HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 05-26-2009 SpecialCITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 26Y 2009Y 5:30 p.m.
MEDICINE LAKE CONFERENCE ROOM
1. Call to Order.
2. Discuss homeowners associations.
3. Discuss subdivision of lot. Maps
4. Set future Study Sessions.
5. Adjourn.
Special Council Meeting 1 of 1 May 26, 2009
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULHVARn, PLYMOUTH, MIN 55447
DATE: January 7, 2009
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager, through Steve Jueften, Community
Development Director
FROM: Marie Darling', Senior Planner fl -trough Barbara Senness, Planning
Manager
SUBJECT: Homeowner Associations
ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photos of Subdivisions Discussed
Recently, the City Council requested that staff prepare a report about homeowner
associations (HOAs). An HOA is a legal entity created by a real estate developer for the
purpose of developing and managing a development of homes. It allows the developer to
transfer financial and legal responsibility of a community to the homeowners.
The Purpose of HOAs
The City of Plymouth requires an HOA with any development that has comnionly -owned
open space, The City requires that the developer record the association documents
a-ainst each affected property as part of the documents recorded with the final plat to
elisure fla al tne s - - - __ - __ - - - -, - __ - - - - - . I . I — 11
e cummon eleinclas are maimained. Siatt reviews 111c clocuments prior to
recording the plat for consistency with City ordinances.
Developers like to create HOAs because they allow them to better compete for buyers.
Subdivisions with HOAs attract initial buyers who want 1) the perceived stability
provided by a well-maintained neighborhood and 2) access to the most possible amenities
without the maintenance demands.
Types of HOAs
There are two main types of HOA communities - a common interest community (CIC) or
a nonprofit corporation. A CIC is a condominium community with no platted property
Page 1
associated with each dwelling. Generally, this type of HOA is used in conjunction with
apartments and some townhouses.
The other type of HOA is a nonprofit corporation. This type of HOA is typically found
in a townhome or single-family development where platted property is assigned to each
dwelling. The City has no jurisdiction over the creation of non-profit corporations, so
developers can create a non-profit HOA without the City's knowledge or approval.
The -majority of HOAs in Plymouth were created in the last 40 years. Although there is
no means of tracking and monitoring HOAS and their principal contacts, staff estimates
tliat there are at least 147 associations, based on property ownership information and City
and State records. These 147 HOAs include a variety of structure types (including
single-family, townhouses and apartment dwellings) and ownership status (condominium
versus individual ownership of property).
Based on structure type and amenities provided, staff identified five categories of HOAs,
as listed below.
I , Attached dwellings with common property and other improvements (like private
drives) and shared amenities (like open space, pools, tennis courts, community
buildings, etc.) These HOAs control the shared exterior maintenance of the
structure (decks, siding, roofs, etc.) and are also likely to have architectural
review authority over additions or modifications to dwellings and property.
Developments like The Fields of Nanterre, The Reserve, and Cimarron Ponds fall
into this category. To staff's knowledge, none of these HOAs has ever dissolved.
These HOAs are multiple -purpose organizations that have a defiried focus on
regular maintenance and shared use of the desired amenities. Ailhough
dissolution is unlikely, it is possible that the HOA could request that the City
maintain some or all of its private drives.
2. Attached dwellings with common property and shared improvements (like
driveways), but no other amenities. These HOAs also control the shared exterior
maintenance of the structure and are likely to have architectural review authority
over additions or modifications to dwellings and property. Developments like
Merrimac Townhomes, Trenton Ponds, Harvest Hills and the Glacier Vista two-
family dwellings fall into this category. To stafl7s knowledge, none of these
HOAs has ever dissolved because the shared maintenance costs involve items like
shared drives, roofs, siding and other issues that are ongoing. Although
dissolution is unlikely, it is possible that the HOA could request that the City
maintain some or all its private drives,
3. Detached dwellings with common property and other shared amenities, like pools,
playgrounds, community buildings, etc. These HOAs may have architectural
review authority over additions or modificat ' ions to dwellings and property.
Developments like Tiberon, Windemere Farins, and Wood Crest fall into this
category. These HOAs are multiple -purpose organizations that have a defined
Page 2
focus on regular maintenance and shared use of the desired amenities. To stafirs
knowledge, none of these HOAs has ever dissolved.
The concern with this HOA category is that the neighborhood may tire of the
maintenance responsibility of the amenity feature, allow it to fall into disrepair
and dissolve the HOA to eliminate the financial responsibility. To limit this
occurrence or potential conflicts over how to reuse amenity properties in the
future, the City now directs developers to plat amenity properties as a lot and
block. With this status, the property could be reused for a single-family home,
allowing the HOA the ability to recoup the costs of removing the amenity. The
most recent example of a subdivision approved with amenities on a property with
lot and block status is the Wood Crest subdivision.
