Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Packet 08-28-2012 Special
CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 28, 2012, 5:30 p.m. MEDICINE LAKE CONFERENCE ROOM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. TOPICS A. 2013 Budget and 2013-2017 CIP B. NW Area Infrastructure Funding C. Major Street Funding Options D. Yard Waste Site E. Trail Gap Study F. Set Future Study Sessions G. Update with City Manager 3. ADJOURN Special Council Meeting 1 of 1 August 28, 2012 rp)City of Agenda 2APlymouthNumber: Adding Quoliry to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Dave Callister, Administrative Services Director August 28, 2012 Item: 2013 Budget At the August 21 Special Council Meeting, Staff reviewed the proposed 2013 budget with Council. As a result of the meeting, there were several items that require follow up or further discussion including: Contingency for Health Insurance Increase (Page 7 of budget binder) — The City currently carries health insurance for its employees from BCBS through a local government consortium. We have received a preliminary estimate that premiums are expected to increase substantially for 2013. Therefore we have placed an additional 100,000 in the contingency portion of the general fund budget to pay for the City's portion of the increase. Historically, the City and the Employee have split the premium increases 50150. If the increases are reduced or the City elects to obtain health insurance coverage elsewhere, we may be able to reduce the contingency amount this Fall before the final levy is adopted. 2. Mayor and Council salaries (Page 12) — Plymouth City Code, Section 205 specifies that there shall be automatic salary adjustments following each municipal regular election. All adjustments are calculated using the U.S. Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers. Since the 2010 and 2012 increases were declined, the automatic adjustment as calculated from 2008 is 8.03%. The Mayor and Council have several options to consider: Accept the increase Accept the same percentage increase as the employees receive for 2013 Decline the increase and keep the current salary structure 3. Uniforms — There was some confusion at the August 21 meeting between uniform purchases and uniform laundering. The total uniform purchases proposed for 2013 is reduced from the $82,985 stated last week, to $53,485. This includes all departmental line items for this category including those not in the general fund. 4. Water Fund rate increase (Page 132) — Per the December 2010 Rate Study (attached), a 3% rate increase would result in budgeted revenue increasing $174,674 in 2013. 5. Sewer Fund rate increase (Page 141) —Per the December 2010 Rate Study, a 2% increase would result in budgeted revenue increasing $142,020 for 2013. The Utility rate study will be updated in 2013 with potential adjustments implemented in 2014. Page 1 6. Water Connection Fee (Page 135) — This item is paid to the Minnesota Department of Health for our water supply connection. The drinking water service connection fee was established in 1993 to help fund program activities related to compliance with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. 7. Water Resource Fund - Curb Raising and Work (Page 137) — Based on the discussion generated on this issue we have attached the following documents for your review: Council Memo 2/9/2001 Council Memo 6/4/2001 Plymouth City Code Section 725 — Storm Drainage Systems Timeline of Events There are three options to consider for placement of this budget item: 1. Water Resource Fund 2. General Fund (levy impact) 3. Street Reconstruction Fund (recommended) 8. Highway Median Maintenance Memo — See attached. 9. Cash Flows for capital funding — See attached. 10. Tax Impact History —Due to differing increases/decreases in market values for different classes of property, the tax burden affects different classes of properties differently from year to year. In 2011 Commercial/Industrial (C/I) properties were not reduced in value as much as residential properties. In 2012, the tax impact was again shifted from C/I to Residential mainly due to the implementation of the Market Value Homestead Exclusion. In 2013 it appears that there will be a small shift from Residential to C/I due to C/I properties increasing in value by 3.8% and residential properties continuing to lose some value. Change Change Change Property Type 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 Residential -5.7% -2.1% -4.4% Residential Lakeshore 8.1% 5.2% 1.5% Condominiums 9.7% 5.5% 10.4% Townhomes 6.1% 3.2% 5.8% Apartments 8.5% 0.1% 11.1% Commercial/Industrial 4.3% 3.7% 3.8% Please remember to bring the budget materials that were distributed for the August 21 Special Meeting to the August 28 meeting_ ATTACHMENTS: Utility Rate Study Water Resource Fund Background Information (4 items) Highway Median Maintenance Memo Cash Flows for capital funding Page 2 City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life Water & Sanitary Sewer Utility Rate Study December 2010 Prepared By: Finance Division Page 3 This page intentionally left blank Page 4 Introduction This utility rate study was completed to update the financial projections for the water and sanitary sewer utilities. The purpose of this rate study is to ensure the following: Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing operations, capital improvements and to maintain adequate cash balances. 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of these utilities to users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. Background The City has maintained a comprehensive long-range capital improvement program for many years focusing upon replacement of existing infrastructure and expansion for new growth. This study incorporates this plan in analyzing the future demands of maintaining the utility systems. The City's planning has resulted in very little debt for the utility systems. Only one bond issue is outstanding, a $13,140,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bond originally issued in 2004, with a remaining balance of $8,360,000. This bond will be retired in 2019. Assumptions The following chart summarizes the significant assumptions in the rate study. 2010 connections over -projected per Comprehensive Plan. Shifted half of excess to 2011 and half to 2012. 2Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index Page 1 , g Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility Growth New residential connections based on Table 3-3 of Comprehensive Plan: 2011-2012 - 215 per year' 2013-2015 -120 pe r yea r 2016-2020 -149 per year 2021-2025 - 122 per year Usage Usage per customer to remain steady. Operating Projections include increases of 3.8%2 annually to account for new demand and inflation. Expenses Capital Capital expenditures from 2010-2025 Capital expenditures from 2010-2025 Expenses estimated at $13.6M which is based on the estimated at $21.4M which is based on the City's Capital Improvement Program through City's Capital Improvement Program through 2015, and includes an inflation factor of 3.8% 2015, and includes an inflation factor of 3.8% for years beyond that. for years beyond that. Rates Projections in revenue are based on no Projections in revenue are based on no rate increase in 2011, 3.5% increase in 2012, 3.0% increase in 2011 and a 2% annual increase in 2013 and 2.5% in 2014. No projected thereafter through 2023. 3% increase in 2024 - increase thereafter. 2025. 2010 connections over -projected per Comprehensive Plan. Shifted half of excess to 2011 and half to 2012. 2Per the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index Page 1 , g Goals of a Utility Enterprise Rate Structure Water and sewer utility funds are reported in financial statements as enterprise funds, meaning that the charges for services are designed to cover the costs of operations. The Council should consider who should predominately pay for costs. While every community may weigh goals differently, the general goals of a utility rate structure are: Rates sufficient to cover capital and operating costs of the system Provide for adequate cash balances for cash-flow and contingencies Allocate costs appropriately to those that use the system Promote water conservation by charging higher rates for greater consumption Compliment the City's economic development goals Capital Needs The City has completed its Capital Improvement Plan (2011— 2015) which is incorporated into this rate study to ensure future capital needs are covered by the proposed rate structures. The CIP for the water and sewer utilities is provided in Appendix D, along with projected needs beyond the CIP timeframe. Water Utility Existing Water Fees The primary revenue sources of the water utility fund are usage fees, base, and demand charges. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water and primarily used to cover the costs of maintenance and enhancements to the existing system. In 2009, usage and base fees accounted for 88.6% of the water fund's operating revenue, and demand charges accounted for 5.9%. The following charts illustrate the relationship between the total residential and commercial customers in comparison to the amount of revenue generated by each: Water Utility Customers Revenue Sources - 2010 Budget Count, Percent) $4,845,4001 40,498, 75% \ 97.66% Residential Commercial imo$1,648,971 970, 2.34% 25% Although the customer base is primarily residential, over 25% of the utility revenue comes from commercial billings. Paged 1 `9' 9 e Base Charges are fixed monthly fees based on the size of meter in the home or business, and were established to recover expenses incurred regardless of the amount of water consumed, such as utility staffing and the billing system. The base charge in 2010 for all customers is $3.37 per month. Demand Charges are billed to commercial users with meters 1 %" or greater. Residential With a three -tiered rate system, the typical resident will pay more for water used for irrigation than they will for water used in daily activities. Most metro area suburbs have adopted a tiered rate system for the following reasons: To promote conservation efforts. To allocate costs appropriately to those who are generating them. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the heat of the summer. A tiered rate structure charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of over -sizing the system for peak days to the peak users. The Minnesota Legislature requires a conservation rate structure for all metropolitan area public water suppliers, who serve more than 1,000 people. A public water supplier must also have a conservation rate structure in place before the State will grant approval for constructing an additional well or for a request to increase the authorized volume of appropriation. The Department of Natural Resources has provided further guidance that an increasing block rate means that there is a significant increase between the blocks to encourage conservation, or at least 25% cost increase between the first two tiers and at least 50% more between the last two. The current and recommended rate structures are in compliance with these guidelines, as there is a 25.4% increase between the first two tiers and a 71.9% increase between the last two. Usage fees account for nearly 83% of the residential billings, with the remaining 17% coming from the base charges. Residential usage fees total around $4 million per year, while base charges bring in over 800 thousand. CnmmPrrinl The average commercial consumption over the past three years (2008-2010) was 798,687,963 gallons. Commercial businesses, industrial, and institutional organizations are included in this category. They comprise 25% of the City's total water usage. The following table shows the top 10 commercial water users which account for 31% of the total commercial consumption and 8% of the overall total consumption. Honeywell Minntech Corp Boston Scientific5cimed Inc United Health Group Hutchinson Technology Plymouth Business Center Regency Plymouth Ventures Providence Academy Lifetime Fitness Inc Hennepin County cuuy usage in canons 61, 288,147 51, 562, 288 25, 584, 671 20, 214, 600 16, 541, 300 16, 434,100 16, 335, 644 13,477,400 12,143, 000 11, 520, 000 In addition to the usage fees, commercial users also have the same base charge as residential and a demand charge based on meter size. Commercial base and demand charges generate approximately 450,000 per year. Approximately 72% of commercial revenue is from usage fees, 26% from demand charges, and the remaining 2% from base charges. This is an area of opportunity for further conservation efforts. Changing the commercial usage rate structure to a tiered system could help support the City's goals of conservation. The following chart breaks down commercial usage by size and type of meter. 2010 Billing Total Count' Usage Minimum Maximum Average Median 11/2" meter 295 117,442,534 130 933,320 34,675 15,000 2" meter 135 90,105,554 1,000 1,383,500 57,465 27,000 3" meter 51 94,730,444 100 2,328,000 167,665 64,000 4" meter 20 90, 730, 716 100 2,898,000 403,248 191,700 6" meter 3 16,488,000 10,000 1,404, 000 515,250 425,700 Regular meter 261 47,225,376 10 743,000 17,043 4,600 Irrigation 379 270,278,550 10 2,180,300 123,415 76,000 727, 001,174 11,350 11, 870,120 1,318,761 804,000 Total billing count is not the some as individual accounts, as many businesses have more than one meter. 2 Irrigation rate added in 2010. Usage based on 2010April-November billings. Considering the primary purpose of a tiered rate structure is to promote conservation, it is difficult to identify a natural break in usage to determine where waste may be occurring due to the varying sizes employee count) of the businesses. In addition, tracking of irrigation usage just started in 2010, prior to which it was flowing through as overall usage. The lack of irrigation history makes any kind of trend analysis difficult, as 2010 was a wetter year than the couple of years prior. Irrigation accounted for 37% of total commercial usage last year. Based on this, in addition to calls received from residents, it may be worth looking at the rate structure for commercial irrigation. Residential irrigation is currently on a two- tiered rate structure, yet commercial only has one rate, regardless of gallons. The concern expressed from residents is that the rate is substantially lower than what residents pay for usage over 35,000 and they see businesses using sprinklers when it is raining. To encourage conservation by the commercial customers, the council should consider either tiering or raising the commercial irrigation rates. The average commercial irrigation usage in 2010 was 123,415 gallons and the median was 76,000. A second tier over the median value would help reconcile the variance between commercial and residential charges. A third tier could be considered for extraordinarily high usage, such as those over 500,000. 51 Page Page 8 Current Water Rates The current billing structure is tiered based on consumption for residential and type of usage for commercial, with rates per 1,000 gallons as follows: Rate / 1,000aaI. Reaular Meter Irrigation-onlvMeter Residential 1.22 up to12,500gallons N/A 1.30 1.53 12,501 to 35,000 gallons up to 35,000 gallons 1.53 2.63 35,000 gallons 35,000 gallons Commercial 1.45 All regular usage N/A 2.63 1.81 N/A All irrigation usage Proposed Water Rates Based on the projections in Appendix C-1, increases would be needed in years 2012-2014 to maintain desired reserves in the water utility. The proposed rates are illustrated in the chart below. per 1, 000 gallons Proposed Residential Increases 0.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 0.00% in aallons 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 to 12,500 1.22 1.22 1.26 1.30 1.33 1.33 12,501 to 35,000 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.53 35,000 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 permonth Base Charge $3.37 $3.37 $3.49 $3.59 $3.68 $3.68 The affect of these rate increases on customers, by various consumption level are as follows: Projected Charges Gallons per Consumption Billing Level Period per customer, per month 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Light 10,000 15.57 15.57 16.11 16.60 17.01 17.01 Average 25,000 37.75 37.75 38.40 38.97 39.47 39.47 Above Avg 50,000 93.26 93.26 93.91 94.49 94.99 94.99 Heavy 90,000 198.46 198.46 199.11 199.69 200.19 200.19 Note: Projections are based on proposed increases to base charges and usage rates. 61 Page Page 9 permonth Proposed Commercial Increases 0.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 0.00% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Usage Fees $1.45 $1.45 $1.50 $1.55 $1.58 $1.58 Demand Charges 11/2" meter 41.91 41.91 43.38 44.68 45.80 45.80 2" meter 62.87 62.87 65.07 67.02 68.70 68.70 3" meter 130.98 130.98 135.56 139.63 143.12 143.12 4" meter 209.58 209.58 216.92 223.42 229.01 229.01 6" meter 419.16 419.16 433.83 446.85 458.02 458.02 The water fund had a cash balance of $7,600,594 as of 12/31/09. One of the goals of completing a utility study is to identify appropriate cash balances. An operating reserve is used to accommodate fluctuations in revenue and expenses due to weather or unforeseen events. A capital reserve should be maintained to provide funding for the CIP and for unexpected repairs that will not be funded by growth. This type of reserve helps minimize the reliance on debt and allows for a steadier rate structure over time. Due to several larger projects over the next couple of years, the cash balances would fall below the recommended reserve in 2013 and 2014 by $421,000 and $235,000 respectively. A temporary transfer of $500 thousand from the Water Sewer Replacement fund in 2013 could be made to maintain the desired reserve. This transfer could be paid back in 2015. The Water Sewer Replacement fund has a projected balance of $5.7 million, which is in addition to the reserves shown in Appendix C, for unforeseen shortages in either the water or sewer fund. Because of this excess reserve, we do not believe the transfer is necessary, but the option is available if unforeseen circumstances caused the cash balances to be even lower than projections. With or without the transfer, increases of 2.5-3.5% are needed in 2012-2014 to maintain the desired long-term cash reserves in the water utility. This includes increases to usage, base and demand charges. We acknowledge that future trends may vary from assumptions made in this study and therefore recommend regular updates and adjustments if necessary. The calculations used to determine recommended reserve balances (shown in Appendix C-1) are described below. The differences in the cash balances with and without the $500,000 transfer are also shown in Appendix C-1, lines 76-97. Water Fund Recommendations 1) We recommend that the Council adopt the rates as presented in this study. We would also recommend that the Council update the study from time to time to make certain that rates are keeping pace with inflation and capital needs. 