HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing & Redevelopment Authority Packet 09-27-1982p
f
5'
f
AGENDA
PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Regular Meeting
September 27, 1982
6:30 P.M.
I. Roll Call
II. Approval of Minutes for August 2, 1982 Meeting
III. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Budget for 1983
IV. Staff Response to HUD's Management Review of Plymouth's Section 8
Program
V. Metropolitan Council's Housing Development Assistance Program
VI. Latest Subsidized Townhouse Project in Plymouth
VII. Subsidized Housing Distribution in Plymouth
VIII. Housing and Social Issues
IX. Adjournment
331• II
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2600
MEMO
DATE: September 23, 1982
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale.
SUBJECT: HRA Budget for 1983
On September 20, 1982 the Plymouth City Council held a public hearing to
review the 1983 City budgets. Part of this public hearing involved the matter
of the HRA's 1983 budget. On October 4, 1982 the City Council intends to take
action on adopting the City budget and consequently woulJ like the HRA's input
prior to that action.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Memo to City Council, 9-17-82 (portion dealing with the general fund and the
HRA's budget, ie pages 1, 2, 3, 6)
3. 1983 Budget (3 sheets)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55541
TELEPHONE (614'4 558-2800
DATE: September 17, 1982
MEMO
TO: Mayor 6 City Council
FROM: James C. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1983 PROPOSED CITY BUbGETS - PUBLIC HEARING
A.
6.
SUMMARY: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing on the
proposed 198) City Budgets for September 20, 1982. The purpose of
the hearing is to provide the public with an opportunity to express
their views with regard to the proposed 1983 City budgets. A copy
of the proposed 1983 budget document in its entirety is available
for inspection at the City Center during normal business hours. It
is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing and
consider further study of comments at upcoming budget study
sessions.
It is the responsibility of the City Manager to annually propose
budgets for City Council consideration. The proposed 1983 budgets
were submitted to the City Council on August 23. Subsequently, the
Council has held two public meetings to study and review the pro-
posed budgets. These budgets are the vehicle by which the City
allocates financial resources to achieve public program goals and
objectives for our community. To that end, the budgets as policy
tools seek to allocate the available fiscal resources in a fashion
which most effectively meets the dwnand for local services in our
growing community. A summary of each of tta: proposed 1981 City bud-
gets is shown below. Where apprcpriate, summary sheat; from the
budget documents are attached for in'rotwation purposes.
I. General Fund
The General Operating budget finances all genes,, q8;,-rnr,&t
services and is supported in large measure .hy property 0XV.S.
Of the proposed $5,011,375 budget, 686 or 0,420,160 would, be
raised through property taxes. Table 1 below portrays- % e
N
WENDRAMDUM
September 17, 1982
Page 2
various revenue sources which support the City's general fund
budget. As can be seen, :he two major sources of fundinq are
property taxes and state and federal aids. Pages 1 through 3 of
the General Fund Budget Summary (attached) provide a more
comprehensive picture of the City's revenue sources.
Table 1
Revenue ources for 1983
General and udget
Property Taxes
683
Stet*/federal Aids
14%
Other
6%
t.kens*s 8
3 4% 5%
Penults
Charges for wmM
Fines 8 Penalties
arvke
Pages 4 and S of the General Fund Budget Summary, identify the
various activities and expenditures in the general fund. A more
graphic portrayal of the activities contained in the qeneral
fund and level of funding devoted to each is shown in Table 2.
The greatest expenditure area of this budget is for the provi-
sion of public safety services. Public safety, including
police, fire, fire inspection and civil defense, represents
almost 40% of our expenditures. Another 24% is required to
deliver public works services, including street maintenance,
snow and ice control. Planning and Building Inspection repre-
sent only 6% of the expenditures while the remaining 32% is
IIEMi#iMdDUN
September 179 1982
Page 3
split about equally between Park and Recreation, Administration,
Financial and Legal and Fixed City Costs.
Table 2
1983 Expendit— uBy Activity
Public Safety. '
Police, Fire, C.D.
Public 38X
Works
tax
I Admin„ Finance.
10%
OtMrV1;,2
l
Park i P&G.
Plan
FixedAcoat.
