390,000 1,371,500 2,337,000 2,002,000 1,694,000 8,794,500
Facilities Management 630,000 430,000 410,000 790,000 4,158,000 6,418,000
Information Technology 270,000 657,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,766,500
Parks and Recreation 3,330,000 3,881,000 1,172,000 2,480,000 1,755,000 12,618,000
Sanitary Sewer 1,400,000 710,000 1,470,000 1,470,000 1,310,000 6,360,000
Streets 10,622,500 4,510,000 7,695,000 21,040,000 28,285,000 72,152,500
Transit 230,000 5,233,000 21,935,000 243,000 245,000 27,886,000
Water 2,165,000 590,000 1,710,000 1,220,000 7,850,000 13,535,000
Water Resources 2,500,000 1,040,000 1,485,000 685,000 590,000 6,300,000
TOTAL 22,537,500 18,423,100 38,730,000 30,225,000 45,915,000 155,830,600
Page 14 Nondgv, November 01, 2010
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Capital Improvement Program
2011 tln, 2015
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Bassett Creek Watershed 650,000 100,000 850,000 50,000 1,650,000
Bonds 1,500,000 1,600,000 3,000,000 6,200,000
Capital Improvement Fund 27,300 105,000 105,000 237,300
Central Equipment Fund 1,380,000 1,296,500 2,327,000 1,965,000 1,694,000 8,662,500
Community Improvement Fund 1,400,000 1,400,000
Donations 40,000 40,000
Facilities Management 363,000 290,000 410,000 790,000 1,121,000 2,974,000
Federal Funding 420,200 350,000 900,000 12,650,000 14,320,200
Federal Transit Funding 1,680,000 1,680,000
General Fund 210,000 180,000 10,000 400,000
Grants 12,000 35,000 37,000 84,000
Hennepin County 850,000 2,275,000 3,125,000
Information Technology Fund 270,000 157,600 516,000 295,000 28,000 1,266,600
Municipal State Aid Fund 850,000 800,000 770,000 1,575,000 6,460,000 10,455,000
Other 100,000 800,000 50,000 7,050,000 50,000 8,050,000
Park Dedication Fund 1,390,000 515,000 115,000 115,000 315,000 2,450,000
Park Replacement Fund 365,000 1,516,000 1,057,000 965,000 677,000 4,580,000
Regional Transit Capital Bonds 230,000 5,233,000 20,255,000 243,000 245,000 26,206,000
Resource Planning 30,000 30,000
sewer Fund 1,290,000 700,000 1,460,000 1,510,000 1,350,000 6,230,000
Special Assessments - Streets 3,440,000 1,215,000 2,015,000 2,935,000 2,960,000 12,565,000
StatelCountylFederal 250,000 800,000 1,050,000
Street Replacement Fund 4,580,000 2,135,000 4,055,000 5,535,000 5,840,000 22,145,000
Utility Trunk Fund 1,590,000 370,000 320,000 7,600,000 9,880,000
Water Fund 1,250,000 420,000 1,640,000 1,620,000 350,000 5,280,000
Water Resources Fund 1,760,000 1,020,000 745,000 765,000 620,000 4,910,000
GRAND TOTAL 22,577,500 18,423,100 38,730,000 30,225,000 45,915,000 155,870,600
Nq e 15 Alarclal, Novembef• 01, 2010
a
0
N
H
Yb
I
61
41
yC y
L. u a
ub
H
O
w
W
v
air
LQJ
H
O
vi
O 7 a
N O
G
Qmcn p
O
a) ro oUS
ani d
L O
o
cz
I 0N
a IN ate--.
nC\' '
U7
N
N
U 64
Un
V7
W QJ
y '49
N
L
o
4-1
ziLy Q•1 Ln N
Li Li Li L U y C.7 U
Co O O m O
N N NQrY-
O b0
O
0 C:) 0 0 cu
U a,
N N N 7] •-
M 4
Ud1
QC. 'm W
O
O U mwwwO
G
a C13
C NCD
UOa o
Ao o
L 4yO
O O O N4-1
W
L O
4jctscts cts Lo G p 41
FU -
i
aU
Cll
Fps Fps Fps
ate+ ' 'ham'
p o o CD
ate+
U
cn
O O O O a
w a'•'
rncts
cu as cu W y cu 41
O s
j
CILnLnLnctsOani da
OIQQQU ¢ f4 4=1
H I
41
yC y
a
air
H
C w G
W
U air
LQJ
U
G
ca
H+-
O
ani d
Oo
E
G
O
V
d..
I
La
a
1.
a
W
LQJ
GO
ani d
Oo
ON
U7 7 QL1
O
o
o O
z
d O
VS U
v4 O41 O
i
Y
bjD
uiYU
O Y
N
O O
W
L O
u
R
w
CL
B LnO O
U
O
L O
O 41
U
L O
O+
In
LQ7Q
Y
hOp c
cd
4
O
U
O s"' mo
y L p Ow
y
Sb U 7] Q]
a ro
A p
4O
C\3
UO
67 L
4O
W L
U W
I 4'.
Oy O
K 4.1
O U
G 4
67 O
CY
y G
M 0
G C V,.G Gy
p Lo o Ky
UO
mC UCD.d O U L IE O
U67li7 [i5
W
OJ
N 4' vii
O
aysU
ted'..
to U
G bl)
41
vl
W
7]
z
rcu
O O O O o o O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O p O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
i- C4 u7 -i r6 N r
N_
O
N
T
N
0
T
0N
U
U
Yr-.
120
G
O
0
CD
C
Cc
G
3
cc
O
O
H
v
CC
m
l4 Cl VZ In MVZ
I
V u n kn00
4W
C05
G
a w w
N
U1
U
WN N
relV
N N Vi
l 00 0%
O
N_
l y
N c
rf
rf
O
a
N
N
O O O O o o O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O p O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
i- C4 u7 -i r6 N r
N_
O
N
T
N
0
T
0N
U
U
Yr-.
120
G
O
0
CD
C
Cc
G
3
cc
O
O
H
v
m
l4 Cl VZ In MVZ 00
V u n kn00G00 O N
WN N N N N Vi
l 00 0% O N_
l yQ % O N r O
C v O 00 Vl N
F `--' 00 l- N O r- D
w C
c1 I r Ln
O O O O O
C
O
00
O O
n
Lr) C)
C1. 0000 kn r
03 aciQ
D
G Q v
O Vn
r:
z m
bG
w
m c
d
Q
v w viio O
ON
rn
000
00 of of 0
n 0 0 0 0 0
Q a
a a
a o 0 0 0
c
IT > 00 000 a V) 110
z
Uc kn t Ln cr)
n
Ln
nR
O0000 N r
R V'i Ln Ln Vl kn
V
C3 C N- krl
NCD
N N N C8N 8>
NN N
O O O O o o O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O p O O
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O
i- C4 u7 -i r6 N r
N_
O
N
T
N
0
T
0N
U
U
Yr-.
