The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Packet 08-10-2021 SpecialCity Council 1 of 1 August 10, 2021 CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA Special City Council August 10, 2021, 5:00 PM 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.TOPICS 2.1 Discuss development terms for the former Four Seasons Mall property Presentation RFP Schedule RFP Draft 2.2 Wayzata School District and City of Plymouth Joint Powers Agreement Discussion JPA Termination Memo Association JPA Notification Memo JPA Playfield Map 2.3 Set future Study Sessions August September October November 3.ADJOURN 1 Special City Council August 10, 2021 Agenda Number:2.1 To:Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by:Chris LaBounty, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Reviewed by:Michael Thompson, Public Works Director Item:Discuss development terms for the former Four Seasons Mall property 1.Action Requested: Review draft request for proposals (RFP) and provide feedback on the development terms for the former Four Seasons Mall property. 2.Background: In June 2021, the City purchased the former Four Seasons Mall site with the intention to solicit proposals from developers on redevelopment of the site in a manner that meets City goals and is driven by market realities. City staff and consultants (Ehlers and Bolton & Menk) have prepared the attached draft RFP for Council to review. Staff is looking for feedback on six major components of the RFP, and based on feedback will present a final RFP at the August 24, 2021 Council meeting. A City website page has been established to help inform and engage the public and email eNotification updates will be provided as the RFP process progresses. 3.Budget Impact: Costs to develop the RFP are paid for under the Transit - Administration fund and are expected to be recovered with the sale of the property. 4.Attachments: Presentation RFP Schedule RFP Draft 2 Four Seasons Mall Redevelopment RFP Council Workshop: August 10, 2021 3 Agenda •Introductions •Goals of the RFP •Council Feedback 1. Vision for the Property 2. Property Guiding 3. Support HRA Property 4. Minimum Requirements 5. Desired Outcomes 6. Schedule & Engagement Plan •Demolition Approach •Questions/Feedback 4 Three Questions •Goal of the RFP is for developers to answer three questions: •What are you going to build? •What are you willing to pay? •What public assistance are you asking for? •This is a challenging site, so we need to be: •Transparent on challenges •Clear on opportunities •Predictable on our expectations 5 Vision for the Property Question 1: Does Council agree this is the Vision for the property? Vision is to build an active, vibrant, and well-connected mixed-use development that meets the following objectives: •Is financially viable and in a reasonable timeframe. [Can the market support it and it can go from the planning to construction quickly.] •Is distinctive and fits into surrounding community. [This is a highly visible corner, and we don’t want “template” buildings.] •Integrates transit and creates an outdoor community space. 6 Property Guiding Question 2: Would Council entertain re-guiding to another use? •Land Use Plan identifies as MXD-R (Mixed Use Residential) •Minimum of 12 dwelling units per acre and maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre. •For this site (17.3-acre) must support 208 – 433 units •Dominium was 318 (or 18/acre) for reference. •MXD-R use is compatible with a transit structure and shared parking concept. •Regardless of Guiding there are use restrictions on the site. 7 HRA Senior Facility Question 3: Would Council support & fund an HRA senior building on this site? •The HRA is interested in developing another senior building. •If entertained, staff expects this to be around 75-100 units. •Opportunity here with early payoff of Plymouth Town Square bonds in 2023. •Could provide affordable units to the property. •Senior/affordable housing is compatible with guiding and transit structure. 8 Minimum Requirements Question 4: Does Council agree with these must have items? The following items must be met: •Park & Ride Structure accommodates 200-vehicles for transit. •Site meets watershed goals for grant funds. •At a minimum, City makes back what they put into the land (prior to buying land for transit structure or HRA building). 9 Desired Outcomes Question 5: Does Council want to change or add any desired outcomes? •Provides high quality multi-family housing options. •Provides quality commercial offerings, including restaurants. •Maximizes shared parking opportunities and limits peak traffic. •Integrates the park and ride facility and is well connected for pedestrians, bicyclists, bus riders, and vehicles. •Creates attractive and creative architecture while maintaining an appropriate level of visual cohesiveness to the surrounding community. •Incorporates high quality site amenities, public art, and potential options for an outdoor community gathering space. •Demolition of the building is completed in 2022 following selection. •Additional standard items on page 6. 10 Schedule & Engagement Plan Question 6: Is Council comfortable with RFP schedule & engagement approach? DATE EVENT June 25, 2021 City closed on property. August 24, 2021 City Council approves & authorize release of RFP. October 28, 2021 Deadline for Proposals. Oct. 29 – Nov. 12, 2021 Staff initial RFP review for completeness. December 7, 2021 Proposal review meeting (Mayor, CM Prom, At-Large CM, Staff). January 25, 2022 Developer interviews with City Council. January 25, 2022 City Council affirms developer selection & framework. February – March 2022 Establish final purchase agreement terms. March/April 2022 Public hearing on purchase by developer. April 2022 Begin planning process 11 Demolition Approach •Demolition of the building by the developer with redevelopment. •Developer must specify in proposal demolition timeline. •Approach set-up to: •Minimizes risk to the City in redevelopment. •Maximizes grants and financial opportunities to redevelop. •Allows developers to salvage/reuse portions of the site (ex. pilings) •Premature demolition could result in loss of funding due to blighted status. •Additional costs related to design, mobilization, stormwater, permitting. 12 Questions or Feedback 13 Four Seasons Agenda 1 | P a g e Four Seasons Redevelopment RFP Schedule DATE EVENT June 25, 2021 City closed on the former Four Seasons Mall property. June 28 –Aug.5, 2021 Staff draft the Request for Proposals (RFP) . August 10, 2021 City Council reviews & comments on draft RFP. Aug. 11-Aug. 20, 2021 Staff finalize RFP. August 24, 2021 City Council reviews final development terms & authorize release of RFP. August 27, 2021 Staff releases RFP. Aug. 28 –Oct. 28, 2021 RFP active. October 28, 2021 Deadline for Proposals. Oct. 29 –Nov. 12, 2021 Staff initial RFP review for completeness & meeting RFP objectives. December 7, 2021 Proposal review meeting (Mayor, CM Prom, At-Large CM, Staff). January 25, 2022 Developer interviews with City Council. January 25, 2022 City Council affirms developer selection and agreement framework. February –March 2022 Establish final purchase agreement terms. March/April 2022 City Council approves purchase agreement & holds public hearing on sale. April 2022 Begin planning process 14 1 15 2 169/Rockford Road Site Request for Proposals Proposal Submissions Developers intending