HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 10-24-2006CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 24, 20069 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUM Individuals may address the Council about any item not contained
on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15
minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The
City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of
referral to staff or Commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
4.1 Presentation on State Constitutional Amendment on the November General Election
Ballot (postponed from October 10) (Jim Erkel from the Minnesota Center for
Environmental Advocacy) (Res2006-414) (Approved)
4_2 Minnesota Manufacturers' Week Proclamation Presentation (Dee Schutte from Twin
West Chamber of Commerce and Pete Jacobson, from Daily Printing)
4_3 Proclamation for Tonka CARES and Reduce the Use (Mayor Judy Johnson)
4_4 Announcement of Home Free's Trivia Challenge on November 11
4.5 Announcement of November 7 General Election (City Clerk Sandy Engdahl)
5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items
contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction
only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda.
6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda. (Approved)
6.01 Approve proposed City Council Minutes
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
October 24, 2006
Page 2
6.02 Approve disbursements (Res2006-415)
6.03 Approve Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for "Taryn Hills 4th Addition"- a replat of
Blocks 8, 9, and 11, and Outlot K of Taryn Hills, for property located southeast of
County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane. U.S. Home Corporation. (2006076 — Res2006-
416)
6.04 Approve Interim Home Occupation License to operate a one -chair hair salon for
property located at 2675 Larch Lane North. Madalyn Alberts. (2006083 — Res2006-
417)
6.05 (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Hearings as 7.1.2)
6.06 (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Hearings as 7.1.3)
6.07 Approve Site Plan Amendment to construct a multipurpose park building with
restrooms, a concession area, and a press box at Greenwood Park located at 18005
Medina Road. Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association. (2006099 — Res2006-
418)
6.08 Approve modifications to the previously approved resolution for Preliminary and Final
Plat for two lots to be known as "Deziel Subdivision" for property located at 4640
Holly Lane North. Laurent Builders, Inc. (2006050 — Res2006-419)
6.09 Approve agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for Federal
participation in construction costs for Fernbrook Lane at Highway 55 from 27th
Avenue North to 34th Avenue North (10 13 - 420)
6.10 Accept third quarter financial statements
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
October 24, 2006
Page 3
7.1.1 Consider establishing the HRA's Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District
1-3 for Plymouth Crossroads Station located south of Highway 55 and east of
7.1.2 Cottonwood Lane. Plymouth HRA (Res2006-421) (Approved)
7.1.2 Final Plat for Plymouth Crossroads Station for property located south of
Highway 55 and east of Cottonwood Lane. Dove Capital 1, LLC. (2005121-F
Res2006-422) (Approved)
7.1.3 Wetland Replacement Plan application for Plymouth Crossroads Station
2005121— Res2006-423) (Approved)
7_2 Assessments for 2006 Street Reconstruction Project (6101 — Res2006-424, Res2006-
425) (Approved)
7_3 Assessments for 2006 Mill and Overlay Project (6106 — Res2006-426) (Approved)
7_4 Off -Sale Liquor License application of Wood and Associates d/b/a Vicksburg Liquor,
1115 Vicksburg Lane (Res2006-427) (Approved)
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
9_1 Set future Study Sessions (postponed from October 10) (Added the canvassing of the
results of the General Election to the November 14 agenda; directed staff to send
correspondence to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting
construction of sound walls for Highway 169 and I-494)
10. ADJOURNMENT (9:05 p.m.)
Agenda Number , 1
TO: City Manager Laurie Ahrens
FROM: Communications Manager Helen LaFave through
Administrative Services Director Jean McGann
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSED MVST STATE
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
DATE: October 19, 2006 for meeting of October 24, 2006
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Mayor Judy Johnson has requested that the City Council consider
the attached resolution supporting the proposed State Constitutional Amendment to dedicate
100% of the motor vehicle sales tax to highways and transit. The proposed amendment will
appear on the November 7, 2006 ballot.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO DEDICATE 100% OF THE MOTOR
VEHICLE SALES TAX REVENUE TO HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT
WHEREAS, Minnesota's transportation infrastructure forms the backbone of the state's
economy and has a direct impact on future economic development;
WHEREAS, too many Minnesotans are being killed in traffic crashes on dangerous roadways;
WHEREAS, funding for highway and transit systems in Minnesota has remained stagnant and is
failing to keep pace with growing population and demands;
WHEREAS, local governments throughout the state are struggling to maintain local
transportation systems while the state's gas tax has not been increased since 1988 and transit
budgets have been cut in recent years;
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has repeatedly turned to revenue from the motor vehicle
sales tax, which has been viewed as user fee revenue, to fund both highway and transit systems,
including the current dedication of 54% of motor vehicle sales tax for transportation purposes;
WHEREAS, the legislature passed a proposed constitutional amendment during the 2005
Legislative Session that would appear on the ballot on November 7, 2006 asking voters if the
remaining 46% of motor vehicle sales tax revenue currently used for other purposes should be
used for highways and transit systems;
WHEREAS, passage of this amendment would mean an increase in stable revenue for highway
and transit systems throughout the state that would rise to approximately $300 million per year
once the transfer of revenue is fully phased -in by 2011;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA supports passage of the proposed amendment to the
Minnesota Constitution dedicating all of the motor vehicle sales tax revenue to transportation
with at least 40% of the revenue for public transit assistance and not more than 60% for
highways purposes.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
WHEREAS, the manufacturing industry is a dynamic part of Minnesota's economy;
and
WHEREAS, promotion of the manufacturing sector's strength, success and
contributions to our quality of life is an integral part of Minnesota's economic
development strategy; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs that significantly
contribute to Minnesota's high standard of living and economic vitality; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector in
Minnesota, providing 16.8 billion in 2005 wages; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing produces $30.7 billion for the state economy and is the
largest share, 13.7 percent of our gross state product; and
WHEREAS, manufactured exports brought over $13.8 billion into the Minnesota
economy in 2005;
NOW, THEREFORE, I hereby proclaim, the week of October 23 — October 27,
2006 shall be observed as
In the City of Plymouth, and ask all citizens to join to recognize and participate in
its observance. ,p A
outh
WHEREAS, many families seldom sit down together for a meal; and
WHEREAS, kids and families are far less connected to each other than in the
past; and
WHEREAS, family connection is the single best success factor we can give our
children; and
WHEREAS, research shows that children who, without the distraction of
television or other technology, share three or more meals every week with their
family do better in school; are less likely to smoke, use drugs or alcohol; are less.
likely to engage in sexual activity; are more likely to eat nutritiously and have a
reduced risk of eating disorders; experience less stress and depression; and
have better social skills, character and manners; and
WHEREAS, Tonka CARES and Reduce the Use, in collaboration with the
Carver County Health Partnership, the Hopkins and the Minnetonka school
districts, Park Nicollet Foundation, and numerous area businesses, have
launched the "Eat. Talk. Connect!" Challenge which encourages families to
harness the power of family mealtimes and share at least three meals every
week for three months, November 2006 through January 2007; and
NOW THEREFORE, I, hereby proclaim Wednesday, November 1, the official
kickoff day for the three-month
in the City of Plymouth, and ask all citizens to join me in congratulating Tonka
ra,A V 2Lei
Judy A. Johnson, Mayor
q"s
ro", 11 IR PI DICE
W--,— I 1Ir
November 11, 2006
Plymouth Creek Center
6:30-11:00 p.m.
Join us for an evening of fun as teams of six to eight individuals compete against each other to answer a
variety of questions. Team members will be pooling their knowledge, so you don't have to worry if an answer is
stuck on the tip of your tongue. Desserts and theater snacks will be served to fortify you for the challenge, and
there will be a cash bar. When your brain gets tired, you'll have a chance to compete with your wallet instead
in silent and live bidding for unique auction items.
Plan to arrive by 6:30 p.m. to meet friends, get a drink, participate in the silent auction and find your place.
Everyone should be seated and ready to play at 7:15. The evening's hosts will explain the rules of the
competition, and then the rounds of questions will begin. We'll update you periodically on scores and provide
special awards for the winners at the end.
Use the enclosed form to plan your team and register for the event. Teams can be comprised of friends and
relatives, neighbors, club members, work colleagues, etc. Even better, once you have organized your team,
encourage a similar team to form for a mini challenge within the event — one church group against another, one
law firm against another, teachers from one school against teachers from another. Just let us know that your
team is participating in a mini challenge, and we'll make sure that it is recognized throughout the evening.
Do you want to participate, but don't have a team? That's fine. Just register as an individual, and we'll match
you up with others to create a team.
Cost: $50.00 per person (paid by Nov. 1); $60.00 per person (after Nov. 1)
All event proceeds will support Home Free programs for battered women and their children.
For questions, contact:
Anne Kamiri
3405 E Medicine Lake BLVD
wwrr rww rw rr,w rrrrwwiruwrrr
763) 559-9008
am ena,homefi eepro ams.org
FREE IP of WOons Too.
7
ClIff
2006
When: November 11, 2006 Where: Plymouth Creek Center
6:30 -11:00 p.m. 1480034 th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55447
Benefiting Home Free programs for battered women and their children
Home Free is a program of Missions Inc., a 501(c)(3) organization)
Complete the registration form below and send with your payment (payable to Home Free) to:
Home Free Trivia Challenge
3405 E Medicine Lake BLVD
Plymouth, MN 55441
For information: (763) 559-9008 or anne@Lhomefreeprograms.orghomefreeprograms.org
Registration for Trivia Challenge 2006
50.00 per person (paid by Nov.1); $60.00 per person (after Nov. 1)
Team Registration (6-8 persons) Team Name (optional):
Team Contact Person:
Address:
Phone:
Team Member
Team Member
Team Member
Team Member
ail:
Team Member
Team Member
Team Member
Is your team participating in a mini challenge? Against whom?
Individual Registrations (I/We want to participate, please place me/us on a team)
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Other Name:
Other Name:
Email:
Donation (I am not able to participate, but I would like to support Home Free)
Name: Phone:
Address:
Total Amount Enclosed (payable to Home Free):
Proposed Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
October 10, 2006
Mayor Johnson called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:05 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on October 10, 2006.
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Johnson, Councilmembers Bildsoe, Hewitt, Stein, and Black.
ABSENT: Councilmembers Slavik and Willis.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Ahrens, Police Chief Goldstein, City Attorney Knutson,
Recreation Superintendent Evans, Deputy Fire Chief Hurr, Planning Manager Senness,
Administrative Services Manager McGann, and City Clerk Engdahl.
Plymouth Forum
Gregory Gray, Oak Park, who is a candidate for Hennepin County Commissioner District No. 2,
introduced himself to the Council.
Presentations and Public Information Announcements
4.01) Constitutional Amendment
This item was postponed until October 24.
4.02) Presentation of Proclamation Declaring October as "Toastmaster's Month"
Mayor Johnson presented a Proclamation Declaring October as "Toastmaster's Month" to
Darshan Domah, Toastmasters District 6/Area 95 Governor.
4.03) Announcement of Open Space and Parks Referendum
Councilmember Black reported on the open space and park referendum on the November 7
General Election.
4.01) Presentation on State Constitutional Amendment on the November General Election
Ballot
This item was postponed to the October 24 Council Meeting).
Approval of Agenda
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 2 of 7
approve thea e nda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Consent Agenda
By request of a citizen, Mayor Johnson removed item No. 6.21, and it was placed under General
Business as item No. 8.1.
Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Hewitt, to adopt
the amended Consent Agenda that included the following items:
6.01) Proposed minutes from the Regular Meetings of September 12 and September 26.
6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements for the Period August 12, 2006 through September
29, 2006 (Res2006-382).
6.03) Resolution Approving a Variance for Brad and Pauline Blaschko for Impervious Surface
Coverage for Property located at 1429 West Medicine Lake Drive (2006077 — Res2006-383).
6.04) Ordinance Amending the Northwest Business Campus PUD by Adding Section 21655.40
to Chapter 21 of the City Code (2006030 — Ord2006-26), Resolution Approving Findings of Fact
for Amending the Zoning Ordinance Text for the Northwest Business Campus PUD (2006030 —
Res2006-384), Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat for CSM Equities, LLC for Property
located at the Northwest Corner of Highway 55 and Northwest Boulevard (2006-30 — Res2006-
385), and a Resolution Approving a PUD General Plan Amendment for CSM Equities, LLC for
Property located at the Northwest Corner of Highway 55 and Northwest Boulevard (2006030 —
Res2006-386).
6.05) Resolution Approving a Variance to allow a Detached Garage in a Front Yard for Ignacio
Alarcon Polania for Property located at 940 Garland Lane North (2006084 — Res2006-387).
6.06) Resolution Approving Variances for Front Yard Setback and Impervious Surface
Coverage for Thomas and Jo Ann Becker for Property located at 10210 South Shore Drive
2006086 — Res2006-388).
6.07) Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Quality Home Services, Inc. to allow
over 1,000 square feet in Gross Floor Area of Attached Garage Space for Property located at
3165 Xanthus Lane North (2006087 — Res2006-389).
6.0) Ordinance Amending the Text of Chapter 21 of the Plymouth City Code, Entitled the
Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (2006080 n- Ord2006-27), Resolution Approving Findings of Fact
for a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to allow a Car Wash with One or More Car Wash
Bays in the C-3 and C-4 Zoning Districts by Conditional Use Permit (2006080 — Res2006-390),
and a Resolution Approving a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permits to Allow an
Accessory Car Wash Addition and 24 -Hour Fuel Sales for Property located at 9950 Rockford
Road (2006080 — Res2006-391).
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 3 of 7
6.09) Resolution Approving a Registered Land Survey to Subdivide Property in Plymouth
Station for a Daycare for Property located at the Northwest Corner of the Intersection of Dunkirk
Lane and Medina Road (2006091— Res2006-392).
6.10) Resolution Approving Variance Request by Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. to allow On -
Site Directional Signage with a Corporate Logo for Property located at 4345 Nathan Lane North
2006078 — Res2006-393).
6.11) Resolution Approving an Interim Home Occupation License for Julie Ralph for Property
located at 4250 Ximines Lane North (2006079 — Res2006-394).
6.12) Resolution Approving Audit Services for 2006, 2007, and 2008 (Res2006-395).
6.13) Resolution Approving Request for Payment No. 12 and Final for Vicksburg Lane
Underground Storage Reservoir (3108 — Res2006-396).
6.14) Resolution Approving Request for Payment No. 3 and Final for Lift Stations Telemetry
System Upgrade (3119 — Res2006-397).
6.15) Resolution Amending 2006 Water Fund Budget (Res2006-398).
6.16) Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for a Deck and Retaining Wall to
Occupy a Drainage and Utility Easement within Lot 14, Block 3, Fawn Creek, 4405 Weston
Lane (Res2006-399).
6.17) Resolution Approving Termination of Water Quality Pond Maintenance Agreement for
Sugar Hills 4th Addition (95090 — Res2006-400).
6.18) Resolution Appointing Additional Election Judges for the General Election (Res2006-
401).
6.19) Resolution Approving Change Order No. 5 for Plymouth Metrolink Station 73 Transit
Facility (3125 — Res2006-402).
6.20) Resolution Stating Opposition to Legislative Proposals that Remove Cable Television
System Build -Out Provisions from Chapter 238 of Minnesota State Law (Res2006-403).
6.21) (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as
item No. 8.1).
6.22) Resolution Approving Agreement between the City of Plymouth and the Plymouth -
Wayzata Youth Baseball Association (Res2006-404).
6.23) Resolution Approving Release of Financial Guarantee for Plymouth Ponds Business Park
Addition (95005 — Res2006-405) and a Resolution Approving Final Release of Financial
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 4 of 7
Guarantees for Paula's Place (2001017 — Res2006-406).
Motion carried to approve the Consent Agenda.
Public Hearings
7.1) Assessments for Removal and Destruction of Diseased Trees (Roll 1)
Administrative Services Director McGann reported on the proposed assessments.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
There being no one wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Hewitt, to adopt a
Resolution Adopting Assessments for 2006 Removal and Destruction of Diseased Trees, Roll 1
Res2006-407). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
7.2) Assessments for Weed Eradication and Destruction (Roll 1)
Administrative Services Director McGann reported on the proposed assessments.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
There being no one wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
a Resolution Adopting Assessments for 2006 Weed Eradication and Destruction, Roll 1
Res2006-408). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
7.3) Alcohol Compliance Check Violation for Woody's Grille, 220 Carlson Parkway
Police Chief Goldstein reported on the second alcohol compliance check violation that occurred
at Woody's Grille, 220 Carlson Parkway, on June 3, 2006. He explained at the time of the
violation, the licensee wasn't a member of the Best Practices Program. A $1,000 fine and 10 -
day license suspension is recommended by City Ordinance.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
Police Chief Goldstein reported the violation occurred on June 3, when an underage buyer was
able to purchase alcohol. An employee of the establishment didn't ask for identification of the
underage buyer. The employee pled guilty to a misdemeanor on July 26 and paid a $300 fine.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 5 of 7
Robert Carlson Jr., owner of establishment, stated when they were notified of the violation, they
terminated the employee who failed the compliance check as well as the general manager. Their
management team was then assigned to work with the Police Department on achieving best
practices goals. He stated 15 of their employees have now attended the TIPS training conducted
by the Police Department. He presented a proposal to the Council whereby they would send two
employees of their management team to the TIPS Train the Trainer Course in Iowa at the
business's expense. After they completed the TIPS course, they would work with the Police
Department for one year in training employees of other Plymouth establishments. They desire to
become the City's model restaurant and partner. This proposal would be in lieu of the
suspension.
There being no one else wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Police Chief Goldstein discussed the TIPS program and the Police Department's involvement
with that program during the past six years. He explained that this training is not a requirement
and is in addition to the Best Practices training. The program is designed to assist employees
that sell alcohol to train those that are going to be serving it. The businesses pay for the
materials ($20 per person), and an employee of the Police Department conducts the five-hour
course. During the past six years, the department has received very little interest in the program,
and there have been occasions where they have had to cancel the training as there have been less
than four people who have signed up. The Police Department promotes the program, but there
has been a lack of interest.
Councilmember Stein asked Mr. Carlson why they didn't originally sign up for the Best
Practices Program. Mr. Carlson replied they received the information after the fact; however,
they were committed to the program after the first incident.
City Manager Ahrens and Police Chief Goldstein stated all applicants receive the Best Practices
materials when they apply for a liquor license, and prior to the liquor license hearing, staff
receives confirmation from the applicants on whether they would be participating in the program.
It was also noted that this is the second violation when the business has just been open for 13
months.
Councilmember Bildsoe shared his views on the Council's consistency when it comes to failed
alcohol compliance checks, specifically, imposing fines, suspensions, and if necessary,
revocation. Police Chief Goldstein agreed that the Council needs to consider the precedence that
has already been established for violations. He noted that the Best Practices training is now
outsourced, and some of those individuals conducting that training are also TIPS certified.
Mr. Carlson stated they would notify all businesses that the TIPS training would be available at
no cost to them. He noted that it would cost $1,000 for each of his employees to attend the TIPS
training, and he would incur approximately $10,000 over the course of the year to conduct the
training. He reiterated that their proposal would be in lieu of the suspension; however, they
would pay the fine.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 6 of 7
Motion was made by Councilmember Stein, and seconded by Councilmember Black, to approve
the $1,000 fine and the recommended 10 -day license suspension would be stayed with the
condition that the licensee to the TIPS training for one year.
Police Chief Goldstein questioned the expense of $10,000 for the licensee when a very small
number of people have attended the training in the past. He suggested if the Council would
approve this proposal, that the licensee conduct the TIPS training for all liquor license holders,
not just bar/restaurant combination establishments.
Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by M yor Johnson, to postpone this
item to November 14 in order that Mr. Carlson can prepare a detailed written proposal on what
they are proposing in order that staff can review the proposal and provide a report to the Council.
With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
7.4) Vacation of Certain Drainage and Utility Easements within Lot 2, Block 1, Bass
Creek Business Park 4th Addition
Public Works Director Cote reported on the proposed vacation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
There being no one wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
a Resolution Authorizing the Vacation of Certain Drainage and Utility Easements within Lot 2,
Block 1, Bass Creek Business Park 4th Addition (2006056 — Res2006-409) and a Resolution
Setting Conditions to be Met Prior to Filing of Resolution No. 2006-409 Vacating Drainage and
Utility Easements within Lot 2, Block 1, Bass Creek Business Park 4th Addition (Res2006-410).
With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
7.5) Vacation of a Drainage and Utility Easement within Lot 2, Block 1, Epiphany Second
Addition
Public Works Director Cote reported on the proposed vacation.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
There being no one wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
a Resolution Authorizing the Vacation of a Drainage and Utility Easement as Legally Described
in Document No. 8812450 which lies within Lot 2, Block 1, Epiphany Second Addition
Res2006-411) and a Resolution Setting Conditions to be Met Prior to Filing of Resolution No.
2006-411 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement as Legally Described in Document No.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of October 10, 2006
Page 7 of 7
8812450 which lies within Lot 2, Block 1, Epiphany Second Addition (Res2006-412). With all
members voting in favor, the motion carried
7.6) Wellhead Protection Plan
Public Works Director Cote and the City's consultant from Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik and
Associates reported on the proposed Wellhead Protection Plan.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
There being no one wishing to appear to give testimony, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Stein, and seconded by Councilmember Hewitt, to accept
the Wellhead Protection Plan. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
General Business
8.1) Contract for the Police -Ordered Towing and Impoundment of Vehicles
Frank Manaro, with Frankie's Towing, reported on the differences of the bids received for the
police -ordered towing and impoundment of vehicles, and he acknowledged his bid was higher
than the other two bidders.
Motion was made by Councilmember Hewitt, and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to adopt a
Resolution Awarding the Contract for the Police -Ordered Towing and Impoundment of Vehicles
Res2006-413). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Reports and Staff Recommendations
9.1) Set Future Study Sessions
This item was postponed until October 24.
Adjournment
Mayor Johnson declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:40 p.m.
Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk
Agenda Number: 6
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Jean McGann, Director of Administrative Services
SUBJECT: Disbursements
DATE: October 16, 2006 for the City Council Meeting October 24, 2006
1. PROPOSED MOTION: To adopt the attached resolution approving the disbursements for
the period ending October 13, 2006.
2. DISCUSSION: Shown below is a listing of disbursements for the various funds for the
period ending October 13, 2006.
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue $917,822.49
Construction & Debt Service 780,828.18
Enterprise & Internal Service 855,514.31
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 259.105.16
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $2,813.270.14
3. RECOMMENDATION: I hereby approve the attached listing of disbursements and
recommend same for payment.
Jean McGann
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO: 2006 -
APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDING OCTOBER 13, 2006
WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending October 13, 2006 was presented to the
City Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the
following funds is approved:
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue $917,822.49
Construction & Debt Service 780,828.18
Enterprise & Internal Service 855,514.31
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 259,105.16
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $2.813.270.14
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 10/13/06
FUND 101 General Fund 394,467.26
201 Recreation Fund 30,164.46
202 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 943.39
203 Transit System Fund 788.88
204 Community Development Fund 0.00
205 Diasaster Donation Manage Grant 491,458.50
207 Economic Development Fund 0.00
208 Specialized Equipment Replacement 0.00
220 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 0.00
250 HRA Section 8 Fund 259,105.16
251 HRA General Fund 0.00
302 GeneralObligation Refunding D/S 0.00
401 General Capital Projects Fund 24,000.61
402 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00
404 Building & Equipment Rev. Fund 380.53
406 Park Replacement Fund 0.00
407 Infrasturcture Replacement Fund 0.00
408 Project Administration Fund 0.00
409 City & Community Parks 6,531.00
410 Neighborhood Parks 0.00
411 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00
413 Community Park Acquisition 0.00
414 Neighborhood Park Acq/Dev 0.00
415 2003 Street Reconstruction 0.00
416 2004 Street Reconstruction 0.00
421 Utility Trunk Fund 0.00
422 Unfinanced Imp Construction 122.31
425 Shenandoah Housing Imp. Area 0.00
426 Shenandoah Administration 0.00
428 Activity Center/Fieldhouse 0.00
430 Public Safety Expansion 0.00
431 HRA Senior Apt. Constr Fund 749,746.91
440 Utility Trunk System Expansion 0.00
470 TIF # 7-1 (Const) 0.00
471 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const) 0.00
472 TIF # 7-3 P.O.S. (Const) 0.00
473 TIF #7-4 P.T.P (Const) 0.00
474 TIF Dev. Exp. Bonds 95 (Const) 0.00
475 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const) 0.00
476 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const) 0.00
478 TIF #7-7 Stonecreek ('Const) 0.00
479 TIF #7-8 Shops @ Plymouth Creek 46.82
501 Water Fund 124,012.06
502 Sewer Fund 498,538.00
503 Solid Waste Management Fund 9,339.25
504• Recreation Facility Fund 3,596.90
505 Water Resources Fund 67,141.90
506 Activity Center Fund 0.00
507 Field House Fund 52.47
601 Central Services Fund 3,318.85
602 Central Equipment Fund 94,253.83
603 Risk Management Fund 5,316.63
604 Design Engineering Fund 219.00
605 Employee Benefits Fund 14,565.34
606 Information Technology Fund 11,970.04
607 Public Facilities Fund 23,190.04
701 Investment Trust Fund 0.00
720 Senior Housing Bond Trustee 0.00
730 1-494 Corridor Commission 0.00
Total Invoice Expense Distribution: 2,813,270.14
Check Register
Date: 10/16/2006
Time: 8:20:41 AM
COUNCIL REPORT - CHECK REGISTER
9/30/2006 Through 10/13/2006
Page 1 Of 22
Vendor Name/
Invoice Description Invoice Amount Check # Check Amount
10,000 Lakes Chapter
07 ICC 8 Memberships 200.00 85355 200.00
AAFES Snack Bar
9.27/9.29 89 meals CampRipley 578.50 85356 578.50
Accurint - Account # 1034558
Sep06 Background searches 30.00 85517 30.00
Adam's Pest Control, Inc.
144.00
Sep06 PCC Pest Control 74.55 85518 74.55
Adams, Arletta
Park and Rec Refund $4.00 85357 $4.00
Aden, Mohamed
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 17.00 85325 17.00
Advanced Drainage Systems
2 18"DRN Bsn,24" std grate 1,001.10 85358 1,001.10
Aggregate Industries
2cy ready mix for curb 289.69 85519 289.69
Airgas North Central
Oxygen 337 81.92 85359 225.92
Service call on oxygen cascase 144.00
Airgas North Central
PD 2 Oxygen USP 126.23 85520 126.23
Akerman, Dmitriy
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 790.00 85292 790.00
Akerman, Efim
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 950.00 85295 950.00
Akerman, Efim
4 Spmkly head damaged 140.00 85553 140.00
All Star Wireless
7510 Blackberry swap 35.00 85521 128.52
Service repair Przybuliski 35.00
Battery nextel Newberger 58.52
Alldata
11.11.06/11.11.07 Subsc mwl 1,597.50 85360 1,597.50
Allied Waste Services
9.15 PW/PM Rubbish Removal $476.65 85522 $476.65
Alpha Investments & Consulting
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $816.00 85279 $816.00
American Fastener
Lynch pin/garden hose/swivel/h $49.84 85361 $57.67
3/8 grdb sae flt wash $7.83
http://cityintemallasplasp_reports/finance/cc_check. asp?sFroniDate=9 %2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
American of Martinsville
Page 2 of 22
Proj5108 Bal owed/lounge fum& 16,203.37 85525 17,342.90
Proj5108 Bal owed/Hammary tabl 1,139.53
Amsave LLS
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,029.00 85280 1,029.00
Anchor Paper
7.5M 11x17 spectrum,6M Liftoff 301.25 85362 2,619.79
400M 8.5x11 recycle copy ppr 2,307.36
Paper by the pound 1.75 11.18
Anderson, Charles & Helen
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 496.00 85287 496.00
Anderson, Nancy
9.28 MAVA 32 Miles reimb 14.24 85448 14.24
Aramark
PCC 3reg,2dcf,sgr,crm,cups 157.56 85363 609.33
PCC 4reg,1 dcf,3crm,cups,tea 163.84
PCC 3 sgr,6crm,tea 36.72
PCC foam cups,stirstixs 29.73
PCC 4reg,3dcf,2sgr,3crm,cups, 221.48
Aramark
CC 16 reg coffee @ 24.00 393.53 85526 393.53
Argo, Nancy
16015 28th Ave N Utility refun 57.48 85613 57.48
Arrow Terminal LLC
Battery cable/flshr/cble tie 474.91 85364 474.91
Astleford International
Lever,plug 82.60 85527 86.24
3 plugs 3.64
At the Lake Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 19,728.00 85282 19,728.00
Auto Electric Specialists
Crown Vic alternator 122.48 85528 192.45
UT Brush set,drive 69.97
Avtar Singh & Narmail Kaur
4820 Quaker Ln utility refund 100.35 85530 100.35
Baldy Sanitation Co
Sep06 Fire 123 Rubbish Removal 335.58 85365 335.58
Balogun, Oluwatoyin
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 59.00 85327 59.00
Barton Sand & Gravel Co.
9.19/9.26 514.46tn CL5,sand,3/ 7,024.94 85367 7,024.94
Bass Lake Hills Townhomes
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 6,354.00 85283 6,354.00
Batteries Plus
1 3.6V LI ION battery 31.94 85531 31.94
Beaman, Charles
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 808.00 85286 808.00
Becker County Sheriffs Dept
W#05004678 R618571 bail 955.00 85532 955.00
http://cityintemaUasplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 3 of 22
Begun, Vladimir
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $742.00 85349 $742.00
Beyzavi, Mehri
Refund permit 40.50 85602 40.50
Blank, Eric
10.9/10.14 5day perdiem/Seattl 125.00 85393 125.00
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik&Asst
Proj5133 8.13/9.9 Well 7&12 1,973.45 85368 1,973.45
Boyer Trucks
Fuel sende/gasket fue 39.47 85369 208.99
Inspect & repair fuel leak eng 12.50
Fast cure/reinf/panel dash 157.02
Braun Intertec Corp
Proj5108 7.14.06 790.50 85370 1,285.00
Proj5108 8.11.06 494.50 .
Braun Intertec Corp
Proj5108 9.8.06 Fireproofing 697.00 85534 697.00
Brock White Company LLC
6-straw/coco blue 429.95 85371 1,172.85
Scourstop panel/anchors/strap 584.54
4 -mortar speed blue pail tamms 158.36
Brock White Company LLC
Cure white/bw form release 55g 445.16 85535 445.16
Bryan Rock Products Inc
9.12 24.32tn 3/4 minus 330.23 85372 330.23
Burk, Donna
4510 Orchid Ln utility refund 35.57 85550 35.57
C.S. McCrossan Const., Inc.
9.5/9.6 416.355tn 41 A Wear 15,076.22 85373 15,076.22
C.S. McCrossan Const., Inc.
9.12/9.14 535.72tn 4 1 A Wear 19,398.42 85536 19,398.42
CDW Government Inc
Simple 512mb 83.06 85374 166.12
Simple 512mb 83.06
CDW Government Inc
1 HP Laserjet 1320 438.84 85537 438.84
CIGNA Behavioral Health
Oct-DecO6 EAP 1,440.00 85538 1,440.00
CSM Financial LLC Cons
R618241 Rntl lic overpay ref 400.00 85539 400.00
Caberallo LLC
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 968.00 85285 968.00
Capital Property Management
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 527.00 85313 527.00
Carefree Services Inc
Proj6124E #I/Final Rd Sweep 31,336.80 85376 31,336.80
Carvin Corporation
2 UHF 16th mic unidirectional, 519.97 85377 519.97
http://cityintemallasplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromD ate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
CenterPoint Energy/Minnegasco
8.21/9.20 WTPI south $1,550.06 85378 $1,550.06
Chad Eichten LLC
5044 Garland Ln utility refund $19.92 85540 $19.92
Chapchay, Laura
OctO6 Section 8 Rent $1,157.00 85320 $1,157.00
Page 4 of 22
Chermak, Kenneth
18615 Cc Rd 47 utility refund 57.94 85586 57.94
Chernith, Vitaly
OctO6 Section 8 Rent 867.00 85348 867.00
Christianer, Esther
Park and Rec Refund 1.00 85379 1.00
City of Crystal
6 "Police in the Schools"regis 120.00 85406 120.00
City of Plymouth/Sewer & Water
Metrolink/Reserve 13.34 85541 13.34
Clem, Steve
3870 Walnut Grove utility refu 10.76 85646 10.76
Coastal Training Technologies
2 Trng bks/Bloodborne Pathogen 70.48 85542 70.48
Commercial Asphalt Co.
9.20/9.28 252.34tn 41Awear6.0, 9,094.21 85380 9,094.21
Concept Engineering Group
Air spade hand tool series,adp 1,565.00 85543 1,565.00
Cook, Greg
Reimb CDL Lic Class A 19.00 85404 19.00
County Materials Corporation
21' 48"manhole&cone,top,base 3,264.40 85383 3,264.40
Cub Foods /3550 Vicksburg
Sep06 Food Charges 1,125.42 85545 1,125.42
Dalco
PCC IOcs hand towels 749.12 85546 749.12
DeWilde, Margot
Park and Rec Refund 4.00 85548 4.00
Decision Resources Ltd
Bal owed/'06 Phone survey 3,000.00 85384 3,000.00
Dukes, Fredrika
OctO6 Section 8 Rent 785.00 85301 785.00
Dundee Nursery&Landscaping Co.
Indian corn/corn stalk bundle 20.04 85385 20.04
Dundee Nursery&Landscaping Co.
D Tiegs plant 41.54 85551 41.54
Dynamex
9-20 Design Write 33.55 85552 33.55
EMC
OctO6 EMC Hdwe maint $910.50 85386 $910.50
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 5 of 22
ESS Bros.
Cl adj ring 492.03 85387 971.28
Hdpe adj rings -25 479.25
85390 15,680.00
Earl F. Andersen Inc.
100 -traffic cone second w/slve 1,247.58 85388 1,374.75
12x6 private -12 127.17
Ecker, Connie
9.20/9.21 GFOA conf Alexandria 217.26 85382 217.26
Egan Oil
850381 Unleaded @ 1.7482 16,642.06 85389 16,642.06
Elan Financial Services
Qvale/NWA San Jose conf $360.20 85375 $3,100.37
Blank -8.18/8.28 UMX,PEK,NRPA $933.60
Sigfrinius/Office Depot,tapes $76.64
Ahrens/APT Qvale registr,AIAMN $1,729.93
Electrical Installation & Mnt
Rplc 4 poles Carlson Pkwy@494 15,680.00 85390 15,680.00
Elk River Ford
Unit 360'06 Ford F450 29,948.60 85391 59,897.20
Unit 598'06 Ford F450 29,948.60
Emmett, Jennifer
Park and Rec Refund 250.00 85392 250.00
Esaulenko, Yuri
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,333.00 85354 1,333.00
Evenflo
10 Triumph, 10 Chase Booster,2 1,611.17 85394 1,611.17
Express Messenger
9.18/9.25 Attorney P/U 37.80 85554 37.80
FPI Paving Contractors Inc
Proj6110 # 1 '06 Trail proj 24,000.61 85395 24,000.61
FSIs Communications LLC
Oct06 3 P&R pay phones 175.74 85555 175.74
Factory Motor, Parts Co
5 gki tfl030 dodge[jeep 45.32 85556 59.89
4 -ACP PF967 spin on 14.57
Fair Manufacturing Inc
Unit 565 fan shaft 372.42 85396 372.42
Farris, Roberta Lynn
Payroll Generated Invoice 443.54 85471 443.54
Fastenal
3 -HSS job 118geg 3.16 85557 3.16
Fenton, Larry
4555 Kimberly utility refund 63.86 85589 63.86
Ferguson Enterprises Inc
Pvc dwv/pe pipe 314.52 85397 314.52
Fernbrook Townhomes
Octt06 Section 8 Rent $13,494.00 85298 $13,494.00
Filtration Systems Inc.
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFroniDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 6 of 22
WTP1 72 12x24x2,7224x24x2 th $927.93 85558 $927.93
Finken, Theresa
2759 Upland utility refund $18.12 85656 $18.12
Fire Equipment Specialities
Pleated filters -12 33.48 85564 $1,433.88
8 "Class A" Foam Angus HI -Comb 607.34 85559 607.34
Fischer, Joshua
189.78
Portable spotlight 47.88
FFI,FFII test reimb 110.00 85429 110.00
Flanagan, Michael
4745 Harbor Ln utility refund 67.86 85608 67.86
Flemming, Tim & Holly
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 885.00 85345 885.00
Force America
Char lynn motor 427.33 85398 427.33
Foss, Jacqueline
9.20/9.22.06 STD 279.30 85428 279.30
Foss, Jacqueline
9.23/10.6.06 STD 1,350.93 85582 1,350.93
Four Seasons Estates
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 16,470.00 85299 16,470.00
Four Seasons Villa
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 426.00 85300 426.00
Fox, Lisa
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 40.00 85321 40.00
Frana and Sons Inc
Proj5108 #13 Vicksburg Crx's 721,771.86 85399 721,771.86
G & K Service Inc
Public Works Uniform Rntl 357.94 85400 357.94
G & K Service Inc
Public Works Uniform rntl 371.42 85560 371.42
Gartner, Denise A
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,208.00 85291 1,208.00
Getten, Glenda
Park and Rec Refund 4.00 85401 4.00
Gezunterman, Matvey
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 601.00 85323 601.00
Grainger
2 -Barrier tape yellow 26.37 85403 737.46
71rg,4 Xlr surveyors vest 144.71
Cable tie/adhesive plastic 70.78
Dust bag 17.63
Pipe tristand vise 408.80
Capacitor 40mfd 370v 14.27
2 -barrier tape yllw 26.37
Economical duster/craper rzr 28.53
Grainger
Pleated filters -12 33.48 85564 $1,433.88
Cartridge filter 86.01
Foam kits/padlocks 584.07
Wall pack cutoff w/Ip 189.78
Portable spotlight 47.88
Battery 1.5V 8.98
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFroniDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
Raceway prewired 5ft $195.28
Cable tie 18in $147.40
Ear plugs/eyewear $64.41
Spade drain $76.59
Gray, Lance & Cindy
5035 NORWOOD LN UTILIITY REFUN $60.86 85588 $60.86
Gray, Shaun
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $985.00 85340 $985.00
Page 7 of 22
Greupner, Karol J
Lunds/NW Area Music Consortium 10.19 85585 10.19
Grigoryants, Alla
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 885.00 85278 885.00
Guggenberger, Suzanne R
Oct06 HAP 798.00 85487 798.00
H & R Construction Co
Rpr guardrail/Schmidt Lk/494 2,450.00 85405 2,450.00
HP - equipment
8.28/9.27 Surestore tape drive 483.00 85415 966.00
7.28/8.27 Surestore tape drive 483.00
Hageman, Kristen
8.10/9.28 97 Mileage Reimb 43.17 85431 43.17
Haigh, Todd
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 180.00 85346 180.00
Hamel Lumber and Supply Inc
Sept06 Hardware supplies 138.40 85566 3,123.01
Sept06 Hardware supplies 8.34
Sept06 Hardware supplies 23.47
Sept06 Hardware supplies 27.25
Sept06 Hardware supplies 400.78
Sept06 Hardware supplies 93.71
Sept06 Hardware supplies 506.86
Sept06 Hardware supplies 81.32
Sept06 Hardware supplies 4.69
Sept06 Hardware supplies 7.05
Sept06 Hardware supplies 39.63
Sept06 Hardware supplies 67.98
Sept06 Hardware supplies 1,034.55
Sept06 Hardware supplies 356.95
Sept06 Hardware supplies 79.09
Sept06 Hardware supplies 56.32
Sept06 Hardware supplies 28.16
Sept06 Hardware supplies 16.68
Sept06 Hardware supplies 5.31
Sept06 Hardware supplies 122.99
Sept06 Hardware supplies 23.48
Harrell, Denine
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 39.00 85290 39.00
Hawkins Nater Treatment
87041b Hydrof,8039.81b C-9 4,460.35 85407 4,460.35
Hawkins Nater Treatment
102401b Hydrotluosilicic 1,273.40 85567 1,273.40
Healthfund of Minnesota
Payroll Generated Invoice $4.85 85408 $70.73
Payroll Generated Invoice $2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $2.00
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
Payroll Generated Invoice $5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice $39.88
Payroll Generated Invoice $7.00
Hedberg Aggregate
Page 8 of 22
Pump/tubing/clamp hose I01.44 85410 212.16
1.84tn boulders 110.72
Hennepin County Treas/417 No15
Ju106 SW Emerg Util permits 215.00 85570 215.00
Hennepin County Treas/A-600
06 2nd 1/2 taxes/proj5I08 8,650.15 85413 8,650.15
Hennepin County Treas/Prop Tax
06 2nd 1/2 property taxes 810.79 85412 810.79
Hennepin County Treas/Room-Brd
Au. -06 Room/Board prisoners 5,726.36 85569 5,726.36
Henry's Waterworks Inc
50 Hydrant stake mrks,50 decal 1,162.44 85571 1,162.44
Hewlett Packard/maint-support
8.28/9.27 Uniform 2 maint 951.31 85414 3,916.72
7.20/8.19 Uniform 1 1,007.05
8.20/9.19 Uniform 1 1,007.05
7.28/8.27.06 Uniform 2 951.31
Hewlett Packard/maint-support
9.20/10.19 Uniform 1 maint 1,007.05 85572 1,007.05
Highlift Equipment Company Inc
Carburetor,gskt,spacer 307.38 85573 307.38
See reinvoice LS 10001631 289.29)
See cr/reinvoice LS 10001631 289.29
Highway 55 Rental
Sky dance blower motor 75.08 85574 75.08
Hillyard
IC Sery call on floor scrubber 136.00 85416 136.00
Hillyard
IC 10cs liners 288.79 85575 288.79
Hirshfield's
34 5gl whiff field paint 639.20 85417 639.20
Hirshfield's
72 50 White field paint 1,441.58 85576 1,441.58
Holden, Kenyatta
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 40.00 85316 40.00
Holiday Fleet
8.24/9.21 E-85 17 trips 342.97 85418 342.97
Holt Motors Inc
Shoe/drum/kit 314.30 85419 377.05
Kit 62.75
Home Depot
8.28/9.27.06 Hdwe charges 2,508.46 85577 2,508.46
Hopkins Parts Co.
Sept06 Equipment Repair ($66.00) 85420 $670.07
Sept06 Equipment Repair $10.32
Sept06 Equipment Repair $32.38
Sept06 Equipment repair $139.82
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/financelcc_check.asp?sFroniDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 9 of 22
Sept06 Equipment Repair 29.04
Sept06 Equipment Repair 9.37
Sept06 Equipment Repair 205.82)
Sept06 Equipment Repair 117.73
Sept06 Equipment Repair 223.39
Sept06 Equipment Repair 82.50)
Sept06 Equipment Repair 139.82
Sept06 Equipment Repair 165.19
Sept06 Equipment Repair 17.51
Sept06 Equipment Repair 139.82
Hong, James
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 849.00 85310 849.00
Huntington, Donald
Park and Rec Refund 1.00 85421 1.00
Hydro Metering Technology
2-T200 turbo gal integ itron 1,821.15 85422 1,821.15
Iannazzo, Dominic
13774 54th Ave Nutility refun 41.82 85549 41.82
Iliarski, Elena & Boris
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 629.00 85296 629.00
Impressive Print
20;100 UB stuffers 1,684.83 85423 1,684.83
Ind School Dist 284/CK ADDR
06 Wayz East/West Pools 3,000.00 85424 3,000.00
Ind School Dist 284/CK ADDR
Sep06 Gymnastics 49.00 85578 49.00
Infrastructure Tech, Inc.
Pan&tilt camera repair 500.08 85425 500.08
Irwin, James
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 331.00 85311 331.00
Izek, David
Park and Rec Refund 44.40 85579 44.40
Izek, David
Park and Rec Refund 255.60 85580 255.60
J & L Enterprises USA, Inc
9.27 Hitting Clinic 290.00 85581 290.00
J. H. Larson Electrical Co.
5 1NOW BPS 480V core&coil 824.01 85426 1,640.79
500ft spool wir/el/org/bro mid 322.37
2-1000w core & coil 329.60
480v core & coil 164.81
JR°s Appliance Disposal, Inc
9.9.06 Spec Recycle collection 3,175.00 85427 3,175.00
Jacobo, Alfredo
Sep-Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,596.00 85276 1,596.00
Jerry, Alisha
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 16.00 85277 16.00
Johannessen, Kim
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 879.00 85317 879.00
Johnson, Kimberly
Sep-Oct06 Utility Reimbursemen 164.00 85318 164.00
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 10 of 22
Johnson, Rick
Sep06 4 Deer Pickups 380.00 85469 380.00
Kavanagh, Joanne (Jo)
Park and Ree Refund 4.00 85430 4.00
Kharam, Gennadiy
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 471.00 85302 471.00
Kohn, Mike
9.20/9.21 lodge GFOA conf Alex 217.26 85609 330.29
9.20/9.22 254 Miles GFOA conf 113.03
Konop, Gil
9.23/10.6.06 STD 1,190.40 85563 1,190.40
Krivanova, Eugena
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 729.00 85297 729.00
LaPointe, Kathy
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,302.00 85315 1,302.00
Lakeview Commons
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 29,094.00 85305 29,094.00
Lakeview Commons
Oct06 HAP 1,769.00 85409 1,769.00
Lakeview Commons
Oct06 HAP 796.00 85568 796.00
Lancaster Village Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 6,960.00 85319 6,960.00
Landlogic
Facility creation from Aerial/ 3,531.00 85432 3,531.00
Larson, Leroy
10.19 Volunteer Recog dinner 350.00 85592 350.00
Lawn King, Inc.
9.12/9.21 sodblueberries,DWF 189.89 85590 189.89
League of MN Cities Ins Trust
06-17 4.21.06 Land car acciden 4,053.94 85433 4,053.94
League of MN Cities Ins Trust
05-27 9.17.05 Kravchinsky 500.00 85591 500.00
League of Minnesota Cities
4re0str/Safety Assist 301 Sob 60.00 85434 24,913.00
06/'07 Membership Dues 24,853.00
Lee, Dan
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,024.00 85288 1,024.00
Litton, Tony & Laura
3210 Everest Ln utility refund 29.97 85659 29.97
Lynn and Associates
9.26.06 Forestry meeting 125.00 85593 125.00
MPWA
Vetsch/11.16/11.17 Fall Conf 219.00 85435 219.00
MPWA
4 Registr/Fall conf 11. 15.06 975.00 85594 975.00
http e//cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 11 of 22
MES Inc
1 Weatherproof cover red $29.43 85595 $29.43
MN AFSCME Council #5
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.20 85596 $359.28
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.47
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 9.47
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 141.92
Payroll Generated Invoice 79.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 53.22
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.20
MN Child Support Payment Ctr
Payroll Generated Invoice 455.00 85436 $1,587.88
Payroll Generated Invoice 664.04
Payroll Generated Invoice 259.34
Payroll Generated Invoice 209.50
MN Dept of Labor&Industry
Sep06 Bldg Permit Surcharge 12,035.50 85597 $12,035.50
MN Dept of Transportation
7.25.06 55&Vicksburg 46.82 85381 46.82
MN Environmental Fund
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00 85437 34.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
MN NCPERS Life Insurance
Oct06 Employee Life Ins 1,474.00 85438 1,474.00
MN Pollution Control Agency
Billstrom,christensen Collecti 540.00 85439 540.00
MN Real Estate Journal
07 Senness Subsc renewal 85.00 85440 85.00
MN Society of CPA's
Jacobson/Audits of Local Govts 229.00 85598 229.00
MTI Distributing Inc
Hinge asm 107.31 85599 107.31
Maciej, Bernard
10.2/10.4 Lodge/mileage Transi 374.06 85533 374.06
Magney Construction Inc
Proj3108 #17 Vcksbrg pump stn 18,112.81 85441 18,112.81
Maintenance Experts Inc
Sep06 Everglaze maint 76.32 85442 76.32
Maple Grove Park & Recreation
Sping'06 Music for Everyone 8,990.19 85443 8,990.19
Matthews, Samella
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 36.00 85337 36.00
Mazo, Gregory
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $838.00 85304 $838.00
http://cityintemallasplasp_reportslfmance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 12 of 22
McCombs, Julie & Mark
17001 39th Ct utility refund 7.45 85583 7.45
Mcallister, Allyne
16140 15th Ave Utility refund 18.57 85523 18.57
Mellies, Michael Richard
R617515 Massage Lic 50.00 85446 50.00
Merriam, Avery
2767 Upland utility refund 17.80 85529 17.80
Metro Athletic Supply Inc
Down bx & chain set 181.00 85603 181.00
Metro Fire
Rapid vent orifice,hose asmb,g 168.60 85604 168.60
See cr/Orion Upgrade Kit 38.00.
Return Orion Upgrade kit 38.00)
Metro Transit
10 Stored Value 394.00 85605 394.00
Metro Water Conditioning Inc.
63bags PW pellets 330.46 85606 330.46
Metrocall
Oct06 1 WR pager rental 12.04 85444 49.75
Oct06 3 SW pagerrental 37.71
Metropolitan Council HRA
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,494.38 85324 1,494.38
Metropolitan Council -Waste
Oct06 Wastewater service 348,730.57 85445 348,730.57
Metropolitan Council/SAC
Sep06 Sery Avail Charge 141,174.00 85607 141,174.00
Michaud, Regina
SIL Fitness/7 vinyl dumbbell 158.45 85468 158.45
Mid-America Festivals
06 Renaissance consigmmnt 229.00 85447 229.00
Miller, Sharon
Park and Rec Refund 30..00 85610 30.00
Mittelstaedt, Sara
8.27/9.27 Country Cake,Wuollet 616.22 85473 616.22
Mobile Lock And Safe Co.
1 rekey CC 108.98 85611 108.98
Mpls Area Assoc of Realtors
Oct-DecO6 MLS 75.00 85612 75.00
Muckala, Toni Denise
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 758.00 85347 758.00
Myers, David John
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 380.00 85289 380.00
NAPA Geniune Auto Parts Co
Wet tire 6.38 85562 19.35
Connectr,conn kit 12.97
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Regis'Ler
Natgun Corporation
Proj3108 412/Final Reservoir 71,905.03 85614 $71,905.03
Nathe-Stewart, Susan
434.52
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 17.00 85344 $17.00
National Waterworks Inc
Bolt & nut/anti seize compound 998.46 85449 $1,257.26
Bolt & nut 258.80
National Waterworks Inc
Bolt & nut/hex nut $230.79 85615 $230.79
Page "13 of 22
Nelson's Catering
9.13 Fall Kick-off seniors 434.52 85450 434.52
Nesbitt, Robert
9.18/9.29 MN JointAnalysis 2,082.50 85470 2,082.50
Neumann's Enterprise
Proj3105 channel drainage 13,015.00 85616 13,015.00
Norsan
Handsoap-5 214.60 85619 431.54
Spry & wipe/glss clnr/gloves 216.94
Nyagwansa, Jane
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 791.00 85312 791.00
Nyangoka, Samson
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,333.00 85338 1,333.00
Nyankira, Edward
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 742.00 85294 742.00
OPR Limited Partnership
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 11,734.00 85326 11,734.00
Oakwood Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 609.00 85284 609.00
Office Depot
Traveldrive flyer 82.10 85452 405.50
Memo open end 81.47
Expand pckt 81.34
Note pad/perf pad/pens/mrks 51.56
Phone bk/laminate refill 43.86
Paper towel/labels/pens/log bk 73.03
Log book 4.39
Return photo elec 4351304814 17.53)
Engineer pad 5.28
Office Depot
Log book 8.78 85620 306.16
Sheet protector/dual cartridge 69.37
Accustamp/inked stamp 7.43.
AAA battery/ink cart/battery p 53.06
Cover/bndr/protractor/finch cr 38.70
Refill laminate 62.32
Foot rest 13.46
Clips/highltr/eraser/dry mrkr 21.72
Pencil hldr/wood sorter/hldr/r 31.32
Okeefe, Matthew
5083 Yuma Ln utility refund 35.00 85601 35.00
Olchanski, Alex
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 349.00 85275 349.00
Oly, Gregory
8.28/9.5 DWI court parking $32.00 85565 $32.00
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/ec_cheek.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToD ate= 10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 14 of 22
On Site Sanitation
8.26/9.1 Shenandoah Pk $14.64 85453 $14.64
On Site Sanitation
9.15/9.17 Plym On Parade 617.70
8.26/9.22 Bass Lk plyfld 58.58
9.14/9.22 Birchview 18.83
826/9.22 Dog Park 58.58
826/9.22 Elm Crk plyfld 106.50
8.26/9.22 East Med Lake 58.58
8.26/9.22 Greenwood Elem 58.58
8.26/9.22 Oakwood plyfld 106.50
8.26/9.22 Pilgrim Ln elem 58.58
8.26/9.22 Plym crk plyfld 106.50
8.26/9.22 Plym Crk plyfld 244.95
8.26/9.22 Plymplyfld 244.95
8.26/9.22 Prkrs lk beach 106.50
8.26/9.22 Prkas lk beach 106.50
8.26/9.22 Prkrs lk beach 106.50
8.26/9.22 Prkrs Ik beach 244.95
8.26/9.22 Oakwood plyfld 106.50
8.26/9.22 Amphitheater 165.08
826/9.22 amphitheater 58.58
8.26/9.22 Yard Waste 58.58
8.26/9.22 Zachary plyfld 244.95
8.26/9.22 Zachary elem 58.58
8.26/9.22 West Med Lake 244.95
8.26/9.22 West Med Lake 213.00
8.26/9.22 West Med Lake 244.95
8.26/9.22 Skate park 58.58
8.26/922 Rdgmntplyfld 106.50
8.26/9.22 Prkrs lk plyfld 58.58
8.26/9.22 Prkrs lk plyfld 58.58
8.26/9.22 Public Works 58.58
8.26/9.22 FHAC/Bubble 58.58
8.26/9.22 Elm Crk plyfld 10650
8.26/9.22 Elm Crk plyfld 244.95
8.26/922 Camelot Park 58.58
85622 4,507.88
Open Your Heart
243.00 85624 $3,718.20
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00 85454 $19.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Orbit Courier
761.00
9.20.06 Fr: MN Toro 14.80 85455 $14.80
Otis Elevator Co.
Oct-DecO6 CC Elev Sery 572.67 85623 $572.67
Owens Services Inc.