120
G
O
0
CD
C
Cc
G
3
cc
O
O
H
v
O
ON
r
r
IF^1
V1 0
O
L
r.
e-
yy ISI
Ln
n
V
a
C) d
W) rC
pri 4
Gl
O O O
0
a
e-
yy ISI
Ln
n
V
a
C) d
I
o
n
O o n
00
0
o CIO
N
r 00 n 7r n r- N
N
O O
r--1
O O O
O
N N
ar
N
pri 4
Gl
i
O O O O O
e- m N Ln
n
C) C) d C) d
I
o
n
O o n
00
o CIO ON
r 00 n 7r n r- N
i
O O O O O
j n
C) C) d C) d
o o
n N 00
t IZT
a
7r m N
ro N
O O O O O O
N N N N
ar
N
i
01 N r) r
C\
O\ M M 110 O
N l M M
i
py p oo v -i O m
CC 110 00 b
00 00 01 Oi CN
I
I
I
at
C4 CA
G1 C
00 00 00 00 o0
i Lr) CT 00 v1
j n O T
00 n v, o o
n N 00
t IZT
a
7r m N
ro N
O O O O O O
N N N N N N
CD
c
N
e4
v
m
0
LL
N
eC
V
r`
LL
a.+
C
CD
CD
0
Q
4!
w
lieL
to
CL
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
O CD 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
CC] Lo V C6 CV r
LO
O
N
r
0
N
m
0
N
N
ON
ON
O
a
N
0
d
C
m
o
00
0
13Q
41
L
O
LL
t
N
U
V
3
LL
C
d
d
7
O
L-
CLa
E
3
E
O
U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CCCCCC0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ci C 0 0 C C 0 C
00I`CO117('')Nr
0
N
co
0
N
N
O
N
T
QN
0
0
N
C- M O ON 1 C -
o
v V c oo N
cq Ln M
b Ln N o r-
O Ln Ln
C
W y
U
cl
1 O O O O O
M. U a.
W W
O
cq
00 00
110ice[ Fri d o o o Lr)
cl
oo
p r- cn o rn
CDrnI rn 09,
Lr) 00
y
c vi
U
cq Ln
UCDOO
N N ON N
d
C
m
o
00
0
13Q
41
L
O
LL
t
N
U
V
3
LL
C
d
d
7
O
L-
CLa
E
3
E
O
U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CCCCCC0C
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ci C 0 0 C C 0 C
00I`CO117('')Nr
0
N
co
0
N
N
O
N
T
QN
0
0
N
0 oao o a a a
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 00
CT 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
co 6 V C cv
LO
0
N
0
0
N
N_
ON
0
N
0
r
0
N
O
Q N D 011 O
00 l0 C
m 01 Q)
bA ! M
CC M V) Vl V) V7 V)
C
W
EQ
U
CD 0 o a a
C)
w o o a a
a
W
C
i••
i"
y n
N O N
N N N N
A
Ln CJ
y Ti M o 00
C' l' Q
Lr) f'1 Lt) f'1 MVl Vl
0.4
a
kn
110 O
O 00
N
I'D
N
D
o
o O
N a 000 ON
N N N N N
p
M
o za
N
wV
es ON N ON
S M It 00
y O N
knun
U
cl
CN m
o 0 0 0 0 0
t N N N N N N
0 o ao o a a a
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 00
CT 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
co 6 V C cv
LO
0
N
0
0
N
N_
ON
0
N
0
r
0
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ln o LQ C LQ C L o Ln
lzf It M M N N r r
LO
0
N
0
N
M
ON
N_
O
N
ON
0
T
0
N
o o Qn
C O N
N kn N N cr 00
lzzr kn C
n ON N O O
W
C
V
C) bA
G 0kn 0
I N O
Lr)
O
QI PC p
r•y p
N O C" M
Q, cdM C O 00
L'a N N M m m
y W
nil N O D V1
h
0000
M ChM
o
O
N
O u
N rq a a r-
y
q
r
kr)
O
G%
0 rf)
Imo}
C14
1N
m N N N M M
V
L
ONN N NN N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ln o LQ C LQ C L o Ln
lzf It M M N N r r
LO
0
N
0
N
M
ON
N_
O
N
ON
0
T
0
N
a
C)
N
Lf
a o 0 o a o C
C CC CD C 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a a a a a a
a a a a a s
m m IT N N d
v
a
N
m
0
N
N
a
N
0
N
a
0
N
00 C- N N
n
C
C1 1p C1 O Vl 00
C 0000 a
W
V
C) a a a o
0 00 0 0
A4 o Vi u1 u1 0
p o 00
00
Ua 4 c -i lir kr k
r.
0 O r- O00n
N
it
p C cu U cOOv
CLv E
V
yOHwyp W
44 VV ly
Ow00N
1%0
O
110
000
O O
116 ol
00
I'D so 0000 0)
a# N N N N N
O
N
O
N r --
rte.
N
V' N O
M
00
L' 1p Vl M
V
Cq Lr)
O O O
N N N
a o 0 o a o C
C CC CD C 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a a a a a a
a a a a a s
m m IT N N d
v
a
N
m
0
N
N
a
N
0
N
a
0
N
N
LO
T
O O O O O O O O O o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
00 (O V N O C Cil -ti N
n
0
ON
M
N
ON
0
N
a
N N vi kr)
W
o Lr, 000
4
0
H
o
C o 41
V
n 7
O
M
N
O
N
O O O O O O O O O o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
00 (O V N O C Cil -ti N
n
0
ON
M
N
ON
0
N
N N vi kr)
o Lr, 000 n o
C o 41 M n 7
M o
t4
V
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
W
4-4
n M 00 N
nof" Irl V'1 D o
O o0
Cd O
It It
U
a
b
cd M O kn M
6 C N-- U
Q
W C s
C3
n o vNi 000
ono n
It:t M OEao14Dcioo
n O-
a
N T T
q O C a0000
N N N N N
dU
N N
ON
It
O n 000
14D
n cr
00 N0 Y
N N M t 14D
6
Cd0) O
N
O
N
O
N
O O O
N N N
O O O O O O O O O o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
00 (O V N O C Cil -ti N
n
0
ON
M
N
ON
0
N
C)
aN
LO
T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a C 0 0 0 0 0 0
T r r r
LO
O
N
C)
N
M
0
N
N
O
N
r
ON
O
C)
N
M 110 110 110
I
V yr C 110
O
p
I
G
W
i-
O
r
o
I
O Cl 00 N
Sd
V
cY, C oo C
N
i
V
a
01
r--1
00
C'
OO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a C 0 0 0 0 0 0
T r r r
LO
O
N
C)
N
M
0
N
N
O
N
r
ON
O
C)
N
M 110 110 110 r- V yr C 110
O Cl 00 N
Sd
V
cY, C oo C o
V 01
O
m
00 C
00 OO
A 6 x O O
m O QO
O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O O Q
p M
W
a
42
y 6
p
L7s
Q H
CG
ON N
00 O\ M U"t
R. N LnM klO ON
r
Vl V-] V1
00 o0
MO 00
O
Q
M O\ O
a O O e 1 6a
G u O O\ M 00
y l o0 00
v
c l c l O
y j EYj O O M r- 00
r
to 00
On
N
00
00 aiVn
N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a C 0 0 0 0 0 0
T r r r
LO
O
N
C)
N
M
0
N
N
O
N
r
ON
O
C)
N
O
rO
N
T
r -i
d1
U
C
m
fn
U
L
0
LL
i
to
U
C
LL
L
d
3
m
U)
