HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1980-121CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, innesota was a on the
11th day of February , 19 80 . The following members were
present: Acting Mayor Davenport, ouncilmem ers Hoyt, Neils and Schneider
The following mem ers were absent: Mayor Hunt
Councilmember Neils introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 80-121
APPROVING AMENDED SIGN PLANS AND SIGN CRITERIA FOR FOUR SEASONS SHOPPING CENTER
LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF COUNTY ROAD 18 AND COUNTY ROAD 9 (A-683)
WHEREAS, Metram Properties has requested approval of amended sign plans and
sign criteria for the Four Seasons Shopping Center located in the southwest
quadrant of County Road 18 and County Road 9; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommended
approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLY-
MOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request of Metram
Properties for amended sign plans and sign criteria for Four Seasons Shopping
Center located in the southwest quadrant of County Road 18 and County Road 9
subject to the following conditions:
1. Per Council Resolution No. 76-583, the aggregate area of all wall signs
shall not exceed 4,020 square feet, and no additional pylon and entrance
signs shall be allowed.
2. Multi -tenant signs shall be permitted only in areas indicated on the
elevation plans, i.e., located over the entrances to the interior mall
as represented on Exhibit D of the sign criteria staff dated 12/19/79.
3. The location and configuration of all signs shall be in accordance with
the sign criteria staff dated 12/19/79, with the following added to
Category D "Prohibited Signs" as item #10: There shall be no reader board
type signs, i.e., those containing movable and removable letters; all
applications for sign permits shall be initialed by the owner/agent for
the shopping center as being in compliance with said criteria.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by'
Councilmember Hoyt , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vote in avor t ereo : Acting Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers
Hoyt-, Neils and Schneider
The following voted against or abstained: None
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passe an a opte