Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Packet 01-24-2012
RECAP AGENDA) CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 24, 20121, 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLYMOUTH FORUMIndividuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allottedfor the Forum. If the full 15 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or Commission for future report. 4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS 4.01 Announce Fire and Ice Festival, February 4 at Parkers Lake Park (Park and Recreation Director Diane Evans) 5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. (Approved) 6.01 Approve proposed City Council Minutes 6.02 Approve disbursements (Res2012-021) 6.03 Approve renewal of liquor licenses for 2012 (Res2012-022) Regular Council Meeting 1 of 3 January 24, 2012 6.04 Approve temporary on -sale liquor applications for the Plymouth Arts Council for 2012 (Res2012-023) 6.05 Approve Final Payment for 2010 Mill and Overlay, from 36th Avenue to Highway 169 to Zachary Lane and Nathan Lane/Old Co. Rd. 15/Revere Lane 10005 — Res2012-024, Res2012-025) 6.06 Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.20 of the City Code regarding Water, Sewer and Surface Water Fees (Ord2012-02) 6.07 Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.19 of the City Code regarding water and sewer area and connection charges (Ord2012-03) 6.08 Approve the Filling of Wetlands and the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for Crossroad Commons Addition (2011014 — Res2012-026) 6.09 Adopt findings of fact for denial of Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang Res2012-027) 6.10 Approve Final Plat and Development Contract for Crossroads Commons at Highway 55 and County Road 73. KTJ 198, LLC. (2011014 — Res2012-028) 6.11 Approve agreement with State of Minnesota, Materials Management Division, for purchase of supplies, commodities, and equipment (Res2012-029) 6.12 Approve Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Plat for "Gleason Lake Heights Addition" at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive. Hanson Builders, Inc. (2011085 — Ord2012-04, Res2012-030, Res2012-031) 6.13 Accept Emergency Management Performance Grant Funds (Res2012-032) 6.14 Amend Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with Maple Grove for the extension of Trunk Sanitary Sewer (3106 — Res2012-033) Regular Council Meeting 2 of 3 January 24, 2012 6.15 Approve 2012 Pay Equity Report (Res2012-034) 6.16 Approve Firefighter Compensation Plan and payment to the Fire Relief Association for Firefighter Disability Insurance (Res2012-035) 6.17 (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item No. 8.03) 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.01 Appeal of denial of 2012 renewal application for Massage Therapist License Steven Ekland) (Res2012-036) (Granted the appeal — license will be issued for 2012) 8. GENERAL BUSINESS 8.01 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for improvements to Plymouth Station Auto Center at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072) (Tabledfrom January 10) (Denied request to extend the current hours) 8.02 Approve Site Plan Amendment for a 275,000 square foot building expansion and related site improvements at 5050 Nathan Lane. St. Jude Medical. (2011081 Res2012-037) (Approved) 8.03 Order and Accept Feasibility Study and Plans and Specifications and Order Public Improvement Hearing and Ad for Bids, 2012 Street Reconstruction Project (12001— Res2012-038, Res2012-039, Res2012-040, Res2012-041, Res2012-042) (Previously item No. 6.17) (Approved) 9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 9.01 Public Works Annual Report 9.02 Adopt 2012 Goals and Legislative Priorities (Approved) 10. ADJOURNMENT (8:15 p.m.) Regular Council Meeting 3 of 3 January 24, 2012 6.01 Proposed Minutes Special Council Meeting January 3, 2012 Deputy Mayor Bildsoe called a Special Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on January 3, 2012. COUNCIL PRESENT: Deputy Mayor Bildsoe, Councilmembers Black, Willis, Stein, Wosje, and Johnson. Mayor Slavik arrived at 6:25 p.m. ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Ahrens, Public Works Director Cote, Parks Director Evans, City Engineer Moberg, and City Clerk Engdahl. ALSO IN ATTENDANCE: Representatives from SRF Consulting Group and WSB and Associates, and two residents, Vernon Peterson and Steven Roell. Proposals for the Peony Lane/Lawndale Extension Project Public Works Director Cote stated the Council considered proposals received from two consulting engineers at the December 13, 2011 Council meeting, related to alignment selection, environmental documentation, design engineering, and acquisition of right-of-way for the Peony Lane/Lawndale Lane corridor from Schmidt Lake Road to the northern City limits. This roadway project and installation of trunk watermain is identified in the Capital Improvements Program for construction in 2014. Because the two engineering proposals are very different in process, scope of work, and outcome, the Council should provide direction to staff on the desired process for the project. He stated staff desires direction on the following questions: 1. Does the Council wish to select an alignment or eliminate one or more of the four alignments currently identified? 2. Does the Council support the roadway type recommenced in the technical memorandum? 3. Does the Council wish to revisit the greenway plan in order to assist in making the alignment decision (staff would consider alternative layouts for the trailhead site to better consider the easterly alignment)? 4. Does the Council wish to consider whether to do an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)? 5. Does the Council want staff to proceed with the geotechnical work (soil borings) now? He stated the options before the Council is to select one of the consulting engineer proposals or reject both proposals (reissue a request for proposal (RFP), proceed with the EAW, select an alignment and issue an RFP for design, or do nothing). Proposed Minutes 1 of 4 Special Meeting of January 3, 2012 Page 1 He then explained the four alignments that have been considered. Alternatives 1 and 3 are variations of the same alignment and it basically comes down to tradeoffs between impacts to the City -owned property versus impacts to the property located at 5705 Lawndale Lane. The fourth alternative originated out of the neighborhood's suggestion to run the proposed alignment more in line with the existing MCES Interceptor Line and its associated easements. A request by the neighborhood to align the road further east of Alternative 4 was not pursued due to the major impacts to the large wetland complex which would not be acceptable to the wetland permitting agencies due to other alternatives being available. Councilmember Willis asked if there is any data on the soil tests when the MCES Interceptor line was constructed. City Engineer Moberg replied there is data that shows the soil borings and logs for that project which is closest to Alternative 4. By request of the Council, City Engineer Moberg addressed each of the four alignments. All alignments would have a speed limit of 45 mph. He stated that Alternative 2 is the most expensive alignment as there is more length to it. Councilmember Johnson asked what the engineering firms could do to assist the Council with this process and to narrow down the alternatives in order to get the most efficient alignment. Public Works Director Cote replied if it's the Council's desire to lean towards more of an easterly route, the focus of the RFP could be narrowed and the soil borings could be taken. Councilmember Black asked if it's envisioned for a trail on the roadway for bikers. City Engineer Moberg replied the CIP contains trails along the Peony Lane corridor (three lanes with trail). However, the trail could be removed if the road is expanded to four lanes in the future. Councilmembers Black and Willis stated they could support Alternatives 1 or 3. Councilmember Willis further stated that Alternative 4 is very close to the wetland and could damage the potential of a trailhead off the Northwest Greenway. The entire Council stated they don't support Alternative 2. Resident Steven Roell, who resides off County Road 47, asked if the City has undertaken a study on the people who travel east on County Road 47 to Vicksburg Lane to Highway 55 as the traffic and congestion is terrible in the mornings. Mayor Slavik stated the focus of this evening's discussion is on the selection of a consultant for this project to traffic issues on County Road 47. Therefore, she requested any questions be directed on that aspect. Resident Vern Peterson asked who petitioned for this road. Councilmember Bildsoe replied nobody petitioned for the extension of this roadway. This project has been in the City's Comprehensive Plan since 1971. The Council requested the consultants to provide comments related to their proposals. They noted that SRF Consulting Group's proposal was $480,550 and WSB and Associates' proposal was $390,068 for a difference of $90,482. Proposed Minutes 2 of 4 Special Meeting of January 3, 2012 Page 2 Representative from WSB and Associates stated if the Council narrowed the RFP to a couple designs, the cost of their proposal would essentially be the same. The only things that change are the alternatives that are looked at, whether an EAW is prepared, and the number of parcels that would be impacted with the right-of-way. A lot of preliminary evaluation was done without the fieldwork. They feel their proposal responded to the City's RFP, and they're comfortable proceeding. Representative from SRF Consulting Group stressed the need for a thorough transparent process for residents which is what their proposal contained. He also spoke of projects that they have worked with the City previously near this area, so they have data they are able to utilize and are very comfortable with this type of project. There would be a lot of impact with the wetland on Alternative 4 which would be difficult. They also agree that Alternative 2 wouldn't be the best alignment, and Alternatives 1 and 3 are the best alignments. He noted that other considerations have to be considered with the alternatives such as protecting the wetland and the trailhead off the Northwest Greenway. In addition, there is value in their firm having the data and resources from similar projects in the City. Councilmember Stein questioned the difference in price between the two proposals and what that could be attributed to. One item was the cost of the title work for the acquisition of property for right-of-way. WSB and Associates didn't include that cost in their proposal as their experience has been allowing cities to work with their city attorneys while SRF Consulting Group would take care of the title work and assume those costs. Public Works Director Cote went through the five questions noted above with the Council in order to receive direction. Below are the answers to the questions: 1. Eliminate Alternative 2. 2. Yes. 3. No, not really, but input is needed from the Parks Department. It's not a problem with Alternatives 1 or 3, but it is with Alternative 4. 4. Yes. 5. Yes. The Council raised the question with their answers above and the discussion held this evening, how does that affect the consultants' proposals. Public Works Director Cote recommended that the consultants respond in writing how the discussion on the five questions affect their proposals. Councilmember Stein also requested the attorneys' costs for the title work of land acquisition. Councilmember Johnson stated that she feels both firms can do this project. She noted that SRF Consulting Group has done other projects in relation to this project and that's value. However, if the City is looking for that value, how can other firms compete? Why were the RFPs sent to more than one firm. Proposed Minutes 3 of 4 Special Meeting of January 3, 2012 Page 3 Mayor Slavik stated another big difference in the cost in the proposals is the public process. A transparent, public process is what the Council strives for with every project and SRF Consulting Group has included that type of process in their proposal. As recommended by Public Works Director Cote, the Council requested the consultants to respond in writing how the discussion on the five questions affect their proposals as well as Councilmember Stein's request for the attorneys' costs for the title work of land acquisition. This item would be on the January 24 agenda. Future Study Sessions The Council moved the fire study item from the February 21 study session at 6:00 p.m. to March 20 at 6:00 p.m. The Council scheduled the following items for the February 21 study session: 1. Parkers Lake Cemetery. 2. Streamlining street lighting rates. 3. Noise Ordinance. 4. City Manager update. Adiournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 8:07 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Proposed Minutes 4 of 4 Special Meeting of January 3, 2012 Page 4 Proposed Minutes Special Council Meeting January 10, 2012 Mayor Slavik called a Special Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Medicine Lake Room, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on January 10, 2012. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Slavik, Councilmembers Black, Willis, Stein, Bildsoe, and Johnson. ABSENT: Councilmember Wosje. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Ahrens, Parks Director Evans, Police Chief Goldstein, Police Captain Lindman, Community Development Director Juetten, City Attorney Knutson, City Prosecutor Knetsch, Deputy Clerk Baird, and City Clerk Engdahl. City Prosecutor Update City Prosecutor Knetsch provided a copy of an annual report in the Council packet for review. He gave additional comments pertaining to the prosecution of cases. He stated that Plymouth is viewed favorably by the court system. Plymouth has the largest number of cases at the Ridgedale facility which is due to the Police Department's strict traffic enforcement. Through his 17 years of experience, he has heard a lot of compliments of the Plymouth police officers. The officers have a history of creditability. Regarding domestics, he takes a hard stance on those cases and with compliance checks, they don't plea bargain, and the clerk has to plead guilty. Police Chief Goldstein added in conversations with his colleagues who use contract attorneys, City Prosecutor Knetsch and his staff take a hard line on cases, and there isn't a lot of room for negotiation. They uphold what the police officers enforce in the field. The attorneys also work with the police officers if they have to dismiss a case because the police officer did something wrong. Mayor Slavik asked about cameras in the squad cars and if those tapes are used for court cases. Police Chief Goldstein replied all squad cars have cameras, and the tapes are kept up 90-180 days and are used in court cases when needed. Councilmember Bildsoe asked City Prosecutor Knetsch if there is anything the City needs to do, such as additional resources to improve efficiency in prosecution that the Council should consider for the 2013 budget. City Prosecutor Knetsch replied he believes the City has a fully funded Police Department. He sees no issues. The squad cars are well maintained, and the evidence room is a "cut above" what he's seen in other departments. Proposed Minutes 1 of 3 Special Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 5 Councilmember Bildsoe asked if the DWI technology that the City uses is still adequate for court. City Prosecutor Knetsch replied the City is still using the intoxilyzer that was introduced in 1993. The State has entered into a contract to replace that equipment statewide at an approximate cost of $3-$4 million. The metropolitan area hopes to have this new equipment sometime in 2012. Councilmember Willis stated of the 1,539 cases that were prosecuted in 2011, half of them were traffic violations. He asked what kind of cases are those. City Prosecutor Knetsch replied usually they're the "daily double," — no license and no insurance. He stated there's another 800 cases that aren't included in those statistics that are small traffic cases that are petty misdemeanors and no right to jury trial. City Prosecutor Knetsch stated the State is in the process of studying security at courthouses and closing suburban courthouses. He stated in the future, this could be an issue that the Council needs to take a stand on. If the City could only use the Hennepin County Courthouse, downtown Minneapolis, there would be increased costs for police officers' overtime, mileage, parking, etc. A discussion was held relative to a recent article in the MN Post on domestic assault prosecution. City Prosecutor Knetsch stated this article was comparing how Minneapolis handles these calls/cases compared to other communities. He stated they spend a considerable amount of time on these cases, and he mentioned that Home Free provides an invaluable service to the City by providing advocates who can work with the victims. He stated no two domestic assaults are the same which makes them difficult. Police Captain Lindman handed to the Council a draft ordinance for the registration of hotel guests and requiring a photo identification for anyone 18 and over. He explained that the City is encountering problems with peddlers/solicitors who reserve a block of rooms under one name at a local hotel. When there are illegal activities that occur, such as drugs and prostitution, it's hard to identify the suspects. According to Minnesota Statute 327. 10, every guest in the room must be registering with the hotel. He stated they met with the hotel operators, and currently, they are only registering the individual reserving the room(s) in their desk register, not the guests. He explained they are in violation of State Statute in not registering every guest. City Prosecutor Knetsch added per the proposed ordinance, the hotels would have the options of photocopying all guests' IDs, 18 and over, or taking the information and recording it in the desk register. The registers need to be retained for one year. The majority of the Council desired more time to review the proposed ordinance. Councilmembers Stein and Willis requested that this item be added to the study session list. Future Study Sessions The Council deleted the study session on March 20 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss the fire study. That item will be scheduled on a future study session. Proposed Minutes 2 of 3 Special Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 6 The Council added discussion of the proposed hotel registration ordinance to the February 21 study session agenda. Adjournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Proposed Minutes 3 of 3 Special Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 7 Proposed Minutes Regular Council Meeting January 10, 2012 Mayor Slavik called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, on January 10, 2012. Boy Scout Pack 283 led the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Slavik, Councilmembers Stein, Willis, Johnson, Black, and Bildsoe. ABSENT: Councilmember Wosje. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Ahrens, City Attorney Knutson, Parks and Recreation Director Evans, Public Works Director Cote, Community Development Director Juetten, Deputy Fire Chief Springer, Police Chief Goldstein, Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol, and City Clerk Engdahl. Plymouth Forum No one was present to address the Council. Presentations and Public Information Announcements 4.02) Announcement of "Skate with the Mayor" on January 20 Parks and Recreation Director Evans announced that the "Skate with the Mayor" on January 20 at Parkers Lake has been cancelled due to the weather conditions. Parks and Recreation Director Evans introduced new park employees—Barb Northway, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation, and Susan Muelken, Activity Center Manager. Approval of Agenda Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Stein, to gpprove thea egnda. With all members voting in favor the motion carried. Consent Agenda Proposed Minutes 1 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 8 Item No. 6.12 was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item No. 8.02. Mayor Slavik noted a revised agreement for item No. 6.16 was given to the Council this evening. Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt the Consent Agenda that included the followingitems: tems: 6.01) Special and Regular Meeting minutes of December 13, 2011. 6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements ending December 31, 2011 (Res2012-001). 6.03) Appointment of City Health Officer for 2012. 6.04) Appointment of City Council Secretary for 2012. 6.05) Resolution Appointing Official Depositories for City Funds for 2012 (Res2012-002). 6.06) Resolution Designating the Plymouth Sun Sailor as the City of Plymouth's Official Newspaper for 2012 (Res2012-003). 6.07) Resolution Approving Amended Policy Regulating the Use of City Facilities (Res2012- 004). 6.08) Resolution Approving Request for Change Order No. 1 and Final Construction for Council Chambers Renovation (Res2012-005). 6.09) Resolution Awarding a Contract for the MIP Water Tower Rehabilitation Project (10021 Res2012-006). 6.10) Resolution Approving an Encroachment Agreement for a Retaining Wall within a Drainage and Utility Easement in Lot 4, Block 4, Spring Meadows, located at 5400 Weston Lane Res2012-007). 6.11) Resolution Approving the purchase of a Replacement Tandem Dump Trunk (Res2012- 008). 6.12) (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business as item No. 8.02). 6.13) Resolution Authorizing Payment of 2012 Membership Dues for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission (Res2012-009). 6.14) Accept Environmental Quality Committee's Annual Report and 2012 Work Plan. Proposed Minutes 2 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 9 6.15) Resolution Authorizing Payment for Purchases that may exceed $100,000 (Res2012-010). 6.16) Resolution Approving Plymouth Creek Center's Catering Contracts (Res2012-011). 6.17) Resolution Approving 2012 Compensation for the City Manager (Res2012-012). 6.18) Resolution Approving Request for Payment No. 6 and Final for Cimarron Ponds Street Reconstruction Project (9113 - Res2012-013). 6.19) Resolution Authorizing an Agreement known as the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment that Delegates Authority to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to Enter into an Amendment with the City to cover the Court Data Required for eCharging (Res2012-014). 6.20) Resolution Approving Donation of Out -of -Service Firefighter Structural Clothing to the International Fire Relief Mission (Res2012-015). 6.21) Resolution Authorizing a Deer and Turkey Management Program for 2012 (Res2012- 016). With all mernbers voting in favor, the motion carried. Public Hearings 7.01) Denial of Renewal Application of Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol stated tonight is the hearing on the appeal of the denial of a renewal application for a Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang. Jia Pan, interpreter, would be assisting Ms. Chang. He stated Ms. Yang also submitted a renewal application for Massage Therapy Center License for her business, 4 U Foot Spa, which was denied based upon the background investigation. She requested a hearing on the denial of this license, but withdrew her appeal of the denial on January 6, 2012 by written request as she has sold the business. Therefore, only the denial of the Massage Therapy Certificate is before the Council this evening. Mayor Slavik opened the public hearing. Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol stated the Police Department conducted the background investigation of the renewal application and concluded that the application would be denied based on Section 1135.13, Subd. (a) and (b) if the City Code and the following: 1. Ms. Chang had knowingly allowed unlicensed massage therapists to conduct business at her second location "Asian Therapy", in New Hope. 2. Former employees of Ms, Chang's had informed New Hope Investigators that they were expected by Ms. Chang to engage in inappropriate sexual acts with patrons. Proposed Minutes 3 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 10 3. The City of New Hope had concluded on November 28, 2011, that Ms Chang had failed to address the licensing issue and a second ordinance violation within a three month period which was cause for revocation of the therapeutic massage enterprise license. 4. Ms. Chang was found guilty in Hennepin County Court to the New Hope Ordinance 8.35(c) (2) Providing massage without a therapeutic massage license. Ms. Chang stated she didn't understand what Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol just read. Mayor Slavik stated the denial of her renewal application is due to the case with the City of New Hope and pleading guilty in Hennepin County Court. Ms. Pan stated Ms. Chang explained everything to the New Hope City Council, but they didn't understand. Tonight she's only appealing the denial for the therapist certificate. Even though Ms. Chang isn't a good manager, she's a good therapist and has all the credentials. She needs this job to support her family. Mayor Slavik stated the Council isn't considering the Massage Therapy Center license this evening, as Ms. Chang withdrew that. The Council is only considering the Massage Therapy Certificate for Ms. Chang. Ms. Pan stated Ms. Chang has brought all her certificates and licenses, and she gave them to the City Clerk if the Council wants to look at them. In New Hope, Ms. Chang's license was denied as a business owner, but she still has the therapist license. Ms. Chang doesn't understand why the therapist license in Plymouth is denied. Councilmember Bildsoe asked Ms. Chang if she has seen the report in front of the Council or understands why the Police Department is recommending denial. Ms. Pan stated she doesn't have a copy of that report but a letter. Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol stated the report that he read wasn't given to Ms. Chang, but a letter from the City Clerk explaining the reasons for denial. He met with Ms. Chang and her husband to explain the reasons for denial, and they also met with Deputy City Clerk Baird. He stated based on the background investigation from New Hope, the basis for the denial is for the massage therapy center and therapist. Councilmember Bildsoe asked if the City can deny a license for an individual if that person has been performing a business that has been found guilty, or essentially applying the fact that Ms. Chang violated the ordinance provisions in New Hope. Can the Council deny her right to be licensed in Plymouth as a massage therapist? Deputy Police Chief Plekkenpol replied yes. By request of Councilmember Bildsoe, Ms. Pan read the resolution that contained the reasons for denial to Ms. Chang. He asked the interpreter if Ms. Chang had any questions. Proposed Minutes 4 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 11 Ms. Pan stated Ms. Chang explained everything to the New Hope City Council. Everything is related to management of a business, not her as a therapist. She's just appealing the therapist denial as she needs a job to support her family. Councilmember Black noted that there was a subsequent violation after the initial violation in New Hope. Mayor Slavik declared the public hearing closed. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt a Resolution Approving the Denial of Massage Therapist Certificate for Yue Chang that directs the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact for the January 24 Council Meeting (Res2012-017). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Ms. Pan asked if the reason why she was denied a therapist license was because of New Hope. Mayor Slavik replied the denial is based on the reasons in the resolution that she read to Ms. Chang. Ms. Pan asked if Ms. Chang can never do work as a therapist in Plymouth or anywhere. City Attorney Knutson stated she can reapply with the City one year after tonight's meeting. Ms. Pan asked if Ms. Chang can apply in another city. City Attorney Knutson replied she can apply with other cities. General Business 8.01) Planned Unit Development Amendment for Improvements to Plymouth Auto Center at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072) Community Development Director Juetten stated this item was before the Council on December 13, 2011, and the applicant requested to table this item to tonight in order to modify the plan based upon the Council's discussion at that meeting. The applicant has amended their original request as follows: 1. Removed the request for a canopy extension to accommodate another pump island. 2. Amended request for expanding business hours. Current hours are 6:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m. They proposed 4:00 a.m.-Midnight. They amended that request to 5:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m. The remainder of their original request remains unchanged: 1. The addition of electronic sign elements within the existing monument sign. 2. A building expansion on the north side of the building. Proposed Minutes 5 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 12 Liz Nalezny, applicant, stated they decided to omit the request for the extra gas pump and canopy and to just extend the business hours one extra hour in the morning. They are a small family business, and they have to adjust their practices to stay competitive. There are no deliveries before 7:00 a.m. so opening one hour earlier shouldn't cause any problems with noise to the adjacent neighborhood. They currently have approximately 23 customers between 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. Councilmember Stein asked if they would be acceptable to limiting their deliveries before 7:00 a.m. Ms. Nalezny replied yes. Councilmember Bildsoe and Mayor Slavik thanked Ms. Nalezny for removing the pump extension. Mayor Slavik stated she will support the detail building on the north side with the work being done inside and the electronic sign. However, she doesn't support the expansion of the hours. She stated she's unsure how many customers they would lose that extra hour since its very quiet that early in the morning, and this business isn't directly on Highway 55. She appreciates the fact that they have invested in their business, but there are adjacent residents who have invested in their homes and properties, and they need to have enjoyment of their homes as well. Motion was made by Mayor Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to adopt a Resolution Approving a PUD General Plan Amendment to allow Improvements to the Plymouth Station Auto Center at Property located at 16925 County Road 24 (2011072 — Res2012-019,) with the exception of condition No. 2 regarding the modified business hours (5:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m.). Councilmember Black stated she would support the additional hour for them to be open as there wouldn't be that much additional traffic. This will be a service to the community. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to amend the main motion to add condition No. 2 back in the Resolution. The Council voted on the amendment, and with Black, Bildsoe, and Johnson yes, and Stein, Willis, and Slavik no, the motion failed. Councilmember Stein asked if this item could be tabled until there is a full Council present. Community Development Director Juetten replied it could be tabled as the review deadline is February 10. Councilmember Johnson asked if the Resolution could be adopted with the tabling of condition No. 2 to January 24 so the applicant can began their work on the project. Ms. Nalezny stated she would appreciate that. She clarified the reason for the extra hour in the morning is for their staff to be better prepared for their customers at 7:00 a.m. which is their busiest time. She extended an invitation to the Council to take a tour of their business so they can show them the work that will be accomplished during that extra hour. Proposed Minutes 6 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 13 The Council voted on the main motion but tabled condition No. 2 of the resolution until January 24. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to Amend PUD 9 1 -1 (Seven Ponds North) Amendment for Plymouth Station for Property located at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072 — Ord2012-01) and a Resolution Approvin Findingsindings of Fact (Res2012-018). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. 8.02) Residential Composting Grant Program Councilmember Willis stated his only concern on this item is that the funding for this project comes from the solid waste budget versus the water resources budget. Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to adopt a Resolution Approving Residential Composting Grant Program with the amendment that the funding comes from the solid waste budget (Res2012-020). Mayor Slavik requested a report from staff in a year on the amount of staff time with this program and resident participation. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Reports and Staff Recommendations There were no reports and staff recommendations. Adiournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Proposed Minutes 7 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 14 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 0 2PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Deb Luesse, Accounting Clerk Reviewed by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager Item: Disbursements Ending January 14, 2012 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution to approve the disbursements for the period ending January 14, 2012. 2. BACKGROUND: Attached is a list of city fund disbursements for the period ending January 14, 2012. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers Resolution Page 1 Invoice Expense Distribution for Period Ended 1.14.12/Council meeting 1.24.12 FUND 100 General Fund 228,750.41 200 Recreation Fund 7,150.11 210 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 0.00 220 Transit System Fund 5,092.90 234 Economic Development Fund 0.00 250 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 16,156.28 254 HRA Section 8 Fund 240.00 254 HAP Check Summary 238,714.36 258 HRA General Fund 1,250.90 300 1998C GO Activity Center 0.00 301 2003D Open Space Refunding 0.00 305 2004A GO Public Safety 0.00 307 1998A -TIF #7-5A Rottland 0.00 308 2005A TIF #1-1 0.00 310 2009A TIF #7-5A Refund 1998A 0.00 311 20098 AC and FH Refunding 0.00 312 2010A GO Open Space 0.00 400 General Capital Projects Fund 15.60 401 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00 404 Community Improvement 0.00 405 Park Replacement Fund 0.00 406 Infrasturcture Replacement Fund 0.00 407 Project Administration Fund 0.00 408 Park Construction 667.01 409 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00 412 Utility Trunk Fund 0.00 413 Improvement Project Construction 517.42 414 Shenandoah Administration 0.00 416 Public Safety Expansion 0.00 851 HRA Senior Apt. Constr Fund 0.00 418 Utility Trunk System Expansion 0.00 420 Water Sewer Construction 0.00 421 Enterprise -Other Construction 86.08 998 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const) 0.00 998 TIF # 7-3 P.O.S. (Const) 0.00 422 TIF #7-4 P.T.P (Const) 0.00 423 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const) 0.00 424 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const) 0.00 425 TIF Housing Assistance Program 0.00 426 TIF #7-7 Stonecreek ('Const) 0.00 427 TIF #7-8 Shops @ Plymouth Creek 0.00 428 TIF HRA Senior Apt. Constr. Fund 0.00 429 TIF HRA 1-3 Crossroads Station 0.00 431 CON -2010A Open Spaces 0.00 500 Water Fund 22,427.30 510 Water Resources Fund 18,198.46 520 Sewer Fund 459,618.23 530 Solid Waste Management Fund 12,706.00 540 Ice Center Fund 38,650.47 550 Field House Fund 5,348.96 600 Central Equipment Fund 40,879.19 610 Public Facilities Fund 38,631.85 620 Information Technology Fund 174,605.70 630 Risk Management Fund 6,841.43 640 Employee Benefits Fund 4,541.49 650 Design Engineering 0.00 660 Resource Planning 2,307.14 800 Investment Trust Fund 0.00 355.99 Total Invoice Expense Distribution: 1,323,753.28 Page 2 PB2) City of Plymouth Check Payment Register 01/01/2012 to 01/14/2012 Check 122120 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 1 2 Tree Moving and Transplanting Inv. 111128 11/28/2011 Move 1 spruce at well site Check 122121 Date Paid:01/05/2012 10,000 Lakes Chapter Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 2012 Membership Check 122122 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Action Fleet Inc Inv. 8628 12/20/2011 Battery 12volt/battery power shutoff Check 122123 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Active Network Inc Inv. 1004323 11/30/2011 Server install Check 122124 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Adam's Pest Control, Inc. Inv. 688543 12/22/2011 Dec'l 1 PCC Pest Control Check 122125 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 Check 122126 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 34927 12/13/2011 Check 122127 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 105087812 12/15/2011 Check 122128 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Inv. 74193 12/05/2011 Check 122129 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Inv. 30263 12/13/2011 Check 122130 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 794756 12/09/2011 Check 122131 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 36638 12/23/2011 Check 122132 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Inv. 19725 12/01/2011 Check 122133 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 Check 122134 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 Check 122135 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. FaIll130 12/16/2011 Inv. FaIll142 12/16/2011 Check 122136 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 600 12/27/2011 Check 122137 Date Paid:01105/2012 Inv. 213550047 12/21/2011 Check 122138 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. WO7406631 12/13/2011 Page 1 of 16 AIA Minnesota 2012 Barb Thomson Membership AIM Electronics Inc 12.7.11 Rink A&C scoreboard horn Airgas North Central 3 -oxygen @ 73.10 Allina Occ Med 10.25/10.28.11 Employee new hires Alphagraphics #489 1,500 FD field reports Amount: $100.00 100.00 Amount: $300.00 300.00 Amount: $513.99 513.99 Amount: $800.00 800.00 Amount: $74.81 74.81 Amount: $175.00 175.00 Amount: $221.45 221.45 Amount: $267.12 267.12 Amount: $773.50 773.50 Amount: $452.85 452.85 American Industrial Refrigeration Inc Amount: 592.50 IC service call 592.50 American Supply Group Inc Amount: 70.09 PW 2cs paper plates 70.09 Andy's Lawncare Amount: 395.15 Dec'l1 Snowplowing 395.15 Association of Minnesota Building Officials Amount: 800.00 2012 Membership 800.00 ATOM 2012 Agency Membership Back 2 Basics Learning LLC 11.8/12.13.11 Mommy and Me art class 12.12.11 Snowman art class BCA 12.5.11 Writing Search Warrants class for 4 Bednar Truck Service Inc 2011.24 unit 50 replace cab mirror Bertelson Total Office Solutions DVD discs/mouse pad Amount: $200.00 200.00 Amount: $648.00 576.00 72.00 Amount: $180.00 180.00 Amount: $591.43 591.43 Amount: $298.90 45.74 Page 3 1/17/2012 Inv. WO7408361 12/14/2011 Hanging folders/interior file folders Inv. WO7410301 12/15/2011 6 -Presentation binders Check 122139 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 411500 12/12/2011 Inv. 411501 12/12/2011 Inv. 411502 12/12/2011 Inv. 411503 12/12/2011 Check 122140 Date Paid:01105/2012 Inv. 12097 01/03/2012 Check 122141 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111130 11/30/2011 Bro-Tex Inc. 3cs Shop paper towels 3cs Shop paper towels 3cs Shop paper towels 3cs Shop paper towels Camp Ripley Mess Fund 9.5/9.7.12 Lease agreement for dept training Campbell Knutson Prof Assoc Nov'l 1 Attorney services Check 122142 Date Paid:01105/2012 Canine Tactical Operations Inv. 120308A 01/03/2012 4 Observers, 2 Class Registr SKIDD class 3.8.12 Check 122143 Date Paid:0110512012 CDW Government Inc Inv. C404775 12/14/2011 VMWare VSphere Inv. C478209 12/15/2011 VMWare View 5,MS SLD Win SRV Std Check 122144 Date Paid:01/05/2012 CenturyLink Inv. 51914431211 12/18/2011 Dec'11 519.1443 Olson/Investigations Inv.55097851211 12/16/2011 Dec'11550.9785 Inv.55188241211 12/16/2011 Dec'11551.8824 Check 122145 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 48059 12/15/2011 Check 122146 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 13190 12/14/2011 Check 122147 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 07140771211 12/16/2011 Check 122148 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Check 122149 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 15532751100 12/20/2011 Check 122150 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Check 122151 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 155781 12/01/2011 Check 122152 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 21484 12/14/2011 Check 122153 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 5130357 12/12/2011 Check 122154 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 1043930 12/14/2011 Check 122155 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 01737332 12/15/2011 Inv. 01737482 12/15/2011 Check 122156 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Page 1 of 16 CIGNA Behavioral Health Jan-Mar'12 EAP City of Maple Grove Nov'l1 Dog Impounds Comcast 12.26/1.25.11 ZWP wireless Commercial Asphalt Co. 12.21.11 10.27ton cold mix Crescent Electric Supply Co 4 fiber cables Cub Foods Dec. 2011 Food charges Cushman Motor Co., Inc. Left/right skid shoe Cutting Edge Property Maintenance Inc 12.3/12.4.11 Snow hauling Rockridge center Dey Distributing Inc Thermostat Digital Ally Inc 10 MIC Batteries Discount Steel Inc Various steal pieces 46 -hr drop Display Sales Inc 198.72 54.44 Amount: $323.44 80.86 80.86 80.86 80.86 Amount: $917.00 917.00 Amount: $38,832.12 38,832.12 Amount: $1,800.00 1,800.00 Amount: $12,012.38 6,662.96 5,349.42 Amount: $206.42 99.70 50.62 56.10 Amount: $1,523.88 1,523.88 Amount: $924.00 924.00 Amount: $72.54 72.54 Amount: $998.82 998.82 Amount: $100.46 100.46 Amount: $852.12 852.12 Amount: $180.43 180.43 Amount: $1,497.50 1,497.50 Amount: $40.05 40.05 Amount: $310.00 310.00 Amount: $676.36 649.32 27.04 Amount: $82.30 Page 4 1/17/2012 Inv. INV0083541 12/23/2011 1 5x8 US Flag 82.30 Check 122157 Date Paid:01/05/2012 DSS Commercial Inc Amount: $1,029.88 Inv. 15845 12/12/2011 Dec'11 Snow services 129.35 Inv. 15911 12/31/2011 Dec'11 Var shelter trash 900.53 Check 122158 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Electrical Installation & Mnt Amount: $9,050.63 Inv. 00119771N 12/13/2011 Signal in flash 36th Ave @ Vicksburg 420.00 Inv. 00119781N 12/13/2011 Signal relampGreen@Revere & 6th 894.81 Inv. 001 1980I 12/16/2011 Ply blvd/36th Ave street light trouble shoot 7,735.82 Check 122159 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Electrical Production Services Inc Inv. 111227 12/31/2011 Ref overpayment 3 Permits 201109572/9570/9573 Check 122160 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Emergency Medical Products Inc Inv. 1425257 12/15/2011 10 lift assist tarps Check 122161 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Energy Sales Inc Inv. 18562 12/09/2011 IC Burner head rpIc,electrode, gasket Check 122162 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Evenflo Inv. IN1062064 12/07/2011 4 Big Kid,4 Momentum biscotti,4 Momentum static carseats/resale Check 122163 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Factory Motor Parts Co Inv. 13789780 12/14/2011 FF/WS Cart Inv. 13798465 12/28/2011 Disc pad kit Inv. 70083147 12/28/2011 Super duty pads Check 122164 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Ferguson Enterprises Inc Inv. 2321397 12/13/2011 3-2 blk mi 150# coup Inv. S01343671002 12/15/2011 CB Lid & Plug Inv. S01344744001 12/14/2011 replacement valve Check 122165 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Fidelity Building Services Inc Inv. 0061590IN 12/01/2011 Dec'11 Janitorial Inv. 0061591 IN 12/01/2011 Dec'11 PD Sunday Janitorial Inv. 0061711 IN 12/01/2011 9cs trash liners Check 122166 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 697 12/20/2011 Check 122167 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 9706102275 12/12/2011 Inv. 9708729489 12/14/2011 Inv. 9708913489 12/14/2011 Inv. 9708913497 12/14/2011 Inv. 9709347539 12/15/2011 Inv. 9709827084 12/15/2011 Gasaway Consulting LLC 12.17.11 Officer Dev Program Grainger Respirator Piston pump 36 -lamps 4 -Program rapid dim ballast 2 lamp 2-respirator/cartridge combo Drivers work gloves (3) Power Center Outlets 1) Check 122168 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Greenway Lawn Maintenance Inc Inv. 111215 12/15/2011 Dec'11 Snowplowing Check 122169 Date Paid:01/05/2012 GroundsCare Inc. Inv. 4315 12/01/2011 Dec'11 Snowplowing Check 122170 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Hawkins Water Treatment Inv. 3290675RI 12/13/2011 ZWP 4786g1 Azone 15 Check 122171 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Hawkins, Ash,Baptie & Co. LLP Page 1 of 16 Amount: $14.25 14.25 Amount: $255.97 255.97 Amount: $483.61 483.61 Amount: $993.12 993.12 Amount: $125.09 24.76 43.22 57.11 Amount: $604.05 35.72 274.42 293.91 Amount: $9,124.62 8,560.69 267.19 296.74 Amount: $1,500.00 1,500.00 Amount: $1,275.59 26.15 30.45 41.17 637.79 407.75 132.28 Amount: 850.00 850.00 Amount: 1,500.00 1,500.00 Amount: 3,556.00 3,556.00 Amount: 240.0Q Page 5 1/17/2012 Inv. 171819 12/07/2011 Dec'11 Section 8 Acctg service Check 122172 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 120611 12/06/2011 Check 122173 Date Paid:01105/2012 Inv. 2323 12/12/2011 Check 122174 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 0110278 12/12/2011 Hennepin County Treasurer 5,709 PVC billing High Five 1,000 Custom offset lapel 1" pin Hoisington Koegler Group Inc Nov'11 Four Seasons Mall redevelopment Check 122175 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Holiday Fleet Inv. 111221 12/21/2011 11.23/12.21.11 18 E-85 fuel trips Check 122176 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 079000 12/07/2011 Inv. 079001 12/07/2011 Inv. 079049 12/08/2011 Inv. 079349 12/14/2011 Inv. 079350 12/14/2011 Inv. 079352 12/14/2011 Inv. 079403 12/15/2011 Check 122177 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 684457 12/13/2011 Check 122178 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 1832 12/05/2011 Check 122179 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 761567 12/14/2011 Hopkins Parts Co. bulb clamp/ruglyde/valve core 1708 oil filter bulb hose clamps bonder/epoxy/epoxe 497 fuel pressure reg Indelco Plastic Fittings INFOSCORE Inc Nov'11 11,968 ck/coupons processing Infrared Heating Sales & Service Inc IC Rink B Co Ray Vac service call 240.00 Amount: $1,497.05 1,497.05 Amount: $1,361.78 1,361.78 Amount: $14,988.00 14,988.00 Amount: $495.49 495.49 Amount: $249.81 15.37 111.00 4.50 20.84 14.11 25.76 58.23 Amount: $61.63 61.63 Amount: $184.52 184.52 Amount: $314.60 314.60 Check 122180 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 International Assoc for Property & Evidence/TAPE Amount:$50.00 Inv. 93027 01/03/2012 2012 Mark Bevins Membership $50.00 Check 122181 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Kid Create Studio Amount: $192.00 Inv. 2501 12/23/2011 4 Messiest Art Camp Ever $192.00 Check 122182 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Kidd Plumbing Inc Inv. 7944 12/26/2011 11.22.11 IC Reset/rebuild womens toilet Check 122183 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 7309918476 12/12/2011 Inv. 73154 12/12/2011 Inv. 73155 12/12/2011 Inv. 73156 12/12/2011 Inv. 7317518501 12/16/2011 Check 122184 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 4661924 11/30/2011 Check 122185 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 6736093 11/29/2011 Check 122186 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 20290 12/12/2011 Check 122187 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 10250613916242 01/03/2012 Check 122188 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 23980 12/01/2011 Killmer Electric Company Inc Plymouth playfield electric repairs Parker Lak plyfld lot lights and drive repairs Plymouth playfield lot light repairs PCC parking lot light repairs Plym Creek Center trail lighting repairs Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc 11.30.11 Bridge Inspections Krames StayWell LLC 4 Lifeguarding manuals Kris Engineering Inc 2 left,2 right hand curb bumpers Law Enforcement Opportunities 1.3.12 Pete johnson/Career Fair Lyndale Plant Services Dec'11 Plant lease/care Amount: $296.00 296.00 Amount: $4,232.87 308.67 2,313.60 322.99 103.72 1,183.89 Amount: $622.75 622.75 Amount: $123.62 123.62 Amount: $399.97 399.97 Amount: $330.00 330.00 Amount: $165.11 165.11 Page 6 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Check 122189 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Steve McComas Amount: 13,800.00 Inv. 111221 12/21/2011 2011 Schmidt,Mooney Gleason Fish Surveys 9,700.00 Inv. 111221A 12/21/2011 2011 curlyleaf pondweed stem 4,100.00 Inv. 152425 12/27/2011 densities/biomass, rake sampl 116.39 Check 122190 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Menard Inc Amount: 517.54 Inv. 92467 12/15/2011 See Credit and reinvoice 95106 for sales tax 484.25 Inv. 92467CM 12/15/2011 Cr inv 92467 /see reinvoice 95106 for sales tax 484.25) Inv. 95106 12/19/2011 Desk screw,var size cedar 517.54 200.00 Check 122191 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Peter Mesher Amount: 256.28 Inv. 111221 12/31/2011 18040 33rd Rehab Loan 256.28 757.65 Check 122192 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Minnesota Elevator Inc Amount: 143.33 Inv. 229433 12/01/2011 Nov-Dec'11 ZWP Elevator maint 143.33 Check 122193 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Minnesota Glove & Safety Inc Amount: 250.89 Inv. 258948 12/14/2011 25 Hard hats 250.89 Check 122194 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Amount: 2,400.00 Inv. 120118 01/03/2012 1.18.12 8 Registr/Collection System Operators 2,400.00 conf Check 122195 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Minnesota Recreation & Park Assoc/MRPA Amount: 525.00 Inv. 120307 12/31/2011 Dan Heitke Mar'12 Certified Plygrnd safety 525.00 course Check 122196 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Morrie's Imports Inc Inv. 499733 12/14/2011 Jewels - warni Inv. 4997331 12/15/2011 Jewels - warni Check 122197 Date Paid:01/05/2012 MPELRA Inv. 120202 01/03/2012 2.2.12 Givonna Kone/Winter Conf registration Check 122198 Date Paid:01/0512012 MTI Distributing Inc Inv. 82090100 11/16/2011 See cr inv 82389500 warranty Inv. 82271700 12/12/2011 1 Pro Force Blower Inv. 82389500 12/31/2011 Crinv 82090100 warranty Check 122199 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 1006254551 01/03/2012 Check 122200 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 51019P 12/30/2011 NAHRO 2.1.12/1.31.13 Membership Robert Nesbitt 12.19/12.30.11 30 hrs MN Joint Analysis Amount: $25.06 12.53 12.53 Amount: $140.00 140.00 Amount: $6,625.18 535.44 6,625.18 535.44) Amount: $495.00 495.00 Amount: $1,140.00 1,140.00 Check 122201 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Northern Sanitary Supply Co Inc Amount: 366.89 Inv. 152271 12/16/2011 PCC -10 bx gloves/handsoap/husky orange/hnd 250.50 pds/germ clnr Inv. 152425 12/27/2011 PCC 1 pail Floor Finish 116.39 Check 122202 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Northern Tool/HSBC Business Solutions Amount: 299.54 Inv. 0191001527 12/09/2011 Strobe Beacon Mount 96.54 Inv. 4062036334 12/15/2011 Tube mount round top wind (for plows) 203.00 Check 122203 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Northwest Community Television Amount: 200.00 Inv. 3765 12/12/2011 11.15/11.18.11 Recycling PSA 200.00 Check 122204 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Office Depot Amount: 757.65 Inv. 586905943001 11/17/2011 Memory flash secure digt 55.53 Inv. 588562417001 11/30/2011 Calendar year 36.89 Inv. 589665559001 12/08/2011 5-Tringler scale 25.60 Inv. 589854747001 12/09/2011 Mth planner/polyjckt/deskpad/steno pd/mth 132.89 Page 7 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Inv. 589924406001 12/14/2011 Inv. 590001582001 12/12/2011 Inv. 590001625001 12/12/2011 Inv. 590084578001 12/12/2011 Inv. 590089281001 12/12/2011 Inv. 590256172001 12/13/2011 Inv. 590277994001 12/13/2011 Inv. 590278411001 12/13/2011 Inv. 590297210001 12/13/2011 Inv. 590405017001 12/14/2011 Inv. 590413827001 12/13/2011 Inv. 59041990 5001 12/14/2011 Inv. 590565981001 12/15/2011 Inv. 590566055001 12/15/2011 Inv. 590567318001 12/15/2011 Check 122205 Date Paid:01105/2012 Inv. W1 1110740 12/21 /2011 clndr/correct tape Return lit organizer inv # 588254163001 191.41) Roll file 67.05 Security case/facial kleenex/heavy duty stapler 69.95 Monitor stand/desktop calculator/correction 22.72 fluid 12.12.11 Attorney courier Dskpd/binders/mth clndr/binder clips/wall clndr 61.75 3pk Astrobrt paper/1 pk binder clips 39.85 Dividers/binders/scissors/label/tape 85.08 Desk pad 15.27 Ninfrt/ink toll on stamp 23.21 Dly Refill/prem divider/mth deskpad 15.13 Return 5pk Dividers inv#590277994001 40.13) 2 -batteries AA 17.44 Envelopes/reinf fldr/perm mrkr/memo 205.46 book/pens/post its/steno pd cacuum,ballast Perf pad 14.05 2 bx Biz cards 101.32 Office of Enterprise Technolog Nov'11 PD Language line Check 122206 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Oil -Air Products LLC Inv. 499951001 12/12/2011 Various fittings and hose Inv. 499960001 12/12/2011 Relief valve Inv. 499961001 12/12/2011 Relief valve Amount: $23.75 23.75 Amount: $1,250.81 1,126.21 107.68 16.92 Check 122207 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 OnTrac Amount: 60.02 Inv. 8411485 11/30/2011 11.21/11.30.11 Attorney courier 48.13 Inv. 8411789 01/03/2012 12.12.11 Attorney courier 11.89 Check 122208 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Park Square Theatre Amount: 88.00 Inv. B000322229A 12/21/2011 2.7.12 Balance due for Ragtime tickets 88.00 Check 122209 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Phasor Electric Company Amount: 2,039.10 Inv. 040308 12/16/2011 IC rplc switches,hand dryers wire,rplc motor for 2,039.10 cacuum,ballast Check 122210 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Pilates MN Amount: 661.50 Inv. 111128C 12/28/2011 11.8/12.20.11 Pilates Reformer 94.50 Inv. 111228 12/28/2011 11.12/12.17.11 Pilates Reformer 189.00 Inv. 111228A 12/28/2011 11.15/12.27.11 Pilates Reformer 189.00 Inv. 111228B 12/28/2011 11.7/12.19.11 Pilates Reformer 189.00 Check 122211 Date Paid:01/0512012 Pirtek Amount: 9.17 Inv. S1570644001 12/13/2011 Fittings 9.17 Check 122212 Date Paid:01/05/2012 PowerPlan /RDO/Vermeer Amount: 1,524.83 Inv. W19361 12/09/2011 Unit 280 Rear wing cylinder 1,524.83 Check 122213 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Prairie Fire Theatre Amount: 1,200.00 Inv. 120302 01/03/2012 3.2.12 Deposit "Jack & the Beanstalk" 400.00 Inv. 120615 01/03/2012 6.15.11 Deposit "Midsummer Night's Dream" 400.00 Inv. 120817 01/03/2012 8.17.12 Deposit "Wizard of Oz" 400.00 Check 122214 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Printers Service Inc Amount: 54.00 Inv. 256897 12/07/2011 3 - 77' Ice Sharp 54.00 Check 122215 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Quantum Development, Inc. Amount: 92.00Page 8 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Dec'11 Facility Rental Check 122216 Date Paid:01/05/2012 R & J Laserworks LLC Inv. 110065 12/13/2011 27 7x9 Citizen academy graduation plaques Inv. 110078 12/11/2011 1 8x10 Award Plaque Check 122217 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Randy's Sanitation Inc Inv. 112118191211 12/19/2011 Dec'11 CWP Rubbish Removal Inv. 112572181211 12/19/2011 Dec'11 ZWP Rubbish Removal Inv. 141321211 12/19/2011 Dec'11 PW/PM Rubbish Removal Inv. 141571211 12/19/2011 Dec'11 PS/CC Rubbish Removal Check 122218 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111221 12/21/2011 Check 122219 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 040805 12/31/2011 Check 122220 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111221 12/21/2011 Raymond signs 40 24x30 Skating Rink signs RDJ Homes R200412208 8.5.04 Bal Erosion refund/Plym park Place proj Rice Creek Watershed District 2012 Blue Thumb Membership 92.00 Amount: $679.97 634.55 45.42 Amount: $1,052.92 57.25 70.81 369.77 555.09 Amount: $384.75 384.75 Amount: $400.00 400.00 Amount: $500.00 500.00 Check 122221 Date Paid: 01/05/2012 Rick Johnson Deer & Beaver Inc Amount: $380.00 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Dec'11 4 Dead Call Pickups 380.00 Check 122222 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Royal Tire Inc Amount: $2,173.44 Inv. M030094097 12/12/2011 10 Recapped tires 1,598.91 Inv. M030094293 12/16/2011 4 Recap tires 574.53 Check 122223 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Rumpca Companies Amount: $25,000.00 Inv. 6082 11/23/2011 11.1/11.8.11 Yard Waste site screening 25,000.00 Check 122224 Date Paid:01/05/2012 S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists Inc Amount: $12,350.00 Inv. 56024 11/29/2011 11.22/11.28.11 Tree&Debris grinding 12,350.00 Check 122225 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 869353 12/03/2011 Check 122226 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 3260560 01/03/2012 Check 122227 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 3429350 12/31/2011 Check 122228 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 22154 12/28/2011 Check 122229 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 490533 12/22/2011 Check 122230 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 Selectaccount Dec'11 FSA/VEBA Sensible Land Use Coalition 2012 Membership SESAC Inc 2012 PCC Annual music licensing fee Shred N Go Inc 12/14 & 12/28 Shredding Service Spartan Promotional Group Inc Iwatch posters Special Operations Training Assoc/SOTA 2012 Single Team Membership Check 122231 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Sprint Inv. 568612126110 12/18/2011 11.15/12.14.11 160 Cell Phones Inv. 812568813049 12/18/2011 11.15/12.14.11 PD MDC's Check 122232 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111228 12/29/2011 Check 122233 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 1888770 12/14/2011 Check 122234 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 10106293 12/15/2011 Page 1 of 16 St Philip the Deacon 12.28/12.29.11 Parking lot lease Streicher's Inc Taclite pro pants Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc 4 LT245/75R16 E WRG tires Amount: $426.39 426.39 Amount: $200.00 200.00 Amount: $1,011.00 1,011.00 Amount: $156.00 156.00 Amount: $218.68 218.68 Amount: $150.00 150.00 Amount: $6,082.57 4,000.84 2,081.73 Amount: $400.00 400.00 Amount: $49.99 49.99 Amount: $1,811.44 575.80 page 9 1/17/2012 Inv. 10106387 12/20/2011 4 P235/75R15 Wrangler tires Inv. 10106541 12/28/2011 8 P235/55R17 98V EAG tires Check 122235 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Sun Newspapers Inv. 1354328 12/22/2011 File 2011085 Check 122236 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Superior Brookdale Ford Inv. 60757 12/13/2011 Car motor Check 122237 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Supreme Building Maintenance Inv. 121111 12/01/2011 Dec'11 Cheshire shelter cleaning Inv. 121211 12/01/2011 Dec'11 Station 73 Cleaning services Check 122238 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 11 T F2330 12/12/2011 Check 122239 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 111218 12/18/2011 Check 122240 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 9618100 12/16/2011 Check 122241 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 376370 12/15/2011 Check 122242 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 5883 12/13/2011 Inv. 5885 12/15/2011 Check 122243 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 102017 12/15/2011 Check 122244 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 100539484001 12/12/2011 Check 122245 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 1225961 12/31/2011 Check 122246 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv.0003613MN 12/16/2011 Check 122247 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. U0320490L 12/21/2011 Check 122248 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 2012 01/03/2012 Check 122249 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 17376 12/10/2011 Check 122250 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. F213490034 12/15/2011 Check 122251 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 600244 12/12/2011 Check 122252 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Inv. 807153 12/15/2011 Taho Sportswear Inc Tech jackets Target Bank 12.17.11 Skate competition Terminal Supply Company tourch refill Toll Company 2 Helium 2 Argon Total Control Systems Inc 4 LCD UPS,4 LCD screen SCADA CWP permanganate day tank Uniforms Unlimited Inc. 70 15ft single cartridge United Rentals Northwest Inc valve shutoff University of Minnesota Kevin Springob 1.18.12 registration US Health Works 11.14/12.7.11 Groth,Topp,Elia,Kvenild,Plouman FIT Test USA Mobility Wireless Inc 12.22/1.21.12 RAD pager rental 272.23 963.41 Amount: $65.78 65.78 Amount: $59.00 59.00 Amount: $891.34 223.37 667.97 Amount: $304.50 304.50 Amount: $123.52 123.52 Amount: $13.00 13.00 Amount: $63.12 63.12 Amount: $1,374.87 1,169.47 205.40 Amount: $1,417.70 1,417.70 Amount: $51.08 51.08 Amount: $175.00 175.00 Amount: $249.00 249.00 Amount: $58.87 58.87 USPCA Region 12 Amount: $160.00 2012 Topp, Dane, Kleist,Gliniany Membership 160.00 Valley Rich Co Inc Amount: $3,902.65 9800 Rockford Rd watermain break repair 3,902.65 W D Larson Companies LTD Inc Amount: $61.63 Filters/spin on lube/element hd air/filter oil 61.63 Walser Chrysler Jeep Arm f The Watson Company IC Concession food resupply Check 122253 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Xcel Energy Inv. 51509749551211 12/22/2011 10.19/12.16.11 Playfields Inv. 51520312001211 12/14/2011 10.26/11.29.11 8 Lift Stations Inv. 51552709981211 12/12/2011 11.11/12.10.11 Civil Defense Sirens Page 1 of 16 Amount: $55.10 55.10 Amount: $995.67 995.67 Amount: $40,461.04 5,205.12 4,599.76 61.28 Page 10 1/17/2012 Inv. 51593725791211 12/12/2011 10.27/11.29.11 3 Transit shelters 1,274.18 Inv. 51671079401211 12/27/2011 10.26/12.15.11 FS2,PW,FS1,lce Center 26,854.50 Inv. 51685621581211 12/12/2011 10.26/11.29.11 Traffic Signals 2,466.20 Check 122254 Date Paid:0110512012 Hennepin County Treasurer Amount: 49.00 Inv. 120204 12/30/2011 2.4.12 Fire & Ice Concession Permit 49.00 Check 122255 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Givonna Kone Amount: 124.53 Inv. 110817 08/17/2011 8.17.11 224.4 Mileage Reimb/Redwood Falls 124.53 meeting Check 122256 Date Paid:01/05/2012 MN AFSCME Council #5 Amount: 20.74 Inv. 2011-00000331 12/30/2011 DUES MTCE - Maintenance Union Dues 20.74 Check 122257 Date Paid:01/05/2012 MN Child Support Payment Ctr Amount: 1,504.19 Inv. 2011-00000332 12/30/2011 CHD SUP% - Child Support Percentage* 1,504.19 Check 122258 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Plymouth Crime & Fire Prevention Fund Amount: 500.00 Inv. 110913 12/27/2011 Refund for SAFER electronic tracking 500.00 device/out of business Check 122259 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Maas, Jackie Amount: 66.00 Inv. Import - 1266 12/28/2011 Park and Rec Refund 66.00 Check 122260 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Raphael, Gervase Amount: 10.00 Inv. Import - 1267 01/04/2012 Park and Rec Refund 10.00 Check 122261 Date Paid:01/05/2012 Stokes, Dawn Amount: 43.00 Inv. Import - 1268 01/04/2012 Park and Rec Refund 43.00 Check 122262 Date Paid:01/0612012 Government Finance Off. Assoc. Amount: 595.00 Inv. 013200412 01/06/2012 2012 Bursheim,Weitgenant,Mastey 595.00 Memberships Check 122263 Date Paid:01106/2012 Hennepin Co Info Tech Dept Amount: 700.00 Inv. 1 DEC62015 12/08/2011 2012 Assessor's Commercial Exchange 700.00 Check 122264 Date Paid:01/06/2012 MAAO/MN Assoc Assess Officers Amount: 480.00 Inv. 120101 01/06/2012 2012 6 Memberships 480.00 Check 122265 Date Paid:01/06/2012 Metropolitan Council Amount: 413,963.81 Inv. 0000976539 12/02/2011 Jan'12 Waste Water service 413,963.81 Check 122266 Date Paid:01/06/2012 Hamel Lumber Inc Amount: 226.19 Inv. 89769 12/31/2011 pointed lath (2) 52.12 Inv. 89789 12/31/2011 mail box post 70.12 Inv. 89866 12/31/2011 box of bolts box of nuts 63.02 Inv. 89952 12/31/2011 4' connectors 4.48 Inv.90005 12/31/2011 supplies 22.07 Inv.90070 12/31/2011 supplies 7.80 Inv.90099 12/31/2011 supplies 6.58 Check 122267 Date Paid:01/0612012 Hopkins Parts Co. Amount: 180.93 Inv. 079506 12/19/2011 1847 shocks 98.07 Inv.079576 12/20/2011 needles 6.29 Inv. 079580 12/20/2011 gun coup (6) 16.99 Inv. 079788 12/27/2011 588 pump & core dpst 130.40 Inv. 079847 12/28/2011 bulb/brake clnr 18.21 Inv. 079849 12/28/2011 core dpst credit (inv#079788) 89.03) Check 122268 Date Paid:01/13/2012 A&M Business Interior Services Amount: $2,172.00 Page 11 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Inv. 258504720 11/30/2011 Chair Storage for Council Chambers project Check 122269 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Ace Lock & Safe Co Inc Inv. A88363 12/28/2011 IC - New door for Team Room 4 Check 122270 Date Paid:01/13/2012 AI's Coffee Company Inv. 93092 12/20/2011 IC Concession coffee resupply Check 122271 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Check 122272 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 9674 12/14/2011 Check 122273 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 795075 12/27/2011 Check 122274 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. D2081166MA 01/01/2012 Check 122275 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 00380071 N 01/01/2012 Check 122276 Date Paid:01113/2012 Inv. 120106 01/06/2012 Check 122277 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 111210 12/10/2011 Check 122278 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Check 122279 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 021238019 12/23/2011 Check 122280 Date Paid:01/1312012 Inv. 1433057 12/31/2011 Jonathan M Aleckson Utility Refund overpayment #17229701 15764 27th Ave N All Seasons Fireplace Insert purchase American Industrial Refrigeration Inc IC Rink C service American Messaging Services LLC Jan'12 PD Pager rentals AMI Imaging Systems, Inc. 3.9.12/3.8.13 Fiche Reader Maint Anoka County Sheriff's Dept 12-698&12-742 Bail Baldy Sanitation Inc Dec'11 Fire 123 Rubbish Removal Barton Sand & Gravel Co 12.19/12.27.11 46.34ton CL5 Recycle/W1 1/2 Batteries Plus 3.6 v AA Berkley Risk Administrators Co 2011 4th qtr Admin services 2,172.00 Amount: $871.33 871.33 Amount: $469.60 469.60 Amount: $21.83 21.83 Amount: $1,000.00 1,000.00 Amount: $341.00 341.00 Amount: $228.73 228.73 Amount: $950.00 950.00 Amount: $400.00 