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 o a a o 0 0
0 0 0 0 a a o
It N a 00 CO V N
T T T
LO
O
N
0
N
N_
N
ON
1 0 It NUtM T
TtN 00 C1 p
It
t0 N O CN M
N N lr
Q\ N
C
U
O O p O O
O p O O
O O
C=> p
W
I=
C12 00 CN O
O O p O
L+
L
r U
NCCdt• O M
Cd
r o CCN r-
3 p tr N cr
H
p O O
00
0r-
0 t0
NHsi
cO*
1 N
00 00 Q Q, p
z
mU
A00
N000
p N O I
N N 1 v1
cd M tp n cr
U
O
Np
N N
NO
N N
d1
U
C
m
fn
U
L
0
LL
i
to
U
C
LL
L
d
3
m
U)
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 o a a o 0 0
0 0 0 0 a a o
It N a 00 CO V N
T T T
LO
O
N
0
N
N_
N
ON
O
O O O O O O O
O O Q O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0
C) M o o LO
C+) N N c- r
LO
O
N
0
N
C7
ON
N_
0
N
0
N
O
ON
Q d' V7 M 00 N
U Lr)O O N all 7r
n lr rn
bu e0a
C7 ct cr1 O Ln
CC M 41
b n N n N oo
Ws
CC
V
0
0 0 0 0 0
tn
o n w
W
N n n
w rn 00 CA
a N N N M cr1
O y
Cd all 0 000 000
01%
o r- 00
w p n
C)
CN—
Q
Cl)
Q+ W0 U N N N N N
Cd
pq
a+ a V7 00 all N O
WO00 011 000 I r
N vl
N
a o
CD Q tn Ln
6Q o
V P4
m
w
C)o Q 110
d It 00 00
a
o M m
C." y r O NV')
0 X-
N N N N N
dv
M 00
Q d M O to Lr)
N onoM
M
t N
r
N
V
O~ N cr1 Ln
O
N
r
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O O O O O O O
O O Q O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0
C) M o o LO
C+) N N c- r
LO
O
N
0
N
C7
ON
N_
0
N
0
N
O
ON
Mmz
A
6
Q
00 171- O1 M r- I'D
N O1 00 O1) t I'D
Ln 1 11 l - 00 00
Cl r•
m
Q
01
71-
r• O D
t 1 11 1 11 M M N
0000 r• G1 M r-
cr
O
M
Otn
N
O
M
O
2)
G
V
Cl r•
m
Q
71- M
V
M
0
CD Ln o
O O O
kn
I t LnU -o r•
r•
oo VO0oGG
6.
0
LL
m
vC1
p
T
kn
N
r•
DN
O
00
N
N
O1)
N
to
O
rf)
C
LL
Lid
d
N
N Q0000 r- Q,
O Idr O
rrOQOO100
WiF
iF
O
OO 00rl- M
M 00 M
O 71- a, O U
r v 71-
0000 r• G1 M r-
cr
vNi
r00
oho
Cl r• r• r Q
71- M c*1
M
G O O O O
N N N N N
O O O O O O O
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
O O O Q Q Q
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
CO Ln 1 M N -
O
N
0
N
co
0
N
N
0
N
O
N
r
ON
r
O O O O O O O O
Q QCD CD CD CD
O O O O Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o oa CD CD 0
cn c7 N N r r
Lo
ON
r
O
N
M
r
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
0
0
N
U N W) c*l V1
D Irl C1 N C\
O
OM-
Cd
U
d
0
o
0
a
0
a
o
o
c
0
W
C
42
y
rL
b
O
CW
i
O
M
r-
ON
ON
I'D Vl Vl
i w
W
wl
171-171-00 N 171- mM
D N
M
0 trl N
c U
p
n Nl rnN r-
Lr) 17rM
Mt
Cl N
N
Vt*1 M M t*1 Com!
O r
N N N N ON N
O O O O O O O O
Q QCD CD CD CD
O O O O Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o oa CD CD 0
cn c7 N N r r
Lo
ON
r
O
N
M
r
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
0
0
N
a
O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000 Q Q Q
O00000000000
LO O LO O LO O LO o LO o LO C:)
LO LO IT NTCl) C7NNrr00
IT NT qT NT qT NT
LO
O
N
0
N
c7
O
N
N
0
N
0
N
0
0
N
U I'D
I
It I'D O\ Gl
o O M
V
r'
rel
V
G
Lr V'] 16
N~
e O\ M 00 00
1-
U
O
M
N
a
O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000 Q Q Q
O00000000000
LO O LO O LO O LO o LO o LO C:)
LO LO IT NTCl) C7NNrr00
IT NT qT NT qT NT
LO
O
N
0
N
c7
O
N
N
0
N
0
N
0
0
N
U I'D V1 It I'D O\ Gl
o O M vn It kn
r' kr 00 Lr V'] 16
e O\ M 00 00 O U
N M
It It t t It
W
v
C:) 0 0 0 0
Cd y
p o t-- to 00
1= y
C+
n
N
vl
4 N
N
Wa h
W bh It CIN Coll CANCO
It It
l G1 4 car to
O O O
U
c
It
fin 01 01 00 Mp
H4
y 00
a o ri vi oo
y N N N N cn
rC
N N N N N
Q
F7
00v
y
o
L L/i 00 kr) V)
01 M 00 00 O
v
7t kn
N ON N N N N
a
O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000 Q Q Q
O00000000000
LO O LO O LO O LO o LO o LO C:)
LO LO IT NTCl) C7NNrr00
IT NT qT NT qT NT
LO
O
N
0
N
c7
O
N
N
0
N
0
N
0
0
N
Q
ON
i
y 00 a1 O O Ln
01 00 C-- 01 O1
A d 06 M O N d- 116
PC .o c14 N r- N t
c
U
L
Op 01 O
a. o00 rev
a
NM
U W
a
N
00 M a
C knfl
O O
O
R O
Na1
N
C) O
m
inv'>
M d
O U
C
Cd
m o` no
r W O V'l 00 M 00
ra N N m
H N
O O 1 0 a 00
V
C
iF NON
00 00 rn
M M cr'1 M cn
z
L
CD4 4 O O O O
O O Q Q Q
4 O p p p
4 0Q 4 4
N N Iti CD
LO
O ON2
mc
a
O
m
TQN
N O
CQ
Q
mC
Y) m
T
4 O
f9
N
3
Ot
r C
NN
C
lll
c
T
Q
N O
3
4
a
o
4 C-
T
Q
N
C13CL
U
Co
6
V
l
O
d 0
U U
d
0
Op 01 O
a. o00 rev
NMO
N
O O O O O O
N N N N N N
CD4 4 O O O O
O O Q Q Q
4 O p p p
4 0Q 4 4
N N Iti CD
LO
O ON2
mc
a
O
m
T QN
N O
CQ
Q
mC
Y) m
T
4 O
f9
N
3
Ot
r C
NN
C
lll
c
T
Q
N O
3
4
a
o
4 C-
T
Q
N
C13CL
U
Co
6
V
l
O
d 0
U U
d
0
aoaaaCDaaoo
oaaoaaaao
00000CoQ
aoaoaaaoo
ooaaaoaaa
M(D-;t CD W(O-tN
T T T T T
CD
N
0
N
C7
ON
N
ON
C
N
a
O
N
dJ Lf) cel t—
CeS
G1 I
Itu
tw
M 110 N
Cl OnONMItEP]
w
CG
r
a
O
9F
1 I 1 E 1
r
0
y
N
C
O
N
aoaaaCDaaoo
oaaoaaaao
00000CoQ
aoaoaaaoo
ooaaaoaaa
M(D-;t CD W(O-tN
T T T T T
CD
N
0
N
C7
ON
N
ON
C
N
a
O
N
dJ Lf) cel t— 00 G1 I
Itu
tw
M 110 N
Cl OnONMItEP]
w
CG
9F
1 I 1 E 1
a y C
x
W m
e+
V
y O It oll CN cc
Q N
QOj
k O NNNNN O
LL
O t
N1
cc
C— 00 I V'1 M V
CItC -
y W t- 00 n O r
NLLN
N
0
O 00 O
Q M M Crl M M
LL
o
Z
u
Q
A
NON Erl t—
V
CIA
NO
N N
CJO
N
aoaaaCDaaoo
oaaoaaaao
00000CoQ
aoaoaaaoo
ooaaaoaaa
M(D-;t CD W(O-tN
T T T T T
CD
N
0
N
C7
ON
N
ON
C
N
a
O
N
0N
6
N
