HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1978-041-CITY OF PLYMOUTH -
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a reqular� meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth. Minsen ota was held on the
16th day of January , 19 78. The following members were
present: Mayor Hunt. Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils, Seibold and Spaeth
The following members were absent: None
Councilmember Spaeth introduced the following Resolution and
move its a option:
RESOLUTION NO. 78-41
ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
PROPOSED RIDGECREST ADDITION- PROJECT NO. 829
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Quaker Lane, Orleans Lane, 31st Avenue, 30th
Avenue and 29th Avenue, all within the proposed plat of Ridgecrest Addition,
legally described as:
All of that part of Lot 2, Auditors Subdivision No. 333, lying North
of the plat of Lake Park Acres except highway and,
All of Lot 1, Subdivision No. 333 except the South 216.3 feet of the
East 101 feet thereof, and
The West 330 feet of the North 642 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township 118, Range 22
with sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, 7 -ton bituminous street with concrete
curb and gutter and required connections to existing trunk sewer and watermains,
and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111 (Laws
1953, Ch. 398, as amended), and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above described land have submitted a petition for said
improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
that the proposed improvement be referred to Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates,
Inc. for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient
speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improve-
ment is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Seibold , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vote n favor thereof, Mayor Hunt Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils.
The 0 ow ng voted against orabstained: T.
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly -Fa%sed and adopted.