CC Computer room to warm 243.00 85624 $3,718.20
FS 3 final billing AC #2 412.40
Fs 3 building hit by lightenin 498.87
PS pumped system down 241.00
CC Replaced inline oil filter 279.93
PCC ck'd vav box problem 293.00
CC Lower level AC not cooling 455.00
PCC Mcquay rooftop in alarm 761.00
PCC game room warm 241.00
FS 3 work on 2nd flr AC -2 293.00
P 12 O Music
10.20 DJ/Little Costume Ball 285.00 85625 $285.00
PAM Oil
Eagle 1 cabin air filter 9.35 85456 $340.09
Pad kit frt 42.39
Element/eagle cabin air filter 56.98
AC battery 57.34
24 -ss by PF46 83.76
Gas tank cap/pad kit 90.27
http e//cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/financelcc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
PAM Oil
Page 15 of 22
AC filter 72.78 85626 $420.44
AC element A 42.32
Oil filter 26.33
Winter blade/fuel filter 61.66
Air filter 11.01
Pad kit 37.86
Winter blade/fuel filter 124.26
Oil filter 44.22
Palen, Jos F
Octl06 Section 8 Rent 1,863.00 85314 $1,863.00
Park Bus Company
9.18 New Library/St Michael $510.00 85457 $510.00
Park Place Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $1,298.00 85328 $1,298.00
Park Place Apartments
Aua Oct06 HAP $1,614.00 85458 $1,614.00
Parkside Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 15,705.00 85329 15,705.00
Party America
9.12/9.26 inhouse charges 39.56 85617 39.56
Paul Crosby Photography
CC Entrance photo rights 639.00 85627 639.00
Paulsen, Gabriele
4113 HEMLOCK LN UTILITY REFUND 96.11 85561 96.11
Pearson, Scott
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 253.00 85339 253.00
Peterson, Mark S
9.7/9.21 120 Mileage Reimb 53.40 85600 53.40
Petrovski, Igor
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 517.00 85306 517.00
Petty Cash
8.15/9.29 Petty Cash reimb 156.03 85459 156.03
Petty Cash
10.20 Little Costume Ball star 100.00 85628 100.00
Pfeiffer, Reese
Octl06 Section 8 Rent 1,105.00 85335 1,105.00
Plant & Flanged Equipment Co
Plug/t bolt w nut/rubber gask-t 1,981.17 85460 1,981.17
Plekkenpol, Daniel
Gas to Breezy point conf 26.20 85547 26.20
Plymouth Amoco
Jul-Sep06 Car Washes 878.62 85584 878.62
Plymouth Automotive Inc.
343'98 Expedition tow 64.02 85629 192.05
342'06 Nissan tow 128.03
Plymouth Colony Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 13,437.00 85330 13,437.00
Plymouth Colony Apartments
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFroniDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
Oct06 HAP $467.00 85461 $467.00
Plymouth Firefight.Relief Assc
2006 Annual Fire State Aid $489,376.00 85462 $489,376.00
Pape 16 of 22
Plymouth Ponds Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 16,381.00 85332 16,381.00
Plymouth Terrace Realty, LLP
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 129.00 85333 129.00
Police Executive Research Foru
Plekkenpol/7.8/7.26.07 Sr Mgmn 7,250.00 85630 7,250.00
Porter, Alton
3695 Yuma Ln utility refund 67.43 85524 67.43
Postmaster / Window D-12
Nov-Dec06 Plym News pstge 4,100.00 85464. 4,100.00
Postmaster / Window D-12
Winter'06 Rec Booklet 6,600.00 85631 6,600.00
Posz, Conrad
10.4.06"Why Do We Say Such 100.00 85544 100.00
Prairie Restorations Inc
9.14.06 Lake Camelot spotspray 161.49 85632 507.57
9.14.06 PCC spot sprayed 346.08
Printers Service Inc
4 -knife sharp 68.00 85465 68.00
Quality Restoration Sery Inc
9.19 Zanzibar wtrmn repairs 783.96 85633 917.58
9.19 9700 56th Ave/wtrm rpr 133.62
Qwest
Oct06 PD to Sheriff 107.57 85634 107.57
R & R Specialties/ Somerset WI
9.19 IC Zamboni resurfacer svc 844.50 85635 844.50
Radio Shack
Hndst rec control 19.16 85637 19.16
Ramsey County
1204 Naive flats,lgl shrub 531.44 85638 531.44
Ramy Turf Products
1 bg NEP,1 bg mix#310 742.84 85466 742.84
Randy's Sanitation Inc
Sep06 CC Rubbish Removal 374.26 85467 724.75
Sep06 WTP1 Rubbish Removal 51.29
Sep06 PW/PM Rubbish Removal 249.33
Aug-Sep06 WTP2 Rubbish Rmvl 49.87
Robichon's In -Line Skate Schl
8.14/8.17 Little rollers,Y Ska 1,205.00 85451 1,205.00
Roth, Rachael
17330 11th Ave utility refund $54.23 85636 $54.23
Roytelman, Ilya
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $618.00 85308 $618.00
S & S Tree&I4orticultural Spec
9.13 Tree removal $10,235.61 85472 $12,738.37
http://cityintemal/asp/asp reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
9.13 tree removal decayed will $2,103.38
9.1.06 Boxelder prune $399.38
Page 17 of 22
Safe Kids/NMHC
13,179.00 85341 13,179.00
1Box Foam Noodles 45.00 85618 45.00
Salmela, Donald E
1,439.00 85303 1,439.00
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 486.00 85293 486.00
Sanderson, Heidi
300.00 85642. 300.00
9.26/9.27 Office Max/Title Poe 95.69 85411 95.69
Scharber & Sons/Long Lake
5,804.41 85478 5,804.41
Tire chain,cutter head,spool 185.13 85640 185.13
Schartz Management Group Inc
58.00 85479 58.00
15620 9th Ave utility refund 29.13 85641 29.13
Schutte, Luan
29.80 85402 29.80
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 305.00 85322 305.00
Schwab, Raejan
50.00 85480 50.00
Oct06 Utility Reimbursement 74.00 85334 74.00
Schwan's Consumer Brands
4,345.77 85481 4,345.77
R200605901 5.8.06 SIPA ref 156,000.00 85474 157,000.00
R2006050900 5.8.06 Erosion ref 1,000.00
Science Explorers
9.29 Musical Science 103.50 85475 287.50
10.3/10.24 Smokeys Forest Frie 184.00
Selectaccount
Sep06 Participant billing 460.60 85476 923.65
Aug -06 Participant billing 463.05
Senior Transportation Program
9.12.06 MN Historical St Paul 105.00 85477 105.00
Senness, Barbara
8.30/9.29 46 Mileage Reimb 49.84 85366 80.09
Barnes/Noble-Architecture MN 30.25
Severson, Robert & Roxanne
5821 Forestview Ln N utility r $21.76 85639 $21.76
Shenandoah Woods
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 13,179.00 85341 13,179.00
Shenoy, Gopal B
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 1,439.00 85303 1,439.00
Sherburne County Sheriff
W#W061543 R618572 bail 300.00 85642. 300.00
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson
Proj5124 7:1/9.15 CR6 Wtr twr 5,804.41 85478 5,804.41
Shred N Go
9-27 Scheduled sery 58.00 85479 58.00
Simons, Gordon
Office Depot/Shipping Tape 29.80 85402 29.80
Southwest MN State Univ
9.27 Dr L Peterson,Civil War 50.00 85480 50.00
Spectrum Human Resource Sys.
12.'06/12.'07 HRVantage sprt/u 4,345.77 85481 4,345.77
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 18 of 22
SportSign Ltd
195.00 85647 761.44
8.7/8.10 Trans]ator services 336.00 85643 336.00
Sports Hut Ski Team
4 P225/60RI6 Eagle Ultri Grip 293.05
92.95
Park and Rec Refund 317.15 85644 317.15
Sports Hut Ski Team
4 P235/55R17 98V Eag 408.24
Park and Rec Refund 195.00 85645 195.00
St Joseph Equipment Inc
Oct06 Section 8 Rent
8.30/9.5.06 54" Stone roller r 511.20 85482 511.20
St Louis Park HRA
259.86
46.48 85485 46.48 .
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 782.78 85342 782.78
Standard Insurance Co
11.98
Oct06 LTD,AD&D,Term Life Ins 6,739.27 85483 6,739.27
Stitchin Post
10 Windshirts/Prog 087 195.00 85647 761.44
188 Flag Football is 566.44
2 LT31/11.50R15 Kummo 257.26
Stone Creek Village Apts
4 P225/60RI6 Eagle Ultri Grip 293.05
92.95
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 6,097.00 85331 6,097.00
Stone Creek Village Apts
4 P235/55R17 98V Eag 408.24
Oct06 HAP 1,249.00 85463 1,249.00
Streicher's Inc
Oct06 Section 8 Rent
Unit 145 Squad setup 2,979.25 85484 6,328,76
2003 Cr of $360.00applied 259.86
46.48 85485 46.48 .
10bx 9MM ammo/see'03 bal of 249.18
Mourning bands blck elastic 11.98
2003 Cr of $360.00 applied 259.86)
See CM214465/MAMBA Sling 31.90
Unit 146 Squad setup 2,998.40
R Gardner/bike patrol pant 89.95
Cr inv I350731/MAMBA sling 31.90)
Streicher's Inc
Battery 3 volt lithium $26.84 85648 $801.57
06-41 Squad 134 push bumper $117.15
Window punch PS -8 $59.21
1 12V map lite bulb $7.40
Squad 118 console boxes $590.97
Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc
Rtn 2 P225,purch2 225n0R16 33.10) 85649 2,150.06
4 P235/55R17 98V Eag UG 408.24
53.63
2 LT31/11.50R15 Kummo 257.26
06' diseased trees
4 P225/60RI6 Eagle Ultri Grip 293.05
92.95
4 P225/60R16 Eagle Ultra Grip 293.05
Drainage & utility easements
2 P235/75R16 Wangler 155.47
4 P235/55R17 98V Eag 408.24
2 P225/70R16,2 225/70R16 367.85
Summer Creek Apts
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 3,948.00 85343 3,948.00
Sun Newspapers/Notices
Ord 2006-21 46.48 85485 46.48 .
Sun Newspapers/Notices
Drainage & utility easements 57.20 85650 $450.46
File 2006076 53.63
File 2006080 50.05
06' diseased trees 89.38
06' Weed eradication 92.95
File 2006091 50.05
Drainage & utility easements 57.20
httpe//cityintemal/asplasp_reports/financelcc_cheek. asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 19 of 22
Sunram Construction Inc
Proj 1004 #2/Final 9th&Niagar $11,817.17 85651 $11,817.17
Superior Ford, Inc.
Screen A 41.32 85486 316.10
Filter ANS 25.65
Shaft As 68.54
85658 3.18
Shaft as/seal 180.59
Superior Products Mfg. Co.
697.20 85660 697.20'
6 Stanchion post&rope,8swivel 835.55 85652 835.55
Sushko, Jerilynn
239.63 85493 239.63
Park and Rec Refund 33.00 85653 33.00
Swift Mechanical
282.23 85494 1,616,69
16210 25th Ave Refund permit 227.85 85488 227.85
Target
111.83
9.1/9.15 Whistle,portfolio,3 d 133.61 85654 133.61
The Green Guardian
319.50
06 #4 Soccer Field D applic 399.38 85489 804.09
06 #4 Greenwood applic 111.83
06 #4 Soccer Field A applic 292.88
The Home Depot AHS Inc
16145 16th AVe refund permit 89.84 85655 89.84
Three Rivers Park District
6.22/7.20 Canoe rental 78.00 85657 78.00
ThyssenKrupp Elevator
Oct06 PS Elev service 135.00 85490 535.00
Oct-DecO6 IC Elev service 400.00
Todd's Lawn and Garden
8.4/8.10 Forced weed/city mow $3,412.50 85491 $3,412.50
Toll Company
2-Propane/forklift cyldr 153.92 85492 153.92
Toll Company
MCSS bushing w 1/4" 3.18 85658 3.18
Traffic Marking Services Inc
9.14 Stop bars near ped crsngs 697.20 85660 697.20'
Tri -K Services, Inc.
Sep06 25yds pulv topsoil 239.63 85493 239.63
Trugreen Chemlawn
06 #2 Peony median ornbedspry 282.23 85494 1,616,69
06 #2 Plym Blvd median ombed 138.45
06 #2 Bass Lk median ornbedsp 111.83
06 #2 Schmidt median ombedsp 117.15
06 #2 Zach median ornbedspry 319.50
06 #2 W Med median ornbedspry 292.88
06 #2 Shenandoah ornbedspray 138.45
06 #2 CR101 median ornbedspry 216.20
Turovskaya, Irina
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 601.00 85309 601.00
Twin City Water Clinic, Inc.
Sep06 Water analysis 640.00 85661 640.00
TwinSource
12cs 38x60 black liners 417.91 85662 417.91
http:/,/cityinternal/asp/asp reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F30%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register Page 20 of 22
Ultimate Office
1 Wood literature rack 128.36 85663 128.36
Uniforms Unlimited Inc.
Zeil/Reserve shirt 53.75 85495 53.75
Uniforms Unlimited Inc.
P Fischer/shirt/mock tneck alt. 91.67 85664 91.67
United Rentals
2 -rubber washer 1.83 85496 1.83
United Rentals
9.16 POP cones,Parade boards 448.79 85665 448.79
United Way of Mpls
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.50 85497 92.43
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 8.00
University of MN
Groth,Anderson/Toward Zero Dea 150.00 85499 150.00
University of MN Plant Disease
9.6.06 Red/Bur oak wilt test 50.00 85498 50.00
V Locker Minnesota LLC
IC Locker rental share 12.60 85500 12.60
Valley Rich Co Inc
8.28/9.11 Fernbrook/Empire 2,640.87 85501 2,640.87
Valspar Paint
Thinner/9" cvrs/brush/mtl try/ 76.10 85502 76.10
Valspar Paint
24 50 pc field 734.85 85666 734.85
Van Reusekom, Bill
Park and Rec Refund 20.00 85503 20.00
Verizon Wireless
Sep06 Tufte&Ahrens 36.61 85504 58.58
Au,--Sep06 759.8159 P&R spare 1.46
Sep06 Aerial 21 8.29
Sep06 Rescue 11 fax 6.11
Sep06 Rescue Vehicle 11 6.11
Viking Trophies
Plates/trophies 37.06 85505 37.06
Viking Trophies
Marble plaques -6 111.61 85667 143.88
Tennis resin/art work 32.27
Village Chevrolet Co.
Pulle/hdl/bezel 68.92 85506 68.92
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/financelcc_check.asp?sFroniD ate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
Voynov, Vladimir
Oct06 Section 8 Rent $962.00 85350 $962.00
Page 21 of 22
WSB & Associates
Prcj7101 Aug06'07 StrRcnstr 117.00 85507 117.00
Wall Street Mgmt Croup LLC
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 531.00 85351 531.00
Walman Optical Co.
G Jurek SCBA eyeglass insert 40.00 85508 40.00
Waste Management Services
Jun -Oct -6 IC Rubbish Removal 34.25 85509 34.25
Waste Management Services
9.9.06 Spec Recycle collection 4,101.42 85668 4,363.76
Oct06 PCC Rubbish Removal 262.34
Wellington Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 2,128.00 85352 2,128.00
West Point Products Inc
Hp 4000/HP 5si 254.29 85669 636.96
Hp 5si 382,67
Willberg, Anders
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 822.00 85281 822.00
Willmann, Kevin
4835 Ranchview Ln utility refu 14.35 85587 14.35
Willow Creek Apartments
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 32,543.00 85353 32,543.00
Wilson, Richard
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 498.00 85336 498.00
Winter Equipment Co Inc
6 30" Prem Plow. marker kit 175.20 85510 175.20
Woody's Hardware
Sept06 Hardware supplies 13.48 85670 56.58
Sept06 Hardware supplies 15.32
Sept06 Hardware supplies 11.47
Sept06 Hardware supplies 2.48
Sept06 Hardware supplies 10.52
Sept06 Hardware supplies 3.31
Wright -Henn Elec. Co.
9-15-06 Street Lighting 7,772.40 85511 7,772.40
Xcel Energy
Sept06 Lift station 5,135.06 85512 12,867.50
Sept06 City Parks 7,318.95
8.23/9.24 13900 13th LS 413.49
Xcel Energy
Sept06 Water twrs 49.69 85671 65,197.51
Sept06 Traffic Signals 2,200.49
Oct06 City buildings 62,211.54
Sept06 Lift stations 735.79
Yesilevsky, Igor
Oct06 Section 8 Rent 906.00 85307 906.00
Yogastudio in Plymouth LLC
8.7/10.25 Yoga youth/adult $2,475.20 85513 $2,475.20
Zee Medical Service
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFroniDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Check Register
CC Medical resupply 128.07
PW Medical resupply 238.14
PD Medical resupply 154.59
WTP2 Medical resupply 92.07
PW Medical resupply 169.43
Zee Medical Service
PCC Medical resupply 73.69
85514
85672
782.30
73.69
Zep Manufacturing
550 dnun Zep orange response $953.42 85515 $953.42
eQuality Pathways to Potential
Sep06 PCC Janitorial service $607.05 85516 $798.75
Sep06 IC Janitorial service $191.70
TOTAL AMOUNT: $2,813,270.14
Page 22 of 22
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=9%2F3 0%2F2006&sToDate=10%2... 10/16/2006
Agenda Number L
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
m
FROM: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner through Barbara Senness, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: U.S. Home Corporation. "Taryn Hills 4h Addition" – Replat of a
portion of Taryn Hills, for property located southeast of County Road 47
and Vicksburg Lane (2006076)
DATE: Oct. 13, 2006 for City Council Meeting on Oct. 24, 2006
REVIEW DEADLINE: Jan. 4, 2007
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a replat for "Taryn Hills 4h Addition", as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
Approval of a replat requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval to replat Blocks 8, 9, and 11, and Outlot K of "Taryn
Hills" (1st Addition), for property located southeast of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane.
The proposed replat would increase the width of the lots by roughly ten feet—to
accommodate a change in the housing product from "Lifestyle" single-family detached
townhomes to "American Heartland" single-family homes. The replat would reduce the
number of lots in the affected area from 22 to 19. A replat requires the same review process
as a preliminary and final plat.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING:
On October 4, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing and subsequently
voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request. The applicant was present in
support of the request. No one from the public wished to speak on the matter.
File 2006076
Page 2
Notice of the Planning Commission's public hearing was published in the City's official
newspaper, and mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. A copy of the
notification area map is attached. Development signage remains on the site.
4. CONTEXT:
A. Site Guiding and Zoning
The subject area to be replatted is guided LA -2 (Living Area 2), and is zoned RSF-3 (Single
Family Detached 3).
B. Surrounding Land Uses
C. Natural Characteristics of Site
The site area is located in the Elm Creek drainage district. The site area does not contain any
land in the floodplain or shoreland overlay district, nor does it contain any wetlands.
D. Previous Actions Affecting Site
In August of 2005, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Taryn Hills, for a
development to contain 575 residential units and a small neighborhood commercial site—for
237 acres of land located east of Vicksburg Lane both north and south of County Road 47.
In December of 2005, the City Council approved the first final plat phase for "Taryn Hills".
That final plat included 235 residential lots (131 lots for single-family detached housing and
104 lots for multi -family attached housing). The proposed "Taryn Hills 4d' Addition" would
replat a small area within the single family portion of that final plat.
In May of 2006, the City Council approved the final plat for "Taryn Hills 2nd Addition". That
final plat created a lot for a 50 -unit rental townhome development to be constructed by
CommonBond Communities. That final plat also included outlots for future platting of the
commercial site.
In September of 2006, the City Council approved the final plat for "Taryn Hills 3rd Addition".
That final plat included seven single-family lots on 5.2 acres north of County Road 47 that
was not part of the original "Taryn Hills" plat.
Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zonin
North Under development for single- & multi-
family homes in "Taryn Hills"
LA -2 RSF-3
RMF -3
West (across
Vicksbur Ln.) Single-family development LAR FRD
South & East Dedicated for "Northwest Greenway" P -I P -I
C. Natural Characteristics of Site
The site area is located in the Elm Creek drainage district. The site area does not contain any
land in the floodplain or shoreland overlay district, nor does it contain any wetlands.
D. Previous Actions Affecting Site
In August of 2005, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Taryn Hills, for a
development to contain 575 residential units and a small neighborhood commercial site—for
237 acres of land located east of Vicksburg Lane both north and south of County Road 47.
In December of 2005, the City Council approved the first final plat phase for "Taryn Hills".
That final plat included 235 residential lots (131 lots for single-family detached housing and
104 lots for multi -family attached housing). The proposed "Taryn Hills 4d' Addition" would
replat a small area within the single family portion of that final plat.
In May of 2006, the City Council approved the final plat for "Taryn Hills 2nd Addition". That
final plat created a lot for a 50 -unit rental townhome development to be constructed by
CommonBond Communities. That final plat also included outlots for future platting of the
commercial site.
In September of 2006, the City Council approved the final plat for "Taryn Hills 3rd Addition".
That final plat included seven single-family lots on 5.2 acres north of County Road 47 that
was not part of the original "Taryn Hills" plat.
File 2006076
Page 3
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a replat is limited to whether or not the
proposal meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance.
If it meets these standards, the City must approve the replat.
6. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval to replat 21.4 acres of "Taryn Hills" (1St Addition) for
property located southeast of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane. The replat would involve
Blocks 8, 9, and 11 totaling 6 acres, and Outlot K (for future development) consisting of 15.4
acres. The purpose of the replat is to increase the width of the lots by roughly ten feet. The
replat would accommodate a change in the housing product from "Lifestyle" single-family
detached townhomes to "American Heartland" single-family homes.
Under the replat, the number of lots in the affected area would be reduced by 3—from 22 lots
to 19 lots. However, the development would continue to remain within the allowable density
range. Additionally, all lots would exceed the minimum lot area standard of 7,000 square feet
and minimum lot width standard of 65 feet, as specified for the RSF-3 district.
Conclusion on the Replat
The Planning Commission and staff have found that the proposed replat would be consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the standards outlined in the Subdivision
Regulations and Zoning Ordinance.
7. RECOMMEDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the attached resolution
approving the replat for "Taryn Hills 4th Addition", as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Minutes
2. Applicant's Narrative
3. Location Map
4. Notification Area Map
5. Approved Final Plat
6. Site Graphics
7. Resolution Approving Replat
Draft Minutes
City of Plymouth
Planning Commission Meeting
October 4, 2006
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair James Holmes, Commissioners Melissa Musliner,
Neset, Kathleen Murdock, Frank Weir and Sarah Anderson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner E. J. Clyman
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Barbara Senness, Senior P er Shawn Drill,
Senior Planner Marie Darling, Planner Joshua Doty, Associate Pl r Kip Berglund and
Office Support Specialist Laurie Lokken
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC FORUM
4. APPROVAL OZAGEND
MOTION by Commissonded by Commissioner Murdock, to approve the
October 4, 2006 PlanninAgenda. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved.
5. CONSENTGENDA
A. APP,UVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION
ON by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Musliner, to approve the
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. U.S. HOME CORPORATION (2006076)
Chair Holmes introduced the request by U.S. Home Corporation for "Taryn Hills 4t'
Addition" replat of blocks 8, 9, 11 and Outlot K of Taryn Hills for property located
southeast of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane.
Senior Planner Drill gave an overview of the September 26, 2006 staff report.
Chair Holmes introduced the applicant, David Hinners, U.S. Home Corporation. Mr.
Hinners said that he had nothing to add to the report.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 2
Chair Holmes opened and closed the public hearing as no one was present to speak on the
item.
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Neset, to approve the
request by U.S. Home Corporation for "Taryn Hills 4h Addition" replat of blocks 8, 9, 11
and Outlot K of Taryn Hills for property located southeast of County Road 47 and
Vicksburg Lane. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
C Holmes introduced the request by Four Season's Automotive for a zoning ordinance
text dment, site plan amendment and conditional use permits to allow a car wash and
24-hour sales for property located at 9950 Rockford Road.
Planner Doty gft an overview of the September 26, 2006 staff report.
Chair Holmes intro d the applicant, Liz Nalezny, Four Season's Automotive. Ms.
Nalezny said that they co ur with everything as presented in the staff report.
Chair Holmes opened and clos&Lthe public hearing as no one was present to speak on the
item.
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, sec ed by Commissioner Musliner, to approve the
request by Four Season's Automotive fo Hing ordinance text amendment, site plan
amendment and conditional use permits to a a car wash and 24-hour fuel sales for
property located at 9950 Rockford Road. e. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved
unanimously.
C. HANS HAGEN HOMES, INC. (2006091)
Chair Holmes introduced the request by Hans Hagen Homes, MIL for a registered land
survey to subdivide a property in Plymouth Station for a day care forerty located at the
northwest corner of the intersection of Dunkirk Lane and Medina Road.
Senior Planner Darling gave an overview of the September 26, 2006 staff
Chair Holmes introduced the applicant, John Rask, Hans Hagen Homes, Inc.
said that they are asking for what was approved in 1998.
Chair Holmes opened and closed the public hearing as no one was present to speak on the
item.
r
Taryn Hills 4th Addition Project Narrative
Developer Introduction -
U.S. Home Corporation, as successor by merger to Lundgren Bros. Construction,
Inc. is the applicant for Taryn Hills 4th Addition. Lundgren Bros. Construction,
Inc. ("Lundgren") has been building homes of distinction within the metropolitan
area since 1970. The vision of Lundgren has always been focused on building `
quality neighborhoods that blend with the natural environment and enhance the
community. Rolling topography, woodlands, wetlands and other natural
amenities have always been features of a Lundgren neighborhood..
In 1999, Lundgren became a division of U.S. Home Corporation. In 2000, U.S.
Home Corporation was purchased by the Lennar Family of Builders. Operating
as a division of the Lennar Family of Builders, Lundgren continues to improve
and enhance their ability to provide exceptional quality, value and design with the
support of one of the nation's largest home builders.
Taryn Hills 4th Addition-
Taryn Hills 4th Addition is a replat of Blocks 8, 9, 11 and Outlot K, Taryn Hills-.
Originally, these homesites were designed to accommodate Lundgren's .
Lifestyle" product- a single family detached townhome which would fit on a 65'
wide homesite. Recently, Lennar Corporation, our parent corporation, has
eliminated this product from Lundgren's building line of homes. As a result,
Lundgren does not have a product that we build that will fit on a 65' wide
homesite. Instead, Lundgren would like to construct homes from our new
product named "American Heatland"- a detached single family home that
requires a minimum of 70' wide homesite.
The plat of Taryn Hills 4th Addition will contain 3 blocks with 19 homesites and 1
outlot. Outlot A is a replat of Outlot K, Taryn Hills, which will accommodate the
future phases of "American Heartland" homes as well as the future phase of
Orrin Thompson's "Homestead Collection" homes.
This replat would reduce the number of homesites by 3 for the previously platted
blocks within Taryn Hills (1St Addition), and would reduce the number of
homesites by 2 within Outlot K (future development area); for a total of 5 fewer
homesites. The plat of Taryn Hills showed a total of 52 "Lifestyle" homesite, with
22 homesites in Phase 1 and 30 homesites in Phase 2. The plat of Taryn Hills
4th Addition shows 19 homesites (which is Phase 1) and we plan for another 28
homesites in future Phase 2. The planned number of "Homestead Collection"
homesites remains unchanged.
Should there be any questions, please contact David Hinners at 952-249-3024.
935 East Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, MN 55391 - Phone 952.473.1231 - Fax 952.473.7401 - www.lundgrenbros.com .....""'
LAR
LAR
3
L'A::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::.
o+
e
vat+
Site
LAR
Location Map - 2006076
US Homes Corportation
Taryn Hills 4th Addition
Southeast of intersection of
County Road 47 & Vicksburg Lane
Request for Preliminary & Final Plat
N
Ci ty Of
W + E
Plymouth, Minnesota S
500 250 0 500 1,000
Land Use Guide Plan
C, Comercial
CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IP, Planned Industiral
0 LA -1, Living Area 1
0 LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area E
LA -4, Living Area 4
0 LAR, Living Area Rural
P -I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
1,500 2,000
Feet
jj
I cwf fi {`n'f # E4*f • r+,r /'q,r\ i (Z w. yn
iyyk,.s mt= ...wbs-
LJe+1.
r.-.^
v.....I-.,+
yr6'
roe.,
ra
NOTIFICATION AREA MAP
Qh 718zz-21
x
E m
rs 05-118.22-11
mow'',,.+
H'...........__..'..._......'.Y v.f .l
05.1dB-22-ih
04'.118-7,2?311822-24
jj
I cwf fi {`n'f # E4*f • r+,r /'q,r\ i (Z w. yn
iyyk,.s mt= ...wbs-
LJe+1.
r.-.^
v.....I-.,+
yr6'
roe.,
ra
T1-11\.1 1 V HILLS R.T. DOC. NO.
I ass ,. ,. ,` ' />! ` •. ,- `' ,
R •,.a7b , ,
a
I\`yam 1 A
r lei a
naW .
adWt'
53 \
DETAIL A
S
V J
oa '
R
Sd
mm.lrs maqu cu 2474 mm.
I, . tnlP_
1 i •,^1116Ida I •
mm e.iameuw Mm®,
L—J---------
R H I L L
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
9y t
SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS
APPROVED FINAL PLAT
FOR AFFECTED AREA)
SATHRE-B ERGQUIST. INC.
TARYN HILLS 4TH ADDITION
DETAIL A
NORTH z
h to
POW
INSET A
rk Ha e,.e yRmou. wmrrk.raoemnmornarvxl
un .mm.d m e.e svmara
Omde
mam Albe tbialN mam
rm b.tlm .+a dpinbe Im Mu ®b euie. ae6®a lorvr N.1Ah ma Wpmleea[k ofgme.
oai v.ve m army v ao.v oa am pM.
PROPOSED REPLAT
6H1;1;1 :i UP j 6HEE16
v'
NORTH
eOi \
elan-Tw*•rr y
ueul .v 1 '4a \ a
14239 R-4aLl2 A-
e-a•• ,
moi+ 1 a \
z
r
yes'•
yr''E
lamIII1 _ \ Hi4
Sr2f3l:,N 157.59"--
PRELtMWARY--G8/0tffi6-j
PROPOSED REPLAT
6H1;1;1 :i UP j 6HEE16
Tarvn Hills OUTLOTS AND PHASING
VdAdd'n
DFIYlTES TwprNXLLS IPX+SE 11
OEXOTES TMrX XEl3 XOA
w
OfNOTESTMruluti ,PRASE EI(\,F
OErgTFf TIwEf XrvEPS TWVE COuarOcw
DEr10TE5 FlTYVMw pEpL'+iUrl
Oe TOTES IfWCYPMKIPXASE II
OEIpTE5lE0ACr P40:[6.u.rOr1—A jP11-11
DErpTES IEOKYPMKIPXASE II 1 M 1'+,
OEIpTFS FJNCE pE'vEIOPr.'lWT MFA lttlWlEucpE SIlE1
OErrOTEi irDuuE pEVEIOPUFliT AwEA[RurplBoxp SDEI
OFrlOTES FYTuIE OEI•ROPUEIi ME+
I XEHEBr [FPI1fY Trul 1N5 PwlOP SPEOb-l^wTpu WAS FXfPNiEo Br uE ON IUSFA uT
DIECTSI vripu Ar:O IIB:T lw wpulr nFcrliEPEO PFOFESSIoxry frtu/EEX w:cFu
nIE u1/S OF TXE SIwTF O: +rvv:FSOTA.
OwIE PFG. uO
U
Q
Fa
j O F
Jw Z
ZO J Z O
F4 Z O
O H
w m
o0 w
O U
r a
O
Cl+EotFn
D+TE1c
A! 5X01}11
Jctl b. llBr<1! D1Y0
FP —LOT EUOSITD1v0
SIFFi
ODI
ODI
RESOLUTION 2006 -
APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT TO ALLOW A REPLAT OF
PROPERTY FOR U.S. HOME CORPORATION FOR "TARYN HILLS 4' ADDITION"
LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF COUNTY ROAD 47 AND VICKSBURG LANE (2006076)
WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation has requested approval of a preliminary plat and final plat
to replat roughly 21.4 acres of land located southeast of County Road 47 and Vicksburg Lane in
the "Taryn Hills" plat; and
WHEREAS, the property is presently legally described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, Lots 1 through 19, Block 9, Lot 1, Block 11, and Outlot K, Taryn
Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing
and recommends approval; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by U.S.
Home Corporation for a preliminary plat and final plat to replat property for "Taryn Hills 0'
Addition", subject to the following conditions:
1. The replat for "Taryn Hills 0' Addition" is approved in accordance with the plans received
by the City on August 16, 2006, except as may be amended by this resolution.
2. Except for the lot rearrangement as indicated by this replat, all conditions of Resolution
2005-447 together with the development contract approving the Final plat for "Taryn Hills"
shall remain in force.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
Resolution 2006 -
File 2006076
Page 2
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on October 24, 2006, with the original thereof on file in my office, and
the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Agenda Number: 6, cy
CITY OF PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
MU'
FROM: Kip Berglund, Associate Planner through Barbara Senness, Planning
Manager
SUBJECT: Madalyn Alberts. Interim Home Occupation License to allow a one -
chair hair salon in the home located at 2675 Larch Lane North (2006083)
DATE: October 13, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
REVIEW PERIOD DEADLINE: December 21, 2006
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move the attached resolution approving an interim home occupation license to allow a one -chair
hair salon, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Approval of an interim home occupation license requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting an interim home occupation license to allow a one -chair hair salon in
her home. The business would occupy approximately twenty percent (200 square feet) of the
main level of the home. All customers would be scheduled by appointment and only one client
would be served at a time. Adequate space is available in the driveway and parking pad for
customer parking; therefore no on -street parking should be needed. The applicant has indicated
that she would meet all applicable codes and ordinances regarding home based businesses. The
applicant is also aware that a state license is required to operate a beauty salon from the home,
and that approval of a state license is contingent upon the City approval.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
On October 4, 2006, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
request. Other than the applicant, no one from the public wished to speak on the matter. Notice
of this public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet. The notification area
map is attached.
File 2006083
Page 2
4. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
B. Previous Actions Affecting Site
Notice of this interim home occupation license application was sent to all property owners within
200 feet of the subject property. An interim home occupation license may be approved
administratively if no one objects to the application. However, if anyone objects to such an
application, the item must be scheduled for Planning Commission review and City Council
action. In this case, there were eight responses in support and two objections to the interim home
occupation license. As a result, the Planning Commission must review the application and make
its recommendation to the City Council.
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying an interim home occupation license is limited to
whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for an interim
home occupation.
6. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
Any home occupation involving more than one customer per day on the premises requires an
interim home occupation license. The applicant states that she would have roughly five
customers on the premises per day, and roughly 20 per week. The applicant states that services
would be offered, by appointment only, Monday through Saturday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
Home occupations are limited to 25 percent of the floor area of one floor of a home. In this case,
the home occupation would occupy roughly 20 percent of one level of the home.
The objections to this interim home occupation were based on 1) increased traffic and parking
with potential safety issues for children, 2) hours of operation, 3) noise, 4) decrease in property
values, and 5) the health, safety and general welfare of the neighborhood being jeopardized.
Traffic and Parking Concerns
The subject property is located along a dead end portion of Larch Lane, between 26th Avenue
and 281h Avenue (see attached map). The dead end has 15 homes, and the applicant's home is
located toward the end of the block. Customers would access the property from 281h Avenue via
Medicine Lake Drive West.
Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning
North, South, Single family homes- LA -1) Living Area 1 RSF-2) Single
East Elmhurst Lakeview Family Detached 2
West Single family homes- LA -1) Living Area 1 RSF-2) Single
Elmhurst Gardens Family Detached 2
B. Previous Actions Affecting Site
Notice of this interim home occupation license application was sent to all property owners within
200 feet of the subject property. An interim home occupation license may be approved
administratively if no one objects to the application. However, if anyone objects to such an
application, the item must be scheduled for Planning Commission review and City Council
action. In this case, there were eight responses in support and two objections to the interim home
occupation license. As a result, the Planning Commission must review the application and make
its recommendation to the City Council.
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying an interim home occupation license is limited to
whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for an interim
home occupation.
6. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
Any home occupation involving more than one customer per day on the premises requires an
interim home occupation license. The applicant states that she would have roughly five
customers on the premises per day, and roughly 20 per week. The applicant states that services
would be offered, by appointment only, Monday through Saturday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
Home occupations are limited to 25 percent of the floor area of one floor of a home. In this case,
the home occupation would occupy roughly 20 percent of one level of the home.
The objections to this interim home occupation were based on 1) increased traffic and parking
with potential safety issues for children, 2) hours of operation, 3) noise, 4) decrease in property
values, and 5) the health, safety and general welfare of the neighborhood being jeopardized.
Traffic and Parking Concerns
The subject property is located along a dead end portion of Larch Lane, between 26th Avenue
and 281h Avenue (see attached map). The dead end has 15 homes, and the applicant's home is
located toward the end of the block. Customers would access the property from 281h Avenue via
Medicine Lake Drive West.
File 2006083
Page 3
On five or six days per week, the proposed home occupation would add roughly 10-14 trips per
day (each customer visit would constitute two trips) to
28th Avenue and to the segment of Larch
Lane leading up to the applicant's home. Using the accepted standard of 10 trips per day per
single family home, this would amount to roughly the number of trips generated by one single
family home. This increase in traffic should not have any significant impact on traffic safety.
Parking for the proposed home occupation could be accommodated in the applicant's driveway
and adjacent parking pad. This could accommodate up to four vehicles. The applicant has stated
that there would be a maximum of two customers at any one time.
Hours operation, Noise and Property Values
As stated above, the applicant's proposed hours of operation (9:00 AM to 6:00 PM) would be
less than the maximum stipulated in the Zoning Ordinance (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM). The
applicant has stated that all work would be done indoors and that there will not be signage nor
would signage be allowed. Additionally, given the nature of the work, no noise would be
generated from the proposed home occupation and it would generate minimal traffic.
The proposed home occupation would be accessory to the principle use of the property as a
single-family home; therefore, there is no evidence that the property values would be affected.
The City Council must review the home occupation request with the standards outlined in
Section 21145 of the Zoning Ordinance. A copy of the standards is attached. Staff reviewed the
standards and finds that all of the standards would be met for a home occupation.
7. CONCLUSION:
The Planning Commission and staff have found that with compliance of the conditions listed in
the resolution addressing the interim home occupation, the proposal would meet all applicable
general and specific standards outlined in Section 21145 the Zoning Ordinance.
S. RECOMMENDATION
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the interim home
occupation license for a one -chair hair salon at 2675 Larch North, subject to the conditions listed
in the attached resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Home Occupation Standards
2. Applicant's Narrative
3. Planning Commission Minutes
4. Location Map
5. Notification Area Map
6. Site Graphics
7. Resolution Approving Interim Home Occupation License
1 ili:i 1[e i h l
SECTION 21145 - HOME OCCUPATIONS
21145.01. PURPOSE:.. The purpose of this section is to maintain the character and
integrity of residential areas and to provide a means through the establishment .of specific
standards and procedures by which home occupations can be conducted in residential
neighborhoods without jeopardizing the health, safety and .general welfare of the surrounding
neighborhood. In addition, this section is intended to provide a mechanism enabling the
distinction between those home occupations having minimal or no secondary impact, and those
which have potential for adverse effects upon surrounding properties.
21145.02. APPLICATION: Subject to the non -conforming use provision of this section,
all occupations other than home offices as defined by Section 21005 of this Chapter which are
conducted in the home shall comply with the provisions of this section.
21145.03. PROCEDURES AND PERMITS:
Subd, 1. Permitted Home Occupations. Permitted home occupations, as defined in
this Chapter, are exempt from permitting and licensing requirements but shall comply with the
applicable provisions of Section 21145.04.
Subd. 2. Interim Home Occupations. Interim home occupations, as defined in this
Chapter; shall require an "interim home occupation license" which shall be applied for, reviewed.
and processed in accordance with the procedural provisions of Section 21030.04, Subd. 2.(a) of
this Chapter. (Amended by Ord. No. 2002-32, 11126102)
Subd. 3. Declaration of Conditions. The Zoning Administrator and City Council
may impose such conditions on the granting' of an interim home occupation license as may be
necessary to carry out the purpose and provisions of this section.
Subd. 4. Effect of Permit. An "interim home occupation license" may be issued for
a period of one (1) year after which the license may be reissued for periods of up to three (3)
years each by the Zoning Administrator.
Subd. 5. Transferability. Home occupation licenses shall not run with the land and
shall not be transferable.
21145.04. REQUIREMENT - GENERAL PROVISIONS: All home occupations shall
comply with the following' general provisions and according to definition, the applicable
requirement provisions.
Subd. 1. General Provisions.
a) No home occupation shall produce light, glare, noise, odor or vibration that will in
any way have an objectionable effect upon adjacent or nearby property.
21145-1
PLYMOUTH ZONING O.._1INANCE
b) No equipment shall be used in the home occupation which will create electrical
interference to surrounding properties.
c) Any home occupation shall be clearly incidental and secondary to the residential
use of the premises, shall not change the residential character thereof, and shall result in
no incompatibility or disturbance to the surrounding residential uses.
d) . No home occupation shall require internal or external alterations or involve
construction features not customarily found in dwellings except where required to
comply with local and state fire and police recommendations.
e) There shall be no exterior storage of equipment, trailers or materials used in the
home gccupation.
f) The home occupation shall meet all applicable fire and building codes.
g). There shall be no exterior display or exterior signs or interior display or interior
signs which are visible from outside the dwelling. (Amended by Ord. No. 2000-06,
02/29/00)
h) All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of the City Nuisance
Ordinance.
i) No home occupation shall be conducted between the hours_ of 10:00 PM and 7:00
AM.
j) Excepting incidental materials, no commodities shall be sold on the premises.
k) Not over twenty-five (25) percent of any one story of the home shall be used for a
home occupation.
1) All home occupations shall be conducted entirely within the principal dwelling,
except that. up to fifty (50)' percent of the total floor area of accessory structures (e.g.,
attached garage, detached garage, shed) on a site may be used for storage of equipment,
trailers, or materials related to the home occupation, provided that no assembly, display,
manufacturing; repair, or -other business operations are conducted within an accessory
structure.. Furthermore, in no case shall the total floor area of accessory structures
devoted to related storage of materials, trailers, or equipment exceed 500 square feet.
Amended by Ord.. No. 2002-02, 01/22/02) (Amended by Ord. No. 2002-32, 11126102).
Subd. 2. Requirements.- Permitted Home Occupations.
a) No person other than those who reside on the premises shall be employed by the
home occupation.
21145-2
PLYMOUTH ZONING C_._JINANCE
b) Not more than one (1) client or customer per day shall come to the premises in
question for purposes pertaining to the conduct of the home occupation.
c) On -street parking facilities shall not be utilized to accommodate parking demand.
d) Not more than one vehicle shall be kept on the premises in relation to the
operation of the home occupation, and such vehicle shall have a gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR) of less. than 12,000 pounds.
Amended by Ord. No. 2002-02, 01/22/02) (Amended by Ord. No. 2002-32, 11/26/02)
Subd. 3. Requirements - Interim Home Occupation.
a) No person other than those who reside on the premises shall engage in business
activities on the premises. The business may employ others only if their work activities
are performed off the premises.
b) Examples of interim home occupations include: massage therapy, barber and
beauty services, photography studio, lessons, saw sharpening, small appliance repair and
the like.
c) The home occupation may involve any of the following: stock -in -trade incidental
to the performance of the service but not sold on the premises, repair service or
manufacturing which.requires equipment other than customarily found in a home.
d) Interim.home occupations may be allowed to accommodate their parking demand
through utilization of on -street parking. In such cases where o.n-street parking facilities
are necessary, however, the Zoning Administrator shall maintain the right to establish the
maximum number of on -street spaces permitted and increase or decrease that maximum
number when and where changing conditions require additional review.
e) There shall not be more than ten (10) client appointments per dayupon the
premises.
Amended by.Ord. No. 2002-02, 01/22/02)
Subd. 4. Prohibited Home Occupation Activities.
a) Auto repair, whether for consideration or not, of vehicles which are not registered
to a resident of the dwelling, or to a son or daughter, sibling, parent, grandparent, or
grandchild of a resident on the property.
b).. Businesses, educational programs or similar gatherings which meet on a regular
basis and have more than five (5) non-residents in-attendarice at a time.
c) Gun or ammunition sales/repair.
d) Music instruction, unless conducted within a single family detached dwelling.
21145-3
PLYMOUTH ZONING OnJINANCE
e) Pet care facilities, except for pet grooming.
Amended by Ord. No. 2002-02, 01/22/02)
21145.05. [REPEALED].
Amended by Ord. No. 2002-02, 01/22/02)
21145.06. INSPECTION: The City hereby reserves the right upon issuing any home
occupation license to -inspect the premises in which the occupation is being conducted to ensure
compliance with the provisions of this section or any conditions additionally imposed.
21145-4
aov v
APPL.vANT'S NARRATIVE
August 23, 2006
The proposed use of the space shown is for me to be,
able. to offer hair services to some people on a part-
time basis. .I arra in the process of selling a tanning
and hair salon in Plymouth, where I am the sole
owner and hairstylist. I will. be out of the tanning
business but would like to work part-time as a
hairstylist. I will be the only person offering services
at the residence. As the drawing indicates, the space
needed is about 200 square feet, which is well below
the 25% limit. Any storage needed is included in the
rooms outlined in the drawings. There will be no
signage. All work is done indoors.. I would offer
services randomly between 9am and 6pm Monday
through Saturday, no more than 5 customers per day.
There will.be no need for on -street parking. All of
the "General Provisions and "Specific Requirements'.'
will be met.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 3
MOTION by Commissioner ,seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the
request by Hans Ha omes, Inc. for a registered land survey to subdivide property in
L
lymouth S n for a day care for property located at the northwest corner of the
ion of Dunkirk Lane and Medina Road. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved
unanimously.
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. MADALYN ALBERTS (2006078)
Chair Holmes introduced the request by Madalyn Alberts for an interim home occupation
license to allow a one -chair hair salon in the home located at 2675 Larch Lane North.
Associate Planner Berglund gave an overview of the September 26, 2006 staff report.
Chair Holmes introduced the applicant, Madalyn Alberts, 2675 Larch Lane North. Ms.
Alberts said she plans to comply with all the provisions presented.
MOTION by Commissioner Neset, seconded by Commissioner Weir to approve the
request by Madalyn Alberts for an interim home occupation license to allow a one -chair
hair salon for property located at 2675 Larch Lane North. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION
approved unanimously.
8. . ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Chair Holmes, without objection, to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
LA -1. .. .. .. ..... ........
LA_1
0 ....
fill Ripm
Q
LAA .........
LA -1. .. .. ..
S ..
26TH AVE N
LA -1 . . . . . . . . ........
J::: ..
Location Map 2006083 Land Use Guide Plan
Madalyn Alberts ® C, Comercial
Alberts Cosmetology ®CC, City Center
2675 Larch Lane North CO, Commercial Office
Request for Interim Home Occupation IP, Planned Industiral
LA -1, Living Area 1
0 LA -2, Living Area 2
N LA -3, Living Area E
W g
0
LLA -
4, Living Area 491CityofAR, Living Area Rural
Plymouth, Minnesota S P -I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
240 120 0 240 480 720 960
Feet
Hennepin County Variance Mar Page 1 of 1
dootg o g 3
ww
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services: Variance Labels
This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from City, County and State authorities.
httD://bugle/variance/-oo-oMan_asnx?PTT)=2) 1182.?. )')OOQRRr.R,iffP;=?.( OkC'.r;iint= NORrR„ff Rh'7i nnA.
Excavation
4 I , only,
r'LOYS Pik LA
7.9 ! A
44-. 'x•
Tap af' F oundat ior;
940•.
Q
t . 953. , ,,#' c a ... - .•. A
q 59.E o ¢2 oN _. :,.a• . F, ' - -. : .. .: ..
I,ovirer-.Most Floor
1eiionflEva
44 O
1Denotes e'xi *tiny; el00 .0 V.
00enoe;'-propcised el V.
Uo. 2661 `ti4
J-3-,4 a;,P
Lot 10, Block 4, "Elmhurst Lakevi6e'
We 6rd6y certify that this Wa-true and correct.iepresentation of a survey of the bcunderies of `the above r l
ascribed' land:nnd_the location of --all builldings and Gisibla encroachments, if any,. frolrn,or on said l°nd,- Signed
15. day, of -April-,l9 ..76, T SURVEYS CAMPl.. ye bry't'
4
GERALD T. COYNE LOT SURVEYS COMPANY RAYMOND •A. PRASCH
300 BRUNSWICK AVE. S. 6917. IDAHO AVE. N.
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINN. LAND SURVEYORS BROOKLYN PARK, MINN,
MINN. REG. NO. 4741 MINN, REG. NO. 6743
REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF t3TATE OF hUNNEBOTA
LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CM OF b"NEAPOLI9 5 166INVOICENO,
5147 W. Broadway Minneapolis, Minnesota S547B 533-9922 r _ 4 68
JUDICIAL tj pr Clpu
F. B. NO. .
SCALE I" CINDUSTRIAL
OMMERCIAL — TOPOGRAPHICAL
DENOTES IRONCITYLOTS — PLATTINGO
a Dc dSWW38981iiaofliQaii
Hub Sef.: For
Excavation
4 I , only,
r'LOYS Pik LA
7.9 ! A
44-. 'x•
Tap af' F oundat ior;
940•.
Q
t . 953. , ,,#' c a ... - .•. A
q 59.E o ¢2 oN _. :,.a• . F, ' - -. : .. .: ..
I,ovirer-.Most Floor
1 eiionflEva
44 O
1Denotes e'xi *tiny; el00 .0 V.
00enoe;'-propcised el V.
Uo. 2661 `ti4
J-3-,4 a;,P
Lot 10, Block 4, "Elmhurst Lakevi6e'
We 6rd6y certify that this Wa-true and correct.iepresentation of a survey of the bcunderies of `the above r l
ascribed' land:nnd_the location of --all builldings and Gisibla encroachments, if any,. frolrn,or on said l°nd,- Signed
15. day, of -April-,l9 ..76, T SURVEYS CAMPl.. ye bry't'
4
C aXuos .
AUG 2. 12
F .- i?Et';RTMEN1
9
9 R Y.I
9
pd4 r
it ! o el r - S Pg id+.;r Y ,,4 ry
r '
rr. _ S' of ,a,lc.q
yi
c - ;
f; {
r _ ,. ,,. d?,•
wPy 7t .: t ,$. 4;ytit v 3p. i r'i ti
PS -4 .. $:
i : ,.. ,
r _
i Pn r.q y _ : I i `ltG,': q ; F •` 'iS ' ,
T i _ , ry,o,,,i7.c { a, frS '''
333yyy,,, •
x _
f„fi"
y • i n y:• ... f ;
tT. .. .•
r -
a' _. ..,
a :
r f_ 'r _.,
t - • !¢¢,
r
F
e. 1 r _ r, :, ' _- t r. ,, ¢q I,y rP-, Ir ' ` '
S ,-':-
f ..
I. v i•:' , ¢, :.. 1 a y
i9}rEl¢
i 6 y r'i r P- r. r tiT y1 iY -
ir •Y'rrs- `
P u
i e,- {' 1 ..'v+ ¢. F'*' ,, ,h. ,. •»
i
y y
rte'
1 }s:_
y
Srr;. .. T.'.
F !'
eP*
t-„ i; >'
r^
v S k _rhe '
rL. ,"} "a'-rf`y`, x • iyQ f !' .. ,:,:
r 5 :sq•'- f F`s` `
i8 id y ! i+ ai.. i s Y F u C -r('H '`3'". c .
r
e:.
L {rr^•'r !' a x 1C? 1 er ry
e
r }} P+dl sty 6 s y r r: n. ' 1° }e r + w P T',• 7
r r{ d ': •
Si
k i 3 '' '¢ - r 5
1_ •r i t„
t
at?,a } . r tysY 6 r
a -
e '.. .. e ! 1. P+7 r a re F y rr •. {, ii. ed ,y$
y.:} •
u x i ''J y
Yz .
F ,.
gra rl• !,'i. y`'
r e
r..
u!
rT
i i : a v 1 ,1 d ,ES x• •.
e •h' a. p ,o''.e
ref
L
777
TIM
i Y
i-
i e
e =, _: -Id w ,tt4 a-, ¢
l
I r•,11 ' 1_.iir1 e-' - v -
k
F ••rn eP n # -4 7a..l_ i
q
y ;,d-.. R J-... -IY, jA'rd> 'N€< F W'-Y- ''
LY•"' . _
g _ 4 ,., _ -•1 C .. ' -
x«r
sp
a ".7 d x, .. Et ! ,... F•'1 .; L., ,. 1' -ac x J r r r
r `^`
Rt
x r Ly rc 'sr iii+}3 3l i "` ?"e lJ, ti &"z i{. a.x e x" •-s rte,:
aqr
4 yt r- s
xoPrs 6w '1;:'# s* e . 3,4#>edka f•n -- ,
3•. —• _ ..-:•
v"'--.a'i ..{ -
i. *,.'-
a
Subject Property
r
A . - o e _
u ,
n ,ffi.':`:a B a.n. , I', t y ¢ •-v3-,*5! t q r r....i.a. -- _.
rt•.y x
d
m.
r - .
tL -: • +:..: 's a •'' 2
i17 V
ROIL
qg
z4,
fl
li
jo
Li
MEN ol
ih
i.3
A7
v,w z4
lip
4 ! (I '` •. -.l , '1 r u [ .:: ..
y n .?rrs y } ! €"j r•"6 t r. r'
77 °
3 _ d• .P z r't _
p..s -_' ° __.,' ,a !k
i` . '
aT td }
i,
ad a' j '
p E'rJ a°rr•
f,
iq,
r 7 ; a, I. N b si r. aet , r a _ 3,, y
9 is
5 _'
Ft
jry° •^' i r R
5.
c. 'I 4 !. •,;,Au.'{ r - r•h - Ufa -J; ' e I ! d rr i iron ,r -,
a '- tk r 1 "'
h1;
r'N.zT - • 4' e
r j' ^ ' I r :.. ,a rft' t. ! . @
d
ty.. LES ?, _ ti;;ft ,d,e•c:; i d . r•, 'a „.
a -_
d.
Ca
i•
ti
vi
a- -_ a a.P I^.{- i _,`!
u..-
a V "p a` a . 1. y ;' .•- _ :F
r
Rs'.
4
71:1
r r iug
fj@
3 a y'i; .Lpyp ' 3 qq BFBLL. s Y'Imz• e- ,h y..;tw'-Y.,s,P
41
r'' i Iti., "yam, it z
MAP
View of d ea.d-e n d P0. rtio n
S
i
r —
i
t
4,.' ", - ,:. -. z t a art v ,{, f L4, ':,.
pAi.., %
Id, f
R i•.". -- ,.
rf ._•,--- .. ,_s, •, '•S,w,;,-:
resxa ` `' .b
y,, g u: t fe S t ). x„
31
b, .,,n ti
t .. '
a '
r , •'s§ ems- 9 + _
t _
u r"
Mg
x
of
L -ch Lane beyond subjectat F1
p I W pertyIN
jA_ 0v re
tit.
v'-
qp9}t' lag r: A e:,:1`- t _r'-{' d!• _
i. r. e'.. I "i4 isr a „... •-: d ...,.'3 - _;, ii>er i.-- t1 t °-f '-
ci Si' t fe :r . s!
fj
Iiy"
e
m,... ._
t :.e_'in;iii o'!-,`f-
7q
T_"
It
mv
r'T '.
i!
21, .4
rj
4 1.1 "_7'vrz
LJ!
4z "
U -1.e', 4
r3w 7-- ei .
72
J' J
AIN
jT
7 ;7
ACel
P
t!f 61
je
L
Aft
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2006 -
APPROVING AN INTERIM HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE FOR MADALYN ALBERTS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2675 LARCH LANE NORTH (2006083)
WHEREAS, Madalyn Alberts has requested an interim home occupation license to operate a
one -chair hair salon in her home at 2675 Larch Lane North, legally described as follows:
Lot 10, Block 4, Elmhurst Lakeview, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting
and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Madalyn
Alberts for an interim home occupation license at 2675 Larch Lane North, subject to the
following conditions:
The interim home occupation license is approved for a one -chair hair salon in accordance
with the application and plans received by the City on August 23, 2006 except as
amended by this resolution.