Department 2011 2011 Change Percent 2012 2012 Change Percent 2013 2013 Change Percent 2014 2014 Change Percent
Central Equipment 1,500,400 1,390,000 -110,400 7% 1,238,500 1,371,500 133,000 11% 2,259,000 2,337,000 78,000 3% 2,130,350 2,002,000 -128,350 6%
Facilities Management 165,000 630,000 465,000 282% 575,000 430,000 -145,000 25% 145,000 410,000 265,000 183% 3,755,000 790,000 -2,965,000 79%
Information Technology 270,000 270,000 0 0% 557,600 657,600 100,000 18% 516,000 516,000 0 0% 295,000 295,000 0 0%
Parks and Recreation 1,176,000 3,330,000 2,154,000 183% 855,000 3,881,000 3,026,000 354% 951,000 1,172,000 221,000 23% 12,090,000 2,480,000 -9,610,000 79%
Sanitary Sewer 1,100,000 1,400,000 300,000 27% 610,000 710,000 100,000 16% 1,210,000 1,470,000 260,000 21% 610,000 1,470,000 860,000 141%
Streets 7,377,500 10,622,500 3,245,000 44% 11,030,000 4,510,000 -6,520,000 59% 18,970,000 7,695,000 -11,275,000 59% 25,180,000 21,040,000 -4,140,000 16%
Transit 125,000 230,000 105,000 84% 6,625,000 5,233,000 -1,392,000 21% 21,805,000 21,935,000 130,000 1% 125,000 243,000 118,000 94%
Water 540,000 2,165,000 1,625,000 301% 1,290,000 590,000 -700,000 54% 440,000 1,710,000 1,270,000 289% 7,920,000 1,220,000 -6,700,000 85%
Water Resources 1,830,000 2,500.000 670,000 37% 950,000 1,040,000 91000 91% 795,000 1,485,000 690,000 87% 585,000 685,000 100,000 17%
TOTAL 14,083,900 22,537,500 8,453,600 60% 23,731,100 18,423,100 -5,308,000 22% 47,091,000 38,730,000 -8,361,000 18% 52,690,350 30,225,000 -22,465,350 43%
Department
Central Equipment Fire, squad, hybrid cost increases, fewer squads Squad and other cost increases, Fire RAD SUV Squad increases Fire, squad increases, Fire RAD SUV
Facilities Management Chambers upgrade ($350,000) Air handlers funded by stimulus in 2010 City Hall window replacement, tuckpointing Fourth Fire Station to 2015 ($3,000,000)
Information Technology None Fiberoptic interconnect with WSD ($100,000) None None
Parks and Recreation Land acquisition ($2,000,000), dog park ($260,000) Land acquisition ($2,000,000), turf replacement ($500,000) Irrigation replacement Hilde ($1,400,000), West Med. And 10th Playfield removed
Sanitary Sewer Abandon lift station ($200,000), trunk oversizing ($100,000) Trunk oversizing ($100,000) and lining Trunk oversizing ($100,000), lining, lift station replacement Lining, lift station replacement ($700,000)
Streets Cost increases, new projects ($4,475,000) Street reconstruction program change ($6,000,000) CR 24 ($3,000,000), Vicksburg ($9,000,000), new projects CR 24 ($3M), Vicksburg to 2015 ($18M), new projects
Transit Bus shelter maintenance ($100,000) Bus shelter maintenance ($100,000), delayed replacement Bus shelter maintenance ($100,000) Bus shelter maintenance ($100,000)
Water Projects not completed in 2010, painting towers ($655,000) Painting tower Painting tower ($1,200,000) Wells and treatment plant to 2015 ($7,600,000)
Water Resources Plymouth Creek funded all in 2011, cost increases Plymouth Creek funded all in 2011, new project Plymouth Creek funded all in 2011, new project New projects
Failed (0 to 20)
Very Poor (21-35)
Poor (36 to 50)
a Fair (51 to 65)
Good (66 to 80)
A Very Good (81 to 90)
Excellent (91 to 100)
2010 ICON Street Rating Data
2010 ICON Ratings
4%3%
Average ICON Rating - 62.5
ICON Strategies (miles)
Routine
Maintenance, 11.76
Seal Coat, 4
Seal coat, ICON Needs
81.600.000
Overlay,
36,000,00
117,600,000 Total Needs
Reconstruction,
70.89
construction,
80,000,000
2010 PASER Street Rating Data
H Failed or Very Poor (0 to 2.9)
Poor (3 to 3.9)
jr Fair (4 to 5.9)
a Good (b to 7.9)
Very Good (8 to 8.9)
Excellent (9 to 10)
2010 PASER Ratings
2%
Average PASER Rating - 6.4
PASER Strategies (miles)
Reconstruction, 5.43
Routine
Maintenance,
102.50
Crack Seal/Seal
Coat,
3,500,000
Pavem
Rehabilit;
14,800,000
Pavement
Rehabilitation, 84.53
Coat, 93.20
PASER Needs
Reconstruction,
6,100,000
i
24,400,000 iotas Needs
Funding Scenarios in New System
m Failed or Very Poor (0 to 29)
Poor (3 to 3.9)
A Fair (4 to 5.9)
Good (6 to 7.9)
n Very Good (8 to 8.9)
ld Excellent (9 to 10)
PASER Scenario 1
Reconstruction only
Cost - $6,100,000
Resulting PASER Rating - 6.5
PASER Scenario 2
All Reconstruction and Pavement Rehabilitation
is Failed or Very Poor (0 to 2.9)
a Poor (3 to 3.9)
j Fair (4 to 5.9)
Good (6 to 7.9)
Very Good (8 to 8.9)
Excellent (9 to 10) Cost - $21,000,000
Resulting PASER Rating - 8.0
PASER CIP Scenario
Combination of Reconstruction and Pavement Rehabilitation by Area
Failed or Very Poor (0 to 2.9)
Poor (3 to 3.9)
Fair (4 to 5.9)
Good (6 to 7.9)
Very Good (8 to 8.9)
Excellent (9 to 10) Cost - $14,000,000
Resulting PASER Rating - 7.4
4,000,000.00
3,500,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00
Results of New System
2011-2015 CIP Funding
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Projected PASER Ratings
7.6-----...__--
7.4 — —- — ----..