4. Detached dwellings with passive common open -space property, but no other
amenities. These HOAs may have architectural review authority over additions or
modifications to dwellings and property. Developments like Rolling Hills Park,
Glen Echo Ponds, Harbor Place, and Churchill Farins are in this category. Should
an HOA dissolve from this category, the City could have difficulty resolving
maintenance issues or may have requests to develop the outlots for other uses.
However, such instances have been rare in the past and the outlot study noted that
only two HOA outlots have the potential to develop with a clear title and these
two outlots have site characteristics that limit their development potential,
5. Detached dwellings with no common property or shared amenities.
Developments like Ivanhoe Woods fall into this category. Developments in this
category exist for architectural control and to provide an additional level of
enforcement to prevent nuisances. HOAs in this category could dissolve without
inipact to the City.
Issues
The City Council has had several discussions with homeowners' associations (HOA) in
recent years, all pertaining to the costs associated with long-term maintenance of
commonly owned property, including both commonly owned open space and private
drives. Two single-family subdivisions (Heritage Woods Estates 2 nd and Harbor Place)
requested the ability to subdivide their open -space property to avoid the burden of
liability insurance and maintenance. Townhouse developments sometimes struggle under
the burden of long-term maintenance of shared improvements and several townhouse
associations have requested that the City take over some or all of their private streets,
including the associations in Cimarron East, Hai -vest Hills, Chelsea Woods, and Cimarron
Ponds. Additionally, two single-family developments (Rolling Hills Park and Glen Echo
Ponds) have dissolved their HOAs, and this has complicated the process of gaining
compliance with diseased tree abatements.
The most recent HOA discussion (Heritage Woods Estates 2 d) led the City Council to
direct staff to prepare a report on the development potential of open -space outlots.
Page 3
Conclusion
HOAs present both risks and benefits to cities. The risks are associated with the
difficulty in requiring them to maintain their common features. If HOAs do not
adequately budget for regular repairs and maintenance, the costs can be overwhelming.
Plymouth has bad requests to take over private drives and provide loans to finance
structure improvements with limited ability to recoup the costs.
Cities also benefit by having HOAs. An HOA can enforce regulations that are above
minimum standards set by local governments, such as design standards and rules for
additions, fences, sheds, pets, vehicle storage, yard maintenance, etc. Developments that
require maintenance above minimum standards improve the image of a city. HOAs may
also provide amenities at private expense, like pools, playgrounds, and clubhouses, that
reduce demands for similar public amenities.
Page 4
N
Chelsea V Ioods A
IFA -9 NOAL
Mon
0
zr
3
cn
T
CD
m
N
Cimarron East, A
CD
4
M Cimarron Ponds
CD
cc
N
The Fields of Nanterre A
w
Glacier Vista
Page 10
N
Glen Echo Ponds A
Page 1
Harbor Place
Page 12
N
Harvest Hills A
Page 13
10 Heritage Woods Estates 2nd
ID
N
Merrimac A
Page 16
N
The Reserve A
Page 17
Rolling
CD
co
N
Hills Piark A
Tiberon n)
Page 19
Trenton Ponds
Page 20
WindemerEl. Farms
Lo
WOOD CREST I C.R. 00C, NO
cl
I
1 n J Id A. J dj!M III
H 1 LIS
9SV42'UrK 1307,14
58VQ'Zrz — — — — — — — — — _
A
VYLUN ITM
OUTLOT
1A I
j 12-0
r -OR
9
6 1, 'ATg 7 Ile557' - li.
zr
i
JL.
5
12
9
mo
w,
W MAO
6 Al
13
3 3
X 7 zo
NaI I
J11
66.27
PIT, 1q.
44.1 14
2 sl - 7 A VEo.sl 3 _I TH
L, 2 II I ` IF 114-1 1"E
pro
e* 1117,. " I
17
16
20
1 !4 12 1 1,1 13 i IR 14 1
ItTl
3
2
1 L9
gTJE- A 8NOR
A) Moo 14.754..7 esif
2
46jLPIIILA . . 7.
9-24 4111 66.0 aim 71M
11-42'27"W 130kI37 — — — —
SATHRE-BERGLUIST, JC.
0- ., 9
POOL LOT
AEIRIAL NOT YET AVAILABLE)
D
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
DATE: April 30, 2009
TO: Plymouth City Council
FROM: Barbara Sen-As'17,1-
Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Lot Split Analysis
Existina lZeaulation of Lot Split
The City's Subdivision Regulations adopted in 2003 provide for administrative approval4--
ot'subdivisions that include no more than three lots. The specific conditions that a minor
subdivision must meet are included in the attachnients,
Do Existing Regulations Ensure Sufficient Protection or Existing Nei ghborhoods?
