HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 11-29-2022City Council 1 of 3 November 29, 2022
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
Regular City Council
November 29, 2022, 7:00 PM
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PLYMOUTH FORUM—Individuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the
regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed
for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The City Council will take no official
action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or Commission or
Committee for future report.
4.PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
5.APPROVE AGENDA —Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items contained in
the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will
not normally take official action on items added to the agenda.
6.CONSENT AGENDA —These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda.
6.1 Adopt proposed City Council Minutes
November 15 Special
November 15 Regular
6.2 Approve disbursements
Check Register Report
Check Register Report - UB Refunds
HCV Payment Register
Invoice Expense Distribution
City Council Resolution 2022-296
6.3 Approve setback variance to allow a 27-foot by 34.5-foot, two story, garage and
home addition, for property located at 16100 5th Avenue North (Janet and Stephen
Olson - 2022063)
Minutes
Correspondence Received
Planning Commission Report
1
City Council 2 of 3 November 29, 2022
Location Map
Aerial
Notification Area Map
Variance Standards
Neighborhood Signatures
Narrative
Existing and Proposed Surveys
Plans
City Council Resolution 2022-297
6.4 Accept utilities for continual maintenance in Parkera Plymouth Addition (2021077)
Location Map
City Council Resolution 2022-298
6.5 Approve 2023 social services and community funding
2023 Funding
City Council Resolution 2022-299
6.6 Consider Ordinance amending Section 205 of the City Code concerning salaries of
Mayor and Councilmembers
City Council Ordinance 2022-17
City Council Resolution 2022-300
6.7 Approve 2023 regular City Council meeting schedule
2023 Meeting Calendar
City Council Resolution 2022-301
6.8 Adopt polling locations for 2023 elections
City Council Resolution 2022-302
7.PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.GENERAL BUSINESS
8.1 Accept the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
Plymouth CR73 Study
City Council Resolution 2022-303
8.2 Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and PUD General Plan request for Enclave mixed-use
development for the properties located west of Highway 169 and south of Bass Lake
Road at Nathan Lane (Enclave Companies – 2022064)
Minutes
Correspondence Received
Planning Commission Report
Location Map
Aerial
Notification Area Map
Comprehensive Plan Excerpt - MXD
2
City Council 3 of 3 November 29, 2022
Traffic Study
Narrative
ALTA Survey
Preliminary Plat
Civil Plans
Enclave Plat Monitoring Info Sheet
Architectural Plans
City Council Ordinance 2022-18
City Council Resolution 2022-304
City Council Resolution 2022-305
City Council Resolution 2022-306
8.3 2023 Legislative Priorities
Draft Legislative Priorities 2023
9.REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
10.ADJOURNMENT
3
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.1
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Jodi Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
Reviewed by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager
Item:Adopt proposed City Council Minutes
1.Action Requested:
Adopt proposed City Council Minutes.
2.Background:
N/A
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
November 15 Special
November 15 Regular
4
Proposed Minutes 1 of 1 Special Meeting of November 15, 2022
Proposed Minutes
Special Council Meeting
November 15, 2022
Mayor Wosje called a Special Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. in the
Medicine Lake Room of Plymouth City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on November 15, 2022.
PLYMOUTH COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Wosje, Councilmembers Carroll, Prom, McGregor, and Davis.
PLYMOUTH COUNCIL ABSENT: Willis.
PLYMOUTH STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Callister, Deputy City Manager Solano, Community and
Economic Development Director Parr, Public Safety Director Fadden, Fire Chief Coppa, Public Works
Director Thompson, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer LaBounty, Park and Recreation
Director Tomlinson, Human Resources Director Timpone, Finance Director Rich, Assistant Finance
Director Larson, and City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup.
2023 Budget Follow-up
Staff reviewed the proposed final tax levy and discussed final budgetary and FTE changes.
Future Study Sessions
There were no changes to future study sessions.
Adjournment
Mayor Wosje adjourned the meeting at 6:36 p.m.
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
5
Proposed Minutes Page 1 of 5 Regular Meeting of November 15, 2022
Proposed Minutes
Regular City Council Meeting
November 15, 2022
Mayor Wosje called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on November 15, 2022.
ROLL CALL
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Wosje, Councilmembers Willis, Carroll, McGregor, Davis, Prom and Peterson.
COUNCIL ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Callister, Deputy City Manager Solano, Community and Economic
Development Director Parr, Public Safety Director Fadden, Fire Chief Coppa, Public Works Director
Thompson, Park and Recreation Director Tomlinson, Human Resources Director Timpone, Finance
Director Rich, City Attorney Mattick, and City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup.
(2.1)Accept Resignation, Declare Vacancy in Ward 2 Council Seat, and Appoint Replacement Ward
2 Councilmember
City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup presented this item.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Prom, to accept
Councilmember Slavik’s Resignation and adopt Resolution Declaring Vacancy for Ward 2 Council Seat
(Res2022-272). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Prom, to adopt
Resolution Appointing Julie Peterson as Ward 2 Councilmember (Res2022-273). With all members voting
in favor, the motion carried.
(2.2)Oath of Office for Ward 2 Councilmember (City Clerk Jodi Gallup)
City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup conducted the oath of office for Ward 2 Councilmember
Julie Peterson.
Plymouth Forum
There was no one present to address the Council.
Presentations and Public Information Announcements
(4.1)Swearing in of PT/OC Firefighters (City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup)
6
Proposed Minutes Page 2 of 5 Regular Meeting of November 15, 2022
Fire Chief Coppa presented on-call and part-time firefighters Max Hazledine, William Toland and
Matthew Cossett with the end of their probationary period. City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
Gallup conducted the oath of office.
Approval of Agenda
Motion was made by Councilmember Peterson, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to approve the
agenda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Consent Agenda
Item No. 6.3 was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as No. 8.3.
Item No. 6.15 was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as No. 8.4.
Motion was made by Councilmember Prom, and seconded by Councilmember Carroll, to adopt the
Consent Agenda that included the following items:
(6.1)Council Minutes from Special Meeting and Regular Meeting of October 25, 2022.
(6.2)Resolution Approving Disbursements ending November 4, 2022 (Res2022-274).
(6.3)(This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item
No. 8.3).
(6.4)Resolution Approving Termination of Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for Bass Lake Villas
(8378848) (Res2022-275).
(6.5)Resolution Approving the Vacation of All Drainage and Utility Easements Embraced Within Lot 2,
Block 1, Dog Park (Res2022-276).
(6.6)Resolution Approving a Variance for Hollydale GC Development, Inc. for Properties Located at
4705 and 4695 Garland Lane, and at 17060 and 17065 46th Avenue (2022070) (Res2022-277),
Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreements for a Subdivision Monument at Four Properties Within
Hollydale and Hollydale 2nd Addition (2022070) (Res2022-278).
(6.7)Resolution Approving the Reclassification of Funding Activities for the Community Development
Block Grant Annual Action Plan for Program Years 2019 (CDBG-CV Funding), 2020 and 2021 (Res2022-
279).
(6.8)Resolution Approving the Allocation of Remaining Unallocated Community Development Block
Grant Covid Funds (Res2022-280).
(6.9)Resolution Awarding Contract for the 2023 Sanitary Sewer Lining Project (SS239001) (Res2022-
281).
7
Proposed Minutes Page 3 of 5 Regular Meeting of November 15, 2022
(6.10) Resolution Awarding Contract for the 2022 Pond Maintenance Project (Res2022-282).
(6.11) Resolution Accepting Utilities for Continual Maintenance for Hampton Hills 7th Addition
(2020099) (Res2022-283).
(6.12) Resolution Accepting Troy Lane Construction and Utilities for Continual Maintenance for Carlson
Ridge (2021086) (Res2022-284).
(6.13) Resolution Accepting Utilities for Continual Maintenance for Highlands on Dunkirk (2022025)
(Res2022-285).
(6.14) Resolution Accepting Streets for Continual Maintenance for Meadow Ridge Ponds (2017016)
(Res2022-286).
(6.15) (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item
No. 8.4).
(6.16) Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for a Retaining Wall on Property Located at
9714 10th Avenue North (Res2022-287).
(6.17) Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for a Retaining Wall on Property Located at
15745 43rd Place North (Res2022-288).
(6.18) Resolution Approving a Variance for Aulik Design Build for Property Located at 2520 Medicine
Lake Drive West (2022071) (Res2022-289).
(6.19) Resolution Approving a Variance for Alexandra and Logan Asche for Property Located at 10210
South Shore Drive (2022078) (Res2022-290).
(6.20) Resolution Authorizing Banking and Investment Authority (Res2022-291).
With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Public Hearings
There were no public hearings scheduled.
General Business
(8.1)Ordinance Amending Chapter XX Section 2005 of the City Code Pertaining to Catalytic
Converters
Public Safety Director Fadden presented this item and stated the increase in catalytic converter thefts
over the past three years.
After questions from the Council, Public Safety Director Fadden provided the following information:
8
Proposed Minutes Page 4 of 5 Regular Meeting of November 15, 2022
The ordinance will allow law enforcement to issue a violation in an effort to curb these thefts.
Catalytic converters will be confiscated on the spot and returned to owner if possible.
Most of the ordinance language was taken from other cities’ policies.
Offenders will not go to jail but will have to appear in court.
City Attorney Mattick clarified the City Code violation is a misdemeanor regardless of quantity of
converters in possession.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Carroll, to adopt
Ordinance Amending Chapter XX Section 2005 of the City Code Pertaining to Catalytic Converters
(Ord2022-16), and Resolution Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 2022-16 (Res2022-292).
With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
(8.2)Certify Local Results of the November 8 General Election
Mayor Wosje noted Hennepin County Commissioner Anderson, Councilmembers-elect Clark Gregor and
Julie Pointer were in the audience.
City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup presented this item and stated the newly elected officials
will be sworn in at the January 10, 2023 City Council meeting.
City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator Gallup provided information on voter turnout and the City Council
thanked her for her hard work during the elections.
Motion was made by Councilmember Peterson, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to adopt
Resolution Certifying the Local Results of the November 8, 2022 General Election (Res2022-293). With
all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
(8.3)Accepting Donations from the Plymouth Lions (previously 6.3)
This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda. Fire Chief Coppa expressed his appreciation for the
Plymouth Lions’ generosity and stated the donation will improve the cardiac arrest patient positioning
system.
Motion was made by Councilmember Carroll, and seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt
Resolution Accepting Donation for Public Safety Medical Equipment (Res2022-294). With all members
voting in favor, the motion carried.
(8.4)Resolution Accepting a Donation of $2,000 from the Plymouth Rotary, $1,000 from the
Plymouth Lions, and $2,200 from Bauer Design Build (previously 6.15)
Public Safety Director Fadden expressed his appreciation for the donations to Presents with Public
Safety.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Carroll, to adopt
Resolution Accepting Donation from Plymouth Rotary, Plymouth Lions, and Bauer Design Build for
9
Proposed Minutes Page 5 of 5 Regular Meeting of November 15, 2022
“Presents with Public Safety” activity (Res2022-295). With all members voting in favor, the motion
carried.
Reports and Staff Recommendations
There were no Reports and Staff Recommendations.
Adjournment
Mayor Wosje adjourned the regular meeting at 7:39 p.m.
_________________________________________
Jodi Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
10
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.2
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Tammy Geurkink, Finance Clerk
Reviewed by:Andrea Rich, Finance Director
Item:Approve disbursements
1.Action Requested:
Adopt resolution approving disbursements.
2.Background:
Attached are lists of City fund disbursements for the period ending 11/18/22.
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
Check Register Report
Check Register Report - UB Refunds
HCV Payment Register
Invoice Expense Distribution
City Council Resolution 2022-296
11
Check Payment Register
11/05/2022 11/18/2022to
11/18/2022 $2,143.34 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT MN Afscme Council #5
11/18/2022Inv. 2022-00000278
Total PriceItem Description
$1,445.50 11/18/2022 Deduction Maintenance Union Dues
$683.54 11/18/2022 Deduction CTP Union Dues
$14.30 11/18/2022 Deduction AFSCME DUES W/ PEOPLE DED
11/18/2022 $1,089.51 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT MN Child Support Payment Center
11/18/2022Inv. 2022-00000279
Total PriceItem Description
$173.97 11/18/2022 Deduction Child Support
$173.97 11/18/2022 Deduction Child Support
$610.52 11/18/2022 Deduction Child Support
$131.05 11/18/2022 Deduction Child Support
11/18/2022 $675.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Plymouth Professional Firefighters MN Local
515911/18/2022Inv. 2022-00000282
Total PriceItem Description
$675.00 11/18/2022 Deduction Firefighter Union Dues
11/18/2022 $31,248.41 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT BPAS
11/18/2022Inv. 2022-00000273
Total PriceItem Description
$11.41 11/18/2022 Benefit VEBA Contributions for PT EE's
$31,237.00 11/18/2022 Benefit VEBA HRA
11/18/2022 $1,575.05 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Delta Dental of MN
10/31/2022Inv. CNS0001098281
Total PriceItem Description
$1,575.05 Delta Dental Admin Fees Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $28,436.12 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Delta Dental of MN
10/31/2022Inv. CNS0001101227
Total PriceItem Description
$28,436.12 Delta Dental Claims Oct 2022
11/07/2022 $27,672.29 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT City of Plymouth
10/27/2022Inv. F102722
Total PriceItem Description
$27,672.29 City water bills 9/16/22 - 10/15/22
11/15/2022 $1,748.84 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank -Account Analysis & Billing
10/31/2022Inv. F103122
Total PriceItem Description
$1,748.84 Analysis service charge - Oct 2022
11/08/2022 $2,942.58 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Invoice Cloud
10/31/2022Inv. 1820202210
Total PriceItem Description
$2,942.58 Credit card fees Oct 2022
11/07/2022 $1,206.85 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT American Express
10/31/2022Inv. F103122
Total PriceItem Description
$1,206.85 Credit card fees Oct 2022
10/31/2022 $723.11 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Przybyls
Total PriceItem Description
Page 1 of 36 11/22/2022 12
$723.11 E Peterson at AWWA conference-Duluth, Amazon credit
10/31/2022 ($126.21)Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Cwayna
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Wayzata Lunch Buddy Program
$100.00 Wayzata Lunch Buddy Program
$46.62 Halloween at the Lake Event
$46.63 Halloween at the Lake Event
$12.00 Freezie Pops for Youth Outreach
$32.22 Cops & Canine
$23.64 Bags for Cops & Canine
$15.82 Name Badges for Community Programs
($368.65)Positive Promotions Credit
$38.35 Snacks for SRO Office
$51.30 Robbinsdale Lunch Buddy Program
$51.30 Robbinsdale Lunch Buddy Program
$52.60 Robbinsdale Lunch Buddy Program
$27.70 Misc. Avery Office Products
$11.81 Misc. Avery Office Products
($368.65)Positive Promotion Credit
$1.10 USPS Change of address
10/31/2022 $135.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Cotterma
Total PriceItem Description
$135.00 The Odyssey Group Job Posting
10/31/2022 $262.64 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Gallup
Total PriceItem Description
$252.64 Study Session: Davanni's
$10.00 City Manager's Monthly Subscription
10/31/2022 $507.88 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Kastner
Total PriceItem Description
$507.88 2022 MAGC Fall conference for 4, Facebook Ad
10/31/2022 $490.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Larson
Total PriceItem Description
$490.00 GFOA Training
10/31/2022 $250.29 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Volk
Total PriceItem Description
$250.29 Facebook Ads
10/31/2022 $1,631.34 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Goehring
Total PriceItem Description
$1,631.34 Painter parts and gas cans
10/31/2022 ($105.00)Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Northway
Total PriceItem Description
($105.00)NRPA Conference credit
10/31/2022 $2,344.10 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Riley
Total PriceItem Description
$79.81 PCC misc supplies
$1,288.95 NRPA Conference hotel J.Riley
$45.96 Garden Volunteer recognition
$87.89 Dome up supplies
$67.93 Dome up supplies
Page 2 of 36 11/22/2022 13
$257.68 Fieldhouse dome up coordination lunch
$457.90 Room layout software for PCC events
$20.00 PCC Boiler MN Dept of Labor License
$37.98 Supplies for PCC fieldhouse
10/31/2022 $2,104.97 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Rippe
Total PriceItem Description
$949.95 Supplies & Conference
$72.97 Supplies
$130.00 Conference
$952.05 Supplies
10/31/2022 $509.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Swartzer
Total PriceItem Description
$200.00 MN Fall Maintenance Expo
$309.00 NWG Fireplace Maintenance
10/31/2022 $1,623.81 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Tomlinso
Total PriceItem Description
$184.86 Staff Training
$1,288.95 Hotel
$150.00 Training
10/31/2022 $250.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Windschi
Total PriceItem Description
$21.97 Amazon - Office Supplies
$84.85 Office Supplies
$52.05 Office Supplies
$32.14 Office Supplies
$21.98 Office Supplies
$37.99 Office Supplies
10/31/2022 $170.32 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv.
F101722-Anderson Total PriceItem Description
$64.22 KA Visa - Amazon - Office Supplies
$89.98 KA Visa - Amazon - Office Supplies
$16.12 KA Visa - Amazon - Subscription
10/31/2022 $921.80 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Coopet
Total PriceItem Description
$921.80 K9 Unit Supplies-training clothing/boots
10/31/2022 $753.02 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Gilmore
Total PriceItem Description
$753.02 NIK Test kits, supplies, vehicle service
10/31/2022 $922.01 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Johnson
Total PriceItem Description
$643.74 4Imprint-folders for Officer Recruit
$119.77 Menards-Fan for Gym
$111.22 Home Depot-Mirrors for Gym
$25.86 Ripley 1 Stop- Gas for #1720 for SWAT Conference
$21.42 FedEx- ship back bad uniform patches
10/31/2022 $105.54 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Kuhnly
Total PriceItem Description
$105.54 Uline-Resealable Bags
Page 3 of 36 11/22/2022 14
10/31/2022 $2,548.66 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Kuklok
Total PriceItem Description
$1,485.00 Pepperball Instructor x3 SWAT 495/each
$1,063.66 Oct Visa Streichers Ripley fuel lodging
10/31/2022 ($202.84)Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Wilson
Total PriceItem Description
$65.28 Retail Crime Conference
$65.28 Retail Crime Conference
$75.00 DMT-G Recert-Martinson
$82.75 Snacks/Water for Training
$246.96 Lodging for Conference
$18.21 Light Mount for M-4 Rifle
$36.20 Hyvee-Snacks for EMR
$75.00 DMT-G Recert-Frederickson
$216.24 Lodging for Conference
$216.24 Lodging for Conference
($1,300.00)Covert Media Training
10/31/2022 $3,322.56 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Browen
Total PriceItem Description
$3,322.56 AWWA Conference Lodging, Water and SCADA Training
10/31/2022 $353.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Keith
Total PriceItem Description
$151.35 Food for training
$202.40 Torque extensions
10/31/2022 $2,027.19 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Labounty
Total PriceItem Description
$393.03 APWA Fall Conference Registration
$50.00 ISI Renewal
$230.00 NALMS Conference Registration
$1,354.16 Public Works Fall Training Food
10/31/2022 $242.31 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Payne
Total PriceItem Description
$242.31 Water main flushing materials
10/31/2022 $290.47 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Stromber
Total PriceItem Description
$290.47 Food - Jimmy Johns
10/31/2022 $37.62 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Rosemey
Total PriceItem Description
$37.62 Sandisk 128GB
10/31/2022 $875.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Fadden
Total PriceItem Description
$275.00 MN BCA - Training - Sally Fiecke
$600.00 MN Chiefs of police assoc - online training series for dept
10/31/2022 $276.06 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Coppa
Total PriceItem Description
$175.00 NFPA Fire Department Membership
$101.06 Applebee's- FD command staff meeting
Page 4 of 36 11/22/2022 15
10/31/2022 $1,152.78 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Dreelan
Total PriceItem Description
$30.94 Coffee filters
$165.00 fire Marshall Conference - Jurek
$315.00 Public Education supplies
$28.97 decontamination supplies
$34.19 decontamination supplies
$17.20 decontamination supplies
$561.48 decontamination supplies
10/31/2022 $317.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Whalen
Total PriceItem Description
$317.98 Duluth Holiday Inn - S Drill - MN APA Conference Lodging
10/31/2022 $2,952.89 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Koch
Total PriceItem Description
$487.84 Costco - Candy, Plymouth on Parade
$98.93 Costco - Runner snacks, Public Safety 5k.
$200.00 Big Frog - Discover Plymouth Volunteer T-shirts
$1,942.50 Big Frog - Public Safety 5k Shirts
$42.49 Walmart - Fishing Poles (Get Hooked on Fishing)
$181.13 Walmart - Fishing Poles (Get Hooked on Fishing)
10/31/2022 $1,575.12 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Fram
Total PriceItem Description
$10.25 Amazon - Senior Event Supplies
$547.07 Canteen- Senior Event Supplies
$30.06 Cub Foods- Senior Event Supplies
$21.46 Cub Foods- Senior Event Supplies
$10.73 Lowes- Brushes on Boardwalk Supplies
$151.35 Michaels - Brushes on Boardwalk Supplies
$18.43 Michaels - Brushes on Boardwalk Supplies
$143.35 Canteen- Senior Event Supplies
$550.00 Pin Depot- Senior Event Supplies
$92.42 Michaels - Art Program Supplies
10/31/2022 $282.61 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Lauer
Total PriceItem Description
$282.61 Badminton supplies
10/31/2022 $1,418.59 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Maas
Total PriceItem Description
$20.97 Cub Foods - cookies
$537.62 How Sweet It Is Volunteer Recognition Cookies
$860.00 Honey & Mackies Volunteer Recognition ice cream
10/31/2022 $1,859.17 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Yandell
Total PriceItem Description
$360.24 ElMar's Pizza for Plymouth on Parade for volunteers
$1,288.95 Hyatt Regency Phoenix
$59.99 Target: mermaid party supplies
$62.98 Target: mermaid party supplies
$87.01 Michaels: mermaid pool party supplies
10/31/2022 $848.23 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Parr
Total PriceItem Description
$275.99 Duluth Holiday Inn - Lori Sommers, MN APA Conference
$265.00 Int'l Code Council - Renew Dues - Tyson Jenkins
Page 5 of 36 11/22/2022 16
$167.25 Maddens on Gull Lake, Kenny Niemeyer - Conference
$139.99 Warners Stellian-Shyvonne Kodlowski Dishwasher-3325 Garland Lane
10/31/2022 $3,553.43 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Hemp
Total PriceItem Description
$406.79 Amazon-Office
$161.60 Soundtrack - Music PCC
$36.50 Uber-Transportation to Airport NRPA
$6.50 Uber-Transportation to Airport NRPA
$1,288.95 Hyatt Regency-Kari Hemp NRPA hotel
$1,288.95 Hyatt Regency-Jessica Koch NRPA hotel
$29.95 Creative Marketplace-Design Subscription
$210.76 Soundtrack - Music PCC/Events
$42.04 Fleet Farm-Program supplies
$7.97 Amazon-Program Supplies
$49.85 Amazon-Program Supplies
$23.57 Curb Service-Taxi from Airport to hotel NRPA
10/31/2022 $499.59 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Pearson
Total PriceItem Description
$75.25 Dick's Sporting Goods- Event Supplies
$380.46 Target- Candy for Plymouth on Parade
$43.88 Amazon- Halloween Supplies
10/31/2022 $1,239.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Reed
Total PriceItem Description
$81.98 Case for new UAV
$153.00 TLO for INV
$297.37 UAV equipment
$130.31 car storage for SIU new
$108.15 covert phones for SIU
$469.17 INV forensics
10/31/2022 $3,879.60 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Topp
Total PriceItem Description
$2,660.72 K9 Food/Kennel Services
$448.08 Medical Supplies
$770.80 MFF Training Supplies/Recruitment Posters
10/31/2022 $399.17 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Maloylo
Total PriceItem Description
$399.17 Conference lodging
10/31/2022 $13.58 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv.
F101722-Baumann Total PriceItem Description
$13.58 Balance of Tax, Title, and License for 2089
10/31/2022 $137.80 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv.
F101722-Dobmeier Total PriceItem Description
$103.28 Parts For #2034 (KM International) & #286 (Interstate)
$34.52 Parts For #2034 (KM International) & #286 (Interstate)
10/31/2022 $557.91 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Hanson
Total PriceItem Description
$50.00 Paypal -- MCCFMA Conference Fee
$397.94 Amazon -- Conference room adapters (PCC)
$64.99 Amazon - Mop Bucket (Fire Station 3)
$20.98 Amazon - security ties (PCC)
$24.00 Xcel conference -- Parking ramp
Page 6 of 36 11/22/2022 17
10/31/2022 $25.49 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Krekelbe
Total PriceItem Description
$25.49 Paint
10/31/2022 $5,870.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: EFT Us Bank Visa
10/17/2022Inv. F101722-Leiseth
Total PriceItem Description
($119.96)Amazon - Return Mounts
$205.29 Azure Professional Services
$281.20 Quadient - Mail machine Ink
$55.95 Jam Software - TreeSize Pro
$275.00 Minnesoat GIS/LIS Conference - Brian Zwilling
$84.58 Amazon - Cell chargers Police
$40.82 Amazon - Cell Cases
$13.99 Amazon - USB Cable
$81.54 Amazon - Cell chargers Police
$37.98 Amazon - Ergonomic Mice - Libby, Aisa
$24.00 Google Monthly
$299.00 Havis dock Repair (police)`
($25.98)Amazon - Return cell Screen Protectors
$23.88 Bookmark Ninja
$7.00 Interstate Parking
$1,066.66 Last Pass Maint 10/8/22 - 10/7/23
$1,050.00 Duo Monthly Maint
$86.00 Hulu
$429.00 StrucCalc Maint 10/10/22 - 10/9/23
($14.84)Amazon - Return Cell Case
$756.20 Digicert SSL plyregister.ci.plymouth.mn.us 10/10/22 - 10/13/24
$71.60 Amazon - PW Cell cases
$499.75 Amazon - Police Cell phone cases
$26.67 Amazon - USB Sticks
$499.00 Sapien - PowerShell Studio 2022
$116.42 Amazon - cell cases CD and PW
11/11/2022 $84,300.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152333 HOLLYDALE GC DEVELOPMENT INC
11/03/2022Inv. 00342436
Total PriceItem Description
$84,300.00 Refund - Bond - B2021065
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152334 Katessa Frazier
11/08/2022Inv. Import - 10430
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/11/2022 $150.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152335 KATRINA KNEESKERN
11/08/2022Inv. 00342554
Total PriceItem Description
$150.00 Refund - Certificate - CR2022-0794
11/11/2022 $126.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152336 Kim Gode
11/07/2022Inv. Import - 10428
Total PriceItem Description
$126.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/11/2022 $25.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152337 Lue Du
11/02/2022Inv. Import - 10427
Total PriceItem Description
$25.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/11/2022 $150.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152338 Shanmugapra Ramadoss
11/08/2022Inv. 00342522
Total PriceItem Description
$150.00 Refund - Certificate - CR2022-0813
11/11/2022 $500.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152339 Richard V Sylte
Page 7 of 36 11/22/2022 18
11/08/2022Inv. Import - 10429
Total PriceItem Description
$500.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/11/2022 $4,000.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152340 TASK MASTERS CONSTRUCTION INC
11/08/2022Inv. 00342523
Total PriceItem Description
$2,000.00 Refund - Bond - B2022084
11/08/2022Inv. 00342525
Total PriceItem Description
$2,000.00 Refund - Bond - B2022080
11/11/2022 $5,684.25 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152341 A-1 Outdoor Power Inc
11/02/2022Inv. 524044
Total PriceItem Description
$2,478.75 Snowblower -- Maintenance Facility #7006
$2,478.75 Snow blower - Plymouth Community Center #7007
$726.75 Snow blower - Plymouth Community Center #7008
11/11/2022 $968.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152342 Ace Lock & Safe Co Inc
10/28/2022Inv. A103969
Total PriceItem Description
$223.00 Repair gate lock - Hilde
10/27/2022Inv. A103972
Total PriceItem Description
$745.00 Replace weather stripping & cover plate - Dome entrance
11/11/2022 $9.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152343 Acme Tools
10/12/2022Inv. 10481705
Total PriceItem Description
$9.98 Steel brushes
11/11/2022 $206.37 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152344 Action Fleet Inc
10/26/2022Inv. I5469
Total PriceItem Description
$206.37 Install new GPS line - #260
11/11/2022 $675.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152345 Advanced Coating Systems/Acs
11/02/2022Inv. 212266
Total PriceItem Description
$675.00 Prep & paint bike rack
11/11/2022 $3,186.79 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152346 Messan Agbemadon
11/02/2022Inv. F110222
Total PriceItem Description
$301.02 Reimbursement Messan Agbemadon-18015 20th Ave Duct Cleaning
11/04/2022Inv. F110422
Total PriceItem Description
$2,565.56 Reimbursement Messan Agbemadon-18015 20th Ave flooring materials
11/07/2022Inv. F110722
Total PriceItem Description
$320.21 Reimburse Messan Agbemadon-18015 20th Ave flooring materials #2
11/11/2022 $175.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152347 American Red Cross
10/26/2022Inv. 22493637
Total PriceItem Description
$175.00 Adult & Pediatric CPR/First Aid
11/11/2022 $503.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152348 Aspen Mills
01/14/2022Inv. 287177
Total PriceItem Description
$29.96 Sport Tek samples - B Olson
10/26/2022Inv. 302850
Total PriceItem Description
$155.99 Work shoe - R Rosckes
Page 8 of 36 11/22/2022 19
10/27/2022Inv. 302913
Total PriceItem Description
$76.00 Work shoe - R Aadalen
10/28/2022Inv. 302968
Total PriceItem Description
$98.28 Pants, shorts, cap - D Schnuettgen
10/28/2022Inv. 302969
Total PriceItem Description
$143.75 Pants, shirts - D Norman
11/11/2022 $403.20 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152349 Bach To Rock / Js Music
11/08/2022Inv. HW10009
Total PriceItem Description
$403.20 Music workshops - Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $3,617.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152350 Baycom Inc.
10/13/2022Inv. EQUIPINV040200
Total PriceItem Description
$3,617.00 55 MK2, i7, LTE, GPS, WIN 10, vehicle dock, power supply
11/11/2022 $73,995.97 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152351 Bituminous Roadways Inc
10/25/2022Inv. 16724
Total PriceItem Description
$28,187.77 St. Mary's
$45,808.20 St. Mary's
11/11/2022 $28,573.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152352 Bollig & Sons Inc
10/28/2022Inv. 25966
Total PriceItem Description
$28,573.00 Demo of 3015 Medicine Lake Blvd E
11/11/2022 $42,020.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152353 Bolton & Menk Consulting Engineers
10/24/2022Inv. 0299697
Total PriceItem Description
$2,871.00 2023 Vicksburg Landscaping
10/24/2022Inv. 0299698
Total PriceItem Description
$13,175.00 2023 Gleason Lake Drive and Carlson Parkway Improvements Project
10/24/2022Inv. 0299699
Total PriceItem Description
$11,486.00 Luce Line Trail Connections
10/24/2022Inv. 0299704
Total PriceItem Description
$4,854.00 2023 City Center Rehab Design Services
11/04/2022Inv. 0300641
Total PriceItem Description
$9,634.75 2022 Vicksburg Supplemental Agreement
11/11/2022 $41.88 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152354 Boyer Trucks
11/03/2022Inv. 003P29425
Total PriceItem Description
$41.88 Hub cap - Unit #2037
11/11/2022 $268.85 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152355 Canteen Refreshment Services
11/02/2022Inv. MSP55999
Total PriceItem Description
$268.85 Concession supplies - PIC
11/11/2022 $14,372.54 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152356 CDW Government Inc
11/01/2022Inv. DT69416
Total PriceItem Description
$1,742.10 LVO X13Y G2 17-1255U 256/16 W11DG
11/02/2022Inv. DV17879
Total PriceItem Description
Page 9 of 36 11/22/2022 20
$1,055.60 Irrigation cradlepoints, 36th Medians - PIC
11/02/2022Inv. DV24441
Total PriceItem Description
$544.44 Cisco Smartnnet - IT Bench Switch
11/02/2022Inv. DV65400
Total PriceItem Description
$11,030.40 Panasonic laptops - Fire - FDM Mobile
11/11/2022 $763.21 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152357 Centurylink/Lumen
09/25/2022Inv. F0925228335
Total PriceItem Description
$244.74 Phone line 763-553-8335
10/25/2022Inv. F1025228335
Total PriceItem Description
$242.75 Phone line 763-553-8335
10/25/2022Inv. F1025229793
Total PriceItem Description
$39.44 Phone line 763-553-9793
10/28/2022Inv. F1028220138
Total PriceItem Description
$118.14 Phone Line 763-450-0138
10/28/2022Inv. F1028220230
Total PriceItem Description
$78.76 Phone line 763-450-0230
10/28/2022Inv. F1028223648
Total PriceItem Description
$39.38 Phone Line 763-450-3648
11/11/2022 $217.22 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152358 Chevrolet of Wayzata
10/03/2022Inv. 343079
Total PriceItem Description
$217.22 Valve cover - #4008
11/11/2022 $87.45 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152359 Cintas Corporation
11/01/2022Inv. 5131034288
Total PriceItem Description
$87.45 Medical Cabinet Resupply - ZWP
11/11/2022 $9,603.05 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152360 Cloud Cabling Inc
10/24/2022Inv. 9157
Total PriceItem Description
$966.04 PCC Project-Temp Audio in Plymouth Room
10/24/2022Inv. 9158
Total PriceItem Description
$6,650.00 PCC Project-Temp Audio in Plymouth Room Installation
11/07/2022Inv. 9192
Total PriceItem Description
$1,987.01 LG 86" Class UQ75 Series LED 4K UHD Smart TV
11/11/2022 $10,115.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152361 Confluence Inc.