6% po
The 1963 General Fund Budget as proposed would levy property
taxes at the maximum amount permitted by the state legislature
under levy limitations. Table 3 shows the comparative level of
property tax support in various public agencies. The City
requires only 12.10% of each property tax dollar in School Dis-
trict #281. The school district requires some 5-3.6%, and
Hennepin County 28.5%. While these figures will vary for each
school district, the City's portion of each property tax dollar
does not exceed 16%.
Table 3
1983 ,10roject— e istribution
of EachProperty Tax Dollar
School District sit
83.6%
Hennepin County
28.696
Vocational School
1R• 1.5%
Plymouth
12.1%
MENCRAHDUM
September 17, 1962
Page 6
SHADE TREE (Cont.)
Expenses
Personal Services
Materials 6 Supplies
Contractual Services
Total Expenses
IV. Housing 6 Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
2893()0
29931
141,714
172,945
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority was created by the City
Council in 1976 for the purpose of exploring ways to improve the
availability of housing for all segments of our population. In
1963, the HRA will administer 72 Section 8 rental assistance
program units, as well as provide for rehabilitation loans and
grants. The General Fund property tax required to support the
proposed $309,139 budget is $209044. The balance of the funds
required to provide the services of the HRA programs comes from
federal agencies.
NRA
Revenues
Taxes $209044
Administration fees 309495
Section 8 Rent Assistance 1659000
Housing Assistance 579600
Home Improvement Grant - COBG 369000
Total Revenues $3099139
Expenses
Personal Services $329776
Materials 6 Supplies 11855
Contractual Services 2749258
Capital Outlay 250
Total Expenses $3099139
V. Water Fund
We anticipate revenues from residential and commercial accounts
will amount to $846,545 in 1983. The water fund is a public
utility and is not supported by property taxes.
108
R
W9WCITYOFPLYMOUTH Z
HOUSING $ REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SUMMARY OF REVENUE
tz FOR THE YEAR 1983
A UGUST .20
1981 1981 1982 Received 1982 1983 1983 1984
Revised Actual Revised As Of Est. Est. Managers Projected
Bum Revenue Bum 5-31-82 Revenue Revenue Est. Rey Buuddget,
Taxes Receivable
Current Ad Va 1 orem 142693 14,748 172011 7,088 179911 209044 201,044 21,826
Total Taxes Receivable 14,693 149748 170,011 79088 171,011 209044 209044 21,826
Other Revenues
Home .Improvement Grant -NWA 0- 69000 0- 0- 0- 0- 0-
Administrative fees 261,827 251,521 100985 139817 289400 301,495 301,495 32,477
Sect 8 Rent Assistance 176,334 1809340 2009000 879708 2109500 1659000 165,000 175,725
Hous. Assist./Land Mritedonn 0- 0- 871,461 801,806 919417 9,000 9,000 99585
Nous. Assist./Other 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 48,600 48,600 51,759
Home Impr. Grant - CDBG 47,850 299788 361,800 30,600 30,600 369000 36,000 38,340
Total Other 251,011 235 649 3699246 212,931 360,917 289,095 2891,095 307,886
FUND TOTALS 265,704 2509397 3861,257 2209019 3779928 3099139 309,139 3299712
108
R
PTymouthcityof
GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET
For the Year 1983
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY i UG U3 D
Fund Activity
702 -- 702
1981 1981 1982 Expended 1982 1983 1983 1984
Revised Actual Revised As Of Est. Reqstd Managers Protected
Budgetet Exp Budget 5-311--82_ Ex trs Budget Bum Budget
PERSONAL SERVICES i
601 Regular salaries.... 26,623 259892 309792 139813 309036 329531 329531. 349646 `
603 Overtime............ 250 266 312 132 229 245 245 261
3
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 26,873_ 26_158 31.104 13,,945 30_265 329776 32- 34_
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
F. 701 Office Supplies.... 347 577 19039 173 562
35
601
37
601
37
640
39 '
702
703
Print S Publish....
Postage...:........
56
223
35
278
35
206
6
102 268 286 286 305
704 Xerox .............. 755 755 823 295 805 877 877
54
934
57751Photography........ 67 0- 50 0- 50 54
s' TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 1,448 1,645 2,153 576 10720 10855 1,855 1,975
x CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
802
803
Legal ..............