2. Compliance with Section 21145 of the Zoning Ordinance, relating to Home Occupations.
The interim home occupation license is valid for one year from the date of approval. The
applicant may apply to the Zoning Administrator for renewal of the interim home
occupation prior to expiration of the license.
4. The applicant must acquire a license from the State of Minnesota to operate a beauty
salon from the home.
Resolution 2006-
2006083)
Page 2
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 24, 2006,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on October 24, 2006, with the original thereof on file in my office, and
the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Agenda Number:us
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner through Barbara Senness, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Dove Capital I, LLC. Final plat and development contract for
Plymouth Crossroads Station", for redevelopment of the Plymouth
Shopping Center area located south of Highway 55 and east of
Cottonwood Lane (2005121-F)
REVIEW DEADLINE: December 15, 2006
DATE: Oct. 17, 2006 for the City Council Meeting on Oct. 24, 2006
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving the final plat and development contract for
Plymouth Crossroads Station".
Approval of a final plat and development contract requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. BACKGROUND:
On May 9, 2006, the City Council approved a rezoning, preliminary plat, and PUD general plan
for the "Plymouth Crossroads Station" project. The project would redevelop the Plymouth
Shopping Center site, former Mr. Gas site, and adjacent vacant parcels located south of Highway
55 and east of Cottonwood Lane. The requested final plat would plat the site into two lots and
four outlots, in accordance with the approved preliminary plat. The final plat would also
dedicate roughly four acres of land as right-of-way to provide for a relocated frontage road with
improved safety and access to Highway 55. The project would consist of a 62,567 square foot
commercial center, including 5 retail buildings, a bank/office building, and a gas/convenience
store with attached car wash.
The Development Review Committee has found this final plat application to be in substantial
conformance with the approved preliminary plat, and with the provisions of City Council
Resolution 83-125 regarding the review of final plats.
File 2005121-F
Page 2
3. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution
approving the final plat and development contract for "Plymouth Crossroads Station".
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Applicant's Narrative
3. Approved Preliminary Plat
4. PUD General Plan Drawings (3)
5. Final Plat
6. Development Contract
7. Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract
September 25, 2006
ARCHITECTURE F'LAPJNING URIBAN DESIG-iN
Plymouth Crossroads Station
Final Plat Narrative
333 ^>Pa'A5H3PIGTON AVE. NE.
I"'HYINt-:la 1. .ci7G..27100
FAX: eS 9 2k 7<53.27 46
This application is being made for Final Plat and PUD of threeproperties at Highway 55 and Cottonwood Lane
see attached legal descriptions), including the existing "Plymouth Shopping Center PUD".
The proposed commercial development includes a cluster of 5 retail buildings and a freestanding bank and
Holiday station. The project is adjacent to the new transit facility. The site is designed to work in conjunction
with and complement this transit station by creating a pedestrian -friendly shopping environment that supports
patronage of both the transit station and the development.
A high standard of site design is achieved through pedestrian -friendly walkways, decorative paving, gathering
areas, pedestrian scale lighting, and extensive landscaping.
The use of a variety of building materials, including brick, precast stone, metal and glass are used to create
interesting architectural details. The buildings are designed to be "four-sided", with glazing and architectural
detailing on all elevations.
The proposed development meets the purposes and intents of PUD districts as established by the Plymouth
Zoning Ordinance, Section 21655 as follows:
It promotes a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city while protecting and
promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city.
Preserves and enhances natural features and open spaces by providing additional landscaping to the area
in addition to maintaining and improving the existing wetland.
Improves the efficiency of public streets and utilities by removing the troublesome frontage road along
Hwy. 55 and providing a new, better circulating, backage road with connection to County Road 73.
Provides a harmonious arrangement of buildings that are planned and designed as an integrated unit,
including building design andmaterials, utilities, parking areas, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and
open spaces.
Construction would start immediately upon approval and receipt of permits. Phasing of the site would allow the
existing Plymouth Shopping Center- to remain open during construction. Phase I includes construction of
buildings A, B, D and E, the frontage road and related site work. Upon completion of Phase I, tenants can
relocate to the newly constructed buildings. Phase II includes the demolition of the shopping center and the
construction of the balance of the buildings.
1
1
CFp 2 5 2006
Djr-atch/2005/05-0064/word/Final PUD Plat Application-Nan•ative.doc
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT
W PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION, LLC
V to 3'
PRELIMINARY PLAT
PuYcel Address Lisl
amI,IaW ALWyl,LT
sa51uaeA..
1r1Y
lu
LOCATION MAP
WAY x In.`s. r.arn... o„ouus
t \ 1 n°a wInu,Tisioswxa`\ 55 (
0LSON j
W
na OUTLOT D -.. .. ... s].ro Jr
c_
1 . \', 4:Rtq nm"s Am.r f <
111<AY er°erx:..xv ai
11;
t{' ` OUTLOT C
SePJS OS 1W W r _t l I M 1 / l C` \
Y \
Ot
r
r.
co
V .'r pueCtC
OUTLOT B
9 R0AO
9_-_
10J y.:
n
L-- -- --- --- ---------- -
X
OUTLOT A
MEA TABULATION i ,
rveromsTl
1A u+u (so.
f u o m o''(.:i x , L ] I,
LB[
Od 319A,5
6, -
e
n• u....r xa
zes.zol I Ii g i ya WETLAND AREA (SEE POLARIS GROUP GRADING PIAN FOR DETAIL)
I
Lola 74]73 I.Z. y t+
o.sz i 1 _ P Pexin .e"a `sso mrsw nm [ .
WT- I
jjjl
o sux«[ro}s xo][s: ID ....ol.
co.vm'...........sasww x; rOsa as
TO".
x.
u" ram
M
I SHEET 2 OF 15 SHEETS
1
PflELIMINMY X91'nEX1S yI5 GICONDITWNS) 1------
I ;._-
ss +e •9u ,rx va -,aax ,.assss:/. a.a vadat ss. I... I... ssc nl.. I.n 9u. ,x /
IIIp1111
9[xsix..• i ysm ss ow] r I
s..vsnmr .uuvn.ru:°w e.-r.-xws r,m <ow9..r: °vuns+nxlna,suwnsasmom m x.wlu.,nan,. ra,9 e9u uww n. w. nr no. un 9.0 IA. vsv
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT
PHASING sire IrsoRnnna4
tom o,E
DJR
333W., illjl. -N
S.iw#210polm I.IN 55401
P1,.16121676.2700
2 (612)676-2796
KEYNOTES
POND
PUD GENERAL PLAN - 1
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
AS1
PUD GENERAL PLAN - 2
S. I
ensnns WATER '.- ; .:_. \ . ' 1
J
7
lr— E%IST NG 5iGR1A EVER -,' `, ` ,' y.
N,. ExISTIIC OIcP,HEAD ElEC1RlC,::_-.,`•`. .,\_\•
1 f ---'- _
E%ISnNG UIJGEflCTi0UH0 El£CR(ICAL
O EJISTIHG POVER POLE
E%ISTIIIG LIGHT PULE
E.J15TING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL i •,. , , ;; nye- - <.._ . -f -_ - - --_ _ -- ' E%:STING UNGERGROUHD ELEGTFICh
E%ISTIIG SPH TARP
x—r— EliSTIHG FENCE,'-
DQ WATER, VALVE ---, •: 1+ I 'I // / ; ``\\ /' _. _ - ,..
FRE HYORaNP i ', •, \` I , _ :N \ FFE
i' 1, '
I 1iI— PRUPOSED,WATER,` /
PROPOSED STORM SEER -: ': '/
r PP,OPOSED 5AHITART / ' ' '
1 % ': \) '
T/ L •' FFEy
PHCP6SED CURB 3: GUTTER,029 - _ ----
E.SRIIG ROAD -______
FUTURE*,,',[ 901.5 ' '•"
I 1I _
OVERLAI)D "FLOOD OkaINAGE 5YlALE'
cT'UT'f A5IAENT / .- -; - v.. h .,_.' \- _. ` ` •`\
ova _ILl FECIIJG _.
I ' \ FFE •6`. /j h ( 's•- _. ! ` FFE
909 901.0 r 1
l .
agyp
r i 11)j r 1 . \ .,, \ \ \ /O
FFE-'•",-6 ' \ 4\`~ (;
I FIFE J
903
e •, 1 1 i j1-------- -'• - --_
r I III r • ,. ___ --^----- - -
zT=\ .c. ( -- / .
II
INLET :PROTECTION DETAJL_----__ I
1{ / •
C (\/ G \ \ \\-
1\ \ _ --'- -`--
WETLANO MITAGATION .3 t::T' `\/-
f '•L. \ ',\_\ `.
7795 SOFT
III
9 &'Ari ro..rr NOTE: ' -. . ''. / _----_
am"n i) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE ENCOMPASSED BY -SILT FENCINGLNTIL
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND VEGITATICN HAS BEEN RE EBTBUSHED.
2)WETLANDS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF 'J
i
USING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN ATIONS F NCE NST CITY,',' OF PLYMOUTH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTIDI N
lYLk]w I•r H:d,.-. i":F>i A''----_____
oanurrrt - '
1 11
I
I
0 1 c0 i 120 "E0
aw.
rl
i ^---------------
SCALE T"
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION
FINAL PLAT SET
mSPLYMOUTH, MN
R STRUCTURE & ..r iGM2 VOIGT CONSULTANTS LLC .
SCREENSCREEN COVER DETAIL
Nmwx°mx.lurOsau SHEET No„ C-7
PUD GENERAL PLAN - 2
PUD GENERAL PLAN - 3
J
am
DOR
337 %lllinEuui A- N
MN 53401
Surae p710
PP. (676
FaF..,(612 (G1716]&279G7]9G
zO
Q
W
Q0
QWFn
0QC) 524a
Z a
O ' C)
2° o z
a= a
AU
2co6lol f5:.
PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS R.T. DOC. NO.
C.R. DOC. NO.
STA TION
u
OUTLOT D A 74
68—
rrl
iliq'
c" C..20OW4r00
it
r
C0LOTC IL
L—R-150JI W.V 4 0 14
SBO'55'05'W 100.00
SEEDEWL
11 J
Al
4 /
V 0 7.
IF 1 2
I
I6
rely
c;
10,
D R
OUTLOT B
It/
Z; Lz I/ 4
O ry \ % .'. jzI
S5755"05'W 327.78 t
11c)
J
w2
I — ---- — — — — — — —
QUAIL B DETAIL A
1/1 ccR OF
2.76
o 60
5151
LEGEND
GSI WON xOnV1025/4- IPDA ".-C. SR
uMNFD BY REO. N0. 19810)
I'ne ofS.0- '3h5. T., . ..... West,
c *d to b... s-1, B9 g...
55 mi alas OS -d. ...L
SN COR. OF SE 1/4 Of NE 3/4 Of I/1 OF H 1/N D< IR. li TN9. IN. R.E. -j
FINAL PLAT
No
OUTLOT A
qFp 531:o 2 SHEETS
1 9.00
N A 5.
c; a
3
SEC. 35.V. I I.. ROE. ]2
THIS PLAT PREPARED BY
qFp 531:o 2 SHEETS
reservedfor recording information)
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTRACT
Developer Installed Improvements)
PLYMOUTH[ CROSSROADS S'TA'TION (2005121-F)
AGREEMENT dated , 20_, by and between the CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and Dove Capital 1, LLC (the "Developer").
1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for
Plymouth Crossroads Station (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is presently legally described as:
Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No, 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being
registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 831051.
AND
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northwest corner of
Tract B, RLS No. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 8 degrees 06 minutes
05 seconds West on a assumed bearing along the west line of said Tract B, a distance of
107.68 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 05 seconds West along the northeasterly
line of Tract A, said RLS No. 1676, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 8 degrees 54
minutes 02 seconds East along said northeasterly line, a distance of 135.17 feet to the
southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as monumented); thence South
74 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East along said right-of-way line, a distance of 97.99 feet
to the point of beginning.
AND
The part of the Southeaster Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the southerly right-of-way line
of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as mono mented); and Northeasterly of the northeasterly
line of Old County Road No. 6 (also being the northeasterly line of Tract B, RLS No. 1676)
AND
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the northeasterly line of
Old County Road No. 6 and Northwesterly of Naumann Cartway (per plat of Schiebe's
Highland View Addition) and Southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as
monumented).
AND
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the southwesterly line of
Old County Road No. 6, and described as beginning at the intersection of the west lien of
said Section 36 wit the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6; thence Southerly
along the west line of said Section 36, a distance of 313.50 feet; thence Northeasterly to a
point on the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, distant 173.00 feet southeasterly
of the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old County
Road No. 6, a distance of 173.00 feet to the point of beginning.
AND
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the southwesterly line of
Old County Road No. 6, and described as commencing at the southwest corner of the
Northwest Quarter of said Section 36; thence Northerly along the west line of said Section
36, a distance of 210.30 feet to the point of beginning thence deflect to the right at an angle
of 90 degrees 30 minutes, a distance of 9.00 feet; thence Northeasterly 358.30 to a point on
the southwesterly line of Old Country Road No. 6, a distance 248.00 feet southeasterly of
the intersection of said southwesterly line with the west line of said Section 36; thence
Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a distance of 75.00
feet; thence Southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Section 36, distant 122.10 feet
Northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly 122.10 feet along the west line of said
Section 36 to the point of beginning.
AND
That part of right-of-way of State Trunk ,Highway No. 55 adjoining the above described
Parcels # 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 70.00 feet
southwesterly (as measured at right angles to) the centerline of eastbound lanes of State
Trunk Highway No. 55.
2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the
Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the
2—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within (180) days after the City Council approves the final
plat.
3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the
plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees,
construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings
until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by
both parties and filed with the City Cleric, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3)
the plat has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City's Community
Development Director has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer
may proceed.
4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use,
development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by
state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding
anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent pennitted by state law, the City may require
compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or
dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract.
5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans.
The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this
Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A - Plat
Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan
Plan C - Tree Preservation and Reforestation Plan
Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements
Plan E - Street Lighting Plan
Plan F - Landscape Plan
Plan G - Permanent Traffic Control Plan
6. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following:
A. Streets
B. Sanitary Sewer
C. Watermain
D. Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, rain gardens, etc.)
E. Grading and Erosion Control
F. Sidewalks/Trails
G. Street Lighting
H. Underground Utilities
I. Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs
J. Landscaping Required by Section 21130.03 of the Zoning Ordinance
K. Tree Preservation and Reforestation
L. Wetland Mitigation and Buffers
M. Monuments Required by Minnesota Statutes
N. Miscellaneous Facilities
3-
0:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance and the City's
Engineering Guidelines. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been
prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City
Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to
assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to
certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City
acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one
or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The
Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's
inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's
engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the
Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a
mutually agreeable time at the City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review
the program for the construction work.
All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in
strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved
plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City Engineer. The
Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the
Developer for the performance of the work required by the Contract. The Developer shall not do any
work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of
this Contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved
in writing by the City Engineer.
7. ADMINISTRATION OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. The Developer shall pay to the City
of Plymouth the costs of administering the Development Contract. Administrative costs include but
are not limited to monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and his/her
engineer on status or problems regarding the project, plan review, coordination for testing, final
inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests
for reduction in security, for all public improvements covered by the development contract. The fee
for administrative costs is $34,180.90.
8. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City
Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such
individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director
may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8
above.
9. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all
necessary permits, including but not limited to:
Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way
MnDOT for State Highway, Drainage, Culvert Replacement, and Traffic Signal
Modification.
Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains
NPDES Permits
MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal
Wo
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 2005121.doc
MnDNR for Dewatering and Work in Protected Waters
City of Plymouth for Building Permits
MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission
City of Plymouth's Right--of-Way Permit
10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by
October 31, 2008, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. The Developer
shall have the option of installing the wearing course of streets within one (1) year following initial
commencement of work on the required basic improvements or installing it after the first course has
weathered a winter season, consistent with warranty requirements. The Developer may, however,
request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon
updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion
date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the
City Engineer.
11. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a
license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in
conjunction with plat development.
12. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility
construction, and street construction is restricted to access the subdivision via Highway 55 Frontage
Road. No construction traffic is permitted on other adjacent local streets.
13. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved Grading Drainage and
Erosion Control Plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Plymouth standards. Within thirty
30) days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with a "record"
grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches
have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record" plan shall contain
site grades and field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and
elevations along all swales, emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches,
Iocations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles; c) lot coiner elevations and house pads; d) top
and bottom of retaining walls.
All lots with house footings placed on fill must be monitored and constructed to meet or exceed
FHA/HUD 79G specifications. The developer must certify that this has been done correctly.
14. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the Erosion Control Plan, Plan B, shall be
implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices
must comply with the Minriesota Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices. The City
may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed
by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of
the work. or in an area that is inactive for more than five (5) days unless authorized and approved by
the City Engineer in writing. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in
accordance with the City's current seeding standards. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched,
and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in
controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or
5—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 2005121.doc
supplementary instructions received froin the City, the City may take such action as it deems
appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the
Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the
Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City
for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the
security to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no
building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control
plan.
15. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible
for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed
when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention
to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In
the event residences are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth
surface and provide proper surface drainage to insure that the streets are passable to traffic and
emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the
subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from
Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open
during the winter months by plowing snow from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets.
The City shall not be responsible for repairing damage in the development because of snow plowing
operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by
the City. The Developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the
development. At a minimum, Iscraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of
this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. The contract shall provide that
the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer.
16. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required
by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City .
property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the
following affidavits:
Contractor's Certificate
Engineer's Certificate
Land Surveyor's Certificate
Developer's Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Contract.
All necessary forms will be furnished by the City of Plymouth. Upon receipt of affidavits and
verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements.
Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of
reproducible mylar "record" plans, and an electronic file of the "record" plans in an AutoCad .DWG
file or a .DXF file prepared in accordance with City standards.
17. PARK DEDICATION. Park dedication shall be a cash fee in lieu of land dedication, in
accordance with the dedication ordinance in effect at the time of issuance of the first building
permit for each lot.
6-
0:\)engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
18. WETLAND MITIGATION. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall post a $10,000
security for wetland mitigation. This security may be in the form of a letter of credit separate fiom the
primary development security or in the form of a non-interest bearing escrow with the City. If the
mitigation area is found to be unsuccessful after the mandatory five-year warranty period, the City
may elect extend the required monitoring period, or keep the security to be used for this mitigation
project or for wetland mitigation/restoration elsewhere within the City. In addition, the City may draw
down the security at any time during the warranty period if the Developer fails to take corrective
measures as directed by the City to perform the work recommended. ,
19. BUILDING PERMITS/CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY.
A. No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and water
and the MPCA Permit has been issued. Prior to issuance of building permits, except those
identified in Section 19.F, curbing, and one lift of asphalt shall be installed on all public and
private streets serving the subject lot.
B. Prior to issuance of building permits, wetland buffer monuments shall be placed in
accordance with the City's zoning ordinance. The monument design shall be approved by
the Community Development Department,
C. Prior to issuance of building permits, written certification of the grading for the block where
the building is to be located must be provided to the City.
D. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings
from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third
parties, and the halting of all work in the plat.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer
assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and
damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors,
subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water
connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a
bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer.
F. After the plat is recorded and written certification of the grading for the block where the
building is to be located, a building permit for one model home will be issued on a lot
acceptable to the Building Official after building permit review and approval. For this
action, the developer shall indemnify the City and hold the City harmless fiom any resulting
property damage, personal injury or death or costs incurred by the City including reasonable
attorney's fee except for the willful misconduct or gross negligence of the City. No sewer
and water connection permits will be issued until the streets needed for access to each model
home have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by
the City Engineer. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until sewer and water
service is provided to these model homes.
20. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Street name signs shall be
installed by the Developer. The signs shall be placed at all intersections or at such other locations
7-
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
as designated by the City Engineer. All street name signs must be installed prior to final building
inspection approval.
The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the City
Engineer and Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). All signs must
be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the
City Engineer.
21. STREET LIGHT OPERATION COSTS. The developer shall pay to the City the energy cost for
the first two years of operation. Six (6) lights at a yearly cost of $1,184.96 per year and a two year
cost of $2,369.92. The cost includes contingencies at $1.20 per lot per year and sales tax. After the
first two years the street lights will be billed on a monthly basis to all the lots in the addition, a total
of two (2) lots, which results in an estimated cost of $49.37 per lot per billing period. The rate
quoted above is dependent upon the operation costs for Xcel Energy under contract franchise with
the City of Plymouth.
22. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.
A. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required
by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers,
imaterialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes
the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil
Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125
percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such
deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further
proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that
the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract.
B. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the
City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal,
planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and
acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and
documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting
development of the plat.
C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from
claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from
plat approval and development. The Developer shall indernnify the City and its officers,
employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in
consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
D. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract,
including engineering and attorneys' fees.
E. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is
attached, all special assessments referred to in this Contract. This is a personal obligation of
the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or
more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it.
8—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
F. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred
under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days
shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year,
G. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special
assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"),
City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees.
H. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with Highway 55 traffic signal
modifications, turn lanes, street repair, restoration and culvert replacements.
23. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development:
A. The Developer shall post a $4,200 security for the final placement of all subdivision iron
monuments. The security was calculated as follows: 42 irons at $100.00 per' iron. The
security will be held by the City Lentil the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have
been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of
survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found
or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot.
B. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City Building Official prior to installation
of any subdivision identification signs.
C. Other Requirements:
1. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of the following:
a. Development contract by the City Council.
b. Wetland mitigation plan by the City Council.
c. Vacation of the existing frontage road right-of-way by Mn/DOT.
2. Prior to recording the final plat, the following items shall be completed:
a. Cross -access and parking easements shall be recorded for this development.
b. The developer shall receive City approval of the fire flow calculations.
c. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement is required adjacent to all street right-of-
ways. Additionally, a 10 foot trail easement shall be required over the. drainage and
utility easement for the trail locations shown on the Landscaping plan. A six foot
drainage and utility easement is required on all side and rear property lines.
d. The City will require 10 -foot drainage and utility easements on each side of a public
utility where these utilities are proposed to be installed outside the public right-of-
way. A separate unobstructed access easement is required from a public street to all
ponds inlets and outlets. The easement must not exceed .15% grade and must be a
minimum of 15 feet wide,
e. Drainage and utility easements are required to the 100 year high water level. for
ponds and wetlands.
f. Vacate the existing MnDOT frontage road right-of-way. Provide Document numbers
for vacated County Road 6 as it is shown on the plat.
9-
0:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 2005121.doc
g. All public roads shall be renamed to Highway 55 Frontage Road except that portion
of proposed Cottonwood Lane North.
h. If the applicant wishes to maintain the median break near County Road 73 on the
relocated frontage road as a temporary condition, they shall pay all legal fees related
to, and execute, a document stating that the median break would be eliminated and
the median would be extended if and when County Road 73 is realigned in the
future.
3. Prior to recording the final plat, the .developer shall revise the final plat and plans as
follows:
a. The landscape plan shall be revised to remove proposed trees from the wetlands,
wetland mitigation areas, and water quality ponds, and to replace such required trees
elsewhere on the site, including the addition of screening trees near the top of the
hill on Outlot C.
b. Provide traffic signal plans.
c. Provide traffic control plans for Trunk Highway 55 culvert replacement.
d. Constructed detention ponds should be relied upon to limit runoff to pre -
development rates and to control downstream flooding where feasible; natural
basins may also be utilized: Subject to City and Watershed approval.
e. Increased volumes of runoff due to development should be minimized by limiting
impervious cover and encouraging infiltration of storm water where soil conditions
are appropriate: Submit a description of how this is being done and show on the
grading plan.
f. The City encourages the use of alternative landscape techniques and materials to
reduce rates and volumes of runoff: Submit a description of how this is being done
and show on the grading plan.
g. Proposed developments must identify all reasonable steps to avoid water quality
impacts and mitigate with appropriate best management practices (BMPs), to
prevent water quality in receiving waters from falling below established standards:
Submit a description of how this is being done and show on the grading plan.
h. Minimum floor elevations must be two feet above the 100 -year HWL. Also,
emergency overland overflow swales must be a minimum of 18 inches below the
lowest building opening where storm water can enter.
i. Provide separate plan and profile sheets for the sanitary sewer & watermain; and the
street & storm sewer. Include street details, dimensions, and curb type. These plans
shall be subject to further review for compliance with the City of Plymouth's
Engineering Guidelines.
OMIN
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
j. Include required details from the current City of Plymouth's Engineering Guidelines
with the plan sheets.
lc. Provide a storm sewer structure and casting schedule consistent with the
Engineering Guidelines.
1. All watermain shall be C900 PVC.
in. Add a note to the utility plan that the City of Plymouth's current Engineering
Guidelines shall apply to all civil construction.
n. Add a note to the utility plan to contact the City of Plymouth's utility supervisor
Scott Newberger at 763-509-5999, at least 48 hours prior to connecting to existing
utilities.
o. Label the wetland mitigation buffer slope with the percent of grade. The slope must
be 5:1 or flatter.
p. Show wetland mitigation typical cross section.
q. Identify the locations of the wetland buffer monuments.
r. Identify the proposed buildings as slab on grade.
s. Provide a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).
t. Identify the location and provide City details of the storm sewer inlet protection, silt
fence, and rock construction entrance.
u. Identify the location for the tree preservation fencing.
v. The 7,795 square feet of wetland mitigation shown on page C-7 is not consistent
with that shown on page C-4, or the Wetland Permit Application.
w. The outlet for the easterly wetland cannot sheet flow across the parking lot. Provide
an outlet control structure. -
x. Provide plan view with elevations to show how the frontage road will work with
future County Road 73. Provide contours for the county road 73 / frontage road
intersection.
y. Show parking lot elevations. Include drainage arrows
z. Show rip rap with filter fabric for the water quality pond overflows, and elevation.
0:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 2005121.doc
aa. Show underground sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain pipes on the
Landscaping Plan. Keep trees and shrubs 10 feet away from each side of all
underground pipes.
bb. Keep all retaining walls out of street right-of-way, and drainage and utility
easements.
cc. Wetland mitigation and buffers cannot be located in a street right-of-way.
dd. Add a catch basin in the northwest quadrant of West Medicine Lake Blvd. / frontage
road intersection, and where a storm pipe crosses a curb line.
ee. Access to the neighboring properties must be maintained.
ff. Provide commercial driveway entrances for all development entrances.
gg. Provided a detail of the NURP pond outfall skimmer structures. Included rip rap,
filter fabric, and overflow elevation.
hh. Show all overland emergency overflow elevations and locations, including the
emergency overflow from the wetland to the north. The overflow must be at least
1.5 feet lower than the low opening of upstream structures or 898.6 whichever is
lower. Clearly label this overland emergency overflow on the grading plan.
ii. Indicate the location and elevation where storm water will overflow Highway 55
northerly. Label this as an emergency overflow route.
J. The drive west of future County Road 73 shall be converted to right in right out
only when future County Road 73 improvements are constructed.
kk. Plat review comments from Hennepin County (excluding suggested median at
frontage road in County Road 73) and MnDOT shall be addressed.
11. Extend the proposed watermain and connect to the existing watermain in
Cottonwood Lane,
4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following items shall be completed:
a. The final plat shall be recorded with Hennepin County.
b. The PUD final plan for each respective building shall receive approval by City staff.
c. The final lighting plan shall be approved by staff, in accordance with the City's
lighting regulations. The lighting plan shall indicate house -side shields and shall
include information on the decorative fixtures.
d. Permanent wetland buffer monument signs shall be installed pursuant to City
requirements.
12—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 200512Ldoc
5. Any future development of Outlot B would require separate review and approval of a
PUD general plan.
6. Compliance with the City's tree preservation regulations. The City's tree preservation
regulations shall be applied separately to Outlot B.
7. The developer shall include tree protection fencing on the plans for the trees to be
preserved. Such fencing shall remain in place until all construction in the area is
completed.
8. Architectural design standards for the buildings shall be as specified by the PUD General
Plan, as outlined in City Council Resolution 2006-194 approved on May 9, 2006.
9. The use of outdoor loudspeakers shall be limited. Any outdoor loudspeaker system shall
be reviewed for compliance with. the City's noise ordinance. The playing of music
during evening and nighttime hours shall be prohibited.
10. The applicant shall properly address any buried trash or construction debris found on the
site. .
E. Standard Conditions:
1. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
2. The developer shall comply with the Ordinance regarding the turning radii,
location of fire hydrants, lock boxes, post -indicator valves, fire department
connections, and fire lanes.
3. All signage shall conform to Section 21155 of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. All structures shall be protected by a City approved NFPA 13 automatic fire
sprinkler system.
5. A reproducible 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted
prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement financial guarantees.
24. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City
Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if
the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it.
B. Certain retaining walls will require a Building Permit. Retaining walls that require a
building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by
a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following
construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the Building
Official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved
plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by
13—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr_200512 Ldoc
special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building
permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built.
C. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants and
restrictions, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat.
D. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6)
months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage
which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly
or indirectly employed by any of them.. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less
than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage
shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of
1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the
Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing
the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance
written notice of the cancellation of the insurance.
E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract.
F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for
any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this Contract.
G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions
of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the
parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly
take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release.
H. This Contract shall ruin with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The
Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title
to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form
attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no
unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify
and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants.
I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to
every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to
City, at law or in equity, or Linder any other agreement, and each and every right, power and
remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often
and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the
right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan,
state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances,
zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does
not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in
14—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevCOntr 2005121.doc
the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease
work, until there is compliance.
25. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be
performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall
promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in
an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than
forty-eight (48) hours in advance, This Contract is a license for the City, to act, and it shall not be
necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any
such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part.
26. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant
to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a
warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for
twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements.
A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor
installing public sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water mains shall be two (2) years
from the date of final written City acceptance of the work.
B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including
concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject
to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is
placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those
instances, the subdivider shall guarantee all work, including street construction,
concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of
two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work.
C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one growing season
following installation.
27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this
agreement, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and
construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in
the form attached hereto, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit
security") for $3,331,242.00. The amount of the security was calculated as follows:
15—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121 \D0CMTS\DevContr_200512 Ldoc
1) Developer Installed Public Improvements. City to own and maintain after development complete.
2) Private - Property owner and/or property owners' association to maintain after
development completed.
Separate Letters of Credit Required for the following:
Letter of Credit Cash
Erosion Control cr $1,500/acre of which $1,000 is cash and
the remainder is a letter of credit in the amount of $18,845 $1,000
Wetland Mitigation and Restoration will be held for a five $10,000
year monitoring period.
Tree Preservation and Reforstation Letter of Credit $12,775
W.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Developer
ITEM Installed (1) Private (2) Total
Street Construction 310,127 307,792 617,919
Highway 55 Culvert Replacemrnt 262,000 0 262,000
Sanitary Sewer System 0 148,150 148,150
Watermain System 79,000 305,900 384,900
Storm Sewer System 236,805 131,523 368,328
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 0 8,000 8,000
Trail Improvements 0 16,325 16,325
Street Signs and Traffic Control 25,000 0 25,000
Highway 55 Demo & Pavement Repair 259,801 0 259,801
Landscaping (Plantings) 0 137,000 137,000
Wetland Mitigation 0 15,500 15,500
Buffer- Posts 0 5,000 5,000
Site Grading & Drainage Imp. 353,200 360,000 713,200
Setting Iron Monuments 0 4,200 4,200
Street Lights 0 9,000 9,000
SUB -TOTAL: 1,525,933 1,448,390 2,974,323
Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts (12%) 183,112 173,807 356,919
Total: 1,709,045 1,622,197 3,331,242
1) Developer Installed Public Improvements. City to own and maintain after development complete.
2) Private - Property owner and/or property owners' association to maintain after
development completed.
Separate Letters of Credit Required for the following:
Letter of Credit Cash
Erosion Control cr $1,500/acre of which $1,000 is cash and
the remainder is a letter of credit in the amount of $18,845 $1,000
Wetland Mitigation and Restoration will be held for a five $10,000
year monitoring period.
Tree Preservation and Reforstation Letter of Credit $12,775
W.
This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank
shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the security, without
notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the
end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30)
days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn
down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City
Engineer that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with
City Engineer approval the security may be reduced from time to time by eighty percent (80%) of the
financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty percent (20%) of the arnounts certified by the
Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed,
2) iron monrunents for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City
satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is
provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City.
28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements
under this Contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval:
Street Light Operating Fee $ 2,369.92
Administration of Development Contract $ 34,180.90
TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS LEVIED: $ 36,550.82
29. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered
to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the
following address:
Dove Capital 1, LLC
333 Washington Avenue N., Suite 206
Minneapolis, MN 55401
30. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or
mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Plymouth
City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55447.
The Developer shall notify the City witNn five (5) days of change of address.
17—
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\DOCMTS\DevContr 2005121.doe
CidY'L l`/ 1i Y I
RESOLUTION 2006 -
APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR "PLYMOUTH
CROSSROADS STATION" FOR DOVE CAPITAL I, LLC FOR 19.34 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 55 AND EAST OF COTTONWOOD LANE (2005121-F)
WHEREAS, Dove Capital I, LLC has requested approval of a final plat to allow the creation of
two lots and four outlots on 19.34 acres of land located south of Highway 55 and east of
Cottonwood Lane; and
WHEREAS, the property is presently legally described as follows:
Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being
registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 831051.
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northwest corner of
Tract B, RLS No. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 8 degrees 06 minutes
05 seconds West on a assumed bearing along the west line of said Tract B, a distance of
107.68 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 05 seconds West along the northeasterly
line of Tract A, said RLS No. 1676, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 8 degrees 54
minutes 02 seconds East along said northeasterly line, a distance of 135.17 feet to the
southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as monumented); thence
South 74 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East along said right-of-way line, a distance of
97.99 feet to the point of beginning.
AND
The part of the Southeaster Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township
118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the southerly right-of-
way line of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as monumented); and Northeasterly of the
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 2
northeasterly line of Old County Road No. 6 (also being the northeasterly line of Tract B,
RLS No. 1676)
AND
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township
118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the northeasterly line
of Old County Road No. 6 and Northwesterly of Naumann Cartway (per plat of Schiebe's
Highland View Addition) and Southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as
monumented).
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36,
Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of
the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, and described as beginning at
the intersection of the west lien of said Section 36 wit the southwesterly line of
Old County Road No. 6; thence Southerly along the west line of said Section 36, a
distance of 313.50 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the southwesterly line
of Old County Road No. 6, distant 173.00 feet southeasterly of the point of
beginning; thence Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old County Road
No. 6, a distance of 173.00 feet to the point of beginning.
I:\er
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township
118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the southwesterly
line of Old County Road No. 6, and described as commencing at the southwest corner of
the Northwest Quarter of said Section 36; thence Northerly along the west line of said
Section 36, a distance of 210.30 feet to the point of beginning thence deflect to the right
at an angle of 90 degrees 30 minutes, a distance of 9.00 feet; thence Northeasterly 358.30
to a point on the southwesterly line of Old Country Road No. 6, a distance 248.00 feet
southeasterly of the intersection of said southwesterly line with the west line of said
Section 36; thence Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6,
a distance of 75.00 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Section
36, distant 122.10 feet Northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly 122.10 feet
along the west line of said Section 36 to the point of beginning.
That part of right-of-way of State Trunk Highway No. 55 adjoining the above described
Parcels # 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 70.00
feet southwesterly (as measured at right angles to) the centerline of eastbound lanes of
State Trunk Highway No. 55.
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 3
WHEREAS, the City staff has prepared a development contract covering the improvements
related to said plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Dove
Capital I, LLC for a final plat for Plymouth Crossroads Station; and
FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat be approved, and that upon prior
execution of the development contract by the developer, the Mayor and City Manager be
authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the City; and,
FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to recording of, and related to said plat:
1. This final plat approves two lots and four outlots, in accordance with the plans received by
the City on September 25, 2006, except as may be amended by this Resolution.
2. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of the following:
a. Development contract by the City Council.
b. Wetland mitigation plan by the City Council.
c. Vacation of the existing frontage road right-of-way by Mn/DOT.
3. Prior to recording the final plat, the following items shall be completed:
a. Cross -access and parking easements shall be recorded for this development.
b. The developer shall receive City approval of the fire flow calculations.
c. A ten foot wide drainage and utility easement is required adjacent to all street rights-of-
way. Additionally, a ten foot wide trail easement is required conterminous with the
drainage and utility easement in areas where the trail would be installed, as shown on the
landscaping plan. A six foot wide drainage and utility easement is required along all side
and rear lot lines.
d. A ten foot wide drainage and utility easement is required on each side of public utilities
where such utilities are proposed to be installed outside the public right-of-way. A
separate unobstructed access easement is required from public streets to all pond inlets
and outlots. The easement area must not exceed 15 percent grade and must be a
minimum of 15 feet wide.
e. Drainage and utility easements are required to the 100 -year high water level for ponds and
wetlands.
f. Provide document numbers for vacated County Road 6, as it is shown on the plat.
g. All public roads shall be renamed Highway 55 Frontage Road, except for that portion of
proposed Cottonwood Lane North.
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 4
h. If the applicant wishes to maintain the median break near County Road 73 on the
relocated frontage road as a temporary condition, they shall pay all legal fees related to,
and execute, a document stating that the median break would be eliminated and the
median would be extended if and when County Road 73 is realigned in the future.
4. Prior to recording the final plat, the developer shall revise the final plat and plans as
follows:
a. The landscape plan shall be revised to remove proposed trees from the wetlands,
wetland mitigation areas, and water quality ponds, and to replace such required trees
elsewhere on the site, including the addition of screening trees near the top of the hill
on Outlot C.
b. Minimum floor elevations must be two feet above the 100 -year high water level. Also,
emergency overland overflow swales must be a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest
building opening where storm water can enter.
c. Provide separate plan and profile sheets for the sanitary sewer and watermain; and the
street and storm sewer. Include street details, dimensions, and curb type. These plans
shall be subject to further review for compliance with the City of Plymouth's Engineering
Guidelines.
d. Include required details from the current City of Plymouth's Engineering Guidelines with
the plan sheets.
e. Provide a storm sewer structure and casting schedule consistent with the Engineering
Guidelines.
f. All watermain shall be C900 PVC.
g. Add a note to the utility plan that the City of Plymouth's current Engineering Guidelines
shall apply to all civil construction.
h. Add a note to the utility plan to contact the City of Plymouth's utility supervisor Scott
Newberger at 763-509-5999, at least 48 hours prior to connecting to existing utilities.
i. Label the wetland mitigation buffer slope with the percent of grade. The slope must be
5:1 or flatter.
j. Show wetland mitigation typical cross section.
k. Identify the locations of the wetland buffer monuments.
1. Identify the proposed buildings as slab on grade.
in. Provide a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).
n. Identify the location and provide City details of the storm sewer inlet protection, silt
fence, and rock construction entrance.
o. Identify the location for the tree preservation fencing.
p. The 7,795 square feet of wetland mitigation shown on page C-7 is not consistent with that
shown on page C-4, or the Wetland Permit Application. Revise drawing accordingly.
q. The outlet for the easterly wetland cannot sheet flow across the parking lot. Provide an
outlet control structure.
r. Provide plan view with elevations to show how the frontage road will work with future
County Road 73. Provide contours for the County Road 73/frontage road intersection.
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 5
s. Show parking lot elevations. Include drainage arrows.
t. Show rip rap with filter fabric for the water quality pond overflows and elevation.
u. Show underground sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain pipes on the Landscaping
Plan. Keep trees and shrubs 10 feet away from each side of all underground pipes.
v. Keep all retaining walls out of street right-of-way, and drainage and utility easements.
w. Wetland mitigation and buffers cannot be located in a street right-of-way.
x. Add a catch basin in the northwest quadrant of the West Medicine Lake Blvd./frontage
road intersection, and where a storm pipe crosses a curb line.
y. Street access to Cottonwood Lane properties must be maintained during construction.
z. Provide commercial driveway entrances for all development entrances.
aa. Provided a detail of the NURP pond outfall skimmer structures. Included rip rap, filter
fabric, and overflow elevation.
bb. Show all overland emergency overflow elevations and locations, including the emergency
overflow from the wetland to the north. The overflow must be at least 1.5 feet lower than
the low opening of upstream structures or 898.6 whichever is lower. Clearly label this
overland emergency overflow on the grading plan.
cc. Indicate the location and elevation where storm water will overflow Highway 55
northerly. Label this as an emergency overflow route.
dd. Plat review comments from Hennepin County (excluding suggested median at frontage
road near County Road 73) and Mn/DOT shall be addressed.
ee. Extend the proposed watermain and connect to the existing watermain in Cottonwood
Lane.
5. Prior to issuance of buildingep rmits, the following items shall be completed:
a. The final plat shall be recorded with Hennepin County.
b. The PUD final plan for each respective building shall receive approval by City staff.
c. The final lighting plan shall be approved by staff, in accordance with the City's lighting
regulations. The lighting plan shall indicate house -side shields and shall include
information on the decorative fixtures.
d. Permanent wetland buffer monument signs shall be installed pursuant to City
requirements.
e. Park dedication shall be a cash fee in lieu of land dedication, in accordance with the
dedication ordinance in effect at the time of issuance of the first building permit for each
lot.
6. The developer shall obtain the appropriate permits or approvals from Mn/DOT, State Health
Department, MPCA, DNR, Wetland Conservation Act (subject to City approval), Hennepin
County, Bassett Creek Watershed, Army Corps of Engineers, and NPDES.
7. Any future development of Outlot B would require separate review and approval of a PUD
general plan.
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 6
8. Compliance with the City's tree preservation regulations. The City's tree preservation
regulations shall be applied separately to Outlot B.
9. The developer shall include tree protection fencing on the plans for the trees to be preserved.
Such fencing shall remain in place until all construction in the area is completed.
10. Architectural design standards for the buildings shall be as specified by the PUD General
Plan, as outlined in City Council Resolution 2006-194 approved on May 9, 2006.
11. The use of outdoor loudspeakers shall be limited. Any outdoor loudspeaker system shall be
reviewed for compliance with the City's noise ordinance. The playing of music during
evening and nighttime hours shall be prohibited.
12. The applicant shall properly address any buried trash or construction debris found on the site.
13. Standard Conditions:
a. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
b. The developer shall comply with the Ordinances regarding turning radii, location of fire
hydrants, lock boxes, post -indicator valves, fire department connections, and fire lanes.
c. All signage shall conform to Section 21155 of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. All structures shall be protected by a City approved NFPA 13 automatic fire sprinkler
system.
e. A reproducible 8 1/2 x 11 inch "As Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to
the release or reduction of any site improvement financial guarantees.
f. Approval of this final plat shall expire two years from the date approved, unless the
developer has recorded the final plat with Hennepin County, or unless prior to expiration,
the developer submits a written request for an extension not to exceed one additional
year, as regulated under Section 512 of City Code.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
Resolution 2006-
2005121-F)
Page 7
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on October 24, 2006, with the original thereof on file in my office, and
the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: October 12, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006 Meeting
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, Director of Public Works
FROM: Shane Missaghi, Water Resources Engineer
SUBJECT: WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR
PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION (2005121); NE'/4 SECTION 35 T118 R22W
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the Wetland;,,
Replacement Plan Application for the proposed Plymouth Crossroads Station development.
BACKGROUND: Dove Capital, LLC. has submitted a Wetland Replacement Plan Application for
the proposed Plymouth Crossroads Station development on a 17 -acre site located on south of Highway
55 between County Road 73 and Cottonwood Lane (Figure One). The project proposes to demolish
the existing strip mall and construct seven retail buildings along with the associated parking, utilities, :-
storm water quality ponds, landscaping, rain gardens, and replacement wetland. One large -wetland
basin has been identified on this site. The project proposes to fill 0.15 acre (6,652 sq. ft) of the wetland
area (Figure Two). The wetland impacts are proposed to be replaced onsite using a combination of at
least 7,213 square feet of New Wetland Credit (NWC) and 41,422 square feet of Public Value Credit
PVC). The proposed replacement exceeds the required minimum of a 2 to 1 ratio as outlined in the
following table:
A detailed Wetland Delineation Report, Sequencing, and Replacement Plan has been submitted with
the application per WCA rules. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Department of Natural
Resources, and U.S. Arany Corp. have reviewed the project and comments have been properly
addressed. The applicant has applied and is expected to obtained MnDNR and U.S. Arany Corp
permits for this project.
Basin
Size
Note Impacted
Area
Required
2 to 1 Mitigation
Proposed
Mitigation
Basin A Over 10 ac. 6,652 sq. ft. 13,384 sq. ft.
New Wetland Credit (NWC) 7,717 sq. ft.
Public Value Credit (PVC): Water Quality Ponds & Wetland Buffer 41,422 sq. ft.
Total Proposed Mitigation 4 49,139 sq. ft
1.13 acres
A detailed Wetland Delineation Report, Sequencing, and Replacement Plan has been submitted with
the application per WCA rules. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Department of Natural
Resources, and U.S. Arany Corp. have reviewed the project and comments have been properly
addressed. The applicant has applied and is expected to obtained MnDNR and U.S. Arany Corp
permits for this project.
PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION (2005121)
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt the
attached resolution approving the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for the proposed Plymouth
Crossroads Station development.
attachments: Figures
Resolution
0:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\MEMOS\wetland 2005121CC.doc
Me
City of Plymouth
0 60 120 240 360 480
Feet
Figure One. Location map of Plymouth Crossroads Station (2005121)
r
LEGEND:
t—k--
E.SRNO ST09l.1 f".
EgSUNG OV RHEAO RE G CA L1
u0
ERNL UROER.R... V EAS
EIRSRN9 POKER POLE
EAS`Rt C UCHT POLE I' 1)1\ t\`` E=VNG OVERHEAD ETECT)LIGAL
A•— E%ISTIJiG UNLEROROUNO ELECTRICC-----
x—x— E%ISRNJ FENCE
WATER VALVEI,,,
J o RRE HH;RANT
PROPQkD WATER
PROP[}SEO STORM SEWER
PRO,POSEO SANITARY
4: GUTTERPR005o) CURB
E.OS NG ROAD
TYRE R.O.W
PRO1\7 R.O.YI
DYERUNB -ROOD DRNNAGE SWALE'
LI UTILITY
II 1 Welland Buffer
16,522 sf
Wetland Mitigation
4,717 sf
o=
vl
004;
1 r
V F004
NOTE: ; 1) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BaQOMPAS
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND VEGITATI(
2) WETLANDS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COI
USING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN AC
OF PLYMOUTH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICAT
Ni
60 0 fi0 120 10O
SCALE 1" = 60'
MWr.MIIML
4d Buffer
sf
Wetland Mitigation
2,496 Sf
Wetland Impact
4,852 sf
Wetland Buffer
22,388 sf "
511, Vdumv Tabiv:
CUeodNaled
51t 54 tuSu 11 5 12 <u yd <u.yde RI _yd.Nat Melh<d
it
05017—
thw,dt -f ...f,<e237406 28067 9340 (C) Gtld
POLARIS GROUP BI
e„e wTx an. e, wlm Iv mn,lmml,,, m ,et NOT FOR
BID SET
MOUTH, MN
NeM<NN
ON BXEET NO.
t—k--
4d Buffer
sf
Wetland Mitigation
2,496 Sf
Wetland Impact
4,852 sf
Wetland Buffer
22,388 sf "
511, Vdumv Tabiv:
CUeodNaled
51t 54 tuSu 11 5 12 <u yd <u.yde RI _yd.Nat Melh<d
it
05017—
thw,dt -f ...f,<e237406 28067 9340 (C) Gtld
POLARIS GROUP BI
e„e wTx an. e, wlm Iv mn,lmml,,, m ,et NOT FOR
BID SET
MOUTH, MN
NeM<NN
ON BXEET NO.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
APPROVING WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION
FOR PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION (2005121)
NE 1/a SECTION 35 T118 R22W
WHEREAS, Dove Capital, LLC is proposing to fill wetlands for construction of the proposed
Plymouth Crossroads Station development; and
WHEREAS, there are no reasonable alternatives for the location of this development; and
WHEREAS, a Replacement Plan Application has been prepared that proposes to replace the
impacted wetlands on-site and in kind at a minimum of 2 to 1 ratio which is required by the
Wetland Conservation Act; and
WHEREAS, the Sequencing Findings of Fact have been prepared for this project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: The filling of wetlands and the Replacement Plan Application
for Plymouth Crossroads Station development is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit a copy of the contract made with an appropriate party to
complete the WCA replacement wetland monitoring requirements.
2. The replacement wetland must be monitored for a five (5) year period from the date of
completion and the monitoring plan must include a section on management of upland
buffer, wetland vegetation, wetland hydrology, tree management and invasive plant
control such as buckthorn and reed canary grass.
3. The developer's wetland consultant shall submit an annual monitoring report to the City
of Plymouth on the anniversary date of the completion of the replacement wetland for a
period of five (5) years containing information required in WCA rule 8420.0620, and
those required in condition number two.
4. Prior to disturbing any wetland area, the developer shall submit a letter of credit in the
amount of the cost of the Replacement Plan. The letter of credit shall extend until
completion of the five year monitoring period. If during the five year period the
replacement wetland does not perfonn as proposed in the plan, work as necessary shall be
undertaken by the developer to bring it into conformance.
5. The developer's wetland consultant shall be consulted and must conduct and record
periodic inspections during the construction of all the newly created wetland basins.
6. The replacement wetland must be constructed concurrently with site grading.
O:\Engineering\DEVLMNTS\2005\200512RRESOL\wetland res 2005121 Mes.doc
7. A deed creating a restrictive covenant running with the land for the replacement area must
be recorded. The deed shall be submitted to the City for approval before recording.
8. The developer shall comply with the City of Plymouth Ordinance 95-2 (Wetland Buffer
Standards).
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED; That the Mayor is authorized to execute the Wetland
Replacement Plan Application for Plymouth Crossroads Station development.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my
office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
O:\Engineet5ng\DEVLMNTS\2005\2005121\RESOL\wetland res 2005121 CRes.doc
Agenda Number:F
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
017
FROM: Marie Darling, Senior Planner, (763-509-5457) through Barbara Senness,
Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association. Request for a Site
Plan Amendment to construct a multi-purpose park building at Greenwood
Playfield, Located at 18005 Medina Road. (2006099)
DATE: October 15, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
REVIEW DEADLINE: December 6, 2006
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a site plan amendment to Greenwood Playfield
located at 18005 Medina Road.
Approval of a site plan amendment requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan amendment to construct a 1,660 square foot
multi-purpose park building in the middle of the ballfields at Greenwood Playfield located at
18005 Medina Road. The proposed building would include concession areas, restrooms, storage
and a press box. The Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association would construct and pay
for the building. Once construction is complete the building becomes City property and would
be maintained by the City. The Wayzata School District is the underlying property owner and
has agreed to allow construction of the building.
As the subject property includes two parcels, the Wayzata School District would consolidate the
two properties to eliminate any Building Code issues that would otherwise result from the
inadequate distance between an existing property line and the proposed building. The
consolidation is administered by Hennepin County through a separate process.
File 2006099
Page 2
3. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC MEETING:
At their October 18, 2006 meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the
request as an item on their consent agenda. No one from the public requested to speak. The
minutes of the meeting are attached. Notice of the public meeting at the Planning Commission
was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet and development signage remains on the site.
The notification area map is attached.
4. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
B. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not
the proposed project meets the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it
meets these measurable standards, the City must then approve the site plan amendment.
C. History
In 1999, the City Council approved a conditional use permit amendment and site plan
amendment to allow a building and parking lot expansion at Greenwood Elementary School..
In 2000, the City Council approved a rezoning, site plan amendment and variances to construct
additional ball fields, soccer fields and associated facilities.
In 2005, the City Council approved a site plan amendment for a parking lot expansion.
5. ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting a site plan amendment to construct a 32 -foot by 42 -foot multi-
purpose park building in the middle of the ball fields at the existing Greenwood Playfield. The
proposed building would have two stories with 1,260 square feet on the first level and 400 square
feet on the second. No exterior lighting is proposed.
The Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan in the RSF-1 zoning
district. Staff used these standards to review this application. The specific standards that apply
to the subject property are as follows:
ADJACENT LAND USES , GUIDING 1 ZONING .
North Single -Family Homes LA -2 RSF-4/FRD
South Single -Family Homes LA -1 RSF-1
East Single -Family Homes LA -1 RSF-2
West Single -Family Homes LA -1 RSF-2
B. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not
the proposed project meets the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it
meets these measurable standards, the City must then approve the site plan amendment.
C. History
In 1999, the City Council approved a conditional use permit amendment and site plan
amendment to allow a building and parking lot expansion at Greenwood Elementary School..
In 2000, the City Council approved a rezoning, site plan amendment and variances to construct
additional ball fields, soccer fields and associated facilities.
In 2005, the City Council approved a site plan amendment for a parking lot expansion.
5. ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting a site plan amendment to construct a 32 -foot by 42 -foot multi-
purpose park building in the middle of the ball fields at the existing Greenwood Playfield. The
proposed building would have two stories with 1,260 square feet on the first level and 400 square
feet on the second. No exterior lighting is proposed.
The Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan in the RSF-1 zoning
district. Staff used these standards to review this application. The specific standards that apply
to the subject property are as follows:
File 2006099
Page 3
Building Materials
Section 21115.03 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for exterior building finishes. All
sides of the proposed building would have equal appearance in design and materials. The
exterior building materials include rockface block and Hardi-siding, with a standing seam metal
roof. These materials conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Public Address System
The applicant is likely to construct the building wired for a PA system to announce calls during
games, but has not provided information showing the system is consistent with City noise
regulations. Staff has included a condition requiring the applicant submit documentation showing
the PA system would conform to City requirements.
6. CONCLUSION:
Staff finds that with the conditions in the attached resolution, the site plan amendment meets all
of the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the site plan amendment to
construct a multipurpose park building, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution
and as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes of the October 18, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting
2. Location Map
3. Notification Area Map
4. Site Graphics
5. Resolution Approving the Site Plan Amendment
Standards for the RSF-1 District
Required Proposed Complies?
Building Setbacks:
Front 50 ft. 260 ft. Yes
Side 25 ft. 315 ft.(min) Yes
Building Height: 35 ft. (max.) 14.5 ft.(to roofline) Yes
Building Coverage (max.): 30% 6% Yes
Lighting: None proposed
Discussion follows
Building Materials
Section 21115.03 of the Zoning Ordinance provides standards for exterior building finishes. All
sides of the proposed building would have equal appearance in design and materials. The
exterior building materials include rockface block and Hardi-siding, with a standing seam metal
roof. These materials conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Public Address System
The applicant is likely to construct the building wired for a PA system to announce calls during
games, but has not provided information showing the system is consistent with City noise
regulations. Staff has included a condition requiring the applicant submit documentation showing
the PA system would conform to City requirements.