to submit a proposal are asked to inform the city by email by September 24, 2021 so they can be notified of any changes or clarifications to this RFP. Emails should be sent to dparr@plymouthmn.gov. Complete proposals are due at city offices by 4 p.m. (CT), October 28, 2021. Proposals received after the deadline will not be accepted. Proposals should be submitted to: City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Include on the sealed proposals: [Name of Firm and Lead Contact] 169/Rockford Road Site Proposal City Project No. NCIP2103 Contact Information Questions regarding this RFP should be directed to: Danette Parr Economic Development Manager dparr@plymouthmn.gov 16 3 Contents I. RFP Overview 5 • Project Summary 5 • Project Opportunity 5 II. Project Objectives 5 • Primary Objectives 5 • Goals and Desires 6 III. Site and Background Information 6 • Property Description 6 • Deed Restrictions 8 Development Site Specifications 8 • Comprehensive Plan 8 • Zoning 9 • Neighborhood Characteristics 10 • Previously Proposed/Approved Projects 11 Transportation 11 • Regional Road Network 11 • Local Road Network 11 • Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails 12 • Bus Transit 12 • Hwy 169 Interchange 12 • Traffic Analysis 13 Water Resources and Environmental 13 • Stormwater Challenges 13 • Public Stormwater Improvements 13 • Watershed Grant Funds 13 • Environmental Analysis 14 • Soil Challenges 14 Additional Redevelopment Expectations 15 • Recommended Development Considerations 15 • Park and Ride Structure 15 • Affordable Housing Component 15 • City Land Expectations 15 • Purchase Price 15 • Public Financing Assistance/Tax Increment Financing 16 • Community Engagement Expectations 16 • Senior Housing Option 16 17 4 IV. RFP Submission and Proposal Selection 16 • RFP Process Timeline 16 • Proposal Content 17 V. Additional Requirements and Obligations 18 • Property Acquisition and Letter of Intent 18 • Responsibility for Responding to RFP 18 • Disclosure and Disclaimer 19 RFP Attachments Attachments (may be accessed by the following links): A. 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Plan Map B. Planned Unit Development Ordinance 2019-03/PUD Zoning Section 21655.66 (to be amended) C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment D. Soils Report E. ALTA Survey F. Geotechnical Report G. Previous Traffic Studies H. 2010 Four Seasons Mall Redevelopment Scenarios Study I. Wetland Delineation J. Existing Deed Restrictions K. Bassett Creek Watershed - Four Seasons Watershed Improvement Project Link 18 5 I. RFP Overview Project Summary: The City of Plymouth is requesting proposals for the redevelopment of a 17.3-acre city owned site located at 4200 Lancaster Lane North. This distinctive property is situated along and highly visible from both Highway 169 and County Road 9 (Rockford Road). The city’s vision for the property is that it will become a vibrant mixed-use development, which connects with the adjacent neighborhoods, is oriented towards maximizing the advantages of the future park & ride structured parking and creates a unique public space to draw people into the development. To accomplish this, the city is seeking an innovative and qualified developer or development team to design and construct a project which will be a gateway development in eastern Plymouth. The city anticipates working proactively and collaboratively with a selected team to create a successful redevelopment project. Project Opportunity: This project represents a unique opportunity for a future developer to create a project of lasting value to the community. The site has known challenges, but the city is confident that the right developer will be able to overcome these to create a successfu l project. The city will be a partner in identifying and leveraging opportunities to keep the project moving forward. Some opportunities include incorporation of a transit park and ride structure, resources for improvements to the adjacent wetland area, planned trail connection upgrades, site improvement resources via a TIF district, potential to incorporate senior and/or affordable housing, and useful information from prior environmental and traffic studies. To assist developers in creating a successful project, this RFP is transparent about the known site challenges, the outcomes that the city believes will make it successful in the eyes of the public, and information about previously approved projects . It’s important for potential future developers to know that previously approved projects are included only for reference and as a snapshot of the sites development plan at a given time. It’s important to the city that a potential future developer look at developing this into a vibrant development with realistic market expectations that can be swiftly moved from concept to construction. II. Project Objectives Primary Objectives: The city envisions the future site to be an active, vibrant, and well- connected mixed-use development that meets the following objectives: • Delivers a viable development that can be designed, approved, and constructed within a reasonable timeframe. • Provides a distinct site design and aesthetic for the scale of the site while also complimenting the character of nearby uses, especially along Lancaster Lane. • Fully integrates transit connectivity while creating public community space with a strong sense of place. 19 6 Goals and Desires: the city also envisions that once the site is redeveloped, it will support the following goals and desires: • Supports City land use and development goals detailed in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. • Provides high quality multi-family housing options that meet identified community needs and fit within the context of the development and surrounding area. • Integrates affordable housing options into the overall housing mix for the site. • Establishes opportunities for quality commercial offerings that can be easily utilized by many users, including the adjacent residents and future park and ride patrons. • Maximizes shared parking opportunities and limits peak traffic time impacts on the directly adjacent neighborhood and roadways. • Utilizes building and site designs that incorporate transit -oriented elements that allow for the integration of the park and ride structure, allowing connectivity and safe circulation for pedestrians, bicyclists, bus riders, as well as automobiles. • Creates attractive and creative architecture while maintaining an appropriate level of visual cohesiveness to the surrounding community. • Incorporates high quality site amenities, public art, and potential options for an outdoor community gathering space. • Spurs investment and provides economic development through employment creation, increased market value and an expanded tax base. III. Site and Background Information Property Description: The site is located at the southwest quadrant of Hwy 169 and Co. Rd. 9. The site is the former location of the Four Seasons Shopping Mall that was originally constructed in 1978. The mall was shuttered approximately ten years ago, and the City of Plymouth recently purchased the site from Wal-Mart, who was previously contemplating a superstore on the site. The existing structure contains roughly 117,000 square feet of building area. The existing building is classified as blighted and the city’s goal is for the structure to be demolished