Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Information Memorandum 02-25-2011
CITY OF PLYMOUTH rp) COUNCIL INFO MEMO February 25, 2011 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS Planning Commission Agenda 03/02/11.............................................................................................. Page 1 February, March, April, May 2011 Official City Meeting Calendars ................................................. Page 2 Tentative List of Agenda Items for Future City Council Meetings ..................................................... Page 6 INFORMATION News Articles, Releases, Publications, Etc ... Cities pass up green stamp of approval, say it costs too much, Article, Star Tribune ......................... Page 7 Time may be right to move public notices to the Web, Article, Sun Sailor ...................................... Page 11 MEETING MINUTES PACT 12/01/10 Meeting Minutes..................................................................................................... Page 14 HRA 01/27/11 Meeting Minutes........................................................................................................ Page 17 STAFF REPORTS Human Rights Commission Appointments .................................. HCACF Population Report 02/22/11 ........................................... Page 21 Page 22 CORRESPONDENCE Letter to Resident, RE: Postponement of the Plat Application for Hampton Hills 2011002 ............ Page 23 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 2, 2011 WHERE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Plymouth City Hall 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA Alt items listed on the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC FORUM 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the February 16, 2011 Planning Commission meeting minutes. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Hampton Hills Investment, LLC. Rezoning and preliminary plat for Hampton Hills 3rd Addition for 177 single family lots to be located on the former Hampton Hills golf course. (2011002) (item to be continued to the March 16, 2011 meeting.) 7. NEW BUSINESS B. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 r� Plymouth Adding Quality to Life February 2011 Modified on 02125111 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 7:00 PM 6:00 PM 2:00 PM PLANNING BOARD AND FIRE & ICE COMMISSION COMMISSION FESTIVAL MEETING RECOGNITION Parkers Lake Council Chambers EVENT Plymouth Creek Center 6 7 8 5:30 PM 9 10 1.1 12 SPECIAL COUNCIL 7:00 PM 7:00 PM MEETING" ENVIRONMENTAL PARK & REC Medicine Lake Room QUALITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMISSION 7:00 PM (EQC) MEETING (PRAC) MEETING REGULAR COUNCIL Council Chambers Council Chambers MEETING Council Chambers 13 14 15 16 7:40 PM 17 7;00 PM 18 19 PLANNING HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COMMISSION MEETING MEETING Council Chambers Medicine Lake Room 20 21 22 2 3 '24 2S 26 7:00 PM 7.00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL PLYMOUTH HRA MEETING PRESIDENTS MEETING ADVISORY Medicine Lake Room DAY Council Chambers COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT) MEETING CITY OFFICES Medicine Lake Room CLOSED 27 28 ' Discuss Transit System and Str + t Assessment Policy Modified on 02125111 Page 2 City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life March 2011 Modified on 02125111 Page 3 1 2 7:30 AM 3 7:00 PM 4 5 STATE OF THE POLICE DEPT. CITY MEETING ANNUAL Council Chambers RECOGNITION EVENT Plymouth Creek 7:00 PM Center PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 6 7 8 7:00 PM 9 7:00 PM 10 11 12 REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL MEETING QUALITY Council Chambers COMMITTEE (EQC) MEETING Council Chambers 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 9:00 AM - SPECIAL COUNCIL PLANNING 12:00 PM MEETING` COMMISSION CITY SAMPLER Medicine Lake Room MEETING Plymouth City Hall Council Chambers 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7:00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL HRA MEETING MEETING Medicine Lake Room Council Chambers 27 28 29 30 31 ' Discu s Future Park Issues and Ll date with City Manager Modified on 02125111 Page 3 r0 City of 9) Plymouth Adding Quality to Life April 2011 Modified on 02125111 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7:00 PM 7 8 6:00-8:00 PM 99:00 AM -1:00 PM PLANNING YARD Et GARDEN YARD Et GARDEN COMMISSION EXPO EXPO MEETING Plymouth Creek Plymouth Creek Council Chambers Center Fieldhouse Center Fieldhouse 10 11 12 12 14 15 16 6:00 PM 5:00-9:00 PM 10:04 AM— Board of 7:00 PM PRIMAVERA 4:00 PM ONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL Plymouth Fine PRIMAVERA Council Chambers QUALITY Arts Council Plymouth Fine COMMITTEE Show Arts Council 7:00 PM E Q C MEETING Plymouth Creek Shaw REGULAR COUNCIL Council Chambers Center Plymouth Creek MEETING Center Council Chambers 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1:00-4:00 PM 10:00 AM -4:00 PM 10:00 AM -4:00 PM 7:00 PM PLANNING PRIMAVERA 7:00 PM -8:30 PM PRIMAVERA COMMISSION Plymouth Fine PRIMAVERA Plymouth Fine MEETING Arts Council Plymouth Fine Arts Council Council Chambers Show Arts Council Show Plymouth Creek Show Plymouth Creek Center Plymouth Creek Center Passover Begins 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 6:00 PM 7.00 PM Board of HRA MEETING Equalization Parkers Lake Roam Reconvened Council Chambers 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Council Chambers Modified on 02125111 Page 4 City of Plymouth ,Adding Quality to Life May 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7:00 PM 7:00 PM PLANNING HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COMMISSION MEETING MEETING Medicine Lake Room Parkers Lake Room 8 9 10 11 7:00 PM 12 5:30-8:00 PM 13 14 7:00 PM ENVITRONMENTAL REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FAIR MEETING QUALITY 2acharay Lane COMMITTEE Elementary School Medicine Lake Room (EQC) MEETING 7:00 PM Parkers Lake Room PARK rt REC ADVISORY COMMISSION (PRAC) MEETING 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Medicine Lake Room 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7:06 PM 7:00 PM 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH HRA MEETING REGULAR COUNCIL ADVISORY Parkers Lake Room MEETING COMMITTEE ON Medicine Lake Room TRANSIT (PACT) MEETING Parkers Lake Room 29 30 EM 31 MEMORIAL DAY Observed CITY OFFICES CLOSED Modified on 021251 It Page 5 Tentative Schedule for City Council Agenda Items March 8, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers • Human Rights Commission Annual Report and Work Plan • Park and Recreation Advisory Commission's Annual Work Plan • Approve Joint Powers Agreement for distribution and operation of Breath Testing Instrument • Approve Payment No. 3 and Final for 36'h Avenue Street Deconstruction Project (S 104) • Approve {Change Order No. 2 for Plymouth Creek Stream Bank Restoration Project (8 128) • Award Contract for Imperial Hills Lift Station (10014) • Accept Utilities for Rusten Wood development (2006046) • Approve designation of Municipal State Aid streets for 2011 • Public Hearing on vacation of drainage, utility and road casements within the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4-113-22 March 15, Special, 6:00 p.m., Medicine Lake Room • Discuss future park issues • Update with City Manager March 22, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers • Approve 2011 Refuse Haulers License Renewals • Approve 2011 Renewal of Consumption and Display Licenses for VFW Hamel and West Medicine Lake Community Club • Approve a final plat for Arbor Grove 2"d Addition located south of the intersection of 46`' Avenue and Yellowstone Lane. (2011004) April 12, Board of Equalization, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers April 12, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers April 26, Board of Equalization Reconvened, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers April 26, Regular, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Note: Special Meeting topics have leen Set bV Council; all other topics erre tentative. Page 6 Format Dynamics:: C1eanPrint :: hUp://www.startribune.com/locaU116632678.html Page 1 of 4 r Point your tarTribunexom ` 4� mobile browser to