2) We recommend that the City Council discuss changes to the commercial irrigation rate. 3) Target Operating and Capital Reserves a. Operating Reserve We recommend the City maintain an operating reserve of an amount equal to three months of operating expenses, including depreciation, 100% of the following year's debt service and 50% of the following year's capital costs. b. Capital Reserve We recommend the capital reserve be maintained at 10% of accumulated depreciation. 71 Page Page 10 The following graph shows the trend for the estimated cash balance in comparison to the recommended target reserves (see Appendix C-1): 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 Water Fund Reserves tiQ titi tiV ti ti ti ti ti^ ti ti tiQ) Lti br tiM ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,LO ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 ,ti0 Estimated Actual Reserve (Target Reserves 81 Page Page 11 Sanitary Sewer Utility The City of Plymouth participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer system. The City is responsible for the sewer collection system within the city limits and then pays MCES disposal fees for treatment. With an increase of 3.8% in 2010 and a budgeted increase of 3.2% for 2011, we projected future increases at 3.8% per year. These fees comprise approximately 67% of the sewer utility's operating expenses. Depreciation accounts for 11%, leaving only 22% of operating expenses within the City's control. Existing Sewer Fees The primary source of funding for the sewer utility fund is usage fees. Sewer usage fees are set at a single -rate structure, which includes a base fee of $4.94 per month plus a usage fee of $2.90 per 1,000 gallons for commercial and residential. The base fee helps cover the costs of expenses incurred regardless of usage, such as utility billing software and staff, while the usage fees are primarily to cover the costs of maintenance and enhancements to the existing system. Proposed Sewer Rates Based on the projections in Appendix C-2, it appears increases would be needed to maintain adequate reserves in the sewer utility. With conservation already encouraged with a tiered residential water rate structure, we do not believe it is necessary to change sewer rates to a tiered system. The proposed rates are illustrated in the chart below. Proposed Increases 0.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 base fee 1 $4.94 4.94 5.04 5.14 5.24 $5.35 per 1,000 gallons 1 2.90 2.90 2.96 3.02 3.08 3.14 The impact of the increases is summarized by various usage levels in the following chart. Projected Charges Consumption Level Gallons per Month 2010 customer, 2011 2012 2013 month 2014 2015 Light 10,000 33.94 33.94 34.62 35.31 36.02 36.74 Average 25,000 77.44 77.44 78.99 80.57 82.18 83.82 Above Avg 50,000 149.94 149.94 152.94 156.00 159.12 162.30 Heavy 90,000 265.94 265.94 271.26 276.68 282.22 287.86 Note: Projections are based on proposed increases to base charges and usage rates. 91 Page Page 12 Cash Balances The sewer fund had a cash balance of $2,827,452 as of 12/31/09. One of the goals of completing a utility study is to identify appropriate cash balances. As with the water fund, an operating reserve should be maintained to accommodate fluctuations in revenue and expenses due to weather or unforeseen events. A capital reserve should be maintained to provide funding for the CIP and for unexpected repairs that will not be funded by growth. The calculations used to determine recommended reserve balances (shown in Appendix C-2) are described below. Sewer Fund Recommendations 1) Target Operating and Capital Reserves a. Operating Reserve We recommend the City maintain an operating reserve of an amount equal to thee months of operating expenses, including depreciation, 100% of the following year's debt service and 50% of the following year's capital costs. b. Capital Reserve We recommend the capital reserve be maintained at 5% of accumulated depreciation. The following graph shows the trend for the estimated cash balance in comparison to the recommended target reserve (see Appendix C-2): 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 Sewer Fund Reserves tiQ titi til ti11) ti1 1 tih ti0 Cb ti tiQ titi ti ti ti tih LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,y0 ,y0 ,LO ,y0 ,y0 ,y0 Estimated Actual Reserve (Target Reserve 10 1 P -e Page 13 Summary The City of Plymouth has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for almost all improvements on a cash basis. The rate study indicates that future increases are necessary to maintain cash balances and pay for capital improvements as well as debt. However, due to the current economy and goals of the Council, we are recommending no increase to either water or sewer rates for 2011, with increases in 2012-2014 for water and, annual increases of 2% to sewer rates in 2012 and beyond. See Appendix A for comparison of the Plymouth's rates to other neighboring cities. The results of this analysis conclude that the recommended rate increases should eliminate the need to issue debt. The utility fund balances should be reviewed regularly to determine whether the available cash is sufficient to cover upcoming capital and operational expenses to identify potential shortages early and reevaluate the option to issue new debt. Appendix A Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates Appendix B Historical Usage Trends Appendix C Water and Sewer Utility Projections Appendix D Capital Improvement Plans for Water and Sewer Page 14 Appendix A Comparisons to Other Cities' Rates The graphs below compare monthly water sewer charges based on 2010 rates and 20,000 gallons per month. Water Sewer Base Usage Base Usage Total Plymouth 3.37 31.41 4.94 58.00 97.72 Bloomington' 5.85 52.30 12.82 0.00 70.97 Brooklyn Park 1.10 39.00 1.10 50.00 91.20 Eden Prairie 2.08 35.00 2.08 44.00 83.17 Maple Grove 5.12 18.00 5.50 27.00 55.62 Minnetonka 0.00 41.38 0.00 59.00 100.38 Sewer charged at flat rate through 2010. Changing to $2.64/1,000 gallons in 2011, which would increase the usage fees to $52.80 for 20,000 gallons used. 2Minimum usage for water and sewer of 4,000 gallons/mo. Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka Water Rate Comparison 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka continued...) Sewer Rate Comparison 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 Base Usage Base Usage Page 1 § ppendix A continued from previous page) Plymouth Bloomington Brooklyn Park Eden Prairie Maple Grove Minnetonka Total Bill Comparison 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 Page I & ppendix A 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 80000 70100 61000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 D Appendix B Historical Usage Trends Annual Per Capita Water Demand (mg) f rr .q ,"I ra ra to r"a ra -J -a r, PIJ M Per Capita Dcmamd FOPUlation Linear IPe( Ca{aita L7ernand) Linear IPopulation) Annual Per Capita Sewer Flows (mg) Sewer Flows Linear (Sower FlowsM Linear (PopulationI Page 1 / ppendix B Daily Per Capita Water Usage and Sewer Flows 180«0 160. 60.E 40.00 PROD o«O m r-@ M o m , e k 2 / \ / &J L d k Demand Rainfall {,a J SEWEPbw5 LinrS mm¢ near (Aa nfaOnR LI near {5cwuFlows I Page I6ppendixB 1 Revenue growth assumption -non-usage 2 Investment income yield 3 Expense growth - personnel 4 Expense growth - all other 5 6 7 Beginning net assets 8 7 Operating Revenues 9 Water Utility Charges - Residential 10 Water Utility Charges - Commercial 11 Demand Charges 12 Penalties' 13 Fire Hydrant Inspection 14 Permits 15 Antennae Charges 16 Water Meter Sales 17 Other 18 Additional Revenue - new growth 19 20 Total Operating Revenues 21 22 Operating Expenses 23 Personal Services 24 Additional person for WTP (2015) 25 Materials & Supplies 26 Employee Development & Meetings 27 Dues & Subscriptions 28 Contractual Services 29 Equipment 30 Other Expenses 31 Depreciation 32 Allocations 33 34 Total Operating Expenses 35 36 Net Operations 37 38 Non operatino revenues (expenses) 39 Interest on Investments 40 Interest on Special Assessments 41 Capital contributions 42 Debt Service - Interest 43 Transfers In (Out) 44 Water Sewer Construction 45 Utility Trunk Replacement 46 Public Facilities 47 Central Equipment 48 General 49 Improvement Project Construction 50 Information Technology 51 Risk Management 52 Employee Benefits 53 54 Total non operating revenue (expense 55 56 Net increase (decrease)in resources 57 58 Ending net assets City of Plymouth Water Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2.0091 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00-A 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 54,652,063 54,208,836 53,765,612 53,114,261 52,490,112 52,270,154 52,141,780 52,072,832 51,864,026 51,723,448 51,513,459 51,231,610 50,875,362 50,419,321 49,867,166 49,213,039 48,450,600 47,572,994 88.56% 3,476,892 3,831,995 4,000,000 3,980,000 5,014,989 5,165,439 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 5,294,575 1,493,706 1,591,356 1,750,000 1,853,750 1,302,655 1,341,735 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 1,375,278 401,176 415,468 425,000 416,625 441,365 454,606 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 465,971 47,228 53,686 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000. 40,000 40,000. 40,000. 40,000 40,000 40,000 54,635 60,000 60,000 61,200 62,424 63,672 64,946 66,245 67,570 68,921 70,300 71,706 73,140 74,602 76,095 77,616 79,169 7,031 4,386 7,000 7,031 7,172 7,315 7,461 7,611 7,763 7,918 8,076 8,238 8,403 8,571 8,742 8,917 9,095 9,277 88,405 105,795 93,000 93,000 94,860 96,757 98,692 100,666 102,680 104,733 106,828 108,964 111,144 113,366 115,634 117,946 120,305 122,712 19,191 40,736 20,000 20,000 20,400 20,808 21,224 21,649 22,082 22,523 22,974 23,433 23,902 24,380 24,867 25,365 25,872 26,390 75,657 26,030 58,946 95,652 133,772 178,163 227,871 285,658 350,022 420,965 498,485 582,584 670,679 764,173 863,067 967,360 1,077,052 5,609,286 6,124,087 6,395,000 6,529,352 7,078,293 7,322,856 7,545,037 7,598,567 7,660,251 7,728,591 7,803,588 7,885,244 7,973,561 8,065,959 8,163,843 8,267,213 8,376,073 8,490,423 1,770,178 1,802,125 1,587,549 1,609,987 1,642,187 1,675,030 1,708,531 1,742,702 1,794,983 1,848,832 1,904,297 1,961,426 2,020,269 2,080,877 2,143,303 2,207,602 2,273,830 2,342,045 65,000 660,194 721,502 642,600 708,900 723,078 737,540 752,290 767,336 790,356 814,067 838,489 863,644 889,553 916,240 943,727 972,038 1,001,200 1,031,236 4,952 5,291 12,600 12,600 12,852 13,109 13,371 13,639 14,048 14,469 14,903 15,350 15,811 16,285 16,774 17,277 17,795 18,329 3,285 3,437 4,700 4,700 4,888 5,084 5,287 5,498 5,718 5,947 6,185 6,432 6,690 6,957 7,235 7,525 7,826 8,139 1,441,025 1,344,977 1,723,138 1,783,338 1,854,672 1,928,858 2,006,013 2,086,253 2,169,703 2,256,491 2,346,751 2,440,621 2,538,246 2,639,776 2,745,367 2,855,182 2,969,389 3,088,164 5,775 9,279 10,050 8,550 8,892 9,248 9,618 10,002 10,402 10,818 11,251 11,701 12,169 12,656 13,162 13,689 14,236 14,806 4,684 4,782 5,000 5,000 5,200 5,408 5,624 5,849 6,083 6,327 6,580 6,843 7,117 7,401 7,697 8,005 8,325 8,658 2,543,610 2,499,455 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 463,290 508,457 446,972 428,527 445,668 463,495 482,035 501,316 521,369 542,223 563,912 586,469 609,928 634,325 659,698 686,086 713,529 742,070 6,896,993 6,899,305 6,932,609 7,061,602 7,211,436 7,406,438 7,605,435 7,831,929 7,962,143 8,164,378 8,373,892 8,590,950 8,815,829 9,048,816 9,290,209 9,540,315 9,799,455 10,067,961 1,287,707) 775,218) 537,609) 532,250) 133,143) 83,582) 60,398) 233,362) 301,892) 435,788) 570,304) 705,706) 842,268) 982,857) 1,126,366) 1,273,101) 1,423,382) 1,577,537) 324,069 67,248 100,000 100,000 76,471 88,382 91,236 88,142 187,400 212,885 235,041 253,943 269,213 313,688 355,225 393,648 428,763 460,363 17,274 10,964 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 237,427 867,459 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 375,175) 352,412) 335,756) 308,913) 280,300) 250,188) 216,800) 180,600) 143,100) 104,100) 63,600) 21,500) 730,443) 84,556) 28,952 4,771) 75,000) 79,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 82,567) 938,127) 60,904) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 48,950) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 50,419) 18,775) 1,617,700) 331,994 113,742) 91,899) 85,815) 44,792) 8,550) 24,556 161,314 225,799 288,455 349,457 386,227 430,702 472,239 510,662 545,777 577,377 2,905,407) 443,224) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 51,746,656 53,765,612 53,114,261 52,490,112 52,270,154 52,141,780 52,072,832 51,864,026 51,723,448 51,513,459 51,231,610 50,875,362 50,419,321 49,867,166 49,213,039 48,450,600 47,572,994 46,572,834 New anticipated growth added to budgeted numbers for 2011. 2 Penalties estimated to remain stable. Not usually addressed in fee increases. N Page 19 59 CIP Funding 60 Current year Capital 61 Additional Capital Equipment for WTP (2015) 62 Bond Proceeds 63 Bond Principal -20048 Issue 64 Total Capital & Related Debt 65 66 Accumulated Depreciation 67 Beginning Accumulated Depreciation 68 Expensed 69 Ending Accumulated Depreciation 70 71 Cash 72 Beginning Cash 73 Add net increase (decrease)in resources( 74 Add back depreciation (31) 75 Less capital contributions (41) 76 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 77 Net other 78 Ending Cash 79 2013 -Temporary Transfer from Replaceme 80 81 Target Operating Reserve 82 Target Capital Reserve 83 Total Target Reserves 84 Excess/(Shortfall) City of Plymouth Water Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 1 2010 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1,668,570) nt 145,460) 2,887,000) 1,250,000) 420,000) 1,640,000) 1,620,000) 350,000) 454,412) 471,679) 489,603) 508,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 86 Capital Outlay Coverage 835.84% 206.99% 268.97% 407.85% 235.69% 222.41% 450.28% 35,000) 483.83% 515.58% 534.66% 1701.13% 1909.59% 2083.29% 2224.11% 2333.82% 2414.09% 2560.19% 745,000) 760,000) 785,000) 805,000) 830,000) 860,000) 890,000) 920,000) 955,000) 995,000) 1,030,000) 1,075,000) 2,413,570) 905,460) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 29,555,779 32,055,779 34,555,779 37,069,779 39,638,446 42,261,112 44,895,446 47,544,926 50,210,129 52,891,652 55,590,116 58,306,163 61,040,463 63,793,708 66,566,619 69,359,943 651,351) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 27,056,323 29,555,779 32,055,779 34,555,779 37,069,779 39,638,446 42,261,112 44,895,446 47,544,926 50,210,129 52,891,652 55,590,116 58,306,163 61,040,463 63,793,708 66,566,619 69,359,943 72,174,456 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 6,082,429 5,876,147 6,246,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 56) 3,672,000) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,876,147 6,746,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 16,274,109 Fund 1 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 500,000 5,895,386 500,000) 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 99 Excess/(Shortfall) 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 4,095,601 5,682,986 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 3,472,611 1,917,608 427,352 179,357 123,361 80,425 256,454 351,288 955,638 1,441,812 1,827,264 947,049 2,089,662 3,130,059 4,062,154 4,879,368 5,574,602 6,221,842 85 86 Capital Outlay Coverage 835.84% 206.99% 268.97% 407.85% 235.69% 222.41% 450.28% 478.69% 483.83% 515.58% 534.66% 1701.13% 1909.59% 2083.29% 2224.11% 2333.82% 2414.09% 2560.19% 87 88 2013 - Without Temporary Transfer from Replacement Fund 89 Beginning Cash 9,031,593 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,368,647 6,266,675 7,116,165 7,854,700 8,484,771 8,993,778 10,476,265 11,860,844 13,141,589 14,312,089 15,365,418 90 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (56) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 76,448) 216,306) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 91 Add back depreciation (31) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 92 Less capital contributions (41) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 93 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,270,000) 1,409,412) 1,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 94 Ending Cash 7,568,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5;368,647 6,266,675 7,116,165 7,854,700 8,484,771 8,993,778 10,476,265 11,860,844 13,141,589 14;312,089 15;365,418 16,294,109 95 96 Target Operating Reserve 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 97 Target Capital Reserve 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 98 Total Target Reserves 4,095,601 5,682,986 1 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,768,775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 99 Excess/(Shortfall) 3,472,611 1,917,608 1 427,352 179,357 123,361 419,575) 251,046) 371,288 975,638 1,461,812 1,847,264 967,049 2,109,662 3,150,059 4,082,154 4,899,368 5,594,602 6,241,842 100 101 102 Statistical 103 As a %of Operating Revenue 104 Usage fees 88.61% 88.56% 89.91% 89.35% 89.25% 