in 2022 following selection of developer or developer team. 20 7 Location of the site within the City of Plymouth Site address: 4200 Lancaster Lane N Plymouth, MN 55447 Site area: 17.3 acres PID’s: 1311822140013-16.29 acres 1311822140009-1.01 acres Owner: City of Plymouth Current Use: Vacant substandard commercial building and parking lot 2040 Land Use Plan: MXD-R (Mixed Use Residential) Zoning: The site is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) 21 8 Redevelopment Site Deed Restrictions: Due to previously agreed to conditions of sale, there are specific site use restrictions that exist on the site. The restrictions can be found in Attachment K. Development Site Specifications Comprehensive Plan: The site is guided MXD-R (Mixed Use Residential) in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which allows a variety of uses, such as: • multi-family dwellings, including apartments. • commercial uses, including restaurants; and • office uses. This guidance intends for the mixing of higher intensity land uses either in one building, or the physical integration of different uses on the same lot or within close proximity. These mixed uses may include a combination of retail, office, cultural or entertainment uses, and higher density residential uses. In the MXD-R classification, high density housing is a required component at a Site Boundary Existing Sidewalk/ Trail Network 22 9 range between 12 units/acre and 25 units/acre. Based on this guidance, it is expected that the 17.3-acre site should provide between 208 and 433 dwelling units. According to the Comprehensive Plan, MXD-R development is expected to demonstrate a higher standard of site and building design. Likewise, evaluation of building design will be based on the building’s relationship to its surroundings and the following architectural characteristics: materials; texture; colors; massing; building components and details; articulation of roof lines and exterior walls; height; and setbacks. In meeting a higher standard of site design, mixed use residential developments should include such things as: well-defined pedestrian walkways; transit improvements; decorative paving materials; street furniture; public plazas; decorative pedestrian-scale lighting; the screening of parking and loading areas; and a quality landscape design that ties together all the individual elements of the development. To encourage pedestrian movement and reduce impervious surfaces, parking for either residential or non - residential uses should not dominate the site. Reducing the amount of surface parking should be accomplished through structured parking, shared parking or by locating a portion of the parking beneath a building. Zoning: The site is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. It is anticipated that mixed use development projects proposed for the site will be processed as PUDs, wi th the location of specific uses and development criteria determined through that process. As stated in the City’s zoning ordinance, section 21655, (https://library.municode.com/mn/plymouth/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CHXXIZOOR_ CHXXIZOOR_S21655PUPLUNDEDI) the intent of the PUD District designation is to allow for the following: 1. Provide for the establishment of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished under this Chapter. 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this Chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, etc.) that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the Cit. 5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open space. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 23 10 8. Provide for the maintenance of, and an amendment procedure for, those planned unit developments listed in Section 21100.02 Subd. 2(b) of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance (See Attachment B). A PUD was previously approved for the site in 2019. The previously approved Four Seasons PUD (see Attachment B) approved a range of housing types and affordability, as well as retail and structured parking. This PUD established the zoning regulations for a previously approved specific development. It is anticipated that the PUD would be amended to reflect the new development plan and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site. Neighborhood Characteristics: Adjacent land uses, and amenities include: North (Across Co. Rd. 9) Commercial uses to the northwest: Holiday Gas Station, Taco Bell, Wendy’s, office uses to the northeast East (Across Hwy 169) Single and two-family homes in New Hope South and West (Across Lancaster Lane) Office uses, single-family homes and townhomes Adjacent Land Uses 24 11 Previously Proposed/Approved Projects: The following information is provided for background and does not represent that the city desires a future redevelopment to match either of these previously approved plans. Additional information can be found in the associated City Council packets and meeting minutes. In 2017 the City Council approved a PUD redevelopment plan called “Agora”. Ultimately, the developer could not secure the necessary financing, and the project was not constructed. The approved redevelopment project included the following: • two hotels (each four stories in height) totaling 195 guest rooms and 8,000 square feet of conference center space; • roughly 20,000 square feet of office space; • roughly 60,000 square feet of retail space; • a 139-unit senior apartment building (4 and 5 stories in height); and • a 339-space parking ramp (3 levels of which 200 spaces would be for city park and ride bus service and the remainder would be for development parking ). In 2019 the City Council approved a future mixed-use development known as “the Dominium/Launch Project”. This project also did not move forward due to an inability to secure financing in a timely manner. The approved mixed-use redevelopment project included the following uses: • general-occupancy/family apartments totaling 163 units and 100% affordable to persons at or below 60% AMI; • senior apartments totaling 155 units; • four commercial buildings totaling 23,300 square feet; and • park and ride ramp with 229 parking spaces. Transportation Regional Road Network: The redevelopment site is located with prime access to both a state highway and a county roadway. It is located directly west of Hwy 169 (84,000 veh icles/day (vpd)) and south of Co. Rd. 9 (27,500 vpd) on the Plymouth/New Hope border. Local Road Network: Access for the redevelopment site is off Lancaster Lane (3,250 vpd) which is located along the west side of the site. Lancaster Lane connects the site to the Hwy 169/Co. Rd. 9 interchange to the north and Hwy 169/36th Avenue interchange to the south. In advance of this development the city will be completing the public improvements outlined in the traffic study included as Attachment G. These improvements include: • Turn lane and signal improvements at the Lancaster Ln/Co. Rd. 9 intersection • Intersection improvements at the Pilgrim Lane/Lancaster Lane intersection near the development. With these improvements Lancaster Lane and the adjacent roadway network will be able to accommodate a mixed-use development of similar traffic demand as outlined in the Recommended Development Considerations. 