Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 07-22-2021Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1 of 2 July 22, 2021 CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC FORUM—Individuals may address the HRA about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the HRA will continue with the agenda. The HRA will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. 3. APPROVE AGENDA —HRA members may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The HRA will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 4. CONSENT AGENDA —These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless HRA member or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. 4.1 Approve proposed HRA minutes 4.1.pdf 4.2 Accept Plymouth Towne Square monthly housing report 4.2.pdf 4.3 Accept Vicksburg Crossing monthly housing report 4.3.pdf 4.4 Vicksburg Crossing - Bond Refunding Vicksburg Crossing 2021 Bond Refunding Pre Sale Report Resolution 2021-12 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.1 Renter Protection Ordinance - Summary of other Metropolitan Communities Ordinances Renter Protection City summary Housing Policies Questionnaire Plymouth Renter Protection Ordinance Draft 1 Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2 of 2 July 22, 2021 6.2 Mixed Income Housing Policy - Summary of other Metropolitan Communities Policies Plymouth Mixed Income Housing Policy Draft Housing Policies Questionnaire Mixed Income Housing Policy City summary 6.3 HRA Funded Rehabilitation Loan Program - Replenish funding Resolution 2021-12 7. UPDATES 8. ADJOURNMENT 2 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:4.1 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:Tina Beckfeld Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Executive Director of HRA Item:Approve proposed HRA minutes 1. Action Requested: Approve the attached minutes from regular HRA meeting held on June 24, 2021. 2. Background: N/A 3. Budget Impact: NA 4. Attachments: 4.1.pdf 3 4 5 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:4.2 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:Tina Beckfeld Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item:Accept Plymouth Towne Square monthly housing report 1. Action Requested: Accept attached Plymouth Towne Square monthly housing report. 2. Background: Plymouth Towne Square Monthly Report. 3. Budget Impact: NA 4. Attachments: 4.2.pdf 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:4.3 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:Tina Beckfeld Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item:Accept Vicksburg Crossing monthly housing report 1. Action Requested: Accept attached Vicksburg Crossing monthly housing report. 2. Background: Accept Vicksburg Crossing monthly housing report. 3. Budget Impact: NA 4. Attachments: 4.3.pdf 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:4.4 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:James Barnes, HRA Manager Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item:Vicksburg Crossing - Bond Refunding 1. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the sale of bonds to refund the Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds, (Series 2012A) and request that the City re-affirm its General Obligation to the refunding bonds. 2. Background: Staff continually reviews ways to control expenditures in the two senior buildings owned and operated by the Plymouth HRA. Earlier this year, the HRA refunded the bonds for Plymouth Towne Square through an inter-fund loan with the City. Ehlers recently reviewed the outstanding bond issue for Vicksburg Crossing to determine if there would be any benefit to the HRA in refunding the bonds. Ehlers has determined that it would be advantageous to refund the bonds for Vicksburg Crossing at this time. The current projected savings for this refunding will range between $577,000 - $855,800 (6.7% - 9.9%). The HRA will need the City to reaffirm their G.O. pledge of the bonds. Staff will bring this before the Council on July 27th. Once the Council has approved the G.O. pledge, Ehlers will prepare the bond offering documents and distribute them to the marketplace. it is anticipated that the sale award of the bonds will be considered at the September HRA meeting. 3. Budget Impact: There will be a positive budget impact between $577,000 - $855,800. 4. Attachments: Vicksburg Crossing 2021 Bond Refunding Pre Sale Report Resolution 2021-12 23 24 25 26 27 • • 28 29 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,110,000 Gov Housing Project Refunding GO Bonds, Series 2012A Existing Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 11/03/2021 ------ 02/01/2022 7,110,000.00 7,110,000.00 ---- 08/01/2022 ----98,300.00 98,300.00 02/01/2023 --470,000.00 2.000%98,300.00 568,300.00 08/01/2023 ----93,600.00 93,600.00 02/01/2024 --480,000.00 2.250%93,600.00 573,600.00 08/01/2024 ----88,200.00 88,200.00 02/01/2025 --490,000.00 2.500%88,200.00 578,200.00 08/01/2025 ----82,075.00 82,075.00 02/01/2026 --500,000.00 2.500%82,075.00 582,075.00 08/01/2026 ----75,825.00 75,825.00 02/01/2027 --515,000.00 2.500%75,825.00 590,825.00 08/01/2027 ----69,387.50 69,387.50 02/01/2028 --525,000.00 2.750%69,387.50 594,387.50 08/01/2028 ----62,168.75 62,168.75 02/01/2029 --540,000.00 2.750%62,168.75 602,168.75 08/01/2029 ----54,743.75 54,743.75 02/01/2030 --555,000.00 2.750%54,743.75 609,743.75 08/01/2030 ----47,112.50 47,112.50 02/01/2031 --570,000.00 3.000%47,112.50 617,112.50 08/01/2031 ----38,562.50 38,562.50 02/01/2032 --590,000.00 3.000%38,562.50 628,562.50 08/01/2032 ----29,712.50 29,712.50 02/01/2033 --605,000.00 3.000%29,712.50 634,712.50 08/01/2033 ----20,637.50 20,637.50 02/01/2034 --625,000.00 3.250%20,637.50 645,637.50 08/01/2034 ----10,481.25 10,481.25 02/01/2035 --645,000.00 3.250%10,481.25 655,481.25 Total $7,110,000.00 $7,110,000.00 $7,110,000.00 -$1,541,612.50 $8,651,612.50 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/03/2021 Average Life 7.616 Years Average Coupon 2.9355166% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 7.616 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 7.616 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/03/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 11/03/2021 2012A HRA GO Housing Proj | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/14/2021 | 8:49 AM 30 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,235,000 Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 (City of Plymouth, MN - G.O.) - Current Refunding of Series 2012A Estimated Sources & Uses Dated 11/03/2021 | Delivered 11/03/2021 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $7,235,000.00 Total Sources $7,235,000.00 Uses Of Funds Underwriter's Discount Allowance (0.80%)57,880.00 Estimated Costs of Issuance 63,500.00 Deposit to Current Refunding Redemption Fund 7,110,000.00 Rounding Amount 3,620.00 Total Uses $7,235,000.00 Series 2021 Govt Hsing Re | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/14/2021 | 8:48 AM 31 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,235,000 Gov Housing Project Refunding GO Bonds, Dated November 3, 2021 Proposed Current Refunding of Series 2012A Assuming G.O. BQ "AAA" Current Market Rates (No cushion) Estimated Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/03/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --46,071.81 46,071.81 - 02/01/2023 525,000.00 0.200%30,943.75 555,943.75 602,015.56 