HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1980-344Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth. Min—nesoota was a on he
19th day of May 19 80. Th fol 10 ing members were
present: Mayor Hunt, ounc me a t, Kg'I'I and The
er
The following members were absent: 1 er Davenport
Maygr Hunt introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 80-344
AMENDING POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 79-738 RELATIVE TO STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR
DETERMINING PARK DEDICATION AND PARC DEDICATION FEES
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 500.25 of the City Code, the City Council has
adopted Policy Resolution No. 79-738 establishing standards and guidelines for
determining that portion of land being platted. subdivided or developed which is
to be conveyed or dedicated to the public for park or playground purposes and with
respect to which cash is contributed to the City in lieu of conveyance or dedica-
tion; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed at their May 19, 1980 meeting clarifying
language relative to trail improvement credit for residential developments having
LA -1 density;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
Dip MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the amendment to Paragraph 5(c)
of Policy Resolution No. 79-738 as follows:
C. Developers shall be required as a condition of their development
contract, to construct and pave all trails and walkways through
and abutting their developments. In the case of residential
developments, includinq planned unit developments, where the
approved density on the et usable land of the entire development
is within the LA -1 land use category, the cost for surfacing of
trails identified in the City's Trail Corridor Plan shall be
considered for credit against park dedication requirements. Such
trail improvements shall be undertaken at the same time as other
public improvements are installed within the development, provid-
ing, however, that the City Staff may recommend deviation from
this policy in the case of individual hardship in terms of the
timing of installation of such trail facilities.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
�ojjWilmember Ho t , and upon vote being taken thereon the
following vo n favor thereof: r Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils
me rojiowing votes a
Whereupon the Resolut
Ist or abstained: none
was declared duly passed and adopted.
rtrr