Audi t
1000
29021
0-
0-
1,000
29000
0-
0-
0-
0-
500
2,000
500
29000
533
29130 ;
810.30 Low moderate housing
0- 0- 87,422 0- 91,417 9,000 99000 99585
810.31
assistance........
Home improv. grant. 479850 249835 421,800 159321 30,600 36,000
489600
36,000
489600
389340
519759
810.32
811
Other housing asst.
Emp. 8 HRA training
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0-
0- 650 650 692
813
abesubscription
0-
50
0-
70
50
70
0-
0-
50
70
54
85
54
85
58
91
816
824
Dues
Liability insur.... 1,934 29133 2,089 501 2,089 2,235 2,235 29380
825
826
Gr life ins........
Gr hos Q ins........
114
700
171
1,060
314
1,272
39
390
15
1,122
123
1,201
123
1,201
131
1,279
827 Workers Comp...... 1,434
2,041
412
1,418
576
1,694
179
579
473
1,634
506
1,748
506
1,748
539
1,862
828
829
PERA...............
FICA 1,111 1,715 29020 696 1,956 2,093 2,093 29229
831 Lg term disb....... 212 257 407 129 354 379 379 404
832
z7
Dental ins.........
Rent. assist.-Sec.B
277
176,334
304
180,340
419
200,000
138
819108
406
210,500
434
165,000
434
1659000
462
175,725
j 109
Fund Activity
702 -- 702
Ci tji of Plyinout
I `
ry , ^
GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET
For the Year 1983
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUSt '20
1981 1981 1.082 Expended 1982 1983 1983 1984
Revised Actual Revised As Of Est. Reqstd Managers Projected
B d e t_ T _Bud et_ 5-31-82 runAtre Raid . _Bud e.t_ Bud e_tu
110
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES (Cont)
838 Rent City equip.... 1,358 1,358 1,467 657 1,467 1,570 11,570 19672
839 City Center alloc.. 0- 0- 19710 743 1,710 29080 29080 29959
899 Reserve 0- 0- 71,690 0- 39495 0- 0- 0-
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 236,436 214;17'3 353,000 1079080 347,458 274,258 274_ 258 292_,830_
DEPARTMENT TOTALS 2642757 241,976 386,257 121,601 3799443 309,139 309.139 3299712
FUND TOTALS 264757 241,976 3869257 1219601 379,443 3091,139 3099139 329,712
110
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
MEMO
DATE: - September 22, 1982
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale
SUBJECT. Response to HUD's Management Review of Plymouth's Section 8 Pr6ptam
At its last meeting of August 2, 1982, the HRA Commissioners directed
staff to inform the HUD Area Office of•the corrective actions staff would be
taking to comply with HUD's Management Review findings and to indicate "target
dates" on which those corrective actions would be accomplished. As well,
staff was directed to determine what were the uncleared findings of the previous
Management Review Report and then make recommendations to the HRA at its next
meeting.
In compliance with these directives, I have initiated the establishment
of target dates for each corrective action for the June 1982 Management
Review. In addition, I have determined what are the uncleared findings from
the previous Management Review.. I also established "target dates" for each of
these items. In a letter I have drafted to the HUD Area Office, I am providing
target dates for all uncleared findings.
Attached is a draft letter to the HUD Area Office indicating our response
and the target dates by which corrective actions will be taken.
Attachment:
1. Letter to Thomas Feeney
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
DATE: ' September 21, 1982
MEMO
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale, Associate Planner
G
SUBJECT: The Housing Development Assistance Program Workshop of , ember 15, 1982
On September 15, 1982 the Metro Council staff held a workshop to explain to
Community Development staff people and other interested parties their new
Housing Development Assistance Program and to introduce the "team" from their
staff that would be involved in this program. Nancy Reeves, Director of the
Housing Division of the Metropolitan Council, gave a summary of the program's
purpose and stated that, in her discussion with other community leaders, they
indicated a desire to have "affordable housing" in their communities, but
stated that there were three problems:
I. 'There was inadequate staff, insufficient time and lack of expertise.
2. There was a lack of financing.
3. There was a problem with neighborhood acceptance with affordable
housing.