7.2 ----- ___ -- - -- --- —
7_.----...--.----
6.8 ------ ----- --- - - - -
6.6
6.46.2
L
i
6 --- -
5.8--
2010 2011
2010 PASER Ratings
2012
Failed, Very
Poor or Poor
11 Fair or Good
Very Good or
Excellent
Street Segments
Legend
Pavement Management Districts
WN
IL
Tisk4, , _ :.
7
7
will • . ._
Street Segments
Legend
PASER Rating
V 0.000000
0.000001 -3-000000
3.000001 -4.500000
4.500001 - 6.000000
6.000001 -7.000000
7.000001 -8.000000
8.000001 -10.000000
r/OV Interstate Highways
Trunk Highways
l\% County State Aid Highways
County Roads
Municipal State Aid Highways
Plymouth Roads
Private Roads
Adjacent Jurisdiction Roadways
Unknown Jurisdiction
2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Program
Pavement Rehabilitation Projects
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Street Reconstruction
Maintenance Overlay
rp City of PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTPlymouth
POLICY
Adding quoiify to Life
The Basis of Special Assessments
A. General
As a charter city, Plymouth has the authority to levy special assessments under the
provisions of the State Local Improvement Code (MSA Chapter 429). Minnesota State
Law, Chapter 429.011 to 429.111 and portions of 444 provides that a municipality shall
have the power to make public improvements such as sanitary sewers, storm sewers,
water source and distribution facilities, street improvements including grading, curb
and gutter, surfacing, sidewalks, street lighting, recreational facilities, etc. The various
procedures the municipality must follow including reports, notices and public hearings
are well defined within the law.
The Statute further provides that the cost of any improvement may be assessed upon
properties benefitted by the improvement based upon the benefits received whether or
not the property abuts on the improvement and whether or not any part of the cost of
the improvement is paid from Municipal State Aid, the county -state aid funds or trunk
highway funds. The law is not specific on how these benefits are to be measured or
how the costs are to be apportioned, but rather makes it incumbent upon the
municipality to determine, with assistance of an engineer or other qualified personnel, a
fair and equitable method of cost sharing among the properties involved.
For the purposes of allocating costs for public improvement projects in the City of
Plymouth, the City Council has defined two forms of benefit;
1. Special benefit
2. General benefit
Special Benefit. The general application of both law and court decisions holds that only
properties that receive a special benefit from improvement projects may be specially
assessed. For example, public utilities brought to an area not served with sanitary sewer,
water, road and drainage result in the properties in question increasing in market value.
Likewise, properties that do not directly abut a street improvement can be shown to
benefit from that improvement if the street provides the only public access to those
properties. Property may only be assessed to the extent the improvement causes the
property to increase in market value.
Public improvement Special Assessment 1 of 14 City Council Policy
General Benefit. The concept of general benefit holds that in some types of improvement
projects the community at large derives a benefit distinct from the special benefit derived
by the properties within the project boundaries. For example, a major thoroughfare may
be deemed to have a general benefit to the community at large, as well as the special
benefit derived by the abutting property,
Special assessments are levied by the City Council on particular parcels of property based
upon the benefit those parcels derive from the improvement as determined by the City
Council.
B. Total Project Cost
The total cost of a public improvement includes the following:
Construction cost plus 15% for engineering, administration, legal fees, assessment
rolls, plus right-of-way costs (fee acquisition and/or easement costs including
staff time) and temporary funding charges, plus other charges for services and
contingencies, plus any assessable charges from other governmental agencies (i.e.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Hennepin County, State of
Minnesota), plus any assessable costs previously incurred by the City.
A portion of other contributing funds from the City (i.e. Municipal State Aid (MSA),
Trunk Utility, Water Resources, etc.) or outside governmental agencies may be deducted
from the total improvement cost to determine the assessable cost.
C. Assessment Interest Rate
The special assessment interest rate shall be established annually by the Finance and
Administrative Services Department. The rate shall be as determined by the rate at which
the City can issue General Obligation Special Assessment bonds plus 1.5% for
administrative costs.
D. Term of Assessment
Assessments shall normally be levied for a period not to exceed five years for
assessments of $5,000 or less, 10 years for assessments greater than $5,000 but $10,000
or less, and 15 years for assessments greater than $10,000. In no case shall the
assessment term exceed the expected useful life of the improvement.
E. City Owned Property
The City from time to time undertakes public improvement projects benefiting property
within the City, and City -owned property is occasionally benefited by and may be
specially assessed for such improvements. City property shall generally be determined
the benefit as follows:
Public Improvement Special Assessment 2 of 14 City Council Policy
Property owned or used by a City utility operation shall be deemed to
benefit in the same manner and to the same extent as a single-family
residential property.
2. Park land shall be viewed on an individual basis; however, smaller
neighborhood parks shall normally not be assessed; rather the costs spread
throughout the benefiting district. Community or central parks should
normally be assessed for benefit as single-family residential property.
3. Storm water holding areas shall not normally be deemed to be assessable.
4. Other categories of property shall be reviewed on an individual basis to
determine benefit.
F. Property Excluded
Special assessments will not be levied against property lying within the boundaries of a
delineated wetland or property dedicated for public right-of-way or easement prior to
development of the property provided that right-of-way or easement was not used as a
means to obtain density credits.
ll. Public Improvement Assessment Policies
A. Sanitary Sewer
Functional Classification. For purposes of benefit determination, the following
two functional classifications are adopted:
a. Trunk. Trunk sanitary sewers are those lines normally sized larger than
eight inches which are required to be constructed to provide service to a
sewer district or sub—district. These trunk lines are identified in the City's
Sanitary Sewer Plan. The cost of trunk facilities is deemed to be a central
system cost. Trunks may provide lateral benefit and where such benefit is
determined the property will be so assessed. Trunks may be constructed in
an alignment to develop lateral benefit which requires deeper pipe
construction. fn such instances, the Council shall consider the degree to
which extra depths may be treated as a trunk versus a lateral cost.
b. Laterals. Lateral sanitary sewer lines in most residential zones (FRD, R-1
through R-3) are not larger than eight inches while other zoned areas may
have lateral benefit up to 12 inches. Laterals are designed to be sized to
collect the sewage from a project area for conveyance to a trunk facility.
2. Central Systema Costs. Central system costs are divided into the following two
categories:
Public Improvement Special Assessment 3 of 14 City Council Policy
B. Water
a. Connection Charge, Sanitary Sewer Residential Equivalent Connection
REC) charges are established by the City to finance central system costs:
sewer trunks, force mains and pumping stations, etc. These improvement
costs are incurred before property can develop. REC charges for sanitary
sewer service to dwelling units or other structures shall be made in
accordance with Chapter 7 of the Plymouth City Code.
b. Area Charges Sanitary sewer area assessments, to finance central system
costs, shall be levied against all benefiting properties within an improvement
district. Sanitary sewer and water area assessments will usually be levied at
the same time.
The current assessment rates (adopted December 12, 2006 to be effective
January 1, 2007) for sanitary sewer area charges is $950 per developable
acre.
Area and connection charges shall be reviewed and annually to determine
whether current charges are projected to be adequate to cover the cost of
infrastructure needed to serve future development.
