HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-402\i
WITY Of PLVMO "
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. a special meeting
the City Council of the City of Plymouth. Minnesota was a on t e
day of Jun , 19_M. The following members were
present: Kay2r Haunt oun i
The follow na members were absent:
of
•rr rrr rrr
kou%ilmember 5@ibold introduced the following Resolution and
mrved Its adoption;
RESOLUTION NO. 78-402
APPROVING ALIGNMENT FOR C.S.A.H. 61 AND C.S.A.H. 10
AND ALIGNMENT OF PINEVIEW LANE TO C.S.A.H. 47
WHEREAS. the Plymc:uth City Council has considered improvements to Pineview
Lane (Project 702) ►shirt, project contemplates the realignment of Pineview
Lane as it intersects with ;.S.A.H. 47, and
WHEREAS, the developers of the Maple Grove Center have requested a determination
of the alignment of C.S.A.H. 10 as it abuts their proposed development, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously requested the Hennepin County Department
of Transportation to propose alignments for C.S.A.H. 61, C.S.A.H. 10 and the
intersection of Pineview Lane with proposed C.S.A.H. 61 and existing C.S.A.H. 47,
and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Transportation has prepared a proposed
alignment study for C.S.A.H. 61 - C.S.A.H. 10, said study dated June 23, 1978.
and
WHEREAS. the City Council has reviewed said study copy:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA that the Council of the City of Plymouth hereby approves the proposed
alignment for C.S.A.H. 61 and C.S.A.H. 10 as outlined in the study dated June 23,
1978 with Alternate A for a portion of the C.S.A.H. 10 alignment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED `h.at the proposed alignment of Pineview Lane to C.S.A.H.
47 be tentatively approved subject to additional final engineering studies by
the City's consulting engineers, which studies shall be made in conjunction with
the Hennepin County Department of Transportation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the previous approval of this Council for C.S.A.H. 10,
dated April 16, 1974 and approved by Resolution No. 76-310, be and the same is
hereby superseded to the extent it conflicts with the June 23, 1978 study.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vo n favor thereof'. ftygr Hunt- Ceun-ilmamhPrc Hnvt Nailer
10 Seibold and Spaeth
TFW-Tollowing voted against orabstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly pa%s*d and adopted,
rrr ttrr ••'�'