HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1975-4621W 1W
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meetinil of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was heYd on to 25th � day
of August , 1975 The following members were pry<.cnt.�
Mayor Hill,- Councilmen Neils, Sei¢g_ld and Soaeth
hefolla,iing menbers were absent: Councilman Hunt
Councilman Neils introduced tho following ResoluC .:s and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 75-462
CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSEII ASSESSMENT
PROJECT NO. 401 NORTHEAST TRUNK SEWER MAIN
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 18th day of August, 1975,
the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving
the Northeast Sanitary Serer Interceptor between points 5 to 5C, 5C to 6 and 6
to approximately 4000 feet north (approximately 49th Avenue North) as shown in the
report on the Comprehensive Sewer Plan for Plymouth and Supplement thereto dated
July 22, 1973, Alternate B, and the Lancaster Lane Lift Station and Force Main,
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. A public hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of September, 1975 at the City
Council Chambers in the City Public Works Building, 14900 23rd Avenue North
at 7:30 p.m, to pass upon the proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least
two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of
the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the
owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilman Seibold , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: -Mayor Hilde, Councilmen Neils, Seibold
and Spaeth
The following voted against or abstained: none - —
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and a upted.