A minor subdivision approved in January 2009 raised the question of Whether tile
Subdivision Reeulations contain sufficient language to ensure appropriate protection of
existing, de,elopcd neighborhoods. Each of the three subject lots in Burl Oaks met the
dimensional (lot area and lot width) requirements of the zoning district in which the
Subdivision is located. Although two of the three lots are smaller in area and width than
the nearby lots. they are NNithin 70 percent of the average size of adjacent lots. As a point
Of referenee. the Zoning Ordinance allows for development of vacant- non-conformil'101
lots that are within 70 percent ofthe lot area and width ofthe district in XvIllch they are
located, with the approval of an administrative permit.
The regulation related to lot dimensions states: "Tlic resulting parcels shall generally
conform with the shape. character, and area of existing or anticipated land subdivisions in
the surrOUnding areas." Two key phrases in this condition are open to interpretation —
general y con1brin andsurrounding area. The Subdivision Regulations do not define
either of these terms. In sucli instances, the Subdivision Regulations state that Webster's
Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Addition shall be used to define terms.
Webster's Tenth Edition defines coWbrin as "to be similar or identical." It defines
ge) 7ei -ally: -as a rule: usually.- Under these definitions. the tern -i gencrall'COI#bl-111
means usually similar or identical.
Page
NVebster's Tenth Edition does not define surrountliiig, but (toes define the noun surround
as "sorneffiHit, (as a border or ambient [present on all sides] environment) thatC7
surrounds." Under this definition, surrounding area means the area that is present oil all
sides of a subject propertv.
Taken together, these definitions inean that lots resulting from a minor subdivision
shOUld usually be similar or identical in size and charac er to the lots present on all sides
of the new lots.
In the last 15 vears. the City has processed five minor subdivisions* that did not include
any variances (which require approval by the City Council prior to the administralik e
approval of the subdivision). In each instance, the zoning of the undivided lot. tile
resulting lots in the minor subdivision and the adjacent properties remained the same. In
other words, I ) the minor subdivision did not include a rezoning and 2) the lots in the
proposed minor subdivisions met the sarne lot size and width requirements as the
surrounding lots, The attachments include maps of each minor subdivision. showing the
lot size and \,,,idtli at the setback ior the sul ject property. Plus all lots Nvithin 250 feet and
all lots xvithin the same subdivision. A diSCUSSiO11 of each of these SUbdivisions follows.
Trainer Subdivision — Sunset Trail between Vinewood and Wedgewood Lanes
The two lots created in this subdivision exceed the 18.500 square foot lot area
requirement in RSF- 1. The lot width ofthe lot with the pre-existing home did not
change. The newtv created lot is 217 feet wide versus the I 10 -foot ininimurn required.
Both lots also meet or exceed the lot size and width of ahnost all ofthe adjacent lots. The
ncioliborhood on Wedgewood and Vinewood is a llliXtUre ofolder and newer homes of
both one and two stories (refer to photos in attachments).
Melin Subdivision — Evergreen Lane south of I S'h Avenue
The Surrounding Elmhurst Gateway subdivision is located west of Medicine Lake and is
one of(he oldest subdivisions in the city. Since the subdivision pre -dates modern zoning
and subdivision regulations. lot sizes and widths are smaller and narrower than in most
other parts of Plymouth. Follow-ing a study of the area. in 200 1, the City Council rezoned
this subdivision and the Elmhurst subdivision to tile north from RSF-2 to RSF-3. The
intent of the rezoning Nvas to make more ofthe existing lots conforming and to make it
easier for property oNvners to improve their properties without the need for a variance.
The two lots created in this minor subdivision exceed the 7.000 square foot lot area and
65-1-Oot lot %N-idth requirernents in RSF-3. Both are double the lot kvidth of most lots in
the surrounding subdi\--ision. The area of the lot oil Evergreen Lane exceeds the size of
Tile Trainer subdivision occurred befOl-e tile CitV COLUICil apprm ed the new SubdiN isiou ReQUIations. It
is im I tided in the analysis as it would have qua I ified ft -)r a iiiinor subdivision,
Page 2
most of the lots in Elmhurst Gatc\va\. The newly created lot fronts on Forest -view Lane
and is at a lower elevation than the abutting and adjacent lots on Evergreen Lane (refer to
13hotos in attachments). The 11OUse on (lie new lot is barely visible to the adjacent lot to
the north. There are no hornes to the south as Forestview Lane deadends at the edge of a
Nvelland. The neighborhood on Evergreen and Forest -view is mixed. ranging from small.
cottage -style homes to new, large homes that replaced teardoNN,ns (reller to photos in
attaclunents).