To meet this challenge Nancy stated that now the Metro Council has accomplished
the following objectives:
1. They have a seven member Housing Assistance Team comprised of Metro
Council Housing staff people.
2. They have joint bonding power to aid in financing projects.
3. The Metro Council approved "an affordable housing assistance program,"
information packet to help educate the "masses".
Phil Cohen, aide to Senator Durenberger and former Brooklyn Center Mayor and
Metro NRA member, then introduced four members of the Metro Council staff who
have, during the past summer, worked in the private sector for one month to
obtain some "hands on" experience in the "real world".
The first person to relate his experiences in the private sector was Guy Pet0son
who worked with a bonding company. He stated that he found out that every c,i(T—
a
HRA Commissioners
September 21, 1982
Page two
program required a different approach/solution to make it work. He said there
was no "cookie cutter" approach. The next person to discuss her role was Joanne
Barron who worked with Orrin Thompson homes who is the largest single family
o builder in the Metro area. She said they sell most of their homes to
first time buyers and she interviewed all the sales people in that firm. Wayne
Nelson worked with Bois Claire Corporation He stated that he worked on the
foT wing aspects of one project:
1. The development objectives.
2. Market feasibility.
3. Preliminary feasibility analysis.
4. Preliminary design work.
5. Financing options.
6. Market analysis.
7. Design and design review.
The last member of the "team" was Chuck Ballantine who worked with Northland
Mortgage Co. He stated VI t the mayor pro em that this company has is dealing
with high interest rates but that it is still possible to produce affordable
housing, although it does require a considerable amount of work to provide the
end product.
After the above individuals had related their private sector internship experiences,
the materials in the information packet were reviewed by various members of the
Metro Council staff. There was little deviation from the packet itself and the
information that was presented seems to have some applicability.
In all, I would say that it was one of the better workshops that the Metro
Council has put on. Although the subject was not brought up at this meeting, it
is my understanding from an earlier meeting I attended with Metro Council that
there would be no charge to communities for most of the services that Metro
Council staff would offer. On September 15, 1982 I contacted Chuck Ballantine
with the Metro Council staff and he confirmed that this would still be the Metro
Council policy, however he also indicated that a charge for staff services would
depend, to a considerable degree, on the time drain on Metro Council staff. In
light of this, I would suggest that we could develop some related housing program(s)
where we perhaps could employ the use of Metro Council staff's input.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: September 22, 1982
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale
SUBJECT:
Latest Subsidized Townhouse Project in Plymouth
Recently the City of Plymouth was informed by the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) that the Mission Oaks townhouse project completed its
mortgage underwriting process and its initial closing. Completion of the
project is scheduled for March of 1983.
The project will consist of 26 family townht-use units on an elongated
site in the north portion of the Mission project. Access is on to County
Road 9 near Goldenrod Lane. There are to be 15 garage units and 44 surface
parking spaces. There will be 1 two bedroom handicap townhouse, 17 two bed-
room townhouses and 8 three bedroom townhouses. All townhouses will be
rental units with 30% of the eligible family's income to pay for rent. This
is a Section 8 New Construction project and it will be managed by an on -the -
site manager. The City HRA staff will not be involved in the selection of
tenants, however, as with Kimberly Meadows and Willow Woods Estates, I will
be recommending families now on the Plymouth Section 8 program who are
experiencing over -crowding to the management company.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. City Council Resolution no. 82-354
4. Letter from James Solem, 8-16-82
a
oil/ND IyiNIJ. Ol fit.. , - • • • ..,
fiu7wdliA4m Ot4i E riOW vYl+,ic.1 '' „„ • •ftAti
08
lRJ/ICR: GROWN ,M ' /''.' "'-r++ ....0 - • - /rt ON O
m vas ^
IR r - \ •, , ' ..•. „r„ .,, 7-q- 8Z
IST 31 i1 . , ,/• •• • ` - -
l` '•
1pap GROW"
dad
fir 0•M* /
M i / , , v _ 1
a •'
j r
r
a•i ,; goo `
r.
