HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-568CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, M nnesota was he—Fd on the
5th day of September 1978 . The following members were
present: Mayor uA`nt, Counci mem ers Hoyt,Neils, Seibold and Spaeth
The following me ers were absent: None
Councilmember Spaeth introduced the following Resolution and
nova adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 78- 568
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 706 - 49th AVENUE
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 5 , 1978,
the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the
following improvements:
On 49th Avenue from Larch Lane to Zachary Lane by the installation of a 5?
foot wide, 7 -ton (gravel equivalency 15.5) bituminous street with concrete
curb and gutter and is to be so constructed so that additional bituminous
material may be placed to bring up to a 9 -ton street (gravel equivalency 24.75)
together with the necessary storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain
facilities and all necessary appurtenances.
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has
been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 2nd day of October, 1978 , in the
City Council Chamber of the Pub iT'c Works Building, at 149 3rd Avenue
North, Plymouth, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed
assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected
by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference
to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least
two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost
of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given
to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll.
Thetion for th adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Counc�lmember Neils 'and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vote in favor thereof-, Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils,
TheSeibold and Spaeth
0 ]owing voted againstapinst or a s a ne None
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.