Sabby SUbdivision — Pineview Lane between 58"' Avenue and Norlh est Blvd.
The newly created lot iti this minor subdivision is currently vacant. At 17.251 square feet
and 18.386 sqUare feet. both lots in the minor subdivision exceed the RSF-2 lot area
inininium of 12.500 square feet. They also rneel or exceed the lot width standard of 80
feet. The two lots back tip to an RSF-1 subdivision with larger lotareas and widths. The
lot sizes are less than the median for lot sizes in the Heritage Woods subdivision.
The pre-existing, horne orients to two existing homes to the north. The new lot is located
to the south behind the pre-existing home and at a lower elevation, The nc v lot Is also at
a lower elevation than the lots to the east, The homes on the west side of Pirieview all
orient to the cul-de-sac west of Pineview. The closest homes are screened from the new
lot bN, existing trees and a 1ence (ret'er to photos in attachments). The home directly
across Pineview frorn the new lot is set back roughly 135 feet from Pineview.
HLIghes Subdivision
The SUITOunding Christiansens Parkers Lake subdivision is an older plat with vastly
varying lot sizes. The two lots created in this subdivision exceed the 18.500 square foot
lot area and I 10 -foot lot %vidth requirements in RSF-L They are substantially larger than
the lots to the -,vest and southwest and substantially smaller than the lots to the immediate
south. cast and north (refer to attachinents).
This neighborhood is in transition. Man,,, small. older homes are being replaced with
large homes (reller to photos in attachments).
Potential Minor Subdivisions
Staff Used GIS to identify all other RSF-1 and RSF-2 lots %xith at least double lot area and
idth. To determine which of these lots may actually have potential for minor
SUbdivision, staff eliminated lots in the following catelories:
Lots developed xvith schools. churches or city parks:
Lots owned by the City;
Lots covered NN"ith wellands or encumbered by utilities;
Unplatted lots;
Lots on a cul-de-sac bordering arterial roadwaN s: and
3
Page 3
Lots Or MAIMS that would require major subdivision,
After climinatino lots that WOUld not be eligible. 224 lots remained (104 RSF-1 lots and
120 RSF-2 lots), While these lots are scattered throughout the city, a significant number
are located south OCCOL11ity Road 6 in older neighborhoods. A large [lumber ofthe lots in
the rest of the city are located in newer subdivisions.
Nearly all of the oversized lots are currently developed. Seven ofthe RSF-1 are vacant
and one of the RSF-2 lots is vacant. Based on the placement of existing homes,, tear
downs Nvould be required on some lots before a minor subdivision could occLir. Staffhas
not determined how many lots NVOUld ffill Into this category.
Findinus and Conclusions
In the last 15 years. the Citv has processed five minor subdivisions. That the City is
aware of. one ofthe fiN..-e has raised concerns aniong neighbors.
The greatest opportunity for near-term additional minor subdivisions is in the older part
of the city where changes in neighborhood character are occurring today. Three of the
five existing minor subdivisions have Occurred in this area.
Using Webster's Dictionary to define key terms. the Subdivision Regulations currently
require that lots resulting fi-orn a minor subdivision usually be similar or identical in size
and character to the lots present on all sides of the new lots. The councii could choose to
alter tile Current language to provide additional clarity or choose to make no changes.
Attachments:
1. Section 506.05 ofthe Subdivions Regulations — Minor Subdivisions
2. Ntaps and photographs of existing Minor SUbdi\ ision sites
3. RSF-1 and RSF-21 lots \vlth potential for minor subdivision
4
Page
5,
w7 1&4 1 A qr
Z
41- 1,
D
a)
4) E
S
I TZM6,
04,
A
ORI;
41.
Melin Minor Subdivision
Average Scale: I inch = 65.5 feet
Copyright 02007 Pictometry Intemational Corp.
I , W;4
fi—g—
iF
y
rz-F
7
r7l t_t7: 77Z--
wm:
M
AlmWL
js
l A c
VV
low
af
Ag
R
fig
Tm
Lu
fig
Tm
A",
E j,9
z
4
sr
A.
La
CD
C)
Shink Minor Subdivision
Average Scale: I inch = 79.8 feet
uopyrignt uzuu i ricyomeiry
161-
E
S
Cotp.
U
CD
LN
IAC 1)
E
S
Pip"
7
P.,
N
N
F.
Ki
Copyright (02007 Pictometry International Corp.
Trainer Minor Subdivision
Average Scale: I inch = 70.8 feet
0
JU
ik
41L
i7,
100'
00
110
7Y
View from Vacant Lot in Sabby Minor Subdivision
ge 16
V A
L4,4- 1
View from Vacant Lot in Sabby Minor Subdivision
ge 16
F
S
0 4 4'
r V
I Ae
j 41F
V
4-V
66
VV
VA .1 r 7
7
A ;X,
W7VOW
c
iLdi( 2-007 Pictwu,:m bim-national Corp.