08/01/2023 --30,418.75 30,418.75 - 02/01/2024 540,000.00 0.300%30,418.75 570,418.75 600,837.50 08/01/2024 --29,608.75 29,608.75 - 02/01/2025 540,000.00 0.400%29,608.75 569,608.75 599,217.50 08/01/2025 --28,528.75 28,528.75 - 02/01/2026 540,000.00 0.500%28,528.75 568,528.75 597,057.50 08/01/2026 --27,178.75 27,178.75 - 02/01/2027 545,000.00 0.650%27,178.75 572,178.75 599,357.50 08/01/2027 --25,407.50 25,407.50 - 02/01/2028 550,000.00 0.750%25,407.50 575,407.50 600,815.00 08/01/2028 --23,345.00 23,345.00 - 02/01/2029 555,000.00 0.850%23,345.00 578,345.00 601,690.00 08/01/2029 --20,986.25 20,986.25 - 02/01/2030 555,000.00 0.950%20,986.25 575,986.25 596,972.50 08/01/2030 --18,350.00 18,350.00 - 02/01/2031 565,000.00 1.050%18,350.00 583,350.00 601,700.00 08/01/2031 --15,383.75 15,383.75 - 02/01/2032 570,000.00 1.200%15,383.75 585,383.75 600,767.50 08/01/2032 --11,963.75 11,963.75 - 02/01/2033 575,000.00 1.300%11,963.75 586,963.75 598,927.50 08/01/2033 --8,226.25 8,226.25 - 02/01/2034 585,000.00 1.350%8,226.25 593,226.25 601,452.50 08/01/2034 --4,277.50 4,277.50 - 02/01/2035 590,000.00 1.450%4,277.50 594,277.50 598,555.00 Total $7,235,000.00 -$564,365.56 $7,799,365.56 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $53,303.56 Average Life 7.367 Years Average Coupon 1.0587766% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.1673622% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.1673774% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.0531242% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.2941670% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.0587766% Weighted Average Maturity 7.367 Years Proposed CR of 2012A HRA | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/13/2021 | 10:40 AM 32 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,235,000 Gov Housing Project Refunding GO Bonds, Dated November 3, 2021 Proposed Current Refunding of Series 2012A Assuming G.O. BQ "AAA" Current Market Rates (no cushion) Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(3,620.00)-3,620.00 02/01/2023 602,015.56 602,015.56 666,600.00 64,584.44 02/01/2024 600,837.50 600,837.50 667,200.00 66,362.50 02/01/2025 599,217.50 599,217.50 666,400.00 67,182.50 02/01/2026 597,057.50 597,057.50 664,150.00 67,092.50 02/01/2027 599,357.50 599,357.50 666,650.00 67,292.50 02/01/2028 600,815.00 600,815.00 663,775.00 62,960.00 02/01/2029 601,690.00 601,690.00 664,337.50 62,647.50 02/01/2030 596,972.50 596,972.50 664,487.50 67,515.00 02/01/2031 601,700.00 601,700.00 664,225.00 62,525.00 02/01/2032 600,767.50 600,767.50 667,125.00 66,357.50 02/01/2033 598,927.50 598,927.50 664,425.00 65,497.50 02/01/2034 601,452.50 601,452.50 666,275.00 64,822.50 02/01/2035 598,555.00 598,555.00 665,962.50 67,407.50 Total $7,799,365.56 $7,795,745.56 $8,651,612.50 $855,866.94 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................792,854.34 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.053%(Bond Yield).....792,854.34 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................3,620.00 Net Present Value Benefit $796,474.34 Net PV Benefit / $8,027,854.34 PV Refunded Debt Service 9.921% Net PV Benefit / $7,110,000 Refunded Principal...11.202% Net PV Benefit / $7,235,000 Refunding Principal..11.009% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/03/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 11/03/2021 Proposed CR of 2012A HRA | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/13/2021 | 10:40 AM 33 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,235,000 Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 (City of Plymouth, MN - G.O.) - Current Refunding of Series 2012A Assuming Conservative G.O. BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 50 bps Estimated Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/03/2021 ----- 08/01/2022 --73,437.58 73,437.58 - 02/01/2023 500,000.00 0.700%49,323.75 549,323.75 622,761.33 08/01/2023 --47,573.75 47,573.75 - 02/01/2024 530,000.00 0.800%47,573.75 577,573.75 625,147.50 08/01/2024 --45,453.75 45,453.75 - 02/01/2025 530,000.00 0.900%45,453.75 575,453.75 620,907.50 08/01/2025 --43,068.75 43,068.75 - 02/01/2026 535,000.00 1.000%43,068.75 578,068.75 621,137.50 08/01/2026 --40,393.75 40,393.75 - 02/01/2027 540,000.00 1.150%40,393.75 580,393.75 620,787.50 08/01/2027 --37,288.75 37,288.75 - 02/01/2028 545,000.00 1.250%37,288.75 582,288.75 619,577.50 08/01/2028 --33,882.50 33,882.50 - 02/01/2029 550,000.00 1.350%33,882.50 583,882.50 617,765.00 08/01/2029 --30,170.00 30,170.00 - 02/01/2030 560,000.00 1.450%30,170.00 590,170.00 620,340.00 08/01/2030 --26,110.00 26,110.00 - 02/01/2031 570,000.00 1.550%26,110.00 596,110.00 622,220.00 08/01/2031 --21,692.50 21,692.50 - 02/01/2032 580,000.00 1.700%21,692.50 601,692.50 623,385.00 08/01/2032 --16,762.50 16,762.50 - 02/01/2033 585,000.00 1.800%16,762.50 601,762.50 618,525.00 08/01/2033 --11,497.50 11,497.50 - 02/01/2034 600,000.00 1.850%11,497.50 611,497.50 622,995.00 08/01/2034 --5,947.50 5,947.50 - 02/01/2035 610,000.00 1.950%5,947.50 615,947.50 621,895.00 Total $7,235,000.00 -$842,443.83 $8,077,443.83 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $53,853.56 Average Life 7.443 Years Average Coupon 1.5643235% Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.6718002% True Interest Cost (TIC)1.6718524% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.5559946% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.8004315% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 1.5643235% Weighted Average Maturity 7.443 Years Series 2021 Govt Hsing Re | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/14/2021 | 8:48 AM 34 HRA of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota $7,235,000 Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 (City of Plymouth, MN - G.O.) - Current Refunding of Series 2012A Assuming Conservative G.O. BQ "AAA" Market Rates + 50 bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2022 -(3,620.00)-3,620.00 02/01/2023 622,761.33 622,761.33 666,600.00 43,838.67 02/01/2024 625,147.50 625,147.50 667,200.00 42,052.50 02/01/2025 620,907.50 620,907.50 666,400.00 45,492.50 02/01/2026 621,137.50 621,137.50 664,150.00 43,012.50 02/01/2027 620,787.50 620,787.50 666,650.00 45,862.50 02/01/2028 619,577.50 619,577.50 663,775.00 44,197.50 02/01/2029 617,765.00 617,765.00 664,337.50 46,572.50 02/01/2030 620,340.00 620,340.00 664,487.50 44,147.50 02/01/2031 622,220.00 622,220.00 664,225.00 42,005.00 02/01/2032 623,385.00 623,385.00 667,125.00 43,740.00 02/01/2033 618,525.00 618,525.00 664,425.00 45,900.00 02/01/2034 622,995.00 622,995.00 666,275.00 43,280.00 02/01/2035 621,895.00 621,895.00 665,962.50 44,067.50 Total $8,077,443.83 $8,073,823.83 $8,651,612.50 $577,788.67 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings.....................516,400.27 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 1.556%(Bond Yield).....516,400.27 Contingency or Rounding Amount....................3,620.00 Net Present Value Benefit $520,020.27 Net PV Benefit / $7,751,400.27 PV Refunded Debt Service 6.709% Net PV Benefit / $7,110,000 Refunded Principal...7.314% Net PV Benefit / $7,235,000 Refunding Principal..7.188% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/03/2021 Refunding Delivery Date 11/03/2021 Series 2021 Govt Hsing Re | SINGLE PURPOSE | 7/14/2021 | 8:48 AM 35 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GOVERNMENTAL HOUSING PROJECT REFUNDING BONDS (CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, GENERAL OBLIGATION), SERIES 2021 Issuer: Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota Governing body: Board of Commissioners Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on July 22, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION RELATING TO GOVERNMENTAL HOUSING PROJECT REFUNDING BONDS (CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, GENERAL OBLIGATION), SERIES 2021; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE; CALLING FOR THE SALE THEREOF AND REQUESTING THE REAFFIRMATION OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH’S GENERAL OBLIGATION PLEDGE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer on July 22, 2021. Secretary 36 -2- RESOLUTION NO. ________ RESOLUTION RELATING TO GOVERNMENTAL HOUSING PROJECT REFUNDING BONDS (CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, GENERAL OBLIGATION), SERIES 2021; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE; CALLING FOR THE SALE THEREOF AND REQUESTING THE REAFFIRMATION OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH’S GENERAL OBLIGATION PLEDGE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (the “Board”) of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (the “Authority”), as follows: SECTION 1.AUTHORIZATION. The Authority proposes to issue its Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds (City of Plymouth, Minnesota, General Obligation), Series 2021 (the “Bonds”), in the approximate principal amount of $7,250,000, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 469 and 475, the proceeds of which will be used to refund in advance of maturity, on February 1, 2022, the 2023-2035 maturities of the Authority’s Governmental Housing Project Refunding Bonds (City of Plymouth, Minnesota, General Obligation), Series 2012A, dated, as originally issued, as of April 5, 2012. SECTION 2. SALE OF BONDS. The Authority has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc. (“Ehlers”), as independent financial advisor in connection with the sale of the Bonds. Ehlers is hereby authorized to solicit on behalf of the Authority proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9). The Board shall meet at a time to be determined in consultation with Ehlers for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. SECTION 3. OFFICIAL STATEMENT. In connection with the sale of the Bonds, the officers or employees of the Authority are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the Authority upon its completion. SECTION 4. GENERAL OBLIGATION PLEDGE OF CITY OF PLYMOUTH. The Authority hereby requests that the City of Plymouth (the “City”) reaffirm its authorization of the pledge of the City’s full faith and credit to the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. Upon vote being taken thereon, the following Commissioners voted in favor: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared passed and adopted on July 22, 2021. 37 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:6.1 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:James Barnes, HRA Manager Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item:Renter Protection Ordinance - Summary of other Metropolitan Communities Ordinances 1. Action Requested: Review existing ordinances from other local communities and provide staff with direction. 2. Background: At the May HRA meeting, the Board reviewed the first draft of a Renter Protection Ordinance (attached). The Board directed staff to learn more about existing ordinances in other local communities. Staff sent a survey (attached) out to thirteen cities and received eight completed surveys back. The attached spread sheet provides a summary of each of the city's ordinances and additional responses asked in the survey. Some common themes in the responses included multiple stakeholder consultation and a 90-day notification period. Additional, many of the respondents indicated they had little pushback and that they have not experienced any unintended consequences as a result of the ordinance. Staff requests the HRA Board review and discuss the Draft Renter Protection Ordinance and provide staff with feedback. 3. Budget Impact: There is no impact to the HRA budget. 4. Attachments: Renter Protection City summary Housing Policies Questionnaire Plymouth Renter Protection Ordinance Draft 38 Has Renter Protection Ordinance Ordinance Summary Stakeholders Consulted Push back from stakeholders Has used the ordinance Changes since adoption Unintended consequences or adverse effects Brooklyn Park Yes New owner must provide 30-day notice about sale 90-day notification period New owner may need to pay relocation costs if rent is increased or non-renewal of lease without cause. City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers No No No Difficult to monitor. Stakeholders consulted indicated they would wait the 3-months until making any changes. Edina Considering Draft includes: 90-day notification period Relocation costs if rent is increased or lease not renewed without cause City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers Trade groups Nothing listed Not adopted N/A N/A Golden Valley Yes 90-day notification period Affects buildings with 15% of the units or more at 60% AMI Relocation costs if rent is increased, lease not renewed without cause or rescreening City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Minnesota Multi-Housing Association No No No Hopkins Yes 90-day notification period Relocation costs if rent is increased, lease not renewed without cause or rescreening City staff Housing advocates Rental property owners One property owner called staff to complain, but did not submit any written or oral comments No No No 39 Has Renter Protection Ordinance Ordinance Summary Stakeholders Consulted Push back from stakeholders Has used the ordinance Changes since adoption Unintended consequences or adverse effects Minneapolis Yes Tenant screening criteria Limit on amount of security deposit Current owner must give 60-day notice before making property available for purchase Targeted at NOAH properties 5 units or more with 20% of the units at 60AMI or below 3-months relocation assistance if new owner increases rent, terminates lease without cause or rescreening causes non-lease renewal City staff Residents Housing advocates Minnesota Multi-Housing Association Yes –This is a complaint- based ordinance and they have received very few to date No Too early to tell Minnetonka Considering Currently include renter protections in their Development Agreements N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/a New Hope Yes New owner must provide 30-day notice about sale 90-day notification period New owner may need to pay relocation costs if rent is increased or non-renewal of lease without cause. City staff Housing advocates Rental property owners Rental property managers No No No No Richfield Yes New owner must provide 30-day notice about sale 90-day notification period New owner may need to pay relocation costs if rent is increased or non-renewal of lease without cause. City staff Housing advocates Rental property owners No –Landlords are not thrilled with new requirements, but have not complained that much Yes No No –Difficult to know about sales before they occur so notices go out late or are missing key information 40 Plymouth Considering (in draft form) with HRA Rental apartments with 15 units+ with at least 20% of the units