http:•%%startribw�e.coEn Cities pass up green stamp of approval, say it costs too much They say they can build green without spending money on LEED, But Minneapolis says it's worth the price. By MARY JANE SMETANKA1, Star Tribune Last update: February 21, 2011 - 9:50 PM In St. Louis Park it is city policy to make sure that new and remodeled municipal buildings are built to "green" standards. How green? For two new fire stations, it means high -efficiency boilers, energy-saving windows, lights that switch off when roams are idle and state-of-the-art handling of storm water. But city officials won't take the ultimate step of seeking LEED certification for its fire stations. They said it costs too much. "It's like being a Minnesota Star City; it doesn't mean much," St. Louis Park Mayor Jeff Jacobs said. "We've done a lot of the things that LEED certification does, but we don't have to pay the fees." Advertisement This Page Cannot Be Displayed LEED, sponsored by the D.S. Green Building Council, is the gold standard for environmentally conscious development. But the cost of seeking certification, which can reach $70,000 for one building, has cash- strapped cities and counties passing on the chance to display LEED plaques on their buildings. Edina, Richfield and Hennepin County have made decisions similar to St. Louis Park's in the past year. New county libraries in Maple Grove and Plymouth use natural light for illumination, and the Maple Grove building uses a nearby pond to help beat and cool the building. But the county hasn't -- and won't -- seek LEED certification for those or other projects, even though the honor has a cacliet that's increasingly recognized. "We've been asked about it, because LEED certification is becomin- well known and has s tatus and meaning for the general public," said Judy Hollander, the county's director of property services. "We have never sought LEED certification ... for reasons of cost." Edina passed on LEED certification for its new public works building, as did Richfield for a Based on your corporate access policies, access to this web site ( http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/minnesota_star_tribune_dp_print/DEWS ;FD_PAGE_NUMBER=l;dcopt=ist; has been blocked because the web category "Advertisements & Popups" is not allowed. If you have questions, please contact IT Helpdesk at ext. 5380 ( helpdeskQ&ci.plymouth.mn.us ) and provide the codes shown below.. Print Powered By Fcrn-gat Dy"namics ' ) P http://www.startribune.com/templates/fdcp? 1298405350690 �., --1 1011 Format Dynamics :: CleanPrint :: http://www.startribune.com/local/116632678.html Page 2 of 4 ``r f Point your mobile browser to http:/,/startribunecorn StarTribune.com public works building and a new municipal center that is under construction. Both cities took pains to use sustainable design. Going green without the seal Edina's public works building uses geothermal heating and cooling, has recycled steel and flooring materials and employs daylight to light parts of the building. City public works director Wayne Houle said the building will earn about $65,000 in utility rebates for energy efficiency. But Edina didn't apply for LEED certification, which it was told would cost $50,000 to $80,000. "Wly spend that to get a plaque on the wall saying this is a green building:'" Houle said. Richfield's new municipal center includes recycled materials, high -efficiency heating and cooling, extensive natural lighting and porous pavers. But City Manager Steve Devich said lie couldn't justify LEED's expense. "Is it great to have that kind of seal of approval on a building" Sure," he said. "But Advertisement does it make a difference in the day-to-day functioning of the building for Richfield residents? No," Dave Wisnewski, Hennepin County's division manager for design and construction,. is a LEED-certified architect. The county follows state of Minnesota sustainable building guidelines instead of LEED. There are similarities, but Wisnewski said state guidelines are not as rigid as LEED's. LEED has advanced partly through canny marketing and is especially attractive in leased buildings where certification can be used to boost rents, he said. "But when you're building libraries or correctional facilities, you don't get that payback," Wisnewski said. No one knows how many Minnesota cities and counties have passed on LEED certification. But Sheri Brezinka, executive director of the Minnesota chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council, said applications from public projects here are increasing. Five public projects were certified in 2009, eight in 2010 and one has been certified so far in 2011. she said. Perhaps the highest profile LEED-certified This Page Cannot Be Displayed Based on your corporate access policies, access to this web site ( http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/minnesota_star_tribune_dp_print/NEWS_;FD_PAGE NUMBER=2;dcopt=ist has been blocked because the web category "Advertisements & Popups" is not allowed. If you have questions, please contact IT Helpdesk at ext. 5380 ( helpdeskPci.Dlymouth.mn.us ) and provide the codes shown below. Print Powered By http://www.startfibune.com/templates/fdcp? 12984015350690 311 ForniatQynamics Page 8 21'))11')011 Fonnat Dynamics :: CleanPrint :: http://www.stailribttiie.coin/local/116632678.html Page 3 of r Point your mobile browser to StarTribune.com hftp:/jtartribure. ron project in Minnesota is Target Field, which received high marks for water re -use, recycled materials and other eco -friendly designs. Minneapolis takes LEED LEED certification is expensive because extensive documentation is required to track each step of a project, and teams of evaluators visit sites. "I can certainly understand the cost issues and being accountable to taxpayers," Brezinka said. But she said the LEED process allows government to prove they're doing what they say they're doing with green L construction. Brezinka said LEED and state of Minnesota green building standards differ because the state measures do not require third -party verification. "Guidelines can help set goals, but along the way shortcuts can be taken," she said. "My only caution is that counties or cities might not get what they think they're getting." One city that is pursuing LEED certification for projects is Minneapolis. Advertisement This Page Cannot Be Displayed The city's new Hiawatha Avenue public works building has earned gold status -- the second-highest LEED level -- and project manager Paul Miller hopes it will achieve platinum, the highest award. "This is a story we're very proud of," Miller said. "We're at LEED platinum level and we did not increase our budget to get there." Miller said careful pre -design work allowed the project to change along the way without big increases in the budget. The $1 I million project had budgeted LEED costs of S50,000 to 580,000, but so far has spent only a bit more than 518,000, he said. Miller said he does not expect LEED costs to grow much more. He said the LEED process is unique, forcing an owner to track a project accurately while keeping; sustainability the top concern. "It's much more than the plaque on the wall," he said. "We can defend the green integrity of the building." In November, the Hiawatha building was named the Minnesota Public Works Association project of the year. "This is the way of doing business now," Based on your corporate access policies, access to this web site ( http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/minnesota_star_tribuane_dp_print/NEWS_;FD—PAGE_NUMBER=3;dcopt=i has been blocked because the web category "Advertisements & Popups" is not allowed. If you have questions, please contact IT Helpdesk at ext. 5380 ( helpdeskPci.plymouth.mn.us ) and provide the codes shown below. Print Powered By (_*Err at Dynamics Page 9 http://w,,vw.startribune.com/templates/fdcp?1298405350690 2 _? 