Hughes Minor Subdivision
LO
0
00 Average Scale: I inch = 118.7 feet
p4,
41
q,w
SIM&
Ae,
lftm,W,
2a.411 7,350
9,469
9,452 14,390
9,891
7,865
10,183 10 WitfUJUMV
Lake
238,658
10,4 8,990
10,57 8,990
9.660
9,635
238,658
009
9,533
9,07
9,587
14,1
9,587
14,197
13,625
Melin Minor Subdivision
1705 Evergreen Lane North
Properties within 250 feet
12,871 10,729
of 7,402
25,125
7A43
9.119 19 15,361
11.2
11.2 16
SA35 29,768
5,000 15
427
20.411 7,528
7,350
9AB A390
A91
14A21 Medicine
10,163
as Lake10.167
ASO
10.571 0'"0
635
9,635
0.009 9 ' 533
9,871
9,614
0. 1 .3S2
Cp
14,197
9,253
13,825 8.855
198 B'"s
7,603 8.018
7,671
14,162 % 7,315
57
Use
018
013 Ig.344
6,12
r- 5,646
6,231 7 1. 6,001
0
25 1 12,764
125
12,226
5,6(14
171
A757 50jm
rIDpCity of Plymouth,
Minnesota
Elmhurst Gateway
Subdivision
1705 Evergreen Lane North
Properties within subdivision
ki
9wTH A VE
87 86
86
104
86 87
25,640
23,658 22,432
24,927 24,901
24,900 22,436
17,684 15,540
15,558
18,870
78
107 M
69
23,356
79
o 21,495
303
20,590
ISO
183
15,690 19.7"
2297
17,170
209
17,101
17,369
37,386
29,791
63
66 /
16,130
166 -
21,124
192
Ajo
21' 124
1,12
A"
16,500
jA
1 7 01 6
16,500
17,016
18,971
Gleason
Lake
Shink Minor Subdivision
630 Holly Lane North
Properties within 250 feet
ity of Plymouth,
Minnesota
2S.763 Ij 22 632 1
L63 2
7 7
14 23,378 1
Burl Oaks
Subdivision
0 Holly Lane North
Properties within subdivision
7
I
15, 8 15.519 17,684 15, 15,558/
20.211
10 is V .8.870 29,791 22'9
17.6 2
15,41 37,38623,356
5,288 24,0 JAC18,"6 6-6 16,130 1(
15A16
15-506 --j 21,495
16,36 21,124
28,749 1 907 13.80 17.390
00
X 20,590
1,425 16,500
15figO 19,744 16,500
22,051
kk 16,5
17,%9 16,8 17,710 17.01
23,363
CD
0 18.971
6,284 8,829
15 ' 884
16,222 17.1 D
0 6TH AVE
z 18,207
23,053 jj2
17,3
31,329
a
17,350
C 0 16,364 7,913
0 1,327
2C1.143 Gleason
15,451 18,670
24,02
1 17.3 Lake
17,80020,407
X 18,120LU
11,092
25,651 jr
19.625
Z4,
20,237 16,815
40,655
ity of Plymouth,
Minnesota
2S.763 Ij 22 632 1
L63 2
7 7
14 23,378 1
Burl Oaks
Subdivision
0 Holly Lane North
Properties within subdivision
7
I
d
21,595
25,6 27,930
0 16,265
21,006
6127,614
40.3S4 '34,405
20,522
21,391 \
109 21,252
282
SUNSET TR
141 113 257
24,254
21,070
5
45,903 Z
24,386 1
0
0
16,112
15,687
13 ' 655
80 80
192
114
20,966 1 20,966
Trainer Minor Subdivision
13240 Sunset Trail
Properties within 250 feet
Cavanaugh
Lake
rpci)ty of Plymouth,
Minnesota
Cavanaugh
Lake
Greer's Orchard Tracts
Subdivision
13240 Sunset Trail
Properties within subdivision
1
22,639 30,617
150
109
166 59,810 37,236 127
76
14,575
21,595
27,930
ct,
16,265
0
21,006 27,631 4
40,394 34,405
59,963
10,999
16,112
24,030
21,391 5.6B7
1L19625 5 80 80 90 116
109 21,252
282
SUNSET TR
257257
07021,070
24,254
45,903 24,386 M
00
43,65t2
0
1
22,549 22,504 40,775 301
Im 150
I ST AVE