10/12/2022Inv. 24733
Total PriceItem Description
$2,115.00 Professional services thru 9/30/22
11/08/2022Inv. 24949
Total PriceItem Description
$8,000.00 Schmidt Woods Master Plan
11/11/2022 $191.40 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152362 Core & Main LP
10/24/2022Inv. R811328
Total PriceItem Description
$191.40 Hydrant tracer wire brackets
11/11/2022 $165.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152363 Crawford Door Sales of The Twin Cities
10/25/2022Inv. 47742
Page 10 of 36 11/22/2022 21
Total PriceItem Description
$165.00 Tighten clutch, reset limits on overhead door - PW
11/11/2022 $35.97 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152364 Cub Foods
11/03/2022Inv. 129
Total PriceItem Description
$35.97 Election judge supplies
11/11/2022 $2,544.41 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152365 Dalco
09/06/2022Inv. 3980595
Total PriceItem Description
$1,096.45 Can liners, toilet tissue, roll towel, foam soap, hand sanitizer
10/21/2022Inv. 4000787
Total PriceItem Description
$880.92 Roll towel - CH
10/24/2022Inv. 4001335
Total PriceItem Description
$567.04 Toilet tissue, roll towels, hand towels, soap, sanitizer - PCC
11/11/2022 $7,688.11 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152366 Dts/Definitive Technology
10/29/2022Inv. 486023187
Total PriceItem Description
$7,688.11 DTS Copier Maintenance - Monthly 10/22/22-11/22/22
11/11/2022 $1,474.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152367 Ducka Dance/Tippi Toes/Jessi Rustad
11/07/2022Inv. 1099
Total PriceItem Description
$1,474.00 Toddler & Me, Tippi Toes classes 9/14-11/2/22
11/11/2022 $96.77 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152368 Gregory Durand
11/08/2011Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$96.77 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $570.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152369 Electronic Communication Systems Llc/Ecsi
10/28/2022Inv. 22090491
Total PriceItem Description
$570.00 Service call - External sliding door is not locking
11/11/2022 $399.76 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152370 Factory Motor Parts Co
11/02/2022Inv. 181300007
Total PriceItem Description
$27.64 Air filter - stock
11/07/2022Inv. 18143447
Total PriceItem Description
$35.04 Fuel filter, radial seal outer air - stock
11/08/2022Inv. 18147754
Total PriceItem Description
$53.25 Coated steel reg
09/28/2022Inv. 70501531
Total PriceItem Description
$164.56 Spare Cushman Battery - PCC
11/04/2022Inv. 70506014
Total PriceItem Description
$11.44 Air filter panel - Unit #381
11/07/2022Inv. 70506067
Total PriceItem Description
$13.83 Radial seal outer air - stock
11/08/2022Inv. 70506295
Total PriceItem Description
$44.43 Battery - Unit #699
11/08/2022Inv. 70506340
Total PriceItem Description
$49.57 Wheel weights
Page 11 of 36 11/22/2022 22
11/11/2022 $215.05 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152371 Flippin Dough Llc/Broadway Bar & Pizza
10/31/2022Inv. 000606
Total PriceItem Description
$215.05 Staff annual training - PIC
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152372 Gerald Freund
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $150.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152373 Tess Georgakopoulos
11/02/2022Inv. 00266
Total PriceItem Description
$150.00 Cooking classes - Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $850.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152374 Global Music Rights, LLC
10/12/2022Inv. INVGMR67648
Total PriceItem Description
$850.00 Global Music Rights License 10/1/22-9/30/23
11/11/2022 $1,055.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152375 Grafix Shoppe
10/14/2022Inv. 147303
Total PriceItem Description
$1,055.00 Reflective kit for 2023 Ford Expedition
11/11/2022 $667.35 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152376 Grainger
10/26/2022Inv. 9491358058
Total PriceItem Description
$36.20 Shower curtains
10/26/2022Inv. 9491358066
Total PriceItem Description
$18.10 Shower curtain
10/26/2022Inv. 9491358074
Total PriceItem Description
$42.13 Shower curtains
10/26/2022Inv. 9491358082
Total PriceItem Description
$354.46 Portable label printer
10/26/2022Inv. 9492441630
Total PriceItem Description
$20.70 Miniature inc bulbs T3-1/4, 0.945W
10/27/2022Inv. 9493775788
Total PriceItem Description
$44.27 Label cartridge
11/02/2022Inv. 9498976167
Total PriceItem Description
$32.36 Grease
11/02/2022Inv. 9499267574
Total PriceItem Description
$62.25 Grease gun
11/02/2022Inv. 9499922780
Total PriceItem Description
$56.88 Cable ties
11/11/2022 $1,966.56 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152377 Green Stuff Outdoor Services
11/01/2022Inv. 414835
Total PriceItem Description
$1,966.56 Round 4 Granular
11/11/2022 $41.48 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152378 Hamel Lumber Inc
10/03/2022Inv. 152722
Total PriceItem Description
$41.48 Gorilla tape, hammer
Page 12 of 36 11/22/2022 23
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152379 Heather Hansen
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $295.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152380 Hawkins Ash CPAs LLP
11/07/2022Inv. 3166012
Total PriceItem Description
$295.00 Client #1505080.2 - Monthly Accounting Services - Plymouth HRA
11/11/2022 $7,149.57 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152381 Hawkins Inc
10/24/2022Inv. 6318933
Total PriceItem Description
$7,149.57 Azone - Central Water Treatment Plant
11/11/2022 $98.90 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152382 Heidi's Lifestyle Gardens Inc
10/27/2022Inv. 172887
Total PriceItem Description
$98.90 Rip rap - St Mary's drainage
11/11/2022 $58.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152383 Hennepin County Treasurer
11/01/2022Inv. 1000194789
Total PriceItem Description
$58.00 Monthly Support for Nov 2022
11/11/2022 $582.28 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152384 Hennepin County Treasurer
10/31/2022Inv. 1000194704
Total PriceItem Description
$582.28 Solid waste - Parks - Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $1,290.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152385 Herc-U-Lift
10/11/2022Inv. R072175
Total PriceItem Description
$1,290.00 Lift rental 10/10/22 - dome up
11/11/2022 $611.47 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152386 Home Depot
10/14/2022Inv. 0013612
Total PriceItem Description
$68.36 Station supplies
11/02/2022Inv. 1010268
Total PriceItem Description
$12.47 Screws - Greenway building
11/02/2022Inv. 1010312-1
Total PriceItem Description
$31.00 Clips, extension cord, cable - Greenway building
11/01/2022Inv. 2010103
Total PriceItem Description
$34.98 Flame barrel - Hilde
10/21/2022Inv. 3015197
Total PriceItem Description
$36.70 Hose swivel, hose adapter, coupler & fitting, spot remover
10/21/2022Inv. 3202203
Total PriceItem Description
($13.77)Coupler - return
10/20/2022Inv. 4014918
Total PriceItem Description
$18.87 Hose, toggle wall plate - PCC
10/20/2022Inv. 4211526
Total PriceItem Description
($35.45)Hose - return
10/19/2022Inv. 5014757
Total PriceItem Description
$56.20 7-pattern nozzle, coupler & fitting, hose
Page 13 of 36 11/22/2022 24
10/26/2022Inv. 8016126
Total PriceItem Description
$154.64 Folding chairs - CH
10/26/2022Inv. 8330200
Total PriceItem Description
($154.64)Folding chairs - CH return
10/26/2022Inv. 8330201
Total PriceItem Description
$159.80 Folding chairs - CH
11/04/2022Inv. 9010742
Total PriceItem Description
$10.28 2x6 boards - Nature Canyon boardwalk
10/25/2022Inv. 9015948
Total PriceItem Description
$232.03 Gloves, batteries, screws
11/11/2022 $853.36 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152387 Hotsy Minnesota
10/25/2022Inv. 14897
Total PriceItem Description
$430.17 Truck wash - FS2
10/25/2022Inv. 14898
Total PriceItem Description
$423.19 Truck wash - FS3
11/11/2022 $622.18 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152388 Huebsch Services
10/25/2022Inv. 20182207
Total PriceItem Description
$131.62 Mat service - PW
10/25/2022Inv. 20182210
Total PriceItem Description
$62.70 Mat service - CH
10/25/2022Inv. 20182211
Total PriceItem Description
$102.77 Mat service - PS
11/01/2022Inv. 20183738
Total PriceItem Description
$325.09 Janitorial supplies & mat service - PCC
11/11/2022 $25.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152389 Ipma -Hr MN
11/07/2022Inv. F110722
Total PriceItem Description
$25.00 MN workforce webinar - Heidi Finn
11/11/2022 $42.26 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152390 Isc/Industrial Supply Co Inc/Bearing&Power
11/01/2022Inv. 80206978
Total PriceItem Description
$42.26 SPK ROLLER BS #2065
11/11/2022 $2,600.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152391 Timothy Jantzen/HappyFeet Soccer Twin
Cities, LLC11/02/2022Inv. 6035
Total PriceItem Description
$2,600.00 Happy Feet soccer classes 10/13-11/5/22
11/11/2022 $258.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152392 Jerry's Service Inc / Plymouth Vip Auto
11/01/2022Inv. 061301112200
Total PriceItem Description
$258.00 Car washes Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $13.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152393 K&S Engraving
10/19/2022Inv. 12386
Total PriceItem Description
$13.00 Par tags - new stations
11/11/2022 $19,522.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152394 Keys Well Drilling Co
Page 14 of 36 11/22/2022 25
10/31/2022Inv. F103122
Total PriceItem Description
$19,522.50 Well # 10 Rehabilitation Project thru 10/31/22
11/11/2022 $7,155.72 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152395 Kidd Plumbing Inc
10/13/2022Inv. 13145
Total PriceItem Description
$252.00 Repair hole in pipe in Zamboni room - PIC
10/13/2022Inv. 13146
Total PriceItem Description
$947.00 Repair mixing valve, flush piping, repair aerators - PIC
11/02/2022Inv. 13147
Total PriceItem Description
$4,620.00 Install New Drinking Fountain, Main Lobby - PIC
10/13/2022Inv. 13148
Total PriceItem Description
$992.00 Repair ERV and Rupp units - PIC
10/13/2022Inv. 13149
Total PriceItem Description
$384.00 Hose for Zamboni - PIC
11/03/2022Inv. 13163
Total PriceItem Description
($39.28)Credit sales tax - invoice 13133
11/11/2022 $420.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152396 Kidzart / Creating Art Inc
11/08/2022Inv. 1360
Total PriceItem Description
$420.00 Alcohol Ink Coaster classs 11/7/22
11/11/2022 $4,440.25 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152397 Klein Underground LLC
11/04/2022Inv. 55703
Total PriceItem Description
$1,359.75 Water main repair - 14310 40th Place
11/04/2022Inv. 55736
Total PriceItem Description
$3,080.50 Curb raising/work - Kilmer Ln N & 13th Ave N
11/11/2022 $1,800.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152398 Kodiak Power Systems, Inc / Michael Prouix
10/07/2022Inv. KPS1119
Total PriceItem Description
$1,800.00 2022 generator inspections
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152399 Michael Krein
11/09/2022Inv. F110922
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $3,333.33 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152400 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P
11/01/2022Inv. 14519
Total PriceItem Description
$3,333.33 Legal Services for Lobbying Nov 2022
11/11/2022 $12,672.06 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152401 Loretto Auto Body LLC
10/28/2022Inv. 1299
Total PriceItem Description
$12,672.06 Squad 1057 front end damage, COP Auto 2022-16
11/11/2022 $341.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152402 Macphail Center For Music
11/04/2022Inv. 0013314IN
Total PriceItem Description
$341.00 Unwrapping music sessions 9/1-12/31/22
11/11/2022 $1,704.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152403 Marco
10/25/2022Inv. INV10503526
Page 15 of 36 11/22/2022 26
Total PriceItem Description
$1,704.00 Phone line changes - PCC
11/11/2022 $5,850.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152404 Martin-Mcallister Consulting Psychologists
Inc10/31/2022Inv. 14963
Total PriceItem Description
$4,550.00 Public Safety Assessments - Oct 2022
10/31/2022Inv. 14964
Total PriceItem Description
$1,300.00 Personnel Evaluation
11/11/2022 $479.97 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152405 Medina Electric LLC
11/07/2022Inv. 52517
Total PriceItem Description
$232.04 Switch out single gang outlets to double gang - Elm Creek
11/07/2022Inv. 52518
Total PriceItem Description
$247.93 Switch out single gang outlets to double gang - PIC
11/11/2022 $2,638.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152406 Merchology LLC
10/27/2022Inv. 287459
Total PriceItem Description
$2,638.00 Clothing order - PIC
11/11/2022 $11,376.20 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152407 Minnesota Clay Co. USA
11/02/2022Inv. 130913
Total PriceItem Description
$11,376.20 PCC project - Pottery Wheels
11/11/2022 $429.32 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152408 Minnesota Occupational Health
10/31/2022Inv. 411499
Total PriceItem Description
$429.32 Random onsite testing 10/10 & 10/26//22
11/11/2022 $600.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152409 MN BCA
09/30/2022Inv. 00000720724
Total PriceItem Description
$600.00 CJDN Access Fee - BCA 7/1/22-6/30/23
11/11/2022 $573.60 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152410 MNL/Minnesota Native Landscapes
10/18/2022Inv. 36693
Total PriceItem Description
$573.60 Horticulture for rain garden - CH
11/11/2022 $284.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152411 Montgomery Brinkman LLC
11/03/2022Inv. 56039
Total PriceItem Description
$284.50 Remove trash - ST73
11/11/2022 $60.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152412 MRI Software LLC / Hab Housing Software
Solutions10/31/2022Inv. MRIUS1261681
Total PriceItem Description
$60.00 Rental History Report - Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $269.68 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152413 MTI Distributing Inc
11/03/2022Inv. 136897200
Total PriceItem Description
$269.68 Battery tray, wiper arm, control lever - #5022
11/11/2022 $128.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152414 Municipal Emergency Svcs/MES Inc
10/27/2022Inv. IN1782494
Total PriceItem Description
$128.00 Lite Tracker
11/11/2022 $1,409.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152415 NAC
10/21/2022Inv. 203911
Page 16 of 36 11/22/2022 27
Total PriceItem Description
$1,409.00 Service call on compressor alarm notifications
11/11/2022 $3,800.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152416 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting Inc
11/04/2022Inv. 30976
Total PriceItem Description
$3,800.00 Cornerstone, Fernbrook, City Center, Birchwood, Gleason
11/11/2022 $55.34 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152417 Napa Genuine Auto Parts Co
11/01/2022Inv. 2349812986
Total PriceItem Description
$8.10 U-bolt
11/02/2022Inv. 2349813153
Total PriceItem Description
$40.69 Premium capsules - stock
11/03/2022Inv. 2349813284
Total PriceItem Description
$6.55 Oil filter - #3059
11/11/2022 $39.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152418 Natural Health Haven LLC/Heidi Neubauer
11/08/2022Inv. 1996
Total PriceItem Description
$39.00 Meditation Basics class
11/11/2022 $520,141.16 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152419 New Look Contracting Inc
11/04/2022Inv. F11042022
Total PriceItem Description
$520,141.16 Hidden Lake & Beacon Heights 2nd Street Reconstruction thru 9/30
11/11/2022 $54.69 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152420 Northern Safety Technology
11/03/2022Inv. 54774
Total PriceItem Description
$54.69 Amber non optic lens w/seal - stock
11/11/2022 $188.54 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152421 Nuss Truck And Equipment
11/08/2022Inv. 4729142P
Total PriceItem Description
$188.54 Fuel filter, db fuel - stock
11/11/2022 $412.67 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152422 Office Depot
11/02/2022Inv. 273863276001
Total PriceItem Description
$260.14 Desk pads, wall calendar - PS
11/02/2022Inv. 273931349001
Total PriceItem Description
$28.68 Wall calendar, desk calendar - PS
10/28/2022Inv. 274115964001
Total PriceItem Description
$51.69 Calendars, T Cell, markers
10/31/2022Inv. 275694720001
Total PriceItem Description
$72.16 Scissors, duck tape, tissue, batteries
11/11/2022 $185.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152423 Office Greens, LLC
10/31/2022Inv. 7479
Total PriceItem Description
$185.00 Monthly lease for Interior Plants - CH
11/11/2022 $2,170.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152424 Optimized Electrical Solutions, LLC
10/30/2022Inv. 8282x313
Total PriceItem Description
$605.00 Check blower equip/power for Dome, tested generator
10/30/2022Inv. 8282x315
Total PriceItem Description
$465.00 Replace momentary switch for shop lights
Page 17 of 36 11/22/2022 28
10/30/2022Inv. 8282x316-1
Total PriceItem Description
$1,100.00 Install wiring to new bottle fill station - PIC
11/11/2022 $4,590.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152425 Ostvig Tree, Inc.
11/02/2022Inv. 3039
Total PriceItem Description
$280.00 Tree removal - 12312 12 Ave N
11/02/2022Inv. 3041
Total PriceItem Description
$2,144.00 Tree removal - 1905 Dunkirk Ln N
11/03/2022Inv. 4089
Total PriceItem Description
$1,552.00 Tree removal - 11725 41st Ave N
11/03/2022Inv. 4090
Total PriceItem Description
$240.00 Tree removal - West Medicine Lake & 29th Ave N
11/02/2022Inv. 4541
Total PriceItem Description
$374.00 Tree removal - 10935 39th Ave N
11/11/2022 $714.30 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152426 Owens Companies Inc
10/18/2022Inv. 31589
Total PriceItem Description
$714.30 Repair rooftop unit burner/gas valve - FS1
11/11/2022 $153.04 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152427 John Palm
11/07/2022Inv. F110722
Total PriceItem Description
$38.49 Pay Diff of Loan Agreement and Expenses-John Palm-12240 24th Ave
11/07/2022Inv. F110722-1
Total PriceItem Description
$114.55 Reimburse John Palm-12240 24th Ave-HRA Funded Rehab
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152428 Kelly Palm
11/09/2022Inv. F110922
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $1,300.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152429 Preferred Striping / Chad Jung
10/25/2022Inv. 4756
Total PriceItem Description
$1,300.00 Parking lot striping - CH & PCC
11/11/2022 $3,784.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152430 Pro Hydro-Testing LLC
10/25/2022Inv. 104332
Total PriceItem Description
$3,784.00 5 Year SCBA Hydro Testing
11/11/2022 $375.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152431 R C Electric Inc
11/02/2022Inv. 8456
Total PriceItem Description
$375.00 Reconnect GFCI at fountain, check tunnel lights
11/11/2022 $431.15 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152432 Reliable Plus/Lube-Tech & Partners LLC
10/21/2022Inv. 3048940
Total PriceItem Description
$431.15 Wash service/repair call
11/11/2022 $2,937.93 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152433 Republic Services #894
10/31/2022Inv. 0894005979474
Total PriceItem Description
$568.92 Dumpster service - Oct 2022
10/31/2022Inv. 0894005981112
Page 18 of 36 11/22/2022 29
Total PriceItem Description
$2,369.01 Dumpster service - Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $1,575.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152434 Richards Tennis
11/03/2022Inv. 174
Total PriceItem Description
$1,575.00 Tennis camp 10/6-10/27
11/11/2022 $372.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152435 Roadkill Animal Control / Curtis A Finch
10/31/2022Inv. F103122
Total PriceItem Description
$372.00 Dead animal removal Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $507,112.74 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152436 Rosenbauer Minnesota LLC
11/03/2022Inv. 0000056755
Total PriceItem Description
$771.74 Heater control valve - #51 (E-21)
11/04/2022Inv. 68233
Total PriceItem Description
$506,341.00 Replacement of T-11 (aerial platform truck)
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152437 Cherry Russell
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $3,311.65 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152438 Safe Fast
10/31/2022Inv. INV268245
Total PriceItem Description
$1,289.55 Jackets, hoodies
10/31/2022Inv. INV268247
Total PriceItem Description
$974.50 Jackets
10/31/2022Inv. INV268249
Total PriceItem Description
$1,047.60 Marking paint
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152439 Jean Sayles
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $150.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152440 Peter Sherman
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$150.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $282.24 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152441 Shred N Go Inc
10/21/2022Inv. 141882
Total PriceItem Description
$218.16 Shredding 10/19/22
10/31/2022Inv. 142144
Total PriceItem Description
$64.08 Shredding 10/26/22
11/11/2022 $73.11 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152442 Siteone Landscape/John Deere
10/19/2022Inv. 124526097001
Total PriceItem Description
$51.98 Soil optimizer
10/20/2022Inv. 124565961001
Total PriceItem Description
$21.13 Vinyl edging, landscape nails
11/11/2022 $387.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152443 Speedpro Imaging
10/20/2022Inv. INV9468
Page 19 of 36 11/22/2022 30
Total PriceItem Description
$387.50 Vinyl lettering - TRASH, RECYCLE
11/11/2022 $26,225.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152444 State of Minnesota
11/01/2022Inv. 00000722309
Total PriceItem Description
$26,225.00 ICWC 2 Day Crew 11/1/22 Contract #208016
11/11/2022 $400.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152445 Jeremy Stephens
11/03/2022Inv. 110322
Total PriceItem Description
$400.00 Chaplain Services Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $50.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152446 Abby Strauss
11/09/2022Inv. F110922
Total PriceItem Description
$50.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $97.45 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152447 Street Fleet
10/31/2022Inv. 523906
Total PriceItem Description
$97.45 Street Fleet Services Oct 2022 - #784
11/11/2022 $325.93 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152448 Streicher's Inc
10/25/2022Inv. I1596926
Total PriceItem Description
$95.98 Shirt, pants, hat, name tag - H Olson
10/31/2022Inv. I1597840
Total PriceItem Description
$25.98 Badges
11/03/2022Inv. I1598688
Total PriceItem Description
$203.97 Shirts - T Weinmann
11/11/2022 $50.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152449 Linda Strong
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$50.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $799.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152450 Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc
11/02/2022Inv. 10190338
Total PriceItem Description
$244.78 23x10.50 - 12NHS CMT tires - #5022
11/07/2022Inv. 10190433
Total PriceItem Description
$554.72 Tires - Unit #381
11/11/2022 $8,175.82 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152451 Talberg Lawn & Landscape Inc
10/15/2022Inv. 225732
Total PriceItem Description
$1,368.57 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225733
Total PriceItem Description
$412.28 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225734
Total PriceItem Description
$1,235.14 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225735
Total PriceItem Description
$584.57 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225736
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225737
Page 20 of 36 11/22/2022 31
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225738
Total PriceItem Description
$182.28 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225739
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225740
Total PriceItem Description
$213.71 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225741
Total PriceItem Description
$457.14 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225742
Total PriceItem Description
$810.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225743
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225744
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225745
Total PriceItem Description
$454.28 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225746
Total PriceItem Description
$157.14 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225747
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225748
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225749
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225750
Total PriceItem Description
$116.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225751
Total PriceItem Description
$213.71 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022
10/15/2022Inv. 225752
Total PriceItem Description
$1,043.00 Turfgrass Mowing and Landscape Maintenance 2022 FS3
11/11/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152452 Thang Labs Inc./Fastest Labs of Plymouth
10/31/2022Inv. 1087
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Lab test
11/11/2022 $651.12 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152453 Thomson Reuters -West Publishing
11/01/2022Inv. 847281519
Total PriceItem Description
$651.12 Clear ProFlex Maintenance
11/11/2022 $190.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152454 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial
10/31/2022Inv. M27733
Total PriceItem Description
Page 21 of 36 11/22/2022 32
$190.50 City Council Mtg Minutes 10/25/22
11/11/2022 $50.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152455 Sarah Toland
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$50.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/11/2022 $5,568.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152456 Tri-K Services
10/31/2022Inv. 9710
Total PriceItem Description
$5,568.00 Pulverized topsoil
11/11/2022 $460.80 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152457 Twin Cities Dots And Pop LLC
11/07/2022Inv. I221107765
Total PriceItem Description
$460.80 Concession supplies - PIC
11/11/2022 $596.81 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152458 Uline
10/12/2022Inv. 155065951
Total PriceItem Description
$596.81 Safety bollard, round flex post
11/11/2022 $557.60 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152459 Unifirst Corporation
10/26/2022Inv. 0900727586
Total PriceItem Description
$281.12 Uniform rental/laundry/rugs
11/02/2022Inv. 0900728932
Total PriceItem Description
$276.48 Uniform rental/laundry/rugs
11/11/2022 $1,980.04 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152460 USA Bluebook
10/19/2022Inv. 148883
Total PriceItem Description
$605.78 Hach DR300 Chlorine
10/20/2022Inv. 149850
Total PriceItem Description
$263.93 Vent filter
10/21/2022Inv. 151182
Total PriceItem Description
$918.33 Filter membrane kit
10/21/2022Inv. 151340
Total PriceItem Description
$192.00 Chlorine SwifTest dispenser
11/11/2022 $4,402.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152461 Valley Rich Co Inc
08/19/2022Inv. 31126
Total PriceItem Description
$4,402.00 Water main repair - 37th Ave and Vicksburg
11/11/2022 $536.85 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152462 Verified Credentials Inc
10/31/2022Inv. 336357
Total PriceItem Description
$536.85 Background Screening Oct 2022
11/11/2022 $1,000.74 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152463 Verizon Wireless
10/25/2022Inv. 9919127827
Total PriceItem Description
$1,000.74 Cell phone Acct 986687379-00002 10/26-11/25/22
11/11/2022 $1,536.83 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152464 Vermont Systems Recreation & Parks
Software10/31/2022Inv. VS006018
Total PriceItem Description
$1,536.83 Bar Code Scanners
11/11/2022 $65.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152465 Daniel Wallin
11/04/2022Inv. F110422
Page 22 of 36 11/22/2022 33
Total PriceItem Description
$65.00 Building Official License Renewal
11/11/2022 $777.61 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152466 The Watson Company
11/03/2022Inv. 129573
Total PriceItem Description
$777.61 Concession supplies - PIC
11/11/2022 $2,460.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152467 Wayzata Public Schools Isd #284
11/02/2022Inv. 21221824
Total PriceItem Description
$2,460.00 Swim lessons 1/3/22-5/26/22
11/11/2022 $105,300.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152468 WEG-Beacon Ridge, LLC
11/04/2022Inv. F110422
Total PriceItem Description
$68,715.00 Beacon Ridge Development Partial Refund
$36,585.00 Beacon Ridge 2nd Development Partial Refund
11/11/2022 $18,409.60 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152469 Whippersnapper Lawn Service
10/31/2022Inv. 9338
Total PriceItem Description
$17,469.15 Parks & Cemetery Mowing
$940.45 Parks & Cemetery Mowing
11/11/2022 $57,948.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152470 WSB & Associates
10/24/2022Inv. R01815300014
Total PriceItem Description
$57,948.00 Zachary WTP Coatings Rehab Project-Design & Bidding 6/30/22
11/11/2022 $35,182.47 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152471 Xcel Energy
10/31/2022Inv. 802463557
Total PriceItem Description
$35,148.45 City Buildings Acct 5167107940
10/31/2022Inv. 802561734
Total PriceItem Description
$34.02 Tunnel Lights Acct 5100132180938
11/11/2022 $60.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152472 Zoll Medical Corp
10/25/2022Inv. 3597718
Total PriceItem Description
$60.00 G5 Battery for AED
11/11/2022 $150.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152473 Rodger Coppa
10/31/2022Inv. F103122
Total PriceItem Description
$150.00 Reimburse expense - Fire Office Mtg Sept 2022
11/11/2022 $241.10 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152474 Erik Fadden
11/07/2022Inv. F110722
Total PriceItem Description
$241.10 Expense reimbursement - IACP Conference 10/14-10/19/22
11/11/2022 $539.25 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152475 Jessica Koch
11/02/2022Inv. F110222
Total PriceItem Description
$156.25 Reimburse mileage - MRPA Conference
11/02/2022Inv. F110222-1
Total PriceItem Description
$383.00 Reimburse expenses - NRPA National Conference
11/11/2022 $2,405.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152476 Law Enforce Labor Services Inc / LELS
11/04/2022Inv. 2022-00000266
Total PriceItem Description
$1,885.00 11/04/2022 Deduction Police Union Dues
$422.50 11/04/2022 Deduction SGT Union Dues
Page 23 of 36 11/22/2022 34
$97.50 11/04/2022 Deduction Captain Union Dues
11/11/2022 $42.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152477 Michael Payne
11/04/2022Inv. F110422
Total PriceItem Description
$42.50 Reimburse mileage - Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152489 * Plymouth Civic League
11/15/2022Inv. Import - 10437
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/18/2022 $46.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152490 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING AND HEATING INC
11/17/2022Inv. 00342852
Total PriceItem Description
$46.00 Refund - Permit - P202207438
11/18/2022 $1,043,390.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152491 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY NATIONAL CO11/08/2022Inv. 00342358
Total PriceItem Description
$1,043,390.75 Refund - Bond - BE2022035
11/18/2022 $85.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152492 Moe Hagestuen
11/10/2022Inv. Import - 10436
Total PriceItem Description
$85.00 Park and Rec Refund
11/18/2022 $41.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152493 SUBURBAN ELECTRIC INC
11/15/2022Inv. 00342733
Total PriceItem Description
$41.00 Refund - Permit - P202208631
11/18/2022 $231.98 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152494 Acme Tools
11/02/2022Inv. 10565603
Total PriceItem Description
$231.98 Hammer drill set, flex volt battery
11/18/2022 $25,914.92 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152495 Action Fleet Inc
10/27/2022Inv. I5471
Total PriceItem Description
$5,922.41 New Vehicle Setup for #1743
11/08/2022Inv. I5497
Total PriceItem Description
$210.00 Remove/install radio & computer #45
11/11/2022Inv. I5503
Total PriceItem Description
$19,155.01 New Vehicle Setup for Fire Department #59
11/15/2022Inv. I5510
Total PriceItem Description
$627.50 Decommission vehicle refurbish equipment #1058
11/18/2022 $6,166.86 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152496 Adorama Inc.
10/28/2022Inv. 32065966
Total PriceItem Description
$8.23 Camera, Lenses and Misc. Items
10/28/2022Inv. 32065969
Total PriceItem Description
$5,874.58 Camera, Lenses and Misc. Items
11/03/2022Inv. 32095172
Total PriceItem Description
$284.05 Camera, Lenses and Misc. Items
11/18/2022 $8,707.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152497 Advanced Engineering & Environmental
Services Ae2s11/08/2022Inv. 83748
Total PriceItem Description
Page 24 of 36 11/22/2022 35
$8,707.50 Plymouth Water Model Distribution 10/28/22
11/18/2022 $277.41 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152498 Messan Agbemadon
11/08/2022Inv. F110822
Total PriceItem Description
$277.41 Reimburse Messan Agbemadon-18015 20th Ave- Bathroom Supplies
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152499 Carrie Almaer
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/18/2022 $101.94 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152500 ALTA
11/16/2022Inv. 12895
Total PriceItem Description
$101.94 Coin plaque & Police dog plate
11/18/2022 $2,387.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152501 American Public Works Association/Apwa
11/02/2022Inv. F110222
Total PriceItem Description
$2,387.50 Membership Renewal for 2/1/2023 - 1/31/2024
11/18/2022 $440.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152502 Artistic Moments/Kris Holtmeyer
11/14/2022Inv. F111422
Total PriceItem Description
$140.00 Holiday cookie art - Adult
11/14/2022Inv. F111422-1
Total PriceItem Description
$300.00 Holiday cookie art - Youth
11/18/2022 $37,707.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152503 Astech Corp
11/14/2022Inv. 22497
Total PriceItem Description
$37,707.50 Bituminous material 2022 Fog Sealing Project
11/18/2022 $241,996.80 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152504 Bald Eagle Builders, Inc.
11/10/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$241,996.80 Troy Lane Developer Reimbursement
11/18/2022 $21,702.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152505 Baycom Inc.
11/08/2022Inv. EQUIPINV040678
Total PriceItem Description
$17,148.00 Panasonic I5 16/512
$4,554.00 Gamber dock
11/18/2022 $552.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152506 Becker Arena Products Inc
10/28/2022Inv. 606802
Total PriceItem Description
$552.00 Black round post cap
11/18/2022 $181.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152507 Benefit Extras, Inc.
11/07/2022Inv. 111954
Total PriceItem Description
$181.50 Cobra & Retiree Admin Fee Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $164.43 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152508 Bound Tree Medical LLC
10/28/2022Inv. 65003769
Total PriceItem Description
$93.55 Oximeters
11/03/2022Inv. 65011592
Total PriceItem Description
$70.88 Sterile pads
11/18/2022 $188.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152509 Bro-Tex Inc.
11/08/2022Inv. 555974
Page 25 of 36 11/22/2022 36
Total PriceItem Description
$188.75 DRC Heavy popup
11/18/2022 $339.70 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152510 Charles Cudd Co LLC
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$339.70 Reimbursement for Excel Invoice -14227 41st Ave N
11/18/2022 $9,948.40 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152511 Cigna Group Insurance/Lina
11/01/2022Inv. 15526110122
Total PriceItem Description
$9,948.40 Life, LTD, AD/D, STD Premium - Nov 2022
11/18/2022 $47.52 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152512 Cintas Corporation
11/01/2022Inv. 5131069697
Total PriceItem Description
$47.52 Medical Cabinet Resupply - FS2
11/18/2022 $957.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152513 City of Maple Grove
10/31/2022Inv. 21483
Total PriceItem Description
$957.00 PUPS Oct 2022 Operations
11/18/2022 $5,008.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152514 CivicPlus, LLC
10/31/2022Inv. 245852
Total PriceItem Description
$5,008.00 Municode Electronic update, Images, Graphs & Tabular Matter
11/18/2022 $3,573.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152515 CNH Architects Inc
10/31/2022Inv. 2524
Total PriceItem Description
$3,573.00 Architecture/Design and Construction Service
11/18/2022 $2,300.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152516 Colleen Bosold
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$2,300.00 Reimburse driveway repair
11/18/2022 $144.93 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152517 Cub Foods
11/09/2022Inv. 50
Total PriceItem Description
$144.93 Retirement celebration - K Lundberg
11/18/2022 $2,049.11 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152518 Dem-Con Companies
10/31/2022Inv. 12831
Total PriceItem Description
$2,049.11 Street sweeping 10/18/22 - 10/21/22
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152519 Tsering Dolker
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/18/2022 $491.40 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152520 ECM Publishers Inc
10/27/2022Inv. 917716
Total PriceItem Description
$245.70 General election notice
10/27/2022Inv. 917717
Total PriceItem Description
$245.70 Bid ad - Sanitary Sewer Lining
11/18/2022 $1,022.19 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152521 Ecolab Inc
11/11/2022Inv. 6273239382
Total PriceItem Description
$1,022.19 Solid power & Solid brilliance detergent
11/18/2022 $799.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152522 Elm Creek Watershed Mgmt Comm
Page 26 of 36 11/22/2022 37
11/01/2022Inv. 297
Total PriceItem Description
$799.75 Cty Rd 47 reconstruction project review
11/18/2022 $13,556.77 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152523 Enterprise Fm Trust
11/03/2022Inv. FBN4595473
Total PriceItem Description
$874.10 Unit 59 Ford Expedition
$736.38 Unit 1743 Chevy Traverse
$498.32 Unit 1735 Chevy Traverse
$495.24 Unit 1738 Chevy Traverse
$498.32 Unit 1737 Chevy Traverse
$478.15 Unit 1736 Ford Escape
$698.09 Unit 1740 Ford F250
$498.32 Unit 1734 Chevy Traverse
$976.67 Unit 1078 Ford Interceptor
$989.32 Unit 1079 Ford Interceptor
$967.64 Unit 1074 Ford Interceptor
$972.86 Unit 1075 Ford Interceptor
$970.65 Unit 1073 Ford Interceptor
$978.68 Unit 1077 Ford Interceptor
$485.70 Unit 1741 Ford Escape
$1,034.98 Unit 1742 Ford Escape
$749.96 Unit 1733 Chevy Tahoe
$653.39 Unit 1739 Chrysler Voyager
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152524 Dana Escobar
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/18/2022 $196.77 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152525 Factory Motor Parts Co
11/14/2022Inv. 18162565
Total PriceItem Description
$34.20 Wiper blades - stock
11/14/2022Inv. 18162689
Total PriceItem Description
$102.59 Wiper blades - stock
11/14/2022Inv. 18162861
Total PriceItem Description
$11.25 Mini lamps - stock
11/09/2022Inv. 70506396
Total PriceItem Description
$16.46 Wheel weight
11/16/2022Inv. 70507158
Total PriceItem Description
$32.27 Upper intake manifold gas - stock
11/18/2022 $2,053.63 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152526 Geargrid Corporation
11/07/2022Inv. 0022223IN
Total PriceItem Description
$2,053.63 Command vehicle garage - FS2
11/18/2022 $120.91 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152527 Grafix Shoppe
10/26/2022Inv. 147468
Total PriceItem Description
$120.91 Magnetic signs
11/18/2022 $426.40 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152528 Great Lakes Coca-Cola Distribution LLC
11/11/2022Inv. 3645213918
Total PriceItem Description
$426.40 Concession supplies - PIC
11/18/2022 $294,259.84 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152529 Healthpartners Insurance Co Inc
11/09/2022Inv. 116762223
Page 27 of 36 11/22/2022 38
Total PriceItem Description
$294,259.84 2022 Medical Insurance Premiums - Dec 2022
11/18/2022 $25.74 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152530 Hennepin County Treasurer
11/02/2022Inv. 1000194621
Total PriceItem Description
$25.74 Hennepin County Radio Fee Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $54.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152531 Hennepin County Treasurer
10/13/2022Inv. 1000193789
Total PriceItem Description
$54.00 HC Booking & Per Diem Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $2,364.36 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152532 Hennepin County Treasurer
10/31/2022Inv. 1000194543
Total PriceItem Description
$2,364.36 HC Booking & Per Diem Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $6,851.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152533 Hennepin County Treasurer
11/02/2022Inv. 1000194585
Total PriceItem Description
$6,851.75 Monthly MDC Charges - Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $15,000.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152534 Hennepin County Treasurer
11/04/2022Inv. 1000194953
Total PriceItem Description
$15,000.00 HC Funding Mental Health Professional 8/1/22-10/31/22
11/18/2022 $500.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152535 Hennepin County Treasurer
10/31/2022Inv. 1000194662
Total PriceItem Description
$500.00 ACF Potable Water Charges
11/18/2022 $3,046.86 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152536 Hennepin County Treasurer
11/02/2022Inv. 1000194584
Total PriceItem Description
$3,046.86 Radio/MESB & MDC fees Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $1,470.96 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152537 Home Depot
11/02/2022Inv. 1010407
Total PriceItem Description
$917.00 Lithium batteries, hammer drill kit
11/01/2022Inv. 2010198
Total PriceItem Description
$163.54 Cable ties, brass QC kit, tape, shower head
11/10/2022Inv. 3321748
Total PriceItem Description
$14.32 Eye bolt set
11/09/2022Inv. 4011676
Total PriceItem Description
$120.87 Shop tools
11/09/2022Inv. 4063830
Total PriceItem Description
$63.57 Painting supplies
11/08/2022Inv. 5011438
Total PriceItem Description
$40.40 Paint for trail staking
10/28/2022Inv. 6314076
Total PriceItem Description
$83.88 Easy reach poles
10/27/2022Inv. 7016366
Total PriceItem Description
$15.92 Proprylene Glycol
10/25/2022Inv. 9063058
Page 28 of 36 11/22/2022 39
Total PriceItem Description
$51.46 Cable ties, battery charger, rope
11/18/2022 $220.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152538 IKI Inc
11/05/2022Inv. 5472
Total PriceItem Description
$220.00 Instant Piano & Instant Guitar classes
11/18/2022 $22.57 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152539 Indelco
11/03/2022Inv. INV360994
Total PriceItem Description
$22.57 Hose shank, fittings
11/18/2022 $2,520.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152540 Invest Plymouth I, LLC
10/01/2022Inv. INV00004
Total PriceItem Description
$2,520.00 Parking for 70 stalls - Oct - Dec 2022 Q4
11/18/2022 $56.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152541 K&S Engraving
11/04/2022Inv. 12407
Total PriceItem Description
$15.00 Wall holders
11/04/2022Inv. 12408
Total PriceItem Description
$41.50 Plate/Velcro - New TW-21
11/18/2022 $2,353.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152542 Kidcreate Studio
07/31/2022Inv. 14809022
Total PriceItem Description
$2,353.00 Art workshops 7/25 - 7/30/22
11/18/2022 $1,672.52 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152543 Killmer Electric Company Inc
11/02/2022Inv. W19251
Total PriceItem Description
$220.00 Repair PED indications - 35th Ave N & Vicksburg Ln
11/02/2022Inv. W19258
Total PriceItem Description
$880.00 Install street signs - Vicksburg Lane
11/11/2022Inv. W19293
Total PriceItem Description
$572.52 Lamp wiring issue - Zachary Playfield
11/18/2022 $3,115.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152544 Klein Underground LLC
11/09/2022Inv. 55745
Total PriceItem Description
$923.00 Curb raising/work - 3400 Olive Ln
11/09/2022Inv. 55746
Total PriceItem Description
$1,517.50 Curb raising/work - 3400 Lawndale Ln
11/09/2022Inv. 55752
Total PriceItem Description
$675.00 Curb raising/work - Kilmer Ln N & 13th Ave N
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152545 Klobe Residential/Anne-Marie Klobe
11/14/2022Inv. 11116
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Kitchen remodeling class
11/18/2022 $5,200.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152546 Kohl's Department Store
11/18/2022Inv. F111822
Total PriceItem Description
$5,200.00 Presents with Public Safety - gift cards
11/18/2022 $9.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152547 Chris Labounty
11/16/2022Inv. F111622
Page 29 of 36 11/22/2022 40
Total PriceItem Description
$9.00 Reimburse parking - NALMA Conference
11/18/2022 $1,758.49 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152548 Larson Companies/Peterbilt
11/16/2022Inv. 2504374011
Total PriceItem Description
$1,758.49 Kit, Exh Rcn Cooler - #41 (L-21)
11/18/2022 $1,500.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152549 Leah Kuisrud / Driven Wild Goose Control
11/04/2022Inv. 4006
Total PriceItem Description
$1,500.00 Goose control visit
11/18/2022 $470.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152550 Least Services/Counseling LLC
11/07/2022Inv. 1130
Total PriceItem Description
$470.00 On call after hours - Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $36.72 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152551 Lowe's
11/09/2022Inv. 23911
Total PriceItem Description
$26.52 Tide pods
09/27/2022Inv. 916364
Total PriceItem Description
$10.20 Gorilla tape
11/18/2022 $336.95 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152552 Macqueen Equipment/Emergency
11/02/2022Inv. P07950
Total PriceItem Description
$67.55 Switch foot SPS - #43 (E31)
11/08/2022Inv. P07969
Total PriceItem Description
$77.50 Powerseal relay - #43 (E-31)
11/08/2022Inv. P08078
Total PriceItem Description
$368.86 Soft goods kits for Cairns helmets
10/31/2022Inv. P45718
Total PriceItem Description
($176.96)Solenoid valve - credit
11/18/2022 $42,110.92 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152553 Mansfield Oil Company
11/08/2022Inv. 23753151
Total PriceItem Description
$19,404.20 7000 Gal Unleaded fixed
11/08/2022Inv. 23753152
Total PriceItem Description
$2,955.49 1001 Gal Unleaded SPOT
11/08/2022Inv. 23753368
Total PriceItem Description
$7,970.08 2000 Gal Diesel SPOT
11/08/2022Inv. 23753369
Total PriceItem Description
$11,781.15 4000 Gal Diesel FIXED
11/18/2022 $148.38 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152554 Metro Products Inc
11/07/2022Inv. 170276
Total PriceItem Description
$148.38 Various Fasteners
11/18/2022 $573,015.99 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152555 Metropolitan Council
11/03/2022Inv. 0001147818
Total PriceItem Description
$573,015.99 Sewer charges for December 2022
11/18/2022 $550.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152556 Minnesota State Fire Department
Association/MSFDAPage 30 of 36 11/22/2022 41
11/18/2022Inv. 2023
Total PriceItem Description
$550.00 2023 MSFDA Membership Dues
11/18/2022 $130.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152557 MN Dept of Labor And Industry
10/29/2022Inv. ABR0293951X
Total PriceItem Description
$130.00 Ice Arena Pressure Vessel License
11/18/2022 $100.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152558 MN Dept of Labor And Industry
10/29/2022Inv. ALR0139504X
Total PriceItem Description
$100.00 Elevator Annual Operators License - PIC
11/18/2022 $263.25 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152559 Montgomery Brinkman LLC
11/10/2022Inv. 56064
Total PriceItem Description
$263.25 Service call on bus stop heater - St Phillip Park & Ride
11/18/2022 $168.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152560 Mr Cutting Edge LLC
10/27/2022Inv. 5035
Total PriceItem Description
$168.00 Ice scraper blade 77" sharpen
11/18/2022 $37.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152561 Napa Genuine Auto Parts Co
11/01/2022Inv. 2349812985
Total PriceItem Description
$16.20 U bolt
11/15/2022Inv. 2349814672
Total PriceItem Description
$20.80 Bulbs
11/18/2022 $1,587.30 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152562 Nardini Fire Equipment Co Inc
08/30/2022Inv. IV00216558
Total PriceItem Description
$306.90 Annual extinguisher inspection - ST73
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217297
Total PriceItem Description
$146.10 Annual extinguisher inspection - Elm Creek Playfield
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217298
Total PriceItem Description
$138.70 Annual extinguisher inspection - Lacompte Green Playfield
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217299
Total PriceItem Description
$286.05 Annual extinguisher inspection - Parkers Lake Pavillion Cabin
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217300
Total PriceItem Description
$138.70 Annual extinguisher inspection - Plymouth Creek Playfield
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217302
Total PriceItem Description
$146.10 Annual extinguisher inspections - Parkers Lake Pavillion
09/07/2022Inv. IV00217303
Total PriceItem Description
$142.40 Annual extinguisher inspection - Zachary Playfield
09/07/2022Inv. IV0217301
Total PriceItem Description
$282.35 Annual extinguisher inspection - Bass Lake Playfield
11/18/2022 $20,000.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152563 Natural Shore Technologies
11/09/2022Inv. 5418
Total PriceItem Description
$20,000.00 Fall Buckthorn spraying
11/18/2022 $1,312.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152564 Ncpers Group Life Insurance
Page 31 of 36 11/22/2022 42
10/01/2022Inv. 695600112022
Total PriceItem Description
$1,312.00 Optional Life Insurance Premium Nov 2022
11/18/2022 $2,041.66 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152565 NFP Corporate Services MN Inc
11/03/2022Inv. 7658
Total PriceItem Description
$2,041.66 Employee Benefits Consulting Fee Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $7,048.08 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152566 Nystrom Publishing Co Inc
10/24/2022Inv. 46008
Total PriceItem Description
$7,048.08 City Newsletter Printing & Mailing - Nov/Dec 2022
11/18/2022 $1,164.56 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152567 Office Depot
11/04/2022Inv. 273237663001
Total PriceItem Description
$67.92 Markers, painters tape, calendar refill pages
11/03/2022Inv. 273261612001
Total PriceItem Description
$46.58 Labels
11/04/2022Inv. 274604733001
Total PriceItem Description
$67.17 Tape cartridges
11/04/2022Inv. 274760046001
Total PriceItem Description
$35.16 USB flash drive
11/04/2022Inv. 274760250001
Total PriceItem Description
$66.34 Dividers, sheet protectors
11/04/2022Inv. 274760254001
Total PriceItem Description
$6.29 Command hooks
11/03/2022Inv. 274760268001
Total PriceItem Description
$98.99 Bubble mailers
11/08/2022Inv. 275174046001
Total PriceItem Description
$39.20 Certificate holders, pens
11/03/2022Inv. 275453123001
Total PriceItem Description
$136.73 Planners
11/03/2022Inv. 275453483001
Total PriceItem Description
$124.86 Shipping labels
11/03/2022Inv. 275453614001
Total PriceItem Description
$194.52 Shipping labels
11/03/2022Inv. 275799391001
Total PriceItem Description
$180.97 Markers, address labels
11/03/2022Inv. 275801364001
Total PriceItem Description
$47.98 Wall calendars
11/07/2022Inv. 276480193001
Total PriceItem Description
$51.85 Labels, task planners
11/18/2022 $107.88 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152568 Office of MN It Services
11/09/2022Inv. DV22100444
Total PriceItem Description
$107.88 Router/CSU for CJDN 2022
Page 32 of 36 11/22/2022 43
11/18/2022 $215.44 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152569 Oil-Air Products LLC
11/14/2022Inv. 721782001
Total PriceItem Description
$186.30 Hydraulic hose fitting - #2071 & stock
11/15/2022Inv. 721873001
Total PriceItem Description
$29.14 6MJ-6MB90 - #2019
11/18/2022 $13.73 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152570 On Time Delivery Service Inc
10/31/2022Inv. 379254
Total PriceItem Description
$13.73 INV #379254 Van Ryswyk delivery
11/18/2022 $1,552.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152571 Ostvig Tree, Inc.