25 12 Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails: The site has excellent sidewalk and trail connectivity, which the city views as an amenity for a future site development. There are local trails and sidewalks adjacent to the site which provide connections to local schools, retail and recreational facilities. This includes connectivity to the Three Rivers Park District’s Bassett Creek Regional Trail that runs along 36th Avenue. Additional trail construction along Co. Rd. 9 is expected to be completed by 2024 and will provide pedestrian and bicycles safe access to New Hope and businesses on the north side of the interchange. Bus Transit: The redevelopment site is currently serviced by Plymouth’s Metrolink bus transit 790 and 795 express service routes. These provide weekday morning express service from Plymouth to Downtown Minneapolis, Downtown East, and the University of Minnesota, with return service to Plymouth in the afternoon and evening. Hwy 169 Interchange Replacement: MnDOT is scheduled to replace the Hwy 169 / Co. Rd. 9 interchange between 2023-2024. With the interchange replacement, MnDOT will be adding trails on both sides of Co. Rd. 9 and reconfiguring the bridge to a folded diamond style intersection to improve safety on the roadway. This project involves removal of all ramps on the south side of the bridge and adding additional traffic signals at the tops of the ramps. With these improvements, MnDOT has indicated that some of the right -of-way from Hwy 169 may be turned back to the city in the area of this redevelopment parcel. The below layout reflects the future interchange as currently proposed. Future Hwy 169 Configuration Traffic Analysis: Traffic studies have been completed during previously proposed redevelopment projects and can be found in Attachment G. When the Four Seasons Mall was fully operating, the site was generating an estimated 5,024 average daily trips. The future development may benefit from not exceeding traffic generation counts for the site as noted in the traffic studies, and as outlined in the Recommended Development Considerations. 26 13 Depending on the final development plan, and if expected average daily trips exceed the count of 6,970, the selected developer may be expected to fund an updat e to the previously conducted traffic study, to be completed by consultant(s) chosen by the city. Water Resources & Environmental Stormwater Challenges: The redevelopment site is located in the Bassett Creek Watershed, with the north stem of Bassett Creek running along the east side of the site. All the water from the site drains to Northwood Lake in New Hope. The redevelopment proposal will be required to meet all watershed requirements including 100-year modeled floodplain for the north stem. The redevelopment proposal must also meet the requirements of the watershed grant funds listed below in the RFP. Included in the RFP as Attachment J is a wetland delineation which is active until 2024. There are known hydric challenges with the site soils which are ou tlined elsewhere in this RFP. Public Stormwater Improvements: There are known localized flooding issues at the intersection of Pilgrim Lane/Lancaster Lane which will be corrected by the city in advance of the development. Public improvements on Lancaster Lane include upsizing the existing storm sewer to included capacity and adding additional inlets. This work will be reimbursed by the TIF district and may be completed either by the city or as part of the redevelopment plan. The city expects coordination with the selected developer/development team to align with the stormwater improvements with the final development needs. Watershed Grant Funds: The Bassett Creek Watershed provided developers of the previous proposed redevelopment projects capital improvement grant funds for use in this area. There is approximately $800,000 remaining in this grant and to access the funds, site improvements must reduce phosphorus loading into Northwood Lake by at least 100 pounds annually. The following page contains an image of the stormwater pond to be constructed in portions of the existing wetland/City wetland parcel and wetland restoration work that was previously proposed to achieve this goal, as well as to provide part of the stormwater requirements for the site. This plan has been approved by the watershed, DNR, and Army Corps of Engineers and the intellectual property for the work is included in the sale of the land for the RFP. Maintenance of the wetland restoration will be the responsibility of the city and the stormwater pond will be the responsibility of the developer. The watershed approved previous development plans and the BMP designed as outlined above. It should be noted that previous development proposals included a net reduction in impervious surfaces on-site and creative stormwater management to improve water quality downstream while still addressing challenging site conditions. 27 14 As part of the developer’s redevelopment proposal, they will be responsible to use the watershed’s ATLAS 14 model for the area and meet all watershed requirements, including freeboard for low floors adjacent to the creek. Previously Approved Army Corps Wetland Restoration and Storm Pond Configuration Environmental Analysis: A Phase I Environmental Assessment was completed for the site, and it was determined that a Phase II was not necessary as a part of the previous projects. The previous analysis included a traffic study to analyze the traffic capacity of the surrounding road network. Depending on the proposal, the selected developer may be expected to fund an update to the environmental assessments, an environmental assessment worksheet, and traffic study to be completed by consultants chosen by the city. Soil Challenges: There is known high ground water and non -hydric soils on the site, which are provided in Attachment D. 28 15 Additional Redevelopment Expectations Recommended Development Considerations: During the approval of two recent development proposals (detailed in this RFP), a series of development standards were studied and established that both the community and city leadership found favorable. While final development proposals will not necessarily be expected to adhere to the below criteria, the selected developer should be prepared for the possibility of additional study or site assessment for any/or all these considerations should the proposed development fall outside these previously established standards: • Maximum Daily Vehicle Trips: 6,970 • Minimum Residential Units: 208 units • Park & Ride Size: 200 structured parking spaces • Site Density: Establish lower densities and heights along Lancaster Lane, while focusing the highest intensity uses toward the Hwy 169 and Co. Rd. 9 perimeters of the site. • Stormwater: Preserve the southernmost wetland area for stormwater use and reduce runoff per watershed standards. • Impervious Surfaces: Future development should reduce impervious site coverage Park and Ride Structure: The location of the park and ride ramp is an important element that should be fully integrated into the future development. The previously established guiding principles for the redevelopment of the site state that “transit facilities shall be considered in conjunction with planning for site parking.” The future parking ramp would provide shared parking spaces for both a City of Plymouth Metrolink park and ride facility and for the proposed development. The city anticipates that 200 spaces would be needed for