88.86% 88.40% 87.78% 87.07% 86.30% 85.47% 84.59% 83.65% 82.69% 81.70% 80.68% 79.63% 78.56% 105 Base & Demand Charges 6.48% 5.85% 6.29% 6.05% 5.95% 5.93% 5.90% 5.86% 5.75% 5.68% 5.62% 5.55% 5.48% 5.39% 5.31% 5.22% 5.14% 5.06% 106 107 108 Alternate - Elimination afReplacement Reserve Fund 109 Beginning Cash 7,600,594 5,527,243 7,663,094 8,457,136 8,147,429 7,941,147 8,811,675 9,661,165 10,399,700 11,029,771 11,538,778 13,021,265 14,405,844 15,686,589 16,857,089 17,910,418 110 45% Replacement Reserve Cash 2,565,000 111 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (56) 651,351) 624,149) 219,958) 128,374) 68,948) 208,806) 140,578) 209,989) 281,849) 356,248) 456,040) 552,155) 654,127) 762,440) 877,605) 1,000,161) 112 Add back depreciation (31) 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,514,000 2,568,667 2,622,667 2,634,333 2,649,480 2,665,203 2,681,523 2,698,463 2,716,047 2,734,300 2,753,245 2,772,911 2,793,324 2,814,513 113 Less capital contributions (41) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 250,000) 114 Less capital and related debt principal(64) 3,672,000) 2,055,000) 1,250,000) 2,500,000) 2,510,000) 1,305,000) 1,409,412) 3,466,679) 1,519,603) 1,583,208) 527,520) 547,566) 568,373) 589,971) 612,390) 635,661) 115 Ending Cash 7,569,212 7,600,594 5,527,243 7,663,094 8,457,136 8,147,429 7,941,147 8,811,675 9,661,165 10,399,700 11,029,771 11,538,778 13,021,265 14,405,844 15,686,589 16,857,089 17,910,418 18,839,109 116 117 Target Operating Reserve 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 118 Target Capital Reserve 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 119 Total Target Reserves 5,099,891 4,918,737 5,76$775 6,002,003 5,619,693 5,895,386 6,140,527 6,392,887 6,637,507 8,026,729 8,366,603 8,710,785 9,059,435 9,412,721 9,770,815 10,052,266 120 Excess /(Shortfall) 427,352 2,744,357 2,688,361 2,145,425 2,321,454 2,916,288 3,520,638 4,006,812 4,392,264 3,512,049 4,654,662 5,695,059 6,627,154 7,444,368 8,139,602 8,786,842 Page 20 1 Revenue growth assumption - non -usage 2 Investment income yield 3 Expense growth - personnel 4 Expense growth - all other 5 6 7 Beginning net assets 8 9 Operating Revenues 10 Sewer Utility Charges - Residential 11 Sewer Utility Charges - Commercial 12 Penaltie52 13 Permits 14 Other 15 Additional Revenue - new growth 16 17 Total Operating Revenues 18 19 Operating Expenses 20 Personal Services 21 Materials & Supplies 22 Employee Development & Meetings 23 Contractual Services 24 Equipment 25 Other Expenses 26 Depreciation 27 Allocations 28 29 Total Operating Expenses 30 31 Net Operations 32 33 Non operating revenues (expenses) 34 Interest an Investments 35 Capital contributions 36 Transfers In (Out) 37 Water Sewer Construction 38 Utility Trunk Replacement 39 Public Facilities 40 Central Equipment 41 General 42 Improvement Project Construction 43 Resource Planning 44 Risk Management 45 Employee Benefits 46 47 Total non operating revenue (expenses) 48 49 Net increase (decrease)in resources 50 51 Ending net assets City of Plymouth Sewer Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 3.80% 32,864,456 32,337,688 31,764,921 31,987,915 33,004,462 34,096,811 35,139,756 36,093,259 36,956,456 37,808,365 38,552,821 39,182,745 39,677,433 40,029,096 40,256,159 40,338,341 40,261,673 40,114,159 4,311,271 4,532,942 4,600,000 5,100,000 6,370,690 6,498,104 6,628,066 6,760,627 6,895,840 7,033,756 7,174,432 7,317,920 7,464,279 7,613,564 7,765,835 7,921,152 8,158,787 8,403,550 2,354,504 2,340,850 2;800,000 3,000,000 1,871,156 1,908,579 1,946,750 1,985,685 2,025,399 2,065,907 2,107,225 2,149,370 2,192,357 2,236,204 2,280,928 2,326,547 2,396,343 2,468,234 69,952 67,369 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 6,831 4,226 7,000 7,000 7,140 7,283 7,428 7,577 7,729 7,883 8,041 8,202 8,366 8,533 8,704 8,878 9,055 9,236 9,114 16,613 10,000 10,000 85,844 135,477 186,102 214,959 244,393 274,416 312,297 350,936 390,347 430,547 471,550 505,881 540,898 576,965 614,115 6,751,672 6,962,000 7,477,000 8,262,844 8,444,463 8,660,067 8,857,204 9,058,283 9,263,384 9,479,844 9,700,633 9,925,839 10,155,548 10,389,852 10,621,348 10,857,475 11,201,151 11,555,135 929,775 935,882 816,494 826,263 842,788 859,644 876,837 894,374 921,205 948,841 977,306 1,006,625 1,036,824 1,067,929 1,099,967 1,132,966 1,166,955 1,201,963 101,439 100,396 143,600 144,700 147,594 150,546 153,557 156,628 161,327 166,167 171,152 176,286 181,575 187,022 192,633 198,412 204,364 210,495 5,152 2,795 6,000 6,000 6,120 6,242 6,367 6,495 6,689 6,890 7,097 7,310 7,529 7,755 7,988 8,227 8,474 8,728 4,715,126 5,075,696 5,133,738 5,147,513 5,343,118 5,546,157 5,756,911 5,975,674 6,202,749 6,438,454 6,683,115 6,937,073 7,200,682 7,474,308 7,758,332 8,053,148 8,359,168 8,676,816 1,147 3,505 5,050 5,050 5,242 5,441 5,648 5,862 6,085 6,316 6,557 6,806 7,064 7,333 7,611 7,901 8,201 8,512 4,494 4,744 5,000 5,000 5,190 5,387 5,592 5,804 6,025 6,254 6,492 6,738 6,994 7,260 7,536 7,822 8,120 8,428 831,739 833,887 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 325,751 372,235 272,910 240,557 249,698 259,187 269,036 279,259 289,871 300,886 312,320 324,188 336,507 349,294 362,568 376,345 390,646 405,491 6,914,623 7,329,140 7,217,792 7,210,083 7,458,084 7,739,604 8,031,281 8,326,429 8,631,339 8,975,883 9,303,882 9,678,924 10,031,768 10,397,734 10,777,313 11,171,012 11,579,360 12,002,903 162,951) 367,140) 259,208 1,052,761 986,378 920,463 825,923 731,854 632,044 503,961 396,751 246,914 123,780 7,882) 155,964) 313,537) 378,209) 447,768) 106,406 15,474 45,000 45,000 52,185 68,695 73,794 77,557 166,080 186,709 179,387 193,987 174,097 181,160 184,360 183,084 176,909 168,469 186,914 269,572 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,246) 374,188) 125,000) 125,000) 26,391) 4,771) 54,000) 56,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 58,643) 32,314) 7,500) 36,477) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 37,571) 1,168 10,000) 10,000) 10,000) 704,940) 205,627) 36,214) 36,214) 105,971 122,481 127,580 131,343 219,866 240,495 233,173 247,773 227,883 234,946 238,146 236,870 230,695 222,255 867,891) 572,767) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 31,996,565 31,764,921 31,987,915 33,004,462 34,096,811 35,139,756 36,093,259 36,956,456 37,808,365 38,552,821 39,182,745 39,677,433 40,029,096 40,256,159 40,338,341 40,261,673 40,114,159 39,888,646 New anticipated growth added to budgeted numbers for 2011. 2 Penalties estimated to remain stable. Not usually addressed in fee increases. x N Page 21 52 Met Council Detail 53 MCES Portion of Operating Expenses 54 MCES %of Operating Expenses 55 56 CIP Funding 57 Current Year Capital 58 Bond Proceeds 59 Bond Principal 60 Total Capital & Related Debt 61 62 Accumulated Depreciation 63 Depreciation as %of Operating Expenses 64 65 Beginning Accumulated Depreciation 66 Expensed 67 Ending Accumulated Depreciation 68 69 Cash 70 Beginning Cash 71 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (4 72 Add back depreciation (26) 73 Less capital contributions (35) 74 Less capital and related debt principal (60) 75 Netother 76 Ending Cash 77 78 Target Operating Reserve 79 Target Capital Reserve 80 Total Target Reserves 81 Excess / (Shortfall) 82 83 Capital Outlay Coverage 84 85 Alternate - Elimination of Replacement Resen 86 Beginning Cash 87 55% Replacement Reserve Cash 88 Add net increase (decrease)in resources (5 89 Add back depreciation (30) 90 Less capital contributions (40) 91 Less capital and related debt principal(62) 92 Ending Cash 93 94 Target Operating Reserve 95 Target Capital Reserve 96 Total Target Reserves 97 Excess / (Shortfall) D IDID CL X n N ry O3 3 s; CL City of Plymouth Sewer Fund Performance Actual Budget' Projections 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 4,429,433 4,630,076 4,700,000 4,850,400 5,034,715 5,226,034 5,424,624 5,630,759 5,844,728 6,066,828 6,297,367 6,536,667 6,785,061 7,042,893 7,310,523 7,588,323 7,876,679 8,175,993 64.06% 63.17% 65.12% 67.27% 67.51% 67.52% 67.54% 67.63% 67.72% 67.59% 67.69% 67.54% 67.64% 67.73% 67.83% 67.93% 68.02% 68.12% 882,560) (374,188) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 882,560) (374,188) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 12.03% 11.38% 11.57% 11.58% 11.51% 11.72% 11.92% 12.04% 12.02% 12.28% 12.25% 12.54% 12.51% 12.47% 12.44% 12.41% 12.38% 12.35% 13,148,551 13,983,551 14,818,551 15,676,884 16,583,884 17,541,218 18,543,551 19,580,939 20,683,014 21,822,859 23,036,757 24,291,350 25,588,183 26,928,862 28,315,053 29,748,486 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 12,314,665 13,148,551 13,983,551 14,818,551 15,676,884 16,583,884 17,541,218 18,543,551 19,580,939 20,683,014 21,822,859 23,036,757 24,291,350 25,588,183 26,928,862 28,315,053 29,748,486 31,230,955 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 9) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 5,251,498 2,019,379 2,178,448 2,407,521. 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3,214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 615,733 657,428 699,178 740,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 2,635,112 2,835,876 3,106,698 2,955,449 3,448,745 3,592,014 3,633,668 3,610,832 4,193,330 3,926,662 4,621,672 4,270,196 4,447,613 4,631,426 4,821,877 5,019,216 5,223,701 5,297,824 787,821 (8,424) 119,252) 523,545 1,130,931 1,327,606 1,536,788 1,925,155 2,030,316 2,052,891 1,844,569 1,533,035 1,591,041 1,513,901 1,280,932 877,755 391,942 46,326) 914.76% 378.00% 246.90% 497.00% 313.68% 325.80% 383.00% 526.42% 320.70% 527.72% 291.06% 475.35% 476.53% 467.19% 446.97% 416.09% 381.73% 356.98% ne Fund 2,827,452 2,987,446 6,613,993 7,714,676 8,054,620 8,305,457 8,670,987 9,358,646 9,114,554 9,601,241 8,938,231 9,173,654 9,280,327 9,237,809 9,031,971 8,750,643 3,135,000 5) 222,994 1,016,547 1,092,349 1,042,944 953,503 863,197 851,910 744,456 629,924 494,688 351,663 227,063 82,181 76,667) 147,514) 225,513) 835,000 835,000 858,333 907,000 957,333 1,002,333 1,037,388 1,102,075 1,139,845 1,213,898 1,254,592 1,296,833 1,340,679 1,386,191 1,433,433 1,482,469 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 150,000) 748,000) 1,210,000) 700,000) 1,460,000) 1,510,000) 1,350,000) 1,051,639) 1,940,624) 1,133,082) 2,221,595) 1,220,832) 1,267,224) 1,315,378) 1,365,362) 1,417,246) 1,471,102) 3,422,933 2,827,452 2,987,446 6,613,993 7,714,676 8,054,620 8,305,457 8,670,987 9,358,646 9,114,554 9,601,241 8,938,231 9,173,654 9,280,327 9,237,809 9,031,971 8,750,643 8,386,498 2,407,521 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3,214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 699,178 140,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 3,106,698 2,955,449 3,448,745 3,592,014 3,633,668 3,610,832 4,193,330 3,926,662 4,621,672 4,270,196 4,447,613 4,631,426 4,821,877 5,019,216 5,223,701 5,297,824 119,252) 3,658,545 1 4,265,931 4,462,606 4,671,788 5,060,155 5,165,316 5,187,891 4,979,569 4,668,035 4,726,041 4,648,901 4,415,932 4,012,755 3,526,942 3,088,674 Page 22 CASH Ending Cash Balances 1 Water 2 Sewer 3 Water Sewer Replacement at 12/22/10 5 Total Ending Cash Target Operating Reserve - Water Target Capital Reserve - Water Target Operating Reserve - Sewer Target Capital Reserve - Sewer Total Target Reserves Excess / (Shortfall) X n w City of Plymouth Utility Funds Combined Cash 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 5,527,243 5,098,094 5,892,136 5,582,429 5,876,147 6,746,675 7,096,165 7,834,700 8,464,771 8,973,778 10,456,265 11,840,844 13,121,589 14,292,089 15,345,418 16,274,109 2,987,446 3,478,993 4,579,676 4,919,620 5,170,457 5,535,987 6,223,646 5,979,554 6,466,241 5,803,231 6,038,654 6,145,327 6,102,809 5,896,971 5,615,643 5,251,498 11,268,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 5,768,583 20,246,426 20,501,170 19,783,272 14,345,670 16,240,395 16,270,632 16,815,187 18,051,244 19,088,394 19,582,836 20,699,595 20,545,592 22,263,502 23,754,754 24,992,981 25,957,643 26,729,644 27,294,190 1,389,968 2,727,408 1,894,314 1,463,159 2,061,798 2,038,159 1,393,582 1,405,842 1,386,034 1,371,875 1,348,342 2,467,717 2,535,987 2,606,739 2,680,064 2,756,059 2,834,821 2,834,821 2,705,632 2,955,578 3,205,578 3,455,578 3,706,978 3,963,845 4,226,111 4,489,545 4,754,493 5,021,013 5,289,165 5,559,012 5,830,616 6,104,046 6,379,371 6,656,662 6,935,994 7,217,446 2,019,379 2,178,448 2,407,521 2,214,521 2,664,901 2,762,820 2,756,607 2,683,654 3;214,283 2,892,511 3,530,529 3,118,358 3,233,045 3,352,017 3,475,434 3,603,463 3,736,277 3,736,277 615,733 657,428 699,178 740,928 783,844 829,194 877,061 927,178 979,047 1,034,151 1,091,143 1,151,838 1,214,567 1,279,409 1,346,443 1,415,753 1,487,424 1,561,548 6,730,713 8,518,862 8,206,590 7,874,186 9,217,521 9,594,018 9,253,362 9,506,218 10,333,856 10,319,550 11,259,178 12,296,925 12,814,216 13,342,211 13,881,313 14,431,937 14,994,516 15,350,091 13,515,713 11,982,308 11,576,682 6,471,485 7,022,874 6,676,614 7,561,826 8,545,026 8,754,537 9,263,287 9,440,416 8,248,667 9,449,286 10,412,542 11,111,669 11,525,706 11,735,128 11,944,099 Page 23 City of Plymouth Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Inflation Rate 3.80% PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT# 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 A- inn Vrnv0-1 by Wnror P-1 Well refurbishing 07-W-002 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 250,000 Future well refurbishing 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Paint MIP water tower 09-W-003 50,000 550,000 Rpl altitude valve- central water tower 10-W-001 35,000 Paint Zachary watertower 12-W-001 60,000 70,000 1,000,000 Paint CR 101 water tower 14-W-001 45,000 100,000 1,200,000 Rpl roof - pump house #1 10 -FM -001 16,000 Rpl roof - pump house #3 10 -FM -002 16,000 CR101-CR6 to CR24 08 -ST -003 400,000 CR24 - 30th Ave to CR101 08 -ST -004 300,000 8th Avenue street reconstruction 09 -ST -010 100,000 2010 street recon - district #72 10 -ST -001 2,000,000 Polaris Lane reconstruction 10 -ST -002 50,000 Annapolis Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -004 50,000 Harbor Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -007 50,000 Lancaster Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -008 275,000 2012 street reconstruction 11 -ST -001 100,000 2013 street reconstruction 13 -ST -001 100,000 2014 street reconstruction 14 -ST -001 100,000 Hwy 55 frontage road reconstruction 14 -ST -002 50,000 2015 street reconstruction 15 -ST -002 100,000 Future street reconstruction 100,000 100,000 1 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Water Fund 2,887,000 1,250,000 420,000 1,640,000 1,620,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Inflated Total 454,412 471,679 489,603 508,208 527,520 547,566 568,373 589,971 612,390 635,661 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. D DDOl7Q X v N Page 24 City of Plymouth Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvement Program Inflation Rate 3.80% PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT# 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ronin Oln1';- A,, I --.- Sanitary sewer maintenance - annual 06 -SS -003 450,000 500,000 510,000 570,000 630,000 710,000 810,000 810,000 Future sanitary sewer annual maint 1,051,639 1,940,624 1,133,082 2,221,595 1,220,832 1,267,224 1,315,378 1,365,362 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 710,000 Imperial Hills lift station 11 -SS -001 140,000 600,000 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. Ferndale N lift station 13 -SS -001 100,000 700,000 28th Ave lift station 14 -SS -001 100,000 700,000 Greentree West lift station 15 -SS -001 140,000 600,000 Waterfront lift station 630,000 Bass Lake Plaza lift station 720,000 8th Avenue reconstruction 09 -ST -010 8,000 2010 street reconstruction 10 -ST -001 100,000 Polaris Lane reconstruction 10 -ST -002 50,000 Annapolis Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -004 50,000 Harbor Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -007 50,000 Lancaster Lane reconstruction 11 -ST -008 10,000 2012 street reconstruction 90,000 2013 street reconstruction 13 -ST -001 40,000 2014 street reconstruction 14 -ST -001 40,000 Hwy 55 frontage road reconstruction 14 -ST -002 50,000 2015 street reconstruction 15 -ST -002 40,000 Future street reconstruction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Sewer Fund 748,000 1,210,000 700,000 1,460,000 1,510,000 1,350,000 810,000 1,440,000 810,000 1,530,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 Inflated Total 1,051,639 1,940,624 1,133,082 2,221,595 1,220,832 1,267,224 1,315,378 1,365,362 1,417,246 1,471,102 Note: Years beyond current CIP Document (2015) are inflated at a 3.8% rate, based on the American City and County Magazine's published Construction Cost Index. Dvnm CL X o I Page 25 Agenda Number: CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Dwight Johnson, City Manager FROM: Mike Kohn, Financial Analyst through Dale Hahn, Fi nance Di rector SUBJECT: Surface Water Utility Revi ew DATE: February 9, 2001 for the Speci al City Council Meeting of February 13, 2001 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Review and give staff direction on proposed Surface Water Utility structure. 