HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-536Pursuant to due call
the City Council of
28th day of
present: Mayor in
The follow
*+f
• CITY OF PLYMOUTH •
and notice thereof, a ct,, meeting of
the City of Plymouth, nN(f n—ed�w s e on t o
August 19 78. The following members were
int, CouncmeiTir ers Hoyt; IQeils and Spaeth
rs were
•t*
:ft
founcilmember Spaeth introduced the following Resolution and
moved Its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 78 - 536
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PROJECT 506 - T.H. 101/COUNTY ROAD 6
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 19, 1978, the City Clerk
was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving the
following improvements:
T.H. 101 between T.H. 12 and approximately :000 feet North of County
Road 6 as well as the intersection of County Road 6 and T.H. 101 by
the installation of sanitary sewer, v3termain, storm sewer, 9 -ton
bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and traffic
signal installation with all necessary appurtenances.
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has
been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE) BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 18th day of September, 1978 ,
at the City Council Chamber of t e Public Works Building, 14900
23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to pass
upon such proposed assessment and at such TTm—e ain place all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given
an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state
in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall
also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel
described in the assessment roll.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Ho t 'and upon vote being taken thereon. the
following vote n favor thereof: Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils
and Spaeth
TMe following vo against or abstained; one
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly parksoU and adopted.