6. CONCLUSION:
Staff finds that with the conditions in the attached resolution, the site plan amendment meets all
of the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the site plan amendment to
construct a multipurpose park building, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution
and as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes of the October 18, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting
2. Location Map
3. Notification Area Map
4. Site Graphics
5. Resolution Approving the Site Plan Amendment
Draft Minutes
City of Plymouth
Planning Commission Meeting
October 18, 2006
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair James Holmes, Commissioners Melissa Musliner, Karl
Neset, Kathleen Murdock, Frank Weir, E. J. Clyman and Sarah Anderson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Barbara Senness, Senior Planner Shawn Drill,
Senior Planner Marie Darling, Planner Joshua Doty, Public Works Director Doran Cote
and Office Support Representative Janice Bergstrom
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC FORUM
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the
October 18, 2006 Planning Commission Agenda. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 4, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Murdock, to approve the
October 4, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved.
B. PLYMOUTH-WAYZATA YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION (2006099)
Chair Holmes introduced the request by the Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball
Association to approve a site plan amendment to construct a multipurpose park building
with restrooms, a concession area, and a press box at Greenwood Park located at 18005
Medina Road. Chair Holmes said there was a revised resolution regarding lighting at the
park structure.
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Musliner, to approve the
request, with the revised resolution, by the Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association
for a site plan amendment to construct a multipurpose park building with restrooms, a
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
October 18, 2006
Page 2
concession area, and a press box at Greenwood Park located at 18005 Medina Road. Vote.
7 Ayes. MOTION approved.
A. HOLLY TROMBLEY (2006074)
Chair \H'esroduced the request by Holly Trombley for a preliminary plat and
varianchaine Woods" for two single family lots for property located at 17815
10th A
Planner Doty gave averview of the October 9, 2006 staff report.
Commissioner Andersonla%ked to see the homes adjacent to the property.
Planner Doty reviewed an aeri hoto showing the proposed houses would be set back a
little further than the existing hom
Chair Holmes introduced the appl:
Grove. Ms. Trombley said she was
DuChaine, owners of the property.
Chair Holmes opened the public hearing.
Holly Trombley, 10245 Quaker Lane, Maple
g on behalf of her parents, Gerald and Carmen
Chair Holmes introduced Scott Rusten, 17725 10th A\
want
r. Rusten said he lives
to the east of the property and is concerned the propothe south side of the lot
would be visible from his back yard. Mr. Rusten askcan be done to preserve
a forward setting of the house. Mr. Rusten asked abd roadway on the north
side. He said there previously had been a cul-de-sacont yard. He said the
DuChaine's have a beautiful lot and can see why wsplit it, but he does
want to preserve the privacy of his back yard.
Chair Holmes introduced Charlie McCarty, 17830 8th Avenue North. Mr.\
cen
e
shares a property line with the DuChaine's and asked about preservation
oFespeciallythetreesalongthebacklines. Mr. McCarty asked about teproposedhouses. Mr. McCarty asked if there is any archaeological signific,
as he had heard Native American Indians used to camp in the area in the lat
Chair Holmes closed the public hearing.
Chair Holmes asked about the setbacks for the proposed site.
I
bUlbC iin was UMMA
ocLUPA1iLY PRE:,s &K 6.
s s•l.
NW- WAP ED USE. IV_ 302.42.1.
UVE 10AV ROF 35 PVF
PLCCP- 5a ?W
5'TbRA4E 1'l P5
AY E F C_-AYi.
CDNF,TR1 tXlctl '7`tpE V•P 1JE)1,1•tLATt CDMBI)5'f16LE.
140" Ni71'iie'S 40ARWA
A. M& -"MV -AL ELEGTV cAL K l . TM -P- SNE&'T
p 516 1-6uUA.THE lblD.tntw U 517E PLAN
INu.UD@ tok lltAtr Q Nlt W15, CIL sCfE P.Llw
S1t ti a! 6 45T64-fib 2. Pt uJ
CNL IFJ E1 5. , 3 G(05• 56c17abS
qO%--,WXW STAW*
VA1 oNS
o ELEVATto4Sg
5 o fNDATIotl
tt E M[MWVM-t KV, TRIGAL-
SF 5MAFICAP045
r•-rv• ••• wy mrecr supervision
an a I am do0cense . r 'tecl Under the laws oFthe State of Mimiesola.
NF.. Y 4-1M -1 r+V•1 O O O D
Signature
ry DD I G C - I3@JnaD Cn1C
Printed
NameISM • -'
f
Reg. No, at
u
i
OCT - 5
I
F- to•of' RowEP+ lrPSfitt+iNTy_--•— ---, —. ____..-__________
I
I
TOW
I W
nn
4------- -+
LJ
h NEW SltW.F 3
1"*out,
09
GFEEN•Wocv `x}t0ol-
5 y
h`i°
I hereb ertify that Ihis.doeument was prepared by the or under my direct supervision /
end I1 m oil
A
y' need ect U1IIL..
laws of the State of Minnesola.
EK -t
Signature
Printed Name
AAI
Reg. No. an
0
tV Dbobrl.B. 11=1coo II°xn%,
r
9; l[6t"G, .t lt,ti .6iSllihk''p
op All. -ft ¢EFE 6Au.r-%GL05. 5Efi
DRNW194 AMIL F* I A-(ta15N1P
ToI. K Bts amej.
zQ 4oNNEcT tY taem W .- aiL. LAws
Ta F--M5n9c, 0; SVS.Mc,F_.:
3Q EX1S"f1UG W tTL- I.IN.Fr : .
RE4YAaTE GYvM06I.AW9
WtkAMW WAWWaS.
Q t,IEW -kTF,R u 300 +1-
NEW ELECTfkVA- .5&Kke. toMpUTTooVGt+rvAo •Pow& Lowe ALOq(A
NEDwA 12oAD UNDj;jt tfpu)4pIx--RV1GE 7p WIC I"64.
OC - 5
o E1Tt)NQtJa><i
IpZp G .'I 1016.0
i
POC
EAWTS u
j021,5p l 5 iu tSa PAv Ik1L F 1016, i `
10110.0
E i1B Fbtw
s
0 LEVELc)
0101.0 1tri15rb• iOLCW' kP ..
T JF O c3`Gtl'h 17Fh
SITE A!
I hereb certify that this docu ant
U.d by me or under my direc,up,,jjon rm a ily ensed rc 'llaws of the State of M,,
ec
l`1 I S E 8"Uh%1MOIK _TRAIL, i2 WtCE . I1I."'[AV,[ . OW A G' SAM %. SiguaNre
1 3o PlWIU5 AT &W INs%mi
oRIJEfi.
3 4 )Z
Printed Name. RAE 5lA$ o I '1610 BASE. I%ftg\ F INt$1: fi1gEp `all•- 51?NtPd -b11JCS g0 arl Gfi1JCGR . 11,;M =ot 11( YE`t5Ta1 RE7AU14t:!a wpReg. No. and Ewek
oa IR4:kIG,AFf1oF.l e,. c atoo® a o o Bon- - G°pC aFj-_FY Ac.E OW QJ4-1.CupcEg- VAW1i . R Dborv7 g
ID
NI
P-ASHIVJw ----
WEPiPs '—
m4_4A. w /
Owdw 125 PSF Lj-
rn TMKM
PLAAI t MTUR43
sm
w
MAID DeTXIL9 COU14Tra+. carAIL.
I her ertify al this docur7a.gt was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionandatIalyrused (rcht t Unde!Aho laws of the State of Minnesota.
Signature
toy
M FLW9 : PWW• 5EE DMM46 W FcEt ' Pw"I= FucTuRES
LXJ tIf?' se,4 E
WAIL• M[x wrra) fo ramaJ wam NEA'TCK. ANG (B WAU.•MlX1mw 'ti Y -W ozgww SEWII[.E -Am.
mse ftr oN o4 or ML WSTRM% PAWI•tbw DMF -6.
It oyE 'TDu.GC•PA?M HOWE(L pI;(t STALL.
A CNMTCV-. , 4ALP p tSPEUSE t.'t`tP1tA. a h.. -
I WNL• PN0U)j tGP ELE41F, tWein T ER.'TWO E'GAt Es.
tQ I9•su 4 A8 •BAR. Pqt GODE'.
1n
WATT IMICE AND MMP,
m RES'Ro tn. PAR ItnotJS. It'CAL, o RN AD Y p. .
r 8 eml .'bul t Jap Om 1 ST Rcm Siler OLY,
S $ u+k1.Iz k3L, l; ikp . PAWIED 8M Sii; tis. Q (0GW.ftXFA(-E . WERW.._PAlt. =-s V nu cll^ce _
TOO 1:
r
M1 (
II
F.RL AND
0 1 -do CM
IfL
Ar
0
tai
i'7 L.1
iF7
11!• [n
C7 i:7
Ill lrfrlrtrlil 1 1 1 11 11 I/I I III IIR;til l IMiI
1 I I I I I I I I! I I! I I I
VA
all
A-- -ADIW,
wi a 1,
r. ,
5 ..;__`' Glir;ulrl•rlr.r...— m:t==-=----••---..--- 1111!!1__
go
fnA
tteloss sEcctio+,o.nx,u
l8" SrAc14
t
a
I hereby cc that this document was prepared by me or mlder my direct supervisiop '
and that I a ly li ns hits er the Is of the State of Minnesota.
SignatureQ,,+ p1`lJ G7G[I • {1l/cL
Pnnted Name
est STAMR Cg A%6
I
U4,9
I.t' Y
tea
w i
i r
Q*.7 mis1
4 • irdGT IOM I .
1 1180 %Ae
I herebWahly'lic ent&
or under my direct supervisionandthchotheSlateydirectsola.
Signature
Printed Name , "
OMA
Reg. No. and Da
TAW% N
Icy "R CAW
n
9
a-
u -
1Ate
3.4a rc STRtl1&ph
1 Yt
MIT w 5
d.
5 G i4<5 D#NAEt
Z''l`tg" `aFFli
b 1Cgpl.}Ili B' t j D tIP
w
t 'K P11 Ti
S AM WNWG"f1011 ID AMD{ Alt RI CtFa SEW ONTAVI-
t
INS
I hereby cern at this 00cument wasprRpared by me or under my direct supervisionandthatIeadlicecchitectDcRthelawstheStateofMinnesota.
Signature
Printed Name
SIGN 66&1VAmf1W
U8, 5wp-
RTSJUM 4006. OCT
4 IM I 14fK1(E
kOfm 4my
Ax*3 15WE
l )C*4 UG C L1QpY
VAUter
40 '
Lit S+1i70!! DETAIL
HyM 5GA1•I+
EPQn f~AtSHINi
t t
L 1 4AyH1Nb, AE1 1IL.
UW IV -ME
rn ' %ll V AT101,i
t18` GN•E
I hereby ce
and hat I a rti that this document W s P'
d-e--drby me or under my direct supervisionteyticsechittrthelawsoftheSlateofMumesota.
Signature
dN &)%EK
Reg. No. and Dale I
Ga OA1'iROI..]Ol JT .
SIDS SLAVA"nak
11Bµsc.NZ - OCT m 5
4 Cat V Fo
a
D* Cw
wyt 't itiE 6AR 5
L64
L7 FouND rto 1 D6TA11.
b BN;
m U'AbPi %VA K44
OCT -.5 .-
m
ATu. (MGKAFOKAIritL[p"L 'F-`
tmxi,i'` & eol4s
GC'T -- 5
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2006 -
APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI-PURPOSE PARK
BUILDING FOR THE PLYMOUTH-WAYZATA YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION AT
GREENWOOD PLAYFIELD AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18005 MEDINA ROAD
NORTH (2006099)
WHEREAS, The Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association has requested approval of a
site plan amendment to construct a multi-purpose park building at Greenwood Playfield located
at 18005 Medina Road North, for property legally described as:
That part of the south %2 of the northwest of the southeast 1/4, and of the southwest
1/4 of the southeast 1/4, lying southwesterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said southwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4;
thence north along the east line thereof 704 feet to the point of intersection of said
east line with the centerline of Medina Road, said point being the point of
beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left 55 degrees 50
minutes along said centerline a distance of 1400 feet; thence on said centerline
along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 700 feet to its intersection
with the west line of said south half of the northwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4, and
there ending; except the northeasterly 33 feet of said property; also except that
part of said southwest 1/4 of the southeast %4 described as follows: Commencing at
the southeast corner of said southwest 1/4 of the southeast %4; thence north along
the east line thereof 290.67 feet to the point of beginning of the exception being
described; thence continuing north 413.33 feet to the point of intersection of said
east line with the centerline of Medina Road; thence deflecting left 55 degrees 50
minutes along said centerline a distance of 577.6 feet; thence deflecting left 90
degrees a distance of 342 feet; thence deflecting left to the point of beginning;
also except that part of said southwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said southwest 1/4 of the southeast 1/4;
thence north along the east line thereof 704 feet to the point of intersection of said
east line with the centerline of Medina Road; thence deflecting left 55 degrees 50
Resolution 2006 -
File No. 2006099
Page 2
minutes along said centerline a distance of 637.6 feet to the point of beginning of
the exceptions being described; thence continuing on last -said course along said
centerline 330 feet; thence deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of 433 feet; thence
deflecting left 90 degrees a distance of 330 feet; thence deflecting left to the point
of beginning, all in Section 18, Township 118 North, Range 22 West of the 5th
Principal Meridian.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting
and recommends approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by the
Plymouth -Wayzata Youth Baseball Association for a site plan amendment, subject to the
following conditions:
1. A site plan amendment to allow construction of a park building is approved in accordance
with the application materials received by the City on October 5, 2006, subject to the
conditions listed below.
2. Prior to any construction -related activity on the site, the applicant is responsible for
acquiring a separate building permit through the Building Department.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance, City Code or the Engineering Guidelines (as may be applicable) and as follows:
a. Revise the plans to include the existing sanitary sewer and watermain information.
Include pipe size, length, material, valves, mechanical fittings, and the top and invert
elevations for the sanitary sewer manholes.
b. Clearly identify the location where the water service will connect into the existing
watermain.
c. Provide proposed sanitary sewer information to include pipe size, type, length,
elevations, and percent of grade. A manhole is required at the angle point location.
d. Identify the lowest floor elevation of the proposed building.
e. Identify the overland emergency storm water overflow route (EOF). The lowest building
opening where storm water can enter must be a minimum of 18 inches above the EOF.
Provide elevations.
f. Add a note to the plans that all civil work shall be done in accordance with the City of
Plymouth's Engineering Guidelines. Include all appropriate City details.
g. Identify the top and bottom elevations of the proposed retaining wall.
h. Provide elevations, cross section and curb type consistent with the Engineering
Guidelines for the proposed parking lot. Include dimensions, parking stalls, and turning
radii.
i. Provide the total amount of disturbed area in square feet. If this amount exceeds 10,000
square feet than watershed approval is required, and water quality impacts shall be
addressed.
Resolution 2006 -
File No. 2006099
Page 3
j. If the watermain service connection is located in the street right-of-way, a permit shall be
required.
4. Prior to installation of the PA system, the applicant shall submit all supporting
documentation necessary to show the system would be in conformance with the City's noise
regulations.
5. Should lighting be installed in the future, the applicant would be responsible for submitting a
revised lighting plan consistent with Zoning Ordinance requirements.
6. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per
Ordinance provisions.
7. Approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or
applicant has substantially started construction of the project. The landowner or applicant
may apply for approval of an extension by the City, as regulated under Section 21045.09 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on October 24, 2006 with the original thereof on file in my office, and
the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Agenda Number • 09
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY CQUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Joshua Doty, Planner (509-5453) through Barbara Senness, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Laurent Builders, Inc. Request for modification to the previously approved
resolution for preliminary and final plat for two lots to be known as "Deziel
Subdivision" for property located at 4640 Holly Lane North. (2006050)
DATE: October 13, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution replacing Resolution 2006-317, approving a preliminary and
final plat for Deziel Subdivision. The new resolution changes the name of the plat from Deziel
Subdivision to RNL Subdivision.
Approval of a revised resolution requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
On August 22, 2006, the City Council approved a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning,
preliminary and final plat to create two lots to be known as "Deziel Subdivision" for property located
at 4640 Holly Lane North. During a review of the plat by Hennepin County, County staff discovered
that the Deziel name had already been used. Consequently, the County required that the name of the
plat be changed. The attached resolution has been modified to include the new plat name (RNL
Subdivision). There are no other changes from the original resolution. The plat name change will
allow the applicant to move forward with recording of the plat and resolution.
3. RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the modifications to
Resolution 2006-317.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution 2006-317
3. Amended Resolution
T I I I
x ..... H T ` ... .
Canadian Pa°. . . . . . . . . . . ,
G.. ..........................
LAA...........
P
p.
La -1 . .
OLD ROCKFORI
Q. .
Location Map - 2006050 Land Use Guide Plan
Laurent Builders, Inc. C, Comercial
Deziel Subdivision CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
4640 Holly Lane North ® IP, Planned Industiral
Request for a Comp. Plan Amendment, 0 LA -1, Living Area 1
Rezoning and Preliminary and Final Plat D LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area E
N ® LA -4, Living Area 4
W Eriboty LAR, Living Area Rural
Of
P-1, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
Plymouth, Minnesota S {> MED LK
500 250 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
7 7
Location Map - 2006050 Land Use Guide Plan
Laurent Builders, Inc. C, Comercial
Deziel Subdivision CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
4640 Holly Lane North ® IP, Planned Industiral
Request for a Comp. Plan Amendment, 0 LA -1, Living Area 1
Rezoning and Preliminary and Final Plat D LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area E
N ® LA -4, Living Area 4
W Eriboty LAR, Living Area Rural
Of
P-1, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
Plymouth, Minnesota S {> MED LK
500 250 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2006-317 -
APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS TO
BE KNOWN AS DEZIEL SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 4640 HOLLY LANE NORTH
2006050)
WHEREAS, Laurent Builders Inc., has requested approval of a preliminary and final plat to
divide the subject property into two lots for property located at 4640 Holly Lane North; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows:
The north 520 feet of the south 1036.5 feet of the west 160 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 118, Range 22, except road.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing
and recommends approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Laurent
Builders Inc., for a preliminary and final plat for two single-family lots to be known as Deziel
Subdivision located at 4640 Holly Lane North, subject to the following findings and conditions:
1. The preliminary and final plat is approved in accordance with the application received by
the City on June 8, 2006 and revised plans received on July 11, 2006, and July 21, 2006,
except as may be amended by this Resolution.
2. The development shall comply with all standards specified for the RSF-1 (Residential
Single Family -1) zoning district. No variances are granted or implied.
3. The applicant shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation ordinance.
Resolution 2006-317
2006050)
Page 2
4. Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall:
a. Pay the park dedication fees in lieu of land dedication for one (1) dwelling unit,
pursuant to the Dedication Ordinance in effect at the time of recording the final
plat.
b. Submit a ten foot drainage and utility easement along Holly Lane, and a six foot
drainage and utility easement along the side and rear property lines.
c. Submit an encroachment agreement for the detached garage on Lot 2, Block 1.
d. Submit a private access easement on the adjacent property east of Lot 2, Block 1
for the detached garage on Lot 2, Block 1.
e. Submit a private access easement on Lot 2, Block 1 for the detached wood and
steel building located on the adjacent property to the east.
f. Submit a private driveway access easement on Lot 2, Block 1 for the adjacent
property to the east.
5. A building permit shall be obtained prior to any construction on Lot 1. No building
permits shall be issued until the final plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
6. A grading permit is required prior to any excavation or grading on the site.
Approval of the site grading and excavation may also be approved with a building permit
for Lot 1.
7. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits:
a. The applicant shall relocate the existing shed according to the C5 plan received by
the City on July 21, 2006, or relocate the shed to a City -approved location.
b. Silt fence shall be installed on the property.
c. A certified survey with final grading plan including elevations shall be reviewed
and approved by the Engineering Department.
8. Standard Conditions:
a. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
b. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage
facility.
c. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property
owner or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the
landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the
expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 510 of City
Code.
d. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred
resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the
City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which
the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
Resolution 2006-317
2006050)
Page 3
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 22, 2006.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 22, 2006, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand o cially ash "such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
cday of ,, 5 L,461 ,
City Cler
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2006 —
Amends and Restates Resolution 2006-317
A RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 2006-317
ADOPTED ON AUGUST 22, 2006, APPROVING PRLIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT
FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS LOCATED AT 4640 HOLLY LANE NORTH
2006050)
APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS TO
BE KNOWN AS DEZIEL SUBDIVISIONRNI, SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 4640 HOLLY
LANE NORTH (2006050)
WHEREAS, Laurent Builders Inc., has requested approval of a preliminary and final plat to
divide the subject property into two lots for property located at 4640 Holly Lane North; and
WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows:
The north 520 feet of the south 1036.5 feet of the west 160 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 118, Range 22, except road.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing
and recommends approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Laurent
Builders Inc., for a preliminary and final plat for two single-family lots to be known as Deziel
SubdivisieARNL Subdivision located at 4640 Holly Lane North, subject to the following findings
and conditions:
1. The preliminary and final plat is approved in accordance with the application received by
the City on June 8, 2006 and revised plans received on July 11, 2006, and July 21, 2006,
except as may be amended by this Resolution.
2. The development shall comply with all standards specified for the RSF-1 (Residential
Single Family -1) zoning district. No variances are granted or implied.
3. The applicant shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation ordinance.
Resolution 2006-
2006050)
Page 2
4. Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall:
a. Pay the park dedication fees in lieu of land dedication for one (1) dwelling unit,
pursuant to the Dedication Ordinance in effect at the time of recording the final
plat.
b. Submit a ten foot drainage and utility easement along Holly Lane, and a six foot
drainage and utility easement along the side and rear property lines.
c. Submit an encroachment agreement for the detached garage on Lot 2, Block 1.
d. Submit a private access easement on the adjacent property east of Lot 2, Block 1
for the detached garage on Lot 2, Block 1.
e. Submit a private access easement on Lot 2, Block 1 for the detached wood and
steel building located on the adjacent property to the east.
f. Submit a private driveway access easement on Lot 2, Block 1 for the adjacent
property to the east.
5. A building permit shall be obtained prior to any construction on Lot I. No building
permits shall be issued until the final plat is filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
6. A grading permit is required prior to any excavation or grading on the site.
Approval of the site grading and excavation may also be approved with a building permit
for Lot 1.
7. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits:
a. The applicant shall relocate the existing shed according to the C5 plan received by
the City on July 21, 2006, or relocate the shed to a City -approved location.
b. Silt fence shall be installed on the property.
c. A certified survey with final grading plan including elevations shall be reviewed
and approved by the Engineering Department.
8. Standard Conditions:
a. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense.
b. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing any open storm water drainage
facility.
c. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property
owner or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the
landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the
expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 510 of City
Code.
d. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred
resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the
Resolution 2006-
2006050)
Page 3
City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which
the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 22, 2006.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 22, 2006, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
CITY'OF PLYMOUTH
r
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: October 4, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Oran Cote, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: FERNBROOK LANE/TH 55
27TH AVENUE NORTH TO 34TH AVENUE NORTH
CITY PROJECT NO. 1013
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the State
of Minnesota Agency Agreement, Agreement No. 90173, between the Department of
Transportation and the City of Plymouth for Federal Participation in construction costs and
authorizing the Department of Transportation to act as the City's agent in accepting federal funds
on its behalf.
BACKGROUND: The City was approved for Federal Aid funds to be used for the construction
of Fernbrook Lane at Trunk Highway 55 from 27th Avenue North to 34th Avenue North. This
project has been determined by MnDOT to be eligible for federal funds in the Surface
Transportation Program (STP) in the safety category. The City needs to enter into an agreement
with the State of Minnesota (MnDOT) for them to act as our agent in accepting federal funds for
this project.
It is anticipated that nearly $1,000,000, is to be paid by federal funds available through the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The City would be required to pay any part of the
cost or expense of the work that the FHWA does not pay. This project is proposed for
construction to begin in 2007.
MnDOT has now prepared and submitted to the City the State of Minnesota Agency Agreement
to collect the federal funding for this project. This agreement has been prepared in accordance
with the adopted State policies for construction projects. Attached is a copy of the State of
Minnesota Agency Agreement.
BUDGET IMPACT: The 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) has funding
identified for this project as follows:
2006- $ 700,000 Design and right-of-way
2007- 1,900,000 Construction
2007- 900,000 Traffic signals
3,500,000 Total Project Cost
SUBJECT: FERNBROOK LANE/TH 55
27 T AVENUE NORTH TO 34TH AVENUE NORTH
CITY PROJECT NO. 1013
Page 2
The draft 2007 — 2011 CIP has been updated to reflect more refined cost estimates. A copy of
the Project Detail Report is attached.
The federal funding will help offset the City's share of the proposed project costs.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council approve
the State of Minnesota Agency Agreement, Agreement No. 90173, between the Department of
Transportation and the City of Plymouth and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute
Agreement No. 90173 for City Project No. 1013.
attachments: Draft 2007 — 2011 Project Detail Report
State of Minnesota Agency Agreement
Map
Resolution
0AEngineeringTR07ECTS\2000 - 2009\1013\Memos\CC_Appr_Agre_ROW_1013_10_24.doe
Capital Improvement Plan 2007 airu 2011
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Project# 06 -ST -001
ProjeetName Fernbrook Lane Reconstruction (27th to 34th Ave.)
Project # 1013
Contact
Department Street Projects
Type hnprovement/Acquisition
Useful Life
Category Unassigned
Priority n/a
Total Project Cost $5,600,000
This project involves the reconstruction of Fernbrook Lane from 27th Avenue to 34th Avenue. The installation of traffic signals on Fernbrook
Lane at 27th Avenue and Harbor Lane are required, as well as geometric changes and modifications to the TH 55 signal. The project also includes
replacing watennain from 34th Avenue to the northerly project limits. Design and right-of-way acquisition in 2006 and construction in 2007.
The watennain north of 34th Avenue is cast iron main that has experienced several breaks. Staff believes it would be best to replace the water
main as part of the street improvement rather than have to go back and tear up the new street later.
Justification
Traffic along this section of Fernbrook Lane has been increasing for many years. Improvements will be needed to maintain traffic flow and
improve safety. Previous study has shown that significant improvement to safety could be made. In addition the roadway condition is
deteriorating and will need significant work in the near future. Applications have been submitted for State and Federal funding. This project is
dependent on acquiring outside funding.
The City's water infrastructure is aging and must be replaced when cost-effective. The most cost-effective time is when streets are being
improved.. Staff reviews each roadway improvement to determine the condition of the underlying water main. If the main is in poor condition and
cannot be reasonably expected to last for the life of the new street surface it should be replaced.
Prior Expenditure 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
7-00,0001 Construction/Maintenance 4,900,000 4,900,000
Total Total 4,900,000 4,900,000
Prior Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
7007000 Federal Funding 1,100,000 1,100,000
Total Municipal State Aid Fund 3,650,000 3,650,000
Water Fund 150,000 150,000
Total 4,900,000 4,900,000
Operational Impact/Other
The reconstruction of Fernbrook Lane will initially decrease operating costs for this roadway, but the overall operating cost of the system will not
decrease since other roads on the system continue to age. The impact on operating costs should be minimal except for signal maintenance and
energy costs. It costs about $200 per year in energy costs to operate a traffic signal with LED lights.
Produced Using the Plan -/t Capital Planning Software Wednesda) October 04, 2006
Mn/DOT Agreement No. 90173
STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN CONSTRUCTION
This agreement is entered into by and between the City of Plymouth ("City') and the State of
Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation'("Mn/DOT"),
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.36, the City desires Mn/DOT to act as the City's
agent in accepting federal fiends on the City's behalf for the construction, improvement, or
enhancement of transportation financed either in whole or in part by federal funds, hereinafter
referred to as the "Project(s)"; and
Mn/DOT requires that the terms and conditions of this agency be set forth in an agreement.
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. DUTIES OF THE CITY.
A. DESIGNATION. The City designates Mii/DOT to act as its agent in accepting
federal funds in its behalf made available for the Project(s).
B. STAFFING.
1. The City will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer, ("Project
Engineer"), to be in responsible charge of the Project(s) and to supervise and
direct the work to be perforined under any construction contract let for the
Project(s). In the alternative where the City elects to use a private consultant for
construction engineering services, the City will provide a qualified, full-time
public employee of the City, to be in responsible charge of the Project(s). The
services of the City to be performed hereunder may not be assigned, sublet, or
transferred unless the City is notified in writing by Mn/DOT that such action is
permitted under 23 CFR 1.33 and 23 CFR 635.105 and state law. This written
consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for
performance of the work.
2. During the progress of the work on the Project(s), the City authorizes its Project
Engineer to request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from
Mn/DOT Agreement No.
N:\FedAid\Lyimette\agreements\DCP\plymouth DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 1
Mn/DOT, pursuant to Mimiesota Statutes Section 161.39. Such services maybe
covered by other technical service agreements. If Mn/DOT furnishes the services
requested, and if Mr /DOT requests reimbursement, then the City will promptly
pay Mn/DOT to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and
expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the
current Mn/DOT labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based
on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. Provision of such services
will not be deemed to make Mn/DOT a principal or co -principal with respect to
the Project(s).
C. LETTING. The City will prepare construction contracts in accordance with
Minnesota law and applicable Federal laws and regulations.
1. The City will solicit bids after obtaining written notification from Mn/DOT that
the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") has authorized the Project(s).
Any Project(s) advertised prior to authorization will not be eligible for federal
reimbursement.
2. The City will prepare the Proposal for Highway Construction for the construction
contract, which will include all of the federal -aid provisions supplied by
Mn/DOT.
3. The City will prepare and publish the bid solicitation for the Project(s) as
required by state and federal laws. The City will include in the solicitation the
required language for federal -aid construction contracts as supplied by Mn/DOT.
The solicitation will state where the proposals, plans, and specifications are
available for the inspection of prospective bidders, and where the City will
receive the sealed bids.
4. The City may not include other work in the construction contract for the
authorized Proj ect(s) without obtaining prior notification from Mn/DOT that such
work is allowed by FHWA. Failure to obtain such notification may result in the
loss of some or all of the federal funds for the Project(s).
5. The City will prepare and sell the plan and proposal packages and prepare and
distribute any addendums, if needed.
6. The City will receive and open bids.
7. After the bids are opened, the City Council will consider the bids and will award
the bid to the lowest responsible bidder, or reject all bids. If the construction
contract contains a goal for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, the City will not
award the bid until it has received certification of the Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise participation from the Mn/DOT Equal Employment Opportunity
Office.
Mn/DOT Agreement No. 82; 4 )
N:\FedAid\Lynnette\agreements\DCP\plymoutli DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 2
D. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.
1. The City will prepare and execute a construction contract with the lowest
responsible bidder, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor," in accordance with
the special provisions and the latest edition of Mn/DOT'S Standard Specifications
for Construction and all amendments thereto.
2. The Project(s) will be constricted in accordance with plans, special provisions,
and standard specifications of each Project. The standard specifications will be
the latest edition of MiJDOT Standard Specifications for Highway Construction,
and all amendments thereto. The plans, special provisions, and standard
specifications will be on file at the City Engineer's Office. The plans, special
provisions, and specifications are incorporated into this agreement by reference
as though frilly set forth herein.
3. The City will furnish the personnel, services, supplies, and equipment necessary
to properly supervise, inspect, and docuument the work for the Project(s). The
services of the City to be performed hereunder may not be assigned, sublet, or
transferred unless the City is notified in writing by Mn/DOT that such action is
permitted under 23 CFR 1.33 and 23 CFR 635.105 and state law. This written
consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for
performance of the work.
4. The City will document quantities in accordance with the guidelines set forth in
the Mn/DOT Contract Administration Manual Sections 410 and 420 that were in
effect at the time the work was performed.
5. The City will test materials in accordance with the Mn/DOT Schedule of
Materials Control in effect at the time each Project was let. The City will notify
Mn/DOT when work is in progress on the Proj ect(s) that requires observation by
the Independent Assurance Inspector as required by the Independent Assurance
Schedule.
6. The City may make changes in the plans or the character of the work, as may be
necessary to complete the Project(s), and may enter into supplemental
agreement(s) with the Contractor. The City will not be reimbursed for any costs
of any work perfonmed under a supplemental agreement unless Mn/DOT has
notified the City that the subj ect work is eligible for federal funds and sufficient
federal funds are available.
7. The City will request approval from Mn/DOT for all costs in excess of the
amount of federal funds previously approved for the Proj ect(s) prior to incurring
such costs. Failure to obtain such approval may result in such costs being
disallowed for reimbursement.
8. The City will prepare reports, keep records, and perform work so as to enable
Mn/DOT to collect the federal aid sought by the City. Required reports are listed
Mn/DOT Agreement No. 8'Lfi s)
N:\FedAid\Lynette\agreements\DCP\plymouth DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 3
in the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Delegated Contract Process Checklist,
available from Mn/DOT's authorized representative. The City will retain all
records and reports in accordance with Mn/DOT's record retention schedule for
federal aid projects.
9. Upon completion of the Project(s), the Project Engineer will determine whether
the work will be accepted.
E. PAYMENTS.
1. The entire cost of the Project(s) is to be paid from. federal fields made available
by the FHWA and by other funds provided by the City. The City will pay any
part of the cost or expense of the Project(s) that is not paid by federal funds.
2. The City will prepare partial estimates in accordance With the terms of the
constriction contract for the Project(s). The Project Engineer will certify each
partial estimate. Following certification of the partial estimate, the City will make
partial payments to the Contractor in accordance with the terms of the
construction contract for the Project(s).
3. Following certification of the partial estimate, the City may request
reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds. The City's request will be
made to Mn/DOT and will include a copy of the certified partial estimate.
4. Upon completion of the Project(s), the City will prepare a final estimate in
accordance with the terms of the construction contract for the Project(s). The
Proj ect Engineer will certify the final estimate. Following certification of the final
estimate, the City will make the final payment to the Contractor in accordance
with the terms of the construction contract for the Project(s).
5. Following certification of the final estimate, the City may request reimbursement
for costs eligible for federal funds. The City's request will be made to Mn/DOT
and will include a copy of the certified final estimate along with the required
records.
F. LIMITATIONS.
1. The City will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws,
ordinances, and regulations.
2. Nondiscrimination. It is the policy of the Federal Highway Administration and
the State of Minnesota that no person in the United States will, on the grounds of
race, color, or national origin,. be, excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity
receiving Federal financial assistance (42 U.S.C. 2000d). Through expansion of
the mandate for nondiscrimination in Title VI and through parallel legislation, the
prescribed bases of discrimination include race, color, sex, national origin, age,
WDOT Agreement No. 92546)
N:\FedAid\Lymiette\agreements\DCP\plymouth DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 4
and disability. In addition, the Title VI program has been. extended to cover all
programs, activities and services of an entity receiving Federal financial
assistance, whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not.
Even in the absence of prior discriminatory practice or usage, a recipient in
administering a program or activity to which this part applies, is expected to take
affirmative action to assure that no person is excluded from participation in, or is
denied the benefits of, the program or activity on the grounds of race, color,
national origin, sex, age, or disability. It is the responsibility of the City to carry
out the above requirements.
3. Workers' Compensation. Any and all employees of the City or other persons
while engaged in the performance of any work or services required or permitted
by the City under this agreement will not be considered employees of MnJDOT,
and any and all claims that may arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of
Min iesota on behalf of said employees, or other persons while so engaged, will
in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Mn/DOT. The City will require
proof of Workers' Compensation Insurance from any contractor and sub-
contractor.
4. Utilities. The City will treat all public, private or cooperatively owned utility
facilities which directly or indirectly serve the public and which occupy highway
rights of way in conformance with 23 CFR.645 "Utilities" which is incorporated
herein by reference.
G. AUDIT.
1. The City will comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) circular A-133, which are incorporated herein
by reference.
2. As provided under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, all books,
records, doctunents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City are
subject to examination by the United States Government, Mn/DOT, and either
the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate, for a minimum of
seven years. The City will be responsible for any costs associated with the
performance of the audit.
H. MAINTENANCE. The City assumes full responsibility for the operation and
maintenance of any facility constructed or improved under this Agreement.
I. CLAIMS. The City will pay any and all lawful claims arising out of or incidental to
the performance of the Project(s) work. The City acknowledges that Mn/DOT is
acting only as the City's agent for receipt and disbursement of federal funds, and not
as a principal or co -principal with respect to the Proj ect(s). In all events, the City will
indemnify Mn/DOT and hold Mn/DOT harmless from any claims arising out of the
Proj ect(s).
Mn/DOT Agreement No. 92846)
N:\PedAid\Lymlette\agreements\DCP\plymouth DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 5
H. DUTIES OF Mn/DOT.
A. ACCEPTANCE. Mn/DOT accepts designation as Agent of the City for the receipt
and disbursement of federal funds and will act in accordance herewith.
B. PROJECT ACTIVITIES.
1. Mn/DOT will make the necessary requests to the FHWA for authorization to use
federal funds for the Project(s), and for reimbursement of eligible costs pursuant
to the terns of this agreement.
2. Mn/DOT will provide to the City copies of the required Federal -aid clauses to be
included in the bid solicitation and will provide the required Federal -aid
provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction.
Mn/DOT will review and certify the DBE participation and notify the City when
certification is complete.
4. Mn/DOT will provide the required labor postings.
C. PAYMENTS.
1. Nh /DOT will receive the federal funds to be paid by the FHWA for the
Project(s), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 161.36, Subdivision 2.
2. Mn/DOT will reimburse the City, from said federal funds made available to each
Project, for each partial payment request, subject to the availability and limits of
those funds.
3. Upon completion of the Project(s), Mn/DOT will perform a final inspection and
verify the federal and state eligibility of all the payment requests. If the Project is
found to have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications,
Mn/DOT will promptly release any remaining federal fields due the City for the
Project(s).
4. In the event Mn/DOT does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature or
other fimding source, or funding cannot be continued at a sufficient level to allow
for the processing of the federal aid reimbursement requests, the City may
continue the work with local funds only, iultil such time as Mn/DOT is. able to
process the federal aid reimbursement requests.
D. AUTHORITY. Mn/DOT may withhold federal fluids, where Mn/DOT or the FHWA
determines that the Project(s) was not completed in compliance with federal
requirements.
E. INSPECTION. Mn/DOT, the FHWA, or duly authorized representatives of the state
and federal governinent will have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor the work
performed under this agreement. The City will make available all books, records, and
Mn/DOT Agreement No. R'2s 46)
N:\FedAid\Lytinette\agi-eements\DCP\plymoutliDCP Agency Agreement. doe 2/5/00 Page 6
documents pertaining to the work hereunder, for a minimum of seven years following
the closing of the construction contract.
III. TORT LIABILITY. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results
thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions
of any others and the results thereof. The Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes
Section 3.736, governs Mn/DOT liability.
IV. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this
agreement without prior written approval of the other party.
V. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments/supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and
executed by the same parties who executed the original agreement, or their successors in
office.
VI. AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE. This agreement is effective upon execution by the
appropriate State officials pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05.
VII. CANCELLATION. This agreement may be canceled by the City or Mn/DOT at any time,
with or without cause, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Such
termination will not remove any unfulfilled financial obligations of the City as set forth in
this Agreement. In the event of such a cancellation the City will be entitled to reimbursement
for Mn/DOT-approved federally eligible expenses incurred for work satisfactorily performed
on the Project to the date of cancellation subject to the terns of this agreement.
Mn/DOT Agreement No. 92S'46)
N:\FedAid\Lyniiette\agreements\DCP\plymouthDCP Agency Agreement. doe 2/5/00 Page 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby.
1. CITY
City certifies that the appropriate person(s)
have executed the contract on behalf of the City as required
by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances
By:
Date:
By:
014yor
C -14r sn-a nes
2. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
Title: Director,
State Aid for Local Transportation
3. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
Date:
Mn/DOT Agreement No. K i46)
N:\FedAid\Lynnette\agreements\DCP\plymouth DCP Agency Agreement.doc 2/5/00 Page 8
FERNBROOK LANE
Project No. 1013
LOCATION
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND
CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
FERNBROOK LANE/TH 55
27TH AVENUE NORTH TO 34TH AVENUE NORTH
AGREEMENT NO. 90173
CITY PROJECT NO. 1013
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction of Fernbrook Lane/TH 55, from 27th
Avenue to 34t' Avenue, Agreement No. 90173 has been prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That said agreement in all things approved as conditioned
therein;
BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Stat. Sec. 161.36, the Commissioner of
Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Plymouth to accept as its agent, federal aid
funds which may be made available for eligible transportation related projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign
Agreement No. 90173, for Fernbrook Lane/TH 55, 27t' Ave. to 34th Ave., City Project No. 1013.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office,
and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
0AEngineeringTR07ECTS\2000 - 2009\1013\ResoMppr_Agree_1013_90173_ROW.DOC
Agenda Number: U-
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM:arry Jacobson, Finance Manager through Jean McGann, Administrative Services
Director
SUBJECT: Third Quarter 2006 Financial Statements
DATE: October 18, 2006 for the City Council meeting on October 24, 2006
1. PROPOSED ACTION
Accept Third Quarter 2006 Financial Statements
2. BACKGROUND
Unaudited Financial Statements are provided to the City Council on a quarterly basis to
review the current year operations. Revenue and expenditures are compared to the budget
and to prior year actual as a iiieans of measuring the current year operations.
3. DISCUSSION
Attached are the third quarter summary financial statements and narrative information for
the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds for Recreation and the HRA, and Proprietary
Funds which include both the Enterprise and Internal Service Funds.
Upon request, staff will provide additional detail for each of the funds outlined hi this report
or for any fund within the City or HRA.
General rund
The General Fund is where most City services to the public arc bud getcd. These services
include city administration, coininunity plaiming, park and recreation, public safety, street
maintenance and repair, development review and regulation, and snow removal.
Approximately 76% of the funding for these services is through property taxes. Other
sources of funding are perm is and licenses, charges for services, intergovernmental funding,
fines, forfeits, and interest investment earnings, and transfers fi-oni other funds within the
City for services provided. In reviewing these financial statements, there are several key
factors to consider.
The General Fund has had revenue collections totaling 59.1% of the 2006 budget
compared to 58.7%acid 2005 budgets.
Building permit revenue is up by 5.5% when compared to 2005 collections and is at
98% of 2006 budget. Building permit revenue is expected to exceed the budget.
Building permit activity is largely dependent upon additional coinit-iereial and
industrial pci-juits and the Tayrn Hills development. Weather will be a key factor in
determining how the activity proceeds between October and the end of the year. It is
not expected that many more residential hermits will be drawn this year.
Electrical permit revenue is at 56% of budget. The electrical permits activity began
in July and is expected to nteet or slightly exceed the budget.
Charges for scrvices revenue is at 87% of 2006 budget and 32% higher than 2005.
Engineering services to others are very strong this year as a result of the fees
received froth the Tayrn I lilts development.
v Court fines, which are for 8 months, puts reveziues a little ahead of budget and
slightly higher than in 2005.
y Property tax revenue is collectcd twice per year. In June the city received its
advance for the 1st half settlement and the balance of the first half payment is
received in July. 'Fhe 2"" half settlements will be received in December.
Expenditures in 2006 equal 71.6% of total budget compared to 74% at this time in
2005.
Expenditures for the first nine tnonths are in line with the previous year's
tures ana tele uuctget for ZuUa.
City of PIymouth
General Fund Reventie and Expenditures
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2006
Total Expendittires $ 17,087,598 71.65% $ 23,849,211 $ 16,652,781 74.03% $22,493,654
2
2006 2005
of of
Revenue 9/3012006 Budget Total Bud et 9/30/2005 Bud et Total Budget
Property Taxes 97234,828 50,88% 18,151,578 8,679,781 51.13% 16,975,807
Licenses and Permits 2,230,007 92,96% 2,399,000 2,120,771 89.43% 2,371,500
Intergovernmental
Revenue 699,169 86.38% 8095393 649,878 85.68% 758,493
Charges for Services 833,301 86.81% 959,900 627,276 74.61% 840,700
Fines and Forfeits 641,483 72.28% 887,500 602,19 l 67.78% 888,500
Internal Billings 10,466 11.89% 88,000 0.00% 88,000
Other Revenue 35,039 84.50% 41,465 28,679 57.36% 50,000
Investment Earnings 206,357 86.92% 237,400 173,916 73.91% 235,300
Transfers 206,230 75.00% 274,975 324,103 113.58% 285,354
Total Revenue 14,096,880 59.11% 23,849,211 13,206,595 58.71% 22,493,654
Expenditures and encumbrances
Administrative Services 1,993,155 69.86% S 2,853,267 1,905,776 69.54% 2,740,524
Comimntity Development 1,446,119 71.38% 2,025,933 1,390,772 72.99% 1,905;308
Parks and Recreation 3,217,059 75.76% 4,246,130 3,1 16,184 77.63% 4,014,156
Police 6,288,759 71.87% 8,750,438 6,021,735 74.74% 8,057,408
Fire 1,317,189 69.77% 1,887,969 1279,355 71.18% 1,797,371
Public Works 2,518,032 69.09% 3,644,455 2,609,748 74.32% 3,511,411
Public Service 307,285 69.68% 441,019 329,211 70.42% 467,476
Total Expendittires $ 17,087,598 71.65% $ 23,849,211 $ 16,652,781 74.03% $22,493,654
2
The following graphs compare 2006 and 2005 revenues and expenditures.
Revenue as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005
10,000,000 --- - --- - -_ - ---- - - -- ------ - ----- -- ---- -
9 000 000 :::.::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_::::::::::::-::_:::::::...-::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::-:::...........:::_::::::::::_
x::_::::::::::::::::_......::::::......::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::
8 000 000 - =__ - -- -- - -- _ -
00007,00$ -- °_= ---_ -- - - - _ 2006
000 0 -__ = _ =-_-=- - - - - = - _ - -_- =- - - 6 00 -- - -- - - - - - - 02005
o0a - _ _=--=---= - _ - -- - 54,000,000
000
4 ooa aoo - _= -=-=== == =- =--
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
TAW IENd
ArC) Sesergo dr ses/a er
pfhe / s dhs
rT0O erg fir POxesON, 0/) d Sen,- 11,01t
is Reye s s
hoe
7 000 000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000 000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
Expenditures as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005
1S
Coirjm4pdr
s d °
p/
ice Fre
rd`' h fy0 Ree
Se,
c
L%
p reohseh/
A4b//
c
i4b/,
c S
r
s
e/
ce
0200
020051
Tax Cancellations and Abatements
As of October 1, 2006, the City has 128 open tax petitions. Daring 2006, 29 tax court cases
were settled resulting in a valuation reductioai of $5.06M and a property tax loss estimated at
15,654.
The following schedule identifies tax cancellations and abatements for the past 10 years and
the court activity by tax year.
Parcels Closed by Tax Year
2006 General Fund End of Year Projections
The outlook for 2006 remains favorable, however, not as strong as prior years. Permit
revenues have begun to slow and continued weakness in the investment rate has had an
impact on revenues.
Revenues are expected to exceed budget by $358,000 along with expenditures being under
budget by $433,800 resulting in an estimated surplus of $791,800. It will take an estimated
715,000 to cover the increase needed to maintain the fuzed balance policy of 40% of
expenditures. The result will be a projected net surplus of $76,800.
4
of Original Estimated
of Parcels Original Reduced Value Value Property
Year Closed Value Value Reduction Reduction Tax Loss
1996 128 333,770,300 305,372,600 28,397,700 8.51% 153,163
1997 49 101,270,500 95,902,300 5,368,200 5.30% 28,953
1998 103 217,096,100 210,172,900 6,923,200 3.19% 31,580
1999 48 203,557,100 198,930,500 4,626,600 2.27% 19,632
2000 37 96,123,900 94,718,900 1,405,000 1.46% 5,101
2001 60 3372751,900 320,861,900 16,890,000 5.00% 59;407
2002 50 355,551,300 337,492,600 18,058,700 5.08% 55,089
2003 67 350,480,500 327,910,300 22,670,200 6.47% 68,628
2004 60 350,731;100 324,198,900 26,532,200 7,56% 84,342
2005 74 367,761,300 352,045,200 15,716,100 4.27% 54,677
10/2006 29 151,369,000 146,309,100 5,059,900 3.34% 15,654
Court Activity by Tax Year
New
Tax Parcels Parcels # Parcels Closed Parcels Open
Year Open 01-01-06 05-01-06 10-01-06 10-01-06
2003 7 4 3
2004 34 13 21
2005 52 5 47
2006 4 60 7 57
TOTAL 97 60 29 128
2006 General Fund End of Year Projections
The outlook for 2006 remains favorable, however, not as strong as prior years. Permit
revenues have begun to slow and continued weakness in the investment rate has had an
impact on revenues.
Revenues are expected to exceed budget by $358,000 along with expenditures being under
budget by $433,800 resulting in an estimated surplus of $791,800. It will take an estimated
715,000 to cover the increase needed to maintain the fuzed balance policy of 40% of
expenditures. The result will be a projected net surplus of $76,800.
4
The following items should be noted for 2006.
Revenues:
Property taxes will be as budgeted.
Permit revenue remains strong and is expected to exceed budget by $150,000.
Charges for services are at 86% of budget. Engineering services to others are
over the budgeted amount as of September 2006 by $119,000. It is expected that
these revenues will end the year approximately $100,000 over budget.
Intergovernmental revenue is ahead of budget, the police state aid received
exceeded the budget by $37,000, and other revenues should result in a variance
of $39,000.
Fines and forfeiture revenue is strong and is ahead of budget. Traffic
enforcement fines are expected to exceed the budget as well as liquor and
tobacco violations.
Interest earnings will be slightly better than budgeted.
Expenditures.
There will be sonic salary savings in the engineering and community
development departments; however, this is already anticipated in the salary
vacancy factor in the General Fund.
It is expected that there will be minor savings across all departments of the
General Fund.
Reserves:
The necessary reserves are expected to be maintained in the General Fund to
provide that the fund balance reserve of 40% is available to fund future cash flow
needs.
Projections for the year enrlin,- December 31, 2006:
Special Revenue Funrls
Special Revenue Funds are established to account for revenues derived from taxes and other
specific revenue sources. These resources are restricted by statute, City Charter, or ordinance to
finance specific City functions or activities.
Recreation — The Recreation Fund revenues are up slightly when compared to total revenue
collections as of September 2005. Total expenditures are less than last year. The fund is on track
for a positive year end.
Revenue will increase substantially in the 4th quarter when the second half property taxes
are received.
T11e transfers in during 2006 are from the Lawful Gambling fund to fund the Music in
Plymouth program.
6
City of Plyrnoutl
General Fund Revenue and Expenditures Projections
For he year ended December 31, 2006
2006 2006
of Of
Reveu re 9/30/2006 Bud get Total Bud et 2006 Estimate Bud et Variance
Property Taxes 9,234,828 50.88% 18,151,578 18,1517578 100.00%
Licenses and Permits 2,230,007 92.96% 2,399,000 2,599,000 108.34% 150,000
Intergovernmental
Revenue 699,169 86.38% 809,393 848,393 104.82% 39,000
Charges for Services 833,301 96.81% 959,900 1,059,900 110.42% 100,000
Fines and Forfeits 641,483 72.28% 887,500 927,500 104.51% 40,000
Internal Billings 10,466 11.89% 88,000 88,000 100.00%
4tbcr Revenue 35,039 84.50% 41,465 41,465 100.00%
hrvestment Earnings 206,357 86.92% 237,400 267;000 112.47% 29,000
Transfers 206,230 75M% 274,975 274.975 100.00%
Total Revenue 14,096,880 59.11% 23,849,211 24,257,811 101.71% 358,000
Expenditures
Administrative Services 1,993,155 69.86% 2,853,267 2,824,767 99.00% 28;500)
Coi3untu1ity Development 1,446,1 19 71.38% 2,025,933 2,005,733 99.00% 20,200)
Parks and Recreation 3,217,059 75.76% 4,246,130 4,203,730 99.00% 42,400)
Police 6,288,759 71.87% 8,750,438 8,6625938 99.00% 87,500)
Fire 1,317,189 69.77% 1,887,969 1,869,169 99.00% 18,800)
Public works 2,518,032 69.09% 3,644,455 3,608,055 99.00% 36,400)
Public Service 307,285 69.68% 441,019 241,019 54.65% 200,000)
Total Expenditures 17,087,598 71.65% 23,849,211 23,415,411 98.18%0 433,800)
Special Revenue Funrls
Special Revenue Funds are established to account for revenues derived from taxes and other
specific revenue sources. These resources are restricted by statute, City Charter, or ordinance to
finance specific City functions or activities.
Recreation — The Recreation Fund revenues are up slightly when compared to total revenue
collections as of September 2005. Total expenditures are less than last year. The fund is on track
for a positive year end.
Revenue will increase substantially in the 4th quarter when the second half property taxes
are received.
T11e transfers in during 2006 are from the Lawful Gambling fund to fund the Music in
Plymouth program.
6
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) - The HRA activities include:
HRA General Fund which is supported through the property tax levy and flows funds
through to the Plymouth Towne Square for senior housing subsidy and provides
other housing related programs
Housing Assistance and Community Development Block Grant fiords which are
essentially self supporting through federal program grant revenues. The Housing
Assistance fund receives funding through the federal Section 8 housing voucher
assistance program.
Communio) De},elopment Block Grant (CDBG)
The CDBG program revenues and expenses are higher than last year due to increased CDBG
program activity. All expenditures are reimbursed by HUD after they have been expended.
HRA - Housing Assistance
Total revenue for the Housing Assistance fund for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 is
416,428 less than 2005. This is due to changes in the timing of payments from HUD for the
various Section 8 vouchers programs. In addition, there has been a decrease in the number of port -
in housing vouchers. Revenues are expected to be on track with expenditures for the year.
HRA - General Fund
Total revenue for the HRA General Fund is less than last year at this time due to fewer housing loan
repayments being received this year. The reduction in spending when comparing 2006 to 2005 is
due to a 2005 transfer of $150,000 to finance construction of the Vicksburg Crossing Senior
Housing facility.
The HRA expects that addition funding from reserves will be used in 2007 to provide for roof and
attic renovations at Plymouth Towne Square in the amount of $254,000.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
7
City of Plymouth
Special Revenuc FLlnC15 Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Laded September 30, 2006
Fvpendilures and ene-umbrances
Personal Services $ 48,868 52.52% $
2006
Materials and supplies 165 31.43% 525
2005
280,178 106.43% 263,257
Internal Billings
of
75.00% 19,990
Total Expendilures $ 344,203
Of
376,820
913 012 0 0 6 Budget Total Budget 9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget
Recreation
Revenue
Propeit , Taxes 313,869 50.33% 623,569 315,529 50.60% 623,569
Charges for Services 966,914 103.33% 935,733 922,072 108.22% 852,053
Miscellanenus 890 876
Investmcnt Earnings 9,450 157.50% 6,000 7,979 132.98% 6,000
Transfers 9,750 75.00% 13,000
Tolal Revenue 1,300,873 82.42% 1,578,302 1,246,456 84.13% 1,4817622
Llpety&tures and encumbrances
Personal Services 687,215 81.48% 843,433 676,185 85.12% 794,389
Materials and Supplies 71,864 77.97% 92,170 73,371 86.17% 85,150
Contractual Services 470,161 84.61% 555,703 491,508 96.35% 510,137
Internal Billings 65,247 75.00% 86,996 68,959 75.00% 91,946
TransCers out 11,373 12,867
Total Expenditures 1;305,860 82.74% 1,578,302 1,322,890 89.29% 1,481,622
2006 2005
of of
9/30/22006 Budget Total BudgetF9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget]
Communti), Development Block Grant
Revenue
Property Taxes 11,332 48.83% 23,206 9,041 48.91% 18,484
Intergovernmental
Revenue 317,018 89.93% 352,534 301,352 82.11% 367,000
Investment Earnings 1,039 96.20% 1,080 197 7.71% 2,554
Total Revenue 329,389 87.41% 376,820 310,590 80.04% 388,038
Fvpendilures and ene-umbrances
Personal Services $ 48,868 52.52% $ 93;048
Materials and supplies 165 31.43% 525
Contractual Services 280,178 106.43% 263,257
Internal Billings 14,992 75.00% 19,990
Total Expendilures $ 344,203 91.34% $ 376,820
8
48,374 52.47% $ 92,190
268 51.05% 525
253,885 91.16% 278,514
12,607 75.00% 16,809
315,134 81.21% $ 388,038
City of Plymouth
Special Revenue Funds Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Bud et Total Budget] F913 012 0 0 5 Bud et Total Budget
HRA Housing Assistance
Revenue
Intergovernmental
Revenue $ 2,733,844 61.75% $ 4,427,245 $ 3,144,515 90.51% $ 3,474,392
Investment Earnings 15,821 105.47% 15,000 16,578 165.78% 10,000
Total Revenue $ 2,749,665 61.90% $ 4,442,245
Expe77ditures ar7d encumbrances
46 9.79%
Personal Services $ 146,918 71.75% $ 204,765
Materials and Supplies 12 2.40% 500
Contractual Services 2,507,840 60.07% 4,174,947
Capital Outlay
38,713
Internal Billings 29,636 75.00% 39,515
Budgeted Surplus 0.00% 22,518
Total EImndilures $ 2,684,406 60.43% $ 4,442,245
2006
of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget
HRA General Fund
ReVeMle
Property Taxes 254,822 49,28%517,091
174,334
Intergovernmental
46 9.79% 470
Revenue $ 8,668 NIA $
Contributions 17,464 58.21% 30,000
Miscellaneous 209 0.00°x°
Investment Earnings 38,713 193.31% 20,026
Use of Fund Balance
Total Revenue $ 319,876 56.40% $ 567,117
Expe77ditures and encumbrances
Personal Services $ 126,537 72.58% $ 174,334
Materials and Supplies 46 9.79% 470
Contractual Services 258,332 71.56% 361,003
Internal Billings 23,483 75.00% 31,310
Transfers
Total Expenclihrres $ 408,398 72.01% $ 567,117
3,161,093 90.72% $ 3,484,392
135;477 87.92% $ 154;090
27 5.40% 500
2,848,648 86.83% 3,280:534
11,976 82.59% 14,500
26,076 75.00% 34,768
3,022,204 86.74% $ 3,484,392
2005
of
9/30/2005 Bud et Total Budget
289,458 49,14% $ 589,072
25,000 NIA $
29,500 98.33% 30,000
186 0.00%
31,505 157.33% 20,025
N/A 150,000
375,649 47.60% $ 789,097
119,734 58.61% $ 204,297
80 16.33% 490
244,481 44.07% 554,797
22,135 75.00% 29,513
150,000 N/A
536,430 67.98% $ 789,097
Total HRA
Revenue $ 3,398,930 $ 5,386,182 $ 3,847,332
Expenditures $ 3,437,007 $ 5,386,182 $ 3,873,768
9
4,661,527
4,661,527
Enterli ise Fun(ls
Water Fund
The Water Fund accounts for the activities to produce and distribute water to City residents.
For the budget year 2006, the Water Fund charges for services revenue is estimated to be
4,160,000. Actual revenue of $2,799,232 has been billed for services through August and portions
of September service for parts of the City. This compares to 2005 revenue of $2,281,506.
Residential utilities are billed every two months.
r At September 30'
x', there were unbilled revenues for the months of August and September
for one area of the city which will be billed in October, and the month of September for the
other area of the City which will be billed in November. These unbilled revenues have not
been estinnated and included in the interim finwicial reports.
r The summer of 2006 was much drier than typical which caused an increase in the demand
for water. This resulted in more water being pumped and treated; this also increased the
amount of electricity and chemicals needed.
o Revenues will also be much higher than expected as a result of the additional volume of
water sold.
Investment earnings are less than 2005 due to fewer funds being on hand to invest as the
City iiiakes expenditures for construction projects. In 2006, capital project expenditures
amount to $1,665,000.
The interest rates have risen in 2006 which has interest earnings being higher than expected.
i The Water Fund budget was amended by the City Council on October 10, 2006. Those
changes have been included in this report. Items addressed at that tinge were well repairs,
operating expenses of the new water treatment plants, additional operating expenses based
on increased volumes and increased revenues based on water sales.
Expenditures in the ainount of $3,935,599 were made during the first 9 months of 2006.
The expenditures are 76.9% of the 2006 budget compared to 73.9% in 2005.
The projected actual year end Net Income (Loss) amount is expected to be as budgeted. The
unbilled utility revenues will catch up at year end.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
U1
Water
Revenue
Charges for Services
Connection Fees
Miscellaneous
Investment Earnings
Transfers
Tolal Revenue
Expendilm-es
Produclion -
Personai Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internai Billings
Debt Service
Production Ea:pendilvi-es
Distribitlion -
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billings
Capital Outlay
Transfers out
Distribulion Expenditures
Total Expenditures
A/ellncome (Goss)
City of Plymouth
Enterprise Favids Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006
of
913 012 0 0 6 Budget Total Budget
2,799,232 67.29% $ 4,160,000
4,260 50.12% 8,500
57,011 102.17% 55,800
299,824 75.09% 399,300
16,377 75.00% 21,836
2005
of
9/30/2005 Budget_ Total Budget
2,291,506 62.59% $ 3,645,200
5,982 66.47% 9,000
58,064 104.62% 55,500
352,230 121.96% 288,800
15,900 75.00% 21,200
3,176,704 68.38% $ 4,645,436 $ 2,713,682 67.51% $ 4,019,700
212,286 77.31% 274,600
215,695 92.18% 234,000
628,864 51.55% 1,220,000
54,610 75.00% 72,814
1,141,137 100.00% 1,341,137
182,463 73.14% $ 249,459
172,518 92.44%n 186,621
574,729 62.23% 923,500
51,865 75.00% 69,154
2,252,592 76.55% $ 2,942,551 $ 981,575 68.70% $ 1,428,734
1,025,835 77-72% 1,319,833
90,340 80.66% 112,000
392,756 76.86% 511,000
76,037 75.03% 301,344
5,320 106.40% 5,000
92,719 75.00% 123,625
1,683,007 77.46% $ 2,172,802
3,935,599 76.94% $ 5,115,353
758,895) $ (469,917)
935,619 73.19% $ 1,278,294
107,633 108.99% 98,760
350,579 76.96% 455,508
80,500 75.00°/o 107,333
97,013 75.00% 129,351
1,571,344 75.94% $ 2,069,246
2,552,919 72.98% $ 3,497,980
160,763 $ 521,720
Seiver Fund
The Sewer Fund budgeted charges for services revenue :for 2006 is $6,118,000. Revenue to date for
2006 is $3,961,848 compared to $3,772,460 for 2005.
Similar to the Water Fund, this revemie only includes billings through August and part of
September. Revenues arc expected to be in line with the budget as the revenues are billed
for the remaining months of the year.
i The expenditures are 79.5% of budget, compared to 79.5% last year.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services increased their rate by -approximately 6%
the first of this year, which was budgeted for.
The Sewer Fund is expected to meet the budgeted revenues for the year and remain with -in
the budgeted expenses.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Sewer
Revenue
Charges for Services
Connection Fees
Miscellaneous
Investment Earnings
Transfers
Toted Revenue
Expenditures
City of Plymouth
Enterprise Funds Revenue and Expenditures
Por the Nine Mouths Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget Total BUCI Ct 9/30/2005 Budget Tota Budget
3,961,848 64.76% $ 6,1 18,000
4,100 55.41% 7,400
3,691 61.52% 6,000
52,216 4S.41% 1 15,000
16,377 75,00% 21,836
4,038,232 64.42% 6,268,236
3,772,460 67.73% $ 5,570,000
5,936 84.80% 7,000
4,727 78.79% 6,000
78,892 71.72% 110,000
15.900 75.00% 21,200
3,877,915 67.86% $ 5,714,200
Personal Services S 691,478 66.11% 1,046,002 738,119 71.58% 1,031,213
Materials and Supplies 46,447 38.37% 121:050 58,697 48.07% 122,114
Contractual Services 3,802,898 84.25% 4,513,951 3,603,204 82.30% 4,378,096
Internal Billings 79,666 77.87% 102,303 78,839 75.00%a 105,118
Capital Outlay 17,466 106.50% 16,400
Transfers out 60,346 75.00% 80,461 60,338 75.00% 80,451
Total EImnditures 4,680,835 79.83% 5,863,767 4,556,663 79.48% 5,733,392
Aret Income (Loss) 642,603) 404,469 678,748) S (19,192)
12
Solid Waste Management Fund
The Solid Waste Fund has estimated revenue of $1,067,413 for 2006. As of September 30, 2006,
revenue totaled $841,916 compared to $746,932 in 2005. The monthly recycling'fee was decreased
in 2006 from $2.00 per month to $1.50. This year's revenue is higher primarily from the Herinepin
County grant money being received earlier than last year. Solid waste expenditures totaled
623,979 and $633,528 for 2006 and 2005 respectively.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Solid Waste Management
Revenue
Charges for Services
Grants From St/Cty/Region
Miscellaneous
investment Earnings
Tolcr1 Revenue
Ex19el7dilures
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billings
Capital Outlay
Transfers out
Total Expendilures
Nei Income (Loss)
City of Plymouth
Enterprise Funds Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget 9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget
247,268 59.01% $ 419,000
169,748 96.05% 176,725
375,046 88.94% 421,688
49,854 99.71% 50,000
841,916 78.87% $ 1,067,413
82,680 52.31% 158,043
10,748 25.09% 42,845
487,569 61.87% 788,095
11,590 60.41% 19,187
2,710 12.90% 21,000
28,682 75.00% 38,243
623,979 58.46% 1,067,413
217,937
13
331,023 59.43% $ 557,000
0.00% 218,000
376,299 174.21% 216,000
39,610 132.03% 30,000
746,932 73.16% $ 1,021,000
108,794 80.39% $ 135,336
8,711 21.97% 39,645
473,117 59.94% 789,305
15,059 75.00% 20,079
0.00% 20,000
27,847 75.00% 37,129
633,528 60.83% 1,041,494
113,404
Ice Center
The Ice Center operation has estimated revenue of $1,353,300 for 2006. As of September 30, 2006
it has received $899,132 compared to $934,931 for 2005. Expenditures for the year to date total
809,742 compared to $795,060 for the same period last year. This represents the second year of
operating with the 3`1 sheet of ice, which is performing in line with projections.
The Ice Center has seen a recent slow down in ice time rental. The Panda Figure Skating
Club has rented less ice time and is in the process of disbanding. This will impact firture
revenues.
In addition, the Wayzata Youth Hockey Association reduced its ice rental in the month of
August to provide time off for the youth hockey players.
Revenues will pick up as the busy ice rental season approaches its the fourth quarter.
Management is aware of the slow clown in revenues and is taking steps to reduce expenses
to meet the net budget expectations.
r The transfer in revenue was used to finance the additional construction in the lobby of
adding file to the area.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Ice Center
Revejnre
Charges for Services
Contributions
Miscellaneous
Investment Earnings
Transfers
Total Revenue
Expenditures
City of Plymouth
Enterprise Funds Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Bud -et 1 9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget
844,351 62.88% $ 1,342,800
2,711 542.20% 500
13,503 135.03% 10,000
38.567 NIA
913,933 72.38% $ 1,262,765
10,309
161 16.10% 1,000
10,528 116.98% 9,000
0.00% 19,909
8997132 66.44% $ 1,353,300 $ 934,931 72.33% $ 1,292,674
Personal Services 352,058 72.05% 488,604 355,754 72.99% 487,393
Materials and Supplies 56,758 68.40% 82,975 109,233 145.50% 75,075
Contractual Services 301,690 76.10% 396,428 271,160 74.52% 363,860
Internal Billings 30,289 75.00% 40,386 30,780 75.00% 41,040
Debt.Service 0.00% 146,966 0.00% 146,966
Capital Outlay 49,502 369.42% 13,400 7,471 38.12% 19,600
Transfers out 19,445 75.00% 25,927 20,662 75.00% 27,550
Total Expenditures 809,742 67.78% 1,194,686 795,060 68.45% 1,161,484
Net Income (Loss) 89,390 158,614 139,871 131,190
M,
Water Resources Fund
The Water Resources Fund is financed primarily through Surface Water Utility fees. The utility
fees are budgeted to generate $2,014,500 for the year. Revenue through September totaled
1,573,599 of which $1,268,611 is from utility fees. The fund had expenditures of $1,751,581 of
which $227,000 was for membership clues to the various Water Management Commissions,
149,000 for equipment, and $318,000 for projects. The remainder was primarily for operating
expenses and contractual services.
Revenues are expected to end the year in line with the budget. The fund continues to make progress
on capital project activity. It appears that all of the budgeted capital outlay may not be spent in
2006.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
City of Plymouth
Enterprise Funds ReVenrle and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget 9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget
Water Resources
Revenue
Charges for Services 1,268,611 62.97% 2,014,500 1,165,883 62.54% 1,864,350
Intergovernmental 86,172 43.66% 197,390 6,284 96.68% 6,500
Contributions 177,959
Miscellaneous 6,797 339.85% 2,000 4,870 243.50% 2,000
lnvestmentEarnings 34,060 82.57% 41,250 41;816 58.69% 71,247
Tolal Revenue 1,573,599 69.78% 2,255;140 1,218,853 62.70% 1,944,097
Expenditures
Operations
Personal Services 477,416 68.31% 698,894 463,361 71.06% 652,093
Materials and Supplies 86,344 78.85% 109,500 69,509 57.97/0 119,900
Contractual Services 645,672 55.95% 1,154,024 621,209 57.17% 1,096,665
Internal Billings 47,561 75.00% 63,415 45,618 75.00% 60,824
Capital Outlay 466,276 40.96% 1,138,500 470,951 42.35% 1,112,100
Transfers out 28.312 75.00% 37,749 27,487 75.00% 36,650
Total Expenditures 1,751,581 54.70% 3,202,082 1,698,135 55.35% 3,068,232
Nei Income (Goss) 177,982) 946,942) 479,282) 1,124,135)
15
Field House
The Field House operations has budgeted revenue for 2006 of $297,000, of which $242,351 has
been received during the first three quarters compared to $231,427 last year.
The field house rentals are up about $5,600 from last year.
expenditures totaled $136,220 for 2006 compared to $134,160 for last year.
An annual not income is budgeted for in flus fund to provide a reserve for the future
replacement needs of the facility.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Field House
Revenue
Charges for Services
Miscellaneous
Investment Earnings
Total Revenue
Expenditure
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billings
Capital Outlay
Depreciation
Transfers out
Total Expenditures
Net Income (Loss)
Enterprise I'Mids Revenue and Expenditures
66.96% $ 82,689
For the Niue Months Ended September 30, 2006
7,450
57,340 59.46%
2006
6,274
2005
8,365
6,714
of
3,000
31
of
2,2.40 _-
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget
64.25% $
9/30/2005 Budget Total Budnet
205,302 74.12% 277,000 $ 1997732 72.79% 274,400
26,955 158.56% 17,000 24,782 175.76% 14,100
10,094 336.47% 3,000 6,913 460.87% 1,500
242,351 81.60% 297,000 $ 231,427 79.80% 290,000
54,120 62.69% $ 86,325
3,272 43.92% 7,450
68,064 66.23% 102,773
5,899 74.99% 7,866
4,865 75.00% 6,487
136,220 64.59% $ 210,901
106,131 $ 86,099
16
55,370 66.96% $ 82,689
1,133 15.21% 7,450
57,340 59.46% 96,433
6,274 75.00% 8,365
6,714 223.80% 3,000
31
2,2.40 _- 74.99% 2,987
129,102 64.25% $ 200,924
102,325 $ 89,076
Internal Service Funds
Central Equipment Fund
The Central Equipment Fund accounts for services performed for other City departments. Revenue
to finance the fund is obtained from various City departments that utilize the City equipment, The
budgeted operating revenue for 2006 in the antount of $2,130,598 is obtained by charging the
individual operating departanents for their share of the rental costs. Expenditures through
September 30th amount to $1,324,299 compared with $2,101,545 for 2005. The decrease is
primarily due to the tinting of expenditures for equipment replacennelt.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Central Egnipment
Revenue
Billings to Departments
Contributions
Miscellaneous
Investment Earnings
Transfers
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billings
Capital Outlay
Transfers out
Total Exj7enditures
City of Plymouth
Internal Service Funds Revenue and Expenditures
Por the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 .
of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget
2005
of
9/30/2005 Budget Total Budget
1,461,451 75.00% 1;948,598 1,403,218 75,00% $ 1,870,958
513,550
81,632 57.23%
24,000
17,189
76,749 147.59% 52,000 88,769 87.99% 101,000
102,376 78.75% 130,000 98,687 75.91% 130,000
2,161,860
11,976
1,640,576 77.00% 2,130,598 1,626,650 77.39% $ 2,101,958
244,801 71.14% 344,117
393,718 76.67% 513,550
81,632 57.23% 142,650
17,189 75.00% 22,918
536,990 50.09% 1,072,000
49,969 75.00% 66,625
1,324,299 61.26% 2,161,860
Net lnconre (Loss) $ 316,277 $ (31,262)
17
254,582 76.23% $ 333,961
371,776 91.23% 407,500
59,711 42.29% 141,184
17,614 75.00% 23,485
1,297,318 109.82% 1,181,300
100,544 148.90% 67,525
2,101,545 97.52% 2,154,955
474,895) $ (52,997)
Risk Management Fund
The Rislc Management Fund administers the City's Property; Casualty and self-insured Worker's
Compensation insurance programs. Fund revenue is provided from charges to user funds and
interest earnings.
Revenue for the first three quarters of 2006 was $355,409 compared to 292,726 for 2005.
The increase is primarily because of increased charge backs to other funds for insurance
coverages.
Interest earnings are the primary source of revenue for this fund. Interest earnings have
strengthened in 2006.
Expenditures for the first nine months 2006 totaled $602,174 compared to $529,002 for
2005.
The City continues to see increased expenses in the areas of Workers Compensation and it is
expected that this trend will continue for the year.
y The fiend continues to be monitored to deterinine if increased charge backs will be needed in
future budget years based on our experience rates.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Rislc Managemcnt
Revenue
Other Revenues
Investment Earnings
Transfers
Total ReI10171W
E,Tjjenditu!'eS
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billitlgs
Transfers out
Total Expenditures
City of Plymouth
Internal Service Funds Revenue and Expenditi.ires
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget T 5 Bud et Total Bud et
54,094 71.18% $ 76,000
154,708 86-91% 178,000
196,607 75.00% 262,143
405,409 78.55% $ 516,143
42,430 72.07% $ 58,873
2,494 29.87% 8,350
546,070 88.23% 618,943
5,930 75.00% 7,907
5,250 75.00% 7,000
602,174 85.89% $ 701,073
31,122 44.14% $ 70,500
138,541 6927% 200,000
123,063 75.00% 164,084
292,726 67.36% $ 434,584
36,642 44.94% $ 81,540
2,564 19.27% 13,305
531,702 94.65% 561,782
9,844 75.00% 13,125
11,250 75.00% 15,000
592,002 86.45% $ 684,752
Net Income (LOSS) $ (196,765) $ (184,930) $ (299,276) $ (250,168)
0
Design Engineering Fund
This Fund serves to provide engineering services for the City's street reconstruction program. Fund
revenue is provided by charges to other funds, Revenue for the first three quarters totaled $189,314
compared to $216,831 in 2005. Expenditures through September 30 amount to $242,083 compared
with $250,123 for 2005. Revenue will pick up in the fourth quarter as the fund earns its final
revenues form the 2006 street reconstruction projects. The field is expected to meet budgeted
revenues and expenses.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
City of Plymouth
Internal Service Funds ReN,elllle and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget ToDBud 9/30/2005 Budget Total Bud et
Design Engineering
201,627 73.86% $ 272,968
Revenue
1,902 105.67% 1,800
Billings to Departments 177,801 56.25% $ 316,090
Investment Earnings 2,513 251.30% 1,000
Transfers 9,000 75.00% 12,000
Total Revenue 189,314 57.53% $ 329,090
Expenditures
Personal Services 201,627 73.86% $ 272,968
Materials and Supplies 1,902 105.67% 1,800
Contractual Services 5,962 54.87% 10,866
Internal Billings 32,592 75.00% 43,456
Transfers out
Tolal Ex.pen&tures 242,083 73.56% $ 329,090
Net Income (Loss) $ (52,769) $
19
204,458 56.25% $ 363,482
1,123 224.60% 500
11,250 75.00% 15,000
216,831 57.21% $ 378,982
166,970 62.79% $ 265,930
1,005 55.83% 1,800
5,731 61,21% 9.363
34,211 75.00% 45,614
42,206 75.00% 56,275
250,123 66.00% $ 378,982
33,292) $
Employee Benefits Fund
This Fund serves as the rccording fund for all employee fringe benefits. Fund revenue is provided
by charges to other funds and interest earnings. Revenue for the first tllrce quarters totaled
1,798,537 compared to $1,078,763 in 2005. Expenditures through September amount to
1,822,151 compared with $1,753,014 for 2005. Revenue and expenditures of this fiend are
typically very close to being equal.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Cniplo}gee Benefits
Revenue
Charges for Services
Billings to Departments
lnvestrneiit Earnings
Transfers
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials & SupPlies
Contractual Services
Total Expenditures
City of Plymouth
Intenial Service Finds Revenue azul Expernditrres
For the Nine Months Dided September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % of
9/30/2006 Budget Total Budget I 9/30/2005 Budget "Total 13Udgct
6,079 65.37% 9,300
1,686,146 61.74% 2,731,000
71,062 102.99% 69,000
35,250 75.00% 47,000
1,798,537 6297% 2,856,300
45 0.03% $ 143,200
80
1,822,026 67.16% 2,713,100
1,822,151 63.79% $ 2,856,300
3,221 35.01% 9,200
1,044,854 41.47% 2;519,500
18.938 27.37% 69 700
11,750 21.36% 55,000
1,078,763 40,66% 2,652,900
0.00% $ 140,000
10
1.753,004 69.76% 2,512,900
1,753,014 66.08% $ 2,652,900
Net Incoi)ze (Lass) $ (23,614) $ - $ (674,251)
20
Information Technology Fund
This Fund provides the equipment, soffivare and support for the City's Information Technology
infrastructure. Revenue to the Fund is generated by user charges to departments based upon
individual departmental allocations. Revenue for the first three quarters totaled $1,465,536 and
expenditures totaled $1,179,169. Expenditures are expected to remain within the budget amounts at
year end.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
City of Plymouth
Internal Service Funds Revenue and Expenditures
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
Of % Of
9/30/2006 Budget 9/30/2005 BudUct Total Bud et
lnfornration Technology Services
Revenue
Charges for Services $ 34,080 -
Billings to Departments 1,315,141 75.26% 1,747,370 1,270,900 74.87% 1,697,371
Miscellaneous 465 20.22% 2,300 851 37.00% 2,300
Investment Earnings 63,743 159.36% 40,000 43,851 125.29% 35,000
Transfers 52,107 75.96% 68,601 86,457 83,96% 102;976
Tolal Revenue 1,465,536 78.87% 1,858,271 1,402,059 76.30% 1,837,647
Exp enditures
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
eternal Billings
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
487,553 74.27% 656,425
185,200 159.38% 116,200
326,668 61.21% 533,693
31,884 75,00% 42,512
147,864 57.28% 258,130
1,179,169 73.38% 1,606,960
442,462 67.50% $ 655,476
89,290 84.08% 106,200
367,759 72.49% 507,309
30,264 75.00% 40,352
5,432 21.30%a 25,500
935,207 70.06% $ 1,334,837
Nei Income (Loss) $ 286,367 $ 251,311 $ 466,852 $ 502,810
21
Facilities Management Fund
This Fund provides the services for all City facilities, Facility rnaintenance and repairs and
replacement costs are provided frorn charges to City operating departments for use of the facilities.
Revenue for the first three quarters totaled $866,448 compared to $823,034 for 2005. Expenditures
totaled $713,271 compared to $603,597 last year. The increase is mainly for the costs associated
with repair's and replacements at public works and the fire stations, and additional services and
expenses related to the recently completed public safety and city hall lobby projects.
The following schedule outlines both revenue and expenditures as comparing 3rd quarter 2006 to
3rd quarter 2005.
Public Facilities
Rei?enzte
Billings to Departments
Investment L:aruings
Transfers
Total Revenue
Expenditures
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies
Contractual Services
Internal Billings
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
City of Plymouth
Internal Service Funds Revenue and Expenditures
Forihe Nitre Months Ended September 30, 2006
2006 2005
of % ofF9/30/2006 Budget Tota] T3ud e[ 9/30/2005 Budget Total Bud et
784,125 75.12% $ 1,043,841
66,873 107.86% 62,000
15,450 75.00% 20,600
866,448 76.92% $ 1,126,441
104,444 70.87% 147,367
36,323 79.04% 45,700
467,765 76.07% 614,897
12,490 75.00% 16,653
92,449 45.30% 204,100
713,271 69.34% 1,028,717
751,502 75.00% $ 1,002,002
56,082 93.47% 60,000
15,450 75.00% 20,600
823,034 76.02% $ 1,082,602
104,155 75.51% $ 137,928
26,274 56.02% 46,900
318,995 5731% 556,587
13,525 75.00% 18,034
140,649 66.41% 211,800
603,597 62.15% $ 971,249
Net Incozzze (Loss) $ 153,177 $ 97,724 $ 219,437 $ 1 1 1,353
4. Conclusion
Based on the results of operations during the 3rd quarter of 2006, it appears that the General and
Special Revenue funds are in line with budget projections. The operations of the City Enterprise
Funds and Internal Services Funds are on track to perform as expected for 2006. As operations are
completed for the 4"' quarter, staff will provide additional information and analysis.
22
Agenda Number: 7 6
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: La 'e Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Ji ax s, Housing Programs Manager through Jean McGann,
dministrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Dove Capital, LLC — Request for Tax Increment Financing for Plymouth
Crossroads Station Redevelopment Project.
DATE: October 16, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
1. PROPOSED ACTION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing and approve the attached resolution establishing
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 and Tax Increment Financing
Plan for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota.
2. BACKGROUND:
The HRA has received a request to create a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Redevelopment
District to assist with the redevelopment of the property located south of Highway 55 and
east of Cottonwood Lane. The current site area includes the parcels containing the existing
Plymouth Shopping Center building and the former Mr. Gas building. Under the plan, the
buildings would be removed and the parcels would be redeveloped. The site area also
includes two vacant parcels lying directly east of the shopping center (see attached location
map).
The developer, Dove Capital LLC., is planning to develop a retail center consisting of office
and retail space including a restaurant, bank and gas station. As part of the overall
redevelopment the developer will address long standing issues with traffic and drainage
surrounding the site.
On April 19, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the overall
development and made the recommendation that the Council approve this development. On
May 9, 2006, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for this development. In
addition, the Planning Commission reviewed this TIF Plan for conformity to the City's
Comprehensive Plan on September 20, 2006, and confirmed that the TIF Plan is in
compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
At the October 19, 2006 HRA meeting, the Board approved the TIF Plan (attached) for the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Tax Increment Finance (Redevelopment) District
1-3 and recommended that the City Council approve the establishment of TIF District 1-3.
This is not the first time a developer has considered the site as a redevelopment project. In
2000, a developer proposed a redevelopment of this site along with an additional area to the
south. This project did not move forward because of issues relating to acquisition of the site
and other project related issues. The current developer had proposed an alternative scenario
as well that did not proceed. In both cases the City indicated that this site is a good candidate
for redevelopment.
3. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING:
Tax increment financing is a tool available to local units of government whereby they may
use the increased property taxes generated by new real estate development within a tax
increment financing district to pay for certain eligible costs. The increased value and the
taxes that result from the new development are "captured" by the local government and are
used to pay for the eligible costs instead of being distributed to the city, county, school
district and other taxing jurisdictions as typically would occur when property taxes are paid.
Once the costs of the improvements have been paid, the full property tax is again distributed
to all of the taxing jurisdictions.
The Tax Increment Financing Plan establishes the boundaries of the TIF district, the
expenditures and financing limitation, and starts the process for collection of tax increment
revenue by the City.
The Development Agreement does not require council approval. It has already been
approved by the HRA Board and is being provided as a source of reference. This agreement
further defines and regulates the use of the tax increment generated by the district. It
includes the form of the pay-as-you-go note, reporting requirements, default and other
general conditions that must be met. The Development Agreement also contains an
assessment agreement that will establish the minimum assessed value for the property which
will minimize the risk to the HRA and the City.
The TIF statute allows the county and the school district to comment on the creation of this
district. Staff has included these comments in the attachments. It should be noted that the
county is not in favor of the establishment of this TIF district. The following paragraph is
taken from their letter dated 10/13/06.
This TIF District proposal does not appear to satisfy the Hennepin County
Board of Commissiners' preferences for use of tax increment, as identified in
Hennepin County Resolution 92-10-017R1, adopted October 27, 1992, because
the TIF Plan does not identify it as being for a renewal or renovation project of
greatest need orfor a lower income housing project of demonstrated need. "
In addition, the County states in this letter that the City does not support including additional
land to support expenditures on future county road improvements. Staff informed the County
that the entire tax increment being generated by this district was already being allocated to
2
the identified improvements in the TIF Plan. There simply were no additional funds
available at this time for county road improvements that may occur in the future.
4. PROJECT FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
The estimated total development cost for this project is $20,901,860, which includes the
acquisition of the site, construction costs and soft costs. The City's Assessing Department
has estimated the completed taxable value will be just over $13 million dollars.
The TIF application submitted for the project indicates a request for assistance in the amount
of $2,548,031. However, the preliminary figures provided by Springsted Inc., indicate that
the maximum amount available for this TIF district will be $1,687,000. The table below
provides a breakdown of improvements and their associated costs that would be paid for by
the TIF assistance. Further information regarding these cost are attached in a memo from the
City Engineer.
Improvement Estimated Cost
Trunk Highway 55 Service Road 548,100
Trunk Highway 55/West Medicine Lake
Drive Intersection
196,000
Trunk Highway 55/County Road 73/South
Shore Drive Intersection
364,000
Trunk Highway 55 Culvert Replacement 335,800
Cottonwood Lane Water Main 94,800
Building Demolition 48,300
Soil Correction 180,000
Total 1,767,000
The TIF (Redevelopment) district will have the following parameters:
The amount of TIF assistance for the improvements will not exceed $1,687,000.
The interest rate will be fixed at 6%.
The TIF assistance will be in the form of a pay-as-you-go note, which means the
developer takes more of the risk as opposed to the HRA/City issuing bonds up front.
The developer will enter into a minimum assessment agreement with the City.
The applicant will pay all of the HRA's costs for preparation of the TIF plan and creation
of the TIF District.
The City's Engineering Department has submitted an application to MnDOT requesting
assistance through the State's Municipal Agreement Program. If we are successful with this
request it will be used to assist with the pending improvements to this project.
6. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS:
In order for the City to consider establishing a Tax Increment Financing District certain
criteria must be met. In early September, SEH conducted an independent blight analysis and
determined the buildings are considered "blighted" under the TIF statute. Additionally, the
3
proposed TIF district meets the "coverage" requirements for existing improvements to the
parcels.
Another requirement that must be met is the "but for" test. Simply stated this test means that
without the use of TIF this project would not occur. The developer submitted a letter to the
City indicating their need for public assistance (see attached Dove Capital letter). Their letter
provided information relating to the challenges on the site and they concluded they would not
be able to carry out the project without the assistance of Tax Increment Financing.
In addition, the developer was requested to supply Springsted with comprehensive project
financial information so it could be evaluated to determine whether there was a need for the
public assistance. Springsted's evaluation concluded that it appears the assistance is
warranted to achieve the City's goals on this site (see attached Springsted letter).
7. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The creation of the TIF district does not in and of itself create a financial impact to the HRA
or the City. The "new" taxes that are generated as a result of the improvements are captured
and will be used to pay the developer for the pay-as-you-go note. If the TIF district is not
established, these funds would be distributed to the taxing jurisdictions just like any other
property tax. However, the project would not be created if the assistance of TIF is not
provided. Additionally, the existing taxes on the property will still continue to be collected
and distributed to the taxing jurisdictions.
8. RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing and approve the attached resolution establishing
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 and Tax Increment Financing
Plan for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota.
9. ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. HRA Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Housing District 1-3)
3. Development Agreement
4. City Engineer's Cost review memo
5. Letter from Dove Capital (Developer)
6. Letter from Springsted, Inc.,
7. Letters from Wayzata School District, Hennepin County
8. Resolution establishing the Tax Increment Financing District and approving the Tax
Increment Financing Plan
9
A A
A A A A A
A A A A A A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A TqJJ
AAAAAAAAAAAA I y GAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA NWq Y 55AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA ----AAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA .
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA 6 6
AAAAAAAAAAAA .....
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAA
A AA A AAAAAAAA ....
A A A A AAAAAAAA
A AAA AAAAAAAA
A A A A A A A A A A A
A AA A AAAAAAAA
AAA AAAAAAAA
A AA A A A A A A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A
A AAA A A A A A A A A .
A A A A A A A A A A A A .
AAAA
A A A -
AAAAAA
AAA A A AAAAAA
AAAA.
A AAAA A
AAAA...
A AAAAAA
A A A A A A A A A A A
q` AAAA - - A AAAAA
li C
fl;_q:..:
A A A AAAAAAAA AAA A
c, AAAA...
CJ A A A A A A A
A
L,AIT1:
A A
A A
A A
A A
A
Legend
Location Map: C, Comercial
HRA TIF District 1-3 ® CC, City Center
Plymouth Crossroads Station ® Co, Commercial Office
9cl
IP, Planned Industiral
LA -1, Living Area 1
LA -2, Living Area 2
ity of Plymouth LA -3, Living Area E
LA -4, Living Area 4
250 125 0 250 500 750 1,000 LAR, Living Area Rural
Feet ® P -I, PublictSemi-Public/Institutional
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Plymouth
Tax Increment Financing Plan
for
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment)
District No. 1-3
within Redevelopment Project Area No.1
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project)
Dated: October 12, 2006
Approved:
Prepared by:
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
651)223-3000
WWW. SPRINGSTED. COM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page(s)
A. Definitions..............................................................................................................................................................1
B. Statutory Authorization..........................................................................................................................................1
C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose.................................................................................................................1
D. Statement of Objectives........................................................................................................................................1
E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District......................................................1
F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule.............................................................................................3
G. Property to be Included in the TIF District..............................................................................................................3
H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District.............................................................................................................5
I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District..........................................................................5
J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing...................................................................................................5
K. Estimated Public Costs..........................................................................................................................................7
L. Estimated Sources of Revenue.............................................................................................................................7
M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness..........................................................................................................8
N. Original Net Tax Capacity......................................................................................................................................8
O. Original Tax Capacity Rate....................................................................................................................................8
P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment.....................................................9
Q. Use of Tax Increment...................................................................................................................:........................9
R. Excess Tax Increment.........................................................................................................................................10
S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule...................................................................................................10
T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses................................................................................................................11
U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule...............................................................11
V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions..................................................................................................11
W. Prior Planned Improvements..............................:................................................................................................12
X. Development Agreements...................................................................................................................................12
Y. Assessment Agreements.....................................................................................................................................12
Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan ......................
AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan............................................................................................13
AB. Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements................................................................................................14
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District..........................................................................................EXHIBIT I
AssumptionsReport............................................................................................................................... EXHIBIT II
ProjectedTax Increment Report............................................................................................................ EXHIBIT III
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report........................................................................EXHIBIT IV
Market Value Analysis Report................................................................................................................EXHIBIT V
Projected Pay As You Go Note Report..................................................................................................EXHIBIT VI
Developer But -For Statement...............................................................................................................EXHIBIT VII
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Section A Definitions
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates
a different meaning:
Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth.
City" means the City of Plymouth, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality",
City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the "Governing Body"
County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Redevelopment Project" means Redevelopment Project Area No.1 in the City, which is described in the
corresponding Redevelopment Plan.
Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Project Area" means the geographic area of the Redevelopment Project Area,
School District" means Independent School District No, 284, Minnesota.
State" means the State of Minnesota.
TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive.
TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3.
TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document).
Section B Statutory Authorization
See Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose
See Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Section D Statement of Objectives
See Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a
Redevelopment District
Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions
exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district:
1) parcels comprising at least 70% of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved
or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings, not including
SPRINGSTED Pagel
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed
occupied' if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel
parking lots; or other similar structures.
2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail
storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad right-of-ways; or
3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section
115C,02, subdivision 15, if the tank facilities:
i) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons;
ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; and
iii) have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used.
For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions
listed above, as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole.
The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in (1) above and the
findings in Section J. The supporting facts and documentation for this determination will be retained by the City for
the life of the TIF District and are available to the public upon request.
Under the TIF Act, "structurally substandard' is defined as buildings containing defects or deficiencies in structural
elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection (including egress), layout and condition
of interior partitions, or similar factors. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with
the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than
15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type.
A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain
access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence
includes recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of
deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior
inspection was not conducted must be made and retained, A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally
substandard building if the following conditions are met:
1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for
certification of the parcel as part of the district;
2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the authority, or was
performed by a developer under a development agreement with the authority,
3) the authority found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was
structurally substandard and that the authority intended to include the parcel in the TIF district, and
4) the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon
filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district.
In the case of (4) above, the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of
a) the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market
value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s)
for the current year.
At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting
conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring
properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or
contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development,
SPRINGSTED Page 2
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation
necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The
allocated administrative expenses of the authority may be included in the qualifying costs. [M.S. Section 469,176,
Subdivision 40)]
Section F Duration of the TIF District
Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt by the Authority of the first tax
increment. Modifications of this plan (see Section Z) shall not extend these limitations.
The Authority reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law
projected to be through the year 2034, if inflationary increment is received in 2008 the final year of the district will be
2033), and anticipates that the TIF District will be active for the maximum duration allowed (see Section P), however
the Authority will decertify the TIF District as early as possible should the projected increment be received in a shorter
time period than originally projected. All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified
shall be paid to the Authority.
Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District
The TIF District is an approximate 18.26 acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the
location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are
described below:
Parcel ID Number Legal Description
36-118-22-23-0006 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
11021 State Hwy No 55 Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range 22,
Plymouth, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the
southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No,
55 (as monumented); and Northeasterly of the
northeasterly line of Old County Road No. 6 (also being
the northeasterly line of Tract B, RLS No. 1676)
36-118-22-23-0006 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
11021 State Hwy No 55 Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 22,
Plymouth, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the
northeasterly line of Old County Road No. 6 and
Northwesterly of Naumann Cartway (per plat of
SCHIEBE'S HIGHLAND VIEW ADDITION) and
Southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as
monumented).
36-118-22-23-0007 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
11015 State Hwy No 55 Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 22,
Plymouth, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, and
described as beginning at the intersection of the west
line of said Section 36 with the southwesterly line of Old
County Road No. 6; thence Southerly along the west line
of said Section 36, a distance of 313.50 feet; thence
Northeasterly to a point on the southwesterly line of Old
County Road No. 6, distant 173,00 feet southeasterly of
the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a distance
of 173,00 feet to the point of beginning,
SPRINGSTED Page 3
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
36-118-22-23-0008 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest
11013 State Hwy No 55 Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 22,
Plymouth, MN Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, and
described as commencing at the southwest corner of the
Northwest Quarter of said Section 36; thence Northerly
along the west line of said Section 36, a distance 210.30
feet to the point of beginning; thence deflect to the right
at an angle of 90 degrees 30 minutes, a distance of 9.00
feet; thence Northeasterly 358.30 to a point on the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, distant
248.00 feet southeasterly of the intersection of said
southwesterly line with the west line of said Section 36 ;
thence Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old
County Road No. 6, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence
Southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Section
36, distant 122.10 feet Northerly of the point of
beginning; thence Southerly 122.10 feet along the west
line of said Section 36 to the point of beginning.
35-118-22-14-0026 Tracts A and B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
11255 State Hwy No 55 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Plymouth, MN Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of
Title No. 831051)
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at
the northwest corner of Tract B, RLS No. 1676,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 8 degrees
06 minutes 05 seconds West on a assumed bearing
along the west line of said Tract B, a distance of 107.68
feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 05 seconds
West along the northeasterly line of Tract A, said RLS
No. 1676, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 8
degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds East along said
northeasterly line , a distance of 135.17 feet to the
southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No.
55 (as monumented); thence South 74 degrees 06
minutes 45 seconds East along said right-of-way line, a
distance of 97.99 feet to the point of beginning.
Vacated Highway R/W That part of the right-of-way of State Trunk Highway No.
Plymouth, MN 55 adjoining the above described (Parcels # 1,2,3,4 and
5) lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and
70.00 feet southwesterly (as measured at right angles
to) the centerline of eastbound lanes of State Trunk
Highway No. 55.
The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent
to the property described above.
SPRINGSTED Page 4
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District
The Authority does not plan to acquire any property located within the TIF District.
Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District
The proposed project includes the redevelopment of the existing 18 -acre site into Plymouth Crossroads Station which
will contain approximately 62,567 square feet of retail. The existing retail space has been found to be substandard
and the developer's proposal includes the demolition of the existing substandard buildings and construction of seven
new commercial structures. The proposed new development will consist of four retail buildings, a restaurant, a
combined bank and office, and gas station with an estimated total market value of $13,465,030. The Authority
intends to use tax increment to assist the developer with the following costs associated with redevelopment of the
site:
Installation of a service road (backage road) along the south side of the redevelopment area. The backage
road will serve as a connector between West Medicine Lake Drive and CSAH 73 and will also connect to an
existing service road on the west end of the site.
Intersection improvements at the TH 55 / West Medicine Lake Drive intersection, The existing traffic signal
will also be modified.
Intersection improvements at the TH 55 / South Shore Drive intersection. The existing traffic signal will also
be modified.
Replacement of an existing drainage culvert under TH 55 to aid in correcting chronic drainage problems in
the area.
Installation of a water main loop in Cottonwood Lane to improve water system pressure and flow for the
existing neighborhood south and west of the site.
Demolition of existing buildings within public right of way.
Correction of unsuitable soils for the proposed public improvements,
The project is expected to be fully constructed by December, 312008 and be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as
of January 2, 2009 for taxes payable in 2010.
At the time this document was prepared there were no signed development contracts with regards to the above
described development.
Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing
In establishing the TIF District, the Authority makes the following findings:
1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district;
A Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment, dated September 5, 2006, was completed by
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc (SEH) for the proposed district consisting of five parcels
comprised of the following types of improvements: 3 business structures located on 2
parcels including parking improvements, 2 unimproved parcels, and occupied road Rights
of Way. Interior and exterior assessments were completed for two of the buildings on
parcel 35-118-22-14-0026 and an exterior assessment was completed for the building on parcel
36-118-22-23-0006. Please note an interior assessment was not able to be performed for
the building (known as Mr. Gas) on parcel 36-118-22-23-0006. The report found that 3 of
the 5 properties would meet the coverage test with 94.32% area coverage, exceeding the
70% area coverage requirement. In addition 100% of the buildings — 3 of 3 buildings -
were found to be "structurally substandard" when considering code deficiencies and other
deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance,
SPRINGSTED Page 5
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
which exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of the buildings, not
including outbuildings, must be found "structurally substandard". The evaluation of
properties within the proposed Redevelopment District provide results that would qualify
the district eligible under the statutory criteria and formulas for a Redevelopment Tax
Increment Financing District.
2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased
market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum
duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan;
The proposed development is a redevelopment project consisting of the demolition of existing
substandard buildings and the construction of approximately 62,567 square feet in the City of
Plymouth. The Authority has reviewed project information submitted by the proposed developer,
showing that the cost of redevelopment of the site, including demolition and site improvements,
makes the proposed development infeasible.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use
of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for
the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: Without the improvements the
City has no reason to expect that significant development would occur without assistance similar to
that provided in this plan. If we are to agree with the assumption that the proposed project
maximizes the site density, then it is reasonable to assume that no development will occur that will
create a greater market value than that which is proposed in this project, Therefore, the City
concludes as follows: The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably
be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future.
a. The Authority's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase
without the use of tax increment financing is $0, and a fair amount attributable to
appreciation in land value.
b. If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the
District, the total increase in market value would be approximately $19,416,763, assuming
a total completed market value of $13,465,030 as of December 31, 2008 with a 2%
compounded annual market value inflator over 25 years.
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $1,912,911 (See Exhibit V),
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the
Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase
greater than $17,503,852 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax
increment assistance.
The comparative analysis outlined above of the estimated market values both with and
without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments assumes no
development will occur on the site because of the high costs associated with
redevelopment of the site. The existing structures were found to be substandard and will
need to be removed and the site cleared for new development. We assume the estimated
market value without creation of the district would only increase at most by an incremental
inflationary amount. The increase in estimated market value of the proposed development
SPRINGSTED Page 6
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the
establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments.
3) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a
whole; and
The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned,
and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning Commission and will generally
complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan.
4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise.
The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are
necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within
the Project Area,
5) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(b) (see method (b) in Section P).
Section K Estimated Public Costs
The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax
increments of the TIF District.
Road Improvements 1,028,100
Site Improvements/Soil Correction/Demolition 228,300
Installation of public utilities 430,600
Loan Principal Payments 0
Loan Interest Payments 2,188,103
Capitalized Interest 261,223
Administrative Expenses 459,593
Pooling — Affordable Housing 0
Total 4,595,918
The public costs listed above are estimates and may be modified as necessary, In any event, the principal amount of
the total estimated public costs will not exceed $1,687,000, as included in Exhibit VI.
Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue
Tax Increment revenue $4,595,918
Interest on invested funds 0
Grants 0
Other 0
Total 4,595,918
The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through pay-as-you-go
financing. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes (90%) will be
distributed to the developer/owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred in accordance with the Pay -Go Note
see Section K and Exhibit VI).
SPRINGSTED Page 7
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness
The Authority does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District.
Section N Original Net Tax Capacity
The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, This value will be equal to the total net
tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified
between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts
certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year.
The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2006, for taxes payable in 2007, is
2,544,100 and current net tax capacity is $47,507. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent
reclassification of property, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will be approximately
49,074,
Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as
a result of:
1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property;
2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District;
3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or
4) changes in property classification rates,
Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate
The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all
local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the
original net tax capacity.
In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the
sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District.
At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for
taxes levied in 2006 and payable in 2007, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County
Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax
increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2005 and payable in 2006, is
94.081% as shown below.
Taxing Jurisdiction
City of Plymouth
Hennepin County
ISD # 284
Other
2005/2006
Local Tax Rate
23.746
41.016
21.893
7.426
Total 94.081%
SPRINGSTED Page 8
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and
Projected Tax Increment
The Authority anticipates that the project will be completed by December 31, 2008, creating a total tax capacity for
TIF District No. 1-3 of $272,321 as of January 2, 2009. The captured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be
143,268 and the first full year of tax increment is estimated to be $134,788 payable in 2010. A complete schedule of
estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit III.
The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that commercial -industrial class rates remain at 1.5% for the first
150,000 of value and 2.0% for all value above $150,000, and assume 2% annual increase in market values.
Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the
extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall certify to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The Authority
may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It the Authority's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits
contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the
anticipated life of the TIF District.
Section Q Use of Tax Increment
Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay
such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of
financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state, Exhibit III shows the
projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District.
The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for
any of the following purposes:
1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative
costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T);
2) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M,S.
Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a; or
3) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School
District.
Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City.
Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a
building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any
other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a
facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or
renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to
repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject
to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the
SPRINGSTED Page 9
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate
subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the
developer or beneficiary.
Section R Excess Tax Increment
In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated
public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to:
1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds of other TIF Districts;
2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof;
3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of tax increment bonds of other TIF
Districts; or
4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School
District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any
excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution.
Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the. Five Year Rule
At least 75% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district to finance
the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 25% of the tax
increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area, except for
pooling to pay debt service on outstanding obligations of other TIF Districts. All administrative expenses are
considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District, Tax increments are considered to have been spent within
the TIF District if such amounts are:
1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after
certification of the district;
2) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities
performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the
district; or
3) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within five years
from certification of the district.
Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 75% of the tax increments must be used
to make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When sufficient money has been set aside to pay
for such contractual obligations, the TIF District'must be decertified.
The Authority does not anticipate that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (except for allowable
administrative expenses and for pooling to pay debt service on outstanding obligations of other TIF Districts).
SPRINGSTED Page 10
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than;
1) amounts paid for the purchase of land;
2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly
connected with the physical development of the real property in the project;
3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the
project;
4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to section 469.178, if any; or
5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance
costs described in clause (1) to (3).
Administrative expenses include city staff time used to establish and administer the TIF District, the amounts paid for
services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual
costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District, Tax increments may be used to pay administrative
expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan
or (b) 10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project. For this TIF District the Authority elects to limit
administrative expenses to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b)
10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project.
Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule
If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified
improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall
be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified
improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial
reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of
the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District.
If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of
the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel
shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as
most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the
TIF District.
Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that
there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed
development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public
assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the
development therein becomes part of the general tax base.
The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below.
SPRINGSTED Page 11
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to be
4,612,521.
2. To the extent the project in 1-3 generates any public cost impacts on city -provided services such as police
and fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to the district, such costs will be
levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion captured by the District.
3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies,
assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is
estimated to be $1,073,351.
The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies,
assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is
estimated to be $2,010,897.
5. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to city levies, assuming
the city's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is estimated to be
1,164,199.
6. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to
determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district,
Section W Prior Planned Improvements
Various permits have been issued for a property within the TIF District within the last 18 months,
The Authority will accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with
a listing of such properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan, The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the
TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. However the
Authority does not believe the issuance of the permits will have a significant impact on the original net tax capacity of
the District,
Section X Development Agreements
The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development but does not anticipate acquiring property
located within the TIF District.
Section Y Assessment Agreements
The Authority may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the
developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of
the TIF District.
The assessment agreement shall be presented to the City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for
the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the
minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the
assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the
County Recorder of each county where the property is located, Any modification or premature termination of this
agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District.
SPRINGSTED Page 12
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
The Authority anticipates entering into an assessment agreement.
Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; a determination to
capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not part of the original TIF Plan, increase in the portion of the
captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of
property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for
approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if:
1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and
2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of
those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the Authority agrees that the TIF
District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the
parcels eliminated.
The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the
TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the
date of certification,
Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of
Revenue. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax
capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the
TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned
improvements. The Authority shall also provide the City Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the
minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the City Assessor review
and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable.
The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax
increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of
the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other
development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates orformulas. In administering and
implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis:
1) prior to July 1, the Authority shall notify the City Assessor of any new development that has
occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a
timely manner.
2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of
an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates
for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to
determine local tax rates in subsequent years.
3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following:
a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the
original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply;
SPRINGSTED Page 13
Housing & Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of
the TIF District;
c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of
estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase
or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax
capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District,
The County Auditor shall notify the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Section AB Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements
The Authority will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto, with the Commissioner of Revenue and
the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The Authority will
comply with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivisions 5
and 6.
SPRINGSTED Page 14
Exhibit I
MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO, 1.3
HR.A TIF District 1-3 Plymouth Crossroads Station
200 100 0 200 400 600 800rpc)ity of Plymouth Feet
SPRINGSTED Page 15
Exhibit I
MAP OF TIF (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-3
WITHIN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO.1
HRA TIF District 1-3 Plymouth Crossroads Station
1 0.5 0 I 2r;bCity of Plymouth immmmmmnmlil rutile,
SPRINGSTED Page 16
Exhibit 11
Assumptions Report
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Scenario 1: EMV $13.465M - 25 Yrs - FD Contribution within district
Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment
Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment
Projected Certification Request Date 12/31/06
Decertification Date 12/31/34 (26 Years of Increment)
2006/2007
Base Estimated Market Value $2,544,100
Original Net Tax Capacity prior to
23.746%
47,507
41.016%
ISD #284
consolidation and reclassification
Other 7.426%
Local Tax Capacity Rate 94.081%
Original Net Tax Capacity * 49,074
Assessment/Collection Year
2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010
Base Estimated Market Value 2,544,100 2,544,100 2,544,100 2,544,100
Increase in Estimated Market Value 0 0 6,881,421 11,109,440
Total Estimated Market Value 2,544,100 2,544,100 9,425,521 13,653,540
Total Net Tax Capacity 49,074 49,074 187,760 272,321
City of Plymouth 23.746%
Hennepin County 41.016%
ISD #284 21.893%
Other 7.426%
Local Tax Capacity Rate 94.081%
Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 35.8252%
Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10%) 10.00%
Pooling Percent 0.00%
2005/2006
Present Value Date & Rate 12/31/06 6.00% Present Value Amount $1,715,422
Notes
Assumes classification of all property will remain or become commercial -industrial when district created.
The total estimated market value of the project is $13,5 million, as provided by city assessor.
The increased market value is approximately $11.0 million. Assume 70% complete in 2007 and 100% in 2008
No assumptions made regarding future changes to class rates or tax rates. Includes 2% market value inflator.
SPRINGSTED Page 17
Exhibit 111
12/31/06 47,507
Pro'ected Tax Increment Report
0 0 94.081% 0
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
0 0
12/31/07 49,074
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
0 0 94.081% 0
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
0 0
12/31/08
Scenario 1: EMV $13.465M - 25 Yrs - FD Contribution within district
49,074 0
Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less:
0
Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Admin.FRe ual
Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainaget
8,343
Ending Capacity Capacity 35.8252% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360% 10.00%nue
79,979
12/31/06 47,507 47,507 0 0 94.081% 0 0 0 0
12/31/07 49,074 49,074 0 0 94.081% 0 0 0 0
12/31/08 49,074 49,074 0 0 94.081% 0 0 0 0
12/31/09 187,760 49,074 49,685 89,001 94.081% 83,733 301 8,343 75,089
12/31/10 272,321 49,074 79,979 143,268 94.081% 134,788 485 13,430 120,873
12/31/11 277,782 49,074 81,935 146,773 94.081% 138,086 497 13,759 123,830
12/31/12 283,353 49,074 83,931 150,348 94.081% 141,449 509 14,094 126,846
12/31/13 289,035 49,074 85,966 153,995 94.081% 144,880 522 14,436 129,922
12/31/14 294,831 49,074 88,043 157,714 94.081% 148,379 534 14,785 133,060
12/31/15 300,742 49,074 90,161 161,507 94.081% 151,948 547 15,140 136,261
12/31/16 306,772 49,074 92,321 165,377 94.081% 155,588 560 15,503 139,525
12/31/17 312,923 49,074 94,524 169,325 94.081% 159,302 573 15,873 142,856
12/31/18 319,196 49,074 96,772 173,350 94.081% 163,089 587 16,250 146,252
12/31/19 325,595 49,074 99,064 177,457 94.081% 166,953 601 16,635 149,717
12/31/20 332,122 49,074 101,402 181,646 94.081% 170,894 615 17,028 153,251
12/31/21 338,779 49,074 103,787 185,918 94.081% 174,914 630 17,428 156,856
12/31/22 345,570 49,074 106,220 190,276 94.081% 179,013 644 17,837 160,532
12/31/23 352,496 49,074 108,702 194,720 94.081% 183,195 660 18,254 164,281
12/31/24 359,561 49,074 111,233 199,254 94.081% 187,460 675 18,679 168,106
12/31/25 366,767 49,074 113,814 203,879 94.081% 191,812 691 19,112 172,009
12/31/26 374,118 49,074 116,448 208,596 94.081% 196,249 706 19,554 175,989
12/31/27 381,615 49,074 119,133 213,408 94.081% 200,776 723 20,005 180,048
12/31/28 389,262 49,074 121,873 218,315 94.081% 205,393 739 20,465 184,189
12/31/29 397,063 49,074 124,668 223,321 94.081% 210,102 756 20,935 188,411
12/31/30 405,019 49,074 127,518 228,427 94.081% 214,906 774 21,413 192,719
12/31/31 413,134 49,074 130,425 233,635 94.081% 219,806 791 21,902 197,113
12/31/32 421,412 49,074 133,391 238,947 94.081% 224,804 809 22,400 201,595
12/31/33 429,855 49,074 136,416 244,365 94.081% 229,901 828 22,907 206,166
12/31/34 438,467 49,074 139,501 249,892 94.081%1 235,101 846 23,426 210,829
4,612,521 I $16,603 $459,593 1_ $4,136,325
SPRINGSTED Page 18
Exhibit IV
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Scenario 1: EMV $13.465M - 25 Yrs - FD Contribution within district
Without
Proiect or TIF District With Proiect and TIF District
Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to each of
the taxing jurisdictions above, the result would be a lower local tax rate (see Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above)
which would produce the same amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case, the total local tax rate
would decrease by 0.130% (see Hypothetical Decrease in Local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the
Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District would generate is also shown above.