2. BACKGROUND: At the June 6, 2000, Special City Council Meeting a moti on was passed that directed staff to prepare a surface water management fee proposal. I n addition, the recently adopted 2001 budget cal I s for i mpl ementati on of a surface water management fee, begi nni ng i n Jul y, 2001. mpl ementati on of a surface water management fee requi res the establ i shment of a uti I i ty as authori zed by State Statute 444.075. By establ i shi ng a Surface Water Uti I i ty the Ci ty wi I I gai n a stabl e, dedi cated, fl ex bl e and fai r source of revenue to support ongoi ng surface water management programs. I n addi ti on, i mpl ementati on of a fee di rectl y rel ated to surface water management costs and runoff may provi de an i ncentive to property owners to reduce the amount of surface water runoff I eavi ng their properties. Staff has prepared a Surface Water Utility proposal and would appreciate City Council input regardi ng the proposed structure. There are three mai n poi nts that need eval uati on and discussion. They are: Are the correct properties targeted for i ncl usi on in the surface water uti I i ty? Are these properties organized i nto the correct categories? Does the uti I ity i mpose the correct fee for surface water servi ces? 3. DISCUSSION: Page 26 Discussion Point Number One The proposed Surface Water Uti I ity structure would target the fol I owing property types: Si ngl e Fami I y Multi -Family Commerci al/I ndustri al Churches School s Public Lands With Occupied Structures I nsti tuti ons Golf Courses Total Acres 8,461.79 927.55 2,473.93 208.48 471.46 207.67 73.59 8.5 (i mpervious only) 12,832.97 The proposed Surface Water Uti I ity woul d exclude the fol I owi ng property types: U nder the current proposal 56.18% of I and woul d be covered by the Surface Water Uti I i ty. Publ i c I ands wi thout occupi ed structures were not i ncl uded because other communi ti es have found it difficult to collect from county, state and federal authori ti es when there are no occupied structures on a parcel of I and. I n the case of our own property, it woul d make I i ttl e sense to charge oursel ves through a uti I i ty for somethi ng that wi I I have to be pl aced on the tax I evy to be pai d. Rai I road and uti I i ty properti es are not i ncl uded because they are al so di ffi cul t to col I ect from. Publ i c ri ghts-of-way were excl uded for the same reasons that publ i c I ands wi thout occupi ed structures were. Vacant land was excluded for both administrative and philosophical reasons. First of a1 I , vacant land is not currently included in our utility billing system. Vacant land would be difficult to set up and track. Secondly, a good case can be made that if al I land were vacant there would be no need for surface water infrastructure or servi ces. It is development that drives the need for surface water management. 2 Page 27 Acres Public Lands Without Occupied Structures 3,190.26 Rai I roads 104.21 Uti I i ty Property 56.87 Publ i c Ri ghtsrof-Way 4,664.67 Vacant 1,990.92 Total 10,006.93 U nder the current proposal 56.18% of I and woul d be covered by the Surface Water Uti I i ty. Publ i c I ands wi thout occupi ed structures were not i ncl uded because other communi ti es have found it difficult to collect from county, state and federal authori ti es when there are no occupied structures on a parcel of I and. I n the case of our own property, it woul d make I i ttl e sense to charge oursel ves through a uti I i ty for somethi ng that wi I I have to be pl aced on the tax I evy to be pai d. Rai I road and uti I i ty properti es are not i ncl uded because they are al so di ffi cul t to col I ect from. Publ i c ri ghts-of-way were excl uded for the same reasons that publ i c I ands wi thout occupi ed structures were. Vacant land was excluded for both administrative and philosophical reasons. First of a1 I , vacant land is not currently included in our utility billing system. Vacant land would be difficult to set up and track. Secondly, a good case can be made that if al I land were vacant there would be no need for surface water infrastructure or servi ces. It is development that drives the need for surface water management. 2 Page 27 Discussion Point Number Two n a perfect worl d each and every property i n the targeted I and uses woul d be eval uated i ndi vi dual I y to determi ne the amount of runoff produced. Thi s i s, however, not possi bl e. Consequently, the current proposal targets similar fees toward si mi I ar categories of property for si ngl e fami I y, mul ti -f ami I y and commerci al /i ndustri al property. For exampl e, al I si ngl e fami I y properti es woul d be charged one rate for each uni t. AI I mul ti -f ami I y properti es woul d be charged another rate for each acre of property. The other groups of property: churches, school s, publ i c I ands wi th occupi ed structure, i nsti tuti onal and gol f courses were measured i ndi vi dual I y because they were I i mi ted i n number and di d vary i n makeup. The fol I owi ng tabl e outl i nes how thi s was done. Category Si ngl e Fami I y Multi -Family Commerci a1 /I ndustri al Churches School s Public lands— Occupied Structures I nsti tuti onal Golf Courses/ Regional Parks Fee Basis Impervious Runoff REF Per Unit 16% 29 1 Per Unit/Per Acre 30% 48 3.32 Per Acre 64% 1.04 7.18 Per Acre Per site Per site Per site Per Acre Per site Per site Per site Per Acre Per site Per site Per site Per Acre Per site Per site Per site I mpervi ous A rea 100% 1.97 13.58 There are differences i n factors, such as percentage of i mpervi ous coverage, that I ead to differi ng amounts of runoff for each of the si ngl e fami I y, mul ti -f ami I y and commerci al /i ndustri al parcel s. To adj ust for these differences averages were used to group properti es together. For exampl e, a sampl e of si ngl e fami I y properti es reveal ed that the average si ngl e fami I y parcel was 16% i mpervi ous. Gi ven thi s f i gure i t can be cal cul ated that I and uti I i zed as si ngl e fami I y wi I I produce runoff of .29 per acre. A sampl e of commerci al / i ndustri al property determi ned that commerci al /i ndustri al property was 64% i mpervi ous on average. Thi s was cal cul ated to produce runoff of 1.04 per acre. The rel ati onshi ps regardi ng the amount of runoff were then uti I i zed to come up wi th a resi denti al equival ent factor (REF). Thi s i s done by taki ng the runoff produced by a property type other than si ngl e fami I y and di vi di ng i t by the average'/2 acre resi denti al I ot's runoff of .145. Example: Commercial /Industrial (1.04)/(.145) 1/2A cre Red denti al = 7.18 Thi s REF can then be mul ti pl i ed by the base resi denti al rate per uni t to determi ne the rate per acre for other I and uses. This is i I I ustrated in the fol I owing two tables. 3 Page 28 Surface Water Utility Rate Modd Si ngl e Fami I y Multi -Family Commerci al/I ndustri al Churches School s Publ i c Lands - Occupied Structure I nsti tuti onal Golf Courses Average Rate Per REF Unit/Acre UnitsiAcres Dollars Month DollarsYear 1.00 2.50 14,815.00 37,037.50 444,450.00 3.32 8.30 927.55 7,698.67 92,383.98 7.18 17.95 2,473.93 44,407.04 532,884.52 2.62 6.55 208.48 1,365.54 16, 386.53 2.76 6.90 471.46 3,253.07 39,036.89 3.32 8.30 194.78 1,616.69 19,400.29 2.34 5.85 73.59 430.50 5,166.02 13.58 33.95 17.9 607.71 7,292.46 Source: Units and acres obtained from 2000 Comprehensive Plan. 96,416.72 1,157,000.68 Surface Water Utility RateModel Si ngl e Fami I y Multi -Family Commerci al/I ndustri al Churches School s Publ i c Lands - Occupied Structure I nsti tuti onal Golf Courses Average Rate Per REF Unit/Acre Units(Acres Dollars Month DollarsYear 1.00 3.25 14,815.00 48,148.75 577,785.00 3.32 10.79 927.55 10,008.26 120,099.17 7.18 23.34 2,473.93 57, 729.16 692, 749.88 2.62 8.52 208.48 1,775.21 21, 302.49 2.76 8.97 471.46 4,229.00 50,747.95 3.32 10.79 194.78 2,101.70 25,220.37 2.34 7.61 73.59 13.58 44.14 17.9 Source: Units and acres obtained from 2000 Comprehensive Plan. n 559.65 6,715.82 790.02 9,480.20 125, 341.74 1,504,100.89 Page 29 The single fami I y, multi -fami I y and commercial /industrial groups could be broken down sti I I f urther but that woul d requi re the exami nati on of many hundreds i f not thousands of i ndi vi dual parcels. The attached document entitled," Surface Water Utility Fee Structures— Other Metro Communities", provides a comparison to how other communities have grouped their properties. Discussion Point Number Three Revenue needs of the surface water utility appear to be in the $1,100,000 to $1,500,000 range. Current Water Resources Fund Operating $473,000 Additional Unfunded Operating 120,000 Capital Expenditures 500,000 Subtotal $1,093,000 Street Sweeping (Currently General Fund) 175,000 Drai nage Mai ntenance (Currently General Fund) 240,000 Subtotal 415,000 Total1 508 000 Gi ven these revenue needs, i t seems I i keI y that the monthly fee for a si ngl e fami I y property would be in the $2.50 to $3.25 range (see Surface Water Utility Rate Models above). The following chart compares these rates to other communities in the metro area. Savage 4.65 Burnsville 4.20 Golden V al I ey 4.00 * A ppl e V al I ey 3.98 Bloomington 3.48 Brookl yn Center 3.33 Plymouth 3.25 New Hope 2.92 Shakopee 2.52 Plymouth 2.50 Eagan 2.03 St. Louis Park 2.00 Crystal 1.95 Edina 1.67 Lakeville 1.63 Eden Prai ri e 1.00 Rate as of March - 2001, i ncrease. 5 Page 30 Agenda Number: CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Dwight D. Johnson, City Manager FROM: Mike Kohn, Financial Analyst through Dale Hahn, Fi nance Di rector SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF STORM WATER UTILITY ORDINANCE DATE: June 4, 2001 for City Council I M eeti ng June 12, 2001 ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached ordinance amending Section 725 of the Plymouth City Code creating a Storm Water Utility. 2. BACKGROUND: At the May 22, 2001, City Council Meeting a public hearing was held and the City Council passed a resolution directing staff to prepare a storm water utility ordinance. The attached ordinance is in response to that request. 3. DISCUSSION: The proposed storm water utility, as outlined in the attached ordinance, is very si mi I ar to those implemented by numerous communities in the Twi n Cities area. It would i mpact al I developed properties based on the amount of runoff that each parcel produces. The only exempt properties would be public rights-of-way, vacant land, rail road rights-of-way, and unoccupied public land. Public and private school would be deferred for one year unti I their next budget cycle. A fee based on the proportionate share of runoff from the non-exempt properti es woul d be pl aced on the uti I i ty bi I I al ong wi th charges for water, sewer, recycl i ng, and street I i ghti ng. The proposed fee schedul e i s as fol I ows: Single Family and Duplex Multi -Family (Townhomes, Commerci al/I ndustri al Condos, and Apartments) 3.25 Per Month/Per Parcel 10.79 Per Month/Per Acre 23.34 Per Month/Per Acre Other property types such as churches, schools, institutions, city, county and state property woul d al I be bi I I ed based on an i ndi vi dual cal cul ati on of each si tes' runoff. The average rate for these groups is $8.97 per month/per acre. Golf courses and regi onal parks woul d have thei r fees based on the amount of run-off produced by the i mpervi ous area of each parcel, not the total parcel si ze. The rate per acre of i mpervi ous surface woul d be $44.14. Rates set at these I evel s woul d be suff i ci ent to generate $1,500,000 per year (see Storm Water Uti I i ty Rate M odel) whi ch woul d ful I y fund the activi ti es and proj ects i dentifi ed i n the Water Resources Management Ran. Page 31 Stor m Water Uti I ity Rate M odel Average 125,341.74 1,504,100.89 Source: Units and acres obtained from 2000 Comprehensive Plan. I n addi ti on, the rates woul d be suff i ci ent to cover fee reducti ons f or appeal s, best management practi ce i ncenti ves, and the deferral of publ i c and pri vate school fees for one year. A I i st of the acti vi ti es supported by the fee can be found i n the fol I owi ng tabl e: Cashflow and Funding Requirements Inflators 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Expenditures Current Operating Salary & Benefits Public Information Materials & Office Consultants and Other Contractual Services Watershed Membership Dues Computer and Space Allocations Other Unfunded Operating Costs Lake Studies Capital Expenditures Lake Cleanup Proiects Pond & Drainage Improvements Possible Revenue Reductions Fee Reduction Appeals & Administration Incentives Program Incentives for Best Management Practices School Revenue Deferral Deferred School Revenues TOTAL REQUIRED FOR RATE 5% 165,799 Rate Per 182,793 191,933 201,530 3% REF Unit/Acre UnitsiAcres Dollars Month DollarsYear Si nal e Fami I v/ D ud ex 1.00 3.25 14.815.00 48.148.75 577, 785.00 Multi -Fami l v 3.32 10.79 927.55 10, 008.26 120, 099.17 Commercial/Industrial 7.18 23.34 2,473.93 57,729.16 692,749.88 Churches 2.62 8.52 208.48 1,775.21 21,302.49 School s 2.76 8.97 471.46 4.229.00 50, 747.95 Publ i c Lands - Occupi ed 3.32 10.79 194.78 2,101.70 25,220.37 Institutional 2.34 7.61 73.59 559.65 6,715.82 Golf Courses 13.58 44.14 17.9 790.02 9,480.20 Average 125,341.74 1,504,100.89 Source: Units and acres obtained from 2000 Comprehensive Plan. I n addi ti on, the rates woul d be suff i ci ent to cover fee reducti ons f or appeal s, best management practi ce i ncenti ves, and the deferral of publ i c and pri vate school fees for one year. A I i st of the acti vi ti es supported by the fee can be found i n the fol I owi ng tabl e: Cashflow and Funding Requirements Inflators 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Expenditures Current Operating Salary & Benefits Public Information Materials & Office Consultants and Other Contractual Services Watershed Membership Dues Computer and Space Allocations Other Unfunded Operating Costs Lake Studies Capital Expenditures Lake Cleanup Proiects Pond & Drainage Improvements Possible Revenue Reductions Fee Reduction Appeals & Administration Incentives Program Incentives for Best Management Practices School Revenue Deferral Deferred School Revenues TOTAL REQUIRED FOR RATE 5% 165,799 174,089 182,793 191,933 201,530 3% 36,600 37,698 38,829 39,994 41,194 3% 92,106 94,869 97,715 100,647 103,666 3% 160,144 164,948 169,897 174,994 180,243 7% 18,690 19,998 21,398 22,896 24,499 4% 0 120,000 124,800 129,792 134,984 3% 0 530,000 545,900 562,277 579,145 3% 50,000 100,000 103,000 106,090 109,273 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 648,339 1,491,603 1,534,333 1,578,622 1,624,533 2 Page 32 The above expendi tures can be broken down i nto the fol I owi ng general areas: Capital Projects 60% Education 10% Standards Revi env/Enforcement 20% M ai ntenance 10% The fees outl i ned above are about average when compared to other communiti es i n the metro area. The fol I owing chart compares the si ngl e fami I y/dupl ex rate to other communities. Savage 4.65 Burnsville 4.20 Golden V al I ey 4.00 A ppl e V al I ey 3.98 New Hope 3.65 Bloomington 3.48 Brook) yn Center 3.33 Plymouth 3.25 Shakopee 2.52 Eagan 2.03 St. Louis Park 2.00 Crystal 1.95 Edi na 1.67 Lakeville 1.63 Eden Prai ri e 1.00 In summary, the storm water utility as current) y proposed provi des the revenues necessary to carry out the obj ecti ves identified in the Water Resources Management Ran by charging properties based on their proportionate share of storm water produced. Only developed properti es are targeted for the fee si nce it i s devel opment that produces the most adverse i mpact upon surface water qual i ty and storm water quanti ti es. t i s recogni zed that the fee structure proposed wi I I not be 100% accurate for most i ndi vi dual properti es due to vari ati ons i n I andscapi ng, surface coverage, grade, and other factors. However, background work has been done to group si mi I ar properti es together i n a manner that wi I I provi de for overal I equity i n terms of fees pai d. Furthermore, the proposed structure does al I ow for chat I enges to the fee structure when non-si ngl e fami I y and dupl ex properti es do have characteri sti cs that pl ace them outsi de the norm for thei r groupi ng. Thi s wi I I hel p ensure that properti es are payi ng onl y thei r fai r share toward the common good of sound water quality and quantity management. One addi ti onal aspect that separates thi s storm water uti I i ty proposal from most others i s the provi si on for monetary i ncenti ves to adopt best management practi ces to reduce adverse quanti ty and qual ity i mpacts. Thi s provi des al I property owners with the possi bi I ity to reduce thei r fee by up to 20% by bei ng proactive i n thei r efforts to address storm water i ssues. 3 Page 3 3 4. RECOMMENDATIONSAND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend City Council approve the attached Storm Water Utility Ordinance amending Section 725 of the City Code. The storm water utility, as outlined in the attached ordinance, will provi de the revenues necessary to carry out the objectives identified in the Water Resources Management Ran by charging properties based on their proportionate share of storm water produced. Only developed properti es are targeted for the fee si nce i t i s devel opment that produces the most adverse i mpact upon surface water qual i ty and storm water quanti ti es. It i s recogni zed that the fee structure proposed wi I I not be 100% accurate for most i ndivi dual properti es due to vari ati ons i n I andscapi ng, surface coverage, grade, and other factors. However, background work has been done to group si mi I ar properti es together i n a manner that wi I I provi de for overal I equity i n terms of fees pai d. Furthermore, the proposed structure does al I ow for chat I enges to the fee structure when non-si ngl e fami I y and dupl ex properti es do have characteri sti cs that pl ace them outsi de the norm for thei r groupi ng. Thi s wi I I hel p ensure that properti es are payi ng onl y thei r fai r share toward the common good of sound water quality and quantity management. 4 Page 34 Plymouth City Code 725.01 Section 725 - Storm Drainage Systems 725.01. Storm Water Utility Established. A municipal storm water utility is hereby established and shall be operated as a public utility pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. 725.02. Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following words or phrases have the meanings given in this Subdivision. A. MS4. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System means a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains) owned and operated by the City and designed or used for collecting or conveying Storm Water. B. NPDES. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is the program for issuing, modifying, revoking, reissuing, terminating, monitoring, and enforcing permits and imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements under sections, 307, 318, 402 and 405 of the Clean Water Act, United States Code, title 33, sections 1317, 1328, 1342 and 1345. C. Pollutant. Anything which causes or contributes to pollution. Pollutants may include, but are not limited to: paints, varnishes, and solvents; oil and other automotive fluids; refuse, rubbish, garbage, or litter; floatables; pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers; hazardous substances and wastes; sewage, fecal coli form and pathogens; dissolved and particulate metals; animal wastes; wastes and residues that result from constructing a building or structure; and noxious or offensive matter. D. Non -Storm Water Discharge. Any discharge to the storm drain system that is not composed entirely of storm water. E. Residential Equivalent Factor (REF). One REF is defined as the ratio of the average volume of runoff generated by one acre of a particular land use to the average volume of runoff generated by 1/2 acre of typical single family residential land, assuming Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Type B" soil conditions, during a standard 1 year rainfall event, as determined by the Public Works Director. F. Storm Water. Any surface flow, runoff, and drainage consisting entirely of water from any form of natural precipitation, and resulting from such precipitation. G. Storm Water Utility Rate. The charge to a typical 1/2 acre single family residential parcel shall be the storm water utility rate. Page 3 5 Plymouth City Code 725.03 725.03. REF for Land Uses. Storm water drainage fees for single family (detached) and duplex parcels shall be on a per parcel basis. These fees shall be calculated by multiplying the REF by the storm water utility rate. Storm water drainage fees for all other land uses shall be determined by multiplying the REF for the land use by the parcels' acreage and then multiplying the resulting product by the storm water utility rate. The REF values for various land uses are as follows: Land Use Per Parcel Single Family (Detached) & Duplex REF 1.00 Per Acre Multi -Family (Townhomes, Condominiums, and Apartments) 3.32 Commercial and Industrial 7.18 725.04. Other Land Uses. Land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be evaluated individually based on the amount of impervious coverage and parcel size. Golf courses and regional parks will have their fees based on the amount of run-off produced by the impervious area of each parcel, not the total parcel size. 725.05. Storm Water Utility. The storm water utility rates are set by Chapter X. Ord. 2007-06, 2/13/2007) 725.06. Appeals — Single -Family and Duplex. Appeals for single-family and duplex properties are generally not allowed. However, owners of single-family and duplex properties, with unique conditions or improvements (natural ponds, water quality ponds, drywells, minimal impervious coverage, etc.) may appeal their surface water fee. The City Manager may adjust the REF for these parcels of land (by up to 75 percent) based upon the demonstration of run-off volumes substantially different from the standards used by the City. Land use data, sufficient to determine storm water runoff, must be supplied by the property owner(s) to demonstrate that a fee adjustment is warranted. Fee adjustments shall not be made retroactively. Appeals of the City Manager's determinations shall be made to the Council. 725.07. Appeals —Other Properties. The City Manager may adjust the REF for all parcels of land which are not single-family or duplex properties (by up to percent) based upon the demonstration of run-off volumes substantially different from the standards used by the City. The area of parcels may also be reduced by the area of qualifying NURP ponds at normal water level. Land use data, sufficient to determine storm water runoff, must be supplied by the property owner(s) to demonstrate that a fee adjustment is warranted. Fee adjustments shall not be made retroactively. Appeals of the City Manager's determinations shall be made to the Council. Page 36 Plymouth City Code 725.08 725.08. Incentives. The Council may adopt, from time to time, by resolution an incentive program which would allow for the reduction of fees for individual parcels of land. The maximum reduction for any parcel shall be 20 percent. 725.09. Exemptions. The following land uses are exempt from storm water utility fees. A. Public Rights -of -Way B. Vacant Land (e.g., undeveloped land, agricultural land without a dwelling) C. Railroad Rights -of -Way D. Unoccupied Public Land (e.g., open space, parks without permanently staffed structures) 725.10. Billing and Payment. Storm water utility charges shall be computed and billed periodically with, and included as a charge on, bills issued by the City for water, sewer, recycling or streetlight services. If a parcel of land subject to the storm water utility charge is not served by other utilities, a separate bill shall be issued every two months for residential properties and every month for commercial properties. 725.11. Amount Due After Due Date. An amount equal to 10 percent of the unpaid current service charges shall be added to each account which is not paid by the due date as specified by the Finance Division. 725.12. Delinquent Bills. If storm water utility charges are not paid within three months after a billing is issued, the City shall certify the amount due, together with penalties, to the County Auditor to be collected with other real estate taxes on the parcel. 725.13. Establishment of Fund. All fees collected for the storm water utility shall be placed in a fund for storm water purposes as permitted by Minnesota Statutes 444.075. (Ord. 2001-17, 6/12/2001; Ord. 2002-34, 12/17/2002) 725.14. Prohibition of Illegal Discharges. No person shall throw, drain, or otherwise discharge, cause, or allow others under its control to throw, drain, or otherwise discharge into the MS4 any pollutants or waters containing any pollutants, other than storm water. The commencement, conduct or continuance of any illegal discharge to the storm drain system is prohibited except as described as follows: A. The following discharges are exempt from discharge prohibitions established by this ordinance: water line flushing, landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, rising ground waters, uncontaminated ground water infiltration, uncontaminated pumped ground water, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs, water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, lawn watering, individual residential car washing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated swimming pool discharges (City Code Section 740), and street wash water. Page 37 Plymouth City Code 725.14 B. Discharges or flow from fire fighting, or other discharges as specified in writing by the City as being necessary to protect public health and safety. C. The prohibition shall not apply to any non -storm water discharge permitted under an NPDES permit, waiver, or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and other applicable laws and regulations, and provided that written approval from the City or State Agency has been granted for any discharge to the storm drain system. 725.15. Prohibition of Illicit Connections. The construction, use, maintenance or continued existence of illicit connections to the storm drain system is prohibited. A. This prohibition expressly includes, without limitation, illicit connections made in the past, regardless of whether the connection was permissible under law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of connection. B. A person is considered to be in violation of this ordinance if the person connects a line conveying sewage to the MS4, or allows such a connection to continue. C. Improper connections in violation of this ordinance must be disconnected and redirected at the owner or occupants cost, to an approved onsite wastewater management system or the sanitary sewer system upon approval of the City. D. Any drain or conveyance that has not been documented in plans, maps or equivalent, and which may be connected to the storm sewer system, shall be located by the owner or occupant of that property, at the owner or occupant cost, upon receipt of written notice of violation from the City requiring that such locating be completed. Such notice will specify a reasonable time period within which the location of the drain or conveyance is to be determined, that the drain or conveyance be identified as storm sewer, sanitary sewer or other, and that the outfall location or point of connection to the storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system or other discharge point be identified. Results of these investigations are to be documented and provided to the City. 725.16 Notification of Spills. Notwithstanding other requirements of law, as soon as any person responsible for a facility or operation, or responsible for emergency response for a facility or operation has information of any known or suspected release of materials which are resulting or may result in illegal discharges or pollutants discharging into storm water, the storm drain system, or waters of the United States, said person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery, containment, and cleanup of such release. In the event of such a release of hazardous materials said person shall immediately notify emergency response agencies of the occurrence via emergency dispatch services. In the event of a release of non -hazardous materials, said person shall notify the City in person or by phone or facsimile no later than the next business day. Notifications in person or by phone shall be confirmed by written notice addressed and mailed to the City within five business days of the phone notice. If the discharge of prohibited materials emanates from a commercial or Page 38 Plymouth City Code 725.16 industrial establishment, the owner or operator of such establishment shall also retain an on-site written record of the discharge and the actions taken to prevent its recurrence. Such records shall be retained for at least three years. 725.17. Enforcement. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any person who has violated or continues to violate the provisions of this ordinance may be subject to the enforcement actions outlined in Chapter XX. In the event the violation constitutes an immediate danger to public health or public safety, the City is authorized to enter upon the subject private property, without giving prior notice, to take any and all measures necessary to abate the violation and/or restore the property at the owner's expense. Ord. 2001-17, 6/12/2001; Ord. 2002-34, 12/17/2002; Ord. 2011-29, 10/25/2011; Ord. 2012-14, 4/24/2012) Page 39 Plymouth City Code Th is page left blah k in ten tion ally) 725 Page 40 City of Plymouth Storm Water Utility Timeline of Events June, 2001, Storm Water Utility established. The 2002 Street Maintenance — Drainage Maintenance budget included concrete and asphalt and culverts. Street Maintenance budget includes concrete and asphalt and curb raising. Street Maintenance — Street Cleaning budget includes street sweeping. Water Resources budget does not include those items but includes first full year of revenue from new Storm Water Utility. 2003 Street Maintenance — Drainage Maintenance removed from General Fund and put into the Water Resources budget. Street Maintenance — Street Cleaning budget includes street sweeping. Street Maintenance budget includes concrete and asphalt and curb. Water Resources budget includes concrete and asphalt and culverts. 2004 Street Maintenance — Street Cleaning removed from General Fund and put into the Water Resources budget. 2007 Water Resources budget includes curb as well as includes concrete and asphalt and culverts and street sweeping. Page 41 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 DATE: August 23, 2012 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager FROM: Diane Evans, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Medians This summer, staff has received numerous complaints regarding the care and maintenance of roadway medians. In particular, weeds growing on County Roads in and alongside the concrete medians. Weeds are always a concern, however, more so this year due to a very short winter and a long, warm summer. Currently the Parks Department is responsible for maintaining the landscaped medians on Zachary Lane, West Medicine Lake Drive, Plymouth Boulevard, 36th Avenue, Peony Lane and County Road 101. Landscape maintenance is typically done 2-3 times a summer on each of the medians. The cost of landscape median care of the six roadway medians is approximately 26,000 per year. In addition, the Parks Department has one vehicle and an employee assigned to spraying all of the concrete roadway medians at least once per season. The County is responsible for spraying and mowing County Roads. Currently, the County contracts with a private vendor cut and maintain all of their roadway medians 2-3 times per summer season. The medians are sprayed for weeds once per season. Because the weeds were so bad on County Road 9, the Parks crew worked for a day and a half cutting median weeds. If the City is interested in taking on additional maintenance on County Roads we would need to contract with a private vendor. Estimated costs for Rockford Road/County Road 9 maintenance: Spraying & maintenance (existing conditions-concrete/grass) = $12,000 Spraying & maintenance (concrete and new landscaped medians) = $25,000 Additional costs and information for landscape improvements of the medians along Rockford Road/County Road 9 is provided as an attachment. Page 42 J; fackfard-; Raa d she e P J' 5t x I T J Median width" .2d' allowing for fixe i ects such as trees, sculptures, signs, etc. to nstalled between the clear mories. r, , 0 0 0 0 E F G are ro Median Island A: 536,109 Total Sq. Feet = 3,650 Sq. Feet of improved turf 2,190 11,388 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 1,460 17,111 Number of new tree plantings 5 7,610 Median Island B: S167,872 Total Sq. Feet = 21,500 Sq. Feet of improved turf 12,900 67,080 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 8,600 100,792 Number of new tree plantings 0 Median Island C:_ 550,361 Total Sq. Feet = 6,450 Sq. Feet of improved turf 3,870 $20,124 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 2,580 $30,237 Number of new tree plantings 0 Median Island D: $70,272 Total Sq. Feet = 9,000 Sq. Feet of improved turf 5,400 $28,080 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 3,600 $42,192 Number of new tree plantings 0 Median Island E: $66,368 Total Sq. Feet = 8,500 Sq. Feet of improved turf 5,100 $26,520 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 3,400 $39,848 Number of new tree plantings 0 Median 1 land F• $320,128 Total Sq. Feet = 41,000 Sq. Feet of improved turf 24,600 $127,920 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 16,400 $192,208 Number of new tree plantings 0 Median Island G: 5281.088 Total Sq. Feet = 36,000 Sq. Feet of improved turf 21,600 $112,320 Sq. Feet of new planting bed 14,400 $168,768 Number of new free plantings 0 Total Estimate Cost of Landscape Improvements = $992,198 Add 25% ($248,050) for surveying, design, permitting, construction contingency, etc. = $1,240,248.00 total budget rib Page 45 r Plymouth Adding Qualiry to Life 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Projected Cash Flows Page 46 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program MSA Fund Revenues Expenditures Beginning Cash Ending Cash available for Estimated State Capital available for Year projects funds Interest Expenditures projects 2012 * Year End Balance Forward 5,116,752 2013 5,116,752 1,966,849 22,853 1,070,000 6,036,454 2014 6,036,454 1,966,849 23,082 660,000 7,366,385 2015 7,366,385 1,966,849 23,313 4,500,000 4,856,547 2016 4,856,547 1,966,849 23,546 3,100,000 3,746,941 2017 3,746,941 1,966,849 23,781 5,737,572 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 City's cash balance State MSA balance Cash available for projects" includes internal funds and allocated funding held at the State. Page 18 Page 47 8/28/2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Park Replacement Fund Revenues Expenditures Beginning Non -Interest Investment Interfund Operating Capital Interfund Ending Cash Year Cash Balance Revenues Interest Repayment Levy Expenditures Expenditures Payment Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward * * 5,276,153 2013 5,276,153 34,610 52,694 154,892 330,000 33,050 500,000 240,807 5,074,492 2014 5,074,492 35,368 50,929 154,892 339,900 33,381 460,000 240,807 4,921,393 2015 4,921,393 36,146 47,241 154,892 350,097 33,714 902,000 240,807 4,333,248 2016 4,333,248 36,944 41,949 154,892 360,600 34,052 795,000 240,807 3,857,775 2017 3,857,775 37,764 36,726 154,892 371,418 34,392 900,000 240,807 3,283,376 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Non-interest revenues include a transfer from the Recreation Fund of $20,000 per year inflated at 3% annually. Page 2 PageB4&2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Community Improvement Fund Year Beginning Cash Balance Revenues Special Investment Assessments Interest Expenditures Capital Expenditures Ending Cash Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward * * * 4,931,294 2013 4,931,294 15,506 49,390 4,996,191 2014 4,996,191 15,661 43,040 1,400,000 3,654,892 2015 3,654,892 15,818 36,628 3,707,338 2016 3,707,338 15,976 37,153 3,760,468 2017 3,760,468 16,136 37,685 3,814,289 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 3 Page/AE92o12 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Park Dedication Fund Revenues Expenditures Beginning Cash Non -Interest Investment Note Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Interest Repayment Expenditures Expenditures Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward 2013 3,167,157 903,500 31,591 17,000 86,597 850,000 2014 3,182,651 905,000 16,584 - 87,463 3,866,000 2015 150,772 390,000 6,484) - 88,338 1,900,000 2016 1,454,050) 