11/14/2022Inv. 3652
Total PriceItem Description
$720.00 Tree removal - 12960 32nd Ave N
11/14/2022Inv. 3653
Total PriceItem Description
$832.00 Tree removal - 323 Union Terrace Ln N
11/18/2022 $62.46 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152572 Oxygen Service Company
11/10/2022Inv. 0008582290
Total PriceItem Description
$62.46 Medical Oxygen Refill - PS
11/18/2022 $75.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152573 Personnel Evaluation Inc
10/31/2022Inv. 45936
Total PriceItem Description
$75.00 PEP Billing - Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $245.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152574 Point of View Productions Inc./Saga Hill
Designs11/15/2022Inv. 4221818-1
Total PriceItem Description
$245.00 Beginning mitten class
11/18/2022 $639.89 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152575 Reinders Inc
11/07/2022Inv. 309212500
Total PriceItem Description
$477.24 Holiday lights - Hilde
11/04/2022Inv. 309225600
Total PriceItem Description
$51.25 Metal staples
11/09/2022Inv. 309234500
Total PriceItem Description
$111.40 Plow flags
11/18/2022 $126,789.70 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152576 Republic Services #894
10/25/2022Inv. 0894005962070
Total PriceItem Description
$589.02 Waste/Recycling Oct 2022 - PIC
10/31/2022Inv. 0894005979453
Total PriceItem Description
$89,660.41 Oct 2022 Curbside and Drop Off Site Services
$36,540.27 Jan-Sept 2022 Drop Off Site Short Bills
11/18/2022 $8,329.99 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152577 Revspring Inc
11/01/2022Inv. INV1319732
Total PriceItem Description
$8,329.99 UB Statement processing, printing & postage Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $2,860.26 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152578 RideCO US Inc.
10/31/2022Inv. 2022341
Total PriceItem Description
Page 33 of 36 11/22/2022 44
$2,860.26 Transit On-Demand software Monthly Fees
11/18/2022 $391,380.21 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152579 RJM Construction LLC
11/07/2022Inv. 2052006921
Total PriceItem Description
$391,380.21 Construction/CM of Fire Stations 2/3 - 10/31/22
11/18/2022 $77.68 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152580 Rosenbauer Minnesota LLC
11/08/2022Inv. 0000056820
Total PriceItem Description
$77.68 Waterproof relay - #51 (E-21)
11/18/2022 $525.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152581 Safe Fast
10/31/2022Inv. INV268246
Total PriceItem Description
$437.50 Jackets
10/31/2022Inv. INV268248
Total PriceItem Description
$87.50 Jacket
11/18/2022 $608.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152582 Science Explorers/Discovery Explorers LLC
11/09/2022Inv. 4898
Total PriceItem Description
$342.00 Mixture Madness class 10/11-10/25/22
11/09/2022Inv. 4902
Total PriceItem Description
$266.00 Great reactions class 10/21/22
11/18/2022 $1,648.87 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152583 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc/Seh
11/11/2022Inv. 436901
Total PriceItem Description
$1,648.87 Project #169189 - CWT Sprint Decommission 10/29/22
11/18/2022 $3,339.60 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152584 SRF Consulting Group Inc
10/31/2022Inv. 148380012
Total PriceItem Description
$2,886.27 Prelim Design - Station 73 Access Imp. thru 10/31/22
10/31/2022Inv. 16060001
Total PriceItem Description
$453.33 Plymouth Park System sign design 10/31/22
11/18/2022 $52,000.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152585 State of Minnesota
11/01/2022Inv. 00000722308
Total PriceItem Description
$52,000.00 Per Contract #208018 Crew #1-4 day 11/1/22-4/30/23
11/18/2022 $6,450.89 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152586 State of Minnesota
11/14/2022Inv. P00016304
Total PriceItem Description
$6,450.89 Materials Testing Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $206.08 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152587 Stone & Steel Design LLC
08/16/2022Inv. 4970
Total PriceItem Description
$176.64 ACF Potable Water Charges
11/11/2022Inv. 5054
Total PriceItem Description
$29.44 Paver engraving
11/18/2022 $3,531.94 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152588 Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc
11/09/2022Inv. 10190533
Total PriceItem Description
$1,284.96 Eagle Enforcer Tires - Stock
11/10/2022Inv. 10190534
Total PriceItem Description
Page 34 of 36 11/22/2022 45
$485.98 Multi trac tires - #5041
11/14/2022Inv. 10190643
Total PriceItem Description
$630.00 Transforce AT2 tires - Unit #2020
11/16/2022Inv. 10190755
Total PriceItem Description
$584.36 Wrangler AT Advent tires - #2020
11/16/2022Inv. 10190803
Total PriceItem Description
$546.64 Workhorse AT tires - #045
11/18/2022 $1,964.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152589 T&D Landscape Inc
11/14/2022Inv. I221007806
Total PriceItem Description
$148.00 Mow & Trim 3325 Garland Ln Sept 2022
11/14/2022Inv. I221007807
Total PriceItem Description
$148.00 Mow & Trim 3315 Garland Ln Sept 2022
11/14/2022Inv. I221007808
Total PriceItem Description
$320.00 Mow & Trim Valor Place both units Sept 2022
11/09/2022Inv. I221109890
Total PriceItem Description
$269.00 Mow, trim, fall clean up - 3325 Garland Ln
11/09/2022Inv. I221109891
Total PriceItem Description
$354.00 Mow, trim, fall clean up, blow out sprinkler - 3315 Garland Ln
11/09/2022Inv. I221109892
Total PriceItem Description
$725.00 Mow, trim, fall clean up, blow out sprinkler - Valor Place
11/18/2022 $38,347.40 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152590 T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
11/09/2022Inv. F110922
Total PriceItem Description
$38,347.40 Plymouth Creek Playfield Parking Lot Reconstruction
11/18/2022 $200.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152591 Thomas Euston
11/14/2022Inv. F111422
Total PriceItem Description
$200.00 Water Efficiency Rebate Program - Rebate Funds
11/18/2022 $35.99 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152592 Toll Company
11/11/2022Inv. 10487311
Total PriceItem Description
$35.99 Propane Delivery Check charge
11/18/2022 $3,623.90 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152593 Total Control Systems Inc
11/07/2022Inv. 10450
Total PriceItem Description
$3,623.90 Changed VFD's at Imperial Hills SLS
11/18/2022 $7,290.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152594 Twin City Seed Company
11/08/2022Inv. 53128
Total PriceItem Description
$7,290.00 Sports field grass seed
11/18/2022 $306.25 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152595 Vermont Systems Recreation & Parks
Software05/31/2022Inv. VS003996
Total PriceItem Description
$306.25 Pager support
11/18/2022 $6,698.30 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152596 Garth & Kristy Warren
11/14/2022Inv. F111422
Total PriceItem Description
Page 35 of 36 11/22/2022 46
$6,698.30 Driveway & Partial Irrigation Reimbursement - 16220 14th Ave N
11/18/2022 $1,421.83 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152597 The Watson Company
11/10/2022Inv. 129698
Total PriceItem Description
$1,310.17 Concession supplies - PIC
11/16/2022Inv. 129831
Total PriceItem Description
$111.66 Concession supplies - PIC
11/18/2022 $2,156.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152598 Wayzata Public Schools Isd #284
11/02/2022Inv. 21221829
Total PriceItem Description
$532.00 Gymnastics equipment Jan - Mar 2022
11/02/2022Inv. 21222870
Total PriceItem Description
$1,624.00 Gymnastics equipment Jun - Aug 2022
11/18/2022 $695.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152599 Weld And Sons Plumbing Inc
07/22/2022Inv. i1564
Total PriceItem Description
$695.00 Install PVC standpipes, reroute softener 14225 & 14227 41st Ave
11/18/2022 $19,755.89 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152600 Wright-Henn Elec. Co.
11/10/2022Inv. F111022
Total PriceItem Description
$19,755.89 Residential Streetlights, LS, Parks, Transit, Traffic - Oct 2022
11/18/2022 $971.00 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152601 WSB & Associates
07/27/2022Inv. R01797300010
Total PriceItem Description
$971.00 Zachary WTP MCC Replacement 6/30/22
11/18/2022 $58,221.35 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152602 Xcel Energy
10/31/2022Inv. 802563681
Total PriceItem Description
$57,935.69 Electric acct 5162617243
11/02/2022Inv. 802785489
Total PriceItem Description
$208.30 Storm Water Acct 5100786236
11/02/2022Inv. 802934813
Total PriceItem Description
$77.36 Electric acct 5100134670071
11/18/2022 $3,500.91 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152603 Younger Exteriors Inc
05/31/2022Inv. 2434
Total PriceItem Description
$3,500.91 S Stephens-11240 48th Ave-Final-CDBG Rehab
11/18/2022 $32.95 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152604 Thomas Evenson
11/14/2022Inv. F111422
Total PriceItem Description
$32.95 Reimburse items for swearing in of new FF
11/18/2022 $8.90 Check Date Paid:Amount: 152605 Marten, Kyle
11/09/2022Inv. F110922
Total PriceItem Description
$8.90 Reimburse padlock
Total Payments:Total Amount Paid:$5,046,266.63 319
Page 36 of 36 11/22/2022 47
Check Payment Register - UB Refunds
11/05/2022 11/18/2022to
11/10/2022 $88.96 Check Date Paid:Amount: Mark Laurent152315
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $63.79 Check Date Paid:Amount: Zinoviy Belyavin152316
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $20.96 Check Date Paid:Amount: Lisa Besnet152317
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $17.62 Check Date Paid:Amount: Judy Bodeen152318
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $168.85 Check Date Paid:Amount: Raymond Bowers152319
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $258.73 Check Date Paid:Amount: Jon Brekke152320
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $10.92 Check Date Paid:Amount: Aimee Bretl152321
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $23.26 Check Date Paid:Amount: Daryl Calhoun152322
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $76.78 Check Date Paid:Amount: Mohan Chettiar152323
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $62.12 Check Date Paid:Amount: Larry Copeland152324
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $87.10 Check Date Paid:Amount: Mandi Lindstrom152325
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $302.66 Check Date Paid:Amount: Fahimeh Maanavi152326
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $126.83 Check Date Paid:Amount: Saket Mahajan152327
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $132.29 Check Date Paid:Amount: Christie McCullum152328
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $143.56 Check Date Paid:Amount: Stanley Pearson152329
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $233.66 Check Date Paid:Amount: Kenneth Polarek152330
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $10.19 Check Date Paid:Amount: Caitlin Schuler152331
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/10/2022 $236.27 Check Date Paid:Amount: Yanak Shagalov152332
Refund 11/10/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $66.12 Check Date Paid:Amount: Charles Bristol152478
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $100.51 Check Date Paid:Amount: Felix Hsu152479
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $1,245.79 Check Date Paid:Amount: Nazmul Jaffer152480
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - customer request
11/18/2022 $186.90 Check Date Paid:Amount: Athena Latiki152481
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $226.02 Check Date Paid:Amount: Sanjyoth Paracha152482
Page 1 of 2 11/22/2022 48
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $100.50 Check Date Paid:Amount: Julia Plotkin152483
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $29.87 Check Date Paid:Amount: Matthew Rimnac152484
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $145.47 Check Date Paid:Amount: Matthias Roehl152485
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $226.54 Check Date Paid:Amount: George Schumacher152486
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
11/18/2022 $706.31 Check Date Paid:Amount: Kevin Uptain152487
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - refund requested
11/18/2022 $74.75 Check Date Paid:Amount: Sharon Vaccaro152488
Refund 11/18/2022 Overpayment - final account refund
Total Refunds:Total Amount Paid:$5,173.33 29
Page 2 of 2 11/22/2022 49
50
Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 11/18/22 Council Meeting 11/29/22
FUND 100 General Fund 615,615.52
200 Recreation Fund 29,893.92
210 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 940.45
220 Transit System Fund 7,827.05
234 Economic Development Fund 0.00
240 Lawful Gambling 0.00
250 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 7,132.36
254 HRA Section 8 Fund 494.99
254 HAP Check Summary 6,398.00
258 HRA General Fund 3,151.74
308 2005A TIF #1-1 0.00
310 2009A TIF #7-5A Refund 1998A 0.00
312 2010A GO Open Space 0.00
314 2012A GO Refunding 2004A 0.00
315 2015A GO Open Space 0.00
316 Plymouth Creek Center Bonds 0.00
400 General Capital Projects Fund 1,156,119.35
401 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00
404 Community Improvement 0.00
405 Park Replacement Fund 263.98
406 Street Reconstruction Fund 75.14
407 Project Administration Fund 0.00
408 Park Construction 0.00
409 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00
412 Water Sewer Replace 0.00
413 Improvement Project Construction 815,650.42
417 Project Warranty Repairs 0.00
418 Utility Trunk System Expansion 917.85
420 Water Sewer Construction 0.00
421 ENT-Water Resources Constrctn 0.00
422 TIF 7-4 PTP Construction 0.00
423 TIF 7-5 Rottlund (Const)0.00
424 TIF 7-6 Berkshire 0.00
425 TIF Housing Assistance Program 0.00
426 TIF 7-7 Stonecreek 0.00
427 TIF 1-1 Shops at Plymth Crk 0.00
428 TIF 1-2 Vicksburg Commons 0.00
429 TIF HRA 1-3 Crossroads Station 0.00
432 TIF 7-8 Quest 0.00
433 TIF 7-9 Four Seasons 0.00
434 TIF 7-10 Sands 0.00
435 Plymouth Creek Center Expansion 18,992.24
436 Doran Bassett Creek 0.00
437 CON - Fire Stations 394,953.21
500 Water Fund 122,626.27
510 Water Resources Fund 18,264.27
520 Sewer Fund 583,160.76
530 Solid Waste Management Fund 126,538.37
540 Ice Center Fund 77,882.56
550 Field House Fund 1,904.08
600 Central Equipment Fund 601,531.91
610 Public Facilities Fund 43,651.78
620 Information Technology Fund 43,720.43
630 Risk Management Fund 12,672.06
640 Employee Benefits Fund 365,710.41
660 Resource Planning 0.00
700 Parkers's Lake Cemetery 0.00
800 Investment Trust Fund 1,748.84
850 Plymouth Town Square 0.00
851 Vicksburg Crossing 0.00
Total Invoice Expense Distribution:5,057,837.96
51
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-296
RESOLUTION APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS ENDING NOVEMBER 18, 2022
WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending November 18, 2022 was presented to
the City Council for approval.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFPLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTAthat the payment of the list of disbursements of the following funds is approved.
US Bank – Check Register
General & Special Revenue $ 661,409.30
Construction & Debt Service $ 2,386,972.19
Enterprise & Internal Service $,1,999,411.74
Housing Redevelopment $ 3,646.73
Check Register Total $ 5,051,439.96
US Bank – Housing Assistance Payments
Housing & Redevelopment Authority $ 6,398.00
$ 6,398.00
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS $ 5,057,837.96
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
52
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.3
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Kip Berglund, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:Danette Parr, Community & Economic Development Director
Item:Approve setback variance to allow a 27-foot by 34.5-foot, two
story, garage and home addition, for property located at 16100
5th Avenue North (Janet and Stephen Olson - 2022063)
1.Action Requested:
Adopt resolution approving a variance for a two-story addition that would be located 6.1 feet in the
northwest corner and 8.3 feet in the southwest corner from the west property line where 15 feet is
required, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Approval requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2.Background:
On November 2, 2022, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
requested variance on their consent agenda. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes
and report are attached. Notice of the Planning Commission’s public meeting was mailed to all
property owners within 200 feet of the site.
After the Planning Commission meeting, staff received correspondence from a resident who lives
within 200 feet of the subject property, with concerns about the proposed variance request. That
correspondence is attached.
3.Budget Impact:
Not applicable.
4.Planning Review Deadline: *
January 12, 2023
5.Attachments:
Minutes
Correspondence Received
Planning Commission Report
Location Map
53
Aerial
Notification Area Map
Variance Standards
Neighborhood Signatures
Narrative
Existing and Proposed Surveys
Plans
City Council Resolution 2022-297
54
1
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Proposed Minutes
Planning Commission Meeting
November 2, 2022
Vice Chair Pointner called a Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on November 2, 2022.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Marc Anderson, Clark Gregor, Bryan Oakley,
Julie Olson, Julie Pointner and Donovan Saba.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chair Michael Boo
STAFF PRESENT: Planning and Development Manager Chloe McGuire, Public Works Director
Michael Thompson, Senior Engineer Technician Amy Riegel, Graduate Engineer Jacob Zea, and
Senior Planner Kip Berglund
Consent Agenda
(4.1) Planning Commission minutes from meeting held on August 17 2022.
(4.2) Variance for the location of entrance monuments at Hollydale, for properties located
at 4705 and 4695 Garland Lane, and at 17060 and 17065 46th Avenue (Hollydale GC
Development, Inc. -- 2022070)
(4.3) Variance to the side-yard setback for a garage and home addition at 16100 5th Avenue
North (Janet and Stephen Olson - 2022063)
(4.4) Variance requests for 1) a detached garage in a front yard and 2) to the height of an
accessory structure for the property located at 2520 Medicine Lake Drive West (Aulik Design
Build - 2022071)
(4.5) Variance request to the livable space side-yard setback for a home addition above the
garage at 10210 South Shore Drive (Alexandra and Logan Asche -- 2022078)
Motion was made by Commissioner Saba, and seconded by Commissioner Gregor, to approve the
consent agenda. With all Commissioners voting in favor, the motion carried.
55
Dear Kip,
Thank you again for answering my questions over the phone and sending what I needed to
review the Olsons’ application for variance (2022063). I was all set to address the planning
commission last night and I followed the blue card procedure for speaking. However, an
unfortunate oversight occurred and I was not offered my opportunity to speak after all. I waited
for my name to be called, which it wasn’t, and when it sounded like the opportunity was going to
be skipped I stood up quickly but the motion was passed without acknowledging me. I then
connected with Chloe who consulted with Ned Carroll and they suggested I attend the City
Council meeting in 2 weeks and perhaps offer my comments at that time. I believe that meeting
is scheduled for 7pm on November 15.
In the meantime, I will provide my comments here. I respectfully ask that you share them with
the Planning Commission members, City Council members, Mayor Wosje, and anyone else that
is giving recommendations or making a decision on this matter.
I am concerned that adding a 2-story building so close to the property line will change the
character of our street and neighborhood.
Let me tell you a little about the neighborhood.
It’s an older section with 73 houses on fairly large lots. My husband and I were first attracted to
Birchwood because of the space between homes and plenty of space for trees. We enjoy the
privacy as well as the neighborliness of the people. We have annual events such as Birchwood
Night Out and a Pumpkin Carving Contest. We have one entrance off the main road and many
of us walk the neighborhood regularly and kids learn to ride bikes on the streets. When the
Olson family arrived a couple years ago they were a wonderful addition. They’re friendly, take
good care of their property, and join and host activities. I hope that they can accomplish their
needs without having to increase the variance by adding a second story that’s noncompliant.
I understand that the question is whether or not the proposal meets the standards for a
variance. I take issue with some of the findings in that regard.
Finding 2b) The request for a variance for a one-story garage may be due to pre-existing
circumstances, but the second story is not due to a pre-existing circumstance.
Finding 2c) While it is true that the addition of a second story would not be out of place in the
neighborhood, it’s the position of the proposed second story that is in question. There are other
options that would allow for office space to be added while staying within the setback ordinance.
The referenced “existing detached garage” is itself one story, not two.
Finding 3) Again, it’s fine to make improvements; it’s the location that’s in question. There are
compliant options for adding home office space.
Finding 6) While the proposed setback is no less than what is already existing, a second story is
not part of a minimum action.
56
To summarize, I appreciate the Olsons wanting to make changes to their home to
accommodate their storage and office needs. I would just like to respectfully voice my thoughts
because this will change the character of the neighborhood and does have an impact on our
neighbors. Though there are times when exceptions to the rules should be considered, I hope
the City of Plymouth will maintain high standards for when it makes sense to go outside of the
governing ordinances.
Thank you for listening to my comments. I appreciate your time and care in considering this and
other requests for variance. We all love this city and want the best for its residents and
businesses.
Sincerely,
Mary Farquhar
16015 5th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55447
57
From: Mary Farquhar <farquharmary@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 10:37 PM
To: Chloe McGuire; Kip Berglund
Subject: RE: Comments on File #2022063, Request for Variance
Thanks, Chloe! I appreciate you and Kip bringing this to the council. Knowing that my comments are
being considered, I am not planning to attend the November 29 Council meeting.
Thank you, all, for your thoughtful consideration in this decision.
Mary Farquhar
From: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov>
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 1:51 PM
To: Mary Farquhar <farquharmary@msn.com>; Kip Berglund <kberglun@plymouthmn.gov>
Subject: RE: Comments on File #2022063, Request for Variance
Hi Mary –
Thanks for your email. We are planning to bring this to council on November 29, 2022 (not next week as
previously anticipated). We will attach your comments to the agenda case and further review your
comments for Council prior to bringing it forward to the Council for a decision.
Are you planning to attend that Council meeting? Please let us know in the next week or so, so we know
if we should slate the item for discussion at the meeting.
Let Kip and I know in the meantime if you have any other comments or questions!
Thanks,
Chloe
Chloe McGuire, AICP | Planning and Development Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Phone: 763.509.5452
From: Mary Farquhar <farquharmary@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2022 4:34 PM
To: Kip Berglund <kberglun@plymouthmn.gov>
Cc: Chloe McGuire <cmcguire@plymouthmn.gov>
Subject: Comments on File #2022063, Request for Variance
You don't often get email from farquharmary@msn.com. Learn why this is important
Some people who received this message don't often get email from farquharmary@msn.com. Learn why this is
important
58
Planning Commission Report Information - 11/02/2022
Janet and Stephen Olson side yard setback variance request – 16100
5th Avenue North (2022063)
INTRODUCTION:
The applicants are requesting approval of a setback variance to allow a 27-foot by 34.5-foot, two
story, garage and home addition. Under the proposal, the addition would replace the existing
attached garage, and detached garage located along the west side of the attached garage. The
proposed addition would be set back 6.1 feet in the northwest corner and 8.3 feet in the southwest
corner from the west side lot line, where the zoning ordinance specifies 15 feet.
Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the site. A copy
of the notification area map is attached.
CONTEXT:
Surrounding Land Uses
Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning
West, East, and
South (across 5th
Avenue)
Single family homes in the
Birchwood Estates Addition
subdivision
LA-1
RSF-1
North Single-family homes in the Birch
Briar subdivision LA-1 RSF-1
Natural Characteristics of Site
The lot is in the Minnehaha Creek watershed district. It is not located within a shoreland overlay
district or a floodplain management overlay district, and there are no wetlands on the property.
Previous Actions Affecting Site
The subject lot was created in 1962 as part of the Birchwood Estates Addition subdivision. The
home was built in 1966.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposal
meets the standards for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance
because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards for a variance.
59
2022063
Page 2
ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
The property is in the RSF-1 (single family detached 1) zoning district. The required side yard
setback is 15 feet for principal structures and attached garages, in addition to detached accessory
structures located in the side yard. Until 2007, detached accessory structures, located in the side
yard, were permitted to encroach up to 6 feet from both the side and rear yard property lines. The
existing northwest corner of the detached garage, built prior to 2005, is located 3.7 feet from the
western side property line and 5.8 feet from the southwest corner.
The applicants state that both the existing attached and detached garages are deteriorating and in
need of repair/replacement. Therefore, they are requesting to replace the existing two-stall (20-
foot by 22-foot), attached garage and 14-foot by 24-foot detached garage, located along the west
side of the attached garage, with a 27-foot by 34-foot, two-story addition. The proposed two-story
addition would contain a three-stall garage, mudroom and bathroom on the main level, and bonus
room above the garage. If approved, the two-story addition would be located 6.1 feet in the
northwest corner and 8.3 feet in the southwest corner from the west property line where 15 feet is
required. The proposed addition would be located further from that side property line than the
existing detached garage as outlined above. In addition to the detached garage to be removed, a
12-foot by 14-foot shed is in the rear yard, north of the home and garages. The shed is located less
than 6 feet from the property line, within the side yard drainage and utility easement. A condition
is included in the attached resolution that either the shed be moved out of the easement (at least 6
feet from the side property line), or that the applicants obtain an encroachment agreement.
The applicants state that the larger garage will accommodate their vehicles to be parked inside,
lawn and snow removal equipment, tools, and sporting equipment. They state that the new addition
will be both aesthetically and architecturally pleasing, and the two-stories will fit the character of
the neighborhood. In addition, the bathroom and mudroom would allow for a changing area within
proximity to the backyard pool.
60
2022063
Page 3
The applicants state that the proposed garage and home addition would allow them to remain in
the home by adding needed additional garage space and a second level that would add needed
home office space. The applicants have been working from home since COVID19. Under the
proposed plan, the proposed garage and home addition would match the architecture of the existing
home.
FINDINGS:
In review of the request, staff finds that all applicable variance standards listed in section 21030
of the zoning ordinance would be met, as follows:
1) The requested variance for a garage and home addition is consistent with the residential
uses listed for this land use classification in the comprehensive plan.
2) The applicants have demonstrated that there are practical difficulties in complying with
the ordinance regulations, because:
a. the request is reasonable, and the property would be used in a reasonable manner;
b. the request is due to circumstances not created by the landowners as they purchased
the home in 2020 after the detached garage was constructed it the current location;
and
c. the variance would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood given
the number of homes within the development that are two-stories, and that the
addition would be set back further from the side property line than the existing
detached garage.
61
2022063
Page 4
3) The requested variance is not based upon economic considerations, but rather, is based
upon a desire to make improvements to the home and provide additional garage and
storage and home office space.
4) The requested variance and resulting construction would not be detrimental to the public
welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood.
The proposed addition would maintain a six-foot setback from the property line and not
affect the drainage and utility easement.
5) The requested variance and resulting construction would not impair an adequate supply
of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it increase traffic congestion or the
danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values
within the neighborhood. The proposed garage and home addition project would match
the architecture of the existing home and increase the property value of this lot.
6) The variance request is the minimum action required to address the practical difficulties.
The proposed garage and home addition would meet or exceed all other zoning
regulations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Community and Economic Development Department staff recommends approval of the requested
variance at 16100 5th Avenue, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the attached
resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Photo
3. Notification Area Map
4. Variance Standards
5. Neighbor Signatures
6. Applicant’s Narrative and Graphics
7. Draft Resolution Approving Variance
P:\Planning Applications\2022\2021063 Olson garage addition setback VAR\Comm Dev\PC Report(11-2-2022).docx
62
w
w w
w w
w
w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w
w
w
w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w w w
w w
w
w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w
w
w
w w
w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w ww w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w
w w w w w ww
w
w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w
w w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w
w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w
w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w
w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w wwwwwwww
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w wwwwwwww
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w wwwwwwww
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w
w
w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w wwwwwwww
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w wwwwwwww
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w
w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w
w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w
w
w
w w
w w w
w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w wwwwww
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w wwwwwww
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
5th A v e
4th Ave 4th Ave
9 t h A v e
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
e
ston Ln
Weston Ln
Vicksburg Ln
5 t h A v e
SITE
^
LA-1
P-I
LA-1
LA-1
LA-1
2022063
Janet & Stephen Olson
16100 5th Avenue
Request for a Variance
K250 0 250 500125
Feet
Legend
C, Comercial
CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IND
w w
LA-1, Living Area 1
w w w
w w w LA-2, Living Area 2
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
w w w w w w
LA-3, Living Area 3
LA-4, Living Area 4
LA-5
MXD
MXD-R
P-I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional63
4th Ave
e
W
e
ston Ln
Weston Ln
5 t h A v e
SITE
2022063 -- Aerial Photograph K175 0 175 35087.5
Feet
64
He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map
0 100 20050 Feet
Da te : 10 /5/20 22
Buffer Size:200Map Co mm e nts :
Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a.
Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us
65
Forms: ZOvariancestds.docx
Community Development Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
(763)509-5450
FAX (763) 509-5407
ZONING ORDINANCE
VARIANCE STANDARDS
The City Council or Zoning Administrator may approve a variance application (major or
minor, respectively) only upon finding that all of the following criteria, as applicable,
have been met:
1. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would be in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Chapter, and would be consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
2. The variance applicant has satisfactorily established that there are practical difficulties
in complying with this Chapter. “Practical difficulties” means that:
a. the applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by
this Chapter;
b. the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property that
were not created by the landowner; and
c. the variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the locality.
3. The variance request is not based exclusively upon economic considerations.
4. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not be detrimental to the
public welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the
neighborhood.
5. The variance, and its resulting construction or project, would not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it substantially increase traffic
congestion in public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or
substantially diminish property values within the neighborhood.
6. The variance requested is the minimum action required to address or alleviate the
practical difficulties.
Section 21030-Plymouth Zoning Ordinance
66
67
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in
Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.
Get Adobe Reader Now!
68
69
5TH A
V
E
N
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 9, Block 1, BIRCHWOOD ESTATES ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:
1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The
scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please
check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if
necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that
you wish to be included on the survey have been shown.
2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.
3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the
property.
4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.
5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review
of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they
are correctly shown before proceeding with construction.
6.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be
existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment.
Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the
ones shown hereon.
7.It should be noted that this survey was completed with significant snow coverage on site. We
cannot be certain that all items were observed and located during the process of conducting the
survey due to the snow cover. If this uncertainty is something you would like to remove, please
expose all improvements and we can return to locate said items, if needed.
8.While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your
proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the
improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before
construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as
the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said
officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and
obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"●" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.
#43503
LICENSE NO.
Wayne W. Preuhs
DATE
S1
SEPTEMBER 14, 2022
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
Phone (952) 474-7964
17917 Highway No. 7
Web: www.advsur.com
Advance
Surveying & Engineering, Co.
STEVE OLSON
16100 5TH AVE N
CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS
PLYMOUTH, MN
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED SURVEY
SHEET NO.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DWG ORIENTATION SCALE
221730 JR
DRAWING NUMBER
20'10'0
MARCH 18, 2022
DATE SURVEYED:
SEPTEMBER 14, 2022
DATE DRAFTED:
SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22
EXISTING HARDCOVER
House 2,322 Sq. Ft.
Decks 190 Sq. Ft.
Large Shed 340 Sq. Ft.
Small Shed 171 Sq. Ft.
Back Patio/Pool 1,633 Sq. Ft.
Porch 60 Sq. Ft.
Front Walk 100 Sq. Ft.
Driveway/Gar. Apron 1,347 Sq. Ft.
TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 6,163 Sq. Ft.
AREA OF LOT 21,616 Sq. Ft.
PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 28.5%
PROPOSED HARDCOVER
House 2,810 Sq. Ft.
Deck 80 Sq. Ft.
Small Shed 171 Sq. Ft.
Back Patio/Pool 1,623 Sq. Ft.
Porch 60 Sq. Ft.
Front Walk 100 Sq. Ft.
Driveway 1,370 Sq. Ft.
TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 6,214 Sq. Ft.
AREA OF LOT 21,616 Sq. Ft.
PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 28.7%
70
A1
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
NEW ADDITION EXISTING HOUSE
6'
-
1
0
"
8'
-
1
1
/
8
"
9'
-
4
1
/
4
"
2'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"
71
A2
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
REAR ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
NEW ADDITIONEXISTING HOUSE
6'
-
1
0
"
8'
-
1
1
/
8
"
9'
-
4
1
/
4
"
2'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"2'-0"
6'
-
1
0
"
8'
-
1
1
/
8
"
9'
-
4
1
/
4
"
72
A3
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
FOUNDATION PLAN
27
'
-
0
"
34'-6"
34'-0"
6'
-
9
"
7'
-
8
"
6'-0"14'-6"11'-0"3'-0"
6'
-
0
"
19'-6"14'-6"
11
'
-
6
"
8'-8"2'-2"3'-8"UNEXCAVATED
CRAWL SPACE
5'
-
6
"
15
'
-
6
"
EXISTING
HOUSE
73
A4
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032BMAIN FLOOR PLAN
GARAGE
27
'
-
0
"
34'-6"
34'-0"
6'
-
9
"
7'
-
8
"
EXISTING
HOUSE
6'-0"14'-6"11'-0"3'-0"
6'
-
0
"
19'-6"14'-6"
11
'
-
6
"
5'-0"
MUDROOM
8'-8"2'-2"3'-8"
5'
-
6
"
15
'
-
6
"
BATH
17'-6"2'-0"4'-9 3/4"4'-0 7/8"5'-7 1/4"
2'
-
3
"
74
A5
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
BONUS ROOM
34'-6"
27
'
-
0
"
34'-6"
6'-6"9'-3 1/4"9'-3 1/4"9'-5 1/2"
6'-6"16'-11 3/4"11'-0 1/4"
3'-2"
3'
-
4
"
75
A6
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
ROOF PLAN
76
A7
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
BUILDING SECTION
GARAGE
BONUS ROOM
TYPICAL WALL SECTION
SEE ELEVATIONS
77
A8
OL
S
O
N
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
22-1-032B
78
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-297
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW A GARAGE
AND HOME ADDITION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16100 5TH AVENUE NORTH
(2022063)
WHEREAS, Janet and Stephen Olson have requested approval of a side yard setback variance for
a garage and home addition; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: Lot 9, Block 1, Birchwood Estates
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Janet and Stephen Olson for a side
yard setback variance for a garage and home addition for property located at 16100 5th Avenue North,
subject to the following findings and conditions:
1.The requested variance is hereby approved to allow a 27-foot by 34.5-foot two-story garage and
home addition for a west side yard setback variance of 6.1 feet where 15 feet is required, in
accordance with the application and plans received by the city on August 17 and 19, 2022 and
additional information on September 14, 2022, except as may be amended by this resolution.
2.The requested side yard setback variance is approved, based on the finding that all applicable
variance standards would be met, as follows:
a)The variance permitting the addition is consistent with the residential uses listed for this land
use classification in the comprehensive plan.
b)The applicants have established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the
ordinance regulations, because:
1) The request is consistent with the residential uses listed for this land classification in
the comprehensive plan and the property would be used in a reasonable manner;
2) The request is due to circumstances not created by the landowners as they are not
the original owners, and the existing detached garage was constructed prior to the
applicants owning the home; and
3) The variance would not alter the essential character of the lot or neighborhood given
the number of homes within the development that are two-stories, and that the
79
Resolution 2022-297
(2022063)
Page 2
addition would be set back further from the side property line than the existing
detached garage.
c) The purpose for the variation is not based exclusively on economic considerations; but rather,
is based upon a desire to make improvements to the home and provide additional garage and
storage and home office space.
d) The requested variance and resulting construction would not be detrimental to the public
welfare, nor would it be injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood. The
proposed addition would maintain a six-foot setback from the property line and not affect the
drainage and utility easement.
e) The requested variance and resulting construction would not impair an adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent properties, nor would it increase traffic congestion or the danger of
fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish property values within the
neighborhood. The proposed garage and home addition project would match the architecture
of the existing home and increase the property value of this lot.
f)The variance request is the minimum action required to address the practical difficulties. The
proposed garage and home addition would meet or exceed all other zoning regulations.
3.A building permit is required prior to construction of the garage and home addition.Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, the applicants shall either move the existing 12-foot by 14-foot shed
out of the 6-foot west side drainage and utility easement or receive approval of an encroachment
agreement as administered through the engineering division.
4.At framing inspection, the building inspector shall field verify that the western walls of the
additions are at least 6.1 feet from the west side property line, based on located property irons.
5.The drainage pattern of adjacent properties shall not be affected because of the construction
project.
6.Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance
provisions.
7.The variance shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property ownersor
applicants has commenced the authorized improvement or use, or unless the applicants, with the
consent of the property owners, have received prior approval from the city to extend the
expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21030.06 of the zoning
ordinance.
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
80
Resolution 2022-297
(2022063)
Page 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota,
certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on
November 29, 2022, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription
thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this ____________day
of _____________, _______.
____________________________________
Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk
81
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.4
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Chris LaBounty, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer
Reviewed by:Michael Thompson, Public Works Director
Item:Accept utilities for continual maintenance in Parkera Plymouth
Addition (2021077)
1.Action Requested:
Adopt attached resolution accepting utilities in Parkera Plymouth Addition (2021077).
2.Background:
Staff received a request to accept utilities in Parkera Plymouth Addition which reflects completed
work in the development. Staff inspected the completed work and determined that it is acceptable.
The funds the City will retain are for the required two-year warranty period for the utilities.
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
Location Map
City Council Resolution 2022-298
82
K
SITE
Rockford Rd.