Statement 2: Since the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictions,
then there is no impact on taxes levied or local tax rates.
1) Taxable net tax capacity = total net tax capacity - captured TIF - fiscal disparity contribution, if applicable.
2) The impact on these taxing jurisdictions is negligible since they represent only 7.89% of the total tax rate.
SPRINGSTED Page 19
Projected Hypothetical
2005/2006 2005/2006 Retained New Hypothetical Hypothetical Tax Generated
Taxable 2005/2006 Taxable Captured Taxable Adjusted Decrease In by Retained
Taxing Net Tax Local Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax Local Local Captured
Jurisdiction Capacity (1) Tax Rate Capacity (1) + Capacity Capacity Tax Rate (*) Tax Rate (*) N.T.C. (*)
City of Plymouth 91,690,648 23.746% 91,690,648 249,892 91,940,540 23.681% 0.065% 59,178
Hennepin County 1,229,870,954 41.016% 1,229,870,954 249,892 1,230,120,846 41.008% 0.008% 102,475
ISD #284 95;534,600 21.893% 95,534,600 249,892 95,784,492 21.836% 0.057% 54,566
Other (2) 7.426% 249,892 7.426%
Totals 94.081% 93.951% 0.130%
Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to each of
the taxing jurisdictions above, the result would be a lower local tax rate (see Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above)
which would produce the same amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case, the total local tax rate
would decrease by 0.130% (see Hypothetical Decrease in Local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the
Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District would generate is also shown above.
Statement 2: Since the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictions,
then there is no impact on taxes levied or local tax rates.
1) Taxable net tax capacity = total net tax capacity - captured TIF - fiscal disparity contribution, if applicable.
2) The impact on these taxing jurisdictions is negligible since they represent only 7.89% of the total tax rate.
SPRINGSTED Page 19
Exhibit V
Market Value Analysis Report
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Scenario 1: EMV $13.465M - 25 Yrs - FD Contribution within district
Assumptions
Present Value Date
P.V. Rate - Gross T. 1.
12/31/06
6.00%
Increase in EMV With TIF District 19,416,763
Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment 1,912,911
Subtotal 17,503,852
Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF 0
Difference 17,503,852
Annual Present
Gross Tax Value @
Year Increment 6.00%
1 2009 83,733 71,335
2 2010 134,788 108,331
3 2011 138,086 104,700
4 2012 141,449 101,179
5 2013 144,880 97,767
6 2014 148,379 94,461
7 2015 151,948 91,258
8 2016 155,588 88,154
9 2017 159,302 85,150
10 2018 163,089 82,240
11 2019 166,953 79,423
12 2020 170,894 76,696
13 2021 174,914 74;056
14 2022 179,013 71,502
15 2023 183,195 69,030
16 2024 187,460 66,639
17 2025 191,812 64,327
18 2026 196,249 62,089
19 2027 200,776 59,926
20 2028 205,393 57,834
21 2029 210,102 55,811
22 2030 214,906 53,856
23 2031 219,806 51,966
24 2032 224,804 50,139
25 2033 229,901 48,374
26 2034 235,101 46,668
4,612,521 1,912,911
SPRINGSTED Page 20
Exhibit VI
Projected Pa -As-You-Go Note Report
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Scenario 1: EMV $13.465M - 25 Yrs - FD Contribution within district
Note Date: 12/31/06
Note Rate: 6.00%
Amount: $1,687,000
Semi -Annual Loan
Net Capitalized Balance
Date Principal Interest P & I Revenue Interest Outstanding
1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1,948,223 $2,184,875.51 $4,133,098.23 $4,133,098.23 $261,222.72
Surplus Tax Increment 3,226.77
Total Net Revenue $4,136,325.00
SPRINGSTED Page 21
1,687, 000,00
02/01/07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,435.00 1,695,435.00
08/01/07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,863.05 1,746,298.05
02/01/08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52,388.94 1,798,686.99
08/01/08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,960.61 1,852,647.60
02/01/09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,579.43 1,908,227.03
08/01/09 0.00 37,544.50 37,544.50 37,544.50 19,702.31 1,927,929.34
02/01/10 0.00 37,544.50 37,544.50 37,544.50 20,293.38 1,948,222.72
08/01/10 1,989.82 58,446.68 60,436.50 60,436.50 0.00 1,946,232.90
02/01/11 2,049.51 58,386.99 60,436.50 60,436.50 0.00 1,944,183.39
08/01/11 3,589.50 58,325.50 61,915.00 61,915.00 0.00 1,940,593.89
02/01/12 3,697.18 58,217.82 61,915.00 61,915.00 0.00 1,936,896.71
08/01/12 5,316.10 58,106.90 63,423.00 63,423.00 0.00 1,931,580.61
02/01/13 5,475.58 57,947.42 63,423.00 63,423.00 0.00 1,926,105.03
08/01/13 7,177.85 57,783.15 64,961.00 64,961.00 0.00 1,918,927.18
02/01/14 7,393.18 57,567.82 64,961.00 64,961.00 0.00 1,911,534.00
08/01/14 9,183.98 57,346.02 66,530.00 66,530.00 0.00 1,902,350.02
02/01/15 9,459.50 57,070.50 66,530.00 66,530.00 0.00 1,892,890.52
08/01/15 11,343.78 56,786.72 68,130.50 68,130.50 0.00 1,881,546.74
02/01/16 11,684.10 56,446.40 68,130.50 68,130.50 0.00 1,869,862.64
08/01/16 13,666.62 56,095.88 69,762.50 69,762.50 0.00 1,856,196.02
02/01/17 14,076.62 55,685.88 69,762.50 69,762.50 0.00 1,842,119.40
08/01/17 16,164.42 55,263.58 71,428.00 71,428.00 0.00 1,825,954.98
02/01/18 16,649.35 54,778.65 71,428.00 71,428.00 0.00 1,809,305.63
08/01/18 18,846.83 54,279.17 73,126.00 73,126.00 0.00 1,790,458.80
02/01/19 19,412.24 53,713.76 73,126.00 73,126.00 0.00 1,771,046.56
08/01/19 21,727.10 53,131.40 74,858.50 74,858.50 0.00 1,749,319.46
02/01/20 22,378.92 52,479.58 74,858.50 74,858.50 0.00 1,726,940.54
08/01/20 24,817.28 51,808.22 76,625,50 76,625.50 0.00 1,702,123.26
02/01/21 25,561.80 51,063.70 76,625.50 76,625.50 0.00 1,676,561.46
08/01/21 28,131.16 50,296.84 78,428.00 78,428.00 0.00 1,648,430.30
02/01/22 28,975.09 49,452.91 78,428.00 78,428.00 0.00 1,619,455.21
08/01/22 31,682.34 48,583.66 80,266.00 80,266.00 0.00 1,587,772.87
02/01/23 32,632.81 47,633.19 80,266.00 _ 80,266.00 0.00 1,555,140.06
08/01/23 35,486.30 46,654.20 82,140.50 82,140.50 0.00 1,519,653.76
02/01/24 36,550.89 45,589.61 82,140.50 82,140.50 0.00 1,483,102.87
08/01/24 39,559.91 44,493.09 84,053.00 84,053.00 0.00 1,443,542.96
02/01/25 40,746.71 43,306.29 84,053.00 84,053.00 0.00 1,402,796.25
08/01/25 43,920,61 42,083.89 86,004.50 86,004.50 0.00 1,358,875.64
02/01/26 45,238.23 40,766.27 86,004.50 86,004.50 0.00 1,313,637.41
08/01/26 48,585.38 39,409.12 87,994.50 87,994.50 0.00 1,265,052.03
02/01/27 50,042.94 37,951.56 87,994.50 87,994.50 0.00 1,215,009.09
08/01/27 53,573.73 36,450.27 90,024.00 90,024.00 0.00 1,161,435.36
02/01/28 55,180.94 34,843.06 90,024.00 90,024.00 0.00 1,106,254.42
08/01/28 58,906.87 33,187.63 92,094.50 92,094.50 0.00 1,047,347.55
02/01/29 60,674.07 31,420.43 92,094.50 92,094.50 0.00 986,673.48
08/01/29 64,605.30 29,600.20 94,205.50 94,205.50 0.00 922,068.18
02/01/30 66,543.45 27,662.05 94,205.50 94,205.50 0.00 855,524.73
08/01/30 70,693.76 25,665.74 96,359.50 96,359.50 0.00 784,830.97
02/01/31 72,814.57 23,544.93 96,359.50 96,359.50 0.00 712,016.40
08/01/31 77,196.01 21,360.49 98,556.50 98,556.50 0.00 634,820.39
02/01/32 79,511.89 19,044.61 98,556.50 98,556.50 0,00 555,308.50
08/01/32 84,138.24 16,659.26 100,797.50 100,797.50 0.00 471,170.26
02/01/33 86,662.39 14,135.11 100,797.50 100,797.50 0.00 384,507.87
08/01/33 91,547.76 11,535.24 103,083.00 103,083.00 0.00 292,960.11
02/01/34 94,294.20 8,788.80 103,083.00 103,083.00 0.00 198,665.91
08/01/34 99,454.52 5,959.98 105,414.50 105,414.50 0.00 99,211.39
02/01/35 99,211.39 2,976.34 102,187.73 102,187.73 0.00 0.00
1,948,223 $2,184,875.51 $4,133,098.23 $4,133,098.23 $261,222.72
Surplus Tax Increment 3,226.77
Total Net Revenue $4,136,325.00
SPRINGSTED Page 21
Exhibit VII
Developer But -For Statement
See following page)
SPRINGSTED Page 22
j
D 0 V E
CAPITAL, LLC
October 10, 2006
To City of Plymouth:
Subject: Plymouth Crossroads TIF 'but -for' Narrative
There are four distinct areas in the 'but -for test. These areas contain issues that the City of Plymouth has been
trying to resolve for decades. The four areas are transportation and circulation, drainage and flooding, severe
sub -surface soil conditions and removal of long standing blight.
Transportation and circulation (reference SRF Traffic Study)
Existing traffic operations at the TH55/West Medicine Lake Drive intersection and at the
TH55/South Shore Drive intersection are greatly compromised by the lack of a well functioning
frontage road along the south side of TH55. Development of the subject property provides the
opportunity for the City to install a new frontage road, stacking lanes, dedicated turn lanes and thru
lanes. In addition it allows for the reallignment of the two intersections and the set aside of land for
future Cty. Rd. 73, improving safety and providing for increased traffic capacity. Traffic signals at
the two intersections will either be modified or replaced.
Drainage and flooding (reference 1980 Plymouth study of storm water system)
The site has historically experienced significant drainage issues that have resulted in traffic flow
and drainage problems. The existing pipe under TH55 is submerged and difficult to access but
plans indicate it is 36 inches in diameter. A 36 inch pipe is capable of conveying a peak discharge
of nominally 30 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the 100 -yr storm event. However, a discharge of
122 cfs is indicated as the design discharge from node 130 to node BC -P32 (the reach
immediately upstream of the pipe) in Appendix C of the 1980 Plymouth study of the storm water
system. Similarly, Appendix B of the Plymouth study indicates an outflow from Pond BGP32 (the
wetland upstream from the pipe) of 80 cfs. In either case the pipe under TH55 is at least 60%
below the capacity to meet present day needs. The improvements in the proposed development
will increase the discharge capacity of the trunk sewer line to 122 cfs, or an increase of 60 inches
equivalent to a 45 in x 73 in arch reinforced concrete pipe). Re -grading of the entire site will also
provide for improved overland flood passage in extreme events adding to upstream protection. A
48 inch diameter pipe was installed across the east side of the property in the mid 1990's. Although
it was properly sized for that time, it is no longer adequate. As part of the development the
downstream portion of the pipe crossing the property will be removed and a 54 inch pipe will be
installed along a new alignment and directly connect to the new pipe under TH55. These
modifications will resolve any future drainage and runoff issues.
Sub -surface soil conditions and removal of long standing blight (reference Braun soil boring
report)
Soil boring tests indicate unstable soil tests down to 100 feet (see soil boring report). Several
thousand feet of infrastructure will need to be placed on pilings in order to ensure the structural
integrity of the roads, utilities and storm drainage. In addition, several buildings will need to be
placed on pilings.
333 Washington Avenue North o Suite 206 Union Plaza • Minneapolis, MN 55401
Page 2 October 10, 2006
Removal of long standing blight (reference Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment)
The current Plymouth Shopping Center and adjacent site have long been considered a
redevelopment opportunity based on the conditions of the buildings.
To meet state statutory tests for blight, an assessment was conducted by Short Elliott Hendrickson,
Inc. (SEH). The assessment concluded that the district met both the statutory coverage test and
conditions of buildings test (see below):
1. Coverage Test — 3 of 5 properties would meet the coverage test with 94.3% area
coverage. This exceeds the 70% area coverage requirement.
2. Condition of Buildings Test -100 percent of the current buildings — 3 of 3 buildings - were
found to be "structurally substandard" when considering code deficiencies and other
deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.
This exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of buildings, not
including outbuildings, must be found "structurally substandard."
The conclusion of the SEH assessment based on these findings is as follows:
Our surveying and evaluation of the properties within this proposed
Redevelopment District render results that in our professional opinion would
qualify the district eligible under the statutory criteria and formulas for a
Redevelopment TIF District (State Statute 469.174 Subd. 10)."
There has been minimal investment in the Plymouth Shopping Center since it was built
over 50 years ago. The buildings have several code violations and are poorly maintained. The
proposed development will allow for the demolition of the current shopping center and removal of
any existing environmental hazards.
The costs associated with resolving the items listed above are extraordinary and impact the proposed project to
the point that without TIF assistance the proposed project is not economically feasible.
Regards,
1
Brett olbjornsen
Director, Business Development
Dove Capital, LLC
Dir: 612.746.1669
Cell: 612.875.8585
Fax: 612.395.9194
brett.colby@dovecapital.us
333 Washington Avenue North . Suite 206 Union Plaza • Minneapolis, MN 55401
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA,
AND
DOVE CAPITAL, LLC
DATED AS OF
2006
This Document Was Drafted By:
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP (lsc)
Suite 1500
50 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE1 DEFINITIONS...................................................... "................................................................................. 1
Section1.1 Definitions.................................................................................................................................... 1
ARTICLE 2 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.........................................................................................4
Section2.1 By the Authority..............................................................:............................................................4
Section2.2 By Developer...............................................................................................................................4
ARTICLE 3 USE, OWNERSHIP OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY; RESTRICTIONS .......................................... 5
Section 3.1 Use of Development Property ...................................................................................................... 5
Section 3.2 Ownership of Development Property ........................................................................................... 5
Section 3.3 Declaration of Restrictive Covenants........................................................................................... 5
Section3.4 Business Subsidy Act................................................................................................................... 5
ARTICLE 4 CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT............................................................................................................ 5
Section 4.1 Construction Plans................................................................................................................. 5
Section 4.2 Undertaking of Improvements...................................................................................................... 6
Section 4.3 Certificate of Completion.............................................................................................................6
ARTICLE5 [RESERVED]...........................................................................................................................................7
ARTICLE 6 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING OF IMPROVEMENTS..................................................................... 7
Section 6.1 Payments Pursuant To Limited Revenue Tax Increment Note To Pay TIF Development Costs. 7
Section6.2 Assignment of Note...................................................................................................................... 8
ARTICLE7 [RESERVED]...........................................................................................................................................9
ARTICLE 8 PROHIBITIONS AGAINST ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER........................................................... 9
Section 8.1 Transfer of Property and Assignment........................................................................................... 9
ARTICLE 9 EVENTS OF DEFAULT; FEES............................................................................................................ 10
Section9.1 Events of Default........................................................................................................................10
Section9.2 Remedies on Default.................................................................................................................. 11
Section9.3 No Remedy Exclusive................................................................................................................. 11
Section9.4 Waivers...................................................................................................................................... 12
ARTICLE10 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ......................... ........ ,.....,..................................................................... 12
Section 10.1 Conflict of interests; Authority Representatives Not Individually Liable ................................ 12
Section 10.2 Equal Employment Opportunity.............................................................................................. 12
Section10.3 Restrictions on Use................................................................................................................... 12
Section 10.4 Titles of Articles and Sections.................................................................................................. 12
Section 10.5 Notices and Demands................................................................................................................12
Section10.6 Term of Agreement..................................................................................................................13
Section10.7 Counterparts....................................................................:......................................................... 13
Schedule A Development Property
Schedule B Project Description
Schedule C Description of Improvements & Public Development Costs
Schedule D Payment Schedule, TIF Schedule
Exhibit A Certificate of Completion
Exhibit B Covenants and Restrictions
Exhibit C Form of Limited Revenue Tax Increment Note
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made as of -,2006, by and between the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "Authority"), a public
body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and
Dove Capital, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation (the "Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority was created pursuant to state law now codified as Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "Act"), by a resolution of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"); and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the Authority has undertaken
certain development activities for the purpose of redeveloping blighted areas, improving the
local tax base, and improving the general economy of the City and the State of Minnesota, which
is a "project" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 8, known as
Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Project Area") pursuant to a Project Plan for
Redevelopment Area No. 1 (the "Project Plan"); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Authority (the "Board") and the City
Council of the City have adopted resolutions, respectively, establishing a portion of the Project
Area as a tax increment financing district ("Tax Increment District"); and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of the Project Plan, the Authority intends
to utilize tax increment financing, as described in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through
469.1799, to finance the cost of certain public improvements related to the redevelopment of an
18 -acre site located in the City to include four retail buildings, a restaurant, a combined bank and
office building and a gas station (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Authority believes that the development and construction of the Project,
and fulfillment of this Agreement are vital and are in the best interests of the Authority and
benefit the health, safety, morals and welfare of the City's residents, and comply with the
applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the Project has been undertaken
and is being assisted.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual
obligations set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Definitions
Section 1.1 Definitions!. In this Agreement, unless a different rneaning_clearly appears ........
from the context:
Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047.
Comment [TMl]: Please do not type
any text in Us"area. .
Agreement" means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified,
amended or supplemented.
Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota.
Available Tax Increment" means any Tax Increment remaining after the payment of any
administrative expenses related to the Development Property then due and owing.
Business Subsidy Agreement" means the Business Subsidy Agreement in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit D to be executed and delivered by the Authority and the Developer in
accordance with Section 3.4 hereof.
Certificate of Completion" means certification in the form attached as Exhibit A, to be
provided to Developer pursuant to this Agreement.
City" means the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, a municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota.
Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents for
the construction work to be performed by the Developer on the Development Property, which
shall be at least as detailed as the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents which
are submitted to the building inspector of the City.
County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota, a political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota.
Developer" means Dove Capital, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation.
Development Property" means the portion of the Project Area described on Schedule A
attached hereto located in the City.
Event of Default" means as set forth in Section 9.1 hereof.
Improvements" means the improvements to be undertaken by the Authority all as further
described in Schedule C attached to this Agreement.
Mortgage" means any mortgage made by Developer which covers, in whole or in part,
the Development Property.
Mortgagee" means the owner or holder of a Mortgage.
Net Tax Capacity" means the value of real property as determined by the assessor for
the County in accordance with Minnesota Statues, Section 273.13, against which the real
property tax is imposed.
Note" means a limited revenue tax increment note, the form of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit C.
2-
Payment Dates" means payments of principal and interest to be made on the dates and in
the amounts set for such payments in Schedule D.
Project" means the redevelopment of an 18 -acre site located in the City to include four
retail buildings, a restaurant, a combined bank and office building and a gas station, and related
improvements of a public nature upon or adjacent to the Development Property.
Project Area" means the area designated for development by the Authority pursuant to
the Project Plan and the Act.
Project Description" means the description on Schedule B attached hereto.
Project Plan" means the Project Plan for the Project Area originally approved by the
Board of the Authority on October 21, 2004, and originally approved by the City Council of the
City on November 23, 2004.
Public Development Costs" means certain costs incurred and to be incurred by the
Developer in the construction of the Improvements, the estimated types and amounts of which
are shown on Schedule C to this Agreement.
Restrictions" means the easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in
Exhibit B.
Section" means a Section of this Agreement, unless used in reference to Minnesota
Statutes.
State" means the State of Minnesota.
Tax Increment" means tax increment as, defined in the Tax Increment Act, derived from
the Tax Increment District.
Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, as
amended.
Tax Increment District" means the Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District
No. 1-3 created by the Authority pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Tax Increment Financing Plan" means Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax
Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 (a redevelopment district) adopted by the
Board of the Authority on September 21, 2006, and approved by the City Council of the City on
October 24, 2006.
Unavoidable Delay" means a failure or delay in a party's performance of its obligations
under this Agreement, or during any cure period specified in this Agreement which does not
entail the mere payment of money, not within the party's reasonable control, including but not
limited to acts of God, governmental agencies, the other party, strikes, labor disputes (except
disputes which could be resolved by using union labor), fire or other casualty, or lack of
materials; provided that within 10 days after a party impaired by the delay has knowledge of the
delay it shall give the other party notice of the delay and the estimated length of the delay, and
shall give the other party notice of the actual length of the delay within 10 days after the cause of
the delay has ceased to exist. The parties shall pursue with reasonable diligence the avoidance
and removal of any such delay. Unavoidable Delay shall not extend performance of any
obligation unless the notices required in this definition are given as herein required.
ARTICLE 2
Representations and Warranties
Section 2.1 By the Authority?. The Authority makes the following representations to the comment Ia21: Please do not type
Developer: any text fi this area.
a) The Authority is a housing and redevelopment authority duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and has the power to enter into this
Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. The Authority has duly authorized the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement.
b) The Project is for a purpose within the power of the Authority under the Act,
and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the Act.
c) The Tax Increment District is a "redevelopment district" within the meaning
of the Tax Increment Act and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the
terms of the Tax Increment Act.
Section 2.2 By Developetl. Developer makes the following representations to the comment [aa31: Please ao no}!type
Authority: any text in diisvea.
a) Developer is a Minnesota limited liability corporation, has power to enter into
this Agreement and has duly authorized the execution and delivery of this Agreement.
b) Developer will, subject to Unavoidable Delays, complete or cause to be
completed the Project in accordance with the teens of this Agreement, and all local, state
and federal laws and regulations.
c) Developer has received no notice or communication from any local, state or
federal official that the activities of Developer, the City or the Authority with respect to
the Development Property may be or will be in violation of any environmental law or
regulation. The Developer is aware of no facts the existence of which would cause it to
be in violation of any local, state or federal environmental law, regulation or review
procedure with respect to the Development Property.
d) Neither the execution or delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement is prevented by, limited by, conflicts with, or results in a
breach of, any restriction, agreement or instrument to which Developer is now a party or
by which Developer is bound.
4-
e) Developer has no knowledge or information that any member of the
governing body of the City or Authority or any other officer of the City or Authority has
any direct or indirect financial interest in the Developer, the Development Property or the
Project.
ARTICLE 3
Use, Ownership of Development Property; Restrictions
Section 3.1 Use of Development Property_ Developer's use of the Development "comment [mya]: Please do not type I
Property shall be subject to and in compliance with all of the conditions, covenants, restrictions
and limitations imposed by this Agreement, the Restrictions and all applicable laws, ordinances
and regulations.
Section 3.2 Ownership of Development Property. Developer hereby represents and"-"— comment [AS]: Please do not type
warrants that, as of the date of this agreement, Developer is the -owner-in'-fee simple of the any text in this area.
Development Property, and there will be no liens, defects or other encumbrances upon title to the
Development Property that would hinder the development of the Development Property by
Developer as contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.3 Declaration of Restrictive Covenant . Developer shall prepare, execute, and Comment [A6]: Please do not type
any text in This area. record on the title to the Development Property a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, m form
approved by the Authority, which includes the Restrictions set forth on Exhibit B. If Developer
determines that operation of the Development Property would endanger the financial viability
thereof, Developer may request the Board of Commissioners to consent to the amendment,
modification or termination of any of the restrictions in any respect. The Authority is under no
obligation to amend, modify or terminate any of the restrictions and may, in its sole and absolute
discretion, refuse to do so.
Section 3.4 Business Subsidv Act. The tax increment financing assistance provided by - comment [A7]: Please do not type
the Authority is not a "business subsidy" because it is "redevelopment when the recipient's any text in this area.
investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation is 70 percent or more of the
assessor's current year's estimated market value" as such terms are defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 116J.993, subdivisions 3 and 3(17). Therefore, the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995, are not applicable.
ARTICLE 4
Construction of Project
Section 4.1 Construction Plansi. Developer shall make available_ Construction_ Plans for comment [TMs]: Please do not type l
the Project to the Authority prior to the construction of the Project. The Construction Plans shall any text in this area. I
provide for construction of the Project in conformity with this Agreement and all applicable state
and local laws and regulations. The Authority shall approve the Construction Plans in writing if,
in the reasonable discretion of the Authority, the Construction Plans: (a) conform to the terms
and conditions of this Agreement; (b) conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws,
ordinances, rules and regulations; and (c) no Event of Default has occurred. The Authority shall
delegate its approval of the Construction Plans to the City.
5-
No approval by the Authority shall relieve Developer of the obligation to comply with the
terms of this Agreement, applicable federal, state and Iocal laws, ordinances, rules and
regulations, or to properly construct the Project. No approval by the Authority shall constitute a
waiver of an Event of Default. Any disapproval of the Construction Plans shall set forth the
reasons therefore, and shall be made within 30 days after the date of their receipt by the
Authority. If the Authority rejects the Construction Plans, in whole or in part, Developer shall
submit new or corrected Construction Plans within 30 days after written notification to
Developer of the rejection. The provisions of this Section relating to approval, rejection and
resubmission of corrected Construction Plans shall continue to apply until the Construction Plans
have been approved by the Authority.
Section 4.2 Undertaking of Improvements.
a) Subject to Unavoidable Delays, Developer will complete the Project or cause
the Project to be completed substantially in accordance with the terms of the Project
Description by December 31, 2008.
b) Upon approval by the Authority of the Construction Plans, the Developer shall
promptly begin the Project and diligently prosecute the completion the development of
the Development Property in accordance with the requirements of the Project
Description. Developer shall make reports, in such detail and at such times as may
reasonably be requested by the Authority, as to the actual progress of Developer with
respect to the Project.
c) Developer shall not interfere with, or construct any improvements over, any
public street or utility easement without the prior written approval of the City. All
connections to public utility lines and facilities shall be subject to approval of the City
and any private utility company involved. All street and utility installations, relocations,
alterations and restorations shall be at Developer's expense and without expense to the
City or the Authority. Developer at its own expense shall replace any public facilities or
utilities damaged during the Project by the Developer or its agents or by others acting on
behalf of or under their direction or control of the Developer. Notwithstanding anything
herein to the contrary, neither the Developer nor the Development Property shall be
subject to assessment for costs associated with the construction of the Improvements.
Comment [A10]: Please do not type
any text in this area.
Comment [A9]: Please do not 'type
any text hi this area.
Section 4.3 Certificate of Completions. _____________
a) Promptly after completion of the Project in accordance with the Project
Description, evidenced by the Developer's provision of an architect's or general
contractor's certificate to the Authority, the Authority will furnish Developer with an
appropriate Certificate of Completion as conclusive evidence of satisfaction and
termination of the agreements and covenants of this Agreement with respect to the
obligations of Developer to complete the Project. The furnishing by the Authority of a
Certificate of Completion for the Project shall not constitute evidence of compliance with
or satisfaction of any obligation of Developer to any Mortgagee. The Authority may
delegate its provision of a Certificate of Completion for any phase of the Project to the
City.
6-
b) If the Authority shall refuse or fail to provide a Certificate of Completion for
the Project, the Authority shall, within 15 days after the Developer provides the
architect's or general contractor's certificate referenced in Section 4.3(a), provide
Developer with a written statement specifying in what respect Developer has failed to
complete the Project in accordance with this Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and
what measures or acts will be necessary, in the opinion of the Authority, for Developer to
obtain the Certificate of Completion for such phase.
ARTICLE 5
RESERVEDI
ARTICLE 6
Tax Increment Financing of Improvements
Section 6.1 Payments Pursuant To Limited Revenue Tax Increment Note To Pam
Development Cost!. Developer has agreed to and shall_be responsible to pay all of its respective----'
costs of the Project, as herein provided. However, the Authority, in order to
all
Developer to proceed with the construction of the Project, is willing to finance the Public
Development Costs and agrees to construct the Improvements. The Authority agrees that it will
make payments pursuant to a limited revenue tax increment note (the "Note"), the form of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit C, in a principal amount sufficient to pay the Public Development
Costs attributable to the Improvements as listed on Schedule C hereto, with the Note to be issued
and interest to begin to accrueat such time as the City engineer has confirmed in writing to the
Authority that the Improvements have been completed, said payments of principal and interest to
be made on the dates (the "Payment Dates") and in the amounts set for such payments in
Schedule D hereto, which is incorporated herein, but subject to the following terms and
conditions, including adjustment as provided in Subsection (c) below:
a) Notwithstanding the Payment Dates provided in Schedule D, no payments
shall be made by the Authority to the Developer unless and until the City engineer has
confirmed in writing to the Authority that the Improvements have been completed, and
the Certificate of Completion has been issued as contemplated in Section 4.3 hereof.
b) The Authority will apply the Tax Increment first to pay any administrative
expenses relating to the Development Property to the extent permitted by the Tax
Increment Act and to the extent that such expenses have not been paid or reimbursed to
the Authority by the Developer. Any Tax Increment remaining after the payment of any
administrative expenses then due and owing (the "Available Tax Increment") shall be
paid to the Developer for reimbursement of the Public Development Costs plus interest as
provided above on the Payment Dates, up to the maximum principal amount of
1,687,000.00.
c) If, upon completion of the Improvements, the total of the actual Public
Development Costs are lower than the total of the Public Development Costs shown in
Schedule C and the budget included as part of the initial Schedule D, then the principal
Ire
Comment [TM11]: Please do not type
any text in this area
amount to be reimbursed to the Developer hereunder shall be reduced to the actual total
cost amount of the Public Development Costs and a new Schedule D shall be prepared
and substituted, which will amortize said actual cost over the remaining Payment Dates
such that amortized payments of principal and interest in each year thereafter are equal,
as nearly as practicable, such principal to bear interest at the rate of six percent (6.0%)
per annum. Furthermore, in the event the time for distribution of property tax revenues to
the Authority by the County shall be modified from the dates presently in force, the
parties shall amend Schedule D to the extent necessary to conform with the intention of
the parties that the Payment Dates shall fall approximately 30 to 45 days after the
expected dates upon which the Authority receives its major property tax distributions
from the County.
d) The Authority shall be obligated to make the payments to the Developer
required pursuant to this Section 6 only firom and to the extent of the Available Tax
Increment actually received from the Tax Increment District for any tax year, and such
payments shall never be considered to be a general obligation or indebtedness of the
Authority or the City; provided that the amount required to be paid by the Authority to
the Developer on any Payment Date shall not exceed the amount set forth in Schedule D
as amended. If, on any Payment Date, the amount of the Available Tax Increment
available to the Authority from the Tax Increment District and to be paid to the
Developer under Section 6.1 is not sufficient to pay the installment then due the
Developer under this Section 6.1 in full, the funds available shall be applied first to
interest and then to principal then due. To the extent that an installment of principal or
interest to be paid under this Section 6.1 is not paid on a Payment Date because the
amount of Available Tax Increment under Section 6.1(b) is insufficient therefor, such
installment shall continue to be an obligation of the City under the terms of this
Agreement, but shall not bear interest fi•om and after said Payment Date, and shall be
paid, subject to the provisions of Section 6.1(e) hereof, only from Available Tax
Increment actually received and available therefor under Section 6.1(b) hereof on the
next subsequent Payment Dates, after the payment of the installment of principal and
interest payable on said subsequent Payment Date.
e) Upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the Developer, the Authority may
prepay all or a portion of the outstanding principal balance due to the Developer pursuant
to this Section 6. 1, and Schedule D, without penalty, on any date at a prepayment price
equal to the outstanding principal balance to be prepaid plus accrued interest to the
prepayment date. If a partial prepayment is made, the prepayment shall be applied to the
last maturing installments of principal and the semiannual payments required under this
Section 6.1 and Schedule D shall not otherwise be reduced. Subsequent to any partial
prepayment, a revised Schedule D shall be prepared and executed by the parties hereto.
The Developer may at any time request the Authority to apply excess Tax Increment
from the Development Property to the prepayment of all or a portion of the principal
balance due hereunder but the Authority, in its sole discretion, shall determine whether
any prepayment shall be made.
Section 6.2 Assignment of Not The Note shall be not assignable nor transferable ---t comment [cbl2]: Please do not type l
any text in flus area.. II
without the prior written consent of the Authority; provided, however, that such consent shall not--------
8-
be unreasonably withheld or delayed if: (a) the assignee or transferee delivers to the Authority a
written instrument acknowledging the limited nature of the Authority's payment obligations
under the Note, and (b) the assignee or transferee executes and delivers to the Authority a
certificate, in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority, pursuant to which, among other
things, such assignee or transferee represents (i) that the Note is being acquired for investment
for such assignee's or transferee's own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view
to the resale or distribution of any part thereof, (ii) that the assignee or transferee has no present
intention of selling, granting any participation in, or otherwise distributing the same, (iii) that the
assignee or transferee is an "accredited investor" within the meaning of Rule 501 of the
Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (iv) that the assignee or transferee,
either alone or with such assignee's or transferee's representatives, has knowledge and
experience in financial and business matters and is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of
the prospective investment in the Note and the assignee or transferee is able to bear the economic
consequences thereof, (v) that in making its decision to acquire the Note, the assignee or
transferee has relied upon independent investigations made by the assignee or transferee and, to
the extent believed by such assignee or transferee to be appropriate, the assignee's or transferee's
representatives, including its own professional, tax and other advisors, and has not relied upon
any representation or warranty from the Authority, or any of its officers, employees, agents,
affiliates or representatives, with respect to the value of the Note, (vi) that the Authority has not
made any warranty, acknowledgment or covenant, in writing or otherwise, to the assignee or
transferee regarding the tax consequences, if any, of the acquisition and investment in the Note,
vii) that the assignee or transferee or its representatives have been given a full opportunity to
examine all documents and to ask questions of, and to receive answers from, the Authority and
its representatives concerning the terms of the Note and such other information as the assignee or
transferee desires in order to evaluate the acquisition of and investment in the Note, and all such
questions have been answered to the full satisfaction of the assignee or transferee, (viii) that the
assignee or transferee has evaluated the merits and risks of investment in the Note and has
detennined that the Note is a suitable investment for the assignee or transferee in light of such
party's overall financial condition and prospects, (ix) that the Note will be characterized as a
restricted security" under the federal securities laws because the Note is being acquired in a
transaction not involving a public offering and that under such laws and applicable regulations
such securities may not be resold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, except in certain limited circumstances, and (x) that no market for the Note exists and
no market for the Note is intended to be developed.
ARTICLE 7
RE SERVEDI
ARTICLE 8
Prohibitions Against Assignment and Transfer
Section 8.1 Transfer of Property and Assignment;. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate...comment laisl: please ao ortype'
ury text in this area. . of Completion and, except as hereinafter provided, Developer has not made and will not make,
or suffer to be made, any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, lease, or other transfer,
with respect to this Agreement or the Development Property or any part thereof or any interest
therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of
m
the Authority, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Authority shall be entitled to
require as conditions to any such approval that: (i) the proposed transferee have the
qualifications and financial responsibility, as reasonably determined by the Authority, necessary
and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by Developer; and (ii) the
proposed transferee, by recordable instrument satisfactory to the Authority shall, for itself and its
successors and assigns, assume all of the obligations of Developer under this Agreement. No
transfer of, or change with respect to, ownership in the Development Property or any part
thereof, or any interest therein, however consummated or occurring and whether voluntary or
involuntary, shall operate, legally or practically, to deprive or limit the Authority of or with
respect to any rights or remedies or controls provided in or resulting from this Agreement with
respect to the Development Property and the completion of the Project that the Authority would
have had, had there been no such transfer or change. There shall be submitted to the Authority
for review all legal documents relating to the transfer.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 8.1 shall not apply to any transfer or
assignment to (i) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the
Developer or (ii) any entity in which the majority equity interest is owned by the parties that
have a majority equity interest in Developer. Provided that no Event of Default exists hereunder,
any such transfer or assignment shall release Developer from their obligations hereunder upon
execution and delivery to the Authority by the transferee or assignee of an instrument in form
and substance satisfactory to the Authority by which the transferee or assignee assumes the
obligations of the Developer hereunder.
In the absence of specific written agreement by the Authority to the contrary, no such
transfer or approval by the Authority thereof shall be deemed to relieve Developer, or any other
party bound in any way by this Agreement or otherwise with respect to the completion of the
Project, from any of their obligations with respect thereto:
ARTICLE 9
Events of Default; Fees
Section 9.1 Events of Defauli The follow_ ing_sh_all be "Events of Default"_under this comment [niaj: Please do nor ype
Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean, whenever it is used Tn this Agreement any text in'tMs area..
unless the context otherwise provides), anyone or more of the following events which occurs
and continues for more than 30 days after notice by the defaulting party of such default (and the
term "default" shall mean any event which would with the passage of time or giving of notice, or
both, be an "Event of Default" hereunder):
a) Failure of Developer to construct or cause to be constructed the Project as
required hereunder.
b) Failure of Developer to furnish the Construction Plans as required hereunder.
c) Failure of Developer or the Authority to observe and perform any other
covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed
hereunder.
10-
d) Failure of Developer to pay any taxes on the Development Property as they
become due.
Section 9.2 Remedies on Default{. In the event the Authority desires to exercise any of
its rights or remedies as provided herein or otherwise available to the Authority at law or in
equity, the Authority shall first provide written notice to Developer setting forth with specific
particularity the Event of Default and the action required to cure or remedy the same (the
Default Notice"). Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of a Default Notice to cure
or remedy the Event of Default specified in the Default Notice, or such longer period as may be
reasonably required to complete the cure as soon as reasonably possible under the circumstances.
If, following Developer's receipt of a Default Notice, Developer does not cure or remedy the
Event of Default therein specified within the time provided above, the Authority may take any
one or more of the following actions at any time prior to Developer's curing or remedying the
Event of Default:
a) Suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances
from Developer, deemed adequate by the Authority, that Developer will cure its default
and continue its performance under this Agreement.
b) Terminate all rights of Developer under this Agreement.
c) Withhold the Certificate of Completion for the Project.
d) Take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to
the Authority to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or
covenant of Developer under this Agreement.
In the event the Authority should fail to observe or perform any covenant, agreement or
obligation of the Authority on its part to be observed and performed under this Agreement,
Developer may take any one or more of the following actions:
e) Suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances
from the Authority deemed adequate by Developer, that the Authority will cure its default
and continue its performance under this Agreement.
f) Terminate all rights of the Authority under this Agreement.
g) Take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or desirable to
Developer to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or
covenant of the Authority under this Agreement.
Section 9.3 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the
Authority or to the Developer is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or
remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every
other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by
statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall
impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right
and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In
11-
Comment [A15]: Please do not type
any text in this area.
Comment [A16]: Please do not type
any text in this area:
order to entitle the Authority or Developer to exercise any remedy reserved to them, it shall not
be necessary to give notice, other than such notice as may be required under this Agreement.
Section 9.4 Waivers!. All waivers by any_party to this Agreement shall be in writing_ If comment,[A17]:, nesse do not type
an provision of this A reement is breached b an art and thereafter waived b another art any text in this area.
YP g Y YP Y Y part-
such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive
any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
ARTICLE 10
Additional Provisions
Section 10.1 Conflict of Interests; Authority Representatives Not Individually Liab1d._ Comment [Als]: Please do not type
No member, official, employee, or consultant or employees of the consultants of the Authority any text'" this area,
shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member,
official, consultant or the consultant's employees or employee participate in any decision relating
to this Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation,
partnership, or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member,
official, consultant or the consultant's employees, or employee of the Authority shall be
personally liable to Developer, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach
by the Authority or for any amount which may become due to Developer or successors or on any
obligations under the terms of this Agreement.
Section 10.2 Equal Employment Opportunity. Developer, for itself and its successors comment [Al9]rPtease ao not type .
and assigns, agrees that during the construction of the Project it will comply with any applicable any text in'this area.
affirmative action and nondiscrimination laws or regulations.
Section 10.3 Restrictions on Usd. Developer agrees for itself, and its successors and commen [Azo]:,Piease do not type
assigns, and every successor in interest to the Devopment Property, or any part tltis arthereof, thatelany text inea..
Developer, and such successors and assigns, shall devote the Development Property to, and only
to and in accordance with, the uses specified in the Project Plan, this Agreement and other
agreements entered into between the Developer and the Authority or the City, and shall not
discriminate upon the basis of race, color, creed, sex or national origin in the sale, lease, or rental
or in the use or occupancy of the Development Property or any improvements erected or to be
erected thereon, or any part thereof.
Section 10.4 Titles of Articles and Section [Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and ' Comment [A21]: Please do not type
Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be l any text in this area.
disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 10.5 Notices and Demandsl. Except as otherwise expressly provided in thiscomment [Azz]: Please do not type
Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any text in flus area.
another party shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally as follows:
a) in the case of Developer, addressed to or delivered personally to:
Dove Capital, LLC
333 Washington Avenue North
12-
Suite 206 Union Plaza
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Attn: Director, Business Development
b) in the case of the Authority, addressed or delivered personally to:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Attn: Executive Director
or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to
time, designate in writing and forward to the other party as provided in this Section.
Section 10.6 Term of Agreement This Agreement shall terminate upon issuance of a comment [a2s]; Please do not type
any, text in this area. -- Certificate of Completion for the Project; provided that, notwithstanding the termination of this
Agreement, the Covenants and Restrictions provided for in Exhibit B shall remain in full force
and effect.
Section 10.7 Counterparts. This Agthreementmay -- • be executed in_any number_of .. comment [a24]: Please do not;type
counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and e same instrument. arty text in this area,
13-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as
of the date first above written.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH
By
Its Chair
By
Its Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2006, by , the Chair of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2006, by , the Executive Director of the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth.
Notary Public
14-
DOVE CAPITAL, LLC
Its: Director, Business Development
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS.
COUNTY OF FIENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2006, by Brett Colbjornsen, the Director, Business Development, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
15-
SCHEDULE A
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
The real property and interests in such property located in the County of Hennepin, State
of Minnesota, and described as follows:
Parcels #I and #2) "Kennedy" P.LN. 35-118-22-14-0021 and 0022
Tracts A and B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 83105 1)
And
Parcel #3) "Kennedy" P.I.N. 35-118-22-14-0019
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northwest corner of Tract B, RLS
No. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence South 8 degrees 06 minutes 05 seconds West on
a assumed bearing along the west line of said Tract B, a distance of 107.68 feet; thence South 89
degrees 55 minutes 05 seconds West along the northeasterly line of Tract A, said RLS No. 1676,
a distance of 100.00 feet; thence North 8 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds East along said
northeasterly line , a distance of 135.17 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk
Highway No. 55 (as monumented); thence South 74 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds East along
said right-of-way line, a distance of 97.99 feet to the point of beginning.
And
Parcel #4) "Holiday Co." P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0006
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range
22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the southerly right-of-way line of State
Trunk Highway No. 55 (as monumented); and Northeasterly of the northeasterly line of Old
County Road No. 6 (also being the northeasterly line of Tract B, RLS No. 1676)
And
Parcel #S) "Holiday Co." P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0006
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeasterly of the northeasterly line of Old
County Road No. 6 and Northwesterly of Naumann Cartway (per plat of SCHIEBE'S
HIGHLAND VIEW ADDITION) and Southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as
monumented).
And
Parcel #6) "Thomas Tart, trustee" P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0007
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the southwesterly line of Old
County Road No. 6, and described as beginning at the intersection of the west line of said
Section 36 with the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6; thence Southerly along the
west line of said Section 36, a distance of 313.50 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, distant 173.00 feet southeasterly of the point of
S -A-1
beginning; thence Northwesterly along the southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a
distance of 173.00 feet to the point of beginning.
And
Parcel #7) "Kay Tart" P.I.N. 36-118-22-23-0008
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the southwesterly line of Old
County Road No. 6, and described as commencing at the southwest corner of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 36; thence Northerly along the west line of said Section 36, a distance
210.30 feet to the point of beginning; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 90 degrees 30
minutes, a distance of 9.00 feet; thence Northeasterly 358.30 to a point on the southwesterly line
of Old County Road No. 6, distant 248.00 feet southeasterly of the intersection of said
southwesterly line with the west line of said Section 36 ; thence Northwesterly along the
southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence Southwesterly to
a point on the west line of said Section 36, distant 122.10 feet Northerly of the point of
beginning; thence Southerly 122.10 feet along the west line of said Section 36 to the point of
beginning.
And
Parcel #8) "Vacated Highway R/W" No P.I.N.
That part of the right-of-way of State Trunk Highway No. 55 adjoining the above described
Parcels # 1,2,3,4 and 5) lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 70.00 feet
southwesterly (as measured at right angles to) the centerline of eastbound lanes of State Trunk
Highway No. 55.
S -A-2
SCHEDULE B
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project includes the redevelopment of an existing 18 -acre site into Plymouth Crossroads
Station which will contain approximately 62,567 square feet of retail. The Development
proposes to demolish the existing substandard buildings and construct seven new commercial
structures. The new development will consist of four retail buildings, one restaurant, a combined
bank and office building and a gas station with an estimated total market value of $13,465,030.
MIMI
SCHEDULE C
IMPROVEMENTS & PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Improvement Public Development Cost
Road Improvements $1,028,100
Site Improvements/Soil Correction/Demolition 228,300
Installation of public utilities 430,600
Total
S -C-1
1,687,000
to be inserted from approved TIF Plan]
SCHEDULED
PAYMENT SCHEDULE, TIF SCHEDULE
S -D-1
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, Dove Capital, LLC ("Developer"), is the Developer of property in the City
of Plymouth, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota described on Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part hereof (the "Development Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Development Property is subject to the provisions of a certain
Development Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of _, 2006, by and between
Developer and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth (the
Authority"); and
WHEREAS, Developer has fully and duly performed all of the covenants and conditions
of Developer under the Agreement with respect to the completion the Project (as defined in the
Agreement);
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby certified that all requirements of Developer under the
Agreement with respect to the completion of the Project have been completed and duly and fiilly
performed, and this instrument is to be conclusive evidence of the satisfactory termination of the
covenants and conditions of the Agreement as they relate to the Project; provided that,
notwithstanding the termination of the Agreement with regard to the Project, the Covenants and
Restrictions provided for in Exhibit B of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Dated this day of , 20_.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH
By
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Its
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
2006, by , the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth.
Notary Public
A-1
day of
of the
IWegI W f1113
COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
1. The Development Property shall not be exempt from real estate taxes notwithstanding
the ownership or use of the land and, specifically, shall not be a part of a job opportunity
building zone or other tax free zone under local or state law.
2. The Development Property shall not be sold, transferred, conveyed or leased to any of
the following parties:
a) An institution of purely public charity;
b) A church or ancillary tax-exempt housing;
c) A public hospital;
d) A public school district;
e) An organization exempt from federal income taxes pursuant to
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if as
a result of such sale, transfer, conveyance or lease the Development
Property would become exempt from real estate taxes; or
f) A Minnesota cooperative association organized under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 308.05 and 308.18 for the purpose of complying with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.133, subdivision 3, or any
other party that would cause the Development Property to be valued and
assessed for real estate tax purposes at a lower percentage of its market
value than the Development Property is then being valued and assessed for
real estate tax purposes or would result in the Development Property
becoming exempt from real estate taxes.
3. The Development Property shall not be used for any of the following purposes;
a) The operation of a public charity;
b) A church or house of worship;
c) The operation of a public hospital;
d) The operation of a public schoolhouse, academy, college, university or
seminary of learning; or
e) Any other use which would cause the Development Property to be valued
and assessed for real estate tax purposes at a lower percentage of its
market value than the Development Property is then being valued and
B-1
assessed for real estate tax purposes or would result in the Development
Property becoming exempt from real estate taxes.
4. The Development Property shall be devoted to uses consistent with Section 10.3 of
this Development Agreement.
5. The Development Property owner shall:
a) not discriminate on the basis of color, creed, national origin, or sex in the
sale, lease, use or occupancy of the Development Property, the
Improvements or any part thereof;
b) develop the Development Property in an orderly manner consistent with
the respective City' zoning ordinances and comprehensive plan.
6. The covenants and restrictions herein contained shall run with the title to the
Development Property and shall be binding upon all present and future owners and occupants of
the Development Property; provided, however, that the covenants and restrictions herein
contained shall inure only to the benefit of the Authority and may be released or waived in whole
or in part at any time, and from time to time, by the sole act of the Authority, and variances may
be granted to the covenants and restrictions herein contained by the sole act of the Authority.
These covenants and restrictions shall be enforceable only by the Authority, and only the
Authority shall have the right to sue for and obtain an injunction, prohibitive or mandatory, to
prevent the breach of the covenants and restrictions herein contained, or to enforce the
performance or observance thereof.
7. The covenants and restrictions herein contained shall remain in effect until the
payment in full of principal of, and interest on the limited revenue tax increment note issued in
accordance with this Development Agreement, and thereafter shall be null and void.
No. R-1
FORM OF LIMITED REVENUE TAX INCREMENT NOTE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE OF 2006
CROSSROADS STATION PROJECT)
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $1,687,000.00 INTEREST RATE: 6.00%
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota
the "Authority"), hereby acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby
promises to pay to Dove Capital, LLC, or its registered assigns (the "Registered Owner"), but
only in the manner, at the times, from the sources of revenue, and to the extent hereinafter
provided, the principal amount stated above with interest, from the date hereof, at the rate per
annum stated above.
This Tax Increment Revenue Note of 2006 (Crossroads Station Project) (or "Note") is
issued pursuant to the provisions of that certain Development Agreement, dated as of
2006, as the same may be amended from time to time (the "Development
Agreement"), by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota (the "Authority") and Dove Capital, LLC (the "Developer").
Provided that the Developer has submitted evidence to the Authority that costs of the
Improvements (as defined in the Development Agreement) have been incurred and paid by the
Developer as provided in the Development Agreement, the principal and interest amounts due
under this Note (the "Note Payment Amounts") shall be payable on 1, 200_, and on
each 1 and 1 thereafter to and including 1, 20_, or, if the first
should not be a Business Day (as defined in the Development Agreement) the next succeeding
Business Day (the "Note Payment Dates"). On each Note Payment Date the Authority shall pay,
by check or draft mailed to the person that was the Registered Owner of this Note at the close of
the last Business Day preceding such Note Payment Date, the Available Tax Increments (as
hereinafter defined) received by the Authority from the Tax Increment District (as hereinafter
defined) since the preceding Note Payment Date or, in the case of the first Note Payment Date,
prior to such first Note Payment Date, as provided in the Development Agreement. All
payments shall be first applied to interest accrued on the Note and then to the unpaid principal of
ISI
the Note. The Authority shall not be required to make any payments on the Note subsequent to
February 1, 2035, and any balance of principal and interest remaining unpaid subsequent to the
payment made on February 1, 2035 shall be deemed forgiven by the Developer. In no event
shall the total Note Payment Amounts paid under this Note exceed the maximum amount of
4,133,098.23.
Interest on this Note will compound semi-annually. Notwithstanding the interest rate
provided herein, the total amount of capitalized interest that shall be payable by the Authority
under this Note is limited to $261,223.00, as provided in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 (Crossroads Station), dated
2006.
The Note Payment Amounts due hereon shall be payable solely from a portion of the tax
increments, less the Authority's administrative fee of ten percent (10%), from the Development
Property within the Authority's Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 (the
Tax Increment District") within its Redevelopment Project Area No. 1, which are paid to the
Authority and which the Authority is entitled to retain pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, as the same may be amended or supplemented
fi•om time to time (the "Available Tax Increments"). This Note shall terminate and be of no
further force and effect following the last Note Payment Date defined above, on .any date upon
which the Authority shall have cancelled and rescinded the Development Agreement or the Note
pursuant to said Development Agreement, or on the date that all principal and interest shall have
been paid in full, whichever occurs earliest. The Authority makes no representation or covenant,
express or implied, that the Available Tax Increments will be sufficient to pay, in whole or in
part, the amounts which are or may become due and payable hereunder.
The Authority's payment obligations hereunder shall be further conditioned on the fact
that no Event of Default under the Development Agreement shall have occurred and be
continuing at the time payment is otherwise due hereunder, but such unpaid amounts shall
become payable if said Event of Default shall thereafter have been cured; and, further, if
pursuant to the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Development Agreement the
Authority elects to cancel and rescind the Development Agreement, the Authority shall have no
further debt or obligation under this Note whatsoever. Reference is hereby made to all of the
provisions of the Development Agreement, including without limitation Section 3.3 thereof, for a
fuller statement of the rights and obligations of the Authority to pay the principal of and interest
on this Note, and said provisions are hereby incorporated into this Note as though set out in full
herein.
This Note is a special, limited revenue obligation and not a general obligation of the
Authority and is payable by the Authority only from the sources and subject to the qualifications
stated or referenced herein. This Note is not a general obligation of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, and neither the full faith
and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged to the payment of the principal of and
interest on this Note and no property or other asset of the Authority, save and except the above -
referenced Available Tax Increments, is or shall be a source of payment of the Authority's
obligations hereunder.
D-2
This Note is issued by the Authority in aid of financing a project pursuant to and in full
conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799.