affordable to households at 60% of AMI Owner to provide notice within 30 days of sale to tenants 90-days protection period New owner may need to pay relocation costs if rent is increased, non-renewal of lease without cause or rescreening City staff HRA Board N/A N/A N/A N/A 41 Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority Renter Protection Ordinance and Mixed Income (Inclusionary) Housing Policy Questionnaire Purpose: The Plymouth HRA and the City of Plymouth are considering adopting a renter protection ordinance and a mixed income housing policy. As part of the process, staff is collecting information from other cities to learn about their experiences with these ordinances/policies and we would greatly appreciate your time in completing this short questionnaire. Contact: Please return your completed survey to Jim Barnes, HRA Manager at jbarnes@plymouthmn.gov or if you have questions, please call 763-509-5412 Name: Email: City: Phone: Renter Protection Ordinance: 1.Has your City enacted or considered enacting a Renter Protection Ordinance? a.Yes b.No c.Considering If yes, please complete the following questions: 1.Who was included in the creation of this ordinance? (check all that apply) a.City Staff b.Residents c.Housing advocates d.Rental Property Owners e.Developers f.Other (list) 42 2.Please briefly summarize your ordinance. 3.Has the ordinance been used by any of the triggering actions within the ordinance? Yes No If yes, has it work as intended? 4.Was there any push back from any particular group in adopting this ordinance? Yes No If yes, please list. 5. Have you amended your ordinance since adoption? Yes No If yes, please explain why. 6.Have there been any unintended consequences or adverse effects to adopting this ordinance? Yes No If yes, please explain. 43 Mixed Income (Inclusionary) Housing Policy 1.Has your City enacted or considered enacting a Mixed Income Housing Policy? a.Yes b.No c.Considering If yes, please complete the following questions: 1.Who was included in the creation of this policy? (check all that apply) a.City Staff b.Residents c.Housing advocates d.Rental Property Owners e.Developers f.Other (list) 2.Please briefly summarize your policy. 3.Has the policy been used by any of the triggering actions within the policy? Yes No If yes, has it work as intended? 4.Was there any push back from any particular group in adopting this policy? Yes No If yes, please list. 5.Have you amended your policy since adoption? Yes No If yes, please explain why. 44 6.Have there been any unintended consequences or adverse effects to adopting this policy? Yes No If yes, please explain. 7.Have you lost any projects or have developers decided not pursue opportunities as a result of this policy? Yes No If yes, please explain. 45 Section 4XX – Protection of Tenants in Affordable Housing 4XX.00 Purpose. It is the purpose of this Section to provide housing stability and protection to tenants in affordable rental housing who are facing displacement by providing for notice to the city and tenants when transitions from current affordable housing uses are planned, and providing tenant relocation assistance when affordable housing is converted and tenants are required to move without adequate time to find new housing. 4XX.05 Definitions. For the purposes of Section 4XX.00 et. seq., the terms defined in this section shall have the meanings given them in the subdivisions as follows: Subd. 1. Affordable housing building. As used in this ordinance, the term “affordable housing building” shall mean a multi-family rental housing building having fifteen (15) or more housing units, where at least 20% of the units rent for an amount that is affordable to households at or below 60 percent of area median income, as median income was most recently determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, Minnesota- Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted for household size and number of bedrooms. Subd. 2. Affordable Housing Unit. As used in this ordinance, the term “affordable housing unit” shall mean a rental unit in an affordable housing building that rents for an amount that is affordable to households at or below 60 percent of area median income, as median income was most recently determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis- St. Paul-Bloomington, Minnesota-Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area, as adjusted for household size and number of bedrooms. Subd. 3. Cause. As used in this ordinance, the term “cause” shall mean the tenant or a member of the tenant’s household materially violated a term or the lease or rental agreement, or violated an applicable federal, state, or local law or regulation. Subd. 4. Relocation Assistance. As used in this ordinance, the term “relocation assistance” shall mean a payment in the amount equal to three months of the current monthly contract rent. Sudb. 5. Tenant protection period. As used in this ordinance, the term “tenant protection period’ shall mean the period that commences on the date when a real estate closing transfers ownership of an affordable housing building and ends on the last day of the third calendar month following the month in which written notice of the transfer is sent to each affordable housing unit tenant pursuant to this Section. Subd. 6. Transfer of Ownership. As used in this ordinance, the term “transfer of ownership’ means any conveyance of title to an affordable housing building, whether legal or equitable, voluntary or involuntary, resulting in a transfer of control of the building, effective as of the earlier of the date of delivery of the instrument of conveyance or the date the new owner takes possession. 4XX.10 Transfer of Ownership. 46 Subd. 1. Notice. Within thirty (30) days after the transfer of ownership of an affordable housing building, the new owner shall give written notice to each affordable housing unit tenant of the building that the property is under new ownership. This notice must include the following information: (a) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the new owner. (b) City Code Section 4XX provides for a three-month tenant protection period for affordable housing unit tenants after an affordable housing building is transferred to a new owner. Under this Section, affordable housing unit tenants are entitled to relocation assistance from the new owner if, during the tenant protection period, the new owner: (1) Without cause, terminates or does not renew the tenant’s rental agreement; (2) Raises the rent and the tenant submits a written notice of termination of their rental agreement; or, (3) Requires existing affordable housing unit tenants to comply with new residency screening criteria and the owner or tenant terminates or does not renew the tenant’s rental agreement. (c) Whether there will be any rent increase during the tenant protection period, the amount of the rent increase, and the date the rent increase will take effect. (d) Whether the new owner will require existing affordable housing unit tenants to comply with new residency screening criteria during the tenant protection period and, if so, a copy of the new screening criteria. (e) Whether the new owner will, without cause, terminate or not renew the tenant’s rental agreement during the tenant protection period, and if so, the date the rental agreement will terminate and the amount of relocation assistance that will be