rpci)ty of Plymouth,
Minnesota
Cavanaugh
Lake
Greer's Orchard Tracts
Subdivision
13240 Sunset Trail
Properties within subdivision
1
co go No 47
20,091
23,394
29,332
22,559
21,277
1Its,
24,999
32,441 23,306
14,570
57 23,170
11,203
32,004
23,170
14,435
P 12,65
24,796
14,929
98
0
9 117
19,469
23,830
16,976 "
1
23,830
Zd
Sabby M,inor Subdivision
5900 Pineview Lane North
Properties within 250 feet rIDpci)ty of Plymouth,
Minnesota
co, Rg No 47
N'570
li,203
21,277
110
32,441
32,004
11,514
11,313
14,435
11,332
12,655
24,796
14,929
13,416
13,588
98
15,946
13,350
90
16,556 23,512 19,469
27,985 19,583
16,976
29,332
Heritage Woods Estates
Subdivision
5900 Pineview Lane North
Properties within subdivision
Parkers
Lake
12,409
12 9 5,2?J., 1 .! '4 136,491
2 9 54
22,030
11,050
43.aID
22.634
25,291 25,650
61,087
25,2"
25,17125,071
39"
11' 5
0
33,372 21,175
1,0 0
36,AM9 35,617
44,788 37.OSO
0,733
I'l 0110
12,8
061,087
F'
44,767
35,602 so
58 58 58
CWco
5
T
0 V
cn
49,270 60.140 46,606
49,712 43.714
18,005
9TH AVE
47,295
50,216 43.136
29,032
30
75 75 9.ra97 1aAVE
lljool
10,750
10,87 474
32,492 32,421
cm 45,706
0,98.
0,851,
10,729 0 0
cc
5
z
0
0
L75 75
23,302 23,301
N
Lu
8TH AVE
z
1
Hughes Minor Subdivision
15020 9th Avenue North
Properties within 250 feet
a
A rp
Parkers
Lake
r0pci)ty of Plymouth,
Minnesota
32,492 a2.421
45,706
23,302 23MI, 42,678
23.303 23,301 43 053
23.3D4 23.300' 43,488
23,304
a34)5 43.892
23,rU23,109 23XJ9 - 3
43.aID
22.634
25,291 25,650
41 5UW043,029
25,2"
39"
26,133
0
33,372 21,175 71
w
36,AM9 35,617
44,788 37.OSO
013 33,786
48,B26 44,767
28,7D
49,270 60.140 46,606
49,712 43.714
41,028
47,295
50,216 43.136
29,032 2"9. 5"0 1
Z: 22,79
44,819 2a,
26,216
100 101
W,314
4.141/ t-46,2
322
0
z
CO
x
Uj
Christiansens Parkers Lake
Subdivision
15020 9th Avenue North
Properties within subdivision
Page 17
w
Z 0 0
z a 0 z (9
0 Z 0mcc0mow3'. Z a u "13: w L 03: zoo, 41 <1 nz, Q< m > H! 0 ow
0 w OLUW00 cc
0 ME6
ffiomoo.o
0 3 a 3 om -
wA=)00 > 0 < 5 w, 0 30 n 0 -
0w>
w0Z am 0 wzo momuzpEixwy
wz 003:
00C WE - z <w M 3: T r'; 3: Z o W , L) Z<< wo omz'wz-Zm o L'- ir z Q z < c
W,Zzx<z W< 0 w' 'U0z
wmz 'zo< wnz<m0<x' ozm: J7Z w:e !<p:<w"R
M <z gwx':Z.3 0 Mw 0 Z om <
wZ
cc cc -=D zm V) m wz:' 0 -.
m
wol < " z
z .0, amnqz
w
a
0 < <
z CE Zo
0 a 0 5 OW, 3:0N,
55 wM<0
Z -
u czwz
x
a 0< %0 0 <Mo zz <Uo=!Mt oz=- . zM '9=(q no Q)X 25--To' om< -0 0 3.>n
15m m <wn,-'0<2-`0 <
N > 3:5zow.MOFLOZ2 d' x02.0Q.m'>
Rw
wmo o nx
w
Z2: 10Z iLC) W, 2om
0w
C) M H
00 ..............
HUHN '2000.2 ... 0"00 ........ 00— .......
20522019nZM2 & T 7 ---- S—. -.-
BOTHAVE
C:)
CO RD NO 47
Av
z
0
Ir
co
z
0
1 LA
ir
cr
wLL
0
55THAVE.
3:
x
C" 0
O I&
cr:
LLI
cov'p
z
Pedfom Lak
050THAVE.
CL
z
45THAVE.
40THAVE.
35THAVE.
1:14
G
30TH AVE.
25TH AVE.
v'
20THAVE.
15THAVE.
10THAVE.
Iq
5THAVE.