400.00 Amount: $292.87 292.87 Amount: $476.58 476.58 Amount: $51.24 51.24 Amount: $6,250.00 6,250.00 Check 122281 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Bertelson Total Office Solutions Amount: 414.75 Inv. WO7330731 11/08/2011 Black out frameless filter/cd/dvd storage case 158.59 Inv. WO7353281 11/17/2011 Shipping tags/tag fasteners 191.94 Inv. WO7362291 11/22/2011 Array Card stock/tape cartridge 64.22 Check 122282 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Boyer Trucks Amount: 209.00 Inv. 106112R 12/23/2011 Spring 209.00 Check 122283 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Cadd/Engineering Supply Inc Amount: 184.04 Inv. 265375 12/20/2011 2- Core 24LB Coated Bond 120.04 Inv. 265377 12/20/2011 2- Core 20LB Bond 64.00 Check 122284 Date Paid:01/1312012 Jennifer S & Curtis Carpenter Amount: 46.07 Inv. 2012-00000004 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #24237024 4780 46.07 Quinwood Check 122285 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. C469029 12/15/2011 Inv. C611422 12/20/2011 Inv. C747338 12/22/2011 Check 122286 Date Paid:01/1312012 Inv. 17939 12/21/2011 Inv. 17940 12/21/2011 Inv. 17941 12/21/2011 CDW Government Inc Laptop computer crime prevention Panasonic Tough Book 2012 Ironport Maintenance Central Wood Products 12.20.11 1 00c Wood Chips 12.20.11 1 00c Wood chips 12.2 1.11 1 00c Wood Chips Amount: $17,458.62 1,870.45 4,362.17 11,226.00 Amount: $5,450.64 1,816.88 1,816.88 1,816.88 Page 12 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Check 122287 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Clear North Technologies Inc Inv. 31700 12/31/2011 McData Switch Upgrade Check 122288 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Comcast Inv. 07376150112 01/01/2012 Jan'12 PC/PS Wireless Check 122289 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Corner House Inv. 120101 01/07/2012 2012 Cornerhouse Interview services Check 122290 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 14140 12/19/2011 Check 122291 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 7172513 12/19/2011 Inv. 7172585 12/19/2011 Amount: $3,331.74 3,331.74 Amount: $59.95 59.95 Amount: $7,731.20 7,731.20 Custom Fire Aparatus Inc Amount: $85.47 Spring/pivot shaft $85.47 Dakota Supply Group Inc Amount: $9,667.10 3 1.5"M120B Gal,24 3/4"M35 short $6,515.10 meters/rplcmnt 16 3/4"x7-1/2" #2 setters,8 1"M7013 meters,8 1" $3,152.00 4 setters/resale Check 122292 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Dalco Inv. 2407684 12/19/2011 hand roll towel Check 122293 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 01738704 12/20/2011 Check 122294 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. I NV55454 12/20/2011 Check 122295 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 0018651 IN 12/22/2011 Check 122296 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 004 12/16/2011 Check 122297 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv.0098037IN 12/23/2011 Check 122298 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 70082079 12/19/2011 Check 122299 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. MNPLY51456 12/23/2011 Inv. MNPLY51466 12/23/2011 Check 122300 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 2330102 12/22/2011 Check 122301 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 1006512858 12/23/2011 Check 122302 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 111213 12/13/2011 Discount Steel Inc HR Drop (32) DTS/Document Tech Solutions Waste toner bottle mx Dynamic Imaging Systems Inc Jan-Dec'12 Picturelink imaging syst maint E G Blank Consulting 12.16.11 NW Green way/land acquisition consulting Earl F. Andersen Inc. iwatch signs Factory Motor Parts Co Super duty pads Fastenal Company HCS 1/2-13 & HCS 5/8-11 5/16 x 3/4 Strip Ferguson Enterprises Inc 2 BRS 600# G&K Services Inc 12.23.11 PW/PM Uniform rental Janet Gamble 10.25/12.13.11 Zumba Gold for Seniors Check 122303 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Grainger Inv. 9712640722 12/20/2011 Wire Shelving with gray bins (2) Inv. 9713830843 12/21/2011 Drivers Gloves (1 pr) Inv. 9714133403 12/21/2011 hose reel multi mount Inv. 9715056330 12/22/2011 Clip/Wire rope Check 122304 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 14940803 01/01/2012 Check 122305 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 1911 11/29/2011 Hasler Inc Jan-Mar'12 Postage meter rental Hawk Performance Specialties 11.17.11 Zamboni repairs Amount: $565.35 565.35 Amount: $18.63 18.63 Amount: $45.73 45.73 Amount: $3,754.35 3,754.35 Amount: $85.00 85.00 Amount: $1,499.45 1,499.45 Amount: $64.88 64.88 Amount: $24.12 10.65 13.47 Amount: $77.54 77.54 Amount: $355.17 355.17 Amount: $180.00 180.00 Amount: $927.76 783.07 9.68 133.83 1.18 Amount: $402.58 402.58 Amount: $2,064.40 464.91 Page 13 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Inv. 1920 12/07/2011 IC Battery charger update Check 122306 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Hennepin County Treasurer Inv. 1000009903 12/19/2011 Nov'11 Room/Board prisoners Check 122307 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Higgins Construction LLC Inv. 111230 12/30/2011 Rehab Loan Payment - Roloff pymnt #1 Check 122308 Date Paid:0111312012 Hildi Inc Inv. 3941 12/27/2011 Actuarial Valuation - work performed through 12/20/11 Check 122309 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 2802655 11/30/2011 Inv. 2812811 12/19/2011 Check 122310 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 1834 12/31/2011 Check 122311 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 2899 12/31/2011 Huebsch See credit/reinvoice 2812811 to include tax IC 2 Dyson hand dryers INFOSCORE Inc Dec'11 11,098 check scanning J Jenson Enterprises Inc Dec'11 Snowplowing 1,599.49 Amount: $2,872.00 2,872.00 Amount: $14,900.00 14,900.00 Amount: $3,365.00 3,365.00 Amount: $4,878.11 2,358.00 2,520.11 Amount: $171.47 171.47 Amount: $400.00 400.00 Check 122312 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Yanzhu Ji Amount: 210.97 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #24224930 13710 210.97 5th Ave Check 122313 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Judy Johnson Amount: 10.72 Inv. 120109 01/09/2012 App for city council PDF annotation 10.72 Check 122314 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Law Enforcement Technology Group LLC Amount: 54,593.50 Inv. 12611 01/01/2012 Jan-Dec'12 LETG Sftwr Maint/support 54,337.00 Inv. 12612 01/01/2012 Jan2012-Dec2012 canine tracker/Saber & 256.50 Stryker Check 122315 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Leroy Job Trucking Inc Amount: 170.00 Inv. 14287 12/02/2011 12.2.11 disposal of dead animals 170.00 Check 122316 Date Paid:01/13/2012 LexisNexis Risk Data Management Inc Amount: 38.35 Inv. 10345582011123 12/31/2011 Dec'11 LexisNexis 38.35 Check 122317 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Lighten UP, LLC Amount: 299.25 Inv. 1609 12/02/2011 80 Watt induction lamps/driver w/reflector kit 299.25 Check 122318 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Lubrication Technologies Inc Amount: 4,291.56 Inv. 1994800 12/22/2011 144.8gI 5W30, 150g ATF, 150gI 15W40 4,291.56 Check 122319 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Lynn & Associates Amount: 937.50 Inv. 111228 12/30/2011 Assessment Svcs - Nov/Dec 2011 937.50 Check 122320 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Metro Fire Amount: 234.27 Inv. 42825 12/19/2011 Tx receiver nightfighter HUD 234.27 Check 122321 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Metro Garage Door Co. Amount: 949.87 Inv. 207111 12/16/2011 Door Repair 949.87 Check 122322 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Metro Water Conditioning Inc. Amount: 1,664.44 Inv. 14021 12/13/2011 IC seals bad both sets 633.03 Inv. 14022 12/13/2011 IC watersoftener repairs 1,031.41 Check 122323 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Metropolitan Council Amount: 37,530.90 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Dec'11 Sewer Availability Charge 37,530.90 Check 122324 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Minnesota Glove & Safety Inc Amount: 18.60 Inv. 259185 12/19/2011 2pr BO palm work gloves 18.60 Page 14 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Check 122325 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Minnesota Historical Society Inv. RH225327 12/15/2011 12.15.11 Ramsey House tickets Amount: $273.00 273.00 Check 122326 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Minnesota Recreation & Park Assoc/MRPA Amount: $1,820.00 Inv. 120101 01/07/2012 2012 Agency+11 P&R Memberships $1,820.00 Check 122327 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Mike Mittelstaedt Amount: $69.00 Inv. 111214 12/14/2011 12.14.11 Officiate 3 adult basketball games $69.00 Check 122328 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 MN Park & Sports Turf Mgr Assoc/MPSTMA Amount: $50.00 Inv. 120101 01/07/2012 2012 Heitke/Luebeck Membership $50.00 Check 122329 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Morrie's Imports Inc Inv. 499973 12/20/2011 Cap asy - oil Amount: $9.68 9.68 Check 122330 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 MS Govern Amount: 78,417.63 Inv. MN00000648A 01/01/2012 Jan-Dec2012 Govern Maint/Gold Support 78,417.63 Check 122331 Date Paid:01113/2012 Eunja & Kook J Nam Amount: 316.30 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #24212395 15355 316.30 58th PI N Check 122332 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Sarat Nath & Nilanjona Mahanta Amount: 50.00 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #24170220 4635 50.00 Trenton Cir N Check 122333 Date Paid:01/13/2012 National Crime Prevention Council Amount: 1,973.68 Inv. 104057 11/29/2011 McGruff safe kids ID kits, coloring books 1,973.68 Check 122334 Date Paid:01/13/2012 National Fire Protection Association Amount: 855.00 Inv. 120101 01/07/2012 2012 NFC subscription renewal 855.00 Check 122335 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Newman Traffic Signs Amount: 3,340.15 Inv. T10243681 12/23/2011 145 New Traffic signs 3,340.15 Check 122336 Date Paid:01/13/2012 North Star Chptr Appraisal Ins Amount: 150.00 Inv. 120101 01/07/2012 2012 Hebert Membership 150.00 Check 122337 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Northern Safety Technology Amount: 572.63 Inv. 29375 12/20/2011 Unit 282 Corner Strobe 572.63 Check 122338 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Northwest Community Television Amount: 492.65 Inv. 3766 12/21/2011 4.29/9.29.11 Rain Garden video production 492.65 Check 122339 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Office Depot Amount: 401.20 Inv. 590919586001 12/19/2011 Mth calendar 11.32 Inv. 591095006001 12/20/2011 Mth Dskpd/mth clndr/laminating pouch 44.17 Inv. 591192799001 12/20/2011 Lsr label/sel pouch/inked stamp 172.68 Inv. 591354683001 12/21/2011 3bx Itr fldr 16.29 Inv. 591436562001 12/22/2011 Mini planner/wkly appt planner 16.47 Inv. 591544818001 12/23/2011 70ct steno/stapler 12.53 Inv. 591561407001 12/23/2011 Jewel case/cd -r spindle/dvd r spindle 44.72 Inv. 591588677001 12/23/2011 Prot sheet 17.98 Inv. 591588753001 12/23/2011 Envelopes 15.76 Inv. 591965492001 12/29/2011 Teachers planner 8.61 Inv. 592104997001 12/30/2011 Tote file/letter tray/dsk dispenser 40.67 Check 122340 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Olsen Chain & Cable Co Inc Amount: 27.17 Inv. 667090 12/21/2011 Chain parts 27.17 Check 122341 Date Paid:01/13/2012 OnTrac Amount: 9.10 Inv. 8412055 12/31/2011 12.19.11 Attorney courier 9.10 Page 1 of 16 Page 15 1/17/2012 Check 122342 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 70964 12/22/2011 Inv. 71082 12/27/2011 Inv. 71147 12/30/2011 Check 122343 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 116996 12/22/2011 Check 122344 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 040297 12/16/2011 Check 122345 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 257110 12/21/2011 Owens Companies Inc Amount: $3,986.35 Pavilion furnace won't lite $445.80 PS - Blower fan w/gas/silicon foam gasket/mis $1,963.05 supplies PS - motor/misc parts and supplies $1,577.50 Park Bus Company 12.15.11 Ramsey House Tour Phasor Electric Company replaced ballast Printers Service Inc 3 - 77' Ice Sharp Amount: $437.50 437.50 Amount: $187.03 187.03 Amount: $54.00 54.00 Check 122346 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Protek Painting Inc Amount: 2,760.00 Inv. 111221 12/21/2011 Computer screen boxes council 2,760.00 chambers/steel corners Check 122347 Date Paid:01/1312012 Rainbow Treecare Inc Amount: 2,503.00 Inv. 11916831192739 12/19/2011 11.23/12.19.11 Brush Hauling 100.00 Inv. 11916831192739A 12/19/2011 11.23/12.19.11 City Tree Removal 2,403.00 Check 122348 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Randy's Sanitation Inc Amount: 306.66 Inv. 114317480112 12/19/2011 Jan'12 PCC Rubbish Removal 306.66 Check 122349 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Roto -Rooter Amount: 150.00 Inv. 04816494818 12/21/2011 12.21.11 Berkshire Big Jet 150.00 Check 122350 Date Paid:01/13/2012 SECAP Amount: 284.95 Inv. 81135441 10/18/2011 Ink head for postage machine 284.95 Check 122351 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Sign A Rama Amount: 2,606.45 Inv. 5784 11/30/2011 2-8x8 nameplates 76 -signs for fire stations 2,370.13 Inv. 5829 12/08/2011 2 8x8 engraed nameplate T Nelson/J Moreen 81.21 Inv. 5836 12/19/2011 10 -nameplates 155.11 Check 122352 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Sport Systems Unlimited Amount: 236.19 Inv. 00343961N 12/20/2011 200 Acrylic Plexiglass/Ad panel screws 236.19 Check 122353 Date Paid:01/13/2012 St Paul Linoleum & Carpet Co Amount: 288.00 Inv. 0063468 12/13/2011 replace carpet tile in office 288.00 Check 122354 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Surfacequest Inc Amount: 5,700.00 Inv. SQ11191 12/27/2011 Council Chambers install Belbien on counter 5,700.00 tops Check 122355 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 11 TF2336 12/20/2011 Inv. 11 TF2469 12/21/2011 Inv. 11 TF2542 12/30/2011 Check 122356 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Inv. 199 12/23/2011 Check 122357 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv.50950000112 01/13/2012 Check 122358 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 17001 12/23/2011 Check 122359 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 12163341211 01/07/2012 Page 1 of 16 Taho Sportswear Inc 36-Gymnastics/lace hoodie 42 -Soccer Long Sleeve T -Shirts Program Tshirt Order Taylor Electric Company LLC CWP rplc camera TDS Metrocom Jan'12 509.5000 Land lines Amount: $1,527.30 1,077.00 354.90 95.40 Amount: $1,766.21 1,766.21 Amount: $2,635.14 2,635.14 TeeJay North Inc Amount: $173.00 PCC revolving door repair $173.00 Thompson Publishing Group Amount: $328.50 1211/12'12 Fair Labor Standards Handbook $328.50 Page 16 1/17/2012 Check 122360 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Diana J & Mark G Tierney Amount: $135.99 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #20832600 16115 $135.99 5th Ave Check 122361 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 378079 12/30/2011 Check 122362 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Inv. 77423 11/28/2011 Check 122363 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Inv. 111231 12/31/2011 Toll Company Propylene set Twinwest Chamber of Commerce Tammy Ward Academy tuition Ultimate Martial Arts Inc 2011 Tae Kwon Do,Little Tigers Check 122364 Date Paid:01/13/2012 USA Bluebook Inv. 557640 12/19/2011 1 34L Cal Gas, Inv. 559683 12/21/2011 1 Val -Matic Air/ Vacuum valve Check 122365 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 2678098711 12/25/2011 Check 122366 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 233914 12/21/2011 Check 122367 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. F213560037 12/22/2011 Verizon Wireless 12/26 - 1/25 Mayor Village Chevrolet Co. Resistor/connector W D Larson Companies LTD Inc Filters (3) Amount: $643.25 643.25 Amount: $550.00 550.00 Amount: $173.60 173.60 Amount: $662.63 164.20 498.43 Amount: $69.03 69.03 Amount: $52.81 52.81 Amount: $19.15 19.15 Check 122368 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Gregory R Wagener & Laura Lindgren-Wagener Amount:$39.49 Inv. 120110 01/01/2012 Utility Refund overpayment #13626100 4000 $39.49 Forestview Check 122369 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 807413 12/22/2011 Check 122370 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Inv. 120113 01/01/2012 Check 122371 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 51626172431211 12/30/2011 Check 122372 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 469566 12/22/2011 Inv. 469567 12/22/2011 The Watson Company IC Concession food resupply Wild Mountain Plymouth- Sunday School Ski Trip Xcel Energy 11.12/12.14.11 PCC,FH,HS,CC,FS3,PS,residential street lights Yocum Oil Company Inc 2300gl Diesel Fuel 5702gl Unleaded fuel Check 122373 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Zee Medical Service Inv. 54102314 11/15/2011 PCC medical resupply Check 122374 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 120109 01/06/2012 Check 122375 Date Paid: 01/13/2012 Inv. 120109 01/09/2012 Check 122376 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 120109 01/01/2012 Check 122377 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. 111229 12/29/2011 Check 122378 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. Import - 1272 01/11/2012 Check 122379 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Inv. Import - 1270 01/11/2012 City of Wayzata tabs for tax exempt vehicles 119@$16.00 Gil Konop STD 64 hours 12/24 - 1/6 Petty Cash Replenish Buy Money John Spiotta 11.21/12.29.11 63.20 Mileage Reimb Brandt, Carl Park and Rec Refund Carpenter, Mary Park and Rec Refund Amount: $491.21 491.21 Amount: $72.00 72.00 Amount: $62,666.04 62,666.04 Amount: $22,527.28 6,234.38 16,292.90 Amount: $93.64 93.64 Amount: $1,904.00 1,904.00 Amount: $1,066.29 1,066.29 Amount: $838.16 838.16 Amount: $35.08 35.08 Amount: $17.00 17.00 Amount: $61.00 61.00 Page 17 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Check 122380 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Gessford, Ellen Amount: $41.00 Inv. Import - 1271 01/11/2012 Park and Rec Refund $41.00 Check 122381 Date Paid:01/13/2012 Kavanaugh, Theresa Amount: $66.00 Inv. Import - 1269 01/11/2012 Park and Rec Refund $66.00 Total Payments: 262 Total Amount Paid: $1,085,038.92 Page 18 Page 1 of 16 1/17/2012 Date: 1/18/12 H.M.S. Windows - Housing Assistance Payments Page: 0001 Time: 8:35:41 AM PAYMENT REGISTER -SUMMARY Q:1hmslreportslPAYSUM.QRF Bank Account Description/Account Number 3110681 Number Date Method Status Name Of Payee Total 0005527 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Dmitriy Akerman 1,220.00 0005528 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Simon Akerman 911.00 0005529 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Ilya Alchits 934.00 0005530 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid The Place Apartments 1,609.00 0005531 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Summer Creek Apts 1,780.00 0005532 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Melair Associates LP DSA 0.00 0005533 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Melair Associates LP DSA 25,704.00 0005534 1 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Wayne Austin 1,116.00 0005535 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Bass Lake Hills Townhomes, LP 1,661.00 0005536 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Vladimir Begun 752.00 0005537 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 0.00 0005538 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 19,581.00 0005539 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos-Oakwood LLC 818.00 0005540 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Hoa Chen 102.00 000554I 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Esso Properties, LLC 1,291.00 0005542 1/1/12 Computer Ck, Paid Fernbrook Townhomes 8,085.00 0005543 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Tim & Holly Flemming 811.00 0005544 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Estates 0.00 0005545 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Estates 16,368.00 0005546 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Four Seasons Villa 444.00 0005547 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Todd Haigh 0.00 0005548 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid DeanHalliwili 433.00 0005549 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Amy Haugen 573.00 0005550 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Andrew Heal 1,054.00 0005551 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCommons 0.00 0005552 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Heartland -Plymouth LkVwCommons 45,634.00 0005553 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Robin Lea Helhmer 930.00 0005554 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Paul Hintermeyer 475.00 0005555 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Elena & Boris lliarski 675.00 0005556 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Eric Johansen 585.00 0005557 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Joseph Palen 830.00 0005558 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Barbie Jo Kalash 627.00 0005559 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Gennadiy Kharam 511.00 0005560 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Lancaster Village Partnership 6,248.00 0005561 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Kathy LaPointe 627.00 0005562 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Shawn Liu 228.00 0005563 1/1/12 Computer Ck, Paid Gregory Mazo 763.00 0005564 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Joan M. Michaud 565.00 0005565 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Klara Mints 1,154.00 0005566 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Grant Moosbrugger 871.00 0005567 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Park Place Apartments 832.00 0005568 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Parkside Apartments 7,080.00 0005569 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Colony Apartments 9,225.00 0005570 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Ponds Ltd Partnership 14,710.00 0005571 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Pointe Apartments 445.00 0005572 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Regency Pointe Apartment Homes 14,147.00 0005573 1/l/12 Computer Ck. Paid Ilya Roytelman 596.00 0005574 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Paul Savariraj 642.00 0005575 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Shenandoah Woods 12,305.00 0005576 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Gopal B Shenoy 1,775.00 0005577 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Leased Housing Assoc 11,373.00 0005578 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Dawa Tashi 566.00 0005579 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Irina Turovskaya 573.00 Page 19 Date: 1/18/12 H.M.S. Windows - Housing Assistance Payments Page: 0002 Time: 835:41 AM PAYMENT REGISTER -SUMMARY Q:1hmslreportslPAYSUM.QRP 0005580 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Vicksburg Crossing 3,044.00 0005581 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Vicksburg Commons 4,537.00 0005582 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Vladimir Voynov 792.00 0005583 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Wellington Apartments Partnership 2,441.00 0005584 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid David Wick 1,147.00 0005585 1 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Dakota County Community Development Agen 873.09 0005586 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Lake County Housing Authority 556.09 0005587 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid Scott County CDA 1,207.09 0005588 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid St. Louis Park Housing Authority 47.09 0005589 1/l/12 Computer Ck. Paid OIVV ( a_, g5emevll - ` 55.00 0005590 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid E 63.00 0005591 1/l/12 Computer Ck. Paid w t t 20.00 0005592 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid r t 16.00 0005593 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid tt i 40.00 0005594 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid rr tti ` 63.00 0005595 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid q tt 16.00 0005596 1/l/12 Computer Ck. Paid tt - 26.00 0005597 1/1/12 Computer Ck. Paid S t4. t 20.00 0005598 1/1/12 Computer Ck, Paid tit t 33.00 0005599 1/l/12 Computer Ck. Paid S 38.00 0005600 1/6/12 Computer Ck. Paid Bigos Willow Creek 740.00 0005601 1/6/12 Computer Ck. Paid Joseph Palen 912.00 0005602 1/6/12 Computer Ck. Paid Plymouth Ponds Ltd Partnership 607.00 0005603 1/6/12 Computer Ck, Paid Xiang Zhan 1,182.00 Total For Bank Account $238,714.36 Of Totals Transactions Computer Checks 389 $238,714.36 Manual Checks 0 $0.00 Direct Deposits 0 $0.00 Total For Bank: $238.714.36 Total - All Bank Accounts Printed: $238,714.36 Page 20 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS ENDING JANUARY 14, 2012 WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending January 14, 2012 was presented to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the following funds is approved: M & I Bank — Check Register General & Special Revenue Construction & Debt Service Enterprise & Internal Service Housing Redevelopment Check Register Total M & I — Housing Assistance Payments Housing & Redevelopment Authority GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS Adopted by the City Council on January 24, 2012 257,149.70 1,286.11 825,112.21 1,490.90 1,085,038.92 238,714.36 238,714.36 1,323,753.28 Page 21 c;ty or Agenda 6 . 0 3PlymouthNumber: Iridin, Qphty da Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Lisa Baird, Deputy City Clerk January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Item: Approve Renewal of Liquor Licenses for 2012 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution renewing 3.2 malt on -sale and off -sale liquor, off -sale intoxicating liquor, on -sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor, and wine licenses for the period February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. 2. BACKGROUND: The City has received and reviewed applications for renewal of all liquor licenses. The Police Department has conducted their investigations and has found no reason not to issue the attached licenses. All approvals are contingent on the receipt of all license fees, proof of required insurance for workers compensation, general liability, and liquor liability by January 31, 2012 as noted in the resolution. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: License fees in the following amounts will be received from each licensee: 3.2 Malt Liquor On -Sale $ 500 3.2 Malt Liquor Off -Sale $ 100 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor $ 8,240 On -Sale Sunday Liquor $ 200 Wine $ 2,000 Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor $ 380 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF 3.2 MALT ON -SALE AND OFF -SALE LIQUOR, OFF -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR, ON -SALE AND SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR, AND WINE LICENSES FOR 2012 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the attached licenses are approved for issuance for the period February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013, with the following conditions: 1. That the required license fees be paid by January 31, 2012; and 2. That proof of worker compensation, general liability, and liquor liability insurance be provided by January 31, 2012. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 2 Resolution 2012 - Page 2 3.2 Off -Sale Licensee Venue Address Plymouth 1998 LLC Cub Foods #31454 4445 Nathan Lane Supervalu Inc. Cub Foods #31644 3550 Vicksburg Lane Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Holiday Stationstore #107 3020 Fernbrook Lane Kwik Trip, Inc. Kwik Trip #411 1605 Annapolis Lane N. PDQ Food Stores, Inc. PDQ Food Store # 204 4090 Annapolis Lane N. RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8851 10200 6th Avenue N. RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8858 4190 Vinewood Lane RBF, LLC of Wisconsin Rainbow Foods #8873 16705 Co. Rd. 24 Northern Tier Retail LLC SuperAmerica #3351 4325 Peony Lane N. Northern Tier Retail LLC SuperAmerica #4341 5750 Nathan Lane N. Target Corporation Target Store T-0664 4175 Vinewood Lane N 3.2 On -Sale Licensee Venue Address Begin Oaks Enterprises, LLC Begin Oaks Golf 5635 Yucca Lane N. Davanni's, Inc. Davanni's Pizza & Hot Hoagies 3015 Harbor Lane Jeffrey Wahl Elm Creek Golf Course 19000 Highway 55 Hollydale Golf, Inc. Hollydale Golf Course 4710 Holly Lane Troupe America, Inc. Plymouth Playhouse 2705 Annapolis Lane N. Hamel VFW VFW of Hamel 19020 Hamel Road West Medicine Lake Community Club West Medicine Lake Community Club 1705 Forestview Lane Uchu L.L.C. Uchu Peruvian Cuisine 4130 Berkshire Lane N Peony's LLC China Bistro 4100 Vinewood Lane N D & D of Minnesota, Inc. Famous Dave's BBQ 11308 Hwy. 55, #5 India Palace Plymouth Inc. India Palace Corp. 4190 Vinewood Ln, #120 SCLP Investments LLC Ketsana's Thai 16605 County Rd 24, Suite 205 JMP Investments, Inc. Marcello's Pizza & Pasta 4112 Lancaster Lane The Noodle Shop Co. -Colorado, Inc. Noodles & Co. 3425 Vicksburg Lane CSM Lodging Svcs, Inc. Residence Inn by Marriott -Plymouth 2750 Annapolis Cir Smashburger Acquisiton-Mpls, LLC Smashburger 3225 Vicksburg Lane, #3225G Asian Mill, Inc. Tea House 88 Nathan Lane LOTUS GROUP, LLC THAI TABLE 101006 th Ave N, Suite 114&115 Licensee Venue Address Peony's LLC China Bistro 4100 Vinewood Lane N D & D of Minnesota, Inc. Famous Dave's BBQ 11308 Hwy. 55, #5 India Palace Plymouth Inc. India Palace Corp. 4190 Vinewood Ln, #120 SCLP Investments LLC Ketsana's Thai 16605 County Rd 24, Suite 205 JMP Investments, Inc. Marcello's Pizza & Pasta 4112 Lancaster Lane The Noodle Shop Co. -Colorado, Inc. Noodles & Co. 3425 Vicksburg Lane CSM Lodging Svcs, Inc. Residence Inn by Marriott -Plymouth 2750 Annapolis Cir Smashburger Acquisiton-Mpls, LLC Smashburger 3225 Vicksburg Lane, #3225G Asian Mill, Inc. Tea House 88 Nathan Lane LOTUS GROUP, LLC THAI TABLE 101006 th Ave N, Suite 114&115 Page 3 Resolution 2012 - Page 3 Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licensee Meinz LLC Cellars Wines -Spirits -Plymouth, Inc. Ken-Ebs Inc. Super Valu, Inc. Hasco Holdings, LLC Lund Beverages, LLC 6020, Inc. DNT Liquors 4, Inc. Plymouth Liquors, Inc. The Applebaum Companies Star Liquors, Inc. Wood & Associates Vinifera Wines and Ales, Inc. Natalia Vasilyevna Karebin Thu Nguyen Venue Bass Lake Wine & Spirits Cellars Wines and Spirits Colony Liquors Cub Discount Liquors Haskell's Plymouth Lunds Wine Market MGM Wines & Spirits Paradise Liquors Plymouth Liquor Sid's Discount Liquor Star Liquors - Plymouth Vicksburg Liquors Vinifera Wines and Ales, Inc. Vino 100 Wandering Spirits On-Sale/Sunday Intoxicating Liquor Licensee Apple Minnesota LLC Bonfire Restaurant Company, LLC Baku, LLC KB&J's Enterprises, Inc. Blazin Wings, Inc. ERJ Dining IV, LLC Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC The After Midnight Group III, LLC Regency Plymouth Ventures LP E. A. Plymouth, Inc. Metro Hospitality, Inc. Plymouth Jakes, Inc. Joe Senser's of Plymouth, Inc. Kobe Operating LLC Michael James Latuff Wadsworth Old Chicago, Inc. Red Robin International, Inc. RT Minneapolis Franchise, LLC Pot Luck Catering, Inc. Woody's Carlson Parkway, LLC Venue Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar Axel's Bonfire Woodfire Cooking Baku Broadway Bar and Pizza Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar Chili's Grill & Bar Chipotle Mexican Grill Cowboy Jacks Crowne Plaza Minneapolis West EI Azteca Green Mill Plymouth Jake's City Grille Joe Senser's Sports Grill and Bar Kobe Japanese Restaurant Latuff's Pizza Old Chicago Red Robin America's Gourmet Burgers & Spirits Ruby Tuesday Town & Country Catering Woody's Grille Address 11540 Bass Lake Road 16605 Co. Rd. 24 #201 15705 35th Avenue N. 4445 Nathan Lane 4130 Berkshire Lane 3455 Vicksburg Lane 3900 Vinewood Lane #1 12 Nathan Lane 11000 Hwy 55 10200 6th Avenue N. 4190 Vinewood Lane 1115 Vicksburg Lane, #5 1400 County Road 101 N, Suite K 3225 Vicksburg Lane N 3435 N. Hwy. 169 A ddress 3500 Vicksburg Lane 3000 Harbor Lane 15 Nathan Lane N 13705 27th Avenue N 3505 Vicksburg Lane 4000 Vinewood Lane 3425 Vicksburg Lane 4120 Berkshire Lane N 3131 Campus Drive 3500 Vicksburg Lane, #500 2705 Annapolis Lane 3005 Harbor Lane 16605 County Road 24, #210 15555 34th Avenue 10820 Highway 55 3505 Vicksburg Lane 2669 Campus Drive 3405 Vicksburg Lane 3155 Empire Lane 220 Carlson Parkway Page 4 c;ty or Agenda 6 . 0 4PlymouthNumber: Iridin, Qphty da Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Item: Approve Temporary On -Sale Liquor Applications for the Plymouth Arts Council for 2012 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving the temporary on -sale liquor applications for the Plymouth Arts Council for 2012. 2. BACKGROUND: The Plymouth Arts Council is conducting the following events this year where they desire to serve wine: February 11 — Jazz Impressions April 12 — Primavera — "Friends of the Art Night" December 7-8 — Winter Musical Review As a non-profit organization, they qualify for Temporary On -Sale Liquor licenses according to Minnesota Statute 340A.404, Subd. 10. This is a State issued license with the City's approval. There is no fee for this license, but the City requires certificate of liquor liability insurance coverage for each event. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: No fee is received for this license. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR APPLICATIONS FOR THE PLYMOUTH ARTS COUNCIL FOR EVENTS IN 2012 WHEREAS, the Plymouth Arts Council has applied for Temporary Liquor Licenses for events to be held on February 11, April 12, and December 7-8, 2012; and WHEREAS, the required certificate of liquor liability insurance has been provided, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the Temporary Liquor License applications of Plymouth Arts Council are hereby approved for events to be held on February 11, April 12, and December 7-8, 2012. Approved this 24th day of January 2012. Page 2 rp)City of Agenda 6 . O 5PlymouthNumber: v Adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Daniel K Campbell, Senior Engineering Technician January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Approve Final Payment, 2010 Mill and Overlay Project Item: 36th Avenue — T.H. 169 to Zachary Lane (Area 1) and Nathan Lane/Old County Road 15/Revere Lane (Area 2) City Project No. 10005 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached two resolutions approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment No. 2 and Final for the 2010 Mill and Overlay Project. 2. BACKGROUND: The 2010 Mill and Overlay Project, City Project No. 10005, included 36th Avenue (Area - 1 located between Zachary Lane and T.H. 169) and on Nathan Lane/Old County Road 15/Revere Lane (Area - 2 located East of Saratoga Lane and South of T.H. 55). This project removed and replaced the top two inches of pavement, replaced damaged concrete curb, installed pedestrian ramps (as needed) and made repairs to utility structures on 36th Avenue, Nathan Lane, Old County Road 15 and Revere Lane. In addition, this project also replaced numerous loop detectors. An edge mill and overlay was also done on Pilgrim Lane from 36th Avenue to Lancaster Lane and a portion of 40th Avenue west of Pilgrim Lane. Change Order No. 1 compensates the contractor for installing three special drainage structures, providing extra catch basin castings and adjustment of manhole castings and gate valves. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The original contract amount for this project was $503,870.24. Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $23,074.27 provides for a total revised contract of $526,944.51. The final value completed by the contractor is $506,536.59 or 3.9% less than the revised contract amount. The total project cost is $583,589.36 including engineering, administration, finance and legal. Funding for this project includes $494,419.28 from the Street Reconstruction Fund, and $89,170.08 from Special Assessments. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Maps Change Order No. 1 Pay Request Resolutions (2) Page 1 Location Map Area I Figure I 2010 Mill & Overlay :Project Location 36th Avenue Area - I City Project .No, 10005 Page 2 iLocation Area 2 Figure 2 2010 Mill & Overlay :Project Location Nathan Lane /TH 55 'Fronage -.Road/Revere Lane Area 2 City Project No. 10005 55 Page 3 DATE: PLACE: PROJECT: PROJECT NO.: CONTRACTOR: CHANGE ORDER NO.: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 February 16, 2011 Plymouth, Minnesota 2010 Mill and Overlay Project 10005 Knife River Corp., North Central 1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: This change order provides for the installation of three special storm sewer structures extra catch basin castings and adjustment of manhole castings and gate valves. The following items are added to the contract: Original Contract Amount $503,870.24 Previous Change Orders 0.00 THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD $23,074.27 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $526,944.51 Approved by: Knif er Corp., North Central By: . Recommended for . Approval by: City Engineer, City of Plymouth: By: Distribution: 1 - City Engineer 2 - Contractor 1 ._ Engineer Or'Engineering\PROJECTS\2010-2019110005\Payments\Cba ge Order No Raga >`R UNIT TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ITEM UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT Extra Catch Basin Castings L.S. 949.39 1 949.39 Special Structures 1 and 3 L.S. 8,426.13 1 8,426.13 Special Structure 13 L.S. 2,998.75 1 2,998.75 Adjust Manhole Castings Each 230.00 43 9,890.00 Adjust Gate Valves Each 135.00 6 810.00 Original Contract Amount $503,870.24 Previous Change Orders 0.00 THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD $23,074.27 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $526,944.51 Approved by: Knif er Corp., North Central By: . Recommended for . Approval by: City Engineer, City of Plymouth: By: Distribution: 1 - City Engineer 2 - Contractor 1 ._ Engineer Or'Engineering\PROJECTS\2010-2019110005\Payments\Cba ge Order No Raga >`R REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: September 21. 20 10 FOR PERIOD PLACE: Plymouth, MN FROM: 9-9-10 TO: 6-13-11. PROJECT: 2010 Mill & Overlay Project PROJECT NO.: 10005 FILE NO.: SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: Sept. 15, 2010 CONTRACTOR: Knife River Corp. N.C. ADDRESS: 4787 Shadow Wood Dr NE Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: Payment No. 2 & Final SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 503,870.24 2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 23,074.27 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 0.00 4. Revised Contract Amount 526,944.51 5. Value Completed to Date 510,536.59 6. Material on Hand 0.00 7. Amount Earned 510,536.59 8. Less Retainage 0 % 0.00 9. Less Liquidated Damages 4,000.00 10. Sub -Total. 506,536.59 11. Less Amount Paid Previously 461,821.72 12. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 2 & Final 44,714.87 Approved By: Robert Moberg, PE, City Engineer By: Approve Aw Page 5 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER No.1 2010 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 10005 WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has been prepared providing for the following: Compensation to the contractor to construct three special drainage structures, providing extra catch basin castings and adjustment of sanitary sewer manhole castings and watermain gate valves. WHEREAS, Change Order No. I for 2010 Mill and Overlay Project, City Project No. 10005, is recommended for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That Change Order No. 1 for Knife River, Corp. N.C., for City Project No. 10005, by increasing the contract amount by $23,074.27 is approved: Original Contract Amount $503,870.24 This change Order No. 1 23,074.27 Revised Contract Amount $526,944.51 Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 6 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - REQUEST FOR PAYMENT N0. 2 AND FINAL 2010 MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 10005 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Knife River, Corp. N.C., as contractor, have entered into an agreement for the 2010 Mill and Overlay Improvement (City Project No. 10005), which included 36th Avenue (Area - 1 located between Zachary Lane and T.H. 169) and on Nathan Lane/Old County Road 15/Revere Lane (Area - 2 located East of Saratoga Lane and South of T.H. 55), said agreement was approved by the City Council on May 11, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the final request for payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 1. That the original contract amount was $503,870.24, one change order was approved in the amount of $23,074.27, and the value of the work to date is 506,536.59. The final amount owed is $44,714.87 and is herewith approved. This project is less than the revised contract amount by 20,407.92 or 3.9%. 2. That the work performed by the contractor for the 2010 Mill and Overlay Project No. 10005 and certified to the City Council by the City Engineer as acceptable. being the same, is hereby released from the contract except as to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final payment. 3. Request for Payment No. 2 and Final in the amount of $44,714.87 to Knife River Corp. N.C. for the 2010 Mill and Overlay Project — 36th Avenue (Area 1 located between Zachary Lane and T.H. 169) and on Nathan Lane/Old County Road 15/Revere Lane (Area - 2 located East of Saratoga Lane and South of T.H. 55) City Project No. 10005 is hereby approved and the Director of Administrative Services is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same forthwith. 4. Funding will be from the Street Replacement Fund and Special Assessments. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 7 aty or Plymouth Agenda 6 . 0 6Number: Iridin, Qphty da Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager January 24, 2012 Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.20 of the Item: City Code regarding Water, Sewer and Surface Water Fees 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached ordinance amending section 1015.20 of the City Code increasing rate fees for water and sanitary sewer for services incurred effective January 1, 2012. 2. BACKGROUND: In 2010, staff completed an updated utility rate study for water and sanitary sewer that was completed by Ehlers and Associates in 2008. The updated water and sanitary sewer rate study adjusted a number of the base assumptions including inflation, interest income, and water consumption rates. As a result of the changed assumptions the report recommended decreasing and/or eliminating proposed rate increases. In 2011, there was no increase in rates. For 2012, it was determined that an increase was necessary to ensure that each utility fund is able to sustain an adequate funding level to afford the costs of ongoing maintenance and provide funding for capital improvement projects within each fund. The study recommended the following increases for 2012: Water 3.5% Sanitary Sewer 2.0% The monthly impact on an average residential customer would be an increase of $1.69. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance increasing water and sanitary sewer rates for 2012. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Rate increases are included within the proposed budget. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Ordinance 1015.20 Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING UTILITY FEES THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1015.20 of the Plymouth City Code is hereby amended as follows: 1015.20 a) REVISED 6.06 Utility Fees. Sanitary Sewer, water, storm water utility fees are as follows: Sewer Utility fees: 1) Base Fee. A charge of $4:94 $5.04 per month shall be made to every sanitary sewer account to defray administrative costs, billing costs, and other fixed costs of the City. (Ord. 2002-31, 11-26-2002; Ord. 2004-27, 1110912004; Ord. 2005-32, 1112912005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12109/2008) 2) Volume Charge. A charge of $20 $2.96 per one thousand gallons of sewage discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system shall be made to each sanitary sewer account except for qualified senior citizens for whom a charge of 2.65 per one thousand gallons will apply. For purposes of this section, an individual must meet the following criteria for the qualified senior citizen discount to apply: (1) the individual must be 62 years of age or older; (2) the property must be homesteaded; and (3) the individual's name must appear on the bill. Seniors in a multi -unit building will also be eligible for a senior discount if the bylaws, or other governing documents for the building, require that at least one tenant/owner in each unit be at least 62 years of age. For residential customers, the volume of such sewage discharge shall be based upon the actual amount of water consumed during the appropriate two month billing, in the period of December through February. For non-residential customers, the volume of such sewer discharge shall be based upon the actual water consumed by the account each month. Alternatively, non-residential customers may have their volumes of sewer discharge based on actual sewage flows or calculated sewage flows if sewer usage or sewer deduct meters are installed. In instances where there is no metered water service to an account or the account history is inadequate, the volume of sewer usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. Alternatively, residential customers who desire to have the volume of sewer discharge based on average winter water usage may install a water meter to meter their well water usage. (Ord. 96-27, 11/20/96; Ord. 97-6, 04/16/97; Ord. 98-15, 05/06/98; Ord. 2002-31, 11/26/2002; Ord. 2003-08, 03/25/2003; Ord. 2004-27, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-32,1112912005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2007-07, 03/27/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/0912008) 3) Amount Due After Due Date. An amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current month service charges and an amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current bi-monthly Page 2 service charges shall be added to each account which is not paid by the due date as specified by the Finance Department. (Ord. 94-25, 12/19/94) b) Water Rates: The rate due and payable to the City by each water user within the City for water taken from the water supply system shall be as follows: 1) Base Fee. A charge of S3-47 $3.49 per month shall be made to every water account. This charge defrays administrative and billing costs of the City as well as the State water connection surcharge. (Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007: Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) 2) Volume Charge -Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional. A charge of 445 $1.50 per one thousand gallons of water used shall be made to each water account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. Ord. 96-27, 11/20/96; Ord. 99-28, 11/02/99; Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005- 34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) Volume Charge -Residential. A charge of" $1.26 per one thousand gallons of water for the first 12,500 gallons used, $4-A-53 $1.58 per one thousand gallons of water for 12,501 to 35,000 gallons used, and &243 $2.72 per one thousand gallons of water for over 35,000 gallons used for a two month billing period, shall be made to each residential water account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 99-28, 11/02/99; Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) Volume Charge -Separately Metered Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional Irrigation. A charge of $4-.4 $1.87 per one thousand gallons of water shall be made to each separately metered commercial, industrial, public and institutional irrigation account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. Volume Charge -Separately Metered Residential Irrigation. A charge of 1.58 per one thousand gallons of water for the first 35,000 gallons used per housing unit served, and $2.72 per one thousand gallons of water for over 35,000 gallons per housing unit served for a two month billing period, shall be made to each separately metered residential irrigation account. In those instances where there is no adequate water meter history, the measure of usage shall be that used for similar classes of property similarly situated. (Ord. 2000-02, 02/01/2000; Ord. 2004-26, 1110912004; Ord. 2005-34, 1112912005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) 3) Demand Charge. The following monthly charge shall be made to every Commercial, Industrial, Public and Institutional water account to reflect the water demand the establishment can place upon the system. Meter Size Charge Page 3 1-1/2" $^$43.38 2" $62.87 $65.07 3" $130.94135.56 4" $209.58-$216.92 6" and over Q^ $433.83 Ord. 99-28,11102199; Ord. 2004-26,1110912004; Ord. 2005-34,1112912005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29,1210912008) 4) Stopped or Faulty Meter. In case the meter is found to have stopped or to be operating in a faulty manner, the amount of water used will be estimated in accordance with the amount used previously. 5) Amount Due After Due Date. An amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current month service charges and an amount equal to 10% of the unpaid current bi-monthly service charges shall be added to each account which is not paid by the due date as specified by the Finance Department. (Ord. 94-25, 12/19/94) 6) Water Availability Charge. A water availability charge at the rate of $4-94 2.01 per month is due and payable by the owner of each lot or parcel of land which has municipal water service available if such lot or parcel is not connected to the municipal water system; provided, this charge is not due if there is no building or other structure on such lot or parcel. (Ord. 2004-26, 11/09/2004; Ord. 2005-34, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06, 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) c) Storm Water Utility Rate: The storm water utility rate is $5 per month and shall be charged to all parcels not listed as exempt in Section 725.08. (Ord. 2004-22, 09/28/2004; Ord. 2005-33, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-06; 02/13/2007; Ord. 2008-29, 12/09/2008) This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and with services incurred effective January 1, 2012. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota this 24`x' day of January 2012. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 4 c;ty or Agenda 6 . 0 7PlymouthNumber: Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Jodi Bursheim, Finance Manager Adopt an Ordinance Amending Section 1015.19 of the Item: City Code regarding Water and Sewer Area and Connection (REC) Charges 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached ordinance amending section 1015.19 of the City Code increasing rate fees for water and sanitary sewer area and connection (REC) charges effective January 1, 2012. 2. BACKGROUND: The Utility Trunk Fund (expansion) was created to track the cost of adding water and sewer mains to new developments and assist in evaluating whether the incoming revenue from new development was adequate to cover the related expenses. In 2010, staff completed a Utility Trunk Fund analysis to ensure rates were sufficient to support the expansion of the water and sewer utilities to undeveloped areas. As a result of the analysis, staff recommended increasing rates annually by 3.8% through 2015 at which time new development is planned to level out and the financial demands on the Utility Trunk fund are reduced. The rates would be increased to the following: Water Area $3,798 Sewer Area $1,024 Water Connection REC $1,104 Sewer Connection REC $ 431 Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached ordinance increasing the rates for 2012. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Ordinance 1015.19 Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE PLYMOUTH CITY CODE CONCERNING WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PERMIT FEES THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1015 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 1015.19. Water and Sanitary Sewer Permit Fees. Water and sanitary sewer permit fees are as follows: a) Residential Water Connection or Disconnection b) Commercical Water Connection or Disconnection c) Residential Sewer Connection or Disconnection d) Commercial/Industrial Sewer Connection or Disconnection e) Alteration or Repair of any Private Underground Sewer or Water System f) Commercial/Industrial Plan Review Fee for Inspection of Private Underground Utility Installation (when submittal documents are required) g) Water turn -off -/turn -on Charge 1) Scheduled during regular business hours 2) Unscheduled during regular business hours 3) Outside regular business hours h) Curb box adjustment: Residential Commercial i) Industrial, Commercial, Public and Institutional Property Private Fire Hydrant Inspection Fee j) Reinspection Fee k) Violation of Water Sprinkling Ban 1) City Sewer Connection Charge (REC) 40 plus cost of meter 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum plus cost of meter 40 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum 1% of Job Cost, $40 minimum 100 40 80 160 35 70 35 per year each 15 100 for each day of violation of Section 720.41 44-5 $431 per unit Page 2 m) City Water Connection Charge (REC) $1,064 $1,104 per unit n) City Water Area Charge $3,659 $3,798 per acre o) City Sewer Area Charge $1,024 per acre Ord. 94-20, 11/07/94; Ord. 96-32, 12/18/96; Ord. 98-7, 3/18/98; Ord. 99-27, 11/02/99; Ord. 2005-35, 11/29/2005; Ord. 2007-27, 11/13/2007; Ord. 2009-01, 12/13/2009; Ord. 2011-02, 1 /25/2011) ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota this 24th day of January 2012. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 3 rp)City of Agenda 6 . O 8PlymouthNumber: v Adding Qq iky to life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Derek Asche, Water Resources Manager January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, Director of Public Works Approve the Filling of Wetlands and the Wetland Item: Replacement Plan Application for Crossroad Commons 2011014) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for the proposed Crossroad Commons Addition (2011014) development. 2. BACKGROUND: Oppidan, Inc. proposes to develop a 16.9 acre parcel on the south side of State Highway 55 at West Medicine Lake Drive (NE'/4 of Section 35, T1 18N, R22W), into a 90 unit senior housing facility and several commercial improvements. Oppidan, Inc. proposes to impact 1,780 square feet (0.04 acre) of a 9.3 acre Type 3/4 PEMB/PEMC/PUBFx) Shallow Marsh/Deep Marsh, Medium Quality, wetland for the construction of a frontage road to provide access to the site from County Road 73 and State Highway 55. Wetlands are proposed to be replaced by 4,526 square feet (0.10 acres) of wetland creation credit, and 1,411 square feet (0.0.3 acre) of upland buffer credit. The new wetland credit is proposed to be Type 2/3 Shallow Marsh/Fresh Wet Meadow. The location of the wetland mitigation is within and adjacent to Wetland 1. The credit proposed exceeds requirements. The applicant intends to meet, rather than exceed, replacement requirements and the excess is considered to be a margin of safety. Page 1 Wetland mitigation is proposed to be according to the following table: A detailed Wetland Delineation Report and Replacement Plan has been submitted to the City and forwarded to all required regulatory agencies per WCA Rules. No comments were received by the January 18, 2012 deadline from the Board of Water and Soil Resources, Bassett Creek Watershed, Hennepin County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Wetland Impact Map Resolution Page 2 Basin Size (square Impacted WCA Required 4j feet) Area (square Wetland Credit at afeet) 2:1 ratio (square E feet) 4-- 0 Wetland A 405,108 1,780 3,560 E E N Total 405,108 1,780 3,560 Notes: Wetland Creation Credit (6,035 x 75%): 4,526 Total replacement a, credit exceeds requirements. The aE, U excess is intended a Upland Buffer Credit (14,115 x 10%): 1,411 to ensure minimum replacement c requirements are L met and not E intended to create E additional credit. N Total Replacement Credit (square feet) 5,937 A detailed Wetland Delineation Report and Replacement Plan has been submitted to the City and forwarded to all required regulatory agencies per WCA Rules. No comments were received by the January 18, 2012 deadline from the Board of Water and Soil Resources, Bassett Creek Watershed, Hennepin County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Wetland Impact Map Resolution Page 2 f _m&W Page 3 Qu we:tw 1 apol.3 e . — l'.,. •` ``. pall 411 HA.,, belale alunmu: Wetland Legend GOPHER STATE ONE CALL CITY Arco 11 25 1EIT°II ire° 1-Bop-RS]-1186 v , - \ •y ` wETLANO MITCAAGi REPLACFMENi y •r` \ NEWLY CREAIEO NO AP AS SH BE W] (34a-WJR)5 SNT' (] fA- 161) Y - CrAir \ \ 1 - BASIN.A J .4.. . ` yayiY),.. y.•.,..P./y_ t:4 ...s_ ' ` - - 1 , , , ,;• J :, ! `--^/} 111' "• T F _^ _ ` ! D BUFFERH' L'. GE s EEO Top Bow RSP s[ED Nix I ` . Ua (]6-641). rx. I. 1 •.. ` . . ` .. . Z. / e1'4 4 - ...\ -\• ` --A 11UFFER MWU.IENT I 'F' V ,FtFSr w.. \ 4 - 'SIU... ` _ ' •-,~ ` \ \ — • • — OEUNEATED YERAND d01NDAPY 1',` /'p ", { i "".\r yq \ i i•'V\ EXIS11N0 TREE UNE yam. n . `^ . y . I OND DR> ti - / \ b°A BA61NADON y 1 ' j J \\:\ . T 1 / I B • is - / I \ts. Exception i i '..' `OA Via,• B - ;. 1 1 ( -. / .— o••- - I ,.• -` - /, WETLAND AT I ' __,,,___.'_.- .,_.._ _l. I \- '•, l ,,RA 11.Wa SF. T )pA 3) LL11.ND ; , , • ITS ' — 1 \ r .. ..--• . r / / 76s I y 1 al:P:IUR HIkISI NT: J; /•. 30' A - OWER ISD,000 1"i UNITS o O O o "...-./ , 1 . \ '': Ill .• - ..• PFEmAOd'-..-....- %" V j 'tl t,,.i• ( LI i I .. — P'oNt'aR- v , -0•c• .ra3r uLAND xTOFFER 1—'}INFILTRAiI P„ I q '( -^?W \ /'J ;t/- l."' r'r,'r,•'.,'..,.,F•"`i. l 1 {r_ o .- r-.1 y O pNfl Y7'fig9W "'!Ty • " tel• 1/ I' { )I,Sb Si'/J eV AL. l 11 1 — ) ^ \. SY.d WBUCWATEPS V.E AND Vii'• `-/,,._I t / Nw I YR-N'M.Q@SJ 1• / ul6splcnDNAL VAR, Am ys•1, , / f Legend euSw Ea0EQ5@ E.d3 tlG P89eL5En X PROPERTY UNE .— —.— =~I WEAK UNE Wetland Data Si FeetLOTLINEGRADINGUMITS ^. 060-- -- +naO— INDEX'CONICUR , FGCW.CONST,iUp9UN.:ENiPINCE GT.EDIEVALENT TOTAL RLL 1,750 V. Sa/-_^- 992 INTERVAL CONTOUR ATi,W FAP - - TOTAL EXCAYATION CURe AND GUTTER >, 6POT. ELEVATION TOTAL IMPACT ~ 1,7110 c1. FLOW DIRECTION eusovMeMYr1,mY SILT FENCE .ED,F. REPLACEMENT REWIRED .3.550 J. STORM SEWER EMERGENCY OVERFLOW er-"'—" —I— WATER MAIN OHBITF MFT Auu pip ACFuiNT GTtlI BASIN INLET PR0lECl10N WETLAND CNEATON 6,035 e.E 75R5,626 a./. SANITARY SEWER UPLANO BUFFER 14,116 It a 101E RETANWG WALL TOTAL %07 J. a' Sp' 100' 150' OFAIN TLE faecal RavIA1On DAfe 72/l+nl Crossroads > zn+nT 91?' ms's Tian Commons PreliminaryO IPPGradingPlan 6125 y HOW M S = ExWbit 7 LAlmewckA, DIIvOaAVtM 3915 rl Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - APPROVING THE FILLING OF WETLANDS AND THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR CROSSROAD COMMONS (201 1014) NE 1/4 SECTION 35 T1 18N R22W WHEREAS, Oppidan, Inc. is proposing to fill wetlands for construction of the proposed Crossroad Commons 90 unit senior housing and commercial development; and WHEREAS, there are no reasonable alternatives for the location of this project; and WHEREAS, a replacement plan application was prepared replacing the wetlands at a minimum 2:1 ratio which is required by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991; and WHEREAS, the applicant is providing wetland creation credit in the amount of 4,536 square feet and upland wetland buffer credit in the amount of 1,411 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Plan meets the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: The filling of wetlands and the Replacement Plan Application for the Crossroad Commons development is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a copy of the contract made with an appropriate party to complete the WCA replacement wetland monitoring requirements. 2. Construction of the replacement wetland must be certified by the City of Plymouth after initial construction and prior to the initiation of monitoring. 3. The replacement wetland must be monitored for a five (5) year period from the date of completion and the monitoring plan must include a section on management of upland buffer, wetland vegetation, wetland hydrology, tree management and invasive plant control such as buckthorn and reed canary grass. The vegetative performance standard shall be 75% native, non-invasive vegetation in both the mitigation area and upland buffer area and shall be met within 5 years after construction. 4. The developer's wetland consultant shall submit an annual monitoring report to the City of Plymouth on the anniversary date of the completion of the replacement wetland for a period of five (5) years containing information required by the Wetland Conservation Act. Page 5 5. Prior to disturbing any wetland area, the developer shall submit a letter of credit in the amount of the cost of the Replacement Plan. The letter of credit shall extend at least until completion of the five year monitoring period. If during the five year period the replacement wetland does not perform as proposed in the plan, work as necessary shall be undertaken by the developer to bring it into conformance. 6. The developer's wetland consultant shall conduct and record periodic inspections during the construction of all the newly created wetland basins. 7. The replacement wetland must be constructed prior to or concurrent with wetland impacts. 8. A deed creating a restrictive covenant running with the land for the replacement area must be recorded. The deed shall meet the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act and be submitted to the City for approval before recording and a recorded copy shall be submitted to the City after recording. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED: That the Mayor is authorized to execute the Wetland Replacement Plan Application for the Crossroad Commons development. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 6 City of Agenda 6 . 0 9PIymouthNumber: Addfn3 Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk Reviewed by: Item: Adopt Findings of Fact for Denial of Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached Resolution approving findings of Fact for Denial of Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang. 2. BACKGROUND: At the January 10, 2012 Council meeting, the Council conducted a hearing on an appeal of denial of the 2012 renewal application for Massage Therapist Certificate by request of Yue Chang. The Council approved the denial and directed the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact for denial. Attached are the findings of fact. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: There is no impact to the budget with this action. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Findings of Fact Resolution Page 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN RE: Appeal of 2012 Renewal Application for Massage Therapist Certificate for Yue Chang FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On January 10 and January 24, 2012, the Plymouth City Council met at its regularly scheduled meetings to consider Yue Chang's appeal of the denial of her 2012 massage therapist certificate. Yue Chang was present and the City Council heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak at the meeting. FINDINGS OF FACT Yue Chang has appealed the administrative denial of her 2012 renewal application for a massage therapist certificate. Yue Chang has withdrawn the appeal of the denial of the license for her massage therapy center known as 4 U Foot Spa. 2. Former employees at Yue Chang's massage center in New Hope were told by Yue Chang that they were expected to engage in sexual acts with patrons. 3. Yue Chang knowingly allowed unlicensed massage therapists to perform massages at her massage business in New Hope in violation of the New Hope City Code. 4. On August 22, 2011 the City of New Hope imposed a $500 administrative penalty and suspended Yue Chang's massage enterprise license in New Hope. 5. On November 28, 2011 the City of New Hope revoked Yue Chang's massage enterprise license. 2 Page 2 6. On December 22, 2011 Yue Chang entered a plea of guilty and was found guilty in Hennepin County District Court of unlawfully practicing, administering or providing a massage service without being licensed to do so in violation of the New Hope City Code 8.35 ( c)(2) . 7. Plymouth City Code § 11335.13(a) and (b) provides: Conditions Governing Issuance. a) Certificates may be issued only to persons of good repute. b) Certificates may be issued only to persons free of convictions of prostitution or offenses which involve moral turpitude or which relate directly to the persons ability, capacity, or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibility of the occupation. Yue Chang is not a person of good repute. 9. Yue Chang has been convicted of an offense which related directly to her ability, capacity and fitness to perform and discharge the responsibility of a massage therapist. DECISION Yue Chang's appeal of the administrative denial of her massage therapist certificate is denied. Dated: January 24, 2012. Page 3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL OF 2012 RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR MASSAGE THERAPY CERTIFICATE FOR YUE CHANG WHEREAS, by request of Yue Chang, on January 10, 2012 the City Council conducted a hearing on an appeal of denial of 2012 renewal application for Massage Therapist Certificate; and WHEREAS, based upon results of the criminal background investigation and testimony given at the hearing, the City Council approved the denial of the 2012 renewal application of the Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact for denial; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the attached Findings of Fact for denial of the 2012 Renewal Application for Massage Therapy Certificate for Yue Chang are hereby adopted. Approved this 24th day of December 2012. 4 Page 4 rp)City of Agenda 6 . 