This Note may be assigned only with the consent of the Authority, which consent must
not be unreasonably withheld. In order to assign the Note, the assignee shall surrender the same
to the Authority either in exchange for a new fully registered note or for transfer of this Note on
the registration records for the Note maintained by the Authority. Each permitted assignee shall
take this Note subject to the foregoing conditions and subject to all provisions stated or
referenced herein.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things
required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened,
and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have
happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by
law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the Authority outstanding on the
date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of
the Authority to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, by its Board of Commissioners, has caused this Note to be
executed by the manual signatures of its Chair and Executive Director and has caused this Note
to be issued on and dated as of 12006.
Executive Director Chair
D-3
CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRATION
It is hereby certified that the foregoing Note, as originally issued on , 2006,
was on said date registered in the name of Dove Capital, LLC, and that, at the request of the
Registered Owner of this Note, the undersigned has this day registered the Note in the name of
such Registered owner, as indicated in the registration blank below, on the books kept by the
undersigned for such purposes.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF DATE OF SIGNATURE OF
REGISTERED OWNER REGISTRATION SECRETARY
Dove Capital, LLC
12006
333 Washington Avenue North
Suite 206 Union Plaza
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Attn: Director, Business
Development
D-4
OCT 0 4 2006
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
DATE: September 28, 2006
TO: Jean McGann, Administrative Services Director
Jim Barnes, Housing Program Manager
FROM: Bob Moberg, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION
TIF ELIGIBLE COSTS
The developer for the subject project has requested the useof tax increment financing (TIF) to
offset costs that will be incurred when the property is redeveloped. The developer's request for
financial assistance is directly related to construction of public improvements which the City
desires to include as part of the redevelopment and which will benefit residents and businesses
outside of the redevelopment area., The developer has also requested financial assistance foi
activities that are unique to the project site, including building demolition and soil correction. In
summary, TIF has been requested for the following site improvements:
1. Installation of a service road (backage road) along the south side of the
redevelopment area. The backage road will serve as a connector between West
Medicine Lake Drive and CSAH 73 and will also -connect to an'existing service
road on the west end of the site.
2. Intersection improvements at the TH 55 / West Medicine Lake Drive
intersection. The existing traffic signal will also be modified.
3. Intersection improvements at the TH 55 / South Shore Drive intersection. The
existing traffic signal will also be modified.
4. Replacement of an existing drainage culvert under TH 55 to aid in correcting
chronic drainage problems in the area.
5. Installation of a water main loop in Cottonwood Lane to improve water system
pressure and flow for the existing neighborhood south and west of the site.
6. Demolition of existing buildings within public right of way.
7. Correction of unsuitable soils for the proposed public improvements.
I have reviewed cost estimates prepared by the developer. and the developer's engineer for the
elements identified above. I have compared the scope of improvements identified in the cost
estimate work with the scope of work shown in the construction plans. I have also reviewed a
O: Engineering\DEVLMNTS\PlymXingSta_09_28 06.doc
geotechnical report for the site, prepared for the developer by Braun Intertec. The estimated costs
are as follows:
Element Estimated Cost
TH 55 Service Road $548,100
TH 55 / West Medicine Lake Drive $196,000
TH 55 / CSAH 73 % South Shore Drive $364,000
TH 55 Culvert Replacement $335,800
Cottonwood Lane Water Main $94,800
Building Demolition $48,300
Soil Correction $180,000
TOTAL $1,767,000
Information provided in the geotechnical report indicates a significant amount of soil correction
will be necessary to support proposed roadway and utility improvements. 'It is likely that some
complex engineering solutions will be needed to construct the desired improvements. The
developer will be responsible for generating solutions that are satisfactory to the City.
The estimated costs provided by the developer for the elements included in their TIF request are
reasonable for the scope of work identified. Given the opportunity the City has to improve some
significant transportation and drainage issues with the redevelopment, these costs can be
considered as a basis in determining the extent of TIF eligibility for the project.
Cc: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works
0:,En&eering\DEV LMNTS\P1ytnXingSta_09_28_06.doc
NWE 89825
HWE 899
LEGEND:
EX SnNC 6T09u 5E1'.ERFFE
O'^"— Exl9i NG
P
PO'
FAHEAO ELECT
E.TSDrIG ON P. DtE
Ilrl
E-TNC UI
lPISIIDR
c%IST rvG OrRREAU CIECIR CRL
6rARY
v— EUTENCE 11'
x-1'--I^
fII
i FFE i
yq - ,
J 902
4 rJ 91.5
STUG
Iid -TER
RPE HYDPN1r
i— PROPOSEDPROPOSED STORII SENER... FFE904.. I l /
ll1/ -
FFE
r - 0
r— POP09ED SANILAP.t
PROPOSED CURB w CUTTER
En5TN4 ROAD
R01•i
PROPOSE. RD OSO wDR
r 1
I1 _ `\ \\_
I}' I . I I' • / J - / j) F ` '
J/I It 903
L'Y•. R- ND-FLr JD DPAINACE 51'IAtE- OVE I ` ' '
i
WETLAND IMPAC
J 1600 soFT jl I I
FFE I'J903
G
p9,
NINE 899.00
MINE 899.61
WETLAND BUFFER
16522 SOFT _ / ' \ \ ..-.
t..' ,Fe• Tcc"'.atms's'?" "..+- l4 /I
I WETLAND MITIGATION ,.
r 17/7 SOFT ll\ \ _-`L:rt EF#+ ai SONY
5.
D,BUFFER WET852 SOAND IMPW2512. SO25125DFT 4852 SOFT
NWE 8958` WETLAND MITIGATION /
HWE 896 2496 SOFT i
NOTE: 1) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BL ENCOMPASSED BY SILT fENLING UNTIL
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE ANDVEGITATION HAS BEEN REESTABLISHED. Ij
2) WETLANDS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF WETLAND BUFFER /
USING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN ACCORDERLE WITH CITY
OF PLYMOUTH STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 6ONSTRUCTION.
22388 SOFT
I
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
PLYMOUTH CROSSROADS STATION
FINAL PLAT SRT
LE _ __ VOIGT CONSULTANTS LLC
PLYMOUTH, MN
SHEET NO. G'_4
October 10, 2006
To City of Plymouth:
CAPI'T'AL, LLC
Subject: Plymouth Crossroads TIF 'but -for° Narrative
OCT 111006
There are four distinct areas in the `but -for' test. These areas contain issues that the City of Plymouth has been
trying to resolve for decades. The four areas are transportation and circulation, drainage and flooding; severe
sub -surface soil conditions and removal of long standing blight.
Transportation and circulation (reference SRF Traffic Study)
Existing traffic operations at the TH55/West Medicine Lake. Drive_ intersection and at the
TH55/South Shore Drive intersection are greatly compromised by the lack of a well functioning
frontage road along the south side of TH55. Development of the subject property provides the
opportunity for the City to install a new frontage road, stacking lanes, dedicated turn lanes and thru
lanes. In addition it allows for the reallignment of the two intersections and the set aside of land for
future Cty. Rd. 73, improving safety and providing for increased traffic capacity. Traffic signals at
the two intersections will either be modified or replaced.
Drainage and flooding (reference 1980 Plymouth study of storm water system)
The site has historically experienced significant drainage issues that have resulted in traffic flow
and rdrainage problems. The existing pipe under TH55 is submerged and difficult to access but
plans indicate it is 36 inches in diameter. A 36 inch pipe is capable of conveying a peak discharge
of nominally 30 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the 100 -yr storm event. However, a discharge of
122 cfs is indicated as the design discharge from node 130 to node BC -P32 (the reach
immediately upstream of the pipe) in Appendix C of the 1980 Plymouth study of the storm water
system. Similarly, Appendix.B of.the Plymouth study indicates an outflow from Pond BC -P32 (the
Wetland upstream from -the pipe) of 80 cfs. In either case the pipe under TH55 is at least 60%
below the capacity to meet present day needs. The improvements in the proposed development
will increase the discharge capacity of the trunk sewer line to 122 cfs, or an increase of 60 inches
equivalent to a 45 in x.73 in arch reinforced concrete pipe). Re -grading of the entire site will also
provide for improved overland flood passage in extreme events adding to upstream protection. A
48 inch diameter pipe was installed across the east side of the property in the mid 1990's. Although
it was properly sized for that time, it is no longer adequate. As pang of the development the
downstream portion of the pipe crossing the property will be removed and a 54 inch pipe will be
installed along a new alignment and directly connect to the new pipe under TH55. These
modifications will resolve any future drainage and runoff issues..
Sub -surface soil conditions and removal of long standing blight (reference Braun soil boring
report)
Soil boring tests indicate unstable soil tests down to 100 feet (see soil boring report). Several
thousand feet of infrastructure will need to be placed on pilings,in order to ensure the structural
integrity of the roads, utilities and storm drainage. In addition, several buildings will need to be
placed on pilings.
333 Washington Avenue North • Suite 206 Union Plaza • Minneapolis, MN 55401
Page 2 October 10, 2006
Removal of long standing blight (reference Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment)
The current Plymouth Shopping Center and adjacent site have long been considered a
redevelopment opportunity based on the conditions of the buildings.
To meet state statutory tests for blight, an assessment was conducted by Short Elliott Hendrickson,
Inc. (SEH). The assessment concluded that the district met both the statutory coverage test and
conditions of buildings test (see below):
1. Coverage Test — 3 of 5 properties would meet the coverage test with 94.3% area
coverage. This exceeds the 70% area coverage requirement.
2. Condition of Buildings Test -100 percent of the current buildings — 3 of 3 buildings - were
found to be "structurally substandard" when considering .code deficiencies and other
deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.
This exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of buildings, not
including outbuildings, must be found "structurally substandard."
The conclusion of the SEH assessment based on these findings is as follows:
Our surveying and evaluation of, the properties within this proposed
Redevelopment District render results that in our professional opinion would
qualify the district eligible under the statutory criteria and formulas for a,
Redevelopment TIF.District (State Statute 469.174 Subd. 10)."
There has-been minimal investment in the Plymouth Shopping Center since it was built
over 50 years ago. The buildings have several code violations and are poorly maintained. The
proposed development will allow for the demolition of the current shopping center and removal of
any existing environmental hazards.
The costs associated with resolving the items listed above are extraordinary and impact the proposed project to
the point that without TIF assistance the proposed project is not economically feasible.
Regards,
i
Brett olbjornsen
Director, Business Development
Dove Capital, LLC
Dir: 612.746.1669
Cell: 612.875.8585
Fax: 612.395.9194
brett.colby@dovecapital.us
333 Washington Avenue North • Suite 206 Union Plaza • Minneapolis, MN 55401
Springsted
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jean McGann, Administrative Services Director
James Barnes, Housing Programs Manager
FROM: Paul Steinman, Vice PresidenVConsultant
Mikaela Huot, Assistant Vice President/Consultant
CC: David MacGillivray, Chairman,
DATE: October 10, 2006
Springsted Incorporated
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2887
Tel: 651-223-3000
Fax: 651-223-3002
www.springsted.com
SUBJECT: Dove Capital, LLC Request for Financial Assistance — Plymouth Crossroads Station
Redevelopment Project Final Internal Rate of Return Analysis
The purpose of this memo is to outline the financial components of the developer's proposal to redevelop the existing
shopping center into a retail project consisting of seven individual buildings on approximately 18.26 acres within the
proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 3-1. The financial components are as follows:
Developer Request for Tax Increment Financing Assistance
o Total Tax Increment Generated
Developer Proforma But -For Analysis
o Total Project Cost
o Total Project Value
o; Internal Rate of Return Analysis
Developer Request for Tax Increment Financinq Assistance
The developer has submitted a request for TIF assistance dated April 15, 2006 for a total amount of $2,548,031 with
estimated total project costs of $20,901,860. In the request, the developer indicates that the purpose of the
assistance is to finance extraordinary costs associated with redevelopment of the site including demolition, public
roads and utilities, soil correction, flood control and prevention. In September 2006, we have been provided with
updated project costs totaling $25,247,044 and a but -for letter from the developer indicating that tax increment
assistance is necessary due to unusual costs, including transportation and circulation, drainage and flooding, sub-
surface soil conditions and removal of longstanding blight, and that TIF assistance will.help to offset these unusual
costs and make the project more feasible, The project costs have increased 20% and the requested amount of
assistance has remained the same since the application was submitted. The following updated estimated sources
and uses of funds related to the proposed project are as follows:
Public Sector Advisors
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Developer Review, TIF 3-1
October 10, 2006
Page 2
Sources of Funds Total Uses of Funds Total
Net Amount to Developer 90% 4,136,325
Bank Loan Amount 16,829,351 Land Acquisition 8,942,488
Equity 6,730,693 Building Construction 8,182,293
TIF 1,687,000 Site Work 2,989,140
Tenant Build out Contingency 709,896
Financing Costs 2,101,606
Soft Costs 2,321,621
Total 25,247,044 Total 25,247;044
City staff has reviewed the project cost estimates prepared by the developer and the developer's engineer. The
estimated costs associated with redevelopment of the site including installation of roads and utilities, intersection
improvements, correction of drainage problems, demolition and soils correction are $1,767,000, We have estimated
this project as proposed could support a TIF Revenue Note, assuming a 6% interest rate, with a maximum amount of
1,687,000. Therefore the recommended maximum reimbursement amount to the developer is $1,687,000, plus
interest costs. A summary of the estimated tax increment is included below:
Total Gross Tax Increment 4,595,918
City Administrative Retainage 10% 459,593
Net Amount to Developer 90% 4,136,325
TIF Revenue Note Principal 1,687,000
TIF Revenue Note Interest 2,188,103
TIF Revenue Note Capitalized Interest 261,223
Total Est. Payments to Developer 4,136,325
rounded up $3227 to make equal to net tax increment
The annual amount of gross tax increment based upon a final market value of $13,653,540 as estimated for taxes
payable 2010 is approximately $134,788. The City anticipates retaining 10% of the tax increment for documented
administrative expenses, with the remaining 90% pledged for payment to the developer. Assuming a 6% interest rate
we estimate it will take the full term of the district (26 years) to pay off a TIF Revenue Note of $1,687,000. The total
projected amount of tax increment, after deduction for state auditor fee, to be generated is approximately $4,595,918,
of which approximately $4,136,325 is pledged to the developer. Our assumptions also include a 2% annual market
value inflator. In the case of a TIF Revenue Note, the assumption of an annual compounded market value inflator is
a risk factor for the developer and not the City.
Developer Proforma But -For Analysis
The but -for test is used to determine whether or not a project will proceed as proposed without the use of public
dollars. To complete this analysis we examined two ten-year commercial project pro -formas, one showing a result if
the developer receives the subsidy and one showing a result if the developer does not receive a subsidy.
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Developer Review, TIF 3-1
October 10, 2006
Page 3
The following assumptions and parameters were used in the proformas:
Revenues and expenses provided by developer
Lease rates provided by developer
o Average starting rate of $25.00 per square foot for retail space
o Future rate increases with lease renewals
Vacancy rates provided by developer
o 6.5%
Equity investment
o $6,730,693 without assistance
o $6,730,693 with assistance
TIF Revenue Note/Present value rate equal to 6% (developer financing)
Developer provided financing terms of 6%, 30 year term — balance paid in full at time of sale in year 11
o $18.5 million without assistance
o $16.8 million with assistance
o $1.687 million tax increment assistance sold to private lender for upfront financing
Sale of asset in year 11, assuming 8% cap rate
Springsted has reviewed the developer's projected lease rates and finds them to be within a reasonable range of
rates in the Plymouth and surrounding area market. The leases appear to be on the high side of noted averages,
however the developer has pre -leased almost all of Phase 1, so we are comfortable with the assumptions. The
developer uses a 6,5% vacancy rate which is also a reasonable assumption for this type of product given the current
market. In both scenarios the developer anticipates an equity contribution of approximately 26% of total estimated
project costs, which we believe shows strong developer commitment, We have not reviewed the proposed financing
terms of the project.
Springsted performed an analysis using the Internal Rate of Return mechanism to estimate the proposed project's
rate of return.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
o measures the average annual yield on an investment
The following table summarizes the results of the IRR analysis:
Without Assistance With Assistance
Internal Rate of Return ear 11 10.36% 11.34%
Calculated Sale $18,340,044 18,340,044
Developers are typically interested in the cash on cash rate of return and return on investment to determine the
profitability of income producing properties. The cash on cash method is an annual test and considers the before -tax
cash flow as a measure of the equity invested to determine the developer's cash return and the return on investment
is a return ratio that compares the net benefits of a project versus its total costs. An investor is typically interested in
the internal rate of return of the project to determine the return on their initial investment, generally over a longer
period, It is our understanding that in this case the developer holds the position as both developer and investor, as it
intends to control and own the property for an extended period of time. The internal rate of return measurement is
typically what is used by public agencies to determine the need for a subsidy.
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Developer Review, TIF 3-1
October 10, 2006
Page 4
Our methodology is to estimate the project's financial performance with and without the assistance in order to meet
the but -for test, Should the IRR lie below a reasonable range without a subsidy, we can assume the project will not
move forward without such subsidy. Should the IRR lie within a reasonable range with a subsidy, we can assume
the amount of subsidy tested is appropriate for the project, All such estimates should be viewed as general
indicators of performance and not exact forecasts. The number of current and future variables affecting these
estimates and actual results are great.
We estimate the overall cumulative cash flow of the project in the early years will be sufficient. Annual cash flow is
covered in the initial years and proves solid and growing through ten years in both scenarios. The developer
assumes an annual amount will be reserved for tenant improvement costs and lease commissions. Debt service
coverage is estimated to be 98% without assistance and 108% with assistance in year three,
Without assistance this project is expected to generate an internal rate of return of 10.36% in 2017, The calculation
of the internal rate of return includes a hypothetical sale of the building in year 11 (2017). Using the Net Operating
Income of year 11 and a capitalization rate of 8%, the estimated sales price of the building asset would be
18,340,044. Using those same assumptions, with the TIF assistance we calculated the project would generate an
IRR of 11.34%, with a calculated sales price of $18,340,044. (The sale price is the same with and without TIF
assistance because we assume the net operating income in year 11 will remain the same, which is used to determine
the assets value in the last year of the analysis)
Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate)
o a ratio used to estimate the value of income producing properties
Conclusion
In this project, since the developer has requested that tax increment finance the unusual expenses of redevelopment,
we are primarily focusing on whether the subsidy is extraordinarily impacting the developers return. The results, with
assistance, show a return of 11.34%, which, in our experience, is within a reasonable IRR range for this type of
project in the current market (10%-15%). In the case of a projected total 11.34% IRR, which is on the low side of
reasonable, the assistance may provide just enough enhancement to influence the developer's investment decisions
regarding this project.
In conclusion, it appears such assistance is necessary to obtain the redevelopment results the City desires on the
proposed site.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Plymouth, Please contact us at (651) 223-3000 or
psteinman anspringsted,com and mhuot a springsted.com with any questions or comments.
Independent School District 284
h,
September 27, 2006
District Administrative Offices
210 County Road 101 North
P.O. Box 660
Wayzata, MN 55391-0660
763.745.5000
Fax: 763.745.5091
Mr. James Barnes
Housing Program Manger
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Plymouth Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-3
Dear Mr. Barnes:
I have reviewed the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-3 (Plymouth
Crossroads Station Project).
The administration of Independent School District (Wayzata) has determined that
the project does not have negative implications for the school district, either
financial or otherwise. Therefore we have no objections to the project going
forward.
Sincerely,
Alan R. Hopeman, Jr.
Executive Director
Finance & Business Services
Cc: Bob Ostlund, Superintendent
Mikaela Huot, .Springsted, Inc.
ARH:kb
www. wayzata.k12.mn. us
CERTIFICATE AS TO RESOLUTION
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"), hereby certify that the attached resolution is a -
true copy of Resolution No. 2006- , entitled: "RESOLUTION RELATING TO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO, 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-3; APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR" (the "Resolution"), on file in the original records of
the City in my legal custody; that the Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of
the City at a meeting on October 24, 2006, and that the meeting was duly held by the City
Council and was attended throughout by a quorum, pursuant to call and notice of such
meeting given as required by law; and that the Resolution has not as of the date hereof
been amended or repealed.
WITNESS my hand officially this day of , 2006.
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services
A-600 Government Center
Minneapolis MN 55487-0060
October 13, 2006
Mikaela Huot
Springsted
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
www.hennepin.us
f
OCT 18 2006 a`
I .
COMMUNIi uE 2LOPMENTDEPARNENT
Re: Plymouth Redevelopment TIF District 1-3 Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Dear Ms. Huot:
Enclosed is a report from Richard P. Johnson, Hennepin County Deputy Administrator, to the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, concerning the proposed Plymouth Croosroads Station
Project Redevelopment TIF District 1-3.
Please arrange to have the report entered into the record of the public hearing of the Plymouth City.
Council on Tuesday, October 24, 2006, to reflect the input of Hennepin County, as provided by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 2.
If you have any questions about this information, ,please call me at 612-348-5076.
Sincerely,
4
Jean M. Bierbaum, Principal Administrative Assistant
Administrative Support Division
Cc James Barnes, Plymouth HRA, City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Blvd, Plymouth, MN 55447
Revu Plymouth 1310242006JTra nsm itta[Letter
An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper
MIL -M
Date: October 13, 2006
Recycled Paper
To: Board of County Commissioners
0AFrom: Richard P. Johnson, Deputy County Administrator
Subject: Plymouth Redevelopment TIF District No. 1-3 Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Hearing Date: Plymouth City Council Tuesday, October 24, 2006, at 7:00 p.m.
PROPOSAL
The City of Plymouth proposes creation of the.Plymouth Crossroads Station Project at State Highway 55, just west.of
Sunset Trail. The substandard buildings on the 18 -acre site will be demolished and replaced with seven new commercial
structures consisting of four retail buildings (62,567 sq.ft. of retail), one restaurant, a combined bank and office and a gas
station. Tax increment will be used to assist with the costs of site improvements, utilities, other improvements and
administrative expenses.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Redevelopment TIF District will have a maximum duration of 26 -tax increment generating years. The project is
expected to be fully constructed by 2008.
Plymouth anticipates using the pay-as-you-go method of financing and does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds.
The Sources and Uses of Funds:
Sources of Funds Amount Uses of Funds: Amount
Tax Increment 4,595,918 Site Improvements 849,491
Interest on Investment Funds 35,714 Installation of public utilities 873,222
Total Sources 4,631,632
Loan Interest Payments 2,188,103
Capitalized Interest , 261,223
Administrative Expenses 459.593
Total Uses 4,631,632 .
Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation Department, has provided the following comments about the impact of the
proposed TIF District on Hennepin County Roads:
This proposed TIF district is located in the southwest quadrant of CSAH 73 and TH 55. The redevelopment
involves construction of 62,567 square feet of commercial space, including a restaurant, .bank/office and gas
station. There is currently no County project for the adjacent segment of County roadway; however, County staff
still believes that the previously proposed straightening of CSAH 73 is a desired improvement.
A Preliminary Plat has been submitted for this TIF; and through the platting process the County has been involved
in discussions with the City, offered suggestions on improving design of access to the TIF site and recommended
adequate right-of-way dedication to accommodate the potential roadway reconstruction.
Minnesota Statutes Section 469.175, subd. 1(a), allows the County to require that the City pay the costs of road
improvements arising out of increased use of county roads related to the development within a TIF District under
certain conditions.
The County should request that the City -include the adjacent future and existing County roads within the physical
boundaries of the TIF district to facilitate expenditure of TIF funds on roadway improvements. This includes the
intersections of CSAH 73 at Sunset Trail and CSAH 73 at TH 55. Also, several parcels within in this TIF district
contain right-of-way for this proposed roadway project, and this corridor must be reserved to accomplish the -future
realignment (see attached figure). We have had discussions with the City. indicating that there will likely be a
County recommendation regarding the County roads. The City does not support this concept." continued
October 13, 2006
Redevelopment TIF District No. 1-3 Plymouth Crossroads Station Project
Page 2
SUMMARYThisTIFDistrict proposal does not appear to satisfy the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners' preference for useoftaxincrement, as identified in Hennepin County Resolution 92-10=017R1, adopted October 27; 1992, because the TIFPlandoesnotidentifyitasbeingforarenewalorrenovationprojectofgreatestneedorforalowerincomehousingprojectofdemonstratedneed. Four of the new buildings will be retail, one will be a restaurant, one a gas station and the
seventh will be a commercial bank and office building.
Of significant note are roadway issues raised by the Hennepin County Transportation Department Director, Jim Grube;
specifically: This proposed TIF district is located in the southwest quadrant of CSAH 73 and TH 55. The redevelopmentinvolvesconstructionof62,567 square feet of commercial space, including a restaurant, bank/.office and gasstation. There is currently no County project for the adjacent segment of County roadway; however, County staffstillbelievesthatthepreviouslyproposedstraighteningofCSAH73isadesiredimprovement. A Preliminary Plat has been submitted for this TIF, and through the platting process the County has been involvedindiscussionswiththeCity, offered suggestions on improving design of access to the TIF site and recommended
adequate right-of-way dedication to accommodate the potential roadway reconstruction.
1(a), allows the County to require that the City pay the costs of roadMinnesotaStatutesSection469.175, subd. improvements arising out of increased use of county roads related to the development within a TIF District under
certain conditions. The County should request that the City include the adjacent future and existing County roads within the physicalboundariesoftheTIFdistricttofacilitateexpenditureofTIFfundsonroadwayimprovements. This includes theintersectionsofCSAH73atSunsetTrailandCSAH73. at TH 55. Also, several parcels within in this TIF district contain
right-of-way for this proposed roadway project, and this corridor
Jmust
be reserved to accomplish the future realignment
see attached figure). We have had discussions with the City indicating that there will likely be a County recommendation
regarding the County roads. The City does not support this concept"
A copy of this report will be sent to the City of Plymouth with a request that it be entered into the public record of thePlymouthCityCouncilpublichearingonTuesday, October 24, 2006, to reflect the County's position on this proposal.
Revu Plymouth 1310242006J
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
RESOLUTION RELATING TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-3; APPROVING A
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the "City"),
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth (the
Authority"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, as amended, has
prepared and presented to the City, and the City has approved, a redevelopment plan, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Redevelopment Plan
the "Project Plan") for Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 (the "Project Area"), and a
redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project").
1.02. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1799 (the "Act"), the
Authority has adopted a tax increment financing plan for the proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-3 (the "Financing Plan"), which is now before this Council for approval. The
Financing Plan is the proposed method for financing the public redevelopment costs of certain of
the redevelopment activities to be undertaken pursuant to the Project Plan. The proposed Tax
Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3 (the "District") comprises contiguous tax
parcels within the Redevelopment Project as described in the Financing Plan,
1.03. Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County and of the
Board of Education of Independent School District No. 284 have been given an opportunity to
meet with the City and comment on the Financing Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.175, subdivision 3, this Council on October 24, 2006, conducted a public hearing on the
desirability of approving the Financing Plan. Notice of the public hearing was duly published as
required by law in the Plymouth Sun Sailor, the official newspaper of the City, on
and , 2006. The City has [not] received written comments on
the Financing Plan from the county and the school district after providing the county. and the
school district boards with information on the fiscal and economic implications of the Financing
Plan not less than 30 days before the date of the public hearing.
1.04. In addition to the notice and opportunity described in Section 1.03, as required by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 2a, the City, not less than 30 days before the
publication of the notice of public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, delivered written notice to
the member of the Board of County Cominissioners of Hennepin County who represents the
District. The notice contained a general description of the boundaries of the District, the
proposed development activities to be undertaken therein, an offer by representatives of the City
to meet and discuss the proposed District with the county commissioner and a solicitation of the
commissioner's comments with respect to the District.
Section 2. Approval of Financing Plan. On the basis of the Financing Plan and the
information elicited at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found,
determined and declared:
2.01. The Financing Plan provides the means to finance certain public redevelopment
costs of the Redevelopment Project that benefit the District. The Financing Plan contains a
statement of objectives for the improvement of the Redevelopment Project, a statement as to the
development program for the District and a statement of the property within the Redevelopment
Project which the City intends to acquire. The Financing Plan also estimates the public
redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Project, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be
incurred, the sources of revenues to finance or otherwise pay public costs of the District, the
most recent net tax capacity of taxable real property within the District, the estimated captured
net tax capacity of the District at completion and the duration of the District. The Financing Plan
also describes and identifies the redevelopment activities to be undertaken or expected to be
undertaken in the District. The Financing Plan further contains alternative estimates of the
impact of the proposed tax increment financing on the net tax capacities of all taxing
jurisdictions in which the District is located. All the captured tax capacity is necessary for the
objectives of the District.
2.02. This Council hereby finds that the addition to the District consists of four (4)
contiguous tax parcel within a "project" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
subdivision 8, and is a proper tax increment financing district within the meaning of Section
469.174, subdivision 9. This Council further finds, based on the information in the Financing
Plan and representations of the developer, that the addition to the District contains the following
conditions, reasonably distributed throughout: The property consists of parcels consisting of 70
percent of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel
parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including
outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or
clearance. Therefore, the addition to the District qualifies as a "redevelopment district" within
the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10.
2.03. This Council hereby finds that the private development proposed, in the opinion of
this Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within
the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed
necessary since private developers could not economically develop the project without the
proposed subsidy; and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be
expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in
the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present
value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the
Financing Plan.
2-
2.04. This Council hereby finds that the Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for
the development of the City as a whole. The development is compatible with the City's zoning
ordinances and other related regulations and encourages efficient use of existing infrastructure as
set forth in the City's Land Use Plan.
2.05. This Council hereby finds that the Financing Plan will afford maximum
opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the
District by private enterprise. The redevelopment activities contemplated in the Project Plan
would provide an increase in employment and housing opportunities in the City, enhance the tax
base of the City and improve the general economy of the City and the State of Minnesota
2.06. Upon review of the Financing Plan, the information elicited at the public hearing
and on the basis of the findings in Sections 2.01 to 2.05, this Council hereby approves the
Financing Plan and the establishment of the District as a tax increment financing district in the
City, to be denominated "Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-3."
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of October, 2006.
3-
7eq-,,,
DATE: October 13, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: James Renneberg, Design Engineer
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
SOUTH BASS LAKE, LOST LAKE AND HEMLOCK LANE
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached two (2) resolutions adopting the
assessment roll as proposed.
BACKGROUND: The City Council set October 24, 2006 as the date of the public hearing on
the final assessment for the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project. There are three project areas for
this reconstruction project. The first area is Hemlock Lane, from Red Fox Drive in Maple Grove
to the recently constructed cul-de-sac. The second area, the South Bass Lake neighborhood, is
located from Zachary Lane to, and including, Larch Lane and 53'a Avenue to 54th Avenue,
including the adjacent cul-de-sacs. The third area is the Lost Lake neighborhood, which includes
the area south of Old Rockford Road to 40th Avenue and from Revere Lane to Ximines Lane (see
attached map). Project construction is complete with the exception of some minor restoration,
corrections and cleanup.
PROJECT FUNDING: The assessment rates for this project are based on the City's Street
Reconstruction Assessment Policy, at the time the project was ordered, and actual construction
costs for new concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer, where applicable.
The proposed assessment for the property owners on Hemlock Lane is $6,690.87 per lot, which
is assessed 35% of street reconstruction and 100% of curb and gutter. In both the South Bass
Lake and Lost Lake areas, the assessments are $4,931.77 and $4,442.01, respectfully, which are
only assessed 35% for the reconstruction of the street.
All properties within each area will be assessed the total listed above with a few exceptions. In
the Lost Lake area, there were two areas that were milled and overlaid and adjacent property
owners will be the cost of a mill and overlay. In total, there are 11 property owners and each
property will be assessed $2,787.29.
There are two properties located in the South Bass Lake Area that are not single-family
residential properties, Timber Shores Park and the Bass Lake Lift Station (both owned by the
City of Plymouth). The assessment for both of these properties was determined by calculating
ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
the actual front footage for each property, dividing it by the average per lot front footage for the
South :Bass Lake Area, and multiplying it by the estimated assessment per single-family lot to
determine an equivalent single-family residential lot rate. The assessment for Timber Shores
Park is $12,329.43 and the Bass Lake Lift Station is $13,069.19.
All three project areas have a lower assessment than originally proposed. Below is the estimated
assessments at the time of the feasibility project, the actual assessments after the project was
completed and recommended assessments per single family dwelling.
Hemlock Assessments
Curb Street Recon. Total
Feasibility $2,079.28 5,226.28 7,305.56
Actual $1,423.14 5,267.73 6,690.87
Recommended $1,423.14 5,267.73 6,690.87
South Bass Lake Assessments
Curb Street Recon. Total
Feasibility 0 $6,212.00 6,212.00
Actual 0 $4,931.77 4,931.77
Recommended 0 $4,931.77 4,931.77
Lost Lake Assessments
Curb Street Recon. Total
Feasibility 0 $5,060.00 5,060.00
Actual 0 $4,442.01 4,442.01
Recommended 0 $4,442.01 4,442.01
The assessment term was determined by the total assessment for each property. Any residential
assessment amount between $0 and $5,000 will be assessed at a 5 -year assessment term at an
interest rate of 8.25% and between $5,001 and $10,000 will have a 10 -year assessment term at a
8.75% interest rate. Attached is a copy of Resolution 2003-179 which established the City's
policy for setting special assessment rates.
Attached in the Assessment Information Packet is a sample of the payment options that was sent
to each property owner. Option 1 is full payment by November 24, 2006 without any interest.
Option 2 is full payment after November 24, 2006, but prior to November 30, 2006 in which
interest will be charged to the date the balance is paid off. Option 3 is a full payoff between the
dates of November 30, 2006 and November 14, 2007. Interest in this option will be for the entire
2007 year regardless of when the balance is paid off. Option 4 is payment over the standard
assessment term (5 or 10 years depending on the assessment term). Finally, Option 5 is a partial
prepayment by November 24, 2006 and the remaining balance to follow the standard assessment
term (Option 4).
The total amount of the final assessments is proposed to be $1,247,462.92 for all three project
areas. The City's portion of the project will be paid through the Street Reconstruction Fund
ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
2,466,936.10) the Water Fund ($60,850.00), the Sewer Fund ($70,388.00) and the Water
Resources Fund ($39,728.44). The City of Maple Grove will contribute $36,649.54 as a portion
of Hemlock Lane is within their city limits.
This Assessment Hearing has been noticed in accordance with the legal requirements including
published notice and mailed notice to each property proposed to be assessed.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt
the attached two resolutions at the conclusion. of the public hearing. These resolutions will adopt
the assessment roll as proposed.
attachments: Assessment Arca Map
Assessment Information :Packet
Assessment Rolls
Resolutions
Q ,J I
Oil N_D AVE
w
CIO W !!;
61 -ST A.VE--
j
it
0
2006 C /
Street Reconstruction Projects
Hemlock Ui'
E'. Streets Reconstructed ,J
Parcels Assessed -~—
o
N
s'
i
i- 77
0
CO io
IM0
g,:52RDAV
LU 0
U)
nOT-- TTT-FFT I -
F
2006 CD
SCHMIDTLAKEi.
N. Street Reconstruction ProjectskA MIDT LAKE RD
South Bass Lake
L50T"-
0 0
m
Streets Reconstructed
LU -
Parcels Assessed J
mi N
VE <
43RD AVE
ROCKFORD RD
k.._ XI M.I_N ES SLA FL .,
i .-. TRE-NTO N LA
ry
Wrgi \
i
40 T
Ji iw
2006
Street Reconstruction Projects / H
r >' !
W
Lost Lake P/ E;. i
3StreetsReconstructed
Parcels Assessed
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-179
ESTABLISHING A PROCESURE TO CALCULATE
NON -PENALTY RELATED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, the City must establish an interest rate on special assessments; and
WHEREAS, the current process of establishing special assessment interest rates is
somewhat subjective and difficult to explain,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that non -penalty related special assessment rates shall
be based on the then current primate rate as published by the Wall Street Journal or
Federal Reserve. The rate for a five-year assessment will be prime. The rate for a 10 -
year assessment will be prime +.5%. The rate for a 15 -year assessment will be prime +
1%.
Adopted by the City Council on April 8, 2003.
Assessment
Public Hearing
Information Pa.cket
2006 Street
Reconstruction
Project
South Bass Lake, Lost
Lake and Hemlock Lane
Project No. 61ol
7:00 P.M.
October24,2oo6
Agenda Item: 7.
1.
2.
3
0
5.
31
7.
AGENDA FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARINGS
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
Purpose of Meeting:
To provide the public an opportunity to hear a presentation of the proposed
assessments concerning public improvement projects benefiting their property.
The citizens have had an opportunity to review the proposed assessment roll in
the City Center as well as at this meeting and will have an opportunity to address
the Council concerning questions regarding these proposed assessments.
The Meeting was Carefully and Thoroughly Announced as Follows:
a. Notices were published in the Plymouth Sailor, the official City newspaper,
as required by law.
b. Written notice was mailed to each property owner in the improvement area
as shown by the records of the Hennepin County Auditor's tax statement
mailing list.
C. Announcements and discussions at Council meetings.
Review of Project Costs and Proposed Assessments:
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
The Procedure for the Hearing will be as Follows:
a. Write name, address, and agenda number on blue card.
b. Pass card to person collecting thein, who will give thein to the Mayor.
C. When your naive is called, come up to the microphone.
d. Please speak clearly into the microphone so that all may benefit from your
remarks.
C. No one may speak twice until all others who wish to speak have done so
Please give your name and address each time you speak.
Open Public Hearing:
Close Public Hearing
Council Action
0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\6101\PuU_14rg\AgendaAssmtHrg6101.doc
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Notice of the hearing was published in the official city newspaper, the Plymouth Sailor and a
notice was mailed to the owners of each parcel described in the assessment roll. For the
purpose of giving mailed notice, owners are those persons shown to be such on the records of
the County Treasurer and these records are used in addressing and mailing notices. If you are
making a payment to your mortgage company which includes a deposit for real estate taxes, it
is probable that the address shown on the County Treasurer's records is that of the mortgage
company and not your own. If some of you did not receive a notice, this may well be the
reason. A copy of the individual roll is available for your inspection.
2. Following the hearing, the Council will decide whether any adjustments in the roll are
necessary and will, by resolution, adopt the roll.
3. Assessment Payment Options, attached, is an example of how to pay for the assessment. A
copy was also sent to you with the Assessment Hearing letting dated October 4, 2006.
4. If after the hearing and after the adoption of the assessment roll by the City Council, you feel
that your assessment is unfair, you may appeal to the District Court of Hennepin County.
Your appeal must be served upon the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days from the date of
the resolution of the Council adopting the particular assessment roll. Your appeal must be
filed with the Clerk of District Court within 10 days after it has been served upon the Mayor or
City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land
m!qy be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment
with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding
officer at the hearing. These rules with respect to time are jurisdictional and the Council may
not extend them. Failure to serve and file your appeal as set out above will result in its
dismissal.
5. The above procedures are digested from Sections 429.061 and 429.081 of Minnesota Statutes
which govern the City Council in their assessment for public improvements.
0:\EngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\6101 W.ssessments\AssmtProcedure6101.doc
Option 1 Full Pavment by 11/24/2006
Pay principal of $4,442.01
Option 2 - Full Payment After 11/24/2006 and Prior to 11/30/06
Pay principal of $4,442.01
Plus - daily interest of 1.004016 for each day beginning 11/25/06.
Example of Payment on 11/27/06
Principal $4,442.01
Interest per day $1.004016 times 34 days $34.14
Total $4,476.15
Option 3 - Full Pay -Off 11/30/06 to 11/14/07
Year 1 assessment payment to County (2007 property tax statement) $1,3.15.95
Plus - remaining principal balance to City $3,553.61
Total $4,869.55
Option 4 - Standard Assessment to Term (Paid to Coun
4,442.01 $1,160.48 $5,602.49
4,442.01 8.25%
Principal Interest Total Payment Ending Balance
Year 1 - 2007 888.40 427.54 1,315.95 3,553.61
Year 2 -2008 888.40 293.17 1,181.57 2,665.21
Year 3 - 2009 888.40 219.88 1,108.28 1,776.80
Year 4 - 2010 888.40 146.59 1,034.99 888.40
Year 5 - 2011 888.40 73.29 961.70 0.00
4,442.01 $1,160.48 $5,602.49
Option 5 - Partial Prepayment By 11/24/06
Example - Resident may pay any amount over $100 as a partial payment
Amount paid to City by 11/24/06 $1,000.00
Revised Standard Assessment to Term (Paid to County)
3,442.01 8.25%
Principal Interest Total Payment Ending Balance
Year 1 - 2007 $688.40 $331.29 $1,019.70 $2,753.61
Year 2 - 2008 $688.40 $227.17 $915.57 $2,065.21
Year 3 - 2009 $688.40 $170.38 $858.78 $1,376.80
Year 4 - 2010 $688.40 $113.59 $801.99 $688.40
Year 5 - 2011 $688.40 $56.79 $745.20 $0.00
3,442.01 $899.23 $4,341.24
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Street Reconstruction. The City Council has adopted a long-range plan providing for the
periodic reconstruction, including mill and overlay, of all paved city streets. With the
improvement of streets, as a result of reconstruction or mill and overlay, adjoining properties
receive special benefit that results in the increase of the property's value. It is the policy of
the City that this special benefit should be paid for by the property owner receiving the special
benefit rather than the City as a whole. This is accomplished by specially assessing the
benefited property as authorized by State Statute, Section 429. The following is the City of
Plymouth's policy regarding special assessment's to properties benefiting from street
improvements.
a. It is the policy of the City to special assess abutting benefiting property for
street reconstruction costs, but not in excess of the special benefit to the
property. This policy applies to all streets that are public streets.
b. The assessment amount for the reconstruction or mill and overlay of previously
paved streets shall be determined annually by the City Council.
The assessment amount is based on the following:
1) In 2006 benefited properties shall be assessed 35% of the engineer's
estimated project cost as set forth in the project feasibility report -or
35% of the actual project cost, whichever amount is less. In 2007 and
thereafter, the rate shall be 40%.
2) For the purposes of street reconstruction or mill and overlay, the project
costs will include the cost of replacing or repairing concrete curb and
gutter. In those cases where bituminous curbing is replaced with
concrete curb and gutter, or where curb and gutter did not previously
exist, the additional special benefit will be assessed. The cost to be
assessed shall be 100% of the cost of installing the concrete curb and
gutter. This cost will be assessed on either a front foot or per lot basis.
The addition of a storm sewer system will also be considered an
additional benefit and shall be assessed at 100% of the cost.
3) Project cost includes both direct construction costs and all indirect costs
such as engineering and administration.
4) Assessments shall normally be levied for a period not to exceed five (5)
years for assessments of $5,000 or less, ten (10) years for assessments
greater than $5,000 but $10,000 or less, and Fifteen (15) years for
assessments greater than $10,000.
O:\Enginoering\GENERAL\ASMTSMSOStrect Rccamtmction Assessments Roposcd.doc
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Page 2
5) Assessments for properties guided or zoned for single-family use shall
be made on a per parcel (unit) basis for a local residential or residential
low volume street design standard as provided for in Plymouth City
Code and Engineering Guidelines A property may be assessed for
more than one unit in cases where the property could be reasonably
further subdivided in accordance with current Plymouth zoning and
subdivision requirements.
6) For properties guided or zoned for other than single family use, the City
shall calculate equivalent units based on the guided or zoned use. The
equivalent units may be based on front footage or area depending upon
the guided or zoned use and parcel configuration.
7) If a street is reconstructed to a design standard greater than the current
design standard due to the guided or zoned uses, the additional cost to
reconstruct the street shall be fully assessed to those properties. If the
street is reconstructed to a design different than the current standard,
the total cost shall be fully assessed to those properties if conditions
warrant.
8) Properties abutting county roadways reconstructed to complete urban
design and having reasonable access thereto shall be assessed in
accordance with this policy. The assessments shall be used to defray
the City's cost participation in the county improvement projects.
9) Properties or areas of property that have been determined to be
unbuildable shall be excluded from assessments. No building permits
will be issued for such property so deleted from assessments.
10) Partial prepayments of assessments can be made in accordance with
Amended Chapter III of the Plymouth City Code (Ordinance 2005-06).
11) Senior Citizens and Disabled People Special Assessments Deferrals in
accordance with City policy (if you are at least 65 years of age or are
disabled, you may qualify to have special assessments deferred). Other
deferrals may be available as authorized by State Statute, Section 429.
0:\Engineering\GENERAL\ASMTS\MIS0.Street Reconstruction Assessments -Proposed -doe
If you are at least 65 years old or disabled, you may qualify to have special assessments
deferred if they create a financial hardship for you.
Eligibility
You are eligible if:
For Senior Citizens
Your property is homestead.
As a property owner you are at least 65 years old.
You had a gross income of less than $27,500 for a one person household in the year
before the assessment installments for local improvements are to be certified with the
County.
If more than one person lives in the household, the income limit is:
2 Persons 31,400
3 Persons 35,350
4 Persons 39,250
5 Persons 42,400
6 Persons 45,550
For Permanent and Total Disability
You meet the criteria for senior citizens above except for age.
You are retired due to a permanent and total disability which must include one of the
following:
Certified legally blind in both eyes.
Loss of both arms at the shoulder.
Loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial limbs can be used.
Complete and permanent paralysis.
Total and permanent loss of mental facilities.
Any other injury which prevents the owner from working and earning an income
that exceeds the limit noted above.
N:/clerical/specialassessments/2006 special assessment guidelines
HOW TO APPLY
Get an application for special assessments deferral at the Plymouth City Center,
3400 Plymouth Blvd., or by calling the Finance Department at 763 509-5302.
Applications due November 30th of each year.
After City staff has reviewed the initial application, applicants will be asked to
submit supplementary documentation to establish and verify the following:
That the owner/occupant is over 65 years old.
That the property owner retired because of permanent and total disability.
That paying the special assessment on the ordinary schedule constitutes a
hardship.