RIDGEMOUNTAN)
OLD I OCKFORD RD
C%,
jD
0 Cb
z CA
cc A
0
3
Kslwe4
TrA
0
coU)
c
0
FA
U)
2
35-
N
r1q
Of) RD NO 6
cc
D
M
b
UZ
Pike Lak
CO'901VO 47
BASS LAKE RD
0
z
a
Bass Llkdew'
P0 ake
LU
C0
ir <
Uj
i -
z
N
C:)
0
Av
z
0
Ir
co
z MIt 1 LA
0
cr
wLL
0
3:
x
C" 0
O I&
cr:
0
coU)
c
0
FA
U)
2
35-
N
r1q
Of) RD NO 6
cc
D
M
b
UZ
Pike Lak
CO'901VO 47
BASS LAKE RD
0
z
a
Bass Llkdew'
P0 ake
LU
C0
ir <
Uj
i -
z
N
012
43
OcKFORD RD
a
7
Av
0
Ir
co
z MIt 1 LA
cr
wLL
0
3:
x
C" 0
O I&
cr:
LLI
cov'p
Pedfom Lak
CD
z
LU C1
C77
r
LLJ vLL
DO
012
43
OcKFORD RD
43
0 q
C4 La'
ca
M
01
60THAVE.
55THAVE.
50TH AVE.
45-H N,. 7
40TH AVE.
35THAVE.
30THAVE.
25TH AVE.
dbD
Zb
20TH AVE.
15THAVE.
RSF-1 and RSF-2 Lots
With at Least Double Lot Area
and Lot Width
RSF-1 Lots
Roo' -2 Lots
L A K
Vacant Lots
City of Plymouth,
Minnesota
I GTH AVE.
THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA
FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS
5-MAVE. NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELD
VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS.
E. I- fl (71 -- 1 RIDGEMOUNTAVE,
Zia;
M!5M>>nMMz>CMC>MtiC:E!;'p >O<co> 'Lqbz=0'MQ0M>N
0 0pZ>M0>KM0<M=zwMz! MCMZK,mo>zcgmzmo x,ulm,=MZ>c>o mo5o2r'z=>mK>xmzzcemDzmzolm-n<ogz>o>mmzm
Z.
0M00 --1z -<0MQZM2M0M'0 - 'M MAMCIP->01 AZ2_<_
Zmxw -'0M>M0Mv MwZZ0 mm wo:l X ,
C.> F o C XIMT?A '-I'M 7>Z*X,oz -<mZ-< wm'm >3g.
M->M'wzMz0z>z>M TMM > M,'Q:RzM*:5S*zy:W 'C'm0
0Mwq*d>*>.M2' -gmm zz?j m*
wc
0 < 0 Z20'zd>x> 7C OZ500 > X M0 Tp :Ec):EOC Qz xpozizomom"
z mom, 6 M .E8T- 0, Fp0o 'wM0> Fn CO 0 MM '000 av 0> , xx5mo* 0 'Ogzo
0 >z :5 a 5 10* 0 MO 1:Dz0M> a OCIMO 0 mzld a z a > 0cl:Ez 00 (') > M
M0
E :::: Miles
0 0.5 1 2 3
Page 20
0
0
Ir
co
z MIt 1 LA
cr
wLL
0
z
3:
x
C" 0
O I&
LLI
cov'p
Pedfom Lak
H" n
LU C1
C77
El
43
0 q
C4 La'
ca
M
01
60THAVE.
55THAVE.
50TH AVE.
45-H N,. 7
40TH AVE.
35THAVE.
30THAVE.
25TH AVE.
dbD
Zb
20TH AVE.
15THAVE.
RSF-1 and RSF-2 Lots
With at Least Double Lot Area
and Lot Width
RSF-1 Lots
Roo' -2 Lots
L A K
Vacant Lots
City of Plymouth,
Minnesota
I GTH AVE.
THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA
FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS
5-MAVE. NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELD
VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS.
E. I- fl (71 -- 1 RIDGEMOUNTAVE,
Zia;
M!5M>>nMMz>CMC>MtiC:E!;'p >O<co> 'Lqbz=0'MQ0M>N
0 0pZ>M0>KM0<M=zwMz! MCMZK,mo>zcgmzmo x,ulm,=MZ>c>o mo5o2r'z=>mK>xmzzcemDzmzolm-n<ogz>o>mmzm
Z.
0M00 --1z -<0MQZM2M0M'0 - 'M MAMCIP->01 AZ2_<_
Zmxw -'0M>M0Mv MwZZ0 mm wo:l X ,
C.> F o C XIMT?A '-I'M 7>Z*X,oz -<mZ-< wm'm >3g.