455,000 45,512) - 89,221 6,560,000 2017 7,693,782) 455,000 75,113) - 90,113 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000) 4,000,000) 6,000,000) 8,000,000) 10,000,000) 2013 2014 2015 2016 3,167,157 3,182, 651 150,772 1,454,050) 7,693,782) 7,404,009) 2017 Page 4 Page/MO12 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Capital Improvement Fund Revenues Expenditures Beginning Cash Investment Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Levy Interest Expenditures Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward * * * * * * 3,243,695 2013 3,243,695 391,432 33,869 105,000 3,563,997 2014 3,563,997 391,432 37,597 - 3,993,026 2015 3,993,026 391,432 41,362 105,000 4,320,820 2016 4,320,820 391,432 45,165 - 4,757,417 2017 4,757,417 391,432 49,531 - 5,198,381 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 5 Page/12012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Street Reconstruction Fund Revenues Expenditures Beginning Cash Non -Interest Investment Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Interest Levy Expenditures Balance 2012 * * * * * * * Year End Balance Forward * 2013 11,435,002 113,489 114,475 2,766,605 2,855,000 2014 11,574,571 114,624 111,917 2,849,603 3,730,000 2015 10,920,715 115,770 108,686 2,935,091 3,155,000 2016 10,925,263 116,928 108,928 3,023,144 3,205,000 2017 10,969,262 118,097 110,252 3,113,838 3,120,000 11,800,000 11,600,000 11,400,000 11,200,000 11,000,000 10,800,000 10,600,000 10,400,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 11,435,002 11,574,571 10,920,715 10,925,263 10,969,262 11,191,450 2017 Page 6 Page/W2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Utility Trunk Funds Revenues Expenditures Purchase of Beginning Cash Non -Interest Investment Street Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Interest Assessments Assessments Expenditures Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward 2013 14,717,321 882,622 157,060 2,874,655 1,460,000 320,000 2014 16,851,658 891,448 175,066 2,903,402 1,640,000 845,000 2015 18,336,573 900,363 191,730 2,932,436 1,840,000 320,000 2016 20,201,101 909,366 210,567 2,961,760 1,840,000 320,000 2017 22,122,794 918,460 191,977 2,991,378 1,840,000 7,920,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 2013 2014 2015 qOV 14,717,321 16,851,658 18,336,573 20,201,101 22,122,794 16, 464, 609 2017 Page 7 Page/M2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Water Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Non -Interest Investment Operating Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Interest Expenses Transfers Debt Expenses Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward 5,185,764 2013 5,185,764 8,168,146 54,445 4,371,709 145,860 1,110,188 2,023,000 5,757,598 2014 5,757,598 8,343,016 63,718 4,415,426 147,319 1,106,800 1,445,000 7,049,788 2015 7,049,788 8,362,767 80,892 4,459,580 148,792 1,100,600 575,000 9,209,475 2016 9,209,475 8,446,395 104,114 4,504,176 150,280 1,098,100 290,000 11,717,428 2017 11,717,428 8,530,859 129,333 4,549,218 151,783 1,099,100 299,000 14,278,520 16,000,000 14, 000, 000 12, 000, 000 10, 000, 000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 8 Page/592012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Sewer Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Non -Interest Investment Operating Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Interest Expenses Transfers Expenses Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward * 2,792,856 2013 2,792,856 7,475,125 24,637 6,495,303 98,148 1,540,000 2,159,167 2014 2,159,167 7,623,385 19,012 6,560,256 99,129 1,480,000 1,662,179 2015 1,662,179 7,774,598 14,565 6,625,858 100,121 1,460,000 1,265,362 2016 1,265,362 7,852,343 10,999 6,692,117 101,122 1,390,000 945,466 2017 945,466 7,930,867 9,953 6,759,038 102,133 970,000 1,055,115 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 9 Page/M2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Water Resources Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Non -Interest Watershed Investment Operating Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Revenues Interest Expenses Transfers Expenses Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward 21631,417 2013 2,631,417 2,706,309 425,000 29,237 1,747,127 42,533 757,000 3,245,302 2014 3,245,302 2,733,372 575,000 34,132 1,764,599 42,958 1,165,000 3,615,249 2015 3,615,249 2,760,706 31,903 1,782,245 43,388 1,785,000 2,797,225 2016 2,797,225 2,788,313 550,000 31,019 1,800,067 43,822 885,000 3,437,668 2017 3,437,668 2,816,196 50,000 37,596 1,818,068 44,260 360,000 4,119,132 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 10 Page/M2012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Central Equipment Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Non -Interest Allocation Capital Investment Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Revenue Transfers Interest Expenses Expenses Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward 6,758,731 2013 6,758,731 13,605 2,556,000 281,300 67,501 1,239,207 1,629,000 6,527,629 2014 6,527,629 13,741 2,581,560 40,000 57,730 1,251,599 2,893,000 5,036,061 2015 5,036,061 13,879 2,607,376 46,456 1,264,115 2,138,000 4,301,656 2016 4,301,656 14,017 2,633,449 33,500 42,111 1,276,756 1,585,300 4,129,177 2017 4,129,177 14,157 2,659,784 39,016 1,289,524 1,839,500 3,713,111 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 11 Page/f72012 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Public Facilities Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Allocation Other Investment Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenue Revenue Interest Expenses Expenses Balance 2012 Year End Balance Forward * 3,809,180 2013 3,809,180 1,546,720 38,101 1,053,835 491,000 3,849,167 2014 3,849,167 1,562,187 37,031 1,064,373 790,000 3,594,012 2015 3,594,012 1,577,809 33,024 1,075,017 1,086,000 3,043,828 2016 3,043,828 1,593,587 32,327 1,085,767 130,000 3,453,976 2017 3,453,976 1,609,523 36,694 1,096,625 82,000 3,921,568 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 12 Page/MO12 City of Plymouth 2013 - 2017 Capital Improvements Program Information Technology Fund Revenues Expenses Beginning Cash Non -Interest Allocation Investment Operating Capital Ending Cash Year Balance Revenues Revenue Interest Expenses Expenses Balance 2012 * * * * * * * Year End Balance Forward * * * * * * * 5,669,147 2013 5,669,147 15,343 1,701,490 53,296 1,563,116 832,900 5,043,260 2014 5,043,260 15,496 1,718,505 49,734 1,578,747 295,000 4,953,248 2015 4,953,248 15,651 1,735,690 50,317 1,594,535 - 5,160,371 2016 5,160,371 15,808 1,753,047 51,096 1,610,480 260,000 5,109,841 2017 5,109,841 15,966 1,770,577 51,898 1,626,585 - 5,321,697 5,400,000 5,300,000 5,200,000 5,100,000 5,000,000 4,900,000 4,800,000 4,700,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Page 13 Page/592012 2D 10 ii;o City of Plymouth Yard Waste Site August 28, 201 " Prepared by Barb Northway Deputy Director of Parks Et Recreation Page 1 The following is a summary of the yard waste site operations, budget, comparisons and considerations. History The City of Plymouth has operated the yard waste site for over 30 years. The site began operations in the early 1970's and continues today. The site operations have been administered by Park Maintenance/Forestry since 2008. The site accepts leaves and soft vegetative materials as well as logs, limbs and brush. The site stopped accepting grass clippings about 10 years ago due to chemicals, volume and odor. Location The yard waste site is located on two acres behind the City of Plymouth Maintenance Facility on 23rd Avenue. 5 1— 7- 3ncp FacJKy LL 23rd Ave O " Ca Rd 6 Yard Waste Site Users The yard waste site is used as a drop off site for leaves and wood waste by City of Plymouth residents, Wayzata and Robbinsdale School Districts, city tree contractors and contracted cities of Long Lake, Medicine Lake and Wayzata. There is no charge for residents, school districts or city tree contractors to access the site. The contracted cities pay an annual or per visit fee for their residents to use the site. The annual fees are: Long Lake $ 1,500 Medicine Lake $ 300 Wayzata $ 2,240 (visit based) Page 2 Hours of Operation Month Weeknights Weekends April W — F, 3 — 6 pm 9 am — 5 pm May - August W — F, 3 — 8 pm 9 am — 5 pm September - October W — F, 3 — 6 pm 9 am — 5 pm November W — F, 3 — 6 pm 9 am — 5 pm The site is closed on Mondays and Tuesdays the entire season as well as Easter, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day and Thanksgiving (Thursday & Friday). Annual Visits 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 29,000 Average Annual Visits 28 Visits/Hour Average Monthly Visits April May June July August September October November 2009 2010 2011 2012 AVG Linear (AVG) Licensing The site is Permitted by Rule through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MN PCA). In 2012, we became licensed as a Wood Waste Site with Hennepin County due to the size & volume of materials. Compost The site receives 10,000 cubic yards of leaves and soft vegetative material from April -May. This is equivalent to 100 semi loads of leaves. In the past, this material was processed into compost on-site by Park Maintenance. In 2012, this material will be taken off-site. Page 3 Wood Waste The site receives about 30,000 cubic yards of wood waste from April -May. This is equivalent to 300 semi loads of brush, limbs and logs. In previous years, as well as 2012 the yard waste vendor will grind the wood waste and remove it from the site. The wood waste must be ground to 1" or less in two directions to meet the Emerald Ash Borer standards. Wood Waste Grinding Site Vendor An RFP was issued in 2012 and Sylva Corporation of Princeton was selected. Sylva's contract calls for the removal of leaves and soft vegetative material from the site. This material will be used to make compost or as an energy source. In addition, Sylva must grind and remove all wood waste. The wood waste will be turned into mulch, playground surfacing or used as an energy source. The cost of Sylva's contract is $10,000 which is for processing leaves. There is no cost to the City for processing and removing wood waste. The next best equivalent bid was 95,000. 2013 Yard Waste Budget Item Amount Comments Salaries & Benefits 22,950 Gate access personnel Operating Supplies 16,400 Site grading & resident product. Reduce b $11,700 if the CIP is approved. Employee Development 100 Professional Services 12,000 Sylva contract & removal of debris Utilities 1,000 Capital Outlay (CIP 150'X200' 4" Pad) 60,000 CIP 150'x 200'4" asphalt pad License 1,200 Hennepin County Page 4 Comparisons A number of neighboring cities use the Lynde private site in Maple Grove. Those cities include: Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Maple Grove and New Hope. As a comparison, the City of Maple Grove pays $238,564 annually for residents to drop yard waste at Lynde. Another option for residents would be to use their residential hauler for yard waste. In a survey of area haulers, the range fee for curb service is $75-$100 annually. Yard Waste Considerations The yard waste site provides for an established operation in case of storm damage. The yard waste vendor has expressed concern with the amount of dirt and debris in the wood waste. Site improvements such as an asphalt pad would allow for a cleaner drop off, storage and grind area. Yard waste site closures due to muddy conditions (spring thaw & rain) The yard waste site proximity to neighboring businesses during grinding cycles may become an issue due to dust and grinding particles which become airborne. Off-site processing of leaves will allow the current site to remain viable for a longer period of time. The volume of leaves and the space they occupy is considerable (one acre). As the City develops the size and location of the yard waste site may need to be reviewed. Page 5 w City of Plymouth Trail Gaps August 28, 2012 Prepared by Diane Evans Director of Parks and Recreation Page 1 THE TRAIL AND SIDEWALK SYSTEM Plymouth's current trail system is an established network of more than 130 miles of city, county and state trails and sidewalks that connect most neighborhoods to parks, schools, and commercial areas. A multi -use trail system is a key amenity to the community because it provides for healthy, non -motorized transportation such as walking, jogging, bicycling and in- line skating. The Trail and Sidewalk Plan, identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan will help Plymouth to continue to effectively implement a high-quality, multi -use trail system. This plan provides the framework that will ensure that trail implementation will serve the transportation and recreation needs of the community. The major goals of the Trail and Sidewalk plan are as follows: Provide trail connections among municipal and regional parks, neighborhoods and major activity centers. Provide trail connections to state, regional, county and adjoining community trail systems. Identify physical barriers to non -motorized access and provide connections across these barriers at key locations where feasible. Consider providing trails on both sides of streets when roadway traffic speed volumes or other safety considerations warrant. TRAIL GAP ANALYSIS The trail gap analysis identifies missing trail sections or gaps in the trail network based on the framework of the 2030 Comprehensive Trail and Sidewalk Plan. In addition to identifying the gaps, the analysis provides an opportunity to: DETERMINE FEASIBILITY - analyze whether the trail section is buildable based on existing conditions (road right of way, alignment obstacles, and/or residential impacts). PRIORITIZATION - established prioritization and timeline for construction according to the Trail and Sidewalk Plan goals. Page 2 BUDGETING - obtain estimated construction costs for planning and budgeting purposes. The trail gap analysis documents include the Trail and Sidewalk Plan map (divided into nine sections) with each trail gap section numerically identified. The trail gap project spreadsheet references the gap/section number and provides further information on location, estimated length, available cost estimates, construction rationale and feasibility. The spreadsheet also places each of the trail gaps/section into one of five categories to assist with the prioritization process. 1. Desirable - important gap/section to complete with no visible obstacles or challenges 2. Challenging - visible obstacles or challenges 3. Future Construction - completed with road improvements and/or development 4. Currently Not Possible - an obstacle and/or road right-of-way issue 5. Neutral - gap/section not as critical (i.e. trail on other side of roadway) As of June 2012, trail sections #50 and #63 were approved by City Council for construction this year. Trail sections #96, #101, #95 and #92 have been placed in the Capital Improvement Program for 2014 as potential projects. Within the next year, staff anticipates that further prioritization and/or adjustments of the trail gaps will need to be completed to appropriately plan and budget for construction. Page 3 Jb 0 7 I .of 1a Plymouth i r ; 4 Dog Park 1 - _ A1 • I 7 1 + Y Z' I YI rs niave f IU rt # 1 3 1 I1 I t-56TH AVE 1 Iµ1 1 t 1 f/ j. \ t +Fti m 1 I 1 r ,l i F( q 55T11•P:VE'N' I f SSTyA I I tl * I yaTw•avEN 131 z 54C CT/V I jl I + mO COM 5; I 1 1 I s, ->I 54TH A" f Inow Z { I I I 1 1 I 1 1 ,-J I VICKSBUgG (A Elm Creek Woods a ; ,•'";g 31 a r r I I ,y i ml e QqL o 5 ' y 2 SSS -T 50 , rjir EMS- J - 4 y -1 —51ST AV QG2 TP G2'f G P\ S STAVE6 SA{ AE 5'I'S7•N, m / V-, i--- fo I z w y Z hwood re nti / 3 r w 2 -`P 3 >Q. O ¢ Y—SGflM,IDT CAKE D A Y~ a"H-PL.Y---O > 50..FI`4`VE jNPVEN --, y " ri~i 497-H PL 497H PL S'Cry- Wa zata Senior MP N O / TLAKE RD aa22Q - SCAMID4L School L S HMIDT LAKE RD I ,.?' 0Hig C Elm Creek Golf ! n G 1 49TH AVE> LA V .. 49THAVE Rg " z j a y I a ^ a - 7taw, I z VVEST o 48THPL J C {> 48TH A3_ 487-H AVE m o w P I J h5THgL Y' zum0 48TFRA VE 48TH, s l Y 1 HAMEC.RD ~ A o Z SGscr P Hollydale Golf s am PD V < 1 w R JPO w m > U y'FS.T I > J Z Z J O a g6T-HA`VE P9ti o P w 1 U o z Fp v a y a w 3 p 9 T `--'— Yme w = wAVE16E 46TH y ,C7 4Sl .45T.H.P.. F t" + A I 17 p RbDkF, 0 O 45TH Arc Plymouth Trail Gaps NW -1 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space Transit Station Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFOR ION SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI C OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\trail_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd 1> 1 56'rNAVEN 2 SH NA2o o I Z Wood tawT H AVE pSTH L r t ' g 1 ' I l DN U JUN r ZZ Y QI i a laL> 1\00\-P 24 Pomerleau Lake Z 22 Camel s y S7TH.PL zp. OL z a Z _ U s[ I. 57TH ASE Begin Oaks Golf Providence 58TH PVE O3,49TH-A3E- -- JAN. OHF w C3' 6 P D Academy r VE N_ 61 5lAVE` 2 60. Ty A 3` s Q JYL, 0 60TH pL c x u pt S Hq 1 LN 27 a 48TH LAVE .0 s OrTTH S o Ilff o P'jE C v° y o o U AS _.. TIFA CO'RD;NA49 Y23 w 7 COsA `, 60TH PL , 11Lu 3K EN-_ 28 + i 59TH PL OP SCHMIDT LAKE RD r t ' g 1 ' I l DN U JUN r ZZ Y QI i a laL> 1\00\-P 24 Pomerleau Lake Z 22 Camel s y S7TH.PL zp. OL z a Z _ U s[ I. 57TH ASE Begin Oaks Golf Providence 58TH PVE O3,49TH-A3E- -- zP w w O SOTH,E 113-4 Academy 10O 18 Ty A OAS, 19 =. 40 S Hq 1 O 000 j- 48TH LAVE .0 s OrTTH S o p 00 U 3 z SC}JMIDTk-AKEARD m 3K 46TH AVE r --w_ _ SC MIDT.LAKE RD_ OP SCHMIDT LAKE RD 56TH-ASE001)" g OD g o 5 Y gO 0o m 9m X00 V' a3SUSCHMIDTLAKERD 0 2p< z zi a'a w O O z 2q VE Apt w za 0: A z; 2 0 -O 48TH ASE = 4P E P o o S J m y y M O27 R y e oG0O LL E z O qL N Z Q487H AVE 2 hV t THqV w w O, p1 a ya 1 Y 47 rHgV aTTH.PV TH AVE s g g D vPr 0 0 g = Q W O iPP.Z p 3 i o Z w 46TH -PL 5 - 463'1y 9 gO P 46TH PL w z a z w J,. 46T.H.AUE_-,- c--_,.-. w !' z OK 7 46TH AVE c A PZTGLACIEV Y001 21 -. o z 16 J F Nature Canyon P 4 STHA< gSTHAVE OJ O i 44TH PL 45TH - AVE- --=- Tu rale Lake o o A 5917A 44TH"PL N v Y a 44TH p yAC H AVE IF. OJ\\- 25,.