INTEREST ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Simple interest will accrue for the term of the assessment on any principal of the special
assessment which is deferred. After the term of the assessment expires, no further
interest will accrue.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL 763 509-5302
N:/clerical/specialassessments/2006 special assessment guidelines
5 Year Assessment Roll
PIN FirstName 211dNanie Address CSZ Street Recon C&G Total
South Bass Lake 2006 St. Recon. Project 6101)
11-118-22-11-0015 JAMES D LIVERS DIANA M LIVERS 11265 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 SO.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-11-0010 JOYCE PEASHA 11345 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 SO.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0017 WILBUR A1KEN DARLEEN AIKEN 11400 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0018 DONALD WINDSETH SHARON WINDSETH 11410 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0019 CRAIG PEACOCK KATHLEEN PEACOCK 11420 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0017 AMY J STARK GREGORY M STARK 11510 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0028 ERNEST WOODROW ANNETTE WOODROW 11515 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 SO.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0016 WILLIAM AUGER SHIRLEY AUGER 11520 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0011 JAMES M BROWN JR LORI A BROWN 11520 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0041 BASS LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOC C/O LORI BROWN 11520 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0027 SCOTT W ANDERSON TODD C DELAINE 11525 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0016 WILLIAM A DUNHAM PATRICIA D DUNHAM 11525 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0012 _ DONALD RINKENBERGER DOROTHY RINKENBERGER 11530 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0019 WENDY A HAYES ROBERT HAYES 11535 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0013 T140MAS GORSUCH 11540 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0018 JEFFREY R OLSEN 11545 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0014 PHILMORE SEVERSON MARILYN SEVERSON 11550 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-2243-0010 RONALD W GRAMS JR MARCY L GRAMS 11555 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0026 VALERIE NORTHWAY 11605 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0010 WAYNE JOHNSON MARY JOHNSON 11610 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0008 JAMES SEVERUD MICHELLE SEVERUD 11610 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0025 VERNON J LARKIN HOLLY J LARKIN 11615 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0009 MARK W MORROW KATHLEEN W MORROW 11615 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0011 BRUCE J PETERSON BONNIE M PETERSON 11620 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0007 KEITH DONALDSON LINDA DONALDSON 11620 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0024 ALAN C BORG JULIE I BORG 11625 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0009 BIRCH VALLEY 1ST REC ASSOC 11625 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0008 HUGH W SOL 3ERG BARBARA B SOLBERG 11625 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0006 ROBERT NORD CLARICE NORD 11700 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0023 LLOYD G SCOTTING MARY K SCOTTING 11705 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0007 MATTHEW S BLOOM MICHELLE L BLOOM 11705 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0012 JAMES EVENSON BARBARA EVENSON 11710 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0005 CHARLES GANNOTT SUE GANNOTT 11710 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0022 ROBERT E MORROW JAMES S MORROW 11715 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0013 DUANE SMITH DONNA SMITH 11720 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0004 KYLE D LEWIS SHERRI A LEWIS 11720 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0021 KENDALL B CORBIN IRINA CORBIN 11725 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0006 ROBERT FITCH NORGEAN FITCH 11725 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0014 KENNETH GUSTAFSON REBECCA GUSTAFSON 11730 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 41932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0003 DAVID J K1RW1N LISA A KIRWIN 11730 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0020 WENDY C LINDER JOHN G LINDER 11735 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0015 KATHLEEN P BROTEN MARK W BROTEN 11740 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0019 ELROY STEWART AUDREY STEWART 11745 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0018 SANDRA M GREGOIRE 11805 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0004 DAVID L TODD LARRY N FOSSUM 11810 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0001 TIMOTHY J RILEY 11810 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0017 KRISTIN TOUT 11815 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0008 JANICE MILEO 11900 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0001 FRANK WILARY CATHERINE WILARY 11900 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0035 JOHN P JORDAN GLORIA M JORDAN 11905 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0005 GREGORY A COLLINS TERRI L COLLINS 11905 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0009 JAMES HAUSCHILD ROSEMARY HAUSCHILD 11910 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0036 RICHARD TREMBLEY CELESTE TREMBLEY 11915 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0004 THOMAS FRIEDERICH MARIE FRIEDERICH 11915 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0010 LANCE H. RUSCO MARCIE A RUSCO 11920 53RD AVE. N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0002 STEVEN P FLOHR KAY A ADAMS 11920 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
Page 1 of 5
11-118-22-21-0037 TIMOTHY LADUKE
I1-118-22-21-0003 JAMES E STRAND
11-118-22-21-0011 GARY ELINDMAN
11-118-22-21-0006 THOMAS J COMBS
11-118-22-21-0023 THOMAS DIEM
I1-118-22-21-0038 GERALD V WINDER
11-118-22-21-0022 ANTHONY L VERBETEN
11-118-22-21-0021 HUMBERTO ALARCON
11-118-22-21-0048 JAMES HABECK
11-118-22-21-0012 JULIE A OLSEN
11-118-22-21-0047 CRAIG H MCWILLIAMS
11-118-22-21-0013 JAMES A CLEMENSON
11-118-22-21-0046 HELEN BJORLIN
I1-118-22-21-0034 GERALD ANDERSON
11-118-22-21-0045 JAMES KEENAN
11-118-22-21-0020 THOMAS J THIELEN
02-118-22-34-0004 DOUGLAS N ARNOLD
11-118-22-21-0033 JOSEPH B COHEN
02-118-22-34-0003 THOMAS VARECKA
02-118-22-34-0002 ANDREW D LAFRENCE
02-118-22-34-0001 MICHAEL J HUB
11-118-22-21-0056 KENT D DOWNING
02-118-22-33-0002 ROBERT HERMAN
11-118-22-22-0071 TIMOTHY J LLOYD
11-118-22-22-0021 LAWRENCE M BRAUCH
11-118-22-22-0045 LOGAN LOGENDRAN
11-118-22-22-0070 ROBERT L LIND
I1-118-22-22-0046 ROBERT J MORELAND
11-118-22-22-0069 RONALD D ARTH
11-118-22-22-0047 ROSELLA GROEN
11-118-22-22-0068 STANLEY F STEVENS
11-118-22-22-0048 RANDY SCHULZ
11-118-22-22-0049 THAD EARLY
11-118-22-22-0067 STEPHEN E BROWN
11-.118-22-22-0050 CRAIG LAUGHLIN
11-118-22-22-0066 CARL A FISCHER
11-118-22-22-0051 TIMOTHY A HENNING
11-118-22-22-0065 PAMELA J NEU
11-118-22-21-0058 PAUL C HOKR
11-118-22-I1-0018 JOHN P LEE
11-118-22-11-0013 GEORGE CARLSON
11-118-22-11-0007 GRACE E TAYLOR
11-118-22-21-0057 ROBERT E FERNELIUS
11-118-22-11-0017 JAMES OBRIEN
11-118-22-11-0012 SALVADOR FLORES
11-118-22-11-0006 BEE VANG
11-118-22-11-0019 VICTORIA L GOLDEN
11-1 18-22-11-0014 DEBRA CARLSON LEVERENTZ
11-118-22-11-0008 MICHAEL H MOURNING
11-118-22-1I-0016 ALVIN ZACHMAN
11-118-22-11-0011 JOSEPHINE BENSON
11-118-22-11-0005 JEROME SIVERSON
11-118-22-11-0009 JOHN G GRAHAM
11-118-22-11-0004 BRUCE WEIR
11-118-22-21-0019 GERALD DAVIS
11-118-22-21-0029 STEVEN HANLEY
11-118-22-21-0018 TODD M O'LEARY
II -118-22-12-0003 ANTHONY J WITKOWSKI
JEAN LADUKE
SALLY JSTRAND
BARBARA A LINDMAN
MICHELLE M COMBS
JEAN DIEM
GAYLEM WINDER
KENDRA L VERBETEN
JEFFREY OLSEN
PAMELA D JONES
MARY ANDERSON
BARBARA KEENAN
SHARON THIELEN
MARIA-CARME T CALDERER
JENNIFER JOHNSTON-COHEN
GAY VARECKA
KAREN L ERICKSON
RACHEL S HUB
ROBIN L DOWNING
KARIN HERMAN
ANGELA M LOASCHING
JANICE G KOCUR
MARY M LOGENDRAN
MARIE D MORELAND
LINDA L ARTH
PENELOPE S STEVENS
PAMELA SCHULZ
MAUREEN EARLY
MAUREEN L BROWN
ANTHONY R WHELIHAN
JAY P NEU
LAURIE J SWENNES
KAREN K LEE
DENISE CARLSON
LELA L FERNELIUS
SUZANNE OBRIEN
MARICELA VARELA-FLORES
CHOUA LEE
JUDY L MOURNING
SHIRLEY ZACHMAN
BONNIE SIVERSON
CHERYL A GRAHAM
CONNIE WEIR
FRANCES DAVIS
DEBRA HANLEY
CARLA J O'LEARY
VERONICA W MURPHY-WITKOWSKI
5 Year Assessment Roll
11925 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11930 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12000 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12000 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12010 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12015 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
1202053 RD AVEN PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12030 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12030 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12045 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12100 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12105 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12110 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12115 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12116 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12120 53RD AVEN PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12120 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12125 53RD AVEN PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12210 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12220 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12230 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12300 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12300 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12305 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12305 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12310 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12315 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
12320 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
12325 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12330 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12335 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12340 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12400 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12405 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12410 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12415 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12420 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
12425 53RD AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
5210 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5220 ARROWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5220 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
5220 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5220 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5225 ARROWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5225 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5225 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5230 ARROWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5230 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
5230 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5235 ARROWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5235 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5235 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5240 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5245 COTTONWOOD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5300 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
5305 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 50.00 4,931.77
5310 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
5315 GOLDENROD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
Page 2 of 5
5 Year Assessment Roll
11-118-22-21-0028 PATRICK STAPLETON JILLAINE STAPLETON 5315 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0017 JACK GRAMS SHIELA GRAMS 5320 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0002 RICHARD KOBUSSEN SUSAN KOBUSSEN 5325 GOLDENROD LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0027 GREGORY S GIBBEL MARIAN T GIBBEL 5325 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-12-0005 THEODORE J BECKER 5330 GOLDENROD LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0016 MARVIN GROTH SUSAN GROTH 5330 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0026 FREDERICK JOHNSON 5335 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0015 TODD E PAULSON ELIZABETH C PAULSON 5340 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0025 JULIUS E WEBSTER MARGARET A WEBSTER 5345 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0014 GARY A NESS KRISTA L NESS 5350 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
11-118-22-21-0024 MICHAEL HERMANN GAIL HERMANN 5355 LARCH LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0011 GREGORY FRANK 5400 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0016 DANIEL P WELTER JULIE J WELTER 5405 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0010 JUDY A MINENKO 5410 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0009 WARREN A WILKINS CYNTHIA J WILKINS 5420 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0015 PAUL MOHR JUDITH MOHR 5425 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0008 DANIEL LEE EVELYN LEE 5430 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0007 RALPH MCKINNEY BARBARA MCKINNEY 5440 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0006 CHRISTOPHER M RADLINSKI LISA M LEFORT 5450 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22114-0014 STEVEN FEENY KATHRYN FEENY 5455 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0005 RYAN F SPANGBERG DEBORAH A SPANGBERG 5460 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0013 ROBERT ZOSS MAURINE ZOSS 5465 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0004 STEPHEN T JOHNSON RHONDA L JOHNSON 5470 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0012 JASON L LEE MICHELLE L LEE 5475 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0003 YU ZENG MICHELLE R ZENG 5480 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-44-0002 ROBERT OCONNOR MARY OCONNOR 5490 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-2243-0015 VINH LAM RIEN THI VU 5496 BALSAM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
02-118-22-43-0002 RANDOLPH M ZEJDLIK SHEILA ZEJDLIK 7374 KIRKWOOD CT N MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 4,932 0.00 4,931.77
13-118-22-31-0011 BLAKE T REINKE MICHELLE K MUCKS 10305 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0011 JAMES M HENNEN SUSAN M HENNEN 10305 41ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0007 DELBERT EDDY DONNA EDDY 10310 41 ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0012 WALLACE B OLSON 10315 40TH AVEN PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0012 RICKI T JOHNSON SUSAN M JOHNSON 10315 41ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0013 JAN JELINEK LIBA JELINEK 10325 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0008 MILFORD DUMMER 10330 41 ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0014 FREDERICK G MADES JANICE M MADES 10405 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0009 WILLIAM H SCHRIEBER KATHLEEN M SCHRIEBER 10410 41ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0015 RONALD CLOUGH VIRGINIA CLOUGH 10415 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0013 WILLIAM G SCHLETZER 10415 41ST AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0016 DOUGLAS W HERMANSEN CHRIS M HERMANSEN 10425 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0005 ROBERT VANDENBERG BETTY VANDENBERG 10505 40TH AVEN PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0006 ROBERT S BORN RANDI K BORN 10515 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0007 THOMAS E DIETRICH SHANNON T DIETRICH 10525 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0001 LESLIE WEIGELT MARY WEIGELT 1053040TH AVEN PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 S0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0002 BRIAN T JOHNSON KAKI F JOHNSON 10610 40TI-I AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0008 DOUGLAS W CARLSON HOLLY R CARLSON 10615 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0003 GARY A SMITH DIANE M SMITH 10620 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0009 STEVEN M VOLBRECHT MARTA S VOLBRECHT 10625 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441. 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0004 SCOTT D NELSON CATHY 1-I NELSON 10626 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-31-0010 MARK WHIPPLE JENNIFER L WHIPPLE 10635 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-32-0002 LEONARD D HONES BARBARA J HONES 10700 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-32-0007 CHAD J HELTEMES ALISON J HATCH 10705 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-32-0008 ROSEMARIE SPARROW 10715 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-32-0003 WILLIAM W SCHUNEMAN MICHELLE N SCHUNEMAN 10720 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-32-0009 JAMES E KLUKKEN SUSAN B KLUKKEN 10725 40TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0030 DOUGLAS V HAZELTON 10725 41 ST AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0031 MICHAEL C UNDERWOOD CATHERINE A UNDERWOOD 10755 41 ST AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
Page 3 of 5
13-118-22-32-0005
13-118-22-23-0029
13-118-22-32-0010
13-118-22-32-0006
13-118-22-32-0011
13-118-22-23-0032
13-118-22-23-0028
13-118-22-32-0074
13-118-22-23-0033
13-118-22-23-0007
13-118-22-32-0075
13-118-22-23-0027
13-118-22-23-0034
13-118-22-23-0026
13-118-22-23-0035
13-118-22-23-0009
13-118-22-23-0015
13-118-22-23-0018
13-118-22-23-0016
13-118-22-23-0019
13-118-22-23-0048
13-118-22-23-0040
13-118-22-23-0051
13-118-22-23-0047
13-118-22-23-0049
13-118-22-23-0041
13-118-22-23-0050
13-118-22-23-0046
13-118-22-23-0042
13-118-22-23-0045
13-118-22-23-0043
13-118-22-23-0044
13-118-22-24-0022
13-118-22-24-0027
13-118-22-24-0020
13-118-22-13-0086
13-118-22-24-0023
13-118-22-24-0028
13-118-22-24-0026
13-118-22-24-0019
13-118-22-13-0085
13-118-22-24-0024
13-118-22-24-0029
13-118-22-24-0021
13-118-22-24-0025
13-118-22-24-0018
13-118-22-13-0084
13-118-22-24-0030
13-118-22-24-0017
13-118-22-24-0014
13-118-22-23-0017
13-118-22-13-0083
13-118-22-24-0016
13-118-22-13-0001
13-118-22-24-0010
13-118-22-23-0006
13-118-22-24-0015
13-118-22-23-0005
JODY A SHANDS
JOHN R TONSAGER
CHRISTOPHER J ISON
LOREN D BURKET
HOWARD FISTERE JR
GARY WALTER
GARY TATGE
DONALD OLSON
REZA VOJOODI
DAVID R HENSTROM
JACK HUANG
LINDSAY B BERGSTROM
DONALD STENZEL
TIMOTHY J LARSEN
KENNETH KANGAS SR
BULENT UGURLU
MARK C SCHNEIDER
PHILIP F FOX
TODD J MCINTYRE
BRIAN P SHAPIRO
JEFFREY SWANSON
DONALD BOSCH
RICHARD WASHINGTON
MARTIN J LENZ
E BODIN
DOUGLAS W VOGT
BEVERLY K COBB
BRIAN A OLSON
DENNIS P DEGIDIO
WILLIAM PRAIRIE JR
S CARIA
JOSEPH KRASKA JR
BONNIE LAMBERTZ
BRIAN D DANIELSON
MORGAN R SMOCK
VINCENT K SCOTT
JOHN P OBRIEN
KIMBERLY J AMSBAUGH
ROBERT C REYNOLDS JR
DAWN WANOUS
CLIFF J WINKEL
LISA M JENSEN
JAMES D BECKWITH
CLARENCE PETERSON
JOSE L MARRUJO
DAVID SINNOTT
MARK GOTSCH
EDWARD L KIRCHOFF
DAVID E COOPER
STEVEN W MCNEILL
VASSILIOS KMIHAILIDIS
ANDREW D LAREW
BRETT A HAWKINS
JACK B MCCORMACK
KURT GARTNER
BARRIE R FROSETH
JON & TERRIANN MATEJCEK
GILLINGHAM F LANDIS
JOSEPH R SHEBUSKI
BRENDA J TONSAGER
NANCY C ]SON
SUSAN L BURKET
LINDA FISTERE
SHARON WALTER
NANCY TATGE
CAROL OLSON
AZAM VOJOODI
ANN H HENSTROM
NANCY HUANG
MONICA J WINKER-BERGSTROM
CRISTIN H LARSEN
DEANNE KANGAS
SUSAN A SCHNEIDER
KATHLEEN M FOX
SUSAN E RANNEY
PAULA SWANSON
KATHRYN BOSCH
CAROL WASHINGTON
JOLYNN S LENZ
D BODIN
JUDITH A VOGT
CHRISTINE M OLSON
KATHRYN J DEGIDIO
LORI PRAIRIE
BETTY CARIA
JANE KRASKA
CARLA J DANIELSON
BRIDGET M MCWI-11TE
SHELLY L OBRIEN
NILS BORGAS
DIANA L REYNOLDS
AMIE H LE
DAVID JJENSEN
SHARON K BECKWITH
MELISSA M MARRUJO
FRANCES SINNOTT
MARY GOTSCH
MICHELLE S KIRCHOFF
KATHY L COOPER
ROSE C MCNEILL
TAMMY K MIHAILIDIS
MOLLY L LAREW
NANCY M MCCORMACK
MAEVE C MURPHY
MARY M RAPAPORT
5 Year Assessment Roll
10800 40TH AVE N
10800 41 ST AVE N
10805 40TH AVE N
10810 40TH AVE N
10815 40TH AVE N
10815 41ST AVE N
10820 41 ST AVE N
10825 40TH AVE N
10825 41 ST AVE N
10830 40TH AVE N
10835 40TH AVE N
10840 41 ST AVE N
10855 41 ST AVE N
10860 41 ST AVE N
10875 41 ST AVE N
10900 41 ST AVE N
10980 40TH PL N
10985 40TH PL N
10990 40TH PL N
10995 40TH PL N
11000 40TH PL N
1100041STAVEN
11005 40TH PL N
1100541 STAVE N
11010 40TH PL N
11010 41ST AVE N
11015 40TH PL N
1101541 STAVE N
1102041 STAVE N
11025 41 ST AVE N
11030 41ST AVE N
11035 41ST AVE N
4005 REVERE LN N
4005 SARATOGA CIR N
4005 TRENTON LN N
4010 REVERE IN N
4010 SARATOGA CIR N
4010 TRENTON LN N
4015 SARATOGA CIR N
4015 TRENTON LN N
4020 REVERE LN N
4020 SARATOGA CIR N
4020 TRENTON LN N
4025 REVERE LN N
4025 SARATOGA CIR N
4025 TRENTON LN N
4030 REVERE LN N
4030 TRENTON LN N
4045 TRENTON LN N
4060 TRENTON LN N
4105 XIMINES LN N
4110 REVERE LN N
4115 TRENTON LN N
4120 REVERE LN N
4120 TRENTON LN N
4120 XIMINES LN N
4125 TRENTON LN N
413OXIMINES LN N
Page 4 of 5
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,787.29
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 50.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
5 Year Assessment Roll
13-118-22-24-0002 RUSSELL JOHNSON BONNIE JOHNSON 4135 TRENTON LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-13-0005 CRAIG M SKAADEN 4140 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0037 JAMES P MERTENSOTTO BARBARA A MERTENSOTTO 4140 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0035 JEFFREY ROBINSON DEBRA ROBINSON 4145 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0036 RONALD A SEIM SUSAN K SEIM 4150 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 2,757 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-24-0038 PAMELA S LEDIN RICHARD L LEDIN 4155 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0014 CATHLEEN M OLSON 4155 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0036 CATHERINE SINJEM DONALD J SINJEM 4160 TRENTON LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-115-22-23-0013 AUGUSTO A SUMANGIL REBECCA N SUMANGIL 4165 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0012 ROBERT J SHAUGHNESSY TSUKIKO 1 SHAUGHNESSY 4175 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-24-0037 JAMES R DOTSETH WANDA DOTSETH 4180 TRENTON LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-23-0025 JUDITH A LUBBEN 4180 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-23-0053 SHELDON D S14AUGI-INESSY RITA M SHAUGHNESSY 4185 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 2357 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-23-0052 ROBERT M THOMLE ADRIENNE G THOMLE 4195 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,757.29
13-118-22-23-0024 JEMAHL WARFORD SABINE U WARFORD 4200 XIMINES LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,787 50.00 2,757.29
13-118-22-13-0004 RICHARD J PADRNOS 4210 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 S0.00 4,442.01
13-118-22-24-0034 BRADLEY W GILBERT SUSAN K GILBERT 4215 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 4,442 0.00 4,442.01
13-115-22-13-0003 DAVID W 1IANSMANN CARA M HANSMANN 4220 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-24-0033 PAUL E ANDERSON 4225 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55441 2,787 50.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-13-0002 TROY WA KELLER 4230 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,787 0.00 2,787.29
13-118-22-24-0031 SON TU NGUYEN ANH HOANG NGUYEN 4235 REVERE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 2,757 S0.00 2,757.29
1,161,846.47 $1,161,846.47
Page 5 of 5
10 Year Assessment Roll
PIN FirstName 2ndName Address CSZ
6,690.87
2006 Street Recon 6101)
6,690.87
5,267.73
02-118-22-12-0028 BO TUY TIENG TUY 6010 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442
02-118-22-12-0029 MICHAEL R ALICANTE BETHANY K ALICANTE 6020 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-12-0030 DOUGLAS S W1TZ
1,423.14
5819 HALIFAX AVE N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
02-118-22-12-0031 CHRISTOPHER J OLSON POLLY C OLSON 6040 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-12-0032 ANN M SIMPKINS
12,329.43
6050 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-12-0033 BRENT REABE 6060 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-12-0034 DOROTHY KREKELBERG 6150 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442
02-118-22-13-0022 AARON R HUGHES 5960 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-13-0023 NATE JAHNAGILE KELLY A JAHNAGILE 5970 HEMLOCK LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
02-118-22-44-0021 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Eric Blank 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
11-118-22-21-0039 CITY OF PLYMOUTH Scott Newberger 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
Page 1 of 1
Street C&G Total
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
5,267.73 1,423.14 6,690.87
12,329 0.00 12,329.43
13,069 0.00 13,069.19
85,616.45
P
P "K
evolelo- M-
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
ASSESSMENTS FROM $0-$5,000
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and
heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of
Hemlock Lane, from Red Fox Drive in Maple Grove to the recently constructed the area from
the Canadian Pacific Railroad to, and including, Balsam Lane from Zachary Lane to, and
including, Larch Lane and 53'd Avenue and 54'1' Avenue west of Larch Lane, including the
adjacent cul-de-sacs, excluding the properties with the Property Identification Numbers 02-118-
22-44-0021 and 11-118-22-21-0039, and the area south of Old Rockford Road to, and including,
40th Avenue and from Zachary Lane to, and including, Revere Lane by reconstruction of streets
with the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation and repair,
storm sewer installation and repair, and all necessary appurtenances; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
2007, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.25% per annum for a 5 year assessment period
from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such property
with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Director, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment was paid within 30 days from the adoption
of this resolution; and he may at any time thereafter, pay the City Finance Director the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 29 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The owner of any
property so assessed may also, within 30 days from the adoption of the resolution, make a
partial prepayment of at least $100 to the City Treasurer. The remaining unpaid balance will
be certified as the new assessment amount. The owner may also at any time prior to
November 15, of any year, pay the remaining unpaid principal balance with interest accrued
to December 31 of the year in which such prepayment is made.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County
Finance Director to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
5. The total cost of the improvement assessed by this resolution is $1,161,846.47.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS
2006 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
ASSESSMENTS FROM $5,001-$10,000
CITY PROJECT NO. 6101
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and
heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of
Hemlock Lane, from Red Fox Drive in Maple Grove to the recently constructed Hemlock Lane
cul-de-sac north of 60"' Avenue, including the properties with the Property Identification
Numbers 02-118-22-44-0021 and 11-118-22-21-0039, by reconstruction of streets with the
installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation and repair, storm sewer
installation and repair, and all necessary appurtenances; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
2007, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8.75% per annum for a 10 year assessment period
from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such property
with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Director, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment was paid within 30 days from the adoption
of this resolution; and he may at any time thereafter, pay the City Finance Director the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 29 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The owner of any
property so assessed may also, within 30 days from the adoption of the resolution, make a
partial prepayment of at least $100 to the City Treasurer. The remaining unpaid balance will
be certified as the new assessment amount. The owner may also at any time prior to
November 15, of any year, pay the remaining unpaid principal balance with interest accrued
to December 31 of the year in which such prepayment is made.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County
Finance Director to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
5. The total cost of the improvement assessed by this resolution is $85,616.45.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
72
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: October 13, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ross A. Beckwith, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
PINEVIEW LANE AND SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 6106
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution adopting the
assessment roll as proposed.
BACKGROUND: The City Council set October 24, 2006 as the date of the public hearing on
the final assessment for the 2006 Mill and Overlay Project. This project involved removing and
replacing the wearing course or top 1.5" of bituminous pavement on Pineview Lane between
Schmidt Lake Road and County Road 61, and portions of Schmidt Lake Road between Pineview
Lane and Fernbrook Lane. In addition, any settled, cracked or heaved. concrete curb and gutter
was removed and replaced, stone and sanitary sewer structures were also repaired as needed.
Project construction will be complete at the time of the assessment hearing.
The City's Street Reconstruction Assessment Policy, at the time the project was ordered,
assesses 35% of the total cost of a mill and overlay project to the adjacent benefiting property
owners. Given the chosen streets in the 2006 project, only portions of Pineview Lane and
Schmidt Lake Road can be assessed, as the majority of the adjacent properties are not benefiting.
In addition, Bass Lake Park has an access onto Pineview Lane and will be included in the
assessment, and the City's excess material waste site will be included in the Schmidt Lake Road
assessment.
Two properties have been removed from the pending assessment list as the project limits were
stopped short of County Road 61. The intersection of County Road 61/County Road 47 is
scheduled to be reconstructed in 2007, at which time the remaining mill and overlay work on
Pineview Lane will be completed. Assessments for that mill and overlay work will be levied to
these two properties once the work is completed in 2007.
PROJECT FUNDING: The assessment rates per single family dwelling along Pineview Lane
are $874.10, and range from $3,010 to $4,622 along Schmidt Lake Road. The pending
assessment amounts were $989.16 along Pineview and ranged from $3,480 to $5,344 for the
three non-residential properties along Schmidt Lake Road. The total amount of assessments
estimated at the time the project was ordered was $43,000. The total amount of the final
0:\Gngineering\PR0]GCTS\2000 - 2009\6106\MemosWssmtHrg_Memo_6106.doc
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
PINEVIEW LANE AND SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD
Page 2
assessments is proposed to be $35,869. The difference in these two assessment amounts is due
to a total project cost 14% lower than estimated at the time the project was ordered, and two
properties not being assessed as originally proposed.
Attached in the Assessment biforniation Packet is a sample of the payment options that was sent
to each property owner. Option 1. is full payment by November 24, 2006 without any interest.
Option 2 is full payment after November 24, 2006, but prior to November 30, 2006 in which
interest will be charged to the date the balance is paid off. Option 3 is a full payoff between the
dates of November 30, 2006 and November 14, 2007. Interest in this option will be for the entire
2007 year regardless of when the balance is paid off. Option 4 is payment over the standard 5
year assessment term. Finally, Option 5 is a partial prepayment by November 24, 2006 and the
remaining balance to follow the standard assessment term (Option 4).
The assessment term for all properties being assessed is 5 years. In accordance with the tenn of
assessments, the assessment interest rate is 8.25%. Attached is a copy of resolution 2003-179
which established the City's policy for setting special assessment rates.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt
the attached resolution at the conclusion of the public hearing. This resolution will adopt the
assessment roll as proposed.
attachments: Assessment Area Map
Assessment Informational Packet
Assessment Roll
Resolution
00ocuments and Settings\mkohn\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\OLK12F\AssmtHrg_Memo_6106.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-179
ESTABLISHING A PROCESURE TO CALCULATE
NON -PENALTY RELATED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, the City must establish an interest rate on special assessments; and
WHEREAS, the current process of establishing special assessment interest rates is
somewhat subjective and difficult to explain,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that non -penalty related special assessment rates shall
be based on the then current primate rate as published by the Wall Street Journal or
Federal Reserve. The rate for a five-year assessment will be prime. The rate for a 10 -
year assessment will be prime + .5%. The rate for a 15 -year assessment will be prime +
1%.
Adopted by the City Council on April 8, 2003.
Assessment Public
Hearing
Information Packet
2006 Mill and Overlay
Project
Pineview Lane and
Schmidt Lake Road
Project No. 61o6
7:oo P.M.
October 24, 2006
Agenda Item: 7.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: October 13, 2006 for the City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ross A. Beckwith, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
PINEVIEW LANE AND SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 6106
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution adopting the
assessment roll as proposed.
BACKGROUND: The City Council set October 24, 2006 as the date of the public hearing on
the final assessment for the 2006 Mill and Overlay Project. This project involved removing and
replacing the wearing course or top 1.5" of bituminous pavement on Pineview Lane between
Schmidt Lake Road and County Road 61, and portions of Schmidt Lake Road between Pineview
Lane and Fembrook Lane. In addition, any settled, cracked or heaved concrete curb and gutter
was removed and replaced, stone and sanitary sewer structures were also repaired as needed.
Project construction will be complete at the time of the assessment hearing.
The City's Street Reconstruction Assessment Policy, at the time the project was ordered,
assesses 35% of the total cost of a mill and overlay project to the adjacent benefiting property
owners. Given the chosen streets in the 2006 project, only portions of Pineview Lane and
Schmidt Lake Road can be assessed, as the majority of the adjacent properties are not benefiting.
In addition, Bass Lake Park has an access onto Pineview Lane and will be included in the
assessment, and the City's excess material waste site will be included in the Schmidt Lake Road
assessment.
Two properties have been removed from the pending assessment list as the project limits were
stopped short of County Road 61. The intersection of County Road 61/County Road 47 is
scheduled to be reconstructed in 2007, at which time the remaining mill and overlay work on
Pineview Lane will be completed. Assessments for that mill and overlay work will be levied to
these two properties once the work is completed in 2007.
PROJECT FUNDING: The assessment rates per single family dwelling along Pineview Lane
are $874.10, and range from $3,010 to $4,622 along Sclunidt Lake Road. The pending
assessment amounts were $989.16 along Pineview and ranged from $3,480 to $5,344 for the
three non-residential properties along Schmidt Lake Road. The total amount of assessments
estimated at the time the project was ordered was $43,000. The total amount of the final
0AEngineeringTROJECTSQ1000 - 2009\6106\Mcmos\AssmtHrg_Memo_6106.doc
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
PINEVIEW LANE AND SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD
Page 2
assessments is proposed to be $35,869. The difference in these two assessment amounts is due
to a total project cost 14% lower than estimated at the time the project was ordered, and two
properties not being assessed as originally proposed.
Included in the attached infonnational packet, which will also be available to residents attending
the assessment hearing, is a sample of the payment options available to the property owners.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt
the attached resolution at the conclusion of the public hearing. This resolution will adopt the
assessment roll as proposed.
attachments: Assessment Area Map
Assessment Infonnational Packet
Assessment Roll
Resolution
WEngineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\6106\Memos\AssmtHrg_Memo_6106.doc
AGENDA FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC NEARING
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROTECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 6106
1. Purpose of Meeting:
To provide the public an opportunity to hear a presentation of the proposed
assessments concerning public improvement projects benefiting their property.
The citizens have had an opportunity to review the proposed assessment roll in
the City Center as well as at this meeting and will have an opportunity to address
the Council concerning questions regarding these proposed assessments.
2. The Meeting was Carefully and Thoroughly Announced as Follows:
a. Notice was published in the Plymouth Sailor, the official City newspaper, as
required by law.
b. Written notice was mailed to each property owner in the improvement area
as shown by the records of the Hennepin County Auditor's tax statement
mailing list.
C. Announcements and discussions at Council meetings.
3. Review of Project Costs and Proposed Assessments:
Ross Beckwith, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
4. The Procedure for the Hearing will be as Follows:
a. Write naive, address, and agenda number on blue card.
b. Pass card to person collecting thein, who will give thein to the Mayor.
C. When your naive is called, come up to the microphone.
d. Please speak clearly into the microphone so that all may benefit from your
remarks.
e. No one may speak twice until all others who wish to speak have done so
Please give your name and address each time you speak.
5. Open Public Hearing:
6. Close Public Hearing
7. Council Action
0AEngineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\6106\PubHrg\AssessHrg_Agenda_6106.doc
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Notice of the hearing was published in the official city newspaper, the Plymouth Sailor and a
notice was mailed to the owners of each parcel described in the assessment roll. For the
purpose of giving mailed notice, owners are those persons shown to be such on the records of
the County Treasurer and these records are used in addressing and mailing notices. If you are
making a payment to your mortgage company which includes a deposit for real estate taxes, it
is probable that the address shown on the County Treasurer's records is that of the mortgage
company and not your own. If some of you did not receive a notice, this may well be the
reason. A copy of the individual roll is available for your inspection.
2. Following the hearing, the Council will decide whether any adjustments in the roll are
necessary and will, by resolution, adopt the roll.
Assessment Payment Options, attached, is an example of how to pay for the assessment. A
copy was also sent to you with the Assessment Hearing letting dated October 2, 2006.
4. If after the hearing and after the adoption of the assessment roll by the City Council, you feel
that your assessment is unfair, you may appeal to the District Court of Hennepin County.
Your appeal must be served upon the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days from the date of
the resolution of the Council adopting the particular assessment roll. Your appeal must be
filed with the Clerk of District Court within 10 days after it has been served upon the Mayor or
City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land
mgy be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment
with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding
officer at the hearing. These rules with respect to time are jurisdictional and the Council may
not extend thein. Failure to serve and file your appeal as set out above will result in its
dismissal.
5. The above procedures are digested from Sections 429.061 and 429.081 of Minnesota Statutes
which govern the City Council in their assessment for public improvements.
WEngineering\P20IECTS\2000 - 2009\6106\Assessments\AssmtProcedure.doc
w
Pay principal of
Option 2 - Full Pa went After 11/24/2006 and Prior to 11/30/06
Pay principal of $874.10
Plus - daily interest of 0.197571 for each day beginning 11/25/06.
Example_of Payment on 11/27/06
874.10
Principal
Interest per day $0.197571 times 34 days $6.72
Total $
880.82
Option 3 - Full Pay -Off 11/30/06 to 11/14/07
Year 1 assessment payment to County (2007 property tax statement) $258.95
Plus - remaining principal balance to City $
699.28
Total $
958.23
Option 4 Standard Assessment to Term (Paid to County)
874.10 8.25%
Principal
Year 1 - 2007 174.82
Year 2 - 2008 174.82
Year 3 - 2009 174.82
Year 4 - 2010 174.82
Year 5 - 2011 174.82
Interest Total Payment Ending Balance
84.13 258.95 699.28
57.69 232.51 524.46
43.27 218.09 349.64
28.85 203.67 174.82
14.42 189.24 0.00
874.10 $228.36 $1,102.46
I O tion 5 - Partial Prepayment By 11/24/06p
Example Resident may pay any amount over $100 as a partial prepayment
Amount paid to City by 11/24/06 $100.00
Revised Standard Assessment to Term (Paid to County)
774.10 8.25%
Principal Interest Total Payment Ending Balance
Year 1 - 2007 154.82 74.51 229.33 619.28
Year 2 - 2008 154.82 51.09 205.91 464.46
Year 3 - 2009 154.82 38.32 193.14 309.64
Year 4 - 2010 154.82 25.55 180.37 154.82
Year 5 - 2011 154.82 12.77 167.59 0.00
774.10 202.23 976.33
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Street Reconstruction. The City Council has adopted a long-range plan providing for the
periodic reconstruction, including mill and overlay, of all paved city streets. With the
improvement of streets, as a result of reconstruction or mill and overlay, adjoining properties
receive special benefit that results in the increase of the property's value. It is the policy of
the City that this special benefit should be paid for by the property owner receiving the special
benefit rather than the City as a whole. This is accomplished by specially assessing the
benefited property as authorized by State Statute, Section 429. The following is the City of
Plymouth's policy regarding special assessments to properties benefiting from street
improvements.
a. It is the policy of the City to special assess abutting benefiting property for
street reconstruction costs, but not in excess of the special benefit to the
property. This policy applies to all streets that are public streets.
b. The assessment amount for the reconstruction or mill and overlay of previously
paved streets shall be determined annually by the City Council.
The assessment amount is based on the following:
1) In 2006 benefited properties shall be assessed 35% of the engineer's
estimated project cost as set forth in the project feasibility report or
35% of the actual project cost, whichever amount is less. In 2007 and
thereafter, the rate shall be 40%.
2) For the purposes of street reconstruction or mill and overlay, the project
costs will include the cost of replacing or repairing concrete curb and
gutter. In those cases where bituminous curbing is replaced with
concrete curb and gutter, or where curb and gutter did not previously
exist, the additional special benefit will be assessed. The cost to be
assessed shall be 100% of the cost of installing the concrete curb and
gutter. This cost will be assessed on either a front foot or per lot basis.
The addition of a storm sewer system will also be considered an
additional benefit and shall be assessed at 100% of the cost.
3) Project cost includes both direct construction costs and all indirect costs
such as engineering and administration.
4) Assessments shall normally be levied for a period not to exceed five (5)
years for assessments of $5,000 or less, ten (10) years for assessments
greater than $5,000 but $10,000 or less, and Fifteen (15) years for
assessments greater than $10,000.
O:\Engineering\GENERAL\ASMTS\NaSOStreet Reconstruction Assessments Proposed.doe
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Page 2
5) Assessments for properties guided or zoned for single-family use shall
be made on a per parcel (unit) basis for a local residential or residential
low volume street design standard as provided for in Plymouth City
Code and Engineering Guidelines A property may be assessed for
more than one unit in cases where the property could be reasonably
further subdivided in accordance with current Plymouth zoning and
subdivision requirements.
6) For properties guided or zoned for other than single family use, the City
shall calculate equivalent units based on the guided or zoned use. The
equivalent units may be based on front footage or area depending upon
the guided or zoned use and parcel configuration.
7) If a street is reconstructed to a design standard greater than the current
design standard due to the guided or zoned uses, the additional cost to
reconstruct the street shall be fully assessed to those properties. If the
street is reconstructed to a design different than the current standard,
the total cost shall be fully assessed to those properties if conditions
warrant.
8) Properties abutting county roadways reconstructed to complete urban
design and having reasonable access thereto shall be assessed in
accordance with this policy. The assessments shall be used to defray
the City's cost participation in the county improvement projects.
9) Properties or areas of property that have been determined to be
unbuildable shall be excluded from assessments. No building permits
will be issued for such property so deleted from assessments.
10) Partial prepayments of assessments can be made in accordance with
Amended Chapter III of the Plymouth City Code (Ordinance 2005-06).
11) Senior Citizens and Disabled People. Special Assessments Deferrals in
accordance with City policy (if you are at least 65 years of age or are
disabled, you may qualify to have special assessments deferred). Other
deferrals may be available as authorized by State Statute, Section 429.
O:\Engineering\GBNBRALUSMTS\MISMtrcd Rcconstruction Assessments_Proposed.doc
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRALS
If you are at least 65 years old or disabled, you may qualify to have special assessments
deferred if they create a financial hardship for you.
Eligibility
You are eligible if-
ForFor Senior.Citizens
Your property is homestead.
As a property owner you are at least 65 years old.
You had a gross income of less than $27,500 for a one person household in the year
before the assessment installments for local improvements are to be certified with the
County.
If more than one person lives in the household, the income limit is:
2 Persons 31,400
3 Persons 35,350
4 Persons 39,250
5 Persons 42,400
6 Persons 45,550
17
For Permanent and Total Disability
You meet the criteria for senior citizens above except for age.
You are retired due to a permanent and total disability which must include one of the
following:
Certified legally blind in both eyes.
Loss of both arms at the shoulder.
Loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial limbs can be used.
Complete and permanent paralysis.
Total and permanent loss of mental facilities.
Any other injury which prevents the owner from working and earning an income
that exceeds the limit noted above.
N:/clerical/specialassessments/2006 special assessment guidelines
HOW TO APPLY
Get an application for special assessments deferral at the Plymouth City Center,
3400 Plymouth Blvd., or by calling the Finance Department at 763 509-5302.
Applications due November 30th of each year.
After City staff has reviewed the initial application, applicants will be asked to
submit supplementary documentation to establish and verify the following:
That the owner/occupant is over 65 years old.
That the property owner retired because of permanent and total disability.
That paying the special assessment on the ordinary schedule constitutes a
hardship.
INTEREST ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Simple interest will accrue for the term of the. assessment on any principal of the special
assessment which is deferred. After the term of the assessment expires, no further
interest will accrue.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL 763 509-5302
N:/clerical/specialassessments/2006 special assessment guidelines
PIN Name NameTwo Address CityStateZip Total
02-118-22-32-0005 DAVID G DE COURSIN ANNE D GRAVES 5740 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 PALMERS COVE 002-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0006 RANDALL J SCHMIDT 5780 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 PALMERS COVE 003-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0016 RONALD D URNESS 5590 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 FITCH 001-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0017 KENNETH J BLAKE JUDITH A BLAKE 5580 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 FITCH 002-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0018 GERALD W GRABOWSKI KATHLEEN L GRABOWSKI 5660 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 GRABOWSKI 001-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0019 SHIRLEY A ROTTER 211 SCISSORTAIL TRL GEORGETOWN, TX 78628 GRABOWSKI 002-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0020 VINCE A BEACOM BETH A BEACOM 5630 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BEACOM 001-001 874.10
02-118-22-32-0021 MICHAEL B HINNENKAMP NANCY J HINNENKAMP 5610 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BEACOM 002-001 874.10
02-118-22-33-0012 MARK G LANGMADE 5570 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 W INDRIDGE AT BASS LK 4TH 001-001 874.10
02-118-22-33-0013 SHERRI A CADY DAVID M SANDERSON 5560 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 W INDRIDGE AT BASS LK 4TH 002-001 874.10
02-118-22-33-0014 JAMES HOUSE KATHY HOUSE 5550 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 W INDRIDGE AT BASS LK 4TH 003-001 874.10
03-118-22-14-0024 MARVIN E SABBY TANYA G SABBY 5900 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 HERITAGE WOODS EST 001-002 874.10
03-118-22-44-0006 CITY OF PLYMOUTH ERIC BLANK 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 RLS 1575 000-000-C 3,496.41
03-118-22-44-0039 KATHLEEN L FRAWLEY 5485 PINEVIEW LN N PINEVIEW, MN 55442 BASS LK WOODS 014-002 874.10
03-118-22-44-0040 KELLY D MARSH SHERRY L MARSH 5475 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK WOODS 015-002 874.10
03-118-22-44-0043 WILLIAM HILL THERESA HILL 5425 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 RLS# 1575 000-000-0 -001 874.10
03-118-22-44-0044 DEANE M ROE 5415 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 RLS# 1575 000-000-0 -002 874.10
10-118-22-11-0034 LARKIN L ADEY 12705 54TH AVE N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 003-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0035 DOUGLAS BROOKS PAVILACK SHERRI S PAVILACK 5395 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 004-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0036 KENNETH E JOSLYN JANET P JOSLYN 5385 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 005-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0037 GEORGE D NASET SHONNA R NASET 5375 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 006-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0038 JAMES OCONNOR KATHRYN OCONNOR 5365 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 007-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0039 PAUL W FLOOD LYNN C DEVORE 5355 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 BASS LK HGTS 4TH 008-004 874.10
10-118-22-11-0045 RUTH ROSENDAHL 5205 PINEVIEW LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55442 Unplatted Section 10 000-000-0 -001 874.10
10-118-22-14-0002 CHARLES F DAWS CHERYL M DAWS 31.26 4TH ST SE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 Unplatted Section 10 000-000-0 -005 874.10
10-118-22-13-0002 BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR CHURCH 5005 NORTHWEST BLVD PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 Unplatted Section 10 000-000-0 -004 3,762.37
10-118-22-31-0003 AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INC 358 FILLMORE AVE ST PAUL, MN 55107 SAVANNAH 000-000-A 4,622.33
10-118-22-34-0001 CITY OF PLYMOUTH DORAN COTE 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Unplatted Section 10 000-000-0 -031 3,009.89
TOTAL $35,869.40
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS
2006 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT
PINEVIEW LANE AND SCHMIDT LAKE ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO. 6106
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard
and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Pineview Lane
between Schmidt Lake Road and County Road 61, and portions of Sclunidt Lake Road between
Fernbrook Lane and Pineview Lane by bituminous resurfacing of streets, replacement of concrete curb
and gutter, and all necessary appurtenances; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract
of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the
amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 5 years,
the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2007, and shall
bear interest at the rate of 8.25% per annum for a 5 year assessment period from the date of
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each subsequent
installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to
the County Finance Director, pay the whole of the assessment on such property with interest
accrued to the date of payment to the City Finance Director, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment was paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may at
any time thereafter, pay the City Finance Director the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 29 or interest will be charged through December 31 of
the next succeeding year. The owner of any property so assessed may also, within 30 days from the
adoption of the resolution, make a partial prepayment of at least $100 to the City Treasurer. The
remaining unpaid balance will be certified as the new assessment amount. The owner may also at
any time prior to November 15, of any year, pay the remaining unpaid principal balance with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such prepayment is made.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Finance
Director to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected
and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
5. The total cost of the improvement assessed by this resolution is $35,869.40.
Adopted by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
Agenda Number: 1. L/
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager C\1'
FROM: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk, ough Jean McGann, Administrative
Services Manager
SUBJECT: OFF -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR APPLICATION FOR WOOD
ASSOCIATES D/B/A VICKSBURG LIQUORS, 1115 VICKSBURG
LANE
DATE: October 4, 2006, for City Council Meeting of October 24, 2006
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct a public hearing, and unless information is received to
the contrary, adopt the attached resolution approving an off -sale intoxicating liquor license
for Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg Liquors, 1115 Vicksburg Lane, for the license period
to expire January 31, 2007.
2. BACKGROUND: The City has received an application for an off -sale intoxicating liquor
license from Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg Liquors, 1115 Vicksburg Lane. This
location was previously licensed to Vicksburg Liquors Inc.
3. ALTERNATIVES: The Council could approve or deny the request.
4. DISCUSSION: All fees have been paid and certificates of insurance provided. The license
application has been investigated and is recommended for approval by the Police
Department. The applicant has received the materials on the City's Best Practices Program,
and will be participating in the program.
Notice of the public hearing has been published and posted.
5. BUDGET IMPACT: All fees have been paid.
6. RECOMMENDATION: Following the public hearing, it is recommended that the Council
approve the off -sale intoxicating liquor license of Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg
Liquors, 1115 Vicksburg Lane.
Plymouth1,2p
Adding Quality to Life
NOTICE OF HEARING ON OFF -SALE
INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSE APPLICATION FOR
WOOD & ASSOCIATES, D/B/A VICKSBURG LIQUORS,
1115 VICKSBURG LANE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Plymouth City Council will conduct a hearing on the
off -sale intoxicating liquor license application of Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg Liquors,
1115 Vicksburg Lane, on Tuesday, October 24, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the
Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard.
All persons wishing to address the Council regarding this application will be heard at that time.
Sandy Engdahl, CMC/MMC
City Clerk
763/509-5080
3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel- 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us
32-118-22-11-0120 32-118-22-11-0118 32-118-22-11-0087
ALLEN W MONTAGUE ANITA L BARNES ANITA R OLSON
JOY N MONTAGUE
1094 WESTON LN N 1091 WESTON LN N 1045 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0084 29-118-22-44-0072 32-118-22-11-0115
ARTAANDRADA BENJAMIN T FISHER BRUCE C NORBY
PATRICIA A NORBY
1031 XENE LN N 16000 12TH AVE N 1075 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0094 32-118-22-11-0024 32-118-22-11-0022
CAROL J OLSON CAROL L SENN CATHLEEN A CARYL
1044 XENE LN N 1160 XENE LN N 1170 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0011 32-118-22-11-0018 32-118-22-11-0008
CECELIA C BISTNER CHARLES F POKORNEY CHARLOTTE K GUSTAFSON
MAEIPOKORNEY
4910 SARATOGA LN N 1190 XENE LN N 1180 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55442 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0063 32-118-22-11-0093 29-118-22-44-0073
CIMARRON PONDS HOMEOWNERS CLARENCE R NOREEN COLTON J RAY
EUNICE M NOREEN
PO BOX 261 1050 XENE LN N 15920 12TH AVE N
HOPKINS, MN 55343 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
33-118-22-22-0003 32-118-22-11-0091 32-118-22-11-0105
COUNTY WORKHOUSE DAVID J LINDSTROM DAVID PERBIX
MARTHA PERBIX
1145 SHENANDOAH LN N 1065 XENE LN N 615 RICE ST
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 WAYZATA, MN 55391
32-118-22-11-0012 32-118-22-11-0015 32-118-22-11-0095
DELBERT D JENSEN DENNIS M CARLSTROM DIANA K LUND
GWENDOLYN M JENSEN
1175 WESTON LN N 1935 PIERCE ST NE 1040 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0014 32-118-22-11-0168 32-118-22-11-0009
DIANNE NASBY DONALD C WILLIAMS DORIS J SCHUSSLER
VIRGINIA R WILLIAMS
1185 WESTON LN N 17410 23RD AVE N 1174 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0101 32-118-22-11-0035 32-118-22-11-0166
DOROTHY L MERRIAM ELIZABETH T HAUGEN ERIK M JENSEN
1010 XENE LN N 1191 XENE LN N 984 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0080 32-118-22-11-0117 29-118-22-44-0031
EUGENE T BOURLAND FAYE YOUNG UPPMAN GEOFFREY R JACOB
NORMA J BOURLAND STEPHEN UPPMAN PAMELA J JACOB
1011 XENE LN N 1085 WESTON LN N 185 GLEASON LAKE RD
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 WAYZATA, MN 55391
32-118-22-11-0023 32-118-22-11-0110 32-118-22-11-0020
GEORGE E MOKLER GERALDINE M COCHRAN GLADYS M FAZENDIN
MARJORIE C MOKLER
1164 XENE LN N 1051 WESTON LN N 1180 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0017 32-118-22-11-0031 32-118-22-11-0122
GORDON W RABENS H EVELYN ELDRIDGE HARDY REYNOLDS JR
MARY G REYNOLDS
1194 XENE LN N 1151 XENE LN N 19827 WATERFORD CT
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 SHOREWOOD, MN 55331
32-118-22-11-0083 32-118-22-11-0107 33-118-22-22-0003
HAROLD M. SCHAIBLE HELEN L REED HENNEPIN COUNTY
2115 MORTON RD 1035 WESTON LN N 417 5TH ST N # 320
WAYZATA, MN 55391 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
32-118-22-11-0081 32-118-22-11-0027 32-118-22-11-0021
IONA M BAKK IONE S BOTTS JAMES KLINGELHOETS
MARDELL KLINGELHOETS
1015 XENE LN N 1144 XENE LN N 1174 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0104 32-118-22-11-0096 32-118-22-11-0127
JANICE A HANNAMAN JANICE B MONSON JANIE KOCH
1021 WESTON LN N 1034 XENE LN N 2315 INDIAN RD
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 MINNETONKA, MN 55305
29-118-22-44-0032 32-118-22-11-0086 32-118-22-11-0113
JEAN M WELCH JOHN E OVERLAND JOSEPHINE F SANSONE
15915 14TH AVE N 1041 XENE LN N 1065 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0085 32-118-22-11-0099 29-118-22-44-0074
JOYCE I HEDRIX JUDITH E MORROW JULI AANDERSON
1035 XENE LN N 1020 XENE LN N 15910 12TH AVE N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
29-118-22-44-0070 32-118-22-11-0082 32-118-22-11-0108
KEITH NUSBAUM KENNETH E IVERSON KRISTIN AANDERSON
FELICIA A NUSBAUM
16020 12TH AVE N 1021 XENE LN N 1041 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0013 32-118-22-11-0090 29-118-22-44-0033
LANTHA L BALLARD LENORA M DANIELSON LEO JORDAN
CAROLJORDAN
1181 WESTON LN N 1061 XENE LN N 15905 14TH AVE N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0166 32-118-22-11-0029 32-118-22-11-0126
LEONARD R JENSEN JR LEONARD W GOLDMAN LORRAINE TERRY
PEARLE GOLDMAN
13413 SUNSET TRL 1141 XENE LN N 1014 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0008 32-118-22-11-0032 32-118-22-11-0100
LYNN M GUSTAFSON MABLE R SMITH MARGARET E SCHLICHT
17555 28TH AVE N 1155 XENE LN N 1014 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0167 32-118-22-11-0109 32-118-22-11-0116
MARILOU E THIBAULT MARION R LUKAWSKI MARK READER
DOROTHY A READER
990 XENE LN N 1045 WESTON LN N 1081 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0106 32-118-22-11-0102 32-118-22-11-0025
MARVIN J FROST MARVIN O GORANSON MARY L MIXA
NORMA J FROST DELORES F GORANSON
261 RIDGEVIEW DR 1011 WESTON LN N 1154 XENE LN N
WAYZATA, MN 55391 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0103 32-118-22-11-0010 32-118-22-11-0036
MAURICE O BRYAN MAYNARD L KOOPMANN MELVIN M BEYER
YVONNE K BRYAN ELGAARD M KOOPMANN LORNA E BEYER
1015 WESTON LN N 1170 WESTON LN N 1195 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55.447
32-118-22-11-0125 32-118-22-11-0007 32-118-22-11-0119
NANCY D LAMARRE NANCY L WENTZEL NAOMI J SEEGER
1030 WESTON LN N 1184 WESTON LN N 1095 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0034 32-118-22-11-0159 32-118-22-11-0026
PATRICIA A SHAPANSKY PATRICIA E KRON PATRICIA H HYLAND
1165 XENE LN N 995 XENE LN N 1150 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0088 32-118-22-11-0092 32-118-22-11-0033
PATRICIA K KAINE PATRICIA S FARR PAUL C MCKINNEY
1051 XENE LN N 1054 XENE LN N 1161 XENE LN N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0011 32-118-22-11-0112 32-118-22-11-0019
PAUL E CHAREST POLLYA BERG RALPH F OSLUND
MARLENE E OSLUND
2552 119TH CT NE # B 1061 WESTON LN N 1184 XENE LN N
BLAINE, MN 55449 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0120 32-118-22-11-0097 32-118-22-11-0098
RANDALL J MONTAGUE RAYMOND E JORGENSEN RICHARD D NEUMAN
SALLY M JORGENSEN HELEN M NEUMAN
7585 VILLA CT N 1030 XENE LN N 1024 XENE LN N
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0028 32-118-22-11-0123 32-118-22-11-0127
ROBERT BAKER ROBERT J WINKLER ROBERT W MILLER
1140 XENE LN N 1080 WESTON LN N 1010 WESTON LN N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0114 32-118-22-11-0124 32-118-22-11-0089
ROLAND M ULRICH ROMAN F STAUB RONALD J DUSA
JUDITH A ULRICH LORRAINE A STAUB
1071 WESTON LN N 1034 WESTON LN N 37 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 TABERNACLE, NJ 08088
32-118-22-11-0016 32-118-22-11-0011 29-118-22-44-0071
RUSSELL V ELY RUTH G CHAREST SCOTT W RICKFORD
BARBARA B ELY
1195 WESTON LN N 1171 WESTON LN N 16010 12TH AVE N
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0006 32-118-22-11-0004 32-118-22-11-0122
STANLEY J HAGEN STATE OF MINNESOTA STEVEN R WILCOX
IDENAA HAGEN GAIL R WILCOX
1190 WESTON LN N 300 S 6TH ST GOVNMENT CTR 2057 WINTERGREEN CT
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487-0063 GREEN BAY, WI 54304
33-118-22-22-0001 29-118-22-44-0069 32-118-22-11-0030
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL THOMAS R ISAACSON VERA H SWANSON
PARK DIST SHELLEY L ISAACSON
DEL MILLER 16100 12TH AVE N 1145 XENE LN N
3000 XENIUM LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
32-118-22-11-0001 32-118-22-11-0005 29-118-22-44-0030
VICKSBURG LTD PRTNRSHP WANDA I THOMPSON WILLIAM A SCHAETZEL
J MILES THOMPSON ANN L SCHAETZEL
742 TWELVE OAKS CTR 1194 WESTON LN N 16005 14TH AVE N
WAYZATA, MN 55391 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
29-118-22-44-0073 29-118-22-44-0075 29-118-22-44-0062
WILLIAM H RAY WILLIAM M DRAZKOWSKI WILLIAM SCHULZ
PAQUITA B RAY JEANNE S DRAZKOWSKI PAULA J SCHULZ
3240 57TH ST SE 15900 12TH AVE N 16015 14TH AVE N
DELANO, MN 55328 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
RP City of
Plymouth
Adding Quality to Life
October 10, 2006
Shannon Wood
Wood & Associates
15705 6th Avenue N.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Wood:
The Plymouth City Council will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, October 24, 2006, at 7:00
P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., to consider your
application for an off -sale intoxicating liquor license at 1115 Vicksburg Lane. You or your
representative should be present to answer any questions the Council may have.
I have enclosed two copies of the public hearing notice. Please post one notice on the premises to
be licensed and the other notice somewhere else in the vicinity. I will post a copy of the hearing
notice at City Hall and have provided for the required published notice.
If you have questions regarding this hearing or need further information prior to the hearing,
please contact me at 763/509-5054.
Sincerely,
Kurt Hoffinan, MCMC
Deputy City Clerk
Encl.
3400 Plymouth Blvd • Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 • Tel: 763-509-5000 • www.ci.plymouth.mn.us
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -
APPROVING OFF -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
WOOD & ASSOCIATES, D/B/A VICKSBURG LIQUORS, 1115 VICKSBURG LANE
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for an off -sale intoxicating liquor license from
Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg Liquors, 1115 Vicksburg Lane; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has paid all fees and provided all required insurance certificates; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing and finds no reason to deny the
application.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth that an
off -sale intoxicating liquor license is hereby approved for Wood & Associates, d/b/a Vicksburg
Liquors, 1115 Vicksburg Lane. The liquor license is issued for the period through January 31,
2007.
Approved by the City Council on October 24, 2006.
Agenda Number:4
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
SUBJECT: Set Future Study Sessions
DATE: October 18, 2006, for City Council meeting of October 24, 2006
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Review the pending study session topics list and set study
sessions or amend the topics list if desired.
2. BACKGROUND: Attached is the list of pending study session topics, as well as calendars
to assist in scheduling.
The City Council needs to schedule a time to canvass the local results of the November 7
election. The canvassing needs to be completed within seven days of the election.
Canvassing of the results has occasionally been scheduled during the day.
Pending Study Session Topics
at least 3 Council members have approved the following study items on the list)
Other requests for study session topics:
Update with City Manager
Possible ordinance on feeding of wildlife (fall), Black
Consider garbage collection changes (Stein)
Work session on land use plan for entire City (Oct./Nov.)
Discuss possible erosion control project at County Road 61 and
County Road 9 (Black, suggested Oct. 24 study session)
Discuss proposed 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Program (Nov.)
Dominium request for feedback on reguiding/rezoning of property
at 1035 Nathan Lane (formerly Minter Weisman)
OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS
October 2006
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
YOM KIPPUR
BEGINS AT
SUNSET
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION, Council
Chambers
7:00 PM HUMAN
RIGHTS
COMMISSION
Parkers Lake Room
12:00 PM -4:00 PM
FIRE STATION #3
OPEN HOUSE, 3300
Dunkirk Lane
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
COLUMBUS DAY
OBSERVED), Public
Works Division closed
7:G3 PM REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING,
Council chambers
7:00 PM
ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMITTEE
EQC), Medicine Lake
Rooms A & B
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
7:00 PM YOUTH
ADVISORY COUNCIL,
Parkers Lake Room
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION, Council
Chambers
6:30 PM VOLUNTEER
RECOGNITION EVENT,
Plymouth Creek Center
7:00 PM HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (HRA),
Medicine Lake Room A
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
11:45 AM PLYMOUTH
BUSINESS COUNCIL,
12201 Ridgedale DNee,
Minnetonka
7:00 PM PLYMOUTH
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ON TRANSIT (PACT),
Parkers Lake Room (this
meeting onty)
7:00 PM REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING,
Council Clambers
29
DAYLIGHT
SAVINGS ENDS -
set clocks back 1
30
VISORY0-
0 Y
RooCOUNCIL,
ADVISORY
LakeParkersLake Room
31
Nov 2006
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
Sep 2006
S M T W T F S
1 2
hour 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30
modified on 10/19/2006
OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS
November 2006
Sunday Monday I Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Dec 2006
S M T W T F$
1
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION, Council
Chambers
2
7.00 PM HUMAN
RIGHTS
COMMISSION
Parkers Lake Room
3 4
10:00 AM -3:00 PM CITY
HALL OPEN FOR
ABSENTEE VOTING
Oct 2006
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 $ 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 2
3 4$ 6 7 8 9
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
STATE GENERAL
ELECTION;
POLLS OPEN 7:00
A.M. - 8:00 P.M.
7:00 PM
ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMITTEE
EOC), Council
Chambers
7:00 PM PARK &
RECREATION
ADVISORY
COMMISSION
FRAC), Plymouth
Ice Center
VETERANS DAY
OBSERVED), City
Offices Closed
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
7:00 PM YOUTH
ADVISORY COUNCIL,
Parkers Lake Room
7:00 PM REGULAR
CouNCIL MEETING,
council chambers
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION, Council
Chambers
7:00 PM HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (HRA),
Metlicine Lake Room A
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
7:00 PM PLYMOUTHADVISORY
COMMITTEE ON
TRANSIT (PACT) ,HOLIDAY
Medicine Lake Room A
THANKSGIVING
HOLIDAY
City Offices Closed
THANKSGIVING
VICKSBURG
CROSSING OPEN
HOUSE, 3155 Vicksburg
Lane
26 27 28 29 30
7:00 PM YOUTH
ADVISORYCOUNCIL,
Parkers Lake Room
11:45 AM PLYMOUTH
BUSINESS COUNCIL,
12201 Ridgedale Drive,
Minnetonka
7'0?.P REGULA
COUNCILPR
MEETING,
Council Chambers
modified on 10/19/2006
OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS
Decemher 2006
Sunday Monday Tuesday I Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Jan 2007
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
1 2Nov2006
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
3
2:00 PM OLD
FASHIONED
CHRISTMAS -
Plymouth Historical
Society Building
4
7:00 PM TRUTH IN
TAXATION PUBLIC
HEARING, Council
Chambers
5 6
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION,Council
Chambers
7
7:00 PM HUMAN
RIGHTS
COMMISSION
Parkers Lake Room
8 9
10 11
7:00 PM TRUTH IN
TAXATION MEETINGCOUNCIL
CONTINUED (IF
NECESSARY), Council
Chambers
7:00 PM YOUTH
ADVISORY COUNCIL,
Parkers lake Room
12
7:00 PM REGULARMEETING,
Council Chambers
13
7:00 PM
ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMITTEE
EQC), Council
Chambers
14
7:00 PM PARK & REC
ADVISORY
COMMISSION (PRAC),
Council Chambers
15
CHANNUKAH
BEGINS AT
SUNSET
16
17 18 19 20
7:00 PM PLANNING
COMMISSION, Council
Chambers
21
7:00 PM HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (HRA),
Medicine Lake Room A
22 23
24
CHRISTMAS EVE
25
CHRISTMAS DAY
City Offices closed
26
11:45 AM PLYMOUTH
BUSINESS COUNCIL,
12201 Ridgedale Drive,
Minnetonka
27
7:00 PM PLYMOUTHADVISORY
COMMITTEE ON
TRANSIT (PACT) ,
Medicine Lake Room A
28 29 30
31
modified on 10/19/2006