2011 Format Dynamics:: CleanPrint :: http://www.startribune.com/local/116632678.html Page 4 of 4 S7, Point your torTribune•com j'no6ilebrowserto http.,//stattribune.rom Miller said. "LEER is out there as a national standard.... I think this is a real responsible way to spend taxpayer dollars." Mary Jane Smetanka • 612-673-7330 Shortcuts To Links In Article 1 http://ezurl.co/502e1 Advertisement This Page Cannot Be Displayed Based on your corporate access policies, access to this web site ( http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/minnesota_star_tribune_dp_print/NEWS_;FD_PAGE_NUMBER=4;dcopt=ist; has been blocked because the web category "Advertisements & Popups" is not allowed. If you have questions, please contact IT Helpdesk at ext. 53813 ( helpdesk@ci.plymouth.mn.us ) and provide the codes shown below. Print. Powered By --Dynamics" http://www.startribune.com/templates/fdcp?1298405350690 Pa9?2NO 11 Time may be right to move public notices to the Web Page I of 3 StarTribune.com MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Time may be right to move public notices to the Web By KEVIN DUCHSCHERE, Star Tribune February 20, 2011 The Hennepin County Board was about to spend $146,000 to publish another 16 months of public notices in the business paper Finance & Commerce. Commissioner Randy Johnson was not happy. "Mr. Johnson," he asked County Administrator Richard Johnson, already knowing the answer but wanting to make sure everyone heard it, "what do we get for $146,0007' The reply: We get published legal notices as required by state law. "is there any other medium that meets the state -imposed, state -mandated requirement that would cost less?" Commissioner Johnson asked. No -- even though Hennepin County already posts most of the information on its website. Left without a choice, commissioners grudgingly approved the money. But not before telling their state lobbyist to seek repeal of the mandate. It's one that costs Minnesota's counties, cities and school districts already struggling with tight budgets. The law requires notices in newspapers of board proceedings, tax levies, forfeited properties, financial statements and project bids. Against the rising tide of Internet use, many see dumping newspaper notices as a cost saver whose time has come. Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, has introduced a bill to let local governments skip the papers and publish such notices only on their websites. Drazkowski, who is leading a GOP charge against several state mandates, said using websites will help jurisdictions make up for cuts in state aid. "This is a way to allow local governments the freedom and flexibility to do the best job they can," he said. The bill has six sponsors, including Bloomington DFLer Ann Lenczewski. It has not been introduced in the Senate. The main opponent is the Minnesota Newspaper Association, which represents 350 newspapers (including the Star Tribune) that see the notices as an important public service and reliable moneymaker. Page 11 littp://www.startribune,com/templates/Pniit_Tllls_Story?sid=l 16578118 i??!?011 Time may be right to move public notices to the Web Page ? of 3 The trade group says local government shouldn't be the sole source of information about itself, and that citizens still mostly turn to newspapers or newspaper websites for public news and information. "Most news organizations have had to cut back, but government isn't getting any smaller," said Mark Anfinson, attorney for the newspaper association. "Public notices is a way of requiring government to tell its people what it's doing and what it's done. Anfinson said he didn't think newspapers would fold if revenue from the notices disappeared. But a law change could mean papers would have to cut reporters, he said. Moving to the Web Publishing notices in newspapers dates to colonial times. But a recent study by the Annenberg Center at the University of Southern California said 40 states entertained proposals to transfer notices to the Web. The report said the Obama administration has moved federal property forfeiture notices online, saving $6.7 million over five years. Last month, the Willmar City Council asked its staff to seek alternatives to notices in the newspaper, even though that would be illegal under Minnesota law. The closest the state comes to that right now is letting local governments use their own websites to advertise for transportation contractors. Opponents of the state mandate, who have been trying to drop it for years, say this time may be different. The cost is one big reason but it's not the only one, said Joe Mathews, a policy analyst with the Association of Minnesota Counties. "We want to make sure the information gets out to where the public will find it, and do it in the most efficient way possible," he said. Drazkowski said the bill makes allowances for those who eschew the Internet. Governments would have to tell people -- in the newspaper -- that notices can be found on their websites. They would be required to maintain a published archive of notices and make them available. The bill also would require that printed copies of online notices be maintained at City Hall and the local library and be mailed to anyone who asks. "The need to keep the public apprised of the activity of government ... shouldn't be compromised," Drazkowski said. Anfinson said the bill would make access to notices unlikely and inconvenient. People shouldn't have to go to the library or government offices to look them up. Many seniors Page, littp:Jlw�\-NN,.startribune.coin/tei-aplates.'Print_This_Story?sid-116578115 (}l i Time may be right to move public notices to the Web aren't adept online, he said. Page 3 of 3 "We got a letter last year from the AARP strongly opposing transfer of public notices to the Internet because a significant portion of their members don't use it," he said. Kevin Duchschere - 612-673-4455 0 2011 Star Tribune. All rights reserved. Pae 3 http://www.startribune.com/templates/Print_This Story:'sid=116578118 F2 /2011 1. 2. 3. Approved Minutes City of Plymouth Plymouth Advisory Committee on Transit (PACT) December 1, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Wosjc, Vice Chair Kedzuf, Committee Members Bliss, Paprocki, Rudnick, and Scherschligt MEMBERS ABSENT: Committee Member Gustafson STAFF PRESENT: Transit Manager Hellekson, Transit Coordinator Maciej, First Transit Representatives Buharin and Baldwin, and Committee Reporter Kovacevick OTHERS PRESENT: None CALL TO ORDER: 7:05 P.M. Approval of Agenda Motion by Vice Chair Kedzuf, seconded by Committee Member Paprocki recommending approval of the .December 1, 2010 PACT meeting agenda. Motion approved. Approval of Minutes Motion by Committee Member Bliss, seconded by Committee Member Rudnick recommending approval of the October 27, 2010 PACT minutes. Motion approved. Review 2010 transit survey information Transit Manager Hellekson said that the volunteer working on the survey results was unable to finish the project. Transit Coordinator Maciej has been working to finish the Dial -A -Ride survey results and charting of the data, She also stated that the fixed route survey results will be available at the February 2011 PACT meeting. Chair Wosje asked if the survey results suggest changes that should be undertaken. Without additional funding in 2011, Transit Coordinator Maciej stated that there will not be funding to make any substantive improvements. PACT 12-1-10 Proposed Minutes Page 1 Page 14 4. Discuss driver awards First Transit Representative Buharin shared the results of the Driver Award survey. The favorite fixed route driver- was Ger Yang. The preferred Dial -A - Ride driver was Dollian Davis. Manager Hellekson stated that the 2010 Driver Awards will be presented at the March 22, 2011 City Council meeting. Staff will notify PACT members once the 2011 City Council schedule has been approved. 5. Fleet update Transit Coordinator Maciej reported that delivery of two new Gillig buses will take place later than originally planned. PACT members will be notified when a delivery date is established, and to which route(s) they will likely be assigned. 6. Review Plymouth Metrolink Transit Performance Measurements (Fixed Route Seat Capacity, Dial -A -Ride Service Hours, System Ridership Graph, Fixed Route Ridership Graph, Dial -A -Ride Ridership Graph) Transit Coordinator Maciej presented the recent data. Benchmarks have been added based on a request at the last PACT meeting. Committee Member Bliss suggested that YTD comparisons would be informative, comparing 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011. 