HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1979-594CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, aregular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, inM'nneso`ta was7eTd on the
17th day of September , 1979 . The following members were
present: Mayor Hunt, C -ounce mem ergs haven o'rl, Neils and Spaeth
The following members were absent: ounc-ilmem er Hoyt
Councilmember Spaeth introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 79-594
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 803 & 815 - LANCASTER LANE OVERLAY AND TURN LANES
WHEREAS, by a Resolution passed by the Council on September 17, 1979, the
City Clerk was directed to prepared a proposed assessment of the total cost of
the following improvements:
Lancaster Lane from 36th Avenue North to CSAH 9 by the installation of
bituminous street overlay together with the replacement of damaged curb
and gutter, and median changes with turn lanes at the entrance to the
Four Seasons Shopping Center; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has
been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY,OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 9th day of October, 1979, in the
City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth
Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such
proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning
property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state
in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall
also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel
described in the assessment roll.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Neils , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor t ereo ayor Hunt, Councilmembers Davenport,
Neils and Spaeth
ine T0110w1ng votes against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was ,declared `dul