Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 08-26-1997 Special08-20-97 09:12AM FROM CITY OF MAPLE GROVE TO 5095060 P002/003 CITY OF MAPLE GROVEICITY OF PLYMOUTH JOINT CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1997 MAPLE GROVE COMMUNITY CENTER ROOM 129 * * i 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order by Respective Mayors 2. Introduction of Council/Staff Plymouth and Maple Grove i i3. Lawndale Connection Gerry Butcher 4. Future Joint Fire Station — Dick Phinney i i 15. Water Main Interconnect — Gerry Butcher I i i 16. Future Development of South/Southwest Maple Grove Miscellaneous Discussion Adjournment Tour of Community Center THANK YOU FOR WORKING TOGETHER 08-20-97 09:12AM FROM CITY OF MAPLE GROVE TO 5095060 P003/003 The City of Maple Grove Directions to Maple Grove Community Center MAPLE GROVE COMMUNITY CENTER Address: 18961 Weaver Lk Rd Same as Co Rd 109) i Maple Gro,4e, MN Postal Code 55369 Information 494-6500 AUL N A FromtoutheNorth: Go on I-94, wdt onto Weaver lake Road (County Road 10). Go east for 6 Blocks. Maple Grove Community Center is on the south side of Weaver Lake Road and east of Cub Foods. Go South on Hwy 169 or Hennepin County Road 81 and turn west onto County Road 109 same as 95th Ave N). Go 3 miles wort on Co Rd 109. Maple Grove Community Center is on the south side of roped 1 block **at of Cub Foods. i From l e South: Go nort A on Interstate 494. At the I-94 / I-694 interchange, follow 1-94 to the northwest. Turn east onto County Idoad 109 (same as Weaver Dake Road). Go east on Weaver Lake Road for 6 blocks. Maple G-,ove Community Center is on the south side of Weaver Lake Road and east of Cub Foods. From the Ya" - GoGo west on Interstate 694. At the I-94 / I.694 interchange, follow I-94 to the northwest. Turn east onto County road 109 (same as Wrevor Lek• Road. Go oast on Wcavcr Lakc Road for 6 blockw. Maple Grove Community Center is an the south side of Weaver Lake Road and east of Cub Foods. City of MAPLE GROVE MEMO Fire Department TO: Mayor Burlingame and Members of the Maple Grove City Council Mayor Tierney and Members of the Plymouth City Council FROM: Scott Anderson, Fire Chief, City of Maple Grove Richard C. Kline, Fire Chief, City of Plymouth DATE: August 20, 1997 SUBJECT: Shared Fire Station Facility and Joint Operations Plan In the coming years, Maple Grove and Plymouth will each be faced with the need to provide increased emergency fire/rescue/hazmat services in the southwest and northwest areas of our respective communities. With the costs of providing such service increasing and the ability to recruit and retain volunteer firefighters becoming more difficult, we have been discussing the concept of a shared fire station facility in our border area and enhancing our existing joint response plan to staff and operate this station. A shared fire station would ideally be located near the border in either community along an existing major collector street such as Vicksburg Lane or Lawndale Lane. This would enable quick travel time for volunteer firefighters from their homes to the station and quick response time for the fire apparatus from the station to the scene of the emergency. The cities would share the cost of acquiring the land and constructing the station. Each city would provide personnel and fire apparatus for the new station. With a shared station, rather than each city having to provide a staff of 20 firefighters, each could provide 10 and share response duties. With a shared station, rather than each city having to provide two engines and other miscellaneous vehicles, each could provide one engine and fewer miscellaneous vehicles. Currently, the two fire departments operate under an automatic mutual aid agreement whereby certain types of confirmed structure fires and rescue incidents automatically cause both cities to respond with personnel and equipment. We also operate a joint hazardous materials response team. Operations at a shared station would be an expansion of the present operating procedure where both Plymouth and Maple Grove fire personnel would respond to calls in either city in these border areas for any type of fire call assigned to this station. The present supervisory structure would be expanded with officers from both departments managing the personnel. Before committing any further staff time on this project, we are requesting guidance from our City Councils. Does each City endorse this concept of a shared fire station? How do you wish us to proceed?