M->M'wzMz0z>z>M TMM > M,'Q:RzM*:5S*zy:W 'C'm0
0Mwq*d>*>.M2' -gmm zz?j m*
wc
0 < 0 Z20'zd>x> 7C OZ500 > X M0 Tp :Ec):EOC Qz xpozizomom"
z mom, 6 M .E8T- 0, Fp0o 'wM0> Fn CO 0 MM '000 av 0> , xx5mo* 0 'Ogzo
0 >z :5 a 5 10* 0 MO 1:Dz0M> a OCIMO 0 mzld a z a > 0cl:Ez 00 (') > M
M0
E :::: Miles
0 0.5 1 2 3
Page 20
rp)City of
Plymouth
Adding Q.oljty to Life
REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING
May 26, 2009
Agenda
Number:
To: Mayor and City Council
Prepared by: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
1. ACTION REQUESTED:
Item: Set Future Study Sessions
Review the pending study session topics list and set study sessions or amend the topics list if desired.
Attached is the list of pending study session topics, as well as calendars to assist in scheduling.
Page I
Pending Study Session Topics
at least 3 Council members have approved the following study items on the list)
Joint meeting with Environmental Quality Committee (fall)
Other requests for study session topics:
Update with the City Manager (fall)
Meet with prosecutor for update (fall) JB)
Page 2
vCity of
PlymouthoiI
Adding Quality to Life
June 2009
Modified on 05122109
Page 3
1 2 3 4 5
Cancelled
PLANNING
COMMISSION
MEETING
Council Chambers
7 8 9 5:30 PM, 10 11 12 13
SPECIAL COUNCIL 7:00 PM 7:00 PM
MEETING ENVIRONMENTAL PARK Et REC
Medicine Lake Room QUALITY ADVISORY COM -
Discuss ArchitecturaL
Guidetines
COMMITTEE
EQC) MEETING
MISSION (PRAC)
MEETING
7:00 PM Council Chambers Council. Chambers
REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING
Council Chambers
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
7:00 PM
PLANNING
COMMISSION
FLAG DAY MEETING
Councit Chambers
21 22 23 24 7:00 PM 25 26 27
7:00 PM PLYMOUTH
REGULAR COUNCIL ADVISORY
MEETING COMMITTEE ON 8:00 AM
Counci[ Chambers TRANSIT (PACT) MUSIC IN
MEETING PLYMOUTH
Medicine Lake 5K RUN
Room A
7:00 PM
HRA MEETING
Parkers; Lake Room
28 29 30
Modified on 05122109
Page 3
vCity of
PlymouthoiI
Adding Quality to Life
July 2009
Modified on 05122109
Page 4
1 2 3 4
5:00 PM
MUSIC IN
PLYMOUTH
Hilde Performance INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE
Center DAY DAY
OBSERVED
CITY OFFICES
CLOSED
5 6 7
7:00 PM
8 9 10 11PLANNING
COMMISSION 7:00 PM
MEETING PARK Et REC
Council Chambers ADVISORY COM -
MISSION (PRAC)
5:30 PM MEETINGENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY Council Chambers
COMMITTEE (EQC)
PPT Tour
12 13 14 5:30 PM 15 16 17 18
SPECIAL COUNCIL
MEETING
Medicine Lake Room
Update with
City Manager
7:00 PM
REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
19 20 21 7:00 PM22PLANNING 2 3 7:00 PM 24 25
COMMISSION HRA MEETING
MEETING
Medicine Lake Room
Council Chambers
7:00 PM
PLYMOUTH
ADVISORY
COMMITTEE ON
TRANSIT (PACT)
MEETING
Medicine Lake
26 27 28 29 30 31
7:00 PM
REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING
Council Chambers
Modified on 05122109
Page 4
vCity of
PlymouthoiI
Adding Quality to Life
August 2009
modified on u:) / zz / uy
Page 5
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2:30-5:00 PM 7:00 PM
National Night PLANNING
Out Kick -Off COMMISSION
Station III MEETING
Council. Chambers
6:30-9:30 PM
NATIONAL
NIGHT OUT
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
7:00 PM 7:00 PM 7:00 PM
REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL PARK Ft REC
MEETING QUALITY ADVISORY COM -
Council Chambers COMMITTEE MISSION (PRAC)
EQC) MEETING MEETING
Council. Chambers Councit Chambers
16 17 18 19 20 21 227:00 PM
PLANNING
COMMISSION
MEETING
Council Chambers
24 25 26 27 28 29
7:00 PM 7:00 PM 7:00 PM
REGULAR COUN- PLYMOUTH HRA MEETING
CIL MEETING ADVISORY Medicine Lake Room
23
31
Council Chambers COMMITTEE ON
TRANSIT (PACT)
MEETING
Councit Chambers
30
modified on u:) / zz / uy
Page 5