Hwy 55
2021077
Dundee Nursery 16800 Highway 55 & Plymouth Presbyterian Church, 3755 Dunkirk LaneRequest for Final Plat and PUD Final Plan
County Rd. 24
Dunkirk Ln
39 t h A ve
39 t h A ve
Dunkirk Ct
83
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-298
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITIES FOR CONTINUAL MAINTENANCE FOR
PARKERA PLYMOUTH ADDITION (2021077)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated April 12, 2022, Invest Plymouth
I, LLC, developer of Parkera Plymouth Addition (2021077), has agreed to install certain improvements
for said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed portions of the street, utility and site grading as noted
below; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction and release of the required financial
guarantee to reflect the completed work.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFPLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTAthat the financial guarantee requirements are reduced and released as follows below and
that the required guarantee and Letter of Credit No. STB2200008 for the items be reduced from
$2,746,548 to $1,150,686:
Item
Original
Amount
New
Amount
% of
Original
Amount
Street Construction $598,000 358,800 60%
Sanitary Sewer System $144,000 36,000 25%
Watermain System $245,000 61,250 25%
Storm Sewer System $286,000 71,500 25%
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod $95,000 95,000 100%
Pond Construction $184,000 92,000 50%
Filtration Basins $9,000 4,500 50%
Street and Traffic Control Signs $90,000 0 0%
Buffer/Park Posts & Signs ($100 per buffer post)$6,000 6,000 100%
Sidewalk Improvements $40,000 24,000 60%
Trail Improvements $107,000 64,200 60%
Landscaping $78,000 78,000 100%
Street Lighting $60,000 0 0%
Erosion Control $58,000 43,500 75%
Site Grading & Drainage Improvements $500,000 125,000 25%
Setting Iron Monuments ($100 per iron)$5,700 5,700 100%
Removal of Temporary Turn-around $2,900 0 0%
Tree Preservation/Protection $8,600 0 0%
Wetland Mitigation and Restoration $25,900 0 0%
Subtotal $2,543,100 $1,065,450 42%
Design, Admin, Insp, As-Builts (8%)$203,448 $85,236
Total $2,746,548 $1,150,686 42%
84
Resolution 2022-298
Page 2
BEITFURTHERRESOLVEDthat the Utilities are accepted for continuous maintenance as of
November 29, 2022, subject to the two-year guarantee by the Developer per Letter of Credit No.
STB2200008.
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
85
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.5
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager
Reviewed by:
Item:Approve 2023 social services and community funding
1.Action Requested:
Adopt attached resolution approving 2023 social services and community funding.
2.Background:
Council has historically provided annual funding to partner social service agencies. These
expenditures were discussed during the 2023 budget process and are included in the 2023 budget.
The total amount of social services related funding is $109,702. The amount is largely unchanged
(minor fluctuations) since 2007 and identical to 2022.
Approval also includes $47,000 in funding for the Plymouth Civic League, Plymouth Rockers, and
Plymouth Arts Council.
A detailed spreadsheet is attached.
3.Budget Impact:
A total amount of $156,702 will be disbursed. This amount is included in the 2023 budget.
4.Attachments:
2023 Funding
City Council Resolution 2022-299
86
City Social Services Funding
Organization Vendor # Funding For 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Communities in Collaboration 11508
Collaborative to Address
Community Concerns 5,887 5,887 5,298 5,298 5,298 5,298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Community Mediation
Services Inc 14596 Mediation Services 4,100 4,100 3,690 3,690 3,690 3,690 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
Interfaith Outreach &
Community Partners 10606 Food Shelf 20,613 20,613 18,552 18,552 18,552 18,552 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052 19,052
Interfaith Outreach &
Community Partners/CONECT 10606
Collaborative Serving
Multi-Family
Apartments 10,100 10,100 9,090 9,090 9,090 9,090 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590 9,590
Missions Inc/Home Free 10578 Domestic Abuse 36,360 33,000 29,700 29,700 29,700 29,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700 31,700
PRISM 10946 Food Shelf 14,000 14,000 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840 14,840
Senior Comm Services (HOME
Program) 11058
House Maintenance for
Seniors 6,300 6,300 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670 5,670
Senior Comm. Services (Senior
Outreach Program) 11058
Case Management and
Outreach for Seniors 14,500 14,500 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050 13,050
Move Forward (formerly Teens
Alone, Inc.) 6168
Counseling for Teens in
Crisis 2,000 2,000 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800
Reach 13990 Therapeutic Recreation 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
113,860 110,500 109,450 109,450 109,450 109,450 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702
Budget 118,000 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702
Eliminated CIC (per Council/City Manager) -5,298
Council decided to keep payments the same - no increase -3,000
109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702 109,702
Former Funding: 2007 2008 2009
NW Henn Human Services Council Senior Leadership Services 1,500 1,500 1,500
Organization 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Plymouth Civic League 30,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000
Plymouth Rockers 3,750 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Plymouth Arts Council 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 40,000 40,000 43,750 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 47,000 47,000 47,000 47,000
87
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-299
RESOLUTION APPROVING 2023 SOCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY FUNDING
WHEREAS, as part of preparing the 2023 budget, the City Council discussed funding to social service
agencies and community organizations that provide services to Plymouth residents; and
WHEREAS, the total amount of social services funding for 2023 is $109,702 which is identical to the
2022 funding; and
WHEREAS, this also includes $47,000 in funding to community organizations including the Plymouth
Civic League, Plymouth Rockers, and Plymouth Arts Council; and
WHEREAS, this funding is included in the 2023 budget which is scheduled for adoption on December
13, 2022.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFPLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that the 2023 social services and community funding in the amount of $156,702 as contained
in the 2023 budget is approved.
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
88
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.6
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Ali Timpone, Human Resources Director
Reviewed by:
Item:Consider Ordinance amending Section 205 of the City Code
concerning salaries of Mayor and Councilmembers
1.Action Requested:
Adopt attached ordinance amending Section 205 of the City Code concerning salaries of Mayor and
Councilmembers and a resolution approving summary publication of said ordinance. Note that the
proposed changes merely cap the automatic increase at a 10% maximum. Approval of the ordinance
requires a 4/7 vote of the Council and approval of the resolution approving summary publication
requires a 6/7 vote.
2.Background:
Current ordinance regarding Mayor and Councilmember salaries provides for an automatic pay
increase following each municipal election. The formula for establishing such an increase is based
on a 24-month lookback period of the CPI. Due to the unusually high inflation rate experienced in
the past two years, this calculation is estimated to be more than 14%. Council has requested that the
ordinance be amended to limit increases to no more than 10%. The change to the ordinance will
clarify that any increase is capped at a maximum of 10% for 2023 and bi-annually thereafter.
A copy of the proposed ordinance with the amended language as noted above is attached.
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
City Council Ordinance 2022-17
City Council Resolution 2022-300
89
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-17
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 205 OF THE PLYMOUTH
CITY CODE CONCERNING THE SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
Section 1.Amendment of City Code. Section 205.01 of the Plymouth City Code is amended as
follows:
205.01. Salaries of Mayor and Councilmembers. Subdivision 1. Mayor. The salary of the
Mayor is $1,319.19 per month. (Ord. 2000-18, 5/09/2000; scheduled adjustments made in 2003,
2005, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021)
Subd. 2. Councilmembers. The salary of a Councilmember is $955.72 per month. (Ord.
2000-18, 5/09/2000; scheduled adjustments made in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2017, 2019,
2021)
Subd. 3. Salary Adjustment. Following the municipal regular election in 2002, and
following each subsequent municipal regular election, the salary of the Mayor and
Councilmembers shall be automatically adjusted effective January 1. The adjustment shall be in
a percentage equal to the change in the United States Department of Labor Consumer Price
Index (November report) for all urban consumers U.S. city average over the 24 months preceding
the municipal regular election (e.g., November 2016 through November 2018 for wages effective
January 1, 2019), not to exceed 10%. This salary shall be in place for 24 months. (Ord. 2000-18,
5/09/2000; Ord. 2019-10, 4/23/2019)
Subd. 4. Waiver of Salary Adjustment. Notwithstanding Subd. 3 of this section, salary
adjustments may be waived by ordinance prior to the date on which a municipal regular election
is scheduled to occur.(Ord. 2010-20, 9/28/2010; Ord. 2019-10, 4/23/2019)
205.02. Health and DentalBenefits. Medical and dental insurance benefits shall be made
available on a pre-tax basis to and paid by the Mayor and individual Councilmembers in an
amount equal to the entire cost. (Ord. 96-19, 8/21/96; Ord. 98-33, 9/16/98; Ord. 2019-10,
4/23/2019)
Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 29th day of November, 2022.
Jeffry Wosje, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Jodi Gallup, City Clerk
90
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-300
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-17
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 205 OF THE PLYMOUTH
CITY CODE CONCERNING THE SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
Ordinance No. 2022-17 amends Section 205 of the Plymouth City Code concerning the salaries of Mayor and
Councilmembers.
A printed copy of the entire ordinance is available for inspection at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office
hours.
APPROVED for summary publication by the City Council this 29th day of November, 2022.
91
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.7
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Jodi Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
Reviewed by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager
Item:Approve 2023 regular City Council meeting schedule
1.Action Requested:
Adopt attached resolution approving 2023 regular City Council meeting schedule.
2.Background:
The Council has conducted regular meetings on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. Staff
has attached monthly calendars where those meeting dates have been inserted but with the
following exceptions (see attached calendars):
-July 11th meeting is scheduled on an if needed basis (typically the Council prefers to only hold one
meeting in July)
-Only one meeting in December
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
2023 Meeting Calendar
City Council Resolution 2022-301
92
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S
1 2345672345678
8 91011121314 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 This calendar shows regular meetings only
29 30 31 30 31 (special meetings are listed on monthly calendars)
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S CITY COUNCIL - 7:00 pm
123412345 2nd & 4th Tuesdays*
5 67891011 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PLANNING COMMISSION - 7:00 pm
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1st & 3rd Wednesdays*
26 27 28 27 28 29 30 31
PARK & REC COMMISSION - 6:00 pm
2nd Thursdays (only 6 meetings per year)
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S
1234 1 2 HRA - 7:00 pm
5 67891011 3 456789 4th Thursdays*
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - 7:00 pm
26 27 28 29 30 31 12425 26 27 28 29 30 2nd Wednesdays
ELECTION DAY (no public meetings)
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S
2 3456781234567 HOLIDAYS (no public meetings)
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 8 91011121314
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Charter Commission - Dec 13th - 7:00 pm
30 29 30 31 Meets annually on 2nd Wednesday of December
Council Notes
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S *No meeting Dec. 26
123456 1234
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 67891011 HRA Notes
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 *Nov. and Dec. meetings moved to 3rd Thursday
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 Planning Commission Notes
*Cancel April 5, July 5
S MTWTF SSMTWTF S
123 1 2
4 5678910 3 456789
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
25 26 27 28 29 30 12425 26 27 28 29 30
JUNE
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
2023
MEETING
CALENDAR
93
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-301
RESOLUTION APPROVING REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2023
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes Regular City Council Meeting dates; and
WHEREAS, Regular City Council Meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the 2023 Regular Meeting dates listed below
are approved:
January 10
January 24
February 14
February 28
March 14
March 28
April 11
April 25
May 9
May 23
June 13
June 27
July 11
July 25
August 8
August 22
September 12
September 26
October 10
October 24
November 14
November 28
December 12
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
94
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:6.8
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Jodi Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Coordinator
Reviewed by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager
Item:Adopt polling locations for 2023 elections
1.Action Requested:
Adopt attached resolution approving polling locations for 2023 elections.
2.Background:
Per Minnesota Statute 204B.16, cities are required to annually adopt polling locations by December
31 each year for the following year even if there are no polling place changes or scheduled
elections. The polling locations listed in the attached resolution were used for the 2022 State
Primary and General Elections with no issues.
3.Budget Impact:
N/A
4.Attachments:
City Council Resolution 2022-302
95
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-302
RESOLUTION APPROVING POLLING LOCATIONS FOR 2023 ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, per Minnesota Statute 204B.16, cities and school districts are required to approve
polling locations annually for the following year even if there are no polling place changes or no
scheduled elections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that the following locations are approved as polling locations for 2023:
Ward 1 1 Hamel VFW Post 5903 19020 Hamel Road
2 Plymouth Covenant Church 4300 Vicksburg Lane North
3 Plymouth Covenant Church 4300 Vicksburg Lane North
4 Glory of Christ Lutheran Church 4040 County Road 101
5 Plymouth Community Center 14800 34th Avenue North
Ward 2 6 Peace Lutheran Church 3695 County Road 101
7 Messiah Methodist Church 17805 County Road 6
8 Parkers Lake Baptist Church 14720 County Road 6
9 Westgate Church 705 County Road 101 North
10 St. Philip the Deacon Lutheran Church 17205 County Road 6
Ward 3 11 Pilgrim United Methodist Church 4325 Zachary Lane North
12 FAIR at Pilgrim Lane 3725 Pilgrim Lane
13 Vision of Glory Lutheran Church 13200 Highway 55
14 Armstrong Senior High School 10635 36th Avenue North
15 West Medicine Lake Community Club 1705 Forestview Lane
16 Fourth Baptist Church 900 Forestview Lane North
Ward 4 17 Minneapolis Laestadian Lutheran Church 13030 47th Avenue North
18 Minneapolis Laestadian Lutheran Church 13030 47th Avenue North
19 Church of the Epiphany 4900 Nathan Lane North
20 Plymouth Community Center 14800 34th Avenue North
21 Zachary Lane Elementary School 4350 Zachary Lane
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
96
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:8.1
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Lori Sommers, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:Danette Parr, Community & Economic Development Director
Item:Accept the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
1.Action Requested:
Adopt the attached resolution accepting the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
Approval requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2.Background:
On March 9, 2021, the City Council expressed support and direction for a small area plan for the
County Road 73/Highway 55 area.
On May 11, 2021, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Request for proposal (RFP) to solicit
proposals from consultants for the completion of the small area plan. The RFP was distributed on
May 17, 2021, and on June 11, 2021, the City received three proposals from area consultants.
On June 22, 2021, Council authorized a consulting contract with Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi)
for completion of the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
On September 28, 2021, the Council held a study session to review a summary report, data findings,
key agency meetings and engagement opportunities for the project.
On December 14, 2021, the Council received a presentation on key findings and three potential
concepts. Based on City Council feedback, the consultant conducted targeted community outreach.
On April 12, 2022, the City Council and the Planning Commission reviewed a draft of the Small Area
Study and provided additional feedback. The consultant is back with the final document that
incorporates those comments.
After acceptance of the County Road 73 Small Area Study, Staff will use the plan to inform potential
development projects in the area and provide clear direction to residents and business owners.
Additionally, Staff and the Planning Commission will work on any necessary City Code amendments
in 2023 to conform to the Study.
3.Budget Impact:
97
The total project cost is $115,200, and the funding will come from the 2020 General Fund surplus
funds.
4.Attachments:
Plymouth CR73 Study
City Council Resolution 2022-303
98
DRAFT
PLYMOUTH
COUNTY ROAD
SMALL AREA STUDY
73
NOVEMBER 17TH 2022 99
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN2
ABOUT
City Council Members
• Jeffry Wosje - Mayor
• Alise McGregor - Ward 1 (Northwest)
• Nick Roehl - Ward 2 (Southwest)
• Jim Davis - Ward 3 (Southeast)
• James Prom - Ward 4 (Northeast)
• Ned Carroll - At Large
• Jim Willis - At Large
The City of Plymouth is conducting a Small Area Study for the land area
surrounding the intersection of County Road 73 and Highway 55 in the
southeastern portion of the city. This study will look to evaluate current
conditions and make recommendations regarding:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Planning Commission Members
• Donovan Saba - Ward 1
• Michael Boo - (Chair) Ward 2
• Bryan Oakley - Ward 3
• Julie Pointner - (Vice Chair) Ward 4
• Julie Olson - At Large
• Marc Anderson - At Large
• Clark Gregor - At Large
• Ned Carroll - Council Coordinating
Representative
Consultants
City Staff
• Dave Callister - City Manager
• Danette Parr - Community and
Economic Development Director
• Chris LaBounty - Deputy Public Works
Director, City Engineer
• Chloe McGuire - Planning and
Development Manager
• Lori Sommers - Senior Planner
• Steve Juetten - Community
Development Director (retired)
HKGi - Planning / Urban Design
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. -
Engineering Analysis
• Future land uses and redevelopment potential.
• Transportation, transit, and utility improvements.
• Future investments into existing parks and open space areas.
The study effort will help lay the ground work to:
• Encourage new investment in the area that support a mix of land uses.
• Provide multi-modal transportation opportunities and stronger
pedestrian connections.
• Enhance the parks and open space amenities in the study area.
100
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
01 PROJECT OVERVIEW 5
Purpose 5
Figure 1.1 - Project Study Area 5
Why Plan? 6
Planning Process 6
Project Timeline 7
02 STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS 9
Preferred Concept 9
Redevelopment Goals and Objectives 10
Recommended Concept Plan 12
Figure 2.1 - Recommended Concept Plan 13
Land Use Plan 14
Figure 2.2 - Small Area Study Proposed Future Land Use 15
Figure 2.3 - 2040 Guided Land Use 15
Transportation and Transit Plan 16
Figure 2.4 - Transportation & Transit Plan North of HWY 55 17
Figure 2.5 - Transportation & Transit Plan South of HWY 55 17
Figure 2.6 - County Road 73 Street Section 18
Figure 2.7 - Old County Road 15 Street Section 18
Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan 20
Figure 2.8 - Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan 21
03 IMPLEMENTATION 23
Keys to Implementation 23
Land Use Controls 25
Redevelopment Phasing 28
Figure 3.1 - Redevelopment Phasing Diagram 28
Redevelopment Financial Opportunities 29
Table 3.1. Financial Analysis 29
04 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 31
Existing Conditions 31
Figure 4.1 - Existing Businesses and Destinations in the Study Area 31
Figure 4.2 - Natural Resources Diagram 32
Figure 4.3 - 2022 Existing Land Use Diagram 33
101
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN4
Figure 4.4 - Existing Zoning Map 34
Figure 4.5 - PTOS Diagram 35
Figure 4.6 - Transportation Diagram 36
Figure 4.7 - Walkshed Diagram 37
Figure 4.8 - Sanitary Sewer Diagram 38
Figure 4.9 - Water System Diagram 39
Figure 4.10 - Stormwater Diagram 40
Figure 4.11 - Redevelopment Potential Diagram 41
Related Background Documents 42
Existing and Planned Infrastructure Investments 43
Figure 4.12 - Redevelopment Staging and Sequencing Diagram 43
Round 1 Community Engagement 44
Preliminary Concepts 46
Figure 4.13 - Preliminary Concept #1 46
Figure 4.14 - Preliminary Concept #2 47
Round 2 Community Engagement 48
Figure 4.15 - Community Engagement Phase 2 Summary Map 49
Influences on Redevelopment 51
Challenges and Opportunities 52
Figure 4.16 - Challenges and Opportunities Diagram 53
05 APPENDIX I
Transportation ii
Transportation & Transit Plan North of HWY 55 iv
Transportation & Transit Plan South of HWY 55 iv
Round I Community Engagement vi
Round II Community Engagement xvi
Concept 1 xviii
Concept 2 xxiv
Eagle Lake to Bryant Lake Regional Trails Master Plan xxix
Highway 55 Bus Rapid Transit System xxx
102
PROJECT OVERVIEW 5 DRAFT
PURPOSE
The City of Plymouth conducted a Small Area Study
for the area surrounding the intersection of County
Road 73 and Highway 55 in the Southeastern portion
of the city (see Figure 1.1). The study evaluated
existing conditions and makes recommendations
regarding transportation improvements and future
redevelopment potential.
The intent of the study is to allow the City of
Plymouth to be proactive in responding to issues,
opportunities, and redevelopment interests. It will
serve as a guide to managing transit supportive
growth in the area. The study establishes the
groundwork to help:
• Encourage reinvestment and new investment in
the area.
• Promote mobility improvements, including
safer pedestrian, biking, transit, and vehicle
connectivity.
• Promote transit supportive mixed-use
development.
• Enhance potential park, trail, and open space
improvements.
• Roadway and transportation improvements.
The planning process involved multiple rounds of
engagement with numerous project stakeholders
including property owners, business owners,
regulatory agencies, and City of Plymouth leadership.
Full details of the planning process and community
engagement are attached.
Figure 1.1 - Project Study Area
PROJECT OVERVIEW
103
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN6
WHY PLAN?
The intent of the study is to allow the City of Plymouth to be proactive in responding to issues,
opportunities, and redevelopment interests. It will serve as a guide to creating a phased approach to
desired residential and business growth in the area that is transit supportive. The County Road 73 Small
Area Study will help to:
• Encourage reinvestment and new investment in the study area.
• Promote unique opportunities for residential, commercial, and mixed-use development that is transit
supportive.
• Help drive future infrastructure decisions and roadway improvements.
• Suggest land use, comprehensive plan changes, and zoning ordinance changes.
• Enhance potential park, trail, and open space improvements, and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity.
PLANNING PROCESS
There were five key steps in the planning process. Staff and the consulting team began the project by
exploring the study area’s existing conditions, identifying the needs and wants of the community, and
pinpointing opportunities and constraints. Preliminary designs were developed and reviewed by the
public and key stakeholders. The feedback helped to establish a preferred direction that is assembled
here in the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
Understand the Context
Aerial view of the study area
Confirm Project Objectives
Explore Alternatives Converge on a Preferred Direction
Assemble the Final Document
104
PROJECT OVERVIEW 7 DRAFT
PROJECT TIMELINE
The planning process began in late summer of 2021 and continued into spring of 2022. The timeline for
this Small Area Study included:
Phase 1: Data and Background Information Collection and Analysis
Initial steps began by building a base of common understanding including existing
land use and physical conditions, planned improvements, and an understanding of
historical planning for the project study area.
Phase 2: Residential, Area Business, and Property Owner Input Via the Project Website
Community and key stakeholder engagement opportunities were utilized to
receive feedback for consideration that helped assess how the planning process
responds to both the needs and wants of all involved parties, balancing opinions
and perspectives on both variable/subjective and non-variable components. A
City Council Study Session was held to review issues and opportunities, present
engagement findings, and discuss a direction for draft concepts.
Phase 3: Develop Draft Concept Alternatives
The consulting team explored alternative concepts with differentiating focuses.
Concepts were then evaluated based on land use impacts, access and circulation,
infrastructure needs, and financial and market feasibility. A joint City Council and
Planning Commission meeting was held in December to discuss and refine draft
concepts before the second round of community and stakeholder engagement.
Phase 4: Draft Concept Alternatives Discussed with Property Owners and Agencies
A second round of community and key stakeholder engagement opportunities
evaluated the alternatives, filtered the desired directions, and converged on a
preferred study direction.
Phase 5: Draft Report with Preliminary Findings Presented to City Council
Based on the technical review of the alternatives and the engagement process, a
preferred Small Area Study was prepared for consideration by the City of Plymouth.
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
2
1
Se
p
t
-
O
c
t
2
0
2
1
No
v
-
J
a
n
2
0
2
2
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
2
2
Ma
r
c
h
-
A
p
r
i
l
2
0
2
2
105
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN8
Our transportation decisions
determine much more than
where roads or bridges or
tunnels or rail lines will be
built. They determine the
connections and barriers
that people will encounter
in their daily lives, and thus
how hard or easy it will be
for people to get where they
need and want to go.
- Elijah Cummings
Sidewalk along County Road 73 looking towards Highway 55
106
RECOMMENDATIONS 9 DRAFT
STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS
PREFERRED CONCEPT
This chapter provides a vision for the future with additional detail into proposed transportation improvements,
land uses, parks, and connectivity improvements to the study area. These recommendations seek to balance
anticipated infrastructure investments in regional transit, a planned regional trail route through the study area,
planned future park improvements, and development potential that support transit ridership and improve
safety and mobility for all. Over time, individual development proposals that come forward to the City may not
look exactly like is prescribed in this plan, but future proposals should generally conform to this recommended
concept plan.
107
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN10
The following sections are intended to provide guidance for developers, engineers, and architects as
they begin to plan and design the built environment of the Plymouth County Road 73 Study Area. These
guidelines are not intended to define a specific style, but rather, to assist the designers of a development
relate to the mass, scale, form, and character of the surrounding area.
The Objectives of the Plymouth County Road 73 Study Area are:
• Balance – To balance design expectations with private investment and the capacity of public funds to
produce results.
• Long-Term Value & Quality – By achieving uniformity in design expectations the value of public and
private investment can be preserved through the creation of a quality environment.
• Design – To achieve a design aesthetic of unique form and character through guiding high-quality
architecture and construction with attention to placement, relationship, and orientation of structures
to provide a greater sense of place.
• Compact Mixed Use – To create a compact concentration of multiple land uses that generate the
critical mass necessary to sustain transit and achieve economic stability of the area.
• Pedestrian Oriented – While it is recognized that automobiles play a pivotal role in the use of the area
these guidelines aim to lay the framework to reduce the dependence upon and dominance of the
automobile through street design, shared parking, pedestrian scaled buildings, pathways, and spaces.
• Public Space – To preserve, enhance, or create many forms of publicly accessible open space, such as
parks, plazas, tree-lined streets and community gathering areas.
• Street Activity – To encourage a sense of place through street level activity by allowing the
imaginative and efficient utilization of land. To develop a sense of community by promoting year-
round pedestrian and outdoor activities at the street level.
Mixed useOutdoor plaza space with dining and shopping
REDEVELOPMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
108
RECOMMENDATIONS 11 DRAFT
Page Intentionally Left Blank
109
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN12
RECOMMENDED CONCEPT PLAN
The Concept Plan provides guidance for the area’s transformation
including new roadway alignments, traffic control measures, new
buildings, and site layouts. The Concept Plan generally identifies how
these potential new development areas integrate with existing uses and
features. The following identifies the redevelopment framework for the
two distinct areas of the study.
Urban streetscape with adjacent
high density residential use
Redevelopment Framework
South of Highway 55:
Roadway Improvements:
• County Road 73 - Realign roadway straight north to connect to
Highway 55.
• Old County Road 15 – Align to create a “T” with newly aligned County
Road 73.
• Sunset Trail – Sunset Trail – Align to create a “T” with newly aligned
County Road 73.
Station 73 Park and Ride Facility Area:
• Develop high density residential and commercial mixed-use buildings.
• Integrate outdoor gather areas, attractive streetscapes, and place
making.
• Create a grade separated crossing under Highway 55 for transit users.
Eagle Lake/Bryant Lake Regional Trails (ELBLRT):
• Create a grade separated crossing under Highway 55 for trail users.
• Extend the ELBLRT from the transit station across Old County Road
15 and into LaCompte Playfield. Continue the regional trail along the
western edge of the park to the south. Connect the trail back to County
Road 73 at the southern edge of the study area and extend the trail
further south to the southern boundary of Plymouth• Provide enhanced sidewalk and trail connections along all streets in the study area.• Anticipate the future park improvements for LaCompte Playfield in 2027.
Boulevard streetscape
Regional trail along urban roadway
North of Highway 55:
Roadway Improvements:
• Develop a roundabout at the intersection of 10th Avenue and South Shore Drive to improve traffic flow.
• Provide a dedicated right turn lane, through lane, and dedicated left turn lane for southbound South Shore
Drive at Highway 55.
• Reduce Highway 55 Frontage Road access to right-in, right-out to improve the safety and efficiency of the
southbound approach to the traffic signal.
• Extend the frontage road to the east and connect with 6th Avenue as part of the development of the John
Allen parcel.
• Provide a right-in, right-out access for the development of the John Allen site at 10th Avenue to help
disperse vehicle trips in the area.
Eagle Lake/Bryant Lake Regional Trails (ELBLRT):
• Extend the ELBLRT from the Luce Line Regional trail along the eastern side of South Shore Drive. Continue
the trail east along the north side of 10th Avenue and create a mid-block crossing of 10th Avenue and
extend the regional trail south within the existing right-of-way and connect to the grade separated crossing
under Highway 55.
General Area:
• Develop transit supportive uses including high density residential, medium density residential, commercial,
and mixed use.
110
RECOMMENDATIONS 13 DRAFT
New Development
Units +/-SF +/-
HDR 690
MDR 46
Office 0
Retail 31,000
Totals 736 31,000
Existing Development Removed
Units SF +/-
LDR 10
MDR 0
HDR 0
Commercial 5,000
Office 30,000
Industrial 3,000
Totals 10 38,000
Net Development
Units SF +/-
726 -7,000
RECOMMENDED CONCEPT PLAN
Figure 2.1 - Recommended Concept Plan
111
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN14
LAND USE PLAN
The transit oriented land use changes recommended in this study help to support the transit system and reflect
regional and national trends in redevelopment occurring in transit oriented districts. The primary change is
adjusting land uses of specific parcels to a mixed use residential designation. This designation would allow for
additional residential density. The land use plan identifies areas recommended to transition to a Mixed Use
(MXD) or Mixed Use Residential (MXD-R) land use guidance.
The proposed land use change areas generally involve
parcels that are currently vacant, correspond to the planned
roadway realignments for safety improvements and traffic
management, or are in close proximity to the Station 73
transit facility. The subsequent Transportation and Transit
Recommendations section provides additional insight
to the roadway realignment recommendations. These
transportation recommendations take into consideration
the additional density shown in the Concept Plan
(forecasting the number trips in the analysis of the future
transportation network). The anticipated traffic generation
of this increased density is built into the recommended
transportation improvements (see transportation section
and traffic analysis in the appendix).
The County Road 73 Small Area Study recommends
maintaining residential uses within the mixed-use land use
guidance to further support the existing transit investment
and the expanded transit service that is being studied with
the all-day service and the BRT route along Highway 55.
Generally, proposed land uses in study area remain a mix of
commercial, office, and residential uses, but more specific
land use objectives are to:
• Introduce mixed use land use designations for
development and redevelopment areas shown,
primarily along the County Road 73 corridor and the
vacant sites north of Highway 55.
• Maintain offices uses along the south side of Highway
55.
• Maintain highway commercial oriented uses along the
north frontage of Highway 55.
Commercial with patio 4-story urban residential
Rowhouse townhome Back-to-back townhomes
Patio homes
FROM THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH’S 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Mixed use development allows the mixing of higher intensity land uses in one building or the physical integration
of different uses on the same lot or within close proximity. Typically, mixed use includes a combination of retail,
office, cultural or entertainment uses with higher density residential use.
With the MXD-R classification, high density housing is a required component. Mixed use developments will be
processed as planned unit developments (PUDs), with the location of specific uses and development criteria
determined through that process.
112
RECOMMENDATIONS 15 DRAFT
Figure 2.2 - Small Area Study Proposed Future Land Use
Figure 2.3 - 2040 Guided Land Use
113
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN16
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT PLAN
At the heart of the study area is the City of Plymouth’s commuter
park and ride facility, Station 73. Station 73 is a 288-vehicle
four-story parking ramp with lobby and restroom facilities. This
Plymouth MetroLink facility is major transit investment, that
continues to expand with the anticipation of an all-day transit
service trial beginning in 2025 and the potential for Bus Rapid
Transit (BRT). The Plymouth express bus services will utilize the
future in-line platforms along Highway 55 while the local on-
demand buses will circulate into the transit facility utilizing the
realigned County Road 73 and Old County Road 15. Beyond the
recommended transportation improvements are the improved
mobility enhancements that address the safety concerns for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. These included added
sidewalks, improvements to queuing and stacking issues, improved
intersection movements and visibility concerns. To better support
improved transit, mobility, and the anticipated redevelopment
densities the following key recommendations include:Roundabout
Bike/pedestrian underpass
South of Highway 55:
Roadway Improvements:
• County Road 73 - Realign roadway straight
north to connect to Highway 55.
• Old County Road 15 – Align to create a “T” with
newly aligned County Road 73.
-The realigned Old County Road 15 will
provide access for buses and park and
ride patrons to Station 73. The ultimate
configuration of traffic control of this
intersection could either be a signal or
roundabout based on determination of
final design considerations.
-Close access of the Old County Road
15 roadway alignment near the County
Road 73/Highway 55 intersection near
Station 73 by creating a cul-de-sac.
• Sunset Trail – Align to create a “T” with newly
aligned County Road 73.
-The realigned Sunset Trail will provide
a controlled intersection for motorists
and safer crossing for pedestrian and
bicyclists.
Turning Movements and Queuing:
• Provide additional queuing for northbound
County Road 73 to westbound Highway 55
with double left turn lanes at the Highway 55
intersection.
• Allow for a left turn on northbound County
Road 73 to the southern frontage road (access
to Starbucks/McDonald’s), but limit access out
to County Road 73 from the southern frontage
road to a right-in, right-out movement.
• Provide a dedicated southbound right turn
lane with adequate queuing onto eastbound
Highway 55.
Create an urban streetscape aesthetic through
the study area to provide a unique character to
the area, calm traffic, and support a pedestrian
oriented public realm. Include features such
as pedestrian scaled lighting, landscaping, site
furnishings, and station area branding elements
and signage.
Recommend designing roads to encourage a
30mph speed limit for County Road 73 and Old
County Road 15 through the study area.
Consolidate access points on County Road 73 and
provide a supporting network of private streets
and parking lot drives to further enhance internal
vehicular circulation for redevelopment areas on
the east side of County Road 73.
114
RECOMMENDATIONS 17 DRAFT
Figure 2.4 - Transportation & Transit Plan North of HWY 55
Figure 2.5 - Transportation & Transit Plan South of HWY 55
[0 Feet250125
[0 Feet250125
ROUNDABOUT @ 10TH AVE N AND
SOUTH SHORE DR
CLOSE ACCESS
3/4 ACCESS @ FRONTAGE RD
EXTEND MEDIAN
PROVIDE RIGHT TURN, THRU
AND LEFT TURN LANE ON SOUTH-BOUND 10TH AVE N
REMOVE SUP LANE (PER
MNDOT HWY 55 PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM)
REALIGN ACCESS TO A “T” INTERSECTION
EXTEND CR-73 NORTH TO HWY 55
REALIGN OLD HWY 15 & CR-73 TO PROVIDE “T”
INTERSECTION (SIGNAL OR ROUNDABOUT)
A
A’
B’B
PROVIDE LEFT TURN LANE TO SOUTH
FRONTAGE RD
CLOSE ACCESS,
CONVERT TO CUL-DE-SAC
FUTURE TRANSIT
PLATFORMS
REALIGN OLD COUNTY RD
15 & CR-73, PROVIDE TURN LANES TO TRANSIT STATION
SEE EXAMPLE SECTIONS ON FOLLOWING PAGE
PRIVATE DRIVE W/
CONSOLIDATED ACCESS ON CR-73
FUTURE TRANSIT PLATFORMS
PROVIDE RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS @ 10TH AVE N
EXTEND NORTHERN
FRONTAGE RD, CONNECT TO
6TH AVE N
PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE
115
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN18
Proposed Street Sections
Thru Lane Median Thru Lane Right Turn
Lane
Planter Sidewalk Setback
Thru Lane Left Turn
Lane
Right Turn
Lane
PlanterPlanter Sidewalk SetbackSidewalkSetback
Figure 2.6 - County Road 73 Street Section
Figure 2.7 - Old County Road 15 Street Section
A A’
B B’
116
RECOMMENDATIONS 19 DRAFT
North of Highway 55:
Roadway Improvements:
• Develop a roundabout at the intersection
of 10th Avenue and South Shore Drive to
improve traffic flow.
• Close access to manufactured home park at
the roundabout location (maintain the two
other existing access points to 10th Avenue).
• Provide a dedicated right turn lane, through
lane, and dedicated left turn lane for
southbound South Shore Drive at Highway 55.
• Reduce Highway 55 Frontage Road access to
right-in, right-out to improve the safety and
efficiency of the southbound approach to the
traffic signal.
• Extend the frontage road to the east and
connect with 6th Avenue as part of the
development of the John Allen parcel.
• Provide a right-in, right-out access for the
development of the John Allen site at 10th
Avenue to help disperse vehicle trips in the
area
Turning Movements and Queuing:
• Extend the frontage road to the east and
connect to existing 6th Avenue as part of the
development of the large vacant parcel north
of Highway 55 to help disperse vehicular trips.
• Create a right-in, right-out access on 10th
Avenue to the large vacant parcel north of
Highway 55 to provide additional vehicular
circulation.
• Prohibit left turns from northbound 10th
Avenue to the frontage road west of 10th
Avenue (the roundabout allows for access to
the west frontage road via circulation around
the roundabout).
• Improve the intersection at the north frontage
road and South Shore Drive. Prohibit left turns
from southbound 10th Avenue to the frontage
road east of 10th. This will ensure the queues
from the Highway 55 signal do not block the
access and create safety concerns.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPPORTUNITIES WITH
TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
Elements of green infrastructure such as permeable
pavers, tree trenches, rainwater gardens, curb cuts,
and the use of native plantings are all examples of
design elements that can have a positive lasting effect
when incorporated into trail and streetscape design.
These features also offer interpretive opportunities for
educational signage to explain green infrastructure
processes to users.
Pedestrian crossing for trailTransit station platforms
Enhanced pedestrian crossing
117
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN20
PARKS, TRAILS, AND OPEN SPACE PLAN
Providing enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections to LaCompte Playfield and Station 73 were some
of the most common responses heard during the community engagement process. The recommendations
for parks and trails in the study area include adding sidewalks and trails to public roadways, routing a
regional trail through the study area, and creating a grade separated crossing of Highway 55 for safer
pedestrian movements north to south. Improvements are planned for LaCompte Playfield in 2027 and a
separate planning/design process for the park improvements will take place in 2026. This study provides
a guide for surrounding connections to the park, how future development could interface with the park,
and a high-level list of desired amenities from the community engagement that should be considered. The
following are the recommendations for parks, trails, and open spaces in the study area:
Bike/pedestrian underpass
Natural surface trails High visibility pedestrian crossing
Boulevard streetscape
• Create a grade separated crossing of Highway 55 (underpass) for
pedestrians and bicycles.
• Extend the ELBLRT through the study area – following South
Shore Drive, 10th Avenue, through existing right-of-way, under
Highway 55, along the west side of LaCompte Playfield, and
south along County Road 73 to Minnetonka.
• Provide a trail connection along the eastern side of the realigned
County Road 73 that can also connect to Station 73 and the
anticipated transit platforms.
• Provide a trail on the south side of Old County Road 15
realignment and along the northern edge of LaCompte Playfield.
• Provide for ADA accessibility improvements and enhanced
pedestrian crossings at key intersections throughout the study
area.
• Provide sidewalks throughout the study area with roadway
realignment projects.
• Provide more trees and well landscaped areas throughout the
study area.
• Maintain the neighborhood park function of South Shore Park
with a playground, basketball court, and open playfield area.
118
RECOMMENDATIONS 21 DRAFT
Figure 2.8 - Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan
119
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN22
INTERPRETIVE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARKS,
TRAILS, AND OPEN SPACES
Public Art
Regional trail corridors and public park spaces
can feature artistic elements in a number of ways.
Sculptural elements can add points of interest
and draw users through a space while featuring
the talents of local artists, while functional art
pieces like wayfinding can serve a dual purpose
(i.e. a mural that doubles as a wayfinding element,
a themed playground, or a bench that features
tactile elements for learning about plants and
animals in the area). These elements may tell
the history of an area by using certain materials,
provide seating, bike parking, shelter, or frame
views and points of interest.
Green Infrastructure
Elements of green infrastructure such as
permeable pavers, rainwater gardens, native
plantings or buffers, and underground water
storage treatment systems are great ways to take
advantage of an areas topography and open
spaces. These details can be easily accompanied
by educational signage to inform park users of the
natural processes happening just below their feet.
Knowing there will be a future planning effort
for LaCompte Playfield, and anticipating future
redevelopment in the area, what park features should be considered at LaCompte Playfield?
Biking Trails Ballfields
Pavilion
Splash Pad!
Cross Country
Skiing
PlaygroundPickleball
Soccer
Dog Run!
Gardens
Fire Pits
Walking Trails
Attractive
Landscaping
Trail and
Sidewalk
Connections
Hockey/
Roller Rink
Basketball
Courts
Lacrosse
Leave As Is
Natural Areas
No Changes
Survey responses received from phase 2 of community engagement
LaCompte Playfield Recommendations
• Consider potential park expansion for LaCompte
Playfield to the east (active uses or stormwater
treatment) and south (natural surface trail loop or bird
blind).
• Consider regrading of portions of LaCompte Playfield
with future improvements to limit seasonal flooding
impacts to active play features such as the ballfields.