provided. (f) The date the tenant protection period will expire. (g) Whether the new owner, on the day immediately following the tenant protection period, intends to: increase rent; require existing affordable housing unit tenants to comply with the new residency screening criteria; or, without cause, terminate or not renew affordable housing unit rental agreements. Subd. 2. Copy of Notices to City. The new owner shall provide a copy of the notices required by this subsection to the City at the same time notice is provided to the tenant or tenants. Subd. 3. Copy of Rent Roll to City. If the new owner claims the property or the unit does not meet the definition of Affordable Housing Building or Affordable Housing Unit, the owner shall provide a copy of the rent roll, including the amount of contract rents paid by tenants, to the City. 47 Subd. 4. Language Requirement. Each notice required by this subsection shall contain an advisory that reads: “This is important information about your housing. If you do not understand it, have someone translate it for you now, or request translation from your landlord.” This advisory must be stated in the notice in the following languages: Spanish, Somali, and Hmong. Upon request by the tenant, the owner must provide a written translation of the notice into the tenant’s native language. 4XX.15. Relocation Assistance. Subd. 1. When Required. A new owner of an affordable housing building must pay relocation assistance to affordable housing unit tenants when, during the tenant protection period, the new owner: (a) Without cause, terminates or does not renew the tenant’s rental agreement; or, (b) Raises the rent and the tenant submits a written notice of termination of their rental agreement; or (c) Requires existing tenants to comply with new residency screening criteria and the owner or tenant terminates or does not renew the tenant’s rental agreement. Subd. 2. When Paid. The new owner must pay the relocation assistance to the tenant within 30 days after receiving tenant’s written notice of termination of the rental agreement or with 30 days after the owner notifies the tenant that the rental agreement will be terminated or not renewed. 4XX.20 Penalty. Subd.1. A violation of subsection 4XX.15 is an administrative offense that may be subject to an administrative citation and civil penalties as provided in City Code Section 2000.01. Notwithstanding any provision of City Code Section 2000.01, the penalty for a violation of subsection 409.15 shall be the sum of the applicable amount of relocation assistance plus $500. Subd. 2. A violation of subsection 4XX.10 is an administrative offense that may be subject to an administrative citation and civil penalties as provided in City code Section _______. Subd. 3. A violation of this Section as to each dwelling unit shall constitute a separate offense. 4XX.25 Payment by City to Displace Tenant. Within 30 days after a person pays the penalty provided for in subsection 4XX.20, subd. 1, the city shall pay to the displaced tenant of the affordable housing unit for which the violation occurred, the applicable amount of relocation assistance. 48 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:6.2 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:James Barnes, HRA Manager Reviewed by:Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item:Mixed Income Housing Policy - Summary of other Metropolitan Communities Policies 1. Action Requested: Review existing policies from other local communities and provide staff with direction. 2. Background: At the May HRA meeting, the Board reviewed the first draft of a Mixed Income Housing Policy (attached). The Board directed staff to learn more about existing policies in other local communities. Staff sent a survey (attached) out to thirteen cities and received eight completed surveys back. The attached spread sheet provides a summary of each of the city's policy and additional responses asked in the survey. All of the policies are triggered when local financial assistance is provided and most of them are also in effect when a change in the Comprehensive Plan, guiding or zoning ordinance is requested. Additionally, many of the respondents indicated they had little push back and that they have not experienced any unintended consequences as a result of the policy. The exception to this was Minneapolis where the push back came from local developers. The out of state developers seem to assume there would be some type of policy and built it into their proformas. Staff requests the HRA Board review and discuss the Draft Mixed Income Housing Policy and provide staff with feedback. 3. Budget Impact: There is no impact to the HRA budget at this time. However, if enacted, there may be an impact in the future. 4. Attachments: Plymouth Mixed Income Housing Policy Draft Housing Policies Questionnaire Mixed Income Housing Policy City summary 49 1 Inclusionary Housing Policy Inclusionary housing is a tool that encourages new developments to make a certain percentage of new housing units affordable. The goal of this policy is to promote high quality housing located throughout the community for a variety of income levels, ages, and household sizes in order to meet the City's goal of preserving and promoting economically diverse housing options within the community. The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing for a broad range of income levels to maintain a diverse population and attract residents to live or work in the City. This Policy has been created to ensure that a reasonable proportion of each new development receiving City financial assistance include units affordable to low and moderate income households and working families. The requirements set forth in this Policy further the City’s Housing Goals and the City’s Comprehensive Plan to create and preserve affordable housing opportunities. These requirements are intended to provide a structure for participation by both the public and private sectors in the production of affordable housing. I.Applicability and Minimum ProjectSize Market Rate Multi-Family Development Receiving City Financial Assistance This Policy applies to market rate multi-family residential developments that receive financial assistance from the City and includes: (1)new developments that create at least 10 multi-family dwelling units;or (2)any mixed use building that creates at least 10 multi-family dwelling units;or (3)renovation or reconstruction of an existing building that contains multi-family dwelling units that includes at least 10 dwelling;or (4)any change in use of all or part of an existing building from a non- residential use to a residential use that includes at least 10 dwellingunits. II.Affordable Dwelling Units General requirement A development that is subject to this Policy shall provide a number of affordable dwelling units equal to at least ten (10%) to twenty percent (20%) of the total number of dwelling units in the development. The units designated as affordable will besubject to the requirements listed below. Calculation of units required. (1)For development of multi-family dwellingunits: 50 2 A.The required number of affordable dwelling units is based on the total number of dwelling units that are approved by theCity. B.To calculate the number of affordable dwelling units required in a development the total number of approved dwelling units shall be multiplied by ten percent (10%) or twentypercent (20%) depending on the affordability standard.Ifthefinalcalculationincludesafraction,thefraction of a unit shall be rounded to the nearest whole number. C.Properties that are remodeled or expanded will be subject to this policy. Affordable dwelling units will be calculated based on the total number of units after renovation or expansion is complete. At least ten percent (10%) or twenty percent (20%) shall be affordable, depending on the affordability standard. Affordability Level The required affordable dwelling units within a residential project subject to this policyshall meet an income eligibility and rent affordability standard for the term of the restriction asfollows: (1)Rental Projects: A.At least twenty percent (20%) of the units shall be affordable for households at sixty percent (60%) Area Median Income (AMI),or B.At least ten percent (10%) of the units shall be at available affordable for households at fifty percent (50%) Area MedianIncome. (2)For-Sale Projects: A.At least fifteen percent (15%) of the units shall be affordable for households at eighty percent (80%) Area Median Income(AMI). Rent and Sale Price Level Rental Unit: The monthly rental price for affordable dwelling units shall include rent and utility costs and shall be based on fifty percent (50%) and/or sixty percent (60%) for the metropolitan area that includes Plymouth adjusted for bedroom size and calculated annually by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for establishing rent limits for the Housing Tax Credit Program. For-Sale Projects: The qualifying sale price for an owner-occupied affordable dwelling unit shall include property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, principal payment and interest, private mortgage insurance, monthly ground lease, and shall be based on eighty percent (80%) AMI for the metropolitan area that includes Plymouth adjusted for bedroom size and calculated annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Period of Affordability In developments subject to this Policy, the period of affordability for the affordable dwelling units shall be at least twenty-five (25) years. Location of Affordable Dwelling Units Except as otherwise specifically authorized by this Policy, the affordable dwelling units shall be located within the development. 51 3 III.Standards for Inclusionary RentalUnits Size and Design of Affordable Units The size and design of the affordable dwelling units should be consistent and comparable with the market rate units in the project and aresubject to the approval of the City. The interior of affordable dwelling units do not need to be identical to the market rate units but if units are smaller than the market rate units with the same number of bedrooms in the development, City approval must be obtained. Exterior/Interior appearance. The exterior materials and design of the affordable dwelling units in any development subject to these regulations shall be indistinguishable in style and quality with the market rate units in the development. The interior finish and qualityof construction of the affordable dwellingunits shall at a minimum be comparable to entry level rental or ownership housing in the City. Construction oftheaffordabledwellingunitsshallbeconcurrentwithconstructionofmarket ratedwellingunits. IV.Integration of Affordable Dwelling Units Distribution of affordable housing units. The affordable dwelling units shall be incorporated into the overall project unless expressly allowed to be located in a separate building or a different location approved by the City Council. Affordable dwelling units shall be distributed throughout the building. Number of bedrooms in the affordable units. The affordable dwelling units shall have a number of bedrooms in the approximate proportion as the market rate units. The mix of unit types, both bedroom and accessible units, of the affordable dwelling units shall be approved by the City. Tenants Rental affordable dwelling units shall be rented only to income eligible families during theperiod of affordability. An income eligible family may remain in the affordable dwelling unit for additional rental periods as long as the income of the family does not exceed one-hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the applicable AMI. If the family income exceeds this amount they must be moved to the first available non-affordable unit. V.Alternatives to On-Site Development of Affordable DwellingUnits This section provides alternatives to the construction of onsite affordable dwelling units as a way to comply with this Policy. The alternatives are listed in subsection (3), below. (1)The alternatives must be: A.Approved by the City Council, and B.Agreed to by the applicant in an Affordable Housing Performance Agreement. C.Applicant must show the City acceptable documentation that a formal commitment to the proposed alternative is in place. (2)This Section does not apply unless the applicantdemonstrates: 52 4 A.The alternative provides an amount of affordable dwelling units equivalent or greater to onsite units in a way that the City determines better achieves the goals, objectives and policies stated in the Housing Goals and Comprehensive Plan; and B.Will not cause the City to incur any net cost as a result of the alternative compliance mechanism. (3)If the conditions in (2) are met, the City may approve one or more of thefollowing options to providing affordable dwelling units that are required by thisPolicy. A.The dedication of existing market rate units to permanently affordable dwelling units that are of equivalent quality and size. Existingdwellingunits are approved as suitable affordable housing dwelling units through covenants, contractual arrangements, or resale restrictions. B.Offsite construction of affordable dwelling units within the City. Offsite construction of units should be located in proximityto public transit service at a site approved by the City. C.Participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units by another developer on a different site within theCity. D.An alternative proposed by the applicant that directly provides or enables the provision of affordable housing units within the City. The alternative must be approved by the City and made a condition of approval of the Affordable Housing PerformanceAgreement. VI.NON-DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RENTSUBSIDIES: Developments covered by the policy must not discriminate against tenants paying rentwith federal, state or local public assistance, including, but not limited to rental assistance, rent supplements, and Housing Choice Vouchers. VII.Affordable Housing Plan (1)Applicability Developments that are subject to this Policy shall include an Affordable Housing Plan as described below. An Affordable Housing Plan describes how the developer complies with each of the applicable requirements of thisPolicy. (2)Approval The Affordable Housing Plan shall be approved by theCity. 