Jim
Ivor~-
Oe
tip
1 / •
IIS / • • , / _-- .
eta comW
WAS
I / 1
ax
dcp
in
fn
1
I
1
1
r r i i ` 1 r• .
vpme
0'. , j' ,• ., ,
dw
06
ei
AJ
OIL
Ae
r
f / /
yf /
i•
r /I ' :
EIS '9
r • . 1 :
IAyENU
CITY OF PLYMffH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City CounciloftheCityofPlymouth, Minnesota, was held on the — 19 day of Sul 1982.
The following members were present:_ Mayorave enport and ounc rs Moen,
Hells Schneider and Threinen
The following gii5e`rs were sent:
i
000
ir
Councllmember Hells introduced the following Resolution and moved its
opt on:
RESOLUTION NO. 82-354
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR FILING TO AND REGARDING FINAL PLAT AND SITE PLAN FOR
MISSION OAKS FIRST ADDITION" AND "MISSION OAKS" FOR MISSION OAKS PARTNERSHIP(R.P.U.D.
76-1) (A-338)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Final Plat avid Development ContractforMissionOaksFirstAddition" as requested by Richard Zejdlik for Mission Oaks
Partnership;
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested approval of an R.P.U.D. Site Plan for the first
phase of a multiple family development, "Mission Oaks" consisting of g, dwellinq units;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that is should and hereby does direct the followinq to be met prior to
recording of said plat and approve the Site Plan subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the Engineer's Memoranda for these projects; deleting item 22E
from the July 2, 1982 Final Plat memo.
2. A drive shall be projected at 41st Avenue North but shall not be used until
41st Avenue North is constructed to the west to County Road 9 at Larch Lane.
Until such time the only access shall be from County Road 9. Phase II will
have access to 41st Avenue North by this driveway only.
3. The screening for the trash enclosures shall be in compliance with the
Ordinance criteria.
4. Payment of Park Dedication Pees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the
City policy in effect at the time of filing the Final Plat.
5. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City for trail purposes with appropriate
credit toward Park Dedication per the Policy in effect at the time of
filing the Final Plat.
Ll
Pago 2
Resolution No. 92-
6. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to eamply with the required number of
plantings per the Landscape Policy, ur a survey verifying the existing
trees which meet the minimum size and type of plantings as specified in
the Landscape Policy shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Building
Permit. The site shall be sodded and seeded in accordance with the City
Landscaping Policy. The intention of the landscaping at the south, side OF the
parking lot abutting 41st Avenue is to screen the lights of cars and the lot
from the homes on the south side of 413t Avenue; and the plantings and berm
contours may be adjusted, if necessary to achieve the ordinance required
screening of 90% opacity.
7. The total number of units for the "Mission Oaks First Addition Phase I"
shall be twenty-six per the Site Plan staff dated and stamped approved.
The maximum number of units to be constructed in Phase II shall be forty-six
units.
S. Development of Phase II is subject to Ordinance requla ions for PUD Final
Plan approval.
9. Appropriate legal documents shall be approved by the City Attorney and
filed with the Final Plat providing for the shared access driveways, and
parking between the phases.
10. Compliance with Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the filinq
Of applicable covenants and other documents governing control and maintenance
Of common areas.
11. Setbacks shall be approved per Site Plan staff dated and stamped approved.
12. Fourteen (14) outside electrical outlets on posts shall be installed in
the parking areas in proportion to the parking stalls.
13. Required Site Performance Financial Guarantee and Agreement shall be suh-
mitted prior to Issuance of Building Permits; and costs of the construction
of the proposed play area shall be included In the quarantee provided by the
petitioiier for on-site developments.
14. Approval includes a variance from the Ordinance covered parklrq require-
ments; there shall be fifteen garage units, two of which may be used for
storage of equipment.
15. Storage areas with outside access shall be no less than 30 sq. ft. for all
two-bedroom units.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Counciimeaber Moen , and upon vote beinq taken thereon,
the following voted n favor reo :_ ouncllmembers Moen, Neils, Schneider,
Threlnen, and Mayor Davenport
The ming voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
August 16, 1982
r:Z UG
V
18rA1982
r u1!y 01 FlyricudI .
The Honorable David Davenport
Mayer of Plymouth
City Hall
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
RE: MISSION OAKS
Plymouth
MHFA #81-016
Dear Mayor Davenport:
3•
r.