• Consider the following desired improvements for
LaCompte Playfield when detailed design of the park
occurs in 2027:
120
IMPLEMENTATION 23 DRAFT
KEYS TO IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the County Road 73 Small Area Study is an ongoing process and represents a
commitment to a set of goals, policies, and actions that will guide the future of the study area. The
County Road 73 Study is a result of careful analysis of the areas challenges and opportunities along with
discussions with the community and other organizations documented into one vision. The County Road
73 Small Area Study provides a framework for transportation and mobility improvements and future
redevelopment that demonstrates how the study area transitions toward a more transit-oriented district.
The study identifies solutions to traffic and mobility issues, creates safer, more identifieable routes for
pedestrians and bicyclists, and promotes more corresponding redevelopment that is transit supportive.
Recognizing the transition of the study area will take numerous years, but the study should be used as a
tool to:
• Encourage the appropriate reinvestment and new investment in the study area.
• Guide the appropriate land uses, Comprehensive Plan changes, and zoning ordinance alignment.
• Guide future infrastructure and mobility improvements.
• Provide enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the study area.
• Enhance park, trail, and open space improvements.
IMPLEMENTATION
121
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN24
Financial Reality
Implementing the County Road 73 Small Area Study requires careful investment
of public funds, but the private side of the financial equation must not be
overlooked. New development and existing businesses will pay for their portion
of the improvements called for in the study. The County Road 73 Small Area Study
seeks to balance the investment in public initiatives with the creation of a financial
environment that sustains successful businesses and strong neighborhoods.
Additional capital dollars from project partners and/or additional funding resources
such as grants will likely be needed to fully implement the recommendations.
Strategic Investments
If financial support for the study was unlimited, the need for strategic decisions would
be less important. However, with limited funds, every expenditure is crucial. It is not
possible to immediately undertake all of the initiatives described in the County Road
73 Small Area Study. Needs and opportunities not contemplated in the study may
arise in the future. Every investment must be evaluated for its impact on enhancing
the overall study area.
Commitment
Commitment to the County Road 73 Small Area Study recommendations and
patience go hand-in-hand. This study does more than simply seek to attract new
development; it provides a road map to enhance the entire study area. Commitment
to the study recommendations means the willingness to actively promote public
and private investments that align with the objectives of the study. It also requires
the willingness by decision-makers to deter developments which do not meet the
objectives. Not all of these decisions will be easy or occur exactly as analyzed or
portrayed in this document.
Patience
The transformation of the County Road 73 Small Area Study will not be implemented
overnight. The time frame for implementation reflects its evolutionary nature, looking
forward over a period of years. The desired change often requires the patience to
wait for the right things to happen, rather than making changes simply to be seen as
doing something.
In order for the City of Plymouth to successfully realize the vision of the County Road 73 Small
Area Study many factors must be considered.
122
IMPLEMENTATION 25 DRAFT
LAND USE CONTROLS
The initial focus of implementation will be on actions needed to establish
the County Road 73 Small Area Study as the official guide to development/
redevelopment of the study area. These implementation procedural steps
involve the adoption of key policy documents and updated development
controls.
Approve the County Road 73 Small Area Study
The first implementation step is for City Council actions to approve the
County Road 73 Small Area Study. These approvals set the stage for
subsequent actions such as amending the comprehensive plan, zoning
ordinances, capital improvement programs, and the allocation of financial
resources.
Amend Land Use Controls
The approval of the County Road 73 Small Area Study is the trigger for
taking other actions needed to guide land use for the area in accordance
with the study’s recommendations. Land use controls not only promote
the desired development outcomes, they also prevent development that
is not consistent with the study. The two key land use controls include the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance.
Update the Comprehensive Plan
The City will need to update the Comprehensive Plan with the new
“County Road 73 Small Area Study” including the land use plan
designations (Table 4.1) and appropriate policies consistent with the
vision of the study. This can be completed prior to, or in conjunction with,
proposed development applications. Amending the Comprehensive Plan
following approval of the County Road 73 Small Area Study creates the
foundation for all other implementation actions. Consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan is a statutory requirement for zoning regulations,
capital improvements, and redevelopment projects. The County Road 73
Small Area Study will be added to the Comprehensive Plan as an additional
appendix.
Zoning Regulations
More direct control of development comes from zoning regulations.
Consistency with the approved County Road 73 Small Area Study will be a
key component in which to analyze proposals and determine the proper
approach to re-zoning.
1
2
123
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN26
Establishing an overlay district approach can:
• Prevent continued investment in private improvements that create barriers to other desired
public improvements (roadway extension, intersection improvements, transit investments, park
improvements, etc.).
• Prevent immediate redevelopment or improvements in favor of more longer term investments.
• Help demonstrate the City’s willingness to support land use changes that enable private
redevelopment supportive of transit investments.
There are significant national and regional resources available that provide model ordinances and
funding assistance for transit oriented development. Pursuit of option 2 would be a strong potential
project to leverage these resources. At the regional level, these resources can be secured through the
Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities program and the Hennepin County TOD program.
Option 1: Planned Unit Developments (PUDs)
The use of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) as per the terms outlined in the zoning code (Chapter
XXI, Section 21655) is intended to allow for the mixing of land uses within a development. The Planned
Unit Development (PUD) zoning district approach would use this study as a guide for directing future
rezoning to be consistent with the preferred land use and proposed public infrastructure investments.
This approach would allow for redevelopment proposals to respond to a more transit supportive land
use pattern that mixes uses and achieves a higher density of development. It is anticipated that future
development will require the assembly of parcels which generally results in a more comprehensive
development plan.
Zoning Ordinance Implementation Options
To facilitate the redevelopment identified in the Concept Plan, a re-zoning will be required. Today, the
area is comprised of PUD, Single Family, Neighborhood Commercial, Office, Highway Commercial, and
Multi-Family zoning districts. The variation of uses, mixed both horizontally and vertically, does not
lend itself exactly to any of the existing zoning districts. The study recommends two zoning options for
implementation: Planned Unit Developments (PUD) or an Overlay District.
Option 2 – Station Area Overlay District
Alternatively, the city could pursue a “Station Area Overlay” that could be applied to not only this study
area, but all station areas within Plymouth where the city is promoting additional density or a mix of uses
which will better support transit investment. Overlay districts can be a valuable tool for cities looking
to implement goals and objectives of the community. The appeal of overlays is their flexibility and
adaptability. They allow local governments to maintain current zoning codes while addressing the special
needs of a particular area. Overlay districts have been used to implement incentive bonus programs,
encourage mixed use development projects and innovative urban design standards. An overlay district
approach would establish a new overlay zoning district that incorporates transit-oriented development
principles. Proactively applying the overlay district through rezoning would ensure re-development
achieves desired transit supportive and transit-oriented development. An overlay district could include
(but not limited to) the following key elements: establishing a “minimum” level of transit supportive
density for both commercial and residential uses; incorporating higher density housing; allowing for the
vertical mixing of uses; placing an emphasis on pedestrian-oriented development form, character, and
design; reducing parking requirements concurrent with transit usage; and integrating affordable housing
as a component of development projects. A proactive approach both supports transit use (transit
investments) and enables more efficient land use development.
124
IMPLEMENTATION 27 DRAFT
Station 73 TRIP
The City of Plymouth Public Works Department is spearheading the integration of future transportation
improvements in the study area. Identified as the Station 73 TRIP (Transit and Regional Improvement
Program) this next step in the detailed evolution of the recommendations in this study seeks to improve
transportation for all users, bolster quality of life for those who live nearby or travel through the area,
coordinate necessary projects with available funding, and facilitate reinvestment in the area. The Station 73
TRIP prioritizes infrastructure investments aimed at making safety, mobility, and capacity improvements.
Figure 4.1 identifies the major investment areas and improvements expected to be completed. These areas
are not indicative of any specific phasing or time-frame for improvements, but rather show the coordinated
improvements that can take place. Available funding will help dictate the timing of these improvements,
however, the City’s initial focus on new investments will be focused on creating an underpass of Highway
55 and the first segments of the Eagle Lake to Bryant Lake Regional Trails.
The Public Works Department is working on more
refined plans to create enhanced pedestrian
connections and improve transportation issues
in the study area. These next step plans will aid
in securing additional grant funding and better
aligning potential future projects.
125
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN28
Figure 3.1 - Redevelopment Phasing Diagram
REDEVELOPMENT PHASING
Redevelopment does not happen overnight. This study provides a guide to transformation over the next
10 to 20 years. The City of Plymouth and individual property owners ultimately will make decisions on
specific redevelopment projects and the timing of these projects. Redevelopment within the County
Road 73 Small Area Study falls into two categories, redevelopment projects that are dependent on
the major transportation changes, and those that are not. The potential projects that are dependent
on infrastructure changes will require site acquisition and utility reconstruction. All projects should be
coordinated with the Station 73 TRIP infrastructure planning.
126
IMPLEMENTATION 29 DRAFT
REDEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITIES
Today, the existing properties that have been identified as redevelopment sites currently pay $177,868 in
taxes, of which $17,590 goes to the City of Plymouth. All told, the redevelopment concepts shown in the
Concept Plan would pay $2,597,750 in taxes annually, of which $561,650 would go to the City of Plymouth.
This represents a change of $2,419,882 in taxes annually, or $544,060 annually to the City.
Over the course of 20 years of taxes paid, (not adjusting for inflation) this would represent about $48.4M in
total taxes, and just under $10.9M to the City.
The sites that have been identified as independent of the County Road 73 realignment (the Plymouth
Lutheran Church Site, the townhomes south of the church site, and the redevelopment parcels north of
Highway 55) would represent a change in tax revenue to the City of $367,013 annually or $7.34M over the
course of 20 years. While the redevelopment projects that are dependent on the realignment of County Road
73 and Old County Road 15 would represent a change of $177,047 annually or $3.54M to the City over 20
years (once the project is built).
Table 3.1. Financial Analysis
County Road 73 Small Area Study Financial Analysis
Assumptions in this financial analysis:
• The assumptions used for this analysis are based on review of other similar projects in the City of
Plymouth and the taxes they are paying. Data was gathered from Hennepin County and Costar.
• This is all assuming a market rate & non-TIF scenario.
• The concept as drawn represents about $173M change in total valuation ($180M shown - $7M existing).
RECOMMENDED CONCEPT
Total Annual
Taxes
Total Annual Taxes
to Plymouth
20 Year Total Taxes 20 Year Total Taxes
to Plymouth
Current Taxes (Independent)$84,643 $6,312 $1,692,859 $126,236
Current Taxes (Dependant)$93,225 $11,278 $1,864,492 $225,569
Total $177,868 $17,590 $3,557,351 $351,805
Independent Roadway
Improvements
$1,738,250 $373,325 $34,765,000 $7,466,500
Dependant on Roadway
Improvements
$859,500 $188,325 $17,190,000 $3,766,500
Total $2,597,750 $561,650 $51,955,000 $11,233,000
Net Total Independent $1,653,607 $367,013 $33,072,141 $7,340,264
Net Total Dependent $766,275 $177,047 $15,325,508 $3,540,931
Total $2,419,882 $544,060 $48,397,649 $10,881,195
It is important to note that the net change in redevelopment yield shown in the Concept Plan may not
fully cover the cost of the infrastructure improvements that are necessary in the study area. However, the
Concept Plan does show a decrease in development intensity compared to Preliminary Concept 1 and even
though Preliminary Concept 1 showed more development density, the traffic analysis suggests the roadway
improvements that are proposed can accommodate the added density/intensity of development shown in
Preliminary Concept 1. Essentially, additional funding sources will be needed to accommodate the necessary
transportation and mobility improvements beyond just the potential redevelopment yield in the district,
however there is additional capacity built into these infrastructure improvements to help close the financial
gap with added density/intensity.
127
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN30
Playground at South Shore Park
128
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 31 DRAFT
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The following pages summarize the existing conditions for the study area including natural features, land
uses, parks, trails, open spaces, and existing infrastructure. Planned investments in transportation, transit
service and parks and trails are also identified as baseline for future planning considerations.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Existing Businesses and Destinations in the Study Area
A Valvoline Instant Oil Change
B Minnetonka Collision Center
C Plymouth Liquor
D Rapid Key Recovery/Sunday’s Off
Pool Company
E Holiday
F South Shore Park
G Sun Valley Mobile Home Park
H Latuff’s Pizzeria
I Talent Masters Staffing/Tres Posh
Decor
J Skin Deep by Angie/Studio 55
Architects/ Modify My Loan US Llc
K Streicher’s Police Equipment
L Station 73 Park & Ride
M Plymouth Village Automotive
N Custom Home Builders Title LLC
O LaCompte Playfield
P GEN Financial Management Inc
Q Heart Inc
R Oakwood Professional Building/
Office
S GoldenCare
T Lakeland Sleep Center/Mondale
Dental/Kennedy Vision Health Center
U Plymouth Lutheran Church
A B
C D
E
F G
H I
J
N P Q R S
T
O
L
K
M
U
STUDY AREA
55
55
73
INFLUENCE AREA
INFLUENCE AREA
INFLUENCE AREA
Figure 4.1 - Existing Businesses and Destinations in the Study Area
129
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN32
• Bassett Creek runs just northeast of the study area.
• A large wetland complex exists south of LaCompte Playfield and
can seasonally inundate portions of the park.
• Another large wetland complex exists west of the study area
with steep topography along the western edge.
• Steep topography exists near Plymouth Lutheran Church and
LaCompte Playfield.
• No portions of the defined study area lie completely within a
floodplain.
Existing wetlands
Natural Resources
Existing stormwater
basin near the
intersection of
County Road 73 and
Highway 55
Figure 4.2 - Natural Resources Diagram
130
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 33 DRAFT
• Predominately commercial uses around Highway 55.
• Higher density residential uses are primarily north of Highway
55 and lower density residential uses are primarily south of
Highway 55.
• Station 73 Park and Ride is the primary public use.
• LaCompte Playfield and South Shore Park are the primary park
uses.
• Plymouth Lutheran Church is the only institutional use in the
study area.
• One industrial use exists in the study area.
Existing Land Use
Existing businesses
along Old County
Road 15
Existing high density residential
Figure 4.3 -2022 Existing Land Use Diagram
131
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN34
Existing Zoning
Figure 4.4 - Existing Zoning Map
• Along Highway 55: O (Office), C-2 (Neighborhood Commercial), and C-3 (Highway Commercial)
zoning.
• North of Highway 55: RMF-4 (Multiple Family Housing)zoning.
• South of Highway 55: RSF-1 (Single Family Detached) zoning.
• Southwest of Highway 55 and County Road 73; and northeast of Highway 55 and County Road 73:
PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning.
132
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 35 DRAFT
• LaCompte Playfield is the only playfield in the southeastern portion
of the City of Plymouth. It includes two ballfields, a playground, a
hockey rink with warming house, and a small parking lot.
• South Shore Park serves residents north of Highway 55 and has a
small trail loop, playground, and open play area.
• Proposed Eagle Lake and Bryant Lake Regional Trails (Three Rivers
Park District).
• The planned Eagle Lake/Bryant Lake Regional Trail connects
from the Luce Line Trail on the north portion of the project area
south along South Shore Drive/Zachary Lane to the existing trail
connection on the south portion of the study area.
Parks, Trails, & Open Space
Existing playground at South Shore
Park
Existing playground
at LaCompte
Playfield
Figure 4.5 - PTOS Diagram
133
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN36
• Highway 55 (MNDOT) and County Road 73
(Hennepin County) are the primary roadways
through the study area.
• Main traffic signal serves over 45,000 vehicles
per day. Due to long signal times, CR 73 vehicle
stacking impacts adjacent intersections.
• While no intersection has an above normal crash
rate, the high volumes and vehicle queuing
through intersections creates a safety concern for
all intersection users.
Transportation and Transit
• Station 73 Park and Ride is a park and ride
facility for Plymouth Metrolink.
• MetroTransit has a planned two-year trial for
all day bus service from Minneapolis to Medina
and is studying alignments for a Highway 55
bus rapid transit (BRT) line. Both plan to use
Station 73 as a stop.
• Existing Plymouth Metrolink Lines are on
Zachary Lane, Old County Road 15, and
Medicine Lake Road.
Station 73 Park
and Ride
Figure 4.6 - Transportation Diagram
134
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 37 DRAFT
Transit Station Walkshed
Pedestrian sidewalk near the Metrolink Transit Station
Figure 4.7 - Walkshed Diagram
Lack of pedestrian facilities along the Frontage Road
135
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN38
• The comprehensive sanitary sewer plan
identifies framework for sanitary sewer service.
• 8” and 9” sanitary service lines collect wastewater
from the residential properties along Balsam
Lane, Cottonwood Lane, Deerwood Lane,
Evergreen Lane, Sunset Trail, Trenton Lane, Union
Terrace Lane, and Zachary Lane.
• A small municipal lift station pumps collected
wastewater from Zachary Lane to Balsam Lane.
• A 10” and 12” carries the residential wastewater
from Saratoga Lane and Sunset Trail,
respectively.
Sanitary Sewer
• South of Highway 55, a 9” sanitary sewer along
Old County Road 15 collects wastewater from
the business district.
• North of Highway 55, a 9” sanitary sewer along
the Frontage Road and South Shore Drive
collects wastewater from the residential and
commercial properties.
• All wastewater flow from the project area is
directed to a 42” sanitary sewer in Highway 55
right-of-way (owned by MCES).
• The existing sewer system is well suited to
accommodate additional development.
Figure 4.8 - Sanitary Sewer Diagram
136
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 39 DRAFT
Existing Water Distribution System Conditions:
• The area is served by a 12” trunk water main
which is well looped from multiple directions.
• The 12” trunk water main serves a distribution
main and connection to deliver water from the
nearby water tower on County Road 6.
• System pressure and flow is robust with
water service pressure exceeding 90 psi and
calculated available fire flow of 3,500 gpm +.
• The existing water system should be well
suited to serve future development.
Water System
Figure 4.9 - Water System Diagram
Recommendations:
• If the road is re-aligned along a new route
(i.e. County Road 15 shifting to the west) the
functionality of the existing 12” main should
be maintained and re-routed accordingly.
• If redevelopment occurs along existing “dead
end” water main sections, and if it is feasible,
these water main sections should be looped
and connected to neighboring water main
sections to support redundancy, fire flow, and
general water quality.
137
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN40
Stormwater
Figure 4.10 - Stormwater Diagram
• There are limited stormwater treatment facilities throughout the study area. The entire study area is
within the Bassett Creek Watershed.
• Primary drainage flows to the north and northeast, eventually discharging into Medicine Lake and
Bassett Creek.
• Large wetland complexes exist south of Highway 55 and LaCompte Playfield, west of County Road 73,
and to the northeast near 10th Avenue.
138
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 41 DRAFT
• The redevelopment potential map, shown above, scores properties
based on a number of variables such as age of structure, land value,
building value, lot coverage, and uses that support transit service.
• This information is considered a baseline in identifying potential
redevelopment parcels and provides a high-level guide to sites
most likely to redevelop, and a range of factors must be analyzed in
the overall assessment of redevelopment potential.
• While these sites are identified as most likely to redevelop,
this does not mean the City will be an active participant in the
redevelopment.
Redevelopment Potential
Vacant Property off Highway 55
Plymouth
Lutheran Church
Figure 4.11 - Redevelopment Potential Diagram
139
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN42
RELATED BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS
Eagle Lake to Bryant Lake Regional Trails Master Plan
The Eagle Lake to Bryant Lake Regional Trails (ELBLRT) Master Plan is a Three Rivers Park District
initiative to provide enhanced regional trail connectivity between Eagle Lake and Bryant Lake.
This proposed regional trail connection would extend through the study area from the Luce
Line Regional Trail to the north and then cross Highway 55 and follow County Road 73 to the
south. The current master plan shows the trails within the existing right of way. Future plans
for the trail alignment will respond to land use and roadway changes in the study area.
(View the ELBLRT Master Plan by clicking here)
Highway 55 Bus Rapid Transit System
This presentation was provided to the City of Plymouth in early 2021 and provided an update
to the Highway 55 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) planning for the Highway 55 Corridor through the
City of Plymouth. It discusses the 2015 Corridor Study by Metropolitan Council and the need for
reverse commuting (i.e. bringing workers outward to Plymouth). The presentation also covers
the Route 757 All Day Service Trail and the Station Area Microstudy. The Microstudy shows maps
of Ford Road at Shelard Parkway, Station 73, Xenium Lane/Northwest Boulevard, City Center, and
Dunkirk Park and Ride.
(See the full presentation by clicking here)
46EAGLE LAKE AND BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY CONCEPT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITIONASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARYPRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINEDHEREIN.
\\m
s
p
-
f
i
l
e
0
1
\
A
0
0
0
0
\
A
0
4
8
.
0
3
_
P
_
B
r
y
a
n
t
-
E
a
g
l
e
L
a
k
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
\
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
\
C
A
D
D
\
P
L
A
N
S
\
F
A
3
-
H
w
y
5
5
-
C
R
1
5
-
Z
a
c
h
a
r
y
L
n
.
d
w
g
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
HIGHWAY 55 - COUNTRY ROAD 15 - ZACHARY LANE
0'180'90'
EAGLE TO BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN
NORTHCOU
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
COU
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
NOTE: The width of the trail shown is 10’ unless otherwise noted. The boulevard width varies.
DRAFTDRAFT
SUBSEGMENT B8: MN HIGHWAY 55 /
COUNTY RD 15 / ZACHARY LN
ZACHARY LANE NZACHARY LANE N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
Existing utility poles on east side of street may require relocation
Trail bends in towards roadway due to narrower right-of-way width
Trail bends out away from roadway due to wider right-of-way width
10’ boulevard width provides potential space for trees
Grass boulevard width varies between 5-8’
10’ boulevard width provides potential space for trees 5’ grass boulevard width
Enhanced crossing treatments recommended over MN Hwy 55
Limited right-of-way space on north side of street; Recommend narrowing roadway by reducing existing travel lanes to 11’, creating more space for trail on
Enhanced crossing treatment recommended
Grass boulevard width varies between 3-5’
Plymouth Metrolink Park & Ride
2’ asphalt buffer between curb and trail
Connection to existing trail on east side of Zachary Lane
LEGEND
Proposed Regional Trail
Preliminary Concept - Not for Construction
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITION ASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARY PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.
Highway 55 Bus
R
a
p
i
d
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Council Worksho
p
:
A
p
r
i
l
2
7
,
2
0
2
1
140
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 43 DRAFT
20
2
2
EXISTING AND PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
The following summarizes a number of planned infrastructure investments that will occur in the study
area over the next few years to compliment the existing Station 73 transit facility.
Station 73 TRIP (Transit and Regional
Improvement Program)
• Planned submittal for Regional
Solicitation dollars and DOT RAISE
Grant dollars.
46
EAGLE LAKE AN
D
B
R
Y
A
N
T
L
A
K
E
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
S
M
A
S
T
E
R
P
L
A
N
PRELIMINARY C
O
N
C
E
P
T
-
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
THIS IS A PRELI
M
I
N
A
R
Y
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
.
F
I
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
,
S
I
T
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
ASSESSMENTS,
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
A
N
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
R
E
N
E
C
E
S
S
A
R
Y
PRIOR TO IMPLE
M
E
N
T
I
N
G
A
N
Y
O
F
T
H
E
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
HEREIN.
\\m
s
p
-
f
i
l
e
0
1
\
A
0
0
0
0
\
A
0
4
8
.
0
3
_
P
_
B
r
y
a
n
t
-
E
a
g
l
e
L
a
k
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
\
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
\
C
A
D
D
\
P
L
A
N
S
\
F
A
3
-
H
w
y
5
5
-
C
R
1
5
-
Z
a
c
h
a
r
y
L
n
.
d
w
g
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
HIGHWAY 55 -
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
R
O
A
D
1
5
-
Z
A
C
H
A
R
Y
L
A
N
E
0'
180'90'
EAGLE TO BRYA
N
T
L
A
K
E
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
M
A
S
T
E
R
P
L
A
N
NORTH
COU
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
COU
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
NOTE: The width
o
f
t
h
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
h
o
w
n
i
s
1
0
’
u
n
l
e
s
s
otherwise noted
.
T
h
e
b
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
w
i
d
t
h
v
a
r
i
e
s
.
DRAFTDRAFT
SUBSEGMENT
B
8
:
M
N
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
/
COUNTY RD 1
5
/
Z
A
C
H
A
R
Y
L
N
ZACHARY LAN
E
N
ZACHARY LAN
E
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
Existing utility poles on east side of street may
require relocatio
n
Trail bends in towards roadway
due to narrower right-of-way widt
h Trail bends out away from road
w
a
y
due to wider righ
t
-
of-way width
10’ boulevard wi
d
t
h
provides potenti
a
l
space for trees
Grass boulevard
width varies between 5-8’
10’ boulevard
w
i
d
t
h
provides potent
i
a
l
space for trees
5’ grass boulevard widt
h
Enhanced crossin
g
treatments recommended ov
e
r
MN Hwy 55
Limited right-of
-
w
a
y
space on north s
i
d
e
of street; Recom
m
e
n
d
narrowing roadw
a
y
b
y
reducing existin
g
t
r
a
v
e
l
lanes to 11’, cre
a
t
i
n
g
more space for
t
r
a
i
l
o
n
Enhanced cross
i
n
g
treatment recommended
Grass boulevard
width varies between 3-5’
Plymouth Metrolink Park
& Ride
2’ asphalt buffer between curb and trail
Connection to exi
s
t
i
n
g
trail on east side
o
f
Zachary Lane
LEGEND
Proposed Reg
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
Preliminary Co
n
c
e
p
t
-
N
o
t
f
o
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
THIS IS A PRELI
M
I
N
A
R
Y
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
.
F
I
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
,
S
I
T
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
ASSESSMENTS,
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
A
N
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
R
E
N
E
C
E
S
S
A
R
Y
P
R
I
O
R
TO IMPLEMENTI
N
G
A
N
Y
O
F
T
H
E
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
H
E
R
E
I
N
.
Highway 55 Bus Rapid
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Area Study
Eagle Lake &
Bryant Lake
Regional Trails Master
Plan
0 100’ 200’ 400’
N
10th Ave N
S S
h
o
r
e
D
r
S Sh
o
r
e
D
r
Sunset Trail
Old
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
5
S
a
r
a
t
o
g
a
L
n
N
Qu
a
k
e
r
L
n
N
De
e
r
w
o
o
d
L
n
N
R
e
v
e
r
e
L
n
6
t
h
A
v
e
N
W M
ed
i
c
i
ne
L
ak
e
D
r
Union Terrace Ln N
6
t
h
A
v
e N
55
55
73
Fro
n
t
a
g
e
R
d
NEAR TERM REDEVELOPMENT
PLAYFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PROPOSED PAVED TRAIL
PROPOSED ELBLRT
INDUSTRIAL USE
0 100’ 200’ 400’
N
6CITY OF PLYMOUTH&
CR73 SMALL AREA PLAN USAGE
NEAR TERM REDEVELOPMENT
NEAR TERM REDEVELOPMENT
PLAYFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PLANNED UNDERPASS
PLANNED BRT STATION PLATFORMS
CLOSE ACCESS 2024
POSSIBLE PARK EXPANSION
INDUSTRIAL USE
Figure 4.12 - Redevelopment Staging and Sequencing Diagram
To
d
a
y
Station 73 Park & Ride Facility
• Significant transit investment.
• Strong ridership, highly utilized.
• Influence of All Day Service Trial >
Transition into Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT) service.
20
2
4
MnDOT Highway 55 Pavement
Preservation Safety Project
• Pavement improvements to
Highway 55.
• Elimination of slip lane to northern
frontage road.
• Potential construction of
underpass.
20
2
5
All Day Service Trial Begins for BRT
• Will last 2 years, then likely
transition to full BRT service.
20
2
5
-
2
0
2
8
ELBLRT and Roadway Improvements
• Remaining ELBLRT improvements
(from Station 73 south to
Minnetonka).
• Local roadway improvements
(dependent on funding).
20
2
8
LaCompte Playfield Planned
Improvements (CIP)
• Separate planning process through
Parks and Recreation Department
in 2027 (informed by this study).
• Reconstruction of park
improvements (CIP dollars are
allocated).
141
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN44
The first round of community engagement occurred in September 2021, with
the City of Plymouth collecting data from all residents, both city-wide and
nearby the project site, about the future of the County Road 73 and Highway
55 study area.
• The City sent 7,800 emails and mailed 830 letters to residents and
property owners providing information about the project and
encouraging them to take part in the online interactive map and survey.
Social media and community platforms such as Facebook, Nextdoor,
Twitter, and Instagram posts were created to provide further awareness of
the key stakeholder and community engagement opportunities.
• The Social Pinpoint portal featured a project landing page that listed the
project purpose, overview, and background information with links to an
online survey and interactive mapping tool for gathering feedback on the
area’s existing conditions. Users left geographically-relevant comments
by dragging and dropping colorful pins on a map. Comments left by
participants were able to be read and voted on by other users.
Survey Comments Summary:
Q1: What are the defining features of the study area that should remain?
Respondents replied with parks, trail connections, and maintaining natural areas to sustain wildlife in the area.
Q2: What issues are present in the study area today? What concerns do you have about the future of the
study area?
Existing issues identified included bike and pedestrian safety, heavy traffic, dangerous intersections, and
the current land use mix.
Future concerns identified include adding more high density residential or large commercial/warehouse,
widening the road and increasing traffic, adding too many lights to make the roads less efficient, and destroying
existing wetlands or natural areas.
2290
Total Site Visits
608
Unique Stakeholders
96
Map Comments
28
Survey Responses
ROUND 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Overall Involvement:
• While improvements to LaCompte Playfield were discussed, the City Parks and Recreation Department
indicated there will be a separate planning process (anticipated in 2026 for construction in 2027-2028)
to better plan for upgrades to the park. Those considerations for park improvements were continually
documented as part of this planning process.
• The issues and opportunities identified during the first round of engagement contributed to the
development of two concepts that explored a variety of possibilities related to land use, redevelopment,
new roadway alignments, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements.
Community Engagement Summary
The following is a summary of the community feedback received. To review all comments collected during
this phase of engagement, please visit the document appendix.
142
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 45 DRAFT
Q3: 10 years from now, how has the study area changed? What land uses or physical improvements
do you envision?
Respondents listed a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment, improved park and open spaces, more
unique destinations for food and shopping, better traffic flow solutions, and preserving nature in the area as
future goals.
Q4: What park features (play area, play fields, etc.) should be considered in the future? What is
missing that you would like to see?
Dog parks, an ice rink and warming house (improved winter use), improved bike/pedestrian trails, safer
connections, improved picnic areas with fire pits, and flooding solutions.
Q5: Do you have any other considerations for the planning effort?
Taking the needs and future impacts of construction and implementing changes to surrounding residents
into consideration, keeping a unique feel to the area, and improving traffic and safety for everyone is a must!
Interactive Map Comments Summary
Pedestrian Connections
Participants would like to see added and
improved sidewalks or pedestrian connections
in the area that connect back to existing trails
or neighborhoods and make it easier to access
parks. Many mentions of grade separated
crossings, improved or signaled crossings at
lights or crosswalks, and making roads more bike
friendly.
Obstructed Views
Many comments
regarding obstructed
views for traffic due to
angled turns/curves,
unkept landscaping,
and heavy traffic at
intersections.
Safety Concerns
Participants expressed
concerns regarding the
safety and efficiency of
the Highway 55/County
Road 73.
Heavy Traffic
The Highway 55 and County Road
73 intersection light is too long, the
intersection feels unsafe for bike/ped
crossing, and traffic is very heavy in
this area. Stop signs are not being
obeyed, and traffic backs-up into
residential areas at other nearby
intersections within the study area.
Improved Parks
More investment in
park and green spaces,
mentions of dog parks,
pickleball, restroom
facilities, more activities
for kids, etc.
Less Commercial Development
Comments pointed to less large
commercial development/
warehouse being desired in this
area and more options for retail,
restaurants, and unique experiences
that can add character.
143
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN46
Figure 4.13 - Preliminary Concept #1
Concept 1 Includes:
• Realign County Road 73 directly northto Highway 55 and realign
Old County Road 15 to intersect at a midpoint between the existing
frontage road and Sunset Drive.
• Redevelop with transit supportive uses including High Density
Residential, Transit Supportive Commercial, and Medium Density
Residential south of Highway 55. Integrate a new building for
Plymouth Lutheran Church with the redevelopment.
• Connect the Eagle Lake/Bryant Lake Regional Trails through the
study area with both an improved at-grade crossing of Highway
55 and a grade separated crossing near the anticipated transit
platforms.
• Redevelop underutilized areas north of Highway 55 with High
Density and Medium Density Residential.
• Anticipate upgrades and potential park expansion to LaCompte
Playfield in 2027/2028 with increased sidewalk and trail
connectivity to the park. A separate, more detailed planning
process for LaCompte Playfield will take place the year before
planned capital investments in the park.High density residential
Preliminary concept designs were developed and reviewed by the public and key stakeholders. The
feedback helped to establish a preferred direction known as the concept plan that is assembled here in
the County Road 73 Small Area Study.
PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS
144
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 47 DRAFT
Concept 2 Includes:
• Realign County Road 73 with a slight meander north/south to Highway 55, and realign Old County
Road 15 to intersect at a midpoint between the existing frontage road and Sunset Drive.
• Redevelop with transit supportive uses including High Density Residential, Transit Supportive
Commercial, and Medium Density Residential south of Highway 55. Integrate a new building for
Plymouth Lutheran Church with the redevelopment.
• Connect the Eagle Lake/Bryant Lake Regional trails through the study area with both an improved at-
grade crossing of Highway 55 and a grade separated crossing near the anticipated BRT platforms.
• Redevelop underutilized areas north of Highway 55 with Mixed Use (a combination of Commercial,
High Density, and Medium Density Residential uses).
• Anticipate upgrades and potential park expansion to LaCompte Playfield in 2027/2028 with increased
sidewalk and trail connectivity to the park. A separate, more detailed planning process for LaCompte
Playfield will take place the year before planned capital investments in the park.
Figure 4.14 - Preliminary Concept #2
145
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN48
ROUND 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
For the second round of community engagement, a letter was mailed to each property owner within
the study area. The letter included information on the online engagement, as well as a paper survey
and contact information for residents without access to technology. The online engagement included
an interactive map, similar to that in the first round of engagement. Responders were able to leave
comments via the interactive mapping tool, geographically documenting their responses. They were also
able to complete a survey on the two concepts.
Survey Comments Summary:
Involvement Summary:
Are there any land uses or key features missing that you would like to see?(The word cloud takes into account the number of times a response was received. Phrases that appear larger in size were popular or mentioned most often).
Nature Walk
Dog
Park
Giant Green
Park
Natural Habitat
Restaurants Mixed Use
Trail
Connections
Preserve Wetlands
Less
Development
Traffic
CalmingOffice Space
Pedestrian FriendlyPedestrian
BridgeSidewalks
More
Trails
1254
Total Site Visits
83
Unique Stakeholders
195
Map Comments
35
Survey Responses
Thinking ahead 10 years from now, what are your top priorities for improvements in the study area?
(Summary list of comments received)
Suggestions
• Intersections improvements a must
• Improved traffic flow badly needed
• Lower road speeds/traffic calming
• Get more people to use transit
• Safe pedestrian connections
• More accessibility
• More park and outdoor amenities/facilities
• Quality restaurants, retail, and mixed use
• More trees and green spaces
• More efforts to protect and preserve natural
habitats and wetlands
• Incorporate green space
• EV infrastructure
Concerns
• More traffic in the area, efficiency should be
a top concern
• More density = more traffic congestion
• No more transit needed
• Too much high density residential being
proposed
• Unsightly existing development
• More density will invite crime
• Current residents want a quiet, single family
neighborhood
• Plans feel disconnected from what exists
today
• No proposed changes seem necessary
146
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 49 DRAFT
Round 2 Community Engagement
A second round of community and stakeholder engagement was conducted through an online platform
and allowed participants to weigh-in on preliminary concept ideas. Feedback on the preliminary
concepts expressed concern over the realignment of County Road 73 through existing single family
homes, and adding additional density in the area. However, comments also indicated a desire to realign
County Road 73 as shown in the concepts to provide a safer configuration of roadways and alleviate
traffic congestion due to the skewed alignments and 4-way stop intersections at County Road 73 and
Old County Road 15. Additional comments included a desire for a grade separated crossing on Highway
55, improved sidewalks and trails throughout the study area, and better connection to Station 73 and
LaCompte Playfield. Additional information on the preliminary concepts and summary of the online
feedback is represented on the following pages.
Online engagement took place during February of 2022 and provide an opportunity for participants to evaluate the concepts
and provide feedback on separate survey about the desired future of the study area.
Figure 4.15 - Community Engagement Phase 2 Summary Map
147
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN50
Which concept best represents the future
vision for the study area?
Concept 1
Concept 2
74%
26%
Why? (Summary of comments)
Less HDR/density
proposed
Addresses road
realignment
Proposed
commercial
Less potential
vehicular
congestion
More green
space
protection
Which concept provides the best
transportation network?
Concept 1
Concept 2
74%
26%
Road curves would
slow traffic
Intersection
improvements
proposed
Enhanced pedestrian
crossings
More walkable
Both would benefit
the BRT plans
More efficient for
traffic Safer/better
pedestrian
connections
Less HDR = less
car traffic
Both will make
traffic worse
Both are
good
We don’t need
the BRT
Density more
spread out
As a walker or biker, which concept would
you feel most comfortable in?
Concept 1
Concept 2
29%
71%
Which concept best fits the City’s plans for
future Bus Rapid Transit?
Concept 1
Concept 2
29%
71%
Note: Responses that expressed a dislike of both concepts were received within the feedback of this survey
148
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 51 DRAFT
INFLUENCES ON REDEVELOPMENT
The future of the study area will take cues from the underlying analysis of the existing conditions,
feedback from the broader community and stakeholders, as well as key issues that need to be addressed.
Below is a summary of key takeaways that will have an influence on future redevelopment.
Community Feedback
Private Development Interest and Market Conditions
Active Redevelopment in the Project Area
• Element Apartments.
Plymouth Lutheran Church Property
• Previous interest in redevelopment of site (plans
included a new, smaller church facility plus high density
housing/senior housing on the same site).
JNA 55 LLC Property
• Vacant site with high visibility to Highway 55. Site
preparation has already taken place.
Strong Desire for
Increased Connectivity
in the Study Area
• Walkability and Bike-
ability to Station 73
(commuter use)
• Walkability and Bike-
ability to LaCompte
Playfield (nearby
resident use)
• Safer Pedestrian & Bike
Crossing of Highway 55
Transportation
Improvements
• Safety concerns
around roadway
and intersection
configuration/controls
• Slowing traffic in the
area
-County Road 73 &
Highway 55
-County Road 73 &
Old County Road 15
-County Road 73 &
Sunset Trail
-10th Avenue North &
Highway 55 Frontage
Road
Retain and Enhance
Existing Green Space
Existing Non-Compatible
Use vs. Future Transit
Supportive Uses
Enhance LaCompte
Playfield
Industrial Use, multiple
driveways at busy intersection,
encroachment issues
Plymouth Lutheran Church property
149
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN52
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
The following summarizes the unique challenges and opportunities
that exist in the study area. This list has been compiled from the existing
conditions and physical analysis, the previous planning work conducted
to date, and the outcomes of the property owner and stakeholder
conversations.
Challenges
• Realigning County Road 73 - The merging of Sunset Trail and County
Road 73 causes confusion for drivers. Potential realignment for County
Road 73 would mean purchasing residential properties as they become
available. This process could take several years to complete.
• Creating a safe pedestrian experience - The busy nature of both
Highway 55 and County Road 73 coupled with the wide roadway create
a safety concern for pedestrians and bicyclists crossing the road.
• Extensive wetland and floodplain areas - Possible limitations for future
development and potential park improvements.
• Increased traffic and traffic calming - The intersection of Highway
55 and County Road 73 currently experience high amounts of traffic,
creating long wait times for drivers. The increase in traffic during rush
hours creates a safety concern for drivers trying to turn both on and off
of Highway 55. Although the intersection improvements will improve
the delay times compared to what is existing, there may be a temporary
increase in traffic waiting times while the project is being constructed.