53 5 (3)Contents. The Affordable Housing Plan shall include at least the following: A.General information about the nature and scope of the development subject to these regulations. B.For requests to an alternative to on-site provision of affordable housing, evidence that the proposed alternative will further affordable housing opportunities in the City to an equivalent or greater extent than compliance with the otherwise applicable on-site requirements of thisPolicy. C.The total number of market rate units and affordable dwelling units in the development. D.The floor plans for the affordable dwelling units showing the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in each unit. E.The approximate square footage of each affordable dwelling unit and average square foot of market rate unit bytypes. F.Building floor plans and site plans showing the location of each affordable dwelling unit. G.Thepricingforeach affordableownershipdwellingunit.Thepricingof each unit shall be determined at time of approval. At time of sale this price may be adjusted if there has been a change in the median income or a change in the formulas used in this ordinance. H.Proposed schedule of individual unit development (market rate vs. affordable units). I.Documentation and specifications regarding the exterior appearance, materials and finishes of the development for each of the affordable dwelling units illustrating that the appearance of affordable units are comparable to the appearance of the market-rateunits. J.An Affordable Dwelling Unit Management Plan documenting policies and procedures for administering the affordable dwelling units in accordance with the Affordable Housing PerformanceAgreement. K.Any and all other information that City staff may request to achieve the Council’s affordable housinggoals. 54 6 VIII.Recorded Agreements, Conditions andRestrictions (1)An Affordable Housing Performance Agreement shall be executed between the City and Developer, in a form approved by the City Attorney, based on the Affordable Housing Plan described in Section VII, which formally sets forth development approval and requirements to achieve affordable housing in accordance with this policy and location criteria. The Agreement shallidentify: a.the location, number, type, and size of affordable housing units to be constructed; and b.sales and/or rental terms; occupancyrequirements; and c.a timetable for completion of the units; and d.restrictions that will be placed on the units to ensure affordability; and e.any terms contained in the approval resolution by the City asapplicable. (2)The applicant or owner shall execute any and all documents deemed necessary by the City Manager, including, without limitation, restrictive covenants and other related instruments, to ensure the affordability of the affordable housing units in accordance with thisPolicy. (3)The applicant or owner must prepare and record all documents, restrictions, easements,covenants,and/oragreementsthatarespecifiedbytheCityasconditions of approval of the application prior to issuance of a building Permit for any development subject to thisPolicy. (4)Documents described above shall be recorded in the Hennepin County Registry of Deeds as appropriate. IX.Definitions 1.Affordable Dwelling Unit: The required affordable dwelling units within a residential project subject to this policyshall meet anincome eligibilityand rent affordabilitystandard for the term of the restriction asfollows: (1)Rental Projects: A.At least twenty percent (20%) of the units shall be affordable for households at sixty percent (60%) Area Median Income (AMI),or B.At least ten percent (10%) of the units shall be at available affordable for households at fifty percent (50%) Area Median Income. (2)For-Sale Projects: A.Atleastfifteenpercent(15%)oftheunitsshallbeaffordableforhouseholds at eighty percent (80%) Area Median Income(AMI). 2.Financial Assistance: This Inclusionary Housing Policy applies to all new and renovated multifamily residential buildings receiving City financialassistance. Financial Assistance is defined as funds derived from the City and includes but is not limited to the following: 55 7 O:\HOUSING\PlansPoliciesProcedures\Inclusionary Zoning Policy A.City of Plymouth B.Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) C.Housing Rehabilitation Fund D.Revenue Bonds (private activity bonds arenegotiable) E.Tax Increment Financing (TIF) F.TaxAbatement G.Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Funds H.Land Write Downs 3.Affordable Housing Plan: Aplanthatdocumentspoliciesandproceduresfor administering the affordable dwelling units in accordance with the Affordable Housing Performance Agreement. 4.Affordable Housing Performance Agreement: Agreement between the City and the developer which formally sets forth development approval and requirements to achieve Affordable Housing in accordance with this policy. 56 Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority Renter Protection Ordinance and Mixed Income (Inclusionary) Housing Policy Questionnaire Purpose: The Plymouth HRA and the City of Plymouth are considering adopting a renter protection ordinance and a mixed income housing policy. As part of the process, staff is collecting information from other cities to learn about their experiences with these ordinances/policies and we would greatly appreciate your time in completing this short questionnaire. Contact: Please return your completed survey to Jim Barnes, HRA Manager at jbarnes@plymouthmn.gov or if you have questions, please call 763-509-5412 Name: Email: City: Phone: Renter Protection Ordinance: 1.Has your City enacted or considered enacting a Renter Protection Ordinance? a.Yes b.No c.Considering If yes, please complete the following questions: 1.Who was included in the creation of this ordinance? (check all that apply) a.City Staff b.Residents c.Housing advocates d.Rental Property Owners e.Developers f.Other (list) 57 2.Please briefly summarize your ordinance. 3.Has the ordinance been used by any of the triggering actions within the ordinance? Yes No If yes, has it work as intended? 4.Was there any push back from any particular group in adopting this ordinance? Yes No If yes, please list. 5. Have you amended your ordinance since adoption? Yes No If yes, please explain why. 6.Have there been any unintended consequences or adverse effects to adopting this ordinance? Yes No If yes, please explain. 58 Mixed Income (Inclusionary) Housing Policy 1.Has your City enacted or considered enacting a Mixed Income Housing Policy? a.Yes b.No c.Considering If yes, please complete the following questions: 1.Who was included in the creation of this policy? (check all that apply) a.City Staff b.Residents c.Housing advocates d.Rental Property Owners e.Developers f.Other (list) 2.Please briefly summarize your policy. 3.Has the policy been used by any of the triggering actions within the policy? Yes No If yes, has it work as intended? 4.Was there any push back from any particular group in adopting this policy? Yes No If yes, please list. 5.Have you amended your policy since adoption? Yes No If yes, please explain why. 59 6.Have there been any unintended consequences or adverse effects to adopting this policy? Yes No If yes, please explain. 7.Have you lost any projects or have developers decided not pursue opportunities as a result of this policy? Yes No If yes, please explain. 