the park and ride facility by 2030. The city is open to working with the future developer to determine how the park and ride ramp would ultimately function, but most commonly, the previous developments have planned for the parking ramp to be city owned and operated as public parking. The park and ride facility would be in operation weekdays during daytime hours. The parking spaces in the ramp that are not needed for the park and ride during weekday daytime hours would be available for development parking during the operating hours for the park and ride. Additionally, the parking ramp would be fully available for development parking during weekday evenings and on weekends. City Land Expectations: The city expects that as part of platting the property, the wellhouse located on the northwest side of the site and the lift station on the southwest side of the site will be platted as city parcels at no cost to the city. The city expects to retain ownership of the stormwater wetland to the south of the site and will manage long term maintenance of the wetland parcel. Purchase Price: The City purchased the property in 2021 using transit funds and expects that following the sale of the property that either with the purchase of the land by a developer or 29 16 through reimbursement through Tax Increment Financing (TIF), that at a minimum all incurred costs will be recouped. Public Financing Assistance/Tax Increment Financing (TIF): TIF District 7-9, a redevelopment TIF District, was established in 2017 to assist in the redevelopment of the site as part of an earlier project. Due to statutory requirements for expenditure of funds within five (5) years of certification, it’s anticipated that the TIF District will be decertified and recertified with the specifics of the new project incorporated. Also, to achieve the city’s development objectives, the city is willing to consider applications for other types of non-city public financial assistance such as grants for demolition and sustainable redevelopment efforts. Community Engagement Expectations: The city is committed to a robust community engagement process specific to this development project and will be anticipating that project submittals include a community engagement plan that reflects the selected development teams planned approach. It is an expectation that the developer or development team will collaborate with city staff to assure that opportunities exist for the neighborhood and general public to stay informed of the process and have opportunities to provide input . Affordable Housing Component: The city is supportive of a developer including an affordable housing component, provided it does not result in creating financing challenges that would delay the construction of the project. The developer should include the percentage of affordable housing being proposed for the redevelopment project. Senior Housing Option: The Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has two city owned senior housing buildings and is currently looking for a third location to consider. The Plymouth HRA is open to establishing a senior housing building on the site if the future developer would find it beneficial to the overall project. IV. RFP Submission and Proposal Selection RFP Process Timeline Estimated RFP Process/Schedule Request for Proposals Issued August 27, 2021 Questions Due (in writing) October 12, 2021 Questions Answered – Development Meeting (Via Zoom) October 19, 2021 Proposals Due 4pm CT on October 28, 2021 Evaluation of Proposals and Developers Chosen to Interview December 14, 2021 Developer Interviews with City Council January 25, 2022 Developer and Redevelopment Framework Chosen January 25, 2022 Negotiate Purchase and Development Agreement Feb – March 2022 The city reserves the right to extend or otherwise modify the above schedule. If any such changes occur, notice will then be provided to developers who notified the city, per the requirement below. 30 17 Proposal Content: Proposal responses should demonstrate clearly and accurately the capabilities, knowledge, experience, and capacity of the development team to meet the requirements of this RFP and proposed project. Respondents must submit one (1) unbound copy and one (1) electronic version, Microsoft Office compatible, on a USB drive. Proposals must be on standard 8 ½” by 11” paper. All supporting documentation must be on paper no larger than 11” by 17”. Materials and USB drives will not be returned. It should be anticipated that development teams invited to interview will be asked to provide additional hardcopy versions. All submitted proposals must include the following information and materials: • A cover page expressing the developer’s desire to submit a proposal and including the following information: • Developer/team’s name and mailing address. • Name, mailing address, telephone number and email address of the primary contact person. • Signature of authorized representative of responding developer or team. In addition to a cover letter, the proposal should include the following A-P materials, in order: Description A In the case of a development team, identify members of the development team, experience with comparable projects and working together, team member capacity to implement proposal and complete the redevelopment project in a timely manner. B List comparable, completed mixed-use developments of a similar nature and scale and describe how the development team has been able to overcome site challenges, such as poor soils and high-water tables. C Narrative that describes the proposed project and how it meets or exceeds the city’s development objectives. D Preliminary site plan(s). E List of proposed project components, stories, number of housing units and type, anticipated types of commercial uses and preliminary building square footages. F Describe and/or illustrate how the park and ride structure and public transportation aspects are integrated into the overall project. G Provide detail on how the site would create community spaces for residents and patrons. H Describe approach to stormwater management and meeting stormwater grant requirements, I Conceptual building elevations and renderings to illustrate the proposed project and a description of anticipated building material for the development. 31 18 J A community engagement plan describing the development team’s approach to working with the surrounding neighborhood and community during the design and development phases. K List of project’s estimated economic benefits including estimated total market value, real estate taxes, and overall employment potential. L List of estimated project construction costs/preliminary capital budget including sources and uses of funds to acquire the site and construct the development, including grants, public financing, etc. Should be broken down to include component uses and assumptions used to develop the preliminary capital budget.) M Projected construction commencement and completion dates. N Letter of Intent stating proposed purchase price for the site. O Developer’s current legal status: corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, etc. and supporting evidence/documentation of financial strength P Any other information that is critical to the city’s ability to evaluate the proposal V. Additional Requirements and Obligations Property Acquisition and Letter of Intent: The property subject to this