• Relocation of the Plymouth Village Automotive - the numerous curb-
cuts and vehicular access points right at the intersection of County Road
73 and Old County Road 15 provide confusion for drivers and unsafe
conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. There are also appear to be
encroachment issues on park property.
• Opportunities
• Transit-oriented development - the convenient location near
Highway 55 provides a strong opportunity for furthering the City of
Plymouth’s overall tax base with expanded residential, commercial,
and employment uses that support the existing Station 73 transit
investment.
• Expanded housing options - including a mix of residential densities
and product types from townhomes and villas, to apartments and
condominiums.
• Transportation improvement opportunities - Potential improvements
to the Plymouth MetroLink transit network as well as the anticipation
of future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along the Highway 55 corridor could
enhance daytime transit ridership to the City of Plymouth to help
support the large daytime employment population.
• Improved bike and pedestrian connections - with the enhanced
roadway network, the addition of bike and pedestrian facilities can
create alternative transportation and recreational opportunities for
residents and employees.
• Existing open space - the expansive wetland and natural areas provide
a unique setting and tremendous amenity for surrounding uses.
• Parks and trails - linking planned recreational features such as
LaCompte Playfield and the Eagle Lake and Bryant Lake Regional Trail
connection can add value to future developments.
Highway 55/County Road 73
intersection
X
Plymouth Lutheran Church
Industrial use - intersection of County
Road 73 & Old County Road 15
LaCompte Playfield
150
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 53 DRAFT
Figure 4.16 - Challenges and Opportunities Diagram
151
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MN54
DRAFTPLYMOUTH
COUNTY ROAD
SMALL AREA STUDY
73
NOVEMBER 17TH 2022 152
APPENDIX
153
Below is an operationally summary of the AM and PM peak hours:
While the morning rush hour has delays, for the most part the afternoon rush hour controls the overall
intersection operations so it will be the focus
• Existing Conditions operates with LOS D/E on approaches and the northbound approach queues through the
S Frontage Road intersection (all-way stop intersection).
• No Build Short Term, includes Elements apartments, 120 units on south side and 310 units on north.
Operations are slightly worse than existing, but no major fatal issues.
• No Build Long Term Concept 1, northbound County Road 73 creates gridlock past Sunset Trail. Southbound
does queue back into S Shore/10th intersection. Not a viable option.
• Build (Straighten County Road 73), “v1” has no capacity improvements and thus no real change from the
No Build Concept 1. Realigning the roadway would improve the safety of the approach and adjacent
intersections, but with no capacity improvements at TH 55 the overall intersection operates the same.
• Build “v2” Concept 1, includes only southbound capacity improvements. No major improvement as the
northbound approach still fails, the southbound approach would no longer queue up to S Shore/10th.
• Build “v3” Concept 1, includes southbound and northbound capacity. Brings overall intersection operations
to existing delays with additional development traffic.
• Build “v3” Concept 2, essentially no change from Concept 1. The intersection improvements provide
additional capacity for the variations in development traffic. Long delays for the northbound and
southbound approaches may still be present due to the TH 55 signal timing.
• At S Shore Drive/10th, without changes to the manufacture homes, the volumes wouldn’t warrant a change
in traffic control. However, if the roadway is reconfigured at the TH 55 signal, a roundabout would provide
easier mobility to serve u-turns.
• At new County Road 73 and Old County Road 15, either a traffic signal or roundabout would operate well in
either Concept 1 or 2.
TRANSPORTATION
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNii 154
APPENDIX iii DRAFT
Table XX
CR 73 Small Area Study
Comparison of Alternatives
AM Peak Hour
Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS
10th Ave at S Shore Dr EB 2.3 A 2.2 A 2.9 A 2.5 A 3.6 A 6.0 A 6.0 A
(Minor Stop NB/SB)WB 0.7 A 0.5 A 16.0 C 5.5 A 0.7 A 3.4 A 3.6 A
(Build v3 - Roundabout)NB 5.3 A 2.2 A 5.9 A 1.9 A 48.9 E 18.8 C 15.2 C 5.7 A 5.3 A 2.8 A 2.4 A 4.5 A 2.6 A 4.6 A
SB 5.7 A 5.4 A 73.6 F 14.6 B 5.6 A 3.1 A 3.4 A
TH 55 at CR 73/S. Shore Dr EB 31.7 C 34.2 C 34.1 C 34.0 C 35.7 D 45.6 D 47.4 D
(Traffic Signal)WB 32.2 C 31.0 C 31.6 C 30.1 C 32.5 C 31.9 C 31.1 C
NB 89.8 F 37.1 D 86.4 F 39.2 D 82.5 F 48.4 D 124.6 F 49.2 D 110.4 F 43.4 D 91.2 F 46.3 D 92.6 F 48.0 D
SB 84.0 F 83.9 F 222.8 F 186.3 F 85.4 F 70.4 E 83.1 F
CR 73 at S. Frontage Rd EB 50.2 F 75.9 F 171.9 F 93.6 F 63.6 F 48.1 E 37.3 E
(Minor Stop EB)NB 16.0 C 14.9 B 21.2 C 22.1 C 39.2 E 40.4 E 30.3 D 26.7 D 14.4 B 16.5 C 16.9 C 14.6 B 12.2 B 11.4 B
SB 1.7 A 1.9 A 1.8 A 2.0 A 1.9 A 2.0 A 1.9 A
CR 73 at Old 15 (AWS)EB 5.3 A 5.4 A 6.1 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 5.7 A
(No Build - All-Way Stop)WB 5.8 A 6.1 A 7.9 A 14.1 B 6.8 A 5.7 A 2.7 A
(Build v1 & v2 - Signal)NB 6.2 A 5.7 A 6.7 A 6.0 A 7.6 A 7.0 A 6.0 A 8.5 A 4.2 A 6.6 A 8.4 A 5.8 A 4.4 A 4.1 A
(Build v3 - Roundabout)SB 5.2 A 4.9 A 5.1 A 8.0 A 8.4 A 4.0 A 4.1 A
CR 73 at Sunset Trail EB 6.9 A 10.3 B 11.0 B 6.9 A 7.0 A 10.2 B 7.5 A
(Minor Stop EB/WB)WB 6.1 A 7.9 A 14.1 B 6.8 A 5.7 A 2.7 A
NB 1.9 A 2.4 A 2.0 A 3.6 A 2.2 A 4.4 A 2.0 A 5.4 A 2.2 A 3.8 A 4.5 A 4.3 A 1.9 A 2.4 A
SB 1.0 A 1.1 A 1.2 A 1.7 A 1.8 A 0.9 A 0.9 A
10th Ave at JA Site Access EB 0.7 A 0.7 A 0.8 A 0.9 A 0.6 A 0.8 A
(Minor Stop NB)NB 0.3 A 1.4 A 0.3 A 1.3 A 0.4 A 1.5 A 0.4 A 1.4 A 0.4 A 1.4 A 0.6 A 1.7 A
SB 7.2 A 6.3 A 6.7 A 6.4 A 6.8 A 7.0 A
COMMENTS:
Notes: MnDOT Traffic Signal Timing: AM peak period 220 second cycle, CR 73 has 33 seconds or 15% of green time.
Signal Timing was not directly adjusted from existing splits for CR 73; same % of cycle length in each scenario but LT vs Thru splits slighlty modified as needed.
LANE GEOMTRICS AT TH 55/CR 73:
No Change No Change No Change
Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south.
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Build v3 - Long TermExisting Conditions No Build - Short Term No Build - Long Term Build v1 - Long Term Build v2 - Long Term
Realign CR 73 Build v3
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - NB Dual Lefts, Through
and Right; SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- No major improvement in
overall intersection operations
from Build v2.
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
Existing Conditions No Build
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
Realign CR 73 Build v1 Realign CR 73 Build v2
- Long cycle length adds delays
to minor approachs at TH 55.
- Short Term additional trips,
approximately 2,050 daily.
- Slight increases in delays.
- S. Frontage has added delay
accessing CR 73.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- Increases delays at TH 55
signal.
- Creates NB gridlock conditions
for S Frontage Rd, NB approach
does spill back to AWS.
- SB to TH 55 spills through 10th
Avenue/S Shore intersection.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- No capacity improvements at
TH 55, only additional storage
with NB realignment.
- No significant improvement
from alignment only.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- Improvement in SB
operations improves NB/SB
efficiency.
No Build
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
Intersection Approach
Concept 1 Short Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term
Build v3 - Long Term
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Concept 2 Long Term
Realign CR 73 Build v3
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - NB Dual Lefts, Through
and Right; SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- No major change from
Concept 1.
Table XX
CR 73 Small Area Study
Comparison of Alternatives
PM Peak Hour
Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS Delay
(S/Veh)LOS
10th Ave at S Shore Dr EB 2.1 A 2.1 A 2.4 A 2.4 A 3.1 A 6.0 A 6.1 A
(Minor Stop NB/SB)WB 0.3 A 1.3 A 8.2 A 4.8 A 1.2 A 3.5 A 3.5 A
(Build v3 - Roundabout)NB 4.9 A 1.9 A 5.1 A 2.3 A 16.9 C 7.2 A 14.1 B 5.3 A 8.6 A 3.2 A 2.9 A 4.6 A 2.7 A 4.7 A
SB 5.0 A 5.8 A 19.9 C 15.7 C 8.1 A 3.1 A 3.1 A
TH 55 at CR 73/S. Shore Dr EB 32.0 C 35.9 D 42.9 D 44.6 D 48.1 D 35.2 D 36.3 D
(Traffic Signal)WB 61.1 E 75.6 E 97.9 F 89.8 F 86.1 F 70.8 E 75.0 E
NB 44.4 D 47.4 D 46.6 D 56.3 E 47.0 D 71.1 E 67.9 E 70.3 E 71.5 E 69.0 E 70.6 E 55.7 E 69.9 E 57.9 E
SB 63.4 E 77.5 E 116.0 F 113.7 F 83.5 F 56.0 E 58.8 E
CR 73 at S. Frontage Rd EB 87.2 F 143.6 F 374.2 F 142.3 F 195.2 F 22.2 C 11.9 B
(Minor Stop EB)NB 45.8 E 36.2 E 54.3 F 44.4 E 72.8 F 59.1 F 48.4 E 37.4 E 54.0 F 42.9 E 9.3 A 7.7 A 4.7 A 4.3 A
SB 1.6 A 1.7 A 2.0 A 2.0 A 2.1 A 2.1 A 1.8 A
CR 73 at Old 15 (AWS)EB 6.2 A 6.7 A 9.9 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 6.0 A
(No Build - All-Way Stop)WB 13.4 B 20.1 C 97.7 F 96.9 F 128.7 F 6.1 A 4.6 A
(Build v1 & v2 - Signal)NB 33.4 D 18.8 C 49.3 E 26.7 D 154.9 F 76.2 F 37.0 D 49.8 D 40.1 D 59.5 E 5.7 A 5.7 A 4.6 A 4.7 A
(Build v3 - Roundabout)SB 6.6 A 9.3 A 13.6 B 16.9 B 17.9 B 5.4 A 4.9 A
CR 73 at Sunset Trail EB 30.9 D 77.0 F 398.3 F 66.7 F 78.4 F 12.7 B 12.0 B
(Minor Stop EB/WB)WB 20.1 C 97.7 F 96.9 F 128.7 F 6.1 A 4.6 A
NB 9.9 A 8.5 A 19.5 C 17.9 C 170.0 F 103.4 F 20.5 C 41.4 E 15.7 C 49.1 E 4.1 A 4.6 A 3.8 A 3.9 A
SB 1.6 A 2.1 A 2.1 A 2.9 A 2.8 A 1.9 A 1.8 A
10th Ave at JA Site Access EB 0.7 A 0.7 A 1.0 A 0.9 A 0.8 A 1.0 A
(Minor Stop NB)NB 0.3 A 1.0 A 0.3 A 1.0 A 0.5 A 1.3 A 0.5 A 1.2 A 0.5 A 1.1 A 0.6 A 1.4 A
SB 6.7 A 6.6 A 6.9 A 6.2 A 6.4 A 6.6 A
COMMENTS:
Notes: MnDOT Traffic Signal Timing: PM peak period 220 second cycle, CR 73 has 62 seconds or 28% of green time.
Signal Timing was not directly adjusted from existing splits for CR 73; same % of cycle length in each scenario but LT vs Thru splits slighlty modified as needed.
LANE GEOMTRICS AT TH 55/CR 73:
No Change No Change No Change
Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south. Realignment of CR 73 south.
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Realign CR 73 Build v3
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - NB Dual Lefts, Through
and Right; SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- Significant improvement in
overall intersection operations.
Build v3 - Long Term
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
Realign CR 73 Build v2
Existing Conditions No Build - Short Term No Build - Long Term Build v1 - Long Term Build v2 - Long Term
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
Existing Conditions No Build
AM
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
No Build Realign CR 73 Build v1
Intersection Approach
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
- Long cycle length adds delays
to minor approachs at TH 55.
- Short Term additional trips,
approximately 2,050 daily.
- Increases delays at TH 55
signal.
- S. Frontage has added delay
accessing CR 73. NB at TH 55
spills back to AWS more
frequently which can impact
Sunset Trail.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- Increases delays and creates
gridlock conditions north and
south of TH 55.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- No capacity improvements at
TH 55, only additional storage
with NB realignment.
- No significant improvement
from alignment only.
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- Improvement in SB operations.
Concept 1 Short Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term Concept 1 Long Term
Build v3 - Long Term
Southbound reconfigured with
one NB departing to add a new
SB RT lane.
Concept 2 Long Term
Realign CR 73 Build v3
LOS By
Approach
LOS By
Intersection
-Long Term additional trips,
approximately 5,500 daily.
- TH 55 - NB Dual Lefts, Through
and Right; SB Left, Through, and
Right lanes.
- Improvement in overall
intersection operations compared
to Concept 1.
APPENDIX iii DRAFT 155
Transportation & Transit Plan North of HWY 55
Transportation & Transit Plan South of HWY 55
[0 150 300Feet
[0 150 300Feet
Page Intentionally Left Blank
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNiv 156
APPENDIX v DRAFT
Page Intentionally Left Blank
APPENDIX v DRAFT 157
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNvi
ROUND I COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The first round of community engagement occurred in September 2021, with
the City of Plymouth collecting data from all residents, both city-wide and
nearby the project site, about the future of the County Road 73 and Highway
55 study area.
• The City sent 7,800 emails and mailed 830 letters to residents and
property owners providing information about the project and
encouraging them to take part in the online interactive map and survey.
Social media and community platforms such as Facebook, Nextdoor,
Twitter, and Instagram posts were created to provide further awareness of
the key stakeholder and community engagement opportunities.
• The Social Pinpoint portal featured a project landing page that listed the
project purpose, overview, and background information with links to an
online survey and interactive mapping tool for gathering feedback on the
area’s existing conditions. Users left geographically-relevant comments
by dragging and dropping colorful pins on a map. Comments left by
participants were able to be read and voted on by other users.
Survey Comments Summary:
Q1: What are the defining features of the study area that should remain?
Respondents replied with parks, trail connections, and maintaining natural areas to sustain wildlife in the area.
Q2: What issues are present in the study area today? What concerns do you have about the future of the
study area?
Existing issues identified included bike and pedestrian safety, heavy traffic, dangerous intersections, and
the current land use mix.
Future concerns identified include adding more high density residential or large commercial/warehouse,
widening the road and increasing traffic, adding too many lights to make the roads less efficient, and destroying
existing wetlands or natural areas.
2290
Total Site Visits
608
Unique Stakeholders
96
Map Comments
28
Survey Responses
Overall Involvement:
• While improvements to LaCompte Playfield were discussed, the City Parks and Recreation Department
indicated there will be a separate planning process (anticipated in 2026 for construction in 2027-2028)
to better plan for upgrades to the park. Those considerations for park improvements were continually
documented as part of this planning process.
• The issues and opportunities identified during the first round of engagement contributed to the
development of two concepts that explored a variety of possibilities related to land use, redevelopment,
new roadway alignments, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements.
Community Engagement Summary
The following is a summary of the community feedback received. To review all comments collected during
this phase of engagement, please visit the document appendix.
158
APPENDIX vii DRAFT
Q3: 10 years from now, how has the study area changed? What land uses or physical improvements
do you envision?
Respondents listed a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment, improved park and open spaces, more
unique destinations for food and shopping, better traffic flow solutions, and preserving nature in the area as
future goals.
Q4: What park features (play area, play fields, etc.) should be considered in the future? What is
missing that you would like to see?
Dog parks, an ice rink and warming house (improved winter use), improved bike/pedestrian trails, safer
connections, improved picnic areas with fire pits, and flooding solutions.
Q5: Do you have any other considerations for the planning effort?
Taking the needs and future impacts of construction and implementing changes to surrounding residents
into consideration, keeping a unique feel to the area, and improving traffic and safety for everyone is a must!
Interactive Map Comments Summary
Pedestrian Connections
Participants would like to see added and
improved sidewalks or pedestrian connections
in the area that connect back to existing trails
or neighborhoods and make it easier to access
parks. Many mentions of grade separated
crossings, improved or signaled crossings at
lights or crosswalks, and making roads more bike
friendly.
Obstructed Views
Many comments
regarding obstructed
views for traffic due to
angled turns/curves,
unkept landscaping,
and heavy traffic at
intersections.
Safety Concerns
Participants expressed
concerns regarding the
safety and efficiency of
the Highway 55/County
Road 73.
Heavy Traffic
The Highway 55 and County Road
73 intersection light is too long, the
intersection feels unsafe for bike/ped
crossing, and traffic is very heavy in
this area. Stop signs are not being
obeyed, and traffic backs-up into
residential areas at other nearby
intersections within the study area.
Improved Parks
More investment in
park and green spaces,
mentions of dog parks,
pickleball, restroom
facilities, more activities
for kids, etc.
Less Commercial Development
Comments pointed to less large
commercial development/
warehouse being desired in this
area and more options for retail,
restaurants, and unique experiences
that can add character.
159
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNviii
##
[0 500 1,000Feet
73
55
W
M
e
d
i
c
i
n
e
L
a
k
e
D
r
S Sh
o
r
e
D
r
10th Ave N
Old
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
5
Old C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
5
S S
h
o
r
e
D
r
55
Inuence Area
Project Area
Parcels
1
2
3
4
8
9
18
28 29 30
31
32
33
34
3537
38
39
40
36
5
6
7
10
11
12131415
16
17
19
21 22
23
24
25 26
27
20
41
42
43
52 53
54 55
66
88
89
90 91
92
93
94
95
96
67
68
69
75
76
77
78
79
80
44
45 46 47 48
49 50
51
57 56
5859
626361
64
81
82
83
84
85
86 87
70 71 73
72 74
65
60
This concerns me Idea for Improvement
Existing Conditions Map:
160
APPENDIX ix DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
1 3 1 Don’t get rid of frontage roads going through here.
2 3 1
I believe this map is outdated. This intersection was replaced and upgraded within the last
1-2 years and works MUCH better now for bicyclists, exiting and entering West Medicine
Lake Dr. from/to the Frontage Road. Thank you for this improvement!
3 2 2
This vacant house concerns me. I do not wish it to be made into a noisy residence with
multiple people living there. I do not wish for lots of loud construction. There are lots of
weeds in the lot and it is unsightly. It brings down the value of the neighborhood. I would
prefer that it is kept to a small, one family, one owner property.
4 -12
The city should be responsible for trimming or cutting dangerous old dead trees that might
fall on the Woods of Medicine Lake Townhomes. The WOM townhome HOA should not
have to be responsible or pay for this. The HOA should not have to pay for maintaining this
wetland area.
5 --
Post a no parking sign. Sometimes there are groups using the picnic area and rather than
park legally on the street they park on the grass. This kills the grass. This is also disrespectful
to the neighborhood that is trying to use the park as a community asset.
6 34 -
Concerned about safety. Is there anything that can be done to encourage family use of this
park and minimize this as a hangout for teenagers and groups that are just making trouble.
Especially after sunset. I find it very beautiful to see how many families, couples, and kids
use this space, morning, day and evening. There are times at night when this park is used
for drinking and drug use. No good can come to the community if this behavior is allowed.
7 2 -I would prefer that there is no sidewalk made on S. Shore Drive. That just leads to more
pedestrian traffic. There is plenty of sidewalk already across the street.
8 10 5 Concerned about increased traffic on South Shore Dr and 10th Ave. Drag racing and
speeding is a common occurrence. Drivers don’t obey the crosswalk signs.
9 13 -Difficult to see traffic coming from medicine lake side with curve and overgrown trees.
10 15 -
This intersection does not work well, especially during rush hours, and especially for
vehicles traveling from 10th Ave/South Shore Drive and turning right onto Hwy 55 west or
going straight to Co Rd 73. It seems that a fix requires more lanes but I’m guessing that’s a
challenge as it seems the space simply isn’t currently available with the businesses on each
side.
11 7 -You can sit at this light for much too long waiting to go straight. The light should be longer
or something else should be done.
12 1 -
55 should be a changed to a overpass here like they did at Highway 7 & Louisiana in St.
Louis Park. Then County Road 73/South Shore Drive with the pedestrian & bike traffic would
be able to go underneath more safely.
13 6 -
I agree that this intersection is very dangerous for bicyclists to cross, in either direction.
I ride during the daytime to avoid riding during morning or evening rush hour. I use the
crosswalk button to cross from south to north. Crossing from north to south I cannot reach
the button without getting off my bike, and just cross with traffic. But the cars coming from
the south, when turning north to Highway 55, do not always watch for bicyclists that take
longer to cross.
14 26 13
This intersection is very difficult for bicycles to cross - especially headed south where there
is no crosswalk button on the west side of the road. Kids on their own bikes cannot safely
cross.
15 2 2 Keep this green space and perhaps make it less of a weedy eyesore. Please do not put an
ugly commercial big building here.
161
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNx
#Likes Dislikes Comment
16 5 2
This area of traffic is dangerous. Cars turning right off 55 come quickly and do not always
see people turning in or out of this road. I have seen accidents and several near accidents
here.
17 1 -Concern: Too many vehicles go through this stop sign without stopping or signaling.
18 38 16
Based upon the proposed plan I feel that this sure appears to be a great waste of city
resources when there are so many more opportunities that should have a much higher
priority than this project. One example is the various side roads and storm drains around
the city that always need attention along with improving existing parks instead of
expanding them. Fix whats broke first before expanding, might i also suggest water quality
at medicine lake?
19 6 6 Concern: Too many vehicles go through these three stop signs without stopping or
signaling.
20 10 30 City should purchase this impound/towing business/property for redevelopment. It’s an
eyesore and no longer belongs here.
21 5 -
If the need arises these towing & auto repair businesses are a great close distance asset to
have in our community. They have been very good neighbors for many years & it’s the rarity
that I’ve ever seen vehicles parked all over the place. No, they do not belong in a industrial
area as suggested. Support your local small businesses.
22 4 17
The amount of cars spilling into the street from this business can make this area difficult to
drive through. There are also often cars or large semi trucks from this business that park at
the LaCompte parking lot, making it difficult to use the parking lot at the park.
23 18 36
The auto impound lot belongs in an industrial area or it needs to be hidden. Better traffic
management is needed at the 73 old CR 15 intersection. Define weather there is or isn’t a
right turn lane. or redo the intersection.
24 -4 People don’t signal at this intersection, difficult to see and turn out of sunset trail.
25 6 9
Concern: This intersection appears to be relatively rare. Perhaps drivers are unfamiliar with
this type, but many vehicles do not signal their turn creating confusion and potential
accidents.
26 15 17
I am deeply concerned regarding the proposed trails that already exist on the proposed
routes along with all of the alternatives that many people already use ie. through
neighborhoods etc. I would rather no trails be proposed due to the fact most biker and
walker prefer using the quiet neighborhoods versus the rather busy county roads.
27 4 -A 10 foot wide bike trail is not needed on County Road 73. A bike trail could be built on the
land that Plymouth owns behind the residential houses and connect it to the existing park.
28 21 9
Why not just leave it as is. Not everything needs to be inter-connected and trailed. Leaving
some areas as a simple old fashioned neighborhoods such as this area is not bad for the
community. In many cases crime goes up around housing that has easy access to trails for
easier escapes for individuals that commit crimes. I would rather see this area planning go
to more important areas such as the medicine lake area better trails there is much more
important!
29 10 13 This is the closest park to our home, but we never go here because we don’t feel that we
can safely walk/bike with our kids coming from the west.
30 1 -Can’t the hockey rink be multi purpose so it’s better utilized. Maybe a hockey rink/volley ball
court or if black topped it could be a roller rink.
162
APPENDIX xi DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
31 5 2 I am concerned with the increase in commercial buildings going up in this space. There is
too many in this small area as it is.
32 13 -1.) Where will the “proposed trails” be placed....north or south of Old City Rd 15? 2.) How will
this project impact the homes on Old City Road 15?
33 17 -What will happen to these homes?
34 2 3 Power. We constantly have power issues in my neighborhood. If we are asking for such a
large change in the space, can we also get funding to bury our lines?
35 24 10
Frankly this idea of connecting the wetlands is just not needed. The connecting
neighborhoods already serve as the various paths that connect this wetland, in living here
that park is just not used other than baseball games and is fine as it is given the easy ways
to get to the park through the neighborhood. Also like many residents in along the wetland
the possibility of paths eliminates our privacy which we highly value. Leave the wetlands as
is for the animals not people.
36 18 -Investigate the wetland filling happening here.
37 6 -Does the DNR know about the filling in of this wetland area?
38 1 -I don’t think there’s a need for a fancy 10’ wide bike trail with grassy tree lined boulevards.
What about the existing mature trees & homeowners landscaped front yards?
39 21 23
This space was acquired over many years effort as open natural space. It is not park land.
Adding access or trails is not consistent with what the neighborhood has supported and
fought for during the past 35 years to preserve the nature and wildlife.
40 20 28
Living on City Rd 73, we see first-hand the high volume of bike and pedestrian traffic that
would use the proposed pathway. While we are excited about the possibility of a bike path,
we are very concerned about the suggestions of putting the pathway along the open
space/wetland behind our home which would cause our back yard to also become a high
traffic area and result in loss of our privacy.
#Likes Dislikes Comment
41 3 4
Since this is a main crosswalk over to fast food and off the Luce Line trail, it would be great
to have a pedestrian bridge in this location. It would also help traffic flow, because when the
“walk” button is pushed, the light (which already takes forever to turn green) takes even longer.
It would be great to have the green light last longer than 10 seconds for cars turning left (east
bound highway 55) to get through the light. Many cars run the light, because otherwise its a
4-5 min wait.
42 1 1 This is a weird spot for right of way. Not sure traffic out of the apartments realize that they
should yield. Maybe a stop sign coming out of the apartments?
43 -2 There has been talk of trails in many comments. This spot is just outside the development area
but it is undeveloped land and would be a good place for trail to extend into.
44 19 1 Would like to see better signage indicating 11th Ave N is a Dead End, to reduce the traffic and
cul de sac turn arounds
45 3 -Extend sidewalk to 10th ave
163
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxii
#Likes Dislikes Comment
46 65 -
Restroom improvement. Currently there is a porta-potty that is placed in the park during
the summer. Can this be upgraded to something that matches the beauty of the rest of the
park? An alternative would be to build a wood privacy fence around this location. Wood
fences are used in many other parks and are a very acceptable option.
47 9 6
Would like to see sidewalk along South Shore drive near South Shore park. Right now in the
winter, the trail through the park is not plowed and it’s very dangerous to walk along South
Shore drive to connect to the trail that starts near condominium building due to curve in
the road.
48 2 43
Would love to have an area for kids to play on their wheeled toys - scooters, skateboards,
Ripsticks, roller blades, hoverboards, one-wheels, bikes, trikes, etc. So much of kids’ play
is on wheels that require a hard surface, and they still use playgrounds and open grassy
space. Maybe replace some of the grassy space with hard surface - either just flat and multi-
purpose, or with features like a skate park.
49 4 1 How about tennis/pickle ball court?
50 55 4 Good place for a pickleball court.
51 5 43 How about tennis courts / pickle ball courts and would be great to have trails connecting
to the rest of Plymouth trail system.
52 9 Can the frontage road be moved behind these buildings to connect South shore and
medicine lake drive?
53 8 -Sidewalks on 1 or both sides of South Shore Drive here would be great.
54 63 38
What is going to happen to the trailer park? It needs to be redeveloped as part of the
plan. Plymouth is no place for a trailer park. Also, Plymouth needs to start constructing
overpasses at the busy intersections on Hwy. 55. Way too many signaled interchanges.
Flashing yellow turns to exit 55 should be implemented at this intersection and others.
55 31 46
A few years ago, the Star Tribune had a great story on mobile home parks, the
neighborhood they become and the people who choose to live there. It really opened my
eyes to the fact that not everybody wants to live in a huge home with a big mortgage.
Negative comments about how “a mobile home park doesn’t belong in Plymouth” are
snooty and misplaced. If the residents are happy there, let it be.
56 28 -
This is a very difficult angled left turn from the frontage road onto 10th Ave. Made more
difficult during rush hour with backed up traffic at the 10th Ave./HWY 55 light obstructing
the view of traffic. Consider a stop sign for the north/southbound 10th Ave. traffic to avoid
blocking the intersection.
57 23 4 I would like to see sidewalk extended to get from 10th Ave to Hwy 55.
58 -1
This frontage road should dead end at S. Shore drive to motor vehicle traffic. It’s way to
close to the intersection of Hwy 55 and is blocked up a lot of the time by the badly timed
signals on 55, Plus it’s at such a odd angle visibility is poor of the traffic coming off 55 & the
vehicles entering from the frontage road across the street.
59 21 -
This is a very dangerous turn/intersection for bicyclists also, traveling in either direction. The
road is way too narrow with sharp curves. This is a prime route for road bicyclists who ride
around Medicine Lake but do not ride on the trail with the two railroad-tie bridges (for fear
of hitting pedestrians, or riding fast over very bumpy terrain). There is no other road that
connects South Shore Drive with West Medicine Lake Dr.
164
APPENDIX xiii DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
60 43 -Right turn lane to hwy 55. It would improve traffic flow during rush hour. Right now if there
are more than 2 cars waiting to cross hwy 55, there is no way to turn right.
61 7 2 Would like to see a pedestrian/bike bridge or tunnel crossing Hwy 55 here and more
restaurants and shops in this area.
62 2 3
I agree with the others commenting that the HWY 55/10th Ave. intersection is dangerous
for pedestrians. This is exacerbated by the close proximity to the park & ride where you
have many who want/need to walk & ride. The situation will worsen if a bike/walking trail is
to pass through here per the Three Rivers Park District plan (https://www.letstalkthreerivers.
org/eagle-to-bryant-lake-regional-trail). I suggest a handicapped accessible underpass on
the east side of intersection.
63 --
I love the suggestion posted about a walking bridge. Building on that, I suggest that we
think about the trails/markers that extend out from the intersection so pedestrians and
bikers can safely navigate the whole area being reviewed
64 12 2
I’ve seen many people try to walk/bike across Hwy 55 after using the bus and it always
seems very dangerous with the increased traffic and people running the light. A walking
bridge would greatly improve that situation.
65 3 1
This intersection doesn’t work during rush hour to get back onto hwy 55 from Starbucks/
McDonald’s. Also can’t turn left to Starbucks coming from CR73 due to backed up left turn
lane to 55 during afternoon rush hour.
66 5 22 Straightening CR73/15 in this area by going behind the Streichers building makes a lot of
sense.
67 8 31
Traffic is really becoming heavy on Hwy 55. Rush hour is quite impressive and likely to get
worse. Rapid Bus service to downtown is a good start. May I suggest lightrail? Already have
room along a well-established corridor. Can run way West of Plymouth, that whole area is
rapidly growing.
68 8 -I think there should be a footbridge across 55
69 --
County Rd 73 at the Transit Station needs a traffic light to allow commuters who use the
Plymouth bus to exit the parking structure at the 73 Transit Station. The rush hour traffic
drivers do not obey the all-way stop signs and just flow through the intersection in a panic
to get to the green light at Hwy 55. While the approaching traffic from the office buildings
and Hwy 55 just flow through, ignoring the stop signs, the bus commuters are trapped if
they want to go straight or left.
70 -2
I’d love to have some Plymouth nightlife of any sort. It is greatly lacking in this area ever
since losing the Flying Tiger and Country House in this exact neighborhood (many years
ago). I’d love to see a social house/cocktail room/live music venue/ bar with sport courts/
independent new restaurants/ taproom or other adult recreation based business around
here! A maker’s space or community art center would be great, too!
71 3 20 Would like to see a drugstore (Walgreen’s, CVS?) in this area
72 10 27
Connect this vacant property with the vacant property on the south side of Hwy 55 via
walking tunnel or walking bridge. This, then, could/would connect S Shore Park with
LaCompte playfield and, perhaps, an eventual path around the swamp south of Hwy 55 as
suggested elsewhere. This would also connect with the Luce Line trail via South Shore Dr.
Perhaps the larger vacant property north of 55 could be another dog park.
165
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxiv
#Likes Dislikes Comment
73 7 8
I think a place for small business / shops would be nice here. Thinking local bakery, small
restaurant or shops/retail. Not more office or apartment but somewhere community could
gather. Someone else mention adding a way to cross 55 to the Park (tunnel) that would
be nice too. There is so much walking and biking around this area but no where to go if
you’d like a destination. You have to bike miles to get to downtown Wayzata to have that
experience. Texa/Tonka just redeveloped a nice space.
74 8 8 This vacant lot should either be turned into something the community can use or planted
with trees. Keeping it a vacant lot seems to be a waste.
75 23 10 This intersection could use a streetlight - the whole road is very dark at night and seems to
have much less streetlights than most other areas in Plymouth
76 3 5 Love the idea of trail along 10th ave (assuming it would then go along Nathan ln) to
connect with Luce line trail.
77 3 18
I am so thankful to have an opportunity to give input. We would like for Plymouth to build
multi-generational co-housing to serve the disabled and help young families. Co-housing
solves a multitude of housing challenges and is already successful in Minnesota. Would
you consider partnering with a nonprofit who successfully plans and executes co-housing
developments?
78 -1 Everybody who works in this building deserves a big pay raise, plus company cars!
79 6 5
Regardless of what you do with this area, Highway 55 and 101/Peony needs an overpass.
It’s an extremely busy road leading to Wayzata High School with traffic backed up in all
directions every morning. Why wouldn’t this be a priority for a walking/biking overpass??
80 12 3
Somewhere on this corridor there needs to be a safer way for people to get across 55 in
a bike or on foot. This area is totally disconnected from all other Plymouth amenities. I
understand the concerns of some for this but the demographic is changing and I would like
to see us enjoy the rest of our city and be connected
81 8 11 Needs to be a right turn lane to assist with back ups for those turning left here and lining
up for hwy 55 stoplight.
82 2 18 Wondering if a round-about could work at some of these intersections to keep traffic
flowing instead of causing back-ups through residential areas?
83 23 2 These are small businesses that provide a valuable service to our community. Whats wrong
with having a family run auto repair business?
84 4 2 Can we add a sidewalk along this road? People cut the corners and it’s difficult to get to the
park safely
85 1 19
Straighten CR73 from Nathan Ln here - to west of Streicher’s - to HWY 55. It becomes the
“through street”. At the north end: The MN Service Rd would go across CR73 at 90 degrees
and connect to the old CR73/OldCR15 making both sides appear and feel more like a
usual service road. Stop signs go on the “new” service road. At the south end: The odd “Y”
intersection is eliminated. CR73 goes through north-south. Sunset Trail/OldCR15 crosses
CR73 at an angle. Stop signs go on Sunset Trail/OldCR15.
86 1 8
This is an odd intersection that is prone to confusion. If this intersection is being re-done, a
more standard design may be beneficial (assuming space allows). One option could be to
make Sunset Trail intersect the main road at a right angle.
87 5 19 Small roundabout here might help with this awful intersection?
166
APPENDIX xv DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
88 10 9
This area has very low walkability and it would benefit the community to improve it. It
serves the needs/safety/health of many as opposed to the few who are loudly speaking
against new safe paths/trails. Trails and nature can co-exist.
89 4 2
This field in your own comments says its disconnected from the rest of the Plymouth rec
systems and is heavily used. I would like to see some investment in a better park for kids
to be at, more open space here, better parking and actual sidewalks to get to it. Living in
the sounding area, I don’t feel comfortable with the increase in traffic and letting my kids
head there. So it rarely is used. In the winter it would be nice to see a larger non-hockey rink
made and an open warming house
90 1 6 It would be nice to squeeze a community garden in somewhere. I am not suggesting this
exact location, but somewhere in the larger area.
91 4 14
It would be very nice to have a dog park in the area, along with designated biking and
walking trails. An “ideal” improvement would be a pedestrian bridge from the north to the
south side of Hwy 55. I think it would also be beneficial to clean up the corner of Plymouth
Automotive as there are so many parked vehicles there.
92 22 22
Move forward with the open land park on city rd 73 / Zachary by running a path south to
connect with the town homes walkways. Eventually it would be great to have a walking
path all around the whole acreage /swamp land.
93 3 2
There used to be a beautiful tamarack grove here with a moss laden floor. The last time I
was back there it was mostly buckthorn and grass. Only the largest tamaracks survive. It
would be nice if it could be restored and if there is a walking path, have it go trough there
so all can enjoy its beauty.
94 2 3
I whole heartily agree with the comments about safer pedestrian and cycling options.
Also, a more substantial fence would be nice to separate highway 55 from county road 15.
Perhaps some noise muffling trees? I love this neighborhood but don’t appreciate the car
dependent infrastructure. I would love to see a bike like that runs along highway 55 or even
a tram/light rail.
95 3 18
This would be a good area for an overhead pedestrian bridge. Lots of people live on both
sides of the road. The road is potentially very dangerous. Freeway speeds and higher. I often
see elderly, babies in strollers, and bicycles crossing here. The combination of a shopping
center & major grocery store on one side and a major movie theater, hotel upscale
restaurant with LOTS of apartments on other side really creates opportunities to share the
economies on both sides of the road SAFELY.
96 6 18 This intersection could use an overpass for pedestrians!
167
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxvi
ROUND II COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
For the second round of community engagement, a letter was mailed to each property owner within
the study area. The letter included information on the online engagement, as well as a paper survey
and contact information for residents without access to technology. The online engagement included
an interactive map, similar to that in the first round of engagement. Responders were able to leave
comments via the interactive mapping tool, geographically documenting their responses. They were also
able to complete a survey on the two concepts.
Survey Comments Summary:
Involvement Summary:
Are there any land uses or key features missing that you would like to see?(The word cloud takes into account the number of times a response was received. Phrases that appear larger in size were popular or mentioned most often).
Nature Walk
Dog
Park
Giant Green
Park
Natural Habitat
Restaurants Mixed Use
Trail
Connections
Preserve Wetlands
Less
Development
Traffic
CalmingOffice Space
Pedestrian FriendlyPedestrian
BridgeSidewalks
More
Trails
1254
Total Site Visits
83
Unique Stakeholders
195
Map Comments
35
Survey Responses
Thinking ahead 10 years from now, what are your top priorities for improvements in the study area?
(Summary list of comments received)
Suggestions
• Intersections improvements a must
• Improved traffic flow badly needed
• Lower road speeds/traffic calming
• Get more people to use transit
• Safe pedestrian connections
• More accessibility
• More park and outdoor amenities/facilities
• Quality restaurants, retail, and mixed use
• More trees and green spaces
• More efforts to protect and preserve natural
habitats and wetlands
• Incorporate green space
• EV infrastructure
Concerns
• More traffic in the area, efficiency should be
a top concern
• More density = more traffic congestion
• No more transit needed
• Too much high density residential being
proposed
• Unsightly existing development
• More density will invite crime
• Current residents want a quiet, single family
neighborhood
• Plans feel disconnected from what exists
today
• No proposed changes seem necessary
168
APPENDIX xvii DRAFT
Which concept best represents the future
vision for the study area?