Lateral Assessments. It is the policy of the City to assess fully the costs of all
lateral sanitary sewers to a given project area. These costs shall include the costs
associated with bringing the sanitary sewer to the property at a point and depth
needed to serve not only the property in question, but adjacent parcels outside of
the current project boundary if the line is to be extended in the future. It shall be
the intent of the policy to insure that the most economical and effective sanitary
sewage collection system can be constructed so as to meet the ultimate needs of
the community at large. In all but high density (R-4) residential developments,
lateral sanitary sewer special benefit shall be limited to pipe sizes no greater than
eight inches in diameter, while in commercial and industrial zoned properties,
including properties zoned high density residential (R-4), the special benefit
shall be limited to a pipe no greater than twelve inches in diameter. Lateral
assessment shall be calculated on a front footage or unit basis.
Functional Classification. For purposes of benefit determination, the following
two functional classifications are adopted:
a. Thenk. Trunk watermains are normally sized twelve inches or larger. These
trunk lines are identified in the City's Water Supply and Distribution Plan.
The cost of trunk facilities is deemed to be a central system cost. Trunks
may provide lateral benefit and where such benefit is determined the
property will be so assessed. There is no lateral benefit for FRD, R-1 and
R-2 development unless a direct building connection is made to the trunk
water main. It is further determined that there is lateral benefit from trunk
water mains for all developments.
Public improvement Special Assessment 4 of 14 City Council Policy
b. Lateral. Lateral lines are normally not larger than eight inches in most
residential zones (FRD, R-1 through R-2) and 12 inches in other zones.
Laterals are designed to be sized to provide water in sufficient volumes and
such pressure as required to serve a project area.
2. Central System Costs. Central system costs are divided into the following
categories:
a. Connection Charge. Water Residential Equivalent Connection (REQ
charges as established by the City to finance central system costs,
representing trunk water mains, reservoirs, wells, pumping stations,
treatment facilities, etc. These improvement costs are incurred before
property can develop. REC charges for sanitary sewer service to dwelling
units or other structures shall be made in accordance with Chapter 7 of the
Plymouth City Code.
b. Area Charges. Water area assessments, to finance central system costs, shall
normally be levied against all benefiting properties within an appropriate
improvement district at the area assessment rate then currently in effect
when water is available to the property.
The current assessment rates (adopted December 12, 2006 to be effective
January 1, 2007) for water area charges is $3,525 per developable acre.
Area and connection charges shall be reviewed and revised annually to
determine whether current charges are projected to be adequate to cover the
cost of infrastructure needed to serve future development.
3. Lateral Assessments. It is the policy of the City to assess fully the costs of all
lateral water mains to a given project area. These costs shall include the costs
associated with bringing the water main to the property at a point needed to serve
not only the property in question, but adjacent parcels outside of the current
project boundary if the line is to be extended in the future. It shall be the intent
of the policy to insure that the most economical and effective water distribution
system can be constructed so as to meet the ultimate needs of the community at
large. In all but high density (R-3 and R-4) residential developments, lateral
water main special benefit shall be limited to pipe sizes no greater than eight
inches in diameter, while in commercial and industrial zones properties,
including properties zoned in high density residential (R-3 and R-4) and
schools, the special benefit shall be limited to a pipe no greater than 12 inches in
diameter. Lateral assessment shall be calculated on a front footage or unit basis.
C. Storm Drainage
Storm drainage facilities, (pipes, ponds, wetlands, lakes, etc.) are designed to
convey storm and other surface water so as to enhance the public health, safety
and welfare. The benefits to the citizens of Plymouth from such facilities are
numerous. They include, but are not limited to:
Public Improvement Special Assessment 5 of 14 City Council Policy
2
a. Protection and preservation of wetlands, marshes and ponds for the
enhancement of ground water recharging, filtration of pollutants, wildlife
habitat, and general aesthetic beauty associated with such natural areas.
b. Conveyance of surface water through piping systems to prevent flooding
and damage to property.
c. Establishment and maintenance of pond and lake levels to prevent flooding
downstream in the watershed.
d. Improvement of receiving water quality for lakes, wetlands and streams.
e. Control of channel erosion and stream morphology.
Protection of the physical and biological integrity of the stream and wetland
corridors.
g. Control bounce and duration of inundation of wetlands and preservation of
the function and values for each type of wetland classification.
A comprehensive storm drainage system benefits all properties in a watershed.
Projects undertaken within a watershed or major drainage district, which
improvements are designed as "trunk" in the Surface water Management Plan,
are deemed to be of general benefit to all of the property within the watershed or
major drainage district. The Council shall determine whether or not trunk benefit
is present in a project. If trunk benefit is present, the cost of that part of the
project will be shared by all within the watershed or major drainage district in the
following manner:
a. Ad valorem taxes collected from property within the watershed.
b. Special assessments levied on property within the watershed or major
drainage district.
Storm Drainage Benefits.
For purpose of assessing storm drainage benefit, the following assessment ratio
shall normally be used.-
Land
sed;
Land Use Ratio
Commercial & Industrial Zones 2-1/2
High Density Residential (R-3 and R-4) 1-1/2
Low Density Residential (Other R Zones) 1
This policy is established on the basis of design run-off coefficients and City
development policies which generally require retention and preservation of
Public Improvement Special Assessment 6 of 14 City Council Policy
natural water courses in residential areas and permits significant dislocation of
these water retention areas and water courses in commercial and industrial areas.
D. Streets
This policy outlines the general street assessment policy which will be applicable
for various street functional classifications and zoned for guided properties. The
policy will assure property owners they are being treated in an equitable manner
with respect to the special benefits their property receives from street
improvements.
2. Functional Classification.
a. Minot Arterials, Minor arterials are roadways designed to provide for the
through movement of traffic and are generally associated with the most
intense land uses. Access to such arterials is generally limited to public
streets. Arterials are normally designed to 9—tan standards with concrete
curb and gutter and a width of 52 feet. Arterials may include medians and
turning lanes.
b, Major Collectors. Major collectors are roadways designed to distribute
traffic from major generators or from minor collectors to the arterial system.
Access to major collectors shall be minimized, however, insuring the
abutting parcels are properly served. Major collectors are designed to 9 -ton
standards with concrete curb and gutter and a width of up to 52 feet. Major
collectors may include medians and turning lanes.
c. Minor Collectors. Minor collectors are roadways designed to distribute
traffic from the major collectors and/or arterials to the local street system
and vice versa. Lane access and local traffic movement within the various
neighborhoods and areas are provided. Minor collectors are designed to S—
ton standards with concrete curb and gutter and width between 44 and 48
feet in commercial/industrial and higher density residential area, and to 7—
ton standards and a width between 32 and 36 feet in residential zones.
d. Local Streets. Local streets are roadways designed to serve as access to
abutting residential or industrial/commercial properties. The design shall
discourage through traffic. Residential streets are designed to 7—ton
standards and a width of 28 feet and commercial/industrial streets are
designed to 9 -ton standards and a width of up to 36 feet.
Assessment Procedures
a. Low Density Residential (FPD, R-1 and R-2). It is the normal City policy
to fully assess the cost of residential street construction (28 feet wide, 7—ton
design, concrete curb and gutter) to the above residential areas if the
property has direct access to the street.
Public Improvement Special Assessment 7 of 14 City Council Policy
b. Higher Density Residential (R-3 and R-4) and Commercial/Industrial. Itis
the normal City policy to fully assess the cost of all streets to the above
residential, commercial and industrial areas if the property abuts the
roadway.
c. Special Considerations.
