HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-729CITY OF PLYMOUTH •
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was he—Td on the
6th day of November , 1978 . The following members were
present: ayor Hunt. Councilmembers Hoyt Neils Seibold and Spaeth _
The following members were a sent: None
Coouncilmember Neils introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 78-729
ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF
OLD COUNTY ROAD NO. 9
WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S.A. 414.851 Metram Properties Company, the developer of
Four Seasons Shopping Center, has petitioned the City Council for a vacation of the
following right-of-way for old County Road No. 9:
That part of Hennepin County Road No. 9 in part of Section 13,
Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west-
erly of the northerly extension of the westerly right of way of
Lancaster Lane, as platted in Plymouth Plaza 4th Addition, and
lying easterly and southerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the northerly lot line of Lot 4, Block 5,
Plymouth Plaza 2nd Addition, distant 46.35 feet westerly of the
northeast corner of said Lot 4 (said northerly line has assumed
bearing of N 88026'06" E); thence N 41033'47" E. a distance of
58.50 feet more or less, to the south line of Hennepin County
State Aid Highway No. 18, Plat 32; thence easterly along said
southerly line of C.S.A.H. No. 18 to its intersection with the
northerly extension of the westerly right of way of said Lancaster
Lane and there terminating.
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said Petition and found the same to be in
order
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that it should, and hereby does, establish the date of November 27, 1978
at 7:30 P.M. at the Council Chambers, Public Works Building, as the time and place
for the Public Hearing on said Petition and directs the administrative staff to
publish notice of said Hearing as provided by law.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
C�.ilwab Y , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vote .n avor t eTi rem: Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt. Neils,
�= Sei t�nl d and Spaeth
Tne roitowing voted against or abstained: None
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.