-`` g 00 w 3a Y O Q z O. -59THAVE I 56'(H Ji S, /"/ QOJ S TjiP`< Tjy 0 m 58TH PVE O3,49TH-A3E- -- 0 a w O W g O m 0 Y z O g w 10O w w I OAS, OG z O 2GL a 40 S Hq 1 jc 000 j- 48TH LAVE .0 s OrTTH S o p 00 o 70 O 3w; 3 z m 3K 46TH AVE OP w 56TH-ASE001)" g OD g o 5 g Y gO 0o m 0 X00 3 46tH -AVE Oz 45TM AVE 0 Z 0 a zzO O z F 3w o3 JF Wy z 2q VE Apt w za 44T 55j-NP 54TH P o o L a eDD° G y M O27 R y e oG0O1 E 5 hV i 07 w w O, p1 a ya 1 26 -53RDAVE w --52ND AVE z0 O w g g O-5 3 0 a 00o w r SOT 0 O a O H -AVE UNDE 4 OOD' O3,49TH-A3E- -- 0 w O m Oy 49TH AE 0 Y z O w w w I OG z O 2GL a 00 Ir--48TH-Avl I- jc 000 j- 48TH LAVE .0 s g ? 47TH AVE p 00 4jTH-A-E.- 3K 46TH AVE OP w g 210 46TH J O 46'CZ` 0m O g Y gO 0 O3 3 46tH -AVE Oz 45TM AVE J Z 0 RZw 49T P z 2q VE Apt 44T Plymouth Trail Gaps North - 2 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORM ION SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI C OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota NAPLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\trail_gaps.mxd 25 v f z o ..N'-PN _ D O Q 9 w o OA 91 fD 0O! Z ROSFw00D _ I J 00 tiN AVE O _ 0 5 w wza 547 e I a 92i w AJ Oa ya x m 53RD"AVE l.58RD.A.VF 53RDR J a w 52ND AVE r zz O O 7 O A J c = O 4 O T 00 OST zgL AP O O O F_ g_ 515 j 2 w ,O n 50TH 610 0 C a OP TNAVE 50TH A 2 49ry ' il0Q_ G\R Pike Lake Eagle Lake 57TH AVE 1 a 1 I I 57THP 1 38x er Shores e11¢ AML -A AOO lam` Ops-- 52ND-AVF. PSE 3 62ND-AVE- 0 v X 0 AVE61ST O 0 yRODOLA J 2 0 OvP GO f z o ..N'-PN _ D O Q 9 w o OA 91 fD 0O! Z ROSFw00D _ I J 00 tiN AVE O _ 0 5 w wza 547 e I a 92i w AJ Oa ya x m 53RD"AVE l.58RD.A.VF 53RDR J a w 52ND AVE r zz O O 7 O A J c = O 4 O T 00 OST zgL AP O O O F_ g_ 515 j 2 w ,O n 50TH 610 0 C a OP TNAVE 50TH A 2 49ry ' il0Q_ G\R Pike Lake Eagle Lake 57TH AVE 1 a 1 I I 57THP 1 38x er Shores e11¢ AML -A AOO lam` Ops-- 52ND-AVF. PSE 3 o O v 7 v 0 O SCHMIDT CAKE RD 0 OOD 3..49TH-P3E-- m OvP KIRK Q E OOO SOTyAO l W 0 J D i' DTH -AVE 49,, > 16 O J 49TH A! O W v J 48TH PL O O w o0 Q x n m W O pGi z a o, O 48TH AV,O U z o N PV E a a5 0 0 48TH 20 2— 48T01"pBpy o s Oi VE D P O J K Z 0P 47TH qVE O Schmidt1AVE G w Lake J - 46TH'AVE- J O a W O O O O 3 J x Z 45TH PL UO 2 z D ¢ r E - 0 45TH AVE 45THAVE-- 44TH -PL-- 44&H AVE- RpO)" o b d'-.51fr iA 51ST -AVE v 0 O SCHMIDT CAKE RD 0 E -RD --' rv m 50TH P4 507-1,Pt A Q E OOO SOTyAOp?I ya Z iy J D i' DTH -AVE 49,, > 16 O J L 499A a c Z m o m 48TH PL NggTHP,i: mlt`, P o0 2 W O OOYO O O QJ O 47TH AVE K n m W O 0 0 P 46TH PL o, Z 00 r 0* 0_ FORESTVIEb 0i <$6TH AJE OOo N PV E a a5 0 0m O pRTH Iz. w 0 56TH AVE v L 3 •.. 55TH PL F2A0 \ O'pc `Y'--- . 0 Z sp ¢ o ¢ F Tl. e PO37 g 5390 N D X iVF+2 OZ CA'NAD'IA'N'P F ACiPIC' P,n C O P, FTON, 9 7 PJB 51ST AVF 39 N 50TH AVE r SSP h viii 49TH AVj. O F o l! 2 z- y-48THAVE- cr y< 1—' 4 47-TH-PL ¢ 51STp Qc z o49THAVO-- ¢ w N 4 m z 46TH -AVE - O—_ -TREND. N J0m 45TH"P y 44THAVE '+TNgVF. R 59TH qVF N. E- TNPN LA P 7_ 41 N\_AH9NVA .. i* LA 2 ti9 0RLF 2! qti Pv PSTN J wz 54TH PL I0 54THAVE z x Z 0' 9 48TH PL o z O JE p A v D Z o 46A w v 477H;PL A JET P 47TNP !9 ,7, S 51ST AVE 45TH AVE Plymouth Trail Gaps NE -3 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORJIION SHOD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI E%W OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesotarib N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\trail_gaps.mxd we 2 / `Z` 2 N qSU RAZ OCD ROCkp, Fm O 45TH Arc 117 RD RD CT 4STHAVE"` c O STy O p Z ~ v p F 5 9 Ga m w 2 O NH PJP~` S' mJ O a OL+D•ROC-KF-ORD RD y D F . U. a 1 OR I ", I'. y!, I P z Q 3 z 43 \ OC do MJI G 20 Ow =O w F RDAVE 4 \\`FO Oa 1 — — — — — - — - RB P a 43RD Q o F 3ROA,P,RD 29 I p p 49 I 56, Kimberly Lane '2pmP 0CD.00KF RD RD. .r p O 2 a Elementary 42N0 41S.T PJ E.. _ Y z I -------------^_^— g 5 w z v a PNS_ Vmo x -41 STAVE - F p ST -AVE- 4 Y m g1.t. K Y¢ W z CKz PCreep °` F I 40THpE o KSfq ^.- Elementar ! II T9 a-40TH.A VE_ --- ._ ___.. S U' D ycGY 40TH AVE ¢ J jN PL D 43 N - 40T.HAY.E ¢ 3g m V{ 9T /}( Y 7 PJNA.RD 39TH PL_ `S^S z 39TH PL w ? HPC- - J m 48 ' 57 r' z g cyyo z be EVE —039TH AG ri- z m o •1M`` D. 0 3gTH AVE J O 39TH CT - FS. --LO)39TH 39TH AVE . R'O'CKF'ORD RD ,lcp• m O f_ _ 39TH AV/,? a O' _ --- a'-\*, a Jtp 39TH AVE 38TH A ' 38TH AVE I 1 D ' ' 3'lA \ 7` ARO 38TH 38'(NP OG 7 w J// -.. 37TH. yw 5 37TH AVE, I I9P900'(N PJ 0 36TH PJE ¢ !l.QG 7H 4 r SOC " P- 39TFi7{'VE 5 NO2 a .rr.s. 01 P WE5 'I ~ z P j reen od SPO 3jry yAO l em en ry o "" ! 9 G2 •,P G > AQ SN PJE O O Y! OQQ- 37 U a J P2ti } 36TH P _ :36IH.AVE 3g/N 0 3STNA p.NIER LA 2' A F MFDN/ q RD C< n f _ _ 36TH yE o W z dy90 , 5pH- AVE_ o-O F.2 or w 2 0 / > F s' Y - m 4y a .P 34TH AVE <d 9 /p''L STAFF . 34THAVr-S P z 2 Hl4< O? V o.____. _ y9D o o r Pb•55 O m "IEW 33R0 QOP, < 33RD R1 LA O y He her PandsG Fo/NA G 5h J z OP ! 2AN! 33RD-AVE ,z W R f a f a OQ6 -33RD-AVEg 32NDPVOPJ - % _ ¢ 32ND Y 0 G 33RD AVF2y T Pl31S _ ., y0 32N S Ali O 4iia2AliP '(' F P2o oq 44 31ST -AVE w m z z w 31 ST AV E i o P 2, O 9L J F 46 4 32ND LF P 9 ¢ 2 w w 32ND A Y z o Maple Creek 31STAVE '- 30TH AVE 53 L I 29 1 1- Y I I 32NDA 51 MEDJ/yA O i CO'RD-N012:4 -.- - - - - IIRIR'iC9 45 0 m < ue y2 TygVE C7 Y to a 30TH -PL zo 3pTHgVE v - 09R! 4, w r PN0 m Q_O z p 30 -TN AP - 30TH PL 52 I36N ZD VCWZZ _ 30TH-AVE- 29T q 2eTNq J 29~ a K 1 a 3 -30TH P' 30THAVE a F p Gr Tree eR LA 28TH pVFwW- m P 2O 2grN AVF 2 9 p a) I P 29TH AVE Z 0 - L 2BT 28TH AVE NA 2 28TH -AVE 1 J' 9 m yA VE yAp Ty 28TH ^aVF a y w F vLF z 27TH PL S k 9LF Z 27TH PL p G Q d 2Jy N Jo z 3•C P,O Y 2jr5 O 2TT p w O 7-TH.A\ _ 2) TH AVE 27TH AVE p D p J o FC,9 ALE- .— - II h g ma GtiTA/q, v yLUF.- Q C cmTI 27TH AVE J O I 27TH AVE c0 CA O m 2 m l Z z27THAVX 9" N Ne r I pU AVE- __ _ 26Th -AVE_. FIy11 yp! F n z p z6'fH ASF 26TH AVE 1 26TH -AVE 26TH AVE c-- 26TH s A g 26TH AVE 25TH AVE a p m w 25TH Ate'- 15 -VH AVE WEST2ED I yTHP L 2gTNCT m Plymouth Trail Gaps West - 4 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORM ION SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI CRWF/DOCUMENTS. rib Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd T °Z Y 45TH AVE Y U 45HAg17 T J Turtle Lake 49 ; 56 2 OL" ROCKFORD RD. Q W U <<Q w x 41ST -AVE 41 Ith Cree entary- g !y 10 I Nature 4-- anyon J'S Iap WNW_ K PE m w wgx Y z zI W a Qv 'z m C m z w AVE-_' b I m y b T 5 a s 41Sw OP 1 P 41g`T-AJE A 141ST AVE - D tY u 40TH AVE - 40TH PL 5748 9 m 39TH AVE 9 #' w 40TH-AwE w 39TH -AVE U O "-O 38TH PL ! Q I RO""CKFORD"'D (GSA•''• q _ 0 9 C I 39TH AVEZ 38TH AVE 50 I I OGS ° _ _ 38TH AVE- c FRV 8TH PLI37TH-AVE O 38TH AJE 608 R 38TH AVE58P _ I a0 7TH -AVE - ` 3ZT AVE. , 0 al 37TH PL YI 37TH PL 67 I Mo th Cliek Play iel -.i_11sw9 37TH AVE N 36TH P\ - a 6TH -AVE 1 mouth Cree *`' f z36THAVE- Y t 3 r I 61 a 4 36TH AVE a 35TH AVE 5 Y I 51 I Y 52 i 2BT z 27TH PL 0 m 27TH AVE 0 m Y U 26TH AVE 28TH AVE -3: - VE -3:- 281H PJE wj i x z I I I 26TH AVE I Z Q 34TH AVEIr7IT0o`0 Q4 W w Q PP z West Lutheran Senior 3 O High S ool CG High p i W W F j LL{ w w z ti ReOR.LA_ ¢ - --I Y J O a A IDP Q LL z 282yQ 0 I O I m l z 1 27TH AVE 62 4 gHAVE z J Z... 45TH -AVE - 44T sy D C41 a keTuril; o p 159 V Q 1.0i A Qo ANNgp 2== P j 44TH"PLN Y Ap` i' oRD`F, O J____-44TH O` 44TH AVE 44TH AVE w YTNq VF '.y w O 01) z 03 9 B LLjs` 9 3 x43 p¢- Yw a D OQ i A3z - 4.3RDQ i PJE I I w1A p 42ND I 842NDPL-43RDA.oVE 111 alS0 Z 42NOAVE m Y 42ND AVE -L g m 10 I Nature 4-- anyon J'S Iap WNW_ K PE m w wgx Y z zI W a Qv 'z m C m z w AVE-_' b I m y b T 5 a s 41Sw OP 1 P 41g`T-AJE A 141ST AVE - D tY u 40TH AVE - 40TH PL 5748 9 m 39TH AVE 9 #' w 40TH-AwE w 39TH -AVE U O "-O 38TH PL ! Q I RO""CKFORD"'D (GSA•''• q _ 0 9 C I 39TH AVEZ 38TH AVE 50 I I OGS ° _ _ 38TH AVE- c FRV 8TH PLI37TH-AVE O 38TH AJE 608 R 38TH AVE58P _ I a0 7TH -AVE - ` 3ZT AVE. , 0 al 37TH PL YI 37TH PL 67 I Mo th Cliek Play iel -.i_11sw9 37TH AVE N 36TH P\ - a 6TH -AVE 1 mouth Cree *`' f z36THAVE- Y t 3 r I 61 a 4 36TH AVE a 35TH AVE 5 Y I 51 I Y 52 i 2BT z 27TH PL 0 m 27TH AVE 0 m Y U 26TH AVE 28TH AVE -3: - VE -3:- 281H PJE wj i x z I I I 26TH AVE I Z Q 34TH AVEIr7IT0o`0 Q4 W w Q PP z West Lutheran Senior 3 O High S ool CG High p i W W F j LL{ w w z ti ReOR.LA_ ¢ - --I Y J O a A IDP Q LL z 282yQ 0 I O I m l z 1 27TH AVE 62 4 gHAVE z J Z... 45TH -AVE - 000 W z_ 44T sy D C41 V- an 4 i wl V Q 1.0i AA N Qo ANNgp 2== P j J m-66F S . an Lak 44TH 4 oRD`F, O p3 A U 0 O..__.. w O 01) r 03 lulu 4340 .P p¢- Z OO z OQ i A3 X W J= 3 z 42ND I O m 65 O U 39THAVE X RO`S(t` o c g 387 O 37T!{AJE--_.:0=--38TH-PJE. G s Zmo Q36TH A I, O yC 0 m T Oo g v 35TH WL O O p0 w 3x 35TH AVE - o \ Q s 34TH-AVE UQ P 33RD AVE 0 P0Zt 32N - DPS v9LOLy / F g Q U Q ryF. 7 06 O.; O OZm X Heritage o pJ\ 31sr-AVE 2y9GP°SEWOOD LA -OAtr e M_ 30TH-AVE—D I I 28TH AVE- 27TH-PL—§: VE- 27TH-PL w L O w z 27_T.H.AVEiQU N Cliftc 64 Plymouth Trail Gaps Central - 5 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORM ION SHOD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI I&W OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota NAPLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd 63 pD C41 m i wl Q 1.0i a Qo ANNgp 2== P I r STgTF ^ 26TH AVE h 64 Plymouth Trail Gaps Central - 5 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORM ION SHOD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI I&W OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota NAPLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd c 2 0 Q J ..r T O LElementa 2 O 845TH AVE -45TH AVC _- &ATH IW. y __ 45TH AVE 45TH- AVE44744l44THPL44aHAVEAONPVPVE. J- Z a ar "AVE F/ qVFF sPlayfie ASanLak44T" AVF _ _ mKIR 07pOD LAo 0p bQwG43RDAVELane75Jry43RDgVE O P ' y r.ti ROCKFORD-RD43R AVE - O 'r~;"-;- RD=RD ROCKFORD RD zF 43 ! ! - 42ND PL ¢ O p 0 3 oy 4 42ND -PL i 7 7 VOz .fr :_ S g O p J XIMINES LA,,,, p z O I , NTON LA ww42NDO.VE w O 3 I FO z w 3 z g pK wO 7 Nie 7F - - O O w 73 ; O D RO 4i s Z . A2 r-I.PG NO z0 f O'O 42A C7 0 00 c m _ 4E - 4P a 41ST AVE p0 ' 1(iv D r... OLD R CK RDRD -'_ OPVE g y Sv .. 3 xl e m 41STVE 2 I€ 71 42 O O` O 4 2 . x{ w Lost Q U O w Lake o `qsr 72 O\'MR O Z w 4M&E 00 J I 40TH PL m 1 he - -- 40T"gV tS P 0 lA v OLD-ROCKFOR,,t?Di-++... N j Q 1 w F. FANS y .41ST AVE A1STAVE 00 ..AOTHAVE- -_ 3 I %% w m 4TT0TN pTN w a. A Ny m I t0 N 9 vE_ _ a OTOPmDq.: P POR p ` at P.1'040TNP1 ,4 FST< S • U t2 ¢ 38Ty`,'CT + 920 b ro NIS "III/, P T nF/ 3 TH'AVF - ng g ^' ? N V as ns Meadow 9 1 S Y J m ..O Thp ¢ AVE ? C UNION TERRACE WAY YPOD -LA Fv-E<qc `cF,Q P I J < FFF'YC,y X000 VSP 1 S .38THA1<0=- O vP F 38TH AVE 9 9 39TH VE 38TH AVE G Clifton E. French "' p M O 1 37TH PL z yx Pilgrim Lan 37T;PL y 2 D le entar Rti 37TH AVE M MA <A 00. if '?' 0 i?. .31 37TH AVE 00 O O rQ FOREST 37TH AVE QVNp3, 36 P/x 1 - 36TH PL w 367H PL OT G -36TH PL 36TH PL O 3 4 Qp` i JO O 06, 00 3.4S.T.A. VEVE 9F,. P 9V pgEWOOD LA OAlrm 411111' oC/q (q CSOZ5 30TH AVE -D - p 29LjH AVE 19TH AVE 3 ccO 2 J z 28TH AVE - 28TH-PL - ww 28TH AVE a 28TH AVE 28TH AVE Z S w J g Fy w 27tH PL3 Y 00 $ < m Coo W Q 3 0 w O l7 U 3 ZF -C'rP Z Z Q d Y Z 27TH- AVEi VALLEY ST z 26TNP 36TH E - 36TH-AVE- PL 6TH AVE PL w Plymouth d Middle School Y35THA\ i i ArmstrongQ Senior 78 Plymouth Playfi High Shoo/, 34TH y.E z 34TH AVE- < o, 9 tn -32ND AVE' w 3zND AVE z O 0 a z z 31ST-AVE 31ST-AVE fe O w a Qt- 50TH A SFO R/pOF ry9,1•P 'PF,GE .. 29TH A E. 4 R RE C/R I q P4E LY 3 ----28TF,±L VE ti Q Wp 2i 27TH AVE ¢ Cc0 PJ<G JU' , 2j 02 Z tN' o j f r 27TH AVE Y 27TH AVF? J 4 79 A Go QF' q FO a f 2 Q m z 79 n A.. 5 o FOCOj4,c w Plymouth Trail Gaps East - 6 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFORM ION SHO,ILD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORINGI I&WEPOCUMENTS. rib Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd AVE `-26T.y- F/y a.',S, F n o n 26TH-AVF 26TH AVE i orn-Hv U 7"y -AVE - 26TH AVE- - Fh- - OreenakSg"' 9 m 26TH AVE. w P VJ - G -25TH -AVE---. > P - 25TH-A 9 _ _ _ _W T. AVE WEST 2 (l PSTNC TH Pi Z tiF Q 3 z v ,a __ r m j T w O UvThq VF ,----SHADY 920 ¢ a J R<-AND.LA Y p. ZSTH rP E > I o S5`c2 b824TH, gLP -.-0 , ' ) E Oi o AOG J tih I < 92 c1 p b ti •F , ' ,, I 9 24TH AVE H AVE O ,EP G4i I 2A! 44 a D r TH PSE 4TH AV,, ti0. U G- 3 23RD AVE d 24 T/i,yL4c--_ 23RD-AVE )> - 23RD AVE m 22N PL a2., STpCKLA A < (QUF 23R--23ROq-VE OC\" 9yo m Zm n U fd` 3 vE w22ND-AVE !m VP 9 2 Sn de m z 2'VD-AVE Y ' 9.G S m ?!9 ZNO Y I V4 Z g T jROy - 2-1 ST AVE v O 'li o g Y i O F C Z b p l o © KreatZ > _- sr Q Q a 2 ILak ' P 21STAiZ= . p m J Lake z o F c.9 - 20TH -AVE w FP O m n D < Q-2 q OB :_..gF20 E gSlq IW Cq 215 s, t Inwz !9 z m ___ZANZIBAR -L.9 g l QEVIEW p 19TH AVE 19TH AVE Mooney s9S-H-PvEQ B T Lake 2§ o y v ¢ 0 3> q0 o HPL w ak oo Playfield j --18TH F!E NE 18TH -AVE P^!t 7FPq,F:rg'CHC w 1 U D e6ACkOq P I 1TSHPVPDImreialfill q J SH < Qz 1 PLm rnJ a 16 11-W CIR O z 17TH AVE p P,VFOq ti p,V 16TH r 17TNP9' Y' P J .a 6 rt a' S M AVF I DP kwood a - r a I 15TH PL P entar p 6 rrrrr . r.++ CORD-Np.6. z - OLL U y"96 w I p.N rrf a- y S F 3 a G-r 9P 83 NI m X90 NOrs. rr 82 G \ EN _ 14TH A E pJE 20 - a W tt tt >I 0 r(`''ri 6jQ'O N bZd ¢ 14TH AVE ,\ptN F ,g Q ¢ = m¢ - 14TH AVE- - } 14TNP E 4, D w Y -141'N l0 U N w K Y Q Z 1 w2 w Q I o yKIMBERLEY LA 13THAVE 13TH AVE PEC - ---¢- IDI_ 4'1Aa -.-._13TH AVE" d 2 NI z0 j 13TH AVE BLACK} E A85 z -12TH -AVE.. O ¢ P _.--- q'FSZ z 12TH AVE 4 w > 12TH AVE P PRCH Q P J Q a EgTQ2 f 1THP, E --.: Qa' artenburg - 11-TH-AVE- AVE, 7 -11TH-AVE F-- 11TH AVE - ZANZIBARLA y k P a 10THAVE 3 P? 9TIwAVE- T H;q, VF OG e a J > S,Q cF TS,gV O 8TH AVE hq VF \PRT PJE. + U v /may i w 8TH AVE m ' TrH-AVE Oe-9TH-PVE V. L/ N F O\1Y LA aP a P ' TCO S_ Quee lana' , m .2 _ - m - 9VE STpN1AQUEENLAS 6,H AVESpPSE i 7TN PJE O! A ¢ g z _ a 6THAVE6TH AVE 1p1 6TH AVE ---._- Q r _.STH p;JE __5'FHAVE— O6THAVEOSZe .Q Q 5TH VE sTyA sTyAUFF J5 ¢ m 4TH AVE_ - 4TH AVEe w r Gleason Lake n Y7Zg / U 1PO6ROCKTON _ m F O,I,< _2Np AVE q'pE son Laken`°IAF / t /gyepWCentrantra 3RDA Z E E1ementary z 2 2NQAVF LNOP yp!! Middle School' 2ND w 2ND AVE III 9 jO'QUEENSLAND CT 1ST AWE- Q 2 BLACK Plymouth Trail Gaps SW -7 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space Transit Station Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City Of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFOR TION SFjOD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIN ageJ OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd 1-26TH-AVE---t--26TH-AVE- 1 ' 162 WESc7 2 TH-PrT y Srry,,IH NCr N z pl-25TH-AVE 25TH AVE00JEvg. -'Sy z I vy v w tih j 0 PJE 9 88 ' LAVII — ----------------- - 23rRD.E— - -1-23RD-AVE g No, it a a 84 --- Y1mo0b>> I v ml Fi _-1- JyQ o g - w1 21STAVE PV.E,._ sew P 00 J 21ST AVE o. g o w o g i w ¢ 20TH AVu W ¢ O VIEW LA x 7 z Q9 c71 1? N B7. 0 g _Z ¢ P\.P m W~ -19TH -AVE_ O 1 r I r gtN' g z SPL > P 112NPI" Q -18TH AVE J F a 18THAVEI 18TH AVE ; 1TT - rk rs L eZ < m P FZA I 11jN J A d89fi 17TH AVE I zz ` 16jN pLD- GORD'NO6^` r AVE 1 1 Ap ~ - +— ---..— GOURD -y0'0--.... 90 92 — 15TH PL 9m s 1m 10 "fie , ake m rOR' A 1 f?` DEL P 15TH AVE—S 87 s r I in 74th, J Yj. GL4' LA YI ? ASE ti9` I1 14TH -AVE 01 O >-+ ons I1 Z I Parkers Lake 13TH PL 93 11 941 j -- - C c7 D g 13TH AVE - g w 3 13TH AVE - m FYj Y1 85 01 I 12TH-AVE4{ 12TH..q VE .- - LLLi N\TOU ST m NP gTO 1 = o 0 10TH AVE 2e r - 9TI3:AVE 9TH-AVE - 9iN AVE 0 V 0 9TH AVE _ z r m TER?z Fg N w - 8TH AVE 0 8TH -AJ U g UO < 7TH -AVE - J ¢ 1 a z J 00 F I < g s 71 STON LA 1 z z 6TH AVE 0 z g 5H-A\/E— W z ji a 62 w o c Jj Y>f - 57H AVE o 4TH AVE z O Z a Circle A\A AVE 4TH AVE gBirchviewElementary a j 3RD -AVE 0 a Centrad 3RD AVE Q z PKE f g < School." ¢ W - G 0 Y 2ND AVEafU Q U ¢ O z U O--GLEAS L KE DRQ 0y Y a P o LF . 95 5TH AVE g IL xmYmWm SUNS a 1 111 z N 1ST AVE 7STHq VE . 100 10TH AVE 5TH AVE 16TH AVE 0- O w 0UCf w 0 O 0 W za m g PJB o Y O 25TH -AVE 11TH -AVE 11TH P O o W I/VDFPPV E 24TH -AVE--- - i IAPcn,ls F o D 24TH -AVE- n RESDEN RD g ur a 1 1 1 1 7 o r rH AVE --5 Wcr 9611 6TH AVE 01 -SYCAMORE CIR Q O w 102a I 1 P m I 100:; 1\ AVp 11 INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD—fig+ I 1 W INDUSTRIAL PARK -B LVD - v Ln 1 wt z O g O tine.mt o M z I11 98 Z J—WATERT0 R C I R C+. 1w1 95 5TH AVE g IL xmYmWm SUNS a 1 111 z N 1ST AVE 7STHq VE . 100 10TH AVE 5TH AVE 16TH AVE 0- O w 0UCf 00 Fo 3 avanaug ake O 17 SUNSETTR _ — SUNSEjj g z g 0 1ST AVw Subset ElementarypYH a W3 Plymouth Trail Gaps South - 8 It Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City Of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFOR TIOeN SO 1LD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIN bb F4 DOCUMENTS. rib Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd w 0 O W za m I O g PJB o Y O 11TH -AVE 11TH P W I/VDFPPV E IAPcn,ls O J n RESDEN RD r WINDEMERE CUR rH AVE --5 Wcr Ze 6TH AVE 01 -SYCAMORE CIR Q OU g w W a 00 Fo 3 avanaug ake O 17 SUNSETTR _ — SUNSEjj g z g 0 1ST AVw Subset ElementarypYHa W3 Plymouth Trail Gaps South - 8 It Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City Of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFOR TIOeN SO 1LD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIN bb F4 DOCUMENTS. rib Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\tmil_gaps.mxd VALLEY ST d 26TNP 26,T.M.9VE O' P J 25TH AVE -a m0O aT D 24TH -AVE — P z A=V/ gerSxHemo ck t J .+y.+ 0 011O 'm r 102 r o o VQo- JSS6VJv ` 23RD Ay R\P N Q NINSULA-RD. m 1 g West Medicine Lake-__ _ ._ 0 123 98 g p --18TH PL J Q 0 PJE IVES LA IJ Q Y T 990AVEOA Q 2® o Y AVE `r`sf < m 61 Nis Beacon ryAVE- QG Academy w VEP za 3 gOLU Z o p 11TH -AVE D 11TH P vy1NOF LNVENWOOD RD m0 y v 0 RESDEN RD A m G WINDEMERECUR D 6TH AVE RE CIR Q s i Q s w O z 1 G Y 'L m r 2 Hid( S'T P 10 o g w Y FORFST' s+,U e cp m m 0 D f ZO EVERGREZN LA of w O w w w 3 .- STA,lEeHH'Yy ur of 9TH AVE O 0 0 O 000 oP lariau(J. 3RD -AVE- - Lake z Ridgemoun Playfield Q D w y ementary, Wayzata East Middle -School Medicine Lake COL-ONIALCIR 12TH AVE 11TH A 104 , 108 77 tOJ 105 = wREEN LA 51,y, oO yd000 w C) O ss 0 n mw 0 3 ROq vF O0 W 0 Q o 'yFO F O im 79 5 w U z g 25TH AVE NPJE LpC w0 II > Q3RDAV 1 TN z n -21S AV 1 N. w R Y d 18TH AVE East icine Lake 110 Pmt J1 '1 O Q OP z7 Y IQTH. -AV 2 10TH AVE I Amo ------------111--- ----------- 2 TRENT y JE00. 8TH AVE La Coaf to 'v-. 