1) Land uses allowed by conditional use permit other than PUD's in the
FRD, R-1 and R-2 districts shall normally be presumed to receive a
special benefit from roadway construction beyond that for the low
density residential land uses.
2) The general rule is to assess platted lots on a front footage basis,
however, where curvilinear and/or cul--de—sac streets produce odd
shaped lots, consideration will be given to the "unit" assessment if the
special benefit to the property in the district is essentially the same.
3) In those cases where the project street benefits undeveloped
homogeneous area, the Council may assess such project cost to the
parcels on the basis of the relationship of the area of each parcel to
the total area within the homogeneous area to be assessed.
4) City participation in street construction costs shall not be considered
unless the standards exceed 36 feet in width and/or 7—ton design
residential)/9—ton design (commercial/industrial).
5) The following table indicates the normal assessment practices of the
City based upon the guiding or zoning of the property proposed to be
assessed:
Public Improvement Special Assessment 8 of 14 City Council Policy
MINOR ARTERIALS :
ACCESS TO
STREET
Direct X I X X X I X
Indirect X X X X X X X X X X
DESIGN
STANDARD
7 -ton X
9—ton X X X X X X
Up to 36 ft. X
Up to 44 ft. X 1 X
Up to 52 ft. X X X X
Concrete
Curb/Gutter
X X X X X X X X X X
Public Improvement Special Assessment 9 of 14 City Council Policy
MAJOR COLLECTORS:
ZONEDfi FRD R R R R 3 R 4 r BZ 3 I
F
GUII3EI} , LA1 LA1' I.A LA CAM' CI ICt SFPwLli
5 i
ACCESS TO
STREET
Direct
X X X X X X X
Indirect X X X X X X X X X X
DESIGN
STANDARD
7—ton X X X X
9 -ton X X X X X X
Up to 36 ft. X X X X
Up to 44 ft. X X
Up to 52 ft. X X X X
Concrete X X X X X X X X X X
Curb/Gutter
Public Improvement Special Assessment 10 of 14 City Council Policy
MINOR COLLECTORS AND LOCAL:
ZONED
al
FRD RIA R R=2 R3 R4."
GUIDED LA1 LA1 LAI LAZ LA3 LA L CNIC
ACCESS TO
STREET
Direct
X X X X X X X X X X
Indirect X X X X X X X X X X
DESIGN
STANDARD
7 -ton X X X X
9—ton X X X X X X
Up to 36 ft. X X X X
Up to 44 ft. X X
Up to 52 ft. X X X I X
Concrete X X X X X X X X X X
Curb/Gutter
4. Street ReeeR4Fdeti Improvements. The City Council has adopted a long-range
plan providing for the periodic reconstruction, including mill and overlay and
pavement rehabilitation {edge mill and overlay, of all paved city streets. With
the improvement of streets, as a result of reconstruction_, or mill and overlay or
pavement rehabilitation, adjoining properties receive special benefit that results in
the increase of the property's value. It is the policy of the City that this special
benefit should be paid for by the property owner receiving the special benefit
rather than the City as a whole. This is accomplished by specially assessing the
benefited property as authorized by State Statute, Section 429. Maintenance
overlays performed by City personel and equipment, shall be limited to those
roadways without curb and gutter and that are in such a condition that
reconstruction is warranted but not programmed in the 5 year capital
improvement program. Maintenance overlays shall not be assessed,
The following is the City of Plymouth's policy regarding special assessments to
properties benefiting from street improvements.
Public Improvement Special Assessment 11 of 14 City Council Policy
a. It is the policy of the City to specially assess abutting benefiting
propertyies for street reconstruction costs, but not in excess of the
special benefit to the property. This policy applies to all streets
that are public streets.
b. The assessment amount for the reconstruction, er mill and overlay
or pavement rehabilitation of previously paved streets shall be
determined annually by the City Council.
The assessment amount is based on the following:
1) Benefited properties shall be assessed 40% of the actual project cost.
For pavement rehabilitation projects, the minimum assessed amount
shall be $1,000. In no case shall the total assessed amount exceed the
actual project cost.
2) For- the i-rsc9-orscrcccTicoirscruEcro YCCLLTp, czze
oe4 sts <A411 iftelude the east e f r-ep1.,. iag or-re-painfig eetlefeteb
e - a -ad gtA±,e-r-. hi these eases w-=1, umiiieuseufbing is r-eplaoed
prem -tiUIlal speeial b eiaefit will be ass esaed. i
t to be assessed shall be 1000% ofth, ,,. st of'installi ig theeene ro+o
c^cirly-anC -b"'crRseestw'lFill be assessedefi eithefirfre-at feet erdnit
basis. The additiaii of a stef-mseYef systefa will alseecon ide-fed aft
additienal benefit aftd shall be assessed at 1001% of the eest.
3) Assessments for properties guided or zoned for single-family use shall
be made on a per parcel (unit) basis for a local residential or residential
low volume street design standard as provided for in Plymouth City
Code and Engineering Guidelines. A property may be assessed for
more than one unit in cases where the property could be reasonably
further subdivided in accordance with current zoning and subdivision
requirements.
4) For properties guided or zoned for other than single family use, the
City shall calculate equivalent units based on the guided or zoned use:
The equivalent units may be based on front footage or area depending
upon the glided or zoned use and parcel configuration.
5) If a street is reconstructed to a design standard greater than the current
design standard due to the guided or zoned uses, the additional cost to
reconstruct the street shall be fully assessed to those properties. If the
street is reconstructed to a design different than the current standard,
the total cost shall be fully assessed to those properties if conditions
warrant.
6) Properties abutting county roadways reconstructed to complete urban
design and having reasonable access thereto shall be assessed in
Public Improvement Special Assessment 12 of 14 City Council Policy
accordance with this policy. The assessments shall be used to defray
the City's cost participation in the county improvement projects.
7) Properties or areas of property that have been determined to be
unbuildable shall be excluded from assessments.
8) Properties not abutting roadways reconstructed to complete urban
design but whose primary public street access is from said roadway
shall be assessed an amount equal to the special benefit received as
determined by a certified real property appraiser.
E. Street Lighting
Street lighting assessments shall be made in accordance with Chapter VII of the
Plymouth City Code.
F. Other Provisions
Payment ofAssessments and Deferrals
Partial Payments
Partial prepayments of assessments can be made in accordance with Chapter III of the
Plymouth City Code (Ordinance 2005-06).
Deferrals
Senior Citizens and Disabled People Special Assessments Deferrals in accordance with
City policy (if you are at least 65 years of age or are disabled, you may qualify to have
special assessments deferred). Other deferrals may be available as authorized by State
Statute, Section 429 or other City policies.
Combined Parcel
Where there is proposed a combination of parcels of record upon which separate special
assessments have been levied, it shall be the policy of the City of Plymouth with respect
to abatement of such special assessments as follows:
1) In no case shall assessments for area charges or front foot lateral charges be
adjusted.
2) Residential Equivalent Charges formerly assessed may be abated by the City
Council, on a case—by—case basis, on parcels that would be unsuitable for
construction only at such time as said parcels are combined with others to
create a suitable parcel.