7. Review Plymouth Metrolink Customer Service Log Transit Coordinator Maciej presented the most recent customer continents. First Transit Representative Buharin commented on the verification of a couple of the complaints. Manager Hellekson said that updated cell phone protocol signs will be printed and posted on all buses. The current signs reference the former city website address. 8. Identify areas of concern and recommendations Vice Chair- Kedzuf reported that she will not be in attendance for the July 2011 PACT meeting. Committee Member Bliss commended Manager Hellekson and Transit Coordinator Maciej on their responsiveness to the ice issue at the Nathan Lane Park and Ride Lot. PACT 12-1-10 Proposed Minutes Page 2 Page 15 9. Other business Chau Wosje recognized Committee Member Paprocki's years of service to transit for the City of Plymouth and presented her with a certificate of appreciation. First Transit Representative Buharin reported that the Wi-Fi system has been removed from the First Transit buses. It had been activated for four weeks and rotated among routes and times of day. Use of Wi-F1 began strong and tapered off each subsequent week. Committee Member Bliss suggested PACT vacancies be posted on the buses since the Committee is looking for a bus rider to fill the vacancy. Manager Hellekson replied that the process is handled by the City Clerks Office although we can post it on buses and in transit facilities. It was suggested by First Transit Representative Buharin, that we use the Rider Alert service to post the vacancy, to which Manager Hellekson responded that the Alert service should be for urgent issues. Manager Hellekson stated that the Toys for Tots program and the IOCP food collection events are still under consideration by staff. Adjourn: Motion by Committee Member Paprocki seconded by Vice Chair Kedzuf to adjourn. Without objection, the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. 2011 meetings: February 23, May 25, July 27, November 30. All meetings held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall on the main floor in the Medicine Lake Room. PACT 12-1-10 Proposed Minutes Page 3 Page 16 APPROVED MINUTES PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 27, 2011 PRESENT. Chairman Jeff Kulaszewicz, Commissioners Paul Caryotakis, David Miller and Bob Stein ABSENT. Commissioner Steve Ludovissie STAFF PRESENT; Housing Program Manager Jim Bames and Office Support Specialist Laurie Lokken OTHERS PRESENT; Councilmember Jim Willis, Grace Management Representative Jody Boedigheimcr and Ehlers & Associates Inc. Representative Jonathan North 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kulaszewicz called the Plymouth blousing and Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7;00 P.M. 2. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve HFLA Meeting Minutes from November 18, 2010 B. Plymouth Towne Square. Accept November and December 2010 housing reports. C. Vicksburg Crossing. Accept November and December 2010 housing reports. MOTION by Commissioner Stein, seconded by Commissioner Caryotakis, to approve the consent agenda. Vote. 4 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously. 3. NEW BUSINESS A. Vicksburg Crossing. November And December 2010 Marketing Reports. ft Chairman Kulaszewicz introduced Grace Management Representative Jody Bocdighei ner. She stated that they are staying in the low 9001% occupancy range. She said that December is historically one of the quietest months that they have and that in comparison, December 2009 had two more inquiries and two more walk-ins than they did in December 2010 but that there were nine vacancies in 2009 and five in 2010. Commissioner Stein stated that it was interesting that none of the five vacancies are in Style E units. Grace Management Representative Boedigheimer responded that there are two affordable, lower -rate apartments available. She said that one is a handicap unit and the other unit is located by the generator. She said that there are approximately 37 names on the waiting list and they Page 17 Approved Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority January 27, 2011 Page 2 have contacted just about all those on the list. She asked if a small article could be included in the Plymouth News that the waiting lists are open at both buildings. Grace Management Representative Boedigheimer added that they are experiencing the same situation with two bedroom rentals at Plymouth Towne Square. She said that they have three, two-bedroom units available at that building and two of those units are located over the garage doors. She said that they have contacted most of the names on the two bedroom waiting list there, too. She said that there are about 70 names on the one bedroom waiting list and about 80 names on the two bedroom waiting list. She said that they have not experienced any problems with the one bedroom units so far. Commissioner Stein asked how much the two bedroom rent is and what reasons are given for turning down units when contacted from the waiting list. Grace Management Representative Boedigheimer responded that the minimum rent is $500 or 37% of their adjusted income. She added that there are various reasons given for turning down available units and that they are not ready to move yet is the most common. She said that someone on the waiting list can turn down available units three times and then their name would be moved to the bottom of their preference category on the waiting list. Grace Management Representative Boedigheimer stated that they have received three deposits for nonspecific apartments but that the applicants want to stay on the waiting list until something becomes available that meets their needs and circumstances. She said that it would be good to 4 fill that list, too. Grace Management Representative Boedigheimer stated that she is looking at an open house again. She said the Cinco de Mayo open house was so successful that they will probably repeat it this year. She said that they receive enough daily and monthly phone calls and inquiries that if they don't need to spend money on marketing, they aren't going to at this point. B. Plymouth Towne Square. Approve Sale Of Refunding Bonds. Chairman Kulaszewicz introduced Housing Program Manager Barnes who gave an overview of the staff report. Housing Program Manager Barnes introduced Jonathan North, representing Ehlers & Associates Inc. Mr. North stated that despite some of the challenges in the market in the past two months,. the HRA did very well in the sale of their bonds. He said that this is refinancing of the Series 2003 bonds, which are another refunding bond for the original financing for the Plymouth Towne Square project. He said that these are advance refunding bonds that are issued by the HRA but ultimately carry the city's general obligation pledge. He said that it is important to have a very strong credit to get good interest rates. Mr. North presented a sale report summarizing the results of the sale of the bonds. He said there were nine bids received and the winning bid was from Morgan Keegan out of Memphis, Page 18 Approved Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority January 27, 2011 Page 3 Tennessee. He said the difference between the low bid and the high bid was about $123,000. He said the bonds will close on February 23, 2011. He said the good news is that by refunding these bonds, the HRA saved a net present value of about 4% of the refunded principal. He said that more spccifrcally and important is that the future value benefit of this refunding was up over $156,000. He said that this refunding has enabled a range of $12,000 to S16,000 in annual savings. Mr. North added that there have been some recent regulatory and financial changes at the federal level. He said there are some financial regulatory reforms that are trying to protect the best interest of communities like Plymouth. He said that commissions, such as this, might be under that regulating umbrella. Chairman Kulaszewicz asked that he keep Housing Program Manager Barnes abreast of those regulations. MOTION by Chairman Kulaszewicz, seconded by Con-imissioner Stein, to approve the resolution awarding the sale of $3,255,000 General Obligation Housing Refunding Bonds for Plymouth Towne Square. 