A. 3g
C MVV w.&& a
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is pleased to inform you that it has
completed the mortgage underwriting process and an Initial Closing has occurred
on Mission Oaks, to be located at County Rd. 9 and Evergreen Lane. The Initial
Closing was on August 6, 1982.
The developer is Richard Zejdlik, and the development will contain 26 family
housing units. The development will utilize Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) Housing Assistance Payments funds provided by HUD through
Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Tenants that
qualify for Section 8 assistance pay no more than 30% of their income toward
rent with the Section 8 subsidy funds making up the difference between the
tenant's portion of the rent and market rent of the unit.
Completion and occupancy of the development is tentatively scheduled for March,
1983. The management company responsible for the initial marketing and
management of Mission Oaks is Redevco, Inc. If you have questions regarding
eligibility requirements, please contact the management agent at:
331 - 2nd Avenue No.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
612) 341-2886
The management agent will begin marketing activities approximately three months
prior to completion of construction.
The Agency is looking forward to the successful completion of this development.
Thank you for your continued cooperation in support of providing low and moderate
income housing. If you have any questions, please contact Mary Ruch, Housing
Development Officer, at 296-3029.
Si nc ,
J es olem
Exe tive or
cc:/Blaire Tremere, Planning Director
Redevco, Inc.
t -net S+. ;:gut. 'Minnesota 55101 (612) 296.7608
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
TELEPHONE (612) 550-2800
MEMO
DATE: September 23, 1983
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM, Milt Dale
SUBJECT:
Subsidized Housing Distribution in Plymouth
Staff has put together a map showing subsidized housing distribution in the
City as of August 1982 and two tables showing the members of subsidized family
and elderly housing opportunities in three comparable communities, Plymouth,
Minnetonka and Edina. The two communities of Minnetonka and Edina have a
contract with the Metro Council for the Section 8 Existing Rent Assistance
Program, however Minnetonka has only 5 certificate holders and Edina has only
2 certificate holders as of August 1982. The rest of the subsidized.family
housing opportunities in Chose two communities are in 3 townhouse projects
in Minnetonka and 2 townhouse projects in Edina.
It is apparent that Plymouth has, so far, achieved a better distribution of
subsidized family housing opportunities than the other two communities while
the City is considerably behind the two communities in the matter of subsidized
elderly housing units.
Attachments:
1. Map of Subsidized Housing in Plymouth as of August 1982.
2. Tables of Family Subsidized Housing Opportunities in Three Communities and
of Elderly Subsidized Housing Opportunities in Three Communities.
1.
I ...
SUBSIDIZED HOUSING IN PLYMOUTH AS OF AUGUST 1982
L E G E N D•
s Z4
One Section 8 Certificate Holder in a Market Rate Apartment, Duplex or House
40
A Section 8 Now Construction Townhouse Project (Number shows how many subsidized
CITY OF c
units project)
A Section 8 Nati Construction Townhouse Project (Approved but not yet constructed)
A Section 8 Now Construction Apartment Project where 20% of Tenants
receivePLYMOUTRC3Section8SubsidySitePurchasedforFutureSubsidizedHousing
I BF II Etiitill il tfa IfiiI
1lB11Dti 1 tl llt1 11lSlB6i0eitl ElObi!il tilfsl9!li 8lt:f!ltll al t ilol s t i=g
1' . •.r
ir.—ra•v-
00,
r r
s •
L1 , ( ... .• i
I.Y. ::; / • // "
AW '
ii" ,• I Gr` •
26
1 .
w
la
I1"Ar 139 •pad ,
wil.• a +• F.. '`
1 1 ' (• /.
6
i .. . VIf
40
48
w •
i ' .. _ . - ' ••: •.,
off, ,,
r !
s -
1
le.
n'L
STREET BASEMAP = =:«--
Note: Symbols are in general proximity of specific unit or site.