60 Has Inclusionary Zoning policy Policy summary Stakeholders Consulted Push back from stakeholders Has used the policy Changes since adoption Unintended consequences or adverse effects Brooklyn Park Yes Ten or more rental units City financing Zoning map changes Comp Plan amendments Planned development overlay amendments City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers City Council No Yes –Several projects currently going through process Yes –Amended to apply to all projects located within TOD zoning areas No –However a senior project originally applied for City financing and then restructured their financing, so they did not need City assistance. Edina Yes City financial assistance City owned land Zoning change Comp Plan amendment Payment in lieu $125K New multifamily projects with 20+ units 10% at 50% AMI 20% at 60% AMI New for-sale projects 10% sold to households earning at or below 80% AMI City staff Residents Housing advocates No Yes Yes –Added clarity to payment in lieu provision No Golden Valley Yes Rental and Ownership (Market Rate) with 10+ units Conditional use permit Zoning map change Comp Plan amendment Planned Unit Development City financial assistance New multifamily projects 15% at 60% AMI 10% at 50% AMI New for-sale projects 10% at 80% AMI City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers No No No No Hopkins Considering N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 61 Has Inclusionary Zoning Policy Ordinance Summary Stakeholders Consulted Push back from stakeholders Has used the Policy Changes since adoption Unintended consequences or adverse effects Minneapolis Yes Rental projects with 20+ units 8% at 60% AMI (no City assistance) 4% at 30% AMI (no city assistance) 20% at 50% AMI (City financial assistance) For-sale (condo) projects 4%-8% at 80% AMI Payment in lieu Offsite option Donate Land City staff Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers Consultants Yes –Some local developers pushed back. National developers seem to assume there will be some sort of policy Yes –in 2020 of the 357 units constructed 18 are affordable and 95 affordable units will be built off-site at a later date No –Will be bringing changes later in the year related to PUDs No –Staff continues to review but so far, no adverse effects. As expected, a few projects are going back to the sellers to renegotiate the land price to off-set the cost of the requirements Minnetonka Yes New rental and for-sale multifamily projects with 10+ units Existing properties that add 10+ units Rental projects 5% at 50% AMI w/o city assistance or change in guiding/zoning 10% at 60% AMI w/o city assistance but with guiding/zoning changes 20% at 50% AMI or 40% at 60% AMI with City financial assistance For-sale projects 10% at 80% AMI City staff Developers No Yes –A few recent projects provided more affordable units than the policy required No No New Hope Considering N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62 Has Inclusionary Zoning Policy Policy Summary Stakeholders Consulted Push back from stakeholders Has used the policy Changes since adoption Unintended consequences or adverse effects Richfield Yes New rental and for-sale projects with 5+ units that receive City financial assistance Payment in lieu option Incentives offered Building permit fee reduction 4d property tax reduction Code flexibility Density bonus of 5-15% Rental projects 20% at 60% AMI 15% at 50% AMI 10% at 30% AMI For-sale projects 20% at 115% AMI 15 % at 100% AMI 10 % at 80% AMI City staff Residents Housing advocates Rental property owners Developers No Yes Yes –Policy makers wanted to encourage more deeply affordable units and larger bedroom sizes so we allow less units for deeper affordability No Plymouth Considering (in draft form) with HRA New or existing projects that add 10+ units and receive City financial assistance Rental 20% at 60% AMI 10% at 50% AMI For-sale 15% at 80%AMI City Staff HRA Board N/A N/A N/A N/A 63 Regular Housing and Redevelopment Authority July 22, 2021 Agenda Number:6.3 To:Housing and Redevelopment Authority Prepared by:Haily Hedblom, Community Development Coordinator Reviewed by:Jim Barnes, Housing Manager Item:HRA Funded Rehabilitation Loan Program - Replenish funding 1. Action Requested: Approve additional funding for the HRA funded Rehabilitation Loan Program. 2. Background: The HRA has operated the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Rehab Program since 1975. Since 1988 (the most recent year for which digitized records are available) the program has assisted 237 households, resulting in over $2.6 million invested in improvements to the Plymouth housing stock. The Rehab Program offers a zero interest, 20-year deferred loan of up to $40,000 to assist low to moderate income Plymouth homeowners with needed home repairs. Loans are forgivable after twenty years if the loan recipient continues to own and reside in the property, otherwise loans are repaid at the time of sale or if the property is no longer their primary residence. Only households with annual gross income at or below 80% of the area median are eligible to participate. The current income limit for a household of four in the Twin Cities is $83,920. Eligible improvements through the program include repairs necessary to preserve the structure or improve the safety and energy efficiency of the home, such as roofing, siding, windows, electrical, plumbing, heating, and insulation. Cosmetic remodeling and building additions are generally not eligible for funding through the program. The Rehab Program is funded through an annual CDBG grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Over the last five years, the average annual budget for the Rehab Program has been approximately $146,000 which has been used to assist a growing average of 7 households per year. The current CDBG rehab budget is less than $20,000; leaving HRA staff unable to assist eligible households until the 2021 annual allocation is dispersed. A waitlist has been generated, with two applications currently under review. In 2016 the HRA approved setting aside $150,000 in HRA General Fund reserves to supplement the CDBG Rehab Program. The HRA Funded Rehabilitation Program has assisted 4 households; two of which have active projects in 2021. The remaining HRA Rehab Program funds is $38,431 which is below the $40,000 maximum loan amount per household. Due to the increased need for the owner-occupied rehab programs, staff is requesting the Board approve a transfer of $150,000 from the HRA General Fund Reserves. 64 3. Budget Impact: There will be an impact to the HRA budget. The $150,000 will come from the HRA General Fund Reserves, Which has a current unrestricted fund balance of $1.3 million. 4. Attachments: Resolution 2021-12 65 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2021- RESOLUTION APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL HOUSING REHABILTATION LOAN PROGRAM FUNDING WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota (“HRA”) allocated $150,000 in January of 2016 to assist moderate income residents in Plymouth to rehabilitate their homes when Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) funds specified for the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program were either not available or applicable; and WHEREAS, the original $150,000 allocated for supplemental rehabilitation loans has since been expended; and WHEREAS, the need for additional Rehabilitation Loan Program funding remains consistent to what was seen in 2016 with several more applications than available funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota that: 1. The HRA will allocate an additional $150,000 from its reserves to supplement the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2021, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Plymouth, Minnesota. Michelle Soderberg, Chair Steve Juetten, Executive Director 66