'Vote, 4 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously. C. First Time Homebuyer And Rehabilitation Program Changes. Chairman Kulaszewicz introduced Housing Program Manager Barnes who gave an overview of the staff report. Commissioner Caryotakis stated that things would change pretty quickly if the market picked up but right now all the appraisals we are seeing are probably quite low. Housing Program Manager Barnes replied that was correct and added that over the past three years, we are seeing more requests for waiving the Loan -to -Value of 100% coming from townhomes and condominiums as that happens to be the market in our city that was hit the hardest. Commissioner Stein asked if in this program, the value of property is the value after or before the rehab is done. Housing Program Manager Barnes responded that the property value is the value before the rehab is done. He said that there isn't a provision in this program or a requirement by CBDG that requires us to go back and get an after -rehab value. He said that one could make an argument that by doing this work we are actually increasing the value; however, a lot of the rehab projects that we do are deferred maintenance (such as replacing a roof) that don't increase the value. Chairman Kulaszewicz stated that it was interesting that property values used for the city's tax base are not significantly different than the actual selling price. Commissioner Stein added that by law, you are supposed to assess within that range. Commissioner Stein asked if these guides could be made available on the city's website. Housing Program Manager Bathes replied that the guides are typically requested by lenders and Page 19 Approved Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authority January 27, 2011 Page 4 occasionally by a participant or an applicant. He said that he would look into getting the HRA policies and procedures added to the city's t ebsite. Commissioner Caryotakis asked what the demand for loans has been. Housing Program Manager Barnes responded that the First Time Homebuyer program does not see a lot of activity at this time of year. He said that there are no federal programs or incentives going on right now that would drive people into buying. He said our rehab program is very slow right now as well. He said that we are working to try and get approval for the applicants that we do have. He said that applicants have had various sources of income that are nontraditional so it is taking us a little longer to go through their applications. Housing Program Manager Barnes added that over the next year, we will be evaluating the CBDG program as a whole and see if the owner -occupied rehab program is one to continue. He said that the problem is that some years we might get 10 to 15 loans and then we get years, Iike now, where we are struggling to get 4 to 5 loans done. He said that we will look at what other cities are doing with their CBDG dollars. Chairman Kulaszewicz asked what form of media is used to promote awareness of these programs to the public. Housing Program Manager Barnes responded that information about our programs are posted on the city website and once or twice a year we place an article in the Plymouth News to remind the public that these programs are available to them and that there is funding available. He said that there is awareness through word of mouth from other county and state a-encies and through the social service network with Cnterfaith and Prism. He said that about once a year we get a letter out to churches to remind them about our programs. He added that there is only $260,000 to $300,000 in CBDG funds and we would not want to create long waiting lists. Commissioner Caiyotakis asked if demand would pick up as the weather warms up or if the economy picks up. Housing Program Manager Barnes replied that it typically does pick up as the spring nears. He said that we are one of five cities who participate in the remodeling fair in Crystal in the spring. He said that in the past, we have combined with the Senate for Energy and Environment in advertising their Fix -Up Fund, which is a state program that they administer, and our programs. MOTION by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Caayotakis, to approve the changes to the First Tune Homebuyer Guidelines and to the Rehabilitation Program Guidelines. Grote. 4 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously. 4. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Chairman Kulaszewicz to adjourn the meeting at 7:36 p.m. Page 20 rp)City of Plymouth E�- Adding Quality to Life To: Kelli Slavik, Mayor Memorandum From: Mike Goldstein, Police Chief Item: Appointment of Human Rights Commission Chair and Vice Chair for 2011 At the Human Rights Commission meeting held last night, the Commission appointed William Garber as the Chair and Jessica Trites Rolle as the Vice Chair for 2011. �1 Page 21 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 DATE: February 22, 2011 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager cc: Steve Juetten FROM: Barbara Senness, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Hennepin County Adult Correctional Facility (HCACF) Population Report Hennepin County community corrections staff has submitted their monthly report on average daily population for the month of January 2011. The average daily population reported for the Plymouth facility was 380, which is less than the occupancy limit of 601 set by the conditional use permit. The chart below shows the average monthly population since January of 2004. As noted previously, in January 2010, Hennepin County closed the building housing the work release population. The closure was related to staff layoffs. Any work release individuals not eligible for electronic home monitoring are now housed in the men's or women's sections. Page 22 HCACF Monthly population Report 700—.__. 500 500 + act a��s v v 300 Q 290 aca — B N ;° ManthlYear Page 22 r virthk 'k Va City Of k04 P1 `ouch Addlog Qijo(itw to Life February 25. 2011 SUBJECT: POSTP©!yEME.yT OF THE REZONVNG AND PRELIXIINARI" PLAT APPLICATION FOR HAMPTON HILLS 3RD ADDITION (2011002) Dear Resident/Land Owner: This letter is to inform you that the application by Hampton Hills Investment, LLC. under File No. 2011002 (requesting approval of a rezoning and preliminary plat) that was previously scheduled for the March 2, 2011 Planning Commission meeting will not be considered at that meeting—but rather, has been postponed to the ivlarch 16; 2011 Planning Conunission meeting. fNFOR'MATION relating to this request may be examined at the community development information counter Gower level of City Hall), on Mondays and Wednesday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to X1:30 p,m.. and Tuesdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.. except holidays. Sincerely. j l'� 1 •�l Barbara Cr. Senness, AICD Planning Manager O-Tlan'Notices PC 201 1002-proponotice-?-Con tin uance Page 23 Plymouth uth Adding Qwtity to Life To: Janene Hebert, City Assessor From: Jan Olsson, Appraiser Supervisor CC: Cal Partner, Director Administrative Services Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Assessing Staff Date: 2/24/2011 Re: 2011 Property Tax Summary The 2011 property tax statements are scheduled to be mailed and posted to the Hennepin County website (wwwl6co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidsrch.jsp) on approximately March 1, 2011. Recently released data pertaining to the payable 2011 property taxes has been compiled into charts, graphs and comparison reports for your review. The estimated market value on the majority of residential properties decreased 6% for the 2010 assessment, compared to 4% for commercial and 9% for apartments. The decreases for the 2010 assessment affect the payable 2011 property taxes. The first tier of residential homestead tax is calculated at 1% from $0 to $500,000. The remainder of value is calculated at 1.25%. The residential market value homestead credit and the agricultural market value credit were created to proportionally reduce the net tax capacity -based property tax and replace the education homestead credit. The market value homestead credit reduces taxes on residential homesteads; and on the house, garage and one acre for farm homesteads. The maximum credit is $304 at $76,000 of market value. The credit decreases after $76,000 and ends at a market value of $413,800. The payable 2011 property tax per school district