HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1975-203CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held—on the qday of April
19 75 . The following members were present Acting Mayor Spaeth, Cnimrilman Nails
The fo owing members were absent Mayor Hilde and Acting Mayor Hunt
Councilman Seibold introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption.
RESOLUTION NO. 75-203
DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
PLYMOUTH FREEWAY CENTER
PROJECT NO. 518
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a petition dated April 21, 1975 from the developers
of the Plymouth Freeway Center for the installation of streets and utilities for the Plymouth '
Freeway Center Addition,
WHEREAS, said petition waives all rights to public improvement hearings and special
assessment hearings,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
• 1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of the streets in the Plymouth Freeway
Center Addition (legally described as that part of the NWU of the SWh of Section 22,
Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of State Trunk Highway':;
No. 55 and westerly of Interstate Highway No. 494 and westerly of the east line of the
west 48.88 rods thereof) by the installation of sanitary sewer, water main, 9 ton
bituminous streets with concrete curb and gutter and necessary storm drainage facilities,`
filed with the Council on April 21, 1975, is hereby declared to be signed by the
required percentage of owners of the property affected thereby. This declaration is
made in conformance to the Minnesota Statutes Section 429.035.
2. The petitioner waives all rights to public improvement hearings and special assessment
hearings.
3. The petition is hereby referred to Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc.
and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the
Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and
as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in conjunction with some other
improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
4. The cost of said improvement is to be financed from the construction fund. f'
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilman,
Neils, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Acting Mayor Spaeth, Councilmen Neils and Seibold. The following voted against or t
abstained: none. Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i