107 106 r I REt'r 3 0` r Lb y K County o Road 7 ki An 1 I Q 9L, wf J Iw w ' VDp 0 D D D R afW CS Plymouth Trail Gaps SE -9 Proposed Neighborhood/Mini Park 1 Corresponding Trail Project Q Connection to Adjacent Community Trail Q Existing Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Grade -Separated Crossing Proposed Subdivisions Proposed Crossing Improvement City Park Proposed At -Grade Railroad Crossing City -Owned Open Space ilE Transit Station - Community Playfield Golf Course Proposed City Trail City Trail Neighborhood Park Proposed City Sidewalk Northwest Greenway City Sidewalk Regional Park Proposed 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School 3 Rivers Park Dist Reg Trail School Park Proposed Northwest Greenway Special Use Park Northwest Greenway Private Minnesota DNR State Trail N 0 0.5 Miles April 2012 THIS REPRESENTS A COMPILATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND OTHER SOURCES THAT HAS City of NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. INFOR TION SHO LD BE FIELD VERIFIED AND COMPARED WITH ORIN ageJF4 OCUMENTS. Plymouth, Minnesota N:\PLY_GIS\PROJECTS\PARKS\tmil_gaps\trail_gaps.mxd 0 a 2012 2012 CIP 2014 CIP 2014 CIP 2014 CIP 2014 Plymouth Park and Recreation TRAIL GAP PROJECTS D DESIRABLE CHALLENGING BUILT W/DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY NOT POSSIBLE IIIOATJON Page 13 Sidewalk feasible. Will be completed in 2012 as part of the road resurfacing 50 CW -4 Co. Rd. 9/Vicksburg Co Rd 9/Cable Co. 37 /Funeral Home East 0.15 25,000 X X project in City Center area. Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. Narrow median at the Xenium Lane intersection needd modification to safely cross street. Street signs relocated beyond the trail. Utility manholes need adjustment.The proposed trail would extend beyond the City right of way in a couple of locations. However a 20 foot drainage and utility easement would be adequate for the proposed trails. 63 C-5 NW Boulevard Campus Drive Heritage Park West 0.29 98,416 X X X Permits are required for construction in County right of way Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. TRAIL EASEMENTS required. The 13500 26th Ave N) would be offset 5 feet from the proposed trail and be approximately 95 feet in length (13600 Industrial Park Blvd) would be 5 feet wide and approximately 475 feet in length. Permits are required for 96 SC -8 Xenium Lane Highway 55 Watertower Circle West 0.61 191,368 X X construction in County right of way Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. Street signs in the trail path would need to be relocated beyond the trail. Utility manholes would need to be adjusted to match the trail grade or relocated. The proposed trail can be built End of Schneiderman within the existing right of way so no easements will need to be obtained. 101 SC -8 Xenium Lane County Road 6 property West 31,131 Permits are required for construction in County right of way Trail is feasible. The proposed bituminous trail would be 8 feet in width and include a 2 foot concrete buffer placed against the back of curb to comply with Hennepin County standards. Place the trail next to the curb will allow for the 95 SC -8 County Road 6 1-494 Xenium Lane South 0.32 90,500 X X X steeper slopes to be mostly avoided. Trail is feasible. The proposed bituminous trail would be 8 feet in width and include a 2 foot concrete buffer placed against the back of curb to comply with 92 SC -8 County Road 6 Fernbrook 1-494 South 0.15 39,800 Hennepin County standards. Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. Street signs in the trail path need to be relocated beyond the trail. Utility manholes would need to be adjusted to 20 NC -2 Fernbrook/Empire Empire Lane North Empire Lane North East 0.16 38,550 X match the trail grade or relocated. Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. Street signs in the trail path need to be relocated beyond the trail. Utility manholes would need to be adjusted to Schmidt Lake Road match the trail grade or relocated. The utility vault can be avoided by stopping 19 NC -2 heading east) Fernbrook Cheshire South 0.19 61,111 X X X X the trail short and relocating the stop sign Trail is feasible. 10 ft. trail back of curb. Street signs in the trail path need to be NC -2 Cheshire Pkwy 55th Ave. 56 Ave. West 0.18 relocated beyond the trail. The existing 2 lane roadway will be expanded to match the 4 lane roadway at both ends of the project. The County has included a trail on the south side of County Road 24 along the entire project length and on the north side between Olive Lane and 32nd Avenue North. Hennepin County website they have money in their CIP for right of way acquisition in 2014 with construction anticipated in 47 1 CW -4 ICo Rd 24 10live Lane 130th Avenue ISouth 10.321 1 X I I X I X I 1 2015. It may take a request on our end to get this project constructed. 1 IIIOATJON Page 13 0 Fe r. Plymouth SECTION TRAIL NAME START LOCATION END LOCATION 81/82 SW -7 County Road 6 Peony/Olive Lane Ferndale Road Park and Recreation dc UJ LU Z ROAD (mi.) EST. COST < UJ UJ 0 South 0.76-.09 $405,210 X I X X I U DESIRABLE CHALLENGING BUILT W/DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY NOT POSSIBLE misc. Due to site conditions limited options exist for a trail.This site provides numerous challenges to construct a trail. For a significant section of the proposed trail a steep slope (3:1 and in some cases steeper) exists off the shoulder of the roadway. There is also a pond and a wetland along the proposed route. Staff suggests this trail be completed with a future road I rennovation project. 93 SC -8 Fernbrook County Road 6 Luce Line Trail West 0.41 135,000 X X Trail is feasible. The proposed trail would be a 10 foot wide bituminous trail. Street signs in the trail path would need to be relocated beyond the trail. Sanitary sewer manholes and water main gate valves would need to be adjusted to match the trail grade. Grading will be minimized with the trail placed against the back of curb for all but the southern portion of the trail. 56 C-5 Old Rockford Road Vicksburg Rockford Road West 0.41 X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 49 CW -4 Old Rockford Road Dunkirk Lane Vicksburg South 0.54 X X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 36 NE -3 Nathan Lane Bass Lake Road 56th Avenue North West 0.19 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 67 C-5 37th Ave. Vicksburg (by Center Bank) Toward Plymouth Blvd South 0.13 FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 112 SE -9 Revere Lane Highway 55 6th Avenue West 0.8 X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 18 NC -2 Schmidt Lake Road heading west) Harbor Lane Providence Academy 0.34 X X X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 25 NC -2 Northwest Blvd 56th Ave. Bass Lake Road West 0.68 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 35 NE -3 Bass Lake Road Highway 169 Nathan Lake South 0.36 X X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 61 C-5 Plymouth Creek Annapolis Plymouth Creek Playfield 0.35 X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 73 CE -6 Old Rockford Road Evergreen Lane Zachary Lane South 0.38 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 72 CE -6 Old Rockford Road Three Rivers Park 41st Avenue South 0.22 X X I FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 79 CE -6 26th Avenue Medicine Lake Blvd Highway 169 North 0.43 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 89 SC -8 County Road 6 Niagra Fernbrook North 0.53 X X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 90 SC -8 County Road 6 Juneau Lane Fernbrook South 0.23 X X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 91 SC -8 County Road 6 Fernbrook 1-494 North 0.15 X X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 98 SC -8 County Road 6 Xenium Lane Highway 55 North 0.49 X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 99 SC -8 County Road 6 Xenium Lane Highway 55 South 0.49 X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 107 SE -9 County Road 15 County Road 73 Quaker Lane South 0.42 X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 105 SE -9 Highway 55 Highway 55 County Road 73 South 0.39 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 108 SE -9 South Shore Drive 10th Avenue Highway 55 East 0.11 X X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 106 SE -9 Zachary Lane Sunset Trail Shelard Parkway East 0.3 X X FEASIBILITY AND COSTTO BE REVIEWED. 110 SE -9 Nathan Lane 13th Avenue 10th Avenue East 0.29 X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. 111 SE -9 10th Avenue Revere Lane Highway 169 South 0.51 X FEASIBILITY AND COST TO BE REVIEWED. Page 14 and Recreation z . -. O fAk aWDz . •- LU x a W - Ln 0 L W0 ~ COMMENTS2 olumn4LAC –j 0 1 NW -1 Vicksburg 51st Ave Co. Rd 47 West 1.2 X X X 2 NW -1 Vicksburg 51st Ave Co. Rd 47 East 1.2 X X X 3 NW -1 Peony Lane Schmidt Lake Road Co. Rd 47 East 1.4 X X X 4 NW -1 Peony Lane Schmidt Lake Road Co. Rd 47 West 1.4 X X X 5 NW -1 Dunkirk Lane 51st/Garland Ave. Co. Rd 47 East 1.1 X X 6 NW -1 Holly Lane 46th Ave. Schmidt Lake Road West 3.4 Connecting to Old Rockford Road and Schmidt Lake Road 7 NW -1 Co. Rd. 47 Co. Rd 101 Vicksburg North 2.1 8 NW -1 Co. Rd. 47 Co. Rd 101 Vicksburg South 2.1 9 NW -1 Troy Lane/54th Peony Lane Co. Rd 47 West 1.1 16 NC -2 46th Ave. Vicksburg Niagra Lane South 2.5 X X Crossing side and front yards 17 NC -2 Vicksburg e -side) Schmidt Lake Road Old Rockford Road East 0.79 X X X Crossing back yards/church properties 21 NC -2 Fernbrook/44th 46th place 44th Place East 0.26 X Crossing side and backyards 23 NC -2 Cheshire Pkwy 56th Ave. Co. Rd 47 West 0.45 X X X X 24 NC -2 Shenandoah Lane Quantico Lane North Woodland Trails East 0.15 X X Front yard crossings 26 NC -2 Northwest Blvd 54th Ave. Schmidt Lake Road West 0.5 No ability to provide walkway/trail over the bridge 27 NC -2 Co. Rd. 47 Vicksburg Northwest Blvd. North 2 28 NC -2 Co. Rd. 47 Vicksburg Northwest Blvd. South 2 34 NE -3 Bass Lake Road Highway 169 Nathan Lake North 0.36 X X X Crossing off ramp from Hwy 169 37 NE -3 Union Terrace Lane 53rd Three Ponds East 0.19 X X Crossing side and front yards 38 NE -3 Zachary Lane 55th Ave. Bass Lake Road East 0.38 X X Crossing side and back yards 39 NE -3 Zachary Lane 47th Ave. Schmidt Lake Road East 0.42 X Crossing driveways, front, back, side yards, mailboxes & retaining walls 43 CW -4 Medina Road Greenwood Elementary Brockton South 0.68 X X Side & back yards 44 CW -4 Co Rd 24 CR 101 West City Limits North 0.64 X X X Side, back, front yards & mailboxes 45 CW -4 Co Rd 24 CR 101 West City Limits South 0.64 X X X Side, back, front yards & mailboxes 46 CW -4 Co Rd 24 Olive Lane Highway 55 North 0.82 X X X Side, back, front yards & driveways 48 CW -4 Co Rd 9 Highway 55 Vicksburg North 0.65 X X Side, back yards 51 CW -4 Vicksburg Highway 55 25th Avenue East 0.76 X X Back & side yards 52 CW -4 Maple Creek28th Avenue Medina Road 0.15 X Back yards, creek 53 CW -4 Maple Creek Medina Road Dunkirk Lane 0.51 X Back & side yards, wetlands 57 C-5 Rockford Road Vicksburg Old Rockford Road North 0.37 X X Apartment building driveway 58 C-5 Plymouth Center 36 1/2th Avenue Rockford Road 0.26 X X X 59 C-5 Fernbrook 44th Place Rockford Road East 0.7 X Driveways 1KATIONALE :3 D ES I RAB LE Page 15 APULSEMCTION TRAIL NAMfA LENGTH JND LOCATION 6 (mi.) and Recreation F-LLJkn C-5 0 Annapolis 40th Avenue East 0.64 wLLL 2 z H a 0 C-5 w Highway 55 County Road 6 1.04 X X Power poles & retaining walls 65 5 t Rockford Road o O North 0.28 COMMENTS U CHALLENGING BUILT W/DEVELOPMENT 60 C-5 Fernbrook Annapolis 40th Avenue East 0.64 X X Trees, front yards & driveways 62 C-5 Fernbrook Highway 55 County Road 6 East 1.04 X X Power poles & retaining walls 65 C-5 Rockford Road Vinewood Lane West side of 1-494 North 0.28 X X Not enough room/easement over 1-494 bridge 66 C-5 NW Boulevard Rockford Road 43 1/2 Avenue East 0.42 X Three Rivers trail runs parallel - unnecessary? 71 CE -6 Rockford Road NW Boulevard Zachary Lane South 1.2 X X X 74 CE -6 Rockford Road Zachary Lane Revere Lane South 0.49 X X Business access 75 CE -6 Rockford Road Nathan Lane Highway 169 North 0.35 X X Crossing off ramp from Hwy 169 76 CE -6 Rockford Road Lancaster Lane Highway 169 South 0.35 X X Crossing on ramp from Hwy 169 77 CE -6 Zachary Lane Rockford Road 36th Avenue East 0.76 X X Retaining wall & trees 78 CE -6 Armstrong HS 36th Avenue 32nd Avenue 0.5 X I X jSchool property to neighborhood 83 SW -7 County Road 6 Dunkirk Lane Vicksburg South 0.42 X X Driveways & front yards 84 SW -7 Vicksburg Lane 25th Avenue County Road 6 East 0.89 X Trees & backyards 85 SW -7 Vicksburg Lane County Road 6 3 1/2 Avenue East 0.43 X X Trees & backyards. Roadside shoulder? 87 SC -8 County Road 6 Vicksburg Niagra Lane South 0.47 X X 88 SC -8 23rd Ave. Fernbrook Niagra Lane 0.48 94 SC -8 Fernbrook County Road 6 Luce Line Trail East 0.41 X X 100 SC -8 Xenium Lane County Road 6 Plymouth Road East 1.08 X X Driveways, mailboxes, back & side yards, railroad crossing 102 SE -9 Magnolia Lane 26th Avenue Magnolia Lane 0.73 X X X Wetland 103 SE -9 West Medicine Lk Parl, Magnolia Lane Forestview Lane 0.28 X X X Wetland 104 1 SE -9 Highway 55 Medicine Lake Drive South Shore Drive North 0.26 X X Easement issues 109 SE -9 South Shore Drive 15th Avenue 13th Avenue South 0.43 X Driveways, yards. Roadside trail? Unnecessry due to Three Rivers Trail? Page 16 City of Plymouth Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING August 28, 2012 Agenda 2 FNumber: To: Mayor and City Council Prepared by: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Item: Set Future Study Sessions ACTION REQUESTED: Establish future study sessions as desired for the topics listed below. Calendars are attached to assist in scheduling. Pending Study Session Topics at least 3 Council members have approved the following study items on the list) Invite county commissioner to discuss County Road 47 Trail Gap Study/Park Replacement Plan (fall) Discuss traffic signal design Policy for emergency utility repairs Funding of infrastructure improvements in Northwest Plymouth and Major Road Funding Options Other requests for study session topics: Update with City Manager Update on Northwest Greenway acquisition Review Boulevard Tree Policy Request of Fire Relief Association for pension increase Page 1 r Plymouth Adding Quality to Life September 2012 Modified on 08115112 CHANGES ARE MADE IN RED Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 87:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION LLABOR DAY MEETING Council Chambers CITY OFFICES CLOSED 9 10 11 12 13 14 157:00 PM 7:00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL PARK ft REC MEETING QUALITY ADVISORY Council Chambers COMMITTEE COMMISSION EQC) MEETING PRAC) MEETING Council Chambers Plymouth Maintenance Facility 16 17 18 7:00 PM 19 7:00 PM 20 21 22 REGULAR COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING COMMISSION Council Chambers MEETING Council Chambers Rosh HoShanah Begins at Sunset 23 24 25 26 CANCELLED 27 7:00 PM 28 29 PLYMOUTHH PLYMOUTH HRA MEETING FIREFIGHTERS 5K ADVISORY Medicine Lake Room Fire Station #2 COMMITTEE ON 11:30 AM TRANSIT (PACT) PLYMOUTH ON STUDY SESSION PARADE Medicine Lake Room CELEBRATION City Center Area Yom Kippur q o Begins at Sunset Modified on 08115112 CHANGES ARE MADE IN RED Page 2 City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life October 2012 Modified on 08115112 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 6:30 PM 7:00 PM VOLUNTEER PLANNING RECOGNITION COMMISSION EVENT MEETING Plymouth Creek Council Chambers Center 7 8jjj 9 7:00 PM 10 7:00 PM 11 7:00 PM 12 13 REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL PARK It REC 12:00-3:00 PM MEETING QUALITY ADVISORY FIRE DEPT. COLUMBUS DAY Council Chambers COMMITTEE COMMISSION OPEN HOUSE Observed EQC) MEETING PRAC) MEETING Fire Station III Council Chambers Plymouth PLYMOUTH PUBLIC Ice Center WORKS DIVISION CLOSED 14 15 16 17 7:00 PM 18 19 20 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 21 22 23 24 25 26 277:00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL HRA MEETING MEETING Medicine Lake Room Council Chambers 28 29 30 31 6:00-8:00 PM Halloween on the Creek Plymouth Creek Center Modified on 08115112 Page 3 vPlymouth November 2012 Adding Quality to Life Modified on 08/09/12 Page 4 1 2 37:00 PM HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE MEETING Lunch Room 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7:00 PM GENERAL PLANNING ELECTION DAY COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers Daylight Savings Time Ends 11 12 13 14 15 16 177:00 PM 7:00 PM 7:00 PM VETERANS DAY REGULAR COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL HRA MEETING 10:00 AM -5 PM VETERANS DAY Observed MEETING QUALITY Medicine Lake Room PLYMOUTH ARTS CITY OFFICES Council Chambers COMMITTEE FAIR CLOSED EQC) MEETING Plymouth Creek Council Chambers Center 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 12:00-5 PM CANCELLED PLYMOUTH ARTS PLANNING COMMISSION THANKSGIVING THANKSGIVING FAIR MEETING HOLIDAY HOLIDAY Plymouth Creek Center Council Chambers CITY OFFICES CITY OFFICES CLOSED CLOSED 25 26 27 28 29 30 7:00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL PLYMOUTH MEETING ADVISORY Council Chambers COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT) MEETING Medicine Lake Room Modified on 08/09/12 Page 4 vPlymouth December 2012 Adding Quality to Life JV J1 Modified on 08115112 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 7:00 PM 6 7 8 PLANNING 2:00-5:00 PM COMMISSION OLD FASHIONED MEETING CHRISTMAS Council Chambers Plymouth Historical Society Building Chanukah Begins at Sunset 9 10 11 12 7:00 PM 13 14 15 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL 7:00 PM REGULAR COUNCIL QUALITY PARK ft REC MEETING COMMITTEE (EQC) ADVISORY Council Chambers MEETING COMMISSION Council Chambers PRAC) MEETING 7:00 PM Council Chambers CHARTER COMMISSION ANNUAL MEETING Medicine Lake Room 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers 2 3 2x4 CHRISTMAS 25 26 27 28 29 VE 7:00 PM HRA MEETING CITY Medicine Lake Room OFFICES CHRISTMAS DAY CLOSE AT 12:00 P CITY OFFICES CLOSED NEW YEAR'S fin Z EVE JV J1 Modified on 08115112 Page 5