vary due to school bond referendums. Examples of how to calculate payable 2011 taxes using the average decrease of 6% in market value are illustrated in the following charts for each school district in Plymouth. The calculations do not include the agricultural homestead credit, or This Old House or Veteran's exclusions. There are eleven different tax calculations within the four school districts due to watershed districts. Our contribution to the fiscal disparity pool for commercial/Industrial properties changed from 41.632% to 41.7963% in 2011. PROPERTY TAX COMPAMSON Pavab!e 2002 Through 2011 ##270 Hockins Schcci District 4234 Wayzata Schccl mstrict Payauie Market Property %Tax to Market Property %Tax to Year Value Taxes ValuA Value Taxes Value `2CO2 148,000 1,535 1.94 221,500 2,645 1.19 "2603 154,300 1,809 1.10 245,900 2,851 1.16 2CC4 177,400 1,906 1.07 253,6CG 2,968 1.12 2CC5 193,4C0 1,954 1.01 289,500 3,096 1.07 2CC6 208,9C0 2,130 1.11 312,7G0 3,432 1.10 2007 225,600 2,214 0.98 337,700 3,581 1.06 2CCS 230,3CC 2,249 0.98 345,500 3,601 1.04 2009 224,3C0 2,235 1,05 328,900 3,580 1.09 2010 213,100 2,259 1.C6 311,600 3,561 1.14 2011-270/0 200,3C0 2,26.3 1.13 284/0-292,900 3,570 1.22 2011-270/7 2C0,3C0 2,279 1.14 284/3-292,900 3,617 1.23 284/7-292,900 3,591 1.23 284/8-292,9C0 3,587 1.22 #281 Robbinsdale School District #279 Osseo School District Payable Year Market Property %Tax to Value Market Property % Tax to Value Taxes value Taxes Value `2002 181,800 2,287 1.26 282,700 3,326 1.18 :'2003 201,800 2,494 1,24 313,800 3,945 1,26 2004 217,900 2,707 1.24 338,900 4,072 1.20 2005 237,500 2,759 1.16 369,400 4,351 1.18 2006 256,500 2,909 1.13 398,900 4,494 1.13 2007 277,000 3,077 1.11 430,800 4,885 1.13 2008 283,400 3,072 1.08 440,700 4,926 1,12 2009 275,500 3,323 1.21 428,360 4,958 1.12 2010 261,700 3,239 1.24 407,000 3,561 1.14 2011-231f0 246,000 3,361 1.37 279/0-382,600 4,996 1.30 2011-281/7 246,000 3,379 1.37 279/8-382,600 5,028 1.31 2011-281/8 246,000 3,375 1.37 Taxes include the tax extension rate, school, city and solid waste market value rates where applicable as well as the market value homestead credit and education tax credits. The properties used in this study are four houses of various market values (one from each of the four school districts within the city of Plymouth. *2002 was the first year for Market Value Homestead Credit. **2003 first year for additional watershed taxing districts JLC? 2/2011 TAX CAPACITY RATE BREAK DOWN Pavabie 2010-2011 City of Plymouth #270/Hopkins-Watershed #0 #270/Hoek ns -Watershed 47 School #284/Wayzata-Watershed 40 2010 2010 2011 2011 Tax Referendum Tax Referendum Extension Rates Extension Rates Rates l Rates % School 23.311 0.16396 24.034 0.17801 County 42.640 45.840 City 24.495 0.00726 26.944 0.01032 Spec Tax Dist 8.138 9.172 HRA 0.512 0.546 TOTAL 100.096 106.536 #284/Wavzata-Watershed #3 2010 2010 2011 2011 Tax Referendum Tax Referendum Extension Rates Extension Rates Rates % Rates % School 23.311 0.16396 24.034 0,17801 County 42.640 45.840 City 25.495 0.00726 26.944 0.01032 Spec Tax Dist 09.649 10.778 HRA 0,512 0.546 TOTAL 101.607 108.142 #244/Wavzata-Watershed #7 2010 2010 2011 Tax Extension Referendum Tax Rates % Rates Extension Rates % School 23.311 0.16396 24.034 County 42.640 45.840 City 25.495 0.00726 26.944 Spec Tax Dist 8.825 9.837 HRA 0.512 0.546 TOTAL 100.783 107.201 #284/Wayzata-Watershed 43 2011 Referendum Rates 0.17801 0.01032 4281 Robbinsdale-Watershed #0 2010 2011 2011 Referendum Tax Referendum Rates Extension Rates 0.22881 0.00726 Rates 34.387 45.840 26.944 9.172 0.546 116.889 #281/Robbinsdale-Watershed #7 0.17801 0.01032 2010 2010 Referendum Rates Tax 2011 Referendum Rates Extension 28.621 Rates School 28.621 County 42.640 City 23.495 Spec Tax Dist 8.138 HRA 0.512 TOTAL 105.406 4281 Robbinsdale-Watershed #0 2010 2011 2011 Referendum Tax Referendum Rates Extension Rates 0.22881 0.00726 Rates 34.387 45.840 26.944 9.172 0.546 116.889 #281/Robbinsdale-Watershed #7 0.17801 0.01032 2010 Tax Extension Rates % 2010 Referendum Rates 2011 Tax Extension Rates % 2011 Referendum Rates School 28.621 0.22881 34.387 0.17801 County 42.640 45.840 City 25.495 0.00726 26.944 0.01032 Spec Tax Dist 8.825 9.837 HRA 0.512 0.546 TOTAL 106.093 117.554 School County City Spec Tax Dist HRA TOTAL 28.621 42.640 25.495 8.219 0.512 105.487 0.22831 0.00726 34.387 45.840 26.944 9.740 0.546 117.457 #279/Osseo-Watershed #0 2011 Referendum Rates 0.17801 0.01032 #281/Rcbbinsdafe-Watershed #8 2010 2010 2011 Tax Referendum Tax Extension Rates Extension Rates % Rates % 28.621 42.640 25.495 8.219 0.512 105.487 0.22831 0.00726 34.387 45.840 26.944 9.740 0.546 117.457 #279/Osseo-Watershed #0 2011 Referendum Rates 0.17801 0.01032 #279/Osseo-Watershed #8 School Market Value Rates, City Market Value Rates, Solid Waste Market Value Rates and the Market Value Homestead Credit are not figured into the Tax Capacity Rate Breakdown. The percentages of the referendums are listed to the right in the above illustrations. Solid waste fee -taxable market value were blended into other taxing districts for the 2010 payable taxes. 2010 Tax Extension Rates % 2010 Referendum Rates 2011 Tax Extension Rates % 2011 Referendum Rates School 22.381 0,21123 24.217 0.023032 County 42.640 45.840 City 25.495 0.00726 26.944 0.01032 Spec Tax Dist 8.219 9.740 HRA 0.512 0.546 TOTAL 99.247 107.287 School Market Value Rates, City Market Value Rates, Solid Waste Market Value Rates and the Market Value Homestead Credit are not figured into the Tax Capacity Rate Breakdown. The percentages of the referendums are listed to the right in the above illustrations. Solid waste fee -taxable market value were blended into other taxing districts for the 2010 payable taxes. C) m Izz, c © r� m cc ri N m c LP, r� Ln ai ry rli co ccS r1 x r° CO m m c C: Qj a lz:;� C7 c C7 r, 00 00 r n C) Ln Ln ri tia ti C C'l LD kc LLQ r; m m G L'1 C� M � 'NI r` 1l1 10 1 N cc C J 4 - o N M r- Ci Jx C3 CD r -i N N r -i C] r-# r'1 r-1 rf r-1 H C C U c 1+ } v v cc Ln fl ccy c Cl Ln C O N Ln c LFl n Ln Ln' N 00 C U7 c oc LD C Ln k. � ri < r" L7 cK H In .� .z ems... C1 FC C Q 4' C C C CJ m Ln Ill LLl CGi Ci04 C+ Yl tl T< rte. N N o Ltd ri L' CD C] m ,, M 0 C M G K, fl r Li L_ '�• "u n C e_ C- en r4 i fV 'p ri ' u C (5 x C ` 'Z: (L cz i CA q IniN C M C u _ m Lt) c N oc _ m c; O M L¢ m N Ln LO Cl !+'1 r -I C7 Cl NC) 1 t\ �, m .^ c e -I N Lll C) N N ri'1 LC Cil 0 cc C7 O r3 x p' W nJ O u r ' ` C- ct i °' U i v +=- C �_ Ll W C-1 r� m H M H m N � GC mM LL' cc Ln C1 n co M r -P o N M C m La r4 rl 10 r- 14 1;4- Lr, c -1 r -I c r- m rl to n r -i c, cc Ln w _ rl H N C7 N AGI H t --i ld G, r -i 1� OC -1 Q Cl kn C3 N C] �G t Ln � _ a.. CC1 06 Q N 06 CC C N N M m M lt::' m C; C) m Izz, c © r� m cc ri N m c LP, r� Ln ai ry rli co ccS r1 x r° CO m m c m L.^, lz:;� C5 N Ca ,� n L7 m m N M r- Ci Jx C3 CD r -i N N r -i C] r-# r'1 r-1 rf r-1 H N N N N N N N The following graphs show the distribution of tax dollars in each school district based on the same property value. The average sale price of 5359,000 for the 2010 assessment was used for the calculations, The worksheets demonstrate the actual tax calculations of a $359,000 valued home in each of the school districts. There may be some variation between watershed districts within the school districts. City of Plymouth 2011 Distribution of Tax Dollar Hopkins School District 270/0 Tax Extension. Rates TAX EXTENSION RATE Schcol District 41.133 Hennepin County 45.540 City of Plymouth 27.972 Miscellaneous 09.172 HRA 00.546 TOTAL 124.685 Pie Chartdaps include additional market value rates HRA Special Taxing District Schcol District 1% City ct Plymouth Gi_ ity of Plymouth Sample Residential Tax Calculation 2010 Market Value for Faxes Payable in 2011 School District #270, Watershed #0 Residential parcel with an assessor's taxable market value of: Tax CaDacity Calculation- Caiculation of Homestead Net Tax Capacity: Credit Rate to a max. of $304 at 76,000 of market value. 