Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1980-641CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meetino of . the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 2nd day of September , 19 80. The following members were present: Ma or Hunt Councilmembers Davenport, Neils and Schneider The following members were absent: Counci mem er Hoyt Councilmember Davenport introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 80-641 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT 914 - 16TH AVENUE WHEREAS, by a resoluiton passed by the Council on September 2, 1980, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the total cost of the following improvements: 1. 16th Avenue from County Road 6 to State Highway 55 by the installation of watermain laterals and trunk facilities, sanitary sewer laterals and trunk facilities, bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and all necessary appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 29th day of September, 1980, in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by fol I OiRn'anci 1 member Neils , and upon vote being taken thereon, the olTowingv-- vot— ed in favor thereof': Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Davenport, Neils and Schneider ine Toiiowing voted against or abstained: Nc Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly pas an