Concept 1
Concept 2
74%
26%
Why? (Summary of comments)
Less HDR/density
proposed
Addresses road
realignment
Proposed
commercial
Less potential
vehicular
congestion
More green
space
protection
Which concept provides the best
transportation network?
Concept 1
Concept 2
74%
26%
Road curves would
slow traffic
Intersection
improvements
proposed
Enhanced pedestrian
crossings
More walkable
Both would benefit
the BRT plans
More efficient for
traffic Safer/better
pedestrian
connections
Less HDR = less
car traffic
Both will make
traffic worse
Both are
good
We don’t need
the BRT
Density more
spread out
As a walker or biker, which concept would
you feel most comfortable in?
Concept 1
Concept 2
29%
71%
Which concept best fits the City’s plans for
future Bus Rapid Transit?
Concept 1
Concept 2
29%
71%
Note: Responses that expressed a dislike of both concepts were received within the feedback of this survey
169
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxviii
Parcels
Building Footprints
Study Area
Influence Area
TOWNHOME REDEVELOPMENT
ON 3 LARGE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS+/- 40 UNITS
REALIGN SUNSET TRAILINTERSECTION
HDR +/- 120 UNITS
NEW CHURCH BUILDING
HDR +/- 120 UNITS
COMMERCIAL+/- 8,000 SF
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR)+/- 200 UNITS
DOUBLE LEFT TURN LANE AT HWY 55,PROTECTED LEFT TURN FOR FRONTAGE
ROAD WITH MEDIAN
IMPROVE AT GRADE CROSSING
FOR PEDESTRIANS
HDR +/- 120 UNITS
PROPOSED EAGLE LAKE/BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL
ROUNDABOUT @ 10TH AVE N &SOUTH SHORE DRIVE
PROVIDE ACCESS TO 10TH AVE N
AVOID ENCROACHMENT WITH TRAIL TO EAST OF R.O.W.
TOWNHOMES
+/- 12 UNITS
HDR +/- 100 UNITS
HDR +/- 90 UNITS
EXTEND FRONTAGE ROAD &
CONNECT TO 6TH AVE N
HDR +/- 120 UNITSENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
TOWNHOMES
+/- 14 UNITS
PARK PLANNING PROCESS TO
BEGIN IN 2026
PLAZA
STATION 73
PARK & RIDE
SURFACE PARKING
STORM-WATER
SOUTH SHORE PARK
POTENTIAL
PARK EXPANSION
POTENTIALPARK
EXPANSION
73
55
W
M
e
d
i
c
i
n
e
L
a
k
e
D
r
Suns
e
t
T
r
a
i
l
10th Ave N
Old
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
5
S S
h
o
r
e
D
r
55
S Sh
o
r
e
D
r
[0500250 Feet
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
10
12
16
13
1415
18
17
19
20 21
22
23 24
25 26 27 28 29
30
31
32
33
3435
36 37
38
39
44 45
4650
51
43414240
47 48 49
52
53 55 5654
5761
62 64
63
65
58
60 59
71
66
70
67 68 69
72
73
Interactive Map Summaries
CONCEPT 1
170
APPENDIX xix DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
1 1 18 I like being able more safely walk and I presume bike across 55.
2 -27 This seems like a good use of the area. It will allow for more HDR along a thoroughfare that can handle the
extra traffic.
3 2 4 Better choice for multiple housing in an area that already has similar housing.
4 1 4 Would like better pedestrian and bicycle access and safer crossing of the road. It’s hard to see around the
curve and watch out for vehicles that sometimes go quite fast.
5 1 -Above grade needed as hwy 55 is too busy and too wide to cross safely with kids/dogs.
6 7 23 Good place for high density housing between commercial and other similar housing.
7 -25 I don’t attend this church, but I think it’s good to provide a spot for them.
8 4 14 The realignment of the Sunset Tr intersection is badly needed regardless of the final design.
9 2 51 We do need more density, that’s what drives affordability.
10 -23 A trail is much needed on this road.
11 -37 We do need park improvements here and I’d love to see the park expand within reason. Nice amenity for
young families.
#Likes Dislikes Comment
12 1 -Crossing for pedestrians should be a bridge or tunnel.
13 1 -Build an overpass.
14 2 12 How about an overpass/bridge? Not enough space?
15 2 -Need longer acceleration lanes for right turns on red, people are taking risks because light is so long.
16 3 -Sure would be nice to have a pharmacy with a pick-up window in our area.
17 1 -
It is ‘interesting’ that either concept would rather consider eliminating single-family homes, the Streicher
building, impound lot, and demolish the church before creating a mixed-use urban area on the mobile
park & east. According to HUD, manufactured home lifespan is 30-55 yrs (they depreciate), while all
homesteads near PLC appear built between ‘55-65 and would continue to appreciate. Anyone like the
downtown Hopkins area, or Minnetonka stretch near Unmapped? Rationale for these concepts, please.
18 1 -Put the HDR here and put more single family housing on the south side of 55. There is too much HDR
everywhere to begin with.
19 -7
Is there a pedestrian bridge at this location? If not, please consider adding as it is near impossible and very
dangerous trying to cross Highway 55. Also, what efforts are in the plan to slow and minimize the traffic on
Highway 55?
20 -44 Can we have one level senior living instead of apartments?
21 1 -
I know that weekends & but for rush hour on weekdays this road does NOT back up with traffic heading
towards 55 at this intersection (unless it turkey crossing time). When it does back up it’s because the traffic
waiting at the signal light on 55 is backed up. Fix the problems there by having 2 left turn lanes onto 55
& a longer green light during rush hour. Please do not destroy our homes & neighborhood which really is
average with traffic most of the time.
22 --City should add a pad with a basketball hoop (like at St Mary’s Park). Don’t need full court, just a place to
shoot hoops.
23 2 -City should add a pad with a basketball hoop (like at St Mary’s Park). Don’t need full court, just a place to
shoot hoops.
24 -33 Please make sure to have sidewalks on the frontage roads to the neighborhoods to the east of the park.
171
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxx
#Likes Dislikes Comment
25 -3
Look, no one really WANTS more development to take place near their house, as we already own a house
and don’t feel the effects of a crazy competitive housing market and skyrocketing rent prices. But without
new developments going in SOMEWHERE neither of these problems will be solved. I live a few houses
south of this proposed development and do these changes scare me a bit? Obviously yes, but I knowingly
chose to live on a busy road and no matter how much I wish for it to change, (part 1/5)
26 -3
it’s never going to be a quiet neighborhood street. I guess I would just ask that these developments are
kept somewhat tasteful (not too tall, visually appealing, etc.), and along with these new units we have a
corresponding increase in the safety and usefulness of Zachary Lane. To me this would mean lowering the
speed limit to 30mph, putting in a MUCH NEEDED sidewalk/trail for the many pedestrians that walk/run/
bike along our road (yes sorry my neighbors to the (part 2/5)
27 -3
east this would slightly stink for you having it go through your yards), fixing the wonky Sunset Trail
intersection which looks inevitable in either plan and making accessing highway 55 easy and convenient
and the most logical choice so all these new residents choose to go that direction instead of heading
south on Zachary. That last part I can’t stress enough. Please improve the lights timing, and the merging
capability going east on 55 towards 169 so that people WANT to go (part 3/5)
28 -3
that direction when they need to get on the freeways. I do like the idea of the townhomes being south of
the Sunset Trail intersection and the apartments being north of it. That’s obviously the logical arraignment
of those two things and would minimize the change that us existing residents would actually notice. All
in all change is scary but with a much needed trail, an expansion of our nearby park, and most likely an
increase in quality retail and restaurants nearby on 55 (part 4/5)
29 -3 these changes could ultimately be a positive for our area. My current neighbors, I welcome your down
votes (part 5/5).
#Likes Dislikes Comment
30 3 -
Adding another concern here about North side of the intersection with curved frontage Rd and shared
right turn (going W on hwy 55) and South lane which makes traffic very difficult to navigate during rush
hours. There were several comments in November survey but they didn’t make it to Concept1 or Concept2.
31 17 -Mixed use or commercial makes more sense here.
32 42 1 All for roundabouts as long as you do them on the moon. We don’t need roundabouts.
33 -3 Why not connect this road through?
34 14 3 Roundabout is not needed at this intersection. Current visibility is good from SB So Shore Dr. Traffic
volumes on So Shore Dr north of 10th Ave are not great. Waste of money!
35 8 -Purchase and redevelop this trailer park...this is a no-brainer.
36 30 -This is a better place for you HDR apartments.
37 12 -Will this new development push out the mobile home park? Will it make properties unaffordable of these
residents?
38 50 -Why not redevelop these properties for mixed use?
39 48 5 We don’t need or want high density housing in an area that would be better left as-is, as a simple
neighborhood. Waste of city resources/money!! Just NO. Please don’t. Both concepts 1 & 2 are bad.
40 32 -The city already owns most of this property, the county had some ROW too. Is this even an option to look
at options or is this already a done deal? I don’t like the this is not made public on these concepts.
41 5 -
I am against both concepts. Putting in high density residential and commercial properties will significantly
add to the congestion in this area, especially during rush hour where the traffic is already backed up. It is
very unfair to the homeowners in this area to have their places removed by imminent domain. A direct
connection to 55 on 73 will encourage speeding and other reckless driving. There is already a long wait for
light changes at this intersection.
172
APPENDIX xxi DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
42 43 -
Current and historical traffic counts do not support the need to straighten CR73. Traffic has actually
dropped 14% between 2001 and 2019. And, with more people working at home (and many expected to
continue to do so), it is unlikely that traffic will grow significantly.
43 16 -Can the school district handle the increase of people/kids?
44 49 3
Your online survey will only allow me to like and comment on concept 1 or concept 2. Har! It doesn’t allow
the choice that I want - that they are both HORRIBLE IDEAS! Take away single family houses and put up
high density monstrosities. How ridiculous.
45 2 3 Any modifications to the Park & Ride should result in direct access to TH55 (for buses). Both of these
concepts make it harder for drivers to get into the structure.
46 4 12
Exiting the Park & Ride can be a problem during rush hour, especially on snowy days. Traffic heading
toward Hwy 55 can back up to the four-way stop, which delays vehicles trying to exit the park and ride as
well as others trying to get to Hwy 55.
47 52 -Who is going to pay for the eminent domain for the road realignment and redevelopment? Will this be
done with out assessing the residents?
48 59 -
Why wreck a beautiful single family home area and put up ugly high density housing? This is a pathetic, ill
conceived, badly thought out idea. This “plan” belongs in non-residential areas way out in the boondocks, if
at all. What’s wrong? Have developers run out of cheap farm land?
49 64 -We do not need or want high density housing especially since the area does not support that and will
never support such an large and frankly too gigantic eyesore!
50 40 -Why drive current businesses that are doing well in this area out of business just because you think we
need something else?
51 67 -
The neighborhoods have shot these types of plans down for a good decade now regarding adding
high density poorly constructed housing in this area where we all live. The area cant support this kind of
construction no matter what is changed. WE DO NOT WANT IT. Maybe further out west near Medina this
could be supported but not here.
52 52 1
I do not support additional housing density in this area, as the design of the roads cannot support this level
of traffic. This area is extremely congested and busy and adding more housing in such a small space will
only add to congestion.
53 3 16 Speed on this road is a real issues. What are the traffic count projection with this improvement? What is
Hennepin County’s stance on this project?
54 52 1
Just so the rush hour commuters can save 5 minuets & speed though the area once or twice a day we have
to cut down all the 200+ year old trees that the 3 dozen area turkey’s roost in every night & destroy the
other wildlife habitat nearby.
55 15 -
Except for twice a day when the AM & PM rush of weekday workers are going back & forth to work this
road does not back up with traffic. It is a nice well-established neighborhood to live in that your proposed
concept would destroy. NO, to any high-density apartments here. More people, more crime.
56 57 -
Too much high density housing in this version. Can you imagine what this area will be like during rush
hour? Whenever there is traffic jam on 394 people cut across Cty 73 to 55 and it is a dangerous mess.
Adding more density and more cars in this area is not wise.
57 54 -
BOTH of your CONCEPTS ARE BAD. Seems like a Vladimir Putin move to use eminent domain to seize
people’s homes & destroy their lives just so the developers can get the land to profit with their apartment
buildings. Most of the residents in this neighborhood have been here for decades & have all grown up
together. Since when did improving the flow of traffic involve taking people’s homes for HDR development.
58 1 50 Will there be sidewalks and/or bicycle lanes along this road?
59 36 -
This park is basically a dud on being useful for most people with most of the land being the baseball fields
& another good portion the hockey rink it sit’s unused most of the time. And now it looks like you want to
expand by take someone’s home. Not Cool.
173
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxii
#Likes Dislikes Comment
60 8 -Don’t forget everyone there is another proposal to comment on, it can be found via the 3 horizontal bars at
the top left corner of the map.
61 59 -Why are we removing single family homes that are affordable for middle income? Why not add density at
PID 3611822240089? There are 12.8 acres that have sat vacant for years!
62 34 1
What’s the objective with taking over an existing neighborhood & replacing it with 440 high density
apartments? Is it just trying to increase bus rider numbers in the 5 minute walking zone? You may pick up
riders but you’ll probably be making the surrounding community less quite and safe in the long run. THIS IS
A BAD CONCEPT.
63 60 -
Why do we need to have even more high density housing, this idea of turning the church area into a new
church and high density housing was tried recently in the past an failed. There is no reason to change what
is there especially with a church population who is dwindling and cant support the current building they
already have. Who is going to pay for this, sure appears as if us tax payers will be footing this bill!
64 43 3 Unkind to tell someone their home is worthy of removal for high density housing.
65 42 2
2018 a similar development plan on this church site plus the adjacent site to the south was denied by
the City Council. That plan included building a new smaller church on a portion of the land & a 80 unit 4
story building of luxury Sr living condos. Now this plan is to still have the new church but now increase
the number of units in the apartment building from 80 to 120 units on just the old church site. This
neighborhood doesn’t want tall HDR’s. Owner occupied townhomes better fit.
66 68 1 We don’t need or want high density housing in an area that would be better left as a simple neighborhood.
Waste of city resources/money!!
67 60 -
Clearly the city has no interest in reports of illegal dumping and wetland filling in this area that the previous
study in November 21’ identified it appears they plan on ignoring that which deeply concerns me and the
validity of this study
68 60 -
Funny how the city is ignoring the reports of dumping and filling of a protected wetland that surfaced
from the last public comment session and nothing has happened. Also the area where this comment is
for sale is not cheap so how much will this cost it deeply concerns me that the lack of transparency on this
project along with these reports!
69 86 -
Clearly based upon the map and comments period back in the November time frame none of our
comments regarding this planning were listened to regarding expanding the park and leaving the
wetlands alone. It is sad that the city of Plymouth does not listen to the people who actually live here and
would be negatively affected by the poorly laid out plan with minimal input being incorporated into either
concept! The money would be put to better uses else where not here!
70 57 1 This area is some of the most affordable single family homes in the city. They should not be taken out.
71 1 45 Doesn’t show sidewalks. Need to connect neighborhood to park and businesses without forcing them to
walk on frontage road sidewalks. Maybe they just are shown?
72 2 49 No sidewalks exist here. Sidewalks on east side of Revere along hwy 15 but not on west side.
73 31 -Dangerous entry way into neighborhood. Looks to be out of scope of project but with additional traffic
trying to access the new commercial and apartments planned, this becomes even more dangerous.
Page Intentionally Left Blank
174
APPENDIX xxiii DRAFT
Page Intentionally Left Blank
175
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxiv
###This concerns meI Like This Ideas and Suggestions
Parcels
Building Footprints
Study Area
Influence Area
TOWNHOMES+/- 56 UNITS
HDR +/- 120 UNITS(PARK VIEWS)
NEW CHURCH BUILDING
HDR +/- 120 UNITS(WETLAND VIEWS)
COMMERCIAL+/- 10,000 SF
DOUBLE LEFT TURN LANE AT HWY 55, PROTECTED LEFT TURN FOR
FRONTAGE ROAD WITH MEDIAN
CENTER MEDIAN AT
10TH AVE N
MIXED USE+/- 5,000 SF
HDR +/- 120 UNITS
ROUNDABOUT @ SOUTH
SHORE DR & 10TH AVE N HAWK SIGNAL @ MIDBLOCK
CROSSING OF 10TH AVE N
ACCESS TO 10TH AVE N
TOWNHOMES+/- 10 UNITS
AVOID ENCROACHMENT WTH TRAIL TO EAST OF
R.O.W.
HDR
+/- 150 UNITS
EXTEND FRONTAGE RD &CONNECT TO 6TH AVE
MIXED USE+/- 180 UNITS
COMMERCIAL+/- 8,000 SF
PROPOSED EAGLE LAKE /BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL
ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
PARK PLANNING PROCESS TO
BEGIN IN 2026
PLAZA
STATION 73
PARK & RIDE
SURFACE PARKING
STORM-WATER
SOUTH SHORE PARK
POTENTIAL
PARK EXPANSION
POTENTIALPARK
EXPANSION
73
55
W
M
e
d
i
c
i
n
e
L
a
k
e
D
r
Suns
e
t
T
r
a
i
l
10th Ave N
Old
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
5
S S
h
o
r
e
D
r
55
S Sh
o
r
e
D
r
[0500250 Feet
2
1
3
4
5 6
7
8 9
10
131211
14
15
16
17 18
19 20 21
22
23
2425
26 27 28
31
322930
34
35
33
46
36
38 39
37
44
40
41 4243
454748
50
49
51
56
53
52 54
57
5958
60
6162
63
64
55
66
65
67
CONCEPT 2
176
APPENDIX xxv DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
1 2 4
I think a roundabout would be safer and more comfortable for pedestrians, bicyclists and people using
wheelchairs. I dislike using this intersection to get to the trail and Medicine Lake because it’s hard to see
around the curve and vehicles drive fast.
2 --
I love the idea of roundabouts to help with traffic flow. There are too many lights and stop signs in
Plymouth and adding roundabouts not only helps with traffic flow but also helps traffic slow down in
order to go around the roundabout. A great solution that Plymouth should incorporate more into re-
development of neighborhoods.
3 --This type of housing here is a good transition to what’s already there and on your way to Cub. But need
traffic controls instead of just stop and go lights.
4 --Double turn lanes are a great idea. At times, the left turn arrow only allows a couple cars through at a
time. With the increased proposed housing density, more people will need to get onto 55 West from 73.
5 1 1 I like the idea of a curves road to calm traffic speeds.
6 1 22 I like the BRT platforms.
7 2 1 Pedestrian crossing above or below road is an absolute must in redesign... having it near bus stop makes
sense.
8 2 12
Concept 2 is much better design than Concept 1 in this area; with about half the HDR units and them
having park/wetlands view. Concept 1 appears it goal was to cram as many HDR units in a small space as
possible; this plan is much more appealing.
9 -2 I like the idea of green space expansion and the removal of the eyesore junk yard with totaled cars that
are probably leaking fuel and oil into the wetland.
10 1 29 Skating rink is used a lot.
11 1 3 I support the idea of sidewalk expansion along this stretch of cr73. It’s very unsafe to walk on the side of
the road currently.
12 2 2 Fine with attached townhomes if 1 or 2 stories like a single family home.
13 1 39 We like the idea of having a larger playground and park for people on the south west end of Plymouth to
Enjoy.
14 1 20 A trail is much needed for this road.
#Likes Dislikes Comment
15 8 -
Why wasn’t a printed copy of these 2 concept maps included with the letter/survey questionnaire sent to
those landowners in the affected area? Makes it difficult for those without internet access to answer the
survey. Especially if the timeline to respond as shown on your website only lasts through February & your
letter wasn’t sent out until Friday 2/18/22.
16 6 -
Crossing Highway 55 during rush hour is very difficult. Supporting businesses on the other side of
the road is hard. It feels like it gets worse during rush hours. Nice that right hand turns are not limited.
Acceleration lane feels long enough right now for me, but some people do almost get rear ended here.
17 3 -Right turn lane here needs to be a dedicated right turn lane and longer lane on S Shore Dr for cars to
stack.
18 3 1
I agree with most people that adding this much High Density housing is ridiculous for this area. Plymouth
does not have any great main street/destination areas like surrounding communities (Wayzata, Maple
Grove, Hopkins). Why can we not add more destinations like restaurants (not more fast food!) and retail so
there are places and things to actually do in Plymouth. We basically have become a housing destination
with a great school district but have to go to other cities to find food/retail.
19 5 -Pull frontage road back to align with frontage road on east side of South Shore Dr
177
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxvi
#Likes Dislikes Comment
20 6 -
On the south side of 55 you do a major re-route of the road. Could you do something similar on the north
side to eliminate the frontage road issue. Could you route the one side behind where the liquor store is
and connect it into to roundabout. Likewise, bring the road by holiday up parallel to SS drive (like was
done by the car wash) and connect it at the roundabout also. Would this help with the traffic flow?
21 7 -
It would be great to have additional smaller retail/restaurant/service spaces within walking distance
of Medicine Lake and surrounding residential areas. All of the spaces in both plans seem to be high-
density housing or commercial, but nothing that helps bring services closer to the community in order to
increase walking and biking
22 3 -Sure wish we had a pharmacy in our area with a pick-up window.
23 2 -This playfield should have amenities the same as the playfields on the south side of 55 unless the crossing
is extremely safe for children.
24 --
Should determine crossing and cost of crossing based off potential use. Rarely see people using the
crossing now, but that could be because it feels unsafe now. See more people using the crossing by Cub
Foods now.
25 --Would prefer to see these as townhomes
26 4 25 Can we have one level senior living instead of apartments?
27 13 5
When looking at commercial vs residential, would prefer residential development. Would prefer low
density or single family development. if you do higher density, would prefer some high architectural
standards in this neighborhood.
28 13 -
Cheaper to put in a traffic signal hear plus no families would lose their home. Tall high density apartments
would look bad here & there’s better parcels of land elsewhere along the east side of 55 going north. Even
the trailer park across 55 by Holiday Gas would be better.
29 -2 Suggesting a roundabout at Sunset Trail.
30 30 1
Since the owners of the 4 parcels of land (including the church) on this side of 73/Old County Rd 15 are
the only ones interested in selling their property why haven’t you come up with a plan to correct the
curve & the intersection with Sunset Trail using only their land? Why destroy the homes of families that
don’t want to move on the north side of the road on Old County Road 15?
31 --
There are many people who walk along Sunset or Ridgemount. There should be dedicated safe crossing
of Zachary/Hopkins Crossroad in order for those pedestrians coming from Sunset or Ridgemount to
access the bike trail/pedestrian trail along Zachary.
32 1 3 This is a very steep hill, there should be access to the park from the houses/apartments, but it will require
a lot of switch backs.
33 1 -City should add a pad with a basketball hoop (like at St Mary’s Park). Don’t need full court, just a place to
shoot hoops.
34 2 3 Provide separation for residents walking along road to the park
35 2 2
Where Sunset Trail and CR73 meet, make this a 90 degree intersection. This will make this safer by 1.
make it easier for those on Sunset to see traffic coming from both directions on CR73. 2. This will slow
down traffic coming south on CR73 as they come onto Sunset Ln. Most of this traffic exceeds the 30 mph
speed limit since it is a straight line off of CR73 and then Sunset Tr goes down hill. This is a dangerous
intersection now.
178
APPENDIX xxvii DRAFT
#Likes Dislikes Comment
36 4 -
Intersection with frontage road/south shore drive on the north side needs to be redesigned - this is
completely non-functional during peak times. There’s a backup because of the frontage road and other
cars block it.
37 12 1
Your online survey will only allow me to like and comment on concept 1 or concept 2. Har! It doesn’t
allow the choice that I want - that they are both HORRIBLE IDEAS! Take away single family houses and put
up high density monstrosities. How ridiculous.
38 3 -Cars turning right on 55 and trying to go straight here are in conflict and tend to block the lanes. Light
needs to be longer.
39 5 -This is a bad intersection, being so close to Hwy 55 and cross-traffic from the gas station and liquor store.
40 20 -
Is this a change from Concept 1? If so, why are trees being removed? There is already a large area here
for multi use. This park is a great asset for the neighborhood and already gets used by everyone for may
different activities. If you are not going to make a real improvement for the neighborhood then I would
just leave it alone.
41 9 -How can you redevelop this area and not removing the trailer park? Makes no sense.
42 31 -If housing is being eliminated to make way for high density apartments, why is this area not being
considered?
43 -2 Will this new development push out the mobile home park? Will it make properties unaffordable of these
residents?
44 27 1 Why not redevelop these properties for mixed use?
45 7 4 Just NO to High Density Residential (HDR) housing anywhere in this area for both concepts proposals. It
is a bad idea as it would increase traffic. I vote NO and reject both concepts.
46 1 -
What is the Cities intent with this reconstruction? Are we going to have another Co Rd 47 issue on our
hands? We like living on this county road because we don’t have major assessments like a residential
street do. If the city applies for a jurisdictional transfer the residents living on this road will be left with the
cost of repair/maintenance. We as residents need long-term transparency to better understand the cost
benefits. This road was repaved with no assessments because its a county rd
47 26 -The city already owns most of this property, the county had some ROW too. Is this even an option to look
at options or is this already a done deal? I don’t like the this is not made public on these concepts.
48 2 -This is a messy intersection. is there a need for it?
49 21 -
Why wreck a beautiful single family home area and put up ugly high density housing? This is a pathetic,
ill conceived, badly thought out idea. This “plan” belongs in non-residential areas way out in the
boondocks, if at all. What’s wrong? Have developers run out of cheap farm land?
50 14 -
Your online survey will only allow me to like and comment on concept 1 or concept 2. Har! It doesn’t
allow the choice that I want - that they are both HORRIBLE IDEAS! Take away single family houses and put
up high density monstrosities. How ridiculous.
51 61 1 The proposed housing would encroach on the protected wetlands.
52 25 1 No reason to extend CR-73, let alone make it a curve. It would be downhill and skewed with TH55. It
would be fun on an icy winter morning!
53 21 -Not a fan of the road realignment. Road should be a smooth curve. But OK with removal of business
buildings, not as much of a fan of removing houses.
54 2 -
Yes. traffic sometimes backs up at the existing intersection here, but only during the afternoon rush hour.
Off peak & weekends there is no backup. The main problem that causes the backup is the intersection
setup on Highway 55. Widen the intersection to fit 2 dedicated left turns lanes from this side of 55 &
fix the timing of the signals so more vehicles move through. The intersection by Holiday really needs
improvement too. Try fixing that problem instead of destroying the homes of families.
55 4 48 Need sidewalks and/or bicycle lanes along CR 15 for people walking or biking to the CR 73 bus station.
179
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxviii
#Likes Dislikes Comment
56 3 1 Can the school district handle the increase of people/kids?
57 20 3
After living with the ongoing stress of the pandemic the last couple years now you’re going to make
families on the north side of Old County Road 15 homeless by seizing their homes using eminent
domain so a developer builds an apartment building with wetland views, the views those families have
a right to. Is this a Putin move? Are you going to give those displaced families a rent-free apartment with
their familiar wetland view in that new building for all that you’re going to put them through?
58 43 1 Why are single family home being removed in favor of high density units?
59 36 1 Who is going to pay for the eminent domain for the road realignment and redevelopment? Wil this be
done with out assessing the residents?
60 9 -Apartment buildings cause shadowing and make park feel less open and shadow our homes
61 53 1 Why are we removing single family homes that are affordable for middle income? Why not add density at
PID 3611822240089? There are 12.8 acres that have sat vacant for years!
62 13 1
It’s been made to sound like the corner of County Road 73 & Sunset Trail intersection is accident central.
Living within eyesight of this corner I know for a fact that this is not so. The FEW accidents that have
occurred at that corner over the years have mostly involved either SPEEDING &/or DRUNK DRIVERS. Both
concepts won’t change that problem but will probably make it easier for those speeders to go faster.
63 5 3 Speed on this road is a real issues. What are the traffic count projection with this improvement? What is
Hennepin County’s stance on this project?
64 1 9
With the increase in traffic in this area, will HWY 73 be widened to have, at minimum, a turning lane at
each intersection? Intersection at sunset will need stop sign, lights or roundabout to ensure traffic does
not back up.
65 67 -
The current owners of this land are trying to sell it for millions, why is the city wasting their money on
buying price gouged land with very little value especially with the neighborhood reporting the land has
some illegal filling of protected wet lands. The land is only worth a very small fraction of what they are
asking for. Do we need a investigation into the city of Plymouth over inappropriate uses of city financials?
The neighborhoods do not want to pay for this!!!
66 67 2
It is deeply concerning that the project feedback from September/October time frame was not
incorporated into this plan especially since it was a wealth of negative feedback from the people who
live around the proposed area. It appears the city is not being transparent and clearly does not want the
input of the people who have to live with this study effects. Maybe it is time we get an investigation into
why our feedback was not included in this proposal.
67 26 1 How much is county road 73 going to be widen in the future for the bike & walking path. Will
homeowners be assessed for those improvements.
180
APPENDIX xxix DRAFT
EAGLE LAKE TO BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAILS
MASTER PLAN
45EAGLE LAKE AND BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY CONCEPT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARY
PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED
HEREIN.
\\
m
s
p
-
f
i
l
e
0
1
\
A
0
0
0
0
\
A
0
4
8
.
0
3
_
P
_
B
r
y
a
n
t
-
E
a
g
l
e
L
a
k
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
\
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
\
C
A
D
D
\
P
L
A
N
S
\
F
A
2
-
S
o
u
t
h
S
h
o
r
e
D
r
.
d
w
g
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
SOUTH SHORE DRIVE
0'300'150'
EAGLE TO BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN
NORTH
NOTE: The width of the trail shown is 10’ unless
otherwise noted. The boulevard width varies.
Existing utility
box and catch
basin may require
relocation
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
SOUTH SHORE SOUTH SHORE
PARKPARK
SUBSEGMENT B7: SOUTH SHORE DRIVE /
10th AVENUE N
1
1
1
1
T
H
T
H
A
V
E
N
A
V
E
N
SOUTH SHORE DRSOUTH SHORE DR
1
0
1
0
T
H
T
H
A
V
E
N
A
V
E
N
Existing utility
poles on east
side of street may
require relocation
Recommend wider
curb ramp to facilitate
pedestrian and bicycle
movements
Connection to
existing South
Shore Park Trail
Existing drainage
structures may
require modification
Trail bends in toward
roadway due to narrow
right-of-way width
Existing marked
crosswalk;
Recommend crossing
enhancements
33’ boulevard width
provides potential
space for new trees
10’ boulevard width
provides potential
space for trees
15’ boulevard width
provides potential
space for trees
5’ grass
boulevard width
Existing utilities may
require relocation
Realign crosswalk
markings with trail
2’ asphalt
buffer between
curb and trail
Trail crosses railroad;
May require grade
crossing signals
Trail implementation
will require right-of-way
acquisition (approx. 7,500
sf, or 14’W x 520’L)
L
U
C
E
L
I
N
E
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
L
U
C
E
L
I
N
E
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
DRAFTDRAFT
Trail connects to and
follows the existing Luce
Line Regional Trail on east
side of South Shore Drive
Existing utility
poles on east side
of 10th Ave may
require relocation
2’ asphalt
buffer between
curb and trail
Enhanced crossing
treatments
recommended at
intersection
LEGEND
Proposed Regional Trail
Luce Line Regional Trail
Preliminary Concept - Not for Construction
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARY PRIOR
TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.
46EAGLE LAKE AND BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY CONCEPT - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARY
PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED
HEREIN.
\\
m
s
p
-
f
i
l
e
0
1
\
A
0
0
0
0
\
A
0
4
8
.
0
3
_
P
_
B
r
y
a
n
t
-
E
a
g
l
e
L
a
k
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
\
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
\
C
A
D
D
\
P
L
A
N
S
\
F
A
3
-
H
w
y
5
5
-
C
R
1
5
-
Z
a
c
h
a
r
y
L
n
.
d
w
g
12
/
1
/
2
0
2
0
HIGHWAY 55 - COUNTRY ROAD 15 - ZACHARY LANE
0'180'90'
EAGLE TO BRYANT LAKE REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN
NORTHCO
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
CO
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
1
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
MN
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
5
5
NOTE: The width of the trail shown is 10’ unless
otherwise noted. The boulevard width varies.
DRAFTDRAFT
SUBSEGMENT B8: MN HIGHWAY 55 /
COUNTY RD 15 / ZACHARY LN
ZACHARY LANE NZACHARY LANE N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
7
3
/
O
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
D
Existing utility
poles on east
side of street may
require relocation
Trail bends in
towards roadway
due to narrower
right-of-way width
Trail bends out
away from roadway
due to wider right-
of-way width
10’ boulevard width
provides potential
space for trees
Grass boulevard
width varies
between 5-8’
10’ boulevard width
provides potential
space for trees
5’ grass
boulevard width
Enhanced crossing
treatments
recommended over
MN Hwy 55
Limited right-of-way
space on north side
of street; Recommend
narrowing roadway by
reducing existing travel
lanes to 11’, creating
more space for trail on
Enhanced crossing
treatment
recommended
Grass boulevard
width varies
between 3-5’
Plymouth
Metrolink Park
& Ride
2’ asphalt
buffer between
curb and trail
Connection to existing
trail on east side of
Zachary Lane
LEGEND
Proposed Regional Trail
Preliminary Concept - Not for Construction
THIS IS A PRELIMINARY CONCEPT. FIELD VERIFICATION, SITE CONDITION
ASSESSMENTS, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ARE NECESSARY PRIOR
TO IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.
181
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxx
HIGHWAY 55 BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM
Highway 55 Bus Rapid Transit
Council Workshop: April 27, 2021
Agenda
•Introductions
•Completed Work
•Transitway Corridor Study
•All Day Service Trial Awarded
•Station Area Microstudy Wrapping-up
•Upcoming Items
•Questions & Comments
182
APPENDIX xxxi DRAFT
Transitway Corridor Study
•2015 Study by Met. Council
•Route from Minneapolis to
Medina studied.
•Route meets many goals of for
Plymouth and cities along
Hwy 55 corridor.
•Found strong need for reverse
commuting (i.e., bringing
workers outward to Plymouth)
Route 757 All Day Service Trial
•Metro Transit recently awarded regional solicitation dollars for an all-day transit service along Hwy 55 (Minneapolis to Plymouth).
•Scheduled for 2024-2025 (being reviewed).
•Route and specific stop locations currently being reviewed.
•This acts as a great test case for future BRT along the corridor.
183
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxxii
Station Area Microstudy
•Plymouth wants to take advantage of upcoming opportunities to
improve potential station areas
•Development/redevelopment
•MnDOT’s Hwy 55 Pavement Preservation Project (2024)
•Co. Rd. 73 Small Area Study (Community Development)
•City Center 2.0 Visioning
•Goal is to understand:
•Where do stations functionally make the most sense.
•How does BRT function with Hwy 55 traffic and signals.
•What barriers and opportunities exist near the stations.
Station Area Microstudy
•Ford Road
•Station 73
•Northwest Blvd
•City Center
•Dunkirk Park & Ride
184
APPENDIX xxxiii DRAFT 185
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxxiv 186
APPENDIX xxxv DRAFT 187
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxxvi 188
APPENDIX xxxvii DRAFT
Upcoming Work
•Preliminary design of Station 73 underpass in coordination with MnDOT
pavement project.
•There are current bills in the House and Senate to have the Met. Council
conduct a robust BRT alternatives analysis ($2.5 million).
•Continue to partner with MnDOT & developers so opportunities are not
lost, and the City remains proactive where it can be.
189
COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MNxxxviii
Questions or Feedback
190
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-303
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE COUNTY ROAD 73 SMALL AREA STUDY
WHEREAS, in March 2021, the City of Plymouth City Council directed staff to prepare a Small Area
Study for the County Road 73 area;
WHEREAS, in May 2021, the City of Plymouth City Council further directed staff to prepare a
Request for Proposal and solicit proposals from area consultants to complete the County Road 73 Small Area
Study;
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth prepared the Request For Proposal, solicited proposals and received
three proposals from area consultant teams on June 11, 2021 and two consulting teams were interviewed
on June 14, 2021;
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth entered into a contract for services with Hoisington Koegler Group
Inc. to complete the County Road 73 Small Area Study; and
WHEREAS, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. created a study that proactively responds to current
issues, interests, and opportunities, as well as both short- and long-term planned residential and business
growth in the area; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the County Road 73 Small Area Study and found it to be
consistent with the city’s goals and objectives for the area.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFPLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that County Road 73 Small Area Study is accepted.
APPROVED by the City Council on this 29th day of November, 2022.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I
compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on November 29, 2022, with the
original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this ______ day of
____________________, ________.
__________________________________
City Clerk
191
Regular City
Council
November 29, 2022
Agenda
Number:8.2
To:Dave Callister, City Manager
Prepared by:Kip Berglund, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:Danette Parr, Community & Economic Development Director
Item:Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and PUD General Plan request for
Enclave mixed-use development for the properties located
west of Highway 169 and south of Bass Lake Road at Nathan
Lane (Enclave Companies – 2022064)
1.Action Requested:
Adopt the attached approving the following:
1. Ordinance - Rezoning from FRD (future restricted development) and C-2 (neighborhood
commercial) to PUD (planned unit development)
2. Resolution - Summary Publication of Ordinance
3. Resolution - Findings of Fact
4. Resolution - PUD General Plan and Preliminary plat
Approval requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council, except the Resolution approving summary
publication requires a 6/7 vote of the City Council.
2.Background:
On November 2, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter and
subsequently voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request. In addition to the
applicant, several residents requested to speak on this item. Correspondence was also received
from a resident related to the request, and a copy of that email is attached to this report.
The residents raised concerns about the additional traffic in the area, a higher density residential
use, and possible negative impacts to their homes. Staff shared that the proposed development
would fall within the density allowance for a mixed-use development, and that the applicant has
had a final traffic study completed based on the proposed mixture of multi-family residential and
retail uses. The applicant has implemented many of the findings in the proposed plans. Findings not
addressed in the proposed plans would be required to be addressed prior to final plan approval.
One resident discussed a traffic study that was completed in 2015 and questioned the differences
between that report and the current draft. Staff responded that the study from 2015 was based on a
higher amount of retail and office uses. Residents also raised safety and maneuverability concerns
about the existing road system around the subject properties including the frontage road along
Highway 169 and the two entrance points to the area at Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane and further
south at Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane. Staff responded that a scheduled public improvement
project in those areas and the proposed improvements associated with the subject application
would help to address those concerns.
192
The Planning Commission questioned the ability for the applicant to maintain architectural control
of the commercial area and how it would meet/match the architecture of the proposed multi-family
building. Staff responded that the covenants, conditions, and restrictions related to architectural
controls could be established in the declaration of easements, covenants, conditions, and
restrictions (ECCR) for the development which was also confirmed by the applicant. The Planning
Commission also questioned whether the applicant could add additional parking if needed. The
applicant stated that the proposed amount of parking is adequate based on other projects in the
area, however, did confirm that additional parking could be added northeast of the proposed
building, if needed. Finally, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed sidewalk locations
and pedestrian maneuverability throughout the development. For connectivity purposes, staff has
added a condition that a sidewalk be constructed along the east side of Nathan Lane from the
northernmost entrance to the proposed multi-family building to Bass Lake Road.
If approved, in conjunction with final plat approval, and prior to grading operations, the developer
would be required to enter into an agreement with the City of Plymouth detailing an agreed upon
financing and construction plan of the Nathan Lane realignment project. General deal points would
include the developer covering roughly 50 percent of road alignment cost via land contribution, in
addition, the developer parcels being assessed in with the public improvement project per city
policy. A condition is included in the resolution related to these details.
A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes and report are attached. Notice of the public
hearing was mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. Development signage is also
posted on the properties.
3.Budget Impact:
Not applicable.