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = FES Tax Capacity Calculation of Non -Homestead Tax Capacity: $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Net Homestead Tax Due: 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 - 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = NHS Tax Capacity Pesidential Homestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Homestead Base Tax: Net Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity bate 3,590 X 1.06940 = $3,839.15 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0014699 = $527.69 = School Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Market Value Homestead Credit: Market value multiplied by the Market Value Homestead Credit Rate to a max. of $304 at 76,000 of market value. Market Value Declines after 76,000. Ends at 413,800. 359,000 X 0.00400 - ($19.30) = Homestead Credit Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Net Homestead Tax Due: S4, 354.48 = Total HS Tax Residential Nonhomestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Nonhomestead Base Tax• Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.06940 = $3,839.15 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0014699 = $527.69 = Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Nonhomestead Tax Due: '$4,403.73 = Total NHS Tax Difference between Nonhomestead and Homestead Taxes: $4,403.78 - $4,354.48= $49.30 = Difference City of Plymouth 2011 Distribution of Tax Dollar Wayzata School District 284/0 Tax Extension Rates TAX EXTENSION RATE School District 41.807 Hennepin County 43.340 City of Plymouth 27.373 Nl iscal laneous 05.172 HRA 00.546 TOTAL 125.338 Pie Chart does include additional market value rates Special Taxing District II hRA School District i% City of Plymouth Sample Residential Tax Calculation 2010 Market Value for Taxes Payable in 2011 School District #284, Watershed # 0 dentias parcel with an assessor's taxable market value Caoacitv Calculation: 59.000 Calculation of Homestead Net Tax Capacity: 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = HS Tax Capacity Calculation of Non -Homestead Tax Capacity: 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = NNS Tax Capacity Residential Homestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Homestead Base Tax: Net Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.06802 = $3,834.19 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0017773 = $638.05 = School Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Market Value Homestead Credit Market value multiplied by the Market Value Homestead Credit Rate to a max. of $304 at 76,000 of market value. Market Value Declines after 76,000. Ends at 413,800. 359,000 X 0.00400 - ($49.30) = Homestead Credit Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Net Homestead Tax Due: $4,459.88 1 = Total HS Tax Residential Nonhomestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Nonhomestead Base Tax: Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.06802 = $3,834.19 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax -- Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0017773 = $638.05 = Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Nonhomestead Tax Due: $4,509.18 ' = Total NHS Tax Difference between Nonhomestead and Homestead Taxes: $4,509.18 - $4,459.88 = $49.30 j = Difference City of Plymouth 2011 Distribution of Tax Dollar Robbinsdale School District 281/0 Tax Extension Rates TAX EXTENSION RATE School District 57.559 Hennepin County 45.844 City of Plymouth 27.973 Miscellaneous 09.1.72 HRA 04.°16 TOTAL 141.09 Pie Chart dces include market value rates. City of piyr;-;OUt;, Speciai Taxing District C% Hennepin County Schcoi District City of Plymouth Sample Residential Tax Calculation 2010 Market Value for Taxes Payable in 2011 School District #281/Watershed # 0 Residential parcel with an assessor's taxable market value of: 5359,000 Tax Capacity Calculation: Calculation of Homestead Net Tax Capacity: 1st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 — 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = HS Tax Capacity Calculation of Neon -Homestead Tax Capacity: 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = NHS Tax Capacity Residential Homestead Tax Calculation. Calculation of the Homestead Base Tax: Net Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.18571 = $4,256.70 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0023172 = $831.87 = School Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Market Value Homestead Credit: Market value multiplied by the Market Value Homestead Credit Rate to a max. of $304 at 76,000 of market value. Market Value Declines after 76,000. Ends at 413,800. 359,000 X 0.00400 W (S49.30) = Homestead Credit Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Net Homestead Tax Due: L55,076.21 = Total HS Tax Residential Nonhomestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Nonhomestead Base Tax: Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.18571 = $4,256.70 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0023172 = $831.87 = Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36,94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X O.00COOOO = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Nonhomestead Tax Due:55,125.51 j = Total NHS Tax Difference between Nonhomestead and Homestead Taxes: $5,125.51 - $5,076.21 = _ $49.30_] = Difference City of Plymouth 2011 Distribution of Tax Dollar Osseo School District 279/0 Tax Extension Rates TAX EXTENSION RATE School District 47.210 Hennepin County 45.840 City of Plymcuth 27.973 Miscallanecus 09.172 HRA 00.546 TOTAL 130.74 Pie Chart does include additional market value rates Hennepin County Special Taxing District 1% HRA City of Plymouth School District City of Piymouth Sample Residential Tax Calculation 2010 Market Value for Faxes Payable in 2011 School District #279 Residential parcel with an assessor's taxable value of: $359,000 Calculation of Homestead Net Tax Capacity: 1 st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = HS Tax Capacity Calculation of Non -Homestead Tax Capacity: 1st. Tier (500,000) = 359,000 X 0.0100 = 3,590 Balance Over 500,000 = 0 X 0.0125 = 0 Total Market Value = 359,000 3,590 = NHS Tax Capacity Residential Homestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Homestead Base Tax: Net Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.07298 = $3,852.00 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0022993 = $825.45 = School Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax: Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0001029 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Market Value Homestead Credit: Market value multiplied by the Market Value Homestead Credit Rate to a max. of $304 at 76,000 of market value. Market Value Declines after 76,000. Ends at 413,800. 359,000 X 0.00400 = {549.30} = Homestead Credit Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multiplied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Net Homestead Tax Due: $4,665.09 = Total HS Tax Residential Nonhomestead Tax Calculation: Calculation of the Nonhomestead Base Tax: Tax Capacity multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 3,590 X 1.07298 = $3,852.00 = Base Tax Calculation of School District Referenda Tax: Market Value multiplied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.0022993 = $825.45 = Referenda Tax Calculation of City Referenda Tax; Market Value multipied by the Referenda Rate 359,000 X 0.000102.9 $36.94 = City Referenda Tax Calculation of the Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee: Market Value multipiied by the Solid Waste Fee Rate 359,000 X 0.0000000 = $0.00 = Solid Waste Fee Total Nonhomestead Tax Due: $4,714.39 = Total NHS Tax Difference between Nonhomestead and Homestead Taxes: $$4,714.39 - $4,665.09 = $49.30 = Difference TAX RATES FOR PAYABLE 2011 City of Plymouth Commercial & Industrial Effective Tax Rates School Sewer 1st 5150,000 Over 5150,000 & District District Preferred Class Nan -Qualifying 270 SO 1 1 VVS 0 2.6558% 3.4884% 270 SO 1 / WS 7 2.6616%fl 3.4962% 279 SD 3&4 / WS 0 2.7188% 3.5449% 279 SO 3&4 / WS 8 2.7238% 3.5515% 281 SO 1 &4 / VVS 0 2.8083% 3.6640% 281 SO 1 &4 / VVS 7 2.8142% 3.6717% 281 SO 1 &4 / VIS 8 2.8133% 3.6706% 284 SD 4 / VVS 0 2.6649% 3.4904% 284 SO 1&2 / VVS 3 2.6789`'/0 3.5091% 284 SO 1 &2 / VVS 7 2.6707% 3.4982% 284 SO 1&2 / WS 8 2.6-099% 3.4970% Apartrnent Effective Tax Rates School SEWER "A" Property Type "HL" Property Type District District 270 SO 1 1 VVS 0 1.520% 0.975% 270 SO 1 1 VVS 7 1.528% 0.980% 279 SO 3&.4 / VVS 0 1.575% 1.041% 279 SO 3&4 / VVS 8 1.582% 1.045% 281 SO 1 &4 / WS 0 1.703%0 1.118% 281 SO 1 &4 / VVS 7 1.711% 1.123% 281 SO 1 &4 / VVS 8 1.710% 1.122% 28.1 SD 4 / WS 0 1.520% 0.987% 281 SD 1 &2 / VVS 3 1.540% 0.999% 284 SO 1&2 / VVS 7 1.528% 0.992% 284 SO 1&2 / VVS 8 1.527% 0.992%a NOTES: Vacant commerciallindustrial land (LC, Ll) have same tax rate as improved properties. All the school districts have additional market value rates included in tax rate. Solid waste management fee is included in all rates (applied against market value). U) LLJ X LU .J Am z h¢® p C7 N C.) CN O N 'g O N O O U O 0 0 Q [} CICU CEJ UMI UCU U C o a z o 0 0 0 00 `moo oZ oo q' a oQ =o 0 0¢ � u -i tO ..