HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1979-296CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, inneM" rota wa�TFEid-on the
4th day of June , 19 79 . The following members were
present: Mayor hunt, ounce mem ers oyt, Re—iTs and Spaeth
The following members were absent: None
Councilmember Spaeth introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 79-296
APPROVING REQUEST BY JOHN KULLE FOR LOT DIVISION OF UNPLATTED LAND AT 1^515
36TH AVENUE NORTH (79029)
WHEREAS John Kulle has requested a division of unplatted land within the City
of Plymouth at 10515 36th Ave. N.-
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommended
approval;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, that it should and hereby does approve the following division for
the following reasons: 1) location of the property presents a uniqueness and
a hardship being bordered by a school on two sides; 2) there are special cir-
cumstances regarding the care and maintenance of the property; 3) lot area
exceeds Ordinance minimum. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make the
necessary special assessment corrections based upon City policy when the
division is approved by Hennepin County.
Land to be divided: Plat 43724, Parcel 4450, PIN 24-118-22-21-0002
Parcels created!. Parcel A - That part of the north 275.00 feet of the west
3-, of the northeast ; of the northwest %- of Section 24,
-Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
east of the west 418.00 feet thereof. Except the east
80.00 feet thereof; subject to an easement for road
purposes over the north 33.00 feet thereof.
Parcel B - The east 80.00 feet of that part of the north
275.00 feet of the west z of the northeast ; of the north-
west a of Section 24, Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 418.00 feet
thereof; subject to an easement for road purposes over the
north 33.00 feet thereof.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councji m r !�and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in avor t ereo : Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils
and Spaeth
Ine ToJrowing voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared dul