4.Planning Review Deadline: *
December 29, 2022
5.Attachments:
Minutes
Correspondence Received
Planning Commission Report
Location Map
Aerial
Notification Area Map
Comprehensive Plan Excerpt - MXD
Traffic Study
Narrative
ALTA Survey
Preliminary Plat
Civil Plans
Enclave Plat Monitoring Info Sheet
Architectural Plans
City Council Ordinance 2022-18
193
City Council Resolution 2022-304
City Council Resolution 2022-305
City Council Resolution 2022-306
194
1
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Proposed Minutes
Planning Commission Meeting
November 2, 2022
Vice Chair Pointner called a Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on November 2, 2022.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Marc Anderson, Clark Gregor, Bryan Oakley,
Julie Olson, Julie Pointner and Donovan Saba.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chair Michael Boo
STAFF PRESENT: Planning and Development Manager Chloe McGuire, Public Works Director
Michael Thompson, Senior Engineer Technician Amy Riegel, Graduate Engineer Jacob Zea, and
Senior Planner Kip Berglund
Public Hearings
(5.1) Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and PUD General Plan request for Enclave mixed-use
development (Enclave Companies - 2022064)
Senior Planner Berglund presented the staff report.
Commissioner Anderson asked how additional parking would be added, if needed, when the site
is already very full.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that there may be some areas the applicant could review to find
an area where potential additional parking could occur on the site. He confirmed that it would
need to be shown but not built.
Commissioner Anderson asked why there is concern for the residential and commercial
architecture to relate to each other when there is so much space and screening between the two
uses.
Senior Planner Berglund explained that the MXD guiding, and PUD zoning would require the
uses to be tied together in terms of design. He noted that the architecture would be up for
discussion, as to whether enough detail has been shown for the residential and commercial
renderings.
Commissioner Anderson recognized that a commercial user is often not on board at this time and
asked if the city would have input on the future design of a commercial building.
Senior Planner Berglund confirmed that there are not any confirmed tenants for the commercial
development. He stated that there could be something similar to an HOA covenant and restriction
to provide architectural controls for the commercial tenants. He commented that could be
195
2
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
required under the final plat request if the items tonight are approved and the project moves
forward.
Commissioner Gregor referenced the request to add more studio units and asked if that would
decrease the need for parking.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that the applicant has confirmed that the higher number of
studio and one-bedroom apartments would decrease the burden on parking.
Commissioner Gregor asked if the density is calculated on the residential portion of the
development or the entire development property.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that all three properties can be used to determine density, with
the exception of wetland, wetland buffer, and floodplain.
Commissioner Gregor noted that with that calculation the density would fall on the low end of
what could be allowed on the site. He commented that he was impressed with the level of trees
that would remain on the site. He asked what the landscaping and tree requirements would be.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that any subdivision request is required to preserve a minimum
amount of significant tree inches and provided details on the allowed removal rates for
residential and commercial development. He stated that the applicant has shown a tree plan that
does not even approach the allowed removal allowances. He stated that are also minimum
landscaping requirements for an approved development and noted that the application would
meet the requirements for landscaping.
Commissioner Gregor referenced the park dedication rates and asked for clarification.
Senior Planner Berglund reviewed the current park dedication fees of $8,000 per residential unit
and $8,000 per acre of commercial or industrial development.
Commissioner Gregor asked for clarification on the anticipation for less access points than
shown on the plan.
Public Works Director Thompson stated that staff has spoken with the developer to perhaps only
have two access points to the residential. He provided details on the realignment and
hammerhead turnaround. He confirmed that they would be reducing the points of access with the
project.
Commissioner Gregor complimented staff on putting in these thoughtful elements such as the
possibility of a future turn lane and reducing the points of access.
Commissioner Oakley asked if 56th Avenue is a public street and asked if that would tie into the
Nathan Lane extension. He asked if the city could choose to do a realignment.
Senior Planner Berglund confirmed that is correct.
196
3
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Public Works Director Thompson confirmed that a realignment could be done within the right-
of-way. He stated that there is a CIP project scheduled for 2024 to redo the commercial streets in
this area and the realignment would be part of that project. He noted that the project may be
accelerated to 2023.
Commissioner Oakley commented that the other road being disconnected from 56 th Avenue is a
private road. He asked if that would be reconstructed by the developer and what spec the road
would be required to be reconstructed to.
Public Works Director Thompson replied that there would be a cost-share contribution from the
developer to the city and the city would lead the public improvement project (sidewalk
extensions, cut off and turnaround, etc.).
Commissioner Oakley commented that as a private road he believes a hammerhead would be
allowed whereas that would not be acceptable on a public road. He asked whether the road
would continue to be private or whether it would convert to a nonconforming public road.
Public Works Director Thompson replied that the road would continue to be private as it would
not meet city standards, such as required width for snowplowing.
Commissioner Oakley referenced the change to the allowable MXD density made earlier this
year and commented that it does not seem that change had an impact on this project.
Senior Planner Berglund confirmed that is correct as the applicant is not requesting to go above
the previously allowed 20 units per acre.
Commissioner Oakley commented on how high the unit count could have been at 20 units per
acre, or even the newly allowed 35 units per acre.
Acting Chair Pointner asked for details on how an emergency vehicle would move through the
site.
Senior Planner Berglund identified the path that emergency vehicles could take around the site.
Acting Chair Pointner asked how people would get in and out of both the residential and
commercial portions of the development.
Public Works Director Thompson stated that this would function similarly to traffic entering and
exiting the gas station. He provided details on the different options. He noted that from a traffic
perspective this would function fine, noting that this traffic would be about one tenth of the
previous traffic study that anticipated a grocery store or more intense use. He noted that the
applicant would dedicate area in the case that a turn lane is needed in the future.
Acting Chair Pointner commented that the sidewalk would extend to TH 169 and asked if there
would be any other trails through the area other than the sidewalks.
197
4
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Senior Planner Berglund replied that there are not additional trails shown as this time, but the
developer may be considering amenity trails. He stated that the parks department reviewed the
plans and identified the trail gaps desired to be completed.
Commissioner Gregor asked if the sidewalk would cross over TH 169 to connect or whether it
would end at the ramp.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that he was unsure and would need to follow up with the parks
department. He noted that at minimum the sidewalk would reach the interchange and was
unaware of the sidewalks on the New Hope side.
Commissioner Gregor asked if any of the entrances would be controlled with stop signs.
Public Works Director Thompson replied that there would be a two way stop condition that
would yield to Nathan Lane.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced the applicant, Brian Bochman who stated that he is present to
address any questions.
Commissioner Anderson asked how the applicant would propose to have architectural control
over the commercial development.
Mr. Bochman replied that the commercial portion will be tenant driven. He recognized that the
uses will not be visible to each other because of the trees that exist between the two. He stated
that they can have comparable colors and materials to tie the uses together. He did not anticipate
a national user, but more of a small tenant multi-space building and another more unknown
development.
Commissioner Anderson asked how long construction would be anticipated to take, as well as
the amount of truck hauling that would be needed for the project.
Mr. Bochman replied that they will direct truck traffic to minimize the impacts to others.
Commissioner Anderson stated that in order to move to final plat there are additional details to
work through and asked if the applicant believes that those requirements can be accommodated
without making significant changes to the plan.
Brad Wilkening, civil engineer for project, stated that they have conducted a floodplain study for
the area and have been working with the watershed model. He stated that they are confident that
from a stormwater perspective there is a lot of room for ponding.
Commissioner Olson commented that there does not seem to be space for additional parking and
asked where that could occur.
Mr. Bochman replied that they will not need additional parking as 65 percent of the units are one
person units. He stated that they could provide additional parking northeast of the fire lane if
needed. He commented that they would ensure there is sufficient parking because people will not
renew leases if there is not space to park.
198
5
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Commissioner Olson stated that she likes the idea of studio apartments as that is a trend. She
noted that a three-bedroom apartment could have three vehicles.
Mr. Bochman replied that they typically do not see that. He stated that two-bedroom apartments
have become their hardest units to lease. He stated that three-bedroom apartments are more rare
and typically are occupied by families rather than three individuals sharing an apartment. He
noted that typically those wanting to share costs by sharing an apartment gravitate to a lower cost
apartment building.
Commissioner Olson asked if there is a limit on the number of vehicles a leased apartment could
have.
Mr. Bochman replied that every vehicle must be registered on the lease. He stated that each
person living in the unit must also be on the lease. He explained that if they are seeing a vehicle
that is not registered, they do follow up.
Commissioner Gregor asked if the applicant has considered EV parking.
Mr. Bochman replied that is one of the most difficult amenities to offer. He stated that they will
install more once the vehicles use a more universal charging station. He stated that they have run
conduit on past projects in anticipation, and then began to see an increased demand. He noted
that they continue to look at options for that.
Commissioner Gregor asked if there is a bus route near this building.
Public Works Director Thompson commented that the city oversees its own transit system and if
this project moves forward they would review bus route options.
Commissioner Oakley referenced the path pedestrians would take to reach the commercial area
and asked if there has been any consideration to add a trail to the commercial area from the
residential area that would not require crossing of Nathan Lane.
Mr. Bochman replied that they would most likely look at those options as they want the retail
areas to be successful.
Acting Chair Pointner asked if there would be vegetation cleanup on the side of Bass Lake and
TH 169.
Mr. Bochman replied that they have contemplated trying to do a monument sign to help the
retailers and apartment identification because the visibility. He stated that they would do some
cleanup to remove volunteer trees but keep the good trees.
Acting Chair Pointner asked the anticipated age group for the apartments.
Mr. Bochman replied that COVID changed how some of these things work. He stated that young
professionals and young married couples have always been the most prevalent apartment
dweller. He stated that the 55 plus group has become a strong second. He stated that as more
199
6
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
amenities are put into buildings and because less maintenance is needed, that age group tends to
gravitate towards apartment living as well.
Acting Chair Pointner commented that she lives near this location and can often hear noise from
the car dealership. She asked if the apartment would create a buffer from the car dealership.
Mr. Bochman commented that the apartment will create a bit of a sound wall to buffer from those
noises.
Acting Chair Pointner opened the public hearing.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced John Degnan, 10110 56 th Ave, who stated that he supports the
proposed development. He stated that something will be developed on the site, and he cannot
imagine a better developer to work with. He commented on the cooperative process and the
adjustments that the developer has made because of input from the residents. He stated that the
HOA for the villas support taking on a small portion of property as proposed and believe that this
is a good development proposal.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Philip Stone, 5445 Nathan Lane #3, who stated that there is a
group of people that are very concerned although they have not taken a strong opposition to the
project. He stated that they have expressed concern with many aspects of the project since 2021.
He stated that his group has split up their concerns and each person coming forward with provide
details on a different area of concern. He commented that they appreciate that staff and the
commission have worked hard to have some adjustments made to the plan, but they still have
concerns.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Kent Brandt, 5484 Nathan Lane #4, stated that he has lived in
his home for 14 years and has a different perspective than the traffic study. He expressed concern
with adding over 220 residents into an already busy residential and commercial area. He
commented that the entry and exit points are already inadequate in that area. He stated that there
are only two points, one at Bass Lake Road and one at Schmidt Lake Road which serve three
residential communities. He commented that several businesses also require easy and convenient
access to this area, via Nathan Lane and the frontage road. He stated that the two points are
already poorly designed, and he did not expect a third entrance. He asked when those two points
would be improved at Nathan Lane and Bass Lake Road as well as at Schmidt Lake Road. He
commented that those improvements are needed now before more residents are added. He was
confused by the enthusiasm of the neighbors to the north side and asked what those residents
would know that he does not.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Don Vessey, 5520 Nathan Lane #4, stated that his main
concern is with the intersection of Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane. He commented that the
intersection was most likely designed over 50 years ago, with cracked and chipped curbs and
cracked sidewalks. He commented that dirt and class five has been hauled in over the year to fill
holes created by semi-trucks. He was unsure that the intersection is properly designed to handle
the increased length of semis with trailers. He asked that consideration be given to improving
that intersection.
200
7
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Nancy Anderson, 5525 Nathan Lane #1, stated that she moved
into her home in 1995 and will be right across from the apartments. She commented that her
main concern is with the road and how it would be changing. She commented on the volume of
semi-trucks that turn onto 56th from Nathan Lane. She commented that it has helped that the
trucks have to slow down with the curve. She stated that her other concern is that the road is a
two-lane road where semis often park on the side, which makes it a one lane road noting that it is
similar with the frontage road. She commented that vehicles are often waiting to turn right out of
Speedway.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Dan Toman, 5540 Nathan Lane #4, commented on the
increased traffic that would be created by this development that would contribute to the already
poor traffic conditions. He stated that the increase of semi-truck traffic already contributes to
safety concerns as the road is not wide enough to accommodate the traffic. He stated that there
are also no streetlights on 56th or the frontage road which contributes to safety concerns. He
stated that 56th and the frontage road also lack painted lines. He referenced the frontage road
bump out which encourages northbound traffic to make the turn west from Schmidt Lake Road
which pushes traffic through neighborhoods. He stated that if the bump out were removed it
would create a straight shot which would assist. He noted that adding streetlights, painted lines,
and addressing his other concerns would increase safety for traffic and pedestrians.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Christopher Gosch, 5545 Nathan Lane #4, stated that he
reviewed the traffic report and was surprised by the fidelity of the study which primarily focused
only on the area and nearby intersections. He believed that the whole area should have been
studied. He noted that the study also took place during only one week and two hours of the day
during peak traffic times. He encouraged the city to review traffic conditions over a much
broader time. He stated that the study was also completed in February and therefore did not
provide a great estimate of the traffic conditions.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Brad Frank, 5570 Nathan Ln #2, who stated that they enjoy
living in Plymouth and have some concerns with this corner of the community. He commented
on the increase in traffic on Nathan Lane and cut through traffic from trucks in the
neighborhoods attempting to avoid the traffic on TH 169. He noted that vehicles cutting through
also travel at high speeds. He recognized that change would happen, and they are not necessarily
against the project but want to speak of their concerns. He thanked city staff for talking with the
residents about their concerns. He also thanked the developer for attempting to address concerns
as well. He was concerned with the impact that adding 220 units to this already congested would
have.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Paul Kroehnert, 5594 Nathan Lane #1, echoed the comments
related to traffic. He believed that the count of vehicles was most likely low and agreed that
those counts are most likely higher during the summer months. He noted the poor geometrics at
Schmidt Lake Road and Bass Lake Road. He stated that he would support a dedicated turn lane
as recommended as a possibility in the future.
Acting Chair Pointner introduced Mary Johnson, 5525 Nathan Lane #3, who stated that they love
Plymouth and their neighborhood. She commented that the development looks interesting and
will be a pleasant place to live but she has concerns with traffic. She commented on the high
level of truck traffic on 56th as well as the parking of trucks along 56th. She stated that if the
201
8
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
straight through of Nathan Lane is removed, all the traffic would take 56 th. She commented that
it does not look like there would be a stop sign at Nathan Lane and 56 th and vehicles take that
turn quickly and travel at high speeds. She also commented on the difficulty is trying to make a
right hand turn onto Bass Lake Road from Schmidt Lake Road when vehicles in front of you are
attempting to make a left-hand turn. She commented that it would seem that removing the middle
driveway would be a positive thing.
Acting Chair Pointner closed the public hearing.
Acting Chair Pointner commented that the item before the commission tonight is related to the
Enclave development and did not believe they cannot consider the other roads. She asked if staff
would be working with residents to address the other concerns.
Public Works Director Thompson commented that the items listed related to traffic are being
considered as part of the overall public improvement project. He commented that staff
understands the existing traffic concerns that would be address through the pavement project the
city will complete. He commented that there will be geometric improvements and other
improvements related to removing the bump out to address those concerns.
Acting Chair Pointner referenced the comment that there are two access points into the
residential areas and asked if there is a plan to change that.
Public Works Director Thompson confirmed that it has been planned to just have those two
access points into the existing residential neighborhoods. He commented that staff is also
familiar with the parking issues of semis that they have been addressing through enforcement.
He stated that the pavement project could also look at expanding the roadways. He understood
that there are existing issues that are there regardless of the development. He recognized that
there is additional traffic that could come forward, but it is lower density than the use that was
considered in 2015. He commented that the public improvement project could address the traffic
concerns raised by the existing residents.
Acting Chair Pointner asked if there has been consideration for a signal at Schmidt Lake Road.
Public Works Director Thompson commented that part of the public project will look at
adjustments relating to the connections to Schmidt of the frontage road and Nathan Lane.
Acting Chair Pointner commented that currently the plan shows three entrances into the
apartment area and asked if that would be the plan or whether the middle driveway would be
eliminated.
Senior Planner Berglund replied that there is a recommendation to remove the middle driveway.
He stated that the applicant has been working on plan revisions that will show the removal of
that driveway.
Public Works Director Thompson confirmed that is the recommendation of staff and the
developer agreed.
202
9
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
Planning and Development Manager McGuire referenced an emailed comment that has been
submitted into the record from Harold Connor.
Public Works Director Thompson stated that the CIP identified the public improvement project to
occur in 2024 but noted that he is coordinating with the applicant to get the construction done in
conjunction with the road improvement project. He anticipated that the public improvement
project would move forward in 2023, which would be when the developer’s project would also
begin construction if all approvals were gained.
Mr. Bochman stated that he appreciates the cooperative efforts of staff. He commented that it is
important for them that the road project is completed while they are doing construction to avoid
additional impacts to residents. He stated that their goal would be to break ground in March or
April and anticipated 18 months of construction.
Commissioner Anderson stated that the reguiding occurred earlier this year for mixed use and
PUD. He stated that this project falls on the lower end of the density allowed. He stated that the
developer seems to be confident in the parking being sufficient and noted that there is language
requiring additional parking if that is needed. He stated that the number of efficiency units is
based on the applicant’s study of the market. He commented that the architecture seems to be
good and believed the realignment of Nathan Lane would be excellent. He noted that a lot of the
traffic concerns will be addressed through the city public improvement project. He believed this
to be a good project.
Commissioner Oakley echoed the comments of Commissioner Anderson. He stated that it seems
that staff is already aware of the traffic concerns in the overall area that will be addressed
through the public improvement project. He believed that the changes proposed would help to
ease the traffic concerns. He commented that this seems like a good opportunity to address
existing issues that do not have to do with the private development project. He stated that it
seems that this project would work well in Plymouth and this type of housing would be a good fit
for this area. He also believed that the blend of commercial and residential would be a benefit.
He thanked the residents that provided logical and thoughtful input tonight.
Commissioner Saba also acknowledged the benefit of the proposed project and public
improvement project working together. He commented that the city has a history of turning these
situations into a positive. He referenced a similar situation that is now outstanding. He
commented that the situation will get a lot better with these changes.
Commissioner Olson stated that she supports the project and commented that it has been great to
see the developer working with the neighborhood. She noted that the city is also being
cooperative and believes this will be a good project.
Commissioner Gregor agreed that there is a good plan from the developer that dovetails with the
improvements that will be completed by the city to address the traffic issues. He stated that he
also supports the project and is hopeful that the concerns of the residents will be resolved.
Motion was made by Commissioner Gregor, and seconded by Commissioner Oakley, to approve
an ordinance amending chapter 21 of the city code to reclassify certain land located west of
Highway 169 and south of Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane, and to approve a resolution
203
10
Proposed Minutes November 2, 2022
approving findings of fact for the rezoning of the land as recommended in the staff report, and to
approve a resolution approving a PUD general plan and preliminary plat for the Enclave mixed
use development.
Further discussion: Acting Chair Pointner commented that she has been with the project from the
beginning as a neighbor. She commented that she has seen the changes the developer has made in
conjunction with input from the residents. She noted that this has been an impressive project to
watch progress and the cooperative nature of all parties.
With all Commissioners voting in favor, the motion carried.
Adjournment
Vice Chair Pointner adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m.
204
205
Agenda Number
File 2022064
PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING
STAFF REPORT
TO: Plymouth Planning Commission
FROM: Kip Berglund, Senior Planner (509-5453) through Chloe McGuire,
Planning and Development Manager
MEETING DATE: November 2, 2022
APPLICANT: Enclave Companies
PROPOSAL: Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, and PUD General Plan request for
Enclave mixed-use development
LOCATION: West of Highway 169 and south of Bass Lake Road at Nathan Lane
CURRENT GUIDING: MXD (mixed-use development)
CURRENT ZONING: C-2 (neighborhood commercial) and FRD (future restricted
development)
REVIEW DEADLINE: December 29, 2022
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting the following:
1. Rezoning from FRD (future restricted development) and C-2 (neighborhood commercial)
to PUD (planned unit development)
2. Preliminary plat
3. PUD general plan
The applications are for four properties, totaling 18.96 acres, located near the southwest corner of
State Highway 169 and Bass Lake Road (County Road 10), south of the intersection of Bass Lake
Road (County Road 10) and Nathan Lane. Under the request, the properties would be developed
with a mixed-use development, consisting of both multi-family residential (4-story, 220 units) and
206
2020064
Page 2
retail uses (two new buildings, totaling 10,200 square feet, in addition to existing gas station to
remain).
Notice of the public hearing was published in the city’s official newspaper. Two mailed notices
were sent out to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. One notice was sent upon receipt
of the application, and the other notice was sent 12 days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the
notification area map is attached. Development signage has also been posted on the site.
CONTEXT:
Surrounding Land Uses
The site is located west of Highway 169, south of Bass Lake Road at the intersection of Bass Lake
Road and Nathan Lane. The properties are currently guided either commercial (C) or commercial
office (CO) and zoned either C-2 (neighborhood commercial) or FRD (future restricted
development)
Natural Characteristics of Site
The site is in the Shingle Creek watershed district. The site contains wetlands, floodplain, and is
in the shoreland overlay district of Bass Creek.
Under a formal application review, the applicant is required to:
1. Provide an up-to-date wetland delineation and provide related wetland buffers.
2. Identify the floodplain elevation and mitigate for any impact on the floodplain.
3. Identify the shoreland overlay district area along Bass Creek and identify the proposed
impervious surface within that area (up to 25 percent impervious surface permitted within
shoreland overlay districts).
4. Satisfy any watershed requirements and City of Plymouth water quality requirements.
Previous Approvals
In 1989, the City Council approved a rezoning, final plat, site plan, and conditional use permit for
the construction of a 2,952 square foot convenience store with motor fuel, at the southeast corner
of Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane, which is currently operating as a Speedway.
Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning
North (across
Bass Lake Road) Office buildings CO
(commercial office)
B-C
(business campus)
West (across
Nathan Ln)
Villa-homes in the Villas
at Bass Creek subdivision
LA-3
(living area 3)
PUD (planned unit
development)
South/Southwest
(across 56th Ave)
Townhomes in the
Hickory Hills Villas
subdivision
LA-3
(living area 3)
RMF-3
(multiple family 3)
East Superior Ford car
dealership C (commercial) C-5
(commercial and industrial)
207
2020064
Page 3
In 2015, the City Council approved a site plan and conditional use permit for a roughly 8,000
square foot commercial building at the southwest corner of Bass Lake Road and Nathan Lane.
However, that building was not constructed, and the approvals have expired. The remainder of the
subject properties are vacant.
In May 2021, the City Council provided comments related to a sketch plan for a mixed-use
development like the proposed project.
In August 2022, the City Council approved a land use guide plan amendment to reguide the subject
properties from C (commercial) and CO (commercial office) to MXD (mixed use development).
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application.
This is because the rezoning of land is also a “quasi-legislative” action (enactment of policy). The
zoning ordinance and map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards
set by the comprehensive plan. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance.
This is because preliminary plat review is a “quasi-judicial” action (enforcement of established
policy). If a preliminary plat application meets the standards, the city must approve the preliminary
plat.
The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. The proposed PUD must be
consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan. The city may impose reasonable requirements in a
PUD not otherwise required that are deemed necessary to protect and promote the health, safety,
and general welfare of the community.
ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting:
1. Rezoning from FRD (future restricted development) and C-2 (neighborhood commercial)
to PUD (planned unit development)
2. Preliminary plat
3. PUD general plan
The applications are for four properties, totaling 18.96 acres, located near the southwest corner of
State Highway 169 and Bass Lake Road (County Road 10), south of the intersection of Bass Lake
Road (County Road 10) and Nathan Lane. Under the request, the properties would be developed
with a mixed-use development, consisting of both multi-family residential (4-story, 220 units) and
retail uses (two new buildings, totaling 10,200 square feet, in addition to existing gas station to
remain).
208
2020064
Page 4
Rezoning:
The applicant is requesting to rezone the roughly 18.96-acre site from both C-2 (neighborhood
commercial) and FRD (future restricted development) to PUD to accommodate the proposed
mixed-use development. A PUD allows greater flexibility in development than would be possible
under a conventional zoning district. The applicant has based their development on the RMF-4 and
C-2 districts, however, site constraints require some flexibility from other zoning ordinance
requirements, as outlined in the report.
Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
Comprehensive Plan:
As previously mentioned, in August 2022, the City Council approved a land use guide plan
amendment to reguide the subject properties from C (commercial) and CO (commercial office) to
MXD (mixed use development). Chapter 462.357, subd. 2 of state statute requires that the zoning
map for each city be consistent with its land use guide plan.
The corresponding zoning district within MXD guided areas is PUD (planned unit development).
Developments within the mixed-use development typically will consist of multiple dwellings
(apartments, townhouses, and similar attached housing) and commercial uses that offer basic
convenience type of goods and services. Community scale commercial uses, and office facilities
(professional, medical dental and similar uses). Both vertical and horizonal mixing of uses is
permitted.
In April 2022, the City Council approved a comprehensive plan text amendment to allow density
in the MXD guiding in a range of 12 to 35 units per acre.
Density is based on net acreage (excluding areas of wetlands and required wetland buffer strips,
areas below the 100-year flood elevation, areas below the ordinary high-water level of lakes and
streams, areas below the high-water level of ponds, areas to be dedicated as public park land or
public open space, areas of right-of-way for arterial roadways) pursuant to the procedures
established by the Metropolitan Council. The four properties total 18.96 acres with 3.72 acres of
wetland, wetland buffers and areas within the 100-year flood elevation for a total of 15.24 acres.
209
2020064
Page 5
Based on net acreage, the site could accommodate 182 to 533 dwelling units under the MXD
guiding. The proposed plan consists of a total of 220 units. Consequently, the proposed number of
residential units would fall into the density category allowance permitted under the MXD guiding.
Therefore, the corresponding request to rezone the site to PUD would be appropriate, based on
the following findings:
1. The requested PUD zoning would be consistent with MXD guiding.
2. The proposed density would be consistent with MXD guiding.
3. The proposed mixed-use development and lot arrangement would comply with the PUD
zoning standards.
4. Adequate infrastructure would be available to support the proposed development.
5. The realignment of Nathan Lane Road is a public benefit by moving traffic further away
from the existing residential properties to the west and south.
6. The result of the project would add needed higher-density residential to the housing stock.
PUD General Plan
The applicant has requested PUD flexibility to address various site constraints. A summary of each
flexibility request is discussed below, along with any standard site review items.
Site Review (Flexibility Requested)
Subdivision and Zoning Requirements
Required Proposed Meets
Requirements?
Lot Arrangement
Apartment Lot Size 1 ac. 11.3 ac. Yes
Retail Lot Size 1 ac. 1.3, 2.6 & 2.7 ac. Yes
Setbacks/Height
Apartment Lot
Front 25 feet 100 feet Yes
Side 25 feet 50 feet Yes
Rear 25 feet 164 feet Yes
Height Max. 45 feet 44 feet Yes
Retail Lots
Front 35 feet 37 feet Yes
Side 75 feet 96 feet Yes
Rear 75 feet 350 feet Yes
Parking
Residential 440 376 *No
Commercial 52 81 Yes
* Discussion below.
210
2020064
Page 6
The applicant is asking for PUD flexibility on the proposed number of parking spaces for the
apartment building and the proposed number of efficiency units. The flexibility requests are further
discussed below.
Parking (Flexibility Requested)
The applicant is asking for PUD flexibility to provide less parking on the residential portion of the
development. Based on the zoning code, the proposed multi-family building would require 440
parking spaces and the commercial uses are required to have 52 parking spaces for a total of 492
parking spaces. The applicant has provided a site plan showing 457 parking spaces (376 spaces in
the apartment building, 220 of which would be enclosed and 156 surface parking stalls, and 81
surface parking stalls on the commercial properties).
Apartment buildings require at least two fee free spaces per dwelling unit, of which one must be
enclosed. The proposed plan would provide at least one enclosed space per dwelling unit and 176
of the required 220 spaces as surface parking for a total of 1.7 parking spaces per dwelling unit.
The applicant has stated that the 1.7 parking spaces proposed per unit is more than adequate based
on other projects that they have completed in the Twin Cities. Other projects, in similar suburban
settings, contain 1.6 to 1.7 parking spaces per unit.
The applicant has provided the city with documentation that includes parking information from
similar sized projects within the Twin Cities. Staff has reached out to some of the cities listed in
the similar projects and can provide a verbal update at the meeting.
Staff analysis:
1. The site is constrained due to environmental concerns onsite. Reduced parking, and
reduced impervious surface in general, is more beneficial for environmental protections.
2. If there is an identified need, this area could be planned to be served by transit in the future,
which would decrease the need for individual vehicles.
3. The proposed apartment building includes more efficiency and one-bedroom units, which
are likely to be one-car households.
4. If there is a parking issue in the future, the applicant would have to implement additional
spaces.
5. The developer has provided staff information on similar developments that function with
reduced parking onsite. The market demand for parking is changing as more people live
alone or work remotely, and as families go to one-car households.
6. The developer has attempted to maximize the amount of parking onsite to get as close to
the city code requirements as possible without encroaching toward wetlands and limiting
the amount of impervious surface within the shoreland overlay district for Bass Creek.
Consequently, staff finds that the proposed 376 parking spaces should be sufficient for the
residential portion of the development and support the PUD flexibility for reduced parking spaces.
Additionally, a condition in the attached resolution would require the developer to provide
additional parking spaces on the site if the City determines there is a parking shortage in the future
(resulting in a total of 440 parking spaces for the residential property).
211
2020064
Page 7
Efficiency Units (Flexibility Requested)
Allowed Requested Flexibility
Efficiency, or Alcove Units 22 units
10% of total units
32 units
14.5% of total units
The applicant states that the 4.5 percent increase over the typical maximum is needed to create
enough density for the development to be feasible while also being able to address environmental
constraints such as impervious surface limitations, wetland buffer requirements and floodplain
preservation. The flexibility request would be an increase of ten units in the project. The applicant
states that efficiency units are a trend in the market and tend to occupy well. In addition, residents
prefer smaller, more private living spaces and will utilize on-site amenities such as communal
areas, and designated community work from home space. Staff finds the proposal acceptable since
there are environmental challenges and on-site amenities available.
Sidewalks/Trails
The proposed plans include amenities on the residential site such as interior and exterior activity
areas, patios, outdoor pool, dog run, and sidewalks around portions of the building. The applicant’s
plan includes a fire lane from the parking lot around the residential building to the north that could
also function as an amenity trail for the residents. Staff is asking the developer to continue the
sidewalk network along the west side of Nathan to Bass Lake Road to allow for further
connectivity to the rest of the area. In addition, the developer would be required to construct an 8-
foot-wide trail along the north side of the property along Bass Lake Road from Nathan Lane east
to the Highway 169 interchange. The attached resolution addresses this matter.
Impervious Surface
Maximum Allowed in
Shoreland Overlay
Proposed West of
Nathan Lane
Proposed East of
Nathan Lane
Impervious
Surface
Coverage
25% 24.3% 23.9%
The applicant has identified the shoreland overlay district area along Bass Creek (300 feet on each
side of the tributary stream) and identified the proposed impervious surface within that area. As
shown in the previous table, the proposed overall impervious surface percentage for the PUD
would be below the 25% allowance. Consequently, the proposed development would comply with
the city’s shoreland overlay regulations. No flexibility from the regulations is requested.
212
2020064
Page 8
Design Standards
The applicant has proposed a modern style, four-story, multi-family building with underground
parking. The proposed materials include stone and masonry on the bottom floors and metal panel
and fiber cement siding on the upper floors. Staff finds that the design of the building meets the
design standards in the ordinance and additional design standards are not necessary to meet the
intent of these standards.
The applicant has provided elevations for the proposed commercial buildings, also consisting of
stone and masonry, metal panels and fiber cement, in addition to storefront glazing. Staff has
requested that the applicant provide additional information on the proposed commercial
architecture to demonstrate how it ties in with the architecture of the multi-family building to
support the MXD guiding and PUD zoning. This matter is addressed in the attached resolution.
213
2020064
Page 9
Wetland/Stream Buffering
The plat is subject to the City’s wetland delineation and buffering regulations. A medium-quality
wetland lies throughout the site along both sides of Bass Creek that runs between the proposed
residential and commercial areas of the subject properties. The applicant is not proposing to fill or
impact the wetland. The zoning ordinance requires that natural buffer strips be provided adjacent
to wetlands to protect them. For medium-quality wetlands, the ordinance requires a buffer strip
averaging 30 feet in width from the wetland edge, together with a 15-foot structure setback from
the edge of the buffer. With identifying the required wetland buffer monuments, the proposal
would comply with City regulations pertaining to buffer strips and setback from the buffer strip.
The attached resolution addresses this matter.
In addition to the wetland buffer requirement, a stream buffer and stream structure setback is
required. The stream buffer would be embodied within the wetland buffer and the 50-foot structure
is identified and would be met as shown on the proposed plans.
Tree Regulations
This development is subject to the City’s tree regulations. The regulations require preservation of
50 percent of the caliper inches of significant trees for residential development sites, or
reforestation and/or monetary restitution for any removal in excess of 50 percent. The regulations
require preservation of 25 percent of the caliper inches of significant trees for non-residential
development sites, or reforestation and/or monetary restitution for any removal in excess of 25
percent.
The tree survey indicates 4,158 caliper inches of eligible significant trees on the residential portion
of the site. The applicant submitted a tree plan indicating that 8.7 percent (362 inches) would be
removed from the total site.
The tree survey indicates 5,239 caliper inches of eligible significant trees on the commercial
portion of the site. The applicant submitted a tree plan indicating that 20.2 percent (1,056 inches)
would be removed from the total site.
Consequently, the proposed development would comply with the City’s tree regulations. No
flexibility from the regulations is requested.
Landscaping
The zoning ordinance states that for multi-family developments with more than 50 dwelling units
require a minimum of 1.5 new overstory trees per dwelling unit (330 trees). The proposed
landscaping plan identifies 331 trees to be planted, consisting of overstory and equivalent
overstory trees.
The zoning ordinance states that commercial developments require a minimum of the greater of
one new overstory tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter or one overstory tree per 1,000 square
feet of gross building floor area (65 trees). The proposed landscaping plan identifies 65 trees to be
214
2020064
Page 10
planted, consisting of overstory and equivalent overstory trees. Consequently, the proposed
landscaping plan meets the zoning ordinance requirements.
Drainage/Treatment of Runoff
The city requires that storm drainage systems be designed so the post-development rate of runoff
from a site does not exceed the pre-development rate. Additionally, the city requires treatment of
storm water runoff before it enters the drainage system. The proposed development includes five
new stormwater management basins, consisting of three on the commercial properties and two on
the residential property. The applicant will finalize compliance with City and watershed
requirements pertaining to drainage and treatment of runoff. The attached resolution addresses this
matter.
Park Dedication
The comprehensive plan does not identify the need for additional park land acquisition on the
subject site. As a result, the applicant is not required to dedicate park land to the city. The applicant
is required to pay an equivalent cash fee in lieu of land dedication prior to recording the final plat.
The park dedication required would be based on the current park dedication rate of $8,000 per
residential dwelling unit and $8,000 per acre of commercial development. The resolution includes
a condition that addresses this matter.
Lighting
The project is in lighting zone 2 (LZ2) and must meet the requirements under section 21105.06 of
the zoning ordinance. The applicant submitted a lighting plan showing the proposed location,
mounting height, and proposed lighting output, but needs to provide fixture details for fixtures that
meet the LZ2 lighting zone requirements. This item is addressed in the attached resolution.
Traffic/Transportation
A traffic study was completed as part of the project based on the proposed uses, commissioned by
the city and reimbursed by the applicant, and is attached. The traffic study included an operational
analysis that examined the existing intersections most affected by the project. Considering on the
proposed Nathan Lane realignment, the traffic study concluded that no improvements are needed
to the existing road system to accommodate the project from a capacity perspective.
The traffic study offered the following recommendations to address and improve safety:
1. The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 106 a.m. peak hour, 155
p.m. peak hour, and 1,568 daily trips. Considering pass-by trips, the resultant net new
traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately
106 a.m. peak hour, 132 p.m. peak hour, and 1,376 daily trips.
2. Results of the year 2025 no-build and year 2025 build intersection capacity analysis
indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS A or better
215
2020064
Page 11
during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours except for the intersection of Bass Lake Road &
Nathan Lane which operates at LOS C or better.
3. Moderate delay and queuing may occur on the Speedway north access approach to Nathan
Lane under 2025 build p.m. peak hour traffic volumes. It would be desirable to limit access
to the eastern retail property to only the southernmost driveway, discouraging use of the
northernmost driveway.
4. Despite the proposed realignment of Nathan Lane only a small percentage of vehicles to
the south of Nathan Lane & 56th Avenue (S Junction) are trucks, which would suggest few
motorists would change their route.
5. Recommendations related to vehicle ingress/egress, internal circulation, and
pedestrian/bicycle connectivity are listed in a separate section of the traffic study (Section
6.0: Site Plan Review).
The applicant would be required to
plat adequate right-of-way in the
southwest corner of the property at
Nathan Lane and 56th Avenue and
along the east side of Nathan Lane,
south of Bass Lake Road for a
potential future turn lane (areas
shown in red).
For the realignment of Nathan Lane,
the developer would need to enter
into an agreement with the city
detailing financing and construction
of these improvements. It is
anticipated that the terms of this
agreement would be included with
preliminary plat prior to the City Council meeting, and final agreement completed with final plat.
The developer will need to work with the city to finalize the location of access points to the site as
part of the realignment of Nathan Lane. It is expected that there will be less direct access points to
Nathan Lane than shown on the proposed plan.
To discourage cut-through traffic, and limit the
number of access points to Nathan Lane, staff is
recommending that the northernmost entrance of
the private drive, located south of the subject
property, be eliminated. An approved turnaround
would be required near the eliminated entrance as
shown on the sketch on the aerial to the right. If
approved, details would be finalized during the
Nathan Lane realignment design.
216
2020064
Page 12
Neighborhood Concerns
Throughout the sketch plan, land use guide plan amendment, and current applications processes,
area residents have raised concerns about the additional traffic in the area, potential cut-through
traffic to the residential subdivision to the south, higher density residential use, and possible
negative impacts to property values, environment, and overall quality of life. As further discussed
in detail above and below, the applicant would be required to be within a permitted density range
for residential development, was required to complete a traffic study, and the subject applications
are subject to environmental protection of the wetland, Bass Creek, existing trees, and floodplain.
Preliminary Plat:
The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide the property into four lots.
Location Type Acres
Lot 1, Block 1 Apartment 11.32
Lot 2, Block 1 Retail 2.72
Lot 3, Block 1 Existing Retail 1.34
Lot 1, Block 2 Retail 2.61
Conclusion on the Preliminary Plat
If the City Council rezones the site as requested, the proposed preliminary plat would be consistent
with the comprehensive plan as amended and would comply with the standards outlined in the
subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT:
If the City Council approves the rezoning, preliminary plat, and PUD general plan, the applicant
would need to obtain the following City approvals prior to development of the subject site.
Final plat and PUD final plan
Floodplain determination
Watershed approval
RECOMMENDATION:
Community and Economic Development Department staff recommends approval of the rezoning,
preliminary plat, and PUD general plan request, by Enclave Companies, for a mixed-use
development, and that the Planning Commission review the application materials, conduct the
public hearing, and provide its recommendation to the City Council.
If new information is brought forward at the public hearing, staff may alter or consider a
recommendation.
217
2020064
Page 13
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Photo
3. Notification Area Map
4. MXD Excerpt (Comprehensive Plan)
5. Traffic Study
6. Applicant’s Narrative and Site Graphics
7. Draft Ordinance Approving Rezoning
8. Draft Resolution Approving Findings of Fact supporting the Rezoning
9. Draft Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan
218