S
r
SUBSIDIZED FAMILY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
F
i
IN THREE COMMUNITIES
Sept 1982 # of Sept 1982 Ratio of
Community 1980 Census 1980 Census Subsidized Family Subsidized Family Units
Population #/Households Units to Total Households
Plymouth 31,615 10,491 182 1:58
Minnetonka 38,683 12,667 145 1:87
Edina 45,114 17,961 118 1:152
SUBSIDIZED ELDERLY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
IN THREE COMMUNITIES
Community Aug.1982 # of 1980 Census Aug 1982 Ratio of
Subsidized Elderly Population Over Subsidized Elderly
Units or Elderly Age 62 Units to Total
Sect. 8 Certificate Households
Holders
Plymouth 17 1,437 1:617
14innetonka 14J 3,224 1:90
Edina 365 8,234 1:49
CITE -,OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHGNE (612) 559-2800
DATE:
MEMO
September 23, 1982
TO: HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale
SUBJECT: Housing and Social Issues
In the July/August 1982 Issue of the Journal of Housing coraments were made
by Abner Silverman which I believe will be havingsome application to the
Plymouth subsidized housing situation even though his comments relate pri-
marily to public housing projects. At present there are three subsidized
housing projects in Plymouth with a fourth scheduled for completion in
early Spring 1983. With a total of 153 lower-income families on four
project sites, meeting the 'non -housing" needs of these families may
become a more critical issue in Plymouth during the 80's.
It is my opinion that the use of local people and resources to help improve
the opportunity for social and economic advancement for poorer people is
the best course of action. The comments by Mr. Silverman address some of
these social issues in a constructive way. (I especially endorse h:s co:nrnents
relative to HUD manuals')
Attachment:
ournalof Housiny article
July/August Issue, 1982
OWon & Comment Journal ofHousingp
Former Asst.
Commis8ioner,
U.S. Public
Hou8inq
Agency
Abner D. Silverman
Subsidized Housing
It is axiomatic that housing serv-
ing low- and moderate -income fam-
ilies assisted by public subsidies
should be managed to serve the
public interest. It is argued that
the public interest is served if a
low- or moderate -income family is
rehoused in a decent, safe, and
sanitary dwelling at a rent within
its financial reach. This is one of
the purposes for which subsidies
are made available. But to limit the
public interest to providing shelter
alone is a narrow view of subsidized
housing purposes and a failure to
capitalize on their potential.
There is a view that the greatest
return on the nation's investment
in subsidized housing will be
achieved when program operations
provide, in addition to housing, op-
portunities for underprivileged
families to improve their health and
living standards, and motivation to
develop the maximum capabilities
they possess or can acquire. This
broader view of the public interest
is reflected in the social goals for
public housing which were enunci-
ated by the Public Housing Admin-
istration on March 22, 1968.
This is a far different sense of
mission from that contained in the
Housing Act of 1937. The Decla-
ration of Policy of that act is set
forth in the following language:
it is hereby declared to be the
policy of the United States to pro-
mote the general welfare of the
Nation by employing its funds and
credit, as provided in this Act, to
assist the several states and their
102 Journal of Housing
political subdivisions to alleviate
present and recurring unemploy-
ment and to remedy the unsafe and
insanitary housing conditions and
the acute shortage of decent safe
and sanitary dwellings for families
of low income."
Public housers had, and cur-
rently have, one choice only. They
have neither funds nor competence
to deal with the serious behavioral,
mental, or physical problems of such
families. They cannot reject per se
families who are on welfare, moth-
ers with illegitimate children, those
with poor social histories or police
records. The courts have held that
the rejection of such families out of
hand, without evidence that their
admission to projects would rep-
resent a hazara to others, is a
violation of due process. Public
housing agencies, unlike unsubsi-
dized private landlords, do not have
the right to be arbitrary or capri-
cious.
The 1968 social goals ran into
housing difficulties arising from in-
creased costs. As a consequence,
HUD adopted a performance fund-
ing program which severely re-
stricted the funds made available
to public housing agencies. The
Housing Act of 1974 created new
financial and social changes in the
low -rent housing program.
Looking at the public housing
program, one must recognize the
total restriction of the housing pro-
gram to welfare families. The in-
troduction of housing for the el-
derly, the program for housing the
Indian population, the use of short-
term private housing, the use of
Section 8 housing—all mark a total
change in the original occupancy
standards of the public housing pro-
grInrecognition of the changes in
public housing under local authority
control since 1937, there is great
need for a different package of serv-
ices now as compared to 40 -plus
years ago. In my judgment, these
are the needed services:
1—Money enough to maintain a
project and provide a suitable
physical and mental state of
health which will permit self -
development.