RFP will be sold by the city, with the exception of portions of the site indicated that will be maintained by the city for public purposes. Responses to this RFP are required to include a Letter of Intent to acquire the site. Offer prices will be one of multiple criteria for evaluating proposals and are not a weighted part of the criteria. The Letter of Intent must state: • The amount offered for the site, • Contingencies associated with this offer, including public participation in the development project and, • The developer’s ability to close on purchase of the site. Responsibility for Responding to RFP: This RFP in no way obligates the respondent to enter into a relationship with the city. Nor does this RFP obligate the city to enter into a relationship with any entity that responds, nor does it limit or restrict the city’s right to enter into a relationship with any entity that does not respond to this RFP. In its sole discretion, the city may pursue discussions with one or more entities responding to this RFP or none at all. The city further reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to cancel this RFP at any time for any reason. The city reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals, in part or in whole, and to waive any minor informalities, as deemed in the city’s best interests. Selection of a developer does not constitute acceptance or approval of all aspects of the developer’s submitted proposal by the city. The city reserves the right to propose and/or require revisions to the 32 19 proposed redevelopment and negotiate with the developer over various aspects of the proposed redevelopment proposal. The city in no way takes responsibility for the costs incurred by respondents or their contractors in connection with this RFP process, including, but not limited to, costs associated with preparing a proposal or participating in any presentations or negotiations related to this RFP. Disclosure and Disclaimer: This Request for Proposals is for informational purposes only. Any action taken by the city in response to proposals made pursuant to this RFP, or in making any award or failing or refusing to make any award, shall be without liability or obligation on the part of the city or any of their officers, employees, or advisors. This RFP is being provided by the city without any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, as to its content, accuracy, or completeness. Any reliance on the information contained in this RFP, or on any communications with the city’s officials, employees, or advisors, shall be at the developer’s own risk. Prospective developers should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analysis in connection with this matter. This RFP is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal without notice. This RFP does not constitute an offer by the city. The city’s determination as to the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting a response to the RFP shall be made at the sole discretion of the city. The city is governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota and all proposals and supporting data shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. 33 Special City Council August 10, 2021 Agenda Number:2.2 To:Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by:Barb Northway, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by:Diane Evans, Parks and Recreation Director Item:Wayzata School District and City of Plymouth Joint Powers Agreement Discussion 1.Action Requested: Discuss the Wayzata School District and City of Plymouth Joint Powers Agreements (JPA). 2.Background: Discuss and provide general direction regarding the Wayzata School District's notification to the City of the termination of the JPAs for Greenwood, Oakwood, and Ridgemount playfields and tennis courts. 3.Budget Impact: Termination of the JPA will result in reductions to the City's 10-year Capital Improvement Program and the annual budget as outlined in the termination memo. 4.Attachments: JPA Termination Memo Association JPA Notification Memo JPA Playfield Map 34 1 In 2020, the City signed one-year extensions to five Joint Powers Agreements (JPA’s) with Wayzata School District. The agreements include: 1. aquatics agreement for use of the East and West Middle School pools; 2. leased outdoor space agreement at Greenwood Elementary; 3. leased outdoor space agreement at Oakwood Elementary; 4. leased outdoor space agreement at East Middle School; 5. field scheduling and maintenance agreement. The reason for extensions versus new agreements was based on the school board’s hesitancy to enter into long term agreements when the future school district facility needs and funding are uncertain. As the District’s enrollment grows, facilities are constantly at the forefront of planning and discussions. While the District has not made us aware of any specific plans, we believe that due to the growth there will be a facilities referendum sometime in early 2023. Should this referendum be held and approved, the District is likely to construct a new middle school and a new elementary school at the 97-acre District owned site at Hamel Road and Tamarack Drive in Medina. Should the referendum fail, the District would be forced to look at other options, including the lease/levy option that was used to expand Oakwood Elementary site. This project resulted in the loss of a baseball/softball field and elevated the discussion about the future of the JPA’s and athletic facilities. The lease/levy option allows school districts the option of constructing a building addition without a referendum as long as the addition is no larger than 20% of the existing building footprint. Should the referendum fail, the District will likely consider expanding its current facilities under this provision. The laws governing this type of financing also contain a maximum funding district-wide of $212 per pupil unit. Despite the fact that referendums almost always pass in the Wayzata School District, we believe the District is not renewing the JPA’s in order to keep all future options open. However, there is a downside to all parties caused by the District keeping their options open. The result of not renewing the JPA’s causes uncertainty and confusion for not only the District, but the City and the residents who rely on the athletic facilities for their recreation needs. In addition, terminating the JPA’s has the potential to increase costs for both entities which is in turn passed on to taxpayers. City staff met with Wayzata school administrative staff several times in 2021 to negotiate new Joint Power Agreements (JPA’s). The negotiations on the aquatic agreement concluded with a five-year agreement with an additional five-year extension for a total of 10 years. No agreements were reached on any of the other agreements. Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: Dave Callister, City Manager Barb Northway, Parks & Recreation Deputy Director Date: July 19, 2021 Item: Wayzata Schools Joint Power Agreements 35 2 Recently, the City was notified by Wayzata School District Executive Director of Finance and Business, Jim Westrum that the agreements for the three outdoor leased space at Oakwood Elementary, Greenwood Elementary, and East Middle School; the maintenance agreement and the tennis court agreements for Oakwood and East Middle School will be terminated on October 31, 2021. In an email, Jim Westrum, stated, “…with the License agreements expiring in October of 2021 and the District not being able to determine its ability to extend the agreements until 2023, the District administration was unable to provide the school board a recommendation to extend the expiring license agreements that would meet the School Board's primary directive. The School Board's directive to the administration was to make certain that our actions today did not unduly obligate future school boards.” The City has built and provided recreational amenities on the sites for the past 40 years of the agreements which began in 1980. The three sites total 57.84 acres. The loss of sports fields is approximately 30% of the total sport fields within the City’s purview. Assets on the sites include diamond and rectangle sport fields, irrigation, basketball and sand volleyball courts, trails, rinks, park buildings, lights, and additional items per the attached asset maps. The original value of the assets was $3.17 million and the depreciated value of the assets is $1.29 million. Regarding termination, the agreements state, “…the District shall reimburse City the verified capital cost of the City in any construction (but not maintenance or repair) for new facilities incurred subsequent to the date of this Agreement multiplied by a fraction, the denominator of which is 20 and numerator of which is the number of whole years remaining until June 1, 2020 at the effective date of such termination.”. At this point in the agreements, there is no reimbursement from the school district to the City for capital improvements. The leased school and tennis court sites are used by students during the day and community users in the evenings. Use of the facilities include parks and recreation programs, youth and adult sports associations, school sports, business renters, Special Olympics, and the casual park user. The City’s current 10-year Capital Improvement Program impact includes: Year Description Amount 2028 Greenwood Irrigation Replacement -$270,000 2028 Oakwood Tennis Court Renovation -$400,000 2030 Oakwood Irrigation Replacement -$320,000 CIP Total Impact -$990,000 The Parks and Forestry budget impact includes the following annual budget reductions to operations: Seasonal Salaries & Benefits -$52,000 Materials & Supplies -$10,300 Utilities -$36,500 Mowing/Turfgrass Management -$35,000 Portable Restroom Rentals -$4,500 Reduction of association cost recovery fee -$30,000 Annual Budget Total Impact -$168,300 Parks & Forestry also plans to redirect employees to additional mowing which is in the current budget under a lawn maintenance contract. 36 3 Impacts and concerns going forward include: ▪ Substantial push-back from the associations due to the potential for the lack of quality maintenance and service through evening/weekend personnel on school-owned facilities. ▪ Continuity of a high-standard service to the current users of the JPA sites. ▪ Associations requesting more use from the City facilities due to concerns with the lack of maintenance on school-owned facilities. ▪ Potential deterioration or lack of funding/staff to maintain JPA site assets by the school district. ▪ Potential for the school district to ask the City to renew agreements if the school district bond referendum passes in 2023. Also, what will the condition of facilities be at that time and how will capital improvements and funding be handled? ▪ School district requests for use of City-owned facilities may have to be limited due to increased pressure on the park system. Removal of City-owned site furnishings on JPA sites (those items not constructed per the agreement) will take place during the fall. Restoring services from the removals will be accomplished over the next few years on City-owned park sites. It is the City’s intent to notify the athletic associations of the JPA termination and acknowledge to the school district the receipt of the termination letters by the end of July. While there is very little under the City’s control at this point, we wanted to update the Council on the latest developments in the event you receive questions going forward. Please feel free to reach out if you have questions or concerns. 37 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !([[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [[[[[ [ [[[[[[[ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [ [ [ "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P !!! !!!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!!!! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! !!!! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field B Field C Field A Greenwoo dElementary Greenwoo d Greenwood TC 0 80 160 24040 Feet THIS RE PR ESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATAFROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOU RCES THAT HASNOT BEE N FIE LD VERIFIED. INFORMAT ION SHOULD BE FIE LDVERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIGINAL SOU RCE DOCU MENTS. 01/25/21 . Legend Citywide Facilities (1) City Trail (8) City Sidewalk (0) Athletic Space (12) !(Benches (15) [[Fences (21) Hard S urfaces (17) Landscape Area (1 ) !(L Lighting (0 ) Park Amenities (25) Park Feature (0) !Irrigation (164) !Property Corner (0 ) "P Park Signs (37) Park Structure (11) nm Tree Inventory (12) Greenwood Park17.28 acres 38 !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !([[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[[[["P "P "P"P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!! ! ! ! 4 Courts1Court Field 2 Field 1 HockeyRink 1 Court PleasureRink Field AField B Field D OakwoodPlayfield OakwoodElementary Kreatz Lake 0 80 160 24040 Feet THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATAFROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HASNOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELDVERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS.12/16/19 . Legend !( Citywide Facilities (1) City Trail (8) City Sidewalk (0) Athletic Space (15) Benches (14) [ [Fences (6) Hard Surfaces (1) Landscape Area (2) !(L Lighting (22) Park Amenities (34) Park Feature (0) !Irrigation (171) !Property Corner (0) "P Park Signs (19) Park Structures (8) nm Tree Inventory (19) Oakwood Playfield21.21 acres 39 !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !([[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[["P "P "P"P"P "P "P"P "P "P "P "P "P "P "P"P "P "P"P "P ! 2 Courts 1Court Hockey Rink Hockey Rink Field 1 Field 2 Field E PleasureRink 4 Courts Field B Field A Field C Field D Rid gemountPlayfield Wayza ta EastMiddle School 0 70 140 21035 Feet THIS RE PR ESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATAFROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOU RCES THAT HASNOT BEE N FIE LD VERIFIED. INFORMAT ION SHOULD BE FIE LDVERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIGINAL SOU RCE DOCU MENTS. 01/26/21 . Legend Citywide Facilities (1) City Trail (4) City Sidewalk (0) Athletic Space (13) !(Benches (10) [[Fences (5) Hard S urfaces (2) Landscape Area (4 ) !