Resolution No. 2007-468. November 13, 2007
Supersedes Resolution 2006-503, December 12, 2006; Resolution 2005-476, December 13, 2005;
Resolution 2005-154, April 12, 2005; Resolution No. 98-6 January 7, 1998; Resolution 95-126,
February 21, 1995; Resolution 89-154, March 6, 1989; Resolution 88-381, June 27, 1988;
Resolution 88-115, February 8, 1988, Resolution 87-132, February 23, 1987, Resolution 85-237,
Public Improvement Special Assessment 13 of 14 City Council Policy
April 1, 1985; Resolution 83-674, December 5, 1983; Resolution 82-615, November 22, 1982;
Resolution 81-803, November 23, 1981; Resolution 81-128, February 23, 1981; Resolution 80-
475, July 21, 1980; Resolution 76-281, May 17, 1976; Resolution 75-624, November 3, 1975;
Resolution 73-342, August 20, 1973; Resolution 66-156, September 12, 1966)
Public Improvement Special Assessment 14 of 14 City Council Policy
74000
72000
70000
68000
66000
64000
62000
60000
58000
56000
54000
Population
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
30.00
25.00
0
20.00
0
15.00
Q
0 10.00
2 5.00
Me
180.00
160.00
ca
140.00
ca
a 120.00
M
100.00
0 80.00
M 60.00
M 40.00
0
20.00
0.00
Historic Water Demand
l0 I 00 Ol O i --I N M zt Ln l0 I- W M
Ol 01 Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O
Ol Ol Ql Ol O O O O O O O O O O
rl i -I ei e -i N N N N N N N N N N
F Maximum Capacity 28 MGD
Historic Water Usage
Maximum Day Demand
MGD)
Average Day Demand (MGD)
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Year Total
Population
Total
Water
Pumped
MG)
Average
Demand
MGD)
Maximum
Demand
MGD)
Total
gallons/
capita/day
1996 60344 3534.22 9.68 22.24 160.46
1997 61620 3218.7 8.82 25.28 143.11
1998 62979 3527.52 9.66 23.49 153.45
1999 64313 3324.09 9.11 21.69 141.61
2000 65894 3596.63 9.85 20.16 149.54
2001 66675 3362.11 9.21 26.7 138.15
2002 67824 3128.43 8.57 18.2 126.37
2003 70238 3812.42 10.44 27.68 148.71
2004 70682 3436.44 9.41 21.97 133.20
2005 70500 3334.25 9.13 24.42 129.57
2006 70676 3540.62 9.70 24.56 137.25
2007 71147 3609.79 9.89 25.76 139.01
2008 71536 3457.605 9.47 25.46 132.42
2009 71930 3524.11 9.66 23.11 134.23
City of
qP Plymouth Memo
Date: November 5, 2010
To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
From: Cal Portner, Administrative Services Direct
Greg Krause, IT Manager
Subject: Council Question
A few weeks ago, we had a question from a council member regarding our fiber optic network.
The following information should be helpful.
I would like to hear about the fiber nent,ork the city owns rand/or asses — what it is expected to do,
its capacity to meet our current1future needs, and its stage of developmentfexpansion if it is not
complete.
Plymouth's fiber optic network
The city's fiber optic network extends from City Hall to Public Works, the Central Water
Treatment Plant, the Zachary Water Treatment Plant, the Plymouth Creek Center, and the
Plymouth Ice Center. Near the Ice Center (Vicksburg Lane and 371h Ave.) we join with the
Wayzata school district fiber network which provides connectivity to fire Station #3.
At City Hall, the computer room network is fiber -connected to Public Safety.
The existing fiber network is currently at 50% of capacity. We have sufficient room for
expansion should a new service need arise. Fiber networks do not have capacity limits like
traditional copper -based wired networks, therefore, speed and load capacity are not commonly
referenced when building a fiber network.
The fiber network is only routed from facility to facility. Cuts in the fiber would create an
outage period until it can be repaired. A few redundancies currently exist with campus radio and
access to commercial lines.
Sen -ices utilizing the fiber network
The fiber network provides connectivity for city-wide voice (Voice over Internet Protocol or
VoIP) and data sharing.
Data sharing includes access to storage area networks, "hot sites" for police information
downloading, the city's closed circuit security system and the utilities division water/sewer
system monitoring application (SCADA).
The utilities monitoring system (SCADA) transmits a lot of data and even with additional Tl
lines, we couldn't move that much data. To resolve the SCADA problem, staff employed a
Motorola Campus Radio Data Network. The line -of -site radio network connects the Schmidt
Lake water storage facility and Zachary Water Treatment Plant to the city fiber network.
The campus radios are located on high points of buildings' 1. and are in-line directed to the
nearest water tower and join the fiber network at the Central Water facility. The radio system
provides data service at a fraction of the cost the TI lines and have proven to be very reliable.
As we grow our fiber network, we will continue to utilize the campus radios to complement the
existing network and provide redundancy.
The fiber network and campus radio system can be supplemented with leased copper TI lines if
needed, although they have a limited load capacity and reduced speeds. City Hall uses Comcast
for outside access to the worldwide web.
Looking Ahead
We are recently added Fire Station #1l to the fiber network. The expansion was completed by
this week, We have also added number of short runs of fiber to connect monitoring equipment to
utilities facilities.
This summer, the public utilities division has added fiber connections to service the water
treatment system (SCADA) by connecting well houses and the supporting facilities. Fire Station
F.;? was also added to that fiber network. By adding Fire r?, the station now uses the city
telephone system and had direct access to our computer network.
The police department is currently using computers with Sprint air cards to send and retrieve
data from LETG and city services. They currently download traffic stop video to LETG through
three access points at the police station. Eventually, we would like to create more "hotspots" for
downloading information so they spend more time in the field. There is also a potential for the
hotspots" to be used for code enforcement and assessing so they can spend more time in the
field as well.
In the CIP, we have place marked a possible opportunity to partner with the Wayzata School
District. Wayzata schools currently have fiber runs from their main data facility to each of their
schools. They are planning to loop their fiber to create redundancies. Providence Academy is
also interested in participating in the partnership. By sharing the costs, the city would safeguard
our existing network at a fraction of the cost and ensure minimal disruptions. The additional
access may provide opportunities for IT service partnerships with other communities.
We are always looking for ways to improve reliability, efficiency, redundancy and decrease
costs. I hope this information is helpful.
Attached are maps and an outline of our fiber optic network.
FL
L. LL
k
0
E m EL
CL 6
Q)
3
2 k\))
G
Tm
B§§
2
Ak
r0) Fiber Path
9ilopw
Cit','f
Plymouth, Minnesota
0 250 500 1.000 1.500 2.. 00
Feet
THIS RE7RE5ENi5 A CWI"-.IOH OF 1HFORMA'nON A46 OATS
1M. COLNTY. STATE AND OTHER SOL RCES THAT WAS
Mr 3E F-4 FIELD VERLED. IVORWATIO" SHOULD 3 HILD
VERIFIED MID COMPARED Wr7HORjLALSCuRCE DOCum—M.
Legend
Filer Pa 11,
Treatment Plant
City Hall & Maintenance
Library
Park Facilities
Post Offices
jaG_ apotA at&u puejjS Z,
65 laa!=l
2 apoW qInW puej;S tZ
0 0 0o'
rb
000
0001 q N` 000
N
VULJ a
0 v
U
63
O
U7
zo
N
0
0 0
II,, L10 7,cc- o6UNC O
co
CL 0
U
UU
C C o
D r
Q O
C7+ y N
a E'v
O y O
C yRi
U seL
C
i+ d
z