2—A sense that the "poor" are
being given a chance to shape
the world in which they live.
3-Security—both physically
against crime) as well as in
terure—so that they may de-
velop roots in their community.
4—Health services for adults and
children --Services that are ac-
cessible, where they feel wel-
come as respected patients, not
merely wards of the state.
5—Education to tweet their needs
for self-imptaaentetn so that they
can develop bwreased earning
capacity, if not for themselves,
as least for their children.
6—Recreational opportunities for
children and teenagers under
skilled swervision
The above costs money. Moreover,
no one can predict that such action
will correct conditions quickly.
At this period in society, the
attempt to meet all the needs of
public housing tenants is nearly
impossible. But. changes should take
place. There seems little advantage
in the use of Section 213 of the act
and the consequent limitations on
LHA action. There is evidence that
adequate funding has not been pro-
vided for security. With current
cost requirements, it would be to
the benefit of all public housing
agencies to spend their available
resources on improving the condi-
tion of existing projects.
It would be better if controls
were grid MIX milor Dm. -
grams -and violations become ma -
ers orstall concern. The s ecr c
oT o s in '
manus s are to rn a me t
rue the tee ec tv ne
ousE authorities. Althot gh there
as been a substantial reduction in
the need for housing since 1930,
there is still a need for some of the
poor to be given an opportunity to
develop social competence and hu-
man dignity.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: September 7, 1982
TO: Plymouth HRA Commissioners
FROM: Milt Dale, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Workshop on the Metro Council's Development Assistance Program
On Thursday, September 16, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., the Metropolitan
Council staff will be holding a workshop for local community
officials regarding ways that lower-income housing might be
produced in today's market.
I will be attending the September 15th meeting for community
development staff people.
A copy of the letter from Charles Weaver, Metro Council Chairman,
is enclosed. You may call Linda Milashius, with the Metro
Council, at 291-6472 should you care to attend. There is no
charge.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
0
MEMO
September 7,. 1982
Plymouth HRA Commissioners
Milt Dale,, Associate Planner
Workshop on the Metro Council's Development Assistance Program
On Thursday, September 16, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., the Metropolitan
Council staff will be holding a workshop for local community
officials regarding ways that lower-income housing might be
produced in today's market.
I will be attending the September 15th meeting for community
development staff people.
A copy of the letter from Charles Weaver, Metro Council Chairman,
is enclosed. You msy call Linda Mil•ashius, with the Metro
Council, at 291-6472 should you care to attend. There is no
charge.
August 23, 1982
4e
Aft
300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291.6359
T0: City Administrators, Planners, Community Development Staff
I am pleased to announce the formdtion of the Metropolitan Council's Development
Assistance Team. The team will be providing technical assistance to local
communities for continuing the development of lower-income and modest -cost
housing.
I invite you to attend a workshop on the Development Assistance Program on -
Wednesday, September 15, 1982. This will be an opportunity to meet tears
members and learn more about the program.
The realities of today's housing market require innovative financial techniques
and a greater involvement between the public and private sectors. Some
communities in the Metropolitan Area are producing housing using bonding, tas,
increment and other funding mechanisms. The Development Assistance Team has
been formed to help additional communities who would like to make use of these
techniques to provide affordable housing.
Team members include Housing Planning and Metro HRA staff who have been working
for several months to lay the groundwork for this program. This has included
Internships in the private sector, testimony to the Metro HRA Advisory
Committee on a wide variety of innovative housing programs and financing tools,
and the preparation of housing development materials.
The workshop will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Metrcpolitan Council Chambers. If
you are unable to attend, you are welcome at the session for local community
officials on Thursday, September 16, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. There is no charge or
formal registration for the workshop. Please call Linda Milashius at 291-6472
by Monday, September 13 if you plan to attend either session.
A few county HRAs are offering or planning to offer similar housing development
assistance. If your city is in the jurisdiction of a county HRA, you should
also contact the office regarding your interests.
I hope you can attend this informal session on the Development Assistance
Program.
Sincerely,
2
Charles Weaver
Chairman
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County riCarverCounty- Dakota County Hennepin County . RammeyCounty • Scott County - Washington County
An Equal Opportunity Employer