(L Lighting (7 ) Park Amenities (16) Park Feature (1) !Irrigation (1) !Property Corner (1 ) "P Park Signs (20) Park Structures (2) nm Tree Inventory (55) Ridgemount Playfield/East Middle School19.35 acres 40 41 42 Plymouth Parks and Recreation | 3400 Plymouth Blvd | 763-509-5200 |recreation@plymouthmn.gov July 30, 2021 TO: Athletic Association Partners FR: City of Plymouth Parks & Recreation Department Barb Northway, Deputy Director of Parks & Recreation Jessie Koch, Recreation Supervisor RE: Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) – City and Wayzata School District The purpose of this letter is to provide an update regarding a change in process for some of the facilities permitted by your organization. For the past 41 years, the City of Plymouth (City) has been scheduling and maintaining three leased school properties (Greenwood, Oakwood and Ridgemount (East Middle School) Playfields which are part of the City and Wayzata School District (School District) JPA’s. Besides day-to-day maintenance and repair operations, the City has made capital investments including infrastructure, e.g., lights, fields, courts, buildings, and other amenities to the sites. The partnership has served the City and School District constituents well. As the agreements stated, “the ideal playfield utilization is characterized by intense but harmonious use of available playfields by constituents of the City, School District, athletic associations and leagues using the facility”. The long-standing agreements between the City and School District will expire on October 31, 2021. The School District has made the decision to not extend/continue the agreements. As of November 1, 2021, the City will no longer be providing services to the sites and will not be involved in the scheduling. In addition, the School District has notified the City that they will be scheduling and maintaining Elementary school sites that currently fall under the maintenance agreement with the City. Facilities impacted include: Birchview, Gleason Lake, Kimberly Lane, Meadow Ridge, Northwoods, Plymouth Creek, and Sunset Elementary Schools. The Plymouth Parks and Recreation Department looks forward to continuing with the positive relationship built between our organization and yours. The goal has been, and will continue to be providing quality, clean and safe spaces for the community to participate in recreational activities, including organized sports. If you have any questions on the information, please do not hesitate to contact Jessie Koch jkoch@plymouthmn.gov or Barb Northway bnorthway@plymouthmn.gov. 43 Parkers Lake Playfield3 Ballfields3 Rectangle/Multi-Purpose Fields4 Tennis Courts LaC ompte Playfield2 Ballfields1 Skating Rink1 Hoc key Rink Bass Lake Playfield2 Ballfields1 Rectangle/Multi-Purpose Fields4 Tennis1 Skating Rink Zachary Playfield6 Ballfields2 Rectangle/Multi-Purpose Fields4 Tennis Courts1 Hoc key Rink1 Skating Rink Plymouth Creek Playfield 3 Ballfields3 Rectangle/Multi-P urpose Fields1 Skating Rink1 Hoc key Rink Elm Creek Playfield4 Ballfields7 Rectangle/Multi-P urpos e Fields Greenwood Par k (Playfield)3 Ballfields3 Rectangle/Multi-P urpos e Fields Oakwood Playfield2 Ballfields2 Rectangle/Multi-P urpos e Fields4 Tennis Courts1 Pickle Ball Court1 Skating Rink1 Hoc key Rink Ridgemount Playfield2 Ballfields8 Rectangle/Multi-Purpose Fields4 Tennis Courts2 Hoc key Rinks 1 Skating Rink Plymouth Playfield3 Ballfields3 Rectangle/Multi-Purpose Fields4 Tennis Courts The Meadows PlayfieldScheduled for deve lopment in 2024 CIP ¬«55 ")101 ")6 ")47 ")10 ")73 ")9 ")61 ")24 §¨¦494 PlymouthPlayfield Elm CreekPlayfield LaComptePlayfield Parkers LakePlayfield PlymouthCreekPlayfield Zachar yPlayfield The Mea dowsPlayfield Bass LakePlayfield Rid gemountPlayfield OakwoodPlayfield Greenwoo d Bass Lake Mo oney Lake GleasonLake Parkers Lake TurtleLake PomerleauLake Pike Lake Medicine Lake CavanaughLake Hidden Lake Snyder Lake Had ley Lake Kreatz Lake Curtis Lake Schmidt Lake Lake Camelot LostLake THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHERSOURCES THAT HAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORMATION SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGIAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS. Playfields Map 07/30/21 Ü00.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1 MilesLegend City Playfields Robbinsdale JPA Wayzata JPA 44 Special City Council August 10, 2021 Agenda Number:2.3 To:Dave Callister, City Manager Prepared by:Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager Reviewed by: Item:Set future Study Sessions 1.Action Requested: Schedule Study Sessions and/or add topics as desired. Calendars are attached to assist with scheduling. 2.Background: Pending Study Session topics (at least three Council members have approved the following study items on the list): None at this time. Staff requests for Study Session topics and/or changes: -September 28 at 5:30 p.m. County Road 73 small area study 3.Budget Impact: N/A 4.Attachments: August September October November 45 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 August 2021 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 OFFICIAL CITY CALENDAR 763-509-5080 plymouthmn.gov SUN TUES MON WED THUR FRI SAT 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Request for Proposal for former Four Seasons Mall property/Joint Powers Agreement with Wayzata School District Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 5:30 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING County Road 47 and 2022 Vicksburg Lane rehabilitation project Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Medicine Lake Room 46 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 September 2021 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 OFFICIAL CITY CALENDAR 763-509-5080 plymouthmn.gov SUN TUES MON WED THUR FRI SAT CHANGES ARE MADE IN RED LABOR DAY CITY OFFICES CLOSED 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Budget Study Session Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers 2 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM PARK & REC ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Medicine Lake Room 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Budget Study Session Medicine Lake Room 47 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 2021 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 OFFICIAL CITY CALENDAR 763-509-5080 plymouthmn.gov 5:30 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Environmental Update Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers SUN TUES MON WED THUR FRI SAT 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Budget Study Session Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers CHANGES ARE NOTED IN RED CHA 31 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Council Chambers 48 SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 November 2021 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 OFFICIAL CITY CALENDAR 763-509-5080 plymouthmn.gov 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Budget Study Session Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY 5:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Budget Study Session (if needed) Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers SUN TUES MON THUR FRI SAT THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY CITY OFFICES CLOSED CITY OFFICES CLOSED VETERANS DAY CITY OFFICES CLOSED PLYMOUTH ARTS FAIR City Hall PLYMOUTH ARTS FAIR City Hall 7:00 PM PARK & REC ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers WED 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING Medicine Lake Room 7:00 PM HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Medicine Lake Room PLYMOUTH ARTS FAIR City Hall 49