HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1973-185VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting
of the Village Council of the Village of Plymouth, Minnesota, was
held on the 21st day of May, 1973. The following members were
present: Mayor Hilde,. Councilmen Hunt, Spaeth and moils
The following members were absent: Councilman Seibold
Councilman Hunt introduced the following Reso-
{lotion and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 73-185
WHEREAS. Robert G. Roderick and Wallace B. Black, owners of Lots 11 and
12, Block 4, Greentree Forest Second Addition, have requested a further divi-
sion of said lots under the ordinance provisions of the Village of Plymouth,
and
WHEREAS, the Village Council has now determined that the division of
said lots, all of which contain less than five (5) acres, would not interfere
with the purposes of the Subdivision Regulations of the Village of Plymouth,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH as follows:
1. Compliance with the provisions of Section 462.358, Subdivision 40
Minnesota Statutes, and Chapter VII of the Village Code as related
to the division or consolidation of platted lots is hereby approved
with respect to the following described parcels:
PARCEL A
Lot 12 and that part of Lot 11. Block 4. Greentree Forest
Second Addition, lying northeasterly of a line drawn from
a point the west line of said Lot 11 distant 122.97 feet
south of the northwest corner of said Lot 11 to a point on
the north line of said Lot 11 distant 60 feet east of said
northwest corner of Lot 11.
PARCEL B
Lot 11, Block 4, Greentree Forest Second Addition, except
that part of Lot 11 lying northwesterly of a line drawn from
a point the west line of said Lot 11 distant 122.97 feet south
of the northwest corner of said Lot 11 to a point on the north
line of said Lot 11 distant 60 feet east of the said northwest
corner of Lot 11.
2. The Village Clerk is directed to prepare a certified copy of this
Resolution for recording purposes.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was
duly seconded by Councilman Spaet.1 , and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor