HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-250CITY OF PLYMOUTH •
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a reaula meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota wasineld on the
1st day of May , 19j�L. The following members were
present: Ma or Hunt ounce me ers Hot Neils Seibold and Spaeth
The following members were absent: Aone
Councilmember Neils introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION #78-250
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLYMOUTH STATE BANK FOR BANK IN I-1 ZONE (A-815)
WHEREAS, Plymouth State Bank has requested conditional use permit approval to operate
a banking facility within an I-1 zoning district, specifically on the north side
of Highway 55 at Industrial Park Boulevard, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommended denial;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should, and hereby does, deny the request of the Plymouth State
Bank for a conditional use permit to operate a banking facility within an I-1 zoning
district, based upon the following findings:
1. The use fails to meet the criteria set forth in Section 9, Subdivision 3 of the
. Zoning Ordinance dealing with conditional uses alloable in an I-1 (Planned Industrial)
zoning district.
2. The proposed use is incompatible with the industrial district in that the activities
of the use entail traffic by the general public into the industrial district.
3. The proposed use is incompatible with the industrial district in that the hours
of business of a bank will extend beyond those of most I-1 uses thereby introducing
traffic and the general public into the I-1 district during hours when said traffic
and activity should be minimized for security purposes.
4. Financial institutions are permitted uses in B-1 and B-2 districts and permitted
by conditional use permit in B-3 districts. Substantial platted and serviced
acreage exists in the community with these zoning classifications upon which
such a use is clearly contemplated by the Zoning Ordinance.
5. Approval of the petitioned conditional use permit would be contrary to Goal B.
Objective 4, Criteria 3 of the adopted Goals, Objectives and Criteria, with
respect to grouping of commercial and industrial uses.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Hoyt , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
75TT6winq voted In ravor thereof; Mayor Hunt, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils._
The following vote against Counc'
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,