HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1980-509CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a rPg0ar meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
4th day of August , 19 80, The following members were
present: Mayor Hunt, Councimembers DavenpoFf, Hoyt and Schneider
The following members were absent: bund mem er Nells
Councilmember Hoyt introduced the following Resolution and
moved its opti on -
RESOLUTION N0, 80- 509
RESOLUTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 806
PINEVIEW LANE IMPROVEMENT
P.I.N. 2-118-22-33-0003
WHEREAS, by a Resolution passed by the Council on July 7, 1980, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the total cost of the following
improvements:
1. Pineview Lane from County Road 47 south to Minneapolis/St. Paul/
Sault Saint Marie Railroad
by the installation of bituminous streets (9 -ton design on Pineview Lane) with
concrete curb and gutter, storm drainage facilities (including previously constructed
facilities) and all necessary appurtenances.
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. A nearing shall_ be held on the 25th day of AugL.t, 1980, in the City
Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard,
Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to
such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice
the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed
notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assess-
ment roll.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Davenport and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted n favor the Mayor Hunt, Councilmember Davenport,
Ine roiiowing voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly7;
**f