- a `Z �' R r N .- OS �T N V O m Cli O m td N ti W O cc] M u'1 nq C3 Q O M O VS SD to q m — n M m N nq J m Op cD d0 V rn C] til q SCC '- M1 K] m N Q l0 O tel' rn: 1 1'- u'i Q S m Cp OS r N m Vf CO _ CO O r cy c� y) rD qp O r t m V] 1.[� n o[] C O r CIL t") O Wm m Qi 0 0 2 r N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m M V V Q v v a v VS �n. �!] Cel CD CO M1 M1 m OS O O N C*! n Q 4 Z 4��m� R N �D t Cl'1 d Q m m n N M r VS r Cfl 9q N V' cD d Q rn m n c d W O r N N Q �t M CL) m i� O rn r a N •^ V CD n n cpl �' m O r r- Vl M V a8 N L n uJ CCI rn VS r N T N m u-! (C) rn "J A Ol p a at rn m m [CI t ei t0 m M1 A C9 O m C? m Q !d1 cD at A IfJ N [O m O O CO tO N '=C1 M rn VS O } Cn < C-) Q r N N N N Cv N N N '] �! m M (�} M m V Q Q d' V' V a uy Cl'1 Cp CC] n M1 aD rn CO g O - rn N M Q U Cn en Ca Cfl O � N V' *13 - N t� N M1 N �-O CLI V} O tC7 O V (T 4 CT Q a0 a"1 W m A N A N VJ -� CB � Cil V) A OS OS 2 p Z r N m Cl} M N OS r M1 CV m OS N V tD ap h n rn r N A m O7 N V (O !� F- m al rn r V cfJ N cr'i Ol ,- Q m Q O n Ca 61 .-- L`7 r eT Cil N m CSl r st [L] fD sn Q at r N m O) rn JT MJ rn rn A N al rn m rn O rn al r m m C3 O r o O O N V 'CO N Vl rn m R g c aC'I a1 m n �_ 'V m N C]S m M1 r T OO N ti] d C•"! R m CC'p M1 al aT rn Ol OS al t1. rn rn Gl a W _ /3 N Q C9 Omq OM1 O N M O C rn 6 O O Q IQ ti W OS O N_ M Ch CQCS M1 tT OQ M1 M rn m M C i N c[l rn R u') N O m 0c M Q U O= •T N N N N N N N N m m M m m ['i m V V C V a a a V! «S CD Ca M M1 flq OS O_ O_ N M 2 Q U O to ® T m o Mi tT N c'! c m O r N V Qt] !D np Q of g 4 N M Ct) rn Q 7 i.O m CT N a] r VS e0 N m S N M to Le m u) Q m Q m m N r m pl A 60 Q m M Cl)m m m C�`5 M Q a Q Q Q <l Q l V il 1J ll] VS CO m Cb n m m rn O r N Q ~ ~ N X X O CYp n v.Cl r N "] M m v V t(! VS CO CO CD A A M1 m v0 m rn d CC] O 9 c O r m tO O N N 4q rn — m m CLS CO m C1.1 1J ct O V ['a'1 N m N Q CO R x f=1 a= N N m — [+Qu c ® N N N N N m m M M m m m v +C' c a Q a Q �P! fp t0 K8 R oq nq Os 6 r N Q _ ' LO CO CO tZ) aq V M1 d AJ q LQ m"i m N O G6 tD C+1 '� s� CD rn r M 'ST ill _ �, 4 � m V CA ti m rn r CV u'1 CCS ry O OZ r r r .- � .- � N N N N N CV N M cri ^) M m m m �'] Q V Q V a st Q sll v] tlp V) tp Ciy Cp A W CO OS O r •-- N V r N Z X O A 1 r CD V} �C-! ,CJ u7 7 e Q V m M m m m N N— CV N r r r O r r W 7 Q Cn N VS m m N CL1 d m cG 4 C m N CO O Q aq N CCl O Q N CL} .-- O V O¢ CO N 0¢ M d CJS C71 C^] S: CP Ca tip N m T m C"i S41 ii- N r rp Oq e.0 M M1 m N m en f~ll 0= N a i.0 Ciq O m V ti'! A -ct{V M a a C', U O Cwi N N N N N N N N [+] m m m m Q� Q +'1- Q V a V) u] VS CLR Cd) p M1 Fn W al O N V CM1n C7 `� 4' CV �- Q m C5 N Q n LO CO •- a) QS Q N O aq N tLl N CLS O cla C7 rn N Q M1 V] R r G CO O— a> Q m N :D O m M aA OS m aq N CO A N aq O M SS [il VY O O o cry A q N a _ M !J? r N Q sCl cD m Os .-- N m � <D 3 O e- N [moi tPJ iD ab dl O N .T! 4] (t3 O t"'A b-� O Il'} N N N m m M M m m Q V Q 1 m cn Z D h t- X'it 'V nq V5 O N M M o] c Q M Cb VS m^ '.'J R W C4 W Ol d O CV m m Q V to 'tl to R M1 - Cn p 4 r r m N iO O N Vp rn a g a OI m Cq !] M _ N if] R rn r C m Q Ci"] �' _ _ m C] r M W M v Q rn CO M1 c' CSS rn C OS CV M 4 rn V) a4 m rn Ol V O] r N V rn c V7 R Ch . CA a C] O N 9 M u3 Vi c¢ O M1 N m M1 Pq O O Vp M 6q rn M1 �T rn CO v u] q CCD N N rn CLP LCSU C x r N N N N N N N Cis m m m m m m V a Q a V Q 11 uP +n Cl') VS CD la CO M1 M1 A m rn¢ CV c2 Va d II U rn w Q m O m �D M1 .� rn VS O N O a® c N �+ rn 4 O N V tO M [�- M1 rn — N O t a CO Vp N T W 6 N til V l0 m n W rn �-- t m O Q a - ] N m Cs] N Ca 0 m V] N orq O !ll r CO N R �] M O t7 O Z r o O m R O N a` Cl] _ Oq a] r r N N V N N VS_ _ N N Cp T— N N N m m V VT s*I m M srQ MJ C+1 rn r C'i a N _ Q a V7 CD Q a nq O V V .-- N alJ VS m C!] Vf VS M d V1 CLS C"1 R Co CGS d n R CJ's n M1 m iD V) al 6 m N r N O] CO m V] r r r r r X Q V m c+1 Q SCS CC) cn m R nq 61 rn O 'r N Q Q *O CD A [O CO rn O O -- N m Q V) +=f) N tD O m N O Vi r Cc3 n m ® I� ? N t¢l3 M M r+] N Q Y"! A amCl O CC3 CQj Q CQO r rn O N m �_!Q'1 [�O m OOi V A OM1 M '� o N V COL` OS d cl 11 -1 Cid 4 M Cti O VZ awl CmO Md'! N rn l0 ZS-� r hl VSO CFS r� On M A +-- VS m m CU N Clp Ca Q N !O O c O] M A trl m fn r O V OS IlF rn M1 O V! 4 Ct] Cp m J Ya O ='m M1¢ N 7 VS � cp OS r N M =t1 [LS :t rn r N � M CU rn O N m VI Cp R ml o 6 N m C'k Vi ID rn M CO O� C [l A L cLl St M ., o] -Z 0 d O CCt O L] Z 96 '� F Q � r in NY X � m � VSO m V A m cO N n m Ci3 v n m aq N M1 CO CO N R N rA N n m N A Ci0 N m Cb N 3 aO LQ: Jq m N R Oq CO N M1 aq rn N A [JS OS N OS OS N A Ol aF N rn V N al [O ql Q rn n C] M1 m V O Cn VS CC! O Vl OS o f i) xzi N Cll A rn r N _ CC] n a0 C� r M V_ iD A eil O 'N N c`! to cp QS r N V V]. O r rri c[s c'! m lD O Q at A CQ st c'] r ap Cff N U O z r N CV N N N N CCi M m m m m m V V B V Q Q m O r N C+p sh 0 0 c N Srpo m .n :-1 :+1 to rYl f-:-. r '1m :n 4 A m La pl mall R �n i rn Nm N Qo MN .+q vo LLJ Nm -r r� C•3 [b ipN ea5 RUN- N CJ np Arn al M1 o� m s - �m OA O O 2 t'ip (O QS N m V: Cb aq b N M L VS CO Cq O N 4 to C{S n rn O r N V tC) [6 rn C3 m ttp OS N f0 O ] M .-- m Q rn T o N d d Z h4 L W N H i- � X U fA � VI O M N� tfi N y c A N t r v N i c Cb A N r CCS A N N IA V! Dl •Q N ecl C.q OS m CD - W O CCS M M1 m O c [dJ r A CO Y e0 V) VS q m N� vl O a4 �C'1 N N Cll A N til eA rn rn R O c� CL1 N m SCS ta'! cq �� VS C+] ^1 m yl,' 7 CJ M aq rn r ry m tf) l= T-- O) O r m cF Cn n ap O � N� V) ti] m rn O' _ N m Q tis CO O M M OS N SD O sb tfi M »_ Q O? QU O= r N N N N N N N S'} M MC-} C'] Ch m C+1 a Q Q Q Q cl V Lri V) tri V] C.O tip R C) Cpl 9 O N O r o r m Ca'1 [YMl CMS CQD rn -ti Q 41 N Q m N �[J F- O N VS oC] C7 Coq 1S] ry® m N S m tO al r N M VS f0 R W O r J c+s i[} CP w aq O r N V 15 M R rn m V) O .- r C'�! Q cR'1 (m0 tC} lc a tel- WM'p O e+J M rn N] Cs C m q m ¢zdi Com'! r m Rt' Q al © r N N N N N N N N C"1 m m [Mi M M m m Q Q Q +3 V a st 'VS Vf Cll Ccl CP CLS R M1 m a) O O N M Q m < CD ~X, C [S f- Vl O m .r2 M ct m m m Cri m M a0 m m m M otl m �"' O m Q al V V rn V rn Q Q CT Q al CO N M1 N K CLS d a Cd M n '•(] 'o Q si m— ai') 9D N Ci fl O •� r N C.O ;h v rn ['h .rl � C6 m o m n — t.l O Q c sir _il. .- �o V CC] a a !!'J � � N v_ eo VJ mN c7 R Oq � rn O q M co CO m o ao C31 Vl zn rq N C — m V' .a rn U © = l M - C] m V V Q a V V C' +.i'J Y] Y] Cf7 C8 CD 3` f� W CT o O CV iii a cs uJ en m C3 S m 1J Q ZT N all A O m Vl Cq T N R O N m g M n OS r Maaq3yi1 aQVlS mNzal+5 OM1aCl�l mrCp M[VL1 QCrnD Cnrnb VNprna OCOrnLaS O_4ali O6 ,1ONCil Tc] 1G�l 2O�[]!S V m — VS rn N CO CJS n O tl' r oq N st) 6! Com] CmrnVp) - C11 Qlj r m Q m — Cp ai'] N OS CO rnQQ O C U h W 7} O ¢t � S S N ST 9 63 3] �_ C�3 m '.Ci [D oC Cn Q N N N A N N N N N M m c uY nS of r N 11 alJ CC 6: ih C +. 4 r3 M1 r oq C L) sr m r Gl O6 - f3 t7 N V C U cU/) w YL N Q N M1 Ca m d3 o S m t£i aS r_ N II C"1 V1 Cp M _ cq O r N m U'] T ClIq Q P- I C+i O W C+1 n6 Q 3 C !. n 40 rn g q N N 1- m C4 W R S O (nV V m O Q R b c CD .M1 rn'] Q Cp ClC7 r d- M Q _ i` VJ m m OS N�& � N CQV C'+) V} CQ rn to r~ N CO O p T m '— M M rn V V] CO W 6 N 6 c] V' Cry M 61 CCp cV CP g N m O n Q O . m '!� O N p O C M �' CO CO 3 G H U Cl7 l.*Y — LU d 0 0O O¢ oo ¢¢ g q p 6 'm <> 0 0 Op O O O0C7OqO O OLl Q p p p qq 0 0 OO 0 0 6d 0 0 OO O O OO ¢¢ OO Q p O¢gC�Qq O p C3 O O O OO po O 4O O p O000 6 0 O O OO W O O 0 0 0 0 at 0 0¢ O C3 p O O OO Q O O¢ q. p p at 0 O O O O O O O¢ ¢ �] C3 p d p 0 0 O O O O XLU SiD O :t'f 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 p p O 0 o G4 C 'ci d p O O' o 0 C, 0¢ Q C C? c. eC7 C, Cn O Cn O O O C7 0 0 0 0 O r N m Q V] to n m rn O Q VS CO A Cg iZl _O O N M 'a CO N m m g N Cx) R p N C!'J p V) O V!' 0 0 0 W � 3 r N NN N N N N N m m m m M M M m m m Q' Q Q Q acp Cry Vi tp m A A W OS O N C3 -p Co Q] H C7 EQ'NQ� a E o@ r E a a 2 0 0 u7 U G U 4 N O Ln 4 Lo O 2 C7 N C.) CN O N 'g O N O O U O 0 0 Q [} CICU CEJ UMI UCU U C o a z o 0 0 0 00 `moo oZ oo q' a oQ =o 0 0¢ � u -i Ul a ri 'I. W WW y; c`S