1 0PlymouthNumber: Adding QoaWy to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager, and Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Approve a Final Plat and Development Contract for Item: "Crossroads Commons" for property located south of Highway 55, between Cottonwood Lane and County Road 73 (2011014-F) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a final plat and development contract for Crossroads Commons. Approval of a final plat and development contract requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. 2. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2011, the City Council approved a preliminary plat and PUD amendment to allow redevelopment of the former Plymouth Shopping Center site. The project would include a 90 -unit senior building, drive-through restaurant, and a commercial outlot for future development. At the August 23rd Council meeting, the developer was asked to provide additional conifers in the northwest portion of the site along Cottonwood Lane. In conjunction with submission of the final plat, the developer provided a revised landscape plan that includes the additional trees. A copy of the revised landscape plan is attached. The requested final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Applicant's Narrative Revised Landscape Plan Approved Preliminary Plat Final Plat Development Contract Resolution Approving Final Plat and Development Contract P:/CommDev/STAFFREP/CC/2011 /2011014 -F -Crossroads -Commons -CC Page 1 oto/l Di y_ F OPPIDAN Builder of tower. Ctearor of value, 5125 CouNTY ROAD 101 1x100 • MINNETONKA, MN 55345 • PHONE; 952/294.0353 Fax: 952/294.0151 u WEB: www;oppidan.corn January 6, 2-012 Shawn Drill, City Planner City of PlymouthIE 3400 Plymouth Baulevard Rlymouth, MN,5544 FRJAN' 9 2012 RE: Final Plat Application Phasing Plan Narrative Crossroads Commons.pevelopm.ent pear.Shawn: Thelollo.wing is;a b.r:ief overview of the proposed phasing of the development being proposed -for Crossroads Commons. PHASE ,I IMPROVEMENTS - Demolition MPRO.VEMENTS: Demolition of the existing building and parking lot areas :on the site. This would be done. immediately upon construction commencing on the site, e Mass grading of the entire development area, as indicated on the plans submitted, This would: include The Waters site, McDonald's Site (as part of the demolition of the asphalt in their lot area) and.the. areas required for the new;public ROW on the east side of the site. m Remediation of contaminated soils encountered. This remediation will be either on-site:or hauled off. -site., depending on the type and level of contamination -and ability to encapsulate on- site; . Surcharge of the eastern portion of the new ROW. This is indicated on. the attached Site Plan and is:consistent with the. area we discussed at our meeting: li Relocation of the Gas. Lineto,accommodate the new road alignment. This will be completed by Centerpoint Energy and the City of Plymouth will work with developer to ensure that this is done at the cost ofCenterpoint as part of a public project. Construct:approxiinately 50%.ofthe :new roadway. The area to be constructedwould be.the western half of the road, to a point on the east side just east of the current Right-In/Right-Out access that exists toHighway 55. This would include both the base and wear courses of.asphalt and a tie in would occur when Phase 11 Is complete'. Install utilit es in thenew.Roadway. Wewould install as much aspossible, subjectonly to the oil conditions on the east end of the site and the surcharge area restricting installation until more stable.soil.is ready. install all landscape and lighting for the portion of the roadway.completed. Page 3 e Complete the modifications to Highway 55 as required. All Design.would be completed in the initial phase. Completion is anticipated in Fall, 2012. PHASE 11 IMPROVEMENTS: e . Remove SOrcharge:stockpile for the east side of the site. a Complete eastern portion -of new roadway out to. County Road 73 on the east side.. Complete -all remaining utilities (if any); landscaping and lighting on the newly constructed portion of the road. Completion is anticipated Fall, 2013, It is the intent to have the western portion of the site open and o.perating for.the Senior Housing and potentially the fast food restaurant in late 2012 or early 2013. We are still working with an office/medical user to complete the.east end of the development. The timing of this user will depend on final negotiations -on: the sale and their willing to open without the roadway being camplefe. The cost estimates for the work in -both Phase I and Phase 11 are attached. This work includes the surcharge and removal of the surcharge on the eastern portion of the roadway, The cost to.eomplete the improvements on Highway 55 are included in-thJ breakdown. To date, th-e costs for Highway 5.5 are estimated based on preliminary plans and estimates and are subject to final plan design and approval by. MNDOT, Additionally, the MNDOT Vacation is moving forward. We have had conversations with MNDOT and they have indicated no issues have arisen at this point and they are running this through the process and should be donebefore we start in the spring, 2012. We look forward to working with the city on a successful. development within the City. Sincerely, Paul J. uccl. Page 4 Dau we m P Mr•AMR Y sePx.e, I Plelat Sobeddo TWE coo[ orr. GQIMgI/eDTxNICAL xAL[ 421 sPNuac ac Tlx mo[ orr. cwMON/EmANtc.L xw[ WE RRAPNc as e-scM - r ,.. rep} RDN IP u A R " rRL _ y "L G-,-•,Aa wLts Nr Iw i'• H"a;2 scx _- GSL f x r - ¢''„,• r•' . v r • - e[sxaieLe.s! 1G5 1ALE5 - LYAZawAA'w""dN7"A'— oilF'FTwN<—Rnms - AZEe , "ss sCxNDDDFtwwwaxLD LI {IR[ LJ.x :Drnu -L-P ED aLoPn w —1— -R— A. x xuwF taTrcAoumioRTAAnrox oP,bNuTIEraA .i.P"ssler.,a3R[ 7- ILw"wAa. nx F _ _ r aaeaeN 5 asxw"owvP'w— J ffc z :w REx Q .AREYs-`"" xtaA+N—FLE Y uuu slow t.a'^m srcw l+ ti IN N •'4,+ : WAxnlSs DH FLA. SYPERsl LSY WANRTts IN THE Ill W A DOOR— SCE ORrnANCY. rFWN6FAIX1 LAND9GPE PLAN (WET IDA) FOR BIJILgXD PLANTINGS 4N PLANT ULLNfR.rRAM]N 9ASIN PLANTNL I'Uti (SNCET la ) FDR PLANING WA 11— OF EACH 9 SN AMD PLAIT SCHEDULE. O t 06' y G REFgrZ Lmd—pa Del cry KwOREUEl PIN N 5 C TOAl 1FfSS RECAl PER CMFLUMO LNrF 1 xV [ • . M W.S S. 5 T0OYCRSTORF RILLS REWIRED) NLSP IEE s IN & [ x DF LDry Y rD DEIXDYaYs SPETREE10REMAIN r - .7 sNN DN,:Rsr R e 1 , A Lor I. 01.00[ E13BIs115 D.F; E ; •_, _ - O.2. sr. 1 5. - 2 ow-H PER 5D LF W JO PERIMETER1.244 SF. 15. . 25 DKRgloar 1pEE9 RLquREo7 PRPMCD: V Lnor,,' aoQ x r... y _ - 81wC MILES 90EM RiWWEO TRECS AE N Ev eEs a L TREES I -` - CI - DmQE ouE pNptsioxvOOMlTREEs SPE ) G5 TEDES MM)NOED L I' ~ - _ CLI BD DPAIDD w FU ILREf - ~ ENrk UNDERROORY FREES. ! 1 A ( r 1 T DF' NT + Excepticn / - s,RLEs LAT 1, Ell EL I Vu Y 1 1 3-SN0 . 1 f It.A 9-PRE _ i-3NM / - - l EO ip ORi 1'RE[S rBD PM 2-OFC ! - - CgWfRIBLEC RTSFORr TREES TDD > FRD TREES INR. i _ Tyg3r. s-$SC ! 1'1 a L ` t - CRNALIENTAL LaOCRSTORI FRFEs• TOC r - SHRYssPERernus D o2nruffvia. LAmF%RWV 011 CdxLT .0v n Sl RATNu Ov SENIOR HOcSINc r iXPPADDMI.IE f)MIFs (JO 00c CSF ! 5•• r I AEa _I ' „ aF ExISPxR TREE frc: oes... - wG f 1 ! , y ,.- WNDPY TD RENaIX NOVTyv (TrP) LFE 89].5 1 7 1 T IYVY C UCERSYDA YREE6 RE RED ! 4 [Qr, Da I OfF 1t e` W / / TYwuNrrypru I iegead r 6tis ' y1` -' 0 NWl.B9.1.3 r r ;•1', j Too rR. APPRDWY U— DI EME71W Plmting Notes :• . .. /.,'' PLAUIE ER.LL ar wMreurrl.r PLAwrzo well AAn1 MACFIRI uS DF Au LNDERmalND DiRiU>°[S MUCO r inrKLAOm x ei uJo- aci.ialia a=1ZE P'l,A11 RF: iCMPOR"Ri dLY. vu Ar alts. PEDeurtr eL-w MA iva E I FULAIIgI. mYInCH lC HAIG g51pC CCNDisIgS (twfRf NPPUGB,l). BY Dtw[E FwoE rD Au DADA An i PRIOR 70 /R Y ELN+ IS L-1. AY 114 ll, 7 rHc Ie, maws rD w[ muM...L eRAee vAL,Ov-hew eLACS euue`n [[ [quALL1I D eD :D 4"GICs Ytd NtiLrPLPPemCE Axr[ B[ Fxk" Lr m &.0 n D11 lo "BILM SC TLEC AL' x Ill ce—N OF hail Ll Is SLNIiDr NO 1C. AM SIZE LDNRCWS 71. IC LOLLED k DIIPLAP SPEE.D IF 1x1314 Nei "1 ne( EGLR- 1 w[ RE.— DO. r9 THE RmI ED". As wB lE0. IDLY EDONG tiZ. RAKE NM SMmM CLRKS AOrSTANE6 RM ISIu C (SMA ISL OR MN[Y N UC D.LrR.APP[0 NO P.Ax11Ic ILL OE IIKIULEe YxiN ALL GADINL AND LDNSTeNCTIW NAs R[Eu muPLEFW w FILE LAR mP Rxq NM[N INL FALILD A EW W rREE La RArze, FxE ROCS mLURJRmr FUR E CRM[ FDR uDKP9 N Nxml GSCORx v s, IFS.9LY ¢ e tD:leumAi a T rtivmTOT NO a 'r ism Ixe[ Cxx m sLiOl ALT- FINISHre DRALG CLT ABDAE MMWT DM MLf. LALCIf ClRE3 AND MDEN'µN5TF0P EOWL WARE P055&L. SPI& FCe[s CF ELANMLI mRfA Ie IPPCREwr-11 N., wY[GAIF MFA. p, rPllgpttp xAISNme uuLw TD ATG C.0 PRC.FCI PLANONC NYLCH. PLA6 6P]N I S MILT tlC APPRDMm 8Y MC LwGSCME ARDIISCT PPeDP 10 5LCu155'M C ANY IL OffN POTS Cf EWLAP IXV ED MATERIALS RENDLE PCT m' PoI[D PLAMPa[ GUr ANC PPEAN APAPr IxyD. Cyilµmq EpwVE, Da wX-LAEp[u 6Ep3 N 8E sl DC, .i UNL[59 NCRe CMPMSE. Emf q Lr ALL FL.wTlxt Axc fRc9ut Cglli4p. <<N+NfI ARCA al0 FM1]OI fIERIC{ wpepclDuAln. < CosnwG covplmxs (w,EnE uauueLq, C"iF.iR.FtCn pASPI CErr'L MR NPThLR KMu nd. IunLTranell eAau FD PRmuY FxDIDMD/ORWOIE EY THC uxESCME mNMM10P, x T5 PD1 dGRCRs'RPLROMAA 1 PRYM[ PNNIF A5 IN. I . - Pfn sYAxDAPc xuASfT' PRMINO MMD 10 CDPPLCT Peen _ 3. 0.. ON Roan PRDUDE SLC KAP CUAR-Lxl[[ De I NND uA1EAIus txE mAROF H BRu.alxo OF Cnf'IIX Ary 'AlDALFREEOrawxS!, SR DETAIL TWEET iQ9 GTY Di hM[W1N h"urwL IN GMl R APE DATE 1 E LAMpsaY'E [Cr's P C 10 FEAR [EFF OF D PPCPo W MCC RANDO DO aB 9GDT WuwCRAfs MIN fRCC W LS xN 3,10501 ALL MORPS- 21 StMEDPLAC[Ndi PLANT uMlFwx SN4L MALT CK YEAR --11 --IF-- vRAP A M-WSID SRCCS f fA91CnSTDP AMC BOYICR. P[ADLE Er APRIL IST, E GSA IF ILPON PCANPN M STA%INLLOF }FSEs AS PEDDIPFIX PEP09RG'L PLNUR ANp ETANC Y xor PLuue AM1[A wE rzr>S x.. IN_ ON LADINCA PLM, MPT COxrRa Pux. e. NO/ N NANOr. SPCOM1. ORNC DNNL AO. FRDwDO PL— MIA PI-- AREAS1-rvR. le RC CCAd/ai LD RrAiD`N[NCWF0. ON 15 NOrLWIE6 IM 511[ iI%LI)NN0 _OARCS r HE IM " COFM l-OS PRIC(1 0 oYJP[ CIDI oGC L DSGPE ACN SIV PNOWE 9 W uAAwnGS 1nVW "P[ SILASL C51Ti NDAxRS 5Gk5 ETC. S PLA FLANOSGI'F COxIAAGTOP SMALL xOiliY VNR3LAP[ ANpllilei Lev TNC Nrm xv snL L"N [er eeR 4 FPIDR rD IxsiuunexiLLP4wnaGiu"LLi CC fIMT FACM S ES ROC MACS R - N NAMWL— NA4"' AMI ANPE W,R"n ,w NMPY4 FADFJr u-IG MRX 5"LL EE MRTERREDs viAAllss 0— x_ rvr NCI ONEF AµC inCp[kIIrC. r 1-7 S IMNO SPECrIOATUR 5077 IILM CT rG uxn0x laver ImrALunOx AxDs sc cauuxccw D' S0' IDD' 157 w, ARIa AMe wI s,'i gIIRRmsTGEaSTALL — AN ERTAALSNFIC MIN LOADER AND A NGONT rC NDq PAM OF NO RAGS SGL YG EEGLMISTIxO 10P 3_ IF, SIC FELE Of —m —O LMDER IRAN ONE i-. DE DDFINED }POM TIM: EEN[RAL CCNrR C-. COPHER'ST.;T ONECALL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CO$ INAH S]. d SILOOML DECRrs. AND ,MCC nl Lxl SP ano DIMAWSf. LANRLUN 4' DEPTN 10— FOR YEFI AMDIICAN STANDARD FOR 1Ml sTOCt[ {ANS 200.1-Eml DP MMT —REPT ALL LA%n CRASS ARE AnY) 12- 0[PTN 1DPSDIL FOR }PIX. 54RURY AND P<PEUNIks '1' p?A LI fmO Dn MAIGIIDH[5F51EM Is Ci@11— CNRA. OF MACR ANTuvea wHCl PRDvcE +Cw1ER FOPs nAtr qty M•M 491-44.-ODOR SCNRDx) RILOUIREMEHl6 EOR 530 ANO TME OP—D. NT. NULON m RE AT ALL FOE[, ONRLE, PCRrxMIAL, Al uMlrzxAxa ARr.. M un. tell Flev I-DIo—s55-1160 lAmL N.IRIDO DELC WWII 0. hAN1S ID w INSSALL[D AE PEA YxLA N Awsl sTACARD PLNIMxc PRALT[Es, ,SCD ARDWD ALL RANfS NThIn SURF MEAS. PCPCNA`,L ANCC .. Ung GAu oLeiLlE :, L P PUR, REPum. tw woxC[ aep/a[ap As RESIRq rpE Ar RDADw"r em,Ovwp ARua Ll4cc 05/IYI1T 9RNe 10 W to FAv[ E' Orr. S+PCmm I+MeAem MULFX N LGH IC a ACENF TD 1Hf STE OISiuPBEc OUPwG COxBTRUCIM. Crossroads L Plan w. "`Oppidan Commons LWr - = zi Rud 1 k^'- Ra Irlyd—Rd .w.A' Dr AL u w .A+ --- — 1WUNIwJu, RdweoM RLl al REVISED I-AiVDSCAPE PLAN Page 5 N C OUTLC Tq? I tY.i15 J 1 O 'aIFlL19Anpl r a l `BA91N A 141 Ary • ,./! 0 + m I 1 RRT C xALL - YE GRn11^N 14 l I IHFILTEA' L.01 I 15A.fID 5'./ I I RD 11'lu I SKSE CHABH. PLAN I I II 1 R I I I I I 308'- 1I I x1.1 ms' BITUNINWN Site Legend . pp/PORT, LINE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTLON T.H CDY Tee s51 -+S T.Zuo, TUI T,.e 1-800 -2 LL®l RnvWDD D" 07/71/11 EASEMENT LINE CUIW AND WSTER R IT, PUy C AND _m. a NENUAL WATER LEVEL INS WALL FENCE Q G9NCAf1E PAKUENY CONUNElE 9DLwALK INSI,w WTr eruIRNWS PAN[uIT,TI: 1ZQNIRMALWN PAN:M[HT 51DS NUMBER LSB' PARxwC STAL 1 W SITE uOHRxCINNTIC51PN r PD,E eCLLARO / POET aC01f ION _Rev 4REGIffuIKD To,ERW1n,/PP MCN C emL Site Malted HOYCNENI 9 1.-ACECROUND-10AHAIIBN Poq Ms PROCCT PROAOED -1 w45TwDOD PIC-CS9nLAA SC-, = INC„ WIN PRACE IIIM'ESETA ANP 91 BGLTPN Q LAWN, IXC. JUNE itl. ]011 2 LCCAnoNS ANO PLEVAnuIS OP "$INC TCPBCRAPHY AND PTRSRES AS SNEA% ON THAT PJ4N AIME APPIIDNUATL CONITRACTGI SNALL FIELE AEIKFY STE CONN IONS AN UTILITY LDEATTIN5 ARM TO EEICAVARCNACOR'1RIICR IF ANY 45CAEPANMES ARE FCLNO, THE ENOI1FE11 G,OUL BC NOTIFIED EGATOLY I REPT:R 11 BWUCASRr gIRNEY FOR TOT 9EARI1Q 1"0119115 ANI APEAS A. ALL gUBE9wS ATE TO FACE BE 6 ftb OR ExERIOP FACE OF WILCCIP UALE= CraNR NOTED. pr 11¢ I T1 PRI—IW PLAIS FBR E ' 8L41Wi11N 115 AND LC 111 11 11- AAHPT. All nW01 10OL. A7F TAr _ I ALL GJRB RAGI TNN, IE SP RET (T0 FACE or CDRB) _N s orNic-SE Aimm bilAA ]. ALL GP@ AND CUTTER SHALL W ETI] UNLESS 1n4RAIM NOTED AT I' / B 1HE CGAIRAVEil SNA HE REESPONS119i FOR PRO BAD u4 uAINTNMIG TRMIC EDHTR0. DEqQES SLGAS BARRICADES WARNING SIGNS BAVETIEII4 SIGH& RADDEAS AND UEHT TO CQI, a Rc NCISHE NT of TRAFFIC WERE NDCESBARY. R/IIxyENT OF THESE DCNCES SNAIL M MPRGND BT T+E CITY AtW ENGINEER PRIOR TO PV[pIWu XE s pT. IRAFYIC CMTRL Csowl To PAARDNH1A NNPCT STNa F*- TI REfgfE P syr T-- L R. BITUWNCUS PA4ENENT AND C0006TC SECTIPNS 10 BE IN ACCCREANCE THIN M IECuwLrIDARINS W THESdCpnTY$r Kqm T e De1ECNAAcu exGHPgnq. SF 'a : ! w, T4 BANAriCTO nTUNTAwRITTEACtEss TP A.oAACENT PRWOtnL4 DI, GDNSTAIJCTNIN AN1 TARE Au pEGun1N5 WCESYINT II,AWD RiuPD1YY SEE PIT U.INA 11. STE LIGHTING AOMN 1N PLAIN 12 FOR RRERERCE w RUER To -TING P RMIAR 6.E UCHTNC OESAILS AHO WIDION[TRICS. ID SDEEh-E,, A PLAN Q 7'.ril. r.1 :. 9.z L3 L, E 9 EE SENIOR HOUSING 130,00D CSF. 90 LNIT3 FFD" M D LR.aN.3 PAnP 9 j INFILTRATION A ! ; Exlsnxc sArvnAgr Q s,1RN .-, + ,uae>AN[ NEw/ A !^ H1` YriEfl EAYMENYS CRM -OT j •. 21 \ / V 2R f'''' I RETNwN6 w,T11 / 0 I r% + ' Fu,uRE 9ENOPPNpT SCE C{iANNG PLAN /' ; II G Y f j REILA'tl sE,RAIa 1 Z r]NALPKRAGE —DBUSIER7WHFS' relW/CNTLGTR 1 PEKIh' PENT YxIS Ii.G ami Sign legend 1, s7w loo nt. x 5,3 ` ! ! HANE -EE17 '` ONR WA,DABBY PW 1 ! I<"u i3 no PARKwc/T'I O A \ / Cx a i / ! 1+ TVIE-wAr/DD xCT ENENx /f] \ / ./ 15 OIrl& IC #AY LANE r', 1`: y JDRSDIG{IDXAL rETLANDS I I/ 36 RIg1Y lUAfI lN1E 1 , SRHIQHT LANE MUST IHm NHR,T IDI Site Det0a Sigmge and St3i Motu TLID PEPEE 1AN ENDS_ x11 nm A V TRAFFIC WITS LANE STRIPE (TTP.) 1 8812 CURB A CUTTER (PXIVASE PARkNC LDS 112 PA.U.O 9W Y RFTLECWIT. 2 0611 WxB Q CUYIER (pumlC sweets) I. LL iRNFlC ERNS PAKNFNT 11ARKCss. AN. CTneN TRNne CONIHC4 eENCxs 9NALL mNFa" ,C nE SI3 PmESSRIAN CROSSNC AH[ADReI-- 1cI LANE T 1: (rn,) 3 MM.TABLE CURB N ""TEN SSAnON105 IY THE FNA uA . ON -I— TRµn[ EGNTA . EENIQES IUUTCU), 1 TCLLOU DIA -Al STWPC + 1+16 CURB Q CUTER STK DO NOY CNTCq D 4' W1IE DACMAL SWIPE 5 CMN AND 2 PNiKWG LOT SwWNC SHNI. BC q' "OE .'D.,DR W,I1C iM0 COATS K PANT. WHTRACIdH uau r PAAJT PLANEP AREA ! EONEI Et[ DDRB GIfER ANY/ ALL DIRE -1 IRAERC ARRCNS AS -RAN w SMITE (TRIO COATS), 3D FY nt21N P.. S A¢KRE KC PARNIND PRONDED PER NSA GA+E CENINA.- EHA L PAINT THE wmm1ATI011AL 5,504 Of CGNGNE, E 9DERALI AND -.0 (RESER ARCH. PLANS) 12 fASS5 WARN STRPINO ACCESSIBILITY IN CACN DE51 707 ACEC551BLE STA4 IN 415 BAONuQW%0 WTx WHITE MaRuER (TRIO jr L CGNCREIL' PAKUENI (SFE STNUGNRAL PVNS) i1 wNFlC AARPFI CMTS BF PUNT). CONNACIEN SNn PUNT nE IHrnoS'NG PARAW IN EACH AGCESSaL I AAIACEIIT P UWIILM HETAWIN ALL INNI-N OYER 9 I, TD INCLNDC A FOHCC) ,1 PARNTSD 3111 BM AND MI SICK POST BAY TD AN AIRSWDLE SPADE IN WWRE LET1Ef0 UPHNUM 17 IN NCIp,s. HAxSFOYYFp PROP w , tl fxCAP A1U351BLE 9GNARI AND STIPPING 4 E 101 —10 AND CASING WHERE REWIRED. [CNCI IE GSwC WMONINENILCXE3aANgICADE +. REWIRCO IN LOCATISNS _M Er IS N wD1ECTFn BY CURB. 21 10' SiDMINO]R USPUBLCAIL u e LCNCRETE SIDEWALK 1 ALL S10P SOWS SHALL aI:BE A 2. W" PAINTED SIM BAR IN WHITE PLANT (M LT]PTS) -CDC AT 1. FROX C9-1ALL STIP BARS SHALL EP1CLIo FROM M_TRAHSINTIN eETWEIN -E5 IE INE CJI 14 ALL SIGNS SHALL SIE Y PLACID 1T BAND 111E BACK OF CAN uNLLSS OTNFARIY NOTED. I wftWeRe91! Ennery L.d B4 DdSm Aa/ a lev9 ieaRl.B JrNN - lYued. APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT Cell b .- HelenelORlnq: C 00' ISO, IED' GOPHER STATE ONE CALL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTLON T. H CDY Tee s51 -+S T.Z uo, TUI T,.e 1-800 -2 LL®l RnvWDD D" 07/71/11 r 95/13/11 W..e S Re TSI Crossroads Commons c` vL Site Loa„ Page 6 CROSSROADS COMMONS 6B "w ,•r. awLLOusWo 8 lP L9w4` — el ryyy 6M76T•A o II `• 'r$ f -_ SJ,3e `r'ir}C- ~- i' ` +fir . xp , Ir "'•-- +,- "°' 1 `a- -y LOT? '._ •ww•"'a wm I r r' d'• ^- 4_ ----- - \ _ ¢ _ Jr ii 5 II _\\\_ w, i "' 1--- -.-°mvvYei\x __z °+t'tr>-_ o- ------- - '— wb 11f 7 'C .•,. " rt , • .e w vim. E,4 ti- t .• e .i'h s.ro Nag°38'i7•W I6A00 I '.r;v / - a x•,5v °a b >,, 5y°d • I +Iw wrx I q 4 ;, s''0w ! .dye 1 7 •r- ,n>>'"__, lad` D°_:•__. 111II x 7 ys Vv. Y.° 'f 3 .i "' I i'I rf f-_]_ !ylae Slim :_ 6N. Ilr llr Iffy!-. Porim. s"""erxv aa. I!' lr q, •-"ree•m :-'-n r+.. OI/fLOTS I I l IIr a d 5 , f.•. Se„c r / Us vas I x°}°nae• I zrY rebaT I r f I m ! I c irI II = 111 tII I I f Sw by rcF a rnr 5S Gv:n Ac g]] f u° IretYv ] s I yI ,°'t' N oar,° ,, ° Yr r ' P a ae)'.II •,,55”' ssr.al FINAL PLAT xrrcerin I Pen..pe °ma ufNffy Eeesl°xre are r18.n Ih r: II sJ LB 11 m I°I J L____L____. Bvwlg 6 reef m .inm, vnlvee viner.:vv lnd'rvrev; d adlvhm9 Iv! Ifnn, vrrd t0 hvf x .isle arta ed/vinMq righl-vf-wY IMev w vhvwn art the pvf SEP - 82011 L -`-- o Lori Yc JE ° yp Ld r9e.e' T Iv m.e rn n ea o ao !m Iso M . SCNe .n Ieel 9.00 L. P ixrr iN Ihv mule Ifnv vl tea N: 1/9 v/ .STG 13 r Mn ofSre ]v r} 3 na rs I I P up°r ae 160.04 1'i L____ __ __ 3pe•wzY 3ilx _ OUMQTD M69' -111'42-W - 530.78 Westwood anoloc nyrNrivois>in11_LJ lM 1 Y.° 'f 3 .i "' I i'I rf f-_]_ !ylae Slim :_ 6N. Ilr llr Iffy!-. Porim. s"""erxv aa. I!' lr q, •-"ree•m :-'-n r+.. OI/fLOTS I I l IIr a d 5 , f.•. Se„c r / Us vas I x°}°nae• I zrY rebaT I r f I m ! I c irI II = 111 tII I I f Sw by rcF a rnr 5S Gv:n Ac g]] f u° IretYv ] s I yI ,°'t' N oar,° ,, ° Yr r ' P a ae)'.II •,,55”' ssr.al FINAL PLAT xrrcerin I Pen..pe °ma ufNffy Eeesl°xre are r18.n Ih r: II sJ LB 11 m I°I J L____L____. Bvwlg 6 reef m .inm, vnlvee viner.:vv lnd'rvrev; d adlvhm9 Iv! Ifnn, vrrd t0 hvf x .isle arta ed/vinMq righl-vf-wY IMev w vhvwn art the pvf SEP - 82011 Sheer 1 .12 .h " Page 7 Yc JE ° yp Ld r9e.e' T Iv m.e rn n ea o ao !m Iso M . SCNe .n Ieel 9.00 P ixrr iN Ihv mule Ifnv vl tea N: 1/9 v/ .STG 13 r Mn ofSre ]v h veeun.d 18 bvw NBH°]B'a]'Y. 8 Oemefev Ill ixeh by 14 fnd .m: mmu 1 P up°r v1 end mated by L;c°nn e1g 2xv 4tia m !vV I/r Westwood Pe.&WOMI Semmes, Int Sheer 1 .12 .h " Page 7 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Developer Installed Improvements) CROSSROADS COMMONS (2011014-F) AGREEMENT dated , 20_, by and between the CITY OF PLYMOUTH, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and KTJ 198, LLC (the Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Crossroads Commons (referred to in this contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on Attachment A attached hereto. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the county recorder or registrar of titles within 180 days after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given by the City, within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the city clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, and 3) the plat has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If the plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until development contracts for such phases are approved by the City. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If the plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within three years after preliminary plat approval. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two years from the date of this contract, no amendments to the City's comprehensive plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's comprehensive plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this contract. Page 8 7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: 8. Plan A - Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Tree Preservation and Reforestation Plan Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements Plan E - Street Lighting Plan Plan F - Landscape Plan Plan G - Permanent Traffic Control Plan IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Streets B. Sanitary Sewer C. Watermam D. Surface Water Facilities (pipe, ponds, underground tanks, rain gardens, etc.) E. Grading and Erosion Control F. Sidewalks/Trails G. Street Lighting H. Underground Utilities I. Street Signs and Traffic Control Signs J. Landscaping Required by Section 21130.03 of the Zoning Ordinance K. Tree Preservation and Reforestation L. Wetland Mitigation and Buffers M. Monuments Required by Minnesota Statutes N. Miscellaneous Facilities The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations and the City's engineering guidelines/standard detail specifications. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the city engineer or designee. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or parttime basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his or her engineer shall schedule a pre - construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors 2— P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 9 being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this contract, for which reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is first approved in writing by the city engineer or designee. 9. ADMINISTRATION OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. The Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow to pay for the costs of administering the development contract. Administrative costs include but are not limited to preparation of the contract, city recording fees for documents required as part of the development, monitoring of construction observation, consultation with the Developer and his/her engineer on status or problems regarding the project, plan review, coordination for testing, periodic and final inspections and acceptance, project monitoring and inspections during warranty periods, and processing requests for reduction or release of security, for all public improvements covered by the development contract. The cash escrow deposit shall be 40,052 (calculated at 4% of the estimated cost of proposed public improvements, as identified on page 16). If, at any time prior to completion of the development contract administration process, the balance in the cash escrow account is depleted to less than 10% of the originally required cash escrow amount, the Developer shall deposit additional funds in the cash escrow account as determined by the City. Any balance remaining in the cash escrow account upon completion of the development contract administration process shall be returned to the developer after all claims and charges thereto have been deducted. 10. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8 above. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: Hennepin County for county road access and work in county right-of-way Minnesota Department of Transportation for state highway access and drainage Minnesota Department of Health for watermains and well abandonment National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System per»tits Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for sanitary sewer and hazardous material removal and disposal Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for dewatering and work in protected waters Bassett Creek Watershed Organization City of Plymouth right-of-way permit, building demolition, and building permits 3— P;1CommDevISTAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 10 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Phase 1 construction: The Developer shall install all required public improvements by October _32012, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. Phase 2 construction: The Developer shall install all required public improvements by October 31, 2013, with the exception of the final wear course of asphalt on streets. Placement of the wear course shall not occur until one freeze — thaw cycle after completion of Phase 2 construction. An inspection of the roadway will be performed by the city engineer or designee prior to wear course placement. From this inspection, any deficiencies or damage to the street, sidewalk and curb will be noted and will need to be corrected prior to the placement of the wear course. Note: Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements are described on the Developer's January 6, 2012 narrative, attached hereto as Attachment B. If there are conflicts between such narrative and the terms of this contract, this contract shall prevail. 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 14. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. No construction traffic is permitted to use the existing right- in/right-out only access point (to be extinguished) along Highway 55. Except to allow construction of the required hammerhead turn -around at the terminus of Cottonwood and to widen the eastern side of the north end of Cottonwood Lane (to address traffic sight lines), no construction traffic is permitted to use Cottonwood Lane. 15. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan (Plan B). The plan shall conform to City of Plymouth standards. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with a "record" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer indicating that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record" plan shall contain site grades and field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles; c) lot corner elevations and building pads; and d) top and bottom of retaining walls. 16. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the Erosion Control Plan (Plan B) shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's best management practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for more than 5 days unless authorized and approved by the city engineer in writing. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding standards. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc -anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's 4— P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Devdopment Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 11 expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten days, the City may draw down the security to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 17. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. In the event buildings are occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to ensure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the subdivision swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from the Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for repairing damage in the development because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. The contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract, the improvements lying within public easements or right-of-way shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: Contractor's certificate Engineer's certificate Land surveyor's certificate Developer's certificate The above certificates shall certify that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this contract. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the city engineer, the city engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Prior to acceptance of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible mylar "record" plans, and an electronic file of the "record" plans in an AutoCad.DWG file, a tagged image format (TIF) file and the electronic point/staking file prepared in accordance with City standards. 5— P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 12 19. PARK DEDICATION. The required park dedication fee, based upon the upland acreage, shall be paid with the building permit for each lot. This fee shall be calculated in accordance with the park dedication ordinance (section 528 of the city's subdivision regulations) in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 20. WETLAND MITIGATION. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall post a 13,630 security for wetland mitigation. This security may be in the form of a letter of credit separate from the primary development security or in the form of a non-interest bearing escrow with the City. If the mitigation area is found to be unsuccessful after the mandatory five-year warranty period, the City may elect to extend the required monitoring period, or keep the security to be used for this mitigation project or for wetland mitigation/restoration elsewhere within the City. In addition, the City may draw down the security at any time during the warranty period if the Developer fails to take corrective measures as directed by the City to perform the work recommended. 21. BUILDING PERMITS/CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. No building permits shall be issued for lots within the plat until this development contract has been fully executed, and the financial sureties required by it are provided to the city. B. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat is recorded with Hennepin County and proof of recording is provided to the city. C. No building permits shall be issued until a contract has been awarded for sewer and water and the MPCA permit has been issued. D. Prior to issuance of building permits for any lot that contains a wetland buffer, permanent wetland buffer monuments shall be installed in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance. Specifications for the monuments are available from the Community Development Department. F. Prior to issuance of building permits, written certification of the grading for the block where the building is to be located must be provided to the City. F. Breach of the terms of this contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and the halting of all work in the plat. G. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. 22. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. Street name signs shall be installed by the Developer. The signs shall be placed at all intersections or at such other locations as determined by the city engineer or designee. All street name signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval. The Developer shall install traffic control signs in accordance with the plan approved by the city engineer and Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices EVE P:1CommDev\STAFFREPIDevelopment Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads- Commons -DC doex Page 13 MMTJTCD). All signs must be installed prior to final building inspection approval or earlier if necessary as determined by the city engineer. 23. STREET LIGHT OPERATION COSTS. The Developer shall pay to the City the energy cost for the first two years of operation. Four (4) lights at an annual cost of $1,200 and a two year cost of $2,400. The cost includes contingencies at $1.20 per lot per year and sales tax. After the first two years the street lights will be billed on a bimonthly basis to all the lots in the addition, a total of three (3) lots, which results in an estimated cost of 100 per lot per billing period. The rate quoted above is dependent upon the operation costs for Xcel Energy under contract franchise with the City of Plymouth. 24. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this contract within 30 days after receipt. Bills not paid within 30 days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. E. In addition to the charges referred to herein, other charges may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 25. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. The Developer shall post a $4,000 security for the final placement of all subdivision iron monuments. The security was calculated as follows: 40 irons at $100.00 per iron. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. In addition, the certificate of survey must also include a certification that all irons for a specific lot have either been found or set prior to the issuance of a building permit for that lot. B. The Developer shall supply a complete set of the approved construction plans in an AutoCAD.DWG electronic file format before the preconstruction conference. 7— P:1ConunDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.doex Page 14 C. The Developer shall include the "City of Plymouth's Standard Detail Specifications" (all applicable sections) in the contract documents of their improvement project. D. Other requirements: 1. Prior to recording the final plat, the Developer shall execute this development contract for the public and private improvements, and shall submit the financial guarantees required herein. 2. Prior to recording the final plat, the Developer shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Right-of-way/ easement/ agreement requirements: 1) Verify that vacation of a portion of Highway 55 right-of-way will be approved by MnYDOT. 2) Separate unobstructed maintenance access easements are required for sanitary sewer and storm sewer manholes outside street right of way. The access easements must be 15 feet wide and must have a slope of less than ten percent with a 12 -foot wide driving surface capable of supporting maintenance equipment. 3) Drainage and utility easements are required over the storm water vault 1, infiltration basin A, wetlands, and ponds. 4) A 40 -foot by 36 -foot street and snow storage easement is required for the hammerhead turn -around on the end of Cottonwood Lane. 5) A five-foot wide sidewalk easement shall be provided along the south boundary of the frontage road right-of-way. 6) A drainage and utility easement is required for storm sewer piping across the westerly 60 feet of the Exception parcel, which is located northeast of the north plat boundary. 7) A permanent driveway easement for the benefit of the property located at 11009 State Highway 55, as presented by the Developer at the July 20, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, shall be provided. 8) Maintenance agreements are required for storm water vault 1 and infiltration basin A for the first five years after all utility work has been accepted by the City. b. Grading and erosion control plans: 1) Call out inlet protection for all catch basins on the erosion control plan. 8— PACommDWSTAFFREPOevelopment Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 15 c. Street and utility plans: 1) The traffic study conducted by SRF recommends dual left turn lanes for northbound County Road 73 at Highway 55. Hennepin County has indicated that in the fixture they may instead prefer to extend the existing median southerly, effectively converting the frontage road entrance at County Road 73 to a right -in, right -out access. The applicant should work with Hennepin County to develop a preferred solution and to determine the timing of such improvements. 2) Confirm that proposed geometrics for West Medicine Lake Drive line up with existing geometrics on the north side of Highway 55. Show the existing lane striping configuration for West Medicine Lake Drive on the north side of Highway 55. 3) Confirm the westbound left turn movement on Highway 55 to southbound West Medicine Lake Drive can be made without modifying the existing median. 4) Confirm the eastbound left turn movement from the frontage road to West Medicine Lake Drive functions as shown. Consider extending pavement markings to improve turning movement. 5) Add a pedestrian ramp on trail in the southeast radius of West Medicine Lake Drive at Highway 55. 6) Add right turn lane sign at eastbound frontage road approach to County Road 73. 7) Provide a single inlet and outlet for storm water vault 1. Eliminate Nyloplast structures and substitute concrete manhole risers at inlet, outlet, and at each end of the isolator row and manifold. Show detail of how the underdrain connects to the outlet riser in storm water vault 1. 8) Confirm that filter media particle sizes are sufficient to provide required reductions for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Phosphorous (TP) in storm water vault 1. 9) Cover the surface of storm water vault 1 with bituminous pavement to protect the structure. 10) Eliminate the storm sewer stub out of catch basin manhole 6. 11) Make the westerly connection to the existing 12 -inch water main with two 45 -degree bends and a 12- inch gate valve. 12) Abandon the existing 12 -inch water main along Highway 55 between the two connection points. 13) Confirm phase 1 & 2 construction limits for sanitary sewer and water main construction. 14) Directional bore the new traffic signal conduits at West Medicine Lake Drive and at County Road 73. 15) To address concerns of traffic sight lines and related safety at the intersection of Cottonwood Lane and the south frontage road of Highway 55, the Developer shall: 1) widen the eastern side of the north end of Cottonwood Lane; and 2) review the design of the 4-- P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 16 landscaping plan to ensure there are no obstructions to visibility at this intersection. Detailed plans shall be provided to address this requirement. d. Water resource plan: 1) Indicate correct wetland buffers and setbacks adjacent to wetland areas shown. e. Fire plan: 1) Turning radii to main entrances must comply with City standards. 2) Fire lane signs are required in approved locations in the areas without designated parking, and at the hammerhead turnaround at the end of Cottonwood Lane. 3) The fire department connections must be relocated to approved locations near the main entrance door for each building. 4) Relocate hydrants to approved locations, as designated by the fire inspector. 5) The minimum required vertical clearance of the main entry canopy for the senior housing building is 13.5 feet. f. Miscellaneous: 1) Change "Manager" to "City Clerk" on the signature bar of the final plat drawing. 2) Correct spelling of "SCHIEBE' S HIGHLAND VIEW ADDITION" in the legal description on the final plat drawing. 3) Indicate block numbers on the final plat drawing. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any grading activities, the Developer shall install and request inspection of silt fencing and tree preservation fencing. 4. The required traffic improvements related to Phase 1 construction shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the senior housing building and for the drive through restaurant. The required traffic improvements related to Phase 2 construction shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on Outlot B. 5. The sidewalks and trails along the streets shall be installed when the streets are installed. The sidewalk shall be located at least five feet away from the south curb line of the frontage road. Upon construction and acceptance, the trails shall be maintained by the City, and the sidewalks shall be maintained by abutting property owners. 10- PACommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 17 G. Individual sites within the development shall provide their own storm water treatment and volume reduction. Detailed drainage plans shall be required with the FUD final plan application for each site. 7. Prior to any development of Outlot B, Outlot B requires separate review and approval of a PUD general plan. 8. No building permits shall be issued until a FUD final plan {for the lot where the building permit is requested} is approved by city staff. 9, Development standards for the PUD shall be as indicated on the plans originally received by the City on June 21, 2011, revised PUD civil site plan received by the City on August 2, 2011, and revised tree preservation and landscaping plan received by the City on August 3, 2011, except as amended. 10. The uses allowed in the FUD shall include all uses allowed as permitted, accessory, conditional, interim, and administrative uses in the C-2 neighborhood commercial) zoning district, as well as senior housing on Lot 1, Block 1, and a free-standing fast food restaurant with drive-through service on Lot 1, Block 2 (as shown on the preliminary plat). 11. The FUD final plan for each lot shall include a final lighting plan that complies with the city's lighting regulations, including the requirement that lighting fixtures located within 300 feet of residential property shall be equipped with house -side shielding. 12. All structures shall comply with the following architectural design standards: a. All structures shall have high quality finishes and shall be constructed of durable materials. The senior housing and fast food buildings shall be constructed in accordance with the respective building elevations and materials as shown on the approved FUD general plan, as amended. The exterior surfaces of any other buildings shall include brick, stone, glass, stucco, or other materials as may be approved by city staff. All building elevations shall receive equal treatment and visual qualities. b. Any visible rooftop or ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened or painted to match the building. Materials for any screening walls shall be of the same materials as the primary structure. c. Trash and recycling storage areas not internal to buildings shall be screened within an enclosure with walls designed to be aesthetically harmonious and compatible with the building. Materials for such enclosures shall be of the same materials as the primary structure. Such enclosures shall include solid wooden gates, d. In order to establish a cohesive, unified development, building materials and colors of buildings within the PUD shall be compatible and complementary with other buildings in the PUD. 11- P;1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.doex Page 18 e. Elevations of all sides of a proposed building shall be submitted with the required PUD final plan, for determination of compliance with the above requirements. 13. All signs shall comply with the following signage criteria: a. All signs shall conform with Section 21155.05 (Signs - General Regulations and Restrictions) of the Zoning Ordinance, except as amended herein. b. The senior housing site (Lot 1, Block 1) shall be allowed one monument sign containing up to 32 square feet in area. Such sign shall not exceed ten feet in height, and shall be set back at least ten feet from lot lines. No other signage is allowed for the senior housing site. c. The fast food restaurant site (Lot 1, Block 2) shall be allowed the following signage: 1. wall signage on four sides of the building, limited to ten percent of the wall area to which the sign is attached; 2. one free-standing sign up to 100 square feet in area, provided the sign does not exceed 30 feet in height, and is set back at least ten feet from lot lines; and 3. menu board signage and directional signage pursuant to the C-2 standards in the zoning ordinance. d. The building(s) for the area of the site shown as Outlot B shall be allowed the following signage: 1. wall signage on the north, west, and east elevations of the building(s), limited to ten percent of the wall area to which the sign is attached; 2. one free-standing sign up to 100 square feet in area, provided the sign does not exceed 30 feet in height, and is set back at least 10 feet from lot lines. Under the PUD, the entire area of Outlot B shall be limited to not more than one such free-standing sign — regardless of whether there are multiple buildings constructed on, or multiple lots created from, this area. e. Wall signage, where allowed within the PUD, shall consist of individual dimensional letters and logos, and shall be architecturally compatible with the building, and with other signage if in a multi -tenant building. Back -lit awnings are prohibited. g. Temporary or directional signage shall comply with zoning ordinance requirements. h. The design and colors of signs on all parcels within the PUD shall be compatible and complementary, to the extent possible, with other signage in the PUD. i. Signage shall be shown on all elevations of a proposed building when the required PUD final plan is submitted, for determination of compliance with the above requirements. j. Prior to installation of such signage, a sign permit shall be obtained from the City Building Division. 12— P:1CommDevISTAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 19 14. For the senior housing site (Lot 1, Block 1), fifteen percent of the trees required to be planted on the site must be 3.5 -inch caliper in size and must be long-lived deciduous species. The PUD final plan for this lot shall indicate compliance with this requirement. 15. The PUD final plan for the fast food site (Lot 1, Block 2) shall indicate a minimum of 25 trees. 16. The city's tree preservation and landscaping regulations will be applied separately to Outlot B upon its platting and development in the future. 17. The landscaping plan for each site within this development shall be designed in a manner that includes complementary plant materials with other sites within the PUD, in order to establish a cohesive, unified development. IS. If the Developer decides to create an outlot for the vacated portion of Cottonwood Lane lying south of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 (in order to address the TIF district boundary), such outlot shall not be built upon and shall be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the owner of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Although such an outlot would be a separate parcel (solely for TIF purposes), such an outlot and proposed Lot 1, Block 1 shall be considered tied together as one property for all other purposes (e.g., setbacks, permits) as related to this PUD. 19. The hours of operation for both lobby service and drive-through window service for the fast food restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2 shall not exceed 1 S hours per day Sundays through Thursdays, and shall not exceed 19 hours per day Fridays and Saturdays. For purposes of this condition, a `day' shall be defined as a 24-hour period from 3:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. the following day. 20. The Developer shall grade the relocated driveway for property at 11009 State Highway 55, and shall install a surface consistent with the city's driveway requirements. 21. ,Standard Conditions: a. Building permits are required for retaining walls 48 inches in height or higher. In addition, a fence is required on top of all retaining walls over 4 feet in height. b. Compliance with the city's tree preservation regulations and landscaping regulations. c. An S 112 x 11 inch "as built" fire protection plan shall be submitted prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement surety. d. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer of each lot shall enter into a site improvement performance agreement and shall provide the required financial guarantee. 13— P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 20 26. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. B. Certain retaining walls will require a building permit. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the building official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in this contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. C. The Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until 6 months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of 1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given 30 days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. D. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this contract. E. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this contract. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the properly being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and 14— PACommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.doex Page 21 each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. L The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision regulations, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 27. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 28. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit or maintain a letter of credit for 25% of the amount of the original cost of the following improvements: A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for utilities including public sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water mains shall be 2 years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be 1 year from the date of final written City acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one growing season following installation. D. The required warranty period for wetland mitigation is 5 years. 29. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this contract, payment of the costs of all public and private improvements, and construction of all public and private improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in a format acceptable to the City, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and letter of credit ("security") for $708,559. The City has additional performance guarantees under the provisions of the related Developer's Agreement for tax increment financing. Estimated project costs are provided on page 16. 15— PACommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.doex Page 22 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the city manager. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. The $708,559 security (letter of credit, cash escrow, or combination thereon required by this contract shall be applied to the Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements as follows: S Phase 1- $3505562 Phase 2 - $357,997 16 P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 23 ESTIMATED COSTS ITEM Public (1) Private (2) Total Street Construction 320,215 0 320,215 Sanitary Sewer System 15,110 0 15,110 Watermain System 105,843 0 105,843 Storm Sewer System 71,940 0 71,940 Storm Tech System 116,590 0 116,590 Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod 0 10,000 10,000 Traffic Control Signal System 200,000 0 200,000 Infiltration Basin 20,000 0 20,000 Street and Traffic Control Signs 9,000 1,000 10,000 Sidewalk Improvements 0 34,624 34,624 Trail Improvements 35,321 0 35,321 Retaining Walls 0 75,124 75,124 Driveway for 11009 State Highway 55 0 10,000 10,000 Street Lighting 0 20,000(3) 20,000 Erosion Control 0 10,950 10,950 Site Grading & Drainage Improvements 0 191,936 191,936 Setting Iron Monuments 0 4,000 4,000 Wetland Mitigation and Restoration 0 13,630 13,630 SUB -TOTAL: 894,019 371,264 1,265,283 Design, Admin., Insp., As-Builts (12%) 107,282 44,552 151,834 TOTAL: 1,001,301 415,816 1,417,117 1) Developer installed public improvements. City to own and maintain after development completed. 2) Developer installed private improvements. Property owner to maintain after development completed. 3) Four street lights @ $5,000 = $20,000. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the city manager. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. The $708,559 security (letter of credit, cash escrow, or combination thereon required by this contract shall be applied to the Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements as follows: S Phase 1- $3505562 Phase 2 - $357,997 16 P:1CommDev\STAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 23 Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with city engineer or designee approval the security may be reduced from time to time by 75% of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed; (2) iron monuments for lot comers have been installed; (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied; (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City; (5) a warranty security is provided; and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 30. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final plat approval: Street Light Operating Fee $2,400 Erosion Control Cash Deposit (Refundable) $2,000 Administration of Development Contract Escrow $40,052 TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS LEVIED: $44,452 31. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: KTJ 198, LLC Attn: Paul Tucci 5125 County Road 101, Suit 100 Minnetonka, MN 55345 The Developer shall notify the City within five days of a change of address. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the Community Development Director, or mailed to the city's Community Development Department by certified mail in care of the Community Development Director at the following address: Plymouth City Hall 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 17— PACommDevISTAFFREP1Development Contracts1201112011014-Crossroads-Commons-DC.docx Page 24 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR "CROSSROADS COMMONS" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF HIGHWAY 55 AND COTTONWOOD LANE (2011014-F) WHEREAS, KTJ 198, LLC has requested approval of a final plat for the roughly 19 -acre site presently legally described as follows: Tracts A, B and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1676, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property, Certificate of Title No. 1207792.) Together with: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 35, Township 118, Range 22; thence North along the West line thereof 805 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said quarter -quarter 683.20 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing East along said parallel line 100 feet; thence Northeasterly, deflecting to the left 81 degrees 49 minutes a distance of 108.3 feet, more or less to the Southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 55; thence Northwesterly along the Southerly right-of-way line of said Highway 97.99 feet; thence Southwesterly 136.74 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. (Abstract Property.) Together with: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota; lying Southerly of the centerline of the Eastbound lane of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as now located and established); and lying Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of Old County Road No. 6 (also being the Northeasterly line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1676) and the Northwesterly extension thereof, and lying Northerly of the Northeasterly lines of Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1676; and lying Northerly of a line beginning at the Northwest corner of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1676; thence North 74 degrees 06 minutes 45 seconds West on an assumed bearing along the Northwesterly extension of the North line of said Tract B, a distance of 97.99 feet; thence South 8 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 15.11 feet to the Northeast corner of Tract A, Registered Lane Survey No. 1676, and there terminating; and lying Southeasterly of a line drawn Northeasterly from the Northwest corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1676, at Page 25 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 2 a right angle to the North line of said Tract A, a distance of 75.00 feet to the centerline of the Eastbound lane of State Trunk Highway No. 55 (as now located and established), which lies Southwesterly of a line run parallel with and distant 70.00 feet Southwesterly (as measured at right angles) of the following described line: Beginning at a point of the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35, distant 1065.36 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, thence run Southeasterly at an angle of 73 degrees 22 minutes 02 seconds from said West line of the Northeast Quarter (measured from South to East) for 2608.47 feet to a tangent spiral point; thence deflect to the right on a spiral curve of decreasing radius (spiral angle 2 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds) for 200 feet to a spiral curve point; thence deflect to the right on a 2 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds circular curve (delta angle 11 degrees 34 minutes 00 seconds) for 578.33 feet to a curve spiral and there terminating. (Abstract Property.) Together with: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36,Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the Southwesterly line of Old County Road 6 and described as beginning at the intersection of the West line of said Section 36 with the Southwesterly line of Old County Road 6; thence Southerly along the West line of said Section 36, a distance of 313.50 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the Southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, distant 173.10 feet Southeasterly of the point of beginning; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a distance of 173.10 feet to the point of beginning. Together with that part of vacated Old County Road No. 6 right-of- way lying southerly of the centerline of said vacated Old County Road No. 6, located in that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying Northwesterly of the Southwesterly extension of the Northwesterly line of Naumann Cartway (as referenced on the plat of SCHIEBE'S HIGHLAND VIEW ADDITION). (Abstract Property.) Together with: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 118, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwesterly of the Southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, and described as commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 36; thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 36, a distance of 210.30 feet to the point of beginning; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 90 degrees 30 minutes, a distance of 9.00 feet; thence Northeasterly 358.30 feet to a point on the Southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, distant 248.10 feet Southeasterly of the intersection of said Southwesterly line with the West line of said Section 36; thence Northwesterly along the Southwesterly line of Old County Road No. 6, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence Southwesterly to a point on the West line of said Section 36, distant 122.10 feet Northerly of the point of beginning; thence Southerly 122.10 feet along the West line of said Section 36 to the point of beginning. Abstract Property.) Page 26 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 3 WHEREAS, city staff has prepared a development contract covering the improvements related to said plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by KTJ 198, LLC for a final plat for Crossroads Commons; and FURTHER, that the development contract for said plat be approved, and that upon prior execution of the development contract by the developer, the mayor and city manager be authorized to execute the development contract on behalf of the city; and FURTHER, that the following conditions be met prior to recording of, and related to said plat: 1. The final plat for Crossroads Commons is approved in accordance with the final plat drawing received by the city on September 8, 2011, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. Prior to recording the final plat, the applicant shall execute a development contract for the public and private improvements, and shall submit the financial guarantees required by it. 3. Prior to recording the final plat, the applicant shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Right-of-way/ easement/ agreement/ permit requirements: 1) Verify that vacation of a portion of Highway 55 right-of-way will be approved by Mn/DOT. 2) Separate unobstructed maintenance access easements are required for sanitary sewer and storm sewer manholes outside street right of way. The access easements must be 15 feet wide and must have a slope of less than ten percent with a 12 -foot wide driving surface capable of supporting maintenance equipment. 3) Drainage and utility easements are required over the storm water vault 1, infiltration basin A, wetlands, and ponds. 4) A 40 -foot by 36 -foot street and snow storage easement is required for the hammerhead turn -around on the end of Cottonwood Lane. 5) A five-foot wide sidewalk easement shall be provided along the south boundary of the frontage road right-of-way. 6) A drainage and utility easement is required for storm sewer piping across the westerly 60 feet of the Exception parcel, which is located northeast of the north plat boundary. Page 27 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 4 7) A permanent driveway easement for the benefit of the property located at 11009 State Highway 55, as presented by the Developer at the July 20, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, shall be provided. 8) Maintenance agreements are required for storm water vault 1 and infiltration basin A for the first five years after all utility work has been accepted by the City. 9) The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits and approvals as follows: MPCA, Minnesota Department of Health, Bassett Creek Watershed Organization, NPDES, DNR, Hennepin County, Mn/DOT, and City of Plymouth. b. Grading and erosion control plans: 1) Call out inlet protection for all catch basins on the erosion control plan. c. Street and utility plans: 1) The traffic study conducted by SRF recommends dual left turn lanes for northbound County Road 73 at Highway 55. Hennepin County has indicated that in the future they may instead prefer to extend the existing median southerly, effectively converting the frontage road entrance at County Road 73 to a right -in, right -out access. The applicant should work with Hennepin County to develop a preferred solution and to determine the timing of such improvements. 2) Confirm that proposed geometries for West Medicine Lake Drive line up with existing geometries on the north side of Highway 55. Show the existing lane striping configuration for West Medicine Lake Drive on the north side of Highway 55. 3) Confirm the westbound left turn movement on Highway 55 to southbound West Medicine Lake Drive can be made without modifying the existing median. 4) Confirm the eastbound left turn movement from the frontage road to West Medicine Lake Drive functions as shown. Consider extending pavement markings to improve turning movement. 5) Add a pedestrian ramp on trail in the southeast radius of West Medicine Lake Drive at Highway 55. 6) Add right turn lane sign at eastbound frontage road approach to County Road 73. 7) Provide a single inlet and outlet for storm water vault 1. Eliminate Nyloplast structures and substitute concrete manhole risers at inlet, outlet, and at each end of the isolator row and manifold. Show detail of how the underdrain connects to the outlet riser in storm water vault 1. 8) Confirm that filter media particle sizes are sufficient to provide required reductions for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Phosphorous (TP) in storm water vault 1. 9) Cover the surface of storm water vault 1 with bituminous pavement to protect the structure. 10) Eliminate the storm sewer stub out of catch basin manhole 6. Page 28 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 5 11) Make the westerly connection to the existing 12 -inch water main with two 45 - degree bends and a 12- inch gate valve. 12) Abandon the existing 12 -inch water main along Highway 55 between the two connection points. 13) Confirm phase 1 & 2 construction limits for sanitary sewer and water main construction. 14) Directional bore the new traffic signal conduits at West Medicine Lake Drive and at County Road 73. 15) To address concerns of traffic sight lines and related safety at the intersection of Cottonwood Lane and the south frontage road of Highway 55, the Developer shall: 1) widen the eastern side of the north end of Cottonwood Lane; and 2) review the design of the landscaping plan to ensure there are no obstructions to visibility at this intersection. Detailed plans shall be provided to address this requirement. d. Water resource plan: 1) Indicate correct wetland buffers and setbacks adjacent to wetland areas shown. e. Fire plan: 1) Turning radii to main entrances must comply with City standards. 2) Fire lane signs are required in approved locations in the areas without designated parking, and at the hammerhead turnaround at the end of Cottonwood Lane. 3) The fire department connections must be relocated to approved locations near the main entrance door for each building. 4) Relocate hydrants to approved locations, as designated by the fire inspector. 5) The minimum required vertical clearance of the main entry canopy for the senior housing building is 13.5 feet. f. Miscellaneous: 1) Change "Manager" to "City Clerk" on the signature bar of the final plat drawing. 2) Correct spelling of "SCHIEBE'S HIGHLAND VIEW ADDITION" in the I egal description on the final plat drawing. 3) Indicate block numbers on the final plat drawing. The senior housing site shall be Block 1, and the fast food restaurant site shall be Block 2. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or any grading activities, the applicant shall install and request inspection of silt fencing and tree preservation fencing. Page 29 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 6 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of a PUD final plan for the lot where the building permit is requested. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer of each lot shall enter into a site improvement performance agreement and shall provide the required financial guarantee. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits for any lot that contains a wetland buffer, permanent wetland buffer monuments shall be installed in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance. 8. The required traffic improvements related to Phase 1 construction shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the senior housing building and for the drive through restaurant (Blocks 1 and 2, respectively). The required traffic improvements related to Phase 2 construction shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building on Outlot B. 9. The sidewalks and trails along the streets shall be installed when the streets are installed. The sidewalk shall be located at least five feet away from the south curb line of the frontage road. 10. Individual sites within the development shall provide their own storm water treatment and volume reduction. Detailed drainage plans shall be required with the PUD final plan application for each site. 11. Prior to any development of Outlot B, Outlot B requires separate review and approval of a PUD general plan. 12. The city's tree preservation and landscaping regulations will be applied separately to Outlot B upon its platting and development in the future. 13. If the Developer decides to create an outlot for the vacated portion of Cottonwood Lane lying south of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 (in order to address the TIF district boundary), such outlot shall not be built upon and shall be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the owner of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Although such an outlot would be a separate parcel (solely for TIF purposes), such an outlot and proposed Lot 1, Block 1 shall be considered tied together as one property for all other purposes (e.g., setbacks, permits) as related to this PUD. 14. The hours of operation for both lobby service and drive-through window service for the fast food restaurant on Lot 1, Block 2 shall not exceed 18 hours per day Sundays through Thursdays, and shall not exceed 19 hours per day Fridays and Saturdays. For purposes of this condition, a `day' shall be defined as a 24-hour period from 3:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. the following day. Page 30 Resolution 2012 - File 2011014-F Page 7 15. The Developer shall grade the relocated driveway for property at 11009 State Highway 55, and shall install a surface consistent with the city's driveway requirements. 16. Standard conditions: a. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat and all easements and agreements are filed and recorded with Hennepin County and proof of recording is submitted to the city. b. No building permits shall be issued until the development contract is executed and the financial sureties required by it are provided to the city. c. The required park dedication fee, based upon the upland acreage, shall be paid with the building permit for each lot. This fee shall be calculated in accordance with the park dedication ordinance in effect at the time of building permit issuance. d. Building permits are required for retaining walls 48 inches in height or higher. Additionally, a fence shall be installed at the top of retaining walls that exceed four feet in height. e. The development shall comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 2011-294 approving the PUD general plan, including but not limited to, conditions pertaining to architectural design standards, signage, and landscaping design. f. Signage shall require separate a sign permit. g. Compliance with the city's tree preservation regulations. h. This approval shall expire two years after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has recorded the final plat, or unless the landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Section 512 of city code. ADOPTED on January 24, 2012. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 24, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of City Clerk Page 31 c;ty or Agenda 6 . 1 1PIymOuthNumber: Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Sandy Engdahl, City Clerk January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Item: 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Agreement with State of Minnesota, Materials Management Division, for purchase of Supplies, Commodities, and Equipment Adopt attached resolution approving agreement with State of Minnesota, Materials Management Division, for purchase of supplies, commodities, and equipment. 2. BACKGROUND: The City is a member and has a contract for the Cooperative Purchasing Venture with the State of Minnesota, Materials Management Division, for the purchase of supplies, commodities, equipment, and services through competitive bidding process or requests for proposals. The City would renew this agreement annually with the State for the purchase of items and supplies off the State contract. In order to streamline the process, the State is eliminating the annual renewal requirement and allowing the agreement to extend beyond five years. Attached is a new agreement, and this agreement would remain in effect until canceled by either party with a 30 day written notice. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: There would be no direct budget impact in approving this agreement. Any purchases that are made off the State contract by City departments would be authorized in the departments' budgets. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Agreement Page 1 iuil s®to MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION Cooperative Purchasing Venture COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT Under the Authority of Minnesota Statutes § 16C.03, Subdivision 10 and Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, Subdivision 1 This Joint Powers Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, through its commissioner of Administration, Materials Management Division ("Division") and CITY OF PLYMOUTH ("Authorized Entity") Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.03, subd. 10, the Division acquires various supplies, commodities, equipment, and services for state agencies and governmental units (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. 1)'through competitive bidding or requests for proposals. The Division, through Minn. Stat. § 16C.11, and the Authorized Entity wish to combine their purchasing functions, as specifically provided below, so that the Authorized Entity may avail itself of the prices which have been agreed upon by the Division and its vendors. The parties agree as follows: 1. Term. This joint powers agreement will be effective on the date State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2, and remains in effect until canceled by either party upon 30 days' written notice to the other party. 2. Services. The Division will make its contracts for commodities and services, as listed on the State of Minnesota's Contract Index, available to the Authorized Entity. 3. Use of Division Contracts. To purchase commodities or services from the Division's contracts, the Authorized Entity must issue a purchase order in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Division's contracts and any requirements applicable to the Authorized Entity's governing body. The Authorized Entity must send purchase orders directly to the applicable vendor and will make payments directly to the vendor in accordance with its established procedures and terms of the Division's contract. The Authorized Entity will not use the goods available under the Division's contracts for the purposes of resale. The Authorized Entity must be the end user of the goods purchased. 4. Liability. The Authorized Entity agrees that neither the Division nor its employees personally assume responsibility or liability for any amounts due or claimed to be due pursuant to any purchase order entered issued by the Authorized Entity. The Authorized Entity will indemnify, save and hold harmless the Division and its employees from any loss, damage or MMD -CPV Agreement 1a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CREATING COOPERATIVE PURCHASING VENTURE MEMBERSHIP 1212011) MS "Ji?, Subd. 1 COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT in Under the Authority of Minnesota Statutes § 16C.03, Subdivision 10 and MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION ' Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, Subdivision 1 Cooperative Purchasing Venture expense, including payment of attorney fees allowable by law, which arise or may arise from the Authorized Entity's use of this joint powers agreement and from any dispute or claim arising from any transaction between the Authorized Entity and the Division's vendors, whether or not the loss, damage, dispute or claim arises during or after the period of this cooperative agreement. The Division's liability will be governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 3.736. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Authorized Entity certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed this cooperative agreement on behalf of the Authorized Entity as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances." C Authorized Signature) Title) Address) Date) STATE OF MINNESOTA By Delegation" Materials Management Division Date) Permit Number/Access Code: MMD -CPV Agreement 1a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CREATING COOPERATIVE PURCHASING VENTURE MEMBERSHIP 12/2011) MS §P4A10 3bd. 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA, MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, FOR THE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING VENTURE WHEREAS, the City is a member and has a contract for the Cooperative Purchasing Venture with the State of Minnesota, Materials Management Division, for the purchase of supplies, commodities, equipment, and services through competitive bidding process or requests for proposals; and WHEREAS, the City annually renews this contract; and WHEREAS, in order to streamline the process, the State is eliminating the annual renewal requirement and allowing the agreement to extend beyond five years; and WHEREAS, this agreement is in effect until cancelled by either party with a 30 -day written notice, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said agreement. Approved this 24th day of January 2012. Page 4 Agenda 6 , 1 2r;b City of Number: Plymouth Adding Quality ro Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Marie Darling, Senior Planner COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager, and January 24, 2012 Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Item: Approve Rezoning, Preliminary and Final Plat for "Gleason Lake Heights Addition", a three lot subdivision at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive (2011085) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt the following to approve a request for "Gleason Lake Heights", a three -lot subdivision, for Hanson Builders, as recommended by the Planning Commission: 1. An ordinance approving the rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2; 2. A resolution approving findings of fact for the rezoning; and, 3. A resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for the three -lot subdivision. Approval of a rezoning, findings of fact, and preliminary and final plat requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. 2. BACKGROUND: At their January 4, 2012 meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5-2 (Anderson and Nelson voting nay) to recommend approval of the request for rezoning and preliminary plat. The Planning Commission does not review requests for final plats. The minutes from the meeting are attached. The applicant was present and spoke in support of the request. One resident requested to speak and submitted a letter (attached) outlining two principal concerns: 1) the loss of privacy and 2) tree impacts. After discussing the privacy concern, the Planning Commission inserted a condition into the resolution that the applicant consider locating the house on Lot 1 15 feet from the west property line, consistent with the required side -yard setback in the RSF-1 zoning district. Notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper and mailed to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. The notification map is attached. Development signage remains on the property. After the meeting, the speaker informed staff that she thought a fence would provide better screening than the additional trees the applicant offered during the meeting. The applicant discussed the concern with the speaker and has agreed to do the following, as outlined in the attached letter and exhibits: Page 1 1. Locate the home on Lot 1 15 feet from the west property line consistent with the RSF-1 district setback; 2. Install a six-foot privacy fence along the west property line of Lot 1, starting 25 feet back from the front property line and extending to the rear property line. They would also install a four -foot wrought -iron style fence with decorative brick columns in the front yard. 3. Install 10-12 foot pine trees in the front yards of each of the lots. Staff contacted the resident regarding these additions and she indicated the fence and setback would help protect her privacy, especially in the back yard. The development review committee has found the final plat application to be in conformance with the proposed preliminary plat. No development contract is necessary for this project as no public improvements are required as a condition of approval. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Correspondence Received Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Ordinance Approving the Rezoning Resolution Approving Findings of Fact Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plat Page 2 IANSON1 BuRdERS January 1.1, 2012 Ms. tan Cao 14607 Gleason Lake Dr. Plymouth:, II/N 55447 Re; Gleason.La.ke-Heights Dear. Ms. Cao, The purpose of this letter and -attached exhibit is to'hopefully address your canceri s about the negative impact :of your privacy from .Gleason Lake Heights, aur three tot developments located Immediately west of your property. We understand and can appreciate your concerns and. hope that, in the spirit of being a good neighbor, our plans as described below will help alleviate your concerns, First : we intend to. position our future'home as far distant to.yQur property as possible.. The future home will be placed as close to the easterly lot line a5 allowed by municipal Ordln'ance. This will allow a greater distance between your l roperty and the future borne? This additional distance should.allowfor°some vegetative and physical screening, which will help with the visual impacts. Secondly, We intend to construct a high. quality privacy fence between our properties. This fence will be located on our property so the future maintenance will be the responsibility of the future homeowner, not yours.. This privacy fence will be-6'tall, the highest allowed.for a resides tial fence. The fence is planned to extend the entire length of our mutual property litre, from he front yard to the rear yard. This fence should provided great deal of visual privacy as well as auditory abatement., not only from our property, but perhaps from the parking lot noises from the office building and Carlson PaAwaytraffic noise to the southeast of your property. Thnrdly; we plan to install at least five Targe spruce trees. These spruce trees will be "machine mov6d" 1n order to :get trees as large as possible, at least 1'0' to 12' tall. These trees will be positioned between the future home and the privacy fence, as well as along the street-. These trees should also.provide a great deal of visual and auditory screening, In addition to being very attractive. (See attached photos of trees) In -summary, we hope our described improvements., the -:revised home positioning, the installation of a G' tall high quality privacy fence the length of our m.utuai property line .and the 13432 Hanson -Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304 1 (763) 421-5435 1 www.hansonbulldees.com Page 3 planting of numerous large spruce trees along`the. property line Will help alleviate your privacy concerns; It is -our intentto respect your privacy and With.th'e improvements described above show our desire to be a good neighbor; as we are certain that, is your intention as Well; We Invite your comments' as well as your questions..Nease feel free to call me on my cell phone anytime, My cell number is 763438-2565, Very Truly Yours, la i A' Nathan Fair Cc {Ills. Marle Darling, Senior Planner Cityof Plymouth 13432 Hanson Boulevard NW, Andover, MN 55304 i (76:3) 421-5435 f www.hanson.buildersxom Page 4 PRIVACY SCREENING n EXHIBIT FOR LOT 1 AND 14607 GLEASON LAKE DR. wa s tT iRan arry r " cl, I_', ww I- K I __, R,x>Err l•: vnRL_.:vrr ur I Gf E rn H ter, 8 I I- - - r- r - - - - - - - --------- t 7 7.3 OF- MUM 7 SEVENTH' 19-12'SPADE PNE \ b I-- L -------,J E Y LIr IFI fILr LJIIIVIV REE FOR PRIVACY F \W { tilsL`JGHI ARG 6.0 \ • I FARE HCIiSE sPRnN, r FETodJCE - T-...... r, 00. 8.0 n aAlv"T iS SACK rriO!.IOF- 2, I I / I BFB rRSM '; Ir NFws[r, PN$F-U. rrsTxFs2(aIslsaans) "t 9fi9R2AG5 f) I I u'.• Prwc pHL^USE IS Sc1BA.CK 58'.. Wrldfr!'1 uFr Fk:MENFFR'JR! PROPE R,' ,.PIF. p,Vk759•:•=RCtd flJ. 6. (985.83) §F,Q — I! EIOSTN j9' FlGU, II-- m c TREE TO BE SAVF04T+Pa HANSON BUILDERS, INC. WILL DO THE FOLLOWING PER THE EXHIBIT SHOWN WE WELL PLACE THE HOUSE 15 FEET OFF THE PROPERTY LINE INSTEAD OF 8 FEET. WE WILL INSTALL A 6 FOOT HIGH PRIVACY FENCE, AS SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT, ALONG THE WESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 1. WE WILL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SPADED PINE TREES IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, AS SHOWN ON THE EXHIBIT, 40 20 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 1E0 So— BROADWAY WAYZASA MN. S39, (952)47&6000 Page 5 Marie Darling From: LAN CAO [lan_cao71@msn,com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:06 PM To: Marie Darling Cc: ' Lan Cao Subject: Gleason Lake Heights Marie, It was nice meeting you at the city planning meeting last week. After thinking over, I believe fence would be a better option to keep both sides of the property more private. I understand that we won't have the same privacy that we have been having after three houses being built next to us. I hope to see some cooperation from the builder side. Please feel free to share my contact information with the owner of the builder. Thank you for your time and efforts. Please keep us posted on the progress. Best Regards, Lan Cao 14607 Gleason Lake Dr Plymouth, MN 55447 cell: 612-750-1488 home: 763-47643589 From: MDarlingC@plymouthmn.clov To: Ian cao7l@msn.com Subject: RE: Gleason Lake Heights Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:14:19 +0000 I'm going to ask someone from the forestry division to take a look at the situation and then I'll contact you with their response. Marie Darting, AIGP I Senior Planner From. LAN CAO [mailto:_lan cao71@msn.com] Sent: Friday, October 28, 20116;43 PM To: Marie Darling Subject: Gleason Lake Heights Marie, Thank you for mailing me the information on the plan of the land/house next to me. The plan helps me better understand what is going on. After I spoke with you, I called Nathan and left voice message. However he has not responded back to me. As we know, it is pretty tight to build three houses on that lot. I am concerned about the trees on my lot which are very close to my neighbor. As they develop, they need to dig the foundation for the house that is going to be next to me. Because the trees are pretty old, I am afraid it is going to be a problem. First, the trees are becoming weak and might die or fall, then cause safety issues around the area. I wonder if this is something I should bring up in the meeting to discuss or I should speak with you, or speak with the developer directly. Personally I think the best solution is cut all the weak trees before they start building foundation. Otherwise, the area become dangerous as the roots get hurt and the tree become weaker. What are your thoughts? I would like to show you and explain further if you have some time to stop by. Have a nice weekend! Page 8 Lan Cao 14607 Gleason Lake Dr. Plymouth, MN 55447 home: 763-476-3589 cell: 612-750-1488 Page 9 January 4, 2012 Dear Ms. Barbara G. Thomson/Plymouth Planning Department, Thank you for your letter regarding the development application submitted by Hanson Builders, Inc, under file no. 2011085 for the property located at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive. As the next door neighbor, we are very concerned about two things: 1. The trees between the development property and our property are old and can be easily damaged. Hanson Builders, Inc. should be responsible for their safety and possible damages to the trees if they have people/contractors work closely to the trees. 2. With the plan to build 3 single-family lots, there will be a huge negative impact on the privacy we have had. Hanson Builders, Inc. should find ways to reduce the negative impact by building 2 single-family lots or changing the existing plan to keep same or similar privacy level we have had? We would like to see changes or solutions made by Hanson Builders, Inc. to address our concerns listed above. Thanks to the city planning department for the opportunity to raise our concerns. Regards, Lan Cao 14607 Gleason Lake Dr Plymouth, MN 55447 Home: 763-46-3589 Cell: 612-750-1488 Email: lar—cao7l@msn.com 10 I. 1 m 4 2012 ; Gify 1: PLVRf ' w VliYtl' OPPAE1 it3EiJFi'i tdT Page 10 Draft Planning Commission Minutes January 4, 2012 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING A. HANSON BUILDERS (2011085) Chair Davis introduced the request by Hanson Builders for rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and preliminary plat for "Gleason Lake Heights Addition" located at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive. Senior Planner Darling gave an overview of the staff report. Senior Planner Darling said a letter was received from Lan Cao, 14607 Gleason Lake Drive, whose primary concerns were about protection for the trees during construction and that rezoning for three single family lots would impact, the privacy of their property more than two single family homes under current zoning. Senior Planner Darling said staff will be inspecting tree preservation fencing during development so the preserved trees continue to meet the definition of "undisturbed" in the subdivision regulations. Fines would be levied for any damage to trees on the subject property proposed to be saved. She said damage to trees on adjacent property is a civil matter. Senior Planner Darling said homes would be closer whether RSF-1 or RSF-2 zoning is used. She explained that in the RSF-1 zoning district the setback is fifteen feet, and ten feet for living/six feet for garage in the RSF-2 zoning district. Commissioner Nelson asked if any residential homes surrounding this proposal are zoned RSF-2. Senior Planner Darling said the properties to the northeast across Harbor Lane and Gleason Lake Drive are RSF-2. The other properties in the area are RSF-1. Chair Davis introduced Nathan Fair, representing Hanson Builders, 13432 Hanson Boulevard. Mr. Fair said this is a small project for Hanson Builders and said staff did a good job describing their proposal. He pointed out the home style they plan to build would be similar to their project on Harbor Lane and 10th Avenue. Mr. Fair said that was a foreclosed property and they built five homes.' He said that was very successful and feels this proposal will be a good fit also. Commissioner Kobussen asked what setback would be used for these houses. Mr. Fair said this plan is similar to the Larkin Pond development and most of the lots would use the ten and six-foot setback. Mr. Fair added that Hanson Builders is working to preserve as many trees as possible. He noted the setback for the house on Lot 1 would be approximately eight feet off the property line. Commissioner Anderson asked if the houses will be built as "spec" homes or waiting for the customer to pick from your portfolio. Mr. Fair said they build "spec" homes which market to relocation buyers who don't have the time to do a custom designed home. He said the houses could be a combination of one or more of the plans. Commissioner Anderson asked if the house could be bigger than the plans indicate. Page 11 Draft PIanning Commission Minutes January 4, 2012 Page 3 Mr. Fair said they do not anticipate building any bigger than what is presented in the packet. Mr. Fair added that they propose to bring in 12-14 large, spaded pine trees to the front yards, similar to their Wood Crest development, to create more privacy between Gleason Lake Drive and the new homes. Chair Davis opened the public hearing. Chair Davis introduced Lan Cao, 14607 Gleason Lake Dr., who said she lives next door to the proposal. Ms. Cao expressed concern about possible damage to the old trees from the building and digging. Ms. Cao said they now have a lot of privacy and they would be looking at houses very close by. She said she is wondering if something could give more privacy and said she does not feel the privacy issue is being addressed. Chair Davis closed the public hearing. I Chair Davis asked if Hanson Builders has plans to add trees on the west side of the property. He asked if anything would be done in this area to supplement the trees that are being removed. Mr. Fair stated they want to be a good neighbor and if there is an area to add additional pine trees, they will. Mr. Fair said they met with Ms. Cao, after plans had been submitted, and discussed removing at their expense any additional trees that are dying. He said they considered a hedge of arborvitae. He noted this area is thick with buckthorn and said he thinks pine trees would do a better job of screening. Commissioner Kobussen asked if they are taking out the buckthorn as that is an undesirable species. Mr. Fair said they are leaving that up to resident to the west, as there would be no privacy at all if the buckthorn is removed. Commissioner Nelson discussed the privacy issue and said the RSF-1 setback would be 15 feet on the west side which is what it looks like on the plan as presented. He asked if that is correct. Mr. Fair said it is very close. Commissioner Nelson said the change in zoning would maximize the return on the property. He asked if the commission can recommend that the setback on the west side be 15 feet with RSF-2 zoning. Planning Manager Thomson clarified that RSF-2 zoning allows a ten-foot/six-foot setback and the city cannot require a greater setback. Page 12 Draft Planning Commission Minutes January 4, 2012 Page 4: Commissioner Nelson reviewed that everything else in the area is RSF-1 and we are accommodating the builder to maximize their return while sacrificing privacy to the neighbor. He said he is looking for compromise and said there would be a 15 -foot setback with no zoning change. Commissioner Oakley discussed condition 5 regarding the driveway on Lot 3 being located at the minimum setback from the west property line. He said he has a hard time understanding why we can regulate the driveway location but not a minimum setback of 15 feet on the west lot line. Planning Manager Thomson explained the driveway is a different situation because the subdivision code has requirements for driveway location as it is a safety issue to keep it as far from the intersection as possible. Commissioner Anderson asked if the city considers the driveway location at Lot 3, which is close to the corner, safe in regard to the type of curve. City Engineer Moberg said the driveway location on Lot 3 is close to a corner. He said the city considers it safe in terms of site distances and curve. City Engineer Moberg said the proposed driveway would be located further west than the existing drive and from his perspective, not making it any worse than what is already there. Commissioner Anderson asked if there is history of usage for the two existing driveways for this property. City Engineer Moberg responded negatively. Planning Manager Thomson added there is a requirement for a turnaround for each driveway so people would not be backing on to Gleason Lake Drive. She said this would improve the safety situation. Commissioner Anderson said a 15 -foot setback cannot be required under RSF-2 zoning, and asked the applicant if Hanson Builders would be willing to do a self-imposed restriction. Mr. Fair said Dean Hanson would have to answer that. He reiterated they are working with the neighbor, bringing in pine trees, cleaning up some dead trees, and said he thinks it will be a nice project. Commissioner Anderson asked if Hanson Builders ever uses fencing. Mr. Fair said Dean Hanson is "green" and prefers a "green fence" using pine trees. MOTION by Commissioner Petrash, seconded by Commissioner Kobussen, to approve the request by Hanson Builders for rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and preliminary plat for "Gleason Lake Heights Addition" located at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive. Page 13 Draft PIanning Commission Minutes January 4, 2012 Page 5 Motion to add a friendly amendment, by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Oakley, to ask Hanson Builders to consider a 15 -foot setback for the property on Lot 1. Commissioner Petrash accepted the amendment. Chair Davis said he would rather have screening than the additional five feet. He said he thought the neighbor would rather have trees screening than a big hole there. Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION approved. Commissioner Nelson and Anderson voting nay. Page 14 Agenda Number6File2011085 • PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth Planning Commission } FROM: Marie Darling, Sr. Planner (509-5457) through Barbara Thomson , Planning Manager MEETING DATE: January 4, 2011 APPLICANT: Hanson Builders PROPOSAL: Rezoning and preliminary plat for the "Gleason Lake Heights Addition" LOCATION: 14509 Gleason Lake Drive GUIDING: LA -1 (living area 1) ZONING: RSF-1 (single family detached 1) REVIEW DEADLINE: February 19, 2012 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and a preliminary plat for "Gleason Lake Heights" to subdivide this roughly 1.5 -acre parcel into three single-family lots. The applicant removed the existing home and garage. The applicant has also requested a final plat, which is reviewed by the City Council. Notice of this public hearing was published in the city's official newspaper. Two mailed notices were sent out to all property owners within 750 feet of the site. One notice was sent upon city receipt of the application, and the other notice was sent 12 days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the notification area map is attached. Development signage has been installed on the property Page 15 File 2011085 Page 2 CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Use Natural Characteristics of Site The site is located within the Minnehaha Creek watershed district. The site does not contain any land within the floodplain or a shoreland management overlay nor does it contain any wetlands. The site contains mature trees and is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. Previous Actions Affecting Site The property has never been platted. The properties containing the office buildings to the south and east and the single-family homes to the west were subdivided around the subject property as part of the Carlson Center subdivision. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the comprehensive plan, the city must deny the rezoning application. The zoning ordinance and map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set by the comprehensive plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The subject site contains 64,223 square feet (1.5 acres). The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and a preliminary plat to subdivide the site into three single- family lots. Under the plan, the applicant would construct two-story homes similar to those they recently constructed in the Larkin Pond subdivision at the intersection of Harbor Lane and 10th Avenue. Each home would contain approximately 3,000 — 4,000 square feet. Page 16 Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning Northwest Single-family homes LA -1 RSF-1 Northeast RSF -2 West Single-family homes LA -1 RSF-1 South Carlson Office Center CO BC Hotel/Restaurant East Carlson Office Center CO BC Natural Characteristics of Site The site is located within the Minnehaha Creek watershed district. The site does not contain any land within the floodplain or a shoreland management overlay nor does it contain any wetlands. The site contains mature trees and is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. Previous Actions Affecting Site The property has never been platted. The properties containing the office buildings to the south and east and the single-family homes to the west were subdivided around the subject property as part of the Carlson Center subdivision. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the comprehensive plan, the city must deny the rezoning application. The zoning ordinance and map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set by the comprehensive plan. The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: The subject site contains 64,223 square feet (1.5 acres). The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and a preliminary plat to subdivide the site into three single- family lots. Under the plan, the applicant would construct two-story homes similar to those they recently constructed in the Larkin Pond subdivision at the intersection of Harbor Lane and 10th Avenue. Each home would contain approximately 3,000 — 4,000 square feet. Page 16 File 2011085 Page 3 Policy Issue: Rezoning The applicant is proposing a rezoning of property that abuts existing residential uses and non- residential uses. Staff considered: 1) how the request fits with the existing area and 2) how it implements the comprehensive plan. Consistency with the existing area The proposed development includes three lots at the periphery of a single-family neighborhood. The proposed RSF-2 zoning district would abut an RSF-1 district along the west lot line and would be adjacent to RSF-1 across the 66 -foot right-of-way of Gleason Lake Drive. The proposed lots would be similar in size to the existing lots in the area, but narrower, as shown below. w. Approx. Lot Area in acres) Approx. Lot Width Lot 1(Proposed) 43 82 Lot 2(Proposed) 50 82 Lot 3 (Proposed) 54 83 14504 Gleason Lake Dr 55 135 14510 Gleason Lake Dr 76 112 14530 Gleason Lake Dr 1.12 111 14607 Gleason Lake Dr 52 150 14611 Gleason Lake Dr 39 93 14615 Gleason Lake Dr 42 119 14619 Gleason Lake Dr 42 110 14709 Gleason Lake Dr 56 90 14715 Gleason Lake Dr 49 95 14717 Gleason Lake Dr 42 95 The proposed homes would all be two-story. The existing homes in the area include a mix of rambler, split entry, story and a half, and two-story homes (see the attached photos). The previous home on the subject property had two stories. To the south and east, the site abuts property developed with multistory office buildings. The adjacent commercial parcel includes a narrow strip of landscaped property with mature spruce trees that buffers the subject property from the traffic on Carlson Parkway and the office buildings. The rear of the subject property also contains many mature spruce trees to buffer the proposed homes from the office building to the south. The comprehensive plan indicates that such screening and extra distance are appropriate transitions between the two different land uses. Page 17 File 2011085 Page 4 Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Chapter 462.357, subd. 2 of state statutes requires that the zoning map for each city be consistent with its adopted land use guide plan, The subject site is guided "living area 1" (LA -1) on the city's land use guide pian. The land use plan chapter of the comprehensive plan identifies RSF-1 single-family detached 1), RSF-2 (single-family detached 2), RSF-3 (single-family detached 3), and RSF-4 (single-family detached 4) as the corresponding zoning districts for properties that are guided LA -1. Density: The LA -1 guiding designation specifies a minimum density goal of two dwelling units per acre and a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. The density of the development is based on the net acreage of the site, which was calculated using the gross acreage less existing roadway easements for a net of 1.5 acres. This method of calculating density is consistent with the procedures established by the Metropolitan Council. Based on this acreage, the site should accommodate three or four dwellings —in accordance with the density guidelines identified in the comprehensive plan. Consequently, the applicant's proposal for three lots is consistent with the density goals identified in the comprehensive plan. Affordable Housing: The applicant has determined that they could not meet the city's affordable housing goals due to land and development costs associated with single-family development. The applicant has estimated that the finished homes would sell for $500,000 to $650,000 each. This site would not present a good option for the city to leverage affordable housing units because the city could better use its resources to assist in the development of affordable housing units in higher density areas with multiple -family dwellings. Preliminary Plat Lot Arrangement Under the proposed plat, the smallest lot would be 18,759 square feet, and the narrowest lot width would be 82 feet, which would conform to the requirements of the RSF-2 district. Utilities Sewer and water services are provided by existing mains in Gleason Lake Drive for all three lots. These mains have adequate capacity to serve the new homes. The individual services will be directionally bored under the street, which is consistent with the city's regulations. Access All three new lots would have driveway access to Gleason Lake Drive, a major collector roadway. Because traffic volumes are higher on major collector streets than on local or minor collector streets, all three driveways should have turnarounds (as shown on the plans) to reduce the potential for vehicles backing out onto Gleason Lake Drive and staff included a condition to this effect in the attached resolution. Lot 3 is located closest to the intersection of Gleason Lake Road and Harbor Lane. Staff included a condition in the attached resolution that the driveway must be located on the west side of the lot so it would be no closer to the intersection than the existing driveway. With these conditions, the proposal is consistent with the subdivision regulations. Page 18 File 2011085 Page 5 Setbacks The RSF-2 zoning district requires a minimum front and rear yard setback of 25 feet, and a minimum side yard setback of ten feet for living area and six feet for garage. The lots have adequate area to allow construction of a home in compliance with setback regulations. Right-of-way The applicant's proposal for Gleason Lake Drive right-of-way dedication mirrors the existing roadway easements. No additional right-of-way is required. Tree Preservation This application is subject to the city's tree preservation regulations. Section 530 of the city code requires preservation of at least 50 percent of the caliper inches of the significant trees for residential development sites, or reforestation and/or monetary restitution for any removal in excess of this threshold. A significant tree is defined as one being eight inches or larger in diameter for deciduous trees, and four inches or larger in diameter for coniferous trees. The tree survey indicates 1218 caliper inches of significant trees on the site. Based on the improvements proposed, the applicant has identified 197 inches of significant trees (16.2 percent) that would likely be disturbed to allow the construction of the homes. Staff has identified an additional nine trees (186 tree inches) that are too close to the proposed grading limits to meet the definition of undisturbed. To avoid fines during construction, staff included a condition in the attached resolution to include these trees as disturbed, although some may be able to survive the disturbance. With this condition, the total percentage of disturbed inches would be 31.4 percent, which would comply with the city's tree preservation requirements. Trail/Sidewalk Section 524.07 of the subdivision regulations require a sidewalk or trail installed on one side of collector and arterial roadways as indicated in the comprehensive plan. The trail on -the north side of Gleason Lake Road satisfies the requirement. Park Dedication The comprehensive plan does not identify the need for park land at the subject site. In lieu of land dedication, the applicant would be required to pay a cash fee for three new lots, pursuant to section 528 of the city code. This matter is addressed in the attached resolution. FINDINGS Community development department staff concludes that the applicant's request is consistent with the existing neighborhood and comprehensive plan based on the following findings: 1) the proposed lots would be similar in size to existing lots in the area; 2) the proposal includes appropriate transitions between the proposed homes and the potentially incompatible office uses to the south and east; and 3) the RSF-2 zoning and the proposed density would be consistent with the LA -1 guiding. Page 19 File 2011085 Page 6 However, given the high level of discretion in a rezoning, the Planning Commission could reasonably reach another conclusion on this application. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request for 1) rezoning the subject property from RSF-1 to RSF-2 and 2) preliminary plat to subdivide 14509 Gleason Lake Drive into three lots, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft ordinance approving the rezoning 2. Draft resolution approving findings of fact 3. Draft resolution approving the preliminary plat 4. Applicant's narrative 5. Photos of homes in the area 6. LA -1 land use classification 7. Location map 8. Aerial photo 9. Notification area map 10. Site graphics P:%CommbevlSTAPPRLPWM261112011085 pc gleoson Ik hgts rea ppAux Page 20 GLEASON LAKE HEIGHTS" Development Narrative Developer Introduction: Hanson Builders, Inc. — Dean Hanson Nathan Fair 13432 Hanson Blvd. Andover, MN 55304 Contact: Nathan Fair Cell: 763-438-2561 Email: NathanFair@edinareatty.com OCT 2 0 2011 The developer is proposing to develop 1.71 acres into three detached single family homes. The density would be = 311.71 = 1.75 units per acre. The developer will be the home builder, Hanson Builders has been building homes in several communities in the City of Plymouth. The site is located south of Gleason Lake Drive, just west of Carlson Parkway. The development will be named "Gleason Lake Heights". Gleason Lake Heights" W:1Projects13279-122 CS -LANDMARK OF MN- 14509 GLEASON LAKE DR- PLYMOUTH1Info - 20091CorrespondencelLetterlGLH-NARRATIVE- 101711.doc.docx Page 21 The proposed development will create three new single family lots. The anticipated home price range would be $500,000 to $650,000. The developer is requesting that the site be re -zoned from RSF-1 to RSF-2. The property to the east and south is zoned B -C Business Campus). The property to the west is RSF-1 and to the north is RSF-1 and a few lots to the north east are RSF-2. The proposed lot areas will exceed both the RSF-2 and RSF-1 minimum requirements. (Please see the lot tabulation at the end of this narrative.) The re -zoning request is reasonable, because it will provide transitional zoning from the existing Business Campus to the existing RSF-1. Property Data PID No. 33-118-22-24-0006 Owner: Virgene J. Weidenfeller Address: 14509 Gleason Lake Road Area: +l- 1.48 acres (+l- 1.71 acres to cl of Gleason Lake Road) The developer has a purchased the property. Proposed Zoning — RSF - 2 Minimum Lot Area — 12,500 square feet Minimum Width- 80 feet Front Yard Setback — 25 feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet to garage and 10 feet to living space Rear Yard Setback -- 25 feet We are not requesting any variances. A preliminary plat lot area tabulation sheet is in Appendix A of this narrative. Site Analysis The site has one existing home that has already been demolished. The proposed plan would create three single family walkout style homes. The proposed homes would fit well into the existing site. There are 14 existing trees that would be removed as part of the development. The removal percentage is 197/1287 = 15.3% The developer will install the required two front yard trees. The existing sewer and water service would be utilized for one of the proposed lots and two new services would be installed for the other two lots. Minor utilities are available to service the site. W:1Projects13279-122 CS -LANDMARK OF MN- 14509 GLEASON LAKE DR- PLYMOUTH1Info - 20091CorrespondencelLetterlGLH-NARRATIVE- 101711.doc.docx Page 22 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARYPLATLOTAREA TABULATION Gleason Lake Heights CITY OF PLYMOUTH Preliminary Plat Lot Area Tabulation Original Tabulation: 10/13/2011 BLOCK 1 Sq. Ft. Acres Lot 1 18,759 0.43 Lot 2 21,705 0.49 Lot 3 23,859 0.55 W:1Projects13279-122 CS -LANDMARK OF MN- 14509 GLEASON LAKE DR- PLYMOUTH1Info - 20091Correspondence\Letter\GLH-NARRATIVE- 10171 Ldoc.docx Page 23- Plymouth, Minnesota Gleason Lake Heights A residential development project by: EEF E EE1 Page 24 Project Summary Hanson Builders purchased the property at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive on 10115. Home construction will start as soon as permits are ready. The intent is to subdivide the property into 3 large lots As many trees as possible will be saved There will be substantial tree plantings Price range will be $450,000 - $6505000 WANSON 2 BuAdERSDEVE LOPIM ENT OF MN z",&94 Page 25 2 14509 Gleason Lake Drive WANSON BuRdERS DEVILOPMINT Of: NNIIff Page 26 14 WANSON II B iLdEr s Z"&"h DEVELOPMEN! OF M Page 28 Builder Profile Builder Hanson Builders Inc. — Dean Hanson, President The most awarded builder in the Twin Cities. Recipient of 77 Architectural Awards (Reggie's) from The Builders Association of the Twin Cities. Currently selling 45 homes per year in 6 communities Complete in-house Design Team Seasoned and skilled staff 31 years building experience, going strong since1979 Sustained profitability, strong balance sheet Refined processes and proven designs WANSON BL ild r 5 f.)F.YH.ORIENT OF M'\ Page 29 0 Contact Information Nathan Fair Phone: 763.438.2561 Email: nathanfair@edinarealty.com Dean Hanson Phone: 763.421.5435 x110 Email: dhanson@hansonbuilders.com WANSON EI 5 Z"e&"le DFV'E1..0PINIE N 10 F M'\' Page 30 7 Homes in the Area Story -and -a -half at 14504 Gleason take Drive Split entry at 14619 Gleason Lake Drive Ramblers at 14709-14717 Gleason Lake Drive Two-story at 14530 Gleason Lake Drive Page 31 Location Map - 2011085 Hanson Builders, Inc. Gleason Lake Heights Rezoning and Preliminary and Final Plat City of Ptyrnouth, Minnesota 100 50 0 100 200 300 y .% Legend C, Comercial CC, City Center CO, Commercial Office IP, Planned Industrial 0 LA -1, Living Area 1 LA -2, Living Area 2 D LA -3, Living Area 3 LA -4, Living Area 4 LA -R1 F7, LA -R2 V -/J LA -R3 F-- LA -RT F7Z P-1, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional Page 32 m u~~ °° of ~~ HHennepin County Mailing Label Map Provided By: Taxpayer Services Department kl 141 l6s) (ell 57 (S's '(35) 51 W f ~""~' °"=' '^"'==` Water ~~~~~~ Major Roads Ip ----' Minor Roads Map Comments: Pm, ei Ij 1331 p^ Ws 11 431 1121 141 061 mnn-au'v--'^~"~^ -- - - For moreinformation Hennepin County GIS Division P-d-n-t-Date: -1-O/--7-/2-O-1-1 Map Legend: iomSouth 6th Street Map Scale: 1^=364' Minneapolis, mw»54v u.FF- .m-..rpnF..~ W f ~""~' °"=' '^"'==` Water ~~~~~~ Major Roads Ip ----' Minor Roads Map Comments: Pm, ei Ij NO,LTii 87 t5 emLE [N PneT LEGEND Ac0.0 Ln.bvrrdep.kp:mykml5lmi wrn Coos m va Vim: am eM14 prmrn m.rxn m .mn caCBCBOT Demon Lu ade nY CGI nemro p.iwMy Nlmm SEE Drvun OuidYP Cnuan[c 3lvain¢ TB pemrn TeWCepPn Ep4Ad CHH Paarn[PmmrivmrbnHm9uk CMN C¢mmuduui¢n Meunle C -C OcumS—. [eef+.x spiv PpP 0¢mrn C¢mWmabmmLpydLrepemmpmllNlrPnPgfSe EB prnurn Lbnrk B¢¢ Ern bre¢mtlmmr Ll+mLaN Taus pp mxA.+ne HxEne LIIm pmem'moe""a>wxW NAup'"' w ITLEcG pewr Pl,r.kOem:n Fl+rM LW Lw+buuv GSY pnmm OorVuw Cf[ p¢npoe HrryrPewrtlnum PI P lon Gw rl GP m GP i 1 -- cm.. o¢,amcdw4¢ rrfC$ Onom 10H rb,lD- LL[IHHm1 IP wn IW vet NOPwo'POvumwNmp. I.M.Elpn GNV n V:IIur Lhv FIVG pnn%v Pon lrar.brvalue RfP gamin 0.n4r0rtM Cemrm PlpaSYe 0 Insmr9xln rrcSNH m:e.,, cAmwW penin Gon4¢ry AfenMb 5Y5TP prem swps„m:1 SlW, Oemm Tmr Au vl TL ppgln Tmrt"uxe UCCB pawl, um¢trmam Cemmrdmem Lbr pcnn umtl um cYnrY PrmUGHwO=-. u m im sox pamHumnoapb sWmys[.m 5T Pmuln mrAnn[uM ENmr Sxwn pLP puam+Vlilp PPlcprnamVlilrgrLl4luvak mH TepNmof NParvu wMn pnan Wmnilmink YNMET !,-1 o nRbnIn "M—l— pemnFPUM MPmIaanL-,u perud Omm T¢aM Ga-Inn-MenuremL 0 p¢win VPLrl.l'nPnl*¢SnamAYh.tl hr uamuNa, 4a1M J i fuxaawx[_ I 1lt ij A`a•, j f i ^+n EI L7 I Win«" n :nrL l y-6IXPNGn 9+a4tEn V RCM0Lu ,R rl/ M SeNt fLr, 1y. 51TE AIN _ I„m Gleme upe„r n.rYrm eRAlm:mm tAN, oRccalmoN or nla,EC, paonnR,v All fm Latae <.m"mwlrea"mauear ral"nPrPrEesownarmmwpra[ePprar wart% 6wWvuIx PfSmicaEl. Tawr+Tip H1 N¢:0. R2Ewaw Wapx llotA cMl wiar Wn[4ee NfeWNmtl 5¢ mutllfim+YL nIpM n¢e[emernmtixMpfwMW CmYa, Pu.a11al Se,w0 na u:eem5a:rCalyao1 euWwnw a Pfw1a 3eumwa IM erbeswuw.a Ix, saimeae<lpTxn, Pabgn+eeueLy; e:mrnw[a P,a1n fn1 YIA[wYuureLweM num Tiurwrvd tloa nn W:ivliP rhea all mtlarymuW uJIWn TM+puasofhbwnbn hampbeawne.ihm rWmxna4: me wmPYuxm numP¢PramhkPn a mra,,:..er%oa,..Ymm.Mer;a, xewmrt cpatlti+rm.,mu,[+m Jeewum..prw:euo-.d a,,a.«+..mr. m,rpk lr.ra raaeTa[r,a, e.e.wrlonelee m.rerYvikH M mxkn M:wulrm Fe:airn YJri+m tlu amrnionmgb¢ru+mary. T>bmmn¢rerm¢ne«tP:. d buJaLormaoWwubleywJ m - .wnm w rtlwlbflly raem aq.:a.nd,m..rm:pwnr- e.nh bmQm:dlmmN aYJep uo4y0NiJs C—C—CRZATMECALL 04114HJrY11 Yrp:etle wuelmuP.efMdli:up N. uJeae lun[nrwrlLkfgi¢bnvrnpm.kd¢rwurslfef rparne¢nm¢frtmid MrelrmrmmYe: Ne Mn; W.131 m, R-I.51Ruw Tm:e wad [w.eYn¢ am nmNnarY:xm.aar, xn e:etliGavrwu mu uAe:4,mvv br PLa'LmefMNap otla4untlnwrgwapiFntlb wavNrdaa xgvrbba Th'u dra4¢antltlnuhPmxaWbfm+m mPAYln Yw% nwpnbuabnma mtliraiburYa wMLw[pnpf[vueaYpmHhWl llenalrn.um,npen¢p mu er9re Apdrru arwwmmmrefwhjraproRrq. ek..em en.x, nrt DEVELOPER For: H...(kjk-.Arc. 13432 Henepn 90. NW An , MN 55304 Canlnp: Nil . Fele Y3433, ” CIVIL ENGINEERRAND SURVEYOR 50 S, ® PBaypulel 150 5, aaney Am. up WerRtq MN 5539, Cenlad: Heb Melulud -P.H. OGWS P-bdan-P.L.S. 952dMGOOe Proposed ZonErg: RSF-2 AM LCL Wldh =B9 t MW Areo =12.599 of Fypb -25 R Hrb=6fi9C RM-25fi I Leer ¢mRJJa YMrwrvH.Mxntgxnwnye,NrN bf m[w uatlarr:g6lmxLwixrrYienutl LM[l+m ¢ W{r Li¢mNLmk5urvelq uaRrtlsf¢wrof rl:eSmePlAllmmu __. ., p.a dM. L,ree.,e<pmr,m.e1L1, SATHRE-BERG911LST. Mc DEC — 8 201! r*fMUM7'i" U1 L 0: q c LL! IM a Lu 0O U ao"s syr K. E5 Page 3 5 WITH 10—IN FEET LEGEND Sltb u,n mJObHonrvry Dwxcrv,Src rvrpry HexciNiltlrn Tpc LLCrd OMrtrvrvpy[Nuonol TLle TlNrdude_arµrq e,w v,erm a<Pld ore JmexveYRn+IWtlt mmrmwa[ mPRmmmMeuee vlq Jm Tutt inm mr sunmra ett dmnnmltrALTunLSM L.MhrswgSpinJy nuelnttN antl ¢tlpNN by ALTA W N9PA u. mmfArk eaa tra•ra.lWd sirvr AG ovum. Alrcndaluvrd Lnh r coDBortmcx Fmm LLWIJOM1 co Nnur CucbLmW D—, CBOK COLgents Cue Pa DramrDnuaPcamn 6EE nrarn Buevluy 6nrmo Glr.omn Td Pumm,hhCwnm MVMI E. CIA. 0.rcnCpman,waponlluxmoR ouc m mnwwal.WJnrc n[ wrrylm Merl N,eGla DIP p4r EDeLrd[ Ge. FNH Z—. E21, ftdwF MAN emm eLwlc Traemrnv E Drmrw CkPVIc WWdk EMM Peau. Mn[r IN FPFOe u,ww Z_. ph DemvvrwNk FU Pcmkr FlNp Gp snbd5 E CF7EPnun env.be PrmlmQunyeFloorEOretlen CN Drwur GUMae eoL nen,nce muyp cP CYWcmm Pea o Ery wLu H6 D ap•pbpi'•hLdslUr H19nkxYm.d me pram, uyK:l oW MMlmaxmwo, GHIIN. rar<mgr POvm LIrN KS Pz,mPYWe G1t dmPN n n IdOawvWue RLP Drnalu RnWbud Cpurem PgNGuc AD E_ mo ms.e l.icnrnd D nSWa,M•d,.1r v 0mvin TgrlkVW rno as oPskA B- H 1REMmmw Tm cnAr,l` nonr• A. ere Prur n LWamm i n com•.rrvmtd-me VfE Pepars llydaaomd Clemnr L'u. um n[atn udaapaacer u,d uN 5TnrrnmurvkapPeasepbmr sasr nrnxuvMmaplMaEmrmhoerVP e.nln Vtiligrote VLP amvlw ValkrvL pf tlmk YYN Ormre Wcmm Mou6,IIIm0aN11LT NWee mmdoAn A0 FWo.mAv" Q. Oeumn Fumd Cat. eon.Amnunm: 0 by lA"rrm Ploe B[tud Muw eY .11" No, algN G r f4wo la I I 41 / fr i'. r ;Si ; ilJal.. n or I I vSrvUaYv J SY u4 taix[ I"rte .• n' 1i1- r, ,. u.t,t ii '6 I I ---I cu1Y L,4 A a K, KmnwDS -eaH ia"z p vNry c, W m. .Th- i v[r nr. Fcumaa DFSHRip A11 Ka pro pftlrr Wrn21} &a plRs mhwLiPeovimpgmy IYrvPNwWmfCeswlr R,lfm meaer, Cpmmmnp as pix aanW fm eamvfJdSaKrsmtpdpfJdfaalaNlNmfJd s wufOrvrdri?,Tv.,lrhlp 1111 NrvvN vaysii waSumvlmru pvmvN wimme wet Jie ula SPmbevu If4afmriwAdur IW vaurdmepf lOrd.W rat elmmveflbm4 vma;.,r NoNumaly dpr¢mean:rvfipcplai6Camry RpeE 115.9911R'Uidla SouHprvKdwim Jrc Wd be vfaSiK Se,.rkast If1 pfrhe SaeueoN HM s E Nvnu pf t15R4} OndKnrmbn IOa, YMtu Wm1'lY.IA ka m Yrp,murt niuy NOTES TNf x Parpun bud. dtumnUervw mnvfKAmulal0amlJmaatlmN4orp rduy. dp ke<epiwtil 54 ievmrnmuummgwp mieom,xwnn, vtlW uervmka dsumbmtWno/urvlevouW fowv bercanvh,arytnQ snErdloblY aN, Kl me tlurlemlveun armed bform.Jp m Ld me Ittl.'d3vurp5sveera,aYeepmmtrr. nmmu, mrwua[w,min<m[firnbrrw,pcanrw.u[.ealmbrer mrv.m cw a. cxlwGeO be yYly ma[ramk Ort or! UW vll tNm:w Nrurswrefhb O'+uem Pok Im1caM Puma RE xutut ILY M1 W¢ CUK. n GOrNens'fATRaNe caLtd 551.aiv.num mrprelzaMm6 uufdeGayMn orry NPVJcmrvnOraum W cvPlMevwn Prvvdd vrrurtlldydoav mrnmdreme, Amelpmrturhn: rva ores alA9u}p 1-ttlaJ. rru md: I.rIY'I–i pir.-I,TN Cun rnr imu ei a of vrArY etmnvuJo•t F1151uek F•u: YOa•rmtl} l. o li Sglq.R (ouoi,vvvl L r.lauc Nu fva y.lrman) Dwvlvyseb• dc FmmvNa•mUa(m imi,nawlfpw Rmr Yua•Es feet SJb Y.q.li fca TnNnv ud Sehemiufuruuuenpuvxee 4 rl F vuLmm rnudu[the[irorRYnurh Ourve} mpa'xrremm horhghvL:Hmxpm Cavq N., ewarGmtWnbev. r,erar h.rvylnPnr•„.d h,. d,weGNm uleaa Wcn nlort rxA,xMnwxra.«prr•Hrem nMa dewa.n:pememe Lf mwr;ra e.r. t pdu<epp<m aemnrtlpp wllbdPwnmdmraP[nam oa• ummL n p t.raahp,..tm ®uuuam,.,rda,blmPqu0. elndmn-m.n tm r Sltb u,n mJObHonrvry Dwxcrv,Src rvrpry HexciNiltlrn Tpc LLCrd OMrtrvrvpy[Nuonol TLle TlNrdude_arµrq e,w v,erm a<Pld ore JmexveYRn+IWtlt mmrmwa[ mPRmmmMeuee vlq Jm Tutt inm mr sunmra ett dmnnmltrALTunLSM L.MhrswgSpinJy nuelnttN antl ¢ tlpNN by ALTA W N9PA I_ SEC.,', - Ll r ID• reaLm y.fi•,KmdeHttl_ r Rtizmromm, R P><inxl ddK.•y=e 0.eva p4r fr i'. r ; Si ; ilJal.. n or I I vSrvUaYv J SY u4 taix[ I"rte .•n' 1i1- r, ,. u.t,t ii '6 I I --- I cu1Y L,4 A a K, KmnwDS -eaH ia"z p vNry c, W m. . Th- i v[ r nr.Fcumaa DFSHRip A11 Ka pro pftlrr Wrn21} &a plRs mhwLiPeovimpgmy IYrvPNwWmfCeswlr R,lfm meaer, Cpmmmnp as pix aanW fm eamvfJdSaKrsmtpdpfJdfaalaNlNmfJd s wufOrvrdri?, Tv.,lrhlp 1111 NrvvN vaysii waSumvlmru pvmvN wimme wet Jie ula SPmbevu If4afmriwAdur IW vaurdmepf lOrd.W rat elmmveflbm4 vma;.,r NoNumaly dpr¢ mean:rvfipcplai6Camry RpeE 115.9911R'Uidla SouHprvKdwim Jrc Wd be vfaSiK Se,. rkast If1 pfrhe SaeueoN HM s E Nvnu pf t15R4} OndKnrmbn IOa, YMtu Wm1'lY.IA ka m Yrp,murt niuy NOTES TNf x Parpun bud. dtumnUervw mnvfKAmulal0amlJmaatlmN4orp rduy.dp ke<epiwtil 54 ievmrnmuummgwp mieom,xwnn, vtlW uervmka dsumbmtWno/urvlevouW fowv bercanvh,arytnQ snErdloblY aN, Kl me tlurlemlveun armed bform.Jp m Ld me Ittl.'d3vurp5sveera,aYeepmmtrr. nmmu,mrwua[ w,min<m[firnbrrw,pcanrw.u[.ealmbrer mrv.m cw a. cxlwGeO be yYly ma[ramk Ort or! UW vll tNm:w Nrurswrefhb O'+uem Pok Im1caM Puma RE xutut ILY M1 W¢ CUK.n GOrNens'fATRaNe caLtd 551.aiv.num mrprelzaMm6 uufdeGayMn orry NPVJcmrvnOraum W cvPlMevwn Prvvdd vrrurtlldydoav mrnmdreme, Amelpmrturhn: rva ores alA9u}p 1-ttlaJ.rru md: I. rI Y'I–ipir.-I,TN Cun rnr imu ei a of vrArY etmnvuJo•t F1151uek F• u: YOa•rmtl} l.o li Sglq.R (ouoi,vvvl L r. lauc Nu fva y.lrman) Dwvlvyseb•dc FmmvNa•mUa(m imi,nawlfpw Rmr Yua• Es feet SJb Y. q.li fca TnNnv ud Sehemiufuruuuenpuvxee 4 rl F vuLmm rnudu[the[irorRYnurh Ourve} mpa' xrremm horhghvL:Hmxpm Cavq N.,ewarGmtWnbev. r,erar h.rvylnPnr•„.d h,. d,weGNm uleaa Wcn nlort rxA,xMnwxra.«prr•Hrem nMa dewa.n:pememe Lf mwr;ra e.r. t pdu< epp<m aemnrtlpp wllbdPwnmdmraP[nam oa•ummL n p t.raahp,..tm ®uuuam,.,rda,blmPqu0. elndmn-m.n tm r Sltb u, n mJObHonrvry Dwxcrv,Src rvrpry HexciNiltlrn Tpc LLCrd OMrtrvrvpy[Nuonol TLle TlNrdude_ arµrq e,w v,erm a<Pld ore JmexveYRn+IWtlt mmrmwa[ mPRmmmMeuee vlq Jm Tutt inm mr sunmra ett dmnnmltrALTunLSM L.MhrswgSpinJy nuelnttN antl ¢tlpNN by ALTA W N9PA hu,.nt,v. rawpmwe.sepeZ%i t. r ID•reaLm y. fi•,KmdeHttl_ r Rtizmromm,R P>< inxl ddK.•y=e 0.eva HENKP1N CDw Y B0 xxx PAGE: YK Page 36 U Cf z Zr D 5ty- m 3 LLL r VJ myOP' Sbd UP 40. WapD ` Orm a O u la z zl Li x z_ t 9m J a L O i X G Z U ¢ z U6 a r C giECNEqDn 6 m H KGNDm a NO. mFILE: TNNA4FN- Y%E-"=ON M-iF 2 aP 4 KNEE B 81l,913 Famly ConCopi Plan Utility Plan Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan Pros ... J Za,il'D, np-2 au. V. are Te, SN" Y, Z"w Iv, 'y EVENTH AD, 4 F, Y v M, k Isk us al 2All. pe Ike e s. IS, Q, Illy :D -n' M rzL q'j? V 77 iiz welv 7 NNSIN NN CENTER 1 ar- LIK PA— LINE / I N07PS: NOTES: 1. Conlrec- to verity M,il Sari So— Mail varts, Fdorto r— Service Installallon, Service Installation For Dalail PlataYd-l. 2.D,,.Il.nolyDrililBorn-2-4'Sonit3ryBeworSe ices.vefifyExlstlng8evA oLocaton&lnv n, 1. Contractor W install Slit Pence prior 0 any Site GmdI,q AdIvilJol 3. E.J.tlng San, wry Sewer has been lined and the firrIng shall be broUrclad enan mal ronnobtlons, 2 The u1st) g drIval may be uscol for a Ccn twflon Entrance, Upon remorNal a Rock Entrance Sam Is Required. 1: Is ...... I Replace Exl,tl.g Street, Curl, & Trail InlyInd, or Mlnimum Street Soollom of 17012,5'ill.5" l0etall Phle Sl 10). 3: G.dNd ArZ. C.lDS A.... SNad1D1..1Muph`Er Sold Dl.kahkid Aress. C It :0',p11,Ex1.TIng Ganhary&.CrSil Line locatlonand Inven, to ensure al Inalsusablelfilc"' If Is .-Irechb, a rovlde 7raffir, Control I Critbur Plan riarravlawsralopproval, priorto sl Llrrlt Work within Gleason Lake Road from B am ret 3 pm. patch roadway sul iLhln 48 fiours. Kav'ccl— t.. E.1 J,g Drlv..,un North slule CfClaascn Laral Rmd open al Tlmas. 3. Ins"I Ta I Cl Sad!Slgn. ENrd anding, itareqLa"Id. 10. At; Work Ic be Completed Jn Actoordarree wlth the Lasuest City of Plymouo Standard Spodflutions. U axist LtrluTE-HoISSNAREENNoI APPR—A- MY ONLY INC 111tolabs CC l TMS SP:CFI TION DYMM Ur T ollaEbTaul'ER1131 N THATIMAOU R-001 EDA 933ION&'NE RUMas UTjLTl.Ut'_ec Mel 7NE LAWS Or 7NE STATE OF NNNNESNOTA. ANDALL.04kAtallsi"DING NEALL.—ELylaul.munfia z U) C3 LU LU !R z C) a_ 0 LLJ z Z 5 Uj K Wn It: 0 F- rC z Z) z 00 0 U) p") z U.1j HE A=- 3 4 Page 37 NORTH SCPI£ IN FEEF L FXn l- Fweuq[Tmv0lfw Ya mhr Savor f} ol..w.n l'o•Iw r R I uf 9[[nmm°WMCFA v . e.. vn[ n ofin wlrw[%^r ux[ f— M 59YL11Fn5i 41RRE,[R '` sw.x uuc a we solnxun aw,cR x me mw,u n Ranw a swfu[Rsf uR.asce or sanhn n ADDI ON I I I II / m r d LLI i C a W Q H n $ I aowe gyd Cw3 Ce9 6`w LIDH r W W 9 C d S W az awo x GNEGNEA SCA L d o d}]41]] somfs Ir9FAnoe.secncw 4 4+eE Page 38 INiiiiiiiEiM....................................................................................................................is ............ 3i€::,.::.::i.r,.....i . 1.€M.=.. I:iij: v• :... ee: GLEASON LAKE HEIGHTSiE.- v:q.:.:..::' rii:::EiP.:i.... € f Single Family Concept Planai::iid:::::::.: 5:e ..................... I:n........ a Iilc..:... .:.:.1 = :. i,.; ..:::.L.:::r:•, :.: r :XeePfeEeea!3ei ..!€ • e:j3!i=l:.:.!: For: Hanson Builders, Inc. IF xn;::+cu: :i ........ :I= •_ ..•' °%' l!Er:h:::•a.^i:,'^:',::, P:::: ij€:,., ' , I•!.. 31 e, l j,,.i ;l.,r.il, . I .1 : . , x _ ! ! :•.. a ...s . !:!I!. X. .:i..i..i..i.i.,.'r! ir.. ::;:.•.•• • . j •:ir : •. .ee•ee• !.!:! NF .• . iuf r, r •:•:. a::•: ni::: l::.€::.!•:. Y: LI l 1• I• n:',:I..'1I3I:1kX:• . :I' IR; i :.::.:?': !.::.1 :i''i„::x:,.:.I...i...: ....I• !q ..' „ ii XPi?iI 13432 Hanson Blvd. NW I€: Andover, MN 55304 eiii''k' . : •e rEi!..XIIi!:iiiies?i •. • %, .x• •II ' • 1 ?i!i?! ii i"I!!I€i€ii! ... .!_€ !i €€E: !Ii! • , :!e€i r=::v ... :,..:... ..! i ` :i!:! , I l,.. r', .:. I..::i !In;,n.;.. .: irK..k..,. •, hp: ...i. .. I 11` I • ,. ' ' ,...,.. . •' ? e l::= F. .. „., i..Ei !€€ L....' .: € n:.n Rn ...4.....:: i"'ii;;!r 1 i .. i :,; ' II , l.;:jiil .!4 Ce:pE 1. n:. ' ...ri%'!p'i ,e. e!:::.e !€!!!!i!!!!" .: 1!IIi!!!!!!:!N!p€!E" .: •%Nii:ii!"::;.u.. IL. L. •• r .. 1 .: _ Hol' !.. 'iell5F i!ii. Iii131 I I ::1n..::::::: Contact: Nathan Fairiiii?= . 1 I ,„. !:..IiAI li I. iiXi • • .:i'• t.... Xi s ::.:: K .. ;:::Xa€:iiii;i.ii,€:3ii==' 1 I :_.:4i!ii ::diiii€€I ::• .h:::r::: •:. e111EQ,1..!.Hi .:; hi . 1 ,,r'€iiK•F •ly:: ,•,;!.F` n i = I: e:. r.:: hu.: ss.. •:..»:.:::r. i F::?s:li: ..i:::ki!!!::::^r. _ :: .. .:.:7,,;„.. ,:::r.:• ..iK!rr.:ra:•rlr. S'SR' ...!I:::!::::1:• rH::1::1::1:::rH!::. .::!!x:::::•: 1^':11:.. .a...l:::, 763^438-2561 Ne . ..:::;,:::: r:.;,»s::.:...r =i° . l! 1I m X!P . I ...i.:..!...:,:...es:.Pii s:::K:::hr: rr. 1..•.,=•'1 I :Ili "::!!:III x= . 1 1 1.. ...11 •r:::::i?7iN°!?.::r,ar.:e::! . .a i?"ei..;;€.' • i€i€iil.'€: iI!?ii:iii:::RuiN°FI€lie€I':€€• '" I . R.•: 'I'r •.Ei'r. S xH:.' •!, • !?e ;mrils n..e .:idlL..;,II,i III„I • .1iiill °s r: ro::::i: .0 a:... u I •t i'':'E : :I: ':... !,.s. ::. ^!! h.. I •ns•I!:':: .....IL. H1a;.',::i'i? eF=!ii"! iI?€I!I= I •• i" 1 ' •e= e.• 'Je i!•. !.'Xe!'i!=ill!•:.^.:... , •ap'.F'!, ,,.l.:Kf rFl::•:IIH1Iih .:: ;1.'III!L'I .: " • • s14 ..I .. • . • - 1 kSI E.S:..l .. S ::..: ISS'SI°NFIhIR r 1 = ..1. Ir. ; .rzl ..I 1 N• .ae, IR, I . , .ii, 1 ;.. I ! ,,.. ... '. .. , r . ! .., !s•!IIE?r,....a r::i •' ..al.=..uesl I}i a ''r:rll .. • ;:E !I: !!•1,tir• •ei'in•' bF ..i.. I I I :a ..1 . ° .: : nl, k.iia!;!•::i?ii::: ,.,.e i l s::. i ..:::::kj.a llSy3ip.:: .. ,' . IX. 1 =',.yLe!!r:IR. nll III!. . • I !!... I I ! rrsl !, r'I 1„Eki! : iir; IS i,l„I eI _ I „. ' 1 I I :I!hIp ?iIk!?ii,j.l ;ii Iiir , :•r.: . I L ........i .. . 1 .. ° . ..!...l. i:. r... s.. .. ,FF' !IE r .i • , F :• n .! k::••:::... IFr..:: !y wl....... .:P. •=IIRL111!h..a •. R::::H:!:::r•:x•RI. I!!1 1k !!n:4:'111x::• !!.a1!F..r1. ••x.... 1 Proposed Zoning:RS F-2r,:iil: ,.. "M:::i! : •I ••:Ill!li .: 1 ql::.1 •:n:: i= : ra..... •. 4. x :..; ....... s 1... 41if R!Po v .........i .I .. 1 .... !X!...... I ..... 1 r 1 . .. r..:r 5.;...;.,r.: se..:..e •:..:::•: X4. ! ': Is . •i:66! _'!!!. _'::::, .I:...:: - !?€?!!!i"i !ii?C= :I : Ilii:: :• •: e . il. .. n4•lI: "' I . .rs;.:. a r. R,::11•• ..,! ...!:1 , .•_ r•:::^4!i!Ni!:iiii!iil::::::k::^::.! M.i41.. :I• s: .; ..:..nn .ei:, H.. .;."n r :IN KI • i. •'i!rir' e..:: s ::: 1 d x 1 .i1 - Width - 80r.• •. "I ..n: •. .1:.:.•:i ... .. .. ' . ...:. iE a ..... IHr•"Ill.:::::a:•::r::::x:::•Ix.:::::::1::::::•.::IH:: .. ::•• € Min €.at Id f% r.:::::rt ''k y . • d. .IK ::?:::.r :.. I e:": EI r.:a K w!...:::a:!:::!:::••L•::-!::!::I:!• .I . . l...i:.:a;:: :alp !.x.''r"Inx :;•. ;, "i..!!Illi' ..::::cll 11 € !I K •e...... .n... :: I:I k.•i '= I h ....x ee .E r ...€L ....a. ...a .. e! • L. "ii" 3?fi3iE.....1i=i€.....E!lie3i?!:::::r.,,i; . 1. x... Eiil. ,,ie;il!ei?r': s, .; : '• :I:°•e :.. ,hi. ....L.....1 .......... ......... ..n .:. .: .....l. 'Mei - IZI•••:: ! L:::I::-1:IS1! !::::::!l::I•' •lk.. , ry' 1nI IH..;..••••; •ILf H. ...: P .1 .. ;, ..1,r'N;:: :a... ,....... .1. I;. N• :........ • Min Lot Area - 12,500 s# l.. ............n.i. ...::......... ...x ..,.x,111 L..... :. ....i !ii!e::i:ii:i •" !! .i s=... .. i:• LIIF..1 :.,,..!iiiiei:::::n: ir:lP:• I:i: .:::::r. :• . : 'i'.•':. a•::: Iti,j 1!i;.,l II!!:I:::::::::: :::_ .': :: s• :::•.°c •• 3: i =€H ..:w ll ••:L•:::::::::.:::::Ixi: 1.::?Y::::-r: ..!; s: a:: •sa . I N.. a r:::::::::::r :r :. kh r :.•,.::::: ^:::::rc §r..r'r•:a1 ,; .. .. es =:I:!Ir.:i:rlEn, .. 'lII,,!:1 •:Irr.: Ikh• :!::•r::w:::::r.:a! I?ij .. ss..: .i I •.. ;, :: ........,!;; ... „I. .::•::z::r.::N•,••:w!!I?:r-g@irl :: "! . !IF :r:?:: l: ;I i¢.::, a r!i!:: :• .. •1 !:.!.!::rr:......:::: .I! . n. •n. 1 aas.; . Ei'lEeenj• I: :::-c:: : ••ill i!!iiri::. yI,•. :. k::::a:::rl: 14::: :: rFle::i .:x..: e 1 . !i^i::rr.::i::E es:: I!•:r: =::ry=Po : i€::l:::::::^.:1!:i::::^:rCIiiie:::::: ., ..;i.;....,,?.;% .. :e:f.:• ..r ..s : l::. •!:. 1 .I. ! . ...._ .a _ r..l......,_.'1:;11:l:^.:::., ..%, r.;ln.;':: .,',..: i...K.. !;. IR... F sb -2J It m:: ::: i ...r. :• .F •.. .. s 10'i : Irv:::. ;:n;rii ii.4., Id... ;! •.•I i'. .. y x .! !isl:!::!ii!In!ii3!:i:i!!i!!!!e!; .. . ! ., e, .... ,. ep •:L:I: ' i • II nkiR: 4'r" !I,! 1, •.,.1 .:: il •I' . j. i ! ' ' „ n .:: • E eflllK i€• i IT, al! • I! ! iE •:!: ry! h .I:. .IL. p•I' 9 n1I, II€ .... 4!II ;• •Itl 1 av I .I e r:s e e .. I%.;E. . yP. kl:•, i $ySb _ $ ! 10 #t i'..,..:...:K 1' ::ff"! I •':!.:13 .::1t,.. ..!N 1 .i!:i K:= , "!I :'€?! :...! ... kn'•' S. S ? ::il ,.. Iji.!. ..@r__',. ' 1 1,., K•I. :::?.! I:I!€iEld;:'rSie tI:I !a : • elm.: 1 .:::r .....»,..,.Ii..x. .. h» •:.!!i f::e:. • :.. . ; ....i'::'::::::.. ... 1 N' iiiiiilE'',F:'r:i;; RrI . III:•r.::.:::n::!•1n"€i!e?!€ijeii'in•,,,ir..•• :• .: ... .• .i .iXFEsl:r: r. •' H:?Kui!xu?::::xr.: : ' ::: .:.......i i r.;.K is I Rysb ' 25 ftr.:• .. i ...: h ii ....I ..I 'i:i!!i°-e=•' Is., . ,R.i kk 1q ..!! @ii:::::rr.• :r:.d..:.: I j,:: j K:p: E ...e! !eiiiiF'r ::l,;l; •1,.j, !!il?Iv'::::' „ .1is •:::::::. IY itl Rliiii:;;H:i:,.. Ir.:ii;:,:r.;l; a .•r. . 1 Ili!els ile :::R::: re. • • rll:i I• ! ir •i .. i!!.:: ::: d!!i :!i p!!!!I!a rlrr . :.:::... es ...E ..r.. H . • lei::!!?! .! •: ! :..ai::.. q :I•,5iq:q:::;:..;, ..... Ild!:x•!HIL..:ia;!• .•I! !:' •C.lie? !.. I€ :. sX... !€s ••• eEi'`! ° .• ... :: .1 I^.....vnrl: .•.:I •• .i?I nl'"€ Sls..l:.......r.:.:: • 141 1...1..... IP..... 1 .•:..H::i:. AI•I:..:....5.... • i.. !n!S . S :, a r.:: •• • ..... .... rR:ri;:'iei;S:..n:..., a;..;... xlr.:.::::iir.:r..,H?;r.. „ ... KI k CI.-.rH:k!1•::!EE ..........a: :. ., :e • • !: 1 l s: s ... Ii?•::a €^ .: H:;.. •'..-'ji,l:i' ' ,„ 1!q i :: n,ilkN:.:ar..; 1„IH;.... . i ;. , ... w,11,„hF.,rrie:.: ••€ BI :• ' . e•oi a R. LRl ,; .:. ,: iia :d I:!vl :•:. !.I. ``'N'::€i p.,15! ',, , •IeYI:.:!!1'?!:Si'IXl1!19"' .1 1 ,, •i I I ::I :. •sill .:! sI is e.:: :€o!:r!'. ,, • ' .3ei=i :: 1 1: III i , :::::!:: . 4 Ix.......... I••:• . •: I!i= : '.:! iei?e ::... ol. :.. :: 1!' • 'I: .: s. ?`€€€€.. €€€^lii,X,: , :...1 I?r•' r .K €€€iii: se s e .. , Mr., ls j . h !: ' • ...:: •• ! ° i:::n n ••1€....x:• Im" IN....... lLLnl6. h ............. .:. .:. ,• „ '. :. .n.IV,. i ..... ills ... :::: I " • I : ='1= .. ,::^e ,I in. I .i•.. Iidfnsass.:r• eX.::i:! [Iiii?hi!Idiei!Eiie: 1 ^::::: ii'i^!! :.:: ?. ..... .....: S ....e .. ` j llj ......:,.. I I:!i? • :.. ... l!I^i .i :I .••: • :• •I. » kn.. .: a.;..• lia!'ili'I"iii!! :.., .II. ..L.. I ..! n::::• : e li.....r, :E a .ee !"'x a .i.l ,,.... 1 .I ..k E 1 n.. L ....:...„,. .I€! r.:: ';i.l.. 'ri !'r 1 is€=R• I•::.?p.. •°° I• i l if I!I!7. { • I rki •':ile:, ?.: : !• .., lel, e. ii n ::,,. li. _ !... L ' ?1,.;.... ; it :!i=,:;. !,I.., . h1 IIII'M 1 !.•1'Ih IC. II Irl -1 - hiiie A , .. E : I! .. •F; •:.•r:i;E • 1X1ni!ExIREii??.... :::....I+".:1:...... eI :e. € iI •. '.. .. i• ' r....:::::.:•.•: i ' I !. e . 1 : !.: ' : ,: :i !E?a' •iY:I ::! kr11 iil?. • l` ... v... k iii':ei?iiiii"iiiiie °%=%i :: •••••• R, ... .... .: .. a:• . !! 1 = , : lF hi:Ll1= ,E ,.i .' .hili?!i . illii!€ i ii=.'• ...1.. .-:: .::. i......X.,.l l....:::: q •^ .. =s .. ce. I . ,i ¢II„::.. •• : E::r les !i?i, ,....f. .Ik. ::! i =I= iii:!€€€:F:' Ir€ ai:i4p!^.i'•ii?a:€i II i ::F I 1. i C % 1 i..uj e: i E'I,, . 'I. ii! ! •:! I i NIN null •i. °:' Sril r i 1 iY I ' !! lTit Xi:esl ! vn :.€:ili -€irq€ •ili• !!€il. [f€ E l'!°':•a: •:.: N !:: n:;_ !.. L!€=: ' :Ih:I' !' ! : _ w .. ': r.:::i° l . k, 'Xn' i ::::•rlir....L ..1.. .. I.RI !.. r;Ks•. Bei: s ..:...::......:. i:Vy... ^:r "€€ •Ni ri. x .!. !L:: i:iiiiii::; •• ; ••• .1 :. s!F .I:ES .s :ee%.! •:.: a :L:::. ....' a....! :i::::! .kr:=.::::. 3r, !: k. xc..1. :. :: x .r....r l......:...::'r: .. •.:::::::..' .. •i .:......,:•.:I:r.::• . :RP:•:::al •n ....i ?R.°' ni 3e .e il?fil1 ......::::::: rr.: 1 1...... I:::r!.....1.1 ;..!:: .;, • ........: F : a n ......... .:.....: • .... •:•, .... .a . 'r' .: , . •esrn•.N•: ': r: E :E; I? !ee r g:. :'.::i C .:leiiir:i=! '•rr 'I ass: a ::::. .:: w..::::.. l.. 1 .. i ... I .xl!! ... CF!F.::. =•:::5 .i ,!, .. dl. .... .. I .: . ': C? :•r =i e ::w:::::: '!I,F.er€ •,X,!ii1X:..Iiw w....L.IM':1.91.1...1.... • !....... w....... ... .. :rl:::. . `•• ... 1:::.:i :• .r::e .3 i! 1?,•I:1 .:::: l:::r:::•kk!:lo: 1 .L....Lkl:g'I' w i• akwl:::L: ,;.. i... I?. ?hIi„ .:a.., l ek== :::: •::R:•1 .i. ,i f1:e;::: 1:1:„ l r.•::: k...Ia R.. ...11 l,dII•.11:. :, :::::''': r..:•€::., ...i.. 1.1 ............ ........ 1 1. I'M: !P. ....: •..I wI: • • aR. •:I! kl . •..,.,,s,.................,"r:• ::R;e2ii€€ :.:L : ,: !...I •.: L....11.h1. .......... .. ..1.1. ...III .. ..,....... ....,:. .. Ii,.5.- F. kx::ca .. Il,..:,.:,.... .. ....... efl:: •:::::::::::,. I,r;;ra!C'l!l Hoenefr ;:;111p !1!:11lX:.1... !1b,k _ ... :i !€:• 3:e 1 :. .,...,...... €1.... ei:eGIh„!I:,y!.:.l...Ilk. i........... r... !I3Ie%ee:ee!e:!:N3 : •I. . w:!::::::;.. ................ :.. x 1• :::::.:::::::r: ............... ::1111::: .......................... r.....:?.: €E' :.. •:.: 3.. ,!. :11:1•:be?::1•.. e ............1........... 1 1. .... I ........ .......... 1....L......lK.. f . a.E :r:::.f: sei3 =•.ieexiee. 4 :e:: .... 1,...; ;..... ra::r.:...... .::::::::::::::d1 1x r ! 1 .::...... !K: •. :::::::: ................ :rs::::.k r :.' .. r:E :! •S1 :•:E ....,,: I:•:•: F.:: :::Xli:..• .11n !I!:...: .! i I..1. 1.1.1 ....I ......... .. :. .....;.... .......... ........:I. ....l... I,„.., ....:::!.... .... .. ....;..I::.:::.... .... :€• xw II': •:k=.o€ ':'tki!!i!c:!:H;.;,.•r K•:I!d1 / 1Ie i .: _•::: PI" .!_':!!..:1:::: .....r..... ?...••wk:::::::i:::>•::::: ., . 1w; _',?;:,x;:;s==:.......,€: !'r, .. i':€ 1 "-400' r!: ?:::1= ;:1 11.::!, ..........L.... • ::::::: ..........................•1• ::i 'gin:...... : k!„...1...... L :..:..R......... i .. .::n:.K::ra:d.::: k 1. k....................1.....................l:x.=.e ..:::... .. I:j:m ! :: IiC :;ii:: €F!::F re1X: 1 .. N ... ... ...............L... rf............................................ f 11 ..... I. II ..1 ... ...... ......... I'... I.e.. .. 3.........e... !:Fe's .. 11.. ..•...... i ..... !1.1.. !. . •Po: • .. ....1 .... ... ....... 4 •::::::::::. ...;......;...:..;.......:...,•..;N,.• !'K.: :. l.rel: .: •:.:•: ••............! e. dN. 111......1 111. ..1 ..x.......... ............................ ... : 1.!s:. •• .:••: • . •: •h•• I=-i:l!.?„ •i? 3ia1l.r ... .1......... ::: .: .............................. ..... ..e. C:.. .....e:::r.:r ::fie?• ...1 .I€! 1 F:::::::::::::::::1::1: .1•:..:.•:•::................ :::• TRIP ..I.:: ... • .,.e I* k.. ..: 1 :..... 1.. 1 1 1....... :: ••::: ............................1 ....: Fq :::I::: __ ....: .i. :! ilial: •.: 1.„!r±:::::::::::!:::::::::;::!!:i:::las : . 11.. : ...L...........:....................rn: .: :!'' 1. e: .iialxig!1 ...N• .:.1....3 ..111 .. I!I! .1k . ::::1 .. J:.... ::::::::::.:::•::.:::::::::::::. .. .::.. .:I . :w ..':,_;:::::::::::::::::•::::r1:1:::::::::............. E .I ii! .:..................::..;..;...........E:,,le"R : I• I 1=e I 9i ....... ....... ........:...... ....... :.e w .'::• i:'?i :?: :: r:•wr!.9^c:::r•.;...;.;................ r •m,» a ....... ..................... ..... .. Cieie...... .. !. E!i?X?r?' I ?eeie'r:eeeeeeF.3F.?eii ... .......... f.. .......1. 1 . .k.... .I ... .. ......... ............................... .. .!... .. k.3.. ......: •lar: .• ... ... F....1.......Ih. I... ::.::::.... r . 1.3 E. ................... ::: c. 1...I Iw:nee;r:!:1 k::::_.:::::.. ............1.. :' :::::a:::: a==s:::•!''!!r::r x SATHRE-SERGQU IST, INC. I............. r.:.r.......1 . _ :::. :,HI .... ... :.. ....... .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r •:::....... ...!1111 ....I...;........... .................;......:: 5i 1"1 eei?sEFC ssi °"F!= fele3E ' € 'S "• - ix.ourH aeowwnr warm+a xx. ssour nlz,n:.aoa 1!<.. :........::::••:i... i ... .: LL . x ...... f ..... .... . [[ .. ..... .....k::::•• ieeeeNP=r'€:i€€F?'lire ....:. ..... I , i .q! :.:. ........... ................... ...: .. .lIR. .. .... € eull:....1. •.I. F1•... I K.....::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l..n iXl.. ........k.E e...l k...e..ki..E...e........... .........II::P:•I.:: eeeeeeN? ... :.:. Page 39 GL,EAS®N LAKE HEIGHTS aw C.m u:tivartnM nary mhl..t.r_twty. a ^^–.0 MuNae e t.,...mw mY Mar<.vrwtw.e.menr.w,ttnYnnn,nn„wlW, un„t,a,ma6Lm.wLon tf ..e n.se..rtuu.mN.t ur nl.tha.,.rttttcr.,,tnnw..rnllnrrl°a YwbalxN m.wlaJwmmfyuw.,u]dilt uW].na ayynW.ldiM1rl In lallmtnamisa.amm.pw W.. iyurxlu lvunsayw.i nieYur iwtnll.rn•t.,nyuw ure.er mn.0 , n ..,Y..n HU NM1rww nmpw:haum r.r tw:r•=na.....aea,wa. n l:w Lblu! y ]uh Mw I ivan, x'n`aLN W wd wn i m IvpPmdnvYvr.CnwmvuplNxMuvp WN.nrv.i.iw_.m° Wfp.l Mon, in. aq.l' aPI I,N Nr u il hnpuu_ r lrrhrp[(iLIin40N Ln%EHAPI,ns+_.n"•waiina.xer W yeiufpee.iivuurNydwy.p(.em.q.nar.Wtrmmum Wd uu ager n1. lt.ppJd15 t .pnxnueiln.tPrw.n.M.W...rrwep,munn.mu.rn.a mrlwu aeul._,W..M1.mw.w hr m. rmr eapnnmw tnu,rped r .I H.m•a.M1vA .nnm.Nwar mL,n.wult.i.n.r.aw.wvu,.s.m;.m.x il.eec`ww :w"q u urnPt>uWr tM.nr.unJ+l na.W.e_ ar,wtrwrt u.rr1.11rvw uPlnmmnAhaau 11. An ua.rWw r •ytt a@ L rJwrvgfwwpin CP.tr n.mi., suinur nrvo gtA n_....u.w.._Lv.wx, senNeHmem n+auLml.plra liw LutprrP.alua _uar ar I wuu.nr uwnxn.uwmn.urwmm= Hwxpin rounq, muni. lhpeby<dlry tMtlnewitNn pintnr6LEAsnN 1.1%811A]C11Tsuert®Nea In uluommuei. d.Y or ]tll 1, ot_o'[Ioh M rf kdN.n mrs ce.KyP.mdn Py' 04 n Bea—PnsiA eoM ISM Jftl_ rwlq q3q ftttplJw3euJreY [NwNrorJw N io bear Nua ap tdeoyel nllI munNlaloi taa nM1 Wo[ n[mmolrz mm by la eeetlnmeen ` n amw.a am,m lr u w ly, °eo]aaern. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 4 0 oanaPes Baud rbw M1rmee t yow4 J•w pe.' Q' '. yyc 1pl,]3 R_114.11 OR'9C ADCMC'/ 51 f R4ei."r^. I 1 sur wwru mnrtll a M IwN RX.'O ^l g,.BB]°4Yi.3•y 11^ 1 a G!. P[M 1 f ca.m3°171ptir milia L• xam `wu mmr 1t L _ Palm tke a swxus wwrut a xl:na us I I i YaPilgr wuwe v want ar • 1 rwwul, nigaoPl nr nntlq rtngaw[x anP Ihww n.INnLlnt,.:slma.r.ca[Hmlw, rnnP..n.rw. ma..laa..4WaP+.aw...awn. x.PPrN'...H.c.nxr onln alwwia I I 1 it j _tom t NC tlui the Wen 111 ketaf,ne bllexwtl ennlh,e raYP Yi I apettefpuptpqlYlnNapuarJUYHNttlssRnJrttwCCnrvnm[inf. la,opimaJ]I anmterpe seuq..rw onnppfasewJimt Qa nlftk 611.W1 QuoneufsneluP]].THvtdtlp liY NPNL RnnHU Wrn: tlm,ce lford pnrW Je Wat1'xe.(widlauaPat QPMaaf heBwYrmtpeuuee JWuweol Lvanow L.eeenln 1 rj sS I Pl Pf C.uuy god:tkna Nvnlwnntnly nlonp JletnitxllneolelA County Poealll9Vk,I;amv9wmp.r.pclwNt Jit Wet 4ruolddXUJwwr Qunrtneftle Pw omiat 4orthm[e WatliA.l.f wwepwarhtgliwy 1 I p I/ J.. 1 I7IM11 I++ I.+rW,adetM1xco[111M,e11cerlo Ilxt.xmail niiieruW_r.yeuww pwlu_ttLllm'Wetvrlttu:altuv ftp— A-lW u. p...etnM1VMYe w.m Wllxvw.ixhNex H iy ti tn.v,.u..nus.fuwll.x,nnpully,,.us.ewnw w. 1.aW uu.a,4wP'a.•I r gWy,,ppenRyv --- t w'.. twua e. II nr m. I NORTH unLWnu9t,rn,nuwrrupttP , aCPL6'n n6Ef JP lwv (A`Y"fK Z:. krw.a.t .,- Lauw adxwml._ r i.r ,tx,..,on.a,..nlwnnuww,m Wr_a nniiernnrHnaoc,avaanlr.riW I J 1 aw C.m u:tivartnM nary mhl..t.r_twty. a ^^–.0 MuNae e t.,...mw mY Mar<.vrwtw.e.menr.w,ttnYnnn,nn„wlW, un„t,a,ma6Lm.wLon tf ..e n.se..rtuu.mN.t ur nl.tha.,.rttttcr.,,tnnw..rnllnrrl°a YwbalxN m.wlaJwmmfyuw.,u]dilt uW].na ayynW.ldiM1rl In lallmtnamisa.amm.pw W.. iyurxlu lvunsayw.i nieYur iwtnll.rn•t.,nyuw ure.er mn.0 , n ..,Y..n HU NM1rww nmpw:haum r.r tw:r•=na.....aea,wa. n l:w Lblu! y ]uh Mw I ivan, x'n`aLN W wd wn i m IvpPmdnvYvr.CnwmvuplNxMuvp WN.nrv.i.iw_.m° Wfp.l Mon, in. aq.l' aPI I,N Nr u il hnpuu_ r lrrhrp[(iLIin40N Ln%EHAPI,ns+_.n"•waiina.xer W yeiufpee.iivuurNydwy.p(.em.q.nar.Wtrmmum Wd uu ager n1. lt.ppJd15 t .pnxnueiln.tPrw.n.M.W...rrwep,munn.mu.rn.a mrlwu aeul._,W..M1.mw.w hr m. rmr eapnnmw tnu,rped r .I H.m•a.M1vA .nnm.Nwar mL,n.wult.i.n.r.aw.wvu,.s.m;.m.x il.eec`ww :w"q u urnPt>uWr tM.nr.unJ+l na.W.e_ ar,wtrwrt u.rr1.11rvw uPlnmmnAhaau 11. An ua.rWw r •ytt a@ L rJwrvgfwwpin CP.tr n.mi., suinur nrvo gtA n_....u.w.._Lv.wx, senNeHmem n+auLml.plra liw LutprrP.alua _uar ar I wuu.nr uwnxn.uwmn.urwmm= Hwxpin rounq, muni. lhpeby<dlry tMtlnewitNn pintnr6LEAsnN 1.1%811A]C11Tsuert®Nea In uluommuei. d.Y or ]tll 1, ot_o'[Ioh M rf kdN.n mrs ce.KyP.mdn Py' 04 n Bea—PnsiA eoM ISM Jftl_ rwlq q3q ftttplJw3euJreY [NwNrorJw N io bear Nua ap tdeoyel nllI munNlaloi taa nM1 Wo[ n[mmolrz mm by la eeetlnmeen ` n amw.a am,m lr u w ly, °eo]aaern. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 4 0 oanaPes Baud rbw M1rmee t G yow4 J•w pe.' Q' '. yyc 1pl,]3 R_114.11 OR'9C ADCMC'/ 51 f R4ei."r^. I 1 Ls r q p.iT1 jYF t , DR g,.BB]°4Yi.3•y 11^ 1 a G!. iEA5 0 1penpitxufGMN • ?1'r !i ca.m3°171ptir y5 G I ' "lpTKP3i OUMiN d ai POt .0 / 1CARi.SON, CENTER wwrw Lam_ ADCMC'/ 51 I g r I y5 f I 1 I ' "lpTKP3i OUMiN d ai POt .0 / 1CARi.SON, CENTER r f 1 i oerH•arP b .A rt x a dire 4 nivMr -- iwtlt Gpnpe sP`t vaE Page 40 wwrw Lam_ L....Ywmgfsl CeaPR G r!R a rK Yqungaw aPlPrm D rti cuMYpe Wn.ICV d' _ _u`.d[G 1pinre5r f4MrER Of e[rnw 31 r f 1 i oerH•arP b .A rt x a dire 4 nivMr -- iwtlt Gpnpe sP`t vaE Page 40 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 14509 GLEASON LAKE DRIVE FOR GLEASON LAKE HEIGHTS(201 1085 THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of Cites. Chapter 21 of the City Code of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Plymouth Zoning Map from RSF-1 (single family detached 1) to RSF-2 (single family detached 2) with respect to the roughly 1.5 acres of property presently legally described as follows: All that part of the west 247 feet of the following described property lying north of the south 820 feet thereof, commencing at a point 446.74 feet east of the southwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118 north, Range 22 west; thence north parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4a distance of 1066.92 feet to the center of County Road; thence northeasterly along the centerline of said County Road 415.99 feet; thence south parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4, a distance of 1238.67 feet to the section line; thence west 378.14 feet to the point of beginning. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Kelli Slavik, Mayor Page 41 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 14509 GLEASON LAKE DRIVE (2011085) WHEREAS, Hanson Builders, Inc. has requested reclassification of the zoning from RSF-1 (single family detached 1) to RSF-2 (single family detached 2) for the roughly 1.5 -acre site presently legally described as follows: All that part of the west 247 feet of the following described property lying north of the south 820 feet thereof, commencing at a point 446.74 feet east of the southwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118 north, Range 22 west; thence north parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast'/4 a distance of 1066.92 feet to the center of County Road; thence northeasterly along the centerline of said County Road 415.99 feet; thence south parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4, a distance of 1238.67 feet to the section line; thence west 378.14 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcel from RSF-1 to RSF-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for reclassification of the zoning from RSF-1 to RSF-2 for the roughly 1.5 -acre site located at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive (as legally described above), based on the following findings: 1. The RSF-2 zoning and the proposed density would be consistent with the LA -1 guiding. 2. The proposed single-family development and lot arrangement would be consistent with the comprehensive plan and comply with all city standards. 3. The proposed development would be consistent with the lots and homes in to the area. 4. The existing streets and utilities are adequate to serve the development. 5. The proposal includes appropriate transitions between the proposed homes and the office uses to the south and east. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. Page 42 Resolution 2012- 2011085) Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 24, 2012 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Page 43 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR HANSON BUILDERS, INC. FOR "GLEASON LAKE HEIGHTS" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14509 GLEASON LAKE DRIVE (2011085) WHEREAS, Hanson Builders, Inc. has requested approval of a preliminary and final plat for the roughly 1.5 -acre parcel presently legally described as follows: All that part of the west 247 feet of the following described property lying north of the south 820 feet thereof, commencing at a point 446.74 feet east of the southwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 118 north, Range 22 west; thence north parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4a distance of 1066.92 feet to the center of County Road; thence northeasterly along the centerline o f said County Road 415.99 feet; thence south parallel with the west line of said southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4, a distance of 1238.67 feet to the section line; thence west 378.14 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Hanson Builders, Inc. for a preliminary and final plat for Gleason Lake Heights, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary and final plat are approved to allow the property located at 14509 Gleason Lake Drive to be subdivided into three single-family lots, in accordance with the application and plans received by the city on October 20 and December 8, 2011, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. Prior to recording the final plat, the applicant shall pay the park dedication cash fee in lieu of land dedication for three lots, in accordance with the ordinance in effect at the time the final plat is recorded. 3. Prior to recording the final plat, the following revisions shall be made to the plans consistent with city code, the zoning and subdivision ordinances, and the engineering guidelines: a. The applicant shall execute a site improvements and performance agreement and submit the required financial guarantees. Page 44 Res. 2012 - File 2011085 Page 2 b. Amend the plat to remove the "Commissioner of Transportation" from city approvals statement on plat. c. Add the following notes to the plans: 1) remove and replace the existing concrete curb as needed at the driveway to lot 3 and for the sewer and water service connection to Lot 3 and 2) restore the trail within 48 hours of pavement removal. d. Verify whether temporary construction easements from properties on the north side of Gleason Lake Drive would be required to accommodate the sewer work. e. Amend the tree preservation plan to: 1) include the following trees as disturbed: 1303-1306, 1327, 1330, 1331, 1333, and 1334 and 2) install the tree preservation fencing farther from 1348. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a survey indicating: 1) a minimum of two front yard trees shall be preserved or two new trees will be planted and 2) a driveway turnaround installed on each lot. 5. The applicant shall consider applying a 15 -foot setback to the west property line consistent with the side -yard setback required by the RSF-1 district. 6. The driveway on Lot 3 shall be located at the minimum setback from the west property line. 7. Standard Conditions: a. No building permits shall be issued until the final plat and easements are filed and recorded with Hennepin County. b. Compliance with the city's tree preservation regulations. c. Removal of all hazardous trees from the property at the owner's expense. d. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the applicant has applied for final plat approval, or unless the applicant has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 510 of city code. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. Page 45 Res. 2012 - File 2011085 Page 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 24, 2012 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Page 46 irp)City of REVISED Agenda 6a1 3PlymouthNumber: Adding Qoality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING prepared by: Daniel E. Plekkenpol, Deputy Chief January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Michael S. Goldstein, Chief of Police Item: Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: To accept Emergency Management Grant Funds totaling $17,644.00 from Hennepin County Emergency Management. These funds will be transferred to our City to be used for any personnel, benefits, supplies, training or equipment expenses from the 21011 budget year. 2. BACKGROUND: Hennepin County Emergency Management originally received an EMPG grant for $429,774.00 on November 18, 2011. Hennepin County Commissioners adopted a resolution on December 13, 2011 that stated, "BE IT RESOLVED, that Contract 51840 with the MN Dept of Public Safety accepting funding for the Emergency Management Performance Grant Program in the amount of $429,774.00 during the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 be approved; that a supplemental appropriation of $429,774.00 be made to the 2011 Emergency Preparedness budget with pass through of excess funding to Human Service and Public Health in the amount of $14,200.00; and any additional excess funds to local cities." Hennepin County Emergency Management just received the application for this grant in mid September of 2011, so by the time they submitted their expenses and the "pass through" dollars for the municipalities it would be January 2012, before we would receive our funds. Upon acceptance of this grant contract our City would be mailed a check for $17, 644.00. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The City Emergency Management program has an additional $1'7, 644.100 to spend on personnel, benefits, supplies, training and equipment. These funds must be applied to the 2011 budget expenses. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Hennepin County EMPG Contract Hennepin County Direct Pay Request Form Hennepin County Resolution 11-0539 Grant award memo from HSEM to Hennepin County Emergency Management Minnesota Department of Public Safety Grant Agreement Page 1 January 9, 2012 Hennepin County Hennepin County Emergency Management 1600 Prairie Drive Medina MN 55340-5421 Dan Plekkenpol City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Dan Plekkenpol, Phone: 612-596-0250 Fax: 763-478-4001 TDD: 763-478-4030 In November 2011, Hennepin County Emergency Management requested approval to pass thru any remaining funds from our 2011 EMPG grant to our local partners. The Hennepin County Board approved our request. Attached is a copy of the check request I've submitted to Accounts Payable for the pass through funds. Also, attached you find a copy of the 2011 EMPG grant for your review and records. Please sign the bottom of this letter and return to me, this documents receipt of and an indication of compliance with the grant requirements, particularly relating to OMB -A133. By signing this letter you certify that you have not been suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Thank you for your work in Emergency Management. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stacy Zurn I have received a copy of the 2011 EMPG contract and will comply with its requirements. Name Title Date Page 2 HENNEPIN COUNTY DIRECT PAY REQUEST FORM HC45601/2011 Date Submitted: 01/09112 Invoice/Reference No,: Page 1 of Department: I Admin/Emergency Management I Prepared By: Stacy Zurn Phone: 612-596-0245 This acknowledgement must be signed bythe.payee unless an invoice, statement, or other supporting documentation is attached. VendoriPa ee Information: (Enter ONE vendor only) Per Minnesota Statues, section 471.391, subd. 1: I declare under the penatiies Name: City of Plymouth - Attn:D. Plekkenpol of law that this account, claim or demand is just and correct and that no partof it Vendor No,: has been paid. Address: 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Signature of Claimant (Payee) (Do not sign in black ink) Line # 7 Description: 2011 EMPG Pass through funds - Funds must be applied to your 2011 budget Amount: I $ 17,644.00 Accounting Distribution: Fund DeptlD Account 1099 Code 10 112099 52935 Proiect Information: Line # 2 Description: I I Amount: I I Accounting Distribution: Fund I DeptlD Account 1099 Code Line # 3 I Description: I I Amount: I I Accounting Distribution: Furid I DeptlD Account 1099 Code Prosect Information: Line # 4 I Description: I I Amount: I I Accounting Distribution: Fund DeptlD Account 1099 Code Line # 5 I Description: I I Amount: I i Accounting Distribution: Fund DeptlD Account I 1099 Code Do not sign in black ink Approval Signature L Subtotal Page 1: $17,644.00 TOTAL ALL PAGES: 1 644.00 Hennepin County, Minnesota aw VE RESOLUTION NO. 11-0539 il 20111 vn-mbennoin,us The following Resolution was offered by Public Works, Energy & Environment Committee: BE IT RESOLVED, thtat Contract 5184C1 with the MN Dept of Public Safety accepting funding for the Emergency Management Performance Grant Program in the amount of $429, 774 during the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 be approved; that a supplemental appropration of $429,774 be made to the 2011 Emergency Preparedness budget with pass through of excess funding to Human Service and Public Health in the amount of $14,200; and any additional excess funds to local cities. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 6 YEAS and 0 NAYS, as follows: County of Hennepin Board of County Commissioners YEAS MAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT Mike Opat X Mark Stenglein X Gail Dorfman X Peter McLaughlin X Randy Johnson X Jan Callison X Jeff Johnson X RESOLUTION ADOPTED ON 1211312011 6wc ATTEST: Deputy/Clerk to the County Board 1 Generated 12/14/2011 3:55:43 PM Page 4 Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Driver and Vehicle Services Emergency Communication Networks Homeland Security and Emergency Management Minnesota State Patrol Office of Communications Office of Justice Programs Office of Pipeline Safety Office of Traffic Safety State Fire Marshal USER Homeland Security and. Emergency Management 444 Cedar Street ® Suite 223 ® Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-6223 Phone: 651.201.7400 0 Fax: 651.296.0459 ® TTY: 651.282.6555 http: //hsem. dps. mn. gov November 18, 201.1 Mr. Eric Waage, Director of Emergency Management Hennepin County 300 S 6th Street A-2303 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0233 Re: Grant # A-EMPG-2 011 -HENNCO-003 21 Dear Mr. Waaoc: I am pleased to announce that Hennepin County has been awarded an Emergency Management Performance Granit (EMPG) in the amount of $429,774.00. Enclosed are three copies of the aant agreement- Please have the authorized official of your agency who has the legal authority to sign grant agreements sign each of the copies on page 2 and return thein to: Ann Kuzj, Grants Specialist Homeland Security & Emergency Management 444 Cedar Street, Suite 223 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-6223 If your grant award is $100,000 or more, please sign and return the Certification Regarding Lobbying form that is enclosed. Also enclosed is a description of rant reporting requirements, which includes the documentation required to support Financial Status Reports. If you have questions, please contact me by phone at 651-201-7422, or by e-mail at ann-kuzj@stateann.us. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Kuzj Grants Specialist Enclosures EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Page 5 Grant Agreement Page 1 Minnesota Department of Public Safety ("State") Grant Program: Homeland Security and Emergency Management Emergency Management Performance Grant 2011 444 Cedar Street, Suite 223 St. Paul, MN 55101-6223 Grant Agreement No.: A-EMPG-2011-HENNCO-003 21 Grantee: Grant Agreement Term: Hennepin County Effective Date: 1/1/2011 300 S 6th Street A-2303 Government Center Expiration Date: 12/31/2011 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0233 Grantee's Authorized Representative: Grant Agreement Amount: LTC Eric Waage, Chief, Operations Division Original Agreement $429,774.00 Hennepin County Matching Requirement $429,774.00 20 W 12th Street St- Paul, Minnesota 55155 651) 268-8957 State's Authorized Representative: Federal Funding: CFDA 97.042 Ann Kuzj, Grant Manager State Funding: Homeland Security and Emergency Management Special Conditions: None 444 Cedar Street, Suite 223 St. Paul, MN 55101-6223 Phone: (651) 201-7422 Anri.kuzj@state.mn.us Under Minn. Stat. § 299A.01. Subd 2 4 the State is empowered to enter into this grant agreement. Term: Effective date is the date shown above or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16C-05, subd_ 2, whichever is Iater_ Once this grant agreement is fully executed, the Grantee may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant agreement. Reimbursements will only be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant agreement. Expiration date is the date shown above or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. The Grantee, who is not a state employee will: Perform and accomplish such purposes and activities as specified herein and in the Grantee's approved Emergency Management Performance Grant 2011 Application ("Application") which is incorporated by reference into this grant agreement and on file with the State at Bremer Tower, 444 Cedar Street, Suite 223, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-6223. The Grantee shall also comply with all requirements referenced in the Emergency Management Performance Grant 2011 Guidelines and Application which includes the Terms and Conditions and Grant Program Guidelines(littp://aapp.dps.mn.gov/Egrants), which are mi corporated by reference into this grant agreement. Bridget Revisions: The breakdown of costs of the Grantee's Budget is contained iia Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant agreement. As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidelines, the Grantee will submit a written change request for any substitution of budget items or any deviation and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines_ Requests must be approved prior to any expenditure by the Grantee. Matching Requirements: (If applicable.) As stated in the Grantee's Application, the Grantee certifies that the matching requirement will be met by the Grantee - Page 6 DPS Grant Agreement non -state (49148) Grant Agreement Page 2 Payment: As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidance, the State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an invoice for the services actaally performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Payment will not be made if the Grantee has not satisfied reporting reQuirements.- ion Regarding Lobbying: (Lf.applicable.) Grantees receiving federal funds over $100,000.00 must and return the Certification Regarding Lobbying form provided by the State -to the Grantee. I. ENCU VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY Indavidua7 cerl 'est nds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Star. I61t.15 and 162.05. By: with delegated authority) Signed: Title: Date: Date: Grant Agreement No. A-EWG-20-DENNCO-00321/3000006422 Supplier.Contract • 36748 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate persons) have executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Gran as required by applicable articles, bylmvs, resolutions, or o finances. By: Title: Date: By: Distribution: DPS/FAS Title: Grantee State's Authorized Representative Date: pPS Grant Ageement non -state (09/08) Page Hennepin County Contract #5184C 1 Minnesota Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Management, Grant Contract No: 2011-HENNCO-00321 IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be duly executed. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN By= Dty/Clerk of the County Board Date: /q-z—l( )11 Approved as to form: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: Approved as to execution: ssistant County Attorney Date: Ie9 And: Coin ty Administrajar Date: ) :)- -%, >- ) i And: Date: Assistan ty Administrator, Public Works an ounty Engineer STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY Individual certifies thatfunds have been encumbered as AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A 14 and 15C D5. Signed: Date: Title: Date: Grant Contract No. Page 8 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety awarded a grant to Hennepin County Emergency Management for $429,774.00 and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Emergency Management Division upon acceptance of the grant pursuant to Hennepin County Resolution 11-0539 was authorized to disperse "pass through" or excess funds to local cities; and WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth Emergency Management Division was awarded a portion on these excess or "pass through" funds totaling $17,644.00 to spend on personnel, benefits, supplies, training and equipment. These funds ,trust be applied to the 2011 budget expenses; and WHEREAS, by signing the attached Emergency Management Performance Grant contract the City of Plymouth can receive the mentioned grant to apply to the 2011 emergency management budget expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that Approved this day of 2012. Page 9 rp)City of Agenda 6.14PlymouthNumber: Adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Amend Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with Maple Item: Grove for the Extension of Trunk Sanitary Sewer City Project No. 3106 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution approving an amendment to Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with the City of Maple Grove for the extension of a trunk sanitary sewer. 2. BACKGROUND: The City's Comprehensive Plan contemplates several drainage areas north of the Canadian Pacific railroad line on either side of Vicksburg Lane and generally west of Pomerleau Lake that are planned to receive trunk sanitary sewer service from a line extended through the City of Maple Grove. On December 28, 2003, the City Council approved a Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with Maple Grove. That agreement contained provisions for payment by Plymouth to Maple Grove for construction, treatment and operation and maintenance costs. In June, 2010, the Metropolitan Council metered sewer flows from Plymouth into Maple Grove to compare the method used to estimate flows per the agreement with actual flows. The metering data showed that the estimates were significantly higher than actual flows and Maple Grove has agreed to amend the agreement to reflect the metered flow rates. More recently, the City has been approached by a developer seeking to change the sewer districts identified in the comprehensive plan to allow more area to be served by Maple Grove. Sewer flow calculations for the additional area showed that the additional area could be served given that a large portion of the Hampton Hills area originally planned to be served through Maple Grove will be served to the southeast. Maple Gove has reviewed the information and has agreed to serve the additional area. An amended agreement that accounted for the items identified above was approved by the City Council on February 22, 2011. The Maple Grove staff later determined that it would be in their best interest to reserve 25% of the design flow capacity of the sewer for Maple Grove properties to be served. Although they agreed that the sewer flow estimates should be reduced, they did not agree to the levels proposed by Plymouth staff. This amended agreement represents a compromise in the flow estimates. Page 1 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Plymouth has reimbursed Maple Grove for construction costs and treatment and operation and maintenance costs through the year 2011 in accordance with the original agreement. Under the terms of the this amendment to the agreement, Plymouth would be responsible for approximately 180,000 for treatment costs (depending upon Metropolitan Council sewer rates) and $7,500 plus 3% inflation for operation and maintenance costs upon full development. The 2012 Sewer Budget includes the cost to serve the area anticipated to be developed. 4. ATTACHMENTS: 2011 Amendment to Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement Resolution Page 2 SECOND -ENDMEYr TO SANHARY SEER SERVICE # GREFAC 1' CITIES OF MAPLE GROVE AND PLYMOUTH THIS A I EENffi T, entemd into tNs day of 12011, between the City of Maple Grove, a municipal c i its the County of Hennepin, hereinafter referred to as 'WEAP'LE GROVE"; and the City of Plymouth. a municipal corporation is the County of Hennepin, hereinafter referred to as "PLYMOUTH"; WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, MAF'LE GROVE aW PL.YMOL IH have enured into a Sanitary Scwu Spice Agreement exetti led October 31, 2003 (kroina cr "AG EENIENT"); and HEREAT, the AGRFrMENT was ainended'Fcbruary 19, 20 tO to make addjustuaerxtS in ope don and main cn:anee cm*% and in treatment costs; and WHEUUAS, the AOREEMENT deFmrlas payment for capital comtruction costs and operationshnaintenanee as addressed within Section 4 and Mbit "B" of Lk AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, PLYMOUTH has made payment for dl capital construction costs pursuant to die AUREEMENT; and WFEd lam, PLYMOUTH hag made payinenr to MAPLE GROVE for opmtion and mai rite -ranee costs through the year 20101 and WHEREAS, PLYMOUTHOUTH and MAPLE CYROVE concur that various assumptions addre d wid& Exhibit "B' of the AGREEMENT ares no longer craw; and WHEREAS, PLYMOUTH and MAPLE GROVE agree that thr- Sewer Sen4ce Area neap in Exhibit "A" of t% AGREEMENT can be revised to exclude certain propurtics and include othc; and WHEREAS, PLYMOUTH desires to amend Seruiee Area No. 3 in Exhibit "A" of tk AGENT, as shown on the attached Proposed Stwear Service Arca No. 3 naap prepued b FLYIw OV111, da cl January 4, 2011, and MAPLE GROVE is agrecable thereto provided the change in Service Area No. 3 turves 25 (minimum) of the design flow capacity of the Ern Road Sub-tnink Sewer for use by MAPLE GR,OVB sewer service area tWetol and SAS, PLYMOUTH and MAPLE GROVE desire to amend the AGREEMENT relative to cost sharing of operation acrd maintenma costs NOW AFORE' it is hereby and Herein mutually agmed, in consideration of each pay's promises and considerations herein set, forth, as fallow: l- Page 3 1. Exhibit "W of tile AGREEMENT is deleted, Amadiftut of Sewer S"ce Area Pio. 3. ewer Service Area No. 3 map prepared by PLYMOUTH, dated January 'I. 2011 and audited lento, is made a part of t<p, AGF ENTE +iT. PLYMOLTH agr ,s to implement memuros, as may be needed, to ensure at lit of to design flow capacity in the Elm Read Sash -min k is reserved for use by MAPLE GROVE service area thereto; MAPLE GROVE. acltt'iowl0ge.s the PLYMOUTH Elm Road cul -trunk sewer service area, per AGREE, comprises a roxintately 75 of the Natal Elmo Read ;dub -trunk sewer service area, and furthermore recognizes such po ontial ortiomate use of the Elm Rj d Sob-t<urnk flaw capacity. I OperatloWMsintenanee Costs and'rreatrttent Costs Prior to Metering Illow. At MAPLE GROVES request, PLYMOUTH agrees to provide MAPLE UROVI with the til number of acwinr avaability charge (SAC) units in PLYMOUTH served by the Vicksburg Latae smitar°y stwer trunk. This request .shall be made upon. ULAPLE t~rRO E's receipt of it JACES annual treatment hill and. PLYMOUTH agr s to raimhurse MAPLE GROVE, on an annual basis. costs for tr ttanrtnt, Wgtftr with costs of operation avid maintenance: of the trunk sanitary sever systtm as drsr,6bW below. a.) MCBS deter fines the nurnher of SAC units for each land use. b.) MCES treatment rate dcWrrnined by total Uratmment cost to M+ PTE GROVE divided by total MAPLE GROVE flow, c.} How volume assumed to be 50,E gallons per SAC per year.. d_) PLYMOUTH ag s to pay MAPLE OROVE, on an annual basis, treatment. costs equivalent to the MCES. treatment rate molt phod by PLYMOUTH ACs multiplied by thy: flow volume of 50,000 gallons per SAC prr yon.'; iglus an oprration)maintenanct cost of $7,500 for 2009; said operationlinaintenance cast to be increased annually at a watt of 10 per year. 4_ eratierr/Main.ten ace Gnats and Trmtnumt Costs Dueing Temp ray Dior to the installation of the permanent meter by MCES, Wmporat'y Metering may be dame for the purpose of estimating total mmural flaw Unvogh the Vicksburg Lane sanitary stwer trunk connection paint. Iftemporary meteain g is done and total annual flow vola= is estimated, Plymouth will reimbuise Maple Grove, on an annual basis, owts for int based on estimated flows from Vlym(m#h less Maple Grove's proportionate flows, tagett,er for costs for operation ar d m i nt ena[l x of the tiunk sanitarysewer sys m as de2cri-W below, a.) MES drterttnines r umli-er of SAC fbr each land use, b.) MCES treatm ant rate pct rmir d by total treatment cost to MApli`a&re divided, by total Maple Grove flow, c.) Flow volume to be estimated based qjn WiTiporary metering. d.) Flow volume assumeed to be.50,ODD gallom, per SAC per year. e,) Plymouth will pay Maple Grove, oil an annual basis, treatment costs eyuivalcut to the estimate flow volume Multiplied by the MCES treatment rate minus Maple Gmvi; SACS rnuldpI ed by thb ='Iu v.,. v(>Iumt of 0,000 gallons per SLAC per year multiplied by the MCES ricatment rate; plus an 0perati0tY1na.intr,0Hr a cc3!.t of $7,500 for 2W9, said operation/maintenarice cost to be increased :annually at a raW of 10 per year. 5, OperationlL;+faintmaence Costs and Treatment Casts after Pernment iLnsta.11ation of MCES NNW. When flavors fiorn Plymouth to Maple Grave am subs.ta.i6al enough. MCES will in 11 a perMalent meter at Elm Road. Subsequent to the installation of the permanent truer, it is amsumed that MCRS will invoice Plymouth dif=tly for the tmatrnent costs. Maple grove will re rnburse Plymouth for tereattnent c C3 of its projm tionate flow and Plymouth will reimburse Maple Grove for operation and maintem:ance of the trunk sanitary sewer systsmm U dewdkd below: a_) MMES deWrrniaes number of SAC for each land m. h.) WCs trcaftmnt rate determined by total tmattwnt cxkgt Lo Maplc Grove divided ley total Maple drove flow, c.) Flow volame assua tud to be 50,000 g !longs per SAS' per year, d.) Plymouth will pay Maple Grove, on an annual basis, operaliewisimaintenanco t of $7,5M for said operadoW=iTrtetjance. cwt to be in=ased anmaRy at a rate of 3.0% per year. e.) Maple Grow will pay Plymauth, on an annual basis, treatment its oquiyalent to the MCES treatment rate multiplied by Maple Girove SACS Multiplied by tktr~ flow volume of 50,000 gallons per SAG per year or flow volurrre as may be otherwise estimted as mutuaLly agreed upon by Lempowy metering at the mquest of NLkPLE URO E, Dated: .2011 Dated: , 2011 CT7Y OF MAPLE GROVE y: MA u n rn Its, yrar 1 By; Ala.„ Madsen Its; City AAm1n;,%mi1'nr;('1L--k Page 5 3v MY OF Pflymoml 2011 3y Kelli Sl avik Its: Mayor r. L4 l: 2011, By. Lau.ric Ahrens Its: My Managpf Gty0fMAPLJE!QRW,` I --coying Dept 129M Arbcw Lakes Pi WY MAFLE CTROVE, MK 55369 Page 6 My Of Maple Grove Le Can Proposed Sever Service Area No. 3 in Plymouth Routed to Maple Grove 1-4-2011 Pb,- ity Gf Plymouth, Minnesota DAF o.1 0.3 a.d FP®Y Orf ML*rrf eT&t 'i]WM5 TM eAs NLR eElNrICLe Yerenen Nll)1lNz!.15P1 6N[U2 R FC1n Mi"lellCL Y}II.COIIIi'+.tlQLJ MRN 9RfeG.ft` L611RLC 63=1ilIFiS LEGEND Well ?aatl LOtrnk;erkceArea-174L FWI Wes lM1 llarca LMksbwg Lane Trim veWceArea- 513 LhlandAars M Or.y E*Lr Senrlce Paea 9oundaary Page 7 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH MAPLE GROVE FOR THE EXTENSION OF TRUNK SANITARY PROJECT N0. 3106 WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has an approved Comprehensive Plan which indicates trunk sewer service for portions of northwest Plymouth to be served from a trunk sanitary sewer extension through the City of Maple Grove to a point near the intersection of Vicksburg Lane and County Road 47; and WHEREAS, the City of Maple Grove has extended trunk sewer lines through their city to the Plymouth border and have expended additional costs to upsize sewer lines to be able to provide capacity for flow from future Plymouth developments; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA That the Amendment to Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement with Maple Grove for the extension of trunk sanitary sewer is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign this agreement. Approved this 24nd day of January, 2012. Page 8 rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quail ty to Life To: REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Reviewed by: January 24, 2012 Item: Agenda Number: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Givonna Kon6, Human Resources Manager Approve 2012 Pay Equity Report 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of the attached resolution approving the 2012 Pay Equity Report. 6.15 Attached is a copy of the Pay Equity Report and attachments as required by the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget. 2. BACKGROUND: Every three years, the city is required by Minnesota Statute Chapter 471, "Pay Equity," to file the attached report with the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget on or before January 31, 2012. The goal of pay equity is to ensure that female -dominated jobs are paid comparably to similarly valued male -dominated jobs. The City of Plymouth uses the Decision Band Method to determine the value and internal ranking of its jobs. In order to determine compliance with pay equity statutes, the city must provide data on all individuals who meet the definition of public employee under Minnesota Statutes, i.e., the individual works more than 67 days per year and more than 14 hours per week. Given this requirement, some paid -on-call, temporary and seasonal positions are included in this analysis. In addition, as required by state statute, the maximum salary for each position reported includes a contribution for health insurance. The four tests required for compliance with pay equity are completeness and accuracy; statistical analysis; salary range; and exceptional service. The city has passed each of these tests. The test for completeness and accuracy determines whether jurisdictions have filed the required reports on time, included correct data and supplied the required information. The statistical analysis test compares salary data to determine whether female -dominated classes are paid consistently below male classes of similar value. The city uses the state's Page 1 pay equity software to determine compliance with the statistical analysis test. A passing score is 80% or higher and the city received a 92.80%. The salary range test compares the average number of years it takes males and females to move through the salary ranges. A passing score is 80% or higher and the city received a 113.95%. The exceptional service test compares how often male -dominated job classes receive longevity or performance pay to how often female -dominated job classes receive longevity or performance pay. A passing score is 0% or 80%. The city received a 0% because we do not offer exceptional service pay. State statute requires that the pay equity compliance report be on file in Human Resources and available to all employees and that a pay equity notice be sent to the exclusive representative of each bargaining group. Notice that the pay equity report was completed will be posted and official copies will be sent to the bargaining units upon the City Council's approval of this report and submission to Management and Budget. A copy will also be sent to the local public library as required by the statute. One of the requirements for compliance is that we report to the Office of Management and Budget on or before January 31, 2012. Your review and approval of the attached documents will ensure that we meet that deadline. It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the 2012 Pay Equity Implementation Report as set forth herein by adoption of the attached resolution. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The results of the 2012 pay equity analysis do not impact the budget. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Compliance Report Predicted Pay for Plymouth Report Job Class Data Entry Verification List for Plymouth Resolution Page 2 Compliance Report Jurisdiction: Plymouth Report Year: 2012 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Case: 1 - 2012 DATA (Private (Jur Only)) Plymouth MN 55447 Contact: Givonna Kone Phone: (763) 509-5070 E -Mail: gkone@plymouthmn.gov The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results. For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports. I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION Job Classes Employees Avg. Max Monthly Pay per employee It. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST A. Underpayment Ratio = 92.80 Male Female Balanced All Job Classes Classes Classes Classes 50 32 8 90 176 61 35 272 6,438.31 6,252.59 6,349.36 Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 235 Value of T = 0.798 a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = $85 b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = $17 III. SALARY RANGE TEST = 113.95 (Result is A divided by B) A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 2.92 B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs= 2.56 IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST= 0.00 (Result is B divided by A) A. % of male classes receiving ESP 0.00 B. % of female classes receiving ESP 0.00 If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00) Page 3 Male Female Classes Classes a. # At or above Predicted Pay 21 12 b. # Below Predicted Pay 29 20 c. TOTAL 50 32 d. % Below Predicted Pay 58.00 62.50 b divided by c = d) Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.) B. T-test Results Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 235 Value of T = 0.798 a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = $85 b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = $17 III. SALARY RANGE TEST = 113.95 (Result is A divided by B) A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = 2.92 B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs= 2.56 IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST= 0.00 (Result is B divided by A) A. % of male classes receiving ESP 0.00 B. % of female classes receiving ESP 0.00 If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00) Page 3 14000 12000 10000 CO 8000 CO KIIIIIl 2000 Predicted Pay Report for Plymouth Case: 2012 DATA 1/12/2012 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Points Mage ;obs Female gobs Balanced Predc-ed Pay Une Cor3s nUatoor, (Min) Liao Co.-itinuation'Max, Page 1 of 4 Page 4 GO 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Points Mage ;obs Female gobs Balanced Predc-ed Pay Une Cor3s nUatoor, (Min) Liao Co.-itinuation'Max, Page 1 of 4 Page 4 Job Job Title Nbr Predicted Pay Report for Plymouth Case: 2012 DATA Nbr Nbr Total Job Job Males Females Nbr Type Points 1/12/2012 Max Mo Predicted Pay Salary Pay difference 1 CLERICAL ASST 1 0 1 1 Female 1 3,208.00 3,600.91 392.91) 2 LABORER -TEMPORARY 3 2 5 Balanced 1 2,992.00 3,600.91 608.91) 3 BLDG ATTENDANT 3 0 3 Male 2 2,862.00 3,884.36 1,022.36) 4 LABORER -SEASONAL 1 0 1 Male 2 3,593.00 3,884.36 291.36) 5 MAINTENANCE HELPER 2 0 2 Male 2 3,520.00 3,884.36 364.36) 6 METER READER 1 0 1 Male 5 4,850.00 4,734.71 115.29 7 COMM SERV OFFICER 2 2 4 Balanced 6 5,046.00 5,018.53 27.47 8 HOUSING SPECIALIST 1 1 2 Balanced 6 5,046.00 5,018.53 27.47 9 MTCE WORKER 44 2 46 Male 6 5,200.00 5,018.53 181.47 10 OFFICE SUPP REP 0 19 19 Female 6 5,046.00 5,018.53 27.47 11 OFFICE SUPP SPEC 0 6 6 Female 7 5,227.00 5,227.69 0.69) 12 ACCOUNTING CLERK 1 4 5 Female 8 5,412.00 5,433.64 21.64) 13 ASSESSMENT TECH 0 1 1 Female 8 5,412.00 5,433.64 21.64) 14 ENGR TCH 1 1 2 Balanced 8 5,412.00 5,433.64 21.64) 15 FIRE SAFETY TECH 1 0 1 Male 8 5,390.00 5,433.64 43.64) 16 MECHANIC 2 0 2 Male 8 5,366.00 5,433.64 67.64) 17 PAYROLL CLERK-CONF 0 1 1 Female 8 5,390.00 5,433.64 43.64) 18 HOUSING TECHNICIAN 0 1 1 Female 10 5,770.00 5,610.23 159.77 19 HUMAN RESOURCES TECH 0 1 1 Female 10 5,750.00 5,610.23 139.77 20 MECHANIC LEAD WORKER 1 0 1 Male 10 5,481.00 5,610.23 129.23) 21 STREET LEADPERSON 1 0 1 Male 10 5,481.00 5,610.23 129.23) 22 UTILITY OPERATOR 3 0 3 Male 10 5,481.00 5,610.23 129.23) 23 WATER RESOURCES TECH 1 0 1 Male 10 5,770.00 5,610.23 159.77 24 COMM RELATIONS OFC 1 0 1 Male 12 6,198.00 4,926.54 1,271.46 25 FORESTRY TECH 0 1 1 Female 12 5,046.00 4,926.54 119.46 26 HOUSING INSPECTOR 1 0 1 Male 12 5,046.00 4,926.54 119.46 27 VOLUNTEER COORD 0 1 1 Female 12 5,046.00 4,926.54 119.46 28 GIS TECHNICIAN 1 0 1 Male 12 6,198.00 4,926.54 1,271.46 29 ICE ARENA MTCE SUPV 1 0 1 Male 13 6,353.00 5,549.26 803.74 30 IT SPT SPEC/HELP DESK TECH 0 2 2 Female 13 6,353.00 5,549.26 803.74 31 UTILITY MTCE SUPV 2 0 2 Male 13 6,353.00 5,549.26 803.74 32 APPRAISER 3 1 4 Balanced 14 6,550.00 5,270.37 1,279.63 33 POC FIREFIGHTERS 9 1 10 Male 14 3,267.00 5,270.37 2,003.37) 34 POC FIREFIGHTERS-LIEUTENAN- 1 0 1 Male 15 3,527.00 5,738.78 2,211.78) 35 ACCOUNTANT 0 1 1 Female 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 Page 2 of 4 Page 5 Predicted Pay Report for Plymouth 1112/2012 Case: 2012 DATA Job Nbr Job Title Nbr Males Nbr Females Total Nbr Job Type Job Points Max Mo Salary Predicted Pay Pay Difference 36 ADMINISTRATIVE MGR 0 1 1 Female 16 6,979.00 6,509.06 469.94 37 BUILDING INSPECTOR 6 1 7 Male 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 38 ENGINEER 1 0 1 Male 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 39 ENVIRON ED COORDINATOR 0 1 1 Female 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 40 FIRE INSPECTOR 2 0 2 Male 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 41 HUMAN RESOURCES COORD 0 1 1 Female 16 6,979.00 6,509.06 469.94 42 POLICE OFFICER 32 4 36 Male 16 7,141.00 6,509.06 631.94 43 POLICE OFFICER SPEC 8 3 11 Balanced 16 7,273.00 6,509.06 763.94 44 RECREATION SUPV 2 2 4 Balanced 16 6,979.00 6,509.06 469.94 45 SR ENGRING TECH 4 0 4 Male 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 46 TRANSIT COORDINATOR 1 0 1 Male 16 6,902.00 6,509.06 392.94 47 APP SUPPORT ANALYST 0 1 1 Female 17 7,193.00 7,434.22 241.22) 48 FORESTER 1 0 1 Male 17 7,193.00 7,434.22 241.22) 49 INVESTIGATOR 6 1 7 Male 17 7,406.00 7,434.22 28.22) 50 PROPERTY MGMT COORD 1 0 1 Male 17 7,193.00 7,434.22 241.22) 51 PUBLIC SAFETY ED SPEC 0 1 1 Female 17 7,118.00 7,434.22 316.22) 52 SUPPORT SERVICES SUPV 0 1 1 Female 17 7,097.00 7,434.22 33722) 53 RECREATION MANAGER 0 1 1 Female 17 7,193.00 7,434.22 241.22) 54 ACTIVITY CENTER MGR 0 1 1 Female 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 55 CITY CLERK 0 1 1 Female 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 56 COMMUNICATIONS MCRA 0 1 1 Female 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 57 FIRE CAPTAIN 2 0 2 Male 18 7,348.00 7,806.62 458.62) 58 ICE ARENA MGR 1 0 1 Male 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 59 PARK MTCE SUPV 2 0 2 Male 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 60 RECONSTR PROG MGR 1 0 1 Male 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 61 SENIOR PLANNER 2 1 3 Balanced 18 7,432.00 7,806.62 374.62) 62 SERGEANT 12 0 12 Male 18 8,122.00 7,806.62 315.38 63 STREET SUPERVISOR 1 0 1 Male 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 64 SUPV ACCOUNTANT 0 2 2 Female 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 65 SUPVfNG APPRAISER 0 1 1 Female 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 66 WATER RESOURCES MGR 1 0 1 Male 18 7,503.00 7,806.62 303.62) 67 NETWORK ENGR 2 1 0 1 Male 19 7,972.00 8,180.44 208.44) 68 TRST AND SOLID WASTE MGR 0 1 1 Female 19 7,972.00 8,180.44 208.44) 69 ASST ENGINEER 1 0 1 Male 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) 70 DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 1 0 1 Male 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) Page 3 of 4 Page 6 Predicted Pay Report for Plymouth Case: 2012 DATA Job Job Title Nbr Nbr Total Job Job Nbr Males Females Nbr Type Points 71 HOUSING PROGRAM MGR 1 72 CENTRAL SERVICES MANAGER 1 73 UTILITIES MANAGER 1 74 DEP DIR PARKS AND RECREATIC 0 75 BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 76 PLANNING MGR 0 77 POLICE CAPTAIN 2 78 CITY ASSESSOR 0 79 DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 1 80 FINANCE MANAGER 0 81 HUMAN RESOURCES MGR 0 82 APPLICATIONS MGR 1 83 CITY ENGINEER 1 84 POLICE CHIEF 1 85 DIRECTOR OF ADM SERVICES 1 86 DIR OF COMM DEVELOPMENT 1 87 DIR OF PARKS AND REC 0 88 DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 89 FIRE CHIEF 1 90 CITY MANAGER 0 Job Number Count: 90 1/12/2012 Max Mo Predicted Pay Salary Pay Difference 0 1 Male 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) 0 1 Male 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) 0 1 Male 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) 1 1 Female 20 8,506.00 8,558.40 52.40) 0 1 Male 21 8,937.00 9,008.56 71.56) 1 1 Female 21 8,937.00 9,008.56 71.56) 0 2 Male 21 8,937.00 9,008.56 71.56) 1 1 Female 22 9,411.00 9,436.75 25.75) 0 1 Male 22 9,411.00 9,436.75 25.75) 1 1 Female 22 9,411.00 9,436.75 25.75) 1 1 Female 22 9,411.00 9,436.75 25.75) 0 1 Male 23 10,043.00 9,922.49 120.51 0 1 Male 24 10,309.00 10,399.19 90.19) 0 1 Male 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 0 1 Male 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 0 1 Male 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 1 1 Female 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 0 1 Male 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 0 1 Male 26 11,358.00 11,352.60 5.40 1 1 Female 27 12,397.00 11,829.93 567.07 Page 4 of 4 Page 7 Plymouth Job Class Data Entry Verification List LGID 950 Case: 2012 DATA Job Class Nbr Nbr Class Jobs Min Mo Max Mo Yrs to Max Yrs of Exceptional Nbr Title Males Females Type Points Salary Salary Salary Service Service Pay 1 CLERICAL ASST I 0 1 F 1 2,168.00 3,208.00 1.00 0.00 2 LABORER -TEMPORARY 3 2 B 1 2,472.00 2,992.00 1.00 0.00 3 BLDG ATTENDANT 3 0 M 2 2,472.00 2,862.00 1.00 0.00 4 LABORER -SEASONAL 1 0 M 2 3,038.00 3,593.00 1.00 0.00 5 MAINTENANCE HELPER 2 0 M 2 3,021.00 3,520.00 1.00 0.00 6 METER READER 1 0 M 5 3,806.00 4,850.00 6.00 0.00 7 COMM SERV OFFICER 2 2 B 6 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 8 HOUSING SPECIALIST 1 1 B 6 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 9 MTCE WORKER 44 2 M 6 4,312.00 5,200.00 5.00 0.00 10 OFFICE SUPP REP 0 19 F 6 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 11 OFFICE SUPP SPEC 0 6 F 7 4,083.00 5,227.00 6.00 0.00 12 ACCOUNTING CLERK 1 4 F 8 4,217.00 5,412.00 6.00 0.00 13 ASSESSMENTTECH 0 1 F 8 4,217.00 5,412.00 6.00 0.00 14 ENGR TCH 1 1 B 8 4,217.00 5,412.00 6.00 0.00 15 FIRE SAFETY TECH 1 0 M 8 4,372,00 5,390.00 1.00 0.00 16 MECHANIC 2 0 M 8 4,675.00 5,366.00 5.00 0.00 17 PAYROLL CLERK-CONF 0 1 F 8 4,372.00 5,390.00 1.00 0.00 18 HOUSING TECHNICIAN 0 1 F 10 4,482,00 5,770.00 6.00 0.00 19 HUMAN RESOURCES TE 0 1 F 10 4,650.00 5,750.00 1.00 0.00 20 MECHANIC LEAD WORKI 1 0 M 10 5,073.00 5,481.00 1.00 0.00 21 STREET LEADPERSON 1 0 M 10 5,073.00 5,481.00 5.00 0.00 22 UTILITY OPERATOR 3 0 M 10 5,073.00 5,481.00 5.00 0.00 23 WATER RESOURCES TE 1 0 M 10 4,482.00 5,770.00 6.00 0.00 24 COMM RELATIONS OFC 1 0 M 12 4,796.00 6,198.00 6,00 0.00 25 FORESTRY TECH 0 1 F 12 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 26 HOUSING INSPECTOR 1 0 M 12 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 27 VOLUNTEER COORD 0 1 F 12 3,949.00 5,046.00 6.00 0.00 28 GIS TECHNICIAN 1 0 M 12 4,796.00 6,198.00 6.00 0.00 29 ICE ARENA MTCE SUPV 1 0 M 13 5,116.00 6,353.00 1.00 0.00 30 IT SPT SPEC/HELP DESK 0 2 F 13 5,116.00 6,353.00 1.00 0.00 31 UTILITY MICE SUPV 2 0 M 13 5,116.00 6,353.00 1.00 0.00 32 APPRAISER 3 1 B 14 5,054.00 6,550.00 6.00 0.00 33 POC FIREFIGHTERS 9 1 M 14 2,832.00 3,267.00 1.00 0.00 34 POC FIREFIGHTERS-LIEI 1 0 M 15 3,527.00 3,527.00 1.00 0.00 35 ACCOUNTANT 0 1 F 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 36 ADMINISTRATIVE MGR 0 1 F 16 5,600.00 6,979.00 1.00 0.00 37 BUILDING INSPECTOR 6 1 M 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 38 ENGINEER 1 0 M 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 39 ENVIRON ED COORDINA 0 1 F 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 40 FIRE INSPECTOR 2 0 M 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 41 HUMAN RESOURCES CC 0 1 F 16 5,600.00 6,979.00 1.00 0.00 42 POLICE OFFICER 32 4 M 16 5,061.00 7,141.00 15.00 0.00 43 POLICE OFFICER SPEC 8 3 B 16 6,238.00 7,273.00 15.00 0.00 44 RECREATION SUPV 2 2 B 16 5,600.00 6,979.00 1.00 0.00 45 SR ENGRING TECH 4 0 M 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 46 TRANSIT COORDINATOF 1 0 M 16 5,312.00 6,902.00 6.00 0.00 47 APP SUPPORT ANALYST 0 1 F 17 5,766.00 7,193.00 1.00 0.00 48 FORESTER 1 0 M 17 5,766.00 7,193.00 1.00 0.00 49 INVESTIGATOR 6 1 M 17 6,370.00 7,406.00 15.00 0.00 50 PROPERTY MGMT COO, 1 0 M 17 5,766.00 7,193.00 1.00 0.00 51 PUBLIC SAFETY ED SPE 0 1 F 17 5,471.00 7,118.00 6.00 0.00 52 SUPPORT SERVICES SU 0 1 F 17 5,691.00 7,097.00 1.00 0.00 53 RECREATION MANAGER 0 1 F 17 5,766.00 7,193.00 1.00 0.00 54 ACTIVITY CENTER MGR 0 1 F 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 55 CITY CLERK 0 1 F 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 56 COMMUNICATIONS MGF 0 1 F 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 57 FIRE CAPTAIN 2 0 M 18 5,885.00 7,348.00 1.00 0.00 58 ICE ARENA MGR 1 0 M 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 Page 8 1 Plymouth Job Class Data Entry Verification List LGID 950 Case: 2012 DATA Job Class Nbr Nbr Class Jobs Min Mo Max Mo Yrs to Max Yrs of Exceptional Nbr Title Males Females Type Points Salary Salary Salary Service Service Pay 59 PARK MTGE SUPV 2 0 M 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 60 RECONSTR PROG MGR 1 0 M 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 61 SENIOR PLANNER 2 1 B 18 5,701.00 7,432.00 6.00 0.00 62 SERGEANT 12 0 M 18 7,394.00 8,122.00 3.00 0.00 63 STREET SUPERVISOR 1 0 M 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 64 SUPV ACCOUNTANT 0 2 F 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 65 SUPVING APPRAISER 0 1 F 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 66 WATER RESOURCES MC 1 0 M 18 5,960.00 7,503.00 1.00 0.00 67 NETWORK ENGR 2 1 0 M 19 6,368.00 7,972.00 1.00 0.00 68 TRSTAND SOLID WASTE 0 1 F 19 6,368.00 7,972.00 1.00 0.00 69 ASST ENGINEER 1 0 M 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1.00 0.00 70 DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 1 0 M 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1.00 0.00 71 HOUSING PROGRAM M( 1 0 M 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1.00 0.00 72 CENTRAL SERVICES MA 1 0 M 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1.00 0.00 73 UTILITIES MANAGER 1 0 M 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1,00 0.00 74 DEP DIR PARKS AND RE 0 1 F 20 6,718.00 8,506.00 1.00 0.00 75 BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 0 M 21 7,042.00 8,937.00 1.00 0.00 76 PLANNING MGR 0 1 F 21 7,042.00 8,937.00 1.00 0.00 77 POLICE CAPTAIN 2 0 M 21 7,044.00 8,937.00 1.00 0.00 78 CITY ASSESSOR 0 1 F 22 7,424.00 9,411.00 1.00 0.00 79 DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 1 0 M 22 7,424.00 9,411.00 1.00 0.00 80 FINANCE MANAGER 0 1 F 22 7,424.00 9,411,00 1,00 0.00 81 HUMAN RESOURCES MC 0 1 F 22 7,424.00 9,411.00 1.00 0.00 82 APPLICATIONS MGR 1 0 M 23 7,968.00 10,043.00 1.00 0.00 83 CITY ENGINEER 1 0 M 24 8,173.00 10,309.00 1.00 0.00 84 POLICE CHIEF 1 0 M 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1.00 0.00 85 DIRECTOR OF ADM SER 1 0 M 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1.00 0.00 86 DIR OF COMM DEVELOP 1 0 M 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1,00 0.00 87 DIR OF PARKS AND REG 0 1 F 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1.00 0.00 88 DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 0 M 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1.00 0.00 89 FIRE CHIEF 1 0 M 26 8,893.00 11,358.00 1.00 0.00 90 CITY MANAGER 0 1 F 27 12,397.00 12,397.00 1.00 0.00 Job Number Count: 90 Page 9 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - APPROVING THE 2012 PAY EQUITY REPORT WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 471, commonly known as the "Pay Equity Law," requires that every political subdivision of the State report its actual compensation plan every third year. The City of Plymouth is required to report its plan on or before January 31, 2012 to the Minnesota Office of Management and Budget; and WHEREAS, said legislation provides for rule making by the Office of Management and Budget regarding the form and substance of said report; and WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth has prepared said report in conformance with the requirements of the rules and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 471; and WHEREAS, said plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to its submission to the Office of Management and Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should, and hereby does: 1. Approve the 2012 Pay Equity Report 2. Directs the City Manager to proceed with the submission of the report and all of the requirements of the statute. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. Page 10 city0f Agenda Piylmouth Number: 6.16 INNEw- Adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Givonna Kone, Human Resources Manager COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed By: Rick Kline, Fire Chief January 24, 2012 Approve 2012 Firefighter Compensation Plan and Item: Payment to the Fire Relief Association for Firefighter Disability Insurance 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the attached resolution for the 2012 paid -on-call firefighter compensation plan and an estimated payment of $3,466.50 to the Fire Relief Association for one-half of the premium for firefighter disability insurance. 2. BACKGROUND: Wages The city is authorized for 78 paid -on-call firefighters. The primary incentive for being a firefighter is service to the community. In addition, the firefighters are provided with valuable training and receive a pension based on their years of service in the amount of $7,500 per year of service. Staff is proposing a one percent increase to paid -on-call firefighter wages which would result in the following range: $11.19--$11.73. Effective April 2011, the City Council eliminated the monthly stipend that was paid to fire officers and began paying an hourly premium to officers in addition to the base hourly wage. The intent was to compensate officers based on actual work performed. The new table for firefighters, including officers, is as follows: 2011 2012 TITLE HOURLY RATES HOURLY RATES Firefighter $11.08--$13.59 $11.19--$13.73 Fire Lieutenant $13.59 + $1.50 = $15.09 $13.73 + $1.50= $15.23 Fire Captain $13.59 + $3.00 = $16.59 $13.73 + $3.00= 16.73 Fire District Chief $13.59 + $6.00 = $19.59 $13.73 + 6.00+ $19.73 Disability Insurance The Fire Relief Association recognized that firefighters' pay could be significantly reduced if they were injured while on duty and received only workers' compensation benefits. The Fire Relief Association made a decision to purchase disability insurance to supplement workers' Page 1 compensation which, together, would get firefighters closer to their pre -disability earnings. This disability policy ensures that firefighters injured while on duty do not suffer an economic hardship. Staff is requesting payment of one half of the disability insurance premium ($3,466.50) which is the same amount the city paid in 2011 for this policy. The city has not yet received information regarding 2012 premiums but the 2012 city portion of the premium is expected to be similar to the 2011 city portion of the premium. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for the 2012 Firefighter compensation plan, including the proposed hourly rates for officers. There are also sufficient funds to pay half the premium for the disability policy. The other half of the disability policy premium is paid by the Fire Relief Association. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Page 2 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2012 PAY SCHEDULE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT OF ONE-HALF THE DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM TO THE FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended the establishment of 2012 pay rates for members of the Plymouth Fire Department; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended a payment of one-half the premium for supplemental disability insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that it should, and hereby does: 1. Establish the following rates of pay for the Plymouth Fire Department commencing January 1, 2012 for paid -on-call firefighters and officers: TITLE Firefighter Fire Lieutenant Fire Captain Fire District Chief 2012 PROPOSED HOURLY RATES 11.19--$13.73 13.73 + $1.50 = $15.23 13.73 + $3.00 = $16.73 13.73+$6.00=$19.73 An additional payment of $100 shall be paid to the paid -on-call fire officer assigned to respond to all calls for service from Friday evening until the following Monday morning each weekend. 2. Authorize a payment of $3,466.50 be made to pay one-half the premium for supplemental disability insurance. APPROVED this 24" day of January, 2012. Page 3 x•1'7 Agenda City of Number: Plymouth nddffigauarrrytolife To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works January 24, 2012 Order and Accept Preliminary Engineering Report, Plans and Specifications, and Order a Public Improvement Hearing and Ad for Bids, Item: Declaring Costs to be Assessed, and Setting Assessment Hearing for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions Ordering the Preliminary Engineering Report, Accepting the Preliminary Engineering Report, Ordering the Plans and Specifications, Accepting the PIans and Specifications, Calling for a Public Hearing, Ordering the Advertisement for Bids, Declaring the Cost to be Assessed, and Setting the Assessment Hearing for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Proj ect No. 12001. 2. BACKGROUND: The 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001, includes Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from GIeason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N. As outlined in the attached Preliminary Engineering Report, total reconstruction, which includes new concrete curb and gutter, is recommended for the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood. Total reconstruction includes a street section width that will vary from 20 feet to 28 feet (from back of curb to back of curb), placement of a 1%z inch bituminous wearing course, 2%z inch bituminous base course, 8 inches of aggregate base, and 12 inches of granular sub -base with drain the installed in the sub- base. esota Lane and 9th Avenue are dead end streets having no adequate means for traffic to turn around. Due to limited right-of-way and existing steep slopes, the construction of a standard 82' diameter cul-de-sac is not feasible in either of these locations. Based on existing conditions staff is proposing to install a 45' diameter cul- de-sac in each of these locations to provide some means for traffic to turn around. Page 1 Proposed improvements to the storm sewer system in the Circle Park neighborhood will include extensive runs of storm sewer piping and additional structures. Many of the streets in this area have nearly flat street grades with minimal storm sewer, resulting in poor drainage conditions. Sump style manholes and catch basins are proposed to be installed with the project in an effort to improve storm water quality prior to it entering wetlands, ponds, and lakes. Additionally, the existing corrugated metal pipe in the area is deteriorating and is proposed to be replaced with either reinforced concrete, or plastic piping. Drain file would also be added in this area to provide for sub -grade drainage. The existing ditch sections on Niagara Lane are also proposed to be eliminated by adjusting street grades on that roadway. In 2001, four speed humps were installed on Niagara Lane, following the submission of a petition by residents on that roadway. As part of the design for this project, staff is proposing to reinstall the speed humps on that roadway. The City Council would need to direct staff to allow for the installation of speed humps on any other street in the proposed project area. The attached Preliminary Engineering Report details traffic counts and speeds on Niagara Lane and Lanewood Lane both prior to and following the installation of the speed humps on Niagara Lane. The bids for this project would include a bid alternate for speed humps to allow the City Council to include or remove speed humps at the Public Improvement Hearing scheduled on March 27, 2012. The City's Maintenance Division has reviewed the water main in the proposed project area and has deemed it acceptable. The water valves in the project area however are at an age where bolts begin to rust and fail, causing water main breaks, and are proposed to be replaced as part of this project. No repairs to the sanitary sewer system are anticipated as part of this project. Sanitary sewer manholes are however proposed to be sealed in an effort to reduce any storm water runoff seeping through the manhole rings. There are two rain gardens proposed in the Circle Park neighborhood to improve water quality in the City. Similar to past Street Reconstruction Projects, the design will include curb cuts, located upstream of the catch basins, where the storm water will flow into the rain gardens and will infiltrate into the soil. Once the rain gardens are full, due to a major rain event, the overflow water will bypass the rain gardens altogether and flow directly into the catch basins. All private utility companies have been notified of this potential project and their facilities have been shown on the proposed construction plans, according to the location notes in the record drawings provided to the City by each company. Additionally, all homeowners having sprinkler systems, invisible dog fences, or any other private utility have been asked to contact City staff and these facilities have been noted on the proposed plans. The Circle Park Neighborhood is located in both the Bassett Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts. Permits will likely be required for this project and all Page 2 permits will be obtained prior to construction. In addition, because this project proposes to disturb more than one acre of land, a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) storm water construction permit will be required. On January 9, 2012, an Information Meeting was held to discuss the details of this proposed project with the residents in the Circle Park Neighborhood. Attached is a summary of the comments and questions from that meeting. Additionally, residents in the proposed project area have been invited to view the final plans prior to the City Council's approval. Bids for this project are scheduled to be received on February 23, 2012, and the public improvement and assessment hearings would be scheduled for March 27, 2012. In accordance with state statute, notice of the proposed improvement hearing' and assessment hearing for this project would be sent to all affected property owners and would be posted in the official City Newspaper in the appropriate time frame. Included with the notice would be a recommended assessment, which would be calculated based on the lowest responsible bid received. The current assessment policy assesses 40% of the project cost for total street reconstruction. At this time, the estimated assessment is $6,500 to $8,000 per single family property. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This proposed project is included in the 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program at an estimated cost of $2,440,000. The total estimated project cost for reconstruction of the streets in Circle Park is approximately $2,853,097.98 of which $1,071,414.03 would be assessed. The sanitary sewer improvements are estimated at $18,377.26 and will be funded from the Sewer Fund. The water main valve replacements are estimated at $128,248.15 and will be funded from the water fund, and rain garden installation is estimated at $27,937.50 and would be funded from the Water Resources Fund. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Preliminary Engineering Report Summary of Comments from Neighborhood Information Meeting Resolutions Page 3 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 January 2012 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and thatI duly Lice ed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 0 REG. NO. 14,55 ),A REVIEWED BY: DATE: Page 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................I INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 EXISTING CONDITIONS...............................................................................................2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.....................................................................................6 SURFACE WATER CONCERNS...................................................................................7 TRAFFIC CONCERNS....................................................................................................7 ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE.........................................................................10 ESTIMATEDCOSTS.....................................................................................................10 CosTSUNCAARY:.......................................................................................................................................10 PROJECT FINANCING: ................ — ...... I .................. .......... I'll" ................................. I I .............. I .................. 10 FUNDINGSUMMARY:..................................................................................................................................11 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATE LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Area Map........................................................................4 Figure 2 - Existing Street Widths...................................................................5 Figure 3 - Proposed Street Widths..................................................................8 Figure 4 - Typical Section — Full Reconstruction.. . ................ ............................. 9 Page 6 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions drawn from studies and investigations are: 1. The proposed street, drainage, sanitary sewer and water main improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost effective. 2. If the recommended streets are not reconstructed at this time, significant maintenance work will be required. 3. Draintile is necessary to reduce retained moisture and/or remove trapped groundwater from the subgrade along some of the streets. 4. Additional right-of-way may be needed at various locations throughout the project area. In all other areas, the existing right-of-way is adequate to construct the proposed street improvements. Based on these conclusions we recommend: I. The proposed improvements for the Circle Park neighborhood be constructed at an estimated total project cost of $2,853,097.98. 2. The proposed rain gardens be constructed at an estimated cost of $27,937.50 and funded from the Water Resources Fund. 3. The sanitary sewer manhole sealing be performed at an estimated cost of $18,377.26 and be funded from the Sewer Fund. 4. The water main valve replacements be done at an estimated cost of $128,248.15 and be funded from the Water Fund. 5_ Any existing storm sewer system be replaced and repaired if needed, and new storm sewer be added where necessary. 6. The project be assessed in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy, adopted on January 25, 2011. 1 Page 7 INTRODUCTION On January 24th, 2012, the Plymouth City Council ordered the preparation of a Preliminary Engineering Report for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 12001, Circle Park. The purpose of this report is to determine, in a preliminary manner, the feasibility of reconstructing and resurfacing existing streets within a proposed project area. The proposed 2012 Street Reconstruction Project investigated in this preliminary engineering report includes reconstructing existing streets. Reconstruction is recommended when the condition of an existing street indicates an unstable base requiring correction of an underlying sub -grade problem. Continued routine maintenance such as crack filling will be required after completion of the rehabilitation to maximize the streets life. EXISTING CONDITIONS As shown in Figure 1, the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood are Shenandoah Lane N., south of County Road 6, 9ch Avenue N from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N and Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason,Lake Drive to 401 Avenue N. According to City records, it appears that the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood were paved after the installation of utilities in the late 1960's and early 1970's. The existing roadway widths in this area range from 12 feet to 28 feet as shown in Figure 2. Two streets in the proposed project area, Minnesota Lane and 91h Avenue, are dead end roadways containing no adequate means for traffic to turn around. All of the streets in the Circle Park area have existing asphalt pavement. The surface conditions of the pavement in this area are generally poor, with pavement distresses including alligator cracking, transverse cracking, and edge cracking. There are also many locations that have patching, typically used to cover potholes and excessive alligator cracking. Soil boring logs, included in a Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec in February of 2009, indicate street sections in the project area that include an existing asphalt thickness ranging from 2.5" to 6" and ars existing road base that includes silty sand, clay, and little to no aggregate base. In 2001, four speed humps were installed on Niagara Lane, following the submission of a petition by residents on that roadway. The following table shows traffic counts and speeds on Niagara Lane and also on Lanewood Lane before and after the installation of the speed humps. The traffic data collected in 2000 was prior to the installation of the speed humps PA Page 8 and the remainder of the traffic data was collected following speed hump installation. Street 85 Percentile Speed (mph) Vehicles Per Da D 2000 Niagara Lane 38 1500 2000 Lanewood Lane 33 200 2001 Niagara, Lane 34.5 400_ 2008 Niagara Lane 25-26 550 2009 Lanewood Lane 25-26 285 Storm sewer is present in the proposed project area on the north half of Niagara Lane, from the Circle Park Pond to 9a' Avenue, around Circle Park, and on Shenendoah Lane, south of the Luce Line Trail. The existing storm sewer consists of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and corrugated metal pipe (CMP). The storm sewer system in this area does not appear to be adequate, with the exception of the RCP on the north half of Niagara Lane, and the RCP in the southern part of Circle Park. An existing ditch section also exists on a portion of Niagara Lane, with existing CMP under each driveway approach. The water main system in the Circle Park area was installed in the early 1970's, and consists of 6" and 8" cast iron pipes. City records indicate that there has not been a high occurrence of water main breaks in this area and that the mains are in good condition. The sanitary sewer system in this area was installed primarily in the late 1960's and consists of 8" and 9" VCP mains. In 2006 and 2008, much of the sanitary sewer in the area was lined. Due to this recent maintenance, no deficiencies are present in the existing sanitary sewer piping. 3 Page 9 or l 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT N CITY of CIRCLE PARK tPLYMOUTH LOCATION MAP (FIGURE 1) RSCALE 1:1000 sir ---------,. I Ilf11. 28 Feet r r r 24 Feat i i 1 1 1 1 12 Feet 27Feet mmiil 20Feet N 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PLYMOUTH Qt m CITY F EXISTING STREET WIDTHS FIGURE 2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Total reconstruction, which includes new concrete curb and gutter, is recommended for the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood. Total reconstruction includes a street section width that will vary from 20 feet to 28 feet (from back of curb to back of curb), placement of a 11/2 inch bituminous wearing course, 21/2 inch bituminous base course, 8 inches of aggregate base, and 12 inches of granular subbase with draintile installed in the subbase. Figure 4 shows a detail of the structural cross sections for total street reconstruction. Proposed street widths will vary from street to street, as shown in Figure 3. Streets in the Circle Park neighborhood are proposed to have a street width of 28 feet, with the exception of Minnesota Lane and Lanewood Lane around Circle Park. Due to existing yard slopes and driveway grades, Minnesota Lane is proposed to be constructed at a width of 21 feet, with no on -street parking. Additionally, staff is proposing to eliminate the grass island in the roadway at the entrance to Minnesota. Lane as it does not meet current City standards. Lanewood Lane on both sides of Circle Park is proposed to be reconstructed as a one-way, 20 foot street, closely matching the existing roadway in that location. As noted earlier in this report, Minnesota Lane and 9th Avenue are dead end streets having no adequate means for traffic to turn around. Due to limited right-of-way and existing steep slopes, the construction of a standard 82' diameter cul-de-sac is not feasible in either of these locations. Based on existing conditions staff is proposing to install a 45' diameter cul- de-sac in each of these locations to provide some means for traffic to turn around. Proposed improvements to the storm sewer system in the Circle Park neighborhood will include extensive runs of storm sewer piping and additional structures. Many of the streets in this area have nearly flat street grades with minimal storm sewer, resulting in poor drainage conditions. Sump style manholes and catch basins are proposed to be installed with the project in an effort to improve storm water quality prior to it entering wetlands, ponds, and lakes. Additionally, the existing corrugated metal pipe in the area is deteriorating and is proposed to be replaced with either reinforced concrete, or plastic piping. Drain file would also be added in this area to provide for subgrade drainage. The existing ditch sections on Niagara Lane are also proposed to be eliminated by adjusting street grades on that roadway. C1 Page 12 The City's Maintenance Division has reviewed the water main in the proposed project area and has deemed it acceptable. The water valves in the project area however are at an age where bolts begin to rust and fail, causing water main breaks, and are proposed to be replaced as part of this project. As noted above, no repairs to the sanitary sewer system are anticipated as part of this project. Sanitary sewer manholes are however proposed to be sealed in an effort to reduce any storm water runoff seeping through the manhole rings. Rain gardens are proposed in the Circle Park neighborhood improve water quality in the City. Similar to past Street Reconstruction Projects, the design will include curb cuts, located upstream of the catch basins, where the storm water will flow into the rain gardens and will infiltrate into the soil. Once the rain gardens are full, due to a major rain event, the overflow water will bypass the rain gardens altogether and flow directly into the catch basins. SURFACE WATER CONCERNS The Circle Park neighborhood is located in both the Bassett Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Permits will likely be required for this project and all permits will be obtained prior to construction beginning. In addition, because the project is disturbing more than one -acre of land, a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) storm water construction permit will be required. TRAFFIC CONCERNS Traffic will be maintained on streets wherever possible during construction. Construction for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project will be staged to provide access to the area in general and minimize disruption to individual driveways. As noted above, Niagara Lane has existing speed humps. As part of the design for this project, staff is proposing to reinstall the speed humps on that roadway. The City Council would need to direct staff to allow for the installation of speed humps on any other street in the proposed project area. 7 Page 13 u D D LEGENO 29 Feet — 21 Feet rr M o 20 Feet [ I I i I ibCITY OF PLYMOUTH 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROPOSED STREET WIDTHS 3 TYPICAL 28' B --B STREET RECONSTRUCTION R/W VARIABLE VARIABLE 14' 14' 2,--2' 2 _2`1 I B-629 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 1' 1' l r 1v 12" SUBGRADE J DETAIL A TYP) 4" DRAINTILE W/FILTER FABRIC (WHERE SPECIFIED) DETAIL A 1--1/2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MN/DOT SPEC_ 2360, TYPE SPWEA230C 2357 TACK COAT 2-1/2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE MN/DOT SPEC_ 2360, TYPE SPNW13240C 8" AGC. BASE CLASS 7 MN/DOT SPEC. 3138 A2(a) 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW SPEC. 3149.213 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) N 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONPLYMOUTH I RE 4 Estimated 12001 Project Schedule City Council receives the Feasibility Report and orders preparation of plans andspecs January 24, 2012 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 City Council approves plans and specs and orders Public Hearing January 24, 2012 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Advertise for bids February 02, 2012 Receive bids February 23, 2012 Public Improvement Hearing, Assessment Hearing, and Award Contract March 27, 2012 Begin Construction May, 2012 Construction ends August 24, 2012 ESTIMATED COSTS Project costs have been estimated for all the improvements studied in this report. The costs include construction costs plus 10% for construction contingencies, 15% for engineering, administration, finance and legal. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix A of this report. The total estimated project costs for improvements of the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, are summarized below. Cost Summary: Construction Cost 2,282,478.38 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 15% Eng. & Admin. 342,371.76 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Project Financing: The City of Plymouth has an adopted method for financing street reconstruction projects, which includes both assessments and City funding. Street reconstruction, curb and gutter, and storm sewer costs will be assessed at 40% to the adjacent property owners with the Street Reconstruction Fund accounting for the remaining 60%. It is proposed that the Water Resources Fund will finance the rain gardens installed with the project, and the total cost for installing the inflow and infiltration sealing system will be 10 Page 16 financed through the Sewer Fund. The total cost for replacing the water main valves will be financed through the Water Fund. F'unding Summary: Funding Source Estimated Cost Water Resources Fund: Rain Gardens 27,937.50 Water Fund: Watermain Valve Replacement 128,248.15 Sewer Fund: I&1 Sealing Manholes 18,377.26 Assessments: Total Street Reconstruction (40% Assessed) 1,071,417.03 Street Reconstruction Fund 1,607,121.04 Total Funding: 2,853,097.98 11 Page 17 12 APPENDIX A -- Cast Estimate Page 18 2012 Street Reconstruction Project City of Plymouth, Minnesota City Project No. 12001 NO. ITEM SCHEDULE A - CIRCLE PARK UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 100,000.00 100,000.00 2 'TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 3 ABANDON STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 100 3.50 350.00 4 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 1,388 7.85 10,895.80 51 REMOVE FENCE L.F. 50 10.00 500.00 6 REMOVE RETAINING WALL L.F. 50 15.00 750.00 7 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 10 339.26 3,392.60 8 REMOVE AND REPLACE 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S.Y. 892 38.19 34,065.48 9 SALVAGE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 16 309.84 4,957.44 10 SALVAGE AND INSTALL BRICK PAVER DRIVEWAY S.F. 350 9,65 3,377.50 11 SALVAGE AND INSTALL RETAINING WALL S.F_ 100 16.48 1,648.00 12 SALVAGE AND INSTALL INVISIBLE DOG FENCE EACH 20 158.39 3,167.80 13 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD EACH 100 48.67 4,867.00 14 SALVAGE AND INSTALL MAILBOX STRUCTURE EACH 92 76.85 7,070.20 15 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL, TYPE C EACH 36 39.15 1,409.40 16 SALVAGE AND INSTALL FENCE L.F. 50 20.08 1,004.00 17 SALVAGE AND INSTALL HYDRANT EACH 7 2,500.00 17,500.00 18 TEMPORARY MAILBOX STRUCTURE L.S. 1 2,800.00 2,800.00 19 CLEARING TREE 25 70.86 1,771.50 20 GRUBBING TREE 25 41.71 1,042.75 21 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 24,060 7.85 188,868.65 22 CHANNEL EXCAVATION C.Y. 1,000 8.38 8,380.00 23 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C.Y. 2,000 8.70 17,400.00 24 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) C.Y_ 10,284 11.82 121,556.88 25 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S.Y. 1,000 2.10 2,100.00 26 TEST ROLLING Rd. Sta 1,000 2.75 2,750.00 27 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL. 10,000 0.87 8,700.00 281 AGGREGATE BASE CL 7 (CV) G.Y. 6,856 17.83 122,242.48 29 DRIVEWAY BASE, AGG. CL. 7 C.Y. 604 28.88 17,443.52 30 DRIVEWAY AGG. CL. 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 20D 22.54 4,508.00 31 3 INCH MINUS RECYCLE MATERIAL TON 200 21.56 4,312.00 32 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 459 65.00 29,835.00 33 TYPE SPNWB230C BASE COURSE MIXTURE (2 112") S.Y. 24,076 8.13 195,737.88 34 TYPE SPWEA240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1'/.") S.Y. 24,076 5.45 131,214.20 35 TACK COAT GAL. 1,204. 2.40 2,889.60 36 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 2,000 10.75 21,500.00 37 4" PE STREET DRAINTILE WISOCK L.F. 9,700 4.47 43,359.00 38 4" PE DRAINTILE SERVICE WISOCK L.F. 375 8.15 3,056.25 39 PE YARD DRAIN EACH 25 219.65 5,491.25 40 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 40 136.80 5,472.00 41 CONNECT EXISTING DISCHARGE LINE TO YARD DRAIN EACH 5 177.74 888.70 42 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 730.94 3,654.70 43 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 750.00 750.00 44 12" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 2,566 29.51 75,722,66 45 15" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 292 31.82 9,291.44 46 18" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL V L -F. 890 34,04 30,295.60 47 21" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.III L -F. 237 36.00 8,532.00 48115" HDPE DUAL WALL L -F. 70 27.50 1,925.00 49112" RC PIPE APRON EACH 7 459,28 3,214.96 50 21" RC PIPE APRON & TRASHGUARD EACH 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 51 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 1,00 16.51 16,510.00 52 CB TYPE ST -2 L.F. 55.5 218.55 12,129.53 Page 19 53 MH TYPE ST -6 (48" DIAMETER) L.F. 115.0 235.98 27,137.70 54 MH TYPE ST -6 (60" DIAMETER) L.F. 32.3 395.65 12,779.50 55 15" DRAIN BASIN WIDOME GRATE EACH 1 750.00 750.00 56 CB CASTING TYPE R -3067 -DL EACH 25 518.54 12,963.50 57 MH CASTING R-1642 EACH 13 553.55 7,196.15 58 MH CASTING R-2561 EACH 1 426.13 426.13 59 HAND -PLACED RIPRAP CL III TON 19 83.91 1,594.29 60 ALTER SANITARY SERVICE EACH 4 846.58 3,386.32 61 4" PVC SEWER SERVICE PIPE - SDR 35 L.F. 100 29.90 2,990.00 62 INFILTRATION & INFLOW (I&I) BARRIERS EACH 33 176.53 5,825.49 63 F & 16" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 25 2,071.74 51,793.50 64 F & 18"' GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 2,502.86 22,525.74 65 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 4 220.46 881.84 66 ALTER WATER SERVICE EACH 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 67 INSULATE WATERMAIN (4") S. F. 1,000 2.94 2,940.00 68 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 42 426.16 17,898.72 69 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLEICATCH BASIN L.F. 25 333.59 8,339.75 70 MANHOLEICATCH BASIN REPAIR L.F. 5 192.93 868.19 71 CONCRETE PED. RAMPS EACH 8 484.96 3,879.68 72 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B61 B L.F. 18,926 8.87 167,873.62 73 36" CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER L.F_ 75 16.80 1,260.00 74 RETAINING WALL - MODULAR BLOCK (<4 HIGH) S.F. 250 22,02 5,505.00 75 RETAINING WALL - CHILTON' LIMESTONE (<4' HIGH) S.F. 500 26.70 13,350.00 76 RAINGARDEN #1 EACH 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 77 RAINGARDEN 42 EACH 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 78 WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MGAL 1,700 9.85 16,745.00 79 COMMERCIAL FERT. ANALYSIS 5-15-10 Lb. 1,689 0.5B 979.62 80 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD S.Y. 40,889 3.25 132,889.25 81 SEEDING: MIXTURE MnIDOT 350 ACRE 1 2,626.500 2,626.50 82 WOOD FIBER BLANKET S.Y. 1,000 1.23 1,230.00 83 SILT FENCE L.F. 1,500 1.59 2,385.00 84 INLET PROTECTION -TYPE SPECIAL EACH 34 133.70 4,545.80 85 F&I TREE, AUTUMN SPRIE MAPLE, 2" B&B EACH 5 315.04 1,575.20 86 F&I TREE, BLACK HILLS SPRUCE, 2" H*B JEACH 5 247.73 1 1,238.65 TOTAL SCHEDULE A $ 1,863,780.89 NO. ITEM SCHEDULE B - SHENANDOAH LANE UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 87 MOBILIZATION L.S_ 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 88 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 89 ABANDON STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 50 3.50 175.00 90 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 200 7.85 1,570.00 91 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 94 2.48 233.12 92 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD EACH 25 48.67 1,216.75 93 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL, TYPE C EACH 26 39.15 1,017.90 94 CLEARING TREE 50 70.85 3,543.00 95 GRUBBING TREE 50 41.71 2,085.50 96 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 6,616 7.85 51,935.60 97 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C.Y. 250 8.70 2,175.00 98 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) C.Y. 2,807 11.82 33,178.74 99 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S.Y. 250 2.10 525.00 100 TEST ROLLING Rd. Sta 100 2,75 275.00 101 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL. 2,500 0.87 2,175.00 102 AGGREGATE BASE CL 7 (CV) C.Y. 1,871 17.83 33,359.93 103 DRIVEWAY BASE, AGG. CL. 7 C.Y. 92 28.88 2,656.96 104 3 INCH MINUS RECYCLE MATERIAL TON 50 21.56 1,078.00 Page 20 105 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 93 65.00 6,045.00 106 TYPE SPNWB230C BASE COURSE MIXTURE (2 112") S.Y. 6,669 8.13 54,218.97 107 TYPE SPWEA240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1'1x") S.Y. 6,669 5.45 36,346.05 108 TACK COAT GAL, 333 2.40 799.20 109 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 250 10.75 2,687.50 110 4" PE STREET DRAINTILE WISOCK L.F. 2,650 4.47 11,845.50 111 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 16 136.80 2,188.80 112 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 1 730.94 730.94 113 12" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 800 29.51 23,608.00 114 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 459.28 918.56 115 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 100 16.51 1,651.00 115 CB TYPE ST -2 L.F. 16.0 218.55 3,496.80 117 MH TYPE ST -6 (48" DIAMETER) L.F. 30.0 235.98 7,079.40 118 CB CASTING TYPE R -3067 -DL EACH 8 518.54 4,148.32 119 HAND -PLACED RIPRAP CL [I] TON 14 83.91 1,174.74 1201 INSTALL 8" SANITARY SERVICE & STUB EACH 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 121 CONCRETE PED. RAMPS EACH 2 484.96 969.92 122 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8618 L.F. 5,074 8.87 45,006.38 123 WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MGAL 500 9.85 4,925.00 124 COMMERCIAL FERT. ANALYSIS 5-15-10 Lb. 344 0.58 199.52 125 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD S.Y. 8,333 3.25 27,082.25 126 SILTFENCE L.F. 2,000 1.59 3,180.00 127 INLET PROTECTION -TYPE SPECIAL EACH 8 133.70 1,069.60 128 F&I TREE, AUTUMN SPRIE MAPLE, 2" B&B EACH 2 315.04 630.08 129 F&I TREE, BLACK HILLS SPRUCE, 2" B*B EACH 2 247.73 495.46 TOTAL SCHEDULE B $ 402,697.49 Bid Alternate A 130 SPEED HUMPS -NIAGARA LN JEACH 1 4 1$ 2,000.00 1 $ 8,000.00 Total Bid Alternate A $ 8,000.00 Bid Alternate B 1. 130 SPEED HUMPS-LANEWOOD LN JEACH 1 4 $ 2,000.00 1 $ 8,000.00 Total Bid Alternate B $ 8,000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULES A & B, AND BID ALTERNATES A & B $ 2,282,478.38 25% DESIGN, ADMIN, CONT _$ 570,619.60 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 2,853,097.98 Page 21 DATE: January 10, 2012 TO: File V JN" Jur, Paiuiicii, Recons Tuetion Program Manager SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC MEETING 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 A public meeting was held on Monday, January 9, 2012 for property owners/residents in the proposed 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, No. 12001. The Circle Park area is Shenandoah Lane N., south of County Road 6, 91h Avenue N from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N and Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9h Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4h Avenue N. Approximately 22 property owners attended the meeting. City representatives present included Jeff Wosje, Ward 2 City Councilman, Doran Cote, Public Works Director, Jim Renneberg, Assistant City Engineer, Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager, and Mike Payne, Engineer. General information was provided regarding the proposed improvements, the reconstruction process, and the City's assessment policy. The major questions and comments were as follows: Can the overhead lines be buried as part of this project: Response: It is possible to bury the overhead lines. However, it would be done separate from the reconstruction project, as the appropriate utility company would do the relocation. It is likely that the homeowners in the area would have to pay for the entire cost of relocating the utility. What portion of the cost is the city paying? The city pays for 60% of the project costs associated with the street reconstruction. The council changed the assessment policy since the last time this project was brought forward. Under the old policy, residents paid 100% of the cost for curb and gutter when it did not previously exist. Residents also paid 100% of the cost for storm sewer if the system was deemed inadequate. The current estimate is based on an average of last years bid prices. Do you have standards for asphalt and monitor its quality? Yes, we follow the Minnesota Department of Transportation specifications for asphalt and we have an inspector on site watching paving operations. We can O.TngineeringlPRO]ELTSaOID-2619412OOl\MemoRkQ&AinfnMtgi?Agg 22 also take core samples afterwards to make sure the asphalt conforms to our specifications. What is the current street standard width? 28 feet from back of curb to back of curb. How far do you go into the boulevard to match grades? Typically it is from 5-10 feet, but can be more. Niagara Lane isn't centered in the right-of-way; will it be in the new design? We try to keep the same footprint whenever possible to minimize impacts. Niagara seems generally close to being centered in the right of way. If a road was grossly offset to one side or the other we would try to make it more centered if possible. If gas mains are hit will you turn off service? The gas lines that are hit most often are the individual services to homes. In that case the gas company is called once the line is hit and they will come out and make repairs. The home would be without gas service until the repair can be made. Will there be any impact to the trees with this construction project? We expect very minimal impact to trees with this project. Are higher volume roads like County Road 6 assessed the same? Higher volume residential roads are assessed the same. Does increased traffic lower the longevity of the street? Higher passenger vehicle traffic does not lower the longevity of a street as passenger vehicles have little impact on the roadway. Much heavier vehicles like school busses and garbage trucks impact the roadway more and the volume of those vehicles is usually fairly constant. Does curb and gutter make a street last longer? Yes, curb and gutter is rigid and provides edge support to the flexible roadway, which results in longer service life. Curb and gutter also offers superior drainage. How wide will Minnesota Lane be? 21 feet from back of curb to back of curb, the minimum width allowed in the City for streets having two-way traffic. Will the fire hydrant in my lot be moved closer to my house? We try to keep a buffer between the roadway and a fire hydrant. That may result in a fire hydrant being moved if the roadway is being widened and an inadequate buffer exists. Can you put in an extra cut in the curb like you do for a driveway? We typically don't put in an extra curb cut for future driveways but we do accommodate special situations. Is the assessment tax deductible? 0:lEngineerinoROJEC7S1201a•26191126015MemoslQ&AinfoMtg,Pag 23 We recommend that you contact a tax professional to answer that question. Will this project increase runoff to Parkers Lake? This project may increase runoff to Parkers Lake. We treat storm water with raingardens and sump manholes in an effort to improve the quality of the sormwater runoff. Why are you proposing to install curb and gutter? Curb and gutter provides edge support for the roadway which increases the life span of the road. It also offers improved drainage and helps prevent plow damage to the boulevard. What is the interest rate on this assessment and is it a fisted rate? If assessments are not paid off in a lump sum an interest rate is charged and the rate is fixed. The current interest rate for a project paid over a ten year term is 3.37%. Can assessments come in higher than the estimate? It is possible for that to happen. However we have noticed a favorable bidding climate the last few years and prepared the estimate using an average of bid prices of previous projects, not the lowest bidder. How many speeding tickets are written on Niagara Lane? We don't know have that information and would have to check with the police department. How does water flow around speed humps on roads with curb and gutter? The speed humps taper down towards the edge of the roadway and stay on the asphalt pavement. Water can still flow in the concrete gutter. Have traffic counts been done on Niagara and Lanewood Lane? Yes, traffic counts were taken before and after the speed humps were installed. When will the Hennepin County 911 Dispatch Center be constructed? The dispatch center is expected to begin construction in the summer of 2013. We are trying to plan with the county so that impacts to the new roadway are minimized. Will the Hennepin County 911 Dispatch Center increase traffic in the Circle Park neighborhood? We do not believe that the dispatch center will increase traffic to the area. Are the final plans done yet? The final plans are not done yet. Usually we send out a letter when the plans are complete. You are welcome to come to city hall to view them. O:SEngineering5PAO7ECT512610-20191120011Memos4Q&A"snfoMi.Page 24 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2012 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 WHEREAS, the 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program made recommendations for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to undertake a Preliminary Engineering Report to determine the work required on each street recommended to be considered for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001; and WHEREAS, the streets including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9rb Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 41' Avenue N is the recommended project area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Engineer is instructed to prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report with all convenient speed by advising the Council, in a preliminary way, as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in conjunction with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 25 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT, ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted January 24, 2012, a report has been prepared with reference to the improvement of the area including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9h Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9fh Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4h Avenue N; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvement includes the reconstruction of streets by the installation of bituminous pavement and concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer installation, water main valve replacement, and all necessary appurtenances; and WHEREAS, said report is being received by the Council on January 24, 2012; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and adjacent property within the designated 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001 for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.011 to 429.111 (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,853,097.98. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 27` h day of March, 2012 in the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard at 7:00 p.m., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. 3. The Plymouth Engineering Department is designated as engineer for the improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 26 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on January 24, 2012, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for improvement No. 12001, the improvement of the Circle Park Neighborhood including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 90' Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9"' Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9h Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4a' Avenue N by reconstruction of streets with the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation, storm sewer installation, water main valve replacement, and all necessary appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in The Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published three times, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on February 23, 2012 at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center building at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, by the engineer and City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7 p.m. on March 27, 2012, in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk for five percent of the amount of such bid. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 27 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012 - A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, estimated costs have been calculated for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No 12001 including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N, and the estimated cost for such improvement is $2,282,478.38, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $570,619.60 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $2,853,097.98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Plymouth is hereby declared to be $1,781,683.95 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $1,071,414.03. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of either 5 years, 10 years, or 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2013, and shall bear the interest rate of 2.44% percent for a 5 year term, 3.37% for a 10 year term, or 4.34% for a 15 year term per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by the law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the City Council thereof. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 28 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on January 24, 2012, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the improvement including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9t' Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9ch Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9"` Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N by reconstruction of streets with the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation, storm sewer installation, water main valve installation, and all necessary appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 27th day of March, 2012, in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 29 City of Plymouth Iridin, Qphty da Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 Agenda 7.01Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Daniel E. Plekkenpol, Deputy Chief of Police Reviewed by: Michael S. Goldstein, Chief of Police Item: Appeal of denial of 2012 renewal application for Massage Therapist License 1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council to hold a hearing as requested by Steve Ekland, pertaining to the administrative denial of a massage therapy license. 2. BACKGROUND: On an annual basis, the City conducts background checks for applications requesting licensure of massage therapists. Due to the information learned in this background investigation the application was denied by staff. As a result of the denial, the applicant has requested a public hearing before the City Council at the January 24, 2012 council meeting. Due to this request, staff has agreed to allow the applicant to maintain his current license until the Council has heard this matter. Mr. Ekland is currently employed by Massage Retreat and Spa at 4445 Nathan Lane Suite B in the City of Plymouth. Per City Ordinance 1135, there are two licenses, one for the business owner and one for a massage therapist. The applicant has reapplied for the massage therapist license. In the investigation, it was learned that 1135.13 subd. (a) (b) were in violation. Subd. (a) states, Certificates may be issued only to person of good repute. Subd. (b) states, "Certificates may be issued only to persons free of convictions of prostitution or offenses which involve moral turpitude or which relate directly to the persons ability, capacity, or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibility of the operation. Under 1135.17 subd. (2) the renewal has been denied and per this section an appeal to the council has been requested. As stated in City Ordinance 1135.17 subd. 2, an appeal will be handled by the City Council in the following manner: The certificate holder may appeal a denial, suspension or non -renewal to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the appeal at the next regularly or specially scheduled City Council meeting 10 days after the service of the notice of appeal upon the City Clerk by the Certificate holder. Hearing on the appeal shall be open to the public and the Certificate holder shall have the right to appear and be represented by legal counsel and to offer evidence in behalf of certification. At the conclusion of the hearing, or soon thereafter as practicable, the City Council may order: Page 1 a) That the denial, revocation, suspension or non -renewal by the City Manager be affirmed. b) That the denial, revocation, suspension or non -renewal by the City Manager be lifted and that the Certificate be issued or returned to the Certificate holder. c) The City Council may base its order regarding the Certificate upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which it may, in its discretion, impose. The license holder was mailed a letter notifying them of this hearing before the Council and was provided copies of this staff report and background investigation. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: There would be no significant impact on the budget from this action. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Denial letter to Steve Ekland Appeal acknowledgement letter Resolution Page 2 December 22, 2011 Steven Ekland Practicing Address: 1373 Hoyt Ave. W. Massage Retreat and Spa Falcon Heights, MN 55108 4445 Nathan Lane N., Suite B Plymouth, MN 55442 RE: 2012 RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR MASSAGE THERAPY CERTIFICATE This letter will serve as your notification that your 2012 renewal application for a Massage Therapy Certificate has been denied. This denial is based on the background checks completed by the Police Department. According to Section 1135.17, Subd. 2, you have the right to appeal this decision to the City Council: The Certificate holder may appeal a denial, suspension, revocation or non -renewal to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the appeal at the next regularly or specially scheduled City Council meeting 10 days after service of the notice of appeal upon the City Clerk by the Certificate holder. Hearing on the appeal shall be open to the public and the Certificate holder shall have the right to appear and be represented by legal counsel and to offer evidence in behalf of certification. At the conclusion of the hearing, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the City Council may order: a) That the denial, revocation, suspension or non -renewal by the City Manager be affirmed. b) That the denial, revocation, suspension or non -renewal by the City Manager be lifted and that the Certificate be issued or returned to the Certificate holder c) The City Council may base its order regarding the Certificate upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which it may, in its discretion, impose. The City Council's next regularly scheduled meeting is on January 10, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at which time you may appeal this decision. Please contact me by January 4, 2012 at (763) 509-5080 if this is your intent. If you have any questions regarding the background investigation conducted by the Police Department, please contact Dan Plekkenpol, Deputy Police Chief, at (763) 509-5187. In order to allow you the opportunity to appeal the denial, we are extending your license until the close of business on January 10, 2012. Sincerely, Sandra Engdahl City Clerk cc: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Dan Plekkenpol, Deputy Police Chief Massage Retreat and Spa Page 3 Plymouth1'2P Adding Quality to Life January 3, 2012 Mr. Steven Ekland 1373 Hoyt Ave. W. Falcon Heights, MN 55108 RE: 2012 RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR MASSAGE THERAPY CERTIFICATE I have received your request to appeal the denial of the 2012 renewal application for your Massage Therapy Certificate. At your request, the hearing on your appeal will be heard by the City Council at their meeting on January 24, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. As indicated in the December 22, 2011 correspondence informing you that your renewal application had been denied, your current license expires after the close of the business day on January 10, 2012. If you have any questions, please contact me at (763) 509-5080. Sincerely, Sandra Engdahl City Clerk cc: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Dan Plekkenpol, Deputy Police Chief 3400 Plymouth Btvd - Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-1482 - Tel: 763-509-5000 - www.d.ptymouth.mn.us Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING DENIAL OF MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE FOR STEVE EKLAND WHEREAS, the background investigation conducted by the Police Department in regards to the license application for Steve Ekland has concluded that the application will be denied; and WHEREAS, the denial is be based on Plymouth City Ordinance 1135.13 sub. (a) and (b); and WHEREAS, Mr. Ekland was convicted of a felony on April 28, 2011, for prescription fraud within Ramsey County, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the recommendation to deny the Massage Therapist Certificate for Steve Ekland is affirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney is directed to prepare findings of fact for this denial for the February 14, 2012 Council Meeting. Approved this 24th of January 2012. Page 5 rp) City of Plymouth Adding Quality to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 Agenda 8.01Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Marie Darling, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager and Steve Juetten, Community Development Director Planned unit development (PUD) amendment for Item: improvements to Plymouth Station Auto Center at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Consider the following for the application requested by Ebert Construction: a) An ordinance amending section 21655.18 of the zoning ordinance and b) An amended resolution approving a PUD amendment to include expanded hours of operation 5 a.m. to 11 p.m.). Approval of the above items requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. 2. BACKGROUND: At the January 10, 2012 City Council meeting, the council approved the applicant's requests for a building addition and an electronic sign at Plymouth Station Auto Center, but continued the request for expanded hours of operation until the January 24, 2012 meeting. The minutes from the January 10, 2012 meeting are attached. Staff attached an ordinance and amended resolution which would allow the hours of operation to be expanded from 6:00 a.m. to 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Not Applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Minutes Resolution 2012-019 Ordinance Amending Section 21655.18 of the Zoning Ordinance Amended Resolution Approving the PUD Amendment Page 1 Ms. Pan st ed Ms. Chang explained everything to the New Hope City Council. Everything is related tom agement of a business, not her as a therapist. She's just appealing the therapist denial as she n ds a job to support her family. Councilmember B k noted that there was a subsequent violation after the initial violation in New Hope. Mayor Slavik declared the blic hearing closed. Motion was made b Councilm ber Black and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe to adot a Resolution Approving the Deniallof Massage Therapist Certificate for Yue Chang that directs the Cily Attorney to prepare findings fact for the JanuM 24 Council Meeting Res2012-017 . With all members voting in favor, the\ hea ied. Ms. Pan asked if the reason why she wtherapist license was because of New Hope. Mayor Slavik replied the denial is basasons in the resolution that she read to Ms. Chang. Ms. Pan asked if Ms. Chang can nevers a the ist in Plymouth or anywhere. City Attorney Knutson stated she can reappCity one ear after tonight's meeting. Ms. Pan asked if Ms. Chang can applycity. City Atto ey Knutson replied she can apply with other cities. General Business 8.01) Planned Unit Development Amendment for Improvements to Plymouth Auto Center at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072) Community Development Director Juetten stated this item was before the Council on December 13, 2011, and the applicant requested to table this item to tonight in order to modify the plan based upon the Council's discussion at that meeting. The applicant has amended their original request as follows: 1. Removed the request for a canopy extension to accommodate another pump island. 2. Amended request for expanding business hours. Current hours are 6:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m. They proposed 4:00 a.m.-Midnight. They amended that request to 5:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m. The remainder of their original request remains unchanged: 1. The addition of electronic sign elements within the existing monument sign. 2. A building expansion on the north side of the building. Proposed Minutes 5 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 2 Liz Nalezny, applicant, stated they decided to omit the request for the extra gas pump and canopy and to just extend the business hours one extra hour in the morning. They are a small family business, and they have to adjust their practices to stay competitive. There are no deliveries before 7:00 a.m. so opening one hour earlier shouldn't cause any problems with noise to the adjacent neighborhood. They currently have approximately 23 customers between 6:00 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. Councilmember Stein asked if they would be acceptable to limiting their deliveries before 7:00 a.m. Ms. Nalezny replied yes. Councilmember Bildsoe and Mayor Slavik thanked Ms. Nalezny for removing the pump extension. Mayor Slavik stated she will support the detail building on the north side with the work being done inside and the electronic sign. However, she doesn't support the expansion of the hours. She stated she's unsure how many customers they would lose that extra hour since its very quiet that early in the morning, and this business isn't directly on Highway 55. She appreciates the fact that they have invested in their business, but there are adjacent residents who have invested in their homes and properties, and they need to have enjoyment of their homes as well. Motion was made by Mayor Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to adopta Resolution Approving a PUD General Plan Amendment to allow Improvements to the Plymouth Station Auto Center at Property located at 16925 County Road 24 (2011072 — Res2012-019) with the exception of condition No. 2 regarding the modified business hours (5:00 a.m.-11:00 p.m.). Councilmember Black stated she would support the additional hour for them to be open as there wouldn't be that much additional traffic. This will be a service to the community. Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to amend the main motion to add condition No. 2 back in the Resolution. The Council voted on the amendment, and with Black, Bildsoe, and Johnson yes, and Stein, Willis, and Slavik no, the motion failed. Councilmember Stein asked if this item could be tabled until there is a full Council present. Community Development Director Juetten replied it could be tabled as the review deadline is February 10. Councilmember Johnson asked if the Resolution could be adopted with the tabling of condition No. 2 to January 24 so the applicant can began their work on the project. Ms. Nalezny stated she would appreciate that. She clarified the reason for the extra hour in the morning is for their staff to be better prepared for their customers at 7:00 a.m. which is their busiest time. She extended an invitation to the Council to take a tour of their business so they can show them the work that will be accomplished during that extra hour. Proposed Minutes 6 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 3 The Council voted on the main motion but tabled condition No. 2 of the resolution until January 24. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe and seconded by Councilmember Willis, to adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to Amend PUD 91-1 (Seven Ponds North) Amendment for Plymouth Station for Property located at 16825 County Road 24 (2011072 — Ord2012-01) and a Resolution ApprovingFindingsindings of Fact (Res2012-018). With all members voting in favor, the motion carried. 8.02) residential Composting Grant Program Councilme ber Willis stated his only concern on this item is that the funding for this project comes from e solid waste budget versus the water resources budget. with IT@ 1= that Mayor Slavik requested aort from staff in a year on the amount of staff time with this program and resident partici tion. With all members voting in favor, e motion carried. Reports and Staff Recommendation There were no reports and staff recommendati s. Adiournment Mayor Slavik adjourned the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Sandra R. Engdahl, Cit}1Clerk Proposed Minutes 7 of 7 Regular Meeting of January 10, 2012 Page 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION NO. 2012019 i A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PLYMOUTH STATION AUTO CENTER AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16825 COUNTY ROAD 24 (2011072) WHEREAS, Ebert Construction on behalf of the Plymouth Station Auto Center, has requested approval of a PUD general plan amendment for property legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, PIymouth Station according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that it should and hereby does approve the request by Ebert Construction for a PUD general plan amendment for the Plymouth Station Auto Center located at 16825 County Road 24, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan amendment is approved to allow the following: 1) a building addition; and 2) electronic signage elements for fuel prices and an electronic changeable copy within the existing monument sign, according to the materials received by the city on September 23, 20f 1 and October 13, 2011 and December 27, 2011, except as amended by this resolution. 2. No LED banding shall be installed around the existing monument sign or around individual elements of the sign. 3. No vehicle service or detailing shall occur outside the building. 4. Prior to commencement of the alterations, the applicant shall obtain the applicable building and sign permits. 5. As no substantial changes are required to the plans, no PUD final plan shall be required. 6. When the electronic sign elements are added to the existing signs, all temporary signs shall be removed from the site and no additional shall be added, with the exception of temporary signage approved through the administrative permit process for temporary sales events. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 10, 2012. Page 5 Resolution 2012-019 File No. 2011072 Page 2: STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 10, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the city this day of , City Clerk Page 6 CITY OF PLYMOUTH HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE CITY CODE TO AMEND PUD 91-1 SEVEN PONDS NORTH) AMENDMENT FOR PLYMOUTH STATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16825 COUNTY ROAD 24 (2011072) THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of City Code. Chapter 21 of the City Code of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota is hereby amended by adding language to Section 21655.18 — PUD 91-1 Seven Ponds North) Amendment for Plymouth Station, as follows: 21655.18 PUD 91-1 (SEVEN PONDS NORTH): AMENDMENT FOR PLYMOUTH STATION: Subd. 1. Legal Description. This PUD is legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Outlot A, Plymouth Station Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Amended by Ord. No. 2006-04, 02/07/06) Subd. 2. Incorporated herein by reference are the Plymouth Station plans received by the City on August 1, 1997 and August 5, 1997, except as amended by City Council Resolution 97-533, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 96193; the Plymouth Station master sign plan received by the City on March 6, 1998, March 11, 1998, and March 12, 1998, except as amended by City Council Resolution 98-256, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 97187; the revision to the sloped roof design standards received by the City on April 17, 1998, except as amended by City Council Resolution 98-308, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 98065; the revision to the PUD general plan for the day care building received by the City on July 21, 1999, except as amended by City Council Resolution 99-386, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 99077; the revision to the PUD general plan to extend the phasing plan received by the City on March 31, 2000, except as amended by City Council Resolution 2000-251, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 20042; the revision to Condition No. 7 of Resolution 97- 533 allowing certain temporary outdoor events and sales, as amended by City Council Resolution 2004-250, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 2004032; the revision to the PUD general plan to extend the construction deadline for a daycare building and revise the master sign plan received by the City on June 30, 2006, as amended by City Council Resolution 2006-359, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 2006058; the revision to Condition No 4 of Resolution 97-533 allowing clothes sales not to exceed a total of 6,656 square feet as a permitted use, as amended by City Council Resolution 2011-198, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 2011028; and the revision to the PUD general plan to allow the following for the Plymouth Station Auto Center: 1) a building addition and 2) installation of electronic elements within the existing monument sign, as amended by City Page 7 Ordinance 2012- 2011072 Page 2 Council Resolution 2012-xxx, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 2011072; and the revision to the PUDeng eral plan to allow the hours of operation for the convenience store/fuel sales for the Plymouth Station Auto Center to be expanded to 5 am to 11 pm, as amended by City Council Resolution 2012-xxx, on file in the Office of the Zoning Administrator under File 2011072. (Amended by Ord. 99-24, 09/07/99) (Amended by Ord. No. 2000-17, 05/09/00) (Amended by Ord. No. 2004-08) (Amended by Ord. No. 2006-24, 09/12/06) Subd. 3. Allowable Uses. The allowable uses are any permitted, accessory, conditional or interim uses (except the interim use entitled seasonal farmer's market and produce sales, as outlined in Section 21460.09, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance) allowed in the C-1 and C-2 Zoning Districts and a grocery superstore not exceeding 65,000 square feet and clothes sales not to exceed a total of 6,656 square feet. In addition, the following uses shall be permitted in the PUD provided they do not exceed 10,000 square feet in building area on an individual basis: 1) appliance and electronic stores; 2) auto repair -minor; 3) book, office supply, and stationary stores; 4) car wash accessory to a convenience grocery market with motor fuel sales; 5) convenience restaurant with drive-through service; 6) fabric/notions stores; 7) free-standing restaurant with liquor service; 8) jewelry stores; 9) music stores and 10) toy stores. All the uses listed above shall be considered as "permitted" uses in the PUD, provided they comply with all development standards and conditions for such uses under the most restrictive corresponding conventional zoning district. Additionally, temporary outdoor events and sales are allowable upon the granting of an administrative permit, provided they are limited to the sale of sporting goods items sold from a business in the PUD, produce, vegetables, flowers, plants and similar items and do not occur within the southerly 350 feet of the PUD, and that only one sales event shall occur at a time per property, and are in accordance with the regulations established in Section 21455.11, Subd. 8(c) of the Zoning Ordinance. (Amended by Ord. No. 2004-08, 06/22/04) (Amended by Ord. No. 2010-17, ou/24/10) Subd. 4. Development Standards. Minimum development standards shall be indicated on the approved PUD General Plan Amendment as cited in Subd. 2 above. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. Kelli Slavik, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra R. Engdahl, City Clerk Page 8 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION REVISING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION 2012-019 WHICH APPROVED A PUD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE PLYMOUTH STATION AUTO CENTER AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16825 COUNTY ROAD 24 (2011072) WHEREAS, the City Council completed its review and approves the request pertaining to the amended hours of operation; WHEREAS, Ebert Construction on behalf of the Plymouth Station Auto Center, has requested approval of a PUD general plan amendment for property legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Plymouth Station according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that it should and hereby does approve the request by Ebert Construction for a PUD general plan amendment for the Plymouth Station Auto Center located at 16825 County Road 24, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan amendment is approved to allow the following: 1) a building addition; and 2) electronic signage elements for fuel prices and an electronic changeable copy within the existing monument sign, according to the materials received by the city on September 23, 2011 and October 13, 2011 and December 27, 2011, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The convenience store/gas dispensing business hours shall be limited to 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. 3. No LED banding shall be installed around the existing monument sign or around individual elements of the sign. 4. No vehicle service or detailing shall occur outside the building. 5. Prior to commencement of the alterations, the applicant shall obtain the applicable building and sign permits. 6. As no substantial changes are required to the plans, no PUD final plan shall be required. 7. When the electronic sign elements are added to the existing signs, all temporary signs shall be removed from the site and no additional shall be added, with the exception of temporary signage approved through the administrative permit process for temporary sales events. Page 9 Resolution 2012 - File No. 2011072 Page 2 ADOPTED by the City Council on January 24, 2012. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 24, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the city this day of City Clerk Page 10 rp) City of Agenda 8.02 . O 2 Plymouth Number: v Adding Quaffty to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Joshua Doty, Senior Planner COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager and Steve Juetten, January 24, 2012 Community Development Director Approve Site Plan Amendment for a 275,000 -square Item: foot building addition, parking expansion and related site improvements for St. Jude Medical located at 5050 Nathan Lane North (2011081) 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a site plan amendment for a 275,000 -square foot building addition, a parking expansion and related site improvements for St. Jude Medical located at 5050 Nathan Lane North, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Approval requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. 2. BACKGROUND: On January 18, 2012, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal. The applicant was present and explained their proposal using a power point presentation. No one from the public wished to speak on the request. The Planning Commission stated their support of the project and added that the design of the building together with the location in the city would make this a standout facility in Plymouth. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes and report is attached. Notice of the public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the site. The notification map is attached. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: Not Applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Report with Attachments Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment PACommDev\STAFFREP\CC\2011\2011081 St. Jude Medical Exp. SPA.docx Page 1 Draft Minutes City of Plymouth Planning Commission Meeting January 18, 2012 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair James Davis, Commissioners Dirh obussen, Nathan dersRobinson, Gordon Petrash, Scott Nelson, Bryan Oakley and Marc An MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Barbara Thomso , Serrior Planner Josh Doty, City Engineer Bob Moberg and Office Support Specialist Lauri Lokken 1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC FORUM 4. APPROVAL OF A MOTION by Comrnissio r Oakley, seconded by Commissioner Petrash, to approve the January 18, 2012 PlanniX Commission Agenda. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved. S. CONSENT/AGENDA A. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 4, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING M ION by Commissioner Petrash, seconded by Commissioner Robinson, to approve the nuary 4, 2012 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved. G. PUBLIC HEARING 7. NEW BUSINESS A. ST. JUDE MEDICAL (2011081) Chau Davis introduced the request by St. Jude Medical for a site plan amendment for a 275,000 square foot building expansion and related site improvements for property located at 5050 Nathan Lane North. Senior Planner Doty gave an overview of the staff report. Senior Planner Doty presented an additional memo to the Planning Commission that corrected the proposed structural coverage in the staff report and added a condition to the draft resolution requiring one-way signage in the loading area. Page 2 Draft Planning Commission Minutes January 18, 2012 Page 2 Cominissioner Nelson asked where the future parking deck that was mentioned in the application would be located on the site. Senior Planner Doty responded that they would locate the future parking deck at the northwest corner of the site. He pointed out that parking deck is not part of this request. He said that their intent was to show their options to add more parking if needed in the future. He added that they would need to come back through the site plan process to ask for approval of a parking deck. Commissioner Anderson asked if there is any requirement in terms of how tall and how thick trees would have to be on top of the berm. Senior Planner Doty replied the ordinance calls out for coniferous trees, berming or fencing as appropriate to provide an effective screen of a loading area. He said a combination of things can be used to provide an effective screen. He said that in this instance, there would be a combination of berming and coniferous trees on top of the berm. He said that staff felt that an effective screen would be provided. Commissioner Anderson asked what the percent of grade on the slope in the driveway into the truck port area would be. Senior Planner Doty deferred his question to the applicant, Commissioner Anderson asked if there would be tractor -trailer type trucks using that driveway. Senior Planner Doty confirmed affirmatively. Commissioner Anderson asked if fire protection circulation all the way around the building has been reviewed. Senior Planner Doty responded that has been reviewed and shown to be substantially in conformance. He said the turning radius evaluations have been reviewed and that there is a condition allowing the fire inspector to take a final look at some of the turning movements. Commissioner Anderson asked if the drive aisles are compacted and able to handle the weight of a fire truck. Senior Planner Doty confirmed affirmatively. Commissioner Anderson asked what the exterior material would be on the building. Senior Planner Doty deferred his question to the applicant. Commissioner Kobussen stated that the dates in item one of the revised resolution should be corrected from 2011 to 2012. Senior Planner Doty noted the correction. Chair Davis introduced Jack Yates, representing St. Jude Medical. Mr. Yates introduced their additional representatives present and gave a presentation of St. Jude Medical's background. Commissioner Petrash asked if St. Jude Medical is a privately or publicly owned company. Mr. Yates responded that they are a public company. Mr. Yates continued his presentation with an overview of the site and building, including exterior materials. Page 3 Draft Planning Commission Minutes January 18, 2012 Page 3 Commissioner Petrash asked if there would be very many new employees or if it would all be the transferring of employees from other locations. Mr. Yates responded that their lease in Maple Grove terminates on April 30, 2013 and they would be moving out of that building and moving to Plymouth. He said that there are also two buildings in Minnetonka with leases terminating in 2013, which would largely be a transfer. He said this is more of a replacement activity than it is new jobs with the growth to come further on down the road. Commissioner Nelson stated it is exciting to have a flagship building for a company like this in Plymouth, which is great for the city. He said the plan looks good and he would welcome more of this kind of business into the city. He said that he did not see any reason to not fully endorse the request. Commissioner Petrash stated that the planning documents were very well done. He said that they were easy to understand and it appears to be a very aesthetically pleasing facility. Commissioner Anderson stated that he appreciated the architecture and how they blended the existing structure materials around and then brought in some new elements as well. He said that is a very creative solution and it is going to be a very nice looking building. A representative of St. Jude Medical stated that the percent of grade for the truck loading area would be 8.3%. Commissioner Oakley stated that with an 8.3% grade, he would support this request. Chau Davis stated that this is a great looking plan. He said that the view, with location along Highway 169, will be a nice addition to the community and he would be voting to approve this request. MOTION by Commissioner Petrash, seconded by Commissioner Nelson, to approve the request by St. Jude Medical for a site plan amendment for a 275,000 square foot building expansion and related site improvements as outlined in the revised resolution for property located at 5050 Nathan Lane North. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION approved. 8. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Chair Davis, with no objection to adjourn the meeting at 7:42 p.m. Page 4 Agenda Number File 2011081 PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Plymouth Planning Commission FROM: Joshua Doty, Senior Planner (509-5453) through Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager MEETING DATE: January 18, 2012 APPLICANT: St. Jude Medical PROPOSAL: Site plan amendment for St. Jude Medical LOCATION: 5050 Nathan Lane GUIDING: IP (Planned Industrial) ZONING: I-2 (General Industrial) REVIEW DEADLINE: April 10, 2012 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: St. Jude Medical is requesting a site plan amendment to construct a 275,000 -square foot building addition, a 288 -stall parking lot expansion, and related site improvements on their 26.6 -acre site. The proposed expansion to the St. Jude Medical campus would allow new space for manufacturing, research and development, warehouse, administrative offices, conference space, and a cafeteria. The building addition is proposed off the southeast side of the existing 205,000 - square foot building. The addition would be constructed around the south side of the existing pond on the site (see aerial photo below). Notice of this public meeting was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet. The notification area map is attached. Page 5 2011081 Page 2 CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Uses Page 6 Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning 1Yorth7 Industrial Use IP I-1 & I-2 Across`S 1st Ave East - State Highway 169 Frontage Road, NIA NIA State Highway 169, and City of New Hope South Gas Convenience Station Store, C & P -I C-3 & P -I Across Schmidt Lake Road Office Use and Church of Epiphany Southwest Residential Homes LA -1 RSF-2 Across Schmidt Lake Road Nathan Lane West Industrial Use IP I-2 Across Nathan Lane Page 6 2011081 Page 3 Natural Characteristics of Site The site is located within the Shingle Creek drainage district. There is an approximately 1.5 -acre wetland located on the east side of the site. The expansion would not impact the wetland. There is a large storm water treatment pond in the center of the site and another two -cell storm water pond in the northeast portion of the site. The site is not within a shoreland overlay district or a flood plain overlay. The site is not subject to tree preservation regulations. Previous Actions Affecting Site The building was constructed in 1975 by Northwestern Bell. AGA Medical purchased the property in 2004. In November of 2005, the City Council approved an 18,000 -square foot addition onto the southwest corner of the building. At that time, the City Council also approved an interim use permit for 512 parking spaces, where the ordinance would require 565 parking spaces. In September of 2006, the City Council approved a site plan amendment for the removal of 233 parking spaces from two unused parking lots in poor condition and an interim use permit to further reduce the parking requirement to 279 spaces. In July of 2007, the City Council approved a site plan amendment for the construction of a 98 - stall surface parking lot on the north side of the building. In November, 2007, the City Council approved a variance to allow a second freestanding sign for AGA Medical Corporation. St. Jude Medical purchased the subject property in 2010. In September, 2011, the city administratively approved a plan modification to allow an 82 -stall parking expansion on the west side of the property. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION 1N DECISION-MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan amendment. I_1 `I_1 '6.y 64 Site Plan Amendment The applicant, St. Jude Medical, is requesting a site plan amendment to allow construction of a 275,000 -square foot, three-story building addition on the south side of the existing 205,000 - square foot, three-story building. The proposed building addition would provide manufacturing, research and development, warehouse, administrative offices, conference space, and a cafeteria. Under the request, the applicant would also: 1) expand the parking lot on the southwest, south Page 7 2011081 Page 4 and east sides of the site to allow 288 additional parking spaces; 2) construct a new loading area on the southeast side of the site; 3) add landscaping throughout the site; and 4) construct three new access driveways. Specifically, a new full -access driveway would be constructed on the southwest side of the site to Nathan Lane. A second full -access driveway would be constructed on the southeast side of the site to the Frontage Road. The Frontage Road (full -access) driveway would provide access to the southeast visitor parking area and would provide the entrance to a one-way loading area, which would have an exit -only access to the Frontage Road. Staff's review of the proposed driveway access locations and their impact on the surrounding external roadways is provided below in the traffic section of this report. The zoning ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan. Staff has reviewed the application with these standards and summarized them as follows: 50 -foot front (east) setback 80 feet Yes 50 -foot front (south) setback 140 feet Yes 50 -foot front (west) setback 305 feet Yes 50 -foot front (east) setback 75 feet Yes 50 -foot side (south) setback 50 feet Yes 50 -foot rear (west) setback 50 feet Yes 10 -foot building to parking 10 feet Yes setback 25 -foot front (east) setback 30 feet Yes 25 -foot side (south) setback 50 feet Yes 25 -foot rear (west) setback 70 feet Yes 10 -foot building to drive 15 feet Yes aisle setback 670 spaces 474 existing spaces Yes* 288 spaces proposed 762 total spaces 480 overstory trees I 487 overstory trees I Yes 50 percent 1 13.7 percent I Yes 45 feet 1 45 feet I Yes o= Fully -shielded & Fully -shielded & Yes House -side shields within House -side shields within 300 feet of residential 300 feet of residential Addressed below The specific standards that require additional explanation are as follows. Page 8 MW 4Q_ Addressed below The specific standards that require additional explanation are as follows. Page 8 2011081 Page 5 Parking The minimum number of required parking spaces was determined based on the total number of employee's to occupy the building at any time. St. Jude Medical supplied the city with documentation that the facility would have a maximum of 670 employees and 762 total parking spaces on the site, which would provide a 92 -space parking surplus. The applicant states that their business operation has minimal shift work and very little overlap of people. Therefore, the 92 -space parking surplus could accommodate the minimal overlap of employees and any guests. The applicant has indicated that in approximately 2014 they anticipate increasing the number of employees in the building by 290 people. The applicant recognizes that the proposed site build- out would not provide sufficient parking to accommodate 290 additional staff. The applicant has, therefore, provided a concept plan (attached to the narrative) for a parking deck in the northwest portion of the site that could increase the total number of parking to 1005 spaces to accommodate 290 additional people. Staff notes that the applicant would have to come back through a separate site plan amendment process to receive approval of a parking deck. Staff will monitor St. Jude Medical's employee population with interior build -out permits to ensure that adequate parking is provided on the site. Staff has added a condition to the approving resolution that requires that the applicant supply the city with employee population numbers when they submit interior building permits for staff review. Loading/Screening Section 21135.14 of the zoning ordinance requires screening of loading areas. The applicant is proposing a new loading area on the southeast side of the building facing the State Highway 169 Frontage Road. The applicant is proposing to screen the loading area with an approximately five-foot high berm. In addition, the applicant is proposing to plant 15 evergreen trees on top of the berm to screen the new loading area from the adjacent Frontage Road to the southeast. Staff finds that the proposed screening would comply with the ordinance. Building DesignJMaterials Section 21115.03; subd. 1 of the zoning ordinance specifies general standards for building construction. The building addition would be finished with metal panels, glazing, brick, columns and curtain walls. The applicant states that the architecture of the building provides an upgrade to the building appearance while also continuing common design and material elements to tie the existing building together with the addition. While a final color/colors have not been selected, they will be neutral (e.g. white, gray). The proposed building materials would comply with zoning ordinance requirements for exterior building finishes. Storm Water Runoff The city requires that storm drainage systems be designed so that the post -development rate of runoff from a site does not exceed the pre -development rate of runoff. Additionally, the city requires treatment of storm water runoff before it enters the drainage system. To accommodate Page 9 2011081 Page G post -development runoff and treatment, the applicant is proposing to use the existing pond and construct three underground storm water treatment systems on the property. The underground storm water treatment systems would be constructed below the south parking lot, the loading area, and the east parking lot. Staff notes the city typically requires that the lowest floor elevation of the building be 18 inches above the emergency overflow elevation. Due to physical site constraints, the applicant has requested that the city consider other measures. Specifically, the applicant has designed a larger - capacity storm sewer system that could adequately drain back-to-back 100 -year storm water events. In addition, the applicant has increased the diameter of openings throughout the emergency overflow system to help prevent any water flow blockages. Lastly, the applicant will develop a storm water maintenance plan for the site to address regular maintenance of the storm sewer system and site procedures for times of high water levels on the site. With the conditions in the attached resolution, city staff finds that the proposed drainage plan complies with city regulations, and the alternative measures for emergency overflow protection are an acceptable alternative to standard practice. Tragic The city ordered a traffic study in conjunction with the site plan amendment, based on concerns raised in an earlier traffic study conducted for a potential expansion by a previous property owner. SRF Consulting Group Inc., the city's traffic consultant, conducted the study in November, 2011. The traffic study: provided site driveway access and circulation recommendations; and evaluated the impact of the expansion on the surrounding external roadways. Driveway/Circulation Recommendations The traffic study provided two specific driveway/circulation recommendations. The study stated that the proposed driveway access to Nathan Lane from the site should be relocated 150 feet to the north to match up with the existing private driveway on the west side of Nathan Lane. The study stated that moving the driveway access to the north would reduce the potential for congestion on Nathan Lane. The traffic study also stated that due to the proximity of the loading exit only) driveway access onto the Frontage Road from Schmidt Lake Road, the applicant should remove the internal driveway connection from the loading area to the south parking lot. After reviewing the site recommendations, the applicant revised their site plan to address the recommendations provided in the study. Staff finds that the applicant's site plan layout is in compliance with the recommendations in the study. Impact of the Expansion on Surrounding Roadways The traffic study indicates that in 2014 (one year after the anticipated completion of the proposed building addition) all of the intersections are expected to continue to operate at an overall "D" level of service (LOS) during the peak hours, except for the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection, Levels of service "A" through "D" are considered acceptable. Page 10 2011081 Page 7 Traffic at the intersection of Nathan Lane and Schmidt Lake Road is currently operating at a "B" level of service (LOS) during a.m. peak hours and a "D" LOS during p.m. peak hours. With the proposed development, the level of service would decrease to "C" during a.m. peak hours and to E" during p.m. peak hours. The traffic study states that changing this intersection from a four- way stop to a signalized intersection would improve operations back to acceptable levels. The traffic study also recommended that the signal timing at the Schmidt Lake Road intersections with the State Highway 169 west and east ramps be optimized to improve levels of service at these intersections. Changes to the signal timing at the west and east ramps would require approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Staff has added conditions to the approving resolution requiring that the applicant construct a signalized intersection at Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane and modify signal timing as identified in the traffic study, prior to the completion and occupancy of the building addition. City staff is in the process of working with the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) and St. Jude Medical to help offset some of the signal costs. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: Staff supports the site plan amendment, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. St. Jude Medical is proposing an expansion that would more than double the size of an existing industrial building to provide a flagship research and development campus facility in the City of Plymouth. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the site plan amendment for St. Jude Medical for property located at 5050 Nathan Lane, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment 2. Applicant's Narrative 3. Traffic Study 4. Location Map 5. Notification Area Map b. Site Aerial Photo 7. Site Graphics PA1CommDevISTAFFREPTC1201112011081 PC St. Jude Medical Exp, SPA.docx Page 11 It]Jf1- 1_ILI-Wlq St. Jude Medical — Plymouth Expansion Plymouth, Minnesota 0%0 ST JUDE MEDICAII MORE CONTROL. LESS RISK Site Plan Amendment Narrative BWBR Commission No. 3.2011060.01 12 January 2012 Page 12 St. Jude Medical Plymouth Expansion Site Plan Amendment Narrative BWBR Commission No. 3.2011060.01 12 January 2012 Prepared by architect BWBR 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 St. Paul MN 55102 651-222-3701 civil engineer PIERCE, PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 Central Avenue NE, Suite 202 Blaine, MN 55434 763-537-1311 Table of Contents mechanical/electrical engineer KARGES-FAULCONBRIDGE, INC. 670 West County Road B St. Paul MN 55113-45.27 651-771-0880 landscape architect DAMON FARBER 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis MN 55402 61.2-33.2-75.2.2 SitePlan Request...................................................................................................................................1 ProjectNarrative....................................................................................................................... .........1 ParkingCalculations..............................................................................................................................2 Attachments Appendix A Page 13 St. Jude Medical Plymouth Expansion SITE PLAN REQUEST BWBR and their consultants, on behalf of St. Jude Medical, are submitting the following request for approval of an expansion project to the St. Jude Medical campus located at 5050 Nathan Lane, Plymouth, MN 55442. The following items are provided as part of the required Site Plan Amendments Summary Application. 1. Project narrative. 2. Parking requirement calculations. 3. Transportation Demand Management Plan (under separate cover). 4. Storm water management calculations (under separate cover). S. Site Plan Amendment drawings to include an accurate certified survey, detailed site plan, luminaire plan, utility plan, grading, erosion control, and storm water drainage plan, landscape plan / reforestation plan, building elevations, typical floor plans and fire protection plan (under separate cover). PROJECT NARRATIVE The Project consists of an expansion at the St. Jude Medical Plymouth Campus. The South Building expansion) will tie into the North Building (existing) along its east end and wrap around the pond to the south. The total new building area is 275,000 square feet. The building expansion is designed as a finished shell space with fit -out of the shell spaces scheduled for future phases of the project. The fit -outs will include the following types of spaces: warehouse, production/manufacturing, R&D lab, office, conference and cafeteria/dining. The attached Site Plan Amendment Drawings, dated 12/13/11, include reference plans noting where these types of spaces may be located. The initial fit -out is scheduled to take place during the summer of 2012. The site is designed to meet lighting, storm water, erosion control, drainage and landscaping requirements as outlined by City of Plymouth ordinance and state and federal agencies, while accommodating future fit -out utility and parking requirements. Throughout Site Plan Narrative, the "existing building" is also referred to as the "North Building," and this South Building Expansion Project is referred to as "South Building,". 12 January 2012 BWBR, Proj. No. 3.2011060.01 Site Plan Amendment Narrative -1 Page 14 St. Jude Medical Plymouth Expansion erg"I 1140F EW911011.1 The site design includes site parking for a total of 748 vehicles. The initial fit -out project scheduled to take place during the summer of 2012 will require parking for 670 staff, Potential future fit -out projects will add an additional 290 staff to the site, increasing the required parking to 960 spaces. To accommodate the increased demand, St. Jude Medical is proposing a future parking deck be constructed as part of the future fit -out projects. The parking deck will increase the total site parking to 1,OOS spaces. Appendix A includes the following support documentation: 1. Table illustrating the parking calculations based upon St. Jude. Medical staff requirements. 2. Table summarizing the parking calculations, 3. Site plan illustrating current site parking counts. 4. Site plan illustrating initial project parking counts. S. Site plan illustrating potential future fit -out parking counts (includes parking deck). 6. Conceptual future fit -out parking deck sketch - Level One and Level Two. Site Plan Amendment Narrative - 2 12 January 2012 BWBR, Prcj. No. 3.2011060.01 Page 15 Plymouth - existing 449 Bldg Ml 52 Bldg M5 25 Bldg MG 144 Bldg M2 157 Bldg M6 22 Bldg M8 111 FA MIMMMMN= Brings total site parking requirement to 960 spaces. Parking deck will be required to meet demand. B WBR KnowlaTdOAKAQQ0pezdSJM Plymouth Expansion Site Plan AmendYufrtt NarrativeI NOT USEDSPL YMOUTH CAMPUS parking -Planning Commission Page 16 Initial Project Staff 67.0_ 748 78 Potential future fit -Out Total Staff* 960 1005** 45 Includes initial project and potential future fit -out tota[ staff requirements Includes available site parking to be provided as part of initial project and future parking deck parking spaces. BWBR KnowledgtALMW&Vq.7&s-SJM Plymouth Expansion JSite PlcanAmendop4tNorrativeyNOT USEDkPLYMOUTH CAMPUS parking - Planning Commission Page 17 SITE PARKING PLAN - EXISTING 476 PARKING SPACES B I W 16 i R 10:00 ST. JUDE MEDICAL PLYMOUTH EXPANSIONhiORfCO -Rai USS.— 32011060M IZ,13.2011 Page 18 SITE PARKING PLAN - EXPANSION INITIAL PROJECT 748 TOTAL PARKING SPACES g I W I g I R :i:ST. JUDE MEDICAL" I PLYMOUTH EXPANSIONMMMM."COMKol.ISSSRISK - 3,2011060.DD 12,13.2011 Page 19 SITE PARKING PLAN - PARKING DECK POTENTIAL FUTURE FIT -OUTS 1005 TOTAL PARKING SPACES B I W I B I R i.: ST. JUDE iVMEb1CAi I PLYMOUTH EXPANSION hiM rnnrnm. LEss nrsx- 3.2011660.00 12.13.2011 Page 20 PARKING DECK CONCEPTUAL SKETCH 295 SPACES FIRST LEVEL 577 TOTAL PARKING SPACES ue N. r:gsm ud rsnue sEesltCa vC 0 a uP I s¢ s4 S¢ VII f. y to-rw4 j 7 Vg kj FIRST LEVEL S I W l E31 R Befoom ST. JUDE MEDICAL" PLYMOUTH EXPANSION moma5o°E 3-2011060.00 12,13.2011 Page 21 PARKING DECD CONCEPTUAL SKETCH 282 SPACES SECOND LEVEL 577 TOTAL PARKING SPACES I SECOND LEVEL B I W I B I R 10 ST. JUDE 1ViEDICAL I PLYMOUTH EXPANSION RUNn%—conkrn ts"Am. 3.2011060.00 12.13.2011 Page 22 84 y e r rp t owku x < iy 94 g4 thy. SECOND LEVEL B I W I B I R 10 ST. JUDE 1ViEDICAL I PLYMOUTH EXPANSION RUNn%—conkrn ts"Am. 3.2011060.00 12.13.2011 Page 22 161E I NGINEERS PLANNERS D ES[GNERS Consulting Croup, Inc. SRF No. 07617 MEMORANDUM TO: Barbara G. Thomson, AICP, Planning Manager City of Plymouth FROM: John Hagen, PE, PTOE, Senior Associate Emily Gross, Engineer DATE: November 4, 2011 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY OF SITE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AT 5050 NATHAN LANE NORTH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Plymouth requested a traffic study be completed for the site development concept at 5050 Nathan Lane North, located in the northeast quadrant of Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane. The main objective of the traffic study was to determine the potential traffic -related impacts to the existing roadway system associated with the site development concept. The study results are summarized in the following paragraphs, with detailed information provided in the body of the memorandum. Existing Conditions: Results of the operations analysis indicate that all key intersections are currently operating at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing traffic control and geometric layout. Potential Site Development Concept: For the purposes of this analysis, the site development concept was assumed to be completed in the year 2013. The development concept consists of a 275,000 square foot research and development addition. It is estimated that this concept would generate 335 trips during the a.m. peak hour; 294 trips during the p.m. peak hour; and 2,230 trips on a daily basis. Site Development Concept Access Review: Current access to the site is proposed to be changed as reflected in the site development concept. Under this concept, the existing two full -access driveways (one on Nathan Lane and the other on 51 st Avenue) would remain. Three new access driveways are proposed, including two new full -access driveways (a Southwest Access located on Nathan Lane approximately 150 feet north of Schmidt Lake Road, and the East Access located on the Highway 169 Service Road approximately 350 north of Schmidt Lake Road), and an exit -only driveway (Southeast Access located on the Highway 169 Service Road approximately 175 feet north of Schmidt Lake Road). www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 154 1 Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 1 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429 An Equal Opporhenihj Employer Page 23 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP November 4, 2011 City of Plymouth Page 2 The potential Southeast Access (exit -only driveway) on the Highway 169 Service Road will likely encourage more traffic exiting the site to use the Highway 169 Service Road than Nathan Lane. This is problematic given the side -street stop -controlled Highway 169 Service Road approach to Schmidt Lake Road, and the close spacing of the service road to the Highway 169 West Ramps. It is therefore recommended that in order to reduce the number of vehicles using the Highway 169 Service Road to enter and exit the site, the Southeast Access should not be physically connected to the main parking area located south of the proposed research and development center building. Providing this separation will still give service vehicles an exit onto the Highway 169 Service Road, while minimizing the additional site -related traffic on the closely -spaced service road. In order to provide optimal distance between the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and the potential new Southwest Access (full -access driveway) on Nathan Lane, we recommend that the proposed driveway be relocated approximately 150 feet to the north and be constructed opposite of the existing site driveway on the west side of Nathan Lane. This will provide additional distance between the driveway and the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and minimize the potential for congestion caused by southbound vehicular queues blocking ingress/egress maneuvers at the proposed Southwest Access. Future Build Conditions: An operations analysis was completed to assess the expected traffic impacts fiom the site development concept. The analysis was conducted for year 2014 (one year after the anticipated completion in year 2013). The results for year 2014 build conditions indicate that all intersections are expected to continue to operate at an overall acceptable LOS D or better during the peak hours (assuming existing geometrics and signal timing), with the exception of the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection. Conversion of the existing ali- way stop -controlled Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection to either a traffic signal or a roundabout would improve operations back to the acceptable levels experienced prior to year 2014 build conditions. It is further recommended that the signal timing at the Schmidt Lake Road intersections with the Highway 169 West and East Ramps be optimized, if the site development concept is constructed, in order to minimize delays and queues within the interchange area. Signal timing optimization will require approval from MnDOT. ConclusionslRecommendations: Based on the analysis, the following is recommended in order for the existing roadway system to accommodate the site development concept: 1. The existing all -way stop -controlled Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection should be upgraded to either a traffic signal or a roundabout. With this improvement, this intersection will return to acceptable levels of service during the year 2014 build peak hour conditions. Before a roundabout can be considered further, right-of-way constraints and geometric issues (two Ianes for the northbound and westbound approaches, and one lane for the southbound and eastbound approaches) will need to be reviewed. Completion of an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) should be done before a final decision is made. Page 24 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth November 4, 2011 Page 3 2. The signal timing at the Schmidt Lake Road intersections with the Highway 169 West and East Ramps should be optimized if the site development concept is constructed, in order to minimize delays and queues within the interchange area. 3. The potential Southeast Access along the Highway 169 Service Road should not be physically connected to the main parking area located south of the proposed research and development center building. This separation will still provide service vehicles an exit on to the Highway 169 Service Road, while minimizing the additional site -related traffic on the closely -spaced service road. 4. The proposed Southwest Access along Nathan Lane should be relocated to the north, opposite of the existing site driveway on the west side of Nathan Lane. This will minimize the potential for congestion caused by southbound vehicular queues extending beyond the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and blocking the proposed Southwest Access. Page 25 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth EXISTING CONDITIONS November 4, 2011 Page 4 The potential site development concept is located in the northeast quadrant of Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane (see Figure 1: Project Location). An operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the following key intersections to determine how traffic currently operates in the study area: Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane Schmidt Lake Road and Holiday Store Access Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 Service Road Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 West Ramp Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 East Ramp Nathan Lane and 51 st Avenue Nathan Lane and Existing West Access 51 st Avenue and Existing North Access 51st Avenue and Highway 169 Service Road The intersections of Schmidt Lake Road with the East and West TH 169 Ramps are signalized, and the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection is all -way stop -controlled. The remaining six intersections/access points are side -street stop -controlled. All key intersections were analyzed using the Synchro/SimTraffic and Highway Capacity software. The existing signal timing for the signalized intersections was used in the analysis. Intersection turning movement counts for the a.m. and p.m. peak hour were collected by SRF and City of Plymouth staff in October 2011. Current geometrics and peak hour traffic volumes for the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers. For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the minor approach. Traffic operations at unsignalized intersections with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support those volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches in most cases. Results of the Synchro/SimTraffic analysis shown in Table 1 indicate that all of the intersections are currently operating at an overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peal-, periods, with existing traffic control and geometric layout. Page 26 V I Project Location Consulting Grasp, fnc. 5050 Nathan Lane Site Development Concept Traffic Study Figure City of Plymouth 0117617 Oclober 2011 Page 27 IN I Existing Conditions Consulting Group. Fnc. 5050 Nathan Lane Site Development Concept Traffic Study Figure 2 City of Plymouth 6117517 October 2011 Page 28 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results November 4, 2011 Page 7 INTERSECTION Level. of Service A.M. Peak P.I. Pear Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane(l) B D Schmidt Lake Road and Holiday Store Access (2) A1C A1C Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 Service Road t21 A1C AID Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 West Ramp (3) A B Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 East Ramp ( 3) B B Nathan Lane and Existing West Access (2) AIA AIA Nathan Lane and 51st Avenue (2) AIA AIA 51 st Avenue and Existing North Access (2) AIA AIA 5Ist Avenue and Highway 169 Service Road (2) AIB AIA 1)Indicates an all -way stop -controlled intersection. The overall intersection LOS is shown. 2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control. The overall intersection LOS is followed by the worst approach LOS. 3) Indicates a signalized intersection. The overall intersection LOS is shown. SITE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AND ACCESS REVIEW The site development concept would be constructed in the northeast quadrant of Schmidt Lake- Road/Nathan Lane intersection, on the existing St. Jude Medical site. The site development concept would consist of a 275.000 square foot research and development building added south of the existing building. For the purposes of this analysis, the site development concept was assumed to be completed in the year 2013. Figure 3 displays the conceptual site plan. Current access to the site is proposed to be changed, as reflected in the site development concept. Under this concept, the existing hvo full -access driveways (one on Nathan Lane and the other on 51st Avenue) would remain. Three new access driveways are proposed, including two new full - access driveways (Southwest Access on Nathan Lane approximately 150 feet north of Schmidt Lake Road, and the East Access on the Highway 169 Service Road approximately 350 north of Schmidt Lake Road), and an exit -only driveway (Southeast Access located on the Highway 169 Service Road approximately 175 feet north of Schmidt Lake Road). Page 29 M01= WWI` & 1 I y SERVICE Z ACCESS 5ISTAVENUENOR7H y_ Itd 5 4Jt1 o: I.0, ( d Q " [ — it : ,. W ' 1 L i z I t `... I r ti A j:S V a } - 1 I. µ Sip - ...., oocw r -; Ir r • i :, _}r t}" EXISTING 1 1 NaRTHBUILDING t L.! i ST. JUPEMEDICAL ., VISI OR 'vls PLYMOIfTH ACCESS E d2¢'' vi rraa r `- I fl '. 6TAFFENiRy II -' 1 4POTENTIAL STAFF 1 w. mm i F 0 60 120 240 1111l1 f11T111 llllll l l}Flllill i.11111ijj1iR11 1111 111 1! SCHMIDT LAKE ROAC I r- 41 Site Development Concept I: rarsult6,g L.ruclp, F„. 5050 Nathan Lane Site Development Concept Traffic Study City of Plymouth D117617 SPACE BREAKDOWN October 2011 FIRST FLOOR 1 X02ST. JUDE MEDICAL. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA SOUTH BUILDING SPACE BREAKDOWN FIRST FLOOR CAFETERIA 25,000 SF WAREHOUSE 25,000 5F PRODUCTION 35,000 SF R & D 6,700 SF SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE 25,000 5F R & D 66,650 SF THIRD FLOOR OFFICES 40,000 SF R & D 51,654 SF 275,000 SF SITE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT BWBR ARCHITECTS 29 SEPTEMBER 2011 120ir000A0 Figure 3 Page Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP November 4, 2011 City of Plymouth Page 9 The potential East Access (exit -only driveway) on the Highway 169 Service Road will likely encourage more traffic exiting the site to use the Highway 169 Service Road rather than Nathan Lane. This is problematic given the side -street stop -controlled Highway 169 Service Road approach to Schmidt Lake Road, and the close spacing of the service road to the Highway 169 West Ramps. It is therefore recommended that in order to reduce the number of vehicles using the Highway 169 Service Road to enter and exit the site, the East Access should not be physically connected to the main parking area located south of the proposed research and development center building. Providing this separation will still provide service vehicles an exit onto the Highway 169 Service Road, while minimizing the additional site -related traffic on the closely -spaced service road. In order to provide optimal distance between the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and the potential Southwest Access (full -access driveway) on Nathan Lane, we recommend that the proposed Southwest Access be relocated approximately 150 feet to the north and be constructed opposite of the existing site driveway on the west side of Nathan Lane. This will provide additional distance between the driveway and the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and minimize the potential for congestion caused by southbound vehicular queues blocking ingress/egress maneuvers at the proposed southern driveway. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Since the site development concept is assumed to be constructed in the year 2013, future build traffic volumes were developed for the year 2014. Year 2014 No Build Traffic Volumes Future year 2014 no build conditions assume the existing building on the site continues to function under its current land uses. Year 2014 build traffic volumes were developed by first applying a one -percent yearly growth rate to the existing traffic volumes, and then adding the site development concept -related traffic to the adjacent roadway system. The one -percent growth rate was applied to account for growth in background traffic volumes on all roadways within the study area, which is consistent with past studies in the area. The site development concept traffic was determined using trip generation estimates for a research and development center. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and on a daily basis were calculated for the site development concept. The trip generation estimates were generated based on the land use type and size using the 2008 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation report. The trip generation estimates for the site development concept are shown in Table 2. Page 31 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates: 2008 ITE Trip Generation Report November 4, 2011 Page 10 Land Use Size(]) KST Daily TripsP A.M. Peak P.M. Peak In Out In Out Research and Development Center 275 2,230 278 57 44 250 s KSF represents 1,000 square feet. As shown in Table 2, the site development concept would generate an additional 2,230 trips on an average weekday, 335 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 278 inbound and 57 outbound trips), and 294 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 44 inbound and 250 outbound trips) using the 2008 ITE trip generation rates. The trips were assigned to the adjacent roadway system using the directional distribution shown in Figure 4. The directional distribution was based on current local travel patterns in the study area and the trip generation characteristics of the site development concept. The combination of the existing traffic volumes, the background traffic growth, and site -generated traffic results in the year 2014 build traffic volumes are shown on Figure 5. FUTURE CONDITIONS To determine how well the existing and future roadway system would accommodate future traffic volumes, an a.m. and p.m. peak hour operations analysis was conducted for year 20t4 build conditions. Year 2014 Build Conditions As shown in Table 3, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the peak hours under year 2014 build conditions with existing geometries and signal timing, with the exception of Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane and the Schmidt Lake Road/Highway 169 East Ramp intersections. Page 32 bi N I Directional Distribution Consulting Group, Inc.5050Nathan Lane Site Development Concept Traffic Study Figure 4 City of Plymouth 0117617 October 2011 Page 33 I iI 14Year 2414 Build Conditions 5050 Nathan Lane Site Development Concept Traffic StudyFigure 5PP UY of Nproulh 6117617Oclube 2011 Page 34 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth Table 3 Year 2014 Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results — Existing Geometrics and Signal Timing November 4, 2011 Page 13 INTERSECTION Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane(l) C E Schmidt Lake Road and Holiday Store Access(2) AIC AID Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 Service Road ( 2) AIC A/1(4) Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 West Ramp ( 3) A C Schmidt Lake Road and Highway I69 East Ramp ( 3) B E Nathan Lane and Existing West Access (2) AIA AIA Nathan Lane and Proposed Southwest Access (2) A/B AIB Nathan Lane and 5l st Avenue (2) A/A A/A 51st Avenue and Existing North Access(2) AIA A/A 51st Avenue and Highway 169 Service Road() AIB AIB Highway 169 Service Road and Proposed East Access ( 2) AIA AIA Highway 169 Service Road and Proposed Southeast Access (2) A/A A/A Indicates an all -way stop -controlled intersection. The overall intersection LOS is shown. czi Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control. The overall intersection LOS is followed by the worst approach LOS. 3) Indicates a signalized intersection. The overall intersection LOS is shown. al Average side -street delay is approximately 90 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. Conversion of the existing all -way stop -controlled Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection to either a traffic signal or a roundabout would improve operations back to the acceptable levels experienced prior to year 201.4 build conditions. A preliminary review of the traffic signal warrants indicates that the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection will meet the requirements of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMLITCD) peak hour warrant under year 2014 build conditions. Although the peak hour warrant is important in determining the need for a signal, it cannot justify the installation of a traffic signal without the support of other vehicular warrants. Modification of the signal timing at the Schmidt Lake Road intersections with the Highway 169 East and West Ramps would improve the traffic operations of these intersections back to acceptable levels. Table 4 shows that all intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable overall intersection LOS D or better during the peals hours under year 2014 build conditions with the recommended improvements. Page 3 5 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth Table 4 Year 2014 Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results — with Recommended Improvements November 4, 2011 Page 14 INTERSECTION Level of Service A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane(l) C C Schmidt Lake Road and Holiday Store Access (2) A/C AID Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 Service Road ( 2) A/C A/E(3) Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 West Ramp( l) A B Schmidt Lake Road and Highway 169 East Ramp( l) B B Nathan Lane and Existing West Access(?) AIA A/A Nathan Lane and Proposed Southwest Access (2) AIB AIB Nathan Lane and 51 st Avenue(?) AIA AIA 51 st Avenue and Existing North Access(?) AIA AIA 51st Avenue and Highway 169 Service Road ( 2) AIB AB Highway 169 Service Road and Proposed East Access (2) AIA A/A Highway 169 Service Road and Proposed Southeast Access ( 2) AIA AIA 1) Indicates a signalized intersection. The overall intersection LOS is shown. 2) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control. The overall intersection LOS is followed by the worst approach LOS. 3) Average side -street delay is approximately 45 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. While the Schmidt Lake Road/Highway 169 Service Road intersection will operate at an overall acceptable LOS during the peak hours, the side -street stop -controlled approach of the Highway 169 Service Road will operate at a LOS E during the p.m. peak hour with an average delay of approximately 45 seconds per vehicle. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience higher levels of delay on the side -street approaches (poor levels of service), but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during the peak hour periods. However, as the side -street delay increases, motorists tend to accept smaller gaps and/or change their route selection if more desirable options are available in order to avoid longer delays. The proximity of the Highway 169 Service Road to the Highway 169 West Ramp makes it difficult to allow for the installation of additional intersection control measures at the Schmidt Lake Road/Highway 169 Service Road intersection to reduce delays on the service road. However, the recommended improvements (i.e. — separation of the Southeast exit -only driveway from the main parking area, and the traffic signal/roundabout at the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Page 36 Ms. Barbara Thomson, AICP City of Plymouth November 4, 2011 Page 15 Lane intersection) will minimize additional site -related traffic on the closely -spaced service road, and make Nathan Lane a more desirable location to access Schmidt Lake Road from the north than the Highway 169 Service Road, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis, the following conclusions and recommendation are offered for your consideration: All key intersections currently operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic control and geometric layout. Under year 2014 build conditions, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at an acceptable overall intersection LOS D or better during the peak hours with existing geometrics and signal timing, with :the exception of the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane and the Schmidt Lake Road/Highway 169 East Ramp intersections. In order for the existing roadway system to accommodate the site development concept at acceptable levels of service, the following improvements are recommended: o Conversion of the existing all -way stop -controlled Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection to either a traffic signal or a roundabout. o Optimization of the signal timing at the Schmidt Lake Road intersections with the Highway 169 East and West Ramps, pending MnDOT approval of any changes. Based on our review of the site development concept access, we recommend the following: o The potential Southeast Access (exit -only driveway) along the Highway 169 Service Road should not be physically connected to the main parking area located south of the proposed research and development center building. This separation will still provide service vehicles an exit on to the Highway 169 Service Road, while minimizing the additional site -related traffic on the closely -spaced service road. o The proposed Southwest Access (full -access driveway) on Nathan Lane should be relocated to the north, constructed opposite of the existing site driveway on the west side of Nathan Lane. This will minimize the likelihood of southbound vehicular queues from extending beyond the Schmidt Lake Road/Nathan Lane intersection and blocking the proposed Southwest Access. H.:Pr-ojecist7617',TSiRepo•1s'.111104_7617 FINdL 5050.Varhan Lane TSdoa Page 37 SCHMiDT LAKE RD LA 1— O Location Map o 2011081 St. Jude Medical - Expansion Site Plan Amendment City of Plymouth, Minnesota 200 1Oo 0 200 400 600 Feet Legend C, Comercial CC, City Center JA CO, Commercial Office K`l IP. Planned Industrial 0 LA -1, Living Area 1 D LA -2, Living Area 2 LA -3, Living Area 3 LA -4, Living Area 4 LA -R1 LA -R2 V -1A LA -R3 0 LA -RT EZ P-1, Public/Sem-Publicllnstitutional r - I r r L.L IZ go KLu Or I= - 2 r LLJIW Iz ID IJ C r I _ Legend C, Comercial CC, City Center JA CO, Commercial Office K`l IP. Planned Industrial 0 LA -1, Living Area 1 D LA -2, Living Area 2 LA -3, Living Area 3 LA -4, Living Area 4 LA -R1 LA -R2 V -1A LA -R3 0 LA -RT EZ P-1, Public/Sem-Publicllnstitutional or In rHennepin County Mailing Label MapIProvidedBy: Taxpayer Services Department 1Z -118-I2-12 1Z -118 -ZZ -11 1Z-11'8 -212- 14 f? rHNUDI vAKE 0,0 --Ai T WAV Ft N 4: 71 42 T2—.- t -f VZZ -4 07 .1 10-Z 1-3Z For more information contact: Print Date: 12/9/2011 Hennepin County GIS Division Map Legend 300 South 6th Street Map Scale: V = 333' Minneapolis, MN 55487 gi sJnfo@co.hennepin.rnn_us Buffer Size: 200 feet Water Major Roads Park Minoi Roads Map Comments: Parcel 5050 NATHAN LAN Buffer Region PLYMOUTH MN Selected Parcels HENNEPIN NAUMapped Page 39 Aerial Photograph - 2011081 city of Plymouth, Minnesot 100 50 0 100 200 300 Feet Page 40 Mo® ST. JUDE MEDICAL; o ® MOPE CONTROL. LESS RISK. Plymouth Expansion 5050 Nathan Lane North Plymouth, MN 55442 Plymouth Planning Commission Issue January 12, 2012 PROJECT DIRECTORY GENER6LNOfES: r . I n.a r i'??°{::iii: ............. ai i!... e`•i;... OWNER ...y... ! .. ;..; .i:....aE.i.§.....:ai. a:a:aiss:::3ni iiiiiiiEiis?::isiir?!:'r.ii:::::m:rs:::ai;i:•isi „•yiiST. JUDE MEDICAL n,ne we.uuLow.xwmm o-m.0....::La.......a.......................,......_..::isv.:::?ii::ii:::i:::'s.!a'ii::s..s_MEENE li GENERAL CONTRACTOR WGOUGH 2]91 F.YrNwlnxur Nenh rm Iwl. Ne 6d:1] F bt.ee>GA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DAMO.N tlARBER N` E= :6.m PP ME= MECHANICAL ENGINEER KARGES-FAULCONBRIDGE, INC. s)InPouu s9aimwea f e5:.i)+umN ELECTRICAL ENGINEER KARGES-FAULCONBRIDGE, INC. mNW]N Iiu as:iv f F 6551 T]: a01eC STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LARSON ENGINEERING, INC. labeneF i,int u).6 F a31Aet moli CIVIL ENGINEER PIERCE PINI+ASSOCIATES VxNe GWeennw N6 KITCHEN CONSULTANT ROBERT o,: RIPE 8 ASSOCIATESsw,w Gm vN,wlax.. Nx am]aN,u SHEET NUMBERING AND ABBREVIATION EXPLANATION 462.1 DE 6ECONDFLOpk) i pOPON,o, r+PaWlrvN 0.x: 1W co coo np AF aEFENENCE PLw EW CNN PxWaI-L Ir aGII- ftll-N LR nCU CIVILLttNIESPVW vu:caum am o:nuc+o uo s WO C. Cp16 Ph09MF16 CNF UFMCLe41PL5N R PLCpPRNJ Y 1ATdNPUN au EauwvFu+Pux sr siais swn„Immew N W ar plwnaEPNmecnce N pFNaNN 066 FP NEON FIN. A ..... vNECn NaEiw,p amc ew aN esawNv.c NP MECHH•1.0 P 4FCH PN,MC Noo OFIAG'150 INIR IM pfMO FLE—SYSTENe P 61GC Pf%4. aC 9 ELCa S}51FNe T lLFce,rF PROJECT LOCATION MAP SHEET INDEX PLANNING GOMMI _ SheetNumbeY, _ Sheet Name ' a' N:En]N mxE, aaiu xeousrE .. __ 6R aaw uE1f m+uuOgOPNiiwOEFuv pR amm ST. JL.L MEo LcA1 Plymouth Expansion IswaR TITLE SHEET• SITE PLAN AMENDMENT 100 Page 41 uwr 11 "IT LEGEND 7- L 7 1i v cL UTILITY INVOIIMA71ON: ui y FMS 31 I `,' ; J 1''' ` l'nn!'' /r 1..,, 3 ,rpm`lr , NI' f rl, .r x ;:,a.::d"M° .:: :., vt 'A k Av.,.W, A IW pk LEGALCESCRIFTION: AND TopoGFLAPHY suRvry vl NOTES CORRESPONDING 70 EASEMENTS! 11h 121 6Z- OPK1% gg ft 4 %1[', h I 11- Y.ulrl b` s! FA Lj; 7.1 GENERAL NOTES: 4r HENNIEPIm coUNTY Imomm t IT 4ICINITYMAP T . .... 6AD ' LAND SURVEYORSsn 7 - - - - - - - - .---_ - - - - - - - - - cre Page 42 I,,::;.. 11 71 r- Lv 4 N P rY 11 rI f li 1 Lur} PaRxwc courrrs 6 s ?ham' c: a N 77 ,y _ _ + _—__.._' — ^-. YL —_.—_—_ f—^ ti. r.,•w . 5 r % > v' , f jr ` i'rnwn oi„m""°."'an 1111 ml Ac Oil OUTC;.: y. li J €16i 1 ,LI Iv SCHMIDT , . 1, LAKE + r:=+ - so -, rovTr V A I N N SIT PLAN - NOTE: CADD FILES OF THE SITE IA.YOUT PLAN WILL RE PRCVIOED TO THE CONTRACTOR ATvA° THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION FOR STAKING PURPOSES. O6MENSIONS SHCWN HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCES TO TYPICAL LAYOUT OF THE SITE NOT ALL SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED. 5r igo OMO ST. JUDE MEDIGL' Plymouth Expansion glWIB R PIERCE PINI ASSOCIATES Page 43 iaa PROPOSEDBALDING FIft57 LEVEL MICHLiNC NOT£: CADD FILES OF THE SITE LAYOUT PIAN WILL eE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACT." AT THE TIME CF CONSTRICTION FOR STAKING PURPOSES. 0,MZNS10NS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCES TO '"PICAL LAYOUT OF TAE SITE. NOT ALL SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED. r IENSION IT P ON 1 m v.+a d mo°m4 5T. JUDE MGDICAL Plymouth Expansion slwIe1R PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES DIMENSION 5178 PLAN 7ONEI 204.1 DI Page 44 r rte 1 MICHLiNC NOT£: CADD FILES OF THE SITE LAYOUT PIAN WILL eE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACT." AT THE TIME CF CONSTRICTION FOR STAKING PURPOSES. 0,MZNS10NS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCES TO '"PICAL LAYOUT OF TAE SITE. NOT ALL SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED. r IENSION IT P ON 1 m v.+a d mo°m4 5T. JUDE MGDICAL Plymouth Expansion slwIe1R PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES DIMENSION 5178 PLAN 7ONEI 204.1 DI Page 44 TCHLINE .. T I h' I r ri: h I FIRST LEVEL FFE=901.5 t 1 1 L" I R -J' gFawnunwrvn K, y-' al 9 I 4 ...._ _. PRoaosSDRUILZMG 11 FFA ST. JUDEn MEDLCAL Plymouth Expansion B WiBlR PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATE$ I f- rr I. 01MENCON STrt PIAN ZONE 2 411.1 WA -911 Page 45 h a... O i FIRST LEVEL FFE=901.5 T J i' I r 9, I IYI, I I e a II -•. I I A F I I•lir I Y I fin i i i i n i i i i. n i i i i. I IlirIIIIIIIUIIIIIIUIIIIIU I I I' I U 1] 11 1, 11 1" - NOTE: SAO F1LE5 OF THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN WILL SE PRCVIDEO TO THE CONTRACTOR AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCNTrONFORSTAK PURPOSES. DIMENSIONS Sn'OtiYN HEREIN -ARE • FOR GENERAL REFERENCES 7C TYPICAL L4YOU7 OF THE SITE. NOT ALL SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED, 01MENSION SEE PAN — IN 9 11 FFA ST. JUDEn MEDLCAL Plymouth Expansion B WiBlR PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATE$ I f- rr I. 01MENCON STrt PIAN ZONE 2 411.1 WA -911 Page 45 Page 46 I om® r Sr JURE MEDSCAL r.... 1 a• J I Plymoouu . M th i MATCHUNC Expansion r j r B W B R 1 a"I:,. PIERCE PINI& Zl. ASSOCIATES L FI I! 7 1 FMP —F h f i 'I i[ xC r i I G4WLrt[ RM f\ l I f .Y nl N77 Y- v 9 y NOT?: CADC FILES OF THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN WILL PROVIOEO Y I BE TO THE CONTRACTOR AT THE TIME OF f d PROPOSED BWLDINO FIRST LEVEL r 1 / •I` r.uuo ,e ' CONSTRUCTION FOR STAKINGINFORPGENEROIMEEFFOENCESOaNHIRERE LAYOUT OF THE SITE. N07 ALL SPTEAL A L®fFFE=961.5., y ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED, r77 MATCXUNEewu w DIMENSION SITE PLAN I NIN I PA - N 204.3DILIP m Page 46 I ' [ iJ I _,u L . _L.... - ._ . _--. . I .. .._ __ - \ I r ST- JUDE MEDICAL J-- I Y Plymouth p nsion 15 W E3 J r I 1 PIERCE PINI & 7 ASSOCIATES PILL r' e f —' r j „_' r' -r 'T, NOTE: CAOC FILES -0'F THE §rrt L-b.Y.OUr'PLAN — WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE COOK STAnR KINGe ; t - ij' THE TIM L7F C4NSTRUCTIGN' FpR STAKINGh -'-- PURPOSES. DIMENSIONS SHOwN HEREIN ARE 41 y, '• i FOR GENERAL REFERENCES TO TYPICAL_— i. — \; iAYOuT OF THE SITE. NOT ALL SITE — v ELEMENTS ARE UIMENSIONEC. Irr ' J "'A 91 o - u , •i _ — — _ OPNENSION SrrE PLAN it •. — .. ... . 1 O .ZONFA 1M 0 SIT PLAN — N204ADIE 4 1 Page 47 z JK,, 0 q'r. T, M X KOA8 g.ZOVERALL GRADIN G AND DRAINAGE PI -AN ST. June MFnicnL Plymouth Expansion IBIW BIR PIERCE ?J NJ & A550CIf T11 I. OVERALL GRADING AND DRAINArE PLAe 205.00G Page 48 Bl11LO1NG / / ST. JUOEUMEDIGL FIRSF LEVEL >® / ^ f Plymouth T nsion 7—= 4 1 E . P, > NO BJWIBIR PIE RCE PINI & i Y / f r + .r.' ASSOCIATES N 11 01 71 f Y Y hC GRADING AND OIPAINAGB PLAN - SONE 1 RADING AND DRAINA.GF'P1 AN — g 205.1CG Page 49 579 j Sr.jUmMEDICAL: PlymouthExpansion. wreHuwe II I I - S - 1,. WMrnw I n.,""` l ti .,.. 00,e a_cf,-'t n.. _ _ _. nm . nm:}t .,sn? :.. E YatS , SII o-' "x To. iL EIJWIBIR 1{ I "i'i _. JJ aaa .., 'Eavo PRGPPSEQBUILDING FIRST LEVEL v...,. FFE-901.5 PIERCE PINI BT 1 A550CIATES son crew. wni", ac Iq'1° I, II lfq tI 4t< r 1. I I C ' - • Awa T oao.o r, _ i" a „ el ell I„ I 4A1 i,"; ,,, A, f: Ir I 4 GRACING AND DP.AJNAGE PIAN ZONE n 1 RA NG AN RAi G P AN — N 2 205.2CG r Page 50 I, I HATCHLINE F I r I I' Ila T r v VEST16ULE FFE-912 5 - I L I I'h ! war FT7 :71vSlr. Nt I it -: , p - - 1 f `" w i C •-" x _ ' n y 4 b Jf'r:A k, P#OPOSEf1 EUILDINc FIRST LEVEL , r,r--. c;l J •( rFFE901,5 MATCHLINE t RA ® AN 'DRAINAGEPLAN myoa - 70NE 3 mai ST. JUDEYMEDICAE Plymouth Expansion BIwIB R PIERCE P1 NI & ASSOCIATES 4` IL GRADrNd A710 DRAINAGE PLAN - ZONE3 205.3CG Page 51 IfI I.rI. _ now IjJI s, 4ra '° Sr.JuneMenlcaE P_ - n i•. 4 - --"- - - - Plymouth Expansion PL d 1 BIWIBIR A 41ii r I iPER E PlfJ[ . 7-7 u: % I t Y• L !* } r''-... II -,,N ' PyVI_ ii V - ,, ti, i Y .f• J ! i I ti } 11 a_ A w.. _ nl . I' `..%, I }(w.-- ..._.,,.. s, - , I i 1 Js , uuo• I_ I' t{ I . r r II1 I' { ' ., w jl 7 P . — 4 •-1 a yfi.{ , .i m rMvf / _ I I, • 111 I y ' \ . I•.,cirom l.' i Lf' K I I r v Ir• xnd !A i 1i es,xm ri. — n,....` iunoon - oo, vw n wrm DRAINAGE PLA ZONE 4 v RA I RAINA PAN -aE 4 ® 20S.4CG Page 52 61 OLE GRAIL SCHmULE OUT k It MANHOLE DETjA[L SCHECULF EWSCHPAIVTROAD 7 91. QVFRAIA UTII rry PLAN CASTING SCHEDULE OEMI00 S'r. j Plymouth Expansion L3 I w La I R PIERCE PJNJ T, 1111 206.000 Page 53 PROPOSED BUILDING FIRST LEVEL ST.JU DW MEbICAY x/96 = Plymouth x vmcwuwe Expansion xx`orn"vx N /'° INR AL DRXNTLE B W I B I RwraRunnow uuwarmLe 1 R4Rlws. 07.ocu- 207SEsE PIERCE PINI& M A550CIATES x.m,wa A wowatol / f N4 777 I r F T h II L<) u.. zones RV UTI fTY PAN —ZQNF 1 - o a 206,11 x x 6 Page 54 I gra, I • "'{ ,. '_ _._._ • , - I ` J Amo Sr. June MEDtcnl; li • a e.wae,d r :a,.,M. /_, . - I _, eo...,.. — -- Plymouth uaIcNUNe _ w ., r 11:2 _ • ,.y .i — — !. ' • w—w M ....—.. w—w_ _ 1 W E>rpanSioR am>ma.L.ua m t-- -- `_L I mss.•• e'=.. .—'E "" " „.—'may^a', - .,u„ FOR KL nN • B W B Rei! _- ttra.-.. A,. Ln, a`.+Nn iNPORNAnON I D uNnLE I suuowG. seee0. •! • - a.w , n ,ate„ PROPOSED I, ii .. •« BUILDING FIRST LEVEL FFEzL9G1.5 PIERCE PI N!& ASSOCIATES jwM E !itel! ,. 4 FOa ALL D"INTLE gNRORNAiION INCLUDING lI DI LE ROUNDcarteULD,NG, IS E swEM 1ffIsax.aco-zav, scv, mIcu r,Me II 1 N. 1 _ g, I .L. •.,,, • ee.w el 77-- II--44AP— a, - G II 11"40 r .. I j LTRRY CLAN - I ZONEZ sN9 uTl !n N 70NE 2 206.2CU Page 5 5 1 4yr I s M 10,11 I J I r w...K Kewe 11-.i f, "•,'"' Aw,p ? H L 11 ;r st I Y i WFORWTCN INCLUDING .qs j, I OPlJIYTLC 4AOVN0 r GOON OrvC, SEE SNEET5 so acu. Tmlsa 1 / I m, MAI VES IBULE - + i, .. " - FFE 972.5 Ir.. !!, Ir..... eta" /, I' ll 1 F , t ! xa'a-neo• %/ ' I a wr! (D RO N E PR NOTED: n `' /} °% aSBrns sa + \ "M"'r O CLOW Sx0RM55EV1CRTERUWry ROME RKCSLD 24" 57ORM SCNER OEIDW WAIERI 14 I PROPOSED M = '4 -' en ILNSR LN, 1O O3 R0[ PROP05E0 IT' )RY ID f11 BUILDING " X SEWER REW-yENMAIry FIRST LEVEL / / !! CDRCUI PROP05E0 15' 5rORM FE— F907.5 I _ SEWER AHCVC WNTCRM4IN ROV E PROPOSED 46- WORM i. O SEWER HCLOW WATEAMAIN 4 _ MATCNI,M{ I + Ixw ohm n F, e•/,. / '. .% u W amiv / ++ I r t TI TY EI AN —70NE No. JUDE Gt 5T. June McDt Plymouth Expansion B,WIBI R PIERCE PINI & A550CIATES eaoe r.1M .•: Ne el.wc' wrc'0ie.r. aLww:na:M:we VT1LTTY PLAN - ZONE 3 206.3CU Page 56 OWNI ' ST JUDE MEDICAL 41 II . vwwa J Plymouth t , Expansion I y BWBR PIERCE P1 N1 & A A55 A: f r I ,. IY I'; { f_ -— r - Z- 71 F— ti ,. I i .i'; ;,rl{ 1•.h9. I,''.In ,4. '"'. .. ' k"'.i-!„ arm, m:w:T°' 2+-_ r I \ y .. ; f,•.-._. uacw wc ,_ ll AR o,. L..iL.TfYPIAN- x 20Nf4I f 06.`tl. / /^ g4.J VTI ITY P =—Z-ONEN L6.a Page 57 MllllllKll Stn AVF1NENi11IH , r Y+S- ..' _ 11+ EE1aaEKMOVEo.SVP. 4crosrearnoxuuns . 11 ZF ItlVWQRY PLAN 9c)vne NlErnc L Plymouth Expansion BIW BIR TREEINVENTORY 222.1 Page 58 r -MY, + e,n Cd SCHMUT LAKE ROAD L l 1. I pR e N PF.VFNNML9 f J enxoTm 1E0.1fGtlWTIFP ltl tltltl LALL WxttdxlWYOtll PNulY WlELLMORC. A 1 N Mce YAinRll ahC! flPoY AT tlY A91xtl fbl ibN. F.aeeie urtetl eec.io, ru nrtn 3 TUPeOp i r l lii ST.Jcop surf Plymouth Expansion BIWIBJR LANDSCAPE PIA N7 7222.2 Page 59 o xxe o E.4 0 0 0 0 Fiff 11 rrw 1 i m 1n O O O O O © O © ®O jib i e r o w IDo e Ex1FIfIfOA FL[y nq[.-eau_m , _ i 1l 3 i3 14 75 16 1 16 17.7- 18.6 1v3 119..77 29.9 17 v1B 1v.9 19 f201v 21 22 23 24 77 m„to , r r L rr I i1, i II.i1Nll llllil 1111 1lII! I i G r--' O 1.5 O O O V O O O O 0ii 1 ' LD•.j I t Mi IIII m 0 N Sr.)rj M>:necac Plymouth Expansion E3IWISIR I May PAN Ek E100R ELEVASTONS REFERENCE - CON 6EPT5 510 Page 60 e Ex1FIfIfOA FL[y nq[.-eau_m , _ 1l 3 i3 14 75 16 1 16 17.7- 18.6 1v3 119..77 29.9 17 v1B 1v.9 19 f201v 21 22 23 24 77 m„to , r r L rr I i1, i mgkJj 24W E ILFIOA 6LEYRlIOd.aglnW/aI iet - • O O CO C.9j ti 021.31 mv' O n 0 ,ta .ew,o soar- to.a.xer: ewe of : wu wmuwx NOTESEESHEET 111.Rf E oA E+evi srEl Foa0.evnncncaLLaurs m 0 N Sr.)rj M>:necac Plymouth Expansion E3IWISIR I May PAN Ek E100R ELEVASTONS REFERENCE - CON 6EPT5 510 Page 60 0 n r If. I f 1 l ij I ++ I QIIb d rl! 4f .iyxy y vv, G) I Pg caCV'_ VI L e' 0 n r If. I f v` I ++ I ypnl h\l,r. ta-h E . Y I + '•. A ':r 4 lA1m L8M6 lYl9 e4 r. 9CHM1t]T LAKE ROAL 4 M osrw - TYM M. = Ai M EPA ST. IttpC MRp+CM1L Plymouth Expansion BIW E3 R wN.. KEY PLAN LUMINAIRESTEP - 900 -OT Page 61 SOUTHWEST VIEW BIVV 21 WON ST. JUDE MEDICAL I PLYMOUTH EXPANSION Page 62 VIEW FROM CORNER 01- SLRVICF ROAD AND SCHMID LAK- ROAD c| vv//R ICKWUM ST. )unsMLmuAc|PLYMOUTH sXpANSIoN EAST VIEW 4- Bawl BJR HOME Sr,JUI)t ML DICAL I P LYMOU . TH EXPANSION . ONE I , ." " ' I -, , I ; ; - A0 11060 Ov 0!.12.2012 Page 64 LYI I VI L VIM/ F HON4 CORNI R C)l Sl RVICE ROAD AND S(-HMIDT LAKF ROAD TOWARD LOADINL-, Doc. K. S I U M M!,»1 C. A I PLYMOUTH EXPANSION Page 65 a -,Y . d ._. S! P19''Yy 1k£I 4F''Y'u n N .•a' 7 ^aiA' I. m .-, M,.cxw: .rr4a.,:^, res' '••tT-"'.-' u'f' W -f" I'..y:.'.1n'ru....sc` M.+R' `lSH./'".w11;'"'v i%. Ju Gh...ut..'hM1+/u+•-':1"""` moi ; gr'T G y" tiLL6{, I 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ST. JUDE MEDICAL TO CONSTRUCT A 275,000 -SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ADDITION, PARKING EXPANSION AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 5050 NATHAN LANE (2011081) WHEREAS, St. Jude Medical has requested approval of a site plan amendment to construct a 275,000 -square foot building addition, parking expansion and related site improvements for property legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, Northwestern Bell Plymouth Office 1St Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public meeting and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by St. Jude Medical, for a site plan amendment to allow a 275,000 -square foot building addition, parking expansion and related site improvements, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site plan amendment is approved for to allow a 275,000 -square foot building addition, parking expansion and related site improvements, in accordance with the plans received by the city on December 13, 2011 and revised plans received on January 3, 2012, and January 12, 2012, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. A separate building permit is required prior to commencement of the proiect. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall fulfill the requirements, submit the required information, and revise the plans as indicated below, consistent with the applicable city code, zoning ordinance, and engineering guidelines: a. Complete a site improvement performance agreement and submit a financial guarantee pursuant to section 21045.10 of the zoning ordinance. b. Update the tree inventory inconsistency between the site demolition plan series and the tree inventory/tree removals plan (sheet 222.1). c. Submit a sound source control plan that shows how the site will comply with the city's noise ordinance. d. Add a "one-way" sign at the entrance to the loading area and "do not enter" signage at the south, exit -only access. Page 67 Resolution 2012 - File No. 2011081 Page 2 e. Easements: 1. Submit drainage and utility easements over the existing ponds, wetlands and drainage area along the service road. 2. Modify the existing 20 -foot sewer and drainage easement, recorded as document no. 4132015, to center the easement on the existing 24 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) storm sewer. f. Agreements: 1. Revise the current maintenance agreement for the two existing water quality ponds, recorded as document number 6361600 and the existing 12 -inch storm water pipe under the building. The revised maintenance agreement shall reflect the new 24 -inch storm sewer pipe, the three underground storm water treatment facilities. The revised maintenance agreement shall also reflect maintenance of the storm sewer system during high water time periods. 2. Submit an encroachment agreement for concrete pavement and retaining walls that are located within existing easements. g. Applicable Permits: 1. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization. 2. NPDES. 3. MPCA — Sanitary Sewer Extension 4. MDH — Water Main Extension 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation h. Grading and Drainage Plan: 1. Submit plans at 22 -inch by 34 -inch for record plans. 2. Update plans to show the delineated wetland boundary. 3. Show normal water levels (NWL) and high water levels (HWL) for existing wetlands. 4. Show a concrete pedestrian ramp at trail connection with the west parking lot. i. Utility Plan: 1. Identify structure dimensions and casting numbers for each structure shown on a storm sewer structure schedule. 2. All storm sewer shall be inspected by the Plymouth Engineering Division. Call 763-509-5500 to schedule inspections. Provide a video inspection report for all new storm sewer lines, underground treatment devices, and the existing 24 -inch storm sewer pipe. 3. Insulate between new water main and storm sewer pipe where clearance is less than three feet. 4. Keep drain tile out of existing easements. 5. Show trail to be replaced where connecting to the existing sanitary sewer. 6. Restore the Nathan Lane street surface within 48 hours of making the sanitary sewer crossing. 7. Maintain existing sanitary sewer flow when sewer connection is made. 8. Use current city standard details, dated 3-11, on details ST -5, ST -6 and ST -9. Page 68 Resolution 2012 - File No. 2011081 Page 3 9. A pressure test and bacteriological test is required for the new water main before placing it into service. 10. Eliminate short-circuiting of drainage through underground storm water system A. Water Resources Plan: 1. Submit calculations that demonstrate an 85 -percent reduction in total suspended solids (TSS) for new impervious areas. A 60 -percent reduction in total phosphorus (TP) loading for new impervious areas is also required. 2. Demonstrate that post -development rates of runoff are less than pre -development rates for the 10 -year and 100 -year frequency rainfall events. 3. Demonstrate that volume reduction requirements are satisfied for the 2 -year rainfall event. k. Fire Protection Plan: 1. Relocate the two hydrants to approved locations. Locate the west hydrant to an approved location that is not in a parking space location or a fire lane sign will be required at the current identified location. 2. The fire apparatus turning radius proofs shall indicate that the apparatus do not come in contact with any objects, extend into parking spaces or extend over curbs. Fire lane sign locations will be identified by the fire inspector on submitted plans and in the field. 4. Prior to the issuance of any interior build -out permits, St. Jude Medical shall supply the city with the maximum number of employees that they would have in the building at one time. The employee total shall include the employees in the entire building plus any new employees expected to use the new space under the interior build -out permit. 5. Prior to final inspection approval of the building addition completion, the applicant shall construct a traffic signal and any related improvements at the intersection of Schmidt Lake Road and Nathan Lane. 6. Silt fence shall be installed prior to any construction on the site. 7. All rooftop equipment shall be screened or painted to match the building. 8. Standard Conditions: a. The applicant shall remove any diseased or hazardous trees. b. New signage shall receive sign permits when required and shall comply with the section 21155 of the zoning ordinance. c. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. d. The site plan shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the applicant has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21045.09 of the zoning ordinance. Page 69 Resolution 2012 - File No. 2011081 Page 4 APPROVED THIS 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2012. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on January 24, 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Page 70 City of Agenda Plymouth Number: Adding Quality to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Prepared by: Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager January 24, 2012 Reviewed by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Order Preliminary Engineering Report, Accept Preliminary Engineering Report, Order Plans and Specifications, Accept Plans and Specifications, Item: Calling for a Public Hearing, Order Advertisement for Bids, Declaring Costs to be Assessed, and Setting Assessment Hearing for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions Ordering the Preliminary Engineering Report, Accepting the Preliminary Engineering Report, Ordering the Plans and Specifications, Accepting the Plans and Specifications, Calling for a Public Hearing, Ordering the Advertisement for Bids, Declaring the Cost to be Assessed, and Setting the Assessment Hearing for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001. 2. BACKGROUND: The 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001, includes Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N. As outlined in the attached Preliminary Engineering Report, total reconstruction, which includes new concrete curb and gutter, is recommended for the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood. Total reconstruction includes a street section width that will vary from 20 feet to 28 feet (from back of curb to back of curb), placement of a 1 %2 inch bituminous wearing course, 2% inch bituminous base course, 8 inches of aggregate base, and 12 inches of granular sub -base with drain tile installed in the sub- base. Minnesota Lane and 9th Avenue are dead end streets having no adequate means for traffic to turn around. Due to limited right-of-way and existing steep slopes, the construction of a standard 82' diameter cul-de-sac is not feasible in either of these locations. Based on existing conditions staff is proposing to install a 45' diameter cul- de-sac in each of these locations to provide some means for traffic to turn around. Page 1 Proposed improvements to the storm sewer system in the Circle Park neighborhood will include extensive runs of storm sewer piping and additional structures. Many of the streets in this area have nearly flat street gr ades with minimal storm sewer, resulting in poor drainage conditions. Sump style manholes and catch basins are proposed to be installed with the project in an effort to improve storm water quality prior to it entering wetlands, ponds, and lakes. Additionally, the existing corrugated metal pipe in the area is deteriorating and is proposed to be replaced with either reinforced concrete, or plastic piping. Drain tile would also be added in this area to provide for sub -grade drainage. The existing ditch sections on Niagara Lane are also proposed to be eliminated by adjusting street grades on that roadway. In 2001, four speed humps were installed on Niagara Lane, following the submission of a petition by residents on that roadway. As part of the design for this project, staff is proposing to reinstall the speed humps on that roadway. The City Council would need to direct staff to allow for the installation of speed humps on any other street in the proposed project area. The attached Preliminary Engineering Report details traffic counts and speeds on Niagara Lane and Lanewood Lane both prior to and following the installation of the speed humps on Niagara Lane. The bids for this project would include a bid alternate for speed humps to allow the City Council to include or remove speed humps at the Public Improvement Hearing scheduled on Mareh 2012. April 10, The City's Maintenance Division has reviewed the water main in the proposed project area and has deemed it acceptable. The water valves in the project area however are at an age where bolts begin to rust and fail, causing water main breaks, and are proposed to be replaced as part of this project. No repairs to the sanitary sewer system are anticipated as part of this project. Sanitary sewer manholes are however proposed to be sealed in an effort to reduce any storm water runoff seeping through the manhole rings. There are two rain gardens proposed in the Circle Park neighborhood to improve water quality in the City. Similar to past Street Reconstruction Projects, the design will include curb cuts, located upstream of the catch basins, where the storm water will flow into the rain gardens and will infiltrate into the soil. Once the rain gardens are full, due to a major rain event, the overflow water will bypass the rain gardens altogether and flow directly into the catch basins. All private utility companies have been notified of this potential project and their facilities have been shown on the proposed construction plans, according to the location notes in the record drawings provided to the City by each company. Additionally, all homeowners having sprinkler systems, invisible dog fences, or any other private utility have been asked to contact City staff and these facilities have been noted on the proposed plans. The Circle Park Neighborhood is located in both the Bassett Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts. Permits will likely be required for this project and all Page 2 permits will be obtained prior to construction. In addition, because this project proposes to disturb more than one acre of land, a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) storm water construction permit will be required. On January 9, 2012, an Information Meeting was held to discuss the details of this proposed project with the residents in the Circle Park Neighborhood. Attached is a summary of the comments and questions from that meeting. Additionally, residents in the proposed project area have been invited to view the final plans prior to the City Council's approval. Bids for this project are scheduled to be received on February 23, 2012, and the public improvement and assessment hearings would be scheduled for Mar -eh 27 April 10, 2012. In accordance with state statute, notice of the proposed improvement hearing and assessment hearing for this project would be sent to all affected property owners and would be posted in the official City Newspaper in the appropriate time frame. Included with the notice would be a recommended assessment, which would be, calculated based on the lowest responsible bid received. The current assessment policy assesses 40% of the project cost for total street reconstruction. At this time, the estimated assessment is $6,500 to $8,000 per single family property. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: This proposed project is included in the 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program at an estimated cost of $2,440,000. The total estimated project cost for reconstruction of the streets in Circle Park is approximately $2,853,097.98 of which $1,071,414.03 would be assessed. The sanitary sewer improvements are estimated at $18,377.26 and will be funded from the Sewer Fund. The water main valve replacements are estimated at $128,248.15 and will be funded from the water fund, and rain garden installation is estimated at $27,937.50 and would be funded from the Water Resources Fund. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Preliminary Engineering Report Summary of Comments from Neighborhood Information Meeting Resolutions Page 3 E i ti -In L 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT N rp CITY OF CIRCLE PARK PLYMOUTH CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 SCALE 1:1000 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 January 2012 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I a duly Lice ed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. REG. NO. 4550L REVIEWED BY: DATE: a Page 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................2 EXISTINGCONDITIONS...............................................................................................2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.....................................................................................6 SURFACE WATER CONCERNS...................................................................................7 TRAFFICCONCERNS....................................................................................................7 ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE.........................................................................10 ESTIMATEDCOSTS.....................................................................................................10 COSTSUMMARY: ....................................................................................................................................... 10 PROJECTFINANCING: ................................................................................................................................. 10 FUNDINGSUMMARY: .................................................................................................................................. I I APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATE LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Project Area Map........................................................................4 Figure 2 - Existing Street Widths...................................................................5 Figure 3 - Proposed Street Widths.................................................................8 Figure 4 - Typical Section — Full Reconstruction.................................................9 Page 6 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions drawn from studies and investigations are: 1. The proposed street, drainage, sanitary sewer and water main improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost effective. 2. If the recommended streets are not reconstructed at this time, significant maintenance work will be required. 3. Draintile is necessary to reduce retained moisture and/or remove trapped groundwater from the subgrade along some of the streets. 4. Additional right-of-way may be needed at various locations throughout the project area. In all other areas, the existing right-of-way is adequate to construct the proposed street improvements. Based on these conclusions we recommend: 1. The proposed improvements for the Circle Park neighborhood be constructed at an estimated total project cost of $2,853,097.98. 2. The proposed rain gardens be constructed at an estimated cost of $27,937.50 and funded from the Water Resources Fund. 3. The sanitary sewer manhole sealing be performed at an estimated cost of $18,377.26 and be funded from the Sewer Fund. 4. The water main valve replacements be done at an estimated cost of $128,248.15 and be funded from the Water Fund. 5. Any existing storm sewer system be replaced and repaired if needed, and new storm sewer be added where necessary. 6. The project be assessed in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy, adopted on January 25, 2011. 1 Page 7 INTRODUCTION On January 24th, 2012, the Plymouth City Council ordered the preparation of a Preliminary Engineering Report for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 12001, Circle Park. The purpose of this report is to determine, in a preliminary manner, the feasibility of reconstructing and resurfacing existing streets within a proposed project area. The proposed 2012 Street Reconstruction Project investigated in this preliminary engineering report includes reconstructing existing streets. Reconstruction is recommended when the condition of an existing street indicates an unstable base requiring correction of an underlying sub -grade problem. Continued routine maintenance such as crack filling will be required after completion of the rehabilitation to maximize the streets life. EXISTING CONDITIONS As shown in Figure 1, the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood are Shenandoah Lane N., south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N and Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N. According to City records, it appears that the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood were paved after the installation of utilities in the late 1960's and early 1970's. The existing roadway widths in this area range from 12 feet to 28 feet as shown in Figure 2. Two streets in the proposed project area, Minnesota Lane and 9th Avenue, are dead end roadways containing no adequate means for traffic to turn around. All of the streets in the Circle Park area have existing asphalt pavement. The surface conditions of the pavement in this area are generally poor, with pavement distresses including alligator cracking, transverse cracking, and edge cracking. There are also many locations that have patching, typically used to cover potholes and excessive alligator cracking. Soil boring logs, included in a Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec in February of 2009, indicate street sections in the project area that include an existing asphalt thickness ranging from 2.5" to 6" and an existing road base that includes silty sand, clay, and little to no aggregate base. In 2001, four speed humps were installed on Niagara Lane, following the submission of a petition by residents on that roadway. The following table shows traffic counts and speeds on Niagara Lane and also on Lanewood Lane before and after the installation of the speed humps. The traffic data collected in 2000 was prior to the installation of the speed humps 2 Page 8 and the remainder of the traffic data was collected following speed hump installation. Street 85 1h Percentile Speed (mph) Vehicles Per Day (VPD) 2000 Niagara Lane 38 1500 2000 Lanewood Lane 33 200 2001 Niagara, Lane 34.5 400. 2008 Niagara Lane 25-26 550 2009 Lanewood Lane 25-26 285 Storm sewer is present in the proposed project area on the north half of Niagara Lane, from the Circle Park Pond to 91" Avenue, around Circle Park, and on Shenendoah Lane, south of the Luce Line Trail. The existing storm sewer consists of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and corrugated metal pipe (CMP). The storm sewer system in this area does not appear to be adequate, with the exception of the RCP on the north half of Niagara Lane, and the RCP in the southern part of Circle Park. An existing ditch section also exists on a portion of Niagara Lane, with existing CMP under each driveway approach. The water main system in the Circle Park area was installed in the early 1970's, and consists of 6" and 8" cast iron pipes. City records indicate that there has not been a high occurrence of water main breaks in this area and that the mains are in good condition. The sanitary sewer system in this area was installed primarily in the late 1960's and consists of 8" and 9" VCP mains. In 2006 and 2008, much of the sanitary sewer in the area was lined. Due to this recent maintenance, no deficiencies are present in the existing sanitary sewer piping. 3 Page 9 44.3i....i"'3 TF41, Li Ll F-41 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT N CITY OF CIRCLE PARKPLYMOUTHrib LOCATION MAP (FIGURE 1) -SCALE 1:1000 I 28 Feet 24 Feet 1 12 Feet 27 Feet lllmlll 20Feet N 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY of EXISTING STREET WIDTHSrwh,PLYMOUTH FIGURE 2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Total reconstruction, which includes new concrete curb and gutter, is recommended for the streets in the Circle Park neighborhood. Total reconstruction includes a street section width that will vary from 20 feet to 28 feet (from back of curb to back of curb), placement of a 1 %2 inch bituminous wearing course, 21/2 inch bituminous base course, 8 inches of aggregate base, and 12 inches of granular subbase with draintile installed in the subbase. Figure 4 shows a detail of the structural cross sections for total street reconstruction. Proposed street widths will vary from street to street, as shown in Figure 3. Streets in the Circle Park neighborhood are proposed to have a street width of 28 feet, with the exception of Minnesota Lane and Lanewood Lane around Circle Park. Due to existing yard slopes and driveway grades, Minnesota Lane is proposed to be constructed at a width of 21 feet, with no on -street parking. Additionally, staff is proposing to eliminate the grass island in the roadway at the entrance to Minnesota Lane as it does not meet current City standards. Lanewood Lane on both sides of Circle Park is proposed to be reconstructed as a one-way, 20 foot street, closely matching the existing roadway in that location. As noted earlier in this report, Minnesota Lane and 9th Avenue are dead end streets having no adequate means for traffic to turn around. Due to limited right-of-way and existing steep slopes, the construction of a standard 82' diameter cul-de-sac is not feasible in either of these locations. Based on existing conditions staff is proposing to install a 45' diameter cul- de-sac in each of these locations to provide some means for traffic to turn around. Proposed improvements to the storm sewer system in the Circle Park neighborhood will include extensive runs of storm sewer piping and additional structures. Many of the streets in this area have nearly flat street grades with minimal storm sewer, resulting in poor drainage conditions. Sump style manholes and catch basins are proposed to be installed with the project in an effort to improve storm water quality prior to it entering wetlands, ponds, and lakes. Additionally, the existing corrugated metal pipe in the area is deteriorating and is proposed to be replaced with either reinforced concrete, or plastic piping. Drain tile would also be added in this area to provide for subgrade drainage. The existing ditch sections on Niagara Lane are also proposed to be eliminated by adjusting street grades on that roadway. 31 Page 12 The City's Maintenance Division has reviewed the water main in the proposed project area and has deemed it acceptable. The water valves in the project area however are at an age where bolts begin to rust and fail, causing water main breaks, and are proposed to be replaced as part of this project. As noted above, no repairs to the sanitary sewer system are anticipated as part of this project. Sanitary sewer manholes are however proposed to be sealed in an effort to reduce any storm water runoff seeping through the manhole rings. Rain gardens are proposed in the Circle Park neighborhood improve water quality ;n the City. Similar to past Street Reconstruction Projects, the design will include curb cuts, located upstream of the catch basins, where the storm water will flow into the rain gardens and will infiltrate into the soil. Once the rain gardens are full, due to a major rain event, the overflow water will bypass the rain gardens altogether and flow directly into the catch basins. SURFACE WATER CONCERNS The Circle Park neighborhood is located in both the Bassett Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Permits will likely be required for this project and all permits will be obtained prior to construction beginning. In addition, because the project is disturbing more than one acre of land, a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) storm water construction permit will be required. TRAFFIC CONCERNS Traffic will be maintained on streets wherever possible during construction. Construction for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project will be staged to provide access to the area in general and minimize disruption to individual driveways. As noted above, Niagara Lane has existing speed humps. As part of the design for this project, staff is proposing to reinstall the speed humps on that roadway. The City Council would need to direct staff to allow for the installation of speed humps on any other street in the proposed project area. 7 Page 13 LEGEND 28 Feet 29 Feet 20 Feet a U L z N 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CITY F PROPOSED STREET WIDTHSPLYMOUTH r,FIAG,URE 3 TYPICAL 28' B -B STREET RECONSTRUCTION R/W R/W I_ VARIABLE _I_ VARIABLE _I 14' 14' I 12'-2" -— B-618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 3% 3% I N 12" L T SUBGRADE TI DETAIL A TYP) 4" DRAINTILE W/FILTER FABRIC (WHERE SPECIFIED) DETAIL A 2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE DOT SPEC. 2360, TYPE SPWEA230C TACK COAT 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE DOT SPEC. 2360, TYPE SPNWB240C BGG. BASE CLASS 7 DOT SPEC. 3138 A2(a) SELECT GRANULAR BORROW SPEC. 3149.213 TEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION N CITY OF PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION PLYMOUTH I RE 4 Lr Estimated 12001 Project Schedule City Council receives the Feasibility Report and orders preparation of plans andspecs January 24, 2012 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 City Council approves plans and specs and orders Public Hearing January 24, 2012 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Advertise for bids February 02, 2012 Receive bids February 23, 2012 Public Improvement Hearing, Assessment Hearing, and Award Contract March 27, 2012 Begin Construction May, 2012 Construction ends August 24, 2012 ESTIMATED COSTS Project costs have been estimated for all the improvements studied in this report. The costs include construction costs plus 10% for construction contingencies, 15% for engineering, administration, finance and legal. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix A of this report. The total estimated project costs for improvements of the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, are summarized below. Cost Summary: Construction Cost 2,282,478.38 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 15% Eng. & Admin. 342,371.76 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Project Financing: The City of Plymouth has an adopted method for financing street reconstruction projects, which includes both assessments and City funding. Street reconstruction, curb and gutter, and storm sewer costs will be assessed at 40% to the adjacent property owners with the Street Reconstruction Fund accounting for the remaining 60%. It is proposed that the Water Resources Fund will finance the rain gardens installed with the project, and the total cost for installing the inflow and infiltration sealing system will be 10 Page 16 financed through the Sewer Fund. The total cost for replacing the water main valves will be financed through the Water Fund, Funding Summary: Funding Source Estimated Cost Water Resources Fund: Rain Gardens 27,937.50 Water Fund: Watermain Valve Replacement 128,248.15 Sewer Fund: I&I Sealing Manholes 18,377.26 Assessments: Total Street Reconstruction (40% Assessed) 1,071,417.03 Street Reconstruction Fund 1,607,121.04 Total Funding: 2,853,097.98 11 Page 17 12 APPENDIX A — Cost Estimate Page 18 2012 Street Reconstruction Project City of Plymouth, Minnesota City Project No. 12001 NO. ITEM SCHEDULE A - CIRCLE PARK UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 100,000.00 100,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 3 ABANDON STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 100 3.50 350.00 41 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 1,388 7.85 10,895.80 5 REMOVE FENCE L.F. 50 10.00 500.00 6 REMOVE RETAINING WALL L.F. 50 15.00 750.00 7 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 10 339.26 3,392.60 8 REMOVE AND REPLACE 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S.Y. 892 38.19 34,065.48 9 SALVAGE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 16 309.84 4,957.44 10 SALVAGE AND INSTALL BRICK PAVER DRIVEWAY S.F. 350 9.65 3,377.50 11 SALVAGE AND INSTALL RETAINING WALL S.F. 100 16.48 1,648.00 12 SALVAGE AND INSTALL INVISIBLE DOG FENCE EACH 20 158.39 3,167.80 13 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD EACH 100 48.67 4,867.00 14 SALVAGE AND INSTALL MAILBOX STRUCTURE EACH 92 76.85 7,070.20 15 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL, TYPE C EACH 36 39.15 1,409.40 16 SALVAGE AND INSTALL FENCE L.F. 50 20.08 1,004.00 17 SALVAGE AND INSTALL HYDRANT EACH 7 2,500.00 17,500.00 18 TEMPORARY MAILBOX STRUCTURE L.S. 1 2,800.00 2,800.00 19 CLEARING TREE 25 70.86 1,771.50 20 GRUBBING TREE 25 41.71 1,042.75 21 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 24,060 7.85 188,868.65 22 CHANNEL EXCAVATION C.Y. 1,000 8.38 8,380.00 23 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C.Y. 2,000 8.70 17,400.00 24 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) C.Y. 10,284 11.82 121,556.88 25 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S.Y. 1,000 2.10 2,100.00 26 TEST ROLLING Rd. Sta 1,000 2.75 2,750.00 27 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL. 10,000 0.87 8,700.00 28 AGGREGATE BASE CL 7 (CV) C.Y. 6,856 17.83 122,242.48 29 DRIVEWAY BASE, AGG. CL. 7 C.Y. 604 28.88 17,443.52 30 DRIVEWAY AGG. CL. 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 200 22.54 4,508.00 31 3 INCH MINUS RECYCLE MATERIAL TON 200 21.56 4,312.00 32 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 459 65.00 29,835.00 33 TYPE SPNWB230C BASE COURSE MIXTURE (2 1/2") S.Y. 24,076 8.13 195,737.88 34 TYPE SPWEA240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1%") S.Y. 24,076 5.45 131,214.20 35 TACK COAT GAL. 1,204 2.40 2,889.60 36 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 2,000 10.75 21,500.00 37 4" PE STREET DRAINTILE W/SOCK L.F. 9,700 4.47 43,359.00 38 4" PE DRAINTILE SERVICE W/SOCK L.F. 375 8.15 3,056.25 39 PE YARD DRAIN EACH 25 219.65 5,491.25 40 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 40 136.80 5,472.00 41 CONNECT EXISTING DISCHARGE LINE TO YARD DRAIN EACH 5 177.74 888.70 42 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 730.94 3,654.70 43 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 750.00 750.00 44 12" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 2,566 29.51 75,722.66 45 15' RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 292 31.82 9,291.44 46 18" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL V L.F. 890 34.04 30,295.60 47 21" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.III L.F. 237 36.00 8,532.00 48 15' HDPE DUAL WALL L.F. 70 27.50 1,925.00 49,12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 7 459.28 3,214.96 50 21" RC PIPE APRON &TRASHGUARD EACH 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 51 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 1,000 16.51 16,510.00 52 CB TYPE ST -2 L.F. 55.5 218.55 12,129.53 Page 19 53 MH TYPE ST -6 (48" DIAMETER) L.F. 115.0 235.98 27,137.70 54 MH TYPE ST -6 (60" DIAMETER) L.F. 32.3 395.65 12,779.50 55 15" DRAIN BASIN W/DOME GRATE EACH 1 750.00 750.00 56 CB CASTING TYPE R -3067 -DL EACH 25 518.54 12,963.50 57 MH CASTING R-1642 EACH 13 553.55 7,196.15 58 MH CASTING R-2561 EACH 1 426.13 426.13 59 HAND -PLACED RIPRAP CL III TON 19 83.91 1,594.29 60 ALTER SANITARY SERVICE EACH 4 846.58 3,386.32 61 4" PVC SEWER SERVICE PIPE - SDR 35 L.F. 100 29.90 2,990.00 62 INFILTRATION & INFLOW (0) BARRIERS EACH 33 176.53 5,825.49 63 F & 16" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 25 2,071.74 51,793.50 64 F & 18" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 2,502.86 22,525.74 65 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 4 220.46 881.84 66 ALTER WATER SERVICE EACH 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 67 INSULATE WATERMAIN (4") S.F. 1,000 2.94 2,940.00 68 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 42 426.16 17,898.72 69 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN L.F. 25 333.59 8,339.75 70 MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN REPAIR L.F. 5 192.93 868.19 71 CONCRETE PED. RAMPS EACH 8 484.96 3,879.68 72 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L.F. 18,926 8.87 167,873.62 73 36" CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER L.F. 75 16.80 1,260.00 74 RETAINING WALL - MODULAR BLOCK (<4' HIGH) S.F. 250 22.02 5,505.00 75 RETAINING WALL - CHILTON' LIMESTONE (<4' HIGH) S.F. 500 26.70 13,350.00 76 RAINGARDEN #1 EACH 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 77 RAINGARDEN #2 EACH 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 78 WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MGAL 1,700 9.85 16,745.00 79 COMMERCIAL FERT. ANALYSIS 5-15-10 Lb. 1,689 0.58 979.62 80 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD S.Y. 40,889 3.25 132,889.25 81 SEEDING: MIXTURE Mn/DOT 350 ACRE 1 2,626.50 2,626.50 82 WOOD FIBER BLANKET S.Y. 1,000 1.23 1,230.00 83 SILT FENCE L.F. 1,500 1.59 2,385.00 84 INLET PROTECTION -TYPE SPECIAL EACH 34 133.70 4,545.80 85 F&I TREE, AUTUMN SPRIE MAPLE, 2" B&B EACH 5 315.04 1,575.20 86 F&I TREE, BLACK HILLS SPRUCE, 2" B"B EACH 5 247.73 1,238.65 TOTAL SCHEDULE A $ 1,863,780.89 NO. ITEM SCHEDULE B - SHENANDOAH LANE UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 87 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 88 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 89 ABANDON STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 50 3.50 175.00 90 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES AND SIZES) L.F. 200 7.85 1,570.00 91 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 94 2.48 233.12 92 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD EACH 25 48.67 1,216.75 93 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL, TYPE C EACH 26 39.15 1,017.90 94 CLEARING TREE 50 70.86 3,543.00 95 GRUBBING TREE 50 41.71 2,085.50 96 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 6,616 7.85 51,935.60 97 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION C.Y. 250 8.70 2,175.00 98 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) C.Y. 2,807 11.82 33,178.74 99 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S.Y. 250 2.10 525.00 100 TEST ROLLING Rd. Sta 100 2.75 275.00 101 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL. 2,500 0.87 2,175.00 102 AGGREGATE BASE CL 7 (CV) C.Y. 1,871 17.83 33,359.93 103 DRIVEWAY BASE, AGG. CL. 7 C.Y. 92 28.88 2,656.96 104 3 INCH MINUS RECYCLE MATERIAL TON 50 21.56 1 $ 1,078.00 Page 20 105 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 93 65.00 6,045.00 106 TYPE SPNWB230C BASE COURSE MIXTURE (2 1/2") S.Y. 6,669 8.13 54,218.97 107 TYPE SPWEA240C WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1'/z") S.Y. 6,669 5.45 36,346.05 108 TACK COAT GAL. 333 2.40 799.20 109 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 250 10.75 2,687.50 110 4" PE STREET DRAINTILE W/SOCK L.F. 2,650 4.47 11,845.50 111 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 16 136.80 21188.80 112 CONNECT RCP PIPE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 1 730.94 730.94 113,12" RC PIPE STORM SEWER, CL.V L.F. 800 29.51 23,608.00 114112" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 459.28 918.56 115 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 100 16.51 1,651.00 116 CB TYPE ST -2 L.F. 16.0 218.55 3,496.80 117 MH TYPE ST -6 (48" DIAMETER) L.F. 30.0 235.98 7,079.40 118 CB CASTING TYPE R -3067 -DL EACH 8 518.54 4,148.32 119 HAND -PLACED RIPRAP CL III TON 14 83.91 1,174.74 120 INS TALL 8" SANITARY SERVICE & STUB EACH 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 121 CONCRETE PED. RAMPS EACH 2 484.96 969.92 122 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8618 L.F. 5,074 8.87 45,006.38 123 WATER FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT MGAL 500 9.85 4,925.00 124 COMMERCIAL FERT. ANALYSIS 5-15-10 Lb. 344 0.58 199.52 125 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD S.Y. 8,333 3.25 27,082.25 126 SILT FENCE L.F. 2,000 1.59 3,180.00 127 INLET PROTECTION -TYPE SPECIAL EACH 8 133.70 1,069.60 128 F&I TREE, AUTUMN SPRIE MAPLE, 2" B&B EACH 2 315.04 630.08 129 F&I TREE, BLACK HILLS SPRUCE, 2" B"B EACH 2 247.73 495.46 TOTAL SCHEDULE B $ 402,697.49 Bid Alternate A 130 SPEED HUMPS -NIAGARA LN JEACH 1 4 $ 2,000.00 1 $ 8,000.00 Total Bid Alternate A $ 8,000.00 Bid Alternate B 130 SPEED HUMPS-LANEWOOD LN EACH 4 1 $ 2,000.00 1 $ 8,000.00 Total Bid Alternate B $ 8,000.00 TOTAL SCHEDULES A & B, AND BID ALTERNATES A & B $ 2,282,478.38 25% DESIGN, ADMIN, CONT $ 570,619.60 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 2,853,097.98 Page 21 DATE: January 10, 2012 TO: File FROM: Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC MEETING 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CITY PROJECT NO. 12001 A public meeting was held on Monday, January 9, 2012 for property owners/residents in the proposed 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, No. 12001. The Circle Park area is Shenandoah Lane N., south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N and Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N. Approximately 22 property owners attended the meeting. City representatives present included Jeff Wosje, Ward 2 City Councilman, Doran Cote, Public Works Director, Jim Renneberg, Assistant City Engineer, Joe Paumen, Reconstruction Program Manager, and Mike Payne, Engineer. General information was provided regarding the proposed improvements, the reconstruction process, and the City's assessment policy. The major questions and comments were as follows: Can the overhead lines be buried as part of this project: Response: It is possible to bury the overhead lines. However, it would be done separate from the reconstruction project, as the appropriate utility company would do the relocation. It is likely that the homeowners in the area would have to pay for the entire cost of relocating the utility. What portion of the cost is the city paying? The city pays for 60% of the project costs associated with the street reconstruction. The council changed the assessment policy since the last time this project was brought forward. Under the old policy, residents paid 100% of the cost for curb and gutter when it did not previously exist. Residents also paid 100% of the cost for storm sewer if the system was deemed inadequate. The current estimate is based on an average of last years bid prices. Do you have standards for asphalt and monitor its quality? Yes, we follow the Minnesota Department of Transportation specifications for asphalt and we have an inspector on site watching paving operations. We can 0:\Engineedng\PROJECTS\2010-2019\12001\Memos\Q&AinfoMtgJ?,agee 22 also take core samples afterwards to make sure the asphalt conforms to our specifications. What is the current street standard width? 28 feet from back of curb to back of curb. How far do you go into the boulevard to match grades? Typically it is from 5-10 feet, but can be more. Niagara Lane isn't centered in the right-of-way; will it be in the new design? We try to keep the same footprint whenever possible to minimize impacts. Niagara seems generally close to being centered in the right of way. If a road was grossly offset to one side or the other we would try to make it more centered if possible. If gas mains are hit will you turn off service? The gas lines that are hit most often are the individual services to homes. In that case the gas company is called once the line is hit and they will come out and make repairs. The home would be without gas service until the repair can be made. Will there be any impact to the trees with this construction project? We expect very minimal impact to trees with this project. Are higher volume roads like County Road 6 assessed the same? Higher volume residential roads are assessed the same. Does increased traffic lower the longevity of the street? Higher passenger vehicle traffic does not lower the longevity of a street as passenger vehicles have little impact on the roadway. Much heavier vehicles like school busses and garbage trucks impact the roadway more and the volume of those vehicles is usually fairly constant. Does curb and gutter make a street last longer? Yes, curb and gutter is rigid and provides edge support to the flexible roadway, which results in longer service life. Curb and gutter also offers superior drainage. How wide will Minnesota Lane be? 21 feet from back of curb to back of curb, the minimum width allowed in the City for streets having two-way traffic. Will the fire hydrant in my lot be moved closer to my house? We try to keep a buffer between the roadway and a fire hydrant. That may result in a fire hydrant being moved if the roadway is being widened and an inadequate buffer exists. Can you put in an extra cut in the curb like you do for a driveway? We typically don't put in an extra curb cut for future driveways but we do accommodate special situations. Is the assessment tax deductible? 0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2010-2019\12001\Memos\Q&AinfoMtgPoage 23 We recommend that you contact a tax professional to answer that question. Will this project increase runoff to Parkers Lake? This project may increase runoff to Parkers Lake. We treat storm water with raingardens and sump manholes in an effort to improve the quality of the sormwater runoff. Why are you proposing to install curb and gutter? Curb and gutter provides edge support for the roadway which increases the life span of the road. It also offers improved drainage and helps prevent plow damage to the boulevard. What is the interest rate on this assessment and is it a fixed rate? If assessments are not paid off in a lump sum an interest rate is charged and the rate is fixed. The current interest rate for a project paid over a ten year term is 3.37%. Can assessments come in higher than the estimate? It is possible for that to happen. However we have noticed a favorable bidding climate the last few years and prepared the estimate using an average of bid prices of previous projects, not the lowest bidder. How many speeding tickets are written on Niagara Lane? We don't know have that information and would have to check with the police department. How does water flow around speed humps on roads with curb and gutter? The speed humps taper down towards the edge of the roadway and stay on the asphalt pavement. Water can still flow in the concrete gutter. Have traffic counts been done on Niagara and Lanewood Lane? Yes, traffic counts were taken before and after the speed humps were installed. When will the Hennepin County 911 Dispatch Center be constructed? The dispatch center is expected to begin construction in the summer of 2013. We are trying to plan with the county so that impacts to the new roadway are minimized. Will the Hennepin County 911 Dispatch Center increase traffic in the Circle Park neighborhood? We do not believe that the dispatch center will increase traffic to the area. Are the final plans done yet? The final plans are not done yet. Usually we send out a letter when the plans are complete. You are welcome to come to city hall to view them. 0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2010-2019\12001\Memos\Q&AinfoMtgl oage 24 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, the 2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program made recommendations for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to undertake a Preliminary Engineering Report to determine the work required on each street recommended to be considered for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001; and WHEREAS, the streets including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 91h Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9t' Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4h Avenue N is the recommended project area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA that the City Engineer is instructed to prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report with all convenient speed by advising the Council, in a preliminary way, as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in conjunction with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 25 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT, ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted January 24, 2012, a report has been prepared with reference to the improvement of the area including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 91h Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvement includes the reconstruction of streets by the installation of bituminous pavement and concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer installation, water main valve replacement, and all necessary appurtenances; and WHEREAS, said report is being received by the Council on January 24, 2012; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and adjacent property within the designated 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No. 12001 for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.011 to 429.111 (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,853,097.98. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 27'-day of "afe 10th day of April, 2012 in the Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard at 7:00 p.m., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. 3. The Plymouth Engineering Department is designated as engineer for the improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 26 Estimated 12001 Project Schedule City Council receives the Feasibility Report and orders preparation of plans andspecs January 24, 2012 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 City Council approves plans and specs and orders Public Hearing January_ 24, 2012 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Advertise for bids February 02, 2012 Receive bids February 23, 2012 Public Improvement Hearing, Assessment Hearing, and Award Contract Mar -eh 27 April 10, 2012 Begin Construction May, 2012 Construction ends August 24, 2012 ESTIMATED COSTS Project costs have been estimated for all the improvements studied in this report. The costs include construction costs plus 10% for construction contingencies, 15% for engineering, administration, finance and legal. Itemized cost estimates are included in Appendix A of this report. The total estimated project costs for improvements of the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, are summarized below. Cost Summary: Construction Cost 2,282,478.38 10% Contingencies 228,247.84 15% Eng. & Admin. 342,371.76 Total Estimated Cost 2,853,097.98 Project Financing: The City of Plymouth has an adopted method for financing street reconstruction projects, which includes both assessments and City funding. Street reconstruction, curb and gutter, and storm sewer costs will be assessed at 40% to the adjacent property owners with the Street Reconstruction Fund accounting for the remaining 60%. It is proposed that the Water Resources Fund will finance the rain gardens installed with the project, and the total cost for installing the inflow and infiltration sealing system will be 10 Page 27 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on January 24, 2012, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for improvement No. 12001, the improvement of the Circle Park Neighborhood including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 91h Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4a' Avenue N by reconstruction of streets with the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation, storm sewer installation, water main valve replacement, and all necessary appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in The Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published three times, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on February 23, 2012 at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center building at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota, by the engineer and City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7 p.m. on Mareh 27 April 10, 2012, in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk for five percent of the amount of such bid. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 28 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION N0. 2012 - A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, estimated costs have been calculated for the 2012 Street Reconstruction Project, Circle Park, City Project No 12001 including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9t' Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9h Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9h Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4"' Avenue N, and the estimated cost for such improvement is $2,282,478.38, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $570,619.60 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $2,853,097.98. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City of Plymouth is hereby declared to be $1,781,683.95 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $1,071,414.03. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of either 5 years, 10 years, or 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2013, and shall bear the interest rate of 2.44% percent for a 5 year term, 3.37% for a 10 year term, or 4.34% for a 15 year term per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by the law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the City Council thereof. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 29 CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2011 - A RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2012 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIRCLE PARK CITY PROJECT N0. 12001 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on January 24, 2012, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the improvement including Shenandoah Lane N, south of County Road 6, 9th Avenue N, from Shenandoah Lane N to Kingsview Lane N, including Minnesota Lane N, Niagara Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, Lanewood Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 9th Avenue, and Juneau Lane N from Gleason Lake Drive to 4th Avenue N by reconstruction of streets with the installation of bituminous pavement, concrete curb and gutter installation, storm sewer installation, water main valve installation, and all necessary appurtenances; and WHERES,the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: A hearing shall be held on the 27th day of Mare 101h day of April, 2012, in the City Council Chambers of the Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Approved this 24th day of January, 2012. Page 30 rp) City of Plymouth Adding QoaWy to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 Agenda Number: To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Prepared by: Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works Receive Public Works Department Item: 2011 Annual Report 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Receive the Public Works Department 2011 Annual Report. 2. BACKGROUND: 9.01 Attached is the 2011 Public Works Department Annual Report. This report has been developed to provide a summary of the variety of work and programs managed by Public Works and highlight the Department's accomplishments for 2011. The Public Works Department has a variety of responsibilities and work programs. Public Works designs and builds capital projects, manages the street system, maintains City facilities and fleet and manages water and wastewater/stormwater services throughout the City and also provides contractual recycling and transit services. Included with this year's annual report is a summary of some of business model changes/impacts that have been made in the department over the last five years. These changes have been made mostly in the name of improving efficiency or increasing the effectiveness of providing public works operations. 3. BUDGET IMPACT: The Public Works Department has an operating budget of approximately $28,000,000 and a capital budget of approximately $20,000,000. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Public Works Department 2011 Annual Report Page 1 Public Works Department 2011 Annual Report January 24, 2012 Page 2 Public Works Street UtilitiesI I Central Services Transit andEngineeringIMaintenanceMaintenanceSolidWaste FleetI Facilities Water Resources D New high -production paver and more in -horse paving AVL testing for salt application Prefabricating mailbox installations Proactive traffic signal maintenance program and battery backups Upgrade and expansion of S ADA system D Modernization of water and sewerfacilities D Reorganisation for accountability and efficiency Enhanced project management D Mobile SC DA and data implementation p Newfleet and facilities policies and procedures New allocation methodology Fleet service delivery changes for efficiency and cost reduction Electronic equipment reservation system New collection method for recyclinglnewcontract N -.IL for improved transit customer service Ongoing transit service evaluation for efficiency i New pavement management program J Right -sizing for efficiency and enhanced project management I Electronic record drawing with GIS application Ai Elimination of -nice to do' and replace with need to do'. i.e. goose management I Pond inventory and maintenance program Page 4 STREET MAINTENANCE 13 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES 354 MILES OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS 294 MAINTAINED BY THE CITY X 3.5 ADDED IN 201 1 3,000 STREET LIGHTS 200 MAINTAINED BY THE CITY X 40 ADDED IN 201 1 70 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 30 MAINTAINED BY THE CITY PAVING PAVE 4 TO 6 MILES OF STREETS PER YEAR X 6.02 MILES PAVED IN 2011 SNOW PLOWING PLOW FULL CITY IN S TO 10 HOURS X 14 EVENTS, 5 FULL CITY IN 2011 SIGNS AND MARKINGS INSTALL, REPAIR AND REPLACE SIGNS CITYWIDE X 460 SIGNS INSTALLED/ REPAIRED IN 2011 PARKERS LAKE CEMETERY DIG GRAVES, SURVEY PLOTS X 1 INTERMENT IN 2011 Page 5 UTILITIES MAINTENANCE 23 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES 320 MILES OF SEWER, 8,300 MANHOLES, 15 LIFT STATIONS X 6.8 MILES ADDED AND 3.9 MILES LINED IN 2011 X 103 MANHOLES ADDED AND 63 SEALED IN 2011 X 2.7 BILLION GALLONS SEWAGE IN 2011 361 MILES OF WATERMAIN, 4,530 FIRE HYDRANTS, 7,900 VALVES X 3.3 MILES, 46 HYDRANTS AND 41 VALVES ADDED IN 2011 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 X 140 WATERMAI N /SERVICE REPAIRS IN 2011 Gallons Pumped Total By Month 17 WELLS, 2 WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, 6 STORAGE TANKS X 3.2 BILLION GALLONS TREATED IN 2011 140 MILES OF STORM SEWER, 8,700 CATCH BASINS/MANHOLES X 2.8 MILES AND 175 CATCH BASINS ADDED IN 2011 230 WATER QUALITY PONDS, 800 NATURAL BASINS Page 6 CENTRAL SERVICES 7 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES PUBLIC FACILITIES CITY HALL, PUBLIC SAFETY, PUBLIC WORKS, 3 FIRE STATIONS CLEANING, SUPPLIES, REPLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND HEATING AND COOLING K CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS REMODEL IN 2011 l( MOISTURE DAMAGE IN SHOOTING RANGE AT FIRE STATION 3 IN 2011 FLEET 420 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AND CENTRAL GARAGE 13M CURRENT VALUE, $20M REPLACEMENT VALUE l( $341,000 PARTS AND LABOR IN 2011 l( $510,000 FUEL IN 2011 TRANSIT AND SOLID WASTE 3 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES CONTRACTED TRANSIT SERVICES 16 FIXED ROUTES (9 EXPRESS, 7 LOCAL), DIAL -A -RIDE, 1 RAMP, 2 PARK-AND-RIDE LOTS, 43 BUSES, 11 SHELTERS X 520,000 FIXED ROUTE RIDES IN 2011 l( 42,000 DIAL -A -RIDE RIDES IN 2011 CONTRACTED RECYCLING SERVICES CURBSIDE AND DROP-OFF CENTER COLLECTION x 6,000 TONS RECYCLED IN 2011 YARD WASTE SITE, EDUCATION, SPECIAL CLEAN-UP EVENT FN(;INFFRINC; 12 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES WATER RESOURCES WATER QUALITY AND DRAINAGE l( PLYMOUTH CREEK STREAM BANK RESTORATION l( CONNOR MEADOWS EROSION REPAIR 1[ WILD WINGS DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT Page 7 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS X CIMARRON PONDS SEWER AND STREET EASMENTS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2011 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - $7M IN CONTRACT VALUE X TARYN HILLS X HAMPTON HILLS X ARBOR GROVE X SPRING MEADOWS X ELM CREEK HIGHLANDS X THE WILLOWS X TAYLOR CREEK X STEEPLE HILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 2011 PROJECTS - $7.5M IN CONTRACT VALUE X CIMARRON PONDS STREET RECONSTRUCTION X ANNAPOLIS LANE STREET RECONSTRUCTION X LANCASTER LANE MILL AND OVERLAY X PEONY LANE MILL AND OVERLAY X SUNCOURT MILL AND OVERLAY X 2011 EDGE MILL AND OVERLAY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT X NEARLY $4,000,000 INVESTED IN STREETS X 15 MILES OF STREETS AFFECTED X 2010 AVERAGE PASER RATING - 6.4 X 2011 AVERAGE PASER RATING - 6.7 Page 8 Failed or Very Poor (0 to 2.9) Poor (3 to 3.9) Fair (4 to 5.9) Good (6 to 7.9) Very Good (8 to 8.9) Excellent (9 to 10) 2010 PASER Ratings 2% 2011 PASER Ratings Failed or Very Poor (0 to 2.9) 1% Poor (3 to 3.9) Fair (4 to 5.9) Good (6 to 7.9) Very Good (8 to 8.9) Excellent (9 to 10) Reconstruction, 2011 PASER Strategies 3.98 Routine Maintenance, Overlay, 70.23 114.60 Crack Seal, 95.98 Page 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREETS 1 FEDERAL SIGN RETROREFLECTIVIT'v INVENTOR-' MAINTENANCE OVERLA" PROGRAM - COOPERATIVE EFFORT WITH MINNETON KA STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT- PILOT STUD`' F:DR IN-HOUSE SWEEPING F4 ] SNOW PLOWING - AVL TESTING AND ANAL`°'SIS UTILITIES I 1 I INFLOW AND INFILTRATION REDUCTION PROGRAM F _21 FLOOD CONTROL ILIFT STATION REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4 ] NEW WELL CENTRAL SERVICES F1-11 FLEET REPLACEMENT - FIRE APPARATUS FLEET MAINTENANCE COST REDUCTION - INCREASED SERVICE INTERVALS IPUBLIC .SAFETY ROOFTOP PARKING DECK FLEET AND FACILITIES ALLOCATION UPDATES TRANSIT AND SOLI} WASTE TRANSIT SERVICE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS F_21 REC"'CLING SERVICE TRANSITION TO N EW CONTRACTOR 1 MULTI-FAMIL'' AND COMMERCIAL RECYCLING 4] SPRINGC:LEANUP ENGINEERING Fl-11 CONTINUE PAVEMENT ,MANAGEP-LENT PROGRAM (LARGE PROJECT} STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NEW DEVELOPMENT 4 WAT E R R ESO U RC ES PROJECTS Page 10 rp)City of Plymouth Adding Quaky to Life REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING January 24, 2012 Agenda 9.02Number: To: Mayor and City Council Prepared by: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager Item: Adopt 2012 Goals and Legislative Priorities 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Make desired changes, and adopt the 2012 Council Goals and Priorities. 2. BACKGROUND: The Council met on January 17 to develop the proposed 2012 Goals and Legislative Priorities. Changes have been made to both documents as requested, and additional legislative priorities may be brought forward to the Council for consideration during the legislative session. Police Chief Goldstein is planning a legislative visit for the Council which will include meetings with our local legislators. 3. ATTACHMENTS: 2012 Proposed Goals and Priorities Page 1 rp)City of Plymouth 7—ding Qu.W, [o Life 2012 City Council Goals Protect Plymouth's Strong Financial Position. Maintain Plymouth's fiscal health by crafting long-term revenue and expenditure plans to ensure sustainable operations at a fair and equitable tax rate. Monitor Economic Challenges. Continue to evaluate and prioritize services. Seek innovative solutions to maintain high quality core services, promote financial transparency and protect Plymouth's strong financial position and quality of life. Provide Efficient and Effective Services. Explore partnerships with neighboring communities, school districts, businesses, and other agencies to decrease costs through shared services and to eliminate duplicate efforts. Streamline business processes through the use of technology, including website enhancements, e -permits and expanded credit card processing. Evaluate community trends and consider associated facility and service needs. Promote Transportation Solutions. Focus on the advancement of the following projects: third lane on 1-494, study of Highway 169 between 1-494 and 1-94, and improvements to Highway 55. Evaluate transit and adjust service levels to maintain suburban transit and meet legislative changes. Pursue Northwest Greenway. As development of northwest Plymouth continues, acquire property and begin planning the Northwest Greenway and park system amenities, as directed by voter referendum. Continue Environmental Initiatives. Collaborate with watershed agencies to ensure effective progress on water quality mandates. Continue energy conservation efforts in city buildings, and promote recycling of expanded waste streams. Continue Proactive Public Safety Initiatives. Continue proactive policing strategies using technology and collaboration to promote and enhance livability. Build on the successes of fire prevention and fire service programs for a safe community. Protect the City's Infrastructure Investment. Ensure that the city can protect and enhance the useful life of City assets (streets, utilities, parks, trails, facilities, and fleet). Continue to monitor financial resources and economic conditions, and consider timing with regard to infrastructure needs. Consider Development and Redevelopment Requests. Continue to carefully consider land use related to development and redevelopment to ensure a well planned community with a varied tax base. Plan the infrastructure to serve future development in northwest Plymouth. Page 2 City of Plymouth 2012 Legislative Priorities eldarnQ {?urfiSy Crr Lije I. TRANSPORTATION A. To efficiently transport commuters and promote business growth, the city encourages the legislature to identify long-term funding sources with growth potential to allow for the construction and maintenance of efficient transit and highway systems. Specifically, Plymouth supports the following: 1. Third lane expansion on 1-494 from Highway 55 to 1-94, the only portion of 1-494 with two lanes. The city opposes a Plymouth -only managed third lane for 1-494. 2. The city supports preservation of suburban transit, expansion of the transit taxing district, and return of full MVST funding to suburban transit providers. 3. The city encourages improvements to Highways 169 and 55 in Plymouth. II. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Day Care Facilities in Residential Areas. The city encourages the amendment or clarification of MN Stat. 245A.14, Subd. 1, to require that a residential day care facility must be accessory to the principal use of a residential property and the business must be operated by residents of the residential structure. III. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Maintain Judicial System Funding. The city strongly encourages support for full judicial system funding as it relates to pre- and post -sentencing impacts and retaining the Minnesota 4t" District Ridgedale Courthouse. B. Fire State Aid (2% Fund). The city supports the continued distribution of Fire State Aid accumulated from insurance premium dues (2% funds) to fund firefighter pensions. Additionally, the city supports the continuation of state funding for fire training and education activities. IV.GENERAL GOVERNMENT A. Local Control. The city opposes legislation that erodes local control or creates mandates without a corresponding state appropriation or funding mechanism. 1. Mandates. Remove unnecessary reporting and other mandates and provide a funding source for state -required mandates. 2. Levy Limits. The city opposes levy limits. State -imposed limits on local decision making are inconsistent with local accountability. Page 3 3. Market Value Homestead Credit. The city opposes reenactment of the Market Value Homestead Credit program because the City was rarely reimbursed for funding this State program. If MVHC is reenacted, the City supports payment directly to the homeowner (not using cities as a conduit) in order to improve transparency and eliminate unpredictability in budgeting. 4. Property Tax Freezes. The city opposes mandated property tax freezes, and urges the Legislature to consider the tax shifting that would occur under such proposals. 5. Business Property Tax. The city supports elimination of the statewide business property tax. B. Sales Tax Exemption on Local Government Purchases. The city supports legislation to reinstate the sales tax exemption for all local government purchases. C. Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council is comprised of 16 members appointed by the Governor. The City supports an effective Metropolitan Council that ensures the highest level of accountability to taxpayers, businesses, and local units of government within the metropolitan region. The City supports this same accountability for other non -elected boards with regulatory and planning powers. D. Data Practices. The City supports addition of an intelligence data classification in the Data Practices